The use of phenobarbitone in the management of agitation and seizures at the end of life

Short subcutaneous infusions for symptom control in palliative medicine

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the efficacy and safety of short subcutaneous infusions (SSCIs) for refractory symptoms in the palliative setting.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of SSCIs in a single palliative care centre over an 18-month period. All clinical notes, medication administration records and infusion monitoring documentation were examined to ascertain therapeutic aim, efficacy and tolerability.

RESULTS

111 patients received one or more SSCIs, 28 in the community and 83 in the inpatient hospice (21% of all admissions). SSCIs were used for a wide variety of reasons including loading doses (to achieve steady state and, thus, symptom relief, sooner), as required doses (for medications too irritant to give as bolus SC injections) and regular maintenance doses (where continuous subcutaneous infusion (CSCI), were unnecessary). 84 single drug SSCIs types and 51 admixtures SSCIs types (2 or more medications) were given. One infusion was poorly absorbed, but SSCIs were otherwise well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

SSCIs appear to be a promising additional option for administering medicines that are too irritant or large in volume for SC bolus injection. For medications with longer half-lives (eg, phenobarbital, valproate, levetiracetam), SSCI loading doses would be expected to achieve steady state and, thus, symptom relief, sooner than CSCIs alone.

Central anticholinergic syndrome from hyoscine hydrobromide in an unresponsive patient

Terminal agitation is common and causes severe distress for patients and loved ones. Careful assessment is of paramount importance in identifying a cause. PA patient with gastric adenocarcinoma who was admitted with adverse effects post-chemotherapy deteriorated acutely with a presumed intracerebral event. Secretions were an issue and hyoscine hydrobromide was commenced. Within twenty-four hours, the patient became acutely agitated and did not respond to standard treatment.After careful clinical examination out-ruling other causes, toxic psychosis secondary to hyoscine hydrobromide was felt to be most likely. Rotating anti-secretories and commencing a phenobarbitone infusion to treat severe agitation resulted in prolonged comfort before death.Inhibiting cholinergic transmission at central muscarinic receptors can cause psychosis, delirium, etc. Hyoscine hydrobromide crosses the blood brain barrier. This case demonstrates that even in unresponsive patients, it may cause agitation. If standard therapies are failing to control agitation, all possibilities must be considered. Central side effects of hyoscine hydrobromide may be a rare but under-recognised cause of agitation. This case demonstrates how through careful clinical assessment of possible differentials, and prompt and effective management of the most likely causes of distress, lasting comfort can be achieved. Patient with gastric adenocarcinoma who was admitted with adverse effects post-chemotherapy deteriorated acutely with a presumed intracerebral event. Secretions were an issue and hyoscine hydrobromide was commenced. Within twenty-four hours, the patient became acutely agitated and did not respond to standard treatment.

Extreme Symptom Burden for Patients With COVID-19 at the End of Life; Extrapolation of Knowledge Gained to Achieve Sustained Comfort and Dignity for all Patients in Their Last Days of Life1

BACKGROUND

We describe two complex cases in the setting of COVID-19 at the End of Life, to enhance learning for all patients.

CASE PRESENTATION

Maintenance of sustained comfort in two cases required multiple drugs, specifically selected for symptoms that necessitated three separate pumps delivering continuous 24-hour subcutaneous infusion.

CASE MANAGEMENT

Management of sustained comfort included opioid, midazolam, anti-secretory, diclofenac for intractable temperature, phenobarbital for extreme agitation, in one, where seizure activity was present, while insomnia, was a prominent feature of another. Management of Akatasia was also required.

CASE OUTCOME

Attention to each individual patient's rapidly evolving symptoms, during the dying phase, with a thorough differential diagnosis, wa s vitally important in the context of a 'Good Death'. This was achieved in both cases, reflected by evidence at the bedside of comfort and a minimum need for 'as required' drugs in the last days of life.

CONCLUSIONS

COVID-19 being a new illness, we need to prospectively study the symptom burden/clustering at End of Life and learn from management of this new disease for other illnesses also. Further research is required to develop protocols on; when does Midazolam dose reach tolerance and when should an alternative drug such as phenobarbital for sustained Gamma-Aminobutyric Acid effects be initiated; examine the optimal approach to sustained temperature control; be cognisant of extrapyramidal side effects of drugs used at End of Life and consider looking at a lack of need for 'as required' drugs in the last days of life as an outcome measure of sustained comfort.

The Rising Status of Phenobarbital: A Case for Use in Severe Refractory Hyperactive Poststroke Delirium

INTRODUCTION

Up to 48% of patients who have had a stroke will experience poststroke delirium (PSD) that can be hyperactive, hypoactive, or mixed. Literature on treatment of the hyperactive subtype is specifically lacking. This case report describes the rapid resolution of severe refractory hyperactive PSD with phenobarbital.

CASE REPORT

A 58-year-old man with a left middle cerebral artery stroke presented with severe hyperactive PSD of 12 days duration, refractory to antipsychotics, alpha-2 agonists, gabapentin, therapeutic valproic acid, benzodiazepines, and ketamine infusion. An oral dose of phenobarbital 30.4 mg, followed by oral maintenance therapy was initiated on day 13 of admission with dramatic improvement. As his Richmond Agitation-Sedation score trended downwards to 0, he was able to cooperate with therapies. This allowed for discharge to a skilled nursing facility for rehabilitation and subsequently home 2 weeks later.

CONCLUSION

Hyperactive PSD is a common complication of stroke with little evidence to guide treatment strategies. This report suggests that phenobarbital, because of its varied mechanisms of action and unique neurochemistry, may be an unrecognized potential therapy.

Phenobarbital in Status epilepticus - Rediscovery of an effective drug

Phenobarbital (PB) is one of the oldest Antiseizure Medicines (ASMs), which is in clinical use since 1912. Its value in the treatment of Status epilepticus is currently discussed controversially. Phenobarbital has fallen out of favor in many countries across Europe because of reports of hypotension, arrhythmias, and hypopnea. Phenobarbital has a strong antiseizure effect with remarkably little sedation. It exerts its clinical effects, through the increase of GABE-ergic inhibition and decrease of glutamatergic excitation by inhibition of AMPA receptors. Despite good preclinical evidence, there are remarkably few randomized controlled studies on humans in SE, which suggest, that it is at least as good as lorazepam in first-line treatment in early SE, and significantly better than valproic acid in benzodiazepine-resistant SE. Data from randomized trials and large non-randomized prospective and retrospective studies suggest, that Phenobarbital is well tolerated even if used in very high dose protocols. Thus, despite its decline in its popularity at least in Europe and North America, it should be considered a highly cost-effective treatment for early and established SE, not only in resource-limited settings. This paper was presented at the 8th London-Innsbruck Colloquium on Status Epilepticus and Acute Seizures held in September 2022.

Use of Phenobarbitone for Palliative Sedation in Dyspneic Crises Due to COVID-19 Pneumonia - A Case Series

Patients who suffer from dyspnea while dying from COVID-19 are treated with opioids and benzodiazepines. In some instances, patients may experience refractory dyspnea at the end of life. Palliative sedation can be prescribed to alleviate such patients' suffering. We describe two patients being treated for severe COVID-19 pneumonia in a tertiary hospital. Both developed intractable dyspneic crises despite high-dose opioids and benzodiazepines. This led to their requirement of palliative sedation in the general ward using subcutaneous phenobarbitone (phenobarbital). We outline clinical considerations for the use of palliative sedation in COVID-19 related dyspnea. In particular, we discuss the evidence for, benefits and limitations of using phenobarbitone for palliative sedation in COVID-19 patients.

Clinical Assessment and Management of Delirium in the Palliative Care Setting

Delirium is a neurocognitive syndrome arising from acute global brain dysfunction, and is prevalent in up to 42% of patients admitted to palliative care inpatient units. The symptoms of delirium and its associated communicative impediment invariably generate high levels of patient and family distress. Furthermore, delirium is associated with significant patient morbidity and increased mortality in many patient populations, especially palliative care where refractory delirium is common in the dying phase. As the clinical diagnosis of delirium is frequently missed by the healthcare team, the case for regular screening is arguably very compelling. Depending on its precipitating factors, a delirium episode is often reversible, especially in the earlier stages of a life-threatening illness. Until recently, antipsychotics have played a pivotal role in delirium management, but this role now requires critical re-evaluation in light of recent research that failed to demonstrate their efficacy in mild- to moderate-severity delirium occurring in palliative care patients. Non-pharmacological strategies for the management of delirium play a fundamental role and should be optimized through the collective efforts of the whole interprofessional team. Refractory agitated delirium in the last days or weeks of life may require the use of pharmacological sedation to ameliorate the distress of patients, which is invariably juxtaposed with increasing distress of family members. Further evaluation of multicomponent strategies for delirium prevention and treatment in the palliative care patient population is urgently required.

Reduced Clearance of Phenobarbital in Advanced Cancer Patients near the End of Life

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Little is known about the pharmacokinetics of phenobarbital in terminally ill cancer patients. We investigated whether phenobarbital clearance alters depending on the length of survival.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the clinical, laboratory, and therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) records of patients who received parenteral or oral phenobarbital for 21 consecutive days or longer between 2000 and 2016. Patients were divided into non-cancer and cancer groups. Cancer patients were further stratified according to the survival interval after TDM: those who survived > 3 months were classified as long-surviving and the remainders short-surviving cancer patients. Phenobarbital clearance (CL_PB) was calculated at steady state. Multiple comparisons of median CL_PB were conducted among the three groups.

RESULTS

Data were collected from 44 non-cancer patients and 34 cancer patients comprising 24 long-surviving and 10 short-surviving cancer patients. Among 10 short-surviving cancer patients, 4 had hepatic metastasis. Median CL_PB (range) in short-surviving cancer patients [0.076 (0.057‒0.114) L/kg/day] was significantly (p < 0.05) lower than that in non-cancer patients [0.105 (0.060‒0.226) L/kg/day] and in long-surviving cancer patients [0.100 (0.082‒0.149) L/kg/day].

CONCLUSION

Terminally ill patients with advanced cancer may have reduced CL_PB, thereby TDM is recommended for these patients particularly near the end of life.

Clinical Assessment and Management of Delirium in the Palliative Care Setting

Delirium is a neurocognitive syndrome arising from acute global brain dysfunction, and is prevalent in up to 42% of patients admitted to palliative care inpatient units. The symptoms of delirium and its associated communicative impediment invariably generate high levels of patient and family distress. Furthermore, delirium is associated with significant patient morbidity and increased mortality in many patient populations, especially palliative care where refractory delirium is common in the dying phase. As the clinical diagnosis of delirium is frequently missed by the healthcare team, the case for regular screening is arguably very compelling. Depending on its precipitating factors, a delirium episode is often reversible, especially in the earlier stages of a life-threatening illness. Until recently, antipsychotics have played a pivotal role in delirium management, but this role now requires critical re-evaluation in light of recent research that failed to demonstrate their efficacy in mild- to moderate-severity delirium occurring in palliative care patients. Non-pharmacological strategies for the management of delirium play a fundamental role and should be optimized through the collective efforts of the whole interprofessional team. Refractory agitated delirium in the last days or weeks of life may require the use of pharmacological sedation to ameliorate the distress of patients, which is invariably juxtaposed with increasing distress of family members. Further evaluation of multicomponent strategies for delirium prevention and treatment in the palliative care patient population is urgently required.

A Review of Agents for Palliative Sedation/Continuous Deep Sedation: Pharmacology and Practical Applications

Continuous deep sedation at the end of life is a specific form of palliative sedation requiring a care plan that essentially places and maintains the patient in an unresponsive state because their symptoms are refractory to any other interventions. Because this application is uncommon, many providers may lack practical experience in this specialized area and resources they can access are outdated, nonspecific, and/or not comprehensive. The purpose of this review is to provide an evidence- and experience-based reference that specifically addresses those medications and regimens and their practical applications for this very narrow, but vital, aspect of hospice care. Patient goals in a hospital and hospice environments are different, so the manner in which widely used sedatives are dosed and applied can differ greatly as well. Parameters applied in end-of-life care that are based on experience and a thorough understanding of the pharmacology of those medications will differ from those applied in an intensive care unit or other medical environments. By recognizing these different goals and applying well-founded regimens geared specifically for end-of-life sedation, we can address our patients' symptoms in a more timely and efficacious manner.

A Protocol for the Control of Agitation in Palliative Care

Background:

Agitation is a distressing and dangerous behavior for all involved.

Objective:

To study a protocol effectiveness and safety.

Methods:

The time when the protocol was initiated and when the agitation was controlled, the number of doses needed and the complications observed were recorded.

Results:

One hundred and thirty-five inpatients of a palliative care service were included. The most frequent diagnosis was head and neck cancer, 37 (27%). The protocol was used 584 times, from 1 to 31 times on each patient, median of 3 times. Five hundred and thirty-four (91%) agitation episodes were controlled with only the first dose of the protocol, without significant complications.

Conclusion:

From those results, it can be said that this protocol is effective and safe.

Pain management at the end of life: A comparative study of cancer, dementia, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients

BACKGROUND

Limited data exist concerning the unique pain characteristics of patients with non-cancer terminal diseases referred for inpatient hospice care.

AIMS

To define the unique pain characteristics of patients admitted to an acute inpatient hospice setting with end-stage dementia or chronic obstructive lung disease (or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) and to compare them to patients with end-stage cancer.

DESIGN

Retrospective patient chart review. Demographic, physiological, pain parameters, and medication utilization data were extracted. Associations between pain characteristics, medication utilization, and admission diagnoses were assessed. Analyses included descriptive statistics.

SETTING/PARTICIPANTS

In total, 146 patients admitted to an acute inpatient hospice between 1 April 2011 and 31 March 2012 with an underlying primary diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (n = 51), dementia (n = 48), or cancer (n = 47).

RESULTS

Pain was highly prevalent in all diagnostic groups, with cancer patients experiencing more severe pain on admission. Cancer patients received a significantly higher cumulative opioid dose compared with dementia and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients. Pain control within 24 h of pain onset was achieved in less than half of all patient groups with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients the least likely to achieve pain control.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the fact that pain is the most common complaint at the end of life, pain management may be suboptimal for some primary diagnoses. Admission diagnosis is the strongest predictor of pain control. Patient with cancer achieve the best pain control, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients are the least likely to have their pain adequately treated.

Evaluation of Subcutaneous Phenobarbital Administration in Hospice Patients

Phenobarbital is used in hospice and palliative care to treat refractory symptoms. In end-of-life care, Food and Drug Administration approved routes of administration may be unreasonable based on patients’ status. In these cases, phenobarbital may be administered subcutaneously for symptom management. However, according to the American Hospital Formulary Service, subcutaneous administration of commercially available injectable phenobarbital is cautioned due to possible skin reactions. This study evaluates the tolerability of phenobarbital administered subcutaneously. Of 69 patients and 774 distinct subcutaneous phenobarbital injections, 2 site reactions were recorded (2.9% of patients; 0.3% of injections). Both were mild, grade 1 reactions. Each patient continued to receive subcutaneous phenobarbital via newly placed ports with no additional reactions. Based on these findings, phenobarbital appears to be well tolerated when administered subcutaneously.

Management of refractory status epilepticus in an actively dying patient

No consensus guidelines exist for the treatment of refractory myoclonic status epilepticus or refractory myoclonus in the palliative care setting. Evidence-based guidelines for the general medical population are often neither practical nor applicable at the end of life. Many challenges, including medication availability, route of administration, monitoring, and work-up are all unique to the palliative care setting. Two patients with refractory myoclonus versus refractory myoclonic status epilepticus are described here, illustrating the challenges involved in treatment as well the need for further research for therapy in the palliative care setting.

End-of-life delirium: issues regarding recognition, optimal management, and the role of sedation in the dying phase

CONTEXT

In end-of-life care, delirium is often not recognized and poses unique management challenges, especially in the case of refractory delirium in the terminal phase.

OBJECTIVES

To review delirium in the terminal phase context, specifically in relation to recognition issues; the decision-making processes and management strategies regarding its reversibility; the potential refractoriness of delirium to symptomatic treatment; and the role of sedation in refractory delirium.

METHODS

We combined multidisciplinary input from delirium researchers and knowledge users at an international delirium study planning meeting and relevant electronic database literature searches (Ovid Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, and CINAHL) to inform this narrative review.

RESULTS

The overall management strategy for delirium at the end of life is directed by the patient's prognosis in association with the patient's goals of care. As symptoms of delirium are often refractory in the terminal phase, especially in the case of agitated delirium, the judicious use of palliative sedation is frequently required. However, there remains a lack of high-level evidence for the management of delirium in the terminal phase, including the role of antipsychotics and optimal sedation strategies. For the family and health-care staff, clear communication, education, and emotional support are vital components to assist with decision making and direct the treatment care plan.

CONCLUSION

Further research on the effectiveness of delirium management strategies in the terminal phase for patients and their families is required. Further validation of assessment tools for diagnostic screening and severity measurement is needed in this patient population.

Clarifying delirium management: practical, evidenced-based, expert recommendations for clinical practice

Delirium is highly prevalent in those with serious or advanced medical illnesses. It is associated with many adverse consequences, including significant patient, family, and health care provider distress. This article suggests a novel approach to delirium assessment and management and provides useful, practical guidance for clinicians based on a complete review of the existing literature and the expert clinical opinion of the authors and their colleagues, derived from over a decade of collective bedside experience. Comprehensive assessment includes careful description of observed symptoms, signs, and behaviors; and an understanding of the patient's situation, including primary diagnosis, associated comorbidities, functional status, and prognosis. The importance of incorporating goals of care for the patient and family is discussed. The concepts of potential reversibility versus irreversible delirium and delirium subtype are proffered, with a description of how diagnostic and management strategies follow from these concepts. Pharmacological interventions that provide rapid, effective, and safe relief are presented. Employing both pharmacological and nonpharmacological interventions, including patient and family education, improves symptoms and relieves patient and family distress, whether the delirium is reversible or irreversible, hyperactive or hypoactive. All interventions can be provided in any setting of care, including patients' homes.

An overview of end-of-life issues in the intensive care unit

The population of the earth is aging, and as medical techniques, pharmaceuticals, and devices push the boundaries of human physiological capabilities, more humans will go on to live longer. However, this prolonged existence may involve incapacities, particularly at the end-of-life, and especially in the intensive care unit. This arena involves not only patients and families, but also care givers. It involves topics from economics to existentialism, and surgery to spiritualism. It requires education, communication, acceptance of diversity, and an ultimate acquiescence to the inevitable. Here, we present a comprehensive overview of issues in the care of patients at the end-of-life stage that may cause physicians and other healthcare providers, medical, ethical, social, and philosophical concerns in the intensive care unit.

Care of the dying patient in hospital

Patients die in hospital every day, some receiving suboptimal care. This article focuses on the care of these patients in their last days specifically discussing medication review, symptom control, assisted nutrition and hydration, spiritual and religious needs, and documentation.

The assessment and management of delirium in cancer patients

Delirium remains the most common and distressing neuropsychiatric complication in patients with advanced cancer. Delirium causes significant distress to patients and their families, and continues to be underdiagnosed and undertreated. The most frequent, consistent, and, at the same time, reversible etiology is drug-induced delirium resulting from opioids and other psychoactive medications. The objective of this narrative review is to outline the causes of delirium in advanced cancer, especially drug-induced delirium, and the diagnosis and management of opioid-induced neurotoxicity. The early symptoms and signs of delirium and the use of delirium-specific assessment tools for routine delirium screening and monitoring in clinical practice are summarized. Finally, management options are reviewed, including pharmacological symptomatic management and also the provision of counseling support to both patients and their families to minimize distress.

Status epilepticus in a hospice inpatient setting

Although evidence-based guidelines on the management of status epilepticus in the general population are available, these cannot be readily applied to hospice inpatients. The treatment of status epilepticus in a hospice setting presents many challenges in terms of choice and availability of drugs, route of administration and availability of monitoring facilities. A case report is presented that illustrates the distinct challenges involved in the management of status epilepticus in this setting. Commonly used antiseizure medications are discussed, with emphasis on the potential benefits and drawbacks in a hospice population.

End of life issues

Despite advances in cancer survival rates, end of life care remains a vital aspect of cancer management. The use of integrated care pathways can facilitate effective care of dying patients in a generalist setting. However, it remains important that staff are able to recognise the onset of the dying process, not only in order to make symptom control provision, but also that appropriate communication can occur with patients and those close to them. This allows the exercise of choice over place and style of care. The key symptoms at the end of life are restlessness, agitation, breathlessness, pain and noisy respiration from retained airway secretions. Ethical tensions arise from the assumptions that the use of opioids and sedatives hastens dying, but this is contradicted by available evidence.

Management of common neurologic symptoms in pediatric palliative care: seizures, agitation, and spasticity

Palliative care for children is complex and focuses on patients' comfort. Some of the most troublesome symptoms as patients approach the end of life are seizures, agitation, and spasticity. Many doctors caring for children at the end of life are uncomfortable or untrained in managing these symptoms in children. Our goal is to help physicians recognize and treat these neurologic symptoms optimally.

Palliative Sedation Therapy in the Last Weeks of Life: A Literature Review and Recommendations for Standards

PURPOSE

Palliative sedation therapy (PST) is a controversial issue. There is a need for internationally accepted definitions and standards.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was performed by an international panel of 29 palliative care experts. Draft papers were written on various topics concerning PST. This paper is a summary of the individual papers, written after two meetings and extensive e-mail discussions.

RESULTS

PST is defined as the use of specific sedative medications to relieve intolerable suffering from refractory symptoms by a reduction in patient consciousness, using appropriate drugs carefully titrated to the cessation of symptoms. The initial dose of sedatives should usually be small enough to maintain the patients' ability to communicate periodically. The team looking after the patient should have enough expertise and experience to judge the symptom as refractory. Advice from palliative care specialists is strongly recommended before initiating PST. In the case of continuous and deep PST, the disease should be irreversible and advanced, with death expected within hours to days. Midazolam should be considered first-line choice. The decision whether or not to withhold or withdraw hydration should be discussed separately. Hydration should be offered only if it is considered likely that the benefit will outweigh the harm. PST is distinct from euthanasia because (1) it has the intent to provide symptom relief, (2) it is a proportionate intervention, and (3) the death of the patient is not a criterion for success. PST and its outcome should be carefully monitored and documented.

CONCLUSION

When other treatments fail to relieve suffering in the imminently dying patient, PST is a valid palliative care option.

Delirium in Older Adults With Cancer: Implications for Practice and Research

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES

To provide a comprehensive review of the literature and existing evidence-based findings on delirium in older adults with cancer.

DATA SOURCES

Published articles, guidelines, and textbooks.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Although delirium generally is recognized as a common geriatric syndrome, a paucity of empirical evidence exists to guide early recognition and treatment of this sequelae of cancer and its treatment in older adults. Delirium probably is more prevalent than citations note because the phenomenon is under-recognized in clinical practice across varied settings of cancer care.

CONCLUSIONS

Extensive research is needed to formulate clinical guidelines to manage delirium. A focus on delirium in acute care and at the end of life precludes identification of this symptom in ambulatory care, where most cancer therapies are used. Particular emphasis should address the early recognition of prodromal signs of delirium to reduce symptom severity.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING

Ongoing assessment opportunities and close proximity to patients' treatment experiences foster oncology nurses' mastery of this common exemplar of altered cognition in older adults with cancer. Increasing awareness of and knowledge delineating characteristics of delirium in older patients with cancer can promote early recognition, optimum treatment, and minimization of untoward consequences associated with the historically ignored example of symptom distress.

Efficacy and safety of palliative sedation therapy: a multicenter, prospective, observational study conducted on specialized palliative care units in Japan

Although palliative sedation therapy is often required in terminally ill cancer patients, its efficacy and safety are not sufficiently understood. The primary aims of this multicenter observational study were to 1) explore the efficacy and safety of palliative sedation therapy, and 2) identify the factors contributing to inadequate symptom relief and complications, using a prospective study design, clearly defined measurement methods, and a consecutive sample from 21 specialized palliative care units in Japan. A sample of 102 consecutive adult cancer patients who received continuous deep sedation were enrolled. Physicians prospectively evaluated the intensity of patient symptoms, communication capacity, respiratory rate, and complications related to sedation. Symptoms were measured on the Agitation Distress Scale, the Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale, and the ad hoc symptom severity scale (0 = no symptoms, 1 = mild and tolerable symptoms, 2 = intolerable symptoms for less than 15 minutes in the previous one hour, and 3 = intolerable symptoms continuing for more than 15 minutes in the previous one hour). Inadequate symptom relief was defined as presence of hyperactive delirium (item 9 of the Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale >or=2) or grade 2 or 3 symptom intensity 4 hours after sedation. The degree of communication capacity was measured on the Communication Capacity Scale. Palliative sedation therapy succeeded in symptom alleviation in 83% of the cases. Median time elapsed before patients initially had one continuous hour of deep sedation was 60 minutes, but 49% of the patients awakened once after falling into a deeply sedated state. The percentage of patients who were capable of explicit communication decreased from 40% before sedation to 7.1% 4 hours after sedation, and the mean Communication Capacity Score significantly decreased to the level of 15 points (P < 0.001). The respiratory rates did not significantly decrease after sedation (18 +/- 9.0 to 16 +/- 9.4/min, P = 0.62), but respiratory and/or circulatory suppression (respiratory rate <or= 8/min, systolic blood pressure <or= 60mHg, or 50% or more reduction) occurred in 20%, with fatal outcomes in 3.9%. There were no statistically significant differences in patient age, sex, performance status, target symptoms, or classes and initial dose of sedative medications between the patients with adequate and inadequate symptom relief. Respiratory and/or circulatory suppression was significantly more likely to occur in patients receiving sedation for delirium and those with higher levels on the Agitation Distress Scale. Higher dose of midazolam was significantly correlated with younger age, absence of icterus, pre-exposure to midazolam, and length of sedation. Palliative sedation therapy is effective and safe in the majority of terminally ill cancer patients with refractory symptoms. However, a small number of patients experience fatal complications related to sedation. Comparison studies of different sedation regimens are needed to determine the most effective and safe sedation protocol.

The Evolving and Important Role of Anesthesiology in Palliative Care

A small but clinically significant proportion of dying patients experience severe physically or psychologically distressing symptoms that are refractory to the usual first-line therapies. Anesthesiologists, currently poorly represented in the rapidly evolving specialties of hospice and palliative medicine, are uniquely qualified to contribute to the comprehensive care of patients who are in this category. Anesthesiologists' interpersonal capabilities in the management of patients and families under duress, their knowledge and comfort level with the application of potent analgesic and consciousness-altering pharmacology, and their titrating and monitoring skills would add a valuable dimension to palliative care teams. This article summarizes the state of the art and means by which anesthesiologists might contribute to improvements in the important end-of-life outcome of safe and comfortable dying.

Delirium in advanced cancer patients

Delirium in advanced cancer is often poorly identified and inappropriately managed. It is one of the most common causes for admission to clinical institutions and is the most frequently cited psychiatric disorder in terminal cancer. Diagnosis of delirium is defined as a disturbance of consciousness and attention with a change in cognition and/or perception. In addition, it develops suddenly and follows a fluctuating course and it is related to other causes, such as cancer, metabolic disorders or the effects of drugs. Delirium occurs in 26% to 44% of cancer patients admitted to hospital or hospice. Of all advanced cancer patients, over 80% eventually experience delirium in their final days. In advanced cancer, delirium is a multifactorial syndrome where opioids factor in almost 60% of episodes. Delirium in such patients, excluding terminal delirium, may be reversible in 50% of cases. Providing adequate end-of-life care for a patient with delirium is the main challenge. The family needs advice and it is important to create a relaxing environment for the patient. The primary therapeutic approach is to identify the reversible causes of delirium. Some therapeutic strategies have been shown to be effective: reduction or withdrawal of the psychoactive medication, opioid rotation, and hydration. Haloperidol is the most frequently used drug, and new neuroleptics such as risperidone or olanzapine are being tested with good results. Methylphenidate has been used for hypoactive delirium.

Potential new methods for antiepileptic drug delivery

Use of novel drug delivery methods could enhance the efficacy and reduce the toxicity of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Slow-release oral forms of medication or depot drugs such as skin patches might improve compliance and therefore seizure control. In emergency situations, administration via rectal, nasal or buccal mucosa can deliver the drug more quickly than can oral administration. Slow-release oral forms and rectal forms of AEDs are already approved for use, nasal and buccal administration is currently off-label and skin patches for AEDs are an attractive but currently hypothetical option. Therapies under development may result in the delivery of AEDs directly to the regions of the brain involved in seizures. Experimental protocols are underway to allow continuous infusion of potent excitatory amino acid antagonists into the CSF. In experiments with animal models of epilepsy, AEDs have been delivered successfully to seizure foci in the brain by programmed infusion pumps, acting in response to computerised EEG seizure detection. Inactive prodrugs can be given systemically and activated at the site of the seizure focus by locally released compounds. One such drug under development is DP-VPA (or DP16), which is cleaved to valproic acid (sodium valproate) by phospholipases at the seizure focus. Liposomes and nanoparticles are engineered micro-reservoirs of a drug, with attached antibodies or receptor-specific binding agents designed to target the particles to a specific region of the body. Liposomes in theory could deliver a high concentration of an AED to a seizure focus. Penetration of the blood-brain barrier can be accomplished by linking large particles to iron transferrin or biological toxins that can cross the barrier. In the near future, it is likely that cell transplants that generate neurotransmitters and neuromodulators will accomplish renewable endogenous drug delivery. However, the survival and viability of transplanted cells have yet to be demonstrated in the clinical setting. Gene therapy also may play a role in local drug delivery with the use of adenovirus, adeno-associated virus, herpesvirus or other delivery vectors to induce brain cells to produce local modulatory substances. New delivery systems should significantly improve the therapeutic/toxic ratio of AEDs.

When midazolam fails

Significant distress is experienced by patients, families, and caregivers when a symptom or disorder, such as an agitated delirium, becomes an intractable, or a catastrophic event, such as irreversible stridor. When palliative sedation is indicated for these patients, midazolam is usually the preferred drug. In some cases, however, midazolam fails to provide adequate sedation. Two cases are presented to illustrate this phenomenon and explore the possible mechanisms underlying this lack of response. These mechanisms appear to be multifaceted. The heterogeneity of the GABA(A) receptor complex and the alterations that this complex can undergo functionally can explain, to some degree, the diversity of the physiological and pharmacological outcomes. Other factors responsible for the diversity in response may include concomitant medications, age, concurrent disease, overall health status, alcohol use, liver disease, renal disease, smoking and hormonal status. Evidence-based guidelines on alternative treatment options should midazolam fail are required. In the interim, a lower threshold for adding an alternative drug, such as phenobarbital, or substituting midazolam with another drug, such as propofol, should be considered in these circumstances.

Pharmacokinetics of Phenobarbital During Certain Enhanced Elimination Modalities to Evaluate Their Clinical Efficacy in Management of Drug Overdose

This work was performed to study the pharmacokinetics of phenobarbital during renal clearance enhancement, intestinal clearance enhancement, and a combination of both to determine which method is clinically more effective in the management of drug poisoning. Thirty young patients with phenobarbital overdose were enrolled in the study. They were classified according to the method of treatment to enhance the elimination of phenobarbital into three equal groups: those treated with multiple-dose activated charcoal (MDAC) alone; those treated with urinary alkalinization alone; and those treated with a combination of the two methods. All patients received the required supportive care at the same time as the elimination procedures. Plasma phenobarbital levels were determined on admission and at 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, and 48 hours after admission by the enzyme multiplied immunoassay technique. The results showed that the decrease in plasma phenobarbital levels with MDAC was significantly greater than with either urinary alkalinization or the combined use of both. The results also revealed statistically significant greater total body clearance for phenobarbital and consequently a shorter half-life with MDAC treatment versus either urinary alkalinization alone or the combined use of both. Thus, the authors conclude that the management of drug overdose in the case of weak acidic drugs that have small volumes of distribution should include the sole use of MDAC and supportive care, without urinary alkalinization.

Effects of high dose opioids and sedatives on survival in terminally ill cancer patients

Concerns that high dose opioids and sedatives might shorten patient survival could contribute to insufficient symptom alleviation for terminally ill cancer patients. To examine the effects of opioids and sedatives prescribed in the final 48 hours on patient survival, a re-analysis of the prospectively collected data was performed on 209 hospice inpatients. Patient characteristics and clinical symptoms were prospectively recorded, and information about the use of opioids and sedatives in the last two days was collected by a chart review. Opioids were prescribed in 82% of the patients, with a median dose of 80 mg oral morphine equivalent (OME)/48 hours. Sixty percent received some sedative medications, mainly haloperidol (43% of total sample, 7.5 mg/48 hours), midazolam (23%, 23mg/48 hours), and hydroxyzine (15%, 50 mg/48 hours). There were no significant differences in survival between the patients who received different doses of opioids (<240, 240--599, and > or =600 mg OME/48 hours) and of benzodiazepines (0, 1--59, and > or =60 mg parental midazolam equivalent/48 hours). Also, the survival of patients with haloperidol, hydroxyzine, and other sedative medications did not differ from those without. Furthermore, an addition of use of opioids and sedatives in the final 48 hours into the multiple regression model for survival prediction achieved no significant increase in predictability. In conclusion, opioids and sedatives used for symptom control in the last days are not associated with patient survival. They are safe and useful medications to palliate severe distress in the terminal stage of cancer when administered with a low initial dosage and adequate titration.

Management of Seizures in Brain Tumor Patients at the End of Life

Few data exist on the management of seizures in brain tumor patients near the end of life. This article provides information on the epidemiology and phenomenology of seizures, as well as on differential diagnostic considerations. Based largely on empirical data from the pediatric epilepsy literature, guidelines for management of seizures near the end of life are given, with emphasis on the use of rectal antiepileptic drugs.