Mucosal malignant melanoma of the head and neck: the Marsden experience over half a century

Mucosal Melanoma of the Oral Cavity: What is the Role of Elective Neck Dissection?

OBJECTIVES

Mucosal melanoma (MM) is a rare malignancy that can present in the head and neck (H&N). The Oral cavity is the second most common primary site in the H&N after sinonasal mucosa. This study investigates the impact of demographic and clinical factors on survival in oral cavity MM. Further, it investigates the outcomes and utility of elective neck dissections (END) in the management of oral MM.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database was used to evaluate 432 patients with oral cavity MM from 2004 to 2016. Kaplan-Meir and Cox regression analyses were used to determine variables associated with survival.

RESULTS

The mean age was 64.0 ± 16.0 years. Most patients were white (85.1%) and male (60.0%). Gingiva (37.6%) and hard palate (36.1%) were the most common primary subsites in the oral cavity. Five-year overall survival was 31.0%. Age (Hazards Ratio [95% Confidence Interval], 1.03 [1.01-1.06]), N-stage (1.94 [1.10-3.42]), M-stage (10.13 [3.33-30.86]), male sex (1.79 [1.06-3.03]), and African-American race (2.63 [1.14-6.11]) were significantly associated with worse survival. 199 patients (46.9%) underwent neck dissection including 118 with lymph node yield (LNY) ≥ 18. The rate of occult nodal positivity was 45.4% for LNY ≥ 18 and 28.3% for LNY ≥ 1. ENDs were not associated with improved outcomes. However, occult lymph node involvement was associated with worse overall survival (p = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

Oral cavity MM has a poor prognosis. Lymph node involvement, distant metastasis, age, race, and male sex are associated with worse outcomes. Performing an END did not improve survival. However, END may have a prognostic role and help select patients for treatment intensification.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4 Laryngoscope, 133:317-326, 2023.

Importance of Margins, Radiotherapy, and Systemic Therapy in Mucosal Melanoma of the Head and Neck

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

The ideal strategy in the treatment of mucosal melanoma of the head and neck (MMHN) remains unclear. Our objective was to evaluate the importance of surgical margins, radiotherapy, and systemic therapy in MMHN.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective Single Institutional Review.

METHODS

Retrospective review of patients with MMHN treated at a tertiary care oncology center between 1999 and 2016.

RESULTS

Seventy-six patients were included, 60 of whom were treated with curative intent. Negative or close margins compared with positive margins were associated with higher 3-year overall survival (OS) (62% vs. 29% vs. 13% P = .012), disease-free survival (33% vs. 29% vs. 4% P = .003), and distant control (48% vs. 29% vs. 22% P = .039). Cases with pre-/postoperative radiotherapy had a marginally higher locoregional control versus without (69% vs. 59%, P = .117). Immunotherapy for recurrent and/or metastatic disease was associated with an increase in 3-year OS (15% vs. 3% P = .01).

CONCLUSION

Achieving negative surgical margins is relevant in disease control. Despite small sample size, our data suggest that radiotherapy may enhance surgical outcomes. Immunotherapy has therapeutic benefit.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 Laryngoscope, 2021.

Multimodal Treatment of Advanced Mucosal Melanoma in the Era of Modern Immunotherapy

Simple Summary

Immunotherapy revolutionized the treatment of cutaneous melanoma and greatly improved treatment outcomes in this group of patients. Mucosal melanoma is a rare disease, biologically distinct from the cutaneous subtype. There is little real-world data on immunotherapy efficacy in mucosal melanoma. Therefore, we aimed to analyze and describe experiences in mucosal melanoma treatment in five high volume oncology centers in Europe. Furthermore, we evaluated if concomitant radiotherapy may improve the outcomes of these patients. We conclude that immunotherapy with anti-PD1 antibodies is a safe and effective treatment of mucosal melanoma. Concomitant radiotherapy may be beneficial in a selected subgroup of patients with advanced mucosal melanoma.

Abstract

Mucosal melanoma is a rare disease epidemiologically and molecularly distinct from cutaneous melanoma developing from melanocytes located in mucosal membranes. Little is known about its therapy. In this paper, we aimed to evaluate the results of immunotherapy and radiotherapy in a group of patients with advanced mucosal melanoma, based on the experience of five high-volume centers in Poland and Italy. There were 82 patients (53 female, 29 male) included in this retrospective study. The median age in this group was 67.5 (IQR: 57.25–75.75). All patients received anti-PD1 or anti-CTLA4 antibodies in the first or second line of treatment. Twenty-three patients received radiotherapy during anti-PD1 treatment. In the first-line treatment, the median progression-free survival (PFS) reached six months in the anti-PD1 group, which was statistically better than 3.1 months in the other modalities group (p = 0.004). The median overall survival (OS) was 16.3 months (CI: 12.1–22.3) in the whole cohort. Patients who received radiotherapy (RT) during the anti-PD1 treatment had a median PFS of 8.9 months (CI: 7.4–NA), whereas patients treated with single-modality anti-PD1 therapy had a median PFS of 4.2 months (CI: 3.0–7.8); this difference was statistically significant (p = 0.047). Anti-PD1 antibodies are an effective treatment option in advanced mucosal melanoma (MM). The addition of RT may have been beneficial in the selected subgroup of mucosal melanoma patients.

Prognostic factors in head and neck mucosal malignant melanoma

OBJECTIVE

Primary mucosal malignant melanoma of the head and neck (HN-PMMM) is an aggressive and uncommon neoplasm. Herein, we present a series of 33 patients and the results of treatment, and aimed to determine prognostic factors in HN-PMMM.

METHODS

Patients who were diagnosed as having HN-PMMM in our reference hospital, between 2005 and 2014 were evaluated. Thirty-three of these patients who had follow-up data were included. Surgical margin status was extracted from the original pathology reports. Archived materials were retrieved for the histopathologic findings: ulceration, necrosis, lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion, pigmentation, and presence of an in situ component. Mitotic activity was evaluated using phosphohistone H3 (PHH3) immunohistochemical staining.

RESULTS

We found an association of PHH3 mitotic activity with overall survival in a univariate analysis and to our knowledge, this is the first report among the available case series of HN-PMMM to evaluate mitotic activity using immunohistochemical staining. We also investigated the relationship between multicentricity and locoregional recurrence, which the authors believe is also a first.

CONCLUSION

PHH3 mitotic activity can be used a prognostic factor for head and neck mucosal malignant melanoma.

Mucosal melanoma of the upper airways tract mucosal melanoma: A systematic review with meta-analyses of treatment

BACKGROUND

Mucosal melanoma of the upper aerodigestive tract (MM-UADT) occurs in a complex anatomic region. It represents a small number of tumors of the head and neck and a small number of melanoma cases.

METHODS

Search strategies initially identified 600, 11 of which were included in this study.

RESULTS

All studies involved surgery and radiotherapy. None were randomized, and all were assessed as having a high risk of selection and performance bias. No studies reported quality of life, treatment-related mortality, or morbidity. The results indicate that the addition of radiotherapy to surgery reduces the rate of locoregional recurrence (hazard ratio [HR], 0.60; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.42-0.87). There was no statistically significant difference in overall survival (HR, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.98-1.37).

CONCLUSION

Surgical resection with postoperative radiotherapy remains the optimal treatment strategy for locoregional control. More robust studies and the use of molecular targeted therapies need to be undertaken to improve overall survival. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 39: 819-825, 2017.

Mucosal melanoma of the head and neck: a population-based study from Slovenia, 1985-2013

Objectives

To assess the incidence and to review experience with the treatment of mucosal melanoma of the head and neck (MMHN) in Slovenia between 1985 and 2013.

Methods

The National Cancer Registry database and clinical records with outcome data of identified patients treated during the period 1985–2013 in Slovenia were reviewed.

Results

In a 29-year period, 61 patients with MMHN were identified, representing 0.5 % of all head and neck malignant tumors and 42 % of all mucosal melanomas in Slovenia. 72 % originated in the sinonasal tract and were predominantly (78 %) diagnosed as a local disease. Regional metastases at diagnosis were more frequent in patients with oral/oropharyngeal primary (44 %; sinonasal MMHN 11 %, p = 0.006). Curative intent treatment was given to 48 (79 %) patients. The overall survival (OS) rates at 2 and 5 years for the whole cohort were 43 % and 18 %, respectively, and for the curative intent group 53 % and 24 %, respectively. In the latter group, multivariate analyses showed postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) to be predictive for locoregional control (LRC) (hazard ratios [HR] for surgery with PORT vs. surgery alone: 1.0 vs. 3.9, p = 0.037), whereas only the World Health Organization performance status (HR for grade 0 vs. grade 1 vs. grade >1: 1.0 (p = 0.022) vs. 1.2 (p = 0.640) vs. 7.7 (p = 0.008)) significantly influenced OS.

Conclusions

MMHN is a rare tumor with a poor prognosis. Combination of surgery and PORT offers the best prospects for LRC but without improvement of OS. Due to potential toxicity of high-dose RT such treatment is indicated in patients in whom LRC outweighs the risks of serious adverse effects.

Survival Outcomes of Mucosal Melanoma in the Head and Neck: Case Series and Review of Current Treatment Guidelines

PURPOSE

Malignant mucosal melanoma of the head and neck (MMHN) is an aggressive and rare neoplasm with poor long-term outcomes. The aim of this study is to evaluate the outcomes of patients treated by a single-institution head and neck multidisciplinary team.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this retrospective case series, all MMHN cases treated at the Royal Melbourne Hospital from 1990-2015 were retrospectively reviewed. Patient demographic characteristics (eg, age), treatment offered, pathology, and outcomes were collected, tabulated, and correlated with outcomes. Survival outcomes were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Comparison was made between oral and sinonasal melanomas.

RESULTS

A total of 16 cases were identified. Two were excluded because of inaccessible data. Of the 14 remaining cases, 8 were sinonasal melanomas and 6 were oral cavity melanomas. Sinonasal tumor patients presented with epistaxis or visual impairment. Oral melanoma patients presented with pigmented lesions or ulceration. Follow-up ranged from 4 months to 11 years. In 2 patients, locoregional recurrences developed that were successfully re-excised. Six patients died of distant metastases despite clear surgical margins. Two patients with sinonasal melanomas died of extensive local disease with intracranial invasion. One patient died 4 years after diagnosis without disease. There were no failures in the neck. The 2- and 5-year overall survival rates were 63.3% and 31.7%, respectively, by the Kaplan-Meier method. The difference in survival between oral and sinonasal melanomas was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite clear surgical margins, MMHN has a poor prognosis and most deaths are due to distant metastases. Systemic therapies such as those used in cutaneous melanoma treatment might be used in the future for MMHN.

Primary mucosal melanoma of the oral cavity: current therapy and future directions

BACKGROUND

Primary mucosal melanoma of the oral cavity is a highly aggressive malignancy of melanocytic origin. The aim of this study is to report a case series of oral mucosal melanomas (OMMs) and provide a review of the literature with regard to treatment guidelines for and prognosis of this pathologic entity.

STUDY DESIGN

We report three cases of OMMs treated in our institutions and the results of a literature review, in which the words "oral" and "mucosal melanoma" were used as the main keywords.

RESULTS

Surgical resection of the primary tumor with wide resection margins appears to be the recommended primary treatment modality with the aim to achieve tumor-free margins. Elective neck dissection and adjuvant radiotherapy have been advocated for locoregional control. Chemotherapy has not been shown to improve survival and is mainly used for palliative purposes. Immunotherapy and biochemotherapy seem to significantly improve survival and could open new therapeutic horizons.

CONCLUSIONS

The prognosis of OMMs remains poor despite treatment. Early diagnosis and aggressive surgical resection followed by adjuvant therapies could be the key to improving survival. Multicenter randomized clinical trials, which may be difficult to conduct because of the rarity to the lesion, would aid in the development of new strategies.

Melanoma: Clinical Presentations

The malignant cell in melanoma is the melanocyte. Because melanocytes are located in the basal layer of the epidermis, melanoma is most commonly seen on the skin. However, melanoma can also arise on mucosal surfaces such as the oral cavity, the upper gastrointestinal mucosa, the genital mucosa, as well as the uveal tract of the eye and leptomeninges. Melanomas tend to be pigmented but can also present as pink or red lesions. They can mimic benign or other malignant skin lesions. This chapter presents the spectrum of typical and less typical presentations of melanoma, as well as patterns of spread. It is divided into (1) cutaneous lesions; (2) patterns of regional spread, (3) non-cutaneous lesions; and (4) distant metastases.

Update on primary head and neck mucosal melanoma

Primary mucosal melanomas (PMMs) of the head and neck are uncommon malignancies that arise mainly in the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses, followed by the oral cavity. The mainstay of treatment is radical surgical resection followed by adjuvant radiotherapy in selected patients with high-risk features. Multimodality therapy has not been well studied and is not standardized. Adjuvant radiotherapy seems to improve locoregional control but does not improve overall survival (OS). Elective neck dissection is advocated in patients with oral PMM. Systemic therapy should be considered only for patients with metastatic or unresectable locoregional disease. Despite improvements in the field of surgery, radiotherapy, and systemic therapy, patients with PMM still face a very unfavorable prognosis (5-year disease-free survival [DFS] <20%) with high rates of locoregional recurrence and distant metastasis. The present review aims to summarize the current state of knowledge on the molecular biology, pathological diagnosis, and management of this disease.

Postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy improves loco-regional recurrence of head and neck mucosal melanoma

Primary head and neck mucosal melanoma (HNMM) is a rare tumor with a poor prognosis. Controversy remains as to whether postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy (PORT) achieves a significant benefit in HNMM treatment. Because of the lack of available conclusive prospective data, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of all relevant available studies to clarify the benefits of PORT. A comprehensive literature search of PubMed and Google Scholar electronic databases was conducted to collect relevant studies until April 30, 2014. Studies published in the English language comparing surgery alone and surgery plus PORT for HNMM were included, with more than 15 study populations. All statistical analyses were performed using STATA version 12.0. A total of 423 patients were available from eight studies and the median sample size was 53 cases. The median follow-up time was 38.2 months (range 18.3-65.2 months). There was a positive association between PORT and loco-regional recurrence of HNMM (odds ratio [OR] = 0.36, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.22-0.60, P = 0.000). No associations were found between the PORT and 3-year and 5-year overall survival (OS) (OR = 1.41, 95% CI = 0.94-2.09, P = 0.093 and OR = 1.06, 95% CI = 0.70-1.61, P = 0.161, respectively). PORT had no impact on 3-year and 5-year OS (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.14, 95% CI = 0.80-1.61, P = 0.472 and HR = 1.34, 95% CI = 0.97-1.85, P = 0.227, respectively). PORT improved loco-regional recurrence of HNMM independent of OS.

Evidence-based practice: endoscopic skull base resection for malignancy

Successful outcomes of endoscopic approaches to benign sinonasal tumors have launched interest in expanding its use for sinonasal malignancy. Because of the heterogeneity and rarity of sinonasal malignancy, evidence for clinical outcomes of endoscopic approaches versus traditional craniofacial resection is low. Using the Oxford Center for Evidence-based Medicine guidelines, we present the existing evidence comparing both techniques for a variety of sinonasal malignancies.

Craniofacial resection and its role in the management of sinonasal malignancies

Sinonasal malignancy is rare, and its presentation is commonly late. There is a wide variety of pathologies with varying natural histories and survival rates. Anatomy of the skull base is extremely complex and tumors are closely related to orbits, frontal lobes and cavernous sinus. Anatomical detail and the late presentation render surgical management a challenging task. A thorough understanding of anatomy and pathology combined with modern neuroimaging and reliable reconstruction within a multidisciplinary team is imperative to carry out skull base surgery effectively. While endoscopic approaches are gaining credibility, clearly, it will be some time before meaningful comparisons with craniofacial resection can be made. Until then, craniofacial resection will remain the gold standard for managing the sinonasal malignancies of the anterior skull base, as it has proved to be safe and effective.

Rising incidence of mucosal melanoma of the head and neck in the United States

Background. While it is established that the incidence of cutaneous melanoma has risen over time in the United States, the incidence trend for mucosal melanoma of the head and neck (MMHN) is unknown. Methods. We used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database to determine incidence trends for MMHN from 1987 to 2009 in the United States. We determined annual percent change (APC) by weighted least squares and joinpoint regression analysis. Results. MMHN incidence increased from 1987 to 2009 (APC 2.4%; P < 0.01). Nasal cavity lesions increased in incidence (APC 2.7%; P < 0.01) over this duration, while the incidence of non-nasal cavity lesions remained stable. The highest rate of increase was in white females ages 55 to 84 (APC 5.1%; P = 0.01). Conclusions. The incidence of MMHN in the United States has been rising since 1987. This trend is driven primarily by increased incidence of nasal cavity melanomas.

[Melanoma of the nasal septum]

Sinonasal mucosal melanoma is a rare neoplasm, accounting for less than 1% of all melanomas. It is more aggressive than its cutaneous counterpart, with a very poor prognosis. We report a case of melanoma arising from mucosae of the nasal septum in a 73-year-old man. Clinical features, diagnosis, and treatment are described and a review of literature is made. Nasal location and relatively nonspecific symptoms frequently delay diagnosis. Optimal treatment guidelines are not established because of its rare occurrence.

Mucosal malignant melanomas in head and neck surgery: a retrospective study of six patients and review of the literature

INTRODUCTION

Of all malignant processes of the oral mucosa, 0.5% are malignant melanomas. Because of late diagnosis, pattern of growth, close proximity to the bone (particularly in palatinal localizations), and the correlated infiltration, malignant melanomas have a bad prognosis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this retrospective study, six cases of patients with oral mucosal malignant melanoma are evaluated, and a critical review of the literature is presented. The female to male proportion was 1:1 with an average age of 60.2 years; all patients were treated between January 1999 and July 2007. A neck dissection was performed on two patients because of clinically positive lymph nodes; one patient received interleukin 2 therapy, and three patients received postoperative radiotherapy. Two male patients died.

CONCLUSIONS

We recommend biopsy on every growing lesion, pigmented or nonpigmented, for the required diagnosis and, in cases of malignant melanoma, wide excision as a second step. Neck dissections should be performed in patients with clinically positive lymph nodes. Concerning interleukin 2 therapy, further studies should be performed in order to evaluate a routine application.

Sinonasal mucosal melanomas

OBJECTIVES

Sinonasal mucosal melanomas account for approximately 1% of all melanomas. These tumors are particularly aggressive, with a recurrence rate between 37 and 54% and a 5-year survival rate between 20 and 46%. Metastases are frequent. The main objective of this study was to analyze all of our cases of sinonasal mucosal melanomas and determine any prognostic factors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All our cases of sinonasal mucosal melanoma over a period of 10 years were included. Ten cases were analyzed. The mean age was 71 years (range: 61-85 years) for seven women and three men. The clinical, radiological, anatomopathological, and surgical data as well as the characteristics of disease progression were analyzed. These data were compared to those reported in the literature.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up was 36.3 months (range: 2-96 months). The 5-year overall survival was 40%. Seven patients developed local recurrences after a mean follow-up of 16 months (range: 2-27 months) with associated metastases in three cases. Analysis of the prognostic factors showed that tumors classified as T1 and limited to the nasal fossae had a better prognosis.

CONCLUSION

Sinonasal mucosal melanomas are rare tumors with a high mortality rate. Treatment of these tumors requires extensive surgical treatment associated with external radiotherapy.

Biochemotherapy in patients with advanced head and neck mucosal melanoma

BACKGROUND

No systemic therapy regimen has been recognized as effective for metastatic mucosal melanoma of the head and neck. We retrospectively analyzed the effectiveness of biochemotherapy in patients with advanced head and neck mucosal melanoma.

METHODS

We evaluated the medical records of 15 patients at our institution who had received various biochemotherapy regimens for advanced head and neck mucosal melanoma.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up duration of 13 months, 3 patients (20%) had partial response, and 4 patients (27%) had complete response. The median time to disease progression for all 15 patients was 10 months. The median overall survival duration for all patients was 22 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Although this was a small study, our results, especially the high complete response and overall response rates, indicate that biochemotherapy for advanced head and neck mucosal melanoma should be considered as a systemic treatment option for patients with this aggressive malignancy.

Mucosal melanoma of the head and neck

OBJECTIVE

Outcomes after radiotherapy for head and neck mucosal melanoma (MMHN).

METHODS

From 1974 to 2005, 17 patients with primary MMHN were treated with radiotherapy. Primary sites included nasal cavity, paranasal sinuses, and oral cavity or oropharynx. Thirteen patients received surgery and postoperative radiotherapy; 4 received definitive radiotherapy.

RESULTS

Local control was 79% at 1 and 5 years for 13 of 13 patients treated with surgery and postoperative radiotherapy compared with 1 of 4 patients treated with definitive radiotherapy. Three patients recurred in the neck; 13 patients developed distant metastases. Disease-free survival was 23% at 1 year and 18% at 5 years. Absolute and cause-specific survivals were identical (53% and 28% at 1 and 5 years).

CONCLUSION

Locoregional control is relatively high after surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy, but most patients recur in distant sites; approximately one fourth of patients are cured at 5 years. Patients with unresectable tumor may be controlled with definitive radiotherapy.

[Primary malignant melanoma of the nasal cavity presenting as a large tumor of the cheek]

INTRODUCTION

Malignant melanoma of the nasal cavity is a rare tumor usually causing unilateral nasal obstruction and nasal bleeding. Diagnosis is achieved with immunohistochemistry analysis. Surgery is proposed for curative treatment.

CASE REPORT

We report the case of a 60-year-old man with a malignant melanoma of the nasal cavity revealed by an important tumor of the cheek. Epistaxis and nasal obstructive syndrome occurred later. Because of the tumor stage, palliative chemotherapy was performed but the patient died 4 months after the diagnosis.

DISCUSSION

This clinical presentation of malignant melanoma of the nasal cavity, related to local spreading, is exceptional. CT scan and MRI are essential for tumor staging and therapeutic decision-making. Prognosis remains poor.

Head and neck melanoma

BACKGROUND

Melanoma of the head and neck and its treatment are complex issues. The behavior of head and neck melanoma is aggressive, and it has an overall poorer prognosis than that of other skin sites.

METHODS

The authors review current data on the treatment of head and neck melanoma, including both cutaneous and mucosal melanoma.

RESULTS

Current understanding of the behavior of head and neck melanoma is reviewed and treatment stratagems are presented. Controversies in treatment include lymphoscintigraphy with sentinel node biopsy, nodal dissection, margin size, role of radiation therapy, and reconstruction. The management goal is to treat melanoma aggressively while minimizing the effects of treatment on patient quality of life.

CONCLUSIONS

Due to its aggressiveness, head and neck melanoma should be treated aggressively when morbidity is not significantly increased. Patient specific treatment is imperative.

Head and Neck Mucosal Melanoma

PURPOSE

The purpose of this article is to discuss the optimal treatment and outcomes for head and neck mucosal melanoma.

METHODS

Review the pertinent literature.

RESULTS

Head and neck mucosal melanoma is a rare entity comprising less than 1% for all Western melanomas. It usually arises in the nasal cavity, paranasal sinuses, and oral cavity. The optimal treatment is surgery. The likelihood of local recurrence after resection is approximately 50%. Radiotherapy (RT) reduces the likelihood of local failure but probably does not enhance survival, which is primarily impacted by advanced T stage and the presence of regional metastases. The 5-year survival rates vary from approximately 20 to 50%. Although the median time to relapse is roughly 1 year or less, late failures are common and cause-specific survival continues to decline after 5 years.

CONCLUSION

The optimal treatment is surgery. Postoperative RT improves local-regional control but may not impact survival. Definitive RT may occasionally cure patients with unresectable local-regional disease or at least provide long-term palliation.

Postoperative radiotherapy for primary mucosal melanoma of the head and neck

BACKGROUND

Primary head and neck mucosal melanoma (HNMM) has a poor prognosis with a low local control rate and frequent distant metastases. The objective of the current study was to determine the impact of postoperative radiotherapy on local control and survival.

METHODS

One hundred forty-two patients with primary HNMM treated between 1979 and 1997 were reviewed. Of these, 69 patients with confirmed primary mucosal melanoma, absence of metastatic disease, and definitive management by surgery with or without postoperative radiotherapy and follow-up at the Institut Gustave-Roussy (Villejuif) were selected. The site of primary HNMM was sinonasal in 46 patients, oral in 19 patients, and pharyngolaryngeal in 4 patients. Twenty-two patients (32%) had a locally advanced tumor (T3-T4) and 17 patients had regional lymph node metastases after pathologic examination (pN > 0). Thirty patients underwent surgery alone and 39 received postoperative radiotherapy. Patients with locally advanced tumors had received postoperative radiotherapy more frequently than those with small tumors (P = 0.02).

RESULTS

Thirty-seven patients (54%) experienced local disease recurrence and 47 patients (68%) developed distant metastasis. The overall survival rates were 47% at 2 years and 20% at 5 years. In the Cox multivariate analysis, patients with early T-classification tumors who received postoperative radiotherapy had a better local disease-free survival (P = 0.004 and P = 0.05, respectively) compared with patients with late T-classification tumors who did not receive postoperative radiotherapy. Patients with advanced T-classification and pN > 0 stage had a shorter distant metastasis disease-free survival compared with patients with early T-classification and pN < 0 stage. Patients with advanced T-classification tumors had a shorter overall survival compared with patients with early T-classification tumors (P = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

The prognosis of patients with HNMM was poor. Patients had a high rate of distant metastasis and a low rate of local control. The current study suggested that postoperative radiotherapy increased local control even for patients with small tumors.