Preparation of glial extracellular matrix: a novel method to analyze glial-endothelial cell interaction

Protective Effects of Complement Component 8 Gamma Against Blood-Brain Barrier Breakdown

The blood-brain barrier (BBB) regulates the traffic of micromolecules and macromolecules between the peripheral blood and the central nervous system, to maintain brain homeostasis. BBB disruption and dysfunction accompany a variety of neurological disorders and are closely related with the neuroinflammatory cascades that are triggered by leukocyte infiltration and glial activation. Here, we explored the role of complement component 8 gamma (C8G) in the maintenance of BBB integrity. Previously, C8G was shown to inhibit neuroinflammation by interfering with the sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P)-S1PR2 interaction. The results of the present study revealed that C8G is localized in perivascular astrocytes, whereas S1PR2 is expressed in endothelial cells (ECs). In the lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced neuroinflammation model, the intracerebroventricular administration of the recombinant C8G protein protected the integrity of the BBB, whereas shRNA-mediated C8G knockdown enhanced BBB permeability and neutrophil infiltration. Using pharmacological agonists and antagonists of S1PR2, we demonstrated that C8G inhibited the inflammatory activation of ECs in culture by antagonizing S1PR2. In the in vitro BBB model, the addition of the recombinant C8G protein preserved endothelial integrity, whereas the knockdown of C8G exacerbated endothelial leakage under inflammatory conditions. Together, our findings indicate an important role for astrocytic C8G in protecting the BBB in the inflamed brain, suggesting a novel mechanism of cross talk between astrocytes and ECs in terms of BBB maintenance.

Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts Enhance Survival and Progression of the Aggressive Pancreatic Tumor Via FGF-2 and CXCL8

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma remains one of the most challenging human cancers. Desmoplasia is predominant in this disease exhibiting a strong stromal reaction with an abundance of the cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs). We aimed in this study to investigate the reciprocal interaction between the tumor cells and the CAFs and its effect on tumor cells survival. We hypothesized that the survival of pancreatic cancer cell with aggressive phenotype is modulated by the Interactions between malignant pancreatic tumor cells and surrounding CAFs. To examine this, we utilized co-culture methods where tumor cells with different malignant potentials, HPAF (low) HPAF-CD11 (moderate/high) co-cultured with CAFs. CAFs-conditioned media increased the growth of HPAF-CD11 but not HPAF cells and increased CXCL8 levels highly in HPAF-CD11 and slightly in HPAF. The growth stimulatory effect and elevated CXCL8 level caused by CAFs-conditioned media were diminished by neutralizing the fibroblast growth factor-2 (FGF-2). In addition, conditioned media of HPAF-CD11 increased CAFs cell number whereas that of HPAF did not, and these effects were suppressed by neutralizing CXCL8. Furthermore, data from gene expression microarray study exhibited different expression profiles between HPAF and HPAF-CD11 when co-culture with CAFs. A significant increase in CXCL8 and FGF-2 expression was observed with HPAF-CD11/CAFs co-culture and to a lower extent with HPAF/CAFs co-culture. Together, these data demonstrate a paracrine bi-directional interaction between pancreatic tumor cells and the CAFs through CXCL8 and FGF-2 that helps the tumor growth. Future in-depth study of these pathways will assist in obtaining diagnostic and therapeutic tools for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

The blood-brain barrier: structure, function and therapeutic approaches to cross it

The blood-brain barrier (BBB) is constituted by a specialized vascular endothelium that interacts directly with astrocytes, neurons and pericytes. It protects the brain from the molecules of the systemic circulation but it has to be overcome for the proper treatment of brain cancer, psychiatric disorders or neurodegenerative diseases, which are dramatically increasing as the population ages. In the present work we have revised the current knowledge on the cellular structure of the BBB and the different procedures utilized currently and those proposed to cross it. Chemical modifications of the drugs, such as increasing their lipophilicity, turn them more prone to be internalized in the brain. Other mechanisms are the use of molecular tools to bind the drugs such as small immunoglobulins, liposomes or nanoparticles that will act as Trojan Horses favoring the drug delivery in brain. This fusion of the classical pharmacology with nanotechnology has opened a wide field to many different approaches with promising results to hypothesize that BBB will not be a major problem for the new generation of neuroactive drugs. The present review provides an overview of all state-of-the-art of the BBB structure and function, as well as of the classic strategies and these appeared in recent years to deliver drugs into the brain for the treatment of Central Nervous System (CNS) diseases.

Cell-cell signaling in the neurovascular unit

Historically, the neuron has been the conceptual focus for almost all of neuroscience research. In recent years, however, the concept of the neurovascular unit has emerged as a new paradigm for investigating both physiology and pathology in the CNS. This concept proposes that a purely neurocentric focus is not sufficient, and emphasizes that all cell types in the brain including neuronal, glial and vascular components, must be examined in an integrated context. Cell-cell signaling and coupling between these different compartments form the basis for normal function. Disordered signaling and perturbed coupling form the basis for dysfunction and disease. In this mini-review, we will survey four examples of this phenomenon: hemodynamic neurovascular coupling linking blood flow to brain activity; cellular communications that evoke the blood-brain barrier phenotype; parallel systems that underlie both neurogenesis and angiogenesis in the CNS; and finally, the potential exchange of trophic factors that may link neuronal, glial and vascular homeostasis.

The impact of glia-derived extracellular matrices on the barrier function of cerebral endothelial cells: an in vitro study

The blood-brain barrier (BBB) is composed of the cerebral microvascular endothelium, which, together with astrocytes, pericytes, and the extracellular matrix (ECM), contributes to a "neurovascular unit". It was our objective to clarify the impact of endogenous extracellular matrices on the barrier function of BBB microvascular endothelial cells cultured in vitro. The study was performed in two consecutive steps: (i) The ECM-donating cells (astrocytes, pericytes, endothelial cells) were grown to confluence and then removed from the growth substrate by a protocol that leaves the ECM behind. (ii) Suspensions of cerebral endothelial cells were seeded on the endogenous matrices and barrier formation was followed with time. In order to quantify the tightness of the cell junctions, all experiments were performed on planar gold-film electrodes that can be used to read the electrical resistance of the cell layers as a direct measure for endothelial barrier function (electric cell-substrate impedance sensing, ECIS). We observed that endogenously isolated ECM from both, astrocytes and pericytes, improved the tightness of cerebral endothelial cells significantly compared to ECM that was derived from the endothelial cells themselves as a control. Moreover, when cerebral endothelial cells were grown on extracellular matrices produced by non-brain endothelial cells (aorta), the electrical resistances were markedly reduced. Our observations indicate that glia-derived ECM - as an essential part of the BBB - is required to ensure proper barrier formation of cerebral endothelial cells.

Side by side comparison between dynamic versus static models of blood–brain barrier in vitro: A permeability study

Endothelial cells in vivo are continuously exposed to shear stress, a tangential force generated by the flow of blood across their apical surfaces that affects endothelial cell structure and function. By contrast, the Transwell apparatus cannot reproduce the presence of intraluminal blood flow that is essential for the formation and differentiation of the BBB. In contrast, the dynamic in vitro model of the BBB (DIV-BBB) mimics both functionally and anatomically the brain microvasculature, creating quasi-physiological conditions for co-culturing human and non-human endothelial cells and astrocytes in a capillary-like structure. We used intraluminal bovine aortic endothelial cells (BAEC) co-cultured with extraluminal glial cells (C6) to obtain elevated trans-endothelial electrical resistance (TEER) and selective permeability to sucrose and phenytoin. The experiments were performed in parallel using Transwell systems DIV-BBB models and data were then cross compared. By contrast with Transwell, C6 and BAEC co-cultured in the DIV-BBB demonstrated predominantly aerobic metabolism evidenced by a robust increase in glucose consumption that was paralleled by a similar change in lactate production. BAEC exposed to glia under dynamic conditions grow in a monolayer fashion and developed a more stringent barrier as demonstrated by high TEER values and a selective permeability to [14C] phenytoin and the well-known paracellular marker [3H] sucrose. In conclusion, these data demonstrate that the exposure to intraluminal flow plays an essential role in promoting endothelial cell differentiation and increasing BBB tightness, thus making the use of the DIV-BBB well suited for pharmacological studies.

Astrocyte-endothelial interactions at the blood-brain barrier

The blood-brain barrier, which is formed by the endothelial cells that line cerebral microvessels, has an important role in maintaining a precisely regulated microenvironment for reliable neuronal signalling. At present, there is great interest in the association of brain microvessels, astrocytes and neurons to form functional 'neurovascular units', and recent studies have highlighted the importance of brain endothelial cells in this modular organization. Here, we explore specific interactions between the brain endothelium, astrocytes and neurons that may regulate blood-brain barrier function. An understanding of how these interactions are disturbed in pathological conditions could lead to the development of new protective and restorative therapies.

Dynamics of CNS Barriers: Evolution, Differentiation, and Modulation

(1) Three main barrier layers at the interface between blood and tissue protect the central nervous system (CNS): the endothelium of brain capillaries, and the epithelia of the choroid plexus (CP) and the arachnoid. The classical work on these barriers in situ until the 1970s laid the foundations for modern understanding. Techniques for brain endothelial cell isolation and culture pioneered by Ferenc Joó in the 1970s opened up new fields of examination, enabling study of mechanisms at the cellular and molecular level. (2) Astrocytic glial cells are closely associated with the brain endothelial barrier. During evolution the barrier appears to have shifted from the glial to the endothelial layer, in parallel with the increasing importance of the microvasculature and its regulation. Vestiges of the barrier potential of glia remain in the modern mammalian CNS. (3) Evolutionary evidence suggests that the advantage derived from ionic homeostasis around central synapses was the major selective pressure leading to refinement of CNS barrier systems. This is one element of the modern 'multitasking' barrier function. (4) While epithelia are constitutively able to form barriers at appropriate interfaces, the 'default' condition for endothelia is more leaky; inductive influences from associated cells especially astrocytes are important in generating the full blood-brain barrier (BBB) phenotype in brain capillaries. The underlying mechanisms are being elucidated at the molecular and genomics level. (5) The barrier layers of the nervous system can be modulated by a number of receptor-mediated processes, involving several signal transduction pathways, both calcium dependent and independent. Some agents acting as 'inducers' in the long term can act as 'modulators' in the short-term, with some overlap of signaling pathways. Modulating agents may be derived both from the blood and from cells associated with cerebral vessels. Less is known about the modulation of the CP. (6) The challenge for the next era of CNS barrier studies will be to apply new knowledge from proteomics and genomics to understanding the in vivo condition in physiology and pathology.

Astrocyte-endothelial interactions and blood-brain barrier permeability

The blood-brain barrier (BBB) is formed by brain endothelial cells lining the cerebral microvasculature, and is an important mechanism for protecting the brain from fluctuations in plasma composition, and from circulating agents such as neurotransmitters and xenobiotics capable of disturbing neural function. The barrier also plays an important role in the homeostatic regulation of the brain microenvironment necessary for the stable and co-ordinated activity of neurones. The BBB phenotype develops under the influence of associated brain cells, especially astrocytic glia, and consists of more complex tight junctions than in other capillary endothelia, and a number of specific transport and enzyme systems which regulate molecular traffic across the endothelial cells. Transporters characteristic of the BBB phenotype include both uptake mechanisms (e.g. GLUT-1 glucose carrier, L1 amino acid transporter) and efflux transporters (e.g. P-glycoprotein). In addition to a role in long-term barrier induction and maintenance, astrocytes and other cells can release chemical factors that modulate endothelial permeability over a time-scale of seconds to minutes. Cell culture models, both primary and cell lines, have been used to investigate aspects of barrier induction and modulation. Conditioned medium taken from growing glial cells can reproduce some of the inductive effects, evidence for involvement of diffusible factors. However, for some features of endothelial differentiation and induction, the extracellular matrix plays an important role. Several candidate molecules have been identified, capable of mimicking aspects of glial-mediated barrier induction of brain endothelium; these include TGFbeta, GDNF, bFGF, IL-6 and steroids. In addition, factors secreted by brain endothelial cells including leukaemia inhibitory factor (LIF) have been shown to induce astrocytic differentiation. Thus endothelium and astrocytes are involved in two-way induction. Short-term modulation of brain endothelial permeability has been shown for a number of small chemical mediators produced by astrocytes and other nearby cell types. It is clear that endothelial cells are involved in both long- and short-term chemical communication with neighbouring cells, with the perivascular end feet of astrocytes being of particular importance. The role of barrier induction and modulation in normal physiology and in pathology is discussed.

Progress and limitations in the use of in vitro cell cultures to serve as a permeability screen for the blood-brain barrier

A relatively simple, widely applicable, and robust in vitro method of predicting blood-brain barrier (BBB) permeability to central nervous system-acting drugs is an increasing need. A cell-based model offers the potential to account for transcellular and paracellular drug diffusional processes, metabolism, and active transport processes, as well as nondefined interactions between a drug and cellular material that may impact upon a membrane's overall permeability profile. Any in vitro BBB cell model to be utilized for the transendothelial BBB permeability screening of potential central nervous system drugs must display reproducible solute permeability, and a number of other general criteria including: a restrictive paracellular barrier; a physiologically realistic cell architecture; the functional expression of key transporter mechanisms; and allow ease of culture to meet the technical and time constraints of a screening program. This article reviews the range of in vitro cell-based BBB models available, including the primary/low passage bovine and porcine brain endothelial cultures as well as the spectrum of immortalized brain endothelial cell lines that have been established. The article further discusses the benefits and limitations of exploiting such systems as in vitro BBB permeability screens.

The pharmacology of nucleotide receptors on primary rat brain endothelial cells grown on a biological extracellular matrix: effects on intracellular calcium concentration

1. Brain capillary endothelial cells express a variety of nucleotide receptors, but differences have been reported between culture models. This study reports examination of nucleotide receptors on primary cultured rat brain capillary endothelial cells (RBCEC) grown on a biological extracellular matrix (ECM) to produce a more differentiated phenotype. 2. Fura-2 fluorescence ratio imaging was used to monitor intracellular free calcium concentration [Ca(2+)](i). ATP, UTP, and 2-methylthioATP (2-MeSATP) increased [Ca(2+)](i) to similar levels, while 2-MeSADP, ADP and adenosine gave smaller responses. 3. Removal of extracellular calcium caused no significant change in the [Ca(2+)](i) response to 2-MeSATP, evidence that the response was mediated by a metabotropic (P2Y) receptor. 4. All cells tested responded to ATP, UTP, 2-MeSATP and ADP, while 63% responded to adenosine and 50% to 2-MeSADP. No cells responded to alpha, beta-methyleneATP. Cells grown on rat tail collagen instead of ECM gave smaller and less uniform [Ca(2+)](i) responses, suggesting that the differentiating effect of the ECM contributed to a more uniform receptor profile. 5. The [Ca(2+)](i) response to the P2Y(1)-selective agonist 2-MeSADP was abolished in the presence of the subtype-selective antagonist adenosine 3'-phosphate 5'-phosphosulphate (PAPS). 6. The P2Y(2) antagonist suramin completely blocked the response to ATP and inhibited the response to UTP by 66%. 7. The A(1) subtype-selective adenosine receptor agonist N(6)-Cyclopentyladenosine (CPA) gave a small but characteristic [Ca(2+)](i) response, while A(2A) and A(2B) subtype-selective agonists failed to generate [Ca(2+)](i) changes. 8. The results are consistent with the presence on RBCEC of a P2Y(2)-like receptor coupled to phospholipase C, and a P2Y(1)-like receptor mobilizing intracellular Ca(2+). The role of multiple nucleotide receptors in the function of the brain endothelium is discussed.