The globular domain of histone H1 is sufficient to direct specific gene repression in early Xenopus embryos

Binding Dynamics of Disordered Linker Histone H1 with a Nucleosomal Particle

Linker histone H1 is an essential regulatory protein for many critical biological processes, such as eukaryotic chromatin packaging and gene expression. Mis-regulation of H1s is commonly observed in tumor cells, where the balance between different H1 subtypes has been shown to alter the cancer phenotype. Consisting of a rigid globular domain and two highly charged terminal domains, H1 can bind to multiple sites on a nucleosomal particle to alter chromatin hierarchical condensation levels. In particular, the disordered H1 amino- and carboxyl-terminal domains (NTD/CTD) are believed to enhance this binding affinity, but their detailed dynamics and functions remain unclear. In this work, we used a coarse-grained computational model, AWSEM-DNA, to simulate the H1.0b-nucleosome complex, namely chromatosome. Our results demonstrate that H1 disordered domains restrict the dynamics and conformation of both globular H1 and linker DNA arms, resulting in a more compact and rigid chromatosome particle. Furthermore, we identified regions of H1 disordered domains that are tightly tethered to DNA near the entry-exit site. Overall, our study elucidates at near-atomic resolution the way the disordered linker histone H1 modulates nucleosome's structural preferences and conformational dynamics.

How Human H1 Histone Recognizes DNA

Linker H1 histone is one of the five main histone proteins (H1, H2A, H2B, H3, and H4), which are components of chromatin in eukaryotic cells. Here we have analyzed the patterns of DNA recognition by free H1 histone using a stepwise increase of the ligand complexity method; the affinity of H1 histone for various single- and double-stranded oligonucleotides (d(pN)n; n = 1-20) was evaluated using their competition with 12-mer [32P]labeled oligonucleotide and protein-oligonucleotide complex delaying on nitrocellulose membrane filters. It was shown that minimal ligands of H1 histone (like other DNA-dependent proteins and enzymes) are different mononucleotides (dNMPs; Kd = (1.30 ± 0.2) × 10-2 M). An increase in the length of single-stranded (ss) homo- and hetero-oligonucleotides (d(pA)n, d(pT)n, d(pC)n, and d(pN)n with different bases) by one nucleotide link regardless of their bases, leads to a monotonic increase in their affinity by a factor of f = 3.0 ± 0.2. This factor f corresponds to the Kd value = 1/f characterizing the affinity of one nucleotide of different ss d(pN)n for H1 at n = 2-6 (which are covered by this protein globule) is approximately 0.33 ± 0.02 M. The affinity of five out of six DNA nucleotide units is approximately 25 times lower than for one of the links. The affinity of duplexes of complementary homo- and hetero-d(pN)20 is only 1.3-3.3-fold higher in comparison with corresponding ss oligonucleotides. H1 histone forms mainly weak additive contacts with internucleoside phosphate groups of ssDNAs and one chain of double-stranded DNAs, but not with the bases.

Structural Mechanisms of Nucleosome Recognition by Linker Histones

Linker histones bind to the nucleosome and regulate the structure of chromatin and gene expression. Despite more than three decades of effort, the structural basis of nucleosome recognition by linker histones remains elusive. Here, we report the crystal structure of the globular domain of chicken linker histone H5 in complex with the nucleosome at 3.5 Å resolution, which is validated using nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. The globular domain sits on the dyad of the nucleosome and interacts with both DNA linkers. Our structure integrates results from mutation analyses and previous cross-linking and fluorescence recovery after photobleach experiments, and it helps resolve the long debate on structural mechanisms of nucleosome recognition by linker histones. The on-dyad binding mode of the H5 globular domain is different from the recently reported off-dyad binding mode of Drosophila linker histone H1. We demonstrate that linker histones with different binding modes could fold chromatin to form distinct higher-order structures.

A developmental requirement for HIRA-dependent H3.3 deposition revealed at gastrulation in Xenopus

Discovering how histone variants that mark distinct chromatin regions affect a developmental program is a major challenge in the epigenetics field. To assess the importance of the H3.3 histone variant and its dedicated histone chaperone HIRA, we used an established developmental model, Xenopus laevis. After the early rapid divisions exploiting a large maternal pool of both replicative H3.2 and replacement H3.3, H3.3 transcripts show a distinct peak of expression at gastrulation. Depletion of both H3.2 and H3.3 leads to an early gastrulation arrest. However, with only H3.3 depletion, defects occur at late gastrulation, impairing further development. Providing exogenous H3.3 mRNAs, but not replicative H3.2 mRNAs, rescues these defects. Notably, downregulation of the H3.3 histone chaperone HIRA similarly impairs late gastrulation, and we find a global defect in H3.3 incorporation into chromatin comparable to H3.3 depletion. We discuss how specific HIRA-dependent H3.3 deposition is required for chromatin dynamics during gastrulation.

Relevance of arginines in the mode of binding of H1 histones to DNA

The mode of binding of sperm and somatic H1 histones to DNA has been investigated by analyzing the effect of their addition on the electrophoretic mobility of linear and circular plasmid molecules. Low concentrations of sperm histones do not appear to alter the electrophoretic mobility of DNA, whereas at increasing concentrations, an additional DNA band is observed near the migration origin. This band then becomes the only component at higher values. In contrast, somatic histones cause a gradual retardation in the mobility of the DNA band at low concentrations and aggregated structures are observed only at higher values. Experiments on the H1 globular domain obtained by limited proteolysis indicate that the mode of binding to DNA depends on the H1 globular domain. The arginine residues appear to be relevant for the different effects as indicated by experiments on sperm histone and on protamine with arginines deguanidinated to ornithines. The modified molecules influence DNA mobility like somatic H1s, indicating that the positive guanidino groups of arginines cannot be substituted by the positive amino groups of ornithines. Modifications of the amino groups of lysines show that these residues are necessary for the binding of H1 histones to DNA but they have no influence on the binding mode.

Histone XH2AX is required for Xenopus anterior neural development: critical role of threonine 16 phosphorylation

A role for histone H2AX, one of the variants of the nucleosome core histone H2A, has been demonstrated in DNA repair, tumor suppression, apoptosis, and cell cycle checkpoint function. However, the physiological function and post-translational modification of histone H2AX during vertebrate development have not been elucidated. Here, we provide evidence showing that Xenopus histone H2AX (XH2AX) has a role in the anterior neural plate for eye field formation during Xenopus embryogenesis. A loss-of-function study clearly demonstrated a critical role of XH2AX in anterior neural specification. Through a differentiation assay with Xenopus animal cap embryonic stem cells, we confirmed that XH2AX is required for the activin-induced anterior neural specification of the ectoderm. Furthermore, we found that Chk1 is an essential kinase to phosphorylate histone XH2AX at Thr(16), which is involved in the biological function of this histone. Taken together, our findings reveal that XH2AX has a specific role in anterior neural formation of Xenopus, which is mediated through phosphorylation of XH2AX at Thr(16) by Chk1.

Functional equivalence of HMGA- and histone H1-like domains in a bacterial transcriptional factor

Histone H1 and high-mobility group A (HMGA) proteins compete dynamically to modulate chromatin structure and regulate DNA transactions in eukaryotes. In prokaryotes, HMGA-like domains are known only in Myxococcus xanthus CarD and its Stigmatella aurantiaca ortholog. These have an N-terminal module absent in HMGA that interacts with CarG (a zinc-associated factor that does not bind DNA) to form a stable complex essential in regulating multicellular development, light-induced carotenogenesis, and other cellular processes. An analogous pair, CarD(Ad) and CarG(Ad), exists in another myxobacterium, Anaeromyxobacter dehalogenans. Intriguingly, the CarD(Ad) C terminus lacks the hallmark HMGA DNA-binding AT-hooks and instead resembles the C-terminal region (CTR) of histone H1. We find that CarD(Ad) alone could not replace CarD in M. xanthus. By contrast, when introduced with CarG(Ad), CarD(Ad) functionally replaced CarD in regulating not just 1 but 3 distinct processes in M. xanthus, despite the lower DNA-binding affinity of CarD(Ad) versus CarD in vitro. The ability of the cognate CarD(Ad)-CarG(Ad) pair to interact, but not the noncognate CarD(Ad)-CarG, rationalizes these data. Thus, in chimeras that conserve CarD-CarG interactions, the H1-like CTR of CarD(Ad) could replace the CarD HMGA AT-hooks with no loss of function in vivo. More tellingly, even chimeras with the CarD AT-hook region substituted by human histone H1 CTR or full-length H1 functioned in M. xanthus. Our domain-swap analyses showing functional equivalence of HMGA AT-hooks and H1 CTR in prokaryotic transcriptional regulation provide molecular insights into possible modes of action underlying their biological roles.

Site-specifically phosphorylated forms of H1.5 and H1.2 localized at distinct regions of the nucleus are related to different processes during the cell cycle

The cell cycle-associated phosphorylation of histone H1.5 is manifested as three discrete phosphorylated forms, occurring exclusively on Ser(17), Ser(172), and Ser(188) during interphase. During late G2 and mitosis the up-phosphorylation occurs exclusively on threonine at either Thr(137) or Thr(154) to build the tetraphosphorylated forms of H1.5, whereas the pentaphosphorylated forms result from phosphorylation at Thr(10). To determine the kinetic and spatial distribution of histone H1 phosphorylation within the nucleus of synchronized Hela cells we localized three distinct phosphorylation sites of histone subtype H1.5 using affinity-purified polyclonal antibodies generated against phosphorylated Ser(17), Ser(172), and Thr(10). Immunofluorescence labeling of synchronized HeLa cells using the specific antibodies revealed that phosphorylation of H1.5 Ser(17) appeared early in G1 at discrete speckles followed by phosphorylation of Ser(172). Thr(10) phosphorylation started during prophase, showed highest phosphorylation levels during metaphase, and disappeared clearly before chromatin decondensation occurred. Experiments using the kinase inhibitor staurosporine indicate the involvement of different kinases at the various phospho-sites. Colocalization studies revealed that Ser(172) phosphorylation of H1.5 and H1.2 does colocalize to DNA replication and transcription sites. These results favor the idea that the various site-specifically phosphorylated forms of H1.5 and H1.2 localized at distinct regions of the nucleus are related to different functions during the cell cycle.

Role of chromatin states in transcriptional memory

Establishment of cellular memory and its faithful propagation is critical for successful development of multicellular organisms. As pluripotent cells differentiate, choices in cell fate are inherited and maintained by their progeny throughout the lifetime of the organism. A major factor in this process is the epigenetic inheritance of specific transcriptional states or transcriptional memory. In this review, we discuss chromatin transitions and mechanisms by which they are inherited by subsequent generations. We also discuss illuminating cases of cellular memory in budding yeast and evaluate whether transcriptional memory in yeast is nuclear or cytoplasmically inherited.

Molecular dynamics of histone H1This paper is one of a selection of papers published in this Special Issue, entitled CSBMCB’s 51st Annual Meeting – Epigenetics and Chromatin Dynamics, and has undergone the Journal’s usual peer review process

The histone H1 family of nucleoproteins represents an important class of structural and architectural proteins that are responsible for maintaining and stabilizing higher-order chromatin structure. Essential for mammalian cell viability, they are responsible for gene-specific regulation of transcription and other DNA-dependent processes. In this review, we focus on the wealth of information gathered on the molecular kinetics of histone H1 molecules using novel imaging techniques, such as fluorescence recovery after photobleaching. These experiments have shed light on the effects of H1 phosphorylation and core histone acetylation in influencing chromatin structure and dynamics. We also delineate important concepts surrounding the C-terminal domain of H1, such as the intrinsic disorder hypothesis, and how it affects H1 function. Finally, we address the biochemical mechanisms behind low-affinity H1 binding.

Projected [(1)H, (15)N]-HMQC-[ (1)H, (1)H]-NOESY for large molecular systems: application to a 121 kDa protein-DNA complex

We present a projected [(1)H,(15)N]-HMQC-[(1)H,(1)H]-NOESY experiment for observation of NOE interactions between amide protons with degenerate (15)N chemical shifts in large molecular systems. The projection is achieved by simultaneous evolution of the multiple quantum coherence of the nitrogen spin and the attached proton spin. In this way NOE signals can be separated from direct-correlation peaks also in spectra with low resolution by fully exploiting both (1)H and (15)N frequency differences, such that sensitivity can be increased by using short maximum evolution times. The sensitivity of the experiment is not dependent on the projection angle for projections up to 45 degrees and no additional pulses or delays are required as compared to the conventional 2D [(1)H,(15)N]-HMQC-NOESY. The experiment provides two distinct 2D spectra corresponding to the positive and negative angle projections, respectively. With a linear combination of 1D cross-sections from the two projections the unavoidable sensitivity loss in projection spectra can be compensated for each particular NOE interaction. We demonstrate the application of the novel projection experiment for the observation of an NOE interaction between two sequential glycines with degenerate (15)N chemical shifts in a 121.3 kDa complex of the linker H1 histone protein with a 152 bp linear DNA.

Fine mapping of posttranslational modifications of the linker histone H1 from Drosophila melanogaster

The linker histone H1 binds to the DNA in between adjacent nucleosomes and contributes to chromatin organization and transcriptional control. It is known that H1 carries diverse posttranslational modifications (PTMs), including phosphorylation, lysine methylation and ADP-ribosylation. Their biological functions, however, remain largely unclear. This is in part due to the fact that most of the studies have been performed in organisms that have several H1 variants, which complicates the analyses. We have chosen Drosophila melanogaster, a model organism, which has a single H1 variant, to approach the study of the role of H1 PTMs during embryonic development. Mass spectrometry mapping of the entire sequence of the protein showed phosphorylation only in the ten N-terminal amino acids, mostly at S10. For the first time, changes in the PTMs of a linker H1 during the development of a multicellular organism are reported. The abundance of H1 monophosphorylated at S10 decreases as the embryos age, which suggests that this PTM is related to cell cycle progression and/or cell differentiation. Additionally, we have found a polymorphism in the protein sequence that can be mistaken with lysine methylation if the analysis is not rigorous.

Macromolecular crowding induces a molten globule state in the C-terminal domain of histone H1

We studied the secondary structure of the C-terminal domains of the histone H1 subtypes H1 degrees (C-H1 degrees ) and H1t (C-H1t) in the presence of macromolecular crowding agents (Ficoll 70 and PEG 6000) by IR spectroscopy. The carboxyl-terminal domain has little structure in aqueous solution but became extensively folded in the presence of crowding agents. In 30% PEG, C-H1 degrees contained 19% alpha-helix, 28% beta-sheet, 16% turns, and 31% open loops. Similar proportions were observed in 30% Ficoll 70 and for C-H1t in both crowding agents. The proportions of secondary structure motifs were comparable to those of the DNA-bound domain. Kratky plots of the small-angle x-ray scattering showed that in crowding agents the C-terminus had the compaction of a globular state. Progressive dissipation of the secondary structure and a linear increase in partial heat capacity with temperature together with increased binding of ANS indicated that the C-terminus is not cooperatively folded in crowded conditions. Native-like secondary structure and compactness in absence of folding cooperativity indicate that the C-terminus in crowding agents is in a molten globule state. Folding of the C-terminus in crowded conditions may increase the rate of the transition toward the DNA-bound state and facilitate H1 diffusion inside cell nuclei.

Differential affinity of mammalian histone H1 somatic subtypes for DNA and chromatin

Background

Histone H1 is involved in the formation and maintenance of chromatin higher order structure. H1 has multiple isoforms; the subtypes differ in timing of expression, extent of phosphorylation and turnover rate. In vertebrates, the amino acid substitution rates differ among subtypes by almost one order of magnitude, suggesting that each subtype might have acquired a unique function. We have devised a competitive assay to estimate the relative binding affinities of histone H1 mammalian somatic subtypes H1a-e and H1° for long chromatin fragments (30–35 nucleosomes) in physiological salt (0.14 M NaCl) at constant stoichiometry.

Results

The H1 complement of native chromatin was perturbed by adding an additional amount of one of the subtypes. A certain amount of SAR (scaffold-associated region) DNA was present in the mixture to avoid precipitation of chromatin by excess H1. SAR DNA also provided a set of reference relative affinities, which were needed to estimate the relative affinities of the subtypes for chromatin from the distribution of the subtypes between the SAR and the chromatin. The amounts of chromatin, SAR and additional H1 were adjusted so as to keep the stoichiometry of perturbed chromatin similar to that of native chromatin. H1 molecules freely exchanged between the chromatin and SAR binding sites. In conditions of free exchange, H1a was the subtype of lowest affinity, H1b and H1c had intermediate affinities and H1d, H1e and H1° the highest affinities. Subtype affinities for chromatin differed by up to 19-fold. The relative affinities of the subtypes for chromatin were equivalent to those estimated for a SAR DNA fragment and a pUC19 fragment of similar length. Avian H5 had an affinity ~12-fold higher than H1e for both DNA and chromatin.

Conclusion

H1 subtypes freely exchange in vitro between chromatin binding sites in physiological salt (0.14 M NaCl). The large differences in relative affinity of the H1 subtypes for chromatin suggest that differential affinity could be functionally relevant and thus contribute to the functional differentiation of the subtypes. The conservation of the relative affinities for SAR and non-SAR DNA, in spite of a strong preference for SAR sequences, indicates that differential affinity alone cannot be responsible for the heterogeneous distribution of some subtypes in cell nuclei.

Mapping the interaction surface of linker histone H1(0) with the nucleosome of native chromatin in vivo

H1 linker histones stabilize the nucleosome, limit nucleosome mobility and facilitate the condensation of metazoan chromatin. Here, we have combined systematic mutagenesis, measurement of in vivo binding by photobleaching microscopy, and structural modeling to determine the binding geometry of the globular domain of the H1(0) linker histone variant within the nucleosome in unperturbed, native chromatin in vivo. We demonstrate the existence of two distinct DNA-binding sites within the globular domain that are formed by spatial clustering of multiple residues. The globular domain is positioned via interaction of one binding site with the major groove near the nucleosome dyad. The second site interacts with linker DNA adjacent to the nucleosome core. Multiple residues bind cooperatively to form a highly specific chromatosome structure that provides a mechanism by which individual domains of linker histones interact to facilitate chromatin condensation.

DNA-induced secondary structure of the carboxyl-terminal domain of histone H1

We have studied the secondary structure of the carboxyl-terminal domains of linker histone H1 subtypes H1(0) (C-H1(0)) and H1t (C-H1t), free in solution and bound to DNA, by IR spectroscopy. The carboxyl-terminal domain has little structure in aqueous solution but becomes extensively folded upon interaction with DNA. The secondary structure elements present in the bound carboxyl-terminal domain include the alpha-helix, beta-structure, turns, and open loops. The structure of the bound domain shows a significant dependence on salt concentration. In low salt (10 mm NaCl), there is a residual amount of random coil, 7% in C-H1(0) and 12% in C-H1t. In physiological salt concentrations (140 mm NaCl), the carboxyl termini become fully structured. Under these conditions, C-H1(0) contained 24% alpha-helix, 25% beta-structure, 17% open loops, and 33% turns. The latter component could include a substantial proportion of the 3(10) helix. Despite their low sequence identity (approximately 30%), the representation of the different structural motifs in C-H1t was similar to that in C-H1(0). Examination of the changes in the amide I components in the 20-80 degrees C temperature interval showed that the secondary structure of the DNA-bound C-H1t is for the most part extremely stable. The H1 carboxyl-terminal domain appears to belong to the so-called disordered proteins, undergoing coupled binding and folding.

H1 family histones in the nucleus. Control of binding and localization by the C-terminal domain

H1 histones bind to DNA as they enter and exit the nucleosome. H1 histones have a tripartite structure consisting of a short N-terminal domain, a highly conserved central globular domain, and a lysine-and arginine-rich C-terminal domain. The C-terminal domain comprises approximately half of the total amino acid content of the protein, is essential for the formation of compact chromatin structures, and contains the majority of the amino acid variations that define the individual histone H1 family members. This region contains several cell cycle-regulated phosphorylation sites and is thought to function through a charge-neutralization process, neutralizing the DNA phosphate backbone to allow chromatin compaction. In this study, we use fluorescence microscopy and fluorescence recovery after photobleaching to define the behavior of the individual histone H1 subtypes in vivo. We find that there are dramatic differences in the binding affinity of the individual histone H1 subtypes in vivo and differences in their preference for euchromatin and heterochromatin. Further, we show that subtype-specific properties originate with the C terminus and that the differences in histone H1 binding are not consistent with the relatively small changes in the net charge of the C-terminal domains.

Myogenic regulatory factors: Redundant or specific functions? Lessons fromXenopus

The discovery, in the late 1980s, of the MyoD gene family of muscle transcription factors has proved to be a milestone in understanding the molecular events controlling the specification and differentiation of the muscle lineage. From gene knock-out mice experiments progressively emerged the idea that each myogenic regulatory factor (MRF) has evolved a specialized as well as a redundant role in muscle differentiation. To date, MyoD serves as a paradigm for the MRF mode of function. The features of gene regulation by MyoD support a model in which subprograms of gene expression are achieved by the combination of promoter-specific regulation of MyoD binding and MyoD-mediated binding of various ancillary proteins. This binding likely includes site-specific chromatin reorganization by means of direct or indirect interaction with remodeling enzymes. In this cascade of molecular events leading to the proper and reproducible activation of muscle gene expression, the role and mode of function of other MRFs still remains largely unclear. Recent in vivo findings using the Xenopus embryo model strongly support the concept that a single MRF can specifically control a subset of muscle genes and, thus, can be substituted by other MRFs albeit with dramatically lower efficiency. The topic of this review is to summarize the molecular data accounting for a redundant and/or specific involvement of each member of the MyoD family in myogenesis in the light of recent studies on the Xenopus model.

The preferential binding of histone H1 to DNA scaffold-associated regions is determined by its C-terminal domain

Histone H1 preferentially binds and aggregates scaffold-associated regions (SARs) via the numerous homopolymeric oligo(dA).oligo(dT) tracts present within these sequences. Here we show that the mammalian somatic subtypes H1a,b,c,d,e and H1 degrees and the male germline-specific subtype H1t, all preferentially bind to the Drosophila histone SAR. Experiments with the isolated domains show that whilst the C-terminal domain maintains strong and preferential binding, the N-terminal and globular domains show weak binding and poor specificity for the SAR. The preferential binding of SAR by the H1 molecule thus appears to be determined by its highly basic C-terminal domain. Salmine, a typical fish protamine, which could have its evolutionary origin in histone H1, also shows preferential binding to the SAR. The interaction of distamycin, a minor groove binder with high affinity for homopolymeric oligo(dA).oligo(dT) tracts, abolishes preferential binding of the C-terminal domain of histone H1 and protamine to the SAR, suggesting the involvement of the DNA minor groove in the interaction.

Unique Residues on the H2A.Z Containing Nucleosome Surface Are Important for Xenopus laevis Development

Critical to vertebrate development is a complex program of events that establishes specialized tissues and organs from a single fertilized cell. Transitions in chromatin architecture, through alterations in its composition and modification markings, characterize early development. A variant of the H2A core histone, H2A.Z, is essential for development of both Drosophila and mice. We recently showed that H2A.Z is required for proper chromosome segregation. Whether H2A.Z has additional specific functions during early development remains unknown. Here we demonstrate that depletion of H2A.Z by RNA interference perturbs Xenopus laevis development at gastrulation leading to embryos with malformed, shortened trunks. Consistent with this result, whole embryo in situ hybridization indicates that endogenous expression of H2A.Z is highly enriched in the notochord. H2A.Z modifies the surface of a canonical nucleosome by creating an extended acidic patch and a metal ion-binding site stabilized by two histidine residues. To examine the significance of these specific surface regions in vivo, we investigated the consequences of overexpressing H2A.Z and mutant proteins during X. laevis development. Overexpression of H2A.Z slowed development following gastrulation. Altering the extended acidic patch of H2A.Z reversed this effect. Remarkably, modification of a single stabilizing histidine residue located on the exposed surface of an H2A.Z containing nucleosome was sufficient to disrupt normal trunk formation mimicking the effect observed by RNA interference. Taken together, these results argue that key determinants located on the surface of an H2A.Z nucleosome play an important specific role during embryonic patterning and provide a link between a chromatin structural modification and normal vertebrate development.

The C-terminal domain is the primary determinant of histone H1 binding to chromatin in vivo

We have used a combination of kinetic measurements and targeted mutations to show that the C-terminal domain is required for high-affinity binding of histone H1 to chromatin, and phosphorylations can disrupt binding by affecting the secondary structure of the C terminus. By measuring the fluorescence recovery after photo-bleaching profiles of green fluorescent protein-histone H1 proteins in living cells, we find that the deletion of the N terminus only modestly reduces binding affinity. Deletion of the C terminus, however, almost completely eliminates histone H1.1 binding. Specific mutations of the C-terminal domain identified Thr-152 and Ser-183 as novel regulatory switches that control the binding of histone H1.1 in vivo. It is remarkable that the single amino acid substitution of Thr-152 with glutamic acid was almost as effective as the truncation of the C terminus to amino acid 151 in destabilizing histone H1.1 binding in vivo. We found that modifications to the C terminus can affect histone H1 binding dramatically but have little or no influence on the charge distribution or the overall net charge of this domain. A comparison of individual point mutations and deletion mutants, when reviewed collectively, cannot be reconciled with simple charge-dependent mechanisms of C-terminal domain function of linker histones.

Mammalian linker-histone subtypes differentially affect gene expression in vivo

Posttranslational modifications and remodeling of nucleosomes are critical factors in the regulation of transcription. Higher-order folding of chromatin also is likely to contribute to the control of gene expression, but the absence of a detailed description of the structure of the chromatin fiber has impaired progress in this area. Mammalian somatic cells contain a set of H1 linker-histone subtypes, H1 (0) and H1a to H1e, that bind to nucleosome core particles and to the linker DNA between nucleosomes. To determine whether the H1 histone subtypes play differential roles in the regulation of gene expression, we combined mice lacking specific H1 histone subtypes with mice carrying transgenes subject to position effects. Because position effects result from the unique chromatin structure created by the juxtaposition of regulatory elements in the transgene and at the site of integration, transgenes can serve as exquisitely sensitive indicators of chromatin structure. We report that some, but not all, linker histones can attenuate or accentuate position effects. The results suggest that the linker-histone subtypes play differential roles in the control of gene expression and that the sequential arrangement of the linker histones on the chromatin fiber might regulate higher-order chromatin structure and fine-tune expression levels.

When the embryonic genome flexes its muscles

During the development of multicellular organisms, both transient and stable gene expression patterns have to be established in a precisely orchestrated sequence. Evidence from diverse model organisms indicates that this epigenetic program involves not only transcription factors, but also the local structure, composition, and modification of chromatin, which define and maintain the accessibility and transcriptional competence of the nucleosomal DNA template. A paradigm for the interdependence of development and chromatin is constituted by the mechanisms controlling the specification and differentiation of the skeletal muscle cell lineage in vertebrates, which is the topic of this review.

An inducible helix-Gly-Gly-helix motif in the N-terminal domain of histone H1e: a CD and NMR study

Knowledge of the structural properties of linker histones is important to the understanding of their role in higher-order chromatin structure and gene regulation. Here we study the conformational properties of the peptide Ac-EKTPVKKKARKAAGGAKRKTSG-NH(2) (NE-1) by circular dichroism and (1)H-NMR. This peptide corresponds to the positively charged region of the N-terminal domain, adjacent to the globular domain, of mouse histone H1e (residues 15-36). This is the most abundant H1 subtype in many kinds of mammalian somatic cells. NE-1 is mainly unstructured in aqueous solution, but in the presence of the secondary-structure stabilizer trifluoroethanol (TFE) it acquires an alpha-helical structure. In 90% TFE solution the alpha-helical population is approximately 40%. In these conditions, NE-1 is structured in two alpha-helices that comprise almost all the peptide, namely, from Thr17 to Ala27 and from Gly29 to Thr34. Both helical regions are highly amphipathic, with the basic residues on one face of the helix and the apolar ones on the other. The two helical elements are separated by a Gly-Gly motif. Gly-Gly motifs at equivalent positions are found in many vertebrate H1 subtypes. Structure calculations show that the Gly-Gly motif behaves as a flexible linker between the helical regions. The wide range of relative orientations of the helical axes allowed by the Gly-Gly motif may facilitate the tracking of the phosphate backbone by the helical elements or the simultaneous binding of two nonconsecutive DNA segments in chromatin.

DNA-induced alpha-helical structure in the NH2-terminal domain of histone H1

It is important to establish the structural properties of linker histones to understand the role they play in chromatin higher order structure and gene regulation. Here, we use CD, NMR, and IR spectroscopy to study the conformation of the amino-terminal domain of histone H1 degrees, free in solution and bound to the DNA. The NH(2)-terminal domain has little structure in aqueous solution, but it acquires a substantial amount of alpha-helical structure in the presence of trifluoroethanol (TFE). As in other H1 subtypes, the basic residues of the NH(2)-terminal domain of histone H1 degrees are clustered in its COOH-terminal half. According to the NMR results, the helical region comprises the basic cluster (Lys(11)-Lys(20)) and extends until Asp(23). The fractional helicity of this region in 90% TFE is about 50%. His(24) together with Pro(25) constitute the joint between the NH(2)-terminal helix and helix I of the globular domain. Infrared spectroscopy shows that interaction with the DNA induces an amount of alpha-helical structure equivalent to that observed in TFE. As coulombic interactions are involved in complex formation, it is highly likely in the complexes with DNA that the minimal region with alpha-helical structure is that containing the basic cluster. In chromatin, the high positive charge density of the inducible NH(2)-terminal helical element may contribute to the binding stability of the globular domain.

Hormone-mediated dephosphorylation of specific histone H1 isoforms

We have previously shown a connection between histone H1 phosphorylation and the transcriptional competence of the hormone inducible mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV) promoter. Prolonged exposure of mouse cells to dexamethasone concurrently dephosphorylated histone H1 and rendered the MMTV promoter refractory to hormonal stimulation and, therefore, transcriptionally unresponsive. Using electrospray mass spectrometry, we demonstrate here that prolonged dexamethasone treatment differentially effects a subset of the six somatic H1 isoforms in mouse cells. H1 isoforms H1.0, H1.1, and H1.2 are non-responsive to hormone whereas prolonged dexamethasone treatment effectively dephosphorylated the H1.3, H1.4, and H1.5 isoforms. The protein kinase inhibitor staurosporine, shown to dephosphorylate histone H1 and down-regulate MMTV in cultured cells, appears only to completely dephosphorylate the H1.3 isoform. These results suggest that dephosphorylation of specific histone H1 isoforms may contribute to the previously observed decrease in transcriptional competence of the MMTV promoter through the modulation of chromatin structure. In a broader sense, this work advances the hypothesis that post-translational modifications of individual histone H1 isoforms directly influence the transcriptional activation/repression of specific genes.

Induction of secondary structure in a COOH-terminal peptide of histone H1 by interaction with the DNA: an infrared spectroscopy study

We have studied the conformation of the peptide Ac-EPKRSVAFKKTKKEVKKVATPKK (CH-1), free in solution and bound to the DNA, by Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy. The peptide belongs to the COOH-terminal domain of histone H1(0) (residues 99-121) and is adjacent to the central globular domain of the protein. In aqueous (D(2)O) solution the amide I' is dominated by component bands at 1643 cm(-1) and 1662 cm(-1), which have been assigned to random coil conformations and turns, respectively. In accordance with previous NMR results, the latter component has been interpreted as arising in turn-like conformations in rapid equilibrium with unfolded states. The peptide becomes fully structured either in 90% trifluoroethanol (TFE) solution or upon interaction with the DNA. In these conditions, the contributions of turn (1662 cm(-1)) and random coil components virtually disappear. In TFE, the spectrum is dominated by the alpha-helical component (1654 cm(-1)). The band at 1662 cm(-1) shifts to 1670 cm(-1), and has been assigned to the COOH-terminal TPKK motif in a more stable turn conformation. A band at 1637 cm(-1), also present in TFE, has been assigned to 3(10) helical structure. The amide I' band of the complexes with the DNA retains the components that were attributed to 3(10) helix and the TPKK turn. In the complexes with the DNA, the alpha-helical component observed in TFE splits into two components at 1657 cm(-1) and 1647 cm(-1). Both components are inside the spectral region of alpha-helical structures. Our results support the presence of inducible helical and turn elements, both sharing the character of DNA-binding motifs.

A compendium of the histone H1 family of somatic subtypes: An elusive cast of characters and their characteristics

The last 35 years has seen a substantial amount of information collected about the somatic H1 subtypes, yet much of this work has been overshadowed by research into highly divergent isoforms of H1, such as H5. Reports from several laboratories in the past few years have begun to call into question some of the traditional views regarding the general function of linker histones and their heterogeneity. Hence, the impression in some circles is that less is known about these ubiquitous nuclear proteins as compared with the core histones. The goal of the following review is to acquaint the reader with the ubiquitous somatic H1s by categorizing them and their characteristics into several classes. The reasons for our current state of misunderstanding is put into a historical context along with recent controversies centering on the role of H1 in the nucleus. Finally, we propose a model that may explain the functional role of H1 heterogeneity in chromatin compaction.Key words: histone H1, linker histones, chromatin organization, chromatin compaction, heat shock.

foxD5a, a Xenopus winged helix gene, maintains an immature neural ectoderm via transcriptional repression that is dependent on the C-terminal domain

Xenopus foxD5a, the full-length fork head gene previously described as a PCR fragment (XFLIP), is first detectable at stage II of oogenesis. Low-abundance maternal transcripts are localized to the animal hemisphere of the cleavage embryo, and protein can be translocated to the nucleus prior to the onset of zygotic transcription. Zygotic expression is strongest in the presumptive neural ectoderm at gastrula and neural plate stages, but there is minor paraxial mesodermal expression during primary gastrulation that becomes significant in the tail bud during secondary gastrulation. Expression of foxD5a in animal cap explants induces elongation and expression of mesodermal, neural-inducing, and early neural-specifying genes, indicating a role in dorsal axis formation. Zygotic foxD5a expression is induced strongly by siamois, moderately by cerberus, weakly by Wnt8 and noggin, and not by chordin in animal cap explants. Expression of foxD5a in whole embryos has differential dorsal and ventral effects. Ventral mRNA injection induces partial secondary axes composed of expanded mesodermal and epidermal tissues, but does not induce ectopic neural tissues. Dorsal mRNA injection causes hypertrophy of the neural plate and expansion of early neural genes (sox3 and otx2), but this is not the result of increased proliferation or expanded neural-inducing mesoderm. The neural plate appears to be maintained in an immature state because otx2 expression is expanded and expression of en2, Krox20, proneural genes (Xnrgn1, neuroD) and a neural differentiation gene (n-tubulin) is repressed in foxD5a-expressing cells. These results indicate that foxD5a maintains an undifferentiated neural ectoderm after neural induction. Expression of foxD5a constructs fused with the engrailed repressor domain or with the VP16 activation domain demonstrates that FoxD5a acts as a transcriptional repressor in axis formation and neural plate expansion. Deletion constructs indicate that this activity requires the C-terminal domain of the protein.

The distribution of somatic H1 subtypes is non-random on active vs. inactive chromatin: distribution in human fetal fibroblasts

Chromatin immunoprecipitation was employed to determine whether or not the previously reported depletion of histone H1 on actively transcribed sequences was selective with respect to H1 subtypes. DNA of immunofractionated chromatin was analyzed by slot-blots for repetitive sequences and PCR for single and low-copy sequences. Based on the analysis of a diverse set of sequences, we report distinct differences in subtype distributions. Actively transcribed chromatin, as well as chromatin poised for transcription, is characterized by a relative depletion of somatic H1 subtypes 2 and 4 (H1s-2 and H1s-4),whereas facultative and constitutive heterochromatin contain all four somatic subtypes. These results support a model in which subtypes are selectively depleted upon gene expression. In turn, the data also support the possibility that the somatic subtypes have different functional roles based on their selective depletion from different classes of DNA sequences.

Histone deacetylase activity is required for the induction of the MyoD muscle cell lineage in Xenopus

Acetylation of nucleosome core histones, which is positively correlated with transcriptional activity, is developmentally regulated in Xenopus. Here we have used the specific histone deacetylase (HDAC)-inhibitor trichostatin A (TSA) to induce precocious histone hyperacetylation in the early frog embryo in order to investigate the potential role of the endogenous changes in chromatin acetylation for the temporally programmed induction of skeletal myogenesis. We show that TSA-treatment (i) selectively blocked the transcriptional induction of the myoD gene, and (ii) severely reduced subsequent muscle differentiation. Both phenotypes required TSA application before gastrulation. This indicates that HDAC activity is required early for the formation of the frog embryonic musculature, apparently for the induction of the MyoD-dependent muscle cell lineage.

Natural allelic variation of duck erythrocyte histone H1b

In our previous work (J. Palyga, Genetic polymorphisms of histone H1. b in duck erythrocytes. Hereditas 114, 85-89, 1991) we reported a genetic polymorphism of duck erythrocyte histone H1.b. Here, we screened H1 preparations in a two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel to refine the distribution of allelic forms of H1.b in fifteen duck populations. We have revealed that the frequency of H1.b allelic variants was significantly different among many conservative and breeding duck groups. While b(1) and b(3) were common in all populations screened, the allele b(2), with a slightly lower apparent molecular weight, was confined mainly to brown-feathered ducks (Khaki Campbell and Orpington) and descendent lines. The C- and N-terminal peptides released upon cleavage with N-bromosuccinimide and Staphylococcus aureus protease V8 from duck allelic histones H1. b2 and H1.b3, respectively, migrated differently in the gel, probably as a result of potential amino acid variation in a C-terminal domain.

Review: chromatin structural features and targets that regulate transcription

The nucleosome and chromatin fiber provide the common structural framework for transcriptional control in eukaryotes. The folding of DNA within these structures can both promote and impede transcription dependent on structural context. Importantly, neither the nucleosome nor the chromatin fiber is a static structure. Histone dissociation, histone modification, nucleosome mobility, and assorted allosteric transitions contribute to transcriptional control. Chromatin remodeling is associated with gene activation and repression. Energy-dependent processes mediate the assembly of both activating and repressive proteins into the nucleosomal infrastructure. Recent progress allows the structural consequences of these processes to be visualized at the chromosomal level. DNA and RNA polymerase, SWI/SNF complexes, histone deacetylases, and acetyltransferases are targeted by gene-specific regulators to mediate these structural transitions. The mistargeting of these enzymes contributes to human developmental abnormalities and tumorigenesis. These observations illuminate the roles of chromatin and chromosomal structural biology in human disease.

A helix-turn motif in the C-terminal domain of histone H1

The structural study of peptides belonging to the terminal domains of histone H1 can be considered as a step toward the understanding of the function of H1 in chromatin. The conformational properties of the peptide Ac-EPKRSVAFKKTKKEVKKVATPKK (CH-1), which belongs to the C-terminal domain of histone H1(o) (residues 99-121) and is adjacent to the central globular domain of the protein, were examined by means of 1H-NMR and circular dichroism. In aqueous solution, CH-1 behaved as a mainly unstructured peptide, although turn-like conformations in rapid equilibrium with the unfolded state could be present. Addition of trifluoroethanol resulted in a substantial increase of the helical content. The helical limits, as indicated by (i,i + 3) nuclear Overhauser effect (NOE) cross correlations and significant up-field conformational shifts of the C(alpha) protons, span from Pro100 to Val116, with Glu99 and Ala117 as N- and C-caps. A structure calculation performed on the basis of distance constraints derived from NOE cross peaks in 90% trifluoroethanol confirmed the helical structure of this region. The helical region has a marked amphipathic character, due to the location of all positively charged residues on one face of the helix and all the hydrophobic residues on the opposite face. The peptide has a TPKK motif at the C-terminus, following the alpha-helical region. The observed NOE connectivities suggest that the TPKK sequence adopts a type (I) beta-turn conformation, a sigma-turn conformation or a combination of both, in fast equilibrium with unfolded states. Sequences of the kind (S/T)P(K/R)(K/R) have been proposed as DNA binding motifs. The CH-1 peptide, thus, combines a positively charged amphipathic helix and a turn as potential DNA-binding motifs.

Reprogramming nuclei: insights from cloning, nuclear transfer and heterokaryons

Mammals and amphibians can be cloned following the transfer of embryonic nuclei into enucleated eggs or oocytes. As nuclear functions become more specialized in the differentiated cells of an adult, successful cloning using these nuclei as donors becomes more difficult. Differentiation involves the assembly of specialized forms of repressive chromatin including linker histones, Polycomb group proteins and methyl-CpG-binding proteins. These structures compartmentalize chromatin into functional domains and maintain the stability of the differentiated state through successive cell divisions. Efficient cloning requires the erasure of these structures. The erasure can be accomplished through use of molecular chaperones and enzymatic activities present in the oocyte, egg or zygote. We discuss the mechanisms involved in reprogramming nuclei after nuclear transfer and compare them with those that occur during remodeling of somatic nuclei after heterokaryon formation. Finally we discuss how one might alter the properties of adult nuclei to improve the efficiency of cloning.

Transcriptional repression by XPc1, a new Polycomb homolog in Xenopus laevis embryos, is independent of histone deacetylase

The Polycomb group (Pc-G) genes encode proteins that assemble into complexes implicated in the epigenetic maintenance of heritable patterns of expression of developmental genes, a function largely conserved from Drosophila to mammals and plants. The Pc-G is thought to act at the chromatin level to silence expression of target genes; however, little is known about the molecular basis of this repression. In keeping with the evidence that Pc-G homologs in higher vertebrates exist in related pairs, we report here the isolation of XPc1, a second Polycomb homolog in Xenopus laevis. We show that XPc1 message is maternally deposited in a translationally masked form in Xenopus oocytes, with XPc1 protein first appearing in embryonic nuclei shortly after the blastula stage. XPc1 acts as a transcriptional repressor in vivo when tethered to a promoter in Xenopus embryos. We find that XPc1-mediated repression can be only partially alleviated by an increase in transcription factor dosage and that inhibition of deacetylase activity by trichostatin A treatment has no effect on XPc1 repression, suggesting that histone deacetylation does not form the basis for Pc-G-mediated repression in our assay.

How do linker histones mediate differential gene expression?

In developing Xenopus laevis embryos the multiple-copy oocyte-type 5S RNA genes are progressively shut down. Results presented in three recent articles 1-3 together demonstrate that replacement of the cleavage stage linker histone B4 by somatic H1 leads to chromatosomes positioned directly over these genes and adjacent sequences so as to occlude the binding site for the critical transcription factor TFIIIA. In contrast, on the somatic-type 5S genes the somatic H1 positions chromatosomes about 65 bp further upstream, thereby leaving the TFIIIA binding site exposed and the genes active. The somatic linker histone thus functions as a specific gene repressor.

Specific binding of high-mobility-group I (HMGI) protein and histone H1 to the upstream AT-rich region of the murine beta interferon promoter: HMGI protein acts as a potential antirepressor of the promoter

The high-mobility-group I (HMGI) protein is a nonhistone component of active chromatin. In this work, we demonstrate that HMGI protein specifically binds to the AT-rich region of the murine beta interferon (IFN-beta) promoter localized upstream of the murine virus-responsive element (VRE). Contrary to what has been described for the human promoter, HMGI protein did not specifically bind to the VRE of the murine IFN-beta promoter. Stably transfected promoters carrying mutations on this HMGI binding site displayed delayed virus-induced kinetics of transcription. When integrated into chromatin, the mutated promoter remained repressed and never reached normal transcriptional activity. Such a phenomenon was not observed with transiently transfected promoters upon which chromatin was only partially reconstituted. Using UV footprinting, we show that the upstream AT-rich sequences of the murine IFN-beta promoter constitute a preferential binding region for histone H1. Transfection with a plasmid carrying scaffold attachment regions as well as incubation with distamycin led to the derepression of the IFN-beta promoter stably integrated into chromatin. In vitro, HMGI protein was able to displace histone H1 from the upstream AT-rich region of the wild-type promoter but not from the promoter carrying mutations on the upstream high-affinity HMGI binding site. Our results suggest that the binding of histone H1 to the upstream AT-rich region of the promoter might be partly responsible for the constitutive repression of the promoter. The displacement by HMGI protein of histone H1 could help to convert the IFN-beta promoter from a repressed to an active state.

Lack of enhancer function in mammals is unique to oocytes and fertilized eggs

Previous studies have shown that the lack of novel coactivator activity in mouse oocytes and one-cell embryos (fertilized eggs) renders them incapable of utilizing Gal4:VP16-dependent enhancers (distal elements) but not promoters (proximal elements) in regulating transcription. This coactivator activity first appears in two- to four-cell embryos coincident with the major activation of zygotic gene expression. Here we show that whereas oocytes and fertilized eggs could utilize Sp1-dependent promoters, they could not utilize Sp1-dependent enhancers, although they showed promoter repression, which is a requirement for delineating enhancer function. In contrast, both Sp1-dependent promoters and enhancers were functional in two- to four-cell embryos. Furthermore, the same embryonic stem cell mRNA that provided the coactivator activity for Gal4:VP16-dependent enhancer function also provided Sp1-dependent enhancer function in oocytes. Therefore, the coactivator activity appears to be a requirement for general enhancer function. To determine whether the absence of enhancer function is a unique property of oocytes or a general property of other terminally differentiated cells, transcription was examined in terminally differentiated hNT neurons and their precursors, undifferentiated NT2 stem cells. The results showed that both cell types could utilize enhancers and promoters. Thus, in mammals, the lack of enhancer function appears to be unique to oocytes and fertilized eggs, suggesting that it provides a safeguard against premature activation of genes prior to zygotic gene expression during development.

Chromatin disruption and modification

Chromatin disruption and modification are associated with transcriptional regulation by diverse coactivators and corepressors. Here we discuss the possible structural basis and functional consequences of the observed alterations in chromatin associated with transcriptional activation and repression. Recent advances in defining the roles of individual histones and their domains in the assembly and maintenance of regulatory architectures provide a framework for understanding how chromatin remodelling machines, histone acetyltransferases and deacetylases function.

Role of histone H1 as an architectural determinant of chromatin structure and as a specific repressor of transcription on Xenopus oocyte 5S rRNA genes

We explore the role of histone H1 as a DNA sequence-dependent architectural determinant of chromatin structure and of transcriptional activity in chromatin. The Xenopus laevis oocyte- and somatic-type 5S rRNA genes are differentially transcribed in embryonic chromosomes in vivo depending on the incorporation of somatic histone H1 into chromatin. We establish that this effect can be reconstructed at the level of a single nucleosome. H1 selectively represses oocyte-type 5S rRNA genes by directing the stable positioning of a nucleosome such that transcription factors cannot bind to the gene. This effect does not occur on the somatic-type genes. Histone H1 binds to the 5' end of the nucleosome core on the somatic 5S rRNA gene, leaving key regulatory elements in the promoter accessible, while histone H1 binds to the 3' end of the nucleosome core on the oocyte 5S rRNA genes, specifically blocking access to a key promoter element (the C box). TFIIIA can bind to the somatic 5S rRNA gene assembled into a nucleosome in the presence of H1. Because H1 binds with equivalent affinities to nucleosomes containing either gene, we establish that it is the sequence-selective assembly of a specific repressive chromatin structure on the oocyte 5S rRNA genes that accounts for differential transcriptional repression. Thus, general components of chromatin can determine the assembly of specific regulatory nucleoprotein complexes.