The use of donor hearts with left ventricular hypertrophy

Primary graft dysfunction in heart transplantation: the challenge to survival

Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) is a life-threatening clinical condition with a high mortality rate, presenting as left, right, or biventricular dysfunction within the initial 24 h following heart transplantation, in the absence of a discernible secondary cause. Given its intricate nature, definitive definition and diagnosis of PGD continues to pose a challenge. The pathophysiology of PGD encompasses numerous underlying mechanisms, some of which remain to be elucidated, including factors like myocardial damage, the release of proinflammatory mediators, and the occurrence of ischemia-reperfusion injury. The dynamic characteristics of both donors and recipients, coupled with the inclination towards marginal lists containing more risk factors, together contribute to the increased incidence of PGD. The augmentation of therapeutic strategies involving mechanical circulatory support accelerates myocardial recovery, thereby significantly contributing to survival. Nonetheless, a universally accepted treatment algorithm for the swift management of this clinical condition, which necessitates immediate intervention upon diagnosis, remains absent. This paper aims to review the existing literature and shed light on how diagnosis, pathophysiology, risk factors, treatment, and perioperative management affect the outcome of PGD.

Heart graft preservation technics and limits: an update and perspectives

Heart transplantation, the gold standard treatment for end-stage heart failure, is limited by heart graft shortage, justifying expansion of the donor pool. Currently, static cold storage (SCS) of hearts from donations after brainstem death remains the standard practice, but it is usually limited to 240 min. Prolonged cold ischemia and ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) have been recognized as major causes of post-transplant graft failure. Continuous ex situ perfusion is a new approach for donor organ management to expand the donor pool and/or increase the utilization rate. Continuous ex situ machine perfusion (MP) can satisfy the metabolic needs of the myocardium, minimizing irreversible ischemic cell damage and cell death. Several hypothermic or normothermic MP methods have been developed and studied, particularly in the preclinical setting, but whether MP is superior to SCS remains controversial. Other approaches seem to be interesting for extending the pool of heart graft donors, such as blocking the paths of apoptosis and necrosis, extracellular vesicle therapy, or donor heart-specific gene therapy. In this systematic review, we summarize the mechanisms involved in IRI during heart transplantation and existing targeting therapies. We also critically evaluate all available data on continuous ex situ perfusion devices for adult donor hearts, highlighting its therapeutic potential and current limitations and shortcomings.

Does donor treatment with inotropes and/or vasopressors impact post-transplant outcomes?

PURPOSE

The purpose was to evaluate the effects of the most commonly used cardiac donor inotropes/vasopressors on subsequent post-heart transplant survival.

METHODS

Adult heart transplant recipients from January 2000 to June 2022 were identified in the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database. Exclusion criteria included: multiorgan transplants, donor age < 15, and recipient age < 18. Donors receiving vasoactive medications at the time of procurement were compared to donors not receiving these medications. Those on vasoactive medications were stratified by medication: phenylephrine, dopamine, dobutamine, norepinephrine and epinephrine, the combination of these agents, and the concomitant administration of vasopressin with any single agent alone or in combination. The primary area of interest was short-and-long-term survival. Survival at 30 days, 1 year, and long-term (Median = 13.6 years) was compared using logistic and Cox models to quantify survival endpoints.

RESULTS

A total of 45,198 donors met inclusion criteria and had data on the use of vasoactive agents available. Mean donor age was 32.3 years with 71% male. Vasoactive medications and potential combinations included phenylephrine in 8156 donors (18.0%), dopamine in 9550 (21.1%), dobutamine in 718 (1.6%), epinephrine in 332 (.73%), and norepinephrine in 4854 (10.7%). A total of 25,856 donors (57.2%) were receiving vasopressin at the time of procurement. There was no impact of donor inotropes on 30-day survival. Donors receiving one inotrope and no vasopressin were associated with increased 1 year mortality (OR 1.14; p = .021), as were donors receiving 2+ inotropes and no vasopressin (OR 1.26; p = .006). For individual agents, 1 year mortality was increased for dopamine (OR 1.11; p = .042) and epinephrine (OR 1.59; p = .004).

CONCLUSIONS

There is no difference in heart transplant recipient survival at 30 days when the donor is receiving inotropes without vasopressin at the time of procurement. Inotropic support without vasopressin is associated with greater 1 year mortality. The impact of donor inotropic support on long term heart transplant survival, and the interaction with vasopressin warrants further study.

Review of Postoperative Care for Heart Transplant Recipients

The early postoperative management strategies after heart transplantation include optimizing the function of the denervated heart, correcting the causes of hemodynamic instability, and initiating and maintaining immunosuppressive therapy, allograft rejection surveillance, and prophylaxis against infections caused by immunosuppression. The course of postoperative support is influenced by the quality of allograft myocardial protection prior to implantation and reperfusion, donor-recipient heart size matching, surgical technique of orthotopic heart transplantation, and patient factors (eg, preoperative condition, immunologic compatibility, postoperative vasomotor tone, severity and reversibility of pulmonary vascular hypertension, pulmonary function, mediastinal blood loss, and end-organ perfusion). This review provides an overview of the early postoperative care of recipients and includes a brief description of the surgical techniques for orthotopic heart transplantation.

Donor heart selection: Evidence-based guidelines for providers

The proposed donor heart selection guidelines provide evidence-based and expert-consensus recommendations for the selection of donor hearts following brain death. These recommendations were compiled by an international panel of experts based on an extensive literature review.

Association of donor hypertension and outcomes in orthotopic heart transplantation

The present study examined the impact of donor hypertension on recipient survival and offer acceptance practices in the United States. This was a retrospective study of all patients undergoing OHT from 1995 to 2019 using the United Network for Organ Sharing and Potential Transplant Recipient file databases. Hypertensive donors were stratified by Short (0-5 years) and Prolonged (> 5 years) hypertension. Multivariable logistic regression was used to analyze offer acceptance practices while Cox proportional-hazards models were used to compare mortality across groups. Of 38,338 heart transplants meeting study criteria, 5662 were procured from hypertensive donors (69% Short and 31% Prolonged). After adjustment, Prolonged donor hypertension was associated with increased mortality (hazard ratio, HR, 1.31, 95% confidence interval, CI, 1.04-1.64), while recipients of Short donors experienced no decrement in post-transplant survival. Both Short and Prolonged hypertension were independently associated with decreased odds of offer acceptance (odds ratio, OR .92 95%CI: .88-.96 and OR .93 95%CI: .88-.99, respectively). While prolonged untreated hypertension in OHT donors is associated with a slight decrement in recipient survival, donors with ≤5 years of hypertension yielded similar outcomes. Donor hypertension was associated with reduced organ offer acceptance, highlighting a potential source of organ underutilization.

Marginal donors and organ shortness: concomitant surgical procedures during heart transplantation: a literature review

Heart transplantation represents the gold standard for end-stage heart failure. However, due to the increasing demand and the shortage of available organs, donor supply remains the main limitation. Marginal donor hearts in high-risk candidates who do not meet standard listing criteria are the only alternative when life expectancy is limited, but their use is still debated. Surgical correction of detected coronary lesions or valvular heart defects allows further enlargement of the number of available organs. In this article, we offer a literature review on this topic and report two marginal donor hearts with angiography evidence of coronary stenosis and preserved ventricular function, which underwent concomitant myocardial revascularization during heart implantation.

Left-ventricular hypertrophy in 18-month-old donor rat hearts was not associated with graft dysfunction in the early phase of reperfusion after cardiac transplantation-gene expression profiling

The use of hearts with left-ventricular (LV) hypertrophy (LVH) could offer an opportunity to extend the donor pool for cardiac transplantation. We assessed the effects of LVH in 18-month-old spontaneously hypertensive stroke-prone (SHRSP) donor rats and following transplantation. In donors, cardiac function and structural alterations were assessed. Then, the hearts were transplanted into young normotensive-rats. We evaluated LV graft function 1 h after transplantation. The myocardial expression of 92 genes involved in apoptosis, inflammation, and oxidative-stress was profiled using PCR-array. Compared to controls, SHRSP-rats developed LVH, had increased LV systolic performance (slope of the end-diastolic pressure-volume (PV) relationship: 1.6±0.2 vs 0.8±0.1mmHg/μl, p<0.05) accompanied by diastolic dysfunction [prolonged time constant of LV pressure decay (Tau: 15.8±0.6 vs 12.3±0.5ms) and augmented diastolic stiffness (LV end-diastolic PV relationship: 0.103±0.012 vs 0.045±0.006mmHg/ml), p<0.05]. They presented ECG changes, myocardial fibrosis, and increased nitrotyrosine immunoreactivity and plasma troponin-T and creatine kinase-CM levels. After transplantation, even though the graft contractility was better in SHRSP rats compared to controls, the adverse impact of ischemia/reperfusion-injury on contractility was not altered (Ees ratio after versus before transplantation: 32% vs 29%, p>0.05). Whereas nitrotyrosine immunoreactivity was higher, myeloperoxidase-positive cell infiltration was decreased in the SHRSP+transplanted compared to control+transplanted. Among the tested genes, LVH was associated with altered expression of 38 genes in donors, while transplantation of these hearts resulted in the change of four genes. Alterations in 18-month-old donor hearts, as a consequence of hypertension and LVH, were not associated with graft dysfunction in the early phase of reperfusion after transplantation.

Primary Graft Dysfunction after Heart Transplantation - Unravelling the Enigma

Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) remains the main cause of early mortality following heart transplantation despite several advances in donor preservation techniques and therapeutic strategies for PGD. With that aim of establishing the aetiopathogenesis of PGD and the preferred management strategies, the new consensus definition has paved the way for multiple contemporaneous studies to be undertaken and accurately compared. This review aims to provide a broad-based understanding of the pathophysiology, clinical presentation and management of PGD.

Comparison of outcomes in lung and heart transplant recipients from the same multiorgan donor

BACKGROUND

Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) and acute cellular rejection (ACR) are important causes of early morbidity and mortality following lung and heart transplantation. While many studies have elucidated donor-related risk factors of PGD and ACR, these complications often occur even with "ideal" donors. Therefore, we investigated potential associations of PGD and ACR between bilateral lung and heart transplant recipients from the same multiorgan donor, respectively.

METHODS

Between 2011 and 2017, 100 donors contributed 100 bilateral lung transplants and 100 heart transplants performed. Logistic regression analysis for PGD and Cox proportional hazards regression analysis for ACR were used to estimate the relationship of heart and lung transplants.

RESULTS

The incidence of PGD was 33% among lung and 17% among heart transplant recipients. Similarly, the incidence of ACR grade ≥ A2 for lung recipients was 38% (30/80), and the incidence of ACR grade ≥ 2R for heart recipients was 19% (15/80). There was no association between the development of PGD and ACR in lung and heart transplant recipients from the same donor, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that inherent donor factors are not critical to the development of PGD and ACR after lung and heart transplantation.

[Left ventricle myocardium hypertrophy of donor heart: the results and outlook]

Left ventricular hypertrophy - is one of the most frequent structural changes in the heart. This article is devoted to the assessment of modern views on the causes of myocardial hypertrophy of the donor heart, indications and contraindications for the heart trans‑ plantation, the outlook of expanding the pool of effective donors through the use of these hearts. Here are considered the issues of post-transplantation remodeling of the donor heart myocardium, The pathogenesis features, the nascence risk and possibilities of drug regulation of the transplanted heart's myocardial hypertrophy of the left ventricle.

Primary graft dysfunction after heart transplantation: a thorn amongst the roses

Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) remains the leading cause of early mortality post-heart transplantation. Despite improvements in mechanical circulatory support and critical care measures, the rate of PGD remains significant. A recent consensus statement by the International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) has formulated a definition for PGD. Five years on, we look at current concepts and future directions of PGD in the current era of transplantation.

Cardiac Donor Risk Factors Predictive of Short-Term Heart Transplant Recipient Mortality: An Analysis of the United Network for Organ Sharing Database

INTRODUCTION

To address the shortage of donor hearts for transplantation, there is significant interest in liberalizing donor acceptance criteria. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate cardiac donor characteristics from the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database to determine their impact on posttransplantation recipient outcomes.

METHODS

Adult (≥18 years) patients undergoing heart transplantation from July 1, 2004, to December 31, 2012, in the UNOS Standard Transplant Analysis and Research (STAR) database were reviewed. Patients were stratified by 1-year posttransplantation status; survivors (group S, n = 13,643) and patients who died or underwent cardiac retransplantation at 1-year follow-up (group NS/R = 1785). Thirty-three specific donor variables were collected for each recipient, and independent donor predictors of recipient death or retransplantation at 1 year were determined using multivariable logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Overall 1-year survival for the entire cohort was 88.4%. Mean donor age was 31.5 ± 11.9 years, and 72% were male. On multivariable logistic regression analysis, donor age >40 years (odds ratio [OR] 1.44, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.27 to 1.64), graft ischemic time >3 hours (OR 1.32, 1.16 to 1.51), and the use of cardioplegia (OR 1.17, 1.01 to 1.35) or Celsior (OR 1.21, 1.06 to 1.38) preservative solution were significant predictors of recipient death or retransplantation at 1 year posttransplantation. Male donor sex (OR 0.83, 0.74 to 0.93) and the use of antihypertensive agents (OR 0.88, 0.77 to 1.00) or insulin (OR 0.84, 0.76 to 0.94) were protective from adverse outcomes at 1 year.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that donors who are older, female, or have a long projected ischemic time pose greater risk to heart transplant recipients in the short term. Additionally, certain components of donor management protocols, including antihypertensive and insulin administration, may be protective to recipients.

Donor predictors of allograft use and recipient outcomes after heart transplantation

BACKGROUND

Despite a national organ-donor shortage and a growing population of patients with end-stage heart disease, the acceptance rate of donor hearts for transplantation is low. We sought to identify donor predictors of allograft nonuse, and to determine whether these predictors are in fact associated with adverse recipient post-transplant outcomes.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We studied a cohort of 1872 potential organ donors managed by the California Transplant Donor Network from 2001 to 2008. Forty-five percent of available allografts were accepted for heart transplantation. Donor predictors of allograft nonuse included age >50 years, female sex, death attributable to cerebrovascular accident, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, a positive troponin assay, left-ventricular dysfunction and regional wall motion abnormalities, and left-ventricular hypertrophy. For hearts that were transplanted, only donor cause of death was associated with prolonged recipient hospitalization post-transplant, and only donor diabetes mellitus was predictive of increased recipient mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Whereas there are many donor predictors of allograft discard in the current era, these characteristics seem to have little effect on recipient outcomes when the hearts are transplanted. Our results suggest that more liberal use of cardiac allografts with relative contraindications may be warranted.

Impact of donor left ventricular hypertrophy on survival after heart transplant

Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) of the donor heart is believed to increase the risk of allograft failure after transplant. However this effect is not well quantified, with variable findings from single-center studies. The United Network for Organ Sharing database was used to analyze the effect of donor LVH on recipient survival. Three cohorts, selected in accordance with the American Society of Echocardiography guidelines, were examined: recipients of allografts without LVH (<1.1 cm), with mild LVH (1.1-1.3 cm) and with moderate-severe LVH (≥ 1.4 cm). The study group included 2626 patients with follow-up of up to 3.3 years. Mild LVH was present in 38% and moderate-severe LVH in 5.6% of allografts. Predictors of mortality included a number of donor and recipient characteristics, but not LVH. However, a subgroup analysis showed an increased risk of death in recipients of allografts with LVH and donor age >55 years, and in recipients of allografts with LVH and ischemic time ≥ 4 h. In the contemporary era, close to half of all transplanted allografts demonstrate LVH, and survival of these recipients is similar to those without LVH. However, the use of allografts with LVH in association with other high-risk characteristics may result in increased mortality.

Interactions among donor characteristics influence post-transplant survival: a multi-institutional analysis

BACKGROUND

Quantification of donor-associated risk in a specific heart transplant recipient is often difficult. Our aim was to identify donor characteristics that affect survival in the contemporary era.

METHODS

Between 1990 and 2006, 7,322 patients from 32 centers in the Cardiac Transplant Research Database underwent heart transplantation. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify donor-associated risk predictors and important interactions between these donor characteristics. Recipient survival was examined using parametric regression analysis in the hazard function domain.

RESULTS

Donor characteristics associated with post-transplant death included donor age, donor requirement for vasoactive therapy, positive donor cytomegalovirus serology, longer graft ischemic time, and lower donor body weight. Several interactions between individual donor characteristics affected survival. In male donors, history of hypertension and diabetes mellitus were risk factors for death (p = 0.006, p = 0.04, respectively), but not in female donors (p = 0.5, p = 0.8, respectively). There was a significant interaction between donor age and recipient-donor weight difference. If the donor was of younger age, increasing recipient-donor weight difference did not result in increased death. With increasing donor age, weight difference did result in compromised survival (p < 0.0003). Donor and recipient gender further modified the degree of risk: risk was higher in female donors and when recipients were male (p < 0.0003).

CONCLUSIONS

This multi-institutional analysis identified important interactions between donor characteristics that affect post-transplant survival that explain some of the discrepancies in the results of previous studies. The results are likely to aid in efficient organ allocation.

The Efficacy of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators in Heart Transplant Recipients

Background— Sudden cardiac death among orthotopic heart transplant recipients is an important mechanism of death after cardiac transplantation. The role for implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) in this population is not well established. This study sought to determine whether ICDs are effective in preventing Sudden cardiac death in high-risk heart transplant recipients.

Methods and Results— We retrospectively analyzed the records of all orthotopic heart transplant patients who had ICD implantation between January 1995 and December 2005 at 5 heart transplant centers. Thirty-six patients were considered high risk for sudden cardiac death. The mean age at orthotopic heart transplant was 44�14 years, the majority being male (n=29). The mean age at ICD implantation was 52�14 years, whereas the average time from orthotopic heart transplant to ICD implant was 8 years �6 years. The main indications for ICD implantation were severe allograft vasculopathy (n=12), unexplained syncope (n=9), history of cardiac arrest (n=8), and severe left ventricular dysfunction (n=7). Twenty-two shocks were delivered to 10 patients (28%), of whom 8 (80%) received 12 appropriate shocks for either rapid ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation. The shocks were effective in terminating the ventricular arrhythmias in all cases. Three (8%) patients received 10 inappropriate shocks. Underlying allograft vasculopathy was present in 100% (8 of 8) of patients who received appropriate ICD therapy.

Conclusions— Use of ICDs after heart transplantation may be appropriate in selected high-risk patients. Further studies are needed to establish an appropriate prevention strategy in this population.

Impact of donor-to-recipient weight ratio on survival after heart transplantation: analysis of the United Network for Organ Sharing Database

BACKGROUND

Generally accepted donor criteria for heart transplantation limit allografts from donors within approximately 20% to 30% of the recipient's weight. We analyzed the impact of donor-to-recipient weight ratio on survival after heart transplantation.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Adult heart transplant recipients reported to the United Network for Organ Sharing from 1999 to 2007 were divided into 3 groups based on donor-to-recipient weight ratio: <0.8, 0.8 to 1.2, and >1.2. Kaplan-Meier methodology was used to estimate survival. Propensity-adjusted Cox regression modeling was used to analyze predictors of mortality. A total of 15 284 heart transplant recipients were analyzed; 2078 had weight ratio of <0.8, 9684 had 0.8 to 1.2, and 3522 had >1.2. Kaplan-Meier survival was not statistically different between groups at 5 years (P=0.26). Among patients with weight ratio <0.8, 5-year survival was lower for recipients with high pulmonary vascular resistance (>4 Woods units; P=0.02). Among recipients with high pulmonary vascular resistance, 5-year survival was similar for those with weight ratio 0.8 to 1.2 and >1.2 (P=0.44). Furthermore, male recipients with elevated pulmonary vascular resistance who received hearts from female donors had a significantly worse survival than males who received hearts from male donors (P=0.01). Propensity-adjusted multivariable analysis demonstrated that weight ratio <0.8 did not predict mortality (hazard ratio, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.94 to 1.27; P=0.21). Five-year survival after propensity matching was not statistically different between those with weight ratio <0.8 versus >/=0.8 (P=0.37).

CONCLUSIONS

Weight ratio did not predict mortality after heart transplantation. However, recipients with elevated pulmonary vascular resistance who received undersized hearts had poor survival. Furthermore, in the setting of high pulmonary vascular resistance, male recipients who received hearts from female donors had worse survival than those who received hearts from male donors. Extending donor criteria to include undersized hearts in select recipients should be considered.

Use of cardiac allografts with mild and moderate left ventricular hypertrophy can be safely used in heart transplantation to expand the donor pool

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to evaluate outcomes of heart transplantation (HTx) and changes in left ventricular wall thickness (LVWT) post-HTx using donors with left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH).

BACKGROUND

Limited data are available on use of donor hearts with LVH in HTx.

METHODS

We reviewed 427 patients who underwent HTx: 62 received hearts with LVH (interventricular septum [IVS] or posterior wall [PW] thickness >or=1.2 cm) by echocardiography, and 365 received hearts without LVH. The median follow-up was 3.8 years (range 0 to 16.2 years).

RESULTS

Recipient age was 56 +/- 11 years and donor age was 30 +/- 12 years. Baseline recipient characteristics were similar in both groups. Donors with LVH were older (35 +/- 12 years vs. 29 +/- 12 years, p = 0.001) and had higher rates of intracranial hemorrhage (38% vs. 15%, p = 0.001). The LVWT was increased in the LVH group compared with LVWT in the non-LVH group (IVS: 1.28 +/- 0.18 cm vs. 0.85 +/- 0.19 cm, PW: 1.27 +/- 0.19 cm vs. 0.85 +/- 0.20 cm, p = 0.0001 for both groups). Mild LVH (1.2 to 1.3 cm) was found in 42%, moderate (>1.3 to 1.7 cm) in 53%, and severe (>1.7 cm) in 5% of donors with LVH. Left ventricular wall thickness regression occurred in both IVS and PW (1.28 +/- 0.18 cm vs. 1.10 +/- 0.13 cm vs. 1.13 +/- 0.14 cm, and 1.27 +/- 0.19 cm vs. 1.11 +/- 0.11 cm vs. 1.13 +/- 0.14 cm, at baseline, 1 year, and 5 years, respectively; p < 0.001 for change from baseline to 1 and 5 years for both locations). Patients with or without donor LVH had similar 1-year (3.5% vs. 9.5%, p = 0.2) and 5-year survival rates (84 +/- 5.9% vs. 70 +/- 2.7%, p = 0.07).

CONCLUSIONS

Short- and long-term survival rates and rates of LVH at follow-up were similar in both groups, suggesting that donor hearts with mild and moderate LVH can be safely used in HTx.

Usefulness and limitations of transthoracic echocardiography in heart transplantation recipients

Transthoracic echocardiography is a primary non-invasive modality for investigation of heart transplant recipients. It is a versatile tool which provides comprehensive information about cardiac structure and function. Echocardiographic examinations can be easily performed at the bedside and serially repeated without any patient's discomfort. This review highlights the usefulness of Doppler echocardiography in the assessment of left ventricular and right ventricular systolic and diastolic function, of left ventricular mass, valvular heart disease, pulmonary arterial hypertension and pericardial effusion in heart transplant recipients. The main experiences performed by either standard Doppler echocardiography and new high-tech ultrasound technologies are summarised, pointing out advantages and limitations of the described techniques in diagnosing acute allograft rejection and cardiac graft vasculopathy. Despite the sustained efforts of echocardiographic technique in predicting the biopsy state, endocardial myocardial biopsies are still regarded as the gold standard for detection of acute allograft rejection. Conversely, stress echocardiography is able to identify accurately cardiac graft vasculopathy and has a recognised prognostic in this clinical setting. A normal stress-echo justifies postponement of invasive studies. Another use of transthoracic echocardiography is the monitorisation and the visualisation of the catheter during the performance of endomyocardial biopsy. Bedside stress echocardiography is even useful to select appropriately heart donors with brain death. The ultrasound monitoring is simple and effective for monitoring a safe performance of biopsy procedures.

Outcome in cardiac recipients of donor hearts with increased left ventricular wall thickness

The ongoing shortage of donors for cardiac transplantation has led to a trend toward acceptance of donor hearts with some structural abnormalities including left ventricular hypertrophy. To evaluate the outcome in recipients of donor hearts with increased left ventricular wall thickness (LVWT), we retrospectively analyzed data for 157 cardiac donors and respective recipients from January 2001 to December 2004. There were 47 recipients of donor heart with increased LVWT >or=1.2 cm, which constituted the study group and 110 recipients of a donor heart with normal LVWT < 1.2 cm that formed the control group. At 3 +/- 1.5 years, recipient survival was lower (50% vs. 82%, p = 0.0053) and incidence of allograft vasculopathy was higher (50% vs. 22%, p = 0.05) in recipients of donor heart with LVWT > 1.4 cm as compared to LVWT <or= 1.4 cm. By Cox regression, donor LVWT > 1.4 cm (p = 0.003), recipient preoperative ventricular assist device (VAD) support (p = 0.04) and bypass time > 150 min (p = 0.05) were predictors of reduced survival. Our results suggest careful consideration of donor hearts with echocardiographic evidence of increased LVWT in the absence of hypovolemia, because they may be associated with poorer outcomes; such hearts should potentially be reserved only for the most desperately ill recipients.

Marginal cardiac allografts do not have increased primary graft dysfunction in alternate list transplantation

BACKGROUND

Clinical success with modern heart transplantation (HT) has led to the development of an alternate list (AL) HT strategy, matching marginal cardiac allografts with recipients who do not meet standard criteria for HT. Marginal allografts may be at an increased risk for primary graft dysfunction (PGD), the leading cause of early mortality after HT.(1) The incidence of PGD in AL HT relative to standard list (SL) HT has not been evaluated, and may contribute to the greater mortality associated with AL HT.(2) The objective of this study was to determine the incidence of and predictors for PGD.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A retrospective analysis was performed on 260 consecutive adult patients undergoing either SL HT (n=207) or AL HT (n=53) at our institution from 1/2000 to 1/2005. PGD was defined by requirement for mechanical circulatory support immediately post-HT or more broadly as the need for either mechanical support or high-dose inotrope (epinephrine > or = 0.07 microg/kg/min). Donor hearts allocated to AL recipients were turned down for SL HT for reasons that included coronary disease, left ventricular dysfunction or hypertrophy, and high-dose inotropic requirement. AL HT recipients were significantly older, with a higher proportion of diabetes mellitus and ischemic cardiomyopathy. Both groups experienced a similar incidence of significant rejection, but overall mortality was higher in the AL HT group. (2) The incidence of PGD did not differ between AL and SL HT recipients. Pre-transplant VAD and prolonged total ischemic times (> or = 4.5 hours) were independent predictors of PGD.

CONCLUSIONS

Select marginal donor hearts used in AL HT do not have an increased incidence of PGD. Pre-transplant VAD and prolonged ischemic times are more important determinants of PGD. These data support continued aggressive utilization of marginal donor hearts in AL HT.

Outcomes With an Alternate List Strategy for Heart Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Heart transplantation (HT) is an effective therapy for end-stage heart failure, but its impact is limited by the scarcity of donor organs and stringent selection criteria for both donors and recipients. The creation of an alternate list to match recipients with contraindications to traditional HT with sub-optimal donor organs has been implemented at some centers, but outcomes using this approach are uncertain.

METHODS

We created an alternate list that matched recipients in whom standard HT was contraindicated with donor organs that had been rejected for use in standard transplantation. Data on patient characteristics and outcomes were compared with a control group of patients transplanted on the standard list over the same time period.

RESULTS

Fifty patients received HT on the alternate list, compared with 195 on the standard list. The most common reasons for recipient listing on the alternate list were age >65 years (n = 28) and diabetes with end-organ dysfunction (n = 9). Alternate-list patients were older and more likely to have an ischemic etiology and diabetes mellitus. The most common reasons for allocation of donor organs to alternate-list patients were coronary artery disease (n = 12), positive hepatitis serology (n = 12) or left ventricular (LV) dysfunction (n = 8). Two-year survival was 70% for alternate-list patients compared with 88% for standard-list patients (p = 0.02). Post-transplant morbidity did not differ significantly between the 2 groups except that alternate-list patients were hospitalized more frequently.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of an alternate list can expand the applicability of HT to patients who would otherwise be denied this therapy. Although associated with greater morbidity and mortality than standard-list HT, alternate-list HT resulted in clinical outcomes that were significantly better than the natural history of end-stage heart failure.

High Prevalence of Cardiotropic Viruses in Myocardial Tissue from Explanted Hearts of Heart Transplant Recipients and Heart Donors: A 3-Year Retrospective Study from a German Patients’ Pool

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of some cardiotropic viruses in virus-associated inflammatory cardiac disease remains controversial. The aim of this study was to examine myocardial tissue samples from explanted hearts of heart transplant recipients and heart donors for nucleic acids of myocardiotropic viruses and to observe the potential risk of viral-induced post-transplantation complications in recipients of cardiac allografts or heart valve homografts.

METHODS

Myocardial tissue samples were analyzed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for enteroviruses, adenoviruses, human cytomegalovirus (HCMV), parvovirus B19 (PVB19), and influenza viruses. The results were compared with serologic and histopathologic findings.

RESULTS

PCR analysis of 449 myocardial tissue samples from explanted hearts indicated infection in 34 (47%) of 73 heart transplant recipients and 48 (60%) of 80 donors. The prevalence of virus infection in donors aged over 65 years was significantly higher than in heart transplant recipients (p = 0.005) or donors aged under 65 years (p = 0.02). The most frequently detected viruses were enteroviruses (group B coxsackievirus) and adenoviruses. HCMV and PVB19 were found less frequently. All samples were negative for influenza viruses. Although the serologic findings and PCR results for different viruses were discordant in 4% to 27% of cases, PCR and histopathologic findings were highly correlated (88%).

CONCLUSIONS

The frequent detection of viral genome sequences in myocardial tissue of both heart transplant recipients and heart donors suggests a significant risk for graft-transmitted viral infection in cardiac and heart valve transplant recipients.

Donor intracranial bleeding is associated with advanced transplant coronary vasculopathy: Evidence from intravascular ultrasound

OBJECTIVES

We evaluated the impact of spontaneous intracranial bleeding (ICB) in the donor on transplant coronary vasculopathy using serial intravascular ultrasound examinations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between January 1995 and December 2000, 72 recipients underwent cardiac transplantation from donors who had experienced spontaneous ICB (ICB group). Their findings using serial intravascular ultrasound analysis at baseline (within 1 month) and 1 year after transplantation were compared with 90 recipients who had undergone transplantation from trauma donors (trauma group).

RESULTS

Compared with the Trauma group, the ICB group showed increased coronary intimal thickness (0.55 +/- 0.33 vs 0.39 +/- 0.3 mm; P = .034), plaque volume (3.84 +/- 2.5 vs 2.28 +/- 1.65 mm(3); P = .015) and plaque burden (7.4 vs 2%) at 1 year after transplantation.

CONCLUSIONS

Donor spontaneous ICB is associated with significantly increased coronary vasculopathy.

Impact of donor spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage on outcome after heart transplantation

Donor cause of death has been suggested to have a significant impact on cardiac transplant morbidity and mortality. Our objective was to evaluate the impact of donor spontaneous intracranial bleeding on clinical outcome after heart transplantation. A group of 160 recipients underwent cardiac transplantation from donors with spontaneous intracranial bleeding (ICB group). These were compared with 197 recipients who were transplanted from trauma donors (Trauma group). A higher 4-year mortality rate was noted in the ICB group (24% vs. 14%, p=0.015). ICB as a cause of donor death was an independent predictor of recipient mortality (adjusted hazard ratio 2.02, 95% CI 1.27-3.40, p<0.0001). Compared with the Trauma group, the ICB group had an increased incidence of post-transplant graft dysfunction during the first week of transplant (10% vs. 3%, p=0.007), and higher incidence of interstitial myocardial fibrosis on their endomyocardial biopsies within 4 weeks of transplant (21% vs. 9%, p=0.0012). There was a trend towards an increased rate of allograft vasculopathy in the ICB group (competing risks adjusted hazard ratio 1.39, 95% CI 0.90-2.13, p = 0.14).

Prolonged donor ischemic time does not adversely affect long-term survival in adult patients undergoing cardiac transplantation

OBJECTIVE

With liberalization of donor eligibility criteria, organs are being harvested from remote locations, increasing donor ischemic times. Although several studies have evaluated the effects of prolonged donor ischemic times on short-term survival and graft function, few have addressed concerns regarding long-term survival.

METHODS

Over the last 11 years, 819 consecutive adults underwent cardiac transplantation at Columbia Presbyterian Medical Center. Recipients were separated into the following 4 groups based on donor ischemic time: <150 minutes, 150 to 200 minutes, 200 to 250 minutes, and >250 minutes. Statistical analysis included Kaplan-Meier survival and Cox proportional hazard models to identify predictors of long-term survival.

RESULTS

Donor ischemic time was 120.1 +/- 21.1 minutes for group 1 (n = 321), 174.1 +/- 14.7 minutes for group 2 (n = 264), 221.7 +/- 14.6 minutes for group 3 (n = 154), and 295.5 +/- 37.1 minutes for group 4 (n = 80) (P <.001). There were no significant differences in recipient age, donor age, etiology of heart failure, United Network for Organ Sharing status, or history of previous cardiac surgery among the groups (P = NS). Prolonged donor ischemic time did not adversely affect long-term survival, with actuarial survival at 1, 5, and 10 years of 86.9%, 75.2%, and 56.4% for group 1; 86.2%, 76.9%, and 50.9% for group 2; 86.4%, 71.0%, and 43.7% for group 3; and 86.7%, 70.1%, and 50.9% for group 4 (P =.867). There was no significant difference in freedom from transplant coronary artery disease among the 4 groups (P =.474).

CONCLUSIONS

Prolonged donor ischemic time is not a risk factor for decreased long-term survival. Procurement of hearts with prolonged donor ischemic time is justified in the setting of an increasing recipient pool with a fixed donor population.

Results after transplantation using donor hearts with preexisting coronary artery disease

OBJECTIVE

Cardiac allografts with coronary artery disease may permit a selective expansion of the donor pool. Twenty-two recipients who received donor hearts with mild to moderate coronary artery disease on angiography were reviewed. All donor organs had preserved left ventricle function on echocardiogram.

METHODS

The procedure was explained to the patients in detail. All survivors have at least 1 year of follow-up. If the coronary arteries of the donor heart were significantly occluded, then the implanting surgeon performed coronary revascularization. Donors were allocated to patients facing imminent death (group I, n = 4) or to those who would otherwise not have been transplanted (group II, n = 18). Median recipient age was 57 years old for group I and 68 years old for group II. Median follow-up was 25 months for group I and 44 for group II.

RESULTS

Outcome was evaluated using survival and freedom from graft coronary disease as end points. In group I, 3 of the 4 hearts required revascularization. In group II, 10 of the 18 required revascularization. The majority of the revascularizations were recipient saphenous vein grafts (84.6%) to the donor left anterior descending artery (50%). The 1-month and 2-year actual survivals for group I are 75% and 50% and 87.5% and 81.3 for group II. One patient in group I who was in extremis and 3 in group II died at less than 90 days. Group II early deaths had donor risk factor combinations of coronary artery disease, left ventricular hypertrophy, and long distance. Freedom from new graft coronary artery disease was 100% at 2 years in group I and 87.5% in group II.

CONCLUSIONS

Selective use of donor hearts with coronary artery disease is acceptable. Early deaths are related to recipient factors as well as associated donor risk factors. Donor hearts with mild or moderate coronary artery disease and preserved function on echocardiogram can be used but may require revascularization with recipient conduit and/or percutaneous transluminal coronary artery angioplasty. Coronary disease in donor hearts requires grading and does not categorically preclude use, particularly in risk-matched recipients.

Extended criteria for organ acceptance. Strategies for achieving organ safety and for increasing organ pool

The terms extended donor or expanded donor mean changes in donor acceptability criteria. In almost all cases, the negative connotations of these terms cannot be justified. Factors considered to affect donor or organ acceptability have changed with time, after showing that they did not negatively affect graft or patient survival per se or when the adequate measures had been adopted. There is no age limit to be an organ donor. Kidney and liver transplantation from donors older than 65 years can have excellent graft and patient actuarial survival and graft function. Using these donors can be from an epidemiological point of view the most important factor to esablish the final number of cadaveric liver and kidney transplantations. Organs with broad structural parenchyma lesion with preserved functional reserve and organs with reversible functional impairment can be safely transplanted. Bacterial and fungal donor infection with the adequate antibiotic treatment of donor and/or recipient prevents infection in the latter. The organs, including the liver, from donors with infection by the hepatitis B and C viruses can be safely transplanted to recipients with infection by the same viruses, respectively. Poisoned donors and non-heart-beating donors, grafts from transplant recipients, reuse of grafts, domino transplant and splitting of one liver for two recipients can be an important and safe source of organs for transplantation.

Comparison of coronary endothelial dysfunction in the working and nonworking graft in porcine heterotopic heart transplantation

BACKGROUND

The nonworking heterotopic heart transplantation model has been used extensively for the study of rejection and coronary endothelial function in different species. The effect of left ventricular loading in a working heart transplantation model, which may be associated with different coronary flow patterns and local nitric oxide release, on the development of coronary endothelial dysfunction and intimal hyperplasia, is unknown.

METHODS

Porcine retroperitoneal "nonworking" heterotopic transplantations (n=10) and "working" heart (with left ventricular filling) transplantations (n=7) were performed. The left ventricular pressure was 0+/-0 mm Hg and 91+/-11 mm Hg in the nonworking and working groups, respectively. In the latter, the left ventricle to systemic arterial pressure ratio was 0.76+/-0.08.

RESULTS

Sixty days after transplantation, epicardial coronary arteries from working and nonworking allografts developed a comparable selective endothelial dysfunction of Gi-protein mediated relaxations. There were no statistically significant differences in the prevalence of intimal hyperplasia, but the severity of intimal hyperplasia was significantly greater in allograft coronary arteries from the working hearts.

CONCLUSION

Working heterotopic allografts develop an endothelial dysfunction comparable with that of nonworking allografts, which validates the use of the simpler nonworking graft for the study of endothelial function. The similar prevalence of intimal hyperplasia with the development of more severe coronary lesions in working hearts may be due to differences in local nitric oxide release in these two models.

Recent trends in early outcome of adult patients after heart transplantation: a single-institution review of 251 transplants using standard donor organs

Older age, prior transplantation, pulmonary hypertension, and mechanical support are commonly seen in current potential cardiac transplant recipients. Transplants in 436 consecutive adult patients from 1994 to 1999 were reviewed. There were 251 using standard donors in 243 patients (age range 18-69 years). To emphasize recipient risk, 185 patients who received a nonstandard donor were excluded from analysis. The indications for transplant were ischemic heart disease (n = 123, 47%), dilated cardiomyopathy (n = 82, 32%), and others (n=56, 21%). One hundred and forty-nine (57%) recipients were listed as status I; 5 and 6% were supported with an intra-aortic balloon and an assist device, respectively. The 30-d survival and survival to discharge were 94.7 and 92.7%, respectively; 1-year survival was 89.1%. Causes of early death were graft failure (n = 6), infection (n = 4), stroke (n = 4), multiorgan failure (n = 3) and rejection (n = 2). Predictors were balloon pump use alone (OR= 11.4, p =0.002), pulmonary vascular resistance > 4 Wood units (OR = 5.7, p = 0.007), pretransplant creatinine > 2.0 mg/dL (OR = 6.9, p = 0.004) and female donor (OR = 8.3, p = 0.002). Recipient age and previous surgery did not affect short-term survival. Heart transplantation in the current era consistently offers excellent early and 1-year survival for well-selected recipients receiving standard donors. Early mortality tends to reflect graft failure while hospital mortality may be more indicative of recipient selection.