The role of antibiotic prophylaxis in the treatment of acute pancreatitis

[Retrospective analysis of adverse drug reactions in stomatology hospital from 2014 to 2016]

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to investigate the characteristics and general rules of adverse drug reactions (ADR) in a 3A-grade stomatology hospital for safe and rational drug use in clinical stomatology.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 52 ADR cases (1∶1.36, males∶females) reported in the West China Hospital of Stomatology of Sichuan University from 2014 to 2016 in terms of gender and age distributions, drug categories, and clinical manifestations.

RESULTS

Eight kinds of drugs and antibiotics were predominately used [24 cases, 46.15% (24/52)], followed by nutrition drugs and antitumor drugs. Cephalosporin was the leading antibiotic drug associated with ADR [20 cases, 83.33% (20/24)]. Intravenous infusion was the most common route of drug administration [49 cases, 94.23% (49/52)]. The most common manifestations of the ADR were damages of the skin and its appendages and lesions of the digestive and nervous systems.

CONCLUSIONS

Strengthening the ADR monitoring system and further management should be implemented to alleviate ADR in stomatology hospitals.

Antibiotic therapy for prophylaxis against infection of pancreatic necrosis in acute pancreatitis

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic necrosis may complicate severe acute pancreatitis, and is detectable by computed tomography (CT). If it becomes infected mortality increases, but the use of prophylactic antibiotics raises concerns about antibiotic resistance and fungal infection.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the efficacy and safety of prophylactic antibiotics in acute pancreatitis complicated by CT proven pancreatic necrosis.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Searches were updated in November 2008, in The Cochrane Library (Issue 2, 2008), MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL. Conference proceedings and references from found articles were also searched.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing antibiotics versus placebo in acute pancreatitis with CT proven necrosis.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Primary outcomes were mortality and pancreatic infection rates. Secondary end-points included non pancreatic infection, all sites infection, operative rates, fungal infections, and antibiotic resistance. Subgroup analyses were performed for antibiotic regimen (beta-lactam, quinolone, and imipenem).

MAIN RESULTS

Seven evaluable studies randomised 404 patients. There was no statistically significant effect on reduction of mortality with therapy: 8.4% versus controls 14.4%, and infected pancreatic necrosis rates: 19.7% versus controls 24.4%. Non-pancreatic infection rates and the incidence of overall infections were not significantly reduced with antibiotics: 23.7% versus 36%; 37.5% versus 51.9% respectively. Operative treatment and fungal infections were not significantly different. Insufficient data were provided concerning antibiotic resistance.With beta-lactam antibiotic prophylaxis there was less mortality (9.4% treatment, 15% controls), and less infected pancreatic necrosis (16.8% treatment group, 24.2% controls) but this was not statistically significant. The incidence of non-pancreatic infections was non-significantly different (21% versus 32.5%), as was the incidence of overall infections (34.4% versus 52.8%), and operative treatment rates. No significant differences were seen with quinolone plus imidazole in any of the end points measured. Imipenem on its own showed no difference in the incidence of mortality, but there was a significant reduction in the rate of pancreatic infection (p=0.02; RR 0.34, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.84).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

No benefit of antibiotics in preventing infection of pancreatic necrosis or mortality was found, except for when imipenem (a beta-lactam) was considered on its own, where a significantly decrease in pancreatic infection was found. None of the studies included in this review were adequately powered. Further better designed studies are needed if the use of antibiotic prophylaxis is to be recommended.

Elevated serum creatinine as a marker of pancreatic necrosis in acute pancreatitis

OBJECTIVES

Pancreatic necrosis is a serious complication of acute pancreatitis. The identification of simple laboratory tests to detect subjects at risk of pancreatic necrosis may direct management and improve outcome. This study focuses on the association between routine laboratory tests and the development of pancreatic necrosis in patients with acute pancreatitis.

METHODS

In a cohort of 185 patients with acute pancreatitis prospectively enrolled in the Severity of Acute Pancreatitis Study, patients with contrast-enhanced computerized tomography performed were selected (n=129). Serum hematocrit, creatinine, and urea nitrogen on admission and peak values within 48 h of admission were analyzed. The volume of intravenous fluid resuscitation was calculated for each patient.

RESULTS

Of 129 patients, 35 (27%) had evidence of pancreatic necrosis. Receiver operating characteristic curves for pancreatic necrosis revealed an area under the curve of 0.79 for admission hematocrit, 0.77 for peak creatinine, and 0.72 for peak urea nitrogen. Binary logistic regression yielded that all three tests were significantly associated with pancreatic necrosis (P<0.0001), with the highest odds ratio, 34.5, for peak creatinine. The volume of intravenous fluid resuscitation was similar in patients with and without necrosis. Low admission hematocrit (< or =44.8%) yielded a negative predictive value of 89%; elevated peak creatinine (>1.8 mg/dl) within 48 h yielded a positive predictive value of 93%.

CONCLUSIONS

We confirm that a low admission hematocrit indicates a low risk of pancreatic necrosis (PNec) in patients with acute pancreatitis. In contrast, an increase in creatinine within the first 48 h is strongly associated with the development of PNec. This finding may have important clinical implications and warrants further investigation.

Characterization of the Physiological Spaces and Distribution of Tolbutamide in the Perfused Rat Pancreas

PURPOSE

To set up and validate a viable perfused rat pancreas model suitable for pharmacokinetic studies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We setup and conducted multiple indicator dilution studies in the single pass perfused rat pancreas. The distribution of the reference markers [99mTc]-red blood cells (RBC), [14C]-sucrose, and [3H]-water, and tolbutamide were analysed using both non-parametric and parametric methods.

RESULTS

The perfusion preparation was observed to be viable by oxygen consumption, outflow perfusate pH, lactate release and insulin release in response to glucose. Parametric analysis of the outflow profiles suggested that the transport of water and tolbutamide from the vascular space was permeability limited. Parametric and nonparametric estimates of Vd for RBC and sucrose were similar and were 0.14+/-0.01, 0.15 0.005 and 0.35+/-0.01 ml/g. The parametric estimate for water, 1.04+/-0.05 ml/g was greater than the nonparametric estimate, 0.89+/-0.02 ml/g. The multiple indicator dilution method Vd of tolbutamide of 0.75+0.08 ml/g was similar to the reported value of 0.73+/-0.04 ml/g estimated by tissue partitioning studies.

CONCLUSIONS

A viable single pass pancreas perfusion model was established and applied to define distribution spaces of reference markers and the distribution kinetics of tolbutamide.

Antibiotic therapy for prophylaxis against infection of pancreatic necrosis in acute pancreatitis

BACKGROUND

Acute pancreatitis is a common abdominal emergency with no specific treatment. Pancreatic necrosis may complicate severe attacks, detectable by computed tomography (CT). Necrosis can become infected, making surgical intervention necessary and increasing mortality to more than 40%. Experimental studies suggest that antibiotic therapy may prevent infection, but could promote resistance and fungal infection.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effectiveness and safety of prophylactic antibiotics in acute pancreatitis complicated by pancreatic necrosis.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The Cochrane Library (Issue 1, 2006), MEDLINE (January 1966-December 2005), EMBASE (January 1980-December 2005) and CINAHL (January 1982-December 2005) were searched. We also examined Conference proceedings.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing antibiotics versus placebo in acute pancreatitis with CT proven necrosis were sought using a detailed search strategy without linguistic limitation. RCTs. Initial searching was undertaken in November 2001. Latest update: December 2005.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers extracted data independently for rates of primary end-points: mortality and pancreatic infection rates. Secondary end-points included: non pancreatic infection and operative rates. Adverse events: antibiotic resistance and fungal infections. Subgroup analyses: antibiotic regimen.

MAIN RESULTS

Five evaluable studies randomised 294 patients. Analysis suggested significantly less mortality with therapy (6%) versus controls (15.3%), odds ratio 0.37 (95% CI 0.17, 0.83). Infected pancreatic necrosis rates were not significantly different (therapy 20%, controls 27.8%), odds ratio 0.62 (95% CI 0.35, 1.09), and neither were operative treatment rates or non-pancreatic infection rates. Fungal infections were not significantly different at 4% with therapy versus 4.9% in controls, odds ratio 0.83 (95% CI 0.30, 2.27). There were no evaluable data on antibiotic resistance. Sub-group analysis was performed for antibiotic regimen: beta lactam (192 patients), and quinolone plus imidazole (102 patients). With beta lactam prophylaxis there was significantly less mortality (6.3%) versus controls (16.7%), odds ratio 0.34 (95% CI 0.13, 0.91), and infected pancreatic necrosis (15.6%) versus (29.2%) in controls, odds ratio 0.41 (95% CI 0.20, 0.85), but there were no significant differences in operative treatment rates or non-pancreatic infections. No significant differences were seen with quinolone plus imidazole.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Antibiotic prophylaxis appeared to be associated with significantly decreased mortality but not infected pancreatic necrosis. Beta lactams were associated with significantly decreased mortality and infected pancreatic necrosis, but quinolone plus imidazole regimens were not. There were variations in methodological quality, treatment regimens, and a lack of data on adverse effects. Further better designed studies are needed to support antibiotic prophylaxis and, should these prove beneficial, to compare beta-lactams with quinolones directly.

Pharmacological prevention and treatment of acute pancreatitis: where are we now?

Acute pancreatitis is a disease of increasing prevalence, unchanged mortality over many decades, and limited treatment strategies. Progress has been made in developing therapies that reduce the rate of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)-associated pancreatitis and in preventing infected pancreatic necrosis with intravenous carbapenems. Attempts at reducing pancreatic enzyme output or inhibiting the activity of digestive enzyme proteases have not yielded encouraging results - nor have anti-inflammatory strategies for the treatment of acute pancreatitis been found to be effective so far. Future therapeutic options that are presently being developed or under investigation attempt to restore pancreatic secretory function, interfere with inflammatory pathways in a more effective manner, or inhibit digestive enzyme proteases more selectively.

Machine learning can improve prediction of severity in acute pancreatitis using admission values of APACHE II score and C-reactive protein

BACKGROUND

Acute pancreatitis (AP) has a variable course. Accurate early prediction of severity is essential to direct clinical care. Current assessment tools are inaccurate, and unable to adapt to new parameters. None of the current systems uses C-reactive protein (CRP). Modern machine-learning tools can address these issues.

METHODS

370 patients admitted with AP in a 5-year period were retrospectively assessed; after exclusions, 265 patients were studied. First recorded values for physical examination and blood tests, aetiology, severity and complications were recorded. A kernel logistic regression model was used to remove redundant features, and identify the relationships between relevant features and outcome. Bootstrapping was used to make the best use of data and obtain confidence estimates on the parameters of the model.

RESULTS

A model containing 8 variables (age, CRP, respiratory rate, pO2 on air, arterial pH, serum creatinine, white cell count and GCS) predicted a severe attack with an area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.82 (SD 0.01). The optimum cut-off value for predicting severity gave sensitivity and specificity of 0.87 and 0.71 respectively. The predictions were significantly better (p = 0.0036) than admission APACHE II scores in the same patients (AUC 0.74) and better than historical admission APACHE II data (AUC 0.68-0.75).

CONCLUSIONS

This system for the first time combines admission values of selected components of APACHE II and CRP for prediction of severe AP. The score is simple to use, and is more accurate than admission APACHE II alone. It is adaptable and would allow incorporation of new predictive factors.

Contrast-enhanced computed tomography in acute pancreatitis: does contrast medium worsen its course due to impaired microcirculation?

BACKGROUND

An early and accurate diagnosis of severe acute (necrotizing) pancreatitis is important to allow timely institution of therapy to limit the extra-pancreatic sequelae of this necrotizing process and to minimize the incidence of super-infection of the necrosis (i.e., progression to infected necrosis). Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) has become the cornerstone of diagnosis by confirming the clinical diagnosis of severe acute pancreatitis based on the various clinical scoring criteria. Moreover, CECT serves as an anatomic roadmap for guiding radiological and surgical interventions. However, still-controversial experimental studies in animals in the mid-1990s suggested that the use of intravenous radiographic contrast media early in the course of the disease might exacerbate the necrotizing process by further impairing the already compromised pancreatic microcirculation. A series of experimental and clinical studies followed that have both refuted and supported this claim; unfortunately, none is conclusive, and the topic remains, as yet, unresolved.

AIMS

Our objective was to review objectively the available literature found by a Medline search on this subject.

METHODS

Meta-analysis and review.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

Our conclusion, after analysis of these studies, is that there are no well-substantiated data that could resolve the controversy. However, several caveats will be offered.

Is late antibiotic prophylaxis effective in the prevention of secondary pancreatic infection?

BACKGROUND

Secondary infection of the inflamed pancreas is the principal cause of death after severe acute pancreatitis (AP). Although patients are not always managed early in the course of AP in clinical practice, prophylactic antibiotics that were used in experimental studies in rats were always initiated early after induction of pancreatitis. The effectiveness of antibiotics initiated later is unknown.

AIM

The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of ciprofloxacin and meropenem initiated early versus later in the course of acute necrotizing pancreatitis (ANP) in rats.

METHODS

100 Sprague-Dawley rats were studied. ANP was induced in rats by intraductal injection of 3% taurocholate. Rats were divided randomly into five groups: group I rats received normal saline as a placebo, group II and IV rats received three times daily meropenem 60 mg/kg i.p. at 2 and 24 h, respectively and group III and V rats received twice daily ciprofloxacin 50 mg/kg i.p. at 2 and 24 h, respectively, after induction. At 96 h, all rats were killed for quantitative bacteriologic study. A point-scoring system of histological features was used to evaluate the severity of pancreatitis.

RESULTS

Meropenem and ciprofloxacin initiated 2 h after induction of pancreatitis significantly reduced the prevalence of pancreatic infection (p < 0.001 and p < 0.04, respectively) as compared to controls. Neither of the antibiotics initiated later during the course of AP caused a significant decrease in pancreatic infection in rats (p > 0.05). Although the rats treated early infected less frequently than the rats treated later, the comparison reached statistical significance only in the meropenem group (p < 0.02).

CONCLUSION

Early antibiotic treatment reduces pancreatic infection more efficiently than late antibiotic treatment in ANP in rats.

[Acute pancreatitis]

While interstitial acute pancreatitis usually takes a benign course, necrotizing acute pancreatitis takes a severe course, mainly because of severe local and systemic complications. After a quick diagnosis it is necessary to rapidly assess a degree of severity of the disease and thus the prognosis. The clinical picture and the result of imaging procedures do not always correspond. The management basically includes to treat pain as well as to administer fluid, electrolyte, protein and calories. In addition, systemic treatment of complications such as shock or respiratory and renal insufficiency--if occurring--is necessary. In case of pancreatic necrosis, prophylactic administration of pancreas-penetrable antibiotics is recommended to avoid infection. In the severely ill with infected pancreatic necrosis, surgery is the treatment of choice. In approximately 10% of all patients with alcohol-induced pancreatitis, there is a gradual transition to chronic pancreatitis.

Cefepime tissue penetration in experimental acute pancreatitis

INTRODUCTION

Antibiotic treatment represents a cornerstone in the management of severe acute pancreatitis. However, different antibiotic substances are currently used. In this study, we analyzed penetration of cefepime into pancreatic tissue in two models of acute pancreatitis.

AIMS AND METHODOLOGY

Following induction of acute pancreatitis, animals were treated with a single intravenous dose of cefepime (0.1 mg/g of body weight). At two different time points, blood and tissue samples were obtained for determination of cefepime concentration and microbiologic analysis.

RESULTS

Mean pancreatic tissue concentrations +/- SEM 30 minutes after drug administration were significantly higher in animals with either mild acute pancreatitis (113 +/- 22 mg/kg) or severe acute pancreatitis (75 +/- 22 mg/kg) than in control animals (30 +/- 6 mg/kg) (p < 0.005). The minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC90) for organisms usually isolated from infected pancreatic necrosis vary between 0.05 and 8 mg/L, which is between nine and 1,500 times lower than the mean peak concentration found in necrotic pancreatic tissue. Seven hours 30 minutes after antibiotic administration, pancreatic cefepime concentrations were still above the MIC90 in 100% and 83% of animals with mild and severe disease, respectively. The infection rate of pancreatic tissue was significantly lower after antibiotic treatment and was similar after imipenem/cilastatin or cefepime treatment.

CONCLUSION

Because of its antibacterial coverage and proven tissue penetration in acute pancreatitis, cefepime should be studied in patients with severe acute pancreatitis.

Antibiotic therapy for prophylaxis against infection of pancreatic necrosis in acute pancreatitis

BACKGROUND

Acute pancreatitis is a common acute abdominal emergency which lacks specific therapy. In severe attacks, areas of the pancreas may become necrotic. The mortality risk rises to >40% if sterile necrosis becomes superinfected, usually with gut derived aerobic organisms. Experimental and clinical studies indicate a window of opportunity of 1-2 weeks, when superinfection, and thus high-risk surgical debridement, may be prevented by administering systemic antibiotics to 'sterilise' tissues adjacent to necrotic areas. There are theoretical risks of encouraging antibacterial resistance and opportunistic fungal infections.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effectiveness and safety of prophylactic antibiotic therapy in patients with severe acute pancreatitis who have developed pancreatic necrosis.

SEARCH STRATEGY

MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched. We also examined other sources including Conference Abstracts (published and unpublished data).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCT) were sought using the search strategy detailed below. No linguistic limitations were applied. RCTs were selected in which antibacterial therapy was evaluated in patients with severe acute pancreatitis associated with pancreatic necrosis proven by intravenous contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT). No linguistic limitations were applied. Searching was undertaken initially in November 2001 and updated in March 2003.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers extracted data from trial publications independently, concerning rates for the primary end-points: with respect to: all cause mortality and rates of infection of pancreatic necrosis (proven by microbiological examination of fine needle aspirate or operative specimens). In addition, secondary end-points included peri-pancreatic sepsis, remote sepsis (respiratory, urinary, central venous line sources), operative rates, length of hospital stay, adverse events including the incidence of drug resistant microorganisms and opportunistic fungal infection.

MAIN RESULTS

It was possible to evaluate mortality in all four included studies, and it demonstrated a survival advantage for antibiotic therapy (Odds ratio 0.32, p=0.02). Pancreatic sepsis (infected necrosis) was also measurable in all four studies and showed an advantage for therapy (Odds ratio 0.51, p=0.04). Extra-pancreatic infection could be evaluated in three studies, but showed no significant advantage for therapy (Odds ratio 0.47, p=0.05).Operative treatment data was available in three studies, but surgery rates were not significantly reduced (Odds ratio 0.55, p=0.08). Fungal infections showed no strongly increased preponderance with therapy (Odds ratio 0.83, p=0.7), but there were no data on infection with resistant organisms. Length of hospital stay could only be evaluated in two studies and was not significantly different. Sub-group analyses planned for the influence on outcome measures of the antibiotic regimen, the time of commencement of therapy in relation to symptom onset and/or hospitalisation, duration of therapy, and aetiology could not be performed as no data were available.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

Despite variations in drug agent, case mix, duration of treatment and methodological quality (especially the lack of double blinded studies), there was strong evidence that intravenous antibiotic prophylactic therapy for 10 to 14 days decreased the risk of superinfection of necrotic tissue and mortality in patients with severe acute pancreatitis with proven pancreatic necrosis at CT. Further studies are required to confirm all of the benefits suggested (in particular the need for operative debridement), to provide more adequate data on adverse effects, to address the choice of antibacterial agents and effects of varying duration of therapy, and whether outcome is related to aetiology.

Has blood glucose level measured on admission to hospital in a patient with acute pancreatitis any prognostic value?

BACKGROUND

Early detection of pancreatic necrosis allows better management of the disease. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) as the gold standard for detecting pancreatic necrosis is expensive.

AIM OF THE STUDY

This study was to evaluate for the first time whether blood glucose estimation on hospital admission--a simple, cheap, readily available laboratory parameter--may detect pancreatic necrosis and have prognostic value in acute pancreatitis.

METHODS

Single blood glucose estimation upon hospital admission was evaluated prospectively for detecting pancreatic necrosis and as a prognostic indicator. The study included 241 nondiabetic patients with a first attack of acute pancreatitis. All underwent CT within 72 h of admission.

RESULTS

High blood glucose (> 125 mg/dl) correlated significantly with complex high clinical and biochemical prognostic scores (Ranson, Imrie), a high Balthazar score, pancreatic pseudocysts, and a long hospital stay, but not with organ failure, indication for artificial ventilation, dialysis, surgery, length of intensive care, and mortality. Pancreatic necrosis detection sensitivity of high blood glucose was 83%, specificity 49%, positive predictive value 28%, and negative predictive value 92%.

CONCLUSION

A patient with normal blood glucose on admission is unlikely to have pancreatic necrosis. Contrast-enhanced CT would not be needed unless the patient fails to improve.

The APACHE II score is unreliable to diagnose necrotizing pancreatitis on admission to hospital

INTRODUCTION

The APACHE II score is highly recommended worldwide for the assessment of severe pancreatitis (interstitial and necrotizing), and a score of at least eight points on admission to the hospital is said to indicate severe pancreatitis.

AIM

To evaluate this assumption and to check whether an APACHE II score of at least eight points really indicates necrotizing pancreatitis as shown by contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT).

METHODOLOGY

This study included 326 patients with a first attack of acute pancreatitis and is part of a prospective study on the natural course of acute pancreatitis. All patients underwent contrast-enhanced CT within 72 hours of admission. The following parameters for the severity of the disease were used: respiratory and renal failure according to the Atlanta classification; indication for dialysis, ventilation, and surgery; time spent in intensive care unit and total hospital stay; Ranson score adjusted for cause; Imrie score; and Balthazar score (CT).

RESULTS

Of the 326 patients, 262 (80%) had interstitial pancreatitis and 64 (20%) had necrotizing pancreatitis. In 74 (28%) of the 262 patients with interstitial pancreatitis, the APACHE II score was at least eight points, indicating severe pancreatitis (overestimation of the disease), whereas the score was less than eight in 41 (64%) of 64 patients with necrotizing pancreatitis (underestimation). Sensitivity was 36%; specificity was 72%; the positive predictive value was 24%; and the negative predictive value was 82%.

CONCLUSION

The evaluation of sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value for all APACHE II score points showed that there was not a "golden" cutoff to detect necrotizing pancreatitis. We conclude that the APACHE II score on admission to the hospital is unreliable to diagnose necrotizing pancreatitis.

Hemoconcentration: an early marker of severe and/or necrotizing pancreatitis? A critical appraisal

OBJECTIVE

A study was designed to reevaluate hemoconcentration as an early marker of severe and/or necrotizing pancreatitis and compare it against contrast-enhanced CT, the gold standard to diagnose acute necrotizing pancreatitis.

METHODS

This prospective study covers the years 1988-1999 for 316 patients (202 male, 114 female) with a first attack of acute pancreatitis. The role of the hematocrit as an early marker of severe and/or necrotizing pancreatitis has been retrospectively evaluated against the prospectively obtained data. They all underwent a CT within 72 h after admission. In addition to the CT-controlled diagnosis of interstitial/necrotizing pancreatitis, the following variables were used to assess severity: initial organ failure according to the Atlanta classification; indication for artificial ventilation and/or dialysis; Ranson score adjusted for etiology; Imrie score; Balthazar score; length of stay in intensive care unit (ICU); total hospital stay; development of pancreatic pseudocysts; indication for operation (necrosectomy); and mortality. Hemoconcentration on admission was defined as a hematocrit level >43.0% for male and >39.6% for female patients. Logistic regression was used to assess the correlation between hemoconcentration and the severity of variables.

RESULTS

Hematocrit, as a single parameter measured on admission, had the same sensitivity and negative predictive value as the more complicated Ranson and Imrie scores obtained only after 48 h. However, its specificity, positive predictive value, and total accuracy were lower. Hemoconcentration significantly correlated with the Balthazar score (differential diagnosis between interstitial and necrotizing pancreatitis), stay in ICU, and total hospital stay. Sensitivity and specificity of the hematocrit cut-off level of 43.0% for male and 39.6% for female patients to detect necrotizing pancreatitis were 74% and 45%, respectively. The positive predictive value was 24% and the negative predictive value 88%. Receiver operation characteristics (ROC) curve values for several cut-offs did not result in more ideal levels.

CONCLUSION

Hemoconcentration does not significantly correlate with important clinical outcome variables of acute pancreatitis including organ failure and mortality rate. Its prognostic value is comparable to the more complicated Ranson and Imrie scores obtained only after 48 h. The major value of this single easily obtainable and cheap parameter on admission lies in its high negative predictive value. In the absence of hemoconcentration, contrast-enhanced CT may be unnecessary on admission unless the patient does not improve.

Prophylactic antibiotics and pancreatic necrosis

Recent controlled clinical studies suggest a positive effect of early antibiotic treatment on late morbidity and mortality in severe acute pancreatitis. In contrast, widespread use of antibiotics may lead to an increased number of fungal infections and multiresistant bacteria. Optimal choice, duration, and route of administration of the antibiotic agent(s) are far from being established. The additional administration of an antifungal agent with prophylactic intention cannot be supported by the currently available data.

Prophylactic antibiotic therapy in the management of acute pancreatitis

Studies done in the early 1970s came to the conclusion that antibiotic prophylaxis was not useful in the management of acute pancreatitis. However, these studies suffered from the drawback of using antibiotics that had poor penetration into the pancreas. In addition, the design of these trials were faulty. With the advent of new information and the availability of better antibiotics, the picture is changing. Recent studies have suggested that antibiotic prophylaxis is useful in decreasing the incidence of infection in patients with severe pancreatitis. Of the antibiotics that have been tested, imipenem appears to be the most promising.