Analysis of alloreactivity and intragraft cytokine profiles in living donor liver transplant recipients with graft acceptance

Clinical liver transplant tolerance: Recent topics

BACKGROUND

Immunosuppression is essential after organ transplantation to prevent severe graft injury due to rejection, but in long-term, transplanted organs are generally accepted with minimal dose of immunosuppression, and adverse effects of it such as renal dysfunction, diabetes and development of malignancies might become to exceed over the benefits in majority of the cases. Accordingly, to achieve the immunologic tolerance has been the ultimate goal in organ transplantation, and the liver has been well recognized as the tolerogenic organ compared to other organs.

METHODS

We referred the reported studies showing the actual protocol to achieve the immunologic tolerance after clinical liver transplantation.

RESULTS

Actually, two main procedures as "elective weaning of immunosuppression" and/or "cell therapy" using various immune-related cells have been introduced to induce the immunologic tolerance in clinical liver transplantation. The cell therapy, especially using regulatory T-cell has been reported to achieve definitive immunologic tolerance in living donor liver transplantation.

CONCLUSION

Although it is still developing, the induction of immunologic tolerance in clinical liver transplantation is realistic. Herein, the current topics of immunologic tolerance in liver transplantation is described.

Cytokines in Liver Transplantation

Cytokines, soluble mediators of the immune system, play a critical role in the pathogenesis of autoimmune, allergic and infectious diseases. They are also implicated in the initiation and development of allograft rejection. During recent years, there have been considerable advances in generating novel anti-cytokine agents with promoted efficacy and safety, which could be administrated for managing dysregulated cytokine secretion; besides, gene therapy for overexpression of immunomodulatory cytokines has shown substantial improvements. Liver transplantation has been established as a life-saving treatment for end-stage hepatic diseases but the growing number of recipients urge for improved post-transplant care including tolerance induction, infection control and resolving immunosuppressant drugs adverse effects. Cytokines with a wide range of proinflammatory and regulatory properties might be considered as potential therapeutic targets for selective suppression or enhancement of the immune responses in recipients. In the present review, we aimed to summarize the positive and negative effects of cytokines on liver allograft in addition to their prognostic and therapeutic values.

Anti-Donor Regulatory T-Cell Therapy in Adult-to-Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation: A Case Report

We report on the case of a 50-year-old female patient with symptomatic polycystic liver disease who underwent living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) using right liver graft from her ABO-identical husband. To achieve operational tolerance, regulatory T-cell (T-reg)-based cell therapy was applied, following the protocol introduced by Todo et al. Briefly, donor lymphocytes were collected by leukapheresis 20 days before LDLT without any adverse events, and the cells were irradiated with a dose of 30 Gy and kept frozen. Lymphopheresis of the recipient was conducted in a similar manner 1 day before LDLT, and donor cells and recipient cells were cultured with anti-CD80/86 antibodies to induce the donor-specific T-reg. At 14 days of culture, the CD4⁺CD25⁺Foxp3⁺ cells had increased from 1.51% to 5.21%, and mixed lymphocyte reaction assay using an intracellular fluorescent dye carboxyfluorescein diacetate succinimidyl ester-labeling technique revealed donor-specific hyporesponsiveness of CD4-positive lymphocytes. On postoperative day (POD) 13 (14 days of culture), these cells were infused to the recipient intravenously without any adverse events. Initial immunosuppression consisted of tacrolimus, steroid and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and cyclophosphamide (40 mg/kg) administered on POD 5. Both the steroid and MMF were continued until 4 weeks after LDLT, and the patient was discharged on POD 30 with normal liver function. On POD 52, the patient developed acute cellular rejection and received appropriate reinforcement of immunosuppressive therapy and is currently doing well with normal liver function 30 months after LDLT with reduced anti-donor allo-activity. In summary, T-reg therapy was safely performed in adult LDLT, and we are following the patient carefully to determine whether she can achieve operational tolerance in the future.

Clinical and Basic Research Progress on Treg-Induced Immune Tolerance in Liver Transplantation

Rejection after organ transplantation is a cause of graft failure. Effectively reducing rejection and inducing tolerance is a challenge in the field of transplantation immunology. The liver, as an immunologically privileged organ, has high rates of spontaneous and operational tolerance after transplantation, allowing it to maintain its normal function for long periods. Although modern immunosuppression regimens have serious toxicity and side effects, it is very risky to discontinue immunosuppression regimens blindly. A more effective treatment to induce immune tolerance is the most sought-after goal in transplant medicine. Tregs have been shown to play a pivotal role in the regulation of immune balance, and infusion of Tregs can also effectively prevent rejection and cure autoimmune diseases without significant side effects. Given the immune characteristics of the liver, the correct use of Tregs can more effectively induce the occurrence of operational tolerance for liver transplants than for other organ transplants. This review mainly summarizes the latest research advances regarding the characteristics of the hepatic immune microenvironment, operational tolerance, Treg generation in vitro, and the application of Tregs in liver transplantation. It is hoped that this review will provide a deeper understanding of Tregs as the most effective treatment to induce and maintain operational tolerance after liver transplantation.

Strategies for Liver Transplantation Tolerance

Liver transplant (LT) recipients require life-long immunosuppression (IS) therapy to preserve allograft function. The risks of chronic IS include an increased frequency of malignancy, infection, renal impairment, and other systemic toxicities. Despite advances in IS, long-term LT outcomes have not been improved over the past three decades. Standard-of-care (SoC) therapy can, in rare cases, lead to development of operational tolerance that permits safe withdrawal of maintenance IS. However, successful IS withdrawal cannot be reliably predicted and, in current prospective studies, is attempted several years after the transplant procedure, after considerable exposure to the cumulative burden of maintenance therapy. A recent pilot clinical trial in liver tolerance induction demonstrated that peri-transplant immunomodulation, using a regulatory T-cell (Treg) approach, can reduce donor-specific alloreactivity and allow early IS withdrawal. Herein we review protocols for active tolerance induction in liver transplantation, with a focus on identifying tolerogenic cell populations, as well as barriers to tolerance. In addition, we propose the use of novel IS agents to promote immunomodulatory mechanisms favoring tolerance. With numerous IS withdrawal trials underway, improved monitoring and use of novel immunomodulatory strategies will help provide the necessary knowledge to establish an active liver tolerance induction protocol for widespread use.

Revisiting the liver’s role in transplant alloimmunity

The transplanted liver can modulate the recipient immune system to induce tolerance after transplantation. This phenomenon was observed nearly five decades ago. Subsequently, the liver’s role in multivisceral transplantation was recognized, as it has a protective role in preventing rejection of simultaneously transplanted solid organs such as kidney and heart. The liver has a unique architecture and is home to many cells involved in immunity and inflammation. After transplantation, these cells migrate from the liver into the recipient. Early studies identified chimerism as an important mechanism by which the liver modulates the human immune system. Recent studies on human T-cell subtypes, cytokine expression, and gene expression in the allograft have expanded our knowledge on the potential mechanisms underlying immunomodulation. In this article, we discuss the privileged state of liver transplantation compared to other solid organ transplantation, the liver allograft’s role in multivisceral transplantation, various cells in the liver involved in immune responses, and the potential mechanisms underlying immunomodulation of host alloresponses.

Clinical significance of Th17 cells in kidney transplantation

Transplantation research has focused on cytotoxic T-cell and plasma cell/B-cell-targeted strategies, but little attention has been paid to the role of T helper 17 (Th17) cells in allograft dysfunction. However, accumulating evidence suggests that Th17 cells contribute to the development of acute and chronic allograft injury after transplantation of various organs, including the kidney. This review summarizes recent reports on the role of Th17 cells in kidney transplantation. Means of improving allograft outcomes by targeting the Th17 pathway are also suggested.

Biomarkers of immune tolerance in liver transplantation

The liver exhibits intrinsic immune tolerogenic properties that contribute to a unique propensity toward spontaneous acceptance when transplanted, both in animal models and in humans. Thus, in contrast to what happens after transplantation of other solid organs, several years following liver transplantation a significant subset of patients are capable of maintaining normal allograft function with histological integrity in the absence of immunosuppressive drug treatment. Significant efforts have been put into identifying sensitive and specific biomarkers of tolerance in order to stratify liver transplant recipients according to their need for immunosuppressive medication and their likelihood of being able to completely discontinue it. These biomarkers are currently being validated in prospective clinical trials of immunosuppression withdrawal both in Europe and in the United States. These studies have the potential to transform the clinical management of liver transplant recipients by mitigating, at least in part, the burden of lifelong immunosuppression.

Minimization of immunosuppression in adult liver transplantation: new strategies and tools

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To describe most relevant data regarding strategies to achieve immunosuppression minimization and/or complete withdrawal in liver transplantation and to discuss the development of tolerance biomarkers to predict the success of immunosuppression weaning.

RECENT FINDINGS

In clinical organ transplantation allograft tolerance has been attained through two different pathways: (1) tolerance or immunosuppression minimization has been attempted by administering induction therapies with or without infusion of donor hematopoietic cells; and (2) the availability of spontaneously tolerant liver and kidney recipients has been exploited to develop biomarkers of allograft tolerance. The use of transcriptional profiling is the most promising approach. Recent publications have identified a gene expression signature in tolerant patients.

SUMMARY

Current immunosuppressive regimens reduce acute rejection episodes but promote a number of complications that have a negative impact on patient morbidity, mortality and quality of life. In this setting, achievement of tolerance is a major goal. Although there are no reliable markers to identify tolerant patients, recent studies have found that tolerant liver recipients exhibit unique peripheral blood transcriptional patterns. The difference in expression patterns is related to the immune response and could constitute the basis of a future diagnostic test of tolerance.

Immunosuppression minimization vs. complete drug withdrawal in liver transplantation

Despite the increase in long-term survival, liver transplant recipients still exhibit higher morbidity and mortality than the general population. This is in part attributed to the lifelong administration of immunosuppression and its associated side effects. Several studies reported in the last decades have evaluated the impact of immunosuppression minimization in liver transplant recipients, but results have been inconsistent due to the heterogeneity of study designs and insufficient sample sizes. On the other hand, complete immunosuppression withdrawal has proven to be feasible in approximately 20% of carefully selected liver transplant recipients, especially in older patients and those with longer duration after transplantation. The long-term risks and clinical benefits of this strategy, however, also need to be clarified. As a consequence, and despite the general perception that a large proportion of liver recipients are over-immunosuppressed, it is currently not possible to derive evidence-based guidelines on how to manage long-term immunosuppression to improve clinical outcomes. Large clinical trials of drug minimization and/or withdrawal focused on clinically-relevant long-term outcomes are required. Development of personalized medicine tools and a deeper understanding of the pathogenesis of idiopathic inflammatory graft lesions will be pre-requisites to achieve these goals.

Dysregulation of Th17 cells during the early post-transplant period in patients under calcineurin inhibitor based immunosuppression

Accumulating evidence suggests that Th17 cells play a role in the development of chronic allograft injury in transplantation of various organs. However, the influence of current immunosuppressants on Th17-associated immune responses has not been fully investigated. We prospectively investigated the changes in Th17 cells in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) collected before and 1 and 3 months after KT in 26 patients and we investigated the suppressive effect of tacrolimus on Th17 in vitro. In the early posttransplant period, the percentage of Th17 cells and the proportion of IL-17-producing cells in the effector memory T cells (TEM) were significantly increased at 3 months after transplantation compared with before transplantation (P<0.05), whereas Th1/Th2 cells and TEM cells were significantly decreased. The degree of increase in Th17 during the early posttransplant period was significantly associated with allograft function at 1 year after transplantation (r = 0.4, P<0.05). In vitro, tacrolimus suppressed Th1 and Th2 cells in a concentration-dependent manner, but did not suppress Th17 cells even at high concentration. This suggests that current immunosuppression based on tacrolimus is inadequate to suppress Th17 cells in KTRs, and dysregulation of Th17 may be associated with the progression of CAD.

Relevance of regulatory T cell promotion of donor-specific tolerance in solid organ transplantation

Current clinical strategies to control the alloimmune response after transplantation do not fully prevent induction of the immunological processes which lead to acute and chronic immune-mediated graft rejection, and as such the survival of a solid organ allograft is limited. Experimental research on naturally occurring CD4⁺CD25^highFoxP3⁺ Regulatory T cells (Tregs) has indicated their potential to establish stable long-term graft acceptance, with the promise of providing a more effective therapy for transplant recipients. Current approaches for clinical use are based on the infusion of freshly isolated or ex vivo polyclonally expanded Tregs into graft recipients with an aim to redress the in vivo balance of T effector cells to Tregs. However mounting evidence suggests that regulation of donor-specific immunity may be central to achieving immunological tolerance. Therefore, the next stages in optimizing translation of Tregs to organ transplantation will be through the refinement and development of donor alloantigen-specific Treg therapy. The altering kinetics and intensity of alloantigen presentation pathways and alloimmune priming following transplantation may indeed influence the specificity of the Treg required and the timing or frequency at which it needs to be administered. Here we review and discuss the relevance of antigen-specific regulation of alloreactivity by Tregs in experimental and clinical studies of tolerance and explore the concept of delivering an optimal Treg for the induction and maintenance phases of achieving transplantation tolerance.

Hot-topic debate on tolerance: immunosuppression withdrawal

1. Liver allografts exhibit intrinsic tolerogenic properties that result in their spontaneous acceptance in many experimental animal models. 2. In clinical transplantation, liver allografts require milder immunosuppression regimens than other organs, are relatively resistant to antibody-mediated rejection, and only very rarely are lost because of immunological insults. 3. A fraction of stable liver transplant recipients can withdraw from all immunosuppression therapy and then maintain normal graft function and not experience rejection. This phenomenon is known as spontaneous operational tolerance (SOT). 4. The intentional discontinuation of immunosuppression in stable liver transplant recipients has led to successful weaning in almost 20% of recipients, but the true prevalence of SOT in unselected recipients is still unknown. 5. The prevalence could be higher in pediatric recipients undergoing transplantation before 1 year of age and in adult recipients with more than 10 years of posttransplant follow-up. 6. Rejection occurring during medically supervised immunosuppression weaning trials tends to be mild and, in the overwhelming majority of cases, can be easily resolved without the administration of high-dose immunosuppression. 7. Tolerant liver recipients exhibit specific transcriptional patterns in peripheral blood and liver tissue that may constitute future diagnostic markers of tolerance. 8. There is still no formal proof that the discontinuation of low-dose immunosuppression in long-term survivors of liver transplantation improves the morbidity and mortality rates associated with immunosuppression therapy.

Finding the right time for weaning off immunosuppression in solid organ transplant recipients

Solid organ transplantation (SOT) requires lifelong immunosuppression (IS) to prevent rejection and graft loss. The currently adopted immunosuppressive protocols are numerous and are based on the administration of at least two molecules with diverse mechanisms of action. Owing to the fact that the majority of immunosuppressants act non-selectively, the immune system is normally oversuppressed, and as a result is less able to both defend the host against infection and to control the spread of malignant cells. Consequently, long-term IS is burdened by chronic toxicity, which may be highly invalidating and may significantly influence patient's quality of life, compliance to treatment, overall success rate, and patient and graft survival. In an ideal scenario, SOT recipients should initially receive just enough IS to favor the onset of clinical operational tolerance (COT), a condition where the immune system of the host does not attack the graft in the absence of any immunosuppressant. COT has been documented after liver transplantation (LT) and renal transplantation (RT). First, COT was accidentally detected in patients who were nonadherent to treatment and who spontaneously decided to stop all IS without any medical guidance or surveillance. Later, it was described in recipients who required IS withdrawal following the occurrence of malignant diseases. Based on strikingly convincing experimental data, several tolerogenic protocols have recently been applied in patients but overall the results have been disappointing. The current literature demonstrates that COT can be safely achieved in stable LT recipients, with completely different strategies. Importantly, the onset of an episode of acute rejection during the attempt of IS withdrawal would not worsen the clinical outcome. On the contrary, COT remains a major challenge after RT because the onset of acute rejection will substantiate in graft loss. Currently, a major field of investigation aims to define markers of COT, which will allow the selection of individuals who are more prone to develop COT. Preliminary results in both RT and LT have just been announced; however, these markers will require validation in prospective studies.

Lymphocyte activation markers may predict the presence of donor specific alloreactivity in pediatric living related liver transplant recipients

This is an observational study with the primary objective to measure donor-specific immune responses by pediatric liver transplant (LT) recipients, using cell surface expression of lymphocyte activation markers and cytokine secretion in mixed lymphocyte reactions. The secondary objective was to demonstrate possible mechanism(s) involved in those who demonstrated donor-specific hyporesponsiveness. Study participants included 17 recipients, their respective parental donors, the non-donor parent, as well as unrelated third party individuals. Within the CD4(+) population, two distinct patterns of CD69 and CD71 expressions were observed: recipients who had a lower percentage of CD4(+)CD69(+) and CD4(+)CD71(+) cells after donor versus non-donor stimulation (therefore a donor/non-donor ratio <1); and recipients who had a higher percentage of CD4(+)CD69(+) and CD4(+)CD71(+) cells after donor versus non-donor stimulation (therefore a donor/non-donor ratio ≥1). Eight recipients had the above defined ratio of <1, with significantly decreased interferon-γ secretion after donor versus non-donor stimulation. CD4(+)CD25(hi.)CD127- regulatory T cells from these eight recipients suppressed donor and non-donor cell induced proliferation. Suppression of proliferation was partially abrogated by interleukin-2. In conclusion, CD69 and CD71 cell surface expression with interferon-γ secretion can be used to identify two distinct populations in pediatric LT recipients. Both active regulation and anergy underlie donor specific hyporesponsiveness.

Operational tolerance after liver transplantation

The achievement of an immunosuppression (IS)-free state after transplantation represents the ultimate goal of any immunosuppressive regimen. While clinical operational tolerance (COT) remains the exception after other types of solid organ transplantation, several cases of COT have been described after liver transplantation (LT). Overall, the experience gained so far worldwide demonstrates that COT can be achieved safely in one quarter of selected individuals, irrespective of the immunological background of donor and recipient, patient age, indication for LT, study endpoint, length of the weaning period and of pre/post-weaning follow-up, presence or not of chimerism. However, most transplant physicians still believe that the achievement of COT is still out of reach for the majority of LT recipients because of the potential risk for transplant survival, the non-randomized nature of most of the studies reported so far, and the selective nature of the patients enrolled in such studies, making them non-representative of the whole population of LT recipients. Despite these concerns, the present article demonstrates that this attitude is potentially no longer justified, given the growing evidence that a permanent and stable IS-free state can be achieved in a proportion of individuals who have received a LT for non-immune mediated liver diseases.

Marking a path to transplant tolerance

Long-term allograft survival requires lifelong immunosuppression, which comes with serious side effects. Inducing immune tolerance to the transplant would enable immunosuppression withdrawal and revolutionize the quality of life of transplant recipients. In this issue of the JCI, Martínez-Llordella et al. identify a profile of biomarkers that predict tolerance in liver transplant recipients (see the related article beginning on page 2845). These findings translate into a new means for prospectively selecting liver transplant patients who would benefit from immunosuppression withdrawal and ultimately may guide development of tolerogenic therapies that allow for allograft acceptance without the use of long-term immunosuppression.

The Tor Vergata weaning off immunosuppression protocol in stable HCV liver transplant patients: the updated follow up at 78 months

BACKGROUND

We report the update of the Tor Vergata immunosuppression (IS) weaning protocol in stable hepatitis C virus (HCV) liver transplant (LT) recipients.

METHODS

The weaning off IS was attempted in 34 patients who had received a LT 63.5+/-20.1 month earlier, for HCV-related end stage liver disease. Patients were observed over a period of 6.5 years. During this time, yearly protocol liver biopsies were performed. Primary endpoints were determined as the feasibility of weaning off IS and its impact on the long term disease progression. Secondary endpoints were defined as the impact on patient morbidity and quality of life.

RESULTS

Of the 8 originally tolerant patients, 7 remain alive and in good condition, while 1 died of severe HCV recurrence 10 years post-LT and 6 years after complete removal of IS. Four out of 26 intolerant individuals died of HCV recurrence (2x), lung carcinoma (1x) and acute myocardial infarction (1x), after a mean follow up period from LT of 115 (range 100-124). The 10-year survival from LT was comparable (89% vs. 87.5%). Liver graft pathology showed no significant differences between the two groups in terms of staging, fibrosis progression rate, and grading. Quantitative HCV RNA assay showed a significant non-logarithmic difference between the two groups (p = 0.03). The two groups were comparable in terms of liver function tests and lipid profile, whereas they differed with regards to glycaemia. While all tolerant individuals were euglicemic, 11 intolerant individuals developed new onset diabetes that required specific treatment (p = 0.03). Finally, significantly more intolerant patients are suffering from either cardiovascular (14/22 vs. 0/7, p = 0.01) or infectious diseases (13/22 vs. 0/7, p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

After a 6.5-year follow up, the complete withdrawal of IS in HCV LT recipient remains safe and beneficial to patients, because it reduces the IS-related morbidity and increases the quality of life. The impact on HCV disease recurrence is less marked than after 3.5 years.

Early immunological monitoring after pediatric liver transplantation: cytokine immune deviation and graft acceptance in 40 recipients

Cytokine deviation may be a factor contributing to graft acceptance. We analyze, in the context of liver transplantation, circulating cytokine levels and their mRNA precursors in liver biopsy samples to study a putative correlation with early immunologic outcome. Forty primary pediatric liver recipients were submitted to a prospective immune monitoring protocol, including 8 of 40 patients with an early, biopsy-proven acute rejection episode. The 32 patients with graft acceptance showed markedly increased interleukin (IL)-10 blood levels at 2 hours after reperfusion on days 1 and 4 after transplantation as compared with baseline, whereas patients with graft rejection only exhibited increased IL-10 levels at 2 hours. A good correlation was observed between IL-10 peripheral levels and levels ascertained by IL-10 reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction at 2 hours and on day 7. Patients with graft acceptance also showed a decrease in interferon gamma (IFN-gamma) at 1 and 2 hours after reperfusion on days 1, 4, 7, 14, and 28 after transplantation. One patient with graft tolerance who had subsequent immunosuppression withdrawal after posttransplantation lymphoproliferative disease showed a similar intraoperative IL-10 pattern, whereas posttransplantation tumor necrosis factor alpha and IFN-gamma levels greatly decreased. The occurrence of cytokine immune deviation may therefore be related to early graft acceptance in children who receive liver transplants.

Operational tolerance in clinical liver transplantation: emerging developments

There is still little understanding of the immune events that occur in transplant patients as they develop a relationship with their graft alloantigens. Though, there is an enormous interest and motivation in inducing specific unresponsiveness to organ allografts in order to allow minimization or complete withdrawal of immunosuppression in the recipient, given that life-long immunosuppressive treatment entails a high risk of infectious and metabolic complications, malignancies, and drug-specific toxicity. Clinical tolerance is defined as stable normal graft function in the total absence of a requirement for maintenance immunosuppression. Effective clinical tolerance has been reported more frequently in liver transplant recipients than after transplantation of other organs, as the liver is an immune-privileged organ for several mechanisms, most of which still remain unclear. According to the English medical literature, cautious, carefully supervised weaning of immunosuppressive drugs in controlled trials is not unreasonable, especially when monitored by protocol biopsies. The five centers in which the weaning has been attempted have reported a similar degree of success (1 out of 4 patients) and no harm to the patient over the short-term. Though, long-term follow-up has been lacking and, at present, there are no reliable immunological parameters that enable patients who can be withdrawn from immunosuppressants without the risk of rejection to be identified. To achieve that goal, appropriate collaboration and interaction between clinicians, immunologists and other basic scientists are desirable, as well as the creation of an international, maybe intercontinental, registry for tolerant patients.

An appraisal of tolerance in liver transplantation

Human liver allografts have a lower susceptibility to rejection than other organs. In addition, in some liver transplant recipients immunosuppressive drugs can be completely withdrawn, and these patients are considered as 'operationally' tolerant. Careful scrutiny of accumulated clinical experience indicates that elective immunosuppressive drug weaning is feasible in almost 20% of selected liver transplant recipients. This is associated with an incidence of 12% to 76% of acute cellular rejection, but these episodes are commonly mild and often resolve by return to baseline immunosuppression (IS), many times without the need to administer steroid boluses. Study of tolerance in liver transplantation (LT) has been hampered by confusion regarding the definitions of rejection and tolerance, and by the absence of prospective studies correlating results of immune monitoring assays and clinical outcome. Thus, we lack a clinically validated treatment-stopping rule capable of predicting the success of IS withdrawal and this procedure has to be performed on a 'trial and error' basis. The search for an accurate means to identify allograft tolerance among immunosuppressed recipients should become a priority in LT research. This information would provide a biological basis for guiding IS withdrawal protocols and for the implementation of tolerance-promoting strategies in LT.

Immunosuppressive activity of serum taken from a liver transplant recipient after withdrawal of immunosuppressants

In orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT), tolerance is induced in a certain combination of donors and a recipient in rats and, in some clinical cases, rejection has not occurred in OLT patients after weaning off immunosuppression. However, this mechanism has not yet been elucidated. Among our cases of liver transplantation (LTx), one OLT patient (Patient A) has not required immunosuppressive drugs for the last 5 years, following post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD). This patient's serum interleukin-2 levels were undetectable following withdrawal of immunosuppressants. The same serum taken after discontinuing the immunosuppressants inhibited concanavalin A blast cultured cells and up-regulated the IL-4/IFN-gamma gene expression ratio. These results suggested that other proteins were induced following withdrawal of immunosuppressants. Proteomic assay demonstrated 12 differentiated spots exclusive to this patient where immunosuppressants have been discontinued. Haptoglobin, found to have immunosuppressive activity in vitro, may play an important role in the maintenance of drug-free tolerance as a natural immunological suppressor after cessation of immunosuppression. Proteomic analysis will allow us to develop a novel weaning protocol for patients on long-term immunosuppression to avoid major immunosuppressant-related complications.

Complete weaning off immunosuppression in HCV liver transplant recipients is feasible and favourably impacts on the progression of disease recurrence

BACKGROUND/AIMS

HCV-related disease recurrence progresses rapidly after liver transplantation. We hypothesised that withdrawal of immunosuppression might favourably impact on disease progression.

METHODS

Weaning off immunosuppression was attempted in 34 HCV-RNA positive patients (mean age 62+/-6.4 years) transplanted 63.5+/-20.1 months earlier, under cyclosporine A monotherapy. Patients were followed for 3 years including yearly protocol liver biopsies. Primary endpoints were feasibility of weaning off immunosuppression and its impact on disease progression. Secondary endpoint was to identify predictors of an immunosuppression-free state and fibrosis progression.

RESULTS

Complete and permanent immunosuppression withdrawal was achieved in 8 patients (23.4%), whereas 14 (41.2%) developed rejection within eight months despite an initial response and 12 (35.2%) rejected during tapering. After a mean follow-up 45.5+/-5.8 months weaned patients showed stabilisation/improvement of histological fibrosis (P<0.01), lower necro-inflammation (P<0.02) and improved liver function (P<0.05) compared to weaning-intolerants. Multiple logistic regression identified low blood cyclosporine A trough levels during the first post-transplant week (P=0.004) and initial steroid-free immunosuppression (P<0.008) as independent predictors of sustained weaning. Achievement of immunosoppression freedom (P=0.02) and baseline staging score (P<0.0001) were independently associated with stabilisation/improvement of histological fibrosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Reconstitution of immune-competence in the host improves the natural history of HCV recurrence in the graft.

The roles of CD25+CD4+ regulatory T cells in operational tolerance after living donor liver transplantation

Recent evidence suggests that CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells (Tregs) affect immune responses, including those to alloantigens in organ transplants. We have followed a group of liver allograft recipients with good liver graft function who have been weaned off immunosuppression (IS). The purpose of this study was to determine whether Tregs contributed functionally to the mechanisms of graft acceptance.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The functional assay used peripheral blood obtained from LTx recipients free of immunosuppression. The Whole population of CD4+ T cells and the CD4+ T cells depleted of CD4+CD25 high cells were tested for proliferation against donor versus third party stimulators. Moreover to determine the antigen-specificity of the Tregs, serially diluted numbering of CD4+CD25+ T cells were co-cultured with CD4+CD25- T cells. The proliferation responses were examined toward donor versus third party stimulators.

RESULT

CD4+ T cells from all LTx recipients off immunosuppression showed hyporesponsiveness to the donor but not to third party stimulators. However, even after depletion of the CD4+CD25 high population, the cells continued to be hyporesponsive toward the donor. In four out of five cases, the suppression exhibited by CD4+CD25+ T cells was more specific for the donor.

DISCUSSION

These findings suggest that donor alloantigen specific regulation by Tregs is one of multiple mechanisms that may contribute to the maintenance of liver graft survival in the absence of immunosuppression.

Living donor liver transplant with clinical tolerance, laboratory evidence of chimerism, and spontaneous clearance of HBV

We present a case of functional and histopathologic tolerance, chimerism, and spontaneous clearance of HBV in a patient four years after living donor liver transplant (LDLT). A 19-year-old male patient underwent a LDLT for HBV cirrhosis. He voluntarily ceased immunosuppression and antiviral therapy after 6 months. He is now four years status post transplant without any episodes of rejection or clinical manifestation of liver disease. PCR and VNTR were used to show donor-recipient chimerism and a large degree of genetic similarity between the pair. MLC and cytokine elaboration were used to show recipient hyporeactivity towards donor antigen. He also has clinical evidence of clearing his HBV without continued use of HBIG.