Current research and treatment for epithelial ovarian cancer. A Position Paper from the Helene Harris Memorial Trust

Precursors of endometrial and ovarian carcinoma

This review discusses precursor lesions of endometrial and ovarian carcinoma with an emphasis on the unique molecular alterations that have led to the development of binary classification schemes for tumors of both the endometrium and ovary. While such a system is well established for endometrial carcinoma, only recently has a binary classification scheme been proposed for ovarian carcinoma. For both, the morphologic and molecular genetic-defining characteristics of their respective precursor lesions are described in detail. Furthermore, similarities and differences of the precursor lesions of specific tumors of these two genital tract organs are also addressed with a brief discussion of the clinical implications of their diagnosis.

15-Lipoxygenase-2 is differentially expressed in normal and neoplastic ovary

Ovarian cancer is a major cause of lethality from gynecological malignancies, and there is a lack of reliable and specific serum markers for this disease. Eicosanoid-related enzymes have previously been implicated in the pathogenesis of various types of cancer, but little is known about the relevance of lipoxygenase isoforms in ovarian cancer and the results on cyclooxygenases are conflicting. For this study, we quantified the expression of eicosanoid-related enzymes (cyclooxygenase-1 and cyclooxygenase-2, 15-lipoxygenase-1 and lipoxygenase-2, 5-lipoxygenase) in normal and malignant human ovarian tissue by real-time polymerase chain reaction and found a 22-fold elevated expression of 15-lipoxygenase-2 in malignant specimens when compared with normal ovarian tissue (P=0.001). In ovarian carcinoma metastases, expression of the enzyme was also augmented (20-fold upregulation, P=0.004). For 15-lipoxygenase-1 and cyclooxygenase-2, we did not observe differential expression, but there was a trend for increased steady-state concentrations of cyclooxygenase-1 (P=0.1 for ovarian carcinoma, P=0.011 for metastases) and 5-lipoxygenase (P=0.1 for ovarian carcinoma, P=0.018 for metastases, respectively). These data indicate that expression of 15-lipoxygenase-2 mRNA is strongly augmented during ovarian carcinogenesis and that the enzyme may constitute a suitable candidate as a tumor marker.

Novel agents in ovarian cancer

The standard treatment for epithelial ovarian cancer remains surgical debulking and chemotherapy with carboplatin and paclitaxel. However, the majority of patients relapse, and few, if any, achieve a cure. Future advancement in treatment should aim at targeting the biology of the disease, specifically mechanisms critical to tumor initiation and progression. Several Phase I and II clinical trials have identified novel opportunities for therapy. The most promising venues appear to be the antiangiogenic agents and the inhibitors of intracellular signaling. Novel modalities of delivering cytotoxics to tumor cells by exploiting ovarian cancer-specific biomarkers are also being tested, and appear promising. Immunomodulatory agents are being developed for consolidation therapy. Although devoid of the common side effects associated with chemotherapy, the use of targeted agents is associated with specific toxicities, related to the biological processes they block. The main challenge for future successful clinical development will be defining molecular markers predictive of response and judicious patient selection based on the biological features of the tumor. Individualized treatment driven by molecular characteristics will open the door to a new age in anticancer medicine.

Expression of MUC1 in primary and metastatic human epithelial ovarian cancer and its therapeutic significance

BACKGROUND

MUC1 is associated with cellular transformation and tumorigenicity and is considered as an important tumor-associated antigen (TAA) for cancer therapy. The objective of this study was to evaluate the patterns of MUC1 expression in primary tumors and metastatic lesions in the advanced stages of epithelial ovarian cancers (EOCs) and correlate the expression with clinicopathological features.

METHODS

The expression of MUC1 was examined on frozen tissue sections from primary EOC (n=42), the matched metastatic lesions (n=30) and paraffin-embedded tissue sections from primary EOC (n=60), normal ovarian tissues (n=20) using immunohistochemistry (IHC) by monoclonal antibody (MAb) C595.

RESULTS

The expression of MUC1 was found in 92% (39/42) of EOC and 90% (27/30) of the matched metastatic lesions in frozen tissue sections respectively while the expression of MUC1 was found in 95% (57/60) of EOC and 5% (1/20) of normal ovarian tissues in paraffin-embedded sections respectively. Most of the tumors showed moderate to strong intensity staining while normal ovarian tissues only showed weak intensity staining. The overexpression of MUC1 was significantly associated with various progression parameters such as tumor stage, grade, residual disease status and presence of ascites (P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

MUC1 is overexpressed in above 90% of late stage of EOC and of metastatic lesions but not in normal ovarian tissues, and the high expression of MUC1 is correlated with EOC progression. MUC1 antigen may be a useful therapeutic target to prevent the development of incurable, recurrent metastatic EOC.

Origins and molecular pathology of ovarian cancer

Epithelial ovarian cancer comprises the majority of malignant ovarian tumors in adult women. These neoplasms are classified into distinct morphologic categories based on the appearance of the epithelium into tumors of serous, mucinous, endometrioid, clear cell, transitional, squamous, mixed and undifferentiated type. Current data indicate that each of these histologic subtypes is associated with distinct morphologic and molecular genetic alterations: high-grade serous and possibly endometrioid carcinomas most probably arise from surface epithelial inclusion glands with TP53 mutations and dysfunction of BRCA1 and/or BRCA2; low-grade serous carcinomas probably arise in a stepwise fashion in an adenoma-borderline tumor-carcinoma sequence from typical to micropapillary borderline tumors to low-grade invasive serous carcinoma via activation of the RAS-RAF signaling pathway secondary to mutations in KRAS and BRAF; mucinous carcinomas arise via an adenoma-borderline tumor-carcinoma sequence with mutations in KRAS; low-grade endometrioid carcinomas arise from endometriosis via mutations in CTNNB1 (the gene encoding beta-catenin) and PTEN. Although the morphologic data strongly support an origin of clear cell carcinoma from endometriosis, there is limited data on the genetic alterations in these uncommon tumors. Thus it is likely that most low-grade, relatively indolent ovarian carcinomas of serous, mucinous and endometrioid type arise from pre-existing cystadenomas or endometriosis whereas most high-grade serous carcinomas arise without an easily identifiable precursor lesion.

Biomarkers of ovarian tumours

Ovarian cancer is one of the most aggressive gynaecological malignancies and most often the high mortality is a direct result of delays in diagnosis. The development of an ovarian cancer-specific biomarker for the early detection of disease has the capacity to improve the dismal survival rate. Currently, there are multiple investigations that are utilising both genomic and proteomic technologies to identify genes, gene products and proteins that may potentially identify diagnostic ovarian cancer biomarkers. Here, we review the studies that are involved in biomarker development for the detection of ovarian cancer.