Flow velocity acceleration in the left ventricle: a useful Doppler echocardiographic sign of hemodynamically significant mitral regurgitation

Quantification of mitral regurgitation orifice area by 3-dimensional echocardiography: comparison with effective regurgitant orifice area by PISA method and proximal regurgitant jet diameter

BACKGROUND

The evaluation of mitral regurgitation (MR) by 3-dimensional (3D) echo has generally been performed by reconstruction of Doppler regurgitant jets but there are little data on measuring anatomic regurgitant orifice area (AROA) directly from 3D mitral valve (MV) reconstructions.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Transoesophageal echo (TOE) 3D images were acquired from 38 unselected patients (age 59+/-11 years, ten in atrial fibrillation) with various degrees of MR. In all patients MV was reconstructed en face from the left atrium (LA) and the left ventricle (LV). AROA was measured by planimetry from 3D pictures and compared to the effective regurgitant orifice area (EROA) by proximal isovelocity surface area and proximal MR jet width from 2D echo. AROA was measured in 95% of patients from LA, 89% from LV and in 84% from both LA and LV. Good correlation was found between EROA and AROA measured from both LA (r=0.97, P<0.0001) and LV (r=0.87, P<0.0001). The mean difference between LA-AROA and EROA was -3.01+/-6.12 mm(2) and -7.18+/-13.84 mm(2) for LV-AROA (P<0.01, respectively). An acceptable correlation was found between the proximal MR jet width and AROA from LA (r=0.71, P<0.0001) and LV perspective (r=0.68, P<0.0001). AROA>or=25 mm(2) differentiated mild MR (graded 1-2) from moderately severe (graded 3-4) with 80-90% accuracy.

CONCLUSIONS

3D TOE provides important quantitative information on both the mechanism and the severity of MR in an unselected group of patients. AROA enables quantification of MR with excellent agreement with the accepted clinical method of proximal flow convergence.

Mitral regurgitation and left ventricular diastolic dysfunction similarly affect mitral and pulmonary vein flow Doppler parameters: the advantage of end-diastolic markers

Enhanced early mitral flow and reduced systolic pulmonary vein flow may be caused both by increased left ventricular pressure as the result of diastolic dysfunction and by increased transmitral flow as the result of mitral regurgitation. Nevertheless, Doppler parameters are widely used to predict left ventricular filling pressure. We aimed to analyze the interference of mitral regurgitation with Doppler parameters usually used to estimate left ventricular filling pressure and to identify markers independent of mitral regurgitation, which could reliably estimate increased left ventricular filling pressure. Eighty-four patients (age, 62 +/- 9 years; 82% men) had a complete echocardiographic Doppler examination. Transmitral E- and A-wave velocity, E deceleration time and A duration, pulmonary vein systolic and diastolic velocities, and reversal flow duration and maximal and minimal left atrial volumes were measured. The difference between the duration of pulmonary vein and mitral A waves was calculated (A'-A). Mitral regurgitant volume was quantitatively assessed by echocardiography. Left ventricular end-diastolic pressure was measured invasively. Patients had a wide range of left ventricular ejection fraction (14% to 70%), mitral regurgitant volume (0 to 94 mL), and left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (3 to 37 mm Hg). E velocity, E/A, pulmonary vein systolic and diastolic, and systo-diastolic ratios were significantly and independently correlated with both left ventricular end-diastolic pressure and mitral regurgitant volume. A'-A showed a strong correlation with left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (r = 0.70; P <.0001), but the relation with mitral regurgitant volume was not significant (r = 0.19; P =.08). Mitral regurgitation affects the majority of Doppler parameters widely used to predict filling pressure but does not influence Ad'-Ad, which proved to be the strongest predictor of left ventricular end-diastolic pressure.

Simple method for estimating regurgitant volume with use of a single radius for measuring proximal isovelocity surface area: an in vitro study of simulated mitral regurgitation

The proximal isovelocity surface area (PISA) color Doppler method with use of a hemielliptic formula is reported to be accurate for quantitating regurgitant volume (RV). However, this formula ideally requires the measurement of 2 or 3 radii and therefore is not widely used clinically. The purpose of this in vitro study was to derive a simple PISA formula for estimating RV with use of a single radius axial to the valve orifice and to compare it with the clinically used single-radius hemispherical formula (2 x pi R(2) x AV x TVI/Vp), where AV is the apparent color Doppler aliasing velocity, R is the PISA color Doppler aliasing radius, TVI is time-velocity integral of the jet by continuous wave Doppler, and Vp is the peak velocity of the jet by continuous wave Doppler. Pulsatile flow studies were performed across a convex curvilinear surface, which more closely approximates the shape of the mitral valve than does a planar surface. Pulse rates (60 to 80 bpm), peak flow velocities (4.0 to 6.0 m/s), and regurgitant orifice areas (0.2 to 1.0 cm(2)) were varied to simulate mitral regurgitation. The AVs were varied from 11 to 39 cm/s, and a single PISA aliasing radius was measured at each AV. Excellent linear correlations were obtained between the PISA radius and the actual RV measured with use of a beaker (r = 0.94 to 0.97, P <.0001). A series of simplified formulas was derived from the regression line of the PISA radius versus the RV. For example, with an AV of 21 cm/s, RV was estimated by a simplified PISA formula (where RV[mL] = 10 x R [mm] - 30) with an accuracy of 3.3 +/- 6.3 mL versus -20.3 +/- 8.7 mL for the standard single-radius PISA method (P <.0001). By using the standard single-radius hemispherical PISA formula, RV was underestimated if the radius was <20 mm. By using simplified regression equations, the PISA radius accurately estimated RV at a PISA radius <20 mm. Clinical studies are necessary to validate this concept.

Mechanism of dynamic regurgitant orifice area variation in functional mitral regurgitation: physiologic insights from the proximal flow convergence technique

OBJECTIVES

We used the Doppler proximal flow convergence technique as a physiologic tool to explore the effects of the time courses of mitral annular area and transmitral pressure on dynamic changes in regurgitant orifice area.

BACKGROUND

In functional mitral regurgitation (MR), regurgitant flow rate and orifice area display a unique pattern, with peaks in early and late systole and a midsystolic decrease. Phasic changes in both mitral annular area and the transmitral pressure acting to close the leaflets, which equals left ventricular-left atrial pressure, have been proposed to explain this dynamic pattern.

METHODS

In 30 patients with functional MR, regurgitant orifice area was obtained as flow (from M-mode proximal flow convergence traces) divided by orifice velocity (v) from the continuous wave Doppler trace of MR, transmitral pressure as 4v(2), and mitral annular area from two apical diameters.

RESULTS

All patients had midsystolic decreases in regurgitant orifice area that mirrored increases in transmitral pressure, while mitral annular area changed more gradually. By stepwise multiple regression analysis, both mitral annular area and transmitral pressure significantly affected regurgitant orifice area; however, transmitral pressure made a stronger contribution (r2 = 0.441) than mitral annular area (added r2 = 0.008). Similarly, the rate of change of regurgitant orifice area more strongly related to that of transmitral pressure (r2 = 0.638) than to that of mitral annular area (added r2 = 0.003). A similar regurgitant orifice area time course was observed in four patients with fixed mitral annuli due to Carpentier ring insertion.

CONCLUSIONS

In summary, the time course and rate of change of regurgitant orifice area in patients with functional MR are predominantly determined by dynamic changes in the transmitral pressure acting to close the valve. Thus, although mitral annular area helps determine the potential for MR, transmitral pressure appears important in driving the leaflets toward closure, and would be of value to consider in interventions aimed at reducing the severity of MR.

Peak mitral inflow velocity predicts mitral regurgitation severity

OBJECTIVES

Mitral regurgitation (MR) is a common echocardiographic finding; however, there is no simple accurate method for quantification. The aim of this study was to develop an easily measured screening variable for hemodynamically significant MR.

BACKGROUND

The added regurgitant volume in MR increases the left atrial to left ventricular gradient, which then increases the peak mitral inflow or the peak E wave velocity. Our hypothesis was that peak E wave velocity and the E/A ratio increase in proportion to MR severity.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of 102 consecutive patients with varying grades of MR seen in the Adult Echocardiography Laboratory at the University of California, San Francisco. Peak E wave velocity, peak A wave velocity, E/A ratio and E wave deceleration time were measured in all patients. The reference standard for MR was qualitative echocardiographic evaluation by an expert and quantitation of regurgitant fraction using two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography.

RESULTS

Peak E wave velocity was seen to increase in proportion to MR severity, with a significant difference between the different groups (F = 37, p < 0.0001). Peak E wave velocity correlated with regurgitant fraction (r = 0.52, p < 0.001). Furthermore, an E wave velocity >1.2 m/s identified 24 of 27 patients with severe MR (sensitivity 86%, specificity 86%, positive predictive value 75%). An A wave dominant pattern excluded the presence of severe MR. The E/A ratio also increased in proportion to MR severity. Peak A wave velocity and E wave deceleration time showed no correlation with MR severity.

CONCLUSIONS

Peak E wave velocity is easy to obtain and is therefore widely applicable in clinical practice as a screening tool for evaluating MR severity.

Clinical utility of the transpulmonary echo enhancing agent Levovist to improve diagnostic confidence in echocardiography

Echo enhancing agents have been used in echocardiography since 1968 for a variety of applications. Until recently, the agents were unable to survive transit through the pulmonary circulation following intravenous injection, and the technique was therefore restricted to investigations of the right side of the heart. Levovist is an echo enhancing agent capable of left heart--and even systemic--enhancement to improve the images obtained with B-mode and Doppler echocardiography. This agent offers important practical advantages in "routine" echocardiography, particularly in patients in whom image quality is suboptimal or baseline examination fails due to physical limitations. Potential future uses of contrast-enhanced echocardiography include quantitative analysis of coronary artery flow.

Usefulness of color Doppler proximal isovelocity surface area method in quantitating valvular regurgitation

To define the clinical utility of the color Doppler proximal isovelocity surface area (PISA) method for estimating regurgitant stroke volume (SV), 160 regurgitant lesions were evaluated in 104 patients with mitral (MR), aortic (AR), and tricuspid (TR) regurgitation. Regurgitant SV by PISA was calculated as 2 pi R2 x V x (time-velocity integral/peak flow velocity), where R is the radius corresponding to the first blue-red interface velocity of the maximal PISA during the cardiac cycle. The time-velocity integral and peak flow velocity from the continuous-wave Doppler recording of the regurgitant jet were used to correct PISA for phasic variations in regurgitant flow. Fifteen lesions were excluded because of difficulty in tracing the continuous-wave Doppler regurgitant curve. Among 145 remaining regurgitant lesions, PISA was measurable in 50 (78%) of 64 cases of MR and 24 (69%) of 35 cases of TR but in only 12 (26%) of 46 cases of AR (p < 0.001). Regurgitant SV by PISA correlated modestly well with jet area/atrial area in all atrioventricular valve lesions (MR: r = 0.55; TR: r = 0.65; p < 0.001). However, the correlation improved if only central jets were considered (MR: r = 0.70; TR; r = 0.75; p < 0.001). These findings are not unexpected because jet area/atrial area underestimates the true severity of regurgitation in cases of eccentric (wall-impinging) jets. PISA was detected in all severe cases of regurgitation but in only 64% of cases of mild MR, 45% of cases of mild TR, and 6% of cases of mild AR (p < 0.01). The color Doppler PISA method is clinically useful in estimating regurgitant SV in MR and TR, including mild cases, but is less useful in AR.

Current status of flow convergence for clinical applications: is it a leaning tower of "PISA"?

Spatial appreciation of flow velocities using Doppler color flow mapping has led to quantitative evaluation of the zone of flow convergence proximal to a regurgitant orifice. Based on the theory of conservation of mass, geometric analysis, assuming a series of hemispheric shells of increasing velocity as flow converges on the orifice--the so-called proximal isovelocity surface area (PISA) effect--has yielded methods promising noninvasive measurement of regurgitant flow rate. When combined with conventional Doppler ultrasound to measure orifice velocity, regurgitant orifice area, the major predictor of regurgitation severity, can also be estimated. The high temporal resolution of color M-mode can be used to evaluate dynamic changes in orifice area, as seen in many pathologic conditions, which enhances our appreciation of the pathophysiology of regurgitation. The PISA methodology is potentially applicable to any restrictive orifice and has gained some credibility in the quantitative evaluation of other valve pathology, particularly mitral and tricuspid regurgitation, and in congenital heart disease. Although the current limitations of PISA estimates of regurgitation have tempered its introduction as a valuable clinical tool, considerable efforts in in vitro and clinical research have improved our understanding of the problems and limitations of the PISA methodology and provided a firm platform for continuing research into the accurate quantitative assessment of valve regurgitation and the expanding clinical role of quantitative Doppler color flow mapping.

Three-dimensional surface geometry correction is required for calculating flow by the proximal isovelocity surface area technique

This study addressed the hypothesis that surface geometry must be taken into account in proximal convergence calculations of regurgitant flow rate. In vitro models allowed flow to converge within models designed to test derived angle correction equations. Flow was overestimated by the uncorrected equation for surfaces allowing flow to converge over less than a hemisphere and underestimated if flow converged over more than a hemisphere. The extent of deviation depended on the two-dimensional versus three-dimensional nature of the surface (angled flat surfaces versus conical surfaces). Correcting these estimates according to the derived equation produced good agreement for all geometries.

Dynamic change in mitral regurgitant orifice area: comparison of color Doppler echocardiographic and electromagnetic flowmeter-based methods in a chronic animal model

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the present study was to investigate dynamic changes in the mitral regurgitant orifice using electromagnetic flow probes and flowmeters and the color Doppler flow convergence method.

BACKGROUND

Methods for determining mitral regurgitant orifice areas have been described using flow convergence imaging with a hemispheric isovelocity surface assumption. However, the shape of flow convergence isovelocity surfaces depends on many factors that change during regurgitation.

METHODS

In seven sheep with surgically created mitral regurgitation, 18 hemodynamic states were studied. The aliasing distances of flow convergence were measured at 10 sequential points using two ranges of aliasing velocities (0.20 to 0.32 and 0.56 to 0.72 m/s), and instantaneous flow rates were calculated using the hemispheric assumption. Instantaneous regurgitant areas were determined from the regurgitant flow rates obtained from both electromagnetic flowmeters and flow convergence divided by the corresponding continuous wave velocities.

RESULTS

The regurgitant orifice sizes obtained using the electromagnetic flow method usually increased to maximal size in early to midsystole and then decreased in late systole. Patterns of dynamic changes in orifice area obtained by flow convergence were not the same as those delineated by the electromagnetic flow method. Time-averaged regurgitant orifice areas obtained by flow convergence using lower aliasing velocities overestimated the areas obtained by the electromagnetic flow method ([mean +/- SD] 0.27 +/- 0.14 vs. 0.12 +/- 0.06 cm2, p < 0.001), whereas flow convergence, using higher aliasing velocities, estimated the reference areas more reliably (0.15 +/- 0.06 cm2).

CONCLUSIONS

The electromagnetic flow method studies uniformly demonstrated dynamic change in mitral regurgitant orifice area and suggested limitations of the flow convergence method.

Regurgitant heart valve flow from 2-D proximal velocity field: continued search for the ideal method

It has been suggested that flow through a leaking heart valve can be determined by studying the proximal velocity field. Normally, only the centre-line velocity is studied as a potential method. The aim of the study is to improve this method by using information from the entire reconstructed proximal velocity field. Four methods are compared: use of the centre-line velocity; use of velocities at three different angles; integration of velocities over a hemisphere; and integration of velocities over an estimated hemi-elliptical isovelocity line. Measurements are performed in a hydraulic model with 4, 6 and 8 mm circular orifices, and these are compared with those from computer simulation. From the results presented in the study, it is suggested that the velocities should be integrated over a hemisphere within a best zone. This zone is dependent on the instrument settings, but in this case it is positioned 1.2-1.4 orifice diameters from the orifice inlet, with an angle of up to +/- 45 degrees from the centre axis, and contains velocities in the range 0.15-0.45 ms-1.

Color flow Doppler determination of transmitral flow and orifice area in mitral stenosis: experimental evaluation of the proximal flow-convergence method

To evaluate the in vivo accuracy of color Doppler flow-convergence methods for determining transmitral flow volumes and effective orifice areas in mitral stenosis, we studied two models for flow-convergence surface geometry, a hemispheric (HS) model and an oblate hemispheroid (OH) model in a chronic animal model with quantifiable mitral flows. Color Doppler flow mapping of the proximal flow-convergence region has been reported to be useful for evaluation of intracardiac flows. Flow-convergence methods in patients with mitral stenosis that use HS assumption for the isovelocity surface have resulted in underestimation of actual flows. Chronic mitral stenosis was created surgically in six sheep with annuloplasty rings (group 1) and 11 sheep with bioprosthetic porcine valves (group 2). Hemodynamic and echocardiographic/Doppler studies (n = 18 in group 1; n = 21 in group 2) were performed 20 to 34 weeks later. Left ventricular inflow obstruction was of varied severity, with mean transmitral valve gradients in group 1 ranging from 1.3 to 18 mm Hg and in group 2 ranging from 6.3 to 25.6 mm Hg. Although transmitral flows derived by both geometric flow convergence models showed significant correlations with reference cardiac outputs, the correlations for the OH model were better than those for the HS model (group 1, r = 0.86 for the OH model vs r = 0.72 for the HS model; group 2; r = 0.84 for the OH model vs r = 0.62 for the HS model). The OH model was also superior to the HS model in determining effective orifice areas compared to reference orifice areas determined by postmortem planimetry of anatomic orifices (group 1 only, r = 0.64 for OH vs 0.58 for HS), by the Gorlin and Gorlin formula (group 1, r = 0.63 for OH vs 0.72 for HS; group 2, r = 0.82 for OH vs 0.76 for HS), and by the Doppler pressure half-time method (group 1, r = 0.76 for OH vs 0.69 for HS; group 2, r = 0.84 for OH vs 0.62 for HS).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Color Doppler regurgitant jet area for evaluating eccentric mitral regurgitation: an animal study with quantified mitral regurgitation

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of the present study was to rigorously evaluate the accuracy of the color Doppler jet area planimetry method for quantifying chronic mitral regurgitation.

BACKGROUND

Although the color Doppler jet area has been widely used clinically for evaluating the severity of mitral regurgitation, there have been no studies comparing the color jet area with a strictly quantifiable reference standard for determining regurgitant volume.

METHODS

In six sheep with surgically produced chronic mitral regurgitation, 24 hemodynamically different states were obtained. Maximal color Doppler jet area for each state was obtained with a Vingmed 750. Image data were directly transferred in digital format to a microcomputer. Mitral regurgitation was quantified by the peak and mean regurgitant flow rates, regurgitant stroke volumes and regurgitant fractions determined using mitral and aortic electromagnetic flow probes.

RESULTS

Mean regurgitant volumes varied from 0.19 to 2.4 liters/min (mean [+/- SD] 1.2 +/- 0.59), regurgitant stroke volumes from 1.8 to 29 ml/beat (mean 11 +/- 6.2), peak regurgitant volumes from 1.0 to 8.1 liters/min (mean 3.5 +/- 2.1) and regurgitant fractions from 8.0% to 54% (mean 29 +/- 12%). Twenty-two of 24 jets were eccentric. Simple linear regression analysis between maximal color jet areas and peak and mean regurgitant flow rates, regurgitant stroke volumes and regurgitant fractions showed correlation, with r = 0.68 (SEE 0.64 cm2), r = 0.63 (SEE 0.67 cm2), r = 0.63 (SEE 0.67 cm2) and r = 0.58 (SEE 0.71 cm2), respectively. Univariate regression comparing regurgitant jet area with cardiac output, stroke volume, systolic left ventricular pressure, pressure gradient, left ventricular/left atrial pressure gradient, left atrial mean pressure, left atrial v wave pressure, systemic vascular resistance and maximal jet velocity showed poor correlation (0.08 < r < 0.53, SEE > 0.76 cm2).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that color Doppler jet area has limited use for evaluating the severity of mitral regurgitation with eccentric jets.

Estimation of regurgitant flow volume based on centerline velocity/distance profiles using digital color M-Q Doppler: application to orifices of different shapes

OBJECTIVES

In this study we investigated the centerline velocity profile method for flow computation as applied to noncircular, as well as circular, orifices using digital color flow data.

BACKGROUND

Recently it has been suggested that flow volume through an orifice can be estimated more accurately by computing the axial "centerline" flow velocity/distance profile proximal to the orifice.

METHODS

A total of seven different orifices were mounted in a constant-flow model: four circular orifices, two rectangular orifices with a major/minor axis ratio of 4:1 and 8:1 and an ovoid orifice having a major/minor axis ratio of 2:1. Three different flow rates were examined (1.68, 3.48 and 6.48 liters/min). Digital measurements of flow velocity at discrete positions along the centerline progressing toward the orifice were analyzed to yield complete flow velocity profiles for each orifice at each flow rate.

RESULTS

A clear separation of the flow profiles for the three different flow rates was observed independent of orifice size for all of the circular orifices. The velocity/distance acceleration curves showed highly significant correlations using multiplicative regression fits (y = ax-b, r = 0.94 to 0.99, all p < 0.0001). An equation for quantitatively correlating the a and b coefficients from the multiplicative regression fits with flow rates was derived from stepwise regression analysis: Flow rate = 23a + 3.3b - 1.5 (r = 0.97, p < 0.0001, SEE 0.46 liter/min).

CONCLUSIONS

In view of the various sizes and shapes encountered clinically for regurgitant orifices, the simplicity of this method for the estimation of the severity of regurgitant lesions might be of importance for clinical applications of this method.

Dynamics of mitral regurgitant flow and orifice area. Physiologic application of the proximal flow convergence method: clinical data and experimental testing

BACKGROUND

The proximal flow convergence method, a quantitative color Doppler flow technique, has been validated recently for calculating regurgitant flow and orifice area. We investigated the potential of the method as a tool to study different pathophysiological mechanisms of mitral valve incompetence by assessing the time course of regurgitant flow and orifice area and analyzed the implications for quantification of mitral regurgitation.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Fifty-six consecutive patients with mitral regurgitation of different etiologies were studied. The instantaneous regurgitant flow rate Q(t) was computed from color M-mode recordings of the proximal flow convergence region and divided by the corresponding orifice velocity V(t) to obtain the instantaneous orifice area A(t). Regurgitant stroke volume (RSV) was obtained by integrating Q(t). Mean regurgitant flow rate Qm was calculated by RSV divided by regurgitation time. Peak-to-mean regurgitant flow rates Qp/Qm and orifice areas Ap/Am were calculated to assess the phasic character of Q(t) and A(t). In the first 24 patients (group 1), computation of Qm and RSV from the color Doppler recordings was compared with the conventional pulsed Doppler method (r = .94, SEE = 29.4 mL/s and r = .95, SEE = 9.7 mL) as well as with angiography (rs = .93 and rs = .94, P < .001). The temporal variation of Q(t) and A(t) was studied in the next 32 patients (group 2): In functional regurgitation in dilated cardiomyopathy (n = 12), there was a constant decrease in A(t) throughout systole with an increase during left ventricular relaxation; Ap/Am was 5.49 +/- 3.17. In mitral valve prolapse (n = 6), A(t) was small in early systole, increasing substantially in midsystole, and decreasing mildly during left ventricular relaxation; Ap/Am was 2.48 +/- 0.26. In rheumatic mitral regurgitation (n = 14), a roughly constant regurgitant orifice area during most of systole was found in 4 patients. In the other patients there was significant variation of A (t) and the time of its maximum; Ap/Am was 1.81 +/- 0.56. ANOVA demonstrated that the differences in Ap/Am were related to the etiology of mitral regurgitation (P < .0001). To verify that the calculated variation in regurgitant orifice area during the cardiac cycle reflects an actual variation, the ability of the method to predict a constant orifice area throughout systole was tested experimentally in a canine model of mitral regurgitation. Five flow stages were produced by implanting fixed grommet orifices of different sizes into the anterior mitral leaflet. A constant regurgitant orifice area was correctly predicted throughout systole with a mean percent error of -1.8 +/- 4% (from -6.9% to +5.8%); the standard deviation of the individual curves calculated at 10% intervals during systole averaged 13.3% (from 3.6% to 19.6%). In addition, functional mitral regurgitation caused by ventricular dysfunction was produced pharmacologically in five dogs, and the color M-mode recordings of the proximal flow convergence region were obtained with the transducer placed directly on the heart instead of the chest, thus ruling out a significant effect of translational motion on the observed flow pattern. The pattern of regurgitant flow variation was identical to that observed in patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The proximal flow convergence method demonstrates that regurgitant flow and orifice area vary throughout systole in distinct patterns characteristic of the underlying mechanism of mitral incompetence. Therefore, in addition to the potential of the method as a tool to quantify mitral regurgitation, it allows analysis of the pathophysiology of regurgitation in the individual patient, which may be helpful in clinical decision making. Calculating mitral regurgitant flow rate and volume from the time-varying proximal flow field (ie, without assuming a constant orifice area that would produce overestimation in individual patients) provides excellent agreement with independent te

Evaluation of mitral regurgitation using a digitally determined color Doppler flow convergence 'centerline' acceleration method. Studies in an animal model with quantified mitral regurgitation

BACKGROUND

The imaging and measurement of the proximal flow convergence region in the left ventricle have been reported to be useful for identifying the site of mitral regurgitation (MR) and for evaluating its severity. However, the application of this method has not gained general acceptance. There have been few in vivo studies with quantified reference standards for determining regurgitant volume, and those that have been reported used spectral Doppler standards and/or nonsimultaneously performed contrast ventriculography. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the proximal flow convergence centerline velocity-distance profile method applied to chronic MR resulting from flail mitral leaflets in an animal model in which regurgitant flow rates and regurgitant volumes were determined simultaneously with electromagnetic flow probes and flowmeters.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In six sheep, a total of 18 hemodynamically different states were obtained when the animals were restudied 6 months after surgical induction of MR produced by severing chordae tendineae to the anterior (three sheep) or posterior (three sheep) mitral leaflet. Echocardiographic studies with a Vingmed 750 were performed to obtain complete proximal axial flow acceleration velocity-distance profiles for each hemodynamic state. The color Doppler velocity data were directly transferred in digital format from the ultrasound instrumentation to a microcomputer. The severity of MR was assessed by the magnitude of the mitral regurgitant fraction determined using both mitral and aortic electromagnetic flow probes balanced against each other to yield regurgitant volume. MR was classified as grade I when the regurgitant fraction was < 20%, as grade II when it was 20% to 35%, and as grade III to IV when it was > 35%. Thus, of the 18 hemodynamic states, 4 (from two sheep) were grade I, 7 (from five sheep) were grade II, and 7 (from three sheep) were grade III to IV. All of the velocity-distance acceleration curves showed organized acceleration fields with highly significant correlations using multiplicative regression fits (y = a.x-b, r = .90 to .99, all P < .01). Grade III to IV MR resulted in rightward and upward shifts of the velocity-distance profile curves compared with those produced by grade II and grade I MR. All of the centerline velocity-distance profiles for grade III or IV regurgitation resided in a domain encompassed by velocities > 0.5 m/s at distances from the orifice > 0.6 cm; the profiles for grade I regurgitation resided in a domain encompassed by velocities < 0.3 m/s at distances from the orifice of < 0.45 cm. The profiles for grade II regurgitations resided in a domain between them. Regression analysis for the distance at which a velocity of 0.5 m/s was first reached bore a close relation to regurgitant fraction (r = .92, P < .0001) and peak regurgitant flow rate (r = .89, P < .0001). In addition, an equation for quantitatively correlating both a and b (coefficients from the multiplicative regression fits) with the peak regurgitant flow rate (Qpeak in L/min) was derived from stepwise regression analysis: Qpeak = 12a + 2.7b-2.4 (r = .96, P < .0001, SEE = .45 L/min).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, using quantified MR volume, we demonstrate that the proximal flow convergence axial centerline velocity-distance profile method can be used for evaluating the severity of MR without any assumption about isovelocity surface shape geometry.

Cardiac motion can alter proximal isovelocity surface area calculations of regurgitant flow

OBJECTIVES

This study addressed the hypothesis that motion of the surface containing a regurgitant orifice relative to the Doppler ultrasound transducer can cause differences between actual flow rate and calculations based on the proximal flow convergence technique.

BACKGROUND

In vitro studies quantitating regurgitant flow rate by proximal flow convergence have been limited to stationary orifices. Clinically, however, valve leaflets generally move relative to the ultrasound transducer during the cardiac cycle and can move at velocities important relative to the measured color aliasing velocities. The transducer therefore senses the vector sum of actual flow velocity toward the orifice and orifice velocity relative to the transducer. This can cause potential overestimation or underestimation of true flow rate, depending on the direction of surface motion.

METHODS

The hypothesis was explored computationally and tested by pumping fluid at a constant flow rate through an orifice in a plate moving at 0 to 8 cm/s (velocities comparable to those described clinically for mitral and tricuspid annulus motion toward an apical transducer).

RESULTS

Surface motion in the same direction as flow caused overestimation of the aliasing radius and calculated flow rate. Surface motion opposite to the direction of flow (typical for mitral and tricuspid regurgitation viewed from the apex or esophagus) caused underestimation of actual flow rate. The underestimation was greater for lower aliasing velocities (36 +/- 11% for 10 cm/s vs. 23 +/- 6% for 20 cm/s). Correcting for surface motion provided excellent agreement with actual values (y = 0.97x + 0.10, r = 0.99, SEE = 0.17 liters/min).

CONCLUSIONS

Physiologic motion of the surface containing a regurgitant orifice can cause substantial differences between actual flow rate and that calculated by the proximal flow convergence technique. Los aliasing velocities used to optimize that technique can magnify this effect. Such errors can be minimized by using higher aliasing velocities (compatible with the need to measure the aliasing radius) or eliminated by correcting for surface velocity determined by an M-mode ultrasound scan.

Validation of the proximal flow convergence method. Calculation of orifice area in patients with mitral stenosis

BACKGROUND

It has been proposed recently that measuring the flow convergence region proximal to an orifice by Doppler flow mapping can provide a means of calculating regurgitant flow rate. Although verified in experimental models, this approach is difficult to validate clinically because there is no ideal gold standard for regurgitant flows in patients. However, this method also can be used to derive cardiac output or flow rate proximal to stenotic orifices and therefore to calculate their areas by the continuity equation (area = flow rate/velocity). Applying this method in mitral stenosis would provide a unique way of validating the underlying concept because the predicted areas could be compared with those measured directly by planimetry.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We studied 40 patients with mitral stenosis using imaging and Doppler echocardiography. Doppler color flow recordings of mitral inflow were obtained from the apex, and the radius of the proximal flow convergence region was measured at its peak diastolic value from the orifice to the first color alias along the axis of flow. Flow rate was calculated assuming uniform radial flow convergence toward the orifice, modified by a factor that accounted for the inflow funnel angle formed by the mitral leaflets. Mitral valve area was then calculated as peak flow rate divided by peak velocity by continuous-wave Doppler. The calculated areas agreed well with those from three comparative techniques over a range of 0.5 to 2.2 cm2: 1) cross-sectional area by planimetry (y = 1.08x-0.13, r = .91, SEE = 0.21 cm2); 2) area derived from the Doppler pressure half-time (y = 1.02x-0.14, r = .89, SEE = 0.24 cm2); and 3) area calculated by the Gorlin equation in the 26 patients who underwent catheterization (y = 0.89x + 0.08, r = .86, SEE = 0.24 cm2). Agreement with planimetry was similar for 22 patients with mitral regurgitation and 18 without it (P > .6), as well as for 6 in atrial fibrillation (P > .2).

CONCLUSIONS

These results validate the proximal flow convergence concept in the clinical setting and also demonstrate that it can be extended to orifice area calculation using the continuity equation.

Enhancement of mitral regurgitation and normal left atrial color Doppler flow signals with peripheral venous injection of a saccharide-based contrast agent

OBJECTIVES

The saccharide ultrasound contrast agent SHU 508 A was used to test the hypothesis that an intravenous, transpulmonary contrast method can enhance color Doppler flow signals in the left atrium in a clinically useful manner.

BACKGROUND

Color Doppler display of mitral regurgitation may be unreliable because of variable signal to noise ratios that are at times poor. Traditional contrast agents enhance color Doppler flow signals in the right heart chambers. This study describes our observation of a recently developed contrast agent, SHU 508 A, capable of pulmonary transit after peripheral venous injection.

METHODS

Control subjects (n = 10) and patients with suspected mitral regurgitation (n = 23) were studied by color Doppler flow imaging before and after 3-g intravenous doses of SHU 508 A. Reference grading of mitral regurgitation (0 to 3) was formulated from left ventricular angiography. In the four-chamber view of the left atrium, we selected for analysis the systolic frame with the maximal retrograde jet of mitral regurgitation (aliased/blue) and the diastolic frame with the maximal color coding from anterograde pulmonary venous flow (red) for planimetry and for grading the intensity of the color Doppler signal (0 to 5).

RESULTS

The score of the color Doppler signal intensity increased by > or = 2.5 after 3 g of SHU 508 A (p < 0.001). Flow detection improved, as shown by the increased jet area of mitral regurgitation (> or = 170%), after 3 g of SHU 508 A (3 +/- 3 vs. 12 +/- 8 cm2, p < 0.001) and by a > or = 200% increase in normal anterograde flow area (p < 0.001) in both the mitral regurgitation group and the control group. After contrast enhancement, the correlation between angiographic grading and the relation of jet area to the left atrial area increased from r = 0.79 to r = 0.91.

CONCLUSIONS

Contrast-mediated increased echogenicity of the left atrial blood pool improves the signal to noise ratio of Doppler images of mitral regurgitation and anterograde atrial flow. The technique is safe and simple and seems to minimize variability due to instrument design and anatomic signal attenuation.

The shape of the proximal isovelocity surface area varies with regurgitant orifice size and distance from orifice: computer simulation and model experiments with color M-mode technique

The hemispheric proximal isovelocity surface area method for quantification of mitral regurgitant flow (i.e., Qc = 2 pi r2v), where 2 pi r2 is the surface area and v is the velocity at radius r, was investigated as distance from the orifice was increased. Computer simulations and steady flow model experiments were performed for orifices of 4, 6, and 8 mm. Flow rates derived from the centerline velocity and hemispheric assumption were compared with true flow rates. Proximal isovelocity surface area shape varied as distance from each orifice was increased and could only be approximated from the hemispheric equation when a certain distance was exceeded: > 7, > 10, and > 12 mm for the 4, 6, and 8 mm orifices, respectively. Prediction of relative error showed that the best radial zone at which to make measurements was 5 to 9, 6 to 14 and 7 to 17 mm for the 4, 6, and 8 mm orifices, respectively. Although effects of a nonhemispheric shape could be compensated for by use of a correction factor, a radius of 8 to 9 mm can be recommended without the use of a correction factor over all orifices studied if a deviation in calculated as compared with true flow of 15% is considered acceptable. These measurements therefore have implications for the technique in clinical practice.

Color Doppler echocardiographic determination of mitral regurgitant flow from the proximal velocity profile of the flow convergence region

Flow rate across an orifice can be determined from color Doppler echocardiographic maps of the flow convergence region proximal to the orifice. Different methods have been developed in vitro. The proximal velocity profile method was prospectively evaluated in patients with mitral regurgitation. Color Doppler echocardiography was performed in 74 patients before cardiac catheterization. The increasing velocities within the flow convergence region were determined in an apical plane on the straight line from the transducer to the leak; thus the proximal velocity profile was established and plotted on a nomogram. Instantaneous regurgitant flow rate was derived from the position of the resulting curve in relation to the nomogram's reference curves, which were derived from in vitro measurements. Regurgitant stroke volume was calculated as regurgitant flow rate.regurgitant velocity-time integral/regurgitant peak velocity, using additional continuous-wave Doppler. The 55 patients with angiographic regurgitation had a close association between regurgitant flow rate (0 to 600 ml/s) and angiographic grade (Spearman's rank correlation coefficient = 0.91; p < 0.0001). Regurgitant flow rate did not overlap between grades < or = 2+, 3+ and 4+. In 16 patients, regurgitant stroke volume by echocardiography correlated well with that by the angiography/Fick method (r = 0.88; SEE = 17.1 ml), with a regression line close to identity (y = 0.89x + 12.7 ml). The proximal velocity profile method enables determination of mitral regurgitant flow and estimation of regurgitant volume.

A comparison of flow convergence with other transthoracic echocardiographic indexes of prosthetic mitral regurgitation

Prosthetic shadowing of the left atrium may prevent detection of mitral regurgitation during transthoracic echocardiography. In 60 patients with mitral valves, Carpentier-Edwards (n = 20), St. Jude (n = 22), and cage-ball (n = 18), we blindly evaluated the accuracy of three transthoracic Doppler signs of significant (> 2+) mitral regurgitation: (1) color Doppler flow convergence, (2) a color Doppler jet of significant regurgitation in the left atrium, and (3) an intense continuous wave Doppler signal. All 60 patients had transesophageal echocardiography, 26 had cardiac catheterization, and 28 had surgery. The sensitivity and specificity of flow convergence for significant regurgitation by transesophageal echocardiography was 73% and 70%, respectively, compared with 33% and 93% for left atrial color Doppler, and 15% and 97% for continuous wave Doppler. The sensitivity of flow convergence in Carpentier-Edwards, St. Jude, and cage-ball valves was 80%, 73%, and 67%, respectively; whereas the sensitivity of left atrial color Doppler was 70%, 27%, and 0%, and the sensitivity of continuous wave Doppler was 33%, 0%, and 13%. Flow convergence was the only sign of significant regurgitation in 12 of 30 patients (40%); 10 of these patients had mechanical valves. We conclude flow convergence is a more sensitive, though less specific, predictor of significant mitral regurgitation than color Doppler, spatial mapping of the left atrium, and continuous wave Doppler, especially when a mechanical valve is present.

Value of acceleration flow signals proximal to the leaking orifice in assessing the severity of prosthetic mitral valve regurgitation

To test the value of acceleration flow signals proximal to the leaking orifice in assessing the severity of prosthetic mitral valve regurgitation, 39 consecutive patients undergoing left ventriculography were examined by Doppler color flow imaging. Acceleration flow signals proximal to the regurgitant orifice were detected in 27 of the 31 patients who had prosthetic mitral regurgitation by left ventriculography (sensitivity 87%). All four patients without acceleration flow signals had mild prosthetic mitral regurgitation by angiography. No acceleration flow signals were detected in any patient without prosthetic regurgitation by left ventriculography (specificity 100%). Individual values of the maximal area of acceleration flow signals obtained from three orthogonal planes in seven patients with mild prosthetic mitral regurgitation by angiography ranged from 0 to 17 mm2 (mean 4 +/- 6). In 8 patients with moderate prosthetic mitral regurgitation by angiography, the maximal area of acceleration flow signals ranged from 21 to 58 mm2 (mean 33 +/- 15), whereas the maximal area of acceleration flow signals in 16 patients with severe prosthetic regurgitation ranged from 20 to 173 mm2 (mean 102 +/- 41). The maximal area of the acceleration flow signals from three planes correlated well with the angiographic grade of prosthetic mitral regurgitation. There was a significant difference in the maximal area of acceleration flow signals between mild and moderate (p less than 0.001), moderate and severe (p less than 0.001) and mild and severe (p less than 0.001) prosthetic mitral regurgitation. Thus, measurement of acceleration flow signals by Doppler color flow imaging is useful in assessing the severity of prosthetic mitral regurgitation.

A new method for quantitation of mitral regurgitation based on color flow Doppler imaging of flow convergence proximal to regurgitant orifice

BACKGROUND

Imaging of the flow convergence region (FCR) proximal to a regurgitant orifice has been shown to provide a method for quantifying the regurgitant flow rate. According to the continuity principle, the FCR is constituted by concentric hemispheric isovelocity surfaces centered at the orifice. The flow rate is constant across all isovelocity surfaces and equals the flow rate through the orifice. For any isovelocity surface the flow rate (Q) is given by: Q = 2 pi r2 Vr, where 2 pi r2 is the area of the hemisphere and Vr is the velocity at the radial distance (r) from the orifice.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We studied 52 consecutive patients with mitral regurgitation (mean age, 49 years; age range, 21-66 years) verified by left ventricular angiography using color flow mapping. The FCR r was measured as the distance between the first aliasing limit--at a Nyquist limit obtained by zero-shifting the velocity cutoff to 38 cm/sec--and the regurgitant orifice. Seven patients without evidence of an FCR had only grade 1+ mitral regurgitation angiographically. There was a significant relation between the Doppler-derived maximal instantaneous regurgitant flow rate and the angiographic degree of mitral regurgitation in the other patients (rs = 0.91, p less than 0.001). The regurgitant flow rate by Doppler also correlated with the angiographic regurgitant volume (r = 0.93, SEE = 123 ml/sec) in the 15 patients in normal sinus rhythm and without other regurgitant lesions in whom it could be measured. The correlation between regurgitant jet area within the left atrium and the angiographic grade was only fair (rs = 0.75, p less than 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Color flow Doppler provides new velocity information about the proximal FCR in patients with mitral regurgitation. According to the continuity principle, the maximal instantaneous regurgitant flow rate, obtained with the FCR method, may provide a quantitative estimate of the severity of mitral regurgitation, which is relatively independent of technical factors.

The Evaluation of Mitral Regurgitation:

In the late 1970s, conventional Doppler techniques, specifically pulsed-wave (PW) Doppler and continuouswave (CW) Doppler, enabled the cardiac sonographer to detect the presence and determine the severity of mitral regurgitation. In the mid 1980s, with the introduction of color flow Doppler, the regurgitant jet area (RJA)/left atrial area (LAA) ratio quickly became the yardstick by which the severity of mitral regurgitation was judged. This simple ratio came to overshadow or even replace the conventional Doppler techniques that had preceded the ratio method. It is our contention that there is currently an overemphasis on the RJA/LAA ratio and we believe that a more balanced approach should be adopted in order to determine the severity of mitral regurgitation.