Eosinophilic infiltration in the nasal mucosa of rhinitis patients: is it affected by the presence of asthma or the allergic status of the patients?

15-hydroxy eicosadienoic acid is an exacerbating factor for nasal congestion in mice

Allergic rhinitis (AR) is one of the most common allergic inflammatory diseases worldwide. In AR, increased blood flow and vascular permeability in nasal mucosa cause rhinorrhea and nasal congestion. We investigated the role of an 11Z,14Z-eicosadienoic acid-derived metabolite, 15-hydroxy-11Z,13Z-eicosadienoic acid (15-HEDE), in functional changes in vasculature and nasal congestion in AR. Repeated intranasal administration of Ovalbumin (OVA) caused AR symptoms, such as sneezing and nasal congestion, in mice. OVA administration increased the level of 15-HEDE in nasal lavage fluid, which reached approximately 0.6 ng/ml after ten OVA treatments. Upon measuring vascular contraction, treatment with 0.1-3 μM 15-HEDE did not cause contraction in mouse aortae, while it dilated aortae that were pre-contracted by thromboxane receptor stimulation. Pretreatment with the voltage-gated K⁺ (K_V ) channel inhibitor 4-aminopyridine significantly inhibited the 15-HEDE-induced vascular relaxation. Intravital imaging showed that administration of 1 μg 15-HEDE dilated blood vessels, and Mile's assay demonstrated that this administration also caused dye leakage, indicating vascular hyperpermeability in mouse ears. Computed tomography scanning and morphological study revealed that administration of 3 μg 15-HEDE narrowed nasal passages and thickened nasal mucosa in mice. Finally, we confirmed that treating mice with 3 μg 15-HEDE caused rhinitis symptoms, such as abdominal breathing, and reduced respiratory frequency, suggesting nasal congestion. 15-HEDE caused vasodilation by activating K_V channels and increased vascular permeability, which may lead to nasal congestion. Furthermore, 15-HEDE might be a new lipid mediator that exacerbates nasal congestion in AR.

Evaluating the Protective Properties of a Xyloglucan-Based Nasal Spray in a Mouse Model of Allergic Rhinitis

A breached nasal epithelial barrier plays an important role in driving allergic rhinitis (AR). Corticosteroids remain the standard of care (SoC) but come with side effects, thus alternative safe and effective treatments able to avoid inflammation and restore barrier integrity are needed. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the barrier-forming capacity of a xyloglucan-based nasal spray (XG) and compare its efficacy to several SoC treatments (corticosteroid spray, oral mast-cell stabilizer and oral antihistamine) in reducing allergic responses in addition to its effect when concomitantly administered with an antihistamine. An ovalbumin (OVA)-induced mouse AR model was used. XG shows a significant efficacy in reducing histological damage in AR mice; improves nasal rubbing and histamine-induced hyper-responsiveness. Total and OVA-specific IgE as well as pro-inflammatory cytokines are significantly reduced compared to OVA challenged-mice, with im-proved efficacy when used as an add-on treatment. However, XG reduces mucous secreting cells (PAS-positive) and mucin mRNA expression similar to the corticosteroid-treated mice. XG-spray maintains tight junction protein expression (ZO-1) and conversely decreases HDAC1 significantly; the latter being highly expressed in AR patients. Moreover, the concomitant treatment showed in all of the endpoints a similar efficacy to the corticosteroids. This innovative approach may represent a novel therapeutic strategy for nasal respiratory diseases like AR, reducing undesirable side effects and improving the quality of life in patients.

Nasal smear eosinophils and allergic rhinitis

Our aim was to find out the association between nasal smear eosinophil count and allergic rhinitis (AR) and to determine a cutoff value that is significant for a diagnosis of AR. We also wanted to determine whether this count is related to the predominant symptoms, duration, or type and severity of AR, or to the presence of coexisting asthma. We selected 100 patients with a clinical diagnosis of allergic rhinitis across all age groups and an equal number of age- and sex-matched controls for the study. Their nasal smear eosinophil counts were recorded in terms of the number of eosinophils per high-power field (HPF). All patients were then clinically assessed for asthma and underwent spirometry. The data were recorded and appropriate statistical analysis done. The difference in the mean eosinophil counts of patients with AR and controls was found to be statistically significant (p = 0.000). A nasal smear eosinophil count of >0.3 per HPF had a 100% specificity and a 100% positive predictive value for AR. Asthma was associated with allergic rhinitis in 40% of patients; an association was not found between nasal smear eosinophil count and the symptoms, duration, type, and severity of allergic rhinitis or coexistent asthma. We conclude that an eosinophil count of >0.3 per HPF in nasal smears is a highly specific criterion for the diagnosis of AR. However, nasal smear eosinophil counts are poor indicators of the degree, duration, or type of upper or associated lower airway inflammation due to allergy.

Altered microRNA expression of nasal mucosa in long-term asthma and allergic rhinitis

BACKGROUND

Asthma and allergic rhinitis (AR) commonly coexist and can be taken as manifestations of one syndrome. Evidence exists that microRNAs (miRNAs) are important in controlling inflammatory processes and they are considered promising biomarkers. However, little is known about the differences in miRNA expression in patients with chronic allergic airway disease. This study evaluated the inflammatory and miRNA profiles of the nasal mucosa of patients with long-term asthma with and without AR.

METHODS

We analyzed inflammatory cells, cytokines, and miRNAs in nasal biopsies and measured exhaled and nasal nitric oxide levels during the nonpollen season in 117 middle-aged men who had suffered mainly from allergic asthma for approximately 20 years and also in 33 healthy controls.

RESULTS

The differences in the number of nasal eosinophils and cytokine expression levels were modest in nasal biopsies taken from asthmatics. Downregulation of miR-18a, miR-126, let-7e, miR-155, and miR-224 and upregulation of miR-498, miR-187, miR-874, miR-143, and miR-886-3p were observed in asthmatic patients in comparison to controls. The differences in miRNA expression were mainly similar in asthmatics with and without AR. With regard to asthma severity, a trend of increased miRNA expression in persistent asthma was seen, whereas the downregulation of certain miRNAs was most distinct in nonpersistent-asthma patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Differences in miRNA expression in the nasal mucosa of subjects with long-term asthma and AR can be seen also when no markers of Th2-type inflammation are detected. Asthma severity had only a minor impact on miRNA expression.

Importance of allergic rhinitis management in achieving asthma control: ARIA update

Asthma continues to be a major burden for the health and healthcare of people worldwide. The recent updates of the Global Initiative for Asthma and the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute asthma guidelines stress the need for achieving and monitoring asthma 'control', emphasizing the importance of identifying, assessing and treating comorbid conditions. Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a major comorbid condition in people with asthma and is related to inflammation of the upper portions of the airway. Recognizing and treating AR has been shown to improve asthma control, specifically by decreasing rates of asthma attacks or asthma exacerbations. In 2008, updated Allergic Rhinitis in Asthma (ARIA) guidelines were published. The updated version of the guidelines has a familiar look, with classification systems and care algorithms that are similar to those presented in other asthma guidelines. The new ARIA guidelines make one major change that should affect the care of adults and children with asthma: everyone with asthma should be assessed for AR. In addition, AR should be considered a risk factor for asthma, and all children and adults with AR, especially persistent AR, should be assessed for asthma, including testing lung function for reversible obstruction whenever feasible. Treatment for AR follows a similar format to that for asthma, including symptom management, treatment of chronic inflammation, identification and management of triggers, including allergens, and ongoing education for self-management. Pharmacotherapies that address both asthma and AR include corticosteroids (intranasal and inhaled), leukotriene receptor antagonists, immunomodulation or immunotherapy. Too often, pharmacotherapy is not supplemented by the necessary education and evaluation related to allergen, trigger identification and management.

Combined airways: impact of upper airway on lower airway

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article reviews recent literature on the important relationship between the nose, paranasal sinuses and lungs. Recent advances in the understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying the association between upper and lower airways are discussed.

RECENT FINDINGS

Epidemiological, clinical, and immunopathological data demonstrate an important link between upper and lower airways beyond the well recognized association of allergic rhinitis and asthma. Other upper airway diseases including occupational rhinitis, chronic rhinosinusitis, nasal polyposis with or without aspirin sensitivity, and obstructive sleep apnea have all been linked to asthma and/or asthma severity, as well as other lower airway diseases. Although the underlying mechanisms to explain these associations are unclear, recent work suggests the presence of systemic inflammation triggered by both the adaptive and innate immune system as a major driving force in combined airway diseases.

SUMMARY

Epidemiological data, clinical observations, and immunopathological studies demonstrate an important link between upper and lower airways. An understanding of how the upper airway impacts on lower airway disease has important diagnostic, therapeutic and prognostic implications.