Oxaliplatin/cisplatin (L-OHP/CDDP) combination in heavily pretreated ovarian cancer

Irinotecan or Oxaliplatin: Which is the First Move for the Mate?

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the present review is to discuss the potential link between RAS, BRAF and microsatellite instability (MSI) mutational patterns and chemotherapeutic agent efficacy [Irinotecan (IRI) vs. Oxaliplatin (OXA)], and how this can potentially influence the choice of the chemotherapy backbone.

METHODS

Following a review of the research literature, all pertinent articles published in the core journals were selected for the study. The inclusion criteria regarded relevant clinical and pre-clinical studies on the topic of interest (Relationship of OXA and IRI to KRAS/BRAF mutations and MSI).

RESULTS

Excision repair cross complementation group 1 (ERCC1) expression is inhibited by KRAS mutation, making tumor cells more sensitive to OXA. Results from OPUS, COIN and PRIME trials support that no conclusive data are available for BRAF mutant population because of the small number of patients. Enhanced IRI cytotoxicity to MSI cell lines is due to the participation of some of the mismatch repair (MMR) components in various DNA repair processes and their role in the maintenance of the pro-apoptotic effect of IRI and G2/M cell arrest.

CONCLUSION

OXA and IRI are indispensable drugs for mCRC treatment and their selection must be as careful as that of targeted agents. We suggest taking into consideration the interaction between known genomic alterations and OXA and IRI activity to personalize chemotherapy in mCRC patients.

Bee Venom Acupuncture Attenuates Oxaliplatin-Induced Neuropathic Pain by Modulating Action Potential Threshold in A-Fiber Dorsal Root Ganglia Neurons

Oxaliplatin is a third-generation platinum-based chemotherapeutic drug widely used in colorectal cancer treatment. Although potent against this tumor, it can induce cold and mechanical allodynia even after a single injection. The currently used drugs to attenuate this allodynia can also cause unwanted effects, which limit their use. Bee venom acupuncture (BVA) is widely used in Korean medicine to treat pain. Although the effect of BVA on oxaliplatin-induced neuropathic pain has been addressed in many studies, its action on dorsal root ganglia (DRG) neurons has never been investigated. A single oxaliplatin injection (6 mg/kg, intraperitoneally) induced cold and mechanical allodynia, and BVA (0.1 and 1 mg/kg, subcutaneous, ST36) dose-dependently decreased allodynia in rats. On acutely dissociated lumbar 4-6 DRG neurons, 10 min application of oxaliplatin (100 μM) shifted the voltage-dependence of sodium conductance toward negative membrane potentials in A- but not C-fibers. The resting membrane potential remained unchanged, but the action potential threshold decreased significantly compared to that of the control (p < 0.05). However, 0.1 μg/mL of BVA administration increased the lowered action potential threshold. In conclusion, these results suggest that BVA may attenuate oxaliplatin-induced neuropathic pain by altering the action potential threshold in A-fiber DRG neurons.

Chemokine CCL2 and its receptor CCR2 in the dorsal root ganglion contribute to oxaliplatin-induced mechanical hypersensitivity

Activation of innate immune mechanisms within the dorsal root ganglion and spinal dorsal horn has been shown to play a key role in the development of neuropathic pain including paclitaxel-related chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN). Here, we tested whether similar mechanisms are generalizable to oxaliplatin-induced CIPN. After a single intraperitoneal injection of 3 mg/kg oxaliplatin, mechanical withdrawal threshold and the expression of C-C chemokine ligand 2 (CCL2) and its receptor, CCR2, in the dorsal root ganglion were measured by behavioral testing and immunohistochemical staining, respectively. Mechanical responsiveness increased from the first day after oxaliplatin injection and persisted until day 15, the last day of this experiment. Immunohistochemical showed that the expression of CCL2/CCR2 started to increase by 4 hours after oxaliplatin treatment, was significantly increased at day 4, and then both signals became normalized by day 15. Cotreatment with intrathecal anti-CCL2 antibodies prevented the development of oxaliplatin-induced mechanical hyperresponsiveness, and transiently reversed established hyperalgesia when given 1 week after chemotherapy. This is the first study to demonstrate CCL2/CCR2 signaling in a model of oxaliplatin-related CIPN; and it further shows that blocking of this signal can attenuate the development of oxaliplatin-induced mechanical hyperalgesia. Activation of innate immune mechanisms may therefore be a generalized basis for CIPN irrespective of the specific class of agent.

Oxaliplatin plus leucovorin and 5-fluorouracil (FOLFOX-4) as a salvage chemotherapy in heavily-pretreated platinum-resistant ovarian cancer

Background

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical impact of oxaliplatin, leucovorin, and 5-fluorouracil (FOLFOX-4) chemotherapy in terms of the response rate, progression-free/overall survival (PFS/OS) and safety profile in patients with heavily pretreated recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer.

Methods

Clinical data were reviewed in 29 patients who received FOLFOX-4 as more than third-line chemotherapy, consisting of 85 mg/m² of oxaliplatin, 200 mg/m² of leucovorin, and bolus 400 mg/m² on day 1 of 5-fluorouracil, followed by a 22-h infusion of 600 mg/m² of 5-fluorouracil for 2 consecutive days every 3 weeks. We also compared the efficacy and toxicity of FOLFOX-4 with that of topotecan, a standard treatment, given at a dosage of 1.5 mg/m² every three weeks in 26 patients.

Results

The median age of enrolled patients was 60 years (range 33 to 85). A median of 4 cycles (range 1–17) of FOLFOX-4 were administered. Complete response and partial response were observed in one (3.5%) and 5 (17.2.2%) patients, respectively, while stable disease was reported in 8 (27.6%) patients. Among all patients, grade 3–4 anemia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia were observed in 0 (0%), 5 (17.2%), and 3 (10.3%) cases, respectively. Grade 3–4 fatigue was recorded in one (3.4%) patient and diarrhea in 2 (6.9%). Median PFS and OS were 2.8 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.7–4.9] and 6.2 months (95% CI 2.4–14.6), respectively. No significant differences in terms of efficacy and toxicity were observed between patients receiving FOLFOX-4 and those treated with topotecan.

Conclusions

The FOLFOX-4 regimen would seem to obtain similar survival rates to those of standard therapy with topotecan in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. Further randomized trials are warranted to confirm our findings.

Hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy using mFOLFOX versus transarterial chemoembolization for massive unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a prospective non-randomized study

BACKGROUND

Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is recommended as the standard care for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) at Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage A-B. However, the efficacy of TACE on large (≥ 10 cm) stage A-B HCC is far from satisfactory, and it is proposed that hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) might be a better first-line treatment of this disease. Hence, we compared the safety and efficacy of HAIC with the modified FOLFOX (mFOLFOX) regimen and those of TACE in patients with massive unresectable HCC.

METHODS

A prospective, non-randomized, phase II study was conducted on patients with massive unresectable HCC. The protocol involved HAIC with the mFOLFOX regimen (oxaliplatin, 85 mg/m² intra-arterial infusion; leucovorin, 400 mg/m² intra-arterial infusion; and fluorouracil, 400 mg/m² bolus infusion and 2400 mg/m² continuous infusion) every 3 weeks and TACE with 50 mg of epirubicin, 50 mg of lobaplatin, 6 mg of mitomycin, and lipiodol and polyvinyl alcohol particles. The tumor responses, time-to-progression (TTP), and safety were assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 79 patients were recruited for this study: 38 in the HAIC group and 41 in the TACE group. The HAIC group exhibited higher partial response and disease control rates than did the TACE group (52.6% vs. 9.8%, P < 0.001; 83.8% vs. 52.5%, P = 0.004). The median TTPs for the HAIC and TACE groups were 5.87 and 3.6 months (hazard radio [HR] = 2.35, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.16-4.76, P = 0.015). More patients in the HAIC group than in the TACE group underwent resection (10 vs. 3, P = 0.033). The proportions of grade 3-4 adverse events (AE) and serious adverse events (SAE) were lower in the HAIC group than in the TACE group (grade 3-4 AEs: 13 vs. 27, P = 0.007; SAEs: 6 vs. 15, P = 0.044). More patients in the TACE group than in the HAIC group had the study treatment terminated early due to intolerable treatment-related adverse events or the withdrawal of consent (10 vs. 2, P = 0.026).

CONCLUSIONS

HAIC with mFOLFOX yielded significantly better treatment responses and less serious toxicity than did TACE. HAIC might represent a feasible and promising first-line treatment for patients with massive unresectable HCC.

New bioactive peptide reduces the toxicity of chemotherapy drugs and increases drug sensitivity

Anticancer bioactive peptide (ACBP) is extracted from normal goat spleens and exhibits antitumor activity alone and in combination with low cisplatin doses to achieve antitumor efficacy similar to higher cisplatin doses via sustained medication modes. In the present study, we investigated whether elevated levels of induced or normal ACBP in MKN‑45 gastric cancer (GC) cells may reduce their toxicity to oxaliplatin (L‑OHP) in a dose‑dependent manner. The growth inhibition rate (IR), morphological changes and gene expression were examined in MKN‑45 GC cells. Compared with normal ACBP, induced ACBP alone significantly enhanced the anticancer activity of L‑OHP‑mediated apoptosis and reduced the amount and side‑effects of L‑OHP (P<0.05). The inhibition of cancer cell growth at high concentrations of induced ACBP and L‑OHP was significantly more effective than at low concentrations. In addition, for the first time, we examined the potential of a combination of induced ACBP and L‑OHP to increase L‑OHP sensitivity in human gastric carcinoma xenograft tumors. Nude mice were implanted with human gastric carcinoma MKN‑45 cells and treated with an intraperitoneal injection of 0.5 ml of normal saline, 30 µg/ml ACBP, 20 µg/ml L‑OHP or 30 µg/ml ACBP + 20 µg/ml L‑OHP [combination of anticancer bioactive peptide and oxaliplatin (A+L)] via the tail vein twice a week. In vivo short‑term intermittent use of induced ACBP alone significantly inhibited MKN‑45 tumor growth. The combination of induced ACBP and L‑OHP also significantly improved the quality of life of the nude mice and reduced the toxicity of L‑OHP. Based on flow cytometry and gene expression analyses, A+L significantly increased the proportion of cells in the G2/M phase (P<0.05) relative to ACBP or L‑OHP alone, and short‑term intraperitoneal injection of ACBP increased the sensitizing effect of L‑OHP. Collectively, these results suggest that high levels of induced ACBP in combination with L‑OHP via a short‑term intermittent medication mode could be a useful clinical therapeutic strategy for GC.

Oxaliplatin vs. cisplatin: competition experiments on their binding to lysozyme

The model protein hen egg white lysozyme was challenged with oxaliplatin and cisplatin. ESI mass spectrometry, surface plasmon resonance and thermal shift analyses demonstrate the formation of a bis-platinum adduct, though in very small amounts. Crystals of the bis-platinum adduct were obtained using two different preparations and the X-ray structures were solved at 1.85 Å and 1.95 Å resolution. Overall, the obtained data point out that, under the analyzed conditions, the two Pt drugs have similar affinities for the protein, but bind on its surface at two non-overlapping sites. In other words, these two drugs manifest a significantly different reactivity with this model protein and do not compete for the same protein binding sites.

Multicenter phase II study of oxaliplatin and sorafenib in advanced gastric adenocarcinoma after failure of cisplatin and fluoropyrimidine treatment. A GEMCAD study

BACKGROUND

Cisplatin and fluoropyrimidine (CF) are standard first- line treatment in advanced gastric cancer, but no second-line treatment has yet been established. We present a phase II study in which we evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of the combination of Sorafenib (S), and Oxaliplatin as second-line therapy.

METHODS

Patients with progressive gastric adenocarcinoma after CF- first-line, ECOG 0-2, and measurable disease were included. The primary objective was PFS. Treatment doses were Oxaliplatin 130 mg/m²/3 weeks and Sorafenib 800 mg/bid/d.

RESULTS

We included 40 patients. CR was 2.5% and SD was 47.2%. Grade 3-4 toxic effects were neutropenia (9.8%), thrombocytopenia (7.3%), neurotoxicity (4.9%) and diarrhea (4.9%). Median PFS was 3 months (95%CI: 2.3-4.1) and median OS was 6.5 months (95% CI: 5.2-9.6). Time to progression (TTP) to first line therapy was a prognosis factor. Median OS was 9.7 months when time-to-progression during first-line chemotherapy was >6 months and 5.6 m when it was <6 months (p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Time-to-progression under a CF-based first-line therapy determines subgroups of GC patients with different prognosis. The combination of Oxaliplatin-Sorafenib in advanced GC patients previously treated with CF appears safe, but our results do not support the implementation of a phase III trial.

Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization imaging mass spectrometry of oxaliplatin derivatives in heated intraoperative chemotherapy (HIPEC)-like treated rat kidney

Oxaliplatin [1,2-diaminocyclohexane (dach)-Pt complex] is a platinum anticancer drug which is mainly used in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer, particularly in Heated Intraoperative Chemotherapy (HIPEC) for the treatment of colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis. In order to better understand the penetration of oxaliplatin in treated tissues we performed a direct imaging of tissue sections from HIPEC-like treated rat kidney using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI) mass spectrometry. This procedure allowed the detection and localization of oxaliplatin and its metabolites, the monocysteine and monomethionine complexes, in kidney sections. Specifically, oxaliplatin and its metabolites were localized exclusively in the kidney cortex, suggesting that it did not penetrate deeply into the organ. Based on these results, an imaging analysis of human tumors collected after HIPEC is currently in progress to assess the distribution of oxaliplatin and/or metabolites with the aim of defining clinical conditions to improve drug penetration.

Value of oxaliplatin treatment in heavily pretreated patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

In order to assess the efficacy and toxicity profile of oxaliplatin, a third generation platinum derivate active against several solid tumors, we carried out a study in a group of heavily pretreated patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). Between August 2003 and May 2004, 19 pretreated patients were enrolled in a phase II trial and were treated with oxaliplatin. The drug was administered intravenously on day 1 of a 21-day schedule, at a dose of 130 mg/m2 for a total of 6 cycles. One (5%) patient achieved complete remission (CR) and 5 patients (27%) had partial response (PR), thus giving an overall response rate of 32%. The patient in CR suffered from an aggressive B NHL. One of the 5 patients in PR had an aggressive B NHL, whereas the remaining 4 had an indolent B NHL. The treatment was well tolerated with minimal hematologic and extrahematologic toxicity. These data suggest and confirm the efficacy and low toxicity of oxaliplatin in the treatment of patients with heavily pretreated NHL. Further trials using oxaliplatin alone or in combination with other conventional drugs are needed.

Tolerance and activity of oxaliplatin with protracted topotecan infusion in patients with previously treated ovarian cancer. A phase I study

BACKGROUND

Topotecan 14-day infusion combined with cisplatin was highly active in ovarian cancer, but too myelosuppressive. We therefore sought to evaluate the feasibility of substituting oxaliplatin for cisplatin to improve safety.

METHODS

Ovarian and primary peritoneal cancer patients, pretreated with at least one prior platinum-containing regimen, performance status (PS) 0-1, without prior pelvic radiation were eligible. Topotecan was continuously infused days 1-15; oxaliplatin was given days 1 and 15; cycles were repeated every 28 days. Five dose levels were explored: topotecan (mg/m2/day)/oxaliplatin (mg/m2) doses: (1) 0.2/65; (2) 0.2/75; (3) 0.2/85; (4) 0.3/85; (5) 0.4/85.

RESULTS

Twenty-three patients (20 ovarian, 1 tubal, and 2 peritoneal) were entered: median age 56 years (range, 37-77); PS: 0=12 and 1=11; histology: papillary serous 7, serous 4, adenocarcinoma 8, poorly differentiated 2. Median of 4 cycles were delivered. Grade 3 neutropenia occurred in 3 of 7 patients at level 5 (with fever at levels 4 and 5), without grade 4 neutropenia or thrombocytopenia. Other toxicities were mild and reversible (mainly gastrointestinal), except one grade 3 neuropathy and one oxaliplatin-related grade 3 hypersensitivity reaction. Six objective responses (five of them complete) were documented among 22 patients spanning several dose levels.

CONCLUSION

Topotecan continuous infusion, combined with oxaliplatin, was associated with no grade 4 hematologic toxicity and evidence of activity. The recommended phase II dose is topotecan 0.4 mg/m2/day continuous infusion d1-15 with oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 on days 1 and 15. A phase II evaluation as second-line treatment for both platinum-sensitive and -resistant ovarian cancer recurrences is ongoing.

Oxaliplatin for the treatment of cisplatin-resistant cancer: A systematic review

Oxaliplatin is widely regarded as being active in cisplatin-resistant cancer. We undertook a systematic review of the literature to identify, describe and critique the clinical and pre-clinical evidence for the use of oxaliplatin in patients with "cisplatin-resistant" cancer. We identified 25 pre-clinical cell models of platinum resistance and 24 clinical trials reporting oxaliplatin based salvage therapy for cisplatin-resistant cancer. The pre-clinical data suggests that there is cross-resistance between cisplatin and oxaliplatin in low-level resistance models. In models with high level resistance (>10-fold) there is less cross-resistance between cisplatin and oxaliplatin, which may be a reason why oxaliplatin is thought to be active in cisplatin-resistant cancer. In clinical trials where oxaliplatin has been used as part of salvage therapy for patients who have failed cisplatin or carboplatin combination chemotherapy, there was a much lower response rate in patients with platinum-refractory or resistant cancers compared to platinum-sensitive cancers. This suggests that there may be cross-resistance between cisplatin and oxaliplatin in the clinic. Oxaliplatin as a single agent had a poor response rate in cisplatin refractory and resistant cancer. Oxaliplatin performed better in combination with other agents for the treatment of platinum-resistant/refractory cancer suggesting that the benefit of oxaliplatin may lie in its more favourable toxicity and ability to be combined with other drugs rather than an underlying activity in cisplatin resistance. Oxaliplatin therefore should not be considered broadly active in cisplatin-resistant cancer.

Behavioral and immunohistological assessment of painful neuropathy induced by a single oxaliplatin injection in the rat

In clinical use, a single infusion of oxaliplatin, widely used to treat metastatic colorectal cancer, induces specific sensory neurotoxicity signs triggered or aggravated by exposure to cold. To study the pathophysiology of these symptoms, we developed and characterized an animal model that reproduces the effects of a single intraperitoneal oxaliplatin administration (3, 6 and 12 mg/kg). Significant allodynia and hyperalgesia to cold stimuli were rapidly observed from 24 h to day 5 with a maximum lowering of 76% at t+30 h versus control. Other behavioral assessments revealed rapid persistent mechanical allodynia, but no thermal hyperalgesia or allodynia to heat and no hyperalgesia to mechanical stimuli. An immunohistochemical study in the superficial layers of the spinal dorsal horn revealed a marked increase in substance P immunoreactivity versus controls (12% versus 4%), whereas calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) immunoreactivity was unchanged. This new animal model for the first time closely mimics the effects observed in humans after a single oxaliplatin infusion, especially onset and highly intense sensory disturbances, hypersensitivity to cold with allodynia and hyperalgesia signs. This model may help to elucidate the mechanisms of this thermal hypersensitivity, especially the possible involvement of small-diameter A-fibers in cold allodynia symptoms. These selective effects may clue up the mechanistic basis for the acute oxaliplatin neuropathy leading to a better understanding of the clinical condition and to optimize its treatment.

A phase I study of oxaliplatin in combination with gemcitabine: correlation of clinical outcome with gene expression

PURPOSE

Oxaliplatin has in vitro activity similar to or higher than other platinum agents. Preclinically, gemcitabine has demonstrated synergy when combined with platinum compounds. These facts formed the rationale for determining the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of gemcitabine in combination with oxaliplatin.

METHODS

Eligible patients with advanced incurable solid tumors were given oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 as a 2-h infusion on day 1 followed by escalating doses of gemcitabine given over 30 min on day 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle.

RESULTS

A total of 43 patients were enrolled, including 30 patients at the MTD in an expanded cohort. At a gemcitabine dose of 800 mg/m2, 1/6 patients had a dose limiting toxicity (DLT) (grade 3 blurred vision and memory loss). At 1,000 mg/m2, 1/6 patients had a DLT (grade 3 increase in AST). At 1,200 mg/m2, 2/3 patients had a DLT (grade 4 thrombocytopenia and grade 3 confusion). The MTD of gemcitabine with 130 mg/m2 of oxaliplatin was therefore 1,000 mg/m2. The clearances of gemcitabine and ultrafilterable platinum are within the ranges previously reported for single agents. A patient with colon cancer had a partial response, and 21 patients had a best response of stable disease. In patients with tumor biopsies treated at the MTD, decreased ribonucleotide reductase M2 expression correlated with response.

CONCLUSION

Treatment with gemcitabine and oxaliplatin was well tolerated with primarily hematologic toxicity at the MTD. Study of biochemical correlates of response remain of interest thought current results remain exploratory.

Clinical application of oxaliplatin in epithelial ovarian cancer

Platinum remains the most active drug class in ovarian cancer treatment; however, new single-agent and combination therapies are needed to improve the clinical outcome of ovarian cancer therapies. Oxaliplatin, a third-generation platinum derivative, has shown effective antitumor activity and a favorable toxicity profile in epithelial ovarian cancer. Preclinical evidence of the synergistic cytotoxic effect of oxaliplatin in combination with several other chemotherapeutic agents and clinical evidence of the absence of any dose-limiting hematologic toxicity associated with this agent have made oxaliplatin an attractive compound for combination agent therapy. This article reviews the current status of the clinical application of oxaliplatin alone and in a combination regimen in epithelial ovarian cancer treatment.

The development of platinum compounds and their possible combination

Cisplatin plays a central role in cancer chemotherapy in spite of its toxicity. To circumvent this toxicity and to enhance its therapeutic index a lot of preclinical and clinical studies have been conducted and several thousand analogues have been synthesized. Much more analysis remains to be done, but nowadays, the absence of any definitive, biologically interpretable molecular predictor of activity is consistent with the idea that platinum compounds have multiple intracellular targets and that cells can have multiple mechanisms of resistance. This review analyses a part of these platinum compounds analyzed to date, their mechanism of action, resistance and the future trends in this sector.

Oxaliplatin induces drug resistance more rapidly than cisplatin in H69 small cell lung cancer cells

Cisplatin produces good responses in solid tumours including small cell lung cancer (SCLC) but this is limited by the development of resistance. Oxaliplatin is reported to show activity against some cisplatin-resistant cancers but there is little known about oxaliplatin in SCLC and there are no reports of oxaliplatin resistant SCLC cell lines. Studies of drug resistance mainly focus on the cellular resistance mechanisms rather than how the cells develop resistance. This study examines the development of cisplatin and oxaliplatin resistance in H69 human SCLC cells in response to repeated treatment with clinically relevant doses of cisplatin or oxaliplatin for either 4 days or 2 h. Treatments with 200 ng/ml cisplatin or 400 ng/ml oxaliplatin for 4 days produced sublines (H69CIS200 and H69OX400, respectively) that showed low level (approximately two-fold) resistance after eight treatments. Treatments with 1,000 ng/ml cisplatin or 2,000 ng/ml oxaliplatin for 2 h also produced sublines, however, these were not stably resistant suggesting shorter treatment pulses of drug may be more effective. Cells survived the first five treatments without any increase in resistance, by arresting their growth for a period and then regrowing. The period of growth arrest was reduced after the sixth treatment and the H69CIS200 and H69OX400 sublines showed a reduced growth arrest in response to cisplatin and oxaliplatin treatment suggesting that 'regrowth resistance' initially protected against drug treatment and this was further upregulated and became part of the resistance phenotype of these sublines. Oxaliplatin dose escalation produced more surviving sublines than cisplatin dose escalation but neither set of sublines were associated with increased resistance as determined by 5-day cytotoxicity assays, also suggesting the involvement of regrowth resistance. The resistant sublines showed no change in platinum accumulation or glutathione levels even though the H69OX400 subline was more sensitive to buthionine sulphoximine treatment. The H69CIS200 cells were cross-resistant to oxaliplatin demonstrating that oxaliplatin does not have activity against low level cisplatin resistance. Relative to the H69 cells, the H69CIS200 and H69OX400 sublines were more sensitive to paclitaxel and taxotere suggesting that the taxanes may be useful in the treatment of platinum-resistant SCLC. These novel cellular models of cisplatin and oxaliplatin resistant SCLC will be useful in developing strategies to treat platinum-resistant SCLC.

Preparation of antitumor oxaliplatin/cisplatin docking dinuclear platinum complex

A new dinuclear docking Pt(II) complex, (cis-diammine) (l-1,2-cyclohexanediamine)(mu-dichloro)-diplatinum(II) oxalate was synthesized by reacting oxaliplatin(l-OHP, [Pt(oxalato)(L-dach)]), L-dach = 1R, 2R-cyclohexanediamine), with cisplatin (CDDP). Elemental analysis of the compound indicated that it was 1:1 molar ratio complex of oxaliplatin and cisplatin. A plausible chemical structure has been proposed as Cl(-) bridged dinuclear complex, judged from its yellow coloration and NMR spectral analysis. This complex can be denoted as, i.e. [Pt(2)Cl(2)(NH(3))(2)(L-dach)](COO)(2) (L-OHP/CDDP). The complex showed higher cytotoxicity against L1210 than the parent complexes and low cross-resistance against L1210/CDDP and L1210/DACH. Its antitumor activity was also tested in vivo against murine leukemia L1210 cell lines. The complex showed much higher activity than the mixture(1:1 molar ratio) of oxaliplatin and cisplatin. The antitumor effect against L1210/CDDP was very high, showing collateral sensitivity, being similar to that of oxaliplatin, and against L1210/DACH it showed no cross-resistance.

Phase I trial of oxaliplatin in combination with cisplatin, protacted-infusion fluorouracil, and radiotherapy in advanced esophageal and gastroesophageal carcinoma

PURPOSE

To define the maximum-tolerated dose of oxaliplatin given with cisplatin, protacted 96-h infusion of fluorouracil, and radiotherapy for patients with advanced esophageal cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Seventeen patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer and 2 patients with local recurrence were treated. Escalating doses of oxaliplatin, cisplatin, and fluorouracil were administered on Days 1 and 29 of radiotherapy. Radiotherapy was delivered in 1.8 Gy daily fractions to a total dose of 50.4 Gy. Dose-limiting toxicity was defined as a Grade 4 hematologic or Grade 3-4 nonhematologic toxicity.

RESULTS

Dose-limiting toxicity caused by diarrhea and asthenia was observed at the IV level. The recommended dose was 85 mg/m- oxaliplatin, 55 mg/m2 cisplatin, and 3000 mg/m2 96-h fluorouracil infusion. Two pathologic complete responses were observed in 12 patients selected for surgery (16%).

CONCLUSIONS

Oxaliplatin, cisplatin, fluouracil, and radiotherapy can be administered together with acceptable toxicity. A Phase II trial is ongoing with resectable esophageal and gastric carcinoma.

Enantiomerically pure [1, 2-diamino-1-(4-fluorophenyl)butane]platinum(II) complexes: synthesis and antitumor activity against MCF-7 and MDA-MB 231 breast cancer and LnCaP/FGC prostate cancer cell lines

Enantiomerically pure 1, 2-diamino-1-(4-fluorophenyl)butanes were synthesized by stereoselective procedures. The enantiomeric purity was determined by (1)H NMR spectroscopy after derivatization with (1R)-myrtenal. For the coordination to platinum, the diamines were reacted with K(2)PtI(4). Reaction with Ag(2)SO(4) yielded the respective sulfatoplatinum(II) complexes, which were converted into the dichloroplatinum(II) complexes by treatment with 2 N HCl. The influence of the configuration and the kind of leaving group on the antitumor activity was studied on the MCF-7 and MDA-MB 231 breast cancer cell lines, as well as on the LnCaP/FGC prostate cancer cell line. It was demonstrated that the dichloroplatinum(II) complexes were more active than the respective diiodoplatinum(II) derivatives. Conversion into the sulfatoplatinum(II) complexes further enhanced the antiproliferative effects. The configuration determined the antitumor effects, dependent on the cell line used: MCF-7: (R, R) > (S, S) > (R, S) > (S, R); MDA-MB 231: (S, S) > (R, R) > (R, S) = (S, R); LnCaP/FGC: (S, S) > (R, R) > (R, S) > (S, R).

Oxaliplatin plus high-dose leucovorin and 5-fluorouracil (FOLFOX 4) in platinum-resistant and taxane-pretreated ovarian cancer: a phase II study

OBJECTIVE

A prospective phase II study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of oxaliplatin plus 5-fluoruracil (5-FU) and high-dose leucovorin (LV) (FOLFOX-4) in patients with platinum-resistant, taxane-pretreated recurrent ovarian cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-eight patients, with a median age of 58 years (range 33-77), were treated with oxaliplatin 85 mg m(-2) as a 2-h infusion on day 1, LV 200 mg m(-2) day(-1) as a 2-h infusion followed by bolus 5-FU 400 mg m(-2) day(-1) and a 22-h infusion of 5-FU 600 mg m(-2) day(-1) for 2 consecutive days. Treatment was repeated every 3 weeks. Patients were evaluated for response every two cycles.

RESULTS

The vast majority of patients had performance status 0 or 1 and 76.3% had > or = 2 metastatic sites. A median number of four cycles per patient (range, 1-8) were administered. Based on an intention-to-treat analysis, 3 patients (7.9%) achieved a complete response (CR) and 8 (21.1%) achieved a partial response (PR), for an overall response rate of 29%. Another 29% of patients had stable disease (SD). The median relapse-free survival was 5.2 months (range 2.5-17), the median time to tumor progression was 4.8 months (range 0.6-19), and the median overall survival was 10.1 months (range 0.2-36). Toxicity was mild to moderate. Grade 3/4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 29% and 21.1% of patients, respectively. Febrile neutropenia was encountered in 3 patients (7.9%), who were successfully treated. Grade 3/4 neurotoxicity developed in 15.8% of patients; neurotoxicity gradually declined after treatment discontinuation. Alopecia, nausea-vomiting, diarrhea, mucositis, and asthenia were not a serious problem. There were no treatment-related deaths.

CONCLUSION

The combination of oxaliplatin and 5-FU/LV (FOLFOX-4) appears to be an effective regimen with a good toxicity profile for the treatment of platinum-resistant, taxane-pretreated ovarian cancer.

Interaction of Oxaliplatin, Cisplatin, and Carboplatin with Hemoglobin and the Resulting Release of a Heme Group

Oxaliplatin, carboplatin, and cisplatin are widely used to treat a number of cancers. While their DNA adducts are believed to cause cell death, the involvement of their protein adducts in the toxicity and action of these drugs is unclear. Here, we report the interactions of hemoglobin (Hb) with the three platinum (Pt) drugs, demonstrating the formation of Hb-Pt complexes and the release of a heme group from Hb. Oxaliplatin (0.05 microM) was able to form three major complexes with Hb (3-10 microM) after 1 h of incubation at room temperature, and these complexes accounted for approximately 60% of the total oxaliplatin. Cisplatin and carboplatin formed one major and two minor complexes only after 24 and 96 h of incubation, respectively. Incubation of these Pt drugs (0.05-10 microM) with whole blood of healthy volunteers and the analysis of red blood cells confirmed the relative ability of these Pt drugs binding to Hb. For the whole blood samples incubated with oxaliplatin and cisplatin for 24 h, only protein complexes were detected in red blood cells, indicating a complete binding of oxaliplatin and cisplatin to the protein. In contrast, carboplatin was partially bound; both the free and the protein-bound carboplatin species were detected in red blood cells. The binding of the Pt drugs to Hb was accompanied by the release of a heme group from Hb, which was monitored by size fractionation, chromatographic separation, and selective detection of both Pt- and iron (Fe)-containing molecular species. The released heme was further identified by size fractionation and nanospray mass spectrometry. The findings of the Pt drug interaction with Hb and the dissociation of heme from Hb are potentially useful for a better understanding of the toxicity and side effects of these chemotherapeutic drugs.

Phase II trial of Oxaliplatin and 5-Fluorouracil/Leucovorin combination in epithelial ovarian carcinoma relapsing within 2 years of platinum-based therapy

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of Oxaliplatin and 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU)/Leucovorin (LV) combination in ovarian cancer relapsing within 2 years of prior platinum-based chemotherapy in a phase II trial.

METHODS

Eligible patients had at least one prior platinum-based chemotherapy regimen, elevated CA-125 > or = 60 IU/l, radiological evidence of disease progression and adequate hepatic, renal and bone marrow function. Patients with raised CA-125 levels alone as marker of disease relapse were not eligible. Oxaliplatin (85 mg/m(2)) was given on day 1, and 5-Fluorouracil (370 mg/m(2)) and Leucovorin (30 mg) was given on days 1 and 8 of a 14-day cycle.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven patients were enrolled. The median age was 57 years (range 42-74 years). The median platinum-free interval (PFI) was 5 months (range 0-17 months) with only 30% of patients being platinum sensitive (PFI > 6 months). Six patients (22%) had two prior regimens of chemotherapy. A total of 191 cycles were administered (median 7; range 2-12). All patients were evaluable for toxicity. The following grade 3/4 toxicities were noted: anemia 4%; neutropenia 15%; thrombocytopenia 11%; neurotoxicity 8%; lethargy 4%; diarrhea 4%; hypokalemia 11%; hypomagnesemia 11%. Among 27 enrolled patients, 20 patients were evaluable for response by WHO criteria and 25 patients were evaluable by Rustin's CA-125 criteria. The overall response rate (RR) by WHO criteria was 30% (95% CI: 15- 52) [three complete responses (CRs) and three partial responses (PRs)]. The CA-125 response rate was 56% (95% CI: 37-73). Significantly, a 25% (95% CI: 9-53) radiological and a 50% (95% CI: 28-72) CA-125 response rate were noted in platinum resistant patients (PFI < 6 months). The median response duration was 4 months (range 3-12) and the median overall survival was 10 months.

CONCLUSION

Oxaliplatin and 5-Fluorouracil/Leucovorin combination has a good safety profile and is active in platinum-pretreated advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.

Therapeutic Strategies to Improve the Efficacy of Oxaliplatin in Gastrointestinal Tumors

The pharmacological characteristics of oxaliplatin make it one of the better chemotherapeutics to be combined with novel molecular-targeted anticancer treatments for the therapy of gastrointestinal tumors. The purposes of this review article are to report the preliminary data of combined therapy of oxaliplatin with inhibitors of angiogenesis or epidermal growth factor receptor and to suggest novel oxaliplatin-based therapeutic strategies. It is hypothesized that well designed, personalized, molecular-based treatments may improve the efficacy of oxaliplatin for the treatment of colorectal, gastric and pancreatic cancer. It is mandatory to rationalize such an approach by adequate determination of predictive surrogate biomarkers of response related to the targets in each single tumor against which therapy is aimed, using standardized assays and quality control.

Phase I and pharmacological study of an oxaliplatin and carboplatin combination in advanced malignancies

BACKGROUND

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study to determine the maximal tolerated dose and the recommended dose, as well as the optimal sequence of a carboplatin/oxaliplatin combination delivered every 3 weeks.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients received either carboplatin [area under the curve (AUC)-based individually calculated dose (starting dose AUC 4 mg.min/ml), 1 h intravenous (i.v.) infusion] followed by oxaliplatin (110 mg/m(2), 2 h i.v. infusion), every 3 weeks, or the reverse sequence.

RESULTS

Sixteen patients were included and only one dose level was assessed. In group A, 10 patients received 23 cycles of carboplatin followed by oxaliplatin. In group B, 6 patients received 20 cycles with the reverse sequence. Delayed recovery from hematological toxicities was treatment-limiting, with mainly moderate thrombocytopenia and neutropenia as dose-limiting toxicities for group A (5 of 10 patients for each) and thrombocytopenia for group B (3 of 6 patients). No febrile neutropenia or grade 3/4 non-hematological toxicity occurred. Pharmacokinetic analysis showed similar mean total platinum AUCs for the two groups: 37.2 +/- 13.7 and 33.6 +/- 9.9 mg.h/l, respectively. One complete response and two partial responses (World Health Organization-International Union Against Cancer criteria, response rate 18.8%) were seen in ovarian, Fallopian and neuroendocrine carcinomas, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This platinum combination appears feasible and active at the dose of AUC 4 mg.min/ml for carboplatin (Chatelut formula) and oxaliplatin 110 mg/m(2); however, it does not allow a significant increase in platinum dose-intensity delivery.

Phase II study of oxaliplatin in platinum-resistant and refractory ovarian cancer: a gynecologic group study

PURPOSE

A phase II study was conducted to determine the efficacy of oxaliplatin therapy in patients with platinum-resistant or refractory epithelial ovarian carcinoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eligible patients were to receive oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 intravenously over 2 hours, every 21 days, until progression of disease or adverse effects prohibited further therapy.

RESULTS

Of 25 patients entered onto the study, 23 were eligible and assessable. There were no patients with complete response. One patient (4.3%) achieved a partial response, with a response duration of 6.4 months. Nine patients (39.1%) experienced stable disease, with a median duration of 5.6+ months (range, 1.8 to 13.1 months). The most frequently reported drug-related toxicities were hematologic, gastrointestinal, and neurologic.

CONCLUSION

Oxaliplatin as a single agent has minimal activity in patients with platinum-resistant or refractory ovarian cancer at the dosage and schedule tested. However, future studies of oxaliplatin combined with other active agents in women with platinum-naïve or platinum-sensitive epithelial ovarian carcinoma may be indicated.

Gemcitabine and its combinations in the treatment of malignant lymphoma

Although combination chemotherapy can induce complete remission in a large proportion of patients with Hodgkin's disease (HD) and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL), 30%-50% of patients will relapse. Gemcitabine has shown promising activity in heavily pretreated patients with HD and NHL even in those who have progressed after autologous stem cell transplantation. Its favorable toxicity profile allows development of combination regimens with other cytotoxic drugs and anti-CD20-targeted therapy, although hematologic toxicities appear to be greater than when gemcitabine is used as a single agent. Prolonged infusion of gemcitabine at a pharmacologically guided dose rate of 10 mg/m2/minute has demonstrated a pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic advantage although clinical efficacy of prolonged infusion needs to be established. Thus far, gemcitabine has been mainly tested in relapsed or refractory patients, and its inclusion in front-line therapy may bring about greater benefit. However, as gemcitabine has not been evaluated in randomized studies either alone or in combination with other chemotherapy drugs, its exact role in the treatment paradigm of lymphoma remains to be determined.

Multicentre phase II study of oxaliplatin as a single-agent in cisplatin/carboplatin +/- taxane-pretreated ovarian cancer patients

BACKGROUND

This multicentre phase II open-label study evaluated safety and antitumour activity of oxaliplatin in cisplatin or carboplatin (cis/carboplatin) +/- taxane-pretreated advanced ovarian cancer (AOC) patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty-eight patients received oxaliplatin 130 mg/M2 intravenously every 3 weeks, 94% having a performance status (PS) 0-1. All were pretreated with cis/carboplatin and 21 (44%) with paclitaxel. The median number of involved organs was two, 18 (38%) had liver metastasis, 23 (48%) were platinum-resistant and 14 (29%) were taxane-resistant. Forty-two patients were evaluable for a response, 18 (43%) were platinum-resistant and 11 (26%) were taxane-resistant.

RESULTS

A total of 253 cycles was administered (median: 5.5/patient). Median cumulative oxaliplatin dose was 666 mg/m2. National Cancer Institute-Common Toxicity Criteria toxicity analysis showed that seven patients (15%) had grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia, two patients (4%) had grade 3 neutropenia, and one patient had grade 3 anaemia. Eleven patients (23%) experienced grade 3 neurosensory toxicity. Of the 29 patients with peripheral neuropathy at the end of treatment, 55% had recovered or improved 1 month later. Eleven objective responses (two complete) were obtained in the 42 evaluable patients [ORR 26%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 14% to 42%], with 10/24 (42%, 95% CI 22% to 63%) in platinum-sensitive, and 1 of 18 (5.6%, 95% CI 0% to 27%) in platinum-resistant patients. Median response duration was 9.2 months (95% CI 6.6% to 11.8%), and median progression-free and overall survival in all treated patients were 4.3 months (95% CI 3.0% to 5.7%) and 15.0 months (95% CI 11.1% to 18.8%), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Oxaliplatin has a good safety profile and is active in cis/carboplatin +/- paclitaxel-pretreated AOC patients.

Effective palliative radiation therapy in advanced and recurrent ovarian carcinoma

PURPOSE

To retrospectively review our experience using radiation therapy as a palliative treatment in ovarian carcinoma.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Eighty patients who received radiation therapy for ovarian carcinoma between 1983 and 1998 were reviewed. The indications for radiation therapy, radiation therapy techniques, details, tolerance, and response were recorded. A complete response required complete resolution of the patient's symptoms, radiographic findings, palpable mass, or CA-125 level. A partial response required at least 50% resolution of these parameters. The actuarial survival rates from initial diagnosis and from the completion of radiation therapy were calculated.

RESULTS

The median age of the patients was 67 years (range 26 to 90 years). A median of one laparotomy was performed before irradiation. Zero to 20 cycles of a platinum-based chemotherapy regimen were delivered before irradiation (median = 6 cycles). The reasons for palliative treatment were: pain (n = 22), mass (n = 23), obstruction of ureter, rectum, esophagus, or stomach (n = 12), a positive second-look laparotomy (n = 9), ascites (n = 8), vaginal bleeding (n = 6), rectal bleeding (n = 1), lymphedema (n = 3), skin involvement (n = 1), or brain metastases with symptoms (n = 11). Some patients received treatment for more than one indication. Treatment was directed to the abdomen or pelvis in 64 patients, to the brain in 11, and to other sites in 5. The overall response rate was 73%. Twenty-eight percent of the patients experienced a complete response of their symptoms, palpable mass, and/or CA-125 level. Forty-five percent had a partial response. Only 11% suffered progressive disease during therapy that required discontinuation of the treatment. Sixteen percent had stable disease. The duration of the responses and stable disease lasted until death except in 10 patients who experienced recurrence of their symptoms between 1 and 21 months (median = 9 months). The 1-, 2-, 3-, and 5-year actuarial survival rates from diagnosis were 89%, 73%, 42%, and 33%, respectively. The survival rates calculated from the completion of radiotherapy were 39%, 27%, 13%, and 10%, respectively. Five percent of patients experienced Grade 3 diarrhea, vomiting, myelosuppression, or fatigue. Fourteen percent of patients experienced Grade 1 or 2 diarrhea, 19% experienced Grade 1 or 2 nausea and vomiting, and 11% had Grade 1 or 2 myelosuppression.

CONCLUSIONS

In this series of radiation therapy for advanced ovarian carcinoma, the response, survival, and tolerance rates compare favorably to those reported for current second- and third-line chemotherapy regimens. Cooperative groups should consider evaluating prospectively the use of radiation therapy before nonplatinum and/or nonpaclitaxel chemotherapy in these patients.

An oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy in patients with relapsed or refractory intermediate and high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

This study was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of substituting cisplatin with oxaliplatin in the DHAP (dexamethasone, cytarabine and cisplatin) regimen for patients with relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Twenty-four evaluable patients with intermediate or high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma were treated at 3-weekly intervals with oxaliplatin (130 mg/m2, d 1), cytarabine (2 g/m2 for two doses, d 2) and dexamethasone (40 mg, d 1-4). The median age of the patients was 58 (range 18-70). Histological subtypes were diffuse large B cell, 20; mantle cell, two; anaplastic large cell, one; and peripheral T cell, one. The overall objective response rate (RR) was 50% [95% confidence interval (CI) = 29-71%] including four complete responses and eight partial responses. RR for those patients treated at first relapse was higher than those treated at second and subsequent relapse (77% versus 29%). Grade 3 and 4 toxicity was mainly haematological: anaemia 17%, neutropenia 75% and thrombocytopenia 75%. No grade 4 non-haematological toxicity was reported. No significant renal and neurotoxicity was demonstrated. Median survival was 10.6 months. Probabilities of 1-year progression-free survival and overall survival were 47% (95% CI = 26-66%) and 50% (95% CI = 23-72%) respectively. In conclusion, dexamethasone, cytarabine and oxaliplatin (DHAX) is a novel combination in salvage therapy for relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. It has clinically significant activity with an acceptable toxicity profile. Lack of renal toxicity makes DHAX an attractive cytoreductive regimen before high-dose chemotherapy.

The integration of paclitaxel and new platinum compounds in the treatment of advanced ovarian cancer

There has been a steady improvement in the survival of patients with advanced ovarian cancer. This has been the result of a more skilled surgical approach to these patients and the development of more effective chemotherapy with a better integration of both modalities in first-line treatment. The current optimal chemotherapeutic approach consists of a platinum compound together with paclitaxel. This recommendation is based upon level I evidence of two large randomized trials which established that the combination of paclitaxel-cisplatin was superior to cyclophosphamide-cisplatin. The long-term follow-up of one of these studies continues to show a significant difference in survival at 5 years. Neurotoxicity has been problematic with these regimens, in particular when paclitaxel was given with the higher dosed shorter infusion schedule, as was done in the European-Canadian Intergroup study. Several approaches to reduce this toxicity have been studied. Among these are the use of different paclitaxel infusion schedules, and the application of less neurotoxic platinum compounds. Weekly paclitaxel has a different toxicity profile than the higher dosed three-weekly schedules, with less neutropenia, alopecia, arthralgia and neurotoxicity. Four platinum compounds are currently marketed: cisplatin, carboplatin, oxaliplatin, and nedaplatin. Of these only cisplatin, carboplatin, and nedaplatin have been approved for the treatment of patients with ovarian cancer (nedaplatin only in Japan). The equivalence of carboplatin and cisplatin has been suggested from trials without a taxoid. Three randomized studies of paclitaxel-carboplatin vs. paclitaxel-cisplatin concluded that paclitaxel-carboplatin is the preferred regimen in terms of (less) toxicity and, where studied, in terms of quality of life. So far, no difference in response rates or progression-free survival has been shown. More mature data on overall survival are awaited. Oxaliplatin (a diaminocyclohexane platinum compound) is of interest because it is only partially cross-resistant with cis- or carboplatin and devoid of severe bone marrow suppression, nephrotoxicity, or ototoxicity. Its dose-limiting toxicity is an unusual form of sensory neuropathy, which is cumulative and, contrary to cisplatin's neurotoxicity, generally reversible. Combinations with other active standard agents, as well as platinum compounds and/or taxoids, are feasible and have shown interesting activity. Similar to carboplatin and oxaliplatin, nedaplatin (cis-diammineglycolatoplatinum) can be given without hydration; its dose-limiting toxicity is myelosuppression, in particular thrombocytopenia. Although activity has been shown, no data from randomized comparative trials are available to allow a judgement on its potential advantages.

Recent advances in the treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer

Ovarian cancer leads to more fatalities than any other form of gynaecological cancer in North America and Europe. Over the last 30 years survival figures have improved somewhat due to improvements in diagnosis, surgery and chemotherapy. Despite these advances, the majority of patients will die from their disease, with the overall 5-year survival being just 30%. The majority of patients with this disease will require treatment with cytotoxic chemotherapy. It is now well established that the platinum agents (cisplatin or carboplatin) are the most important drugs to be included in first-line regimens. More recently, randomised trials have confirmed the benefit of the addition of taxanes to platinum-containing regimens and the standard of care has become the combination of carboplatin and paclitaxel. Several unanswered questions remain regarding the optimal schedule, the optimum duration of treatment, possible benefits to be gained from the addition of other drugs and whether paclitaxel the best taxane. Despite high response rates to first line chemotherapy, the majority of patients with advanced ovarian cancer will relapse and will be candidates for further chemotherapy, which can palliate symptoms and improve survival even in recurrent disease. For a patient relapsing within six months of first-line treatment, studies have shown that there is little point in rechallenge with the same drugs. However, for patients who have a longer treatment-free interval the response rates to rechallenge with platinum is significant. A number of drugs have been shown to have activity in platinum- and taxane-refractory disease and are approved for this and/or other applications. These include topotecan, etoposide, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, epirubicin, gemcitabine, altretamine, oxaliplatin and vinorelbine. Anti-oestrogens such as tamoxifen have a small but significant response rate. Recurrent ovarian cancer is a good setting to test investigational agents and compounds with promising activity including new platinums and taxoids, as well as a range of new compounds. Non-cytotoxic approaches that are showing promise include therapies designed to overcome drug resistance, signal transduction inhibitors, immunotherapy and gene therapy.

Current and future potential roles of the platinum drugs in the treatment of ovarian cancer

The discovery of cisplatin more than two decades ago was the most important therapeutic advance in the treatment of ovarian cancer. Today, cisplatin or carboplatin in combination with paclitaxel is the most commonly used first-line treatment for patients with advanced ovarian cancer. Although platinum drugs remain a critical component of chemotherapy in this type of cancer, cumulative toxicities can limit their use. These toxicities include nephrotoxicity, neurotoxicity and ototoxicity with cisplatin and myelosuppression with carboplatin. Although these adverse events can often be managed, the interventions themselves can complicate and add to the costs of treatment. Importantly, acquired resistance to traditional platinum drugs often develops in patients with ovarian cancer and can limit the usefulness of these drugs. Research into new platinum drugs has focused on identifying compounds with improved tolerability profiles and, importantly, those which can circumvent mechanisms of platinum resistance. New platinum drugs currently under development that are showing promise in ovarian cancer include oxaliplatin, nedaplatin, satraplatin, BBR3464 and ZD0473. If the encouraging in vitro activity shown by new compounds, such as ZD0473 and BBR3464, translates into efficacy in the clinic, they may offer an extended spectrum of activity which includes patients with ovarian cancer resistant to the classical platinum drugs.

Treatment of platinum-resistant ovarian cancer

In the United States, almost 70% of the 23,000 women diagnosed annually with epithelial ovarian cancer present with advanced disease (FIGO stages III-IV). Primary therapy for these patients includes surgical cytoreduction and 6-8 courses of platinum- and taxane-based chemotherapy. Although 90% of patients will respond to this multi-modality combination regimen, most patients will experience recurrences. The 5 year survival for women with stage III disease is 15-30% and 0-20% for those with stage IV disease. Medical and gynecological oncologists, therefore, must be prepared to treat many women with recurrent ovarian cancer.

Phase I clinical trial of weekly combined topotecan and irinotecan

Combining antineoplastic analogues may increase efficacy by increasing the serum and intracellular concentration of the cytotoxic moiety shared by the analogues. Topotecan and irinotecan are two camptothecan analogues that are active in different human tumors (topotecan in ovary; irinotecan in colon) and in different experimental tumor systems. These data suggest that different mechanisms of drug resistance may be operative for the two agents, and if incomplete cross-resistance exists between analogues, concomitant administration may be advantageous. The objectives of this phase I study were 1) to determine in a phase trial design whether topotecan and irinotecan administered concomitantly on a weekly schedule can be delivered at the same dose intensity as that of single-agent topotecan or irinotecan delivery; and 2) to determine whether hematologic and/or nonhematologic toxicity is increased with topotecan and irinotecan administered together as a prelude to a possible phase II trial in responsive tumor categories. Irinotecan was administered for 30 to 45 minutes weekly x 4 at four dose levels: 50, 75, 100, and 125 mg/m(2)/wk. Topotecan was administered for 30 minutes (after irinotecan administration) at two dose levels within each of the irinotecan dose levels (1.0 and 1.5 mg/m(2)). Concomitant single-dose granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) was used for leukocyte counts between 1,000 cells/mm(3) and 3,500 cells/mm(3) to maintain schedule. Maximum tolerated dosage (MTD) for the topotecan and irinotecan combination was defined as that which permitted 4 weeks of topotecan and irinotecan administration with G-CSF at or near the dose intensity reported for each single agent. Twenty-one patients received 32 4-week cycles. Dose-limiting toxicity was hematologic with grade IV leukopenia and neutropenia occurring at all dose levels. There was no apparent increase in the diarrhea syndrome associated with irinotecan. The MTD for irinotecan (at 125 mg/m(2)/wk) is the same MTD as with single-agent irinotecan use. The MTD for concomitant topotecan (1.5 mg/m(2)/wk) is 60% of the single-agent topotecan dose for the 5-day topotecan schedule (at 2.5 mg/m(2)/wk) but only 30% of the single-agent topotecan dose for the weekly schedule (5 mg/m(2)/wk). The topoisomerase I inhibitor dose is increased minimally when the analogues are administered concomitantly on a weekly schedule. Comparative trials of single-agent topotecan and irinotecan versus the combination of topotecan and irinotecan would be necessary to provide the proof of principle that combining analogues can increase therapeutic effectiveness.

Pilot study of the paclitaxel, oxaliplatin, and cisplatin combination in patients with advanced/recurrent ovarian cancer

To determine the feasibility of the paclitaxel, oxaliplatin, cisplatin combination in advanced ovarian cancer (AOC), 15 patients with AOC (8 chemonaive, and 7 second-line, disease-free interval > or = 12 months) received paclitaxel 135 mg/m2 at day 1, with oxaliplatin 100 mg/m2 and cisplatin 75 mg/m2 at day 2, every 3 weeks for 6 cycles. Pretreated patients received prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (5 microg/kg/d, days 6-13). Seventy cycles were administered; median 5 (range: 2-6 cycles) in chemonaive, and 4 (range: 2-6) in pretreated patients. There were grades III to IV neutropenia in 77%, febrile neutropenia in 24%, and grades III to IV thrombocytopenia in 4% of the cycles. Besides neutropenia, cumulative neurosensory toxicity was also limiting although reversible, with National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria grades II to III observed in 13 patients. Three of the pretreated patients had complete responses (43%), three had partial responses, and one had disease stabilization. Six of the 8 chemonaive patients had complete responses (75%), 1 had disease stabilization, and 1 had disease progression. The median follow-up is 17 months (range: 9-20 months) in chemonaive and 41 months (range: 13-58 months) in pretreated patients, and time to progression has been consistently more than 12 months, with 6 patients (5 chemonaive) still progression free (range: 15+ to 22+ months). This active combination shows acceptable hematologic toxicity, and reversible cumulative neurosensory toxicity. Further clinical exploration of the present combination appears warranted.

Oxaliplatin. A review of its pharmacological properties and clinical efficacy in metastatic colorectal cancer and its potential in other malignancies

Oxaliplatin is a platinum compound that inhibits DNA synthesis, primarily by causing intrastrand cross-links in DNA. Oxaliplatin has a broad spectrum of antineoplastic activity and has demonstrated a lack of cross-resistance with other platinum compounds. In patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, intravenous oxaliplatin has been trialled as a monotherapy and in combination with other agents. The highest response rates were achieved when oxaliplatin was used in combination with fluorouracil/folinic acid (leucovorin; calcium folinate), typically > or = 50% in the first-line setting and 13 to 45% as a second-line therapy. First-line triple therapy with oxaliplatin and fuorouracil/folinic acid achieved significantly higher response rates and longer median progression-free survival than fluorouracil/folinic acid therapy alone. However, no significant difference in the median duration of overall survival was found. This may be a consequence of the subsequent use of oxaliplatin and/or surgery after disease progression in patients who relapsed after fluorouracil/folinic acid therapy alone. Neoadjuvant therapy with oxaliplatin/fluorouracil/folinic acid has proven beneficial in enabling surgical removal of previously unresectable liver metastases. In 2 studies, surgery with curative intent was performed in 16 and 51% of patients with initially unresectable liver metastases following oxaliplatin/fluorouracil/folinic acid therapy; the 5-year survival rates were 40 and 50%, respectively. In patients with advanced ovarian cancer, first-line therapy with oxaliplatin/cyclophosphamide achieved an objective response rate which did not differ significantly from that of cisplatin/cyclophosphamide (33 vs 42%). In addition, oxaliplatin has shown efficacy in patients with platinum-pretreated ovarian cancer and achieved objective response rates similar to paclitaxel in this setting (16 vs 17%). Promising results have also been found with oxaliplatin in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, breast cancer, mesothelioma and non-small cell lung cancer. Reversible, cumulative, peripheral sensory neuropathy is the principle dose-limiting factor of oxaliplatin therapy. Haematological and gastrointestinal toxicities occur frequently but are generally mild to moderate in intensity.

CONCLUSION

Oxaliplatin in combination with fluorouracil/folinic acid is an effective treatment option for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, both as a first-line therapy and in patients refractory to previous chemotherapy. Although preliminary results failed to show any overall survival advantage of this regimen over fluorouracil/folinic acid alone, this may be a consequence of trial design and requires further examination. Additional clinical investigation of oxaliplatin in patients with other cancers is warranted given the promising results achieved in early trials, most notably in patients with platinum-pretreated ovarian cancer.

High-dose platinum versus standard dose in advanced ovarian carcinoma: a randomized trial from the Gynecologic Cooperative Group of the French Comprehensive Cancer Centers (FNCLCC)

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of platinum dose intensity on pathological response rate and overall survival in patients with advanced ovarian adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

Between February 1992 and December 1996, 195 previously untreated patients with FIGO stage IIb-c, IIIb-c, or IV with macroscopic residual disease after suboptimal debulking surgery were randomized to receive CCC (100 mg/m(2) of cisplatin, 300 mg/m(2) of cyclophosphamide, 300 mg/m(2) of carboplatin, n = 96) or CC (100 mg/m(2) of cisplatin, 600 mg/m(2) of cyclophosphamide, n = 99) for six courses at 28-day intervals. A second-look laparotomy was planned at the end of chemotherapy.

RESULTS

In the CCC arm, the platinum compound received dose intensity and relative total dose were 85 and 76%; in the CC arm, they were 94 and 85%. Grade 3-4 toxicity was more frequent in the CCC arm than in the CC arm for leukopenia (56% vs 26%, P < 0.001), febrile neutropenia (18% vs 4%, P = 0.002), anemia (31% vs 5%, P < 0.001), thrombopenia (55% vs 4%, P < 0.001), and ototoxicity (8% vs 0%, P < 0.001). The pathologic complete response rate was 22 and 14% in the CCC and CC arms, respectively (P = 0.19). With a median follow-up of 53 months, the median time to failure and the 3-year treatment failure-free survival rate were 17.4 months and 22% vs 13 months and 11% in the two arms, respectively (P = 0.01). The median survival time and the 3-year overall survival rate were, respectively, 30 months and 42% vs 25 months and 33% (P < 0.20).

CONCLUSION

The platinum dose intensification (1.6-fold increase) obtained with the CCC association improves the treatment failure-free survival without significant impact on overall survival when compared with the CC regimen in suboptimal debulked ovarian adenocarcinoma. However, because of its high rate of hematologic toxicity and ototoxicity, this association cannot be recommended for routine practice.

Oxaliplatin clinical activity: a review

Oxaliplatin (Eloxatin), a recently developed third-generation cisplatin analogue with a 1,2-diaminocyclohexane (DACH) carrier ligand, has displayed preclinical and clinical activity in a wide variety of tumour types. Synergistic with 5-FU in colorectal cancer (CRC), the combination has proven efficacy in 5-FU-resistant advanced disease and in previously untreated CRC, as demonstrated in controlled phase III trials, while evaluation in the adjuvant setting is ongoing. Due to its excellent safety profile, its unique mechanism of action and lack of cross-resistance with other active agents in CRC, oxaliplatin has also been combined with CPT-11 and Raltitrexed with promising results. Trials in pretreated and untreated advanced ovarian cancer (AOC), as a single agent or in combination with cisplatin, cyclophosphamide or paclitaxel, indicate a yet to be defined role in AOC and confirm its lack of cross-resistance with cis/carboplatin. Clinical investigations of single agent and combination therapies in breast, lung, prostate and germ-cell carcinomas, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and malignant mesothelioma are being pursued. While the role of oxaliplatin in medical oncology is yet to be fully defined, it appears to be an important new anticancer agent.

Oxaliplatin or paclitaxel in patients with platinum-pretreated advanced ovarian cancer: A randomized phase II study of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Gynecology Group

PURPOSE

This was a multicentric, open, randomized, phase II study of single-agent paclitaxel and oxaliplatin to evaluate the efficacy of oxaliplatin in a relapsing progressive ovarian cancer patient population and to analyze the safety profile and impact of both agents on quality of life, time to progression, and survival.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eighty-six patients with platinum-pretreated advanced ovarian cancer were randomly assigned to two arms: 41 received paclitaxel at 175 mg/m(2) over 3 hours every 3 weeks, and 45 received oxaliplatin at 130 mg/m(2) over 2 hours every 3 weeks. For inclusion, patients had to have a performance status of 0 to 2 and to have received at least one and no more than two prior cisplatin- and/or carboplatin-containing chemotherapy regimens within the last 12 months.

RESULTS

Seven confirmed responses were observed in each arm, for an overall response rate in the total treated population of 17% (95% confidence interval [CI], 7% to 32%) in the paclitaxel arm and 16% (95% CI, 7% to 29%) in the oxaliplatin arm. Median time to progression was 14 weeks and 12 weeks, and overall survival was 37 weeks and 42 weeks in the paclitaxel and oxaliplatin arms, respectively. Among 63 patients with a 0- to 6-month progression-free, platinum-free interval, there were five objective responses with paclitaxel in 31 patients and two objective responses with oxaliplatin in 32 patients. Nine patients (22%) in the paclitaxel arm had grade 3 or 4 neutropenia (National Cancer Institute of Canada [NCIC] Common Toxicity Criteria). Two patients (4%) experienced grade 3 thrombocytopenia in the oxaliplatin arm. Maximum grade (grade 3) NCIC neurosensory toxicity was experienced by three patients (7%) in the paclitaxel arm and by four patients (9%) in the oxaliplatin arm.

CONCLUSION

Single-agent oxaliplatin at 130 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks is active with moderate toxicity in patients with cisplatin-/carboplatin-pretreated advanced ovarian cancer.

Oxaliplatin and paclitaxel combination in patients with platinum-pretreated ovarian carcinoma: an investigator-originated compassionate-use experience

PURPOSE

Compassionate-use oxaliplatin paclitaxel was assessed for toxicity and efficacy according to clinical platinum resistance status in cisplatin-carboplatin-pretreated advanced ovarian cancer patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-seven patients, retrospectively grouped into four oxaliplatin-paclitaxel dose levels (mg/m2): (DL1: 100/135; DL2: 130-135/135; DL3: 100/160-175; DL4: 130-135/160-175), received oxaliplatin and paclitaxel every three to four weeks.

RESULTS

Thirty-one of thirty-seven treated patients were evaluable for activity, with 1 complete and 14 partial responses, (objective response rate: 48%, 95% CI: 31-66). Of 18 platinum-resistant patients 6 responded, and of 13 platinum-sensitive patients, 9 responded. One patient (3%) had two febrile neutropenia episodes, and eight (22%) and eleven patients (30%) had grades 3 and 4 neutropenia, respectively. Six patients (16%) experienced grade 3 peripheral neuropathy. The median response duration was 10.8 months, with a 23-month (range 8-54) median follow-up. Median progression-free and overall survivals were 9 months (95% CI: 7-12), and 25.2 months (95% CI: 12-39), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The antitumour activity of oxaliplatin-paclitaxel in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer patients accords with experimental data on the agents' lack of cross-resistance. Time-related progression parameters confirm it as a promising salvage treatment option.