Projected cost-effectiveness of primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction

The national infarct angioplasty project: UK experience and subsequent developments

The UK had previously established a comprehensive strategy for in-hospital nurse-led thrombolysis for patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction, with a growing use of pre-hospital thrombolysis by paramedical staff in the ambulance services. The National Infarct Angioplasty Project was sponsored by the government and examined the introduction of primary percutaneous coronary angioplasty (PPCI) in a variety of urban, rural and mixed communities. The project found that PPCI could be delivered within acceptable timelines, would be cost-effective, and could be delivered to the majority of the population. A project was therefore undertaken in England to transform services. There has been a rapid change and by 2012/13 over 95% of eligible patients received PPCI. Survival of patients with STEMI has improved over time and length of stay in hospital halved. However, nearly a quarter of STEMI patients do not receive reperfusion therapy (often because of late presentation) and additional work is needed to minimise delays to treatment. There are unexplained differences between regions in numbers of PPCI procedures per million population, and there is also variance between centres in the proportion of patients who are in shock or on a ventilator. Additional research is needed to ensure a consistent approach for these sick patients, who might have the most to gain from early treatment. The national audit programmes have been instrumental in measuring the changes in strategies, monitoring performance and highlighting the associated improvements in outcomes. A new risk model is being developed to allow a more comprehensive comparison of outcomes in different hospitals.

A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Surgery for Middle-Aged Men with Severe Obstructive Sleep Apnea Intolerant of CPAP

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is associated with increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Conventional OSA therapy necessitates indefinite continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). Although CPAP is an effective treatment modality, up to 50% of OSA patients are intolerant of CPAP. We explore whether surgical modalities developed for those intolerant of CPAP are cost-effective.

METHODS

We construct a lifetime semi-Markov model of OSA that accounts for observed increased risks of stroke, cardiovascular disease, and motor vehicle collisions for a 50-year-old male with untreated severe OSA. Using this model, we compare the cost-effectiveness of (1) no treatment, (2) CPAP only, and (3) CPAP followed by surgery (either palatopharyngeal reconstructive surgery [PPRS] or multilevel surgery [MLS]) for those intolerant to CPAP.

RESULTS

Compared with the CPAP only strategy, CPAP followed by PPRS (CPAP-PPRS) adds 0.265 quality adjusted life years (QALYs) for an increase of $2,767 (discounted 2010 dollars) and is highly cost effective with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $10,421/QALY for a 50-year-old male with severe OSA. Compared to a CPAP-PPRS strategy, the CPAP-MLS strategy adds 0.07 QALYs at an increase of $6,213 for an ICER of $84,199/QALY. The CPAP-PPRS strategy appears cost-effective over a wide range of parameter estimates.

CONCLUSIONS

Palatopharyngeal reconstructive surgery appears cost-effective in middle-aged men with severe OSA intolerant of CPAP. Further research is warranted to better define surgical candidacy as well as short-term and long-term surgical outcomes.

COMMENTARY

A commentary on this article appears in this issue on page 509.

Economic evidence of interventions for acute myocardial infarction: a review of the literature

AIMS

The aims of this review are to identify and evaluate studies exploring the cost-effectiveness of primary angioplasty (PPCI) vs. thrombolysis (TL) for treating acute myocardial infarction (AMI).

METHODS AND RESULTS

A comprehensive free-text searching identified economic evaluation studies that were reviewed with respect to their effectiveness data, identification, measurement and valuation of resource data, measurement and valuation of health outcomes (clinical and QALYs) and uncertainty analysis. A total of 14 studies were included in the review: seven were economic evaluations alongside RCTs, two community-based studies or registries and five decision-analytical models. PPCI was found to be cost-effective when compared with TL in eight studies, cost-saving in three, cost-neutral in one, and not significantly different in terms of both cost and benefits in two studies.

CONCLUSIONS

The cost-effective evidence available is mainly derived from RCTs with stringent inclusion criteria using established catheter laboratories for providing PPCI treatment; these two components might restrict the generalisability of their "for managing patients with STEMI in hospital" settings. In order to aid policy makers on the real costs and benefits of the PPCI and TL, it is necessary to conduct more analyses with data from the real world in which there are more strategies evaluated for delivering PPCI than merely those in established catheter laboratories.

Challenges in modelling the cost effectiveness of various interventions for cardiovascular disease

OBJECTIVES

Decision analytic modelling is essential in performing cost-effectiveness analyses (CEAs) of interventions in cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, modelling inherently poses challenges that need to be dealt with since models always represent a simplification of reality. The aim of this study was to identify and explore the challenges in modelling CVD interventions.

METHODS

A document analysis was performed of 40 model-based CEAs of CVD interventions published in high-impact journals. We analysed the systematically selected papers to identify challenges per type of intervention (test, non-drug, drug, disease management programme, and public health intervention), and a questionnaire was sent to the corresponding authors to obtain a more thorough overview. Ideas for possible solutions for the challenges were based on the papers, responses, modelling guidelines, and other sources.

RESULTS

The systematic literature search identified 1,720 potentially relevant articles. Forty authors were identified after screening the most recent 294 papers. Besides the challenge of lack of data, the challenges encountered in the review suggest that it was difficult to obtain a sufficiently valid and accurate cost-effectiveness estimate, mainly due to lack of data or extrapolating from intermediate outcomes. Despite the low response rate of the questionnaire, it confirmed our results.

CONCLUSIONS

This combination of a review and a survey showed examples of CVD modelling challenges found in studies published in high-impact journals. Modelling guidelines do not provide sufficient guidance in resolving all challenges. Some of the reported challenges are specific to the type of intervention and disease, while some are independent of intervention and disease.

Estimating the payoffs from cardiovascular disease research in Canada: an economic analysis

BACKGROUND

Investments in medical research can result in health improvements, reductions in health expenditures and secondary economic benefits. These "returns" have not been quantified in Canada. Our objective was to estimate the return on cardiovascular disease research funded by public or charitable organizations.

METHODS

Our primary outcome was the internal rate of return on cardiovascular disease research funded by public or charitable sources. The internal rate of return is the annual monetary benefit to the economy for each dollar invested in cardiovascular disease research. Calculation of the internal rate of return involved the following: measuring expenditures on cardiovascular disease research, estimating the health gains accrued from new treatments for cardiovascular disease, determining the proportion of health gains attributable to cardiovascular disease research and the time lag between research expenditures and health gains, and estimating the spillovers from public- or charitable-sector investments to other sectors of the economy.

RESULTS

Expenditures by public or charitable organizations on cardiovascular disease research from 1981 to 1992 amounted to $392 million (2005 dollars). Health gains associated with new treatments from 1994 to 2005 (13-yr lag) amounted to 2.2 million quality-adjusted life-years. We calculated an internal rate of return of 20.6%.

CONCLUSION

Canadians obtain relatively high health and economic gains from investments in cardiovascular disease research. Every $1 invested in cardiovascular disease research by public or charitable sources yields a stream of benefits of roughly $0.21 to the Canadian economy per year, in perpetuity.

Setting Up a Population-Based Program to Optimize ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Care

The development of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) systems of care at the city, region, or nation levels has not only improved the speed of reperfusion but also enhanced the reach of primary angioplasty to areas far from percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) centers. Setting up a STEMI system of care is a sophisticated process that requires a solid PCI hospital and emergency medical services infrastructure, disciplined collaboration, and a focus on outcomes measurement and continuous quality improvement. This article reviews the accumulated evidence supporting the development of STEMI systems of care and offers practical insights into this process.

State-Transition Modeling

State-transition modeling (STM) is an intuitive, flexible, and transparent approach of computer-based decision-analytic modeling, including both Markov model cohort simulation as well as individual-based (first-order Monte Carlo) microsimulation. Conceptualizing a decision problem in terms of a set of (health) states and transitions among these states, STM is one of the most widespread modeling techniques in clinical decision analysis, health technology assessment, and health-economic evaluation. STMs have been used in many different populations and diseases, and their applications range from personalized health care strategies to public health programs. Most frequently, state-transition models are used in the evaluation of risk factor interventions, screening, diagnostic procedures, treatment strategies, and disease management programs.

State-transition modeling: a report of the ISPOR-SMDM Modeling Good Research Practices Task Force--3

State-transition modeling is an intuitive, flexible, and transparent approach of computer-based decision-analytic modeling including both Markov model cohort simulation and individual-based (first-order Monte Carlo) microsimulation. Conceptualizing a decision problem in terms of a set of (health) states and transitions among these states, state-transition modeling is one of the most widespread modeling techniques in clinical decision analysis, health technology assessment, and health-economic evaluation. State-transition models have been used in many different populations and diseases, and their applications range from personalized health care strategies to public health programs. Most frequently, state-transition models are used in the evaluation of risk factor interventions, screening, diagnostic procedures, treatment strategies, and disease management programs. The goal of this article was to provide consensus-based guidelines for the application of state-transition models in the context of health care. We structured the best practice recommendations in the following sections: choice of model type (cohort vs. individual-level model), model structure, model parameters, analysis, reporting, and communication. In each of these sections, we give a brief description, address the issues that are of particular relevance to the application of state-transition models, give specific examples from the literature, and provide best practice recommendations for state-transition modeling. These recommendations are directed both to modelers and to users of modeling results such as clinicians, clinical guideline developers, manufacturers, or policymakers.

Critical review of the use of erythropoietin in the treatment of anaemia during therapy for chronic hepatitis C

Combined pegylated interferon (PegIFN) and ribavirin represents the standard therapy for patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC), which allows for sustained viral response (SVR) in up to 90% of patients depending on certain viral and host factors. Clinical studies have demonstrated the importance of adherence to therapy, that is, the ability of patients to tolerate and sustain a fully dosed therapy regimen. Adherence is markedly impaired by treatment-related adverse effects. In particular, haemolytic anaemia often requires dose reduction or termination of ribavirin treatment, which compromises treatment efficacy. Recent evidence points to a beneficial role of recombinant erythropoietin (EPO) in alleviating ribavirin-induced anaemia thereby improving quality of life, enabling higher ribavirin dosage and consequently improving SVR. However, no general consensus exists regarding the use of EPO for specific indications: its optimal dosing, treatment benefits and potential risks or cost efficiency. The Swiss Association for the Study of the Liver (SASL) has therefore organized an expert meeting to critically review and discuss the current evidence and to phrase recommendations for clinical practice. A consensus was reached recommending the use of EPO for patients infected with viral genotype 1 developing significant anaemia below 100 g/L haemoglobin and a haematocrit of <30% during standard therapy to improve quality of life and sustain optimal ribavirin dose. However, the evidence supporting its use in patients with pre-existing anaemia, non-1 viral genotypes, a former relapse or nonresponse, liver transplant recipients and cardiovascular or pulmonary disease is considered insufficient.

Comparative effectiveness of ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction regionalization strategies

BACKGROUND

Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is more effective on average than fibrinolytic therapy in the treatment of ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction. Yet, most US hospitals are not equipped for PCI, and fibrinolytic therapy is still widely used. This study evaluated the comparative effectiveness of ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction regionalization strategies to increase the use of PCI against standard emergency transport and care.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We estimated incremental treatment costs and quality-adjusted life expectancies of 2000 patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction who received PCI or fibrinolytic therapy in simulations of emergency care in a regional hospital system. To increase access to PCI across the system, we compared a base case strategy with 12 hospital-based strategies of building new PCI laboratories or extending the hours of existing laboratories and 1 emergency medical services-based strategy of transporting all patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction to existing PCI-capable hospitals. The base case resulted in 609 (95% CI, 569-647) patients getting PCI. Hospital-based strategies increased the number of patients receiving PCI, the costs of care, and quality-adjusted life years saved and were cost-effective under a variety of conditions. An emergency medical services-based strategy of transporting every patient to an existing PCI facility was less costly and more effective than all hospital expansion options.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that new construction and staffing of PCI laboratories may not be warranted if an emergency medical services strategy is both available and feasible.

Implementation of early goal-directed therapy for severe sepsis and septic shock: A decision analysis

OBJECTIVE

Early goal-directed therapy (EGDT) reduced mortality from septic shock in a single-center trial. However, implementation of EGDT faces several barriers, including perceived costs and logistic difficulties. We conducted a decision analysis to explore the potential costs and consequences of EGDT implementation.

DESIGN

Estimates of effectiveness and resource use were based on data from the original trial and published sources. Implementation costs and lifetime projections were modeled from published sources and tested in sensitivity analyses. We generated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios from the hospital (short-term) and U.S. societal (lifetime) perspectives, excluding nonhealthcare costs, and applying a 3% annual discount.

SETTING

Simulation of an average U.S. emergency department.

PATIENTS

Total of 1,000 simulation cohorts (n = 263 for each cohort) of adult patients with severe sepsis/septic shock.

INTERVENTIONS

EGDT under three alternative implementation strategies: emergency department-based, mobile intensive care unit team, and intensive care unit-based (after emergency department transfer).

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

For an average emergency department, we estimated 91 cases per yr, start-up costs from $12,973 (intensive care unit-based) to $26,952 (emergency department-based), and annual outlay of $100,113. EGDT reduced length of stay such that net hospital costs fell approximately 22.9% ($8,413-$8,978). EGDT implementation had a 99.4% to 99.8% probability of being dominant (saved lives and costs) from the hospital perspective, and cost from $2,749 (intensive care unit-based) to $7019 (emergency department-based) per quality-adjusted life-yr with 96.7% to 97.7% probability of being <$20,000 per quality-adjusted life-yr from the societal perspective. The intensive care unit-based strategy was the least expensive, because of lower start-up costs, but also least effective, because of implementation delay, and all three strategies had similar cost-effectiveness ratios. Sensitivity analyses showed these estimates to be particularly sensitive to EGDT's effect on mortality and intensive care unit length of stay, but insensitive to other variables.

CONCLUSIONS

EGDT has important start-up costs, and modest delivery costs, but assuming LOS and mortality are reduced, EGDT can be cost-saving to the hospital and associated with favorable lifetime cost-effectiveness projections.

Is primary angioplasty cost effective in the UK? Results of a comprehensive decision analysis

OBJECTIVE

To assess the cost effectiveness of primary angioplasty, compared with medical management with thrombolytic drugs, to achieve reperfusion after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) from the perspective of the UK NHS.

DESIGN

Bayesian evidence synthesis and decision analytic model.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted and Bayesian statistical methods used to synthesise evidence from 22 randomised control trials. Resource utilisation was based on UK registry data, published literature and national databases, with unit costs taken from routine NHS sources and published literature.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Costs from a health service perspective and outcomes measured as quality-adjusted life years (QALYs).

RESULTS

For the base case, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of primary angioplasty was 9241 pounds sterling for each additional QALY, with a probability of being cost effective of 0.90 for a cost-effectiveness threshold of 20,000 pounds sterling. Results were sensitive to variations in the additional time required to initiate treatment with primary angioplasty.

CONCLUSIONS

Primary angioplasty is cost effective for the treatment of AMI on the basis of threshold cost-effectiveness values used in the NHS and subject to a delay of up to about 80 minutes. These findings are mainly explained by the superior mortality benefit and the prevention of non-fatal outcomes associated with primary angioplasty for delays of up to this length.

A review of health care models for coronary heart disease interventions

This article reviews models for the treatment of coronary heart disease (CHD). Whereas most of the models described were developed to assess the cost effectiveness of different treatment strategies, other models have also been used to extrapolate clinical trials, for capacity and resource planning, or to predict the future population with heart disease. In this paper we investigate the use of modelling techniques in relation to different types of health intervention, and we discuss the assumptions and limitations of these approaches. Many of the models reviewed in this paper use decision tree models for acute or short term interventions, and Markov or state transition models for chronic or long term interventions. Discrete event simulation has, however, been used for more complex whole system models, and for modelling resource-constrained interventions and operational planning. Nearly all of the studies in our review used cohort-based models rather than population based models, and therefore few models could estimate the likely total costs and benefits for a population group. Most studies used de novo purpose built models consisting of only a small number of health states. Models of the whole disease system were less common. The model descriptions were often incomplete. We recommend that the reporting of model structure, assumptions and input parameters is more explicit, to reduce the risk of biased reporting and ensure greater confidence in the model results.

Treatment alternatives for hepatitis B cirrhosis: a cost-effectiveness analysis

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) patients with cirrhosis are at risk for developing costly, morbid, or mortal events, and therefore need highly effective therapies. Lamivudine is effective but is limited by viral resistance. In contrast, adefovir and entecavir have lower viral resistance, but are more expensive. The most cost-effective approach is uncertain.

METHODS

We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of six strategies in HBV cirrhosis: (1) No HBV treatment ("do nothing"), (2) lamivudine monotherapy, (3) adefovir monotherapy, (4) lamivudine with crossover to adefovir on resistance ("adefovir salvage"), (5) entecavir monotherapy, or (6) lamivudine with crossover to entecavir on resistance ("entecavir salvage"). The primary outcome was the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained.

RESULTS

The "do nothing" strategy was least effective yet least expensive. Compared with "do nothing," using adefovir cost an incremental US dollars 19,731. Entecavir was more effective yet more expensive than adefovir, and cost an incremental US dollars 25,626 per QALY gained versus adefovir. Selecting between entecavir versus adefovir was highly dependent on the third-party payer's "willingess-to-pay" (e.g., 45% and 60% of patients fall within budget if willing-to-pay US dollars 10K and US dollars 50K per QALY gained for entecavir, respectively). Both lamivudine monotherapy and the "salvage" strategies were not cost-effective. However, between the two salvage strategies, "adefovir salvage" was more effective and less expensive than "entecavir salvage."

CONCLUSION

Both entecavir and adefovir are cost-effective in patients with HBV cirrhosis. Choosing between adefovir and entecavir is highly dependent on available budgets. In patients with HBV cirrhosis with previous lamivudine resistance, "adefovir salvage" appears more effective and less expensive than "entecavir salvage."

Recommendation to Develop Strategies to Increase the Number of ST-Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients With Timely Access to Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Although evidence suggests that primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the preferred reperfusion strategy in the majority of patients with ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), only a minority of patients with STEMI are treated with primary PCI, and of those, only a minority receive the treatment within the recommended 90 minutes after entry into the medical system. Market research conducted by the American Heart Association revealed that those involved in the care of patients with STEMI recognize the multiple barriers that prevent the prompt delivery of primary PCI and agree that it is necessary to develop systems or centers of care that will allow STEMI patients to benefit from primary PCI. The American Heart Association will convene a group of stakeholders (representing the interests of patients, physicians, emergency medical systems, community hospitals, tertiary hospitals, and payers) and quality-of-care and outcomes experts to identify the gaps between the existing and ideal delivery of care for STEMI patients, as well as the requisite policy implications. Working within a framework of guiding principles, the group will recommend strategies to increase the number of STEMI patients with timely access to primary PCI.

Can the published cost analysis data for delivery of an efficient primary angioplasty service be applied to the modern National Health Service?

Despite the clinical benefits and safety profile of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), the health care system in the UK has been slow to adopt this strategy as first line management for ST segment elevation myocardial infarction. The cost implications of a 24 hour a day, seven days per week primary PCI service and the absence of an existing efficient working model within the National Health Service (NHS) framework are two of the major deterrents for provision of such a service. The existent cost effectiveness data for primary PCI is critically reviewed, with particular reference to the NHS.

Role of clopidogrel in unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: from literature and guidelines to practice

Clinical trials are the backbone of treatment paradigm shifts and guideline development. In terms of acute coronary syndromes, the American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association (ACC-AHA) have developed extensive guidelines to assist the practitioner in the appropriate use of drugs including antiischemic, anticoagulant, and antiplatelet agents. Clopidogrel, an adenosine 5'-diphosphate antagonist, is one such drug. Unfortunately, consensus guidelines are limited by the design of the clinical trials they reference. Clopidogrel trials have examined various outcomes in patients for a limited time frame, making longer term use of the drug difficult to justify. An ongoing study, estimated to be completed in 2005, is evaluating the long-term use of clopidogrel in high-risk patients. Aspirin, however, has become a lifelong therapy for many patients, based on clinical trials and medical experience. Patient-specific risk factors, the drugs' safety profiles, and costs, in addition to the ACC-AHA guidelines, must all be considered by clinicians when selecting the appropriate agent and its duration of use.

Waiting for urgent procedures on the weekend among emergently hospitalized patients

PURPOSE

Many hospital departments tend to have lower staffing levels on weekends. We evaluated the use of selected urgent procedures for emergently hospitalized patients and measured the time until procedure based upon the day of hospital admission.

METHODS

We analyzed all acute care admissions from all 190 emergency departments in Ontario, Canada, between 1988 and 1997. We selected patients (n = 126,754) who underwent one of six prespecified procedures as their most responsible procedure: fiberoptic bronchoscopy, esophageal gastroduodenoscopy, magnetic resonance imaging, echocardiography, ventilation-perfusion scanning, or coronary angiography. We noted each patient's day of procedure and day of hospital admission. For waits of less than 8 days, we analyzed the time to procedure based upon the day of admission.

RESULTS

Only 5% (n = 5903) of the urgent procedures were performed on the weekend. Of the six selected procedures, coronary angiography showed the most skewed pattern of performance (1.5% performed on the weekend) and esophageal gastroduodenoscopy showed the least skewed pattern (8% performed on the weekend). Patients admitted on Fridays or Saturdays had the longest waits for procedures. For all six procedures, patients with relatively longer waits had relatively longer total in-hospital stays (P <0.001 for each).

CONCLUSION

Relatively few urgent procedures are performed in emergently hospitalized patients on the weekend, suggesting that greater attention to weekend care might result in more timely interventions and shorter lengths of stay.

Reperfusion in acute myocardial infarction: current concepts

Myocardial reperfusion is the treatment of choice in acute myocardial infarction. Pharmacological thrombolysis restores coronary artery patency in about two thirds of patients with acute myocardial infarction. However, mechanical reperfusion with primary angioplasty and stenting achieves higher patency rates with less complications, especially in high-risk patients. Adjunctive pharmacotherapy and new device technology may improve the outcome of primary angioplasty. Facilitated angioplasty using a combination of half-dose thrombolysis, platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists, and early intervention, appears to be a promising strategy for the treatment of acute myocardial infarction in the modern era. The efficacy and safety of this approach are currently evaluated in several ongoing trials.

The limited incorporation of economic analyses in clinical practice guidelines

BACKGROUND

Because there is increasing concern that economic data are not used in the clinical guideline development process, our objective was to evaluate the extent to which economic analyses are incorporated in guideline development.

METHODS

We searched medline and HealthSTAR databases to identify English-language clinical practice guidelines (1996-1999) and economic analyses (1990-1998). Additional guidelines were obtained from The National Guidelines Clearinghouse Internet site available at http://www.guideline.gov. Eligible guidelines met the Institute of Medicine definition and addressed a topic included in an economic analysis. Eligible economic analyses assessed interventions addressed in a guideline and predated the guideline by 1 or more years. Economic analyses were defined as incorporated in guideline development if 1) the economic analysis or the results were mentioned in the text or 2) listed as a reference. The quality of economic analyses was assessed using a structured scoring system.

RESULTS

Using guidelines as the unit of analysis, 9 of 35 (26%) incorporated at least 1 economic analysis of above-average quality in the text and 11 of 35 (31%) incorporated at least 1 in the references. Using economic analyses as the unit of analysis, 63 economic analyses of above-average quality had opportunities for incorporation in 198 instances across the 35 guidelines. Economic analyses were incorporated in the text in 13 of 198 instances (7%) and in the references in 18 of 198 instances (9%).

CONCLUSIONS

Rigorous economic analyses may be infrequently incorporated in the development of clinical practice guidelines. A systematic approach to guideline development should be used to ensure the consideration of economic analyses so that recommendations from guidelines may impact both the quality of care and the efficient allocation of resources.

[Analysis of the medico-economic literature comparing primary angioplasty and thrombolysis in the management of acute myocardial infarction]

OBJECTIVE

To assess the generalizability of the medico-economic analysis comparing primary coronary angioplasty and thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction.

METHOD

A systematic analysis of published studies was performed by two independent reviewers, in accordance with guidelines promulgated by health economic experts.

RESULTS

Eleven articles, which concerned seven studies, were selected. Respectively, four evaluations were carried out in U.S. and three other in European countries (France, Netherland and Austria). There were three randomized trials, two observational studies and two decision trees. The costs were respectively ranged 2042 to 83,708 1999 US dollars for thrombolytic therapy and 3289 to 83,477 1999 US dollars for angioplasty. In two randomized trials and one decisional tree, the primary coronary angioplasty was both more effective and less costly than the thrombolysis therapy. One observational study concluded that thrombolytic therapy was less costly than primary angioplasty despite comparable effectiveness. Two analysis could not conclude of a difference between the alternatives, because of lack of statistical power.

DISCUSSION

Published medico-economic analysis remain of a little interest for the French health care system because of lack of transparency in presentation of results. The dominance of the primary angioplasty was sensitive to time required for patient's transfer (ideally less than an hour), to the presence of redundant laboratories in an area and to the presence of an experienced staff for 24 h a day.

Comparison of coronary-artery bypass surgery and stenting for the treatment of multivessel disease

BACKGROUND

The recent recognition that coronary-artery stenting has improved the short- and long-term outcomes of patients treated with angioplasty has made it necessary to reevaluate the relative benefits of bypass surgery and percutaneous interventions in patients with multivessel disease.

METHODS

A total of 1205 patients were randomly assigned to undergo stent implantation or bypass surgery when a cardiac surgeon and an interventional cardiologist agreed that the same extent of revascularization could be achieved by either technique. The primary clinical end point was freedom from major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events at one year. The costs of hospital resources used were also determined.

RESULTS

At one year, there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of the rates of death, stroke, or myocardial infarction. Among patients who survived without a stroke or a myocardial infarction, 16.8 percent of those in the stenting group underwent a second revascularization, as compared with 3.5 percent of those in the surgery group. The rate of event-free survival at one year was 73.8 percent among the patients who received stents and 87.8 percent among those who underwent bypass surgery (P<0.001 by the log-rank test). The costs for the initial procedure were $4,212 less for patients assigned to stenting than for those assigned to bypass surgery, but this difference was reduced during follow-up because of the increased need for repeated revascularization; after one year, the net difference in favor of stenting was estimated to be $2,973 per patient.

CONCLUSION

As measured one year after the procedure, coronary stenting for multivessel disease is less expensive than bypass surgery and offers the same degree of protection against death, stroke, and myocardial infarction. However, stenting is associated with a greater need for repeated revascularization.

New developments in percutaneous coronary intervention

The field of percutaneous coronary intervention continues to progress at a tremendous rate. Advances in techniques, in device technology, and in adjunctive therapy have increased significantly the number of patients who may benefit from angioplasty and have increased the early and long-term success rates of these procedures. Future progress in radiation therapy, IIb/IIIa inhibitors, stent design, and other novel approaches undoubtedly will offer further improvements in the capability of coronary interventions to help patients live longer and feel better.

Health-related quality of life after stroke a comprehensive review

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

We performed a comprehensive review of all quality-of-life (QOL) estimates for stroke appearing in the peer-reviewed literature between 1985 and 2000. We examine variation in QOL weights and the rigor of methods used to assess QOL and discuss the implications for cost-utility assessment and resource allocation decisions.

METHODS

Through a systematic search, we identified 67 articles that met our inclusion criteria. A team of trained researchers read each article and followed detailed guidelines to extract QOL weights and other parameters. This effort yielded 161 QOL estimates for stroke-related health states. All estimates were measured on a 0 to 1 scale, with 0 representing the worst outcome and 1 representing the best.

RESULTS

QOL estimates range from -0.02 to 0.71 (n=67) for major stroke, from 0.12 to 0.81 (n=14) for moderate stroke, from 0.45 to 0.92 (n=38) for minor stroke, and from 0.29 to 0.903 (n=42) for general stroke. Although QOL should decrease with severity, there were many instances in which the QOL for major stroke as reported by one study exceeded the QOL for moderate stroke as reported by another. The same reversal was found for moderate and minor stroke, and it occurred even when both authors used similar assessment methods and subject populations. Authors of cost-utility and decision analyses rarely base their choice of QOL weights on their own primary data (19%). When obtaining weights from secondary sources, some authors (23%) chose QOL weights for a severity of stroke that did not match the severity for which they sought data.

CONCLUSIONS

QOL estimates for stroke vary greatly and are not always estimated in sound fashion. This impedes the comparability and quality of the cost-effectiveness studies that use these QOL weights and hampers good resource allocation decisions.

Quality of life measurement clarifies the cost-effectiveness of Helicobacter pylori eradication in peptic ulcer disease and uninvestigated dyspepsia

OBJECTIVES

Previous economic studies of Helicobacter pylori eradication in dyspepsia and peptic ulcer disease have not measured quality of life using utilities (preference probabilities), which are needed to compare the cost-effectiveness of such treatment to other health care interventions. The goals of this study were to measure quality of life in patients with dyspepsia or peptic ulcer and apply these measurements to published models of disease management to determine cost-effectiveness in dollars per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained.

METHODS

Utilities for dyspepsia and peptic ulcer disease were measured in adult patients (n = 73) on chronic acid suppression for peptic ulcer or ulcer-like dyspepsia. Median utility values were applied to the results of published cost-effectiveness analyses and a previously validated dyspepsia model. Cost-utility ratios for early H. pylori eradication in uninvestigated dyspepsia and peptic ulcer disease were then computed.

RESULTS

The total disutility, or lost quality of life, for an ulcer was 0.11 QALY, of which 0.09 QALY was attributed to dyspeptic symptoms. After these results were incorporated into published studies, cost-utility ratios for ulcer treatment varied from $3,100 to $12,500 per QALY gained, whereas estimates for uninvestigated dyspepsia management ranged from $26,800 to $59,400 per QALY. Sensitivity analyses indicated a range of $1,300 to $27,300 per QALY for management of duodenal ulcer and $15,000 to $129,700 per QALY for dyspepsia.

CONCLUSIONS

Strategies that emphasize early H. pylori eradication were cost-effective for patients with peptic ulcer and possibly cost-effective for patients with uninvestigated dyspepsia, relative to other medical interventions. Dyspeptic symptoms cause significant disutility that should be incorporated in future cost-effectiveness analyses of treatment strategies.

The health and activities limitation index in patients with acute myocardial infarction

Utility assessment is required to estimate quality-adjusted life years, but is often avoided due to the cumbersome nature of elicitation techniques. The Health Activities and Limitations Index (HALex) offers a method of utility assessment using existing values from the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) and a utility algorithm to derive preferences. The authors assessed the construct validity of the HALex by comparing derived values with directly assessed HALex utilities in patients post acute myocardial infarction (AMI). OLS regression was used to model the relationship between utilities and patient demographics, comorbidities, and treatment. The mean and median utility for patients (n = 160) was.57 (SD = 22) and.55 respectively, and was not statistically different from the mean [.57 (SD =.30)] and median (.58) for similar NHIS respondents (n = 46). Patients with a comorbidity index of three or less had mean utilities.13 higher than the mean utility for patients with an index of four or more. No relationship was found between patients' age, race, and income and their utilities. The HALex scoring algorithm is a promising means to obtain utilities, and provides a methodology to easily estimate utilities for patients, but is not without limitations.

Cost-effectiveness of reperfusion strategies

Reperfusion of acute myocardial infarction has become the standard of management during the first few hours. Cost per year of life saved is one measure of the effectiveness of reperfusion strategies. Estimates of the cost per year of life saved have been approximately $17,000 for streptokinase and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty and approximately $33,000 for tissue plasminogen activator. Assuming that percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty is more effective than thrombolysis, we calculated the cost-effectiveness of this strategy in different hospital settings. The estimated costs in hospitals with existing cardiac catheterization laboratories were $11,000 per year of life saved for primary angioplasty and $14,000 for thrombolysis compared with no intervention. In hospitals without catheterization facilities, it would be cost-ineffective to build such laboratories only to treat acute infarction with angioplasty. Preliminary results suggest that stenting may also be cost-effective in association with angioplasty.