Reciprocal mutations of highly conserved residues in transmembrane helices 2 and 7 of the alpha(2A)-adrenoceptor restore agonist activation of G(i1)alpha

Bring your own G protein

G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR)-Galpha fusion proteins were first characterized more than 10 years ago as a strategy for studying receptor-G protein signaling. A large number of studies have used this approach to characterize receptor coupling to members of the Gs, Gi, and Gq families of Galpha subunits, but this strategy has not been widely used to study Galpha12 and Galpha13. As described in the article by Zhang et al. in this issue of Molecular Pharmacology (p. 1433) characterization of the signaling properties of thromboxane A2 receptor (TPalpha) -Galpha12 and -Galpha13 fusion constructs demonstrates the applicability of this strategy to members of this unique family of Galpha subunits, and how this strategy can be used to resolve otherwise difficult problems of receptor pharmacology associated with these proteins. The general strategy of making receptor-Galpha fusion constructs has wide applicability to a number of research problems, but there are perhaps also "hidden messages" in how different receptor-Galpha subunit fusion pairs behave.

Functional complementation and the analysis of opioid receptor homodimerization

Complementation of function after coexpression of pairs of nonfunctional G protein-coupled receptors that contain distinct inactivating mutations supports the hypothesis that such receptors exist as dimers. Chimeras between members of the metabotropic glutamate receptor-like family have been particularly useful because the N-terminal ligand binding and heptahelical transmembrane elements can be considered distinct domains. To examine the utility of a related approach for opioid receptors, fusion proteins were generated in which a pertussis toxin-resistant (Cys351Ile) variant of the G protein Gi1alpha was linked to the C-terminal tails of the delta opioid peptide (DOP), kappa opioid peptide, and mu opioid peptide receptors. Each was functional as measured by agonist stimulation of guanosine 5'-([gamma-35S]thio)triphosphate ([35S]GTPgammaS) binding in Gialpha immunoprecipitates from membranes of pertussis toxin-treated HEK293 cells. Agonist function was eliminated either by fusion of the receptors to Gi1alphaGly202Ala,Cys351Ile or mutation of a pair of conserved Val residues in intracellular loop 2 of each receptor. Coexpression, but not simple mixing, of the two inactive fusion proteins reconstituted agonist-loading of [35S]GTPgammaS for each receptor. At equimolar amounts, reconstitution of DOP receptor function was more extensive than kappa or mu opioid receptor. Reconstitution of DOP function required two intact receptors and was not achieved by provision of extra Gi1alphaCys351Ile membrane anchored by linkage to DOP transmembrane domain 1. Inactive forms of all G protein alpha subunits can be produced by mutations equivalent to Gi1alphaGly202Ala. Because the amino acids modified in the opioid receptors are highly conserved in most rhodopsin-like receptors, this approach should be widely applicable to study the existence and molecular basis of receptor dimerization.

Random mutagenesis of the M3 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor expressed in yeast: identification of second-site mutations that restore function to a coupling-deficient mutant M3 receptor

The M(3) muscarinic receptor is a prototypical member of the class A family of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). To gain insight into the structural mechanisms governing agonist-mediated M(3) receptor activation, we recently developed a genetically modified yeast strain (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) which allows the efficient screening of large libraries of mutant M(3) receptors to identify mutant receptors with altered/novel functional properties. Class A GPCRs contain a highly conserved Asp residue located in transmembrane domain II (TM II; corresponding to Asp-113 in the rat M(3) muscarinic receptor) which is of fundamental importance for receptor activation. As observed previously with other GPCRs analyzed in mammalian expression systems, the D113N point mutation abolished agonist-induced receptor/G protein coupling in yeast. We then subjected the D113N mutant M(3) receptor to PCR-based random mutagenesis followed by a yeast genetic screen to recover point mutations that can restore G protein coupling to the D113N mutant receptor. A large scale screening effort led to the identification of three such second-site suppressor mutations, R165W, R165M, and Y250D. When expressed in the wild-type receptor background, these three point mutations did not lead to an increase in basal activity and reduced the efficiency of receptor/G protein coupling. Similar results were obtained when the various mutant receptors were expressed and analyzed in transfected mammalian cells (COS-7 cells). Interestingly, like Asp-113, Arg-165 and Tyr-250, which are located at the cytoplasmic ends of TM III and TM V, respectively, are also highly conserved among class A GPCRs. Our data suggest a conformational link between the highly conserved Asp-113, Arg-165, and Tyr-250 residues which is critical for receptor activation.

Mechanism of action of Gq to inhibit G beta gamma modulation of CaV2.2 calcium channels: probed by the use of receptor-G alpha tandems

The stable interaction of a G-protein coupled receptor and a particular partner G-protein was made possible by creating tandems between the alpha(2A) adrenergic receptor (alpha(2A)-R) and pertussis toxin-resistant mutants of different G alpha subunits of heterotrimeric G-proteins. Both alpha(2A)-R-G alpha(o) and alpha(2A)-R-G alpha(i) proved able to reconstitute agonist-induced voltage-dependent inhibition of N-type calcium channels (Ca(V)2.2) similar to the wild-type alpha(2A)-R when expressed in COS-7 cells. The interaction of G(q) with the G(i/o) signaling pathways was studied by expressing either G alpha(q) or a chimeric construct based on G alpha(q) containing the last five amino acids of G alpha(z), which is activated by alpha(2A)-R. It was found that G alpha(qz5) activated by the wild-type alpha(2A)-R inhibited Ca(V)2.2 currents in a voltage-independent fashion. Furthermore, G alpha(qz5) counteracted the voltage-dependent inhibition resulting from alpha(2A)-R-G alpha(o) activation. We subsequently investigated the basis for the behavior of G alpha(qz5). Our evidence suggests that this occurs as a result of a downstream effect of activation of G alpha(qz5) because it was blocked by C-terminal construct of phospholipase C beta 1. Furthermore it is likely to occur in part via protein kinase C (PKC) activation, because the PKC activator phorbol dibutyrate mimicked the effects of G alpha(qz5) in alpha(2A)-R-G alpha(o)-transfected cells. Conversely, cells expressing both alpha(2A)-R-G alpha(o) and G alpha(qz5) exhibited a partial restoration of voltage-dependent inhibition in the presence of the PKC inhibitor bisindolylmaleimide I (GF 109203X). The potential sites of phosphorylation are discussed.

Regulation of the avidity of ternary complexes containing the human 5-HT(1A) receptor by mutation of a receptor contact site on the interacting G protein alpha subunit

1 Fusion proteins were constructed between the human 5-HT(1A) receptor and pertussis toxin-resistant forms of both G(i1)alpha and G(o1)alpha mutated at residue(351) from cysteine to either glycine or isoleucine. Each of these was expressed stably in HEK293 cells. 2 Increasing concentrations of GDP inhibited binding of the agonist [(3)H]-8-OH-DPAT but not the antagonist [(3)H]-MPPF to each construct. 3 The IC(50) for GDP was greater for constructs containing isoleucine at residue(351) of the G proteins compared to those with glycine at this position. 4 The G protein antagonist suramin had similar effects to GDP on the binding of [(3)H]-8-OH-DPAT. 5 The proportion of 5-HT(1A) receptor binding sites detected by [(3)H]-MPPF that displayed high affinity for 8-OH-DPAT was significantly greater when the interacting G protein contained isoleucine rather than glycine at residue(351). 6 The 5-HT(1A) receptor displayed similar avidity of interaction with G(i1)alpha and G(o1)alpha. 7 These results indicate that a higher avidity ternary complex is formed between 8-OH-DPAT, the 5-HT(1A) receptor and G proteins when isoleucine rather than glycine is located at residue(351) of the interacting G protein.

Measurement of agonist-dependent and -independent signal initiation of alpha(1b)-adrenoceptor mutants by direct analysis of guanine nucleotide exchange on the G protein galpha(11)

Immunoprecipitation of a fusion protein between the alpha(1b)-adrenoceptor and Galpha(11) following a [(35)S]GTPgammaS [guanosine-5'-O-(3-thio)triphosphate] binding assay resulted in incorporation of low levels of nucleotide. The agonist phenylephrine increased incorporation some 30-fold. Agonist-induced binding represented 1.0 mol of [(35)S]GTPgammaS/mol of fusion protein. This was to the G protein linked to the receptor rather than endogenous Galpha(q)/Galpha(11) as a fusion protein containing the alpha(1b)-adrenoceptor and a form of Galpha(11) (G(208)A) unable to exchange guanine nucleotides effectively, bound [(35)S]GTPgammaS very poorly. Fusion proteins between A(293)E, D(142)A, and 3CAM mutants of the alpha(1b)-adrenoceptor and Galpha(11) bound substantially greater levels of [(35)S]GTPgammaS in the absence of agonist than the fusion incorporating the wild-type receptor. Constitutive binding of the nucleotide induced by these mutants was only 20% of the level achieved by phenylephrine. These mutant receptors thus do not provide an accurate mimic of the agonist-occupied state. Phentolamine reduced the binding of [(35)S]GTPgammaS and acted as a partial inverse agonist for each of the constitutively active mutants. [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding to Galpha(11) was elevated by phenylephrine in both wild-type and constitutively active mutant forms of the fusion proteins, but agonist potency and binding affinity were 50 times higher for the fusions containing the mutated receptors. These studies provide the first direct demonstration of the capacity of constitutively active mutants of a receptor to stimulate guanine nucleotide exchange on the alpha subunit of a G(q) family G protein and defines a strategy potentially suitable for any receptor that couples to these G proteins.