In vitro activity of BAY 12-8039, a new fluoroquinolone, against species representative of respiratory tract pathogens

Antibacterial Activity of CdTe/ZnS Quantum Dot-β Lactum Antibiotic Conjugates

β-Lactum antibiotics are broad class of antibiotics which kills bacteria by inhibiting the formation of peptidoglycan that constitutes the bacterial cell wall. The resistance that develops in bacteria for antibiotics led the scientific world to think about the future aspects for modifying the way through which antibiotics are acted on the bacteria and become lethal for them. In this consequence, the potential of latest marketed antibiotics e.g. Amoxiciline (I), ceftazidim (II) have been evaluated after being conjugated with quantum dots. The surface of quantum dots has been conjugated with antibiotics by carbodiimide coupling with the help of 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide (EDC) and N-hydroxysuccinimide (NHS) as conjugating agent between antibiotic and functionalized quantum dots. The antibacterial properties of QD-conjugated antibiotics have been determined by disc diffusion assay. The potency of QD-conjugated antibiotics has been estimated by determining their MIC50 for the selected strain of Gram-negative (Escherichia coli) and Gram-positive (Staphylococcus aureus) bacteria. Minimum inhibitory concentration study, minimum bactericidal concentration and growth pattern analysis revealed that QD-antibiotic conjugates showed slightly more prospective than pure native antibiotics against both Gram-negative (Escherichia coli) and Gram-positive (Staphylococcus aureus) bacteria.

Cefotaxime Mediated Synthesis of Gold Nanoparticles: Characterization and Antibacterial Activity

Cefotaxime (CTX) is a third-generation cephalosporin antibiotic with broad-spectrum activity against Gram negative and Gram positive bacteria. However, like other third-generation cephalosporin antibiotics, its efficacy is declining due to the increased prevalence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogens. Recent advances in nanotechnology have been projected as a practical approach to combat MDR microorganisms. Therefore, in the current study, gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) were prepared using cefotaxime sodium, which acted as a reducing and capping agent, besides having well-established antibacterial activity. The synthesized cefotaxime-loaded gold nanoparticles (C-AuNPs) were characterized by UV-Visible spectroscopy, FTIR, TEM and DLS. In addition, the in vitro antibacterial activity of C-AuNPs was assessed against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. UV-Visible spectroscopy verified the formation of C-AuNPs, while TEM and DLS verified their nano-size. In addition, CTX loading onto AuNPs was confirmed by FTIR. Furthermore, the colloidal stability of the synthesized C-AuNPs was ascribed to the higher net negative surface charge of C-AuNPs. Most importantly, the synthesized C-AuNPs showed superior antibacterial activity and lower minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values against Gram-negative (Escherichia coli, Klebsiella oxytoca, Pseudomonas aeruginosa) and gram-positive (Staphylococcus aureus) bacteria, compared with pure CTX. Collectively, CTX was successfully adopted, as reducing and capping agent, to synthesize stable, nano-sized spherical C-AuNPs. Furthermore, loading CTX onto AuNPs could efficiently restore and/or boost the antibacterial activity of CTX against resistant Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria.

Efficacy and tolerability of moxifloxacin in 2338 patients with acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis

OBJECTIVE

A post-marketing surveillance (PMS) study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of moxifloxacin 400mg once daily in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis (AECB) treated by pulmonologists and pulmonary specialists in community-based practice settings.

PATIENT AND METHODS

2338 patients with AECB (54% male; 46% female) were included in the analysis. PMS studies are prospective, open, uncontrolled and observational in design. All therapeutic decisions were made by the attending physician, based on their clinical practice and experience. This approach was adopted in order to provide valuable information on the safety and efficacy of moxifloxacin therapy in routine clinical practice.

RESULTS

The main symptoms of AECB (cough, expectoration, dyspnoea, chest pain and fever) were either resolved or improved in 80-97% of patients. Most patients (65%) improved within 3 days of starting moxifloxacin therapy and 91.6% by day 5. Mean time to improvement was 3.2±1.6 days. Overall, 96.1% of patients were judged by their physician to be either cured or improved following moxifloxacin therapy. Approximately 57% of patients had previously been treated with an antibiotic for their last episode of AECB. The antibiotics used were mostly macrolides (18.2% of patients), beta-lactams (16.9%), tetracycline/ doxycycline (9.9%) and quinolones (9.5%). The tolerability of moxifloxacin therapy was rated as 'very good' or 'good' in 95.4% of patients. Adverse events were reported in only 1.5% of patients.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, moxifloxacin 400mg once daily was effective and well tolerated in this group of patients with AECB, combined with a rapid onset of action and a similarly high clinical success rate to that observed in controlled comparative clinical trials.

Once-daily moxifloxacin therapy for community-acquired pneumonia in general practice : evidence from a post-marketing surveillance study of 1467 patients

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy, safety and tolerability of oral moxifloxacin in outpatients with respiratory tract infections treated in general practices in Germany with the focus on community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). METHODS, DESIGN AND PATIENTS: This was an open-label, prospective, uncontrolled, post-marketing surveillance study undertaken between October 2001 and June 2002. Symptoms associated with pneumonia were documented at baseline and at follow-up visits. A general assessment was given and the number of days until improvement/cure were recorded by the attending physician at the end of therapy.

RESULTS

A total of 9036 patients were treated with moxifloxacin, of which 1467 had CAP. The recommended dosage of moxifloxacin (400mg once daily) was used in 97.8% of all CAP patients. Between the initial and final follow-up visits, symptoms of CAP were either improved or cured in 90-99% of patients. More than half of the patients showed improvement after 3 days (54.2%); 89.2% of patients were improved after 5 days. The mean time for patients to recover was 8.0 +/- 2.7 days, with 88.7% of patients recovered by day 10 of treatment. Physicians rated moxifloxacin therapy as 'very good' or 'good' in 96.6% of patients and virtually all favoured prescribing moxifloxacin again. Ten patients (0.7%) reported adverse events during moxifloxacin therapy, mostly gastrointestinal disturbances.

CONCLUSIONS

Moxifloxacin is a very effective and safe treatment for patients with CAP and is highly accepted by physicians and patients because of rapid symptom improvement and good tolerability.

Efficacy and tolerability of moxifloxacin in patients with sinusitis treated in general practice : results of a post-marketing surveillance study

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy, safety and tolerability of moxifloxacin, an 8-methoxy fluoroquinolone, in patients with respiratory tract infections (RTIs) treated in general practice in Germany. Different RTIs were analysed separately, and this paper focuses on patients with acute sinusitis. METHODS, DESIGN AND PATIENTS: This was an open-label, prospective, uncontrolled, post-marketing surveillance study undertaken between October 2001 and June 2002. Symptoms of sinusitis (fever, cough, nasal obstruction, nasal secretion and headache) were assessed at baseline and at follow-up visits, and classified as 'absent', 'mild' or 'severe' by the attending physician.

RESULTS

Altogether 9036 patients were treated with moxifloxacin, of whom 2405 adult men and women had sinusitis. Sinusitis symptoms were improved or cured in at least 92% of patients. Moxifloxacin produced significant improvements after only 3 days (71.6% of patients); 96.2% of patients were improved after 5 days. Most patients (89.5%) had recovered by day 8 and 97.3% by day 10. Physicians rated moxifloxacin therapy as 'good' or 'very good' in 96.6% of patients and almost all favoured prescribing moxifloxacin in the future. Very few adverse events were reported with moxifloxacin (<0.4%), and were mostly gastrointestinal disturbances.

CONCLUSIONS

Moxifloxacin is a very effective and safe treatment for patients with acute sinusitis in general practice and is highly regarded by both physicians and patients because of rapid symptom improvement and good tolerability.

Efficacy and safety of intravenous moxifloxacin versus cefoperazone with azithromycin in the treatment of community acquired pneumonia

To compare the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of intravenous moxifloxacin with those of a commonly used empirical antibiotic regimen, cefoperazone and azithromycin in the treatment of community acquired pneumonia (CAP) in adult patients requiring initial parenteral therapy, 40 patients with CAP were divided into two groups, a moxifloxacin group (n = 20) and a control group (n = 20), which were treated for 7 to 14 days. The patients in the moxifloxacin group were intravenously given 400 mg of moxifloxacin (Avelox) once a day. Patients in the control group were administered 2.0 g of cefoperazone twice a day and azithromycin 0.5 g once a day. Clinical, bacteriological, and laboratory examinations were performed before the treatment, and at the end of the treatment. Our results showed that there was no significant difference in the clinical efficacy rate between two treatment groups at end of therapy (90% for moxifloxacin, 95% for cefoperazone plus azithromycin) (P > 0.05). The bacteriologic eradication rate at the end of treatment was 90% in the moxifloxacin group and 80% in the cefoperazone-plus-azithromycin group, whereas there was no significant difference between the two groups (P > 0.05). In addition, both drugs were well-tolerated in this trial, with the number of drug-related adverse events being comparable. It is concluded that moxifloxacin is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for CAP and was equivalent to the commonly used empirical treatment of cefoperazone plus azithromycin. Moxifloxacin is likely to offer clinicians an alternative for reliable empirical CAP treatment in the face of increasing antibiotic resistance.

Real-life treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis with moxifloxacin or macrolides: a comparative post-marketing surveillance study in general practice

OBJECTIVE

To compare the real-life treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (AECBs) using moxifloxacin tablets or one of the oral macrolides azithromycin, clarithromycin or roxithromycin in terms of symptom relief, time until improvement and cure, overall efficacy and tolerability.

METHODS

This prospective, non-interventional, multicentre study included out-patients with AECB whose last exacerbation was treated with a macrolide. The current AECB was treated either with moxifloxacin or with one of the macrolides azithromycin, clarithromycin or roxithromycin. Data were obtained on the patient's characteristics, disease and treatment history, the course of the current AECB including time to improvement and cure, and the final assessments of efficacy and tolerability. All adverse events were recorded in patients treated with moxifloxacin; for patients receiving macrolides, only drug-related adverse events were reported.

RESULTS

464 physicians treated 904 patients with moxifloxacin and 846 patients with one of the macrolides. Age, sex and body mass index were well matched between the two treatment groups. However, more moxifloxacin than macrolide patients presented with a generally bad condition (62.8% vs 48.6%). About 42% of patients in both groups had had chronic bronchitis for 1-5 years, and about 27% for 5-10 years. The mean number of AECBs in the previous 12 months was 2.7 and 2.6, respectively. Moxifloxacin was administered to most patients for 5 (43.8%) or 7 days (42.4%). Patients in the macrolide group were treated in most cases with clarithromycin 500 mg for 4-7 days, roxithromycin 300 mg for 6-7 days or azithromycin 500 mg for 3 days. Physicians assessed overall efficacy and tolerability as 'very good' or 'good' in 96.1% and 98.1%, respectively, of moxifloxacin-treated patients and in 67.5% and 91.7%, respectively, of macrolide-treated patients. The mean duration until improvement and cure of AECB was 3.2 days (+/- SD 1.5) and 6.2 days (+/- 2.6) in moxifloxacin-treated patients compared with 4.5 days (+/- 1.8) and 7.5 days (+/- 3.0) in macrolide-treated patients (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

The results of this study conducted under real-life treatment conditions in patients with AECBs who were previously treated with a macrolide showed faster symptom relief and higher recovery rates with moxifloxacin compared with macrolides. The two treatment groups had comparably good safety and tolerability profiles.

Antistaphylococcal effect related to the area under the curve/MIC ratio in an in vitro dynamic model: predicted breakpoints versus clinically achievable values for seven fluoroquinolones

Prediction of the relative efficacies of different fluoroquinolones is often based on the ratios of the clinically achievable area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) to the MIC, usually with incorporation of the MIC50 or the MIC90 and with the assumption of antibiotic-independent patterns of the AUC/MIC-response relationships. To ascertain whether this assumption is correct, the pharmacodynamics of seven pharmacokinetically different quinolones against two clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus were studied by using an in vitro model. Two differentially susceptible clinical isolates of S. aureus were exposed to two 12-h doses of ciprofloxacin (CIP) and one dose of gatifloxacin (GAT), gemifloxacin (GEM), grepafloxacin (GRX), levofloxacin (LVX), moxifloxacin (MXF), and trovafloxacin (TVA) over similar AUC/MIC ranges from 58 to 932 h. A specific bacterial strain-independent AUC/MIC relationship with the antimicrobial effect (I(E)) was associated with each quinolone. Based on the I(E)-log AUC/MIC relationships, breakpoints (BPs) that are equivalent to a CIP AUC/MIC ratio of 125 h were predicted for GRX, MXF, and TVA (75 to 78 h), GAT and GEM (95 to 103 h) and LVX (115 h). With GRX and LVX, the predicted BPs were close to those established in clinical settings (no clinical data on other quinolones are available in the literature). To determine if the predicted AUC/MIC BPs are achievable at clinical doses, i.e., at the therapeutic AUCs (AUC(ther)s), the AUC(ther)/MIC50 ratios were studied. These ratios exceeded the BPs for GAT, GEM, GRX, MXF, TVA, and LVX (750 mg) but not for CIP and LVX (500 mg). AUC/MIC ratios above the BPs can be considered of therapeutic potential for the quinolones. The highest ratios of AUC(ther)/MIC50 to BP were achieved with TVA, MXF, and GEM (2.5 to 3.0); intermediate ratios (1.5 to 1.6) were achieved with GAT and GRX; and minimal ratios (0.3 to 1.2) were achieved with CIP and LVX.

Moxifloxacin: a review of its use in the management of bacterial infections

Moxifloxacin (Avelox) is a fluoroquinolone antibacterial with a methoxy group in the C-8 position and a bulky C-7 side chain. Moxifloxacin is approved for use in the treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (AECB), community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), acute bacterial sinusitis and uncomplicated skin and skin structure infections (approved indications may differ between countries). Moxifloxacin has a broad spectrum of antibacterial activity, including activity against penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae. It achieves good tissue penetration and has a convenient once-daily administration schedule, as well as being available in both intravenous and oral formulations in some markets. Moxifloxacin has good efficacy in the treatment of patients with AECB, CAP, acute bacterial sinusitis and uncomplicated skin and skin structure infections, and is generally well tolerated. Thus, moxifloxacin is an important option in the treatment of bacterial infections.

Effects of Enteral Feeding on the Oral Bioavailability of Moxifloxacin in Healthy Volunteers

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Moxifloxacin is a new generation fluoroquinolone antimicrobial agent used worldwide. In clinical practice in intensive care units, moxifloxacin may be frequently administered through a nasogastric feeding tube. In the absence of an oral liquid formulation and since the multivalent cations contained in enteral feeds may potentially impair absorption of moxifloxacin administered via this route, we studied the effect of concomitant enteral feeding on the pharmacokinetics and tolerability of moxifloxacin administered as a crushed tablet through the nasogastric tube.

PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS

This was a single-centre, open-label, randomised, controlled, nonblinded, three-way crossover study. Twelve young healthy volunteers (nine females and three males) aged 20-42 years were included in the study. Each participant received three separate treatment regimens in a randomised fashion: an intact moxifloxacin 400 mg tablet (regimen A, reference treatment), a crushed moxifloxacin 400 mg tablet as a suspension through a nasogastric tube with water (regimen B) and a crushed moxifloxacin 400 mg tablet as a suspension through a nasogastric tube with enteral feeding (regimen C). A washout period of 1-week followed each treatment. Concentrations of moxifloxacin in serum were measured by a validated high-performance liquid chromatography method. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated by noncompartmental methods. Additionally, the primary parameters indicative for changes in absorption (area under the serum concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity [AUC(infinity)] and peak serum concentration [C(max)]), were tested for bioequivalence, assuming log-normally distributed data using ANOVA.

RESULTS

All moxifloxacin treatment regimens were well tolerated. The AUC(infinity) was slightly, but not statistically significantly, decreased in treatments with regimens B and C. AUC(infinity) (geometric means 39.6 [regimen A] vs 36.1 [regimen B] vs 36.1 mg.h/L [regimen C] and point estimates 91% for B : A and C : A) indicated bioequivalence of the treatments. Bioequivalence criteria of AUC(infinity) and C(max) were met upon retrospective statistical analysis. Likewise C(max) after moxifloxacin administration through nasogastric tube with water (regimen B) and with tube feed (regimen C) were slightly decreased (geometric means 3.20 [regimen A] vs 3.05 [regimen B] vs 2.83 mg/L [regimen C]; point estimates 88% for B : A, and 95% for C : A). They were within the range seen in other studies conducted with oral administration of the drug. No statistically significant differences were observed in time to reach C(max) (t(max); median 1.75 [regimen A] vs 1.00 [regimen B] vs 1.75 hours [regimen C]). Thus, the rate of absorption of moxifloxacin was not affected by administration through a nasogastric tube. This route of ingestion seems to be associated with a slight loss of bioavailability independent of the carrier medium used (water vs enteral feed); no clinically relevant interaction with the multivalent cations contained in the enteral feed was observed, indicating that moxifloxacin and enteral nutrition can be administered concomitantly.

CONCLUSION

There was no clinically relevant effect of enteral feeding on the pharmacokinetics of oral moxifloxacin in healthy volunteers. This result has to be evaluated in patients, particularly those from the intensive care unit, who are characterised by severe infectious and/or concomitant diseases that might influence absorption of moxifloxacin.

In vitro and bactericidal activities of ABT-492, a novel fluoroquinolone, against Gram-positive and Gram-negative organisms

In vitro activities of ABT-492, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, trovafloxacin, moxifloxacin, gatifloxacin, and gemifloxacin were compared. ABT-492 was more potent against quinolone-susceptible and -resistant gram-positive organisms, had activity similar to that of ciprofloxacin against certain members of the family Enterobacteriaceae, and had comparable activity against quinolone-susceptible, nonfermentative, gram-negative organisms. Bactericidal activity of ABT-492 was also evaluated.

Effectiveness of ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, or moxifloxacin for treatment of experimental Staphylococcus aureus keratitis

The purpose of this study was to quantitatively compare, in a rabbit keratitis model, the levels of effectiveness of moxifloxacin, levofloxacin, and ciprofloxacin for the treatment of Staphylococcus aureus isolates of diverse antibiotic susceptibilities. Rabbit eyes were intrastromally injected with approximately 100 CFU of methicillin-sensitive or methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MSSA or MRSA, respectively) organisms that were either sensitive or resistant to ofloxacin. One drop of moxifloxacin (0.5%), levofloxacin (0.5%), or ciprofloxacin (0.3%) was topically applied hourly from 4 to 9 (early) or 10 to 15 (late) h postinfection. At 1 h after cessation of therapy, the corneas were harvested, and the number of CFU per cornea was determined. For the ofloxacin-sensitive strains, early treatment of MSSA or MRSA with moxifloxacin, levofloxacin, or ciprofloxacin produced approximately a 5-log decrease in CFU per cornea relative to that in untreated eyes (P </= 0.0001). For late therapy of ofloxacin-sensitive strains, moxifloxacin, levofloxacin, and ciprofloxacin produced approximately 5-, 4-, and 2- to 3-log reductions in CFU per cornea, respectively (P </= 0.0001). Early treatment of the ofloxacin-resistant strains with either moxifloxacin or levofloxacin produced a >/=4-log or >/=3-log decrease, respectively, in the MSSA or MRSA strains (P </= 0.0001), whereas ciprofloxacin treatment produced a 1-log decrease in CFU per cornea relative to that in untreated eyes (P = 0.1540). For late treatment of ofloxacin-resistant strains, levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin failed to significantly reduce the number of CFU per cornea (P >/= 0.3627), whereas moxifloxacin produced a significant reduction in CFU per cornea of approximately 1 log (P </= 0.0194). Therefore, for three of the four treatments tested, moxifloxacin demonstrated greater effectiveness than either levofloxacin or ciprofloxacin.

In vitro antibacterial activity of moxifloxacin against hospital isolates: a multicentre study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the in vitro antibacterial activity of moxifloxacinin in comparison to that of other fluoroquinolones (ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin and trovafloxacin).

METHODS

A total of 2,196 strains was collected in 11 French hospitals in 1998. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) (mg/L) were determined by agar dilution and agar diffusion was performed with 5-microg discs. Internal quality control was carried out with genetically defined strains.

RESULTS

MIC50s and MIC90s of moxifloxacin against nalidixic acid (NAL)-susceptible Enterobacteriaceae (n = 663) were 0.12 and 0.5. As for other quinolones, the activity of moxifloxacin (4-32) was reduced against NAL-intermediate and NAL-resistant strains (n = 222). MIC50s and MIC90s of moxifloxacin were 2 and 4 for ciprofloxacin-susceptible P. aeruginosa (n = 128); moxifloxacin had no activity against ciprofloxacin-resistant strains (n = 56). The activity of moxifloxacin was maintained against NAL-susceptible A. baumannii (n = 11; 0.032-0.125), but reduced against NAL-resistant strains (n = 30; 16-32). H. influenzae (n = 97) and M. catarrhalis (n = 40) were inhibited by low concentrations (0.03-0.06 and 0.06-0.25, respectively). Moxifloxacin had better activity (0.06-0.12) than other tested quinolones against methicillin-susceptible S. aureus strains (n = 110); ciprofloxacin-resistant strains (n = 85) (2-8) were usually methicillin-resistant. Moxifloxacin was moderately active against enterococci (n = 149) (E. faecalis: 0.5-16; E. faecium: 2-4). Streptococci (n = 194) and pneumococci (n = 136), including 70 penicillin G-intermediate or G-resistant strains, were inhibited by low concentrations (0.25-0.5 for each species). Based on the regression curve, tentative zone diameter breakpoints could be > or =21 and <18 mm for MIC breakpoints of < or =1 and >2 mg/L, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

While retaining activity against Enterobacteriaceae, moxifloxacin was moderately active against P. aeruginosa. Its activity was inferior to that of ciprofloxacin for these species. This study confirmed the comparatively high in vitro activity of moxifloxacin against Gram-positive cocci and other pathogens isolated from community-acquired respiratory tract infections.

In vitro susceptibility of Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis: a European multicenter study during 2000-2001

OBJECTIVE

To assess the current (2001) activity of respiratory fluoroquinolones and comparator agents against respiratory pathogens isolated in European countries.

METHODS

During 2000-2001, we prospectively collected 1995 isolates of Haemophilus influenzae, 1870 isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae and 649 isolates of Moraxella catarrhalis from hospital laboratories in France, Germany, Greece, Italy, Spain and the UK. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS)-approved broth microdilution antimicrobial susceptibility testing methods and interpretive criteria were used throughout.

RESULTS

Of the S. pneumoniae isolates, 99.6% were susceptible to moxifloxacin, gatifloxacin and levofloxacin; the corresponding figure for H. influenzae was 100%. All M. catarrhalis isolates had moxifloxacin MICs </= 0.12 mg/L. For all three pathogens, fluoroquinolone susceptibility remained unchanged from the previous 1997-98 study. The incidence of penicillin non-susceptibility in the S. pneumoniae isolates tested remained similar to or higher than that recorded in previous studies: France, 165/291 (56.7%); Germany, 46/506 (9.1%); Greece, 20/55 (36.4%); Italy, 45/364 (12.4%); Spain, 146/268 (54.5%); and the UK, 26/386 (6.7%). Significant levels of resistance to oral compounds (cefuroxime, cefaclor, cefdinir, clarithromycin, azithromycin, tetracycline, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole) were detected among S. pneumoniae isolates. beta-Lactamase production among H. influenzae isolates ranged from 6.2% to 33.1% per country, and ampicillin, clarithromycin or trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole resistance were the most common phenotypes detected. beta-Lactamase production among M. catarrhalis isolates ranged from 94.1% to 100% per country.

CONCLUSIONS

With the exception of a few localized reports, resistance to moxifloxacin and other new fluoroquinolones in common respiratory pathogens is a rare occurrence, despite significant resistance to other compound classes. Surveillance will play a key role in tracking changes in fluoroquinolone susceptibility in European countries.

In vitro activity of moxifloxacin against recent community-acquired respiratory tract pathogens isolated in France: a national survey

Between February and June 2000, 2345 consecutive strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis, Staphylococcus aureus and Klebsiella pneumoniae were isolated from 2088 adult patients suffering from community-acquired respiratory tract infections, in 97 hospital laboratories. Of the 1037 S. pneumoniae isolates, 48.3% were intermediately or highly penicillin resistant. For invasive isolates, the MIC90s of penicillin G, amoxycillin, cefuroxime, ceftriaxone, erythromycin, ofloxacin, ciprofloxacin and moxifloxacin were 2, 2, 4, 0.5, 1024, 2, 2 and 0.25 mg/l, respectively. All but one invasive strain were susceptible to moxifloxacin whereas 97.5% were susceptible to levofloxacin. The MIC90s of clinical isolates with intermediate susceptibility or high resistance to penicillin G, were 2, 2, 4, 1, 1024, 2, 2 and 0.25 mg/l. About 98.1, 97.0, and 83.1% of strains were inhibited by concentrations < or = 1 mg/l of moxifloxacin, levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin, respectively (E-test). Eight of the 1037 S. pneumoniae strains were not susceptible to moxifloxacin and had mutations in gyrA (eight strains), parC (four strains) or parE (three strains). Against H. influenzae (32.7% were beta-lactamase producers) and M. catarrhalis (96.3% were beta-lactamase producers), the MIC90s of moxifloxacin, amoxycillin and co-amoxiclav were 0.094 and 0.125 mg/l, 64 and 8 mg/l, and 1.5 and 0.25 mg/l, respectively. Against oxacillin-susceptible S. aureus and K. pneumoniae, the MIC90s of moxifloxacin were 0.125 and 0.84 mg/l respectively. Moxifloxacin had the highest in vitro activity of all antibiotics tested.

Therapies in development for community-acquired pneumonia

The current use of antimicrobials has become more complex due to the extensive emergence of antibiotic resistance. The single most important approach in resistance control is probably the judicious use of chemotherapeutic agents. New agents that may be of use in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia are currently in development. Antimicrobials can be grouped according to their mechanism of action. These include protein synthesis inhibitors (ketolides, oxazolidinones, streptogramins and glycylcyclines), nucleic acid synthesis inhibitors (fluoroquinolones), peptidoglycan synthesis inhibitors (beta-lactams and glycopeptides) and agents interfering with membrane function (cationic peptides and lipopeptides). Among those agents under development, only the oxazolidinones, the cationic peptides and the lipopeptide antibiotics can be truly regarded as structurally novel inhibitors as the other agents are analogues of existing compounds which have been in clinical use for many years.

Advances in the research and development of chemotherapeutic agents for respiratory tract bacterial infections

The activity of existing antibiotics is diminishing due to the increasing number of resistant strains and by the increase of infections with naturally resistant microorganisms. New agents are urgently needed to meet this challenge and the molecular strategies adopted for the discovery of these compounds must focus on minimizing the emergence of future resistance to them. Novel compounds can be grouped on the basis of their mechanism of action: inhibitors of nucleic acid synthesis (fluoroquinolones), inhibitors of protein synthesis (ketolides, oxazolidinones, streptogramins, and glycylcyclines), inhibitors of peptidoglycan synthesis (beta-lactams and glycopeptides), and agents interfering with membrane function (cationic peptides, and lipopeptides). Regarding the agents that are already in the research and development pipeline, only the oxazolidinones, the cationic peptides and the lipopeptide antibiotics can be truly considered as structurally novel inhibitors because the other agents are analogues of existing compounds that have been in use for many years.

Profile of moxifloxacin drug interactions

We report a brief description of the interaction profile of moxifloxacin. After oral administration, the absorption of moxifloxacin was unaffected by ranitidine or by food consumption. Drugs containing multivalent cations (e.g., Mg(++), Al(+++), and Fe(++), but not Ca(++)) impaired absorption. No clinically relevant effect of moxifloxacin was seen on the pharmacokinetics of digoxin under combination steady state conditions. Also, moxifloxacin did not affect the pharmacokinetics of theophylline or vice versa. This result, plus further data proving lack of interaction with glyburide, warfarin, and oral contraceptives, confirms the absence of metabolic interactions involving the cytochrome P-450 system, as previously reported. Concomitant administration of probenecid did not affect the elimination of moxifloxacin. Moxifloxacin thus has a unique drug interaction profile that is advantageous for its safe use.

Evaluation of the clinical microbiology profile of moxifloxacin

Moxifloxacin is a new broad-spectrum antibacterial agent for treatment of respiratory tract infection of pathogens, including the major pathogens isolated in respiratory tract infections. The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of moxifloxacin are: excellent bioavailability, long half-life, and superior tissue penetration. Consequently, the 90% minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC(90)) values exhibited by moxifloxacin are generally lower than the concentrations of moxifloxacin found in circulation and in pulmonary tissues after a standard 400-mg dose given for up to 30 h. The relationship between moxifloxacin MIC(90) values and clinical response was investigated. The results of 13 clinical trials, performed in 30 countries between 1997 and 1998 and comprising 2618 patients treated with moxifloxacin or a comparator drug, were reviewed. Overall, 94% clinical success and 95% bacterial eradication was observed with moxifloxacin. These results were equivalent or superior to results seen with the comparator drugs. Clinical response rates and bacterial eradication rates with moxifloxacin were not significantly affected by bacterial resistance to other antibiotics (i.e., penicillin, clarithromycin, or amoxicillin). The majority (89%-97%) of the different bacterial strains with MICs for moxifloxacin < or =2 mg/L were successfully eradicated. In conclusion, moxifloxacin has potent in vivo bactericidal activity, and pathogen sensitivity to moxifloxacin is in accordance with US Food and Drug Administration and European suggested breakpoint values.

Streptococcus pneumoniae response to repeated moxifloxacin or levofloxacin exposure in a rabbit tissue cage model

The role of moxifloxacin and levofloxacin pharmacokinetics (PK) in antimicrobial efficacy and in the selection of fluoroquinolone-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae strains was investigated using the rabbit tissue cage abscess model. A rabbit tissue cage was created by insertion of sterile Wiffle balls in the dorsal cervical area. Animals orally received a range of moxifloxacin or levofloxacin doses that simulate human PK for 7 days 48 h after the Wiffle balls were inoculated with fluoroquinolone-sensitive S. pneumoniae (10(7) CFU). Abscess fluid was collected on a daily basis over 14 days to measure bacterial density and MICs. Moxifloxacin regimens produced a range of area under the concentration-time curve (AUC)/MIC ratios ranging from 9.2 to 444 and peak/MIC ratios ranging from 1.3 to 102. Levofloxacin doses produced AUC/MIC ratios of 5.1 to 85.5 and peak/MIC ratio of 0.9 to 14.8. Moxifloxacin at 6.5, 26, and 42 mg/kg reduced the bacterial log CFU per milliliter in abscess fluid (percentage of that in a sterile animal) by 4.2 +/- 2.2 (20%), 5.8 +/- 0.4 (100%), and 5.4 +/- 0.4 (100%), respectively, over the dosing period. Levofloxacin at 5.5, 22, and 32 mg/kg reduced the log CFU per milliliter in abscess fluid (percentage of that in a sterile animal) by 2.8 +/- 0.7 (20%), 5.1 +/- 1.3 (80%), and 4.6 +/- 1.3 (60%), respectively. Moxifloxacin has a greater bactericidal rate as determined by regression of log CFU versus time data. The AUC/MIC and peak/MIC ratios correlated with the efficacy of both drugs (P < 0.05). Resistance to either drug did not develop with any of the doses as assessed by a change in the MIC. In conclusion, data derived from this study show that moxifloxacin and levofloxacin exhibit rapid bactericidal activity against S. pneumoniae in vivo, and moxifloxacin exhibits enhanced bactericidal activity compared to levofloxacin, with AUC/MIC and peak/MIC ratios correlated with antimicrobial efficacy for both drugs. The development of fluoroquinolone-resistant S. pneumoniae was not observed with either drug in this model.

Gemifloxacin and ciprofloxacin pharmacodynamics in an in-vitro dynamic model: prediction of the equivalent AUC/MIC breakpoints and doses

To compare the antimicrobial effects (AMEs) of gemifloxacin (GEM) and ciprofloxacin (CIP) on Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, a series of pharmacokinetic profiles of GEM (a single dose with the half-life (T(1/2)) of 7.4 h and CIP (two 12 h doses with T(1/2) of 4 h) were simulated in vitro over eight-fold ranges of the AUC/MIC ratio. Species- and strain-independent linear relationships observed between the intensity of AME (I(E)) and log AUC/MIC were not superimposed for GEM and CIP (r(2)=0.99 and 0.98, respectively). The predicted ratio for GEM that might be equivalent to a clinically established breakpoint value of AUC/MIC=125 (mg h/l)/(mg/l) for CIP was estimated at 110 (mg h/l)/(mg/l). It was calculated, that a daily dose of CIP that might provide the same AME as a clinical dose of GEM (320 mg) on a hypothetical strain of S. aureus with MICs=MIC(50)s would be as high as 2 x 3200 mg.

Bactericidal activity of moxifloxacin compared to grepafloxacin and clarithromycin against Streptococcus pneumoniae and Streptococcus pyogenes investigated using an in vitro pharmacodynamic model

The aim of the present investigation was to study and compare the killing activity of two new fluoroquinolone compounds, moxifloxacin and grepafloxacin, and a new generation macrolide, clarithromycin, against three clinical isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae (penicillin-susceptible, -intermediate and -resistant) and two Streptococcus pyogenes (erythromycin-susceptible and -resistant) strains by simulating their human pharmacokinetics in a pharmacodynamic model. Results were achieved by measuring the reduction in viable bacterial count during the 24-h experimental period. All three antimicrobials led to a continuous reduction in the bacterial counts of penicillin-susceptible S. pneumoniae and erythromycin-susceptible S. pyogenes strains, the maximal reduction observed after 8-10 hours being 5-6 logs for moxifloxacin and 3 logs for grepafloxacin; clarithromycin exhibited a similar reduction of 5 logs only after 24 h. No regrowth was observed for any strain after 24 h with any of the antibiotics. The bactericidal activity of both the fluoroquinolones was not affected by penicillin resistance of S. pneumoniae and erythromycin resistance of S. pyogenes. In contrast, clarithromycin was not able to reduce the bacterial count of penicillin-resistant S. pneumoniae and erythromycin-resistant S. pyogenes strains. Moxifloxacin exhibited, within 24 h, higher and faster bactericidal activity than grepafloxacin and clarithromycin against S. pneumoniae, and was not affected by penicillin resistance. These results suggest that moxifloxacin is a promising new agent for treatment of streptococcal infections.

Benchmarking the in vitro activities of moxifloxacin and comparator agents against recent respiratory isolates from 377 medical centers throughout the United States

To benchmark the activity of moxifloxacin (a newer fluoroquinolone), a U.S. study comprising 16,141 contemporary isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae (5,640), Haemophilus influenzae (6,583), and Moraxella catarrhalis (3,648) referred from 377 institutions during 1998 is described. For S. pneumoniae the modal MIC and MIC at which 90% of the isolates were inhibited (MIC(90)) for moxifloxacin were 0.12 and 0.25 microg/ml, respectively, independent of susceptibility to other drug classes, geography, or site of infection. Eleven isolates were intermediate or resistant to levofloxacin and grepafloxacin; of these isolates, 1 remained susceptible to sparfloxacin, 2 remained susceptible to moxifloxacin, and 4 remained susceptible to trovafloxacin. All 11 isolates possessed classic mutations in gyrA and/or parC known to confer reduced susceptibility to fluoroquinolones. Four isolates (originating from four separate states) belonging to a multidrug-resistant, fluoroquinolone-resistant clone were identified by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. For moxifloxacin and trovafloxacin, at least 87% of isolates demonstrated MICs > or =3 twofold concentrations below the susceptibility breakpoints, in contrast to no more than 15% for levofloxacin, grepafloxacin, and sparfloxacin. Of the isolates that were multidrug resistant (7.4%), >98% remained susceptible to moxifloxacin. The modal MIC and MIC(90) for M. catarrhalis (both 0.06 microg/ml) and for H. influenzae (both 0.03 microg/ml) were independent of beta-lactamase production. These data demonstrate the in vitro activity of moxifloxacin and establish a baseline for future studies.

Benchmarking the in vitro activity of moxifloxacin against recent isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae, Moraxella catarrhalis, and Haemophilus influenzae. A European multi-centre study

To benchmark the activity of moxifloxacin, a European study comprising 900 Streptococcus pneumoniae, 1051 Haemophilus influenzae, and 226 Moraxella catarrhalis referred from 30 institutions during 1998 is described. For S. pneumoniae, moxifloxacin and trovafloxacin MIC(90) and modal MICs values were 0.12 microg/ml and independent of susceptibility to other drug classes, geography, or site of infection. MIC(90)/modal MICs were, respectively, 0.25/0.12 microg/ml for grepafloxacin, 0.25/0.25 microg/ml for sparfloxacin, and 1.0/0.5 microg/ml for levofloxacin. The moxifloxacin C(max):MIC ratio of 20.8-26.3 is higher than comparator fluoroquinolones. Five isolates were intermediate or resistant to grepafloxacin, sparfloxacin, or levofloxacin of which four and three remained susceptible to trovafloxacin and moxifloxacin, respectively. For moxifloxacin, > 90% of S. pneumoniae isolates demonstrated MICs > or =3 dilutions below the susceptibility breakpoint used. Modal MICs and MIC(90) for M. catarrhalis (both 0.03 microg/ml) and H. influenzae (0.03 microg/ml and 0.06 microg/ml) were independent of beta-lactamase production. These data demonstrate the in vitro activity of moxifloxacin and establish a baseline for future surveillance studies that will be important for detecting and tracking any trends in changing activity of this fluoroquinolone.

Moxifloxacin, a new antibiotic designed to treat community-acquired respiratory tract infections: a review of microbiologic and pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic characteristics

Moxifloxacin (BAY 12-8039) is a new 8-methoxy-fluoroquinolone antibacterial agent. The minimum inhibitory concentration for 90% of organisms (MIC90) is less than 0.25 mg/L for commonly isolated community-acquired respiratory tract pathogens including penicillin-susceptible and -resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus sp, and Moraxella catarrhalis, and less than 1.0 mg/L for atypical pathogens such as Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Chlamydia pneumoniae, and Legionella pneumophila. To date, emergence of resistance to moxifloxacin has been uncommon, including selection of resistance under experimental conditions (methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus, S. pneumoniae). A postantibiotic effect is observed for both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria. Human pharmacokinetics in healthy volunteers after a single 400-mg oral dose were mean maximum concentration (Cmax) 3.2 mg/L, area under the curve (AUC) 37 mg x hour/L, and terminal elimination half-life 12.0 hours. At steady-state, Cmax and AUC were approximately 4.5 mg/L and 48 mg x hour/L, respectively. Because of a balanced system of excretion, no dosage adjustments are required in patients with renal or hepatic impairment. Moxifloxacin also has excellent penetration into upper and lower respiratory tissues. Laboratory pharmacodynamic models suggest that MIC and AUC values predict therapeutic response. Notably, the drug can be administered once/day and is not associated with drug interactions secondary to altered hepatic metabolism. In addition, since its metabolism does not involve the cytochrome P450 system, many common drug interactions are absent. The agent is being investigated in clinical trials and shows promise as a safe and effective once-daily treatment of respiratory infections. In addition, its chemical structure and pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties indicate that it has enhanced potential to minimize emergence of bacterial resistance, which should make it an excellent choice for treating respiratory tract infections now and in the future.

Clinical efficacy and antimicrobial pharmacodynamics

Changes in the susceptibility of bacterial pathogens and the availability of new antimicrobial drugs mean that physicians need to understand the underlying pharmacodynamics of each antimicrobial therapy. Antimicrobial pharmacodynamics determine clinical efficacy and should therefore be carefully considered when selecting appropriate antibiotic agents in the therapeutic setting.

Moxifloxacin: a review of its clinical potential in the management of community-acquired respiratory tract infections

Moxifloxacin is an extended-spectrum fluoroquinolone which has improved coverage against gram-positive cocci and atypical pathogens compared with older fluoroquinolone agents, while retaining good activity against gram-negative bacteria. The antibacterial spectrum of moxifloxacin includes all major upper and lower respiratory tract pathogens; it is one of the most active fluoroquinolones against pneumococci, including penicillin- and macrolide-resistant strains. In in vitro studies, emergence of bacterial resistance was less common with moxifloxacin than with some other fluoroquinolones, but this requires confirmation in large-scale clinical studies. As with other fluoroquinolones, moxifloxacin achieves good penetration into respiratory tissues and fluids. It shows a low potential for drug interactions and dosage adjustment is not required for patients of advanced age or those with renal or mild hepatic impairment. The efficacy of oral moxifloxacin has been demonstrated in large, well-designed clinical trials in patients with community-acquired pneumonia, acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis or acute sinusitis. Moxifloxacin 400 mg once daily achieved bacteriological and clinical success rates of approximately 90% or higher. It was as effective as, or more effective than, comparators including clarithromycin, cefuroxime axetil and high dose amoxicillin in these trials. The most commonly reported adverse events in patients receiving moxifloxacin are gastrointestinal disturbances. Moxifloxacin is also associated with QTc prolongation in some patients; there are, as yet, no data concerning the possible clinical sequelae of this effect in high-risk patients. Moxifloxacin has a low propensity for causing phototoxic reactions relative to other fluoroquinolones, and animal data suggest that it has a low potential for causing excitatory CNS and hepatotoxic effects.

CONCLUSIONS

As an extended-spectrum fluoroquinolone, moxifloxacin offers the benefits of excellent activity against pneumococci, once daily administration and a low propensity for drug interactions. Although studies are needed regarding its tolerability in at-risk patients with QT interval prolongation, available data suggest that moxifloxacin is likely to become a first-line therapy option for the treatment of community-acquired lower respiratory tract infections, particularly in areas where drug-resistant S. pneumoniae or H. influenzae are common.

Activity of newer fluoroquinolones in vitro against gram-positive bacteria

Several newer fluoroquinolones, which have been recently introduced or are under investigation, display substantially greater potency against gram-positive organisms than the older generation agents of this class. Nevertheless, for problem organisms including methicillin-resistant strains of Staphylococcus aureus and many Enterococcus faecium, concentrations of newer antimicrobials required to inhibit 90% of organisms in the collections studied remain above those that are projected to be achievable with clinical use. Nevertheless, enhanced potency of several newer quinolones may result in a favourable pharmacodynamic profile leading to improved outcomes against gram-positive infections and possibly to the delayed or diminished emergence of resistance to these agents.

Activity of moxifloxacin against pathogens with decreased susceptibility to ciprofloxacin

A panel of 279 clinical isolates of Gram-positive cocci and Gram-negative bacilli with varying levels of resistance to ciprofloxacin were analysed for susceptibility to moxifloxacin, ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin and nalidixic acid. Moxifloxacin was eight- to 32-fold more potent than ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin against staphylococci and Streptococcus pneumoniae, and equivalent to eight-fold more potent against enterococci. Although ciprofloxacin was intrinsically more potent than the other quinolones against highly susceptible Gram-negative isolates, the percentages of Gram-negative isolates susceptible to 1 mg/L of moxifloxacin or ciprofloxacin, or 2 mg/L of ofloxacin were 78%, 80% and 76%, indicating in-vitro equivalence of the agents against a collection that included isolates with diminished quinolone susceptibility. Staphylococci were analysed according to their ciprofloxacin susceptibility status. As ciprofloxacin resistance increased to high levels, all quinolone MICs increased, but moxifloxacin and ofloxacin MICs increased less than ciprofloxacin MICs. In mutational studies moxifloxacin inhibited more mutants (69%) at a concentration of 1 mg/L than did ciprofloxacin (63%) at 1 mg/L or ofloxacin at 2 mg/L (31%). The study indicated that moxifloxacin is more potent than ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin against Gram-positive pathogens, may be comparable in activity against less quinolone-susceptible Gram-negative isolates (other than Pseudomonas aeruginosa), and is less affected than ciprofloxacin by mechanisms responsible for increasing quinolone resistance in staphylococci.

Moxifloxacin

Moxilloxacin is a new fluoroquinolone antibacterial agent with a broad spectrum of activity, encompassing gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria. It has improved activity against gram-positive species (including staphylococci, streptococci, enterococci) and anaerobes compared with ciprofloxacin. This is offset by slightly lower activity against pseudomonal species and Enterobacteriaceae. In common with other fluoroquinolones, moxifloxacin attains good penetration into respiratory tissues and fluids and its bioavailability is substantially reduced by coadministration with an antacid or iron preparation. However, moxifloxacin does not interact with theophylline or warfarin. In clinical trials in patients with community-acquired pneumococcal pneumonia (CAP), acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (AECB) or acute sinusitis, moxifloxacin 400 mg once daily achieved bacteriological and/or clinical success rates of approximately 90% or higher. Moxifloxacin was as effective as amoxicillin 1 g 3 times daily and clarithromycin 500 mg twice daily in CAP and as effective as clarithromycin in AECB. In patients with sinusitis, a 7-day course of moxifloxacin 400mg once daily was as effective as a 10-day course of cefuroxime axetil 250mg twice daily. In contrast to some other fluoroquinolones, moxifloxacin appears to have a low propensity for causing phototoxic and CNS excitatory effects. The most common adverse events are gastrointestinal disturbances.

BAY 12-8039, a novel fluoroquinolone. Activity against important respiratory tract pathogens

BAY 12-8039 or moxifloxacin is a new 8-methoxyquinolone with documented, improved activity against Gram-positive cocci and anaerobic bacteria. This study tested 1250 commonly isolated respiratory tract pathogens (251 Moraxella catarrhalis, 499 Haemophilus influenzae, 500 Streptococcus pneumoniae) from 1996-1997 clinical infections at more than 30 medical centers. Among the M. catarrhalis strains (81% beta-lactamase-positive) the BAY 12-8039 MIC90 was 0.06 microgram/mL, a potency equal to ofloxacin but less than all other tested fluoroquinolones (ciprofloxacin, clinafloxacin, levofloxacin, sparfloxacin, trovafloxacin). The H. influenzae strains were generally less susceptible to BAY 12-8039 (MIC90, 0.03 microgram/mL) than the tested fluoroquinolones, and the other comparison compounds were less active overall. All S. pneumoniae strains were susceptible to BAY 12-8039 at < or = 0.25 microgram/mL (MIC90, 0.06-0.12 microgram/mL), a value equal-potent to trovafloxacin. This new fluoroquinolone, BAY 12-8039, appears promising for the treatment of community-acquired respiratory tract infections caused by common bacterial species.

In vitro activity of BAY 12-8039, a new fluoroquinolone, against species representative of respiratory tract pathogens

The in vitro antibacterial activity of BAY 12-8039, a novel 8-methoxy-quinolone, was compared with those of other quinolones, amoxicillin/clavulanate, cefuroxime and erythromycin against species commonly implicated in respiratory tract infections as well as viridans group streptococci. The new compound was highly active against methicillin-susceptible staphylococci (MIC90 0.125 microgram/ml), penicillin-susceptible and penicillin-resistant pneumococci (MIC90 0.5 and MIC50 0.25 microgram/ml, respectively), penicillin-susceptible and penicillin-resistant viridans group streptococci (MIC90 0.5 and 0.25 microgram/ml, respectively), group A streptococci (MIC90 0.25 microgram/ml), M. catarrhalis (MIC90 0.125 microgram/ml) and H. influenzae (MIC90 0.063 microgram/ml), irrespective of beta-lactamase production. It was, however, less active against methicillin-resistant staphylococci (MIC50 and MIC90, 2 and 4 micrograms/ml, respectively). The new compound demonstrated bactericidal activity at concentrations 2, 4, 8 times the MIC against representative isolates of the above collection. At a concentration of eight times the MIC, the frequency of spontaneous resistance ranged from 2.5 x 10(-7) to < 4 x 10(-8). These results suggested that BAY 12-8039 would be a promising agent for the eradication of respiratory tract pathogens and that clinical trials assessing its efficacy for the management of infections caused by these organisms are warranted.