Long-term anti-ischemic effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition in patients after myocardial infarction. The Captopril and Thrombolysis Study (CATS) Investigators

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 and renin-angiotensin system blockers: A review and pooled analysis

A novel coronavirus called severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is causing an international outbreak of respiratory illness described as coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). SARS-CoV-2 infects human cells by binding to angiotensin-converting enzyme 2. Small studies suggest that renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blockers may upregulate the expression of angiotensin-converting enzyme 2, affecting susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2. This may be of great importance considering the large number of patients worldwide who are treated with RAS blockers, and the well-proven clinical benefit of these treatments in several cardiovascular conditions. In contrast, RAS blockers have also been associated with better outcomes in pneumonia models, and may be beneficial in COVID-19. This review sought to analyse the evidence regarding RAS blockers in the context of COVID-19 and to perform a pooled analysis of the published observational studies to guide clinical decision making. A total of 21 studies were included, comprising 11,539 patients, of whom 3417 (29.6%) were treated with RAS blockers. All-cause mortality occurred in 587/3417 (17.1%) patients with RAS blocker treatment and in 982/8122 (12.1%) patients without RAS blocker treatment (odds ratio 1.00, 95% confidence interval 0.69-1.45; P=0.49; I²=84%). As several hypotheses can be drawn from experimental analysis, we also present the ongoing randomized studies assessing the efficacy and safety of RAS blockers in patients with COVID-19. In conclusion, according to the current data and the results of the pooled analysis, there is no evidence supporting any harmful effect of RAS blockers on the course of patients with COVID-19, and it seems reasonable to recommend their continuation.

Captopril Pretreatment Produces an Additive Cardioprotection to Isoflurane Preconditioning in Attenuating Myocardial Ischemia Reperfusion Injury in Rabbits and in Humans

Background. Pretreatment with the angiotensin-converting inhibitor captopril or volatile anesthetic isoflurane has, respectively, been shown to attenuate myocardial ischemia reperfusion (MI/R) injury in rodents and in patients. It is unknown whether or not captopril pretreatment and isoflurane preconditioning (Iso) may additively or synergistically attenuate MI/R injury. Methods and Results. Patients selected for heart valve replacement surgery were randomly assigned to five groups: untreated control (Control), captopril pretreatment for 3 days (Cap3d), or single dose captopril (Cap1hr, 1 hour) before surgery with or without Iso (Cap3d+Iso and Cap1hr+Iso). Rabbit MI/R model was induced by occluding coronary artery for 30 min followed by 2-hour reperfusion. Rabbits were randomized to receive sham operation (Sham), MI/R (I/R), captopril (Cap, 24 hours before MI/R), Iso, or the combination of captopril and Iso (Iso+Cap). In patients, Cap3d+Iso but not Cap1hr+Iso additively reduced postischemic myocardial injury and attenuated postischemic myocardial inflammation. In rabbits, Cap or Iso significantly reduced postischemic myocardial infarction. Iso+Cap additively reduced cellular injury that was associated with improved postischemic myocardial functional recovery and reduced myocardial apoptosis and attenuated oxidative stress. Conclusion. A joint use of 3-day captopril treatment and isoflurane preconditioning additively attenuated MI/R by reducing oxidative stress and inflammation.

Progressive left ventricular hypertrophy after withdrawal of long-term ACE inhibition following experimental myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND

Although discontinuation of chronic ACE inhibitor (ACEi) therapy after myocardial infarction (MI) is common in clinical practice, some clinical studies reported an increased incidence of ischemia-related events after withdrawal. To further address this issue, we assessed hemodynamic, neurohormonal and vascular consequences of withdrawing long-term ACEi treatment after experimental MI.

METHODS

Rats were subjected to coronary ligation to induce MI, and received quinapril (15 mg/kg/day) from 2 weeks to 14 months post-MI. Subsequently, surviving rats were randomized to sacrifice at 0, 4, and 6 weeks after ACEi withdrawal. Rats were studied for signs of heart failure, hemodynamics and cardiac function, neurohormones, and vascular edothelial function.

RESULTS

After discontinuation of ACEi treatment, plasma aldosterone levels increased between 0-4 weeks without further increment thereafter, suggesting persistent RAAS activation. Acetylcholine-induced aortic relaxation was impaired at 4 and 6 weeks, indicating rapid and sustained development of endothelial vasodilator dysfunction after withdrawal. Moreover, 24% of the rats developed heart failure signs (edema, dyspnea), and 3 rats died, all within 4 weeks after withdrawal. Significantly increased N-ANP levels and lung weights at 4, but not at 6 weeks suggest a transient volume overload. Finally, LV/body weight ratios significantly increased between 0-4 as well as 4-6 weeks, indicating progressive LV hypertrophy.

CONCLUSIONS

The observed alterations after withdrawing long-term post-MI quinapril treatment in the present study may account for an increased risk for ischemic events. Thus, our findings highlight the potentially harmful effects associated with abrupt discontinuation of long-term post-MI ACE inhibition, and imply careful clinical consideration in this matter.

Improvement of EDHF by Chronic ACE Inhibition Declines Rapidly After Withdrawal in Rats With Myocardial Infarction

Heart failure after myocardial infarction (MI) is associated with endothelial dysfunction. There is conflicting evidence on the exact nature of this endothelial dysfunction and how endothelium-dependent vasodilation is affected by angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACE-I) therapy. Furthermore, consequences of acute ACE-I withdrawal are largely unknown. Therefore, we studied the contribution of nitric oxide (NO) and endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor (EDHF) to the effects of ACE-I therapy and its withdrawal on endothelial function in MI rats. Rats were subjected to coronary ligation to induce MI and were assigned to quinapril or vehicle from 2 weeks to 8 months post-MI. In parallel, MI rats treated for 14 months with quinapril were subjected to treatment withdrawal for 0, 4, and 6 weeks. Acetylcholine (ACh)-induced relaxation and underlying endothelium-derived mediators were studied in isolated aortic rings. Long-term quinapril (8 months) resulted in markedly improved endothelium-dependent vasodilation in rats with myocardial infarction, which could be attributed to marked improvement in non-NO/prostanoid-mediated relaxation (ie, EDHF). After 14 months of follow-up, maximum vasodilation was still preserved by quinapril. Withdrawal after 14 months of treatment caused significantly impaired ACh-induced EDHF-mediated relaxation within 4 weeks. A marked reduction in EDHF-mediated relaxation caused this impairment. NO-mediated relaxation was unaffected. These findings highlight the importance of EDHF impairment in development of endothelial dysfunction after myocardial infarction and the possibility of improving EDHF-mediated vasodilation with chronic ACE inhibitor therapy. In addition, withdrawal of chronic ACE inhibition after MI should be considered carefully, as profound endothelial dysfunction may develop rapidly.

The revised role of ACE-inhibition after myocardial infarction in the thrombolytic/primary PCI era

Many studies have investigated the process of left ventricular (LV) dilatation and the effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors after myocardial infarction (MI). It has been generally accepted that progression of LV dilatation is a major predictor of heart failure and death after MI. Also, attenuation of LV dilatation is thought to be one of the main mechanisms by which ACE inhibitors (ACE-Is) produce their beneficial effects. However, evidence for this hypothesis came from studies that were performed before thrombolytic therapy and primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were routinely used after acute MI. Nowadays, reperfusion is obtained much more frequently and LV dilatation after MI has become less prevalent. Nevertheless, ACE-Is proved effective in reducing cardiac morbidity and mortality. Therefore, mechanisms other than attenuation of LV dilatation, such as anti-atherosclerotic effects or plaque stabilisation, may explain the long-term beneficial effects of ACE-Is after MI. In the present overview, we evaluate the role of LV dilatation and the effects of ACE-Is after MI in the thrombolytic/primary PCI era and provide recommendations on ACE-I use in clinical practice.

The role of coronary endothelial function testing in patients suspected for angina pectoris

Coronary vasomotor function plays an important role in onset and progression of coronary artery disease. Suwaidi [Circulation 101 (2000) 948] and Schächinger [Circulation 101 (2000) 1899] demonstrated that vasomotor dysfunction has a significant impact on events in patients with minimal coronary artery disease. Endothelial specific testing can be performed in coronary as well as peripheral arteries. However, non-coronary tests have a low correlation with the coronary vasomotor response, as assessed by acetylcholine. In large clinical prospective placebo-controlled trials, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and lipid-lowering drugs reduce morbidity and mortality after myocardial infarction or myocardial infarction-induced heart failure. The same drugs restore endothelial dysfunction after myocardial infarction, as was demonstrated in small experimental and clinical studies. Recent studies in patients with coronary artery disease showed a relation with endothelial dysfunction and the occurrence of adverse coronary events. For this reason, it is important to develop methods to evaluate endothelial function.

Effect of ramipril on postrevascularization prevalence of angina and quality of life

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of angina after invasive revascularization is not negligible and impacts on quality of life. It has not been clarified whether potential anti-ischemic actions of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (1) may apply to non high-risk patients and (2) may reduce the prevalence of angina. We sought to test the hypothesis that ramipril, an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, may reduce the postrevascularization prevalence of angina pectoris and improve quality of life.

METHODS

In the Angiotensin-converting enzyme Post-Revascularization Study (APRES), 159 patients who underwent invasive revascularization for chronic angina and who had not had heart failure, acute myocardial infarction (AMI), or severe left ventricular dysfunction were randomized to receive 10 mg of ramipril or placebo. During the 12- to 46-month follow-up, the Specific Activity Scale class, exercise tests, and SF-36 quality of life scores were serially assessed.

RESULTS

The average prevalence of angina of Specific Activity Scale class II or worse was 26.6% in the ramipril group and 19.9% in the placebo group (p=0.16). The average prevalence of exercise-inducible ischemia was 30.8% in the ramipril group and 25.2% in the placebo group (p=0.39). There were no significant differences between the two treatment groups in the SF-36 quality of life scores or in the Duke treadmill score. Post-hoc power calculations revealed that the power to rule out a clinical significant benefit of ramipril on the prevalence of angina, quality of life, and Duke treadmill score was >90%.

CONCLUSIONS

These data do not suggest that ramipril reduces the prevalence of angina pectoris or improves quality of life after invasive revascularization in such patients

Anti-ischemic effects of angiotensin- converting enzyme inhibition in hypertension

OBJECTIVES

We investigated whether augmentation of bradykinin (BK) bioavailability with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition is associated with reduced exercise-induced myocardial ischemia in hypertension.

BACKGROUND

Bradykinin responses are depressed in hypertension, and endothelial dysfunction contributes to myocardial ischemia by promoting abnormal coronary vasomotion during stress.

METHODS

Fourteen hypertensive (HT) and 17 normotensive (NT), mildly symptomatic patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and ST-segment depression during exercise were studied before and after seven days of oral enalapril (EN), which was titrated from 2.5 to 20 mg daily. Patients underwent two treadmill exercise tests and determination of forearm vasodilator response to BK.

RESULTS

Despite receiving a lower dose of EN (7.8 vs. 14.8 mg, p < 0.001), NT patients had a significant reduction in blood pressure compared to HT patients. Compared to pre-EN, the ischemic threshold, defined as the rate-pressure product at the onset of 1-mm ST depression (p = 0.045), the duration of exercise to 1-mm ST depression (180 +/- 54 s, p = 0.007) and the maximum exercise duration (94 +/- 18 s, p < 0.001) were greater after EN in HT patients, but not in NT subjects (all p > or = 0.3). Patients with a greater drop in blood pressure experienced no improvement in exercise-induced ischemia. Forearm blood flow responses to BK were improved with EN in all patients to a similar extent. Moreover, no correlation was observed between the basal response to BK or the magnitude of its improvement with EN and with either the dose of EN or the improvement in exercise ischemic threshold.

CONCLUSIONS

Exercise-induced myocardial ischemia is ameliorated in HT patients with CAD by ACE inhibition.

Impairment of myocardial blood flow reserve in patients with asymptomatic left ventricular dysfunction: effects of ACE-inhibition with perindopril

Myocardial blood flow (MBF) reserve is impaired in patients with symptomatic chronic heart failure. Whether this is already present in asymptomatic left ventricular (LV) dysfunction, and whether it is affected by angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition, is unknown. We examined MBF in 20 patients with asymptomatic LV dysfunction and compared them to healthy volunteers. MBF (reserve) was assessed with positron emission tomography (PET) and N-13 ammonia at rest, during dipyridamole stress test (DST) and during cold pressor test (CPT). Further, in the LV-dysfunction group, we studied the effects of 3 months treatment with ACE inhibition with a second PET study. Patients were randomized double-blind to perindopril 4 mg daily or placebo. MBF at rest was similar in controls and patients. DST-induced MBF reserve, however, was decreased in patients vs. controls (1.71+/-0.2 vs. 2.62+/-0.5, respectively p < 0.05). Also CPT-induced MBF was lower in patients (1.14+/-0.06 vs. 1.23+/-0.03, p < 0.05). After 3 months double-blind treatment, CPT-induced MBF decreased in the placebo group (from 1.12+/-0.02 to 0.93+/-0.06), but was preserved in the perindopril group (from 1.16+/-0.08 to 1.14+/-0.08 shifts from baseline: -0.19+/-0.05 vs. -0.02+/-0.07 respectively p = 0.07). This was compatible with a trend to a smaller increase in coronary vascular resistance during CPT (1.23+/-0.08 vs. 1.03+/-0.06, placebo vs. perindopril, p = 0.06). In patients with asymptomatic LV dysfunction, MBF, both after vasodilation and after CPT, is already impaired. ACE inhibition with perindopril during this short-term treatment had no significant effects.

Anti-ischemic effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors: a future therapeutic perspective

The renin-angiotensin system and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) are increasingly being implicated in the pathogenesis of coronary artery disease and its sequelae and the potential of ACE inhibitors to protect the heart is a topic that has emerged recently as a matter for scientific discussion. Experimental and clinical studies have shown the beneficial effects of ACE inhibitors on the metabolism, function and structure of healthy and damaged hearts and these data support the concept of both primary and secondary cardioprotection with this class of drugs. Animal studies have demonstrated the potential beneficial effects of ACE inhibition at a variety of sites, including improvement of endothelial function, inhibition of platelet aggregation, prevention of atherosclerotic lesions and inhibition of myointimal proliferation, extending the concept to a more general definition of cardiovascular protection with ACE inhibitors involving both the heart and the vessels. ACE inhibitors prevent stimulation of smooth muscle cell angiotensin-II (A-II) receptors, thereby blocking both contractile and proliferative actions of A-II. In addition, ACE inhibition of kininase inhibits the breakdown of bradykinin, a direct stimulant of nitric oxide release from the intact endothelial cell. Thus, at the cellular level ACE inhibition shifts the balance of ongoing mechanisms in favour of those promoting vasodilatory, anti-aggregatory, antithrombotic and antiproliferative effects. Although these data have not all been validated in human studies, the reduction of ischemic events in studies of ACE inhibition in left ventricular dysfunction (LVD) and, more recently, also in patients without LVD, cannot be explained solely by improved hemodynamics, and it is possible that actions on the endothelium, the atherosclerotic process and platelets are at least in part responsible. So, the available data underlie the potential benefits of ACE inhibition in the field of ischemic heart disease and atherosclerosis; the results of ongoing studies in humans looking more directly at the influence of ACE inhibitors in this setting are awaited with interest.

Anti-ischemic potential of drugs related to the renin-angiotensin system

Actions mediated by the renin-angiotensin system may be inhibited at various levels: renin itself may be inhibited, angiotensin-I (A-1) conversion to angiotensin-II (A-II), or binding of A-II at the A-II type 1 (A-II1) receptor. The angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and the A-II1 receptor antagonists are now clinically established. Because ACE is a relatively unspecific peptidase which catalyses the breakdown of A-I, bradykinin and neuropeptides like substance P and neurotensin, the effects of ACE inhibitors go far beyond the prevention of A-II production. On the other hand, in certain tissues like vascular and cardiac tissue, A-II is produced by other enzymes, for instance chymase, and ACE inhibitors do not consistently prevent A-II production. The action of A-II1 receptor antagonists may also not be confined to prevention of binding of A-II at the A-II1 receptor, as by rebound more A-II may bind at the A-II type 2 (A-II2) receptor and thus mediate until now not well defined effects. Thus, anti-ischemic actions of these drugs may be related to multiple mechanisms. Inhibition of A-II effects at the A-II1 receptor may prevent systemic and coronary vasoconstriction and growth effects of A-II on various cell types. In addition, A-II may potentiate, by pre- and postsynaptic mechanisms, activation of the sympathetic nervous system. Prevention of breakdown of bradykinin, substance P and neurotensin may result in direct vasodilation or release of nitrous oxide from the endothelium. Thus, growth-inhibiting effects may also be mediated. All these mechanisms seem to direct to a reduction of cardiac load by vasodilation and to a limitation of cardiovascular cell growth. While the systemic circulating renin-angiotensin system is probably responsible for control of cardiac load, local systems seem to control cell growth. Systemic effects seem to depend on activation of the renin-angiotensin system which has been shown in various ischemic syndromes. Activation of various components of the renin-angiotensin system has been demonstrated in myocardial ischemia, acute myocardial infarction and coronary occlusion and reperfusion models as well as in chronic left ventricular dysfunction post-myocardial infarction. While animal models of stress-induced myocardial ischemia have revealed predominantly positive results, clinical studies, which mostly were small and not well controlled, were equivocal. Large clinical trials with ACE inhibitors in acute myocardial infarction showed small benefits over placebo. Hypotension seems to be a critical side-effect in this situation. Experimental models show protective effects of both ACE inhibitors and A-II1 receptor antagonists in the situation of ischemia and reperfusion. New data on large clinical trials in patients at risk of cardiovascular events but normal left ventricular function demonstrate clear benefits of an ACE inhibitor. Large clinical trials in patients with chronic left ventricular dysfunction post-myocardial infarction show reduction of ischemic events.

Effects of quinapril on clinical outcome after coronary artery bypass grafting (The QUO VADIS Study). QUinapril on Vascular Ace and Determinants of Ischemia

The QUO VADIS study was designed to explore whether 1 year of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition with quinapril (40 mg/day) would decrease ischemia in patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Patients (n = 149) scheduled for CABG were randomized 4 weeks before surgery. Study medication was used from randomization up to 1 year after CABG. Exercise testing was performed at randomization; the exercise test was repeated 1 year after CABG and patients underwent 48-hour Holter monitoring. Clinical ischemic events were recorded and defined as death, revascularization, myocardial infarction, recurrence of angina pectoris, ischemic stroke, or transient ischemic attack. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. Total exercise time increased overall by 75 +/- 76 seconds 1 year after CABG (placebo +79 +/- 75 seconds, quinapril +72 +/- 79 seconds, p = 0.6). All patients had ischemic ST-segment changes at randomization; 33% of patients had ischemic ST-segment changes 1 year after CABG (placebo 29%, quinapril 37%, p = 0.4). On Holter monitoring, the number of patients experiencing > or = 1 episodes of ischemia was equal in both groups. Treatment with quinapril significantly reduced clinical ischemic events after CABG: 15% in patients on placebo versus 4% of patients on quinapril (hazard ratio 0.23, 95% confidence interval 0.06 to 0.87, p = 0.02). Long-term quinapril treatment significantly reduced clinical ischemic events within 1 year after CABG, although ischemia at exercise testing and Holter monitoring was unchanged.

Reduction of exercise-induced myocardial ischemia during add-on treatment with the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor enalapril in patients with normal left ventricular function and optimal beta blockade

OBJECTIVES

We sought to study the effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition on exercise-induced myocardial ischemia.

BACKGROUND

Although angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors have been shown to reduce ischemic events after myocardial infarction, few data are available regarding their direct anti-ischemic effects in patients with coronary artery disease.

METHODS

We studied 43 patients (average age 63 +/- 8 years) with exercise-induced myocardial ischemia (> or =0.1 mV ST depression, despite optimal beta blockade) and normal left ventricular function (ejection fraction >0.50). In a double-blind, placebo-controlled parallel design, patients were treated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (enalapril 10 mg twice daily) or placebo. Assessments were made after three weeks (short-term) and 12 weeks (long-term).

RESULTS

At baseline, the groups were well matched for all clinical characteristics. After three weeks, there was a slight but not significant increase in time to 0.1 mV ST depression in both groups (p = NS); rate pressure product (RPP = heart rate x systolic blood pressure) was also unaffected. After 12 weeks, however, time to 0.1 mV ST depression further increased in the enalapril group (5.6 +/- 1.9 min) but was unchanged in the placebo group (4.4 +/- 1.3 min; p < 0.05 between groups). In contrast, RPP was not affected. Concentrations of both atrial and brain natriuretic peptides at peak exercise tended to be lower by enalapril, if compared to placebo (p = NS).

CONCLUSIONS

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition may reduce exercise-induced myocardial ischemia in patients with normal left ventricular function. Further studies are needed to elucidate the mechanisms involved.

No effects on myocardial ischaemia in patients with stable ischaemic heart disease after treatment with ramipril for 6 months

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of a 6-month angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor intervention on myocardial ischaemia. METHOD: We randomized 389 patients with stable coronary artery disease to double-blind treatment with ramipril 5 mg/day (n = 133), ramipril 1.25 mg/day (n = 133), or placebo (n = 123). Forty-eight-hour ambulatory electrocardiography was performed at baseline, and after 1 and 6 months. RESULTS: Relevant baseline variables were similar in all groups. Changes over 6 months in duration of >/= 1 mm ST-segment depression (STD), total ischaemic burden and maximum STD did not differ significantly between the treatment groups. There was no difference in the frequency of adverse events between the groups. CONCLUSION: ACE inhibitor treatment has little impact on incidence and severity of myocardial ischaemia in patients with stable ischaemic heart disease.

Effects of acute and chronic angiotensin receptor blockade on myocardial vascular blood volume and perfusion in a pig model of coronary microembolization

Based on the reduction of ischemic cardiac events in clinical trials and experimental observations, inhibition of the effects of angiotensin II on coronary microcirculatory function may afford myocardial protection after injury. The immediate effects of intracoronary AT1 receptor blockade with irbesartan were examined in a pig model in the healthy myocardium and in acute ischemia induced by injection of 30-microm microspheres into the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD). Electron-beam computed tomography was performed for in-vivo quantitative measurements of regional intramyocardial vascular blood volume (V(B)) and perfusion (F(M)), as well as left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and muscle mass. Ratios of V(B) and F(M) in the anterior (LAD-supplied)/ inferior (control) myocardium were generated. At baseline, 0.2 mg/kg irbesartan injected into the LAD increased V(B) and F(M) ratios significantly by 27 +/- 8% and 51 +/- 13%, respectively. After anterior coronary microembolization, V(B) and F(M) ratios were 0.60 +/- 0.05 and 0.51 +/- 0.05, respectively, and were significantly increased by irbesartan (by 24 +/- 10% and by 36 +/- 11%, respectively). After 4 weeks of treatment with oral irbesartan (n = 7) or placebo (n = 7), an improved LVEF (56 +/- 4% v 44 +/- 4%, P = .046) was observed in irbesartan-treated animals, but no difference in LV end-diastolic volumes or muscle mass. Resting V(B) (0.95 +/- 0.06 v 0.76 +/- 0.06; P = .047) and F(M) (0.84 +/- 0.05 v 0.64 +/- 0.04; P = .016) ratios were significantly greater in irbesartan-treated animals. Using adenosine, there was a trend for higher V(B) and F(M) ratios in irbesartan- v placebo-treated animals. Therefore, in a pig model of acute myocardial ischemia, AT1 receptor blockade by irbesartan induced microvascular vasodilation and, ostensibly, conveyed myocardial protection. Long-term treatment with irbesartan resulted in moderate enhancements of resting V(B) and F(M) compared with placebo, suggesting a role for coronary microcirculatory effects of chronic AT1 receptor blockade in preserving LVEF.

Cardiac production of angiotensin II and its pharmacologic inhibition: effects on the coronary circulation

Angiotensin II (AII), produced systemically as well as locally in the heart, affects the coronary circulation, as do consequences of its pharmacologic inhibition. AII is a powerful vasoconstrictor directly acting on vascular smooth muscle cells, modulating sympathetic innervation and calcium ion influx, and releasing other vasoconstrictor factors. In addition to these immediate actions, AII has longer-term biologic actions that influence cardiac endothelial function, vascular smooth muscle cell phenotype expression, and fibroblast proliferation. Moreover, the production of AII is interrelated with the vasodilator substances bradykinin, nitric oxide, and prostaglandins E2 and I2 (prostacyclin). Circulating hormonal actions of AII include fluid retention, direct vasoconstriction, and sympathetic neuromodulation, all resulting in increased left ventricular preload and afterload. Because of these local and hormonal characteristics, AII can immediately affect the myocardial balance of metabolic demand and supply and long term can induce structural vascular and myocardial alterations. Pharmacologic inhibition of AII production likely conveys myocardial and vascular protection in situations of acute myocardial oxygen debt. In the long term, inhibition of AII may attenuate structural changes in the coronary microcirculation related to various cardiomyopathies or acute tissue injury, and direct antiatherogenic effects may also occur.

Acute anti-ischemic effects of perindoprilat in men with coronary artery disease and their relation with left ventricular function

Long-term angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition may reduce ischemic events in patients with coronary artery disease, but whether it protects against acute ischemia or the effects of preexisting left ventricular (LV) dysfunction on potential anti-ischemic properties is unknown. We performed a double-blind trial in 25 patients with exercise-induced ischemia. The effects of perindoprilat on pacing-induced myocardial ischemia were examined. Fourteen patients received perindoprilat and 11 patients received placebo. Based on LV function, 2 subgroups were formed in the perindoprilat group: 7 patients with LV dysfunction (LV ejection fraction <0.40), and 7 patients with normal LV function. After receiving the study medication, the pacing test was repeated. During the first pacing test both groups developed ischemia. After perindoprilat administration, the increase in systemic vascular resistance and LV end-diastolic pressure were significantly blunted (p <0.05). Further, the ischemia-induced increase in arterial and cardiac uptake of norepinephrine was inhibited by perindoprilat, and the increase in atrial natriuretic peptide was less pronounced; also, ST-segment depression was reduced by 32% compared with placebo (all p <0.05). In the group with LV dysfunction, perindoprilat reduced LV end-diastolic pressure significantly by 67% and myocardial lactate production was prevented, but this did not happen in the group with normal LV function. In addition, the increase in arterial norepinephrine was reduced by 74% and 33%, respectively (p <0.05). These results indicate that perindoprilat reduced acute, pacing-induced ischemia in normotensive patients. In patients with (asymptomatic) LV dysfunction these effects were more pronounced than in patients with normal LV function.

Ischemia and left ventricular dysfunction: a reciprocal relation?

There is convincing evidence that (prolonged) episodes of myocardial ischemia lead to impairment of left ventricular (LV) function and ultimately to chronic congestive heart failure (CHF), but whether the opposite is also true has not been well established. We studied this issue in two groups of CHF patients with positron emission tomography (PET) by using [13N]ammonia (13NH3) as a tracer. In the first protocol we compared 12 patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (who have normal coronary arteries) with 12 healthy controls. In the second protocol we studied a group of 24 patients with documented coronary artery disease (CAD). In this protocol, we compared patients with normal LV function to those with LV dysfunction and CHF. In patients with cardiomyopathy, myocardial blood flow at rest was normal but flow reserve (after dipyridamole infusion) was significantly impaired (1.7 +/- 0.08) compared with normal subjects (2.7 +/- 0.04; p <0.05). Furthermore, by examining [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose (18FDG) uptake, a perfusion-metabolism mismatch was observed in 24 +/- 6% of the myocardium in patients with cardiomyopathy as opposed to 0% of normals (p <0.05). In patients with CAD, myocardial blood flow reserve (measured in non-stenotic arteries to non-infarcted area) was impaired in CHF patients (1.7 +/- 0.06) compared to those with normal LV function (2.3 +/- 0.05; p <0.05). In both groups of CHF patients, the impairment of blood flow reserve showed a significant correlation with the severity of CHF. In conclusion, myocardial blood flow reserve is impaired in patients with CHF in proportion to the degree of CHF. Metabolic studies with 18FDG further show that, in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy and CHF, flow-metabolism mismatch is present in a substantial part of the myocardium, suggesting a pathogenetic role for ischemia.