Bone marrow mobilized with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in related allogeneic transplant recipients: a study of 29 patients

Incidence and risk factors for secondary graft failure in uniformly treated patients with severe aplastic anemia receiving fludarabine and cyclophosphamide for conditioning and matched sibling bone marrow graft as stem cell source

BACKGROUND AIMS

Graft failure after allogeneic transplant for aplastic anemia is problematic. The risk of graft failure depends on multiple variables, including the preparative regimen, donor type, stem cell dose and source among other variables.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with aplastic anemia who underwent matched-sibling allogeneic transplant at a single center.

RESULTS

We identified 82 patients who fit the inclusion criteria. One had primary graft failure and was excluded from this analysis. The recipient median age was 22 years. The donor median age was 23 years. The median time from diagnosis to transplant was 1.6 months. The median number of red cell transfusions before transplant was nine. The median number of platelet transfusions before transplant was 18. Thirteen patients developed secondary graft failure, with a cumulative incidence at 5 years of 16% and median time to develop secondary graft failure of 129 days. All patients engrafted with a median time for neutrophil engraftment of 19 days and a median time for platelet engraftment of 22 days. The survival of patients with or without secondary graft failure was not different. Major or bidirectional ABO incompatibility and older recipient age were statistically significantly associated with greater risk of secondary graft failure.

CONCLUSIONS

Secondary graft failure is a significant complication after allogeneic transplant for SAA. Identification of recipients at risk and mitigating the potential risks of this complication is warranted.

Frontline-matched sibling donor transplant of aplastic anemia patients using primed versus steady-state bone marrow grafts

Priming donors with G-CSF before BM harvest is reported to improve engraftment and GvHD in recipients. These effects are highly desirable when transplanting patients with non-neoplastic hematologic diseases, particularly AA patients. Here we retrospectively report the outcomes of 39 AA patients receiving a primed BM graft from MSD to 43 patients receiving a steady-state BM graft from MSD, otherwise transplanted using a uniform transplant platform. The graft had higher TNC and CD34 cell concentrations in the primed group (p < 0.001), and that was reflected in higher TNC and CD34 doses per kilogram of recipient in the primed group (p = 0.004 and 0.03, respectively). The OS for primed BM graft recipients was 97.4% and 78.9% for the steady-state BM graft recipients, p-value = 0.01. The cumulative incidence of death without GF was 2.6% in the primed group and 16.3% in the steady-state group, p-value = 0.03. There was no difference in GvHD incidence between the two groups. We confirm that priming improved the TNC and CD34 graft concentration and cell dose; this evidence along with other reported studies constitute reasonable evidence to prove that BM priming improve engraftment. We observed no increase in GvHD using primed BM graft.

G-CSF treatment of healthy pediatric donors affects their hematopoietic microenvironment through changes in bone marrow plasma cytokines and stromal cells

Although G-CSF mobilized peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) transplantation is commonly used in adults, bone marrow (BM) is still the preferred stem cell source in pediatric stem cell transplantation. Despite the fact that G-CSF is increasingly being used to enhance the hematopoietic stem/progenitor cell (HSPC) yield in BM transplantation (G-BM), the direct effects of G-CSF on the pediatric BM microenvironment have never been investigated. The BM hematopoietic niche provides the physical space where the HSPCs reside. This BM niche regulates HSPC quiescence and proliferation through direct interactions with other niche cells, including Mesenchymal Stromal Cells (MSCs). These cells have been shown to secrete a wide range of hematopoietic cytokines (CKs) and growth factors (GFs) involved in differentiation, retention and homing of hematopoietic cells. Here, we assessed changes in the BM microenvironment by measuring levels of 48 different CKs and GFs in G-BM and control BM (C-BM) plasma from pediatric donors. In addition, the effect of G-CSF on cell numbers and characteristics of HSPCs and MSCs was assessed. IL-16, SCGF-b, MIP-1b (all >1000 pg/mL) and RANTES (>10.000 pg/mL) were highly expressed in healthy donor pediatric BM plasma. Levels of IL-3, IL-18, GROa, MCP-3 (p<0.05) were increased in G-BM, whereas levels of RANTES (p<0.001) decreased after G-CSF treatment. We found a negative correlation with increasing age for IL2-Ra and LIF (p<0.05). In addition, a concomitant increase in the number of both hematopoietic and fibroblast colony forming units was observed, indicating that G-CSF affects both HSPC and MSC numbers. In conclusion, G-CSF treatment of healthy pediatric donors affects the hematopoietic BM microenvironment by expansion of HSPC and MSC numbers and modifying local CK and GF levels.

Are we underutilizing bone marrow and cord blood? Review of their role and potential in the era of cellular therapies

Since the first hematopoietic stem cell transplant, over a million transplants have been performed worldwide. In the last decade, the transplant field has witnessed a progressive decline in bone marrow and cord blood utilization and a parallel increase in peripheral blood as a source of stem cells. Herein, we review the use of bone marrow and cord blood in the hematopoietic stem cell transplant setting, and we describe the recent advances made in different medical fields using cells derived from cord blood and bone marrow.

Two versus three day upfront use of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor in healthy bone marrow donors for pediatric bone marrow transplantation

In order to decrease donors' exposure to granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF), we compared the effect of two versus three days of G-CSF priming on CD34+ yield in bone marrow (BM) harvest. Although the number of BM-CD34+ cells was higher in 3day G-CSF priming, we achieved the same number of CD34+ cells per recipient's weight in 2day G-CSF priming group, too. In addition, the number of total nucleated cells (TNC) harvested from BM were similar with two or three day regimen. But mononuclear cells (MNC) of the BM graft was higher in the 3day G-CSF priming group. Similar to CD34+ cell numbers, BM harvest yielded similar TNC, and MNC numbers per kilogram of the recipient. We also found that, young donors (≤10year) had more peripheral blood MNC, bone marrow MNC and CD34+ cell numbers. Another interesting finding of this study was obtaining adequate number of peripheral blood stem cells for leukapheresis with three day G-CSF administration. Since engrafment times were also similar in two groups, we concluded that 2-days G-CSF priming was resulted in sufficient mobilization of BM stem cells.

Management of mobilization failure in 2017

In contemporary clinical practice, almost all allogeneic transplantations and autologous transplantations now capitalize on peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) as opposed to bone marrow (BM) for the source of stem cells. In this context, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) plays a pivotal role as the most frequently applied frontline agent for stem cell mobilization. For patients classified as high-risk, chemotherapy based mobilization regimens can be preferred as a first choice and it is notable that this also used for remobilization. Mobilization failure occurs at a rate of 10%-40% with traditional strategies and it typically leads to low-efficiency practices, resource wastage, and delayed in treatment intervention. Notably, however, several factors can impact the effectiveness of CD34⁺ progenitor cell mobilization, including patient age and medical history (prior chemotherapy or radiotherapy, disease and marrow infiltration at the time of mobilization). In recent years, main (yet largely ineffective) approach was to increase G-CSF dose and add SCF, but novel and promising pathways have been opened up by the synergistic impact of a reversible inhibitor of CXCR4, plerixafor, with G-CSF. The literature shows to its favorable results in upfront and failed mobilizers, and it is necessary to use plerixafor (or equivalent agents) to optimize HSC harvest in poor mobilizers. Different CXCR4 inhibitors, growth hormone, VLA4 inhibitors, and parathormone, have been cited as new agents for mobilization failure in recent years. In view of the above considerations, the purpose of this paper is to examine the mobilization of PBSC while focusing specifically on poor mobilizers.

Differential T cell subsets and cytokine profile between steady-state and G-CSF-primed bone marrow and its association with graft-versus-host disease

Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a major complication of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). At our Institution, patients transplanted using G-CSF-primed bone marrow (G-BM), have a lower incidence of GVHD when compared to other sources. The objective of this study was to analyze and compare T cell subsets and cytokines in donor G-BM and steady-state BM (SS-BM). A prospective study was performed in 48 donor samples. Mononuclear cells were isolated by gradient density. T cell subsets and cytokine production in supernatants were analyzed by multiparametric flow cytometry. Six and 16 patients developed acute and chronic GVHD, respectively. Patients who developed GVHD were characterized by a predominant pro-inflammatory response (IL-17A (10.02 vs 0.43pg/mL, p=0.006), TNF-α (54.57 vs 0.81pg/mL, p=0.001)), in contrast to a deficient suppressor profile (IL-10 (7.87 vs 41.37pg/mL, p=0.003)) and Tregs (0.95% vs 1.52%, p=0.004). G-BM showed an enhanced suppressive phenotype (increased Th2 and Tregs) in comparison to SS-BM. GVHD is associated with an imbalance between pro-inflammatory and suppressor immune responses. G-BM showed a more favorable immunologic profile characterized by diminished pro-inflammatory cytokine production, which was associated with a lower frequency of GVHD in our cohort.

Management of Elderly Patients with Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in the Accelerated or Blastic Phase

In the elderly population, the accelerated and blastic phases of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) are difficult to treat, not just because of the higher chance of acquired mutations than in younger individuals, but because of additional associated co-morbidities. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors are well-established in the treatment of the chronic phase of CML, and their use in advanced phases is ever-increasing. Elderly patients who are still eligible candidates for transplant can undergo reduced-intensity transplants from related or unrelated donors after reverting to chronic phase. Post-transplantation, these patients require adequate monitoring and therapy to prevent relapses. Newer modalities of treatment or interventions are urgently required in this complex group of patients.

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor-primed bone marrow: an excellent stem-cell source for transplantation in acute myelocytic leukemia and chronic myelocytic leukemia

Background:

Steady-state bone marrow (SS-BM) and granulocyte colony-stimulating growth factor-primed BM/peripheral blood stem-cell (G-BM/G-PBSC) are the main stem-cell sources used in allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation. Here, we evaluated the treatment effects of SS-BM and G-BM/G-PBSC in human leucocyte antigen (HLA)-identical sibling transplantation.

Methods:

A total of 226 patients (acute myelogenous leukemia-complete remission 1, chronic myelogenous leukemia-chronic phase 1) received SS-BM, G-BM, or G-PBSC from an HLA-identical sibling. Clinical outcomes (graft-versus-host disease [GVHD], overall survival, transplant-related mortality [TRM], and leukemia-free survival [LFS]) were analyzed.

Results:

When compared to SS-BM, G-BM gave faster recovery time to neutrophil or platelet (P < 0.05). Incidence of grade III-IV acute GVHD and extensive chronic GVHD (cGVHD) was lower than seen with SS-BM (P < 0.05) and similar to G-PBSC. Although the incidence of cGVHD in the G-BM group was similar to SS-BM, both were lower than G-PBSC (P < 0.05). G-BM and G-PBSC exhibited similar survival, LFS, and TRM, but were significantly different from SS-BM (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in leukemia relapse rates among the groups (P > 0.05).

Conclusions:

G-CSF-primed bone marrow shared the advantages of G-PBSC and SS-BM. We conclude that G-BM is an excellent stem-cell source that may be preferable to G-PBSC or SS-BM in patients receiving HLA-identical sibling hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation.

Stem cell mobilization and collection from pediatric patients and healthy children

Today, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is a standard treatment for a variety of conditions in children, including certain malignancies, hemoglobinopathies, bone marrow failure syndromes, immunodeficiency and inborn metabolic disease. Two fundamentally different types of HSCT are categorized by the source of the stem cells. The first, autologous HSCT represents infusion of patient's own hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) obtained from the patient; the second, allogeneic HSCT refers to the infusion of HSCs obtained from a donor via bone marrow harvest or apheresis. Bone marrow has been the typical source for HSCs for pediatric donors. Bone marrow harvest is a safe procedure mainly related to mild and transient side effects. Recently, a dramatically increased use of mobilized peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) in the autologous as well as allogeneic setting has been seen worldwide. There are limited data comparing mobilization regimens; also mobilization practices vary widely in children. The most commonly used approach includes granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) at 10 mg/kg/day as a single daily dose for 4 days before the day of leukapheresis. G-CSF induced pain was less reported in children compared to adult donors. For the collection, there are several technical problems, derived from the size of the patient or donor, which must be considered before and during the apheresis. Vascular access, extracorporeal circuit volume, blood flow rates are the main limiting factors for PBSC collection in small children. Most children younger than 12 years require central vascular access for apheresis; line placement may require either general anesthesia or conscious sedation and many of the complications arise from the central venous catheter. In this review, we discuss that the ethical considerations and some principals regarding children serving as stem cell donors and the commonest sources of HSCs are presented in children, together with a discussion of how to collect and process these cells.

G-CSF-primed bone marrow as a source of stem cells for allografting: revisiting the concept

The source of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) for allogeneic transplantation has evolved over the last decades, from the sole use of unstimulated bone marrow (BM) to the use of G-CSF (filgrastim)-mobilized peripheral blood, G-CSF-primed BM (G-BM) and cord blood. G-CSF-mobilized PBSC has replaced BM as the most commonly used source of allogeneic stem cells. G-BM is a source of HSCs, with studies demonstrating the safety and feasibility of this strategy with the potential for reducing GvHD, while retaining the speed of engraftment. Although the G-BM had lost its use as the optimal source of stem cells, after the widespread use of haploidentical transplantation, their use has resurfaced in 2010. This source can still be used in today's world of transplantation in aplastic anemia and other benign diseases, as well as in children donors. This study intends to review the evidence for this approach and whether this approach still has merit in the ever-evolving field of allogenic HSC transplantation. The merit of G-BM is its ability to offer speed of engraftment with reduced GvHD.

Clinical outcomes and graft characteristics in pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: Effect of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor priming

In this study, we aimed to determine the effect(s) of G-CSF priming on graft and transplantation parameters and compare these findings with those obtained without priming. A total of 64 pediatric patients transplanted from HLA-matched family donors were enrolled in the study. Twenty-nine patients received G-CSF primed marrow (G-BM group) and 35 patients received steady state bone marrow (S-BM group). Number of total nucleated cells (TNC) and CD34(+) cells, CFU-GM colony number, neutrophil and platelet engraftment times, total length of stay in hospital, overall and disease free survival, and occasions of acute and chronic GvHD has been compared between these two groups. Granulocyte colony stimulating factor primed bone marrow (G-BM) yielded higher numbers of CD34(+) cells, TNCs, and CFU-GM colony numbers compared to those obtained in S-BM. The neutrophil engraftment time, platelet engraftment time, length of stay in hospital, overall survival and disease free survival were not different between G-BM and S-BM groups. Also the cumulative incidence of grades II-IV acute and chronic GvHD were similar. It was observed that the use of G-CSF did not increase the risk of acute or chronic GvHD. We concluded that use of G-CSF for stem cell mobilization is an effective and safe method in children.

Safety and feasibility of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) primed bone marrow (BM) using three days of G-CSF priming as stem cell source for pediatric allogeneic BM transplantation

There are limited data on the optimal dosing and schedule of G-CSF priming prior to BM harvest. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of three days of G-CSF of primed BM from related pediatric donors. Forty-five children were treated. All donors received 5 μg/kg per day of G-CSF as a single subcutaneous injection for three consecutive days prior to the BM harvest. The median age of the donors was seven yr (range, 0.8-18) and no donor experienced major adverse events related to G-CSF administration. The median age for the recipients was five yr (0.3-16 yr). Thirty-five patients had non-malignant disorders. The median dose of nucleated (TNC) and CD34+, CD3 cells infused per recipient weight was 5.4 × 10(8) /kg (range, 0.61-17), 4.7 × 10(6) /kg (range, 1.6-19), and 43.8 × 10(6) /kg (range, 1.8-95), respectively. All patients achieved neutrophil and platelets engraftment, at a median of 15 (range, 10-22) and 23 days (range, 13-111), respectively. At a median follow up of 60 months (range 12-100), the estimated five yr overall and EFS was 91% and 80%, respectively. Collection of BM following three days of G-CSF priming from pediatric donors is safe and results in high TNC and CD34+ cell yield.

Granulocyte-mobilized bone marrow

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In the last few years, mobilized peripheral blood has overcome bone marrow as a graft source, but, despite the evidence of a more rapid engraftment, the incidence of chronic graft-versus-host disease is significantly higher with, consequently, more transplant-related mortality on the long follow-up. Overall, the posttransplant outcome of mobilized peripheral blood recipients is similar to that of patients who are bone marrow grafted. More recently, the use of bone marrow after granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) donor priming has been introduced in the transplant practice. Herein, we review biological acquisitions and clinical results on the use of G-CSF-primed bone marrow as a source of hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) for allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

RECENT FINDINGS

G-CSF the increases the HSC compartment and exerts an intense immunoregulatory effect on marrow T-cells resulting in the shift from Th1 to Th2 phenotype with higher production of anti-inflammatory cytokines. The potential advantages of these biological effects have been translated in the clinical practice by using G-CSF primed unmanipulated bone marrow in the setting of transplant from human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-haploidentical donor with highly encouraging results.

SUMMARY

For patients lacking an HLA-identical sibling, the transplant of G-CSF primed unmanipulated bone marrow from a haploidentical donor combined with an intense in-vivo immunosuppression is a valid alternative achieving results that are well comparable with those reported for umbilical cord blood, HLA-matched unrelated peripheral blood/bone marrow or T-cell-depleted haploidentical transplant.

Allogeneic transplantation: peripheral blood vs. bone marrow

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) have been widely adopted as a source of stem cells for allogeneic transplantation, although controversy remains regarding their role compared to the use of bone marrow.

RECENT FINDINGS

Ten-year follow-up has been reported from several large randomized trials and a recently completed trial using unrelated donor stem cells has been reported. In addition, two meta-analyses have been reported from the findings of a number of randomized studies. Several studies indicate that PBSCs confer survival advantages over bone marrow with matched sibling donors for most disease categories except where the risks of disease recurrence within the first year are low, but with the extra risk of more chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Using PBSCs from unrelated donors does not appear to be more beneficial than bone marrow, but with early follow-up. New strategies for rapid mobilization of PBSCs from normal donors using plerixafor have been reported. Early studies suggest that filgrastim-stimulated bone marrow may confer some of the advantages of PBSCs without the risks of chronic GVHD.

SUMMARY

PBSCs are a preferred source of stem cells for many types of allogeneic transplant, in which matched related donors are available. Whether the same benefits accrue from unrelated donors will require further follow-up.

Comparison of outcomes after transplantation of G-CSF-stimulated bone marrow grafts versus bone marrow or peripheral blood grafts from HLA-matched sibling donors for patients with severe aplastic anemia

We compared outcomes of patients with severe aplastic anemia (SAA) who received granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF)-stimulated bone marrow (G-BM) (n = 78), unstimulated bone marrow (BM) (n = 547), or peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) (n = 134) from an HLA-matched sibling. Transplantations occurred in 1997 to 2003. Rates of neutrophil and platelet recovery were not different among the 3 treatment groups. Grade 2-4 acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) (relative risk [RR] = 0.82, P = .539), grade 3-4 aGVHD (RR = 0.74, P = .535), and chronic GVHD (cGVHD) (RR = 1.56, P = .229) were similar after G-BM and BM transplants. Grade 2-4 aGVHD (RR = 2.37, P = .012) but not grade 3-4 aGVHD (RR = 1.66, P = .323) and cGVHD (RR = 5.09, P < .001) were higher after PBPC transplants compared to G-BM. Grade 2-4 (RR = 2.90, P < .001), grade 3-4 (RR = 2.24, P = .009) aGVHD and cGVHD (RR = 3.26, P < .001) were higher after PBPC transplants compared to BM. Mortality risks were lower after transplantation of BM compared to G-BM (RR = 0.63, P = .05). These data suggest no advantage to using G-BM and the observed higher rates of aGVHD and cGVHD in PBPC recipients warrants cautious use of this graft source for SAA. Taken together, BM is the preferred graft for HLA-matched sibling transplants for SAA.

A prospective study of G-CSF primed bone marrow as a stem-cell source for allogeneic bone marrow transplantation in children: a Pediatric Blood and Marrow Transplant Consortium (PBMTC) study

A prospective multicenter trial was conducted to evaluate the safety and feasibility of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)-primed bone marrow (G-BM) in children receiving allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT). A total of 42 children with a median age of 9.8 years (range, 0.8-17 years) were enrolled. Donors with median age of 9.2 years (range, 1.1-22 years) received 5 microg/kg per day of subcutaneous G-CSF for 5 consecutive days. BM was harvested on the fifth day. No donor experienced complications related to G-CSF administration or marrow har-vest. Median nucleated (NC) and CD34 cells infused was 6.7 x 10(8)/kg (range, 2.4-18.5 x 10(8)/kg) and 7.4 x 10(6)/kg (range, 2-27.6 x 10(6)/kg), respectively. Neutrophil and platelet engraftment was at a median of 19 days (range, 13-28 days) and 20 days (range, 9-44 days), respectively. A total of 13 (32%) patients developed grade 2 graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), and 5 (13%) of 40 evaluable patients developed chronic GVHD (3 limited and 2 extensive). Higher cell dose was not associated with increased risk of acute or chronic GVHD. Overall survival and event-free survival at 2 years were 81% and 69%, respectively. Collection of G-BM from pediatric donors is safe, and can result in high NC and CD34 cell doses that facilitate engraftment after myeloablative BMT without a discernable increase in the risk of GVHD.

Risk assessment in haematopoietic stem cell transplantation: Stem cell source

Bone marrow (BM) has been used for many years as the unique source of progenitor cells for allogeneic transplantation. However, two other sources of progenitor cells, peripheral blood (PB) and umbilical cord (UC), are being increasingly used. The type of graft is one of the most important factors in determining the speed and robustness of the reconstitution after the transplant of monocytes, T lymphocytes, B lymphocytes, NK cells, and dendritic cells. This fact is of especial relevance since the most important reactions after allogeneic transplants - e.g. graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), graft-versus-leukaemia effect (GvL), achievement of full donor chimerism, and fight against infections - are strongly influenced by a rapid and robust reconstitution of these cells. For this reason, the choice of the type of graft for allogeneic transplantation will influence the clinical outcome.

Clinical outcomes and graft characteristics in pediatric matched sibling donor transplants using granulocyte colony-stimulating factor-primed bone marrow and steady-state bone marrow

Matched sibling donor (MSD) transplant is a life-saving procedure for children with various hematological malignancies and non-malignancies. Traditionally, steady-state bone marrow (S-BM) has been used as the source of stem cells. More recently, peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) after granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) mobilization has gained popularity. Adult studies of G-CSF-primed BM (G-BM) have shown that it produces rapid white blood cell engraftment like PBSC, but with less chronic graft-vs.-host disease. No such study has been published in pediatric patients. We conducted a pilot clinical trial of G-BM for pediatric patients. Ten patients were enrolled and were compared to a contemporaneous group of 12 patients who received S-BM. Patients in the G-BM group received a higher dose of total nucleated cells/kg (7.01 vs. 3.76 x 10(8), p = 0.0009), higher granulocyte-macrophage colony-forming units (CFU-GM)/kg (7.19 vs. 3.53 x 10(5), p = 0.01) and had shorter inpatient length of stay (28 vs. 40 days, p = 0.04). The engraftment, transfusion requirement and disease-free survival between the two groups were similar. We concluded that G-BM should be considered as an alternative graft source to S-BM, with the benefits of larger graft cell dose, higher CFU-GM dose and shorter length of stay.

Pilot study of allogeneic G-CSF-stimulated bone marrow transplantation: harvest, engraftment, and graft-versus-host disease

Peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) harvests mobilized by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) contain more CD34+ cells and provide more rapid engraftment than do bone marrow (BM) harvests. However, some reports have suggested a higher risk of chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), possibly because such PBPC harvests contain approximately 10 times more T lymphocytes than do BM harvests. Some groups are attempting to combine the faster engraftment of PBPCs with the lower incidence of GVHD observed after BM transplantation by using G-CSF-primed BM conventionally harvested from iliac crests for allogenic BM transplantation. We report the results of a pilot study of 38 allogeneic transplants using G-CSF-stimulated BM from related donors, with a focus on the harvest composition, engraftment, and incidence of acute and chronic GVHDs.

Weighing the risks of G-CSF administration, leukopheresis, and standard marrow harvest: ethical and safety considerations for normal pediatric hematopoietic cell donors

BACKGROUND

Granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) is used for collection of hematopoietic cells in most adult and a smaller but significant percentage of pediatric normal donor harvests. Short and long-term risks of G-CSF administration and leukopheresis are not well understood in the pediatric population.

PROCEDURE

Literature review including observations from the IBMTR, NMDP, EBMT, German Donor Registry, and the authors' work.

RESULTS

G-CSF causes temporary discomfort in a minority of younger donors. Rare serious side effects of G-CSF have yet to be reported in children. To date, an increase in hematological malignancies after short-term G-CSF use has not been detected in adult donors and no cases have been reported in children. Reported complications of leukopheresis in children are rare and minor, but donors <20 kg may be exposed to allogeneic blood products. Pediatric aged donors vary widely in their ability to assent or consent to the risks of a donation procedure. There are key regulations and ethical imperitives, which must be addressed in deciding which donation procedures are appropriate for minors.

CONCLUSIONS

While short term administration of G-CSF and leukopheresis appear to be safe and effective procedures when used to assist in collection of a hematopoietic cell graft from a normal pediatric donor, institutions adding or substituting one or both of these procedures for standard marrow donation must decide whether the donor should be considered a research subject, and if so, whether the new procedures are a minor increase over minimal risk. Because these procedures are being performed on and off study at many pediatric centers, a comprehensive study addressing donor safety could help clarify risks of rare adverse events.

Use of G-CSF in matched sibling donor pediatric allogeneic transplantation: a consensus statement from the Children's Oncology Group (COG) Transplant Discipline Committee and Pediatric Blood and Marrow Transplant Consortium (PBMTC) Executive Committee

Preliminary studies indicate that G-CSF-primed marrow harvesting may result in a graft with increased mononuclear cells collected, increased CD34(+) stem and progenitor cell dose and a potential for more rapid engraftment. Increased cell dose plus other potential positive effects of G-CSF priming have resulted in improved survival in non-randomized preliminary studies. These benefits may be available without the increased risk of chronic graft versus host disease (GVHD) that is experienced with allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) transplant. A phase III Children's Oncology Group (COG)/Pediatric Blood and Marrow Transplant Consortium (PBMTC) trial comparing G-CSF-primed marrow to standard marrow has been proposed. This document reviews background studies of G-CSF-primed marrow and addresses benefits and risks of G-CSF administration to normal pediatric donors. We conclude that the approach is promising and warrants further study. Risks of G-CSF to the donor are minimal and benefits to both donor and recipient may occur.

Differential effects of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor on marrow- and blood-derived hematopoietic and immune cell populations in healthy human donors

A recent phase III trial comparing granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)-stimulated bone marrow (G-BM) and G-CSF-mobilized peripheral blood (G-PB) in matched sibling allograft recipients showed that G-BM produced a similar hematologic recovery but a reduced incidence of extensive chronic graft-versus-host disease, indicating differences in the cell populations infused. As a first step toward identifying these differences, we treated a group of healthy adult humans with 4 daily doses of G-CSF 10 microg/kg and monitored the effects on various hematopoietic and immune cell types in the PB and BM over 12 days. G-CSF treatment caused rapid and large but transient increases in the number of circulating CD34+ cells, colony-forming cells, and long-term culture-initiating cells and in the short-term repopulating activity detectable in nonobese diabetic/severe combined immunodeficiency/beta2-microglobulin-null mice. Similar but generally less marked changes occurred in the same cell populations in the BM. G-CSF also caused transient perturbations in some immune cell types in both PB and BM: these included a greater increase in the frequency of naive B cells and CD123+ dendritic cells in the BM. The rapidity of the effects of G-CSF on the early progenitor activity of the BM provides a rationale for the apparent equivalence in rates of hematologic recovery obtained with G-BM and G-PB allotransplants. Accompanying effects on immune cell populations are consistent with a greater ability of G-BM to promote tolerance in allogeneic recipients, and this could contribute to a lower rate of chronic graft-versus-host disease.

The source of cells for allografting

Peripheral blood is used almost exclusively as the source of hematopoietic cells for autografting, but the best source of cells for allografting is the subject of considerable discussion and debate. Randomized studies comparing unstimulated bone marrow with G-CSF-mobilized peripheral blood in the sibling allogeneic setting have indicated a trend to more chronic graft-versus-host disease in peripheral blood recipients. However, whether the use of G-CSF-mobilized peripheral blood cells leads to more acute graft-versus-host disease is uncertain. Adults undergoing sibling allografting appear to benefit in terms of improved disease-free survival or improved overall survival with the use of G-CSF-mobilized peripheral blood. It is not clear, however, whether these benefits also extend to children or those undergoing matched unrelated transplantation.

Autologous transplantation of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor-primed bone marrow is effective in supporting myeloablative chemotherapy in patients with hematologic malignancies and poor peripheral blood stem cell mobilization

We assessed the hematopoietic recovery and transplantation-related mortality (TRM) of patients who had failed peripheral blood stem cell mobilization and subsequently received high-dose chemotherapy supported by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)-primed bone marrow (BM). Studied were 86 heavily pretreated consecutive patients with acute leukemia (n = 21), refractory/relapsed non-Hodgkin lymphoma (n = 41) and Hodgkin disease (n = 17), and multiple myeloma (n = 7). There were 78 patients who showed insufficient mobilization of CD34+ cells (< 10 cells/microL), whereas 8 patients collected less than 1 x 106 CD34+ cells/kg. BM was primed in vivo for 3 days with 15 to 16 microg/kg of subcutaneous G-CSF. Median numbers of nucleated cells, colony-forming unit cells (CFU-Cs), and CD34+ cells per kilogram harvested were 3.5 x 10(8), 3.72 x 10(4), and 0.82 x 10(6), respectively. Following myeloablative chemotherapy, median times to achieve a granulocyte count higher than 0.5 x 10(9)/L and an unsupported platelet count higher than 20 and 50 x 10(9)/L were 13 (range, 8-24), 15 (range, 12-75), and 22 (range, 12-180) days, respectively, for lymphoma/myeloma patients and 23 (range, 13-53), 52 (range, 40-120), and 90 (range, 46-207) days, respectively, for leukemia patients. Median times to hospital discharge after transplantation were 17 (range, 12-40) and 27 (range, 14-39) days for lymphoma/myeloma and acute leukemia patients, respectively. TRM was 4.6%, whereas 15 patients died of disease. G-CSF-primed BM induces effective multilineage hematopoietic recovery after high-dose chemotherapy and can be safely used in patients with poor stem cell mobilization.

G-CSF-primed haploidentical marrow transplantation without ex vivo T cell depletion: an excellent alternative for high-risk leukemia

Based on our encouraging results of G-CSF-primed HLA-matched related marrow transplants for high-risk leukemia, we extended the study from matched related to haploidentical transplants using G-CSF primed marrow and sequential immunosuppressants to prevent both graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and host-versus-graft rejection (HVGR). Fifteen high-risk leukemia patients, who needed urgent transplantation but lacked an HLA-matched donor, underwent G-CSF-primed haploidentical marrow transplantation without ex vivo T cell depletion. Donors were given G-CSF (Lenograstim) at 3-4 microg/kg/day for 7 days prior to marrow harvest. GVHD and HVGR prophylaxis were combined in the sequential usage of cyclosporin A, methotrexate, anti-thymocyte globulin and mycophenolate mofetil. All patients established sustained trilineage engraftment at a median of 19 days and 21 days for neutrophil and platelets respectively. G-CSF priming significantly increased CD34(+) and CFU-GM cells, reduced total lymphocytes and reversed the CD4(+)/CD8(+) ratio in the donor marrow. The incidence of grade II-IV acute GVHD was 33.3%. Nine patients survived more than a year with a Karnofsky performance status of 100%. Estimated overall disease-free survival at 2 years was 60 +/- 7%. In conclusion, using G-CSF priming marrow grafts along with sequential immunosuppressants provided an excellent alternative for the treatment of high-risk hematological malignancy in patients who lack matched donors.

Assessment of G-CSF stimulated BM hematopoietic stem cells in normal donors

BACKGROUND

The clinical use of G-CSF has recently been expanded to include mobilization of stem cells for both autologous and allogeneic transplantation. Most of the published studies have focused on stem cells released into the peripheral blood (PB) after G-CSF treatment. However, little is known about the effects of G-CSF on BM. This study evaluated the concurrent effects of short-term G-CSF on both BM and PB stem and progenitor cells in normal individuals.

METHODS

Volunteers received 5 or 10 microg/kg of G-CSF for 5 consecutive days (Days 1-5). On Days 0, 3, 6, 9 and 15, BM and PB samples were obtained. Flow cytometry and functional assay were performed to analyze stem cells, subpopulations, adhesion molecules, colony-forming units and LTCIC.

RESULTS

The total nucleated cells and absolute numbers of CD34(+)/mL showed a similar response pattern in both BM and PB, with a peak around Day 6 that returned to baseline levels by Day 15. However, there was a reciprocal change in the percentage of CD34(+) cells between BM and PB compartments. The expressions of adhesion molecule showed an up- and down-regulation of alpha4 and alpha5 integrin subunits, respectively, also correlated with the CD34(+) mobilization patterns.

DISCUSSIONS

The functional characterization of integrins, and further clinical examination of G-CSF-stimulated BM is warranted. G-CSF-stimulated BM maybe considered as an alternative source of stem cells in transplantation.

Granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)-primed allogeneic bone marrow: significantly less graft-versus-host disease and comparable engraftment to G-CSF-mobilized peripheral blood stem cells

Prospective studies have shown rapid engraftment using granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor-mobilized peripheral blood stem cells (G-PBSCs) for allogeneic transplantation, though the risks for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) may be increased. It was hypothesized that the use of G-CSF to prime bone marrow (G-BM) would allow rapid engraftment without increased risk for GVHD compared with G-PBSC. Patients were randomized to receive G-BM or G-PBSCs for allogeneic stem cell transplantation. The study was designed (beta <.8) to detect a difference in the incidence of chronic GVHD of 33% (alpha <.05). The plan was to recruit 100 patients and to conduct an interim analysis when the 6-month follow-up point was reached for the first 50 patients. Fifty-seven consecutive patients were recruited (G-BM, n = 28; G-PBSC, n = 29). Patients in the G-PBSC group received 3-fold more CD34(+) and 9-fold more CD3(+) cells. Median times to neutrophil (G-BM, 16 days; G-PBSC, 14 days; P <.1) and platelet engraftment (G-BM, 14 days; G-PBSC, 12 days; P <.1) were similar. The use of G-PBSC was associated with steroid refractory acute GVHD (G-BM, 0%; G-PBSC, 32%; P <.001), chronic GVHD (G-BM, 22%; G-PBSC, 80%; P <.02), and prolonged requirement for immunosuppressive therapy (G-BM, 173 days; G-PBSC, 680 days; P <.009). Survival was similar for the 2 groups. Compared with G-PBSC, the use of G-BM resulted in comparable engraftment, reduced severity of acute GVHD, and less subsequent chronic GVHD.

Peripheral blood stem cell versus bone marrow allotransplantation: does the source of hematopoietic stem cells matter?

Hematopoietic stem cells from 4 different sources have been or are being used for the reconstitution of lymphohematopoietic function after myeloablative, near-myeloablative, or nonmyeloablative treatment. Bone marrow (BM)-derived stem cells, introduced by E. D. Thomas in 1963, are considered the classical stem cell source. Fetal liver stem cell transplantation has been performed on a limited number of patients with aplastic anemia or acute leukemia, but only transient engraftment has been demonstrated. Peripheral blood as a stem cell source was introduced in 1981, and cord blood was introduced as a source in 1988. The various stem cell sources differ in their reconstitutive and immunogenic characteristics, which are based on the proportion of early pluripotent and self-renewing stem cells to lineage-committed late progenitor cells and on the number and characteristics of accompanying "accessory cells" contained in stem cell allografts.

Peripheral blood stem cells for allogeneic transplantation: a review

Peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) have become increasingly popular for use in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. PBSCs are readily collected by continuous-flow apheresis from patients and healthy donors after the administration of s.c. recombinant colony-stimulating factors with only minimal morbidity and discomfort. Although the precise identification of PBSCs remains elusive, they can be phenotypically identified as a subset of all circulating CD34(+) cells. There are important phenotypic and biologic distinctions between PBSCs and bone marrow (BM)-derived progenitor cells. PBSCs express more lineage-specific antigens but are less metabolically active than their BM-derived counterparts. The use of PBSCs for allogeneic transplantation has been compared to BM in several randomized trials and cohort studies. The use of PBSCs in leukemia, myeloma, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, and myelodysplasia has resulted in shorter times to neutrophil and platelet engraftment at the expense of increased rates of chronic graft-versus-host disease. The increase in graft-versus-host disease is mainly due to a log-fold increase in donor T cells transferred with the graft. Relapse rates after transplantation may be lower after PBSC transplantation but a convincing survival advantage has not been demonstrated overall. It is possible that a stronger graft-versus-tumor effect may exist with PBSCs when compared with BM although the mechanisms leading to this effect are not clear.

Allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation

Granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF)-mobilized peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) are now widely used instead of bone marrow for autologous transplantation due to earlier hematopoietic recovery after transplant. The low toxicity of G-CSF has prompted phase I and II studies to evaluate PBSC for allogeneic transplantation; these studies have demonstrated that engraftment of neutrophils, red blood cells and platelets is faster with peripheral blood cells compared to marrow. In randomized studies comparing mobilized PBSC and marrow for allogeneic transplantation, most trials have confirmed significantly earlier engraftment with PBSC and similar risks of acute graft-vs.-host disease (GVHD). In some trials, an increase of 10-15% in grade II-IV GVHD has been noted with PBSC. All studies showed a trend towards more chronic GVHD with PBSC. Some randomized studies have shown improved survival and disease-free survival with the use of PBSC due to lowered transplant-related mortality and fewer relapses in recipients of PBSC as a result of improved immune reconstitution and a graft-vs.-leukemia (GVL) effect. This survival benefit is most apparent in patients with more advanced hematologic malignancies, but further studies are needed to define the relative benefits of PBSC for patients with less advanced disease. The GVL effect of PBSC is currently being exploited with the use of non-ablative allografts.

Colony-Stimulating Factors in Stem Cell Transplantation: Effect on Quality of Life

Health-related quality of life (QOL) is poorest during the immediate post-transplantation period, but the impact of medical interventions during this period has not been studied. Colony-stimulating factors (CSFs), which are used to minimize short-term negative outcomes, might be expected to improve QOL; however, little is published about their impact on QOL during this period. We conducted a MEDLINE search to identify studies reporting on outcomes of stem cell transplantation (SCT) affected by the CSFs, mainly sargramostim and filgrastim. End points studied were: mucositis, incidence and type of infection, duration of hospitalization, time to myeloid engraftment, and quantity and quality of harvested cells. To impute the impact of CSFs on QOL post-SCT, we also reviewed the association between QOL and CSF outcomes in other circumstances. Data suggest that both CSFs improve QOL in the early autologous or allogeneic post-bone marrow transplantation period. Poor QOL caused by infection and increased length of hospital stay is expected to be improved by sargramostim. Time to myeloid engraftment, when negatively affecting QOL, is expected to be improved with both CSFs; however, the time to myeloid engraftment is consistently shorter with filgrastim. Current prospective trials designed to study the effects of CSFs in the immediate post-SCT period should collect QOL data.