Clinical and genetic characteristics of a five-generation family with a novel form of myotonic dystrophy (DM2)

Effectiveness and safety of mexiletine versus placebo in patients with myotonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The rare nature of dystrophic and non-dystrophic myotonia has limited the available evidence on the efficacy of mexiletine as a potential treatment. To address this gap, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of mexiletine for both dystrophic and non-dystrophic myotonic patients.

METHODS

The search was conducted on various electronic databases up to March 2023, for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing mexiletine versus placebo in myotonic patients. A risk of bias assessment was carried out, and relevant data was extracted manually into an online sheet. RevMan software (version 5.4) was employed for analysis.

RESULTS

A total of five studies, comprising 186 patients, were included in the meta-analysis. Our findings showed that mexiletine was significantly more effective than placebo in improving stiffness score (SMD =  - 1.19, 95% CI [- 1.53, - 0.85]), as well as in reducing hand grip myotonia (MD =  - 1.36 s, 95% CI [- 1.83, - 0.89]). Mexiletine also significantly improved SF-36 Physical and Mental Component Score in patients with non-dystrophic myotonia only. Regarding safety, mexiletine did not significantly alter ECG parameters but was associated with greater gastrointestinal symptoms (GIT) compared to placebo (RR 3.7, 95% CI [1.79, 7.64]). Other adverse events showed no significant differences.

CONCLUSION

The results support that mexiletine is effective and safe in myotonic patients; however, it is associated with a higher risk of GIT symptoms. Due to the scarcity of published RCTs and the prevalence of GIT symptoms, we recommend further well-designed RCTs testing various drug combinations to reduce GIT symptoms.

Transcriptome Analysis in a Primary Human Muscle Cell Differentiation Model for Myotonic Dystrophy Type 1

Myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) is caused by CTG-repeat expansions leading to a complex pathology with a multisystemic phenotype that primarily affects the muscles and brain. Despite a multitude of information, especially on the alternative splicing of several genes involved in the pathology, information about additional factors contributing to the disease development is still lacking. We performed RNAseq and gene expression analyses on proliferating primary human myoblasts and differentiated myotubes. GO-term analysis indicates that in myoblasts and myotubes, different molecular pathologies are involved in the development of the muscular phenotype. Gene set enrichment for splicing reveals the likelihood of whole, differentiation stage specific, splicing complexes that are misregulated in DM1. These data add complexity to the alternative splicing phenotype and we predict that it will be of high importance for therapeutic interventions to target not only mature muscle, but also satellite cells.

Cerebral involvement and related aspects in myotonic dystrophy type 2

Myotonic dystrophy type 2 (DM2) is an autosomal dominant multisystemic disorder caused by CCTG repeats expansion in the first intron of the CNBP gene. In this review we focus on the brain involvement in DM2, including its pathogenic mechanisms, microstructural, macrostructural and functional brain changes, as well as the effects of all these impairments on patients' everyday life. We also try to understand how brain abnormalities in DM2 should be adequately measured and potentially treated. The most important pathogenetic mechanisms in DM2 are RNA gain-of-function and repeat-associated non-ATG (RAN) translation. One of the main neuroimaging findings in DM2 is the presence of diffuse periventricular white matter hyperintensity lesions (WMHLs). Brain atrophy has been described in DM2 patients, but it is not clear if it is mostly caused by a decrease of the white or gray matter volume. The most commonly reported specific cognitive symptoms in DM2 are dysexecutive syndrome, visuospatial and memory impairments. Fatigue, sleep-related disorders and pain are also frequent in DM2. The majority of key symptoms and signs in DM2 has a great influence on patients' daily lives, their psychological status, economic situation and quality of life.

Myotonic Muscular Dystrophy Type 2 in CT, USA: A Single-Center Experience With 50 Patients

ABSTRACT

Myotonic dystrophy type 2 (DM2) is an autosomal dominant disorder due to a (CCTG)n repeat expansion in intron 1 of the CNBP gene. In this article, we report the clinicopathologic findings in 50 patients seen at a single site over a 27 year period. DM2 was the fifth most common type of muscular dystrophy seen at our center with a 5-fold lower frequency as compared to DM1. Age of symptom onset ranged from 15 to 72 years, and the mean duration between symptom onset and diagnosis was 7.4 years. Weakness referable to the proximal lower extremities was the presenting symptom in 62% of patients. The degree of generalized weakness varied from severe in 30% to no weakness in 20% of patients. Clinical myotonia was noted in 18% and myotonic discharges on electromyography in 97% of patients. Pain symptoms were uncommon in our cohort. A significant correlation was noted between limb weakness and degree of muscle pathologic changes. There was no correlation between CCTG repeat size and other clinicopathologic findings. Six patients (12%) had cardiac abnormalities including one who developed progressive nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy ultimately leading to cardiac transplantation. In 21 patients followed for 2 or more years, we noted a mean rate of decline in total Medical Research Council score of about 1% per year.

Myotonic dystrophy type 2: the 2020 update

The myotonic dystrophies are the commonest cause of adult-onset muscular dystrophy. Phenotypes of DM1 and DM2 are similar, but there are some important differences, including the presence or absence of congenital form, muscles primarily affected (distal vs proximal), involved muscle fiber types (type 1 vs type 2 fibers), and some associated multisystemic phenotypes. There is currently no cure for the myotonic dystrophies but effective management significantly reduces the morbidity and mortality of patients. For the enormous understanding of the molecular pathogenesis of myotonic dystrophy type 1 and myotonic dystrophy type 2, these diseases are now called "spliceopathies" and are mediated by a primary disorder of RNA rather than proteins. Despite clinical and genetic similarities, myotonic dystrophy type 1 and type 2 are distinct disorders requiring different diagnostic and management strategies. Gene therapy for myotonic dystrophy type 1 and myotonic dystrophy type 2 appears to be very close and the near future is an exciting time for clinicians and patients.

Myopathies with finger flexor weakness: Not only inclusion-body myositis

Muscle disorders are characterized by differential involvement of various muscle groups. Among these, weakness predominantly affecting finger flexors is an uncommon pattern, most frequently found in sporadic inclusion-body myositis. This finding is particularly significant when the full range of histopathological findings of inclusion-body myositis is not found on muscle biopsy. Prominent finger flexor weakness, however, is also observed in other myopathies. It occurs commonly in myotonic dystrophy types 1 and 2. In addition, individual reports and small case series have documented finger flexor weakness in sarcoid and amyloid myopathy, and in inherited myopathies caused by ACTA1, CRYAB, DMD, DYSF, FLNC, GAA, GNE, HNRNPDL, LAMA2, MYH7, and VCP mutations. Therefore, the finding of finger flexor weakness requires consideration of clinical, myopathological, genetic, electrodiagnostic, and sometimes muscle imaging findings to establish a diagnosis.

The myotonic dystrophy experience: a North American cross-sectional study

Introduction: Myotonic dystrophy (DM) is a chronic, multisystemic, neurological condition. Patients and caregivers are uniquely suited to identify what symptoms are most important and highlight the unmet needs that are most relevant to DM. Methods: We conducted a North American, cross‐sectional study of people with DM type‐1, congenital DM, and DM type‐2 and their family members. We sent patients and caregivers separate surveys to identify and quantitate the issues of greatest importance, examine the differences between groups, and identify the most important challenges experienced by this population. Results: 1,180 people with DM and 402 family members/caregivers responded to the surveys. They reported considerable physical and cognitive symptoms, extensive diagnostic delays, and varying clinical phenotypes on the basis of DM type. Discussion: Marked disease burden and numerous unmet needs exist in DM. These needs vary based on DM type and highlight the complex clinical phenotypes of these neurological disorders. Muscle Nerve 59:457–464, 2019

A Patient with Proximal Myotonic Myopathy and Parkinsonism

Introduction:

There are two case reports of patients who had proximal myotonic myopathy (PROMM) / myotonic dystrophy (DM) Type 1 and parkinsonism. The combination of myotonic myopathy and parkinsonism is so rare that it may appear to be just a coincidence. However, previous neuropathological examinations of patients who had myotonic dystrophy showed that there were intracytoplasmic inclusion bodies in the nigra and striatum, which raises the possibility that myotonic myopathy may be associated with parkinsonism. In this report we describe a patient with PROMM and a clinically definite parkinsonism to highlight this possibility.

Case Report:

A 65-year-old man developed proximal muscle weakness, myotonia and atrophy around the age of 55 and was diagnosed as having PROMM at the age of 62. Needle electromyography and muscle biopsy supported the diagnosis. A gene study of the DM Type 1 showed a normal CTG repeat length. At age 63, he developed rest tremor, bradykinesia, hypomimia, stooped posture, and gait disturbance. The postural instability worsened rapidly. The tremor and rigidity were much worse in his right side, where myotonia was more severe. Levodopa therapy was only partially effective.

Conclusion:

This is a case report of a patient with PROMM that shows an association with a rapidly progressive form of parkinsonism. We suggest that this may be a novel form of a neurodegenerative disorder, which we name ‘Parkinsonism- Myotonic Myopathy-Complex’.

Myotonic Dystrophy-A Progeroid Disease?

Myotonic dystrophies (DM) are slowly progressing multisystemic disorders caused by repeat expansions in the DMPK or CNBP genes. The multisystemic involvement in DM patients often reflects the appearance of accelerated aging. This is partly due to visible features such as cataracts, muscle weakness, and frontal baldness, but there are also less obvious features like cardiac arrhythmia, diabetes or hypogammaglobulinemia. These aging features suggest the hypothesis that DM could be a segmental progeroid disease. To identify the molecular cause of this characteristic appearance of accelerated aging we compare clinical features of DM to “typical” segmental progeroid disorders caused by mutations in DNA repair or nuclear envelope proteins. Furthermore, we characterize if this premature aging effect is also reflected on the cellular level in DM and investigate overlaps with “classical” progeroid disorders. To investigate the molecular similarities at the cellular level we use primary DM and control cell lines. This analysis reveals many similarities to progeroid syndromes linked to the nuclear envelope. Our comparison on both clinical and molecular levels argues for qualification of DM as a segmental progeroid disorder.

Abnormalities in Skeletal Muscle Myogenesis, Growth, and Regeneration in Myotonic Dystrophy

Myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) and 2 (DM2) are autosomal dominant degenerative neuromuscular disorders characterized by progressive skeletal muscle weakness, atrophy, and myotonia with progeroid features. Although both DM1 and DM2 are characterized by skeletal muscle dysfunction and also share other clinical features, the diseases differ in the muscle groups that are affected. In DM1, distal muscles are mainly affected, whereas in DM2 problems are mostly found in proximal muscles. In addition, manifestation in DM1 is generally more severe, with possible congenital or childhood-onset of disease and prominent CNS involvement. DM1 and DM2 are caused by expansion of (CTG•CAG)n and (CCTG•CAGG)n repeats in the 3' non-coding region of DMPK and in intron 1 of CNBP, respectively, and in overlapping antisense genes. This critical review will focus on the pleiotropic problems that occur during development, growth, regeneration, and aging of skeletal muscle in patients who inherited these expansions. The current best-accepted idea is that most muscle symptoms can be explained by pathomechanistic effects of repeat expansion on RNA-mediated pathways. However, aberrations in DNA replication and transcription of the DM loci or in protein translation and proteome homeostasis could also affect the control of proliferation and differentiation of muscle progenitor cells or the maintenance and physiological integrity of muscle fibers during a patient's lifetime. Here, we will discuss these molecular and cellular processes and summarize current knowledge about the role of embryonic and adult muscle-resident stem cells in growth, homeostasis, regeneration, and premature aging of healthy and diseased muscle tissue. Of particular interest is that also progenitor cells from extramuscular sources, such as pericytes and mesoangioblasts, can participate in myogenic differentiation. We will examine the potential of all these types of cells in the application of regenerative medicine for muscular dystrophies and evaluate new possibilities for their use in future therapy of DM.

WITHDRAWN: Evidence for a relatively high proportion of DM2 mutations in a large group of Polish patients

The Publisher regrets that this article is an accidental duplication of an article that has already been published, 10.1016/j.pjnns.2018.02.008. The duplicate article has therefore been withdrawn. The full Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal can be found at https://www.elsevier.com/about/our-business/policies/article-withdrawal.

Evidence for a relatively high proportion of DM2 mutations in a large group of Polish patients

INTRODUCTION

Myotonic dystrophies (DMs) type 1 (DM1) and type 2 (DM2) are autosomal dominant, multisystem disorders, considered the most common dystrophies in adults. DM1 and DM2 are caused by dynamic mutations in the DMPK and CNBP genes, respectively.

METHODS

Molecular analyses were performed by PCR and the modified RP-PCR in patients, in their at-risk relatives and prenatal cases.

RESULTS

The analysis of Polish controls revealed the range of 5-31 CTG repeats for DM1 and 110-228 bp alleles for DM2. Among 318 confirmed probands - 196 (62%) were DM1 and 122 (38%) - DM2. Within DM1families, 10 subjects carried a low expanded CTG tract (< 100 repeats), which resulted in a full mutation in subsequent generations. Two related individuals had unstable alleles-188 bp and 196 bp without common interruptions.

CONCLUSION

The relative frequencies of DM1/DM2 among Polish patients were 68% and 32%, respectively, with a relatively high proportion of DM2 mutations (1.6:1).

Hearing impairment in patients with myotonic dystrophy type 2

Objective

To systematically assess auditory characteristics of a large cohort of patients with genetically confirmed myotonic dystrophy type 2 (DM2).

Methods

Patients with DM2 were included prospectively in an international cross-sectional study. A structured interview about hearing symptoms was held. Thereafter, standardized otologic examination, pure tone audiometry (PTA; 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 kHz), speech audiometry, tympanometry, acoustic middle ear muscle reflexes, and brainstem auditory evoked potentials (BAEP) were performed. The ISO 7029 standard was used to compare the PTA results with established hearing thresholds of the general population according to sex and age.

Results

Thirty-one Dutch and 25 French patients with DM2 (61% female) were included with a mean age of 57 years (range 31–78). The median hearing threshold of the DM2 cohort was higher for all measured frequencies, compared to the 50th percentile of normal (p < 0.001). Hearing impairment was mild in 39%, moderate in 21%, and severe in 2% of patients with DM2. The absence of an air–bone gap with PTA, concordant results of speech audiometry with PTA, and normal findings of BAEP suggest that the sensorineural hearing impairment is located in the cochlea. A significant correlation was found between hearing impairment and age, even when corrected for presbycusis.

Conclusions

Cochlear sensorineural hearing impairment is a frequent symptom in patients with DM2, suggesting an early presbycusis. Therefore, we recommend informing about hearing impairment and readily performing audiometry when hearing impairment is suspected in order to propose early hearing rehabilitation with hearing aids when indicated.

Early onset posterior subscapular cataract in a series of myotonic dystrophy type 2 patients

PurposeEarly onset posterior subscapular cataract (<50 years of age) is a characteristic feature of myotonic dystrophy type 2 (DM2). Nevertheless, despite being operated at a young age, many patients remain undiagnosed for years. The purpose of this study was to assess the prevalence of early onset posterior subscapular cataract as a presenting symptom of the disease in a cohort of patients with DM2.Patients and methodsWe retrospectively reviewed medical records of DM2 patients followed in our institution for the presence of early onset posterior subscapular cataract, of any secondary causes of cataract, of the age of onset of muscle weakness and of final disease diagnosis.ResultsTwenty-eight patients were studied. Nine patients (32.1%) had presented early onset posterior subscapular cataract at a median age of 43 years (IQR=36-46) and seven (25%) reported it was the presenting sign. No patient was referred for neuromuscular evaluation due to the occurrence of early onset cataract. Median delay between cataract onset and referral for neuromuscular evaluation was 10 years (IQR=6.0-19.5) and final DM2 diagnosis was achieved after a median of 16 years (IQR=6.5-19.5).ConclusionThis study shows that early onset posterior subscapular cataract was the first symptom of the disease in 25% of our DM2 patients. Nevertheless, none was suspected of having cataract in the context of DM2, and referral for neuromuscular evaluation was made after a long delay and usually following the appearance of other symptoms. Ophthalmologists can be the first physicians encountering these patients and should have a low threshold for referring them for neuromuscular evaluation.

Use of Clinical and Electrical Myotonia to Differentiate Childhood Myopathies

We retrospectively reviewed 2030 childhood electromyograms performed over an 11-year period (2004-2014). Twenty children (1%) with myotonic discharges were identified and placed into 2 groups. Group A (electrical and clinical myotonia) comprised 9 children (8 with myotonia congenita and 1 with paramyotonia congenita); all of them had diffuse myotonic discharges without clinical weakness or elevated creatine kinase. Group B (electrical myotonia without clinical myotonia) comprised 11 children (4 with inflammatory myopathy; 3, congenital myopathy, 3, muscular dystrophy; and 1, congenital muscular dystrophy). Clinical weakness was demonstrated in all of them and elevated creatine kinase in 6; all had a myopathic electromyogram and scattered myotonic discharges. We conclude that myotonic discharges are a rare but characteristic spontaneous discharge identified during electrodiagnostic studies in children. The presence of electrical and clinical myotonia provides helpful clues to differentiate between various muscle disorders in children.

Myotonic Dystrophy Type 2: An Update on Clinical Aspects, Genetic and Pathomolecular Mechanism

Myotonic dystrophy (DM) is the most common adult muscular dystrophy, characterized by autosomal dominant progressive myopathy, myotonia and multiorgan involvement. To date two distinct forms caused by similar mutations have been identified. Myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1, Steinert's disease) is caused by a (CTG)n expansion in DMPK, while myotonic dystrophy type 2 (DM2) is caused by a (CCTG)n expansion in CNBP. Despite clinical and genetic similarities, DM1 and DM2 are distinct disorders. The pathogenesis of DM is explained by a common RNA gain-of-function mechanism in which the CUG and CCUG repeats alter cellular function, including alternative splicing of various genes. However additional pathogenic mechanism like changes in gene expression, modifier genes, protein translation and micro-RNA metabolism may also contribute to disease pathology and to clarify the phenotypic differences between these two types of myotonic dystrophies.This review is an update on the latest findings specific to DM2, including explanations for the differences in clinical manifestations and pathophysiology between the two forms of myotonic dystrophies.

Myotonic dystrophy: diagnosis, management and new therapies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Myotonic dystrophies type 1 and type 2 are progressive multisystem genetic disorders with clinical and genetic features in common. Myotonic dystrophy type 1 is the most prevalent muscular dystrophy in adults and has a wide phenotypic spectrum. The average age of death in myotonic dystrophy type 1 is in the fifth decade. In comparison, myotonic dystrophy type 2 tends to cause a milder phenotype with later onset of symptoms and is less common than myotonic dystrophy type 1. Historically, patients with myotonic dystrophy type 1 have not received the medical and social input they need to maximize their quality and quantity of life. This review describes the improved understanding in the molecular and clinical features of myotonic dystrophy type 1 as well as the screening of clinical complications and their management. We will also discuss new potential genetic treatments.

RECENT FINDINGS

An active approach to screening and management of myotonic dystrophies type 1 and type 2 requires a multidisciplinary medical, rehabilitative and social team. This process will probably improve morbidity and mortality for patients. Genetic treatments have been successfully used in in-vitro and animal models to reverse the physiological, histopathological and transcriptomic features.

SUMMARY

Molecular therapeutics for myotonic dystrophy will probably bridge the translational gap between bench and bedside in the near future. There will still be a requirement for clinical screening of patients with myotonic dystrophy with proactive and systematic management of complications.

Myotonic dystrophies: An update on clinical aspects, genetic, pathology, and molecular pathomechanisms

Myotonic dystrophy (DM) is the most common adult muscular dystrophy, characterized by autosomal dominant progressive myopathy, myotonia and multiorgan involvement. To date two distinct forms caused by similar mutations have been identified. Myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1, Steinert's disease) is caused by a (CTG)n expansion in DMPK, while myotonic dystrophy type 2 (DM2) is caused by a (CCTG)n expansion in ZNF9/CNBP. When transcribed into CUG/CCUG-containing RNA, mutant transcripts aggregate as nuclear foci that sequester RNA-binding proteins, resulting in spliceopathy of downstream effector genes. However, it is now clear that additional pathogenic mechanism like changes in gene expression, protein translation and micro-RNA metabolism may also contribute to disease pathology. Despite clinical and genetic similarities, DM1 and DM2 are distinct disorders requiring different diagnostic and management strategies. This review is an update on the recent advances in the understanding of the molecular mechanisms behind myotonic dystrophies. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Neuromuscular Diseases: Pathology and Molecular Pathogenesis.

The spectrum of myotonic and myopathic disorders in a pediatric electromyography laboratory over 12 years

This study assessed the spectrum of disorders associated with electrophysiologic myotonia in a pediatric electromyography laboratory. Records of 2234 patients observed in the Electromyography Laboratory at Boston Children's Hospital from 2000-2011 were screened retrospectively for electrophysiologic diagnoses of myotonia and myopathy. Based on electromyography, 11 patients manifested myotonic discharges alone, eight exhibited both myotonic discharges and myopathic motor unit potentials, and 54 demonstrated myopathic motor unit potentials alone. The final diagnoses of patients with myotonic discharges alone included myotonia congenita, paramyotonia congenita, congenital myopathy, and Pompe disease (acid maltase deficiency). The diagnoses of patients with both myotonic discharges and myopathic motor unit potentials included congenital myopathy and non-Pompe glycogen storage diseases. Myotonic discharges are rarely observed in a pediatric electromyography laboratory, but constitute useful findings when present. The presence or absence of concurrent myopathic motor unit potentials may help narrow the differential diagnosis further.

The unstable CCTG repeat responsible for myotonic dystrophy type 2 originates from an AluSx element insertion into an early primate genome

Myotonic dystrophy type 2 (DM2) is a subtype of the myotonic dystrophies, caused by expansion of a tetranucleotide CCTG repeat in intron 1 of the zinc finger protein 9 (ZNF9) gene. The expansions are extremely unstable and variable, ranging from 75–11,000 CCTG repeats. This unprecedented repeat size and somatic heterogeneity make molecular diagnosis of DM2 difficult, and yield variable clinical phenotypes. To better understand the mutational origin and instability of the ZNF9 CCTG repeat, we analyzed the repeat configuration and flanking regions in 26 primate species. The 3′-end of an AluSx element, flanked by target site duplications (5′-ACTRCCAR-3′or 5′-ACTRCCARTTA-3′), followed the CCTG repeat, suggesting that the repeat was originally derived from the Alu element insertion. In addition, our results revealed lineage-specific repetitive motifs: pyrimidine (CT)-rich repeat motifs in New World monkeys, dinucleotide (TG) repeat motifs in Old World monkeys and gibbons, and dinucleotide (TG) and tetranucleotide (TCTG and/or CCTG) repeat motifs in great apes and humans. Moreover, these di- and tetra-nucleotide repeat motifs arose from the poly (A) tail of the AluSx element, and evolved into unstable CCTG repeats during primate evolution. Alu elements are known to be the source of microsatellite repeats responsible for two other repeat expansion disorders: Friedreich ataxia and spinocerebellar ataxia type 10. Taken together, these findings raise questions as to the mechanism(s) by which Alu-mediated repeats developed into the large, extremely unstable expansions common to these three disorders.

Nuclear ribonucleoprotein-containing foci increase in size in non-dividing cells from patients with myotonic dystrophy type 2

Myotonic dystrophies (DM) are genetically based neuromuscular disorders characterized by the accumulation of mutant transcripts into peculiar intranuclear foci, where different splicing factors (among which the alternative splicing regulator muscleblind-like 1 protein, MBNL1) are ectopically sequestered. The aim of the present investigation was to describe the dynamics of the DM-specific intranuclear foci in interphase nuclei and during mitosis, as well as after the exit from the cell cycle. Primary cultures of skin fibroblasts from DM2 patients were used, as a model system to reproduce in vitro, as accurately as possible, the in vivo conditions. Cycling and resting fibroblasts were investigated by immunocytochemical and morphometric techniques, and the relative amounts of MBNL1 were also estimated by western blotting. MBNL1-containing foci were exclusively found in the nucleus during most of the interphase, while being observed in the cytoplasm during mitosis when they never associate with the chromosomes; the foci remained in the cytoplasm at cytodieresis, and underwent disassembly in early G1 to be reformed in the nucleus at each cell cycle. After fibroblasts had stopped dividing in late-passage cultures, the nuclear foci were observed to progressively increase in size. Interestingly, measurements on muscle biopsies taken from the same DM2 patients at different ages demonstrated that, in the nuclei of myofibers, the MBNL1-containing foci become larger with increasing patient's age. As a whole, these results suggest that in non-dividing cells of DM2 patients the sequestration in the nuclear foci of factors needed for RNA processing would be continuous and progressive, eventually leading to the onset (and the worsening with time) of the pathological traits. This is consistent with the evidence that in DM patients the most affected organs or tissues are those where non-renewing cells are mainly present, i.e., the central nervous system, heart and skeletal muscle.

Best practice guidelines and recommendations on the molecular diagnosis of myotonic dystrophy types 1 and 2

Myotonic dystrophy is an autosomal dominant, multisystem disorder that is characterized by myotonic myopathy. The symptoms and severity of myotonic dystrophy type l (DM1) ranges from severe and congenital forms, which frequently result in death because of respiratory deficiency, through to late-onset baldness and cataract. In adult patients, cardiac conduction abnormalities may occur and cause a shorter life span. In subsequent generations, the symptoms in DM1 may present at an earlier age and have a more severe course (anticipation). In myotonic dystrophy type 2 (DM2), no anticipation is described, but cardiac conduction abnormalities as in DM1 are observed and patients with DM2 additionally have muscle pain and stiffness. Both DM1 and DM2 are caused by unstable DNA repeats in untranslated regions of different genes: A (CTG)n repeat in the 3'-UTR of the DMPK gene and a (CCTG)n repeat in intron 1 of the CNBP (formerly ZNF9) gene, respectively. The length of the (CTG)n repeat expansion in DM1 correlates with disease severity and age of onset. Nevertheless, these repeat sizes have limited predictive values on individual bases. Because of the disease characteristics in DM1 and DM2, appropriate molecular testing and reporting is very important for the optimal counseling in myotonic dystrophy. Here, we describe best practice guidelines for clinical molecular genetic analysis and reporting in DM1 and DM2, including presymptomatic and prenatal testing.

If you build a rare disease registry, will they enroll and will they use it? Methods and data from the National Registry of Myotonic Dystrophy (DM) and Facioscapulohumeral Muscular Dystrophy (FSHD)

INTRODUCTION

Registries are becoming increasingly important for rare diseases as experimental therapies develop. This report describes the methodology behind the National Registry of Myotonic Dystrophy (DM) and Facioscapulohumeral Muscular Dystrophy (FSHD) Patients and Family Members to facilitate the development of other rare disease registries. We also highlight data about the pathophysiology and select burdens of DM and FSHD reported at baseline and longitudinally.

METHODS

The Registry consists of de-identified, patient reported information collected at baseline and annually and information from review of medical records. Investigators can use the Registry to analyze de-identified data and to facilitate recruitment into clinical studies.

RESULTS

To date, the Registry has enrolled 1611 members, facilitated 24 studies, and collected data annually for up to 8 years. Genetic test results were obtained in 56.2% of enrollees. Approximately one-third of members used assistive devices and another one-third reported psychological problems at baseline. Wheelchair use was reported for both short and long distances by 7.0% of DM and 18.1% of FSHD members. Approximately 60% of members reported their employment was affected by their disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Strengths of the Registry include large sample sizes, stringent review of clinical and molecular data, annually updated information, and regular interactions between patients and investigators. Registry data provide new insights into the burdens of DM and FSHD, such as, psychological problems and reduced employment. Opportunities abound for investigators to utilize Registry resources to assess the impact of these and other burdens on health care costs, progression of symptoms, and quality of life.

Cultured myoblasts from patients affected by myotonic dystrophy type 2 exhibit senescence-related features: ultrastructural evidence

Myotonic dystrophy type 2 (DM2) is an autosomal dominant disorder caused by the expansion of the tetranucleotidic repeat (CCTG)n in the first intron of the Zinc Finger Protein-9 gene. In DM2 tissues, the expanded mutant transcripts accumulate in nuclear focal aggregates where splicing factors are sequestered, thus affecting mRNA processing. Interestingly, the ultrastructural alterations in the splicing machinery observed in the myonuclei of DM2 skeletal muscles are reminiscent of the nuclear changes occurring in age-related muscle atrophy. Here, we investigated in vitro structural and functional features of satellite cell-derived myoblasts from biceps brachii, in the attempt to investigate cell senescence indices in DM2 patients by ultrastructural cytochemistry. We observed that in satellite cell-derived DM2 myoblasts, cell-senescence alterations such as cytoplasmic vacuolization, reduction of the proteosynthetic apparatus, accumulation of heterochromatin and impairment of the pre-mRNA maturation pathways occur earlier than in myoblasts from healthy patients. These results, together with preliminary in vitro observations on the early onset of defective structural features in DM2 myoblast derived-myotubes, suggest that the regeneration capability of DM2 satellite cells may be impaired, thus contributing to the muscular dystrophy in DM2 patients.

Myotonic dystrophy types 1 and 2

Myotonic dystrophies (dystrophia myotonica, or DM) are inherited disorders characterized by myotonia and progressive muscle degeneration, which are variably associated with a multisystemic phenotype. To date, two types of myotonic dystrophy, type 1 (DM1) and type 2 (DM2), are known to exist; both are autosomal dominant disorders caused by expansion of an untranslated short tandem repeat DNA sequence (CTG)(n) and (CCTG)(n), respectively. These expanded repeats in DM1 and DM2 show different patterns of repeat-size instability. Phenotypes of DM1 and DM2 are similar but there are some important differences, most conspicuously in the severity of the disease (including the presence or absence of the congenital form), muscles primarily affected (distal versus proximal), involved muscle fiber types (type 1 versus type 2 fibers), and some associated multisystemic phenotypes. The pathogenic mechanism of DM1 and DM2 is thought to be mediated by the mutant RNA transcripts containing expanded CUG and CCUG repeats. Strong evidence supports the hypothesis that sequestration of muscle-blind like (MBNL) proteins by these expanded repeats leads to misregulated splicing of many gene transcripts in corroboration with the raised level of CUG-binding protein 1. However, additional mechanisms, such as changes in the chromatin structure involving CTCN-binding site and gene expression dysregulations, are emerging. Although treatment of DM1 and DM2 is currently limited to supportive therapies, new therapeutic approaches based on pathogenic mechanisms may become feasible in the near future.

Absent, unrecognized, and minimal myotonic discharges in myotonic dystrophy type 2

The purpose of this study was to describe the frequency of absent, unrecognized, or minimal myotonic discharges (MDs) in myotonic dystrophy type 2 (DM2). We performed a retrospective review of needle electromyography (EMG) data prior to genetic diagnosis in 49 DM2 patients at the Mayo Clinic. MDs were not reported on first or repeat EMG studies (n = 8) and not found in archived recordings of 4 patients (8%); archived EMG recordings (n = 4) confirmed the absence of MDs (n = 2), including 1 patient with normal insertional activity in all muscles, and misinterpretation of MDs as slow fibrillation potentials (n = 1) and complex repetitive discharge (CRD) activity (n = 1). Eight (16%) patients had minimal classic MDs with diffusely increased insertional activity, including waning-only MDs in all patients in this group with archived EMG recordings (n = 5). Diffuse MDs were found in 33 (67%) patients. Absent or minimal MDs do not exclude DM2. Over-reliance on diffuse MDs in patients who present with myopathy may lead to delay in genetic diagnosis of DM2.

Primary myopathies and the heart

Myopathies are frequently not confined to the skeletal muscles but also involve other organs or tissues. One of the most frequently affected organ in addition to the skeletal muscle is the heart (cardiac involvement, CI). CI manifests as impulse generation or conduction defects, focal or diffuse myocardial thickening, dilation of the cardiac cavities, relaxation abnormality, hypertrophic, dilated, restrictive cardiomyopathy, apical form of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, noncompaction, Takotsubo phenomenon, secondary valve insufficiency, intra-cardiac thrombus formation, or heart failure with systolic or diastolic dysfunction. CI occurs in dystrophinopathies, Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy, facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy, limb girdle muscular dystrophies, laminopathies, congenital muscular dystrophies, myotonic dystrophies, congenital myopathies, metabolic myopathies, desminopathies, myofibrillar myopathy, Barth syndrome, McLeod syndrome, Senger's syndrome, and Bethlem myopathy. Patients with myopathy should be cardiologically investigated as soon as their neurological diagnosis is established, since supportive cardiac therapy is available, which markedly influences prognosis and outcome of CI in these patients.

Severity, type, and distribution of myotonic discharges are different in type 1 and type 2 myotonic dystrophy

To characterize and compare electrical myotonia in myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) and type 2 (DM2), 16 patients with genetically confirmed DM1 and 17 patients with DM2 underwent standardized concentric needle electromyography of deltoid, biceps, extensor digitorum communis, first dorsal interosseous, tensor fascia lata (TFL), vastus lateralis (VL), tibialis anterior, and thoracic paraspinal muscles. Eight needle insertions per muscle were made by electromyographers blinded to DM type who recorded the presence and type of myotonia (e.g., classic waxing-waning or less specific waning discharges). Manual muscle testing was performed by a physical therapist. Overall, myotonia was more elicitable in DM1 than DM2; only in VL and TFL was myotonia more elicitable in DM2 than DM1. The major type of myotonia was waxing-waning in DM1, and waning in DM2. Four DM2 (24%), but no DM1 patients had only waning myotonia. In the arms, myotonia was distally predominant in both DM1 and DM2. In the legs, it was distally predominant in DM1, but both proximal and distal in DM2. The severity of myotonia was positively correlated with muscle weakness and with the presence of waxing and waning discharges in DM1, but with neither in DM2. Thus, myotonia is qualitatively and quantitatively different in DM1 than DM2. Except for proximal leg muscles, myotonia is more evocable in DM1 than DM2. It tends to be waxing-waning in DM1 but waning in DM2, thus making electrodiagnosis of DM2 more challenging. Its severity correlates with muscle weakness and the presence of waxing-waning discharges in DM1 but not DM2.

Cerebral involvement in myotonic dystrophies

Myotonic dystrophy types 1 (DM1) and 2 (DM2) are similar yet distinct autosomal-dominant disorders characterized by muscle weakness, myotonia, cataracts, and multiple organ involvement, including the brain. One key difference between DM1 and DM2 is that a congenital form has been described for DM1 only. Expression of RNA transcripts containing pathogenic repeat lengths produces defects in alternative splicing of multiple RNAs, sequesters specific repeat-binding proteins, and ultimately leads to developmentally inappropriate splice products for a particular tissue. Whether brain pathology in its entirety in adult DM1 and DM2 is caused by interference in RNA processing remains to be determined. This review focuses on the similarities and differences between DM1 and DM2 with respect to neuropsychological, neuropathological, and neuroimaging data relating to cerebral involvement, with special emphasis on the clinical relevance and social consequences of such involvement.

Gene expression analysis in myotonic dystrophy: indications for a common molecular pathogenic pathway in DM1 and DM2

An RNA gain-of-function of expanded transcripts is the most accredited molecular mechanism for myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) and 2 (DM2). To disclose molecular parallels and divergences in pathogenesis of both disorders, we compared the expression profile of muscle biopsies from DM1 and DM2 patients to controls. DM muscle tissues showed a reduction in the major skeletal muscle chloride channel (CLCN1) and transcription factor Sp1 transcript levels and an abnormal processing of the CLCN1 and insulin receptor (IR) pre-mRNAs. No essential differences were observed in the muscle blind-like gene (MBNL1) and CUG binding protein 1 (CUGBP1) transcript levels as well as in the splicing pattern of the myotubularin-related 1 (MTMR1) gene. Macroarray analysis of 96 neuroscience-related genes revealed a considerable similar expression profile between the DM samples, reflective of a common muscle pathology origin. Using a twofold threshold, we found six misregulated genes important in calcium and potassium metabolism and in mitochondrial functions. Our results indicate that the DM1 and DM2 overlapping clinical phenotypes may derive from a common trans acting mechanism that traps and influences shared genes and proteins. An RNA gain-of-function of expanded transcripts is the most accredited molecular mechanism for myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) and 2 (DM2). To disclose molecular parallels and divergences in pathogenesis of both disorders, we compared the expression profile of muscle biopsies from DM1 and DM2 patients to controls. DM muscle tissues showed a reduction in the major skeletal muscle chloride channel (CLCN1) and transcription factor Sp1 transcript levels and an abnormal processing of the CLCN1 and insulin receptor (IR) pre-mRNAs. No essential differences were observed in the muscle blind-like gene (MBNL1) and CUG binding protein 1 (CUGBP1) transcript levels as well as in the splicing pattern of the myotubularin-related 1 (MTMR1) gene. Macroarray analysis of 96 neuroscience-related genes revealed a considerable similar expression profile between the DM samples, reflective of a common muscle pathology origin. Using a twofold threshold, we found six misregulated genes important in calcium and potassium metabolism and in mitochondrial functions. Our results indicate that the DM1 and DM2 overlapping clinical phenotypes may derive from a common trans acting mechanism that traps and influences shared genes and proteins.

Myotonic dystrophies type 1 and 2: a summary on current aspects

Myotonic dystrophies (DMs) encompass at least 2 forms: myotonic dystrophy type 1 and 2. In general, DMs are late-onset autosomal dominant disorders characterized by a variety of multisystemic features including myotonia, muscular dystrophy, cardiac conduction defects, dilated cardiomyopathy, posterior iridescent cataracts, frontal balding, insulin-resistance and disease-specific serological abnormalities such as gamma-glutamyltransferase and creatine kinase elevations, hyperglycemia, hypotestosteronism, and reduced immunoglobulin (Ig) G and IgM levels. Beyond the adult forms, in the classic DM1, a congenital form and an early-onset form is recognized. Here we summarize current aspects of the myotonic dystrophy pathogenesis and review the core features of both types of myotonic dystrophies, including the congenital DM1.

RNA pathogenesis of the myotonic dystrophies

Myotonic dystrophy (dystrophia myotonica, DM) is the most common form of muscular dystrophy in adults. The presence of two genetic forms of this complex multisystemic disease (DM1 and DM2) was unrecognized until the genetic cause of DM1 was identified in 1992. The fact that the DM1 mutation is an untranslated CTG expansion led to extended controversy about the molecular pathophysiology of this disease. When the DM2 mutation was identified in 2001 as being a similarly untranslated CCTG expansion, the molecular and clinical parallels between DM1 and DM2 substantiated the role of a novel mechanism in generating the unusual constellation of clinical features seen in these diseases: the repeat expansions expressed at the RNA level alter RNA processing, at least in part by interfering with alternative splicing of other genes. For example, in both DM1 and DM2, altered splicing of chloride channel and insulin receptor transcripts leads to myotonia and insulin resistance, respectively. Although other mechanisms may underlie the differences between DM1 and DM2, the pathogenic effects of the RNA mechanism are now clear, which will facilitate development of appropriate treatments.

Genetics and molecular pathogenesis of the myotonic dystrophies

Pathogenic repeat expansions were initially identified as causing either a loss of gene product, such as in fragile X mental retardation, or an expansion of a polyglutamine region of a protein, as was first shown in spinobulbar muscular atrophy (Kennedy's disease). The pathogenic effect of the repeat expansion in myotonic dystrophy type 1, however, has been controversial because it does not encode a protein but nonetheless results in a highly penetrant dominant disease. Clinical and molecular characterization of myotonic dystrophy types 1 and 2 have now demonstrated a novel disease mechanism involving pathogenic effects of repeat expansions that are expressed in RNA but are not translated into protein.

Myotonic dystrophy type 2 and related myotonic disorders

The myotonic dystrophies are a group of dominantly inherited disorders characterized by muscle wasting, myotonia, cataracts, hypogonadism and other system manifestations. Myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) results from an unstable expansion of a CTG repeat in 3' UTR of the DM protein kinase (DMPK) gene on chromosome 19q 13.3. Myotonic dystrophy type 2 (DM2) is caused by an unstable expansion of a CCTG tetraplet repeat in intron 1 of the zinc finger 9 (ZFN9 gene) on chromosome 3q 21.3. However, the clinical diagnosis of DM2 is more complex than that of DM1, and conventional molecular genetic methods used for diagnosis of DM1 are not helpful for DM2. We here describe the detailed clinical, laboratory and biomolecular tests to identify DM2 and related myotonic disorders. At present, foci of accumulated noncoding CCTG repeat RNA (ribonuclear inclusions) in the cell nuclei are thought to interfere with the regulation and expression of several genes at the basis of multisystemic aspects of myotonic dystrophy type 2.

Myotonic dystrophy: RNA pathogenesis comes into focus

Myotonic dystrophy (DM)--the most common form of muscular dystrophy in adults, affecting 1/8000 individuals--is a dominantly inherited disorder with a peculiar and rare pattern of multisystemic clinical features affecting skeletal muscle, the heart, the eye, and the endocrine system. Two genetic loci have been associated with the DM phenotype: DM1, on chromosome 19, and DM2, on chromosome 3. In 1992, the mutation responsible for DM1 was identified as a CTG expansion located in the 3' untranslated region of the dystrophia myotonica-protein kinase gene (DMPK). How this untranslated CTG expansion causes myotonic dystrophy type 1(DM1) has been controversial. The recent discovery that myotonic dystrophy type 2 (DM2) is caused by an untranslated CCTG expansion, along with other discoveries on DM1 pathogenesis, indicate that the clinical features common to both diseases are caused by a gain-of-function RNA mechanism in which the CUG and CCUG repeats alter cellular function, including alternative splicing of various genes. We discuss the pathogenic mechanisms that have been proposed for the myotonic dystrophies, the clinical and molecular features of DM1 and DM2, and the characterization of murine and cell-culture models that have been generated to better understand these diseases.

New methods for molecular diagnosis and demonstration of the (CCTG)n mutation in myotonic dystrophy type 2 (DM2)

Myotonic dystrophy types 1 and 2 are autosomal dominant, multisystemic disorders with many similarities in their clinical manifestations. Myotonic dystrophy type 1 is caused by a (CTG)n expansion in the 3' untranslated region of the DMPK gene in 19q13.3 and myotonic dystrophy type 2 by a (CCTG)n expansion in intron 1 of ZNF9 in 3q21.3. However, the clinical diagnosis of myotonic dystrophy type 2 is more complex than that of myotonic dystrophy type 1, and conventional molecular genetic methods used for diagnosing myotonic dystrophy type 1 are insufficient for myotonic dystrophy type 2. Herein we describe two in situ hybridization protocols for the myotonic dystrophy type 2 mutation detection. Chromogenic in situ hybridization was used to detect both the genomic expansion and the mutant transcripts in muscle biopsy sections. Chromogenic in situ hybridization can be used in routine myotonic dystrophy type 2 diagnostics. Fluorescence in situ hybridization on extended DNA fibers was used to directly visualize the myotonic dystrophy type 2 mutation and to estimate the repeat expansion sizes.

Muscle pathology in 57 patients with myotonic dystrophy type 2

We evaluated muscle biopsies from 57 patients with genetically confirmed myotonic dystrophy type 2/proximal myotonic myopathy (DM2/PROMM). Light microscopy showed myopathic together with "denervation-like" changes in almost all biopsies obtained from four different muscles: increased fiber size variation, internal nuclei, small angulated fibers, pyknotic nuclear clumps, and predominant type 2 fiber atrophy. Quantitative morphometry in 18 biopsies that were immunostained for myosin heavy chain confirmed a predominance of nonselective type 2 fiber atrophy. These histological changes were similar in all patients regardless of the site of biopsy, the predominant clinical symptoms and signs, and the clinical course. It is likely that, in a number of undiagnosed patients, DM2 is the underlying disorder. With a better understanding of the histopathological pattern in DM2, biopsies from patients with undiagnosed neuromuscular disorders can now be reevaluated.

Myotonic dystrophy type 2: human founder haplotype and evolutionary conservation of the repeat tract

Myotonic dystrophy (DM), the most common form of muscular dystrophy in adults, can be caused by a mutation on either chromosome 19 (DM1) or 3 (DM2). In 2001, we demonstrated that DM2 is caused by a CCTG expansion in intron 1 of the zinc finger protein 9 (ZNF9) gene. To investigate the ancestral origins of the DM2 expansion, we compared haplotypes for 71 families with genetically confirmed DM2, using 19 short tandem repeat markers that we developed that flank the repeat tract. All of the families are white, with the majority of Northern European/German descent and a single family from Afghanistan. Several conserved haplotypes spanning >700 kb appear to converge into a single haplotype near the repeat tract. The common interval that is shared by all families with DM2 immediately flanks the repeat, extending up to 216 kb telomeric and 119 kb centromeric of the CCTG expansion. The DM2 repeat tract contains the complex repeat motif (TG)(n)(TCTG)(n)(CCTG)(n). The CCTG portion of the repeat tract is interrupted on normal alleles, but, as in other expansion disorders, these interruptions are lost on affected alleles. We examined haplotypes of 228 control chromosomes and identified a potential premutation allele with an uninterrupted (CCTG)(20) on a haplotype that was identical to the most common affected haplotype. Our data suggest that the predominant Northern European ancestry of families with DM2 resulted from a common founder and that the loss of interruptions within the CCTG portion of the repeat tract may predispose alleles to further expansion. To gain insight into possible function of the repeat tract, we looked for evolutionary conservation. The complex repeat motif and flanking sequences within intron 1 are conserved among human, chimpanzee, gorilla, mouse, and rat, suggesting a conserved biological function.

Confirmation of the type 2 myotonic dystrophy (CCTG)n expansion mutation in patients with proximal myotonic myopathy/proximal myotonic dystrophy of different European origins: a single shared haplotype indicates an ancestral founder effect

Myotonic dystrophy (DM), the most common form of muscular dystrophy in adults, is a clinically and genetically heterogeneous neuromuscular disorder. DM is characterized by autosomal dominant inheritance, muscular dystrophy, myotonia, and multisystem involvement. Type 1 DM (DM1) is caused by a (CTG)(n) expansion in the 3' untranslated region of DMPK in 19q13.3. Multiple families, predominantly of German descent and with clinically variable presentation that included proximal myotonic myopathy (PROMM) and type 2 DM (DM2) but without the DM1 mutation, showed linkage to the 3q21 region and were recently shown to segregate a (CCTG)(n) expansion mutation in intron 1 of ZNF9. Here, we present linkage to 3q21 and mutational confirmation in 17 kindreds of European origin with PROMM and proximal myotonic dystrophy, from geographically distinct populations. All patients have the DM2 (CCTG)(n) expansion. To study the evolution of this mutation, we constructed a comprehensive physical map of the DM2 region around ZNF9. High-resolution haplotype analysis of disease chromosomes with five microsatellite and 22 single-nucleotide polymorphism markers around the DM2 mutation identified extensive linkage disequilibrium and a single shared haplotype of at least 132 kb among patients from the different populations. With the exception of the (CCTG)(n) expansion, the available markers indicate that the DM2 haplotype is identical to the most common haplotype in normal individuals. This situation is reminiscent of that seen in DM1. Taken together, these data suggest a single founding mutation in DM2 patients of European origin. We estimate the age of the founding haplotype and of the DM2 (CCTG) expansion mutation to be approximately 200-540 generations.

Assessment of cardiovascular autonomic function in myotonic dystrophy type 2 (DM2/PROMM)

BACKGROUND

Proximal myotonic myopathy is an autosomal dominant multisystem disorder with a recently defined CCTG expansion on chromosome 3 in the major subgroup (myotonic dystrophy type 2). Cardiac rhythm disturbances have been described in patients with this disease, but it is not known whether myotonic dystrophy type 2/proximal myotonic myopathy patients suffer from dysautonomia and whether cardiac arrhythmias relate to autonomic dysfunction.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate cardiovascular autonomic function in myotonic dystrophy type 2/proximal myotonic myopathy patients with and without cardiac arrhythmias.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Standard autonomic function tests (heart rate responses to Valsalva manoeuvre, deep breathing and active change of posture, and blood pressure responses to active change of posture and sustained handgrip), resting heart rate variability in the time- and frequency-domain, and the corrected QT interval length were determined in 16 patients with genetically defined myotonic dystrophy type 2/proximal myotonic myopathy and compared to the results obtained in 16 age- and sex-matched healthy control subjects.

RESULTS

Standard autonomic tests yielded similar results in both groups. Measures of heart rate variability tended to be lower in myotonic dystrophy type 2/proximal myotonic myopathy patients compared to healthy controls, but reached statistical significance only for the number of R-R intervals exceeding 50 ms (p50) and the power spectrum density in the low-frequency range (low-frequency power). Four patients (25%) suffered from mild cardiac rhythm disturbances encompassing paroxysmal tachycardia, sinoatrial block, right bundle branch block, ventricular premature beats and bradycardia. The autonomic responses of these patients were essentially similar compared to those without cardiac arrhythmias, apart from a decreased heart rate response to deep breathing in the patients with cardiac arrhythmias.

CONCLUSIONS

We found no major abnormalities of cardiovascular autonomic function in patients with myotonic dystrophy type 2/proximal myotonic myopathy, neither in the whole study group nor in the subgroup of patients with cardiac rhythm abnormalities.

Myotonic dystrophy type 2: molecular, diagnostic and clinical spectrum

BACKGROUND

Myotonic dystrophy types 1 (DM1) and 2 (DM2/proximal myotonic myopathy PROMM) are dominantly inherited disorders with unusual multisystemic clinical features. The authors have characterized the clinical and molecular features of DM2/PROMM, which is caused by a CCTG repeat expansion in intron 1 of the zinc finger protein 9 (ZNF9) gene.

METHODS

Three-hundred and seventy-nine individuals from 133 DM2/PROMM families were evaluated genetically, and in 234 individuals clinical and molecular features were compared.

RESULTS

Among affected individuals 90% had electrical myotonia, 82% weakness, 61% cataracts, 23% diabetes, and 19% cardiac involvement. Because of the repeat tract's unprecedented size (mean approximately 5,000 CCTGs) and somatic instability, expansions were detectable by Southern analysis in only 80% of known carriers. The authors developed a repeat assay that increased the molecular detection rate to 99%. Only 30% of the positive samples had single sizeable expansions by Southern analysis, and 70% showed multiple bands or smears. Among the 101 individuals with single expansions, repeat size did not correlate with age at disease onset. Affected offspring had markedly shorter expansions than their affected parents, with a mean size difference of -17 kb (-4,250 CCTGs).

CONCLUSIONS

DM2 is present in a large number of families of northern European ancestry. Clinically, DM2 resembles adult-onset DM1, with myotonia, muscular dystrophy, cataracts, diabetes, testicular failure, hypogammaglobulinemia, and cardiac conduction defects. An important distinction is the lack of a congenital form of DM2. The clinical and molecular parallels between DM1 and DM2 indicate that the multisystemic features common to both diseases are caused by CUG or CCUG expansions expressed at the RNA level.

Myotonic syndromes

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To highlight recent advances in understanding the clinical manifestations and molecular genetics of myotonic syndromes, with particular emphasis on the myotonic dystrophies.

RECENT FINDINGS

Myotonic syndromes include the non-dystrophic myotonias, caused by mutations in genes encoding the chloride or sodium channels that are specific to skeletal muscle, and the myotonic dystrophies. Previous studies have shown that myotonic dystrophy type 1 is caused by the expansion of a CTG repeat in the gene. Recently, it was discovered that myotonic dystrophy type 2 (proximal myotonic myopathy) is also caused by a DNA expansion mutation. In both types of myotonic dystrophy the expanded repeat is transcribed and the RNA produced from the mutant allele is retained in nuclear inclusions. Recent studies suggest that the mutant RNA has a toxic effect on muscle fibers by interfering with the essential functions of the myonucleus, such as RNA processing.

SUMMARY

It now appears likely that myotonic dystrophy is the first instance of a genetic disease in which the harmful effect of a mutation involves the production of a pathogenic RNA. However, the exact mechanism is not understood, and it is unclear whether this RNA-mediated disease process is also responsible for the manifestations of myotonic dystrophy in non-muscle tissues.

Myotonic dystrophy: clinical and molecular parallels between myotonic dystrophy type 1 and type 2

Myotonic dystrophy (DM) is a dominantly inherited disorder with a peculiar pattern of multisystemic clinical features affecting skeletal muscle, the heart, the eye, and the endocrine system. Two genetic loci have been associated with the DM phenotype: DM1 on chromosome 19, and DM2 on chromosome 3. In 1992, the mutation responsible for DM1 was identified as a CTG expansion located in the 3' untranslated region of the dystrophica myotonica-protein kinase gene (DMPK). How this untranslated CTG expansion causes DM1 has been a matter of controversy. The recent discovery that DM2 is caused by an untranslated CCTG expansion, along with other discoveries on DM1 pathogenesis, indicate that the clinical features common to both diseases are caused by a gain of function RNA mechanism in which the CUG and CCUG repeats alter cellular function, including alternative splicing of various genes.