Dextropropoxyphene acts as a noncompetitive N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonist

Fentanyl but not Morphine Interacts with Nonopioid Recombinant Human Neurotransmitter Receptors and Transporters

Synthetic opioids, including fentanyl and its analogs, have therapeutic efficacy in analgesia and anesthesia. However, their illicit use in the United States has increased and contributed to the number one cause of death for adults 18-50 years old. Fentanyl and the heroin metabolite morphine induce respiratory depression that can be treated with the μ opioid receptor (MOR) antagonist naloxone. With higher or more rapid dosing, fentanyl, more than morphine, causes chest wall rigidity and can also induce rapid onset laryngospasm. Because non-MORs could mediate differing clinical manifestations, we examined the interactions of fentanyl and morphine at recombinant human neurotransmitter transporters, G protein-coupled receptors, and the N-methyl-D-aspartate glutamate receptor. Both drugs were agonists at MOR, κ, and δ opioid receptors. Morphine had little or no affinity at other human receptors and transporters (K _i or IC₅₀ value >100 µM). However, fentanyl had K _i values of 1407 and 1100 nM at α _1A and α _1B adrenoceptor subtypes, respectively, and K _i values of 1049 and 1670 nM at dopamine D4.4 and D1 receptor subtypes, respectively; it also blocked [³H]neurotransmitter uptake by the vesicular monoamine transporter 2 (IC₅₀ = 911 nM). Pharmacokinetic models indicate that these Ki and IC₅₀ values are pharmacologically relevant. Fentanyl had little affinity for other receptors or transporters. Thus, noradrenergic disposition at specific receptor subtypes in relevant organs may play a role in respiratory and cardiothoracic effects of fentanyl. Data suggest that less selective fentanyl receptor pharmacology could play a role in the different clinical effects of morphine compared with fentanyl, including fentanyl-induced deaths after illicit use. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: The synthetic opioid fentanyl induces different clinical effects, including rapid onset muscular rigidity, vocal cord closure, and rapid death, than the heroin metabolite morphine. Our data indicate for the first time that the two drugs have very different effects at recombinant human neurotransmitter receptors and transporters that might explain those clinical differences.

Src kinase as a mediator of convergent molecular abnormalities leading to NMDAR hypoactivity in schizophrenia

Numerous investigations support decreased glutamatergic signaling as a pathogenic mechanism of schizophrenia, yet the molecular underpinnings for such dysregulation are largely unknown. In the post-mortem dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), we found striking decreases in tyrosine phosphorylation of N-methyl-D aspartate (NMDA) receptor subunit 2 (GluN2) that is critical for neuroplasticity. The decreased GluN2 activity in schizophrenia may not be because of downregulation of NMDA receptors as MK-801 binding and NMDA receptor complexes in postsynaptic density (PSD) were in fact increased in schizophrenia cases. At the postreceptor level, however, we found striking reductions in the protein kinase C, Pyk 2 and Src kinase activity that in tandem can decrease GluN2 activation. Given that Src serves as a hub of various signaling mechanisms affecting GluN2 phosphorylation, we postulated that Src hypoactivity may result from convergent alterations of various schizophrenia susceptibility pathways and thus mediate their effects on NMDA receptor signaling. Indeed, the DLPFC of schizophrenia cases exhibit increased PSD-95 and erbB4 and decreased receptor-type tyrosine-protein phosphatase-α (RPTPα) and dysbindin-1, each of which reduces Src activity via protein interaction with Src. To test genomic underpinnings for Src hypoactivity, we examined genome-wide association study results, incorporating 13 394 cases and 34 676 controls. We found no significant association of individual variants of Src and its direct regulators with schizophrenia. However, a protein-protein interaction-based network centered on Src showed significant enrichment of gene-level associations with schizophrenia compared with other psychiatric illnesses. Our results together demonstrate striking decreases in NMDA receptor signaling at the postreceptor level and propose Src as a nodal point of convergent dysregulations affecting NMDA receptor pathway via protein-protein associations.

Role of active metabolites in the use of opioids

The opioid class of drugs, a large group, is mainly used for the treatment of acute and chronic persistent pain. All are eliminated from the body via metabolism involving principally CYP3A4 and the highly polymorphic CYP2D6, which markedly affects the drug's function, and by conjugation reactions mainly by UGT2B7. In many cases, the resultant metabolites have the same pharmacological activity as the parent opioid; however in many cases, plasma metabolite concentrations are too low to make a meaningful contribution to the overall clinical effects of the parent drug. These metabolites are invariably more water soluble and require renal clearance as an important overall elimination pathway. Such metabolites have the potential to accumulate in the elderly and in those with declining renal function with resultant accumulation to a much greater extent than the parent opioid. The best known example is the accumulation of morphine-6-glucuronide from morphine. Some opioids have active metabolites but at different target sites. These are norpethidine, a neurotoxic agent, and nordextropropoxyphene, a cardiotoxic agent. Clinicians need to be aware that many opioids have active metabolites that will become therapeutically important, for example in cases of altered pathology, drug interactions and genetic polymorphisms of drug-metabolizing enzymes. Thus, dose individualisation and the avoidance of adverse effects of opioids due to the accumulation of active metabolites or lack of formation of active metabolites are important considerations when opioids are used.

CYP3A4 mediates dextropropoxyphene N-demethylation to nordextropropoxyphene: humanin vitroandin vivostudies and lack of CYP2D6 involvement

The individual cytochrome P450 isoforms in dextropropoxyphene N-demethylation to nordextropropoxyphene were determined and the pharmacokinetics of dextropropoxyphene and nordextropropoxyphene in cytochrome P4502D6 (CYP2D6) extensive (EM) and poor (PM) subjects were characterized. Microsomes from six CYP2D6 extensive metabolizers and one CYP2D6 poor metabolizer were used with isoform specific chemical and antibody inhibitors and expressed recombinant CYP enzymes. Groups of three CYP2D6 EM and PM subjects received a single 65-mg oral dose of dextropropoxyphene, and blood and urine were collected for 168 and 96 h, respectively. Nordextropropoxyphene formation in vitro was not different between the CYP2D6 extensive metabolizers (Km = 179 +/- 74 microM, Cl(int) = 0.41 +/- 0.26 ml mg(-1)h(-1)) and the PM subject (K = 225 microM, Cl(int) = 0.19 ml mg(-1) h(-1)) and was catalysed predominantly by CYP3A4. There was no apparent difference in the pharmacokinetics of dextropropoxyphene and nordextropropoxyphene in CYP2D6 EM and PM subjects. CYP3A4 is the major CYP enzyme catalysing the major metabolic pathway of dextropropoxyphene metabolism. Hence variability in the pharmacodynamic effects of dextropropoxyphene are likely due to intersubject variability in hepatic CYP3A4 expression and/or drug-drug interactions. Reported CYP2D6 phenocopying is not due to dextropropoxyphene being a CYP2D6 substrate.

Morphine, Oxycodone, Methadone and Its Enantiomers in Different Models of Nociception in the Rat

We studied the effects of the commonly used mu-opioid receptor agonists morphine, oxycodone, methadone and the enantiomers of methadone in thermal and mechanical models of acute pain and in the spinal nerve ligation model of neuropathic pain in rats. Subcutaneous administration of morphine, oxycodone, and methadone produced a dose-dependent antinociceptive effect in the tail flick, hotplate, and paw pressure tests. l-methadone, racemic methadone, and oxycodone had a similar dose-dependent antinociceptive effect, whereas the dose-response curve of morphine was shallower. In the spinal nerve ligation model of neuropathic pain, subcutaneous administration of morphine, oxycodone, methadone and l-methadone had antiallodynic effects in tests of mechanical and cold allodynia. l-methadone showed the strongest antiallodynic effect of the tested drugs. d-methadone was inactive in all tests. Morphine 5.0 mg/kg, oxycodone 2.5 mg/kg, and l-methadone 1.25 mg/kg decreased spontaneous locomotion 30 min after drug administration. In conclusion, in acute nociception all mu-opioid receptor agonists produced antinociception, with morphine showing the weakest effect. In nerve injury pain, l-methadone showed the greatest antiallodynic potency in both mechanical and cold allodynia compared with the other opioids. Opioids seem to have different profiles in different pain models. l-methadone should be studied for neuropathic pain in humans.

Characterizing the subjective, psychomotor, and physiological effects of oral propoxyphene in non-drug-abusing volunteers

BACKGROUND

The subjective, psychomotor, and physiological effects of a widely prescribed prescription opioid, propoxyphene, have not been studied in a population of non-drug-abusing people. The drug also has potential for abuse and it was of interest in the present study to determine if the drug had any abuse liability-related subjective effects in this population.

METHODS

Eighteen volunteers participated in a crossover, randomized, double-blind study in which they received, all p.o., placebo; 50 mg propoxyphene napsylate; 100 mg propoxyphene napsylate; 200 mg propoxyphene napsylate; 40 mg morphine sulfate; and 2 mg lorazepam. Measures were assessed before and for 300 min after drug administration.

RESULTS

Both morphine and lorazepam produced subjective effects. There were no statistically significant subjective effects obtained with any dose of propoxyphene in the group as a whole, but approximately 30-50% of the subjects did appear to experience subjective effects from the drug. Drug liking was not consistently observed in this subset. Propoxyphene, unlike lorazepam, did not impair psychomotor or cognitive performance. Both propoxyphene and morphine produced miosis.

CONCLUSIONS

There was a lack of statistically significant subjective effects of propoxyphene in the group as a whole, including a propoxyphene dose that was twice as high as the typical clinically-prescribed dose of 100 mg. However, there were some subjects who did report effects, consistent with the notion that patients differ in their sensitivity to opioid effects.

The analgesic effect of codeine as compared to imipramine in different human experimental pain models

The hypoalgesic effect of single oral doses of 100 mg imipramine and 125 mg codeine was evaluated in a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, 3-way cross-over experiment including 18 healthy volunteers. Pain tests were performed before and 90, 180, 270, 360 and 450 min after medication. The tests included determination of pain tolerance thresholds to pressure, pain detection/tolerance thresholds to single electrical sural nerve stimulation and pain summation at tolerance threshold to repetitive electrical sural nerve stimulation (temporal summation) and pain experienced during the cold pressor test, rated as peak pain intensity, pain average intensity and discomfort. Compared to placebo, imipramine significantly increased pressure pain tolerance threshold (P = 0.03) and increased pain tolerance threshold (P = 0.05) and pain summation threshold (P = 0.03), but not pain detection threshold to electrical stimulation. Imipramine did not cause significant changes in pain perception during the cold pressor test. Codeine significantly increased pressure pain tolerance threshold (P = 0.02), pain detection (P = 0.04) and pain tolerance threshold (P = 0.01) and pain summation threshold (P = 0.02) to electrical stimulation. In addition, codeine reduced the pain experienced during the cold pressor test (P = 0.04-0.003). It is concluded that both imipramine and codeine inhibit temporal pain summation, whereas only codeine reduces cold pressor pain. Pain summation may be a key mechanism in neuropathic pain. Imipramine has a documented effect on such pain conditions on temporal summation. The present study showed that codeine also inhibits temporal summation, which is in line with the clinical observations indicating that opioids relieve neuropathic pain.

d-morphine, but not l-morphine, has low micromolar affinity for the non-competitive N-methyl-D-aspartate site in rat forebrain. Possible clinical implications for the management of neuropathic pain

A diverse range of opioids and enantiomers were examined for their ability to displace binding at the [(3)H] MK-801-labelled site of the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor in rat forebrain, displacement which is equitable with non-competitive NMDA receptor antagonist activity. Surprisingly, d-morphine, but not natural l-morphine, has low micromolar affinity for the site, suggesting clinical potential for racemic dl-morphine in the treatment of neuropathic pain with reduced development of tolerance. The opioid mu-receptor agonists: levorphanol, d- and dl-methadone, displayed similar properties. With the exception of the case of d-morphine, the structural requirements for affinity correspond closely with those previously found for the inhibitory effects of opioids on monoamine uptake.

Neuronal inhibitory effects of methadone are predominantly opioid receptor mediated in the rat spinal cord in vivo

This study aims to assess whether the antinociceptive actions of methadone are mediated solely through opioid mechanisms, or whether its reported affinity for NMDA receptors has physiological relevance in vivo. Methadone is a mu-opioid receptor agonist reported to relieve pain unresponsive to other opioids. It is a racemic mixture comprising d- and l-optical isomers; the d-isomer has a lower affinity for opioid receptors, and both also exhibit NMDA receptor binding, likely to indicate antagonist activity. d -Methadone is antinociceptive in behavioural studies via non-opioid mechanisms, which could include functional NMDA receptor-blocking activity. Here we investigate the ability of d - and dl -methadone to inhibit noxious and innocuous electrically-evoked responses of dorsal horn neurones in the anaesthetized rat. Racemic methadone (5, 25, 50, 250 microg) applied spinally, dose-relatedly inhibited the C-fibre evoked response, input and wind-up of the neurones, with a profile resembling that of morphine. d-Methadone (5, 25, 50, 250, 500 microg) was also inhibitory, although less potent by a factor of between 13 and 48 depending on the neuronal measure; its profile of inhibition resembled that of the racemic mixture rather than an NMDA receptor antagonist. Both compounds had minimal effects on Abeta-fibre-evoked activity. The inhibitory effects of both d - and dl -methadone on noxious-evoked activity were naloxone reversible. The naloxone reversibility of d -methadone inhibitions is best interpreted as indicative of a purely opioid mechanism of action. However, the ability of naloxone to reverse the effects of d -methadone may also reflect a degree of synergy between weak NMDA antagonist and opioid agonist activity.

Symptom control in hospice--state of the art

There are a myriad of physical symptoms which can complicate the care of patients with advanced disease. Without knowledge of and attention to these distressing symptoms, the rest of the work of the interdisciplinary hospice team is greatly hampered. In this article, we review the management of ten prevalent symptoms in hospice care and to identify areas of clinical investigation underway and point of future areas ripe for investigation.

N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor channel block by meperidine is dependent on extracellular pH

Large concentrations of meperidine inhibit N-methyl-D-aspartate-(NMDA) receptor channels by channel block mechanisms. Extracellular pH regulates the activity and drug sensitivity of NMDA-receptor channels. We examined the influence of extracellular pH on sensitivity to meperidine of epsilon/zeta heteromeric NMDA-receptor channels expressed in Xenopus oocytes. Inhibition of epsilon1/zeta1, epsilon2/zeta1, epsilon3/zeta1, and epsilon4/zeta1 channels by meperidine was dependent on pH, with more inhibition at acidic pH and less inhibition at alkaline pH. The degree of voltage-dependence of meperidine block was only slightly affected by changes in pH, whereas affinity for meperidine was greatly reduced at alkaline pH. Furthermore, interaction of meperidine with Mg(2+) block was reduced at alkaline pH. Because the percentage of the protonated form of meperidine is only slightly affected by pH, changes in properties of the meperidine binding site may be involved in mechanisms of alteration of meperidine potency by pH.

IMPLICATIONS

At acidic pH the potency of meperidine for N-methyl-D-aspartate-receptor channels was increased. Any antinociceptive and neuroprotective benefit from the N-methyl-D-aspartate-receptor antagonist property of meperidine may be pH dependent.

Opioid analgesics as noncompetitive N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) antagonists

Much evidence points to the involvement of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors in the development and maintainance of neuropathic pain. In neuropathic pain, there is generally involved a presumed opioid-insensitive component, which apparently can be blocked by NMDA receptor antagonists. However, in order to obtain complete analgesia, a combination of an NMDA receptor antagonist and an opioid receptor agonist is needed. Recent in vitro data have demonstrated that methadone, ketobemidone, and dextropropoxyphene, in addition to being opioid receptor agonists, also are weak noncompetitive NMDA receptor antagonists. Clinical anecdotes suggest that the NMDA receptor antagonism of these opioids may play a significant role in the pharmacological action of these compounds; however, no clinical studies have been conducted to support this issue. In the present commentary, we discuss evidence for the NMDA receptor antagonism of these compounds and its relevance for clinical pain treatment; an overview of structure-activity relationships for the relevant opioids as noncompetitive NMDA receptor antagonists also is given. It is concluded that although the finding that some opioids are weak noncompetitive NMDA receptor antagonists in vitro has created much attention among clinicians, no clinical studies have been conducted to evaluate the applicability of these compounds in the treatment of neuropathic pain conditions.