Pain, Physician-assisted Suicide, and Euthanasia

James Rachels and the morality of euthanasia

My fundamental thesis is that Rachels dismisses the traditional Western account of the morality of killing without offering a viable replacement. In this regard, I will argue that the substitute account he offers is deficient in at least eight regards: (1) he fails to justify the foundational principle of utilitarianism, (2) he exposes preference utilitarianism to the same criticisms he lodges against classical utilitarianism, (3) he neglects to explain how precisely one performs the maximization procedure which preference utilitarianism requires, (4) his account of the sanctity of life is subject to the very criticism he levels against the traditional position, (5) he cannot justify the exceptions he makes to his interpretation of the sanctity of life, (6) his account could easily be used to justify murder, (7) his embrace of autonomy as an ethical principle undermines his preference utilitarianism, and (8) he cannot maintain the moral identification of acts of killing and letting die.

Crisis in Caregiving: When Home-Based End-Of-Life Care is No Longer Possible

Understanding the factors that precipitate caregiving crises that cannot be resolved at home is central to improving options for care at life's end. The purpose of this study was to explore caregivers’ perceptions of the crises that preceded and were resolved by relocation during end-of-life care. In-depth interviews were conducted with 36 caregivers of people who died in a hospice house. The results illuminate a conceptual model of the caregiving crisis, which has three stages: a) precipitating factors — the interrelationship between illness trajectory and reciprocal suffering (physical, psychological, emotional and social distress), b) crisis, and c) resolution (settled or unsettled). Relocation presents an opportunity for families to relinquish the burden of end-stage care so that they can resume and complete a lifelong relationship. Careful recognition of and attention to the intimate dynamics that accompany suffering and dying are essential elements of palliative care, which aims to uphold the dignity of the dying person and the integrity of the family in both caregiving and bereavement.

Spiritual well-being as a dimension of quality of life for patients with advanced cancer and AIDS and their family caregivers: Results of a longitudinal study

Based on a longitudinal, quality-of-life study, this article presents pilot data regarding the spiritual well-being of patients with advanced cancer or AIDS and their family caregivers. Data include similarities and differences between the patient and caregiver populations and patient/family caregiver dyads as well as trends with regard to changes in spiritual well-being during the illness and dying process. The reliability of the Spiritual Well-Being Scale 1 was examined for patient and caregiver groups, as was the relationship between selected demographic variables and spiritual well-being. Implications for practice are discussed.

The clinician's dilemma: two dimensions of ethical care

There is a continuing intense medico-ethico-legal debate around legalized euthanasia and physician assisted suicide such that ethically informed clinicians often agree with the arguments but feel hesitant about the conclusion, especially when it may bring about a change in law. We argue that this confusion results from the convergence of two continua that underpin the conduct of a clinician and are especially prominent in psychiatry. The two continua concern the duty of care and the importance of patient autonomy and they do not quite map into traditional divides in debates about sanctity of life, paternalism, and autonomy. As ethical dimensions, they come into sharp focus in the psychological complexities of end-of-life care and they form two key factors in most ethical and legal or disciplinary deliberations about a clinician's actions. Whereas both dimensions are important when a clinician reflects on what s/he has done or should do, they need careful balancing in a request for euthanasia or physician assisted suicide where the patient wants to take a decisive role in his or her own end-of-life care. However, end-of-life is also a situation where clinicians often encounter 'cries for help' so that both continua are importantly in play. Balancing these two continua without using blunt legal instruments is often required in psychiatric care in such a way as to problematize the idea that patient decisions should dominate the care options available. A simplistic approach to that issue arguably plays into what has been called an 'impoverished construction of life and death' and, some would say, devalues the basic commitments fundamental to medical care.

Euthanasia: An Indian perspective

In our society, the palliative care and quality of life issues in patients with terminal illnesses like advanced cancer and AIDS have become an important concern for clinicians. Parallel to this concern has arisen another controversial issue-euthanasia or "mercy -killing" of terminally ill patients. Proponents of physician-assisted suicide (PAS) feel that an individual's right to autonomy automatically entitles him to choose a painless death. The opponents feel that a physician's role in the death of an individual violates the central tenet of the medical profession. Moreover, undiagnosed depression and possibility of social 'coercion' in people asking for euthanasia put a further question mark on the ethical principles underlying such an act. These concerns have led to strict guidelines for implementing PAS. Assessment of the mental state of the person consenting to PAS becomes mandatory and here, the role of the psychiatrist becomes pivotal. Although considered illegal in our country, PAS has several advocates in the form of voluntary organizations like "death with dignity" foundation. This has got a fillip in the recent Honourable Supreme Court Judgment in the Aruna Shaunbag case. What remains to be seen is how long it takes before this sensitive issue rattles the Indian legislature.

Opioids, iatrogenic harm and disclosure of medical error

The safety of patients in U.S. hospitals is a serious problem, with adverse events because of medical error affecting a significant proportion of hospitalized patients. Patients at the end of life are particularly vulnerable and are at risk of potential adverse events. This article presents a case in which opioids were rapidly titrated to neurotoxic doses in a patient who was terminally extubated. The patient was profoundly sedated and was noted to have Cheyne-Stokes breathing. The possibility of opioid-related iatrogenic harm is raised, and a discussion of what counts as medical error in these circumstances is explored. Palliative care specialists have a unique responsibility to provide guidance and establish a standard of care that clinicians should adhere to. Prevention of harm in dying patients should be a priority in the hospital setting.

Illness-related hopelessness in advanced cancer: influence of anxiety, depression, and preparatory grief

The growing interest in the psychological distress in patients with cancer has been the major reason for the conduction of this study. The aims were to assess the relationship of hopelessness, anxiety, distress, and preparatory grief, as well as their predictive power to hopelessness. Ninety-four patients with advanced cancer completed the study at a palliative care unit in Athens, Greece. Beck Hopelessness Scale, the Greek version of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) scale, and the Preparatory Grief in Advanced Cancer Patients scale were administered. Information concerning patients' treatment was acquired from the medical records, whereas physicians recorded their clinical condition. Hopelessness correlated significantly with preparatory grief (r = .630, P < .0005), anxiety (r = .539, P < .0005), depression (r = .642, P < .0005), HAD-Total (r = .686, P < .0005), and age (r = -.212, P = .040). Multiple regression analyses showed that preparatory grief (P < .0005), depression (P < .0005), and age (P = .003) were predictors of hopelessness, explaining 58.8% of total variance. In this patient sample, depression, preparatory grief, and patients' age were predictors of hopelessness.

End of life content in geriatric textbooks: what is the current situation?

Background

Physicians caring for elderly people encounter death and dying more frequently than their colleagues in most other disciplines. Therefore we sought to examine the end-of-life content in popular geriatric textbooks and determine their usefulness in helping geriatricians manage patients at the end of their lives.

Methods

Five popular geriatric textbooks were chosen. Chapters on Alzheimer's disease, stroke, chronic heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and lung cancer were examined because of their high mortality rates among the elderly patients. Text relevant to end-of-life care was highlighted. Two reviewers independently coded text into 10 pre specified domains and rated them for the presence of end-of-life information. Content was rated as absent, minimally helpful, or helpful. The proportion of helpful information was calculated.

Results

The textbook with the best end-of-life coverage contained 38% helpful information, the worst had only 15% helpful information. Minimally helpful information ranged from 24% to 50%. As much as 61% of the content in one textbook contained no helpful information at all. Of the ten domains, epidemiology, disease progression and prognostic factors were fairly well covered. Information on advance care planning, ethical issues, decision making and effects of death and dying on patient's family were generally lacking under the individual diseases though they were covered as general topics in other parts of the textbooks. All except one textbook dedicated a chapter to the care of the dying.

Conclusion

This study showed that end-of-life content in geriatric textbooks differed significantly. Most of the textbooks lack good coverage on end-of-life care and more can be done to improve on this.

Hypnosis for pain management

Nurses are in a key position to learn and use hypnosis with patients to reduce pain and enhance self-esteem. However, most nurses lack knowledge about the clinical effectiveness of hypnosis and may seek continuing education to become skilled in its use. Painful procedures, treatments, or diseases remain a major nursing challenge, and nurses need complementary ways to relieve pain from surgery, tumors, injuries, and chemotherapy. This article examines the evidence base related to hypnosis for pain management, as well as how to assess and educate patients about hypnosis.

The schedule of attitudes toward hastened death: Validation analysis in terminally ill cancer patients

Objective: The faithful translation of the English version of the Schedule of Attitudes toward Hastened Death (SAHD) into Greek and its validation as an assessment tool in terminally ill cancer patients receiving palliative treatment.

Methods: 120 terminally ill cancer patients attending a Palliative Care Unit, at the University of Athens, Greece, between June 2003 and November 2003 for palliative treatment.

Results: SAHD would be a useful instrument for measuring desire for hastened death with valid psychometric properties in a Greek cancer population. The SAHD demonstrated high reliability. Desire for hastened death was significantly associated with Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HAD) depression (r = 0.607, p < 0.0005) and substantially correlated with HAD anxiety (r = 0.502, p < 0.0005). “Pain intensity” had a moderate correlation with SAHD scores (r = 0.28, p = 0.01) and SAHD scores correlated significantly with “pain interference in mood” (r = 0.38, p = 0.01) and in “enjoyment of life” (r = 0.34, p = 0.03). SAHD correlation with quality of life was statistically significant (r = −0.38, p < 0.01) as was health status (r = −0.36, p < 0.01). Patients with a Poor Performance Status (from Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group scale) correlated significantly with high scores in SAHD (p = 0.038). Factor analysis supported the unidimentionality of the measurement.

Significance of results: SAHD could be a useful and valid instrument for measuring desire for hastened death in Greek terminally ill cancer patients.

Pain and Desire for Hastened Death in Terminally Ill Cancer Patients

The purpose of this study was to assess the relationship between pain and the desire for hastened death in terminally ill cancer patients. The participants were 120 terminally ill cancer patients under palliative treatment from June 2003 to November 2004. Patients completed a pain assessment tool, the Greek Brief Pain Inventory (G-BPI), and a self-report measure of the desire for hastened death, the Greek Schedule of Attitudes Toward Hastened Death (G-SAHD). Moderate but statistically significant associations were found between some of the severity and interference items of G-BPI and G-SAHD; more specifically, between G-SAHD and G-BPI3, "worst pain in the last 24 hours" (r = 0.279, P = .002); G-SAHD and G-BPI4, "least pain in the last 24 hours" (r = 0.253, P = .005); and G-SAHD and G-BPI5, "average pain in the last 24 hours" (r = 0.283, P = .002). A stronger association was revealed between G-SAHD and G-BPI8, "relief provided by pain treatment and medications in the last 24 hours" (r = -0.326, P = .000). Multiple regression analyses including the enter model and the forward model were conducted. According to the enter model, the strongest predictors of hastened death were items G-BPI6, "current pain"; G-BPI8, "relief provided by pain treatment and medications in the last 24 hours"; G-BPI9i, "interference of pain in general activity"; and G-BPI9iii, "interference of pain in walking." According to the forward model, significant predictors of the desire for death were items G-BPI5, "average pain in the last 24 hours"; G-BPI6, "current pain"; G-BPI9i, "interference of pain in general activity"; and G-BPI9ii, "interference of pain in mood," all of which were statistically significant (P = .000-.042). Pain appeared to have a statistically significant relationship with the desire for hastened death. Effective treatment by healthcare professionals should be provided to reduce pain and cancer-related symptoms as well as the desire for hastened death.

Reciprocal suffering: the need to improve family caregivers' quality of life through palliative care

There is growing recognition of the reciprocity of suffering by patients and families experiencing terminal illness and the need to improve the quality of their lives as the patient's illness progresses. Research is presented that addresses the importance of a dyadic perspective in recognizing patients' and families' stress and adjustment and the related physical, emotional, social, spiritual and financial needs at the end-of-life. These aspects of quality of life are specifically addressed by palliative care. The philosophy and goals of palliative care are described, as is its role in promoting the best possible quality of life for patients and their families experiencing terminal illness. This article addresses the importance of assessing the dynamics of the family caregiving system and potential palliative care interventions to enhance the quality of life of family caregivers. Implications for research are also discussed.

Influence of pain and quality of life on desire for hastened death in patients with advanced cancer

OBJECTIVE

to assess the relationship between quality of life, pain and desire for hastened death in advanced cancer patients.

METHODS

120 Greek patients with advanced cancer were interviewed with the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 version 3.0 (EORTC QLQ-C30), the Greek Brief Pain Inventory (G-BPI), the Greek Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (G-HADS) and the Greek Schedule of Attitudes toward Hastened Death (G-SAHD).

RESULTS

statistically significant associations were found between total G-SAHD scores and scores for the worst level of pain in the previous 24 hours (G-BP13) (r = 0.279, P = 0.002), and between total G-SAHD scores and scores for the level of pain relief obtained in the last 24 hours (G-BP18) (r = -0.326, P = 0.0005). The strongest correlations were found between G-SADH and emotional functioning (r = 0.569, P<0.0001) and global quality of life (r = -0.331, P<0.0001) from EORTC QLQ-C30. In multivariate analyses, emotional functioning, social functioning, financial impact, and the interference of pain in general activity and mood were significant predictors of G-SAHD (all P<0.0001).

CONCLUSION

quality of life and pain appeared to have a statistically significant relationship with desire for hastened death. Adequate palliative care should alleviate pain and the desire for hastened death, improving quality of life.

The end of life decisions – should physicians aid their patients in dying?

Decisions pertaining to end of life whether legalized or otherwise, are made in many parts of the world but not reported on account of legal implications. The highly charged debate over voluntary euthanasia and physician assisted suicide was brought into the public arena again when two British doctors confessed to giving lethal doses of drugs to hasten the death of terminally ill patients. Lack of awareness regarding the distinction between different procedures on account of legal status granted to them in some countries is the other area of concern. Some equate withdrawal of life support measures to physician assisted suicide whereas physician assisted suicide is often misinterpreted as euthanasia. Debate among the medical practitioners, law makers and the public taking into consideration the cultural, social and religious ethos will lead to increased awareness, more safeguards and improvement of medical decisions concerning the end of life. International Human Rights Law can provide a consensual basis for such a debate on euthanasia.

Consensus statements, positions, standards, and guidelines for pain and care at the end of life

Standards, guidelines, and position and consensus statements by themselves do not change practice or improve pain management and care at the end of life. However, if they are used effectively, they support best practices, provide a forum for discussion of current recommendations, and provide nurses with the latest science and information to advocate for effective pain and symptom management.

Ethical and Legal Issues in End-of-Life Care

The End-of-Life Nursing Education Consortium (ELNEC) is a train-the-trainer educational program to help nursing faculty integrate care of dying patients and their families in the nursing curriculum. This article presents techniques derived from the ELNEC project regarding teaching the ethics module and the key content areas for developing ethical decision-making skills in end-of-life care. Competent end-of-life nursing care begins with an understanding of ethics and the potential affect on care of dying patients and their families.

The Pursuit of Physician-Assisted Suicide: Role of Psychiatric Factors

Physician-assisted suicide (PAS) has attracted considerable professional attention in recent years in the end-of-life care debate. The role of depression and other psychiatric illnesses on the patient's pursuit of PAS is unclear. As part of a qualitative study exploring the motivations, deliberations, and complications experienced by persons with incurable diseases who were actively seeking PAS, we conducted semistructured interviews that were reviewed for psychiatric content. In total, 159 interviews were conducted with 60 participants concerning 12 prospective cases (12 patients and 20 family members) and 23 retrospective cases (28 family members), with more than 3600 pages of transcripts. Depressive symptoms, when present, were not described by the subjects and/or their family members to be an influential factor in their pursuit of PAS; no subject appeared or was described to suffer from depression-related decisional incapacity. Findings from this study, albeit from a small and self-selected sample, highlight not only the importance of avoiding a reductionistic understanding of the role of psychiatric illnesses in contributing to serious pursuit of PAS, but also the pressing need for scientifically rigorous studies of PAS in samples representative of the larger population.

Guidelines for an acceptable euthanasia procedure

The Netherlands is one of the very few countries that has guidelines for the practice of euthanasia. Each year there are about 9700 explicit requests for euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide (EAS), of which approximately 3600 patients are agreed upon in The Netherlands. Other countries have criticized the Dutch policy concerning EAS. First of all, it has been suggested that palliative care in The Netherlands is not adequate and that euthanasia is often requested by patients with depression. Additionally, part of the criticism is based on the regulation of the euthanasia procedure in The Netherlands. This chapter describes the guidelines for the procedure for euthanasia in The Netherlands, and focuses on some of the practical problems and issues of euthanasia. Also, the current situation concerning euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide in The Netherlands is summarized and described.

Characteristics of terminal cancer patients who committed suicide during a home palliative care program

Cancer patients may commit suicide at any stage of the disease and many risk factors of suicide have been described in the literature. To identify the possible vulnerability factors of suicide in five terminal cancer patients who committed suicide while they were cared for at home by well-trained palliative care teams, a psychological autopsy study was carried out by reviewing their medical records; their report of symptoms at the time of care; and with the caregivers', doctors', and nurses' recollection of events by means of a structured interview prepared ad hoc. We collected data regarding the physical, emotional, and social suffering of the patients, their personality profile, and their feelings with respect to the illness and disability. The interviews lasted for a mean of two hours and were performed from 2-8 years after the suicide events by the social worker at the Rehabilitation and Palliative Care Division. The interviews took place between June 1996 and January 1998. All the patients showed great concern about the lack of autonomy and independence, refused dependence on others and had fear/worry of losing their autonomy. Four patients presented functional and physical impairments, uncontrolled pain, awareness of being in the terminal stage, and mild to moderate depression. They had a feeling of hopelessness consequent to their clinical conditions, fear of suffering, and feeling of being a burden on others. They had a strong character and managerial professions. They had isolated themselves from others and they had previously talked about suicide. Before committing suicide, three patients had adverse physical/emotional consequences to the oncological treatments-they showed aggressiveness towards their family and one towards the home care physician. Multiple vulnerability factors were present simultaneously in all patients. However, the loss of, and the fear of losing, autonomy and their independence and of being a burden on others were the most relevant. The identification of a cancer patient at risk of committing suicide forms the first step for the prevention of and the setting up of adequate psychosocial rehabilitation of these patients whenever possible.

Physician-assisted suicide: the legal slippery slope

BACKGROUND

In Oregon, physicians can prescribe lethal amounts of medication only if requested by competent, terminally ill patients. However, the possibility of extending the practice to patients who lack decisional capacity exists. This paper examines why the legal extension of physician-assisted suicide (PAS) to incapacitated patients is possible, and perhaps likely.

METHODS

The author reviews several pivotal court cases that have served to define the distinctions and legalities among "right-to-die" cases and the various forms of euthanasia and PAS.

RESULTS

Significant public support exists for legalizing PAS and voluntary euthanasia in the United States. The only defenses against sliding from PAS to voluntary euthanasia are adhering to traditional physician morality that stands against it and keeping the issue of voluntary euthanasia legally framed as homicide. However, if voluntary euthanasia evolves euphemistically as a medical choice issue, then the possibility of its legalization exists.

CONCLUSIONS

If courts allow PAS to be framed as a basic personal right akin to the right to refuse treatment, and if they rely on right-to-die case precedents, then they will likely extend PAS to voluntary euthanasia and nonvoluntary euthanasia. This would be done by extending the right to PAS to incapacitated patients, who may or may not have expressed a choice for PAS prior to incapacity.

Factors to consider before participating in a hastened death: issues for medical professionals

An emerging problem that health professionals face in working with terminally ill patients is how to respond to the concerns and conflicts that emerge near the end of life. Most important are those that challenge the traditional healing, caring and therapeutic roles. Among these, perhaps none has drawn as much attention as the issue of physician-assisted dying--particularly what has been termed assisted suicide. Although the ethics of assisted dying have been actively debated by ethicists for decades, the topic is now being discussed with increasing frequency in medical, psychiatric, psychological, and legal journals. Interest has been driven by the interrelationship of changing public opinion, demographics, and the nature of the dying process; admissions of assistance by numerous physicians; and several statewide attempts at legal change, culminating in a successful voters' initiative in Oregon.

Assisted suicide, depression, and the right to die

The debate surrounding the legalization of assisted suicide continues despite a limited body of empirical research. Relatively few studies have addressed interest in assisted suicide or the desire for hastened death (rather than approval of legislation) among medically ill patients, and this literature is plagued by methodological limitations. In general, this research has demonstrated a significant association between depression and desire for death; however, the magnitude of this association is unclear. Nevertheless, psychological and social factors have typically appeared more influential in determining patients' desire for death than physical symptoms such as pain. The impact of these findings on future legislative efforts to legalize assisted suicide is discussed.

Psychiatric evaluation of death-hastening requests. Lessons from dialysis discontinuation

The authors aim to facilitate the psychiatric evaluation of death-hastening decisions, such as cessation of life-support treatment or physician-assisted suicide, by deriving principles for evaluating patients from a literature review and a recently completed prospective study on dialysis discontinuation conducted by consultation psychiatrists. Factors are delineated and suggestions are provided for the evaluation of requests to accelerate dying. Included are the authors' method for determining major depression in the context of terminal illness and their "vector analysis" in assessing patient requests to stop dialysis. As our society heatedly examines the care provided to the terminally ill, psychiatry also needs to reconsider whether actions that foreshorten life can be normative and permissible. Familiarity with competency, psychiatric diagnosis, and ease in communication and negotiation between patient, family, and staff are resources that psychiatrists can bring to these complicated assessments. Challenging areas include diagnosing depression, establishing the adequacy of palliative care, and appreciating issues related to personality features, family dynamics, and ethnic differences.

Palliative treatments of last resort: choosing the least harmful alternative. University of Pennsylvania Center for Bioethics Assisted Suicide Consensus Panel

Comprehensive palliative care, as exemplified by many state-of-the-art hospice programs, is the standard of care for the dying. Although palliative care is very effective, physicians, nurses, patients, families, and loved ones regularly face clinically, ethically, legally, and morally challenging decisions throughout the dying process. This is especially true when terminally ill patients are ready to die in the face of complex, difficult-to-treat suffering and request assistance from their health care providers. Although physician-assisted suicide has received the most attention as a potential last-resort response, this practice remains illegal in the United States except in Oregon, and even there it is relatively infrequent. More commonly, decisions are made about accelerating opioid therapy for pain, foregoing life-sustaining therapy, voluntarily stopping eating and drinking, and administering terminal sedation in response to unacceptable suffering. The moral distinctions between these practices are critical to some but relatively inconsequential to others. This paper illustrates, through summaries of real clinical cases, how each of these practices might be used in response to patients in particular clinical circumstances, keeping in focus the patient's values as well as those of families, other loved ones, and health care providers. The challenge is to find the least harmful solution to the patient's problem without abandoning patients and their loved ones to unacceptable suffering or to acting in a more deleterious way on their own.

Assisted dying and nursing practice

PURPOSE

Nurses' views are often solicited about physician-assisted dying, a concept that incorporates both assisted suicide and active euthanasia. Yet nurses are rarely asked about their own clinical experience of assisted dying. The literature indicates that many nurses experience difficulty distinguishing professionally sanctioned end-of-life interventions from those that are not. In this article the investigator explores the social, legal, and political roots of assistance in dying, and critically examines the profession's position on nurse participation in assisted dying and the research regarding nurse-assisted dying.

SCOPE

The bioethics and nursing literature was reviewed from 1990 to 1999. The databases used were the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature and Medline.

CONCLUSIONS

The complex nature of caring for highly symptomatic dying patients, and the difficulty some nurses experience in distinguishing a moral difference between hastening and assisting death, strongly indicate a need for additional nursing research that does not use a forced answer.

Euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide

In the Netherlands there are about 9700 explicit requests for euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide (EAS) each year, of which approximately 3600 are granted. Other countries have criticized the Dutch policy concerning EAS. It has been suggested that palliative care in the Netherlands is not adequate and that euthanasia is often requested by patients with depression. In addition, this criticism is partly based on the firm stance that 'human life has an absolute value and a human being has under no circumstances the right of self-determination over his or her own life'. Many aspects of EAS are currently the focus of attention in the literature. In this review the following aspects of EAS are discussed: ethics, judicial questions, the relationship between depression and euthanasia, and the impact of EAS on members of the family. Also, the current situation concerning EAS in the Netherlands is summarized and described. Despite the fact that EAS have been widely discussed in the literature, the association between depression and the number of requests for EAS remains to be discovered. It is also not yet known what the effects of EAS are on members of the family, and whether unnatural death causes a higher incidence of complicated grief.

Diagnosing suffering: a perspective

The alleviation of suffering is crucial in all of medicine, especially in the care of the dying. Suffering cannot be treated unless it is recognized and diagnosed. Suffering involves some symptom or process that threatens the patient because of fear, the meaning of the symptom, and concerns about the future. The meanings and the fear are personal and individual, so that even if two patients have the same symptoms, their suffering would be different. The complex techniques and methods that physicians usually use to make a diagnosis, however, are aimed at the body rather than the person. The diagnosis of suffering is therefore often missed, even in severe illness and even when it stares physicians in the face. A high index of suspicion must be maintained in the presence of serious disease, and patients must be directly questioned. Concerns over the discomfort of listening to patients' severe distress are usually more than offset by the gratification that follows the intervention. Often, questioning and attentive listening, which take little time, are in themselves ameliorative. The information on which the assessment of suffering is based is subjective; this may pose difficulties for physicians, who tend to value objective findings more highly and see a conflict between the two kinds of information. Recent advances in understanding how physicians increase the utility of information and make inferences allow one to reliably use the subjective information on which the diagnosis and treatment of suffering depend. Knowing patients as individual persons well enough to understand the origin of their suffering and ultimately its best treatment requires methods of empathic attentiveness and nondiscursive thinking that can be learned and taught. The relief of suffering depends on physicians acquiring these skills.

Hospice and euthanasia in The Netherlands: an ethical point of view

This contribution is a report of a two months' participant observation in a Dutch hospice. The goal of the observation was to gain an overview of moral decisions in a hospice in which euthanasia, a tolerated practice in the Netherlands, is not accepted as an option. In an introduction, the development of palliative care in the Netherlands will be briefly presented. Subsequently, various moral decisions that were taken during the participant observation are presented and analysed by means of case reports. Attention is especially drawn to decisions that directly or indirectly relate to euthanasia. These moral decisions will be clarified in the light of the philosophy behind the concept of palliative care as it has evolved since the foundation of St Christopher's Hospice, London in 1967.

When there is no benchmark: designing a primary care-based chronic pain management program from the scientific basis up

Managed care has been accused of ignoring the patient with pain. The challenge for a health maintenance organization (HMO) was not just how to deliver state-of-the-art care, but how to deliver it to the 40,000 members who experience chronic pain at a reasonable cost and with enduring outcomes. This article describes how one managed care organization set about improving the care of patients with chronic pain. The article includes the design process, the model implemented, and some suggestions for transfer of this technology to others who might want to explore developing a similar model.

Physician-Assisted Suicide: The Influence of Psychosocial Issues

BACKGROUND: Physician-assisted suicide (PAS) is perhaps the most compelling and clinically relevant mental health issue in palliative care today. The desire for death, the consideration of suicide, the interest in PAS, and the relationship of these issues to depression and other psychosocial issues appear to be of paramount importance. METHODS: Psychiatric and psychosocial perspectives are used to understand the factors contributing to the interest in PAS, as well as to guide interventions in the clinical care of patients with advanced disease. RESULTS: Research and clinical experience suggest that attending to issues of depression, social support, and other psychosocial issues in addition to pain and physical symptom control are critical elements in interventions that are useful in reducing the distress of patients who desire hastened death. CONCLUSIONS: Psychosocial and psychiatric issues are among the most powerful predictors of desire for death and interest in PAS. Evaluation and intervention in these areas, particularly depression, is a critical component of compassionate care.

Euthanasia and international human rights law: prolegomena for an international debate

In this paper we examine in what respects international human rights law can provide a basis for the establishment of an international debate on euthanasia. Such a debate seems imperative, as in many countries euthanasia is considered taboo in the context of medical practice, yet at the same time, supposedly, decisions are taken to intentionally shorten patients' lives. In the Netherlands, the act of euthanasia will not lead to the prosecution of the physician involved if the physician has complied with certain procedures. The Dutch debate centres on procedures marginalizing important moral aspects of euthanasia. An international debate, addressing the fundamental morality of euthanasia and of other medical decisions involving the end of life, will eventually enhance medical practice in the Netherlands as well as in other countries.

End-of-life care in The Netherlands and the United States: a comparison of values, justifications, and practices

Voluntary active euthanasia (VAE) and physician-assisted suicide (PAS) remain technically illegal in the Netherlands, but the practices are openly tolerated provided that physicians adhere to carefully constructed guidelines. Harsh criticism of the Dutch practice by authors in the United States and Great Britain has made achieving a balanced understanding of its clinical, moral, and policy implications very difficult. Similar practice patterns probably exist in the United States, but they are conducted in secret because of a more uncertain legal and ethical climate. In this manuscript, we plan to compare end-of-life care in the United States and the Netherlands with regard to underlying values, justifications, and practices. We will explore the risks and benefits of each system for a real patient who was faced with a common end-of-life clinical dilemma, and close with challenges for public policies in both countries.

International efforts in cancer pain relief

OBJECTIVES

To provide a review of the problem of cancer pain and cancer pain management around the world.

DATA SOURCES

Review articles, World Health Organization reports, guidelines, and personal experience relating to international efforts in the relief of cancer pain.

CONCLUSIONS

Cancer pain is a worldwide problem that is not even addressed in most countries of the world because of limited options for cancer treatment and scare resources. Yet pain relief for many patients is possible in developing countries with international assistance and support.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE

Oncology nurses have the ability to advocate for the needs of patients with cancer throughout the world. Oncology nurses can work with nurses in developing countries to enhance pain management through support of existing programs, serving as volunteers, and recruitment of resources to assist nurses in these countries.

Oregon emergency physicians' experiences with, attitudes toward, and concerns about physician-assisted suicide

OBJECTIVE

To determine emergency physicians' (EPs') attitudes toward physician-assisted suicide (PAS), factors associated with those attitudes, current experiences with attempted suicides in terminally ill persons, and concerns about the impact of legalizing PAS on emergency medicine practice.

METHODS

A cross-sectional, anonymous mailed survey was taken of EPs in the state of Oregon.

RESULTS

Of 356 eligible physicians, 248 (70%) returned the survey. Of the respondents, 69% indicated that PAS should be legal, 65% considered PAS consistent with the physician's role, and 19% believed that it is immoral. The respondents were concerned that patients might feel pressure if they perceived themselves to be either a care burden on others (82%) or a financial stress to others (69%). Only 37% indicated that the Oregon initiative has enough safeguards to protect vulnerable persons. Support for legalization was not associated with gender, age, or practice location. Respondents with no religious affiliation were most supportive of PAS (p < 0.001), and Catholic respondents were least suppportive (p = 0.03). A majority (58%) had treated at least 1 terminally ill patient after an apparent overdose. Most respondents (97%) indicated at least 1 circumstance for which they would sometimes be willing to let a terminally ill patient die without resuscitation after PAS if the Oregon initiative becomes law: if verified with an advance directive from the patient (81%), with documentation in writing from the physician (73%), after speaking to the primary physician (64%), if a competent patient verbally confirmed intent (60%), or if the family verbally confirmed intent (52%).

CONCLUSIONS

Although the majority of Oregon EPs favor the concept of legalization of PAS, most have concerns that safeguards in the Oregon initiative are inadequate to protect vulnerable patients. These physicians would consider not resuscitating terminally ill patients who have attempted suicide under the law's provisions, only in the setting of documentation of the patient's intent.

Pain: ethics, culture, and informed consent to relief

As medical technology becomes more sophisticate the ability to manipulate nature and manage disease forces the dilemma of whencanbecomesought. Indeed, most bioethical discourse is framed in terms of balancing the values and interestsandthe benefits and burdens that inform principled decisions about how, when, and whether interventions should occur. Yet, despite advances in science and technology, onecaregiver mandateremains as constant and compelling as it was for the earliest shaman—the relief of pain. Even when cure is impossible, the physician's duty of care includes palliation. Moreover, the centrality of this obligation is both unquestioned and universal, transcending time and cultural boundaries.

Although universally acknowledged, pain is a complex phenomenon for both the patient and the caregiver, influenced as much by personal values and cultural traditions as by physiological injury and disease.