Serial changes in contribution of substrates to energy expenditure after transthoracic esophagectomy for cancer

Energy Expenditure in Upper Gastrointestinal Cancers: a Scoping Review

Malnutrition is prevalent in people with upper gastrointestinal (GI) cancers and is associated with shorter survival and poor quality of life. In order to effectively prevent or treat malnutrition, nutrition interventions must ensure appropriate energy provision to meet daily metabolic demands. In practice, the energy needs of people with cancer are frequently estimated from predictive equations which are not cancer-specific and are demonstrated to be inaccurate in this population. The purpose of this scoping review was to synthesize the existing evidence regarding energy expenditure in people with upper GI cancer. Three databases (Ovid MEDLINE, Embase via Ovid, CINAHL plus) were systematically searched to identify studies reporting on resting energy expenditure using indirect calorimetry and total energy expenditure using doubly labeled water (DLW) in adults with any stage of upper GI cancer at any point from diagnosis. A total of 57 original research studies involving 2,125 individuals with cancer of the esophagus, stomach, pancreas, biliary tract, or liver were eligible for inclusion. All studies used indirect calorimetry, and one study used DLW to measure energy expenditure, which was reported unadjusted in 42 studies, adjusted for body weight in 32 studies, and adjusted for fat-free mass in 13 studies. Energy expenditure in upper GI cancer was compared with noncancer controls in 19 studies and measured compared with predicted energy expenditure reported in 31 studies. There was heterogeneity in study design and in reporting of important clinical characteristics between studies. There was also substantial variation in energy expenditure between studies and within and between cancer types. Given this heterogeneity and known inaccuracies of predictive equations in patients with cancer, energy expenditure should be measured in practice wherever feasible. Additional research in cohorts defined by cancer type, stage, and treatment is needed to further characterize energy expenditure in upper GI cancer.

Assessment of the Physical Invasiveness of Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy during the Perioperative Period Based on Changes in Energy Metabolism

A novel treatment method for achalasia of the esophagus and related disorders is known as peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM). This study aimed to calculate the resting energy expenditure (REE) and evaluated the degree of physical invasiveness based on metabolic changes during the perioperative period of POEM. Fifty-eight patients who underwent POEM were prospectively enrolled; REE, body weight (BW), and basal energy expenditure were measured on the day of POEM, postoperative day 1 (POD 1), and three days after POEM (POD 3). The median REE/BW increased from 19.6 kcal/kg on the day of POEM to 24.5 kcal/kg on POD 1. On POD 3, it remained elevated at 20.9 kcal/kg. The stress factor on POD 1 was 1.20. Among the factors, including the Eckardt score, operation time, and the length of myotomy, the length of myotomy was associated with changes in REE/BW. During the perioperative period of POEM, the level of variation in energy expenditure was lower than that of esophageal cancer surgeries performed under general anesthesia. However, because the length of myotomy is a factor affecting changes in energy expenditure, careful perioperative management is desirable for patients with longer myotomy lengths.

Influence of Esophageal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection on the Changes of Energy Metabolism during the Perioperative Period

Esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is considered to be more complex than gastric ESD. This study aimed to assess the physical invasiveness of esophageal ESD during perioperative periods by measuring resting energy expenditure (REE). The factors affecting REE that could be used to identify patients requiring perioperative management were also investigated. Overall, 75 patients who had undergone esophageal ESD were prospectively enrolled. REE, body weight, and basal energy expenditure were measured on the day of and the day following ESD. The mean REE/body weight was 20.2 kcal/kg/day on the day of ESD and significantly increased to 23.0 kcal/kg/day one day after ESD. The stress factor on the day after ESD was 1.11. White blood cell, neutrophil, and C-reactive protein levels increased on the day after ESD and correlated with the changes in REE. Among the factors including age, body mass index, total resection area, operation time, and sarcopenia, only the total resection area was associated with changes in REE. In conclusion, energy metabolism increases during the perioperative period for esophageal ESD. The increase in the stress factor for esophageal ESD was higher than that in gastric and colorectal ESD. Furthermore, patients with large resection areas require greater attention in perioperative management. 

Analysis of the associated factors for severe weight loss after minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy

BACKGROUND

This study investigated the risk factors for severe weight loss (SWL) within one year after minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy.

METHODS

Esophageal cancer patients who underwent McKeown esophagectomy between January and July 2017 were prospectively enrolled. Preoperative body weight (PBW) was chosen as the initial body weight.

RESULTS

Forty-four patients were enrolled and successfully followed up for one year. Median weight loss was 7.4% (quartile: 5.3-8.1%) and 12.6% (quartile: 8.8-17.7%) four weeks and one year after surgery, respectively. Accelerated weight loss occurred during the first two weeks after discharge, with median weight loss of 5.6% (quartile: 4.2-7.1%). Multivariable analysis showed that age ≥ 70 years (odds ratio [OR] 7.65; P = 0.030), preoperative sarcopenia (OR 7.18; P = 0.030), the first surgery in the daily schedule (OR 6.87; P = 0.032) and vocal cord paralysis (OR 12.30; P = 0.046) were independent risk factors for short-term (4 weeks) SWL (> 7.5% PBW), while an American Society of Anesthesiologists score of 3-4 (OR 6.58; P = 0.047), a high fat-free mass (OR 21.91; P = 0.003), and vocal cord paralysis (OR 25.83; P = 0.017) were independent risk factors for long-term (1 year) SWL (> 13.0% PBW) after esophagectomy. Postoperative symptoms of insomnia, appetite loss, dysphagia, eating difficulties, and taste issues were also related to SWL.

CONCLUSIONS

In esophageal cancer patients who have undergone esophagectomy, the first two weeks after hospital discharge is a key period for nutrition intervention. Patients with associated factors for SWL require postoperative nutrition support.

Resting energy expenditure and nutritional status in patients undergoing transthoracic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer

This study was to assess the resting energy expenditure of patients with esophageal cancer using indirect calorimetry. Eight male patients with esophageal cancer and eight male healthy controls were enrolled in this study. All patients underwent transthoracic esophagectomy with lymph nodes dissections. The resting energy expenditure was measured preoperatively, and on postoperative day 7 and 14 using indirect calorimetry. Preoperatively, the measured resting energy expenditure/body weight in these patients was significantly higher than that of the controls (23.3 ± 2.1 kcal/kg/day vs 20.4 ± 1.6 kcal/kg/day), whereas the measured/predicted energy expenditure from the Harris-Benedict equation ratio was 1.01 ± 0.09, which did not differ significantly from the control values. The measured resting energy expenditure/body weight was 27.3 ± 3.5 kcal/kg/day on postoperative day 7, and 23.7 ± 5.07 kcal/kg/day on postoperative day 14. Significant increases in the measured resting energy expenditure were observed on postoperative day 7, and the measured/predicted energy expenditure ratio was 1.17 ± 0.15. In conclusion, patients with operable esophageal cancers were almost normometabolic before surgery. On the other hand, the patients showed a hyper-metabolic status after esophagectomy. We recommended that nutritional management based on 33 kcal/body weight/day (calculated by the measured resting energy expenditure × active factor 1.2-1.3) may be optimal for patients undergoing esophagectomy.

Immunonutrition risk factors of respiratory complications after esophagectomy

BACKGROUND

There are many reports suggesting predictive factors for respiratory complications after esophagectomy, but few studies have focused on this problem from the aspect of immunonutrition.

METHODS

A series of 45 esophageal cancer patients who underwent potentially curative resection between April 1996 and March 2001 was enrolled in this study. Preoperative and intraoperative variables were analyzed for a correlation between risk factors and respiratory complications. In this study, immunonutrition variables as assessed by ultrasonography and indirect calorimetry were used. Uni- and multivariate analyses were performed to determine the predictive factors.

RESULTS

Of 45 patients, nine patients (20%) developed respiratory complications. In univariate analysis, forced expiratory volume in 1 s per body surface area (m(2)) in preoperative respiratory parameters, respiratory quotient, and caloric contributions of fat (percentage) and carbohydrate according to indirect calorimetry, and serum CH50 level significantly influenced the occurrence of postoperative respiratory complications. In multivariate analysis, the caloric contribution of fat (percentage) by indirect calorimetry and serum alpha(1)-antitrypsin (serine protease inhibitor) independently affected the occurrence of respiratory complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative excessive fat oxidation (potential starvation) and alpha(1)-antitrypsin were independent predictive factors for postoperative complications. Nutrition support such as enteral feeding to improve this malnourished state would reduce the incidence of postoperative respiratory complications.

Nutrition in the intensive care unit

Nutritional support has become a routine part of the care of the critically ill patient. It is an adjunctive therapy, the main goal of which is to attenuate the development of malnutrition, yet the effectiveness of nutritional support is often thwarted by an underlying hostile metabolic milieu. This requires that these metabolic changes be taken into consideration when designing nutritional regimens for such patients. There is also a need to conduct large, multi-center studies to acquire more knowledge of the cost-benefit and cost effectiveness of nutritional support in the critically ill.

Nutritional Management of Patients With Esophageal and Esophagogastric Junction Cancer

BACKGROUND: Malnutrition is common in patients with esophageal and esophagogastric cancer. Compared to patients with other digestive and extradigestive neoplasia, the highest incidence (78.9%) was found in those with esophageal cancer. Malnutrition is associated with postoperative complications, increased morbidity, and prolonged hospital stays. METHODS: The authors review the impact and causes of malnutrition in esophageal cancer patients and present strategies that can be used to preserve or restore the nutritional status in this patient population throughout treatment. RESULTS: Patients usually are unable to sustain weight on oral intake alone and require additional means of nutritional support. Several methods can be used to provide nutritional care to the esophageal cancer patient, such as diet modification, oral supplementation, and enteral or parenteral nutrition. The enteral route is preferred due to preservation of gut integrity, reduced risk of complications, and less expense. In terminally ill patients, minimal nutritional intervention may be all that is needed to achieve patient comfort. CONCLUSIONS: In order to improve clinical outcomes and the quality of life for patients with esophageal and esophagogastric cancers, the extent of malnutrition must be identified and treated.

Indirect calorimetry: can this technology impact patient outcome?

This review of 23 papers involving indirect calorimetry published over the past 18 months shows how our understanding of the metabolic response to injury has changed, highlights the problems introduced by use of predictive equations and alterations in indirect calorimetry testing protocol, and emphasizes the need to monitor cumulative energy balance by comparing daily caloric intake to energy expenditure.