Fatal interaction between tranylcypromine and imipramine

Clinically Relevant Drug Interactions with Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitors

Monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOI) are a class of drugs that were originally developed for the treatment of depression but have since been expanded to be used in management of affective and neurological disorders, as well as stroke and aging-related neurocognitive changes. Ranging from irreversible to reversible and selective to non-selective, these drugs target the monoamine oxidase (MAO) enzyme and prevent the oxidative deamination of various monoamines and catecholamines such as serotonin and dopamine, respectively. Tyramine is a potent releaser of norepinephrine (NE) and is found in high concentrations in foods such as aged cheeses and meats. Under normal conditions, NE is unable to accumulate to toxic levels due to the presence of MAO-A, an enzyme that degrades neurotransmitters, including NE. When MAO-A is inhibited, the capacity to handle tyramine intake from the diet is significantly reduced causing the brain to be vulnerable to overstimulation of postsynaptic adrenergic receptors with as little as 8-10 mg of tyramine ingested and can result in life-threatening blood pressure elevations. In addition to adverse reactions with certain foods, both older and newer MAOIs can negatively interact with both sympathomimetic and serotonergic drugs. In general, patients on a MAOI want to avoid two types of medications: those that can elevate blood pressure via sympathomimetic actions (e.g., phenylephrine and oxymetazoline) and those that can increase serotonin levels via 5-HT reuptake inhibition (e.g., dextromethorphan, chlorpheniramine, and brompheniramine). Illicit drugs that stimulate the central nervous system such as ecstasy (MDMA, 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine) act as serotonin releasers. Patient involvement is also crucial to ensure any interaction within the healthcare setting includes making other providers aware of a MAOI prescription as well as avoiding certain OTC medications that can interact adversely with MAOIs.

60 Years of Combining Tranylcypromine: A Systematic Review of Available Evidence

BACKGROUND

Tranylcypromine is the only irreversible monoamine oxidase inhibitor that is approved in the United States and in Europe for the management of treatment-resistant major depressive disorder. Comprehensive data in the literature regarding the efficacy and tolerability of tranylcypromine (TCP) combination strategies have not been systematically investigated yet.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of available literature based on the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Study types considered eligible for inclusion were studies that reported information on efficacy and/or tolerability/adverse effects of pharmacological TCP add-on or coadministration strategies among people with psychiatric disorders.

RESULTS

Ninety-six articles were included in qualitative analyses. A relevant body of evidence shows that TCP combined with first- and second-generation antipsychotics seems relatively safe and might have beneficial effects in some patients with depressive disorders, although caution is needed with some second-generation antipsychotics that have proserotonergic activity. Although evidence is not entirely consistent, amitriptyline as add-on agent might be efficacious and associated with a low rate of severe adverse events. Although available data from case reports are scarce, certain other agents, such as trazodone, but also lithium, seem to have a good risk-benefit profile with regard to TCP that should be further investigated in the context of high-quality studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Any combination of a psychotropic with TCP should be preceded by an evaluation of drug-to-drug interaction and an informed consent process and followed by close monitoring. Before any combination strategy, doctors should reevaluate factors of pseudo-treatment resistance, such as rapid-metabolizing status, noncompliance, trauma, alternative diagnosis, or drug abuse.

The serotonin toxidrome: shortfalls of current diagnostic criteria for related syndromes

INTRODUCTION

Serotonin syndrome (toxicity) describes adverse drug effects from toxic amounts of intra-synaptic central nervous system serotonin. A wide range of drugs have been implicated to cause serotonin toxicity, not all justifiably. The plausible agents all have a final common pathway resulting in a substantial increase in central nervous system serotonergic neurotransmission. Serotonin toxicity is characterized by neuromuscular excitation, mental status changes, and autonomic dysregulation. Signs and symptoms represent a spectrum of toxicity (mild to life-threatening) related to increasing serotonin concentrations. As there is no consensus on the threshold for "toxicity" or diagnostic criteria, the true incidence of serotonin toxicity is unknown. The incidence in overdose is easier to quantify and is reasonably common in serotonergic antidepressant overdoses. In a large case series of overdoses, moderate serotonin toxicity occurred in 14% of poisonings with a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor. While half those ingesting a monoamine oxidase inhibitor in combination with a serotonergic agent in overdose exhibit at least moderately severe serotonin toxicity. In contrast, the incidence of serotonin toxicity in those on therapeutic serotonergic agents appears to be very low.

OBJECTIVES

To provide a narrative review of the current diagnostic criteria, utilizing case reports of fatalities to evaluate how many meet the various diagnostic criteria and propose practical solutions to resolve controversies in diagnosis.

METHODS

A review of serotonin toxicity diagnostic criteria in the English literature was completed by searching Embase and PubMed from January 1990 to July 2021 for the keywords "serotonin syndrome/toxicity" paired with "diagnostic criteria" or "diagnosis." Also, fatal cases of serotonin toxicity identified from a recent systematic review were independently examined to determine what diagnostic criteria were met and whether serotonin toxicity or another cause was most likely.

REVIEW OF DIAGNOSIS CRITERIA

Serotonin toxicity is a clinical diagnosis, four diagnostic criteria (Sternbach, Serotonin Syndrome Scale, Radomski, and Hunter) have been proposed. However, the Serotonin Syndrome Scale has not been validated in patients with serotonin toxicity and only utilized in those on a serotonergic agent. The remaining three criteria are utilized more widely but have undergone little refinement or validation.

REVIEW OF FATAL CASES

Shortfalls with diagnostic criteria can be illustrated by examining case fatalities. Of 55 fatal cases reviewed, 12 (22%) were unlikely to be serotonin toxicity. Sternbach and Radomski criteria were met by 25 (45%), 20 (36%) had insufficient data reported and 10 (18%) met an exclusion criterion. Few had sufficient information reported to determine whether Hunter Criteria were met, with only 13 (24%) documented as meeting the criteria, the remaining 42 (76%) had insufficient data.

RESOLVING SHORTFALLS IN CURRENT DIAGNOSTIC CRITERIA

As serotonin toxicity is a clinical diagnosis, issues arise when basing the diagnosis on symptom criteria alone, without considering whether the drug/s ingested increase central nervous system serotonin or whether there is an alternative diagnosis. This has resulted in case reports and government warnings for drugs that cannot plausibly cause significant serotonin toxicity (e.g., ondansetron and antipsychotics). We propose when assessing for a serotonin toxidrome, both the causative agent(s) and clinical scenario is considered to determine the likelihood of serotonin toxicity. Then the clinical features assessed, those with a moderate to high prior probability (e.g., serotonergic drug-drug interaction, overdose, recent initiation or increase in dose of serotonergic agent/s) could be diagnosed based on the Hunter criteria. However, those with a low probability (e.g., stable therapeutic doses of a serotonergic agent) require more specific and stringent criteria. Finally, we propose a minimum dataset for case reports/series of serotonin toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

More complete and accurate reporting of serotonin toxicity cases is required in the future, to avoid further misleading associations that are physiologically implausible.

Toxicities of opioid analgesics: respiratory depression, histamine release, hemodynamic changes, hypersensitivity, serotonin toxicity

Opioid-induced respiratory depression is potentially life-threatening and often regarded as the main hazard of opioid use. Main cause of death is cardiorespiratory arrest with hypoxia and hypercapnia. Respiratory depression is mediated by opioid μ receptors expressed on respiratory neurons in the CNS. Studies on the major sites in the brainstem mediating respiratory rate suppression, the pre-Bӧtzinger complex and parabrachial complex (including the Kӧlliker Fuse nucleus), have yielded conflicting findings and interpretations but recent investigations involving deletion of μ receptors from neurons have led to greater consensus. Some opioid analgesic drugs are histamine releasers. The range of clinical effects of released histamine include increased cardiac output due to an increase in heart rate, increased force of myocardial contraction, and a dilatatory effect on small blood vessels leading to flushing, decreased vascular resistance and hypotension. Resultant hemodynamic changes do not necessarily relate directly to the concentration of histamine in plasma due to a range of variables including functional differences between mast cells and histamine-induced anaphylactoid reactions may occur less often than commonly believed. Opioid-induced histamine release rarely if ever provokes bronchospasm and histamine released by opioids in normal doses does not lead to anaphylactoid reactions or result in IgE-mediated reactions in normal patients. Hypersensitivities to opioids, mainly some skin reactions and occasional type I hypersensitivities, chiefly anaphylaxis and urticaria, are uncommon. Hypersensitivities to morphine, codeine, heroin, methadone, meperidine, fentanyl, remifentanil, buprenorphine, tramadol, and dextromethorphan are summarized. In 2016, the FDA issued a Drug Safety Communication concerning the association of opioids with serotonin syndrome, a toxicity associated with raised intra-synaptic concentrations of serotonin in the CNS, inhibition of serotonin reuptake, and activation of 5-HT receptors. Opioids may provoke serotonin toxicity especially if administered in conjunction with other serotonergic medications. The increasing use of opioid analgesics and widespread prescribing of antidepressants and psychiatric medicines, indicates the likelihood of an increased incidence of serotonin toxicity in opioid-treated patients.

Fatal serotonin syndrome: a systematic review of 56 cases in the literature

INTRODUCTION

Serotonin syndrome (SS) is a drug-induced potentially life-threatening clinical condition. There is a paucity of data on the risk factors, clinical course, and complications associated with fatal SS.

OBJECTIVE

To characterize the epidemiological profile, clinical features, and risk factors associated with fatal SS through a systematic review.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of MEDLINE and Google Scholar for case reports, case series, or cohort studies of fatal SS.

RESULTS

Initial database search identified 2326 articles of which 46 (56 patients) were included in the final analysis. The mean age was 42.3 years (range 18-87 years) with female predominance (57%). North America and Europe constitute 80% of the reported fatal SS. The symptoms evolved very rapidly, within 24 h after the administration of serotonergic drugs in 59% of the cases. Fever (61%) was the most common symptom, followed by seizure (36%) and tremors (30%). The mean temperature in the reported cases (25 patients) was 41.6 ± 1.3 °C (range 38.3-43.5 °C). SS was reported to occur with the maintenance dosage of serotonergic agents, after initiation of the drug for the first time, and addition of the drugs for the development of another unrelated illness. Creatine kinase (CK) activities were elevated (>3 times of the upper limit of normal) in eighteen patients, and it was very high (>25,000 IU/L) in four patients. Presence of high grade fever, seizures, and high CK activities may be associated with severe SS. Nine patients (16%) received 5-HT2A antagonists as a therapy. About 50% of patients died within 24 h of the onset of symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

While fatal SS is rare, frequently observed features include hyperthermia, seizures, and high CK activities. Cyproheptadine use appears infrequent for these patients.

The anaesthetist, opioid analgesic drugs, and serotonin toxicity: a mechanistic and clinical review

Most cases of serotonin toxicity are provoked by therapeutic doses of a combination of two or more serotonergic drugs, defined as drugs affecting the serotonin neurotransmitter system. Common serotonergic drugs include many antidepressants, antipsychotics, and opioid analgesics, particularly fentanyl, tramadol, meperidine (pethidine), and methadone, but rarely morphine and other related phenanthrenes. Symptoms of serotonin toxicity are attributable to an effect on monoaminergic transmission caused by an increased synaptic concentration of serotonin. The serotonin transporter (SERT) maintains low serotonin concentrations and is important for the reuptake of the neurotransmitter into the presynaptic nerve terminals. Some opioids inhibit the reuptake of serotonin by inhibiting SERT, thus increasing the plasma and synaptic cleft serotonin concentrations that activate the serotonin receptors. Opioids that are good inhibitors of SERT (tramadol, dextromethorphan, methadone, and meperidine) are most frequently associated with serotonin toxicity. Tramadol also has a direct serotonin-releasing action. Fentanyl produces an efflux of serotonin, and binds to 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT)_1A and 5-HT_2A receptors, whilst methadone, meperidine, and more weakly tapentadol, bind to 5-HT_2A but not 5-HT_1A receptors. The perioperative period is a time where opioids and other serotonergic drugs are frequently administered in rapid succession, sometimes to patients with other serotonergic drugs in their system. This makes the perioperative period a relatively risky time for serotonin toxicity to occur. The intraoperative recognition of serotonin toxicity is challenging as it can mimic other serious syndromes, such as malignant hyperthermia, sepsis, thyroid storm, and neuroleptic malignant syndrome. Anaesthetists must maintain a heightened awareness of its possible occurrence and a readiness to engage in early treatment to avoid poor outcomes.

Drug-drug Interactions in Psychiatric Practice, Part 1: Reasons, Importance, and Strategies to Avoid and Recognize Them

This column begins a series exploring drug-drug interactions (DDIs) with a special emphasis on psychiatric medications. As explained in this column, this topic is important for multiple reasons. First, a large percentage of the population is receiving psychiatric medications. Second, these patients are likely to be on multiple medications which means that they are at risk for an adverse DDI. Third, DDIs may occur but not be recognized even though they have significant health care consequences for the patient. Fourth, these consequences can range from a catastrophic outcome to more everyday clinical problems involving a myriad of presentations as enumerated in this column. Also discussed in this column is the fact that all drugs, including psychiatric medications, interact on the basis of their pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics rather than their therapeutic use. Therefore, psychiatric medications may interact with medications prescribed for nonpsychiatric reasons as well as with other psychiatric medications. Tables are included that explain reasons for multiple medication use and principles to follow to minimize the risk of adverse DDIs.

Combining antidepressants: a review of evidence

Sequenced (stepped) treatment approaches are widely endorsed in the management of depression. Combining antidepressants is a recognised step for those failing to respond to monotherapy. Despite the limited evidence base, this strategy is widely used by clinicians in practice. Not every combination used clinically has a sound neuropharmacological rationale and the use of such combinations may increase the side-effect burden without any additional advantage to the patient. Efficacy of various antidepressant combinations along with the data on side-effect profile and toxicity of such combined treatments are reviewed here. The different combinations are considered by each class of antidepressant available in the UK.

Augmentation of phenelzine with aripiprazole and quetiapine in a treatment-resistant patient with psychotic unipolar depression: case report and literature review

Irreversible monoamine oxidase inhibitor (MAOI) antidepressants have significant efficacy in treatment-resistant unipolar depression, but in some instances patients may not achieve remission. Among the adjunctive and augmentation strategies, certain second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) have approval for inadequate responders to antidepressant therapy, including aripiprazole, brexpiprazole, and quetiapine, with lurasidone and the olanzapine/fluoxetine combination indicated for bipolar depression. Clinicians may eschew SGA options in part due to the limited literature on SGA-MAOI combinations, with only one published case involving aripiprazole, and none for olanzapine, lurasidone, or brexpiprazole. In addition to the limited publication history on SGA-MAOI treatment, clinicians may also be deterred by uncertainty regarding SGA mechanisms and the risk of serotonin syndrome or other adverse outcomes. This paper describes the case of a 54-year-old male with a history of psychotic unipolar depression treated with a combination of phenelzine, aripiprazole, and quetiapine, and reviews the 12 published cases of SGA-MAOI combination therapy with a focus on the pharmacological basis for serotonin syndrome, and the SGA mechanisms that should not be associated with a risk for this syndrome.

Tranylcypromine in mind (Part I): Review of pharmacology

It has been over 50 years since a review has focused exclusively on the monoamine oxidase (MAO) inhibitor tranylcypromine (TCP). A new review has therefore been conducted for TCP in two parts which are written to be read preferably in close conjunction: Part I - pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, drug interactions, toxicology; and Part II - clinical studies with meta-analysis of controlled studies in depression, practice of TCP treatment, place in therapy. Pharmacological data of this review part I characterize TCP as an irreversible and nonselective MAO-A/B inhibitor at low therapeutic doses of 20mg/day with supplementary norepinephrine reuptake inhibition at higher doses of 40-60mg/day. Serotonin, norepinephrine, dopamine, and trace amines, such as the "endogenous amphetamine" phenylethylamine, are increased in brain, which leads to changes in neuroplasticity by e.g. increased neurotrophic growth factors and translates to reduced stress-induced hypersecretion of corticotropin releasing factor (CRF) and positive testing in animal studies of depression. TCP has a pharmacokinetic half-life (t_1/2) of only 2h which is considerably lower than for most other antidepressant drugs. However, a very long pharmacodynamic half-life of about one week is found because of the irreversible MAO inhibition. New studies show that, except for cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2A6, no other drug metabolizing CYP-enzymes are inhibited by TCP at therapeutic doses which defines a low potential of pharmacokinetic interactions in the direction from TCP to other drugs. Insufficient information is available, however, for plasma concentrations of TCP influenced by comedication. More quantitative data are also needed for TCP metabolites such as p-hydroxytranylcypromine and N-acetyltranylcypromine. Pharmacodynamic drug interactions comprise for instance severe serotonin toxicity (SST) with serotonergic drugs and hypertensive crisis with indirect sympathomimetics. Because of the risk of severe food interaction, TCP treatment remains beset with the need for a mandatory tyramine-restricted diet. Toxicity in overdose is similar to amitriptyline and imipramine according to the distance of therapeutic to toxic doses. In conclusion, TCP is characterized by an exceptional pharmacology which is different to most other antidepressant drugs, and a more special evaluation of clinical efficacy and safety may therefore be needed.

Quetiapine for Insomnia Associated with Refractory Depression Exacerbated by Phenelzine

Objective:

To report the successful treatment of phenelzine-associated insomnia with low-dose quetiapine in a patient with refractory depression.

Case Summary:

A 42-year-old white man with severe major depression unresponsive to selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitors, bupropion, and tricyclic antidepressants improved following treatment with the monoamine oxidase inhibitor (MAOI) phenelzine. Insomnia, present to a moderate degree prior to antidepressant therapy, worsened markedly following phenelzine treatment and failed to respond to diphenhydramine, temazepam, triazolam, clonazepam, Zolpidem, or trazodone given at high therapeutic doses. Sleep disturbance resolved with low-dose (50 mg) adjunctive quetiapine, with no adverse effects.

Discussion:

Major depression refractory to standard therapy is a common and serious condition. Some cases respond to MAOIs; however, orthostatic hypotension and insomnia frequently occur. Potentially serious MAOI interactions with psychotropic drugs have raised concerns about combining these agents. In this case, a failure of a number of other medications known to treat MAOI-associated insomnia safely prompted a trial of quetiapine. Despite the possibility that enhanced serotonergic activity might have resulted in serotonin syndrome, no adverse interactions between phenelzine and quetiapine were noted. The use of low-dose, once-daily quetiapine, along with its unique binding properties, may account for its increased safety in combination with phenelzine.

Conclusions:

This case illustrates that low-dose quetiapine may be an alternative treatment for phenelzine-associated insomnia. Further case reports are needed to establish the safety and effectiveness of combining these agents.

Serotonin Syndrome: Analysis of Cases Registered in the French Pharmacovigilance Database

BACKGROUND

More information would be required for a better understanding of the actual circumstances of serotonin syndrome (SS) occurrence in routine clinical practice.

AIM

The objective of the study was to analyze characteristics of SS French pharmacovigilance reports, especially involved drugs and nature of drug-drug interactions (DDIs).

METHOD

We performed a retrospective analysis of SS registered in the French pharmacovigilance database between January 1, 1985 and May 27, 2013. Only cases whose clinical symptoms fulfilled Sternbach, Radomski, or Hunter SS diagnostic criteria were retained for the analysis.

RESULTS

Most of the 125 (84.0%) analyzed cases were associated with a recent change in a serotonergic drug (introduction, increasing the dose or overdose). Antidepressants were the most often involved serotonergic drugs, mostly serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SRIs, 42.1%) and to a lesser extent serotonin-noradrenalin reuptake inhibitors (9.1%, mainly venlafaxine), tricyclic antidepressants (8.6%, mainly clomipramine), and some monoamine oxidase inhibitors (6.2%, mainly moclobemide). Nonpsychotropic medications were also involved, generally opioids (14.8%, mainly tramadol). Most of the cases (59.2%) resulted from pharmacodynamic DDIs, most often involving SRIs + opioids (mostly paroxetine + tramadol). However, SS also occurred with a single serotonergic drug in a significant number of cases (40.8%), most often SRIs (mainly fluoxetine) or venlafaxine at usual doses. Lastly, a major pharmacokinetic DDI could have played a role in 1/5 (20.8%) of cases.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study about SS based on a large pharmacovigilance database and published in English. Our results reveal not only the frequent involvement of antidepressants and tramadol, the importance of DDIs (both pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic), but also the significant risk of SS even with a single serotonergic drug used at normal dose.

Serotonin toxicity

Serotonin toxicity is a potentially life-threatening condition associated with a range of psychotropic medications, co-administration of specific combinations of agents and overdose of certain drugs. It is associated with a wide diversity of clinical signs and symptoms, including cognitive, autonomic and somatic effects, as well as serious complications, including possible death. Diagnosis is often challenging and requires a high index of suspicion. Differential diagnosis includes syndromes such as neuroleptic malignant syndrome. Management depends on the causal agent and urgency of clinical presentation. Treatment may involve discontinuing the causal agent and providing supportive measures, or emergency intervention to preserve vital functions (airway, breathing, circulation), amongst other measures. Further research is needed to clarify the incidence of serotonin toxicity, issues related to differential diagnosis, optimal management of the condition, and treatment of mood problems following serotonin toxicity.

Bupropion: pharmacology and therapeutic applications

A total of 17 years after its introduction, bupropion remains a safe and effective antidepressant, suitable for first-line use. Bupropion undergoes metabolic transformation to an active metabolite, 4-hydroxybupropion, through hepatic cytochrome P450-2B6 (CYP2B6) and has inhibitory effects on cytochrome P450-2D6 (CYP2D6), thus raising concern for clinically-relevant drug interactions. Common side effects are nervousness and insomnia. Nausea appears slightly less common than with the SSRI drugs and sexual dysfunction is probably the least of any antidepressant. Bupropion is relatively safe in overdose with seizures being the predominant concern. The mechanism of action of bupropion is still uncertain but may be related to inhibition of presynaptic dopamine and norepinephrine reuptake transporters. The activity of vesicular monoamine transporter-2, the transporter pumping dopamine, norepinephrine and serotonin from the cytosol into presynaptic vesicles, is increased by bupropion and may be a component of its mechanism of action. Bupropion is approved for use in major depression and seasonal affective disorder and has demonstrated comparable efficacy to other antidepressants in clinical trials. Bupropion is also useful in augmenting a partial response to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor antidepressants, although bupropion should not be combined with monoamine oxidase inhibitors. It may be less likely to provoke mania than antidepressants with prominent serotonergic effects. Bupropion is effective in helping people quit tobacco smoking. Anecdotal reports indicate bupropion may lower inflammatory mediators such as tumor necrosis factor-alpha, may lower fatigue in cancer and may help reduce concentration problems.

A drug-drug interaction knowledge assessment instrument for health professional students: a Rasch analysis of validity evidence

BACKGROUND

It is essential that current and future health professionals be able to evaluate for possible clinically significant drug-drug interactions (DDIs) and when detected, determine appropriate management strategies to prevent patient harm.

OBJECTIVE

Assess the validity of a DDI knowledge assessment instrument in a health professional student population.

METHODS

This study recruited health professional students (medical, nurse practitioner, and pharmacy) beginning experiential training at the University of Arizona. Students were given a knowledge assessment instrument that included 15 medication pairings selected on the basis of clinical importance and were asked to select the most appropriate DDI management strategy for each pair by selecting "avoid combination," "usually avoid combination," "take precautions," or "no special precautions." Data were analyzed in 2 ways because of the subjective nature of classifying DDIs into specific management categories. In the first analysis, respondents were given credit for a correct item only if they selected the management strategy deemed appropriate (management strategy analysis). In another analysis, students were given credit for an item only if they correctly identified specific DDIs (DDI recognition analysis). Rasch analysis was used to assess the validity of the knowledge instrument.

RESULTS

A total of 165 of the 226 eligible health professional students completed the DDI knowledge assessment (73% response rate). The mean score for management strategy analysis was 3.82 out of 15, whereas DDI recognition analysis produced a higher average (mean=6.55). Good reliability was demonstrated in both strategies, and no ceiling or floor effects were observed. Some construct underrepresentation occurred with both scoring strategies, and some mistargeting was identified when analyzing the management strategy.

CONCLUSIONS

Although improvements in construct representation may be beneficial, the instrument used demonstrated good reliability and validity and could be used by educators to assess and improve DDI knowledge. The ability of the participants to identify DDIs and select an appropriate management strategy was low. These results support the need for additional DDI education in this institution's health curricula.

Methylene blue and serotonin toxicity: inhibition of monoamine oxidase A (MAO A) confirms a theoretical prediction

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOI) are known to cause serotonin toxicity (ST) when administered with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI). Methylene blue (methylthionium chloride, MB), a redox dye in clinical use, has been reported to precipitate ST in patients using SSRI. MB was assessed for MAO inhibition and so for its potential to precipitate ST.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

Inhibition of purified human MAO was quantified using kinetic assays and visible spectral changes to study the interactions of MB with MAO A.

KEY RESULTS

MB was a potent (tight binding) inhibitor for MAO A. It also inhibited MAO B but at much higher concentration. Interactions of MB with the active site of MAO A were confirmed by its action both as an oxidising substrate and as a one-electron reductant.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

MB is a potent reversible inhibitor of MAO A with implications for gut uptake of amines when administered orally. At concentrations reported in the literature after intravenous administration, MAO B would be partially inhibited but MAO A would be completely inhibited. This inhibition of MAO A would be expected to lead to perturbations of 5-hydroxytryptamine metabolism and hence account for ST occurring when administered to patients on SSRI treatment.

Detrimental antidepressant drug-drug interactions: are they clinically relevant?

This paper takes the position that detrimental drug-drug interactions (DDIs) involving antidepressants are clinically relevant. In doing so, it begins with a definition of the terms: drug-drug interaction, detrimental, and clinical relevance. It then discusses the issues of proof and provides an overview of the clinically relevant DDIs involving antidepressants. It also gives examples involving drugs besides antidepressants based on the premise that the underlying principles are applicable regardless of the therapeutic classes of the drugs involved.

Pharmacogenomics, informatics, and individual drug therapy in psychiatry: past, present and future

The modern era of psychopharmacology began in the 10 year period from the late 1940s to the late 1950s. During this period, the first antidepressants, antipsychotics, anxiolytics and mood stabilizers were all discovered. In the 1960s, the pharmacology of these drugs was elucidated and theories about the mechanisms of action proposed. In the 1970s and 1980s, new, more selective compounds were developed based on improved structure-activity relationships derived from in vitro receptor binding studies and animal models. These compounds entered clinical testing in the 1980s and began to be marketed in the late 1980s and 1990s. All of these agents were approved to treat psychiatric syndromes which are conditions defined by a cluster of signs and symptoms. None of these agents was developed based on an understanding of the pathophysiology of the illnesses being treated. None of these agents are curative and virtually all have limited clinical efficacy. In the earliest days of the modern era, there were few drugs available to combine and many had such broad actions that they were often marginally tolerated or unsafe when used in combination (tricyclic antidepressants and monoamine oxidase inhibitors). With the advent of more medications, the frequency and extent of polypharmacy has exploded. In addition to simply having more drugs from which to select with different pharmacological profiles, many newer medications are also more selective in their pharmacological actions and thus are often better tolerated and safer when used in combination. In addition, there is the concern that the trade-off for more selective pharmacology may have been better tolerability at the expense of reduced efficacy, which clinicians then compensate for by using more medications in combination. For all of the above reasons, polypsychopharmacology has been present from the beginning of the modern era of psychopharmacotherapy and continues to be the rule rather than the exception. In fact, the frequency and the complexity of such polypsychopharmacology are both enormous and increasing. The percentage of patients being discharged from the Biological Branch of the National Institute of Mental Health on more than three psychiatric medications increased more than ten times between 1974-79, and 1990-95. The majority of patients seen in the Veterans Administration Medical System in the United States are on unique combinations of medications and the frequency and complexity of such polypharmacotherapy is increased in patients on psychiatric medications. Throughout the modern era, there have been attempts to determine whether there are populations of patients selectively responsible to specific agents (e.g. serotonin versus norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors). However, no compelling data have so far emerged. Instead, clinicians generally resort to combining drugs on the basis of symptoms such as psychosis and depression or anxiety and depression. Science has primarily informed the clinician about safety concerns rather than efficacy concerns when using such combinations. That will change in the future with a better understanding of the pathophysiology of psychiatric illnesses which in turn will lead to improved therapies and the potential for more rationally derived combination treatments.

A review of serotonin toxicity data: implications for the mechanisms of antidepressant drug action

Data now exist from which an accurate definition for serotonin toxicity (ST), or serotonin syndrome, has been developed; this has also lead to precise, validated decision rules for diagnosis. The spectrum concept formulates ST as a continuum of serotonergic effects, mediated by the degree of elevation of intrasynaptic serotonin. This progresses from side effects through to toxicity; the concept emphasizes that it is a form of poisoning, not an idiosyncratic reaction. Observations of the degree of ST precipitated by overdoses of different classes of drugs can elucidate mechanisms and potency of drug actions. There is now sufficient pharmacological data on some drugs to enable a prediction of which ones will be at risk of precipitating ST, either by themselves or in combinations with other drugs. This indicates that some antidepressant drugs, presently thought to have serotonergic effects in animals, do not exhibit such effects in humans. Mirtazapine is unable to precipitate serotonin toxicity in overdose or to cause serotonin toxicity when mixed with monoamine oxidase inhibitors, and moclobemide is unable to precipitate serotonin toxicity in overdose. Tricyclic antidepressants (other than clomipramine and imipramine) do not precipitate serotonin toxicity and might not elevate serotonin or have a dual action, as has been assumed.

Monoamine oxidase inhibitors, opioid analgesics and serotonin toxicity

Toxicity resulting from excessive intra-synaptic serotonin, historically referred to as serotonin syndrome, is now understood to be an intra-synaptic serotonin concentration-related phenomenon. Recent research more clearly delineates serotonin toxicity as a discreet toxidrome characterized by clonus, hyper-reflexia, hyperthermia and agitation. Serotonergic side-effects occur with serotonergic drugs, and overdoses of serotonin re-uptake inhibitors (SRIs) frequently produce marked serotonergic side-effects, and in 15% of cases, moderate serotonergic toxicity, but not to a severe degree, which produces hyperthermia and risk of death. It is only combinations of serotonergic drugs acting by different mechanisms that are capable of raising intra-synaptic serotonin to a level that is life threatening. The combination that most commonly does this is a monoamine oxidase inhibitor (MAOI) drug combined with any SRI. There are a number of lesser-known drugs that are MAOIs, such as linezolid and moclobemide; and some opioid analgesics have serotonergic activity. These properties when combined can precipitate life threatening serotonin toxicity. Possibly preventable deaths are still occurring. Knowledge of the properties of these drugs will therefore help to ensure that problems can be avoided in most clinical situations, and treated appropriately (with 5-HT(2A) antagonists for severe cases) if they occur. The phenylpiperidine series opioids, pethidine (meperidine), tramadol, methadone and dextromethorphan and propoxyphene, appear to be weak serotonin re-uptake inhibitors and have all been involved in serotonin toxicity reactions with MAOIs (including some fatalities). Morphine, codeine, oxycodone and buprenorphine are known not to be SRIs, and do not precipitate serotonin toxicity with MAOIs.

Deadly drug interactions in emergency medicine

Many life-threatening drug interactions are predictable, avoidable events. Emergency medicine physicians have a responsibility to recognize and prevent drug interactions. Keeping current on the many pharmaceutical therapies,their pharmacology, and potential drug interactions currently represents one of the biggest challenges for emergency medicine practitioners. Using current drug interaction resources and knowing the limited number of medications that are responsible for the most serious drug interactions can ease this seemingly overwhelming burden greatly. Clinicians need to be particularly vigilant when prescribing drugs for patients who are taking medications with potential for drug interactions leading to serious consequences.