Heparin and protamine use in peripheral vascular surgery: a comparison between surgeons of the Society for Vascular Surgery and the European Society for Vascular Surgery

The Additional Value of Activated Clotting Time-Guided Heparinization During Interventions for Peripheral Arterial Disease

PURPOSE

Unfractionated heparin is widely used to lower the risk of arterial thromboembolic complications (ATECs) during interventions for peripheral arterial disease (PAD), but it is still unknown which heparin dose is the safest in terms of preventing ATECs and bleeding complications. This study aims to evaluate the incidence of complications during interventions for PAD and the relation between this incidence and different heparinization protocols.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis of a prospective multicenter cohort study was performed. Between June 2015 and September 2022, 355 patients who underwent peripheral interventions for PAD were included. All patients who were included before July 2018 received 5000 international units (IU) of heparin (group 1). Starting from July 2018, all included patients received an initial dose of 100 IU/kg, with potential additional heparin doses based on activated clotting time (ACT) values (group 2). Data on ACT values and complications within 30 days post-procedurally were collected.

RESULTS

In total, 24 ATECs and 48 bleeding complications occurred. In group 1, 8.7% (n=11) of patients suffered from ATEC, compared with 5.7% (n=13) in group 2. Thirteen percent of patients (n=17) in group 1 had a bleeding complication, compared with 14% (n=31) in group 2. Arterial thromboembolic complications were more often found in patients with peak ACT values of <200 seconds, compared with ACT values between 200 and 250 seconds, 15% (n=6) versus 5.9% (n=9), respectively, p=0.048. Patients with peak ACT values >250 seconds had a higher incidence of bleeding complications compared with an ACT between 200 and 250 seconds, 24% (n=21) versus 9.8% (n=15), respectively, p=0.003. Forty-four percent of patients (n=23) in group 1 reached a peak ACT of >200 seconds, compared with 95% (n=218) of patients in group 2 (p=0.001).

CONCLUSION

ATEC was found in 6.8% (n=24) and bleeding complications in 14% (n=48) of patients who underwent a procedure for PAD. There was a significantly higher incidence of ATECs in patients with a peak ACT value <200 seconds, and a higher incidence of bleeding complications in patients with a peak ACT value >250 seconds. The findings obtained from this study may serve as a basis for conducting future research on heparinization during procedures for PAD, with a larger sample size.

CLINICAL IMPACT

Heparin is administered during arterial interventions for peripheral arterial disease (PAD) to decrease the risk of arterial (thrombo)embolic complications (ATEC) during or shortly following surgery. The effect of heparin is unpredictable in the individual patient, and the optimal dosage of this anticoagulant has not yet been established. Using the activated clotting time (ACT), the anticoagulatory effect of heparin can be monitored periprocedurally. Previous research on the incidence of both ATEC and bleeding complications, or on the optimal dosage of heparin administration, is scarce. This study aims to investigate the incidence of ATEC and bleeding complications between 2 different dosage protocols of heparin-a standard bolus of 5000 IU or ACT-guided heparinization-and thereby provide clarity on the optimal dose of heparin during peripheral arterial interventions for PAD.

The Impact of Intra-Operative Heparin on Thromboembolism and Death in a Matched Cohort of Patients with a Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm

Objective

Portuguese nationwide estimates indicate that 20% of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) are treated when ruptured. In these cases, intra-operative unfractionated heparin (UFH) usage rates vary widely. Evidence on this topic is scarce and focused on patients treated by open repair (OSR). The aim was to determine the influence of UFH on peri-operative thromboembolic events (TEs) and death in a cohort of ruptured AAA (rAAA).

Methods

Retrospective, single-centre, comparative study. From 2011 to April 2023, all consecutive rAAAs (endovascular repair [EVAR] and OSR) were considered. Primary outcomes were 30-day TE free survival and TE rates. The secondary outcome was 30-day death. Safety endpoints were procedural blood loss, blood product requirements, and secondary interventions due to haemorrhage. Using propensity score matching (PSM) each UFH patient was matched with one no UFH patient in a 1:1 ratio.

Results

The study included 250 patients. After PSM, 190 patients were analysed (EVAR: 60.0% no-UFH vs. 64.4% UFH). TE free survival estimates favoured the UFH group (67.3% vs. 47.2%, p = .009; UFH adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.01, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-4.17). TEs were more frequent in the no UFH group (20.0% vs. 44.2% patients, p < .001; UFH aOR 0.31, 95% CI 0.15-0.65 for any TE), driven by an increase in bowel ischaemia (17.9% no UFH vs. 3.2% UFH, p = .001). Most events occurred in the first 72 hours. EVAR was associated with reduced TE and improved TE free survival (aOR 0.20, 95% CI 0.09-0.45 and aOR 5.54, 95% CI 2.34-13.08, respectively). No significant differences in 30-day survival were noted (75% no-UFH vs. 83% UFH, p = .26; aOR 1.08, 95% CI 0.48-2.43) nor in blood loss, peri-operative red blood cell and fresh frozen plasma requirements, or secondary interventions due to haemorrhage (p = .10; p = .11; p = .13 and p = .18 respectively).

Conclusion

In this cohort, intra-operative UFH was safe and associated with improved TE free survival, driven by a reduction in bowel ischaemia. Conversely, mortality remained unaffected. Randomised controlled trials are required to confirm these findings.

The Impact of Heparin on Mortality Following Open Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair

BACKGROUND

Systemic administration of heparin is widely used in patients undergoing open elective abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. However, no clear consensus exists in the use of intraoperative heparin during open ruptured AAA (rAAA) repair. In this study, we assessed the safety of intravenous heparin administration in patients undergoing open rAAA repair.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study comparing patients who received and did not receive heparin during open rAAA repair in the Vascular Quality Initiative database between 2003 and 2020 was conducted. The primary outcomes were 30-day and 10-year mortality. The secondary outcomes included estimated blood loss, number of packed red blood cells transfused, early postoperative transfusions, and postsurgical complications. Propensity score matching was used to adjust for potentially confounding variables. The outcomes were compared between the 2 groups using relative risk for binary outcomes and paired t-test and the Wilcoxon rank-sum test for normally and non-normally distributed continuous variables, respectively. Survival was examined using Kaplan-Meier curves and compared using a Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

A total of 2,410 patients who underwent open rAAA repair between 2003 and 2020 were studied. Of the 2,410 patients, 1,853 patients received intraoperative heparin and 557 did not. Propensity score matching on 25 variables yielded 519 pairs for the heparin to no heparin comparison. Thirty-day mortality was lower in the heparin group (risk ratio: 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.66-0.84) and in-hospital was also lower in the heparin group (risk ratio: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.60-0.77). Furthermore, estimated blood loss was 910 mL (95% CI: 230 mL to 1,590 mL) lower in the heparin group and the mean number of packed red blood cells transfused intraoperatively and postoperatively were 17 units lower in the heparin group (95% CI: 8-42). Ten-year survival was higher for patients who received heparin, and their rate of survival was approximately 40% higher than those who did not receive heparin (hazard ratio: 0.62; 95% CI, 0.53-0.72; P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients who received systemic heparin administration at the time of open rAAA repair, there were significant short-term and long-term survival benefits within 30 days and at 10 years. Heparin administration may have afforded a mortality benefit or been a surrogate for healthier and less moribund patients at the time of the procedure.

Perprocedural Heparinization in Non-cardiac Arterial Procedures: The Current Practice in the Netherlands

PURPOSE

Heparin is the most widely-used anticoagulant to prevent thrombo-embolic complications during non-cardiac arterial procedures (NCAP). Unfortunately, there is a lack of evidence and consequently non-uniformity in guidelines on perprocedural heparin management. Detailed insight into the current practice of antithrombotic strategies during NCAP in the Netherlands is important, aiming to identify potential optimal protocols and local differences concerning perprocedural heparinization.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A comprehensive online survey was distributed electronically to vascular surgeons of every hospital in the Netherlands in which NCAP were performed. Data were collected from September 2020 to October 2021.

RESULTS

The response rate was 90% (53/59 hospitals). During NCAP, all surgeons generally administered heparin before arterial clamping. In 74% (39/54) of hospitals, a single heparin dosing protocol was used for all types of patients and vascular procedures. In 40%, there was no uniformity in heparin dosing between vascular surgeons. Depending on the procedure, a fixed bolus heparin, predominantly 5000 IU, was administered in 73% to 93%. In the remaining hospitals (7%-27%), a bodyweight-based heparin protocol was used, with an initial dose of 70 or 100 IU/kg. A minority (28%) monitored the effect of heparin in patients using the activated clotting time add (ACT) after activated clotting time. Target values varied between 180 and 250 seconds or 2 times the baseline ACT.

CONCLUSION

This survey demonstrates considerable variability in perprocedural heparinization during NCAP in the Netherlands. Future research on heparin dosing is needed to harmonize and optimize heparin dosage protocols and contemporary guidelines during NCAP, and thereby improve vascular surgical care and patient safety.

CLINICAL IMPACT

This survey demonstrated persisting intra- and inter-hospital variability in perprocedural heparinization during non-cardiac arterial procedures (NCAP) in the Netherlands. The observed variability in heparinization strategies highlights the need for high quality evidence on perprocedural anticoagulation strategies. This is needed in order to harmonize and optimize heparin dosage protocols and contemporary guidelines and thereby improve vascular surgical patient care. Based on the current results, an international survey will be conducted by the authors to gain additional insight into the antithrombotic strategies used during NCAP, aiming to harmonize anticoagulation protocols worldwide.

More Effective Anticoagulation During Non-Cardiac Arterial Procedures Using Activated Clotting Time Guided Heparin Administration

OBJECTIVES

Arterial thrombo-embolic complications (ATEC) are still common during and after non-cardiac arterial procedures (NCAP) despite the administration of (a fixed bolus of) heparin. These ATEC could be due to existing individual differences in heparin sensitivity. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of an ACT guided heparin dose protocol and to evaluate if a more effective target ACT can be achieved during NCAP.

METHODS

In this multi-center prospective study, 194 patients undergoing elective and non-elective NCAP were enrolled and received heparin according to a heparin dose protocol which aimed to obtain a target ACT of 250 seconds (s.), measured by the Medtronic HMS Plus. Patients received a standardized bolus of 5 000 IU followed by additional boluses depending on the actual ACT. Primary outcome was the ACT value reached. Secondary outcomes were incidence of all ATEC and haemorrhagic complications.

RESULTS

The mean baseline ACT was 138 ± 17 s. The mean ACT five minutes after the initial heparin bolus of 5 000 IU was 197 ± 31 s. 48% of patients reached an ACT of 200 s. and six per cent of patients reached an ACT of 250 s. Additional dosages of heparin were administered in 72% of patients. With this ACT guided heparin protocol 86% of patients reached an ACT of 200 s. and 26% of patients reached an ACT of 250 s. A negative correlation was found between body weight and the ACT at T1 (P ˂ 0.001). ATEC and haemorrhagic complications occurred in 11.3% and 16.5% of patients. The lowest incidence of ATEC was found in patients with peak ACT between 200 and 250 s, namely 6.3%.

CONCLUSION

This ACT guided heparin protocol proved to be feasible, safe and more patients reached an ACT > of 200 s. compared to a standardized heparin bolus of 5 000 IU. Further research is needed to investigate if ACT guided heparin administration could be preferable over not monitoring the anticoagulant effect of peri-procedural heparin and results in a lower incidence of ATEC, without an increase in haemorrhagic complications.

A Standardized Bolus of 5 000 IU of Heparin Does not Lead to Adequate Heparinization during Non-cardiac Arterial Procedures

BACKGROUND

In non-cardiac arterial procedures (NCAP), heparin is administered to prevent arterial thromboembolic complications (ATEC). Heparin has a nonpredictable effect in the individual patient, also known as variation in heparin sensitivity. Various dosing protocols are in use, but the optimal dose is currently still unknown. A standardized bolus of 5 000 IU heparin is most frequently used by vascular surgeons and interventional radiologists. The activated clotting time (ACT) is an established method to measure the level of anticoagulation, but has, until now, not gained widespread use in NCAP. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the anticoagulant effect during NCAP of a standardized bolus of 5 000 IU heparin by measuring the ACT.

METHODS

In this prospective study, 190 patients undergoing NCAP were enrolled between December 2016 and September 2018. The ACT was measured during open and endovascular/hybrid procedures. All patients received a standardized bolus of 5 000 IU heparin. The ACT was measured by the Hemostasis Management System Plus (HMS Plus, Medtronic®), before, 5 minutes after administration of heparin, and every 30 minutes thereafter. The primary outcome was periprocedural ACT values measured. Secondary outcomes were ATEC and hemorrhagic complications.

RESULTS

A large individual patient variability in the response to heparin was found. The mean baseline ACT in all patients was 129 ± 18 s., and the mean ACT 5 minutes after the initial bolus of heparin was 191 ± 36 s. After the initial dose of 5 000 IU heparin 60 (33%) and 10 (6%) patients reached an ACT of 200 and 250 s., respectively. Despite the use of heparin, ATEC occurred in 17 patients (9%). The lowest number of ATEC occurred in the group of patients with an ACT between 200 and 250 s.

CONCLUSIONS

A standardized bolus of 5 000 IU heparin does not lead to adequate and safe heparinization in non-cardiac arterial procedures. Patient response to heparin shows a large individual variability. Therefore, routine ACT measurements are necessary to ascertain adequate anticoagulation. Further research is needed to investigate if heparin dosing based on the ACT could result in less arterial thromboembolic complications, without increasing hemorrhagic complications.

Protamine Induced Anaphylactic Shock after Peripheral Vascular Surgery

Anaphylactic reactions to protamine are quite rare and almost exclusively reported during cardiac surgery. In this report, we illustrate a rare case of protamine reaction after peripheral vascular surgery a couple of months after cardiac surgery and how the patient survived this critical complication.

The association of venous thromboembolism chemoprophylaxis timing on venous thromboembolism after major vascular surgery

OBJECTIVE

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is reported to occur in up to 33% of patients undergoing major vascular surgery. Despite this high incidence, patients inconsistently receive timely VTE chemoprophylaxis. The true incidence of VTE among patients receiving delayed VTE chemoprophylaxis is unknown. We sought to identify the association of VTE chemoprophylaxis timing on VTE risk, postoperative transfusion rates, and 30-day mortality and morbidity in patients undergoing major open vascular surgery.

METHODS

Patients undergoing major open vascular surgery (open abdominal aortic aneurysm [oAAA] repair, aortofemoral bypass, and lower extremity infrainguinal bypass [LEB]) were identified using the Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative (MSQC) between July 2012 and June 2015. The VTE rate was compared between patients receiving early versus delayed VTE chemoprophylaxis. VTE chemoprophylaxis delay was defined as therapy initiation more than 24 hours after surgery. The risk-adjusted association of the chemoprophylaxis timing and VTE development was determined using multivariable logistic regression. Blood transfusion rates, 30-day mortality, and postoperative complications were compared across groups.

RESULTS

A total of 2421 patients underwent major open vascular surgery, including 196 oAAA repair, 259 aortofemoral bypass, and 1966 LEB. The overall incidence of 30-day VTE was 1.40%, ranging from 1.12% for LEB to 3.57% for oAAA repair. Among patients receiving early VTE chemoprophylaxis, the rate of VTE was 0.78% versus 2.26% among those with a delay in VTE chemoprophylaxis (P = .002). When accounting for the preoperative risk of VTE, delayed chemoprophylaxis was associated with a significantly higher risk of VTE (odds ratio, 2.38; 95% confidence interval, 1.12-5.06; P = .024). The early VTE chemoprophylaxis group was associated with a significantly decreased risk of bleeding compared with those with a delay (14.31% vs 18.90%; P = .002). Overall 30-day mortality and postoperative complications were similar with the exception of an associated higher rate of infectious complications in the delayed VTE chemoprophylaxis group, including superficial surgical site infection (6.00% vs 4.06%; P = .028), pneumonia (3.25% vs 1.85%; P = .028), urinary tract infection (2.95% vs 1.57%; P = .020), and severe sepsis (3.05% vs 1.71%; P = .029).

CONCLUSIONS

Although patients undergoing major open vascular surgery have a low risk of VTE at baseline, there is a significantly greater risk of developing VTE among patients who have a delay in the administration of VTE chemoprophylaxis. Postoperative transfusion rates were significantly lower among patients receiving early chemoprophylaxis. There were no differences in the 30-day mortality and postoperative complications, except for infectious complications. Given these findings, surgeons should consider early chemoprophylaxis in the postoperative setting after major open vascular surgery without contraindication.

Individual Differences in Heparin Sensitivity and Their Effect on Heparin Anticoagulation During Arterial Vascular Surgery

OBJECTIVES

To investigate whether a fixed heparin dose results in adequate heparinisation levels and consequent inhibition of haemostatic activation in all patients.

METHODS

This prospective clinical pilot study included 24 patients undergoing arterial vascular surgery. Individual heparin responsiveness was assessed using the Heparin Dose Response (HDR) test, while the activated clotting time (ACT) and heparin concentration were measured to monitor the peri-procedural degree of anticoagulation. Finally, peri-operative haemostasis was evaluated with rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM).

RESULTS

Eight patients were identified with reduced heparin sensitivity (RS group) and 16 patients with normal heparin sensitivity (NS group). Compared with the NS group, the RS group showed less prolonged ACTs after heparinisation with heparin concentrations below the calculated target heparin concentration. ROTEM revealed shorter clot formation times in the intrinsically activated coagulation test (INTEM) 3 min (114 ± 48 s vs. 210 ± 128 s) and 30 min after the initial heparin bolus (103 ± 48 s vs. 173 ± 81 s) in the RS group compared with the NS group. In the RS group, one patient developed a major thromboembolic complication.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that a third of the study population had reduced heparin sensitivity, which was associated with lower levels of heparinisation, and lower inhibition levels of clot initiation and clot formation. Identifying patients with reduced heparin sensitivity by monitoring the anticoagulant effect of heparin could decrease the risk of thrombotic complications after arterial vascular surgery.

Pediatric patients undergoing arteriovenous fistula surgery without intraoperative heparin

INTRODUCTION

Arteriovenous fistula (AVF) creation in children could be extremely challenging for vascular surgeons due to small vessels with a high tendency of vasospasm. This could be one reason for primary failures (PF) and early access thrombosis. There exists no guideline for the need of intraoperative heparin administration during hemodialysis fistula creation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of intra-operative heparin administration on immediate outcome.

METHODS

Medical records of 42 pediatric patients aged between 7 and 17 years were retrospectively reviewed. All received an AVF under inpatient conditions by exclusively one vascular surgeon with many years of professional experience. The intraoperative anticoagulation standards changed by the years 2001 based on the decision of the vascular surgeon. Therefore, we build two groups (group 1: 14 patients with 5000 IU of intravenous heparin during surgery and group 2: 28 patients without heparin). Major complications included hematoma or bleeding leading to surgery. PF was defined as the inability to use the AVF even once due to absent maturation or occlusion within 4 weeks after creation.

RESULTS

We found 6 (14%) PF with the need of immediate surgical access revision (three from group 1 and three from group 2; p = 0.350). There were no bleedings leading to surgery in all cases, but 5 (12%) hematomas without the need of surgical revision (three from group 1 and two from group 2; p = 0.736).

CONCLUSIONS

We found no benefit of heparin administration during clamping the arteries while performing the arteriovenous fistula in pediatric patients.

Controlled continuous systemic heparinization increases success rate of artery-only anastomosis replantation in single distal digit amputation: A retrospective cohort study

Replantation is a prime indication for distal digital amputation, as it helps restore hand aesthetics and functions; however, venous anastomosis is often not feasible. Previous studies used systemic anticoagulation in distal digital artery only anastomosis replantation surgery to improve replantation success rate, however, which yielded limited level of clinical evidence. This study aimed to compare controlled continuous heparinization (CCH) and intermittent bolus heparinization (IBH) for surgical outcome and clinical variables after single distal digital artery only anastomosis replantation surgery.A single-institution, retrospective cohort study was performed. Out of 324 patients who underwent digital replantation surgery, we focused the study for the Zone I and II single distal digital amputation patients excluding confounding factors. Sixty-one patients were included in this study and underwent artery-only anastomosis replantation surgery with postoperative CCH (34 patients) or IBH (27 patients) protocols. The CCH group targeted activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) at 51 to 70 seconds, monitoring aPTT levels every eight hours and administering 100 mg of aspirin per day. The IBH group received 300 mg of aspirin per day and underwent IBH (12,500 U). Both groups received intravenous prostaglandin E1 drips (10 μg). To verify the factors affecting the success rate of the heparin protocol, patient factors, clinical factors, and operative factors were extracted from the medical records. Statistical analysis with inverse probability of treatment weights propensity score methods compared treatment outcomes and clinical variables.The CCH group's replantation success rate was higher (91.17% vs 59.25%), and the transfusion rate was increased (P = 0.032). However, the significant decrease in hemoglobin levels (>15%) did not differ between the groups (P = 0.108). Multivariable logistic regression analysis with potent univariate variables (P < .10) revealed that CCH was a statistically significant variable in replantation success rate (P = 0.004). Neither the major bleeding complications nor the significant decrease in patients' platelet levels were observed in both groups.Our study suggests that CCH after artery-only anastomosis replantation surgery in Zone I and II distal digital replantation is a safe method to improve the replantation success rate and may provide a guideline for use of the anticoagulation method following artery-only anastomosis distal digital replantation surgery.

Multiple preoperative and intraoperative factors predict early fistula thrombosis in the Hemodialysis Fistula Maturation Study

OBJECTIVE

Early thrombosis (ET) contributes to autogenous arteriovenous fistula (AVF) failure. We studied patients undergoing AVF placement in the Hemodialysis Fistula Maturation Study, a prospective, observational cohort study, using a nested case-control analysis to identify preoperative and intraoperative predictors of ET.

METHODS

ET cases were compared with controls, who were matched for gender, age, diabetes, dialysis status, and surgeon fistula volume. ET was defined as thrombosis diagnosed by physical examination or ultrasound within 18 days of AVF creation. Conditional logistic regression models were fit to identify risk factors for ET.

RESULTS

Thirty-two ET cases (5.3%) occurred among 602 study participants; 198 controls were matched. ET was associated with female gender (odds ratio [OR], 2.75; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.19-6.38; P = .018), fistula location (forearm vs upper arm; OR, 2.76; 95% CI, 1.05-7.23; P = .039), feeding artery (radial vs brachial; OR, 2.64; 95% CI, 1.03-6.77; P = .043) and arterial diameter (OR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.02-2.26; P = .039, per mm smaller). The draining vein diameter was nonlinearly associated with ET, with highest risk in 2- to 3-mm veins. Surprisingly, ET risk was lower in diabetics (OR, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.07-0.47; P = .0004), lower with less nitroglycerin-mediated brachial artery dilation (OR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.20-1.92; P = .029 for each 10% lower) and higher with lower carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (OR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.02-2.20; P = .041, for each m/s lower). Intraoperative protamine use was associated with a higher ET risk (OR, 3.26; 95% CI, 1.28-∞; P = .038). Surgeon's intraoperative perceptions were associated with ET: surgeons' greater concern about maturation success (likely, marginal, unlikely) was associated with higher thrombosis risk (OR, 8.09; 95% CI, 4.03-∞; P < .0001, per category change), as were absence vs presence of intraoperative thrill (OR, 21.0; 95% CI, 5.07-∞; P = .0001) and surgeons' reported frustration during surgery (OR, 6.85; 95% CI, 2.70-∞; P = .0004). Decreased extent of intraoperative thrill (proximal, mid or distal third of the forearm or upper arm, based on AVF placement) was also associated with ET (OR, 2.91; 95% CI, 1.31-∞; P = .007, per diminished level). Oral antithrombotic medication use was not significantly associated with ET.

CONCLUSIONS

ET was found to be associated with female gender, forearm AVF, smaller arterial size, draining vein diameter of 2 to 3 mm, and protamine use. Paradoxically, diabetes and stiff, noncompliant feeding arteries were associated with a lower frequency of ET. Absent or attenuated intraoperative thrill, and both surgeon frustration and concern about successful maturation during surgery, were correlated strongly with ET.

Peptides used in the delivery of small noncoding RNA

RNA interference (RNAi) is an endogenous process in which small noncoding RNAs, including small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) and microRNAs (miRNAs), post-transcriptionally regulate gene expressions. In general, siRNA and miRNA/miRNA mimics are similar in nature and activity except their origin and specificity. Although both siRNAs and miRNAs have been extensively studied as novel therapeutics for a wide range of diseases, the large molecular weight, anionic surface charges, instability in blood circulation, and intracellular trafficking to the RISC after cellular uptake have hindered the translation of these RNAs from bench to clinic. As a result, a great variety of delivery systems have been investigated for safe and effective delivery of small noncoding RNAs. Among these systems, peptides, especially cationic peptides, have emerged as a promising type of carrier due to their inherent ability to condense negatively charged RNAs, ease of synthesis, controllable size, and tunable structure. In this review, we will focus on three major types of cationic peptides, including poly(l-lysine) (PLL), protamine, and cell penetrating peptides (CPP), as well as peptide targeting ligands that have been extensively used in RNA delivery. The delivery strategies, applications, and limitations of these cationic peptides in siRNA/miRNA delivery will be discussed.

Chemically modified poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) cryogel for the adsorption of heparin

Various clinical procedures, such as cardiovascular surgery or extracorporeal blood purification, involve systemic anticoagulation using heparin. High concentrations of circulating heparin require neutralization due to possible serious bleeding complications. The intravenous administration of the heparin antagonist protamine sulfate is routinely clinically performed, but is frequently associated with adverse reactions. Therefore, there is a need for a valid and safe alternative to achieve extracorporeal heparin removal from blood or plasma, such as a filter, a matrix, or an adsorbent. Here, we describe the development of a macroporous poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate)-based monolithic cryogel functionalized with l-lysine (pHEMA-lys) and the characterization of its selective heparin adsorption. The maximum binding capacity was quantified in vitro using aqueous and serum solutions under static and dynamic conditions, and fresh human plasma under static conditions. The pHEMA-lys bound 40,500 IU and 32,500 IU heparin/g cryogel at the equilibrium in aqueous solution and 50% serum, respectively. In human plasma spiked with 100 IU/mL of heparin, the binding was still highly efficient (4330 IU/g cryogel after 30 min, i.e., 87% of the initial concentration). The cryogels showed good blood compatibility, as indicated by negligible adsorption of albumin, antithrombin III, and total protein, and may thus be suitable for extracorporeal heparin removal.

Shared quality data are associated with increased protamine use and reduced bleeding complications after carotid endarterectomy in the Vascular Study Group of New England

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this study was to evaluate whether protamine usage after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) increased within the Vascular Study Group of New England (VSGNE) in response to studies indicating that protamine reduces bleeding complications associated with CEA without increasing the risk of stroke.

METHODS

We reviewed 10,059 CEAs, excluding concomitant coronary bypass, performed within the VSGNE from January 2003 to July 2012. Protamine use and reoperation for bleeding were evaluated monthly using statistical process control. Twelve centers and 77 surgeons entering the VSGNE between 2003 and 2008 were classified as original participants, and 14 centers and 60 surgeons joining after May 2009 were considered new. Protamine use for surgeons was categorized as rare (<10%), selective (10%-80%), or routine (>80%). Outcome measures were in-hospital reoperation for bleeding, postoperative myocardial infarction (POMI), and stroke or death.

RESULTS

Two significant increases occurred in protamine use for all VSGNE centers over time. From 2003 to 2007, the protamine rate remained stable at 43%. In 2008, protamine usage increased to 52% (P < .01), coincident with new centers joining the VSGNE. Protamine usage then increased to 62% in 2010 (P < .01), shortly after the presentations of the data showing a benefit of protamine. This effect was due to 10 surgeons in the original VSGNE centers who increased their usage of protamine: six surgeons from rare use to selective use and four surgeons to routine use. Reoperation for bleeding was reduced by 0.84% (relative risk reduction, 57.2%) in patients who received protamine (0.6% vs 1.44%; P < .001). There were no differences in POMI (1.1% vs 1.09%) or stroke or death (1.1% vs 1.03%) between protamine treated and untreated patients, respectively. Reoperation for bleeding was decreased for surgeons who used protamine routinely (0.5%; P < .001) compared with selective (1.4%) and rare users (1.5%) of protamine. There were no differences in POMI (0.9%, 1.2%, 1.1%; P = .720) and stroke or death rates (1.0%, 1.2%, 1.0%; P = .656) for rare, selective, and routine users of protamine.

CONCLUSIONS

Protamine use increased over time by VSGNE surgeons, most significantly after the presentations of VSGNE-derived data showing the benefit of protamine, and was associated with a decrease in reoperation for bleeding. Improvements in processes of care and outcomes can be achieved in regional quality groups by sharing safety and efficacy data.

The use of heparin in patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms

The use of systemic heparin in patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (rAAAs) remains a contentious issue with no clear guidelines. This review reports the current understanding, at a molecular and clinical level, of the possible benefits and risks of heparin in emergency aneurysm repair (both open and endovascular). MEDLINE, EMBASE, AMED, SCOPUS, CINAHL and Cochrane Library were searched for all articles containing the keywords 'rupture', 'abdominal', 'aneurysm' and 'heparin'. Current experience, indications and outcomes were analyzed. Articles were searched for both endovascular and open repair of AAAs. A total of eight studies were included for analysis in the systematic review. Of these, only one paper focused specifically on heparin use in open repair of ruptures and suggested a benefit. Of the remaining seven, two were self-reporting retrospective studies assessing individual surgeons' practice, one was a case report and the remaining four included mention of heparin use but with no outcome data. The evidence available suggests that a pro-coagulable state exists in rAAAs. This may be responsible for the morbidity and mortality postprocedure, which arises predominantly from multiple organ failure and cardiac compromise rather than outright hemorrhage. This diathesis may respond well to heparin administration, suggesting that heparin administration in ruptured aneurysms is appropriate.

Serious anaphylactic reactions due to protamine sulfate: a systematic literature review

Anaphylactic reactions caused by injection of protamine sulfate during cardiac surgery are a well-known complication. A systematic literature review was therefore conducted to gather evidence of the knowledge concerning these side effects, and to see if any prospective randomized studies supported this. Studies investigating the effect of protamine sulfate in human beings were extracted from MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Library, retrieving 487 articles. Abstracts were evaluated by both authors, and referred articles not found in the primary search were furthermore extracted from reviews and case reports, resulting in a total of 272 relevant articles. Of these, 9 retrospective studies and 16 prospective studies were performed in an evidence-based manner. However, only 3 of the 16 prospective articles had an optimal design as far as inclusion criteria, randomization, and description of symptoms were concerned. Incidence of anaphylactic reactions in the prospective studies was 0.69% compared to 0.19% in the retrospective studies, but caution should be taken due to a pronounced heterogeneity of those studies. One study found heparinase I unsuitable as replacement for protamine sulfate. Overall, our findings support the low incidence of anaphylactic reactions reported in previous studies, but of note only few prospective investigations was conducted on the subject. Our study also emphasizes the need for critical appraisal of many routine procedures: in all aspects of medical care, systematic literature review conducted in a well-structured, repeated manner should be given high priority.

Systemic Administration of Heparin Intraoperatively in Patients Undergoing Open Repair of Leaking Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm May Be Beneficial and Does Not Cause Problems

The aim of this study was to investigate whether intravenous heparin administration was associated with a reduction in perioperative mortality and late distal thrombectomy in patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneuryms (AAAs). One hundred thirty-one patients had repair of ruptured AAA between January 1999 and January 2004. Sixty-three received heparin according to the consultant's preference at the time of the operation. Data were prospectively collected, and multivariate analysis was performed for independent predictive factors. Thirty-day mortality was 29%. Patients receiving heparin had lower perioperative mortality (16% vs 42%; p = .001). Heparin administration was not associated with increased hemorrhage or transfusion. Multivariate analysis confirmed that heparin administration was independently predictive of survival ( p = .036). Other factors found to reduce survival were age ( p = .023), smoking ( p = .042), and systolic blood pressure (< 100 mmHg) at presentation ( p = .045). Fewer patients had thrombectomy after heparin (8% vs 12%), but this was not statistically significant. Perioperative complications were similar in both groups. The administration of systemic heparin before the clamp is applied to leaking aneurysms does not appear to increase hemorrhage and subsequent mortality and may reduce the need for early thrombectomy.

Carotid endarterectomy in patients with chronic renal insufficiency: A recent series of 184 cases

BACKGROUND

The published results of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in chronic renal insufficiency (CRI) patients are contradictory, mostly because of the relatively small number of patients in these studies. To better assess the neurologic complications and mortality, we reviewed a recent and substantially larger series of CRI patients who underwent CEAs.

METHODS

From March 2000 to March 2003, 675 consecutive primary CEAs were performed in 609 patients (346 men, 57%) under general anesthesia. Asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis accounted for 71% of cases. CRI (serum creatinine level > or = 1.5 mg/dL) was detected in 166 patients (27%) who underwent 184 CEAs. The remaining 443 patients (73%) had 491 CEAs.

RESULTS

Patients with CRI were different in age (76 +/- 8 years vs 72 +/- 9 years, P < .001), male gender (73% vs 51%, P < .001), coronary artery disease (50% vs 28%, P < .001), and diabetes mellitus incidence (38% vs 27%, P < .02). No significant difference in stroke rates was observed between the CRI patients and the control group (1.2% vs 0.5%). The mortality rate for CRI patients was 3%, whereas it was 0% for the control group ( P < .002). The 143 CRI patients with serum creatinine levels from 1.5 to 2.9 mg/dL had a 0.7% mortality rate, whereas it was 17% for 23 patients with serum creatinine levels of 3 mg/dL or more ( P < .001). The stroke rate for the former group was 0.7% and 4.3% for the latter group (NS). Asymptomatic (16) and symptomatic (7) patients with serum creatinine levels of 3 mg/dL or more had mortality rates of 13% and 28%, respectively, with P = .6.

CONCLUSION

The high mortality rate observed in patients with serum creatinine levels of 3 mg/dL or more after CEA calls for a nonoperative approach in the management of asymptomatic patients.

Low-molecular-weight heparin in arterial reconstructive surgery: a double-blind, randomized dose-finding trial

Periprocedural and postprocedural anticoagulation during arterial reconstructive surgery (ARS) with intravenous heparin is standard of care. The general use and correct dosage of low-molecular-weight heparin, however, are still under debate. A prospective, randomized, double-blind trial was performed with a parallel group comparison of four dose regimen of a low-molecular-weight heparin, reviparin sodium, in patients undergoing major ARS. Sixty-five patients were randomly allocated to receive twice-daily subcutaneous injections of reviparin, 3500 (group A, n=17), 4200 (group B, n=16), 5950 (group C, n=16), and 7000 (group D, n=16) anti-Xa IU per day. Patients were eligible for the trial if they had angiographically proven peripheral arterial obstructive disease with a planned arterial reconstruction of the infrarenal aorta, iliaca artery, or femoralis artery. Fifty-nine patients completed the trial. The goal was to determine the optimal dose of the low-molecular-weight heparin to achieve a minimum of early vascular events (less than 12%) with a minimum of major bleeding events (less than 10%) during a short-term follow-up of up to 8 postoperative days. There was no reocclusion in the entire population. Patients randomized into the two lower dose groups (A and B), however, experienced a relatively high incidence of restenosis, whereas patients enrolled in group D, receiving the highest dose of reviparin, experienced an unacceptably high rate of bleeding events (all bleeds, 43%; major bleeding, 14.3%). Thus, the optimal dose of reviparin sodium to be administered in patients undergoing major ARS is half the therapeutic dose: 5950 to 6300 anti Xa IU (75-85 anti Xa IU/kg body weight per day). Patients included in group C had no major bleeding event (95% confidence interval, 0% to 6.6%), a significant improvement of the doppler ankle-brachial systolic pressure index (difference of 0.46 +/- 0.29, P=.017), and a higher rate of responders with regard to the puls status measured at the tibialis posterior arteries (66.7%) compared to groups A and B (46.7% and 54.5%, respectively, P=.086). The efficacy and safety of this dosage regimen in comparison to standard of care should be further substantiated in larger trials.

Comparison of the use of enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin in patients undergoing lower extremity revascularization

Present available studies suggest that heparin prevents early vessel thrombosis in the immediate postoperative (POP) period after lower extremity bypass. Long-term anticoagulation with warfarin has also been used in these patients, based on its beneficial effect in preventing long-term graft failure. To compare the effectiveness between unfractionated heparin (UH) and low-molecular-weight heparin (enoxaparin) when used as transitional therapeutic POP anticoagulant therapy, a prospective study was performed. Seventy consecutive patients undergoing lower extremity bypass were studied. The initial 35 patients were started on a drip of UH 6 hours POP. The next 35 consecutive patients were treated with enoxaparin, the first dose starting 6 hours POP. All patients underwent subsequent anticoagulation with oral warfarin. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups with regard to demographics, percentage of above/below the knee bypasses, type of conduit used, emergency operations, and overall complications. There was a significant difference in the length of stay (p = 0.05) in favor of the enoxaparin group, which also reflected a decreased overall cost in this group. In conclusion, POP anticoagulation with enoxaparin is as safe end effective as UH in patients undergoing lower extremity revascularization. Enoxaparin was associated with a decreased overall length of stay and hospital costs.

Extracellular calcium modulates the effects of protamine on rat myocardium

We studied the effects of protamine (10-300 microg. mL(-1)) as well as its interaction with heparin in rat left ventricular papillary muscles in vitro at calcium concentrations of 0.5 and 1 mM under low (isotony) and high (isometry) loads. Protamine induced a negative inotropic effect that was less pronounced at calcium 0.5 mM (active force at protamine 300 microg/mL, 84 +/- 20 vs 57 +/- 15% of baseline, P: < 0.05); whereas at calcium 1 mM there was a marked contracture of the muscle. For the smallest concentrations of protamine and at calcium 0.5 mM, we observed a moderate positive inotropic effect that was suppressed by nifedipine. Protamine induced a negative lusitropic effect under low load and decreased postrest potentiation, suggesting an impairment in the functions of the sarcoplasmic reticulum. Heparin was able to inhibit and reverse the negative inotropic effect of protamine. The negative inotropic effect of protamine is enhanced by an increase in extracellular calcium concentration. This negative inotropic effect is probably related to calcium overload and impairment in sarcoplasmic reticulum functions, and heparin can block these effects.

IMPLICATIONS

The negative inotropic effect of protamine is enhanced by an increase in extracellular calcium concentration. This negative inotropic effect is probably related to calcium overload and impairment in sarcoplasmic reticulum functions, and heparin can block these effects.

The effect of differing rates and injection sites on the amount of protamine delivered before detection of hemodynamic alterations in dogs

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effect of the route and rate of protamine administration on the amount of protamine that could be delivered before a hemodynamic reaction occurred in dogs.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective randomized experimental study.

ANIMALS

Twenty adult mixed-breed dogs weighing 25.1+/-2.5 kg.

METHODS

Before vascular surgery, the dogs were heparinized to reach an activated clotting time (ACT) of 300 seconds. After completion of the vascular surgery, protamine was administered intravenously until a hemodynamic reaction was recorded. The 4 groups of dogs were given protamine at 5 mg/min (slow) or 10 mg/min (fast) via the cephalic or the jugular veins. Systemic and pulmonary arterial pressures, central venous pressure (CVP), and pulmonary arterial occlusion pressure (PAOP) were recorded before and after protamine administration. The dose of protamine was recorded when a reaction occurred, which was defined as mean arterial pressure (MAP) <60 mm Hg or mean pulmonary arterial pressure (MPAP) >20 mm Hg or more than double the baseline value.

RESULTS

Significant decreases in systolic arterial pressure (SAP), MAP, and diastolic arterial pressure (DAP) and significant increases in systolic (SPAP), mean (MPAP), and diastolic (DPAP) pulmonary arterial pressures were recorded after protamine administration. The cephalic slow group had significantly fewer protamine reactions than other groups (chi-square = 8.57, P = .03, df = 3). Significantly more protamine could be delivered from the cephalic vein (52.5+/-14.5 mg) compared with the jugular vein (37.6+/-16 mg) before a reaction occurred (P = .048).

CONCLUSION

The rate of administration did not have an effect on the amount of protamine delivered. Adverse reactions were minimized when protamine was administered via the cephalic vein at a slow rate.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

We would recommend delivering protamine after cardiopulmonary bypass or vascular surgery through a peripheral venous route.

Nonfractionated heparin fails to inhibit arterial thrombosis in a human ex vivo thrombosis model

The effect of nonfractionated heparin on the formation and composition of arterial thrombus is unclear. The purpose of this study in a human ex vivo model was to analyze fibrinoplatelet thrombi and test the inhibitory effect of nonfractionated heparin on arterial thrombus formation. Experiments were carried out in Sakariassen perfusion chambers. Strips coated with either tissue factor (TF) or collagen were exposed to human blood collected from healthy volunteers at an arterial shear stress rate of 2600 s-1 for 1 to 4 min. Platelet deposition was determined using immunoenzymatic techniques to quantify P-selectine, a platelet membrane receptor, in thrombi. Fibrin deposition was determined by quantifying fibrin degradation products released after application of plasmin (D-dimers). Heparin was injected into the blood flow through a blender port system located between the venous puncture site and perfusion chamber. The results of the study showed that in a human ex vivo model, formation of arterial thrombus on two thrombogenic surfaces (tissue factor and collagen) is not inhibited by nonfractionated heparin.

Risk factors for clinically important adverse events after protamine administration following cardiopulmonary bypass

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to determine risk factors for adverse events following protamine administration after cardiopulmonary bypass.

BACKGROUND

Intravenous protamine administration is associated with a risk of severe systemic reactions. However, risk factors for these events have not been well delineated, thus hampering development of preventive strategies.

METHODS

A case-control study nested within a cohort of consecutive patients undergoing surgery requiring cardiopulmonary bypass was performed. The primary case definition included those events (pulmonary hypertensive and systemic hypotensive) occurring within 10 min of protamine administration in the absence of other measurable causes of hemodynamic compromise.

RESULTS

Comparing the 53 cases to the 223 control subjects, three risk factors were independently associated with events (multivariable odds ratio [95% confidence interval]): neutral protamine Hagedorn insulin use (8.18 [2.08, 32.2]); fish allergy (24.5 [1.24, 482.3]), and a history of nonprotamine medication allergy (2.97 [1.25, 7.07]). These risk factors demonstrated an increasingly strong association with progressively more specific case definitions. An estimated 39% of cardiopulmonary bypass patients had one or more of these risk factors. Prior intravenous protamine, central venous pressure prior to protamine, preoperative ejection fraction and the need for inotropes when coming off bypass did not exhibit statistically significant associations with events (all p > 0.15). Prior protamine allergy was associated specifically with an increased risk of pulmonary hypertension (multivariable odds ratio 189; 95% confidence interval 13, 2,856).

CONCLUSIONS

Immunologic factors are important in predisposing individuals to protamine reactions, and a substantial proportion of patients are at considerably increased risk Strategies to reduce the risk of protamine-associated events are needed.

Low-dose heparin appears safe and can eliminate protamine use for carotid endarterectomy

OBJECTIVE

To determine the morbidity associated with carotid endarterectomy (CEA) when low doses of heparin (30 U/kg) are used for anticoagulation. This technique eliminates the need for protamine and its potentially deleterious effects on some patients.

DESIGN

A retrospective chart review.

SETTING

A large academic medical center.

PARTICIPANTS

The records of 420 consecutive CEAs in 337 patients (83 bilateral procedures).

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The amount of heparin used was less than that used in most reported studies. Eighty-two percent of patients received only 2,000 U of heparin for their entire operation (range, 500 to 3,000 U). Complication rates were low. Neurologic complications included a 0.95% incidence of nonfatal stroke and a 2.1% incidence of transient neurologic deficits that resolved in the first day. There was no mortality. The wounds were described in the postoperative period as dry (96%), swollen (3%), or bloody (1%). No patients received protamine.

CONCLUSION

The use of 5 to 10,000 U of heparin will provide anticoagulation for more than an hour. In CEA surgery, anticoagulation for this duration is often unnecessary. A smaller dose of heparin (30 U/kg) can provide adequate anticoagulation for this procedure while eliminating the potentially deleterious effects of protamine use. No additional morbidity was attributed to this technique.

Extracorporeal heparin adsorption following cardiopulmonary bypass with a heparin removal device--an alternative to protamine

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the therapeutic efficacy and applicability of a heparin removal device (HRD) based on plasma separation and poly-L-lysine (PLL) affinity adsorption as an alternative to protamine in reversing systemic heparinization following cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB).

DESIGN

A prospective study.

SETTING

University research laboratory.

SUBJECTS

Adult female swine (n=7).

INTERVENTIONS

Female Yorkshire swine (n=7, 67.3+/-3.5 [SEM] kg) were subjected to 60 mins of right atrium-to-aortic, hypothermic (28 degrees C) CPB. After weaning from CPB, the right atrium was recannulated with a two-stage, dual-lumen cannula which was connected to an HRD via extracorporeal circulation. Blood flow was drained at 1431.2+/-25.4 mL/min from the inferior vena cava, through the plasma separation chamber of the HRD (where heparin was bound to PLL), and reinfused into the right atrium. The HRD run time was determined by a previously established mathematical model of first-order exponential depletion.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Heart rate, mean arterial pressure, pulmonary arterial pressure, central venous pressure, kaolin and celite activated clotting time (ACT), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), heparin concentration, and plasma free hemoglobin were obtained before, during, and after the use of the HRD. Pre-CPB ACT was 167+/-89 secs (kaolin) and 99+/-7 secs (celite), and APTT was 34+/-5 secs. The HRD run time averaged 27.4 +/-1.5 mins targeted to remove 90% total body heparin. Use of the HRD was not associated with any adverse hemodynamic reactions or increases in plasma free hemoglobin. The heparin concentration immediately following CPB was 4.85+/-0.24 units/mL, with ACT >1000 secs and APTT >150 secs in all animals. During heparin removal, total body heparin content followed first-order exponential depletion kinetics. At the end of the HRD run, heparin concentration decreased to 0.51+/-0.09 units/mL, with kaolin ACT returning to 177+/-22 secs, celite ACT returning to 179+/-17 secs, and APTT returning to 27+/-3 secs (p > .05 vs. pre-CPB baseline for all variables).

CONCLUSIONS

The HRD is capable of reversal of anticoagulation following CPB without significant blood cell damage or changes in hemodynamics. The HRD, therefore, can serve as an alternative to achieve heparin clearance in clinical situations where use of protamine may be contraindicated.

A novel protamine variant reversal of heparin anticoagulation in human blood in vitro

PURPOSE

Protamine reversal of heparin anticoagulation during cardiovascular surgery may cause severe hypotension and pulmonary hypertension. A novel protamine variant, [+18RGD], has been developed that effectively reverses heparin anticoagulation without toxicity in canine experiments. Heretofore, human studies have not been undertaken. This investigation hypothesized that [+18RGD] would effectively reverse heparin anticoagulation of human blood in vitro.

METHODS

Fifty patients who underwent anticoagulation therapy during vascular surgery had blood sampled at baseline and 30 minutes after receiving heparin (150 IU/kg). Activated clotting times were used to define specific quantities of [+18RGD] or protamine necessary to completely reverse heparin anticoagulation in the blood sample of each patient. These defined amounts of [+18RGD] or protamine were then administered to the heparinized blood samples, and percent reversals of activated partial thromboplastin time, thrombin clotting time, and antifactor Xa/IIa levels were determined. In addition, platelet aggregation assays, as well as platelet and white blood cell counts were performed.

RESULTS

[+18RGD] and protamine were equivalent in reversing heparin as assessed by thrombin clotting time, antifactor Xa, antifactor IIa levels, and white blood cell changes. [+18RGD], when compared with protamine, was superior in this regard, as assessed by activated partial thromboplastin time (94.5 +/- 1.0 vs 86.5 +/- 1.3% delta, respectively; p < 0.001) and platelet declines (-3.9 +/- 2.9 vs -12.8 +/- 3.4 per mm3, respectively; p = 0.048). Platelet aggregation was also decreased for [+18RGD] compared with protamine (23.6 +/- 1.5 vs 28.5 +/- 1.9%, respectively; p = 0.048).

CONCLUSIONS

[+18RGD] was as effective as protamine for in vitro reversal of heparin anticoagulation by most coagulation assays, was statistically more effective at reversal than protamine by aPTT assay, and was associated with lesser platelet reductions than protamine. [+18RGD], if less toxic than protamine in human beings, would allow for effective clinical reversal of heparin anticoagulation.

Should heparin be reversed after carotid endarterectomy? A randomised prospective trial

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether heparin reversal after carotid endarterectomy reduces the incidence of haemorrhagic complications.

DESIGN

A randomised prospective trial.

METHODS

Sixty-four patients randomised to reversal of heparin or no reversal, of whom 31 received protamine titrated to the residual circulating heparin at closure of arteriotomy. Measurements included serial activated clotting times (ACTs), wound drainage, neck swelling using duplex Doppler imaging to measure the depth from skin to carotid bifurcation, and the recording of all complications.

RESULTS

Wound drainage volumes were significantly reduced by protamine reversal (68.5 ml compared to 35 ml, p < 0.001), but neck swelling was not (72 mm compared to 70 mm, p = 0.77). Two patients who were not reversed developed neck haematomas requiring evacuation. More importantly, two patients receiving protamine, thrombosed the operated internal carotid artery (ICA) postoperatively and died despite urgent thrombectomy. A further patient who was not randomised in this study but who received protamine also developed ICA thrombosis within the same 3 month period.

CONCLUSIONS

Reversing heparin with protamine reduces postoperative wound drainage after carotid surgery but may predispose to ICA thrombosis and stroke. This is in keeping with a previous retrospective study published during our trial.

Differential effects of novel protamine variants on myocyte contractile function with left ventricular failure

BACKGROUND

Protamine administration can cause left ventricular (LV) dysfunction, which may have clinical significance in the setting of congestive heart failure (CHF). Protamine variants have recently been constructed with heparin reversal capacity similar to protamine. The purpose of this study was to examine the potential differential effects of these protamine variants on isolated myocyte contractile function in normal myocytes and in myocytes after the development of CHF.

METHODS

Contractile function was measured by means of computer-aided videomicroscopy in myocytes from five normal pigs and five pigs with CHF induced by rapid pacing (240 beats/min for 3 weeks). Myocyte contractility was examined in the presence of 40 micrograms/ml native protamine or one of three protamine variants: (1) reduced charge (+18) and lysine substituted for arginine; (2) lysine-substituted variant with glutamic acid substituted for the initial proline; or (3) arginine-rich peptide with a terminal arginine-glycine-aspartic acid (RGD) amino acid sequence.

RESULTS

In the presence of native protamine, myocyte percent shortening fell from baseline in both the normal (2.86 +/- 0.15 versus 4.58 +/- 0.08, p < 0.05) and the CHF groups (1.01 +/- 0.06 versus 2.07 +/- 0.05, p < 0.05). With both of the lysine-substituted protamine variants, percent shortening fell from baseline in the normal group (3.42 +/- 0.20 for arginine and 3.74 +/- 0.20 for glutamic acid versus 4.58 +/- 0.08, p < 0.05), and was unchanged in the CHF group (1.94 +/- 0.13 versus 2.07 +/- 0.05, p = 0.34 for arginine; and 1.96 +/- 0.10 versus 2.07 +/- 0.05, p = 0.31, for glutamic acid). However, with the arginine/RGD variant, percent shortening fell from baseline in both the normal (2.86 +/- 0.23 versus 4.58 +/- 0.08, p < 0.05) and the CHF groups (1.32 +/- 0.10 versus 2.07 +/- 0.05, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Specific changes in the primary and secondary structures of protamine had different effects on myocyte contractile function. Furthermore, the negative effects of lysine-substituted protamine variants on myocyte contractility were less pronounced in both CHF and normal myocytes. Thus protamine variants may be of clinical use, particularly in the setting of preexisting LV dysfunction.

Effects of differing rates of protamine reversal of heparin anticoagulation

BACKGROUND

Protamine sulfate reversal of heparin anticoagulation may be associated with adverse cardiovascular side effects. The purpose of this study was to determine whether diminished systemic oxygen consumption and hemodynamic changes were more likely to accompany rapid versus slow protamine administration.

METHODS

Fifteen patients undergoing abdominal aortic aneurysm resection in a prospective randomized double-blinded study received intravenous protamine (1.5 mg/kg) rapidly during a 3-minute period (group I, n = 7) or slowly during a 15-minute period (group II, n = 8). Systemic oxygen consumption (VO2) and hemodynamic parameters were assessed for up to 20 minutes after protamine administration began.

RESULTS

Blood pressure declines (millimeters of mercury) were greatest in group I with rapid protamine administration (-19 systolic and -9 diastolic) compared with group II with slow protamine administration (-12 systolic and -1 diastolic). Heart rate fell markedly in both groups I and II. Cardiac output (CO) declined in group I at virtually all time periods. Similar CO declines in group II occurred 10 minutes after protamine infusion had begun and persisted for 3 minutes after protamine administration was complete. Maximum VO2 decreases were -16% (60 seconds into protamine infusion) and -13% (1.5 minutes after protamine infusion) in groups I and II, respectively, with statistically significant declines (p < 0.05) occurring only in group I compared with baseline values. Statistically significant differences (p < 0.01), however, were found when mean declines during and after protamine infusion were compared with controls for both CO and VO2 in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Significant declines in systemic VO2 and hemodynamic perturbations accompany protamine reversal of heparin anticoagulation during aortic surgery. Rapid protamine administration increases the magnitude of these adverse responses.

Low molecular mass heparin instead of unfractionated heparin during infrainguinal bypass surgery

OBJECTIVES

To test whether low molecular mass heparin (LMMH) is comparable to unfractionated heparin (UFH) as an anticoagulant during infrainguinal bypass surgery and to investigate laboratory evidence of hypercoagulation in patients undergoing infrainguinal bypass surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eighteen patients were randomised to receive either UFH or LMMH (70 anti-Xa units/kg b.w.). Soluble fibrin, measured as fibrin monomers (FM) and fibrinopeptide A (FPA), were measured in blood from the femoral vein before, during and after release of the occluding clamps during surgery. In addition, fibrinogen prothrombin complex, thrombin-antithrombin complex, platelets and antithrombin were measured before surgery. Heparin levels (Anti Xa) were measured during surgery.

RESULTS

Increased levels of fibrinogen, FPA, thrombin antithrombin complex and FM were recorded prior to surgery. During surgery no further increase was noted. The anti Xa levels were slightly higher in patients with LMMH than in patients receiving UFH. Levels of FM were significantly lower in patients receiving LMMH. No difference in FPA was noted. A positive correlation between fibrinogen and FPA and FM respectively was recorded. Four patients, two in each group, were reoperated for graft occlusion. One patient in the UFH group required reoperation because of bleeding.

CONCLUSIONS

LMMH is comparable to UFH as an anticoagulant during infrainguinal bypass surgery. Variables reflecting hypercoagulability are elevated in this group of patients and are positively correlated to the fibrinogen level. High fibrinogen levels could thus be a risk for perioperative thrombosis.

Direct effects of protamine sulfate on myocyte contractile processes. Cellular and molecular mechanisms

BACKGROUND

Administration of the arginine-rich, highly charged protamine (PROT) molecule has been associated with episodes of acute left ventricular (LV) dysfunction. The objective of the present study was to test the hypothesis that PROT has direct effects on isolated LV myocyte contractile processes and sarcolemmal transduction systems.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Exposure of porcine LV myocytes (n = 305) to 40 micrograms/mL PROT (reflecting a dose of 2.5 mg/kg) decreased basal contractile function and beta-adrenergic responsiveness. For example, myocyte percent shortening was 4.3 +/- 0.1% in control myocytes and decreased to 2.8 +/- 0.2% in the presence of 40 micrograms/mL PROT (P < .05). Myocyte percent shortening was 9.3 +/- 0.7% after beta-adrenergic receptor stimulation (isoproterenol; 25 nmol/L) and was significantly reduced in the presence of 40 micrograms/mL PROT (5.7 +/- 0.7%, P < .05). PROT reduced myocyte responsiveness to forskolin (100 mumol/L), which directly activates adenylate cyclase, by > 40% from forskolin. In addition, PROT abolished the inotropic effects of ouabain on myocyte contractile function. To determine contributory mechanisms for the effects of PROT on myocyte sarcolemmal systems, beta-receptor- and cardiac glycoside-binding characteristics were determined in sarcolemmal preparations. beta-receptor binding was 175 +/- 10 fmol/mg and was reduced to 140 +/- 6 fmol/mg in the presence of PROT (P < .05). Ouabain receptor binding was 7.1 pmol/mg and decreased to 2.6 +/- 0.4 pmol/mg in the presence of PROT. In addition, cAMP production after stimulation with isoproterenol and forskolin was significantly blunted in the presence of PROT. Variants of the PROT moelcule were constructed by specific amino acid substitutions and deletions, which provided a means to vary charge as well as structure. Substitution of arginine with lysine in the PROT peptide sequence ameliorated the negative effects on myocyte contractile processes; despite identical overall charge (21+). However, a PROT variant with an 18+ charge but different amino acid sequence induced significant negative effects on myocyte function and inotropic responsiveness. Thus, the effects of PROT on myocyte contractile processes are not due simply to the high positive charge of the molecule. To further establish that PROT can contribute to changes in LV function in the clinical setting, fluorescein-labeled PROT was circulated in antegradely perfused rabbit hearts. Microscopic examination revealed that PROT could traverse the vascular compartment of the myocardium and come in direct contact with the myocyte.

CONCLUSIONS

The unique findings from the present study suggest that a fundamental contributory mechanisms for the changes in LV function observed after protamine administration may be the direct effect of unbound protamine on myocyte contractile processes.

Effective and less toxic reversal of low-molecular weight heparin anticoagulation by a designer variant of protamine

PURPOSE

This investigation assessed protamine reversal of heparin anticoagulation by formation of a protamine-heparin alpha-helix by use of a new designer-variant protamine [+18BE] that was made from an existing protamine variant [+18B] whose non-alpha-helix-forming amino acid proline (P) was replaced by an alpha-helix-forming glutamic acid (E). The rate of administration of the new [+18BE] variant protamine on efficacy and toxicity in comparison to that of [+21] standard protamine and [+18B] was also studied.

METHODS

Acetyl-EAA(K2A2K2A)4K2-Amide [+18BE] was administered intravenously in a 1:1 dose to low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH)-anticoagulated (intravenous 150 IU antifactor Xa/kg) dogs over 10 seconds or 3 minutes (n = 7, each group). Reversal efficacy was documented by measuring activated clotting time, thrombin clotting time, antifactor Xa, and antifactor IIa. Toxicity was defined by measuring systemic blood pressure, heart rate, cardiac output, pulmonary artery pressure, and oxygen consumption. Measurements were made at baseline, after administration of LMWH, before its reversal, and for 30 minutes thereafter. Results were compared with those after LMWH reversal with [+21] standard protamine and the [+18B] variant. A total toxicity score (TTS) was calculated for each compound from maximal declines in blood pressure, heart rate, cardiac output, and oxygen consumption.

RESULTS

LMWH anticoagulation reversal was significantly (p < 0.01) less toxic over 10 seconds and 3 minutes with the [+18BE] designer variant (TTS -2.3, -2.2) compared with the [+21] standard protamine (TTS -6.4, -7.2). Percent LMWH reversal at 3 minutes revealed [+18BE] to have antifactor Xa activity as high as 91%, compared with 68% for protamine [+21], when given over 3 minutes (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

This investigation documents that a new designer variant of protamine [+18BE] has superior efficacy compared with [+21] standard protamine for reversal of LMWH anticoagulation and that this occurs with a highly favorable toxicity profile.

Pharmacological prophylaxis against postoperative graft occlusion after peripheral vascular surgery: a world-wide survey

OBJECTIVES

To define current practice regarding the use of pharmacological prophylaxis to prevent postoperative graft occlusion.

DESIGN

Prospective open questionnaire.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Questionnaires regarding this subject were sent to vascular surgeons throughout the world to analyse current practice.

RESULTS

651 questionnaires were returned with a response rate of 62% and form the basis for this report. Data from 100,334 vascular reconstructions were reported in this survey. Prophylaxis against postoperative graft occlusions was common. Treatment periods were usually greater than 1 year. Among carotid surgery patients, 82% received prophylaxis, consisting mainly of low-dose acetysalicylic acid (ASA). In Mid-Europe the use of oral anticoagulation was more common than in other regions (p < 0.001). Among aneurysm surgery patients, 38% received prophylaxis. For infrainguinal bypass, ASA in low dose was the most commonly used agent worldwide. However, oral anticoagulation was more frequent in Mid-Europe, in contrast to South America where the combination of ASA and dipyridamole was most common. Considerable geographical differences regarding patient selection, the frequency of specific procedures and operative techniques existed.

CONCLUSIONS

Important world-wide differences exist regarding prophylaxis for postoperative graft occlusion.