[Deep pelvic endometriosis: management and proposal for a "surgical classification"]

Laparoscopic Modified Radical Hysterectomy for Severe Endometriosis: A Single-Center Case Series

STUDY OBJECTIVE

The main objective is to describe the feasibility and report a single-center experience of a standardized laparoscopic modified radical hysterectomy technique among patients with severe endometriosis and pouch of Douglas obliteration.

DESIGN

A single-center case series of laparoscopic modified radical hysterectomy performed at the Poissy Hospital between December 2012 and May 2021.

SETTINGS

Single-center, gynecology unit (level III) with a focus on endometriosis.

PATIENTS

Patients with severe endometriosis (stage 4 American Fertility Society) and pouch of Douglas obliteration.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Fifty-two patients with severe endometriosis underwent the surgical procedure. Of these patients, 23.1% underwent a rectal shaving (n = 12), 1.9% a discoid resection (n = 1), and 17.3% a rectal resection (n = 9), including a protective ileostomy in 1 case. Ureterolysis was performed on 82.7% of patients (n = 43). The average hospital stay was 3.3 days. Seven patients required intermittent self-catheterization (13.5%). Minor complications (Clavien-Dindo grade 1 and 2) occurred in 25.9% of the patients and severe complications in 3.8% of them (Clavien-Dindo grade 3, no grade 4). Two patients (3.8%) were reoperated: one for a postoperative occipital alopecia (balding) and the other for vaginal dehiscence with evisceration. Approximately 50 patients (96.2%) had a complete resection of endometriosis. The median follow-up was 14 months (interquartile range, 6-23 mo) with 94.3% of them improved (much and very much) and 3.8% minimally improved.

CONCLUSION

In our experience, laparoscopic modified radical hysterectomy is a reliable procedure with a low rate of severe complications. This technique needs to be assessed by other surgeons and others centers across the country and abroad, to determine the likelihood of it succeeding.

Comparison Between Sonography-Based and Surgical Evaluation of Endometriotic Lesions Using the #Enzian Classification - A Retrospective Data Analysis

PURPOSE

To compare the location and sizes of deep endometriosis (DE) lesions evaluated by preoperative transvaginal sonography (TVS) in different #Enzian compartments with intraoperatively assessed DE location and size.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective data analysis of 93 women undergoing TVS and surgery for DE in 2019 at a tertiary referral center for endometriosis.

RESULTS

#Enzian compartment C (rectum) showed the highest rate of exact concordance with 74% of cases, which increased to 87% when a tolerance margin of a maximum of 3mm for TVS measurements was taken into account. For compartment B (uterosacral ligaments, parametria) and compartment A (vagina, rectovaginal space), the rates of exact concordance were slightly lower. In compartment O (ovary), high exact concordance rates similar to those observed for compartment C were observed. In compartment T (tubo-ovarian unit), most reliable estimations were seen for slight (TVS T1) and severe adhesions (TVS T3). There were only a few cases of missed lesions as well as false positives on TVS: Sensitivity was 100% for all compartments except for A and B left (97%) and FB (urinary bladder, 86%); specificity was 100% for FB, FI (other intestinal locations), FU (ureters) and O right, 86%-98% for A, B right, C, O left and FO (other extragenital lesions) and 70% for B left.

CONCLUSION

The preoperative evaluation of the location and size of DE lesions by TVS in different #Enzian compartments is accurate, providing a detailed presurgical description of the extent of ovarian and deep endometriosis and associated minor or severe adhesions.

Accuracy of combined physical examination, transvaginal ultrasonography, and magnetic resonance imaging to diagnose deep endometriosis

OBJECTIVES

To assess the ability of physical examination (PE), transvaginal ultrasonography (TVUS), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) alone and combined to diagnose deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE).

DESIGN

We retrospectively queried our pelvic MRI database to identify women who underwent PE, TVUS, and pelvic MRI for DIE up to 12 months before surgery between January 1, 2016 and August 31, 2020. The presence of uterosacral ligaments (USL), vaginal, rectosigmoid (RS), parametrial, or sacrorectogenital septum (lateral) DIE shown by PE, TVUS, and MRI were correlated with surgical and histological findings.

SETTING

Academic hospital.

PATIENT(S)

We included 178 patients.

INTERVENTION(S)

Clinical and imaging evaluation of women who were diagnosed at surgery with deep pelvic endometriosis.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy of each technique separately and combined were assessed for each location. When the 3 techniques were combined, 2 models were tested as follows: all 3 techniques positive and concordant; and ≥2 techniques positive and concordant.

RESULT(S)

The prevalence of USL, vaginal, RS, and lateral DIE were 94.4%, 20.2%, 34.3%, and 32.6%, respectively. In addition, MRI was more sensitive than PE, TVUS or any combination to detect DIE. Moreover, MRI and model B were the most accurate for detecting USL and RS locations with an accuracy of 90.4% and 82.6%, a sensitivity of 91.1% and 50%, and a specificity of 77.8% and 90.9%, respectively. Model B was the most accurate for the vaginal location with an accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of 82.6%, 50%, and 90.9%, respectively. Finally, MRI was more accurate than any combination for identifying a lateral location with an accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of 75.1%, 36%, and 93.8%, respectively.

CONCLUSION(S)

A combination of PE, TVUS, and MRI was more accurate than each technique separately to diagnose DIE because of the equally high sensitivity of each, as well as the high specificity of PE and TVUS.

Endometriosis Classification, Staging and Reporting Systems: A Review on the Road to a Universally Accepted Endometriosis Classification

OBJECTIVE

In the field of endometriosis, several classification, staging and reporting systems have been developed. Which endometriosis classification, staging and reporting systems have been published and validated for use in clinical practice?

DATA SOURCES

A systematic PUBMED literature search was performed. Data were extracted and summarized.

METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION

na TABULATION, INTEGRATION AND RESULTS: Twenty-two endometriosis classification, staging and reporting systems have been published between 1973 and 2021, each developed for specific, and different, purposes. There still is no international agreement on how to describe the disease. Studies evaluating the different systems are summarized showing a discrepancy between the intended and the evaluated purpose, and a general lack of validation data confirming a correlation with pain symptoms or quality of life for any of the current systems. A few studies confirm the value of the ENZIAN system for surgical description of deep endometriosis. With regards to infertility, the endometriosis fertility index has been confirmed valid for its intended purpose.

CONCLUSION

Of the 22 endometriosis classification, staging and reporting systems identified in this historical overview, only a few have been evaluated for the purpose for which they were developed. The literature search was limited to PUBMED. Unpublished classification, staging or reporting systems, or those published in books were not considered. It can be concluded that there is no international agreement on how to describe endometriosis or how to classify it, and that most classification/staging systems show no or very little correlation with patient outcomes. This overview of existing systems is a first step in working towards a universally accepted endometriosis classification.

Endometriosis classification, staging and reporting systems: a review on the road to a universally accepted endometriosis classification. Hum Reprod Open 2021;2021:hoab025. [PMID: 34693032 PMCID: PMC8530712 DOI: 10.1093/hropen/hoab025]

STUDY QUESTION

Which endometriosis classification, staging and reporting systems have been published and validated for use in clinical practice?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Of the 22 endometriosis classification, staging and reporting systems identified in this historical overview, only a few have been evaluated, in 46 studies, for the purpose for which they were developed.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

In the field of endometriosis, several classification, staging and reporting systems have been developed.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

A systematic PUBMED literature search was performed. Data were extracted and summarized.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

Twenty-two endometriosis classification, staging and reporting systems have been published between 1973 and 2021, each developed for specific, and different, purposes. There still is no international agreement on how to describe the disease. Studies evaluating the different systems are summarized showing a discrepancy between the intended and the evaluated purpose, and a general lack of validation data confirming a correlation with pain symptoms or quality of life for any of the current systems. A few studies confirm the value of the ENZIAN system for surgical description of deep endometriosis. With regards to infertility, the endometriosis fertility index has been confirmed valid for its intended purpose.

LARGE SCALE DATA

NA.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

The literature search was limited to PUBMED. Unpublished classification, staging or reporting systems, or those published in books were not considered.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

It can be concluded that there is no international agreement on how to describe endometriosis or how to classify it, and that most classification/staging systems show no or very little correlation with patient outcomes. This overview of existing systems is a first step in working toward a universally accepted endometriosis classification.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

The meetings and activities of the working group were funded by the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists, European Society for Gynecological Endoscopy, European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology and World Endometriosis Society. A.W.H. reports grant funding from the MRC, NIHR, CSO, Wellbeing of Women, Roche Diagnostics, Astra Zeneca, Ferring, Charles Wolfson Charitable Trust, Standard Life, Consultancy fees from Roche Diagnostics, AbbVie, Nordic Pharma and Ferring, outside the submitted work. In addition, A.W.H. has a patent Serum biomarker for endometriosis pending. N.P.J. reports personal fees from Abbott, Guerbet, Myovant Sciences, Vifor Pharma, Roche Diagnostics, outside the submitted work; he is also President of the World Endometriosis Society and chair of the trust board. S.M. reports grants and personal fees from AbbVie, and personal fees from Roche outside the submitted work. C.T. reports grants, non-financial support and other from Merck SA, non-financial support and other from Gedeon Richter, non-financial support from Ferring Pharmaceuticals, outside the submitted work and without private revenue. K.T.Z. reports grants from Bayer Healthcare, MDNA Life Sciences, Roche Diagnostics Inc, Volition Rx, outside the submitted work; she is also a Board member (Secretary) of the World Endometriosis Society and World Endometriosis Research Foundation, Research Advisory Board member of Wellbeing of Women, UK (research charity), and Chair, Research Directions Working Group, World Endometriosis Society. The other authors had nothing to disclose.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NA.

Endometriosis classification, staging and reporting systems: a review on the road to a universally accepted endometriosis classification

Background

In the field of endometriosis, several classification, staging and reporting systems have been developed. However, endometriosis classification, staging and reporting systems that have been published and validated for use in clinical practice have not been systematically reviewed up to now.

Objectives

The aim of the current review is to provide a historical overview of these different systems based on an assessment of published studies.

Materials and Methods

A systematic Pubmed literature search was performed. Data were extracted and summarised.

Results

Twenty-two endometriosis classification, staging and reporting systems have been published between 1973 and 2021, each developed for specific and different purposes. There is still no international agreement on how to describe the disease. Studies evaluating different systems are summarised showing a discrepancy between the intended and the evaluated purpose, and a general lack of validation data confirming a correlation with pain symptoms or quality of life for any of the current systems. A few studies confirm the value of the Enzian system for surgical description of deep endometriosis. With regards to infertility, the endometriosis fertility index has been confirmed valid for its intended purpose.

Conclusions

Of the 22 endometriosis classification, staging and reporting systems identified in this historical overview, only a few have been evaluated, in 46 studies, for the purpose for which they were developed. It can be concluded that there is no international agreement on how to describe endometriosis or how to classify it, and that most classification/staging systems show no or very little correlation with patient outcomes.

What is new?

This overview of existing systems is a first step in working towards a universally accepted endometriosis classification.

The ENDOPAIN 4D Questionnaire: A New Validated Tool for Assessing Pain in Endometriosis

OBJECTIVES

To study the measurement properties, the responsiveness and the minimal clinically important difference of the ENDOPAIN-4D: a new questionnaire for assessing pain in endometriosis.

METHODS

A prospective, observational, multicentre study was conducted including all women ≥18 years consulting for symptomatic proven endometriosis between 1 January 2017 and 30 June 2018 and volunteering to participate. Each patient had to answer a new self-administered patient-reported outcome (PRO) questionnaires (the ENDOPAIN-4D) at inclusion (T0) and 12 months after medical or surgical treatment (T1). Criteria defined by COSMIN were used to validate the questionnaire's measurement properties. The minimal clinically important difference was estimated by the anchor-based method.

RESULTS

The study included 199 women. The ENDOPAIN-4D score had a four dimensional structure with good internal consistency (measured by Cronbach α): (I) pain-related disability (α = 0.79), (II) painful bowel symptoms (α = 0.80), (III) dyspareunia (α = 0.83), and (IV) painful urinary tract symptoms (α = 0.77). They produced four subscores that can be summed to obtain a single score (α = 0.61). The ENDOPAIN-4D total score ranged from 0 to 94.00 (mean ± SD: 46.7 ± 22). The total score was significantly correlated with the PROs used in endometriosis. Sensitivity to change was good with large effect sizes (ES) (mean of the differences: 36.3 p = 1.8 10-7, ES 0.76). The minimal clinically important difference of the global score was determined to be 10.9.

CONCLUSIONS

The ENDOPAIN-4D questionnaire is easy to use, valid, and effective in assessing patient reported pain symptoms in women treated for endometriosis. This new instrument can be used as the primary outcome for future clinical trials and as a tool for routine patient follow-up.

Classification of deep endometriosis (DE) including bowel endometriosis: From r-ASRM to #Enzian-classification

Endometriotic lesions may affect peritoneal and ovarian tissues, cause secondary adhesions, and - in case of deep endometriosis (DE), invade organs such as the urinary bladder, ureters, and bowel. Over decades, several classification systems have been proposed with the rASRM score being the most widely accepted one to date. However, the rASRM classification has certain limitations regarding the description of DE. In contrast, the Enzian classification, which has been updated and modified recently in the form of the so-called #Enzian classification, has proved to be the most suitable tool for staging DE and now also includes peritoneal or ovarian diseases as well as adhesions. In the ideal scenario, a classification for endometriosis can be used with both diagnostic and surgical methods. The present work discusses the pros and cons of scores for endometriosis and highlights the need for using one universal classification system.

Do high-dose progestins impair sexual function in women treated for endometriosis? A prospective observational longitudinal study

INTRODUCTION

High-dose progestins are used as an effective therapy for painful symptoms of endometriosis but their impact on sexual function has been poorly studied. The study aims to assess the impact of high-dose progestin on sexual function among women treated for endometriosis.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In this bicenter prospective observational study, women with endometriosis who received medical or surgical treatment for endometriosis and who were sexually active were included. They completed the Sexual Activity Questionnaire (SAQ, a validated tool) before (T0) and 12 months after (T1) endometriosis treatment. We classified patients into two groups according to whether they were using high-dose progestins at T1: a high-dose progestin group and a control group. The main outcome was sexual function measured by the SAQ score (from 0 to 30) at T1. The secondary outcomes were each individual SAQ item, the dyspareunia 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS) and the quality of life assessed with EuroQoL Group 5D Index (EQ-5D) at T1. We also assessed the change in dyspareunia VAS and quality of life between T0 and T1. The Ethics Committee of Ile-de-France (Act 2004-806, 9 August 2004) approved the study.

RESULTS

Among 214 women included, 25 (12%) were exposed to high-dose progestins at T1. The SAQ score of women exposed to high-dose progestins was significantly lower compared with the control group, with or without adjustment for covariates (15.5 ± 6.3 vs 18.3 ± 6.2, P = .03, adjusted effect size -0.44 [95% CI -0.86 to -0.02], P = .04). High-dose progestin intake at T1 was associated with a lower subscore on two SAQ items: pleasure (1.8 ± 0.8 vs 2.2 ± 0.9, P = .02), and satisfaction with frequency of intercourse (1.2 ± 1.2 vs 1.8 ± 1.1, P = .02). In the overall population, dyspareunia VAS and quality of life assessed by EQ-5D improved between T0 and T1 (45 ± 29 at T0 vs 28 ± 29 at T1, P < .001; 0.78 ± 0.14 at T0 vs 0.86 ± 0.14 at T1, P < .001, respectively). At T1, the groups did not differ significantly for dyspareunia VAS (effect size 0.36 [95% CI -0.06 to 0.78], P = .10) and quality of life (EQ-5D, effect size 0.02 [95% CI -0.40 to 0.44], P = .91).

CONCLUSION

In this observational study, high-dose progestins impair the sexual function of women treated for endometriosis even though they improved dyspareunia.

Validation of the Sexual Activity Questionnaire in women with endometriosis

STUDY QUESTION

Is the Sexual Activity Questionnaire (SAQ) a valid tool for patients treated for symptomatic endometriosis?

SUMMARY ANSWER

For women having surgical treatment for endometriosis, we determined that the SAQ is a valid and responsive tool.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Endometriosis adversely affects sexual quality of life. Suitable validated sexual quality of life instruments for endometriosis are lacking both in clinical practice and for research.

STUDY, DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

A total of 367 women with proven endometriosis undergoing medical or surgical treatment were included in an observational study conducted between 1 January 2012 and 31 December 2014 in two French tertiary care centers. Both hospitals are reference centers for endometriosis treatment. Of these 367 women, 267 were sexually active and constituted the baseline population.

PARTICPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTINGS, METHODS

Women >18 years old with histological or radiological proven endometriosis, consulting for painful symptoms of at least 3 months duration, infertility, or other symptoms (bleeding, cysts) were invited to complete self-administered questionnaires before (T0) and 12 months after treatment (T1). Tests of data quality included descriptive statistics of the data, missing data levels, floor and ceiling effects, structural validity and internal consistency.The construct validity was obtained by testing presupposed relationships between previously established SAQ scores and prespecified characteristics of the patients by comparing different subgroups of patients at T0. Sensitivity to change was subsequently calculated by comparing the SAQ score between T1 and T0 overall and for different subgroups of treatment. Effect sizes (to T1) were calculated according to Cohen's method. The minimally important difference was estimated by a step-wise triangulation approach (including anchor-based method).

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

In total, 267 sexually active patients (204 surgical and 63 medical treatment) completed the SAQ at T0 and 136 (50.9%) at T1. The SAQ score ranged from 2.0 to 28.0 (mean ± SD: 16.8 ± 5.7).The SAQ score was one-dimensional according to the scree plot with good internal consistency (Cronbach alpha = 0.78, 95% CI 0.74-0.81) and had good discriminative ability according to pain descriptors and quality of life in endometriosis. The SAQ was responsive in patients treated by surgery but the effect size was low (0.3, 95% CI (0.0-0.6), P = 0.01). The minimally important difference was determined at 2.2.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

The effect size for medical treatment was non-significant. Other effect sizes were low but statistically significant. This could be explained by lower libido due to progestin intake, which was used for both surgically and medically treated patients.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

The SAQ is easy to use, valid and effective in assessing sexual quality of life in patients with endometriosis. This patient-reported score could be used as a primary outcome for future clinical studies. The minimally important difference estimation will be useful for future research. We recommend using 2.2 for the minimally important difference of the SAQ.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

This work was funded by the 'Direction à la Recherche Clinique et à l'Innovation' of Versailles, France and the 'Institut de Recherche en Santé de la Femme' (IRSF). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

[Endometriosis: Assessment of the Ultrasound-Based Endometriosis Staging System score (UBESS) in predicting surgical difficulty]

OBJECTIVES

Surgical management of endometriosis may require different levels of surgical skill which influences the orientation of the patient. The Ultrasound-Based Endometriosis Staging System (UBESS) is a score developed in 2016 to predict the difficulty of surgery. To study the correlation between UBESS score and two main surgical classifications in the literature.

METHODS

Study performed at the center of Poissy, France, between July 2016 and December 2017. Patients who underwent prospective UBESS staging then operated of their endometriosis were included. The patients were classified according to the levels of surgical difficulty of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (RCOG) and the classification created by Chi et al. The criterion of judgment was the correlation between the UBESS stages and RCOG and CHI levels. In a second analysis, we determined the predictive value of the operative plan for items included in the systematic sonographic evaluation described by Menakaya et al. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients were included in the study. Correlation was found to be low between UBESS and RCOG (θ=0.22) and between UBESS and CHI (θ=0.30). The prediction of the operative plan was good for endometrioma, sites specific tenderness, sliding sign, vaginal and digestive tract involvement; but modest for the anterior compartment and uterosacrals ligaments.

CONCLUSION

In our study on a small number of patients, the UBESS score does not adequately predict the surgical difficulty. Taken separately, the items of systematic sonographic evaluation based on 5 domains successfully predict the operative plan.

Fluorescence of Deep Infiltrating Endometriosis During Laparoscopic Surgery: A Preliminary Report on 6 Cases

BACKGROUND

The standard treatment of rectovaginal deep infiltrating endometriosis nodules (RVDIEN) consists in their surgical removal. RVDIEN are anatomically neovascularized. Indocyanine green (ICG) reveals vascularized structures when becoming fluorescent after exposure to near-infrared (NIR) light. This study aims to evaluate if fluorescence-guided surgery can improve the laparoscopic resection of RVDIEN, thus avoiding a rectal perforation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with a symptomatic RVDIEN, scheduled for a laparoscopic rectal shaving, were enrolled in the study. Technically, the RVDIEN was targeted and removed with the help of the NIR imager device Image 1 Spies (Karl Storz GmBH & Co KG, Tuttlingen, Germany) or Visera Elite II (Olympus Europe SE & Co KG, Hamburg, Germany), after an intraoperative, intravenous injection of ICG (0.25 mg/kg).

RESULTS

Six patients underwent a fluorescence-guided laparoscopic shaving procedure for the treatment of a nonobstructive RVDIEN. Fluorescence of the RVDIEN was observed in all the patients. In one patient, once the main lesion was removed, the posterior vaginal fornix still appeared fluorescent and was removed. No intraoperative rectal perforation occurred. The postoperative hospital stay was 2 days. No postoperative rectovaginal fistula occurred within a median follow-up of 16 months (range = 2-23 months).

CONCLUSION

In this preliminary study, fluorescence-guided laparoscopy appeared to help in separating the RVDIEN from the healthy rectal tissue, without rectal perforation. Moreover, this technique was helpful in deciding if the resection needed to be enlarged to the posterior vaginal fornix.

Laparoscopic surgery with urinary tract reconstruction and bowel endometriosis resection for deep infiltrating endometriosis

Deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) is the most severe form of endometriosis. It causes chronic pelvic pain, severe dysmenorrhea, deep dyspareunia, dyschezia, and dysuria, markedly impairing the quality of life of women of reproductive age. A number of randomized controlled trials on surgical and medical treatments to reduce the pain associated with endometriosis have been reported, but few have focused on this in DIE. DIE causes not only pain but also functional invasion to the urinary organs and bowel, such as hydronephrosis and bowel stenosis. In addition to DIE resection, surgical treatment involves adhesion separation as well as resection and reconstruction of the urinary organs and bowel; high-level skills are required. The severity of DIE should be evaluated preoperatively as accurately as possible. Using ENZIAN in conjunction with the AFS (The revised American Fertility Society classification of endometriosis) classification makes a more detailed assessment of DIE possible. The operative procedures used for laparoscopic resection of urinary DIE and reconstruction of the urinary organs are chosen based on the type of lesion (intrinsic/extrinsic) and length of stenosis. In addition to ureteroneocystostomy, the psoas bladder hitch and Boari bladder flap procedures are applied when necessary to extend the urinary tract. Bowel resection for bowel endometriosis is classified into classic segmental resection and conservative approaches (shaving/discoid). When these procedures are employed, it is advisable to work in consultation with urologists and gastroenterologists and to inform the patients of the associated risks and outcomes. Furthermore, postoperative medication is essential because it is difficult to conduct repeated surgeries.

Sexual Function and Quality of Life in Patients Affected by Deep Infiltrating Endometriosis: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives

Endometriosis is one of the most common gynecological diseases and has an incidence of approximately 6%-10% in women of reproductive age. Deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) is considered the most aggressive form of endometriosis and is defined as a lesion that penetrates for more than 5 mm under the peritoneal surface. It has been demonstrated that DIE is associated with pelvic pain symptoms, and the intensity of pain is correlated with the depth of infiltration. Other symptoms are dysmenorrhea, deep dyspareunia, and painful defecation and urination. These symptoms are strongly associated with a significant reduction of the quality of life and a marked impairment of sexual function in the affected women. Therefore, a multidisciplinary approach and psychological support for women affected by DIE appear mandatory in order to reduce the impact of the disease on quality of life and sexual function as much as possible.

[Endometriosis: increasing concentrations of serum interleukin-1β and interleukin-1sRII is associated with the deep form of this pathology]

OBJECTIVES

To assess interleukin-1β (IL-1β) and its inhibitory soluble interleukin-1 receptor type II (IL-1sRII) levels into the serum of patients with various forms of endometriosis and normal women, and investigate the correlation with disease activity.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this prospective laboratory study (2005-2010), 510 women with histologically proven endometriosis and 93 endometriosis-free controls have been enrolled. Laparoscopic complete exploration of the abdominopelvic cavity and blood samples have been performed in each patient. For each serum, IL-1β and IL-1sRII have been evaluated using Elisa.

RESULTS

IL-1β and IL-1sRII have been respectively detectable in 64% and 54.6% of serum samples from all 603 women studied. IL-1β was higher in women with deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) (mean 10.0pg/mL [0.005-416.2]) than in endometriosis-free women (mean 0.5pg/mL [0.01-1.7], P<0.01) or in women with superficial endometriosis (SUP) (mean 0.6pg/mL [0.1-2.9], P<0.01). Also, IL-1sRII was higher in DIE (mean 236.7pg/mL [0.9-6975]) than in the witness group (mean 85.0pg/mL [1-235.2], P<0.05) or in SUP (mean 85.1pg/mL [0.6-302], P<0.01).

CONCLUSION

This study highlights both a marked significant increase in serum IL-1β and IL-1sRII levels in DIE compared to SUP and normal women and suggests that a defect in the control of IL-1 can impact the pathophysiology of endometriosis.

Obstetric Outcomes in Patients Treated for Deep Pelvic Endometriosis

Purpose

The aim of this study was to assess obstetric outcomes and symptoms during and after pregnancy in women submitted to surgical treatment for deep pelvic endometriosis.

Methods

We evaluated 123 women who underwent surgery for severe deep pelvic endometriosis-related symptoms. Interventions were excision of rectovaginal septum nodule with or without rectal or vaginal resection, or excision of nodule of uterosacral ligaments. On the basis of pregnancy desire, patients were submitted to a telephone interview and asked if there had been a pregnancy and its outcome. They were also asked to describe their pain symptoms before, after and during the pregnancy.

Results

From the 123 patients, we selected 43 women desiring pregnancy after surgery, who answered the telephone interview. Twenty-four patients (55.8%) got pregnant. We recorded 34 pregnancies a mean 21.8 ± 17.9 months after surgery. In the group of 25 full-term pregnancies, 14 women (56%) had a vaginal delivery without complications, and 11 (44%) underwent a cesarean section. In only 3 cases, was the indication of cesarean section related to previous surgery. Seventy-one percent of women treated without rectal or vaginal resection delivered vaginally. We also registered 1 case of uncomplicated vaginal delivery in a patient with vaginal resection and another 1 in a patient with rectal resection. In the patients who complained of pain before pregnancy, we observed a resolution of pain symptoms during pregnancy, but after delivery these symptoms reappeared.

Conclusions

In patients submitted to surgery for deep pelvic endometriosis, even in cases of vaginal or rectal resection, a cesarean section is not always mandatory.

Deep infiltrating colorectal endometriosis treated with robotic-assisted rectosigmoidectomy

Robotic-assisted surgery for the treatment of deep infiltrating bowel endometriosis appears to be feasible, effective, and safe.

Background and Objective:

Deep infiltrating pelvic endometriosis with bowel involvement is one of the most aggressive forms of endometriosis. Nowadays, robotic technology and telemanipulation systems represent the latest developments in minimally invasive surgery. The aim of this study is to present our preliminary results and evaluate the feasibility of robotic-assisted laparoscopic colorectal resection for severe endometriosis.

Methods:

Between September 2009 and December 2011, 10 women with colorectal endometriosis underwent surgery with the da Vinci robotic surgical system (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). We evaluated the following parameters: short-term complications, clinical outcomes and long-term follow-up, pain relief recurrence rate, and fertility outcomes.

Results:

Extensive ureterolysis was required in 8 women (80%). Ovarian cystectomy with removal of the cystic wall was performed in 7 women (70%). Torus resection was performed in all women, with unilateral and bilateral uterosacral ligament resection in 1 woman (10%) and 8 women (80%), respectively. In addition to segmental colorectal resection in all cases, partial vaginal resection was necessary in 2 women (20%). An appendectomy was performed in 2 patients (20%). The mean operative time with the robot was 157 minutes (range, 90–190 minutes). The mean hospital stay was 3 days. Six patients had infertility before surgery, with a mean infertility time of 2 years. After a 12-month follow-up period, 4 women (67%) conceived naturally and 2 (33%) underwent in vitro fertilization.

Conclusion:

We show that robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery for the treatment of deep infiltrating bowel endometriosis is feasible, effective, and safe.

[Bladder endometriosis and barrenness: diagnostic and treatment strategy]

Deep infiltrating endometriosis is a well-known female disease responsible for chronic pelvic pain, urinary dysfunction, infertility, and altered quality of life. Endometriosis and infertility are complex entities and the optimal choice of management of both of them remains obscure. Mechanism of development of the disease has to be understood to optimize patients care. The link between barrenness and endometriosis is well known, but there is no direct link between bladder lesion and infertility. Bladder endometriosis is a deeply infiltrating endometriosis lesion. Its management is first diagnostic and then remedial. In case of ineffectiveness of medical strategy, surgical treatment is indicated. However, for patient suffering from symptomatic isolated bladder endometriosis, surgical management can be offered in first intention. Isolated bladder injuries due to endometriosis are mostly treated by conservative laparoscopic surgery, after a complete evaluation of endometriosis disease and barrenness by clinical exam and imaging techniques.

Accuracy of transvaginal sonography and rectal endoscopic sonography in the diagnosis of deep infiltrating endometriosis

OBJECTIVES

To compare the accuracy of transvaginal sonography (TVS) and rectal endoscopic sonography (RES) for the diagnosis of deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE), with respect to surgical and histological findings.

METHODS

This was a longitudinal study of 81 consecutive patients referred for surgical management of DIE, who underwent both TVS and RES preoperatively. The diagnostic criteria were identical for TVS and RES, and were based on visualization of hypoechoic areas in specific locations (uterosacral ligaments, vagina, rectovaginal septum and intestine). We calculated the sensitivity, specificity, predictive values and accuracy of TVS and RES for the diagnosis of DIE.

RESULTS

Endometriosis was confirmed histologically in 80/81 (98.7%) patients. Endometriomas and DIE were present in 43.2% and 97.5% of the women, respectively. For the diagnosis of DIE overall, TVS and RES, respectively, had a sensitivity of 87.3% and 74.7%, a positive predictive value of 98.6% and 98.3%, and an accuracy of 86.4% and 74%. For the diagnosis of uterosacral endometriosis, they had a sensitivity of 80.8% and 46.6%, a specificity of 75% and 50.0%, a positive predictive value of 96.7% and 89.5% and a negative predictive value of 30% and 9.3%. For the diagnosis of intestinal endometriosis, they had a sensitivity of 92.6% and 88.9%, a specificity of 100% and 92.6%, a positive predictive value of 100% and 96% and a negative predictive value of 87% and 80.6%.

CONCLUSION

TVS is apparently more accurate than is RES for predicting DIE in specific locations, and should thus be the first-line imaging technique in this setting.

[Digestive endometriosis of the caecum and intussusception: about one case]

We report the case of a 40-years-old woman who had a caeco-colic intussusception on a digestive endometriosis. Such exceptional association can be life-threatening, requiring urgent surgery.

Urological and colorectal complications following surgery for rectovaginal endometriosis

OBJECTIVES

To report the short- and medium-term complications of laparoscopic laser excisional surgery for rectovaginal endometriosis.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

University teaching hospital, UK.

POPULATION

A total of 128 women with histologically confirmed rectovaginal endometriosis who underwent laparoscopic laser surgery between May 1999 and September 2006.

METHODS

Women were identified from operative database, and a case note review was performed. Data for surgical outcome and surgical complications were collected.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Rates of urinary tract and colorectal complications.

RESULTS

A total of 128 women underwent surgery. Of these, 32 required intraoperative closure of a rectal wall defect, including 3 segmental rectosigmoid resections. There were three rectovaginal fistulae and one ureterovaginal fistula. Ureteric damage occurred in two women, and five women suffered postoperative urinary retention. The risk of intraoperative bowel intervention was increased in women who complained of cyclical rectal bleeding.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic laser excision of rectovaginal endometriosis is a safe procedure with similar, if not lower, complication rates to other published surgical series.

Prise en charge chirurgicale de l'endométriose

Both laparoscopic techniques (excision and ablation) for the treatment of superficial peritoneal endometriosis are equally effective (EL2). For the treatment of ovarian endometriomas larger than 3 cm, laparoscopic cystectomy is superior to drainage and coagulation (EL1). Excision of deep rectovaginal endometriosis with or without rectal invasion significantly reduces endometriosis-associated pain (EL4). Laparoscopic partial bladder cystectomy is easier for dome endometriosis than vesical base lesions (EL4). Hysterectomy with ovarian conservation is associated with a high risk of pain recurrence (EL4). Despite bilateral oophorectomy, pain recurrence can occur with hormonal treatment (EL2). Rates of major (ureteral, vesical, intestinal or vascular) complications of endometriosis surgery range from 0.1 to 15% of patients. Higher rates are more common with deep endometriosis surgery (EL2). Patients should be aware of these specific major complications. It is advisable to explain that pain improves, either partially or completely, in about 80% of patients.

Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and rectal endoscopic sonography for the prediction of location of deep pelvic endometriosis

BACKGROUND

We compared the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and rectal endoscopic sonography (RES) for the diagnosis of deep pelvic endometriosis (DPE), with respect to surgical and histological findings.

METHODS

Longitudinal study of 88 consecutive patients referred for surgical management of DPE, who underwent both MRI and RES pre operatively. The diagnostic criteria were identical for MRI and RES and were based on visualization of hypointense/hypoechoic areas in specific locations. DPE was diagnosed when at least one site was involved. We calculated the sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, accuracy and 95% confidence interval of MRI and RES for DPE.

RESULTS

DPE and endometriomas were present in 97.7 and 39.7% of women, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values of MRI and RES, respectively, were 84.8 and 45.6%, 88.8 and 40%, 98.5 and 87.8% and 40 and 8.5% for uterosacral endometriosis; 77.7 and 7.4%, 70% and 100, 85.3 and 100% and 89.7 and 70.9% for vaginal endometriosis and 88.3 and 90%, 92.8 and 89.3%, 96.4 and 94.7% and 78.8 and 80.6% for colorectal endometriosis.

CONCLUSIONS

MRI is more accurate than RES for the diagnosis of uterosacral and vaginal endometriosis, whereas the two methods are similarly accurate for colorectal endometriosis.

Laparoscopic resection of intestinal endometriosis: A 5-year experience

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To describe the clinical manifestations, surgical techniques, and complications observed in patients undergoing laparoscopic resection of intestinal deeply infiltrating endometriosis (DIE).

DESIGN

Prospective nonrandomized (Canadian Task Force Classification II-3).

SETTING

University hospital and private practice.

PATIENTS

We evaluated 125 patients with intestinal DIE treated from February 2000 through September 2005.

INTERVENTIONS

Laparoscopic radical excision of DIE followed by resection of the rectosigmoid colon.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The clinical examination of our patients demonstrated that 66.4% of patients had tenderness, whereas 80.8% had nodules on the pouch of Douglas. In 95.2% we observed pain caused by cervical mobilization, and all the patients had pain during the pouch of Douglas mobilization. Regarding bowel infiltration, preoperative investigation with rectal endoscopic ultrasonography was positive in all cases. Endoscopic rectal ultrasonography demonstrated the depth of intestinal infiltration. Superficial lesions were observed in 9.6% of patients and muscularis involvement in 71.2%. The segmental resection was performed in most of the patients (92%) and the linear resection in 6.4% of them. Median surgical time was 110 minutes, and the median hospital stay was 7 days after the surgery; the patients continued fasting for 3 to 7 days. The return to normal activity was achieved in a median 15 days after the surgery. The surgical procedure and the postoperative follow-up demonstrated no complications in 90.4% of the patients. Minor complications were observed in 4% of the cases. Major complications occurred in 5.6% of the patients, including 2 cases of intestinal fistulas (1.6%) and 3 cases of long-lasting urinary retention (2.4%).

CONCLUSION

Clinical symptoms of patients with intestinal endometriosis are not specific. Operative laparoscopy is a safe and effective method to treat intestinal endometriosis. To avoid major complications, special attention must be paid to the intestinal anastomosis and to the nerve preservation.

Traitement cœlioscopique de l'endométriose profonde. À propos de 118 cas

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate risks and benefits of laparoscopic surgery of deep endometriosis, especially with bowel involvement with the aim of improve the inform consent of patients and choice of adequate management.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Observational continuous study on 118 patients suffering from deep endometriosis (48 with bowel endometriosis) treated by laparoscopic surgery.

RESULTS

95.6% of the patients improved their symptoms (93.7% for dyspareunia). Upon the 29 infertile patients, 21 (72%) got pregnant, including 14 (66%) spontaneously. During operative time, 3 laparotomies occurred, two of them for haemorrhage. During postoperative time, 4 major complications (2 rectal fistulas and 2 ureteral necrosis) and minor complications occurred.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

Those data confirm the efficiency of laparoscopic treatment of deep endometriosis especially for pain relief and fertility. Nevertheless, few but severe complications may occur. Therefore, it is imperative to deliver clear, loyal and appropriate information before to proceed to such a treatment.

Laparoscopic excision of posterior vaginal fornix in the treatment of patients with deep endometriosis without rectum involvement: surgical treatment and long-term follow-up

BACKGROUND

The objective of the study is to evaluate the short- and long-term efficacy of complete laparoscopic excision of deep endometriosis, without rectum involvement, with the opening and partial excision of the posterior vaginal fornix.

METHODS

Thirty-one patients were included in the study with symptomatic extensive disease including involvement of the cul-de-sac, rectovaginal space and posterior vaginal fornix without rectum involvement. Endoscopic surgery was performed with complete separation of rectovaginal space and in-block resection of the diseased tissue, opening and partial excision of the posterior vaginal fornix and vaginal closure either by laparoscopic or by vaginal route. Patients filled in questionnaires on pain before and 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months after surgical treatment.

RESULTS

No intraoperative complications were observed; 65% were free of analgesic on post-operative day 2, 38% had total remission of chronic pain and 22% were improved; 38% had total remission of dysmenorrhoea and 22% were improved; 45% had total remission of dyspareunia and 25% were improved. Follow-up improvement of symptoms was statistically significant and was maintained for 5 years without recurrence of the disease or repeated surgery (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Complete surgical resection of deep infiltrative endometriosis with excision of the adjacent tissue of the posterior vaginal fornix improves quality of life with persistence of results for long time in patients not responsive to medical treatment.