Correlates of objective patient compliance with removable appliance wear

Evaluation of the Prevalence of White Spot Lesions During Fixed Orthodontic Treatment Among Patients Reporting for Correction of Malocclusion: A Prevalence Study

BACKGROUND

Despite recent breakthroughs in caries preventive measures, one of the biggest issues clinicians confront is preventing demineralization while undergoing orthodontic therapy. The buildup of plaques around orthodontic brackets over time causes white spot lesions (WSLs). The goal of the present research was to assess the prevalence of WSLs in patients undergoing orthodontic treatment before starting therapy and at six and 12 months into therapy, adopting the visual examination approach.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We looked for WSLs on tooth surfaces gingival to an archwire because this is the area most likely to experience enamel demineralization during orthodontic treatment. The visual assessment was conducted using the following scale at baseline, six months, and 12 months for orthodontic patients: score 0: no demineralization or noticeable white patches on the surface; score 1: mild demineralization with a visible white spot but no surface disruption; score 2: moderate demineralization with a noticeable WSL that has a roughened surface but does not need repair; and score 3: severe demineralization with a noticeable WSL that needs repair. Fisher's exact test was used after a chi-square analysis to determine whether there were any differences between all three categories (six months, 12 months, and control).

RESULTS

The frequency of WSL in patients at 12 months of orthodontic treatment was 46.57%, while it was 11.86% in patients who just started orthodontic treatment. The difference was statistically significant (p = 0.01), showing that the frequency was greater in patients at 12 months of orthodontic treatment as compared to patients who had just started undergoing orthodontic treatment. The frequency of WSL in patients at six months of orthodontic treatment was 37.34%, while it was 11.86% in patients who just started orthodontic treatment. The difference was statistically significant (p = 0.03), showing that the frequency was greater in patients at six months of orthodontic treatment as compared to patients who had just started undergoing orthodontic treatment. The frequency of WSL in patients at six months of orthodontic treatment was 37.34%, while it was 46.57% in patients at 12 months of orthodontic treatment. The frequency was greater in patients at 12 months of orthodontic treatment as compared to patients at six months of orthodontic treatment; however, the difference was non-significant statistically (p = 0.76).

CONCLUSION

This clinical investigation revealed that the number of WSLs increased significantly during the first six months of treatment and then increased gradually until the final 12 months. During the first few months of treatment, doctors should assess the patients' dental hygiene habits and, if necessary, take further precautions to prevent demineralization.

Patient compliance with Twin Block appliance during treatment of Class II malocclusion: a randomized controlled trial on two check-up prescriptions

BACKGROUND

Compliance is crucial for the treatment outcome with removable appliances. Previous studies on treatment with the Twin Block appliance have focused on effectiveness in relation to other treatment methods or wear-time. Studies on different check-up intervals to improve compliance seem to be lacking.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the impact of two different check-up prescriptions on patient compliance and treatment outcome during treatment with Twin Block.

TRIAL DESIGN

Two-arm parallel group, single-centre, randomized controlled trial.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seventy-three patients, 38 boys, and 35 girls, mean age 11.2 years, were included and block-randomized into two groups treated with a Twin Block appliance. Group 1 was called for check-up visit every sixth week and group 2 every fourth week. Compliance was evaluated with a TheraMon® microsensor, moulded into the appliance, measuring wear-time. Overjet, overbite, and molar relationships were assessed on study casts before and after treatment. The treatment outcomes were analysed on an intention-to-treat basis.

RESULTS

In group 1, the reduction of overjet was 5.2 mm and the mean wear-time was 6.9 hours. In group 2, the reduction was 4.7 mm and the wear-time was 6.1 hours. Seventy-four per cent of the patients presented an overjet of 4 mm or less. Wear-time did not correlate to age, gender, or severity of malocclusion.

HARMS

No harm was observed in any patient. Lateral open bites were registered during treatment but were normalized at the end of the treatment.

LIMITATIONS

The trial was a single-centre study and long-term effects were not evaluated.

CONCLUSIONS

During treatment with the Twin Block appliance, a 4-week check-up interval did not improve treatment outcome or increase wear-time, compared to a 6-week check-up interval. The mean wear-time was 6.5 hours per day, even if the recommendation was 12 hours.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT05155774.

Orthodontic Compliance Assessment: A Systematic Review

Objectives

The aim of this review was to determine whether the type of removable appliance, as well as the age and sex of the patient, may affect the extension or reduction of wear time by assessing the correlation between the mean actual and orthodontist-recommended wear times.

Methods

Randomised case control trials, cohort studies, case series, observational studies, reviews, and retrospective analyses were identified. The quality of the studies was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration Tool and modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The electronic databases Embase, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were reviewed, and 542 articles were obtained, of which 31 were qualified for qualitative synthesis. The data from 1674 participants were collected and a weighted average was determined for the mean wear time of each appliance.

Results

Regardless of the type of extra- or intraoral appliances, mean wear time was shorter than recommended, although patients using intraoral appliances cooperated more. The best compliance was noted for Schwarz appliances (73.70%) and plate retainers (85%). There was no evidence of an influence of patients’ age and sex on compliance during treatment.

Conclusions

The considerable inconsistency and imprecision of articles could affect the reliability of the results. Previous studies analysing the effectiveness of treatment with removable appliances based on an arbitrarily assumed average wear time need to be revised in order to verify the actual wear time with the use of microsensors.

Factors Influencing Appliance Wearing Time during Orthodontic Treatments: A Literature Review

This review aims to analyze the multiple factors affecting patients’ level of compliance (how much they wear removable devices/clear aligners) during orthodontic treatments and to investigate the available methods and devices to monitor the appliance wearing time and to improve it. A literature search was conducted on electronic databases (Pubmed, Scopus, and Google Scholar). The results of the present study suggest that compliance indicators may misestimate the intraoral wearing time. Compliance is affected by patient-related factors (age, personality traits, the importance of personal appearance, self-perception of malocclusion), appliance-related factors (visibility, pain/discomfort), and clinician-related factors (trust, clear and complete communication, motivation). The motivation of pre-pubertal patients is mostly external, while adolescents/young adults have intrinsic motivation for orthodontic treatment. Patients’ self-reports tend to overestimate the appliance wearing time. Even if there is a lack of evidence, teledentistry might improve patients’ awareness of being monitored, thus increasing the time for which orthodontic devices are worn. Compliance is a key factor for clear aligner treatments, but high-quality studies focusing on this aspect are missing. Further studies should focus on how to handle the lack of cooperation and how to increase compliance in order to maximize the treatment’s results.

Effectiveness of an Essential Oil Mouthwash in Maintaining Proper Oral Health in Orthodontic Patients—an In Vivo Study

Introduction:

Patients undergoing orthodontic therapy face greater difficulties in maintaining good oral hygiene. To improve mechanical plaque removal, a common strategy is to incorporate a chemotherapeutic agent. Thus, the effects of adding essential oil mouthwash to a standard oral hygiene regimen to maintain oral health were evaluated.

Material and Method:

Two groups were created with 25 patients each. Gingival index and orthodontic plaque index were calculated as initial reading. Gingival index and orthodontic plaque index were calculated again after 6 months.

Result:

In the control group, the mean score of gingival index and orthodontic plaque index were significantly increased from baseline reading (T1) to after 6 months reading (T2). In the experimental group, increase in the mean score of gingival index and orthodontic plaque index was not statistically significant.

Conclusion:

When an essential oil mouthwash is added to the daily oral hygiene regimen (conventional manual toothbrushing + brushing with monotufted brush), it maintained the gingival health and amount of plaque accumulation in orthodontic patients over a period of 6 months.

The Use of Microsensors to Assess the Daily Wear Time of Removable Orthodontic Appliances: A Prospective Cohort Study

Orthodontic treatment with removable appliances is still common in children and adolescents. However, their effectiveness depends primarily on the patients’ compliance. Currently, it is possible to check the daily wear time (DWT) of the removable appliances using special microsensors. The aim of this prospective cohort study was to assess the degree of patients’ compliance depending on the type of removable appliance used. In total, 167 patients (87 F, 80 M) were enrolled in the study and were treated with block appliances (Klammt, Twin-Block), Schwarz plates, and block appliances in combination with headgear. All patients were followed up for 6 months with the mean daily wear time checked at followup visits using TheraMon^® microsensors fitted in the appliances. It has been shown that the type of appliance influences the patients’ compliance. The DWT for the Twin Block was significantly longer compared to the DWT for the other appliances. Girls have been shown to wear removable appliances better than boys. It has been proven that the majority of patients do not follow the orthodontist’s recommendations, wearing removable appliances for just over half of the recommended time. Microsensors can be used for objective verification of patients’ compliance, which allows for a reliable assessment of the effectiveness of treatment with removable appliances.

The Attitude, Perception, and Mental Health of Patients Receiving Orthodontic Treatment During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Saudi Arabia

PURPOSE

The COVID-19 pandemic has forced dental clinics to shut down indefinitely, leaving thousands of orthodontic patients in unending fear and dismay. The study aimed to assess the attitude, perceptions and mental health status of patients undergoing orthodontic treatment in Saudi Arabia during the lockdown.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted among orthodontic patients of different clinics across Saudi Arabia and selected using two-stage clustered sampling. A validated Arabic questionnaire comprising four sections including demographic data, patients' interactions, attitude and perception, and Kessler Psychological Distress Scale was sent via digital means. Descriptive and inferential statistics were applied with the level of significance set to p<0.05.

RESULTS

A total of 512 orthodontic patients voluntarily participated in the study. Eighty-four percent of the patients contacted their orthodontist once or twice during this period, 22% percent did not receive any communication from their orthodontist, 18% were very worried about not being able to continue their treatment, 72% were concerned about the treatment duration increasing post lockdown, 18% suffered cuts or lacerations due to their appliance, and 32% had poking wires. Seventy-six percent of patients were willing to visit a clinic post lockdown only with proper preventive measures in place. A mild level of mental distress (22.76 ± 8.69) was reported using the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale. Female orthodontic patients >25 years of age with >1 year of ongoing treatment were associated with higher levels of mental distress.

CONCLUSION

The current pandemic has impacted the mental health status of orthodontic patients in some form or another. Older females with longer treatment times were more affected by the lockdown. The lack of effective communication from the orthodontist led to some negative perceptions about their treatment.

Comparison of objective wear time between monoblock and twin-block appliances measured by microsensor

OBJECTIVES

To assess the objective compliance levels in skeletal Class II patients with mandibular retrognathia wearing monoblock and twin-block appliances.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A prospective clinical study was conducted with 30 patients between 10 and 15 years old who were equally divided into two study groups. Group 1 was treated with monoblock, and group 2 was treated with twin-block appliances. The patients were instructed to wear their appliance for 15 hours per day. Wear times were monitored by a microsensor. (TheraMon; MCTechnology, Hargelsberg, Austria) for an average of six appointments. Patients were also instructed to record their wear times on a chart, and this record was admitted as subjective wear time. Statistical analysis was performed with the data derived from both the patients' charts and the monitoring records.

RESULTS

The mean wear time by the patients was 10.67 ± 3.93 hours, which was less than the 15 hours prescribed by the orthodontist, with no difference between the two appliances (P > .05). The regular use rate, which included the days with a wear time of 8 hours or more per day, was 75%. Compliance levels decreased by 35% throughout the six control appointments. Patients declared that their wear time was more than their objective wear time by an average of 3.76 hours.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite their different designs, there was no significant difference between the monoblock and twin-block appliances in terms of compliance.

Predictors of patient compliance during Class II division 1 malocclusion functional orthodontic treatment

OBJECTIVES

To determine factors that could predict Class II/1 malocclusion patient compliance during functional treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The sample consisted of 77 subjects (aged 11-13 years; 47% girls) presenting with Class II/1 malocclusion. Inclusion criteria were distal molar relationship, overjet greater than 5 mm, and confirmed pubertal growth spurt. Removable functional appliances (62% Twin Block [TB], 38% Sander Bite Jumping [BJ]) with built-in maxillary expansion screws were used. Follow-up period was 1 year. Patients and parents independently filled out the Child Perception Questionnaire, Parental/Caregiver Perception Questionnaire, and Family Impact Scale to assess emotional and social well-being, oral symptoms, functional limitations, parental emotions, family activities, conflicts, and financial burden as possible predictors of compliance during treatment. Sex, overjet, and appliance type were also analyzed.

RESULTS

There were more noncompliant than compliant patients (55% vs 45%). Parental perception of altered emotional well-being of their children was the strongest predictor, increasing compliance odds 3.4 times (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2-9.4; P = .017). Patients were 3.2 times (95% CI, 1.1-9.3; P = .033) more likely to cooperate with TB compared with BJ appliance. OJ ≥ 8 mm increased compliance odds 3.1 times (95% CI, 1.0-9.4; P = .044).

CONCLUSIONS

Parental perception of child's emotional well-being alteration, severity of malocclusion, and type of appliance are major predictors of compliance. Psychosocial issues and oral function limitations reported by children and family impact are of negligible influence.

Impact of COVID-19 Lockdown on Patients Undergoing Orthodontic Treatment: A Questionnaire Study

With COVID-19 declared as a worldwide pandemic, a nationwide lockdown was implemented overnight in India on March 24, 2020. With no prior warning or anticipation, patient appointments were temporarily ceased as institutions and clinics were indefinitely closed. To our knowledge, no study addresses the orthodontic patient perspective in such testing times, where they are entirely restricted to the confines of their homes.

AIM

To assess the impact of the COVID-19-related lockdown on the treatment and psychology of patients undergoing orthodontic treatment.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A self-designed online exploratory questionnaire of 15 questions was distributed to 500 potential responders selected from obtained lists through messages and emails. It was mandatory to answer all questions and the survey was anonymized and did not contain any identifying information. Online consent was taken before participation in the study. The obtained data were evaluated using descriptive and inferential statistics.

RESULTS

The response rate was 81.6%. The study revealed that the majority of patients were affected by the lack of access to orthodontic visits. The reasons for the same were attributed to fear of increased treatment duration, inconveniences caused by poking wires, broken brackets, etc., and lack of communication between the orthodontists and patients, among the various other reasons. The importance of orthodontic appointments was also understood by patients.

CONCLUSION

The study threw light on the essential need for understanding the psychology of patients undergoing orthodontic treatment. In any situation where patients do not have access to seek help, all the factors discussed in the study should be considered and it is of utmost importance that orthodontic professionals see to it that their patients are being looked after mentally, if not physically, in whatever way possible.

Removable appliances to correct anterior crossbites in the mixed dentition: a systematic review

Objectives: To investigate the effectiveness of an upper removable appliance in the treatment of an anterior crossbite in term of quality of life, effectiveness, treatment time, long term stability and cost minimization.Design: Systematic reviewData source: A search strategy was implemented using both manual hand search and electronic databases, including Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), PubMed, ScienceDirect, Scopus and Ebsco.Study eligibility criteria: Randomized controlled clinical trialsParticipants: Children in the early or late mixed dentition with an anterior crossbite affecting one or more incisors, and no underlying skeletal class III pattern.Interventions: Upper removable appliance compared with other orthodontic appliances.Study appraisal and synthesis: All potential articles were checked against the inclusion criteria independently, and in duplicate by two investigators. Risk of bias of eligible studies to be included in the final analysis was assessed independently by two authors using Cochrane risk of bias tool.Results: A total of 524 articles were identified in both manual and electronic searches as well as by checking the reference lists of the final articles to be included in the study. Only 7 reports of 3 RCTs met the inclusion criteria and thus were included in the final analysis. All but one of the 3 RCTs were judged to be of very low quality. No statistical methods were employed to combine the studies due to the heterogeneity of the studies.Conclusion: A fixed appliance was more cost-effective than a removable appliance in the correction of an anterior crossbite with a functional shift. There was no significant difference in terms of quality of life, pain intensity or long-term stability between the two appliances. On the other hand, both a removable appliance and cemented bite-pads were equally effective in the correction of an anterior dental crossbite without having any side effect.

Development of 'My Retainers' mobile application: Triangulation of two qualitative methods

OBJECTIVE

Diligent wear of removable orthodontic retainers requires prolonged adherence and is invariably necessary to preserve optimal results. Patient-informed behaviour-change interventions represent a promising and novel means of enhancing adherence to removable retainer wear. The aim of this study was to describe the development of a patient-informed mobile application designed to enhance retainer wear.

METHODS

App development encompassed consideration of participant preferences, social media posts, available interventions and behaviour change theories. Qualitative methods including analysis of publicly-available retainer-related posts on Twitter (n = 827) and one-to-one interviews were undertaken. Audio-recorded one-to-one interviews were undertaken to identify patient preferences in relation to features, content and design of the application. A criterion-based purposive sample of participants wearing vacuum-formed retainers for at least 4 years was used (n = 15). Thematic analysis of transcribed data was undertaken. These data were triangulated to inform design and content of the application.

RESULTS

The need to facilitate communication with the treating clinician, responsive reminder and tracking systems, and access to useful and engaging written and visual information, in addition to other personalised and interactive features were considered important. Concerns related to retainer wear shared on Twitter informed an exhaustive list of frequently-asked questions. Application features were mapped to relevant theoretical constructs. Determinants of existing behavioural change theories were also used to link application features to retainer wear and maintenance.

CONCLUSIONS

A holistic process involving both patient and professional input can be useful in informing the development of mobile applications. The orthodontic application ("My Retainers") will undergo further scrutiny in relation to its effectiveness in inducing behavioural change and concerning patient experiences prior to finalisation.

Evaluation of the effectiveness of a tailored mobile application in increasing the duration of wear of thermoplastic retainers: a randomized controlled trial

Background

The ‘My Retainers’ mobile application is a patient-informed intervention designed to enhance removable retainer wear and associated patient experiences during the retention phase.

Objectives

To evaluate the effect of receiving the ‘My Retainers’ application on objectively assessed thermoplastic retainer (TPR) wear time, stability, periodontal outcomes, patient experiences, and knowledge related to retainers.

Materials and methods

Eighty-four participants planned for removable retention with TPRs were assigned either to receive the ‘My Retainers’ application or to control not receiving electronic reminders during the 3-month period. Randomization was based on computer-generated random numbers and allocation was concealed using opaque, sealed envelopes. The primary outcome was objectively assessed retainer wear recorded using an embedded TheraMon® micro-electronic sensor. Secondary outcomes, including irregularity of the maxillary and mandibular incisors, plaque levels, bleeding on probing and probing depth, were assessed at baseline and 3-month follow-up; and analysed using a series of mixed models. Experiences and knowledge related to orthodontic retainers were recorded using questionnaires. The outcome assessor was blinded when possible.

Results

Receipt of the mobile application resulted in slightly higher median wear time (0.91 hours/day); however, this difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.56; 95% confidence interval [CI]: −2.19, 4.01). No significant differences were found between the treatment groups in terms of stability (P = 0.92; 95% CI: −0.03, 0.04), plaque levels (P = 0.44; 95% CI: −0.07, 0.03), bleeding on probing (P = 0.61; 95% CI: −0.05, 0.03) and probing depth (P = 0.79; 95% CI: −0.09, 0.07). Furthermore, similar levels of patient experiences (P = 0.94) and knowledge related to retainers (P = 0.26) were found. However, marginally better levels of knowledge were identified in the intervention group. No harms were observed.

Limitations

A relatively short follow-up period with the study confined to a single-center in a university-based hospital.

Conclusions

Provision of the bespoke ‘My Retainers’ application did not lead to an improvement in adherence with TPR wear over a 3-month follow-up period. Further refinement and research are required to develop and investigate means of enhancing adherence levels.

Clinical registration

NCT03224481.

Patient compliance and orthodontic treatment efficacy of Planas functional appliances with TheraMon microsensors

OBJECTIVES

To assess patient compliance and treatment efficacy of preventive expansion treatment with removable Planas functional appliances using an integrated microsensor.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Wear time (WT) and behavior of 69 patients undergoing treatment with Planas functional appliances were assessed and analysed using TheraMon microsensors (Gschladt, Hargelsberg, Austria). Patients were followed up for a period of 9 months, and visits were made every 3 months to download WT data from the microsensor and to assess wearing behavior. From individual WT graphs,10 parameters were derived to characterize compliance for each patient. Treatment efficacy was measured by eight parameters determining the level of expansion after 9 months of treatment.

RESULTS

Patients wore their device on average 15.8 ± 5.2 h/d. WT was unrelated to age and gender, but it was positively influenced by patient habits when keeping appliances during eating, sports, care and handling. Treatment efficacy in terms of intercanine and intermolar expansion was 4.4 ± 1.9 mm and 4.6 ± 2.0 mm for the maxilla, and 5.3 ± 2.0 mm and 4.7 ± 2.3 mm for the mandible, respectively. Efficacy was negatively affected by poor compliance (WT < 9 h/d) and by high variability of within-subject WT recordings.

CONCLUSIONS

Perfect compliance is not necessary to achieve treatment success, but patients should exhibit sufficient wear time to allow maxillary expansion to occur. The TheraMon microsensor offers a new perspective and aid to individualize treatment prescriptions.

How patient-selected colors for removable appliances are reflected in electronically tracked compliance (wear times and wear behavior)

OBJECTIVES

A broad spectrum of colors for removable appliances, intended to optimize acceptance of treatment and patient cooperation, have been available on the dental market for years. This is the first study to analyze how patient-selected colors are reflected in wear times and wear behavior of removable appliances.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study included 117 children (55 girls and 62 boys) who were treated with active removable plate or functional appliances. All patients were offered to choose from 11 different colors, which were pooled into six groups (black, blue, green, yellow, pink, red) for analysis, or to combine any two to four colors ("multicolored" group) for their appliances. All appliances featured a built-in microsensor (TheraMon; MC Technology, Hargelsberg, Austria) for objective wear-time tracking. Differences between wear times were analyzed using pairwise t tests and Tukey correction.

RESULTS

The longest median wear times were recorded in the blue and green groups (≈11 h/d) and the shortest ones in the red and pink groups (≈9 h/d), but they were not significantly influenced by the patient-selected colors. The median wear times involved an age-related decrease by 0.56 h/y that was statistically significant ( P = .00005). No gender-specific patterns of wear behavior were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient-selected colors for removable appliances can presumably improve acceptance of treatment, but they are not associated with statistically significant improvements in wear time or wear behavior.

Compliance with removable orthodontic appliances

Data sourcesMedline via OVID, PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science Core Collection, LILACS and BBO databases. Unpublished clinical trials accessed using ClinicalTrials.gov, National Research Register, ProQuest Dissertation and Thesis database.Study selectionTwo authors searched studies from inception until May 2016 without language restrictions. Quantitative and qualitative studies incorporating objective data on compliance with removable appliances, barriers to appliance wear compliance, and interventions to improve compliance were included.Data extraction and synthesisQuality of research was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration's risk of bias tool, the risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (ROBINS-I), and the mixed methods appraisal tool. Statistical heterogeneity was investigated by examining a graphic display of the estimated compliance levels in conjunction with 95% confidence intervals and quantified using the I-squared statistic. A weighted estimate of objective compliance levels for different appliances in relation to stipulated wear and self-reported levels was also calculated. Risk of publication bias was assessed using funnel plots. Meta-regression was undertaken to assess the relative effects of appliance type on compliance levels.ResultsTwenty-four studies met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 11 were included in the quantitative synthesis. The mean duration of objectively measured wear was considerably lower than stipulated wear time amongst all appliances. Headgear had the greatest discrepancy (5.81 hours, 95% confidence interval, 4.98, 6.64). Self-reported wear time was consistently higher than objectively measured wear time amongst all appliances. Headgear had the greatest discrepancy (5.02 hours, 95% confidence interval, 3.64, 6.40). Two studies found an increase in compliance with headgear and Hawley retainers when patients were aware of monitoring. Five studies found younger age groups to be more compliant than older groups. Three studies also found compliance to be better in the early stages of treatment. Integration between quantitative and qualitative studies was not possible.ConclusionsCompliance with removable orthodontic appliances is suboptimal. Patients wear appliances for considerably less time than stipulated and self-reported. Compliance may be increased when patients are aware of monitoring; however, further research is required to identify effective interventions and possible barriers in order to improve removable orthodontic appliance compliance.

Discomfort, expectations, and experiences during treatment of large overjet with Andresen Activator or Prefabricated Functional Appliance: a questionnaire survey

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to investigate the amount of functional and social discomfort experienced after 1 and 6 months of appliance wear, comparing a slightly modified Andresen Activator (AA) and a Prefabricated Functional Appliance (PFA).

METHODS

Ninety-seven patients randomly selected by lottery in an AA (40 subjects), and a PFA (57 subjects) group, with an Angle Class II, Division 1 malocclusion, were eligible for the study. One month and 6 months after start of treatment, a questionnaire, addressing discomfort, perception of treatment need and outcome, was used.

RESULTS

The response rate was 69% after 1 month, and 45% after 6 months. The most common discomfort reported was the 'appliance falling out during sleep' followed by 'difficulties in remembering it'. The only difference was for pain, which was experienced more extensively in the AA group after 1 month of treatment. The dentist appeared to have the greatest impact on the decision to initiate treatment. Teasing, because of appearance, occurred in 13% of the cases.

CONCLUSIONS

No difference could be seen between groups for the experience of functional or social discomfort after 6 months of appliance use. Adequate time should be allowed for clarifying treatment difficulties, using treatment need as motivation.

PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS

The PFA eliminates the need for taking impressions. Furthermore, it can be economically advantageous to both patients and clinicians.

How is adult patient adherence recorded in orthodontists' clinical notes? A mixed-method case-note study

BACKGROUND

Patient adherence in orthodontic treatment is extremely important as it is linked with better treatment outcomes. Despite its importance, however, there is no shared definition of the concept. This makes the recording of adherence-related behaviors in patient notes difficult. The current study explored how, and to what extent adherence is recorded in adult patients' medical records by orthodontists working in a large National Health Service (NHS) London hospital.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A mixed-methods approach was used. A total of 17 clinicians with a mean age of 31 years (SD =4.87) provided N=20 case notes spanning N=324 appointments with patients they judged to be non-adherent. The notes were inspected for evidence of recording of patient adherence using adherence indicators identified in the literature.

RESULTS

The term "adherence" did not feature in any notes. The quantitative analysis showed that the three most frequent adherence-related behaviors recorded in notes were "oral hygiene," "appointment attendance" and "breakages of appliances." Qualitative analysis not only confirmed these factors but also showed that 1) the clinical aspects of treatment, 2) clinician-patient interaction factors and 3) patient attitudes also featured. This part of the analysis also highlighted inconsistencies across case notes in terms of the amount of information being recorded.

CONCLUSION

Adherence as a term does not feature in the clinical case notes of clinician-identified non-adherent adult patients, while predictors of adherence are recorded with varying degrees of consistency.

Performance of clear vacuum-formed thermoplastic retainers depending on retention protocol: a systematic review

We aimed at comparing the performance of vacuum-formed thermoplastic retainers (VFR) worn either full-time or part-time, in maintaining orthodontic treatment results in terms of tooth alignment, arch form and occlusion. We reviewed randomized and prospective controlled clinical trials comparing VFR wearing protocols and searched databases, without restrictions, for published and unpublished literature. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and the overall level of certainty in the evidence following ADA methodology. 184 studies were initially identified and reduced to the 3 randomized controlled trials included in the systematic review by means of specific criteria. One study followed patients 1 year into retention, and the other two for 6 months. Little's Irregularity Index, intermolar and intercanine width, arch length, overjet and PAR score did not differ significantly between the patients wearing their retainers part time or full time. We observed a slight increase in the overbite in the part-time group in only one trial. With a moderate level of certainty, we found that during the observation period, full-time VFR wear is not superior to part-time, bearing in mind the potential implications for health burden, retainer longevity and cost-effectiveness, as well as patient satisfaction and compliance.

Orthodontic palatal implants: clinical technique

The aim of this paper is to familiarize the readers with some of the clinical considerations necessary to ensure successful use of mid-palatal implants. Both surgical and technical aspects will be discussed along with a description of impression techniques used.

Oral health-related quality of life in children with cleft lip and palate

Considering the essential need for oral health-related quality-of-life measures for patients with craniofacial malformations, the current study aimed to investigate the oral health-related quality of life of Iranian patients with cleft lip and palate. Fifty children referred to Cleft lip/Palate Research Center of Mashhad Dental School (Iran) were recruited. Participants were asked to complete the Child Oral Health Impact Profile questionnaire. The questionnaire comprised 38 items and was divided over 5 subscales. The scores on all subscales were compared with regard to patients' age, sex, and type of cleft. A significant difference between boys and girls was found on the subscale "emotional well-being" (P = 0.027). There was no significant difference between 8- to 12-year-old patients and those older than 12 years. Also, no significant difference was found between bilateral and unilateral cleft lip and palate patients regarding mean score of Child Oral Health Impact Profile questionnaire and its subscales. Oral health-related quality of life of cleft lip and palate patients did not change with patients' age. Also, the impact of unilateral and bilateral clefts on OHRQoL was similar. Quality of life of girls was more affected by oral health.

Effectiveness of en-masse retraction using midpalatal miniscrews and a modified transpalatal arch: Treatment duration and dentoskeletal changes

Objective

The purpose of this study was to compare the treatment duration and dentoskeletal changes between two different anchorage systems used to treat maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion and to examine the effectiveness of en-masse retraction using two miniscrews placed in the midpalatal suture.

Methods

Fifty-seven patients (9 men, 48 women), who had undergone level anchorage system treatment at Aichi-Gakuin University Dental Hospital (Nagoya, Japan) were divided into two groups according to the method of maxillary posterior anchorage reinforcement: midpalatal miniscrews (25 patients, mean age 22 years) and conventional anchorage (32 patients, mean age 19 years). The en-masse retraction period, overall treatment duration, pre-treatment effective ANB angle, and change in the effective ANB angle were compared with an independent-samples t-test.

Results

Compared to the headgear group, the duration of en-masse retraction was longer by approximately 4 months in the miniscrew group (p < 0.001). However, we found no significant difference in the total treatment duration between the groups. Moreover, a greater change in the effective ANB angle was observed in patients treated with miniscrews than in those treated with the conventional method (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

The level anchorage system treatment using miniscrews placed in the midpalatal area will allow orthodontists more time to control the anterior teeth during en-masse retraction, without increasing the total treatment duration. Furthermore, it achieves better dentoskeletal control than does the conventional anchorage method, thereby improving the quality of the treatment results.

Habit breaking appliance for multiple corrections

Tongue thrusting and thumb sucking are the most commonly seen oral habits which act as the major etiological factors in the development of dental malocclusion. This case report describes a fixed habit correcting appliance, Hybrid Habit Correcting Appliance (HHCA), designed to eliminate these habits. This hybrid appliance is effective in less compliant patients and if desired can be used along with the fixed orthodontic appliance. Its components can act as mechanical restrainers and muscle retraining devices. It is also effective in cases with mild posterior crossbites.

Objective assessment of patient compliance with removable orthodontic appliances: a cross-sectional cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To assess objectively patient compliance with removable orthodontic appliances and the effect of possible influential factors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Wearing times of 45 White patients were recorded with the aid of the TheraMon microsensor. Patient compliance was assessed relative to wear prescription and other parameters, such as age and sex.

RESULTS

There was high individual variation in most measured variables and in all groups/subgroups. During a median observation period of 186 days (range, 55-318 days) the actual wear time was 9.0 h/d (range, 0.0-16.0 h/d) and did not differ between distinct prescriptions (P = .49). Eight patients wore their appliances less than 2 h/d, and six of them did not wear their appliances at all. Overall, the median wear per day relative to prescription was 62.5% (range, 0.0-89.3%) for the 14 h/d and 112.5% (range, 0.0-200.0%) for the 8 h/d prescription wear (P = .01) groups. There was a strong negative correlation of age (median: 12.5 years) with the daily percentage of actual wear time per day relative to wear prescription (14 h/d prescription: n = 21, rho = -0.61, P = .00; 8 h/d prescription: n = 24, rho = -0.73, P = .00), while sex did not exert a significant influence on compliance (P = .58).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the fact that patients and parents were informed about wear time recording, compliance was insufficient with regard to functional treatment (14 h/d prescription), while it was sufficient for retention purposes (8 h/d prescription). Objective measures are necessary to assess compliance with removable orthodontic appliances since patient compliance is a highly variable issue.

A Scottish cost analysis of interceptive orthodontics for thumb sucking habits

OBJECTIVE

There is a potential cost saving to be made within the NHS by providing simple interceptive treatment rather than comprehensive treatment at a later date. The focus of this study is to determine the size of this potential cost by looking at the cost to NHS Tayside for the provision of interceptive treatment for cessation of thumb sucking and where this has been unsuccessful (or not provided) the costs of correction of the associated malocclusion.

DESIGN

A cost analysis is described, investigating the costs of treatment solely to the NHS, both in the primary and secondary setting.

METHODS

Three potential treatment pathways are identified with the costs calculated for each pathway. The actual cost of providing this treatment in NHS Tayside, and the potential cost saving in Tayside if there was a change in clinical practice are calculated. Both discounting of costs and a sensitivity analysis are performed.

RESULTS

The cost to NHS Tayside of current practice was calculated to be between £123,710 and £124,930 per annum. Change in practice to replace use of a removable with a fixed habit breaker for the interceptive treatment of thumb sucking reduced the calculated cost to between £99,581 and £105,017.

CONCLUSION

A saving could be made to the NHS, both locally and nationally, if the provision of a removable habit breaker was changed to a fixed habit breaker. In addition, increasing the proportion receiving active treatment, in the form of a fixed habit breaker, rather than monitoring, would appear to further reduce the cost to the NHS considerably.

Development of a measure for orthodontists to evaluate patient compliance

INTRODUCTION

Interruption of treatment and poor compliance are problems in orthodontics, especially when the patient does not pay for treatment. The aim of this study was to develop a measure for orthodontists, regardless of type of practice, to assess their opinions about patient compliance.

METHODS

A questionnaire, based on an orthodontic patient cooperation scale, was modified in 2 pilot phases. The piloted version was tested among 249 respondents. A principal component analysis was performed that included factors with an eigenvalue greater than 1. Reliability was assessed by means of internal consistency with Cronbach's alphas and by test-retest (n = 40) measures, using an intraclass correlation coefficient. To assess construct validity, the responses of private and public practitioners were analyzed with chi-square and t tests.

RESULTS

The response rate was 77%. The final questionnaire showed good reliability: Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.878, and the intraclass correlation coefficient after the test-retest was 0.868. The participation rate was good, there were few missing values, and the study was multifaceted; thus the questionnaire also showed good validity for face, content, and construct. The differences between private and public practitioners were statistically significant. Five factors describing the different aspects of compliance were shown.

CONCLUSIONS

Observed differences between public and private orthodontists and dentists performing orthodontics indicated clearly the need to develop a specific measure for countries with a publicly funded system of oral health care. The measure showed good reliability and validity for face, content, and construct among Finnish orthodontists and dentists performing orthodontics. The predictive validity of the measure to assess actual patient compliance remains to be tested.

Oral health-related quality of life in Dutch children with cleft lip and/or palate

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the oral health-related quality of life (OH-RQoL) of Dutch cleft lip and palate patients. It was hypothesized that (1) there is no difference between cleft patients' and their parents' reports of patients' OH-RQoL; (2) there are no gender differences; (3) there are no differences in OH-RQoL between cleft patients with regard to their symptoms; and (4) there is no difference between patients above and below 12 years of age.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The sample consisted of 122 patients with clefts (age range, 8-15 years) and their parents. Respondents were recruited from the cleft palate team of Amsterdam. They completed the Child Oral Health-Related Quality of Life questionnaire (COHIP). Items were divided into five different subscales, and scores on all subscales were compared between and within groups.

RESULTS

Patients' and parents' perceptions differed significantly on three of the five subscales. Girls and boys did not differ significantly with regard to their perception of reported OH-RQoL. The cleft lip and cleft lip and alveolus [CL(A)] subgroup scored significantly higher on the functional well-being subscale. The cleft patients aged 12 years and older scored significantly lower on the emotional well-being and oral symptoms subscales when compared with their younger peers.

CONCLUSIONS

Only the second hypothesis was not rejected in this study. This means that parents are not interchangeable with regard to reporting on their children's perceptions related to OH-RQoL, that OH-RQoL changes with age, and that it is important that subgroups are respected when investigating OH-RQoL in cleft patients.

Prevalence of white spot lesions during orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances

OBJECTIVE

To determine the prevalence of white spot lesions (WSLs) in orthodontic patients at 6 and 12 months into treatment using the visual examination method.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients 6 and 12 months into treatment were examined for the presence of WSLs. The control group consisted of patients who were examined for WSLs immediately after bonding. Upon clinical evaluation, teeth were given a visual score based on the extent of demineralization.

RESULTS

The percentages of individuals having at least one WSL were 38%, 46%, and 11% for the 6-month, 12-month, and control groups, respectively. The 6-month (P  =  .021) and 12-month groups (P  =  .005) were significantly different from the control group but were not significantly different from each other (P  =  .50). Of subjects in the study who had at least one visible WSL, 76% were males and 24% were females (P  =  .009).

CONCLUSIONS

This clinical study showed a sharp increase in the number of WSLs during the first 6 months of treatment that continued to rise at a slower rate to 12 months. Clinicians should evaluate the oral hygiene status of patients during the initial months of treatment and, if necessary, should implement extra measures to prevent demineralization.

Patients' perceptions, treatment need, and complexity of orthodontic re-treatment

The aim of the present study was to investigate the subjective perception and objective treatment need and complexity of patients seeking orthodontic re-treatment. One hundred subjects (66 females, 34 males, age 26.7+/-8.2 years) seeking re-treatment were asked to complete a questionnaire which was constructed based on pilot interviews with 15 patients. The questions focussed on treatment experiences, retention procedures following the first course of treatment, and expectations of and motivations for re-treatment. A visual analogue scale (VAS 0-10) was used. The 're-treatment' group was matched with an untreated control group by age, gender, and the first consultation date. The study models of both groups were scored with the Index of Complexity, Outcome, and Need (ICON). Analysis of variance was used for across-time comparisons of VAS scores of patient's perception of their dental appearance, paired t-test for comparisons of the motivation VAS scores between the first treatment and re-treatment, and Mann-Whitney test for comparisons between the re-treatment and control groups. Eighty-eight patients (26.3+/-8.4 years) completed the questionnaire. After the initial treatment, 36 per cent of the patients did not have any retention measures. The mean VAS scores for dental aesthetics at the start and end of the initial treatment were 2.3+/-2.1 and 6.6+/-2.7, respectively. The scores for the present situation and expected results of re-treatment were 4.1+/-2.7 and 8.8+/-1, respectively. These scores differed significantly from each other. Seventy-nine pairs of models were matched for evaluation of treatment need and complexity. The mean ICON scores of the re-treatment group were significantly lower than the controls (45+/-21 versus 57+/-24), the aesthetic component being the main contributing factor to this difference (25+/-16 versus 36+/-18). Both groups showed a treatment need (ICON>43), with the untreated controls having a relatively higher complexity. These results indicate that patients seeking re-treatment had a good perception of dental aesthetics, strong motivation, and an objective treatment need.

Effectiveness of an essential oil mouthrinse in improving oral health in orthodontic patients

OBJECTIVE

To test the null hypothesis that adding Listerine mouthrinse to the standard oral hygiene regimen has no added benefit for orthodontic patients in maintaining proper oral health.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients within their first 6 months of orthodontic treatment were assigned either to the brushing + flossing (N = 25) or brushing + flossing + Listerine (N = 25) group. Initially, all of the participants received a prophylaxis and instructions on how to brush and floss. Measurements were recorded for the bleeding, gingival, and plaque indices (BI, MGI, and PI, respectively) that provided baseline values (T1). Subsequent measurements were taken at 3 months (T2) and 6 months (T3). Mean BI, MGI, and PI at T1, T2, and T3 were compared statistically between the groups using repeated measures analysis of variance. The significance level was set at P < or = .05.

RESULTS

The response profiles for the BI, MGI, and PI over time were significantly different between the two groups. Patients who had Listerine in their daily oral hygiene regimen exhibited significantly lower scores for all three indices at T2 and T3 than the patients who only brushed and flossed.

CONCLUSIONS

The hypothesis is rejected. This study shows that use of Listerine mouthrinse can reduce the amount of plaque and gingivitis in patients undergoing orthodontic treatment. Adding Listerine to the standard oral hygiene regimen may be beneficial for orthodontic patients in maintaining proper oral health, thus reducing the likelihood that white spot lesions and gingivitis will develop.

Patient compliance and locus of control in orthodontic treatment: a prospective study

INTRODUCTION

Increased understanding of orthodontic patients will improve communication between dentist and patient; this is important for an optimal treatment outcome. In this prospective study, we addressed the relationship between patient compliance and locus of control (LOC) characteristics and evaluated posttreatment changes in LOC profiles.

METHODS

Two types of LOC questionnaires, the Rotter internal control scale (RICS) and the Nowicki-Strickland external control scale (NSECS), were given to 561 patients before conventional orthodontic treatment. After orthodontic treatment, the same questionnaires were readministered, and patient compliance was evaluated by an orthodontist and 3 dental hygienists. LOC scores were calculated at the end of the examination period. The difference in LOC between the good and poor compliance groups, and the posttreatment changes in LOC were evaluated.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in RICS and NSECS profiles between the good and poor compliance groups. NSECS decreased significantly after orthodontic treatment, but there were no significant changes in RICS.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient compliance appears to be a complex factor that cannot be predicted by LOC evaluation before orthodontic treatment. Patients who underwent orthodontic treatment showed decreased external control dispositions.

Dental appointment no-shows: why do some parents fail to take their children to the dentist?

BACKGROUND

Children are considerably dependent on their parents, not least in relation to achieving good oral health. There is a group of children who do not show up for dental treatments or only regular check-ups despite reminders from the dental health clinic. The cost of patients failing to come for scheduled appointments is also considered significant.

AIM

The aim of this study was to illuminate the main problem explaining why some parents fail to bring their children to the dental health clinics or to encourage and supervise them when they can take the responsibility themselves for dental treatments or only regular dental check-ups.

DESIGN

In-depth interviews were carried out with 16 parents of children who regularly had failed to turn up for appointments at the dental health clinic. The verbatim transcribed interviews were analysed in line with the guidelines for grounded theory.

RESULTS

A core category, 'being overloaded in daily life', emerged from the data and formed, together with three additional related categories, a conceptual model.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that these families experience an overload of demands related to their daily living and survival. Health-promoting efforts in the form of regular dental check-ups for their children have low priority for them.

Implant anchorage in orthodontic practice: the Straumann Orthosystem

Dental implants have been used to provide orthodontic anchorage. This article provides an overview of the Straumann Orthosystem implant system (Institut Straumann, Waldenburg, Switzerland) and its application, including the anatomy of the bony palate and contiguous structures. Considerations in placement of the Orthosystem implant include the avoidance of contiguous anatomic structures such as the nasal cavity, the degree of ossification of the palatal suture, and the quality and quantity of bone in the proposed implant site, all of which are discussed in this article.

Clinical and quantitative assessment of headgear compliance: A pilot study

INTRODUCTION

This study was undertaken to evaluate the compliance of patients using headgear with a timing device and to determine the efficiency of the electronic module timer as a patient motivator.

METHODS

Twenty-one patients (average age, 14 years 10 months) were selected from the orthodontic clinic of Federal University of Paraná on the basis of headgear wear for anchorage. The patients were instructed to wear their headgear 14 hours a day for a given number of days. The headgears were equipped with recorders (Compliance Science System and Affirm smart headgear modules, Ortho Kinetics, Vista, Calif). The patients were not told about the recorders, but they were instructed to keep track of their wear times. At the end of the test period (T1), the patients' reported wear times were compared with readings from the electronic modules. The patients were assigned a second period of headgear wear (T2) and told that their use would be monitored electronically. Again, the wear times reported by the patients were compared with the values from the electronic modules. Total time, number of hours accumulated between sessions, and quality time (uninterrupted use of headgear) were assessed.

RESULTS

Patients reported wearing their headgear an average of 13.6 hours per day; the electronic modules detected 5.6 hours per day in T1 and 6.7 hours per day in T2. Quality time was 1.8 hours per day in T1 and T2. The mean actual hours of daily wear relative to the provider's requirement was 56.7% in T1 and 62.7% in T2. Boys were more compliant than girls. After they learned of the electronic device, the girls' compliance improved. Younger patients were more compliant than older ones. The compliance rate of older patients improved slightly in T2.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients tend to overreport their headgear wear times. The mean actual hours of daily wear relative to the providers' requirement was 56.7%. This increased to 62.7% when patients knew a recording device was being used. A monitoring system can provide feedback to the patient, facilitate parental involvement, and motivate patients to comply with headgear wear.