Quality of life in patients with advanced colorectal cancer: what has been learnt?

Can the Correlation of Periodontopathies with Gastrointestinal Diseases Be Used as Indicators in Severe Colorectal Diseases?

Gastrointestinal problems are among the most common health problems which can acutely affect the healthy population and chronically involve health risks, seriously affecting the quality of life. Identifying the risk of gastrointestinal diseases in the early phase by indirect methods can increase the healing rate and the quality of life.: The proposal of this study is to verify a correlation between gastrointestinal and periodontal problems and the risk of inflammatory gastrointestinal diseases (IBD). The study was conducted on 123 people who were observed to have gastrointestinal and psychological problems. The participants were divided into three groups, depending on each one's diagnosis. The control group (CG) was composed of 37 people who did not fit either irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) according to the ROME IV criteria, nor were inflammatory markers positive for IBD. Group 2 (IBS) was composed of 44 participants diagnosed with IBS according to the ROME IV criteria. Group 3 was composed of 42 participants who were diagnosed with IBD. All study participants underwent anthropometric, micro-Ident, and quality of life tests. A directly proportional relationship of the presence of bacteria with IBD patients with the exception of Capnocytophaga spp. and Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans was observed. These two bacteria correlated significantly with IBS. Follow-up of the study participants will help determine whether periodontal disease can be used as an indicator of severe colorectal disease. In addition, this study should be continued especially in the case of IBD more thoroughly to follow and reduce the risk of malignancy.

Hakami A. Assessment of Quality of Life (QoL) of Colorectal Cancer Patients using QLQ-30 and QLQ-CR 29 at King Abdulaziz Medical City, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

Objective

We aimed to assess the quality of life (QoL) and its predictors in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients at King Abdulaziz Medical City, Jeddah.

Methods

A total of 118 CRC patients at King Abdulaziz Medical City, a tertiary hospital in Jeddah, participated in this study. The participants were provided with the online questionnaire via WhatsApp by trained researchers and data collectors in February 2021. All participants were required to answer the three-section questionnaire comprising of (a) demographic data and a validated Arabic version of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) quality of life questionnaires, (b) a general version (QLQ-30), and (c) a CRC-specific version (QLQ-CR29).

Results

Statistical analysis revealed that the most common comorbidity among the participants was diabetes mellitus (42.4%). In addition, the mean global health status was 63.91 ± 24.75. For the global health tool QLQ-C30, results exhibited that physical functioning [62.94 (30.04)] and social functioning [63.56 (31.95)] scored below the threshold, while the cognitive functioning scale scored the highest [74.86 (25.11)]. In addition, on the QLQ-C30 scales, fatigue and insomnia were distressing, with fatigue scoring the highest. For the disease-specific tool QLQ-CR29, it was found that for the symptom scale, urinary frequency and embarrassment scored the highest. Conclusion. The participants reported high global quality of life on both the EORTC QLQ-30 and QLQ-CR29 scales. This study identifies the factors and predictors that affect the quality of life of CRC patients in Saudi Arabia. Recognizing these factors and predictors may empower those patients to maintain positive perception towards the impact of colorectal cancer and improve their survival.

Traditional Chinese Medicine Combined With Chemotherapy and Cetuximab or Bevacizumab for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial

Background

Huangci Granule is a traditional Chinese medicine for treating metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Huangci Granule combination with chemotherapy and cetuximab (CET) or bevacizumab (BV) for treating mCRC.

Methods

We performed a randomized, controlled, and double-blind trial and recruited patients with mCRC who were planned to undergo chemotherapy combined with CET or BV. The treatment group was treated with Huangci Granule, while the control group was treated with placebo. Continuous treatment until disease progression, death, intolerable toxicity or up to 6 months. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoint was quality of life and safety.

Result

320 patients were randomly assigned to receive treatment, including 200 first-line patients and 120 second-line patients. In the first-line treatment, the median PFS was 9.59 months (95% CI, 6.94–13.25) vs 6.89 months (95% CI, 4.99–9.52) in treatment group and control group (HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.50–0.97; P = 0.027). Chinese medicine was an independent factor affecting the PFS. In the second-line treatment, the median PFS was 6.51 months (95% CI, 4.49–9.44) vs 4.53 months (95% CI, 3.12–6.57) in the treatment group and control group (HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.45–0.95; P = 0.020). Compared with the control group, “role function,” “social function,” “fatigue,” and “appetite loss” were significantly improved in the treatment (P < 0.05) and drug related grades 3 to 4 adverse events were less.

Conclusion

Huangci Granule combined with chemotherapy and CET or BV can prolong the PFS of mCRC, improve the quality of life, reduce adverse reactions, and have good safety.

Measuring health-related quality of life in patients with advanced cancer: a systematic review of self-administered measurement instruments

PURPOSE

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are becoming increasingly important in clinical practice. The implementation of PROMS in routine practice is challenging because information regarding psychometric quality of measurement instruments is fragmented and standardization is lacking. The aim of this study is to evaluate the quality of self-administered HRQoL measurement instruments for use in patients with advanced cancer in clinical practice.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, and CINAHL to identify studies concerning self-administered HRQoL measurement instruments in patients with advanced cancer between January 1990 and September 2016. Quality of the measurement instruments was assessed by predefined criteria derived from the COSMIN checklist.

RESULTS

Sixty-nine articles relating to 39 measurement instruments met the inclusion criteria. Information regarding important measurement properties was often incomplete. None of the instruments performed sufficient on all measurement properties. Considering available information, the EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL appeared to have adequate psychometric properties, together with the EORTC QLQ-BM22.

CONCLUSIONS

Many of the existing HRQoL measurement instruments have not yet been evaluated in an adequate manner. Validation of self-administered HRQoL measurement instruments is an ongoing development and should be prioritized. This review contributes to improved clarity regarding the availability and quality of HRQoL measurement instruments for patients with advanced cancer and supports health care professionals in an adequate selection of suitable PROMs in clinical practice.

Quality of Life After "Total Mesorectal Excision (TME)" for Rectal Carcinoma: a Study from a Tertiary Care Hospital in Northern India

Quality of life (QoL) is a key element in rectal cancer (RC) patients. There is not much data regarding this from North India. This study assesses QoL following low anterior resection (LAR) and abdominoperineal resection (APR), operated for low rectal tumors at a high-volume center in northern India. One-hundred-thirty patients of rectal carcinoma were prospectively assessed for quality of life using the European Organization for Cancer QLQ-30 and CR29 questionnaires and compared with reference data population. There was no significant difference in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 functional or symptom score between the study group and reference data population. Specific functional and symptom QoL scores of the study group were comparable to that of reference data population. There was no significant difference in the EORTC QLQ-C30 functional or symptom score between APR and LAR groups, except for the symptom of nausea and vomiting which was reported significantly more by the LAR group patients than APR group (p = 0.001). LAR patients had significantly higher scores with regard to nausea and vomiting than patients with an APR (p < 0.05). APR patients had significantly higher scores with regards to urinary frequency (p = 0.0001), abdominal pain (p = 0.0001), and embarrassment (p = 0.0001) than LAR patients. Quality of life after APR and LAR for rectal carcinoma was found to be comparable to the reference data population, and the QoL after APR was similar to that after LAR barring a few symptoms.

Spiritual Well-being in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Receiving Noncurative Chemotherapy: A Qualitative Study

BACKGROUND

Spiritual well-being (SWB) is an important quality-of-life dimension for cancer patients in the palliative phase. Therefore, it is important for healthcare professionals to recognize the concept of SWB from the patient's point of view. A deeper understanding of how patients experience and reflect upon these issues might influence patient care.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to explore SWB in colorectal cancer patients receiving chemotherapy in the palliative phase.

METHODS

We used a qualitative method of in-depth interviews and a hermeneutic editing approach for the analyses and interpretations.

RESULTS

Twenty colorectal cancer patients in the palliative phase, aged 34 to 75 years, were included: 12 patients were receiving first-line chemotherapy, and 8 patients were receiving second-line chemotherapy. Through empirical analyses, we identified subthemes according to the SWB dimensions defined by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality-of-life group. Under the SWB dimension, (i) relationships with self and others, we identified the subthemes: (a) strategies for inner harmony and (b) sharing feelings with significant others. Under the dimension, (ii) existential issues, we identified the subtheme (c) coping with end-of-life thoughts. Under the dimension, (iii) specifically religious and/or spiritual beliefs and practices, we identified the subtheme (d) seeking faith as inner support.

CONCLUSION

Knowledge about cancer patients' use of different strategies to increase their SWB may help healthcare professionals to guide patients through this vulnerable phase.

IMPLICATION FOR PRACTICE

Healthcare professionals need sufficient courage and willingness to share their patients' thoughts, beliefs, and grief to be able to guide patients toward improving their SWB.

The Relationship Between Health-Related Quality of Life and Survival in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients Treated With Korean Medicine

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to identify the relationship between health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measured by the Functional Assessment Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) and survival in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients.

METHODS

The clinical characteristics and FACT-G scores were retrospectively reviewed in mCRC patients who visited the Cancer Center of Korean Medicine. The overall survival (OS) was calculated and compared using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed based on clinical characteristics and FACT-G scores. To identify significant differences in answer frequency, χ² tests and Fisher's exact tests were used.

RESULTS

A total of 58 patients were reviewed. The proportion of patients who had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-Performance Status ≥ 2 was 43.1%, multiple distant metastatic sites was 77.6%, liver metastases was 43.1%, been previously treated was 89.7%, and received more than the second-line chemotherapy was 75.5%. The mean total FACT-G score was 65.3 (median 65.6). The median OS was 7 months. There was no significant difference in OS between the 2 groups divided by the median values of FACT-G total and subscores. In univariate analyses, functional well-being (FWB) score had a significant impact on survival. In multivariate analyses, presence of liver metastasis, FACT-G total score, and FWB score were significant prognostic predictors of survival. No statistically different answer frequency was observed for any question regarding FWB.

CONCLUSIONS

This study found that FACT-G total and FWB scores were potential prognostic factors for predicting OS in relapsed or refractory mCRC patients treated with Korean Medicine.

Predictors of health-related quality of life and association with survival may identify colorectal cancer patients at high risk of poor prognosis

PURPOSE

To investigate the mediators of health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients and effect on overall survival.

METHODS

We analyzed baseline (within 1 year of diagnosis) SF-12v1 questionnaire data from 3734 CRC patients and assessed the differences in mental composite scores (MCS) and physical composite scores (PCS) by socio-demographics and risks of poor HR-QoL by these factors. Hazard ratios were generated using univariate Cox regression for MCS and PCS dichotomized using the normalized scoring-based mean of 50 and survival estimates generated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Differences in MCS and PCS were identified by sex, age, education level, alcohol use, tobacco use, and stage. Race, marital status, and cancer site differed only by PCS. Being female, never married, former alcohol user, or with stage IV disease significantly increased risk of a poor HR-QoL, with magnitudes of risk from 1.25- to 1.97-fold. Higher education level had a protective effect (MCS: P _trend = 2.32 × 10^-7; PCS: P _trend = 5.62 × 10^-14). Hispanics and African-Americans had a 1.35- and 1.57-fold risk of poor PCS, and increase in age had a protective effect for risk of poor MCS (P _trend = 1.84 × 10^-7). Poor MCS or PCS were associated with poor prognosis and decreased survival at 5 years (HR_MCS 1.57, 95 % CI 1.41-1.76 and HR_PCS 2.38, 95 % CI 2.08-2.72), and both remained significant when adjusting for age, gender, race, education level, tumor stage, and tumor site.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings identify potential mediators for HR-QoL and suggest that baseline HR-QoL assessment may be prognostic for CRC.

A cross-sectional assessment of quality of life of colorectal cancer patients in Saudi Arabia

OBJECTIVE

In this cross-sectional study, we aimed to describe the quality of life of Saudi colorectal cancer (CRC) patients and identify the factors that may further improve health care for CRC survivors in Saudi Arabia (KSA).

METHODS

A total of 106 CRC patients from five different private and public tertiary level hospitals in Saudi Arabia participated in this study. CRC patient was interviewed by a trained researcher between September and December 2014. All respondents answered a three-part questionnaire which includes demographic data and a validated Arabic version of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life.

RESULTS

Participants had a mean score for global health of 67.1 (95 % CI 62.55-71.71). Among the five scales of quality of life, social functioning and functional scales of CRC patients scored the highest [Mean 83.49 (95 % CI 78.64-86.33)] while the lowest scored was emotional scales [66.9 (95 % CI 61.81-71.98)]. Insomnia was considered the most distressing symptom on the symptom scales. Using the disease-specific tool, it was found that sexual interest scored the highest. On the symptom scale, dissatisfaction with stoma care problems scored the highest.

CONCLUSION

Factors associated with a major reduction in all domains of quality of life included employment status and tumor location. This study identifies the factors and issues that affect the quality of life of CRC patients in KSA. Addressing these factors and issues may lessen the burden of cancer survivors in the KSA or may prolong their survival.

Systematic review recommends the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer colorectal cancer-specific module for measuring quality of life in colorectal cancer patients

OBJECTIVES

To critically appraise the measurement properties of standardized health-related quality of life (HRQOL) instruments for colorectal cancer (CRC) patients and to provide recommendations on the choice of HRQOL instruments.

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING

Systematic review of English language literature published between January 1985 and May 2014 identified through a database search of PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Ovid MEDLINE. HRQOL instruments were rated on methodological quality and overall levels of evidence using a Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instrument checklist.

RESULTS

Internal consistency and hypothesis testing were evaluated most frequently in 63 studies identified. The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colorectal (FACT-C) was the most extensively evaluated. The highest number of positive ratings in the overall level of evidence was found in the CRC-specific quality of life questionnaire module (QLQ-CR38) in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) module, followed by the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Bowel instrument, FACT-C, and Quick-FLIC. The EORTC QLQ-CR38 had the most positive ratings on measurement property and was recommended.

CONCLUSION

The EORTC QLQ-CR38 was recommended to assess HRQOL in patients with CRC, regardless of disease stage and primary tumor site.

Predicting postoperative morbidity following cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CS+HIPEC) with preoperative FACT-C (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy) and patient-rated performance status

BACKGROUND

Cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CS+HIPEC) is associated with significant perioperative morbidity. One goal of our ongoing patient-reported health-related quality of life (HRQoL) program is to describe the prognostic value of HRQoL measures for predicting postoperative morbidity and mortality following CS+HIPEC.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected clinical database for all patients treated for peritoneal carcinomatosis and who participated in our patient-reported HRQoL program from 2001 to 2011 was done. Patients completed the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy questionnaire plus the colon symptom subscale, in addition to the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status rating prior to CS+HIPEC. The trial outcome index (TOI), a specific measure of function, symptoms, and physical well being of the patient, was analyzed. The TOI is a combination of the physical and functional well being subscales + the colon-specific subscale of the FACT-C.

RESULTS

Of 855 patients, 387 (45.2 %) participated in the HRQoL trials. Mean age was 53.3 years, and 213 (55 %) were female versus 174 (45 %) males. There were 240 patients (62 %) who had a complication versus 147 (38 %) who had no complication. A 30-day mortality rate of 7.7 % (30) was documented. Patients who suffered a 30-day postoperative mortality demonstrated a lower mean preoperative score in the FACT-C TOI 52.7 versus 61.7; P < 0.001. Independent predictors of 30-day mortality on multivariate analysis included TOI (0.05), age (0.001), and smoking (0.001). Patients with a higher TOI score were less likely to suffer a mortality (95 % CI 0.9-1.0, P = 0.05). Patients with a higher emotional well being (EWB) score were less likely to suffer a complication 0.9 (95 % CI 0.87-1.0, P = 0.04). Other independent predictors of postoperative morbidity included diabetic status (P = 0.05), ECOG performance status (0.001), and gender (0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative HRQoL, as measured by FACT-C and ECOG performance status and added to traditional factors, helps predict postoperative morbidity and mortality following CS+HIPEC.

A cross-sectional survey of quality of life in colostomates: a report from Iran

Background

Considering the complications that colostomies may cause, patient self-assessments of their social, emotional, physical, sexual and functional conditions may help their surgeons to evaluate the impact of their interventions or use supplementary methods to maintain patient functional status or decrease its loss to the minimum level. The aim of this study was to evaluate the Quality of Life in Iranian patients with colostomies and to compare the age and gender differences among them.

Method

This cross-sectional study was conducted from 2009 to 2010 to evaluate the quality of life of 96 patients who had undergone surgery for rectal cancer and had permanent colostomies. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancers Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ)-C30 and the EORTC QLQ-CR38 were used to assess patient Quality of Life.

Results

The mean scores for the functional subscales were as follows: Physical Function, 70.9 (±2.2); Role Function, 68.4 (±2.6); Emotional Function, 56.9 (±2.7); Cognitive Function, 68.7 (± 2.6); and Social Function, 64.2 (±3.3). The EORTC questionnaires showed significant differences between males and females. Males had better body image scores. Sexual Function and Sexual Enjoyment were impaired in both males and females, but males had significantly higher scores and better roles in Physical and Sexual Functions. More sexual enjoyment problems in older ages were observed in both males and females.

Conclusion

Having a colostomy was associated with a high level of emotional and sexual function impairment. The differing challenges between males and females should encourage us to design sex-specific interventions that improve the quality of life in this group of patients.

Screenee perception and health-related quality of life in colorectal cancer screening: a review

Screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) has become established to varying degrees in several Western countries for the past 30 years. Because of its effectiveness, screening has been adopted or is planned in a number of other countries. In most countries, the screening method (e.g., fecal occult blood test [FOBT], sigmoidoscopy) is followed by colonoscopy, for verification. In other countries (e.g., United States, Germany), colonoscopy is the preferred first-line investigation method. However, because colonoscopy is considered to be invasive, might be poorly tolerated, and can be associated with complications, the idea of adopting colonoscopy as the primary screening method suffers. Negative effects of screening methods can reduce participation in programs and thereby negate the desired effect on individual and societal health. At present, there is no generally accepted method either to assess the perception and satisfaction of patients screened or the outcome of the screening procedures in CRC. In this review, we discuss the past development and present availability of instruments to measure health-related quality of life (HRQoL), the scarce studies in which such instruments have been used in screening campaigns, and the findings. We suggest the creation of a specific instrument for the assessment of HRQoL in CRC screening.

Baseline physical functioning status of metastatic colorectal cancer patients predicts the overall survival but not the activity of a front-line oxaliplatin-fluoropyrimidine doublet

BACKGROUND

No differences in response rate (RR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and quality of life (QoL) were seen in patients randomly treated with biweekly oxaliplatin plus either fluorouracil/folinic acid or capecitabine.

METHODS

We investigated the independent effect of baseline clinical characteristics and physical functioning (PF) domain on RR, PFS, and OS in 310 patients who completed the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire. Multivariate analyses stratified by treatment were performed. An exploratory analysis was done by grouping patients with a PF score superior or equal to the highest quartile (n = 111), included between the highest and the lowest quartiles (n = 99), or inferior to the lowest quartile (n = 100). The relationship between these three groups and the ECOG PS was then analysed.

RESULTS

At multivariate analysis, OS was negatively affected by the number of metastatic sites, the serum alkaline phosphatase, and the ECOG PS, while it was positively affected by the previous surgical resection of the primary tumour. Adding the baseline PF score, the number of disease sites (p < 0.0001), the serum alkaline phosphatase (p = 0.0057), and the PF (p = 0.0007) retained an independent significance, while the ECOG PS and the previous surgery were no longer significant. PF did not significantly affect PFS or RR. A good but not totally overlapping correlation was found between PF grouping and ECOG PS score.

CONCLUSIONS

Baseline self-reported PF independently predicted the OS of patients. Assessment of QoL should be incorporated in randomised trials evaluating the management of patients with MCRC.

Reporting on quality of life in randomised controlled trials in gastrointestinal surgery

BACKGROUND

Although health-related quality of life (HRQOL) has become an important outcome measure in surgical trials, questions still remain about the quality of its reporting. The aim of this study was to evaluate HRQOL assessment methodology of randomised clinical trials concerning gastrointestinal surgery.

METHODS

All articles published in the calendar years 2006 and 2007 that purported to assess quality of life as end points or make some conclusion about quality of life were chosen for review from eight general surgical journals and four medical journals. Identified eligible studies were selected and then evaluated on a broad set of predetermined criteria.

RESULTS

Twenty-four published randomised controlled clinical trials (RCTs)s with an HRQOL component were identified. Although most trials exhibited good-quality research, some methodological limitations were identified: Only 21% of the studies gave a rationale for selecting a specific HRQOL measure, 46% of the studies failed to report information about the administration of the HRQOL measure, and 37% did not give details on missing data.

CONCLUSIONS

Although it is clear that HRQOL is an important end point in surgical RCTs because the information helps to influence treatment recommendations, a number of methodological shortcomings have to be further addressed in future studies.

Health-related quality of life as a valid outcome in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer

With the recent trend of improved survival, there has been a marked interest in reviewing and refining the contribution of health related quality of life (HRQoL) outcome measures of treatment in advanced colorectal cancer. However, if HRQoL data are going to be of clinical value and help both physicians and patients make decisions there is a need for a consensus on both the design and methods of measurement of HRQoL in clinical trials, and an acknowledgement of the interpretation of the outcomes in clinical practice. Whilst it is encouraging to find that the quality of HRQoL measurement in clinical research has improved significantly over the last fifteen years, with a growing number of trial-based HRQoL studies, there is still the potential to improve the use of HRQoL in clinical decision making in advanced colorectal cancer. There is also the need to further refine measurement of HRQoL to provide useful data specific to these patients. It is anticipated that developments such as the liver metastases module EORTC (QLQ-LMC21) questionnaire will increase the sensitivity to change of the generic cancer measure, the EORTC QLQ-C30 and will provide essential HRQoL information regarding the use of treatments in both the curative and palliative settings. Furthermore, easy to use simple tools such as the "minimum standard checklist for evaluating HRQoL outcomes in cancer clinical trials" might be of help in guiding investigators on the basis of minimum criteria.

Assessment and data analysis of health-related quality of life in clinical trials for gastric cancer treatments

This review contains a practical guide as well as a number of design and analytical methods for conducting health-related quality of life assessments in clinical trials for gastric cancer treatment. Although we address issues specific to the assessment of gastric cancer, many are applicable to clinical trials for different cancer types.

Quality of Life assessment through the EORTC questionnaires of colorectal cancer patients in advanced disease stages

PURPOSE

The purpose of the present work is to evaluate Quality of Life in a group of colorectal cancer patients in advanced stages of their disease, along a standard chemotherapy treatment protocol, through the EORTC core questionnaire QLQ-C30 and the colorectal cancer module QLQ-CR38. These two questionnaires had previously been validated in our country. The present study has the novelty of its use during the chemotherapy treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A consecutive sample of 44 colon o rectal cancer patients in stage IV, from an initial group of 46 patients who were addressed, have filled in the questionnaires, in three moments during their treatment process. Clinical and demographic data have also been recorded. Quality of Life scores and changes in them among the three assessments have been calculated.

RESULTS

The quality of life scores of patients who have followed the treatment have been >70 points (100) in most dimensions, and has shown similar to the clinical data. Changes of >20 points in the quality of life scores during the treatment process appear in areas related to toxicity, fatigue and insomnia. Quality of life has been stable or has had small changes (between 10 and 20 points) in most dimensions.

CONCLUSIONS

Quality of Life in the present sample has been good in general. The treatment has been administered to patients who could tolerate it adequately.

A meta-analysis of two randomised trials of early chemotherapy in asymptomatic metastatic colorectal cancer

This report constitutes a prospectively planned meta-analysis combining two almost identical trials undertaken in Australasia and Canada to study the effect of starting chemotherapy immediately in asymptomatic patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Patients (n=168) were randomised to receive either immediate or delayed treatment (at onset of predefined symptoms). Australasian patients received either weekly 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (500 and 20 mg m(-2), respectively) (n=59) or the daily x 5 Mayo Clinic schedule (425 and 20 mg m(-2), respectively) (n=42). Canadian patients were treated with the Mayo schedule (n=67). Otherwise, the two studies were almost identical in design and each used the European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 instrument for measuring quality of life (QoL). Treatment was continued until 6 months had elapsed or disease progression occurred. Low accrual led to trial suspension before the predetermined sample size for either study was reached. Median survival was not significantly better with immediate treatment (median 13.0 vs 11.0 months; hazard ratio, 1.15; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.79-1.72; P=0.49). There was no statistically significant difference in progression-free survival (time from randomisation until first evidence of progression after chemotherapy, 10.2 vs 10.8 months; hazard ratio, 1.08; 95% CI 0.71-1.64; P=0.73). There was no difference in overall QoL or its individual domains between the two treatment strategies at baseline or at any subsequent time point. Early treatment of asymptomatic patients with metastatic colorectal cancer did not provide a survival benefit or improved QoL compared to withholding treatment until symptoms occurred.

Benefit-risk assessment of irinotecan in advanced colorectal cancer

Irinotecan exerts its cytotoxic activity through inhibition of the nuclear enzyme topoisomerase I. It has been approved in most countries worldwide for treatment of patients with advanced colorectal cancer (CRC). Activity is seen in previously untreated patients and in patients refractory to fluorouracil treatment, whether it is given alone or in combination with other cytotoxic drugs. Irinotecan was first developed in patients refractory to fluorouracil. Activity in terms of tumour responses and patient benefit was seen in several phase II trials that used either a weekly or a three-weekly schedule. In two randomised trials (irinotecan vs best supportive care, and irinotecan vs an infused fluorouracil-based regimen), irinotecan prolonged median survival by approximately 2.5 months without any deterioration in quality-of-life. It was later studied in previously untreated patients with advanced CRC in combination with fluorouracil/folinic acid (leucovorin). In three large randomised trials, median time to tumour progression was prolonged by approximately 2.5 months and overall survival by about 2.5 months compared with fluorouracil/folinic acid alone. Tumour responses were also seen more frequently in the irinotecan arm (35-40% vs 20%). Again, quality-of-life scores were not deteriorated by the addition of irinotecan. Irinotecan has many acute adverse effects. The most prominent and dose limiting being diarrhoea and neutropenia. With irinotecan monotherapy, diarrhoea was seen in 80% of patients and severe grade 3 to 4 diarrhoea occurred in 30-40% of the patients. The severity of diarrhoea can be diminished by preventive actions. Less risk of diarrhoea is generally seen when irinotecan is combined with fluorouracil. Neutropenia is generally short-lived, but may be severe if diarrhoea is also present. This has been noticed particularly when irinotecan has been given in combination with a bolus fluorouracil/folinic acid regimen. Other toxicities include acute cholinergic-like symptoms, nausea and vomiting, and alopecia. In spite of these adverse effects, irinotecan has been accepted as an important first-line treatment for patients with advanced CRC, in combination with, preferably, an infused fluorouracil-based regimen, and has been approved for use as monotherapy in the second-line indication.

Analysis of incomplete quality of life data in advanced stage cancer: A practical application of multiple imputation

This paper presents a practical approach to analyzing incomplete quality of life (QOL) data that contains non-ignorable dropouts in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). QOL scores for the physical domain at baseline and at the end of the first and second courses of chemotherapy were compared between two treatment groups in a phase III trial. One hundred and 103 eligible patients were randomized to receive cisplatin and irinotecan (CPT-P) or cisplatin and vindesine, respectively; of those two groups, 83 and 85, respectively, completed a QOL questionnaire at least at baseline. A multiple imputation incorporating auxiliary QOL variables was implemented as one of alternatives of sensitivity analyses; these were complete case, available case, and pattern mixture analyses. Although larger sensitivity to missing data was found for CPT-P treatment, none of the alternative analyses demonstrated a significant difference in estimated slopes over time between the groups. This study presents an analytical approach for dealing with the complex problem of missing QOL data. It must be noted, however, that the validity of the multiple imputation method we present is not certain unless we can specify sufficiently informative auxiliary variables to ensure the conversion of non-ignorable missingness to ignorable.

Associations between Plasma Insulin-Like Growth Factor Proteins and C-Peptide and Quality of Life in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

OBJECTIVE

Predictors of quality of life (QOL) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer are lacking. The insulin-like growth factor (IGF) family of proteins is associated with QOL in noncancer populations. We sought to study whether these proteins are associated with QOL in patients with colorectal cancer.

METHOD

We used a cohort of 526 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with combination chemotherapy. Plasma samples of IGF-I, IGF-II, IGF binding protein-3, and C-peptide were collected before initiation of chemotherapy. QOL was measured by the uniscale instrument and the Symptom Distress Scale at baseline and throughout treatment.

RESULTS

Baseline plasma levels of IGF-I and IGF-II before initiation of chemotherapy were significantly associated with several important baseline QOL measures in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Patients with lower levels of IGF-I reported increased distress with regard to appearance, appetite, cough, and nausea intensity after adjustment for potential confounders. Similarly, decreased levels of IGF-II were predictive of worse quality related to appearance, appetite, fatigue, nausea frequency and intensity, pain frequency, and composite Symptom Distress Scale score. IGF binding protein-3 and C-peptide were not predictive of baseline QOL. Baseline biomarkers were not associated with subsequent changes in QOL during treatment. Higher body mass index was significantly associated with superior baseline QOL in several areas; nonetheless, the association of IGF-I and IGF-II with baseline QOL measures remained significant even after controlling for baseline body mass index.

CONCLUSION

Baseline plasma IGF-I and IGF-II are significantly associated with symptom distress. Whether this association is simply reflective of patient nutritional status and/or disease burden or represents an independent biological effect of IGFs on QOL remains uncertain. Nonetheless, these data suggest that molecular biomarkers may be useful predictors of QOL in cancer patients.

Psychosocial factors associated with quality of life among individuals attending genetic counseling for hereditary cancer

The aim of this multicenter study was to explore associations between psychosocial factors (general self-efficacy, perceived availability of social support, cancer-related distress) and health-related quality of life, among individuals at risk for hereditary cancer. One-hundred and twenty one participants with a family history of breast-cancer or colorectal cancer answered a questionnaire 2-4 weeks prior to genetic counseling. The two dimensions of the health-related quality of life measure, mental and physical health were both used as outcome variables. Multiple regression (linear) analyses revealed that increasing degrees of cancer-related distress was related to decreasing degrees of mental health whereas increasing degrees of self-efficacy and social support were related to increasing degrees of this outcome variable. Self-efficacy, self-esteem support and tangible aid seemed to moderate the relationship between cancer-related distress and mental health. These results suggest that self-efficacy and certain resources of social support buffer the negative association between cancer-related distress and mental health, and might be suitable for interventional efforts. Implications for genetic counseling practice are discussed.

Quality of life in patients with colorectal cancer 1 year after diagnosis compared with the general population: a population-based study

PURPOSE

Quality of life (QOL) has become an important outcome measure for patients with cancer, but long-term results from population-based studies are rare. The objective of our study was to identify specific limitations of QOL in survivors of colorectal cancer in comparison with men and women from the general population 1 year after diagnosis when acute treatment effects are expected to have declined.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

QOL was assessed 1 year after diagnosis in a population-based cohort of 439 patients with colorectal cancer from Saarland (Germany) using the EORTC-QLC30 questionnaire. Specific functional and symptom QOL scores were compared with published reference data from the general population.

RESULTS

Of 439 patients, 378 of them survived the first year after tumor diagnosis (86.1%). Of these, 309 returned the questionnaire (response rate, 81.7%). Compared with the general population, colorectal cancer patients scored their physical, role, cognitive, and global health functioning only slightly worse. More severe limitations were observed for the emotional and social functioning scales and for the symptom subscales of fatigue, dyspnea, insomnia, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties. The differences regarding functional and symptom scores were predominantly found in younger age groups whereas older cancer patients and controls rated their health and QOL similarly.

CONCLUSION

Deficits in emotional and social functioning and specific limitations like fatigue, dyspnea, insomnia, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties are main factors hampering the QOL among colorectal cancer patients and seem to affect predominantly younger patients.

Research methodology: cancer cachexia syndrome

Cachexia is a syndrome and therefore does not have a specific definition. Patients are characterized by the presence of anorexia, early satiety, weight loss, weakness, anaemia and oedema. These features occur to a variable extent in different patients and may change in severity during the course of a patient's illness. The multifactorial origin of cachexia precludes a uniform pathophysiological definition. Taken together these factors have hindered clinical studies both at a fundamental level and in terms of the introduction of effective therapy. The advent of novel therapeutic targets (e.g., ubiquitin-proteasome pathway) and biological response modifiers has opened possibilities for new clinical trials in cachexia. Regulatory authorities feel it is important not only to demonstrate efficacy in terms of patients' nutritional status (e.g., lean body mass) but also functional status (e.g., performance status). This article reviews current methods to assess the latter. Methods focused on measuring physical activity level (e.g., doubly labelled water technique or physical activity meters) promise objective data which can be readily interpreted in terms of clinically meaningful benefit.

Methodological issues in assessing health-related quality of life of colorectal cancer patients in randomised controlled trials

Although health-related quality of life (HRQOL) is increasingly reported as an important endpoint in cancer clinical trials, questions still remain about the quality of its reporting. The aim of this study was to evaluate the level of reporting of HRQOL in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of colorectal cancer (CRC). A systematic literature search from 1980 to March 2003 was undertaken on a number of databases. Identified eligible studies were selected and then evaluated on a broad set of HRQOL predetermined criteria by four reviewers. Thirty-one randomised controlled trials involving 9683 colorectal cancer patients were identified. Nearly all studies dealt with metastatic patients and principally compared different chemotherapy regimens. The HRQOL tool most often used was the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30), which was used in 48% of the studies. Some methodological limitations were identified: 39% of the RCTs did not report HRQOL compliance at baseline and 52% did not give details on missing data. A rationale for using a specific HRQOL measure was given in only 10% of the studies. Whilst HRQOL assessment is a potential valuable source of information in understanding the impact of colorectal cancer, a number of methodological shortcomings have to be further addressed in future studies.