Lung cancer after treatment for Hodgkin's lymphoma: a systematic review

Pilot study of lung cancer screening for survivors of Hodgkin lymphoma

Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) treatment increases the risk of lung cancer. Most HL survivors are not eligible for lung cancer screening (LCS) programs developed for the general population, and the utility of these programs has not been tested in HL survivors. We ran a LCS pilot in HL survivors to describe screening uptake, participant characteristics, impact of a decision aid and screen findings. HL survivors treated ≥5 years ago with mustine/procarbazine and/or thoracic radiation, were identified from a follow-up database and invited to participate. Participants underwent a low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) reported using protocols validated for the general population. Two hundred and eighteen individuals were invited, 123 were eligible, 102 were screened (58% response rate): 58% female, median age 52 years, median 22 years since HL treatment; 91.4% were deemed to have made an informed decision; participation was not influenced by age, sex, years since treatment or deprivation. Only three of 35 ever-smokers met criteria for LCS through the program aimed at the general population. Baseline LDCT results were: 90 (88.2%) negative, ten (9.8%) indeterminate, two (2.0%) positive. Two 3-month surveillance scans were positive. Of four positive scans, two patients were diagnosed with small-cell lung cancer; one underwent curative surgery. Coronary artery calcification was detected in 36.3%, and clinically significant incidental findings in 2.9%. LDCT protocols validated in ever-smokers can detect asymptomatic early-stage lung cancers in HL survivors. This finding, together with screening uptake and low false positive rates, supports further research to implement LCS for HL survivors (clinicaltrials gov. Identifier: NCT04986189.).

Benign and malignant pulmonary parenchymal findings on chest CT among adult survivors of childhood and young adult cancer with a history of chest radiotherapy

PURPOSE

Childhood and young adult cancer survivors exposed to chest radiotherapy are at increased risk of lung cancer. In other high-risk populations, lung cancer screening has been recommended. Data is lacking on prevalence of benign and malignant pulmonary parenchymal abnormalities in this population.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of pulmonary parenchymal abnormalities in chest CTs performed more than 5 years post-cancer diagnosis in survivors of childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancer. We included survivors exposed to radiotherapy involving the lung field and followed at a high-risk survivorship clinic between November 2005 and May 2016. Treatment exposures and clinical outcomes were abstracted from medical records. Risk factors for chest CT-detected pulmonary nodule were assessed.

RESULTS

Five hundred and ninety survivors were included in this analysis: median age at diagnosis, 17.1 years (range, 0.4-39.8); and median time since diagnosis, 22.3 years (range, 1-58.6). At least one chest CT more than 5 years post-diagnosis was performed in 338 survivors (57%). Among these, 193 (57.1%) survivors had at least one pulmonary nodule detected on a total of 1057 chest CTs, resulting in 305 CTs with 448 unique nodules. Follow-up was available for 435 of these nodules; 19 (4.3%) were malignant. Risk factors for first pulmonary nodule were older age at time of CT, CT performed more recently, and splenectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

Benign pulmonary nodules are very common among long-term survivors of childhood and young adult cancer.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS

High prevalence of benign pulmonary nodules in cancer survivors exposed to radiotherapy could inform future guidelines on lung cancer screening in this population.

Tislelizumab monotherapy in patients with previously untreated early-stage classical Hodgkin lymphoma: a real-world study

The anti-PD-1 antibodies have been reported to show a striking effect in relapsed and refractory(R/R) classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL), however, there is still limited real-world data assessing the role of anti-PD-1 antibody monotherapy in early-stage cHL. In this retrospective analysis, we reported the effectiveness and safety of tislelizumab monotherapy in the first-line therapy of early-stage cHL. Twenty-three consecutive patients (10 males and 13 females) with previously untreated stage I A-II B cHL were included. At interim evaluation after 2 doses of tislelizumab monotherapy, 11 of 23 patients (47.8%) achieved complete response (CR). At the end of tislelizumab monotherapy (EOTM), objective response was observed in 22 of 23 patients (95.7%), with CR in 16 patients (69.6%). Among six patients with PR-EOTM, two patients underwent 4 cycles of ABVD chemotherapy and one patient underwent 4 cycles of tislelizumab plus AVD. One patient who developed progressive disease (PD) after 4 doses of tislelizumab subsequently underwent 4 cycles of ABVD chemotherapy. Except for four patients with CR-EOTM, consolidative radiotherapy was given to 19 patients. All patients obtained CR at the end of all treatments. With a median follow-up time of 21.3 months (range, 6.9-32.7 months), the estimated 2-year PFS rate and 2-year OS rate were 95.65% and 100%, respectively. Except for grade 3 lymphocyte count decreased, no other grade 3/4 TRAE was observed. In addition, no serious AE was reported. Our preliminary data observed that tislelizumab monotherapy was safe and highly effective in previously untreated early-stage cHL.

How I Follow Hodgkin Lymphoma in First Complete (Metabolic) Remission?

Hodgkin lymphoma is characterized by a high cure rate in the modern era of medicine regardless of stage, but patients suffer from a high risk of comorbidity associated with the administered therapy. The main aim of this review article is to assess and analyze the various comorbidities associated with Hodgkin lymphoma and address the survivorship of patients, including fertility, secondary cancers due to cardiovascular toxicity, and quality of life. Furthermore, this review explores the optimal strategy for detecting relapse. The treatment paradigm of Hodgkin lymphoma has shifted, with a paradigm shift toward achieving a high cure rate and low toxicity as a standard of care in this patient population. Checkpoint inhibitors, especially nivolumab, in combination with chemotherapy are increasingly being studied in the first line of therapy. However, their long-term toxicity remains to be assessed in longer follow-up. In conclusion, Hodgkin lymphoma survivors, regardless of their treatment, should be followed up individually by a multidisciplinary survivorship team in order to detect and properly treat the long-term side effects of therapy.

Lung cancer in patients who have never smoked - an emerging disease

Lung cancer is the most common cause of cancer-related deaths globally. Although smoking-related lung cancers continue to account for the majority of diagnoses, smoking rates have been decreasing for several decades. Lung cancer in individuals who have never smoked (LCINS) is estimated to be the fifth most common cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide in 2023, preferentially occurring in women and Asian populations. As smoking rates continue to decline, understanding the aetiology and features of this disease, which necessitate unique diagnostic and treatment paradigms, will be imperative. New data have provided important insights into the molecular and genomic characteristics of LCINS, which are distinct from those of smoking-associated lung cancers and directly affect treatment decisions and outcomes. Herein, we review the emerging data regarding the aetiology and features of LCINS, particularly the genetic and environmental underpinnings of this disease as well as their implications for treatment. In addition, we outline the unique diagnostic and therapeutic paradigms of LCINS and discuss future directions in identifying individuals at high risk of this disease for potential screening efforts.

Clinicopathologic characteristics of second primary squamous cell carcinoma in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma after intensity-modulated radiotherapy

To compare the clinicopathologic characteristics of second primary squamous cell carcinoma (SPSCC) in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) after intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with that after radiotherapy (RT). From 49,021 patients with NPC who treated by definitive RT, we were able to identify 15 male patients with SPSCC after IMRT, and 23 male patients with SPSCC after RT. We examined the difference between groups. In IMRT group, 50.33% developed SPSCC within 3 years, whereas 56.52% developed SPSCC after more than 10 years in RT group. Receiving IMRT was related positively to an increased risk of SPSCC (HR = 4.25; P < 0.001). There was no significant correlation between receiving IMRT and the survival of SPSCC (P = 0.051). Receiving IMRT was related positively to an increased risk of SPSCC, and the latency was much shorter. A follow-up protocol, especially in the first three years, should be designed for NPC patients with IMRT.

Post-irradiation sarcoma after definitive radiation therapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Postirradiation sarcoma (PIS) is a rare radiation-induced malignancy after nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively screened 9,185 NPC patients between 2000 and 2020 and identified 41 patients with PIS according to the modified Cahan's criteria: (1) the PIS must have arisen within a previous radiation field; (2) a latent period must have existed; (3) histologically proved sarcoma; (4) the tissue in which the PIS arose must have been healthy prior to the radiation. The initial radiation therapy techniques used were 2D (25; 61.0%), 3D (7; 17.1%), and IMRT (9; 22%).

RESULTS

The time (year) from radiotherapy (RT) to PIS was longer when using 2D or 3D irradiation techniques (median, 14.2; range, 3.4-28.1; Q1-Q3, 8.6-19.7) than when using IMRT (median, 6.6; range, 3.8-15.7; Q1-Q3, 4.5-11.7; P =.026). The time (year) from RT to PIS diagnosis was significantly longer when using lower radiation energy from cobalt-60 (median, 15.8; range, 10.4-28.4; Q1-Q3, 12.5-23.8) than when using a higher radiation energy of 6 or 10 MV (median, 10.2; range, 3.4-23.3; Q1-Q3, 6.5-16.1; P =.006). The 2-year overall survival rates for patients who underwent surgery, radical radiotherapy, systemic therapy alone and no treatment were 60.7 %, 42.9 %, 0 % and 0 %, respectively (P =.000). Of the 3 retrievable initial RT dosimetry plans for NPC, the D95 values (dose that covers 95 % of the PIS volume) for PIS were 6267, 6344 and 5820 cGy, respectively.

CONCLUSION

High radiation energy and modern techniques may shorten NPC PIS latency. Surgery may be associated with improved survival if feasible.

The characteristics and survival of second primary lung cancer after Hodgkin's lymphoma: A comparison with first primary lung cancer using the SEER database

OBJECTIVE

The study aimed to compare the characteristics and prognosis between patients with second primary lung cancer following Hodgkin's lymphoma and those with primary lung cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using the SEER 18 database, the characteristics and prognosis were compared between the second primary non-small cell lung cancer following Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL-NSCLC) (n = 466) and the first primary non-small cell lung cancer (n = 469,851)(NSCLC-1), as well as between the second primary small cell lung cancer following Hodgkin's lymphoma (n = 93) (HL-SCLC) and the first primary small cell lung cancer (n = 94,168) (SCLC-1). Comparisons of categorical variables were performed using Chi-square or Fisher's test. Continuous variables were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. Overall survival (OS) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the difference between groups was analyzed by log-rank test.

RESULTS

HL-NSCLC group had more males than NSCLC-1 group, and the median age of HL-NSCLC group was younger than that of NSCLC-1 group. Patients with HL-NSCLC showed inferior OS than those with NSCLC-1 (median: 10 months vs. 11 months, P = 0.006). Both HL-SCLC and SCLC-1 groups had poor prognosis, with median OS of 7 months (P = 0.4). The 3-year cumulative risks of death from any cause for patients with the latencies from HL to NSCLC of 0 to 5 years, >5 to 10 years, >10 to 15 years, >15 to 20 years, and>20 years were 71.8%, 82.6%, 86.8%, 85.7% and 78.5%, respectively(P = 0.020).

CONCLUSION

HL-NSCLC patients had worse prognosis than NSCLC-1 patients, while HL-SCLC patients shared similar characteristics and survival with SCLC-1 patients.

A real-world study of combined modality therapy for early-stage Hodgkin lymphoma: too little treatment impacts outcome

Multiple clinical trials have assessed de-escalation strategies from combined modality therapy (CMT) to chemotherapy-alone for the treatment of early-stage classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL), confirming similar outcomes. The application of these data to the real-world is limited, however. We conducted a retrospective, multicenter cohort study comparing CMT vs chemotherapy-alone in patients with early-stage cHL (stage IA-IIB) treated between January 2010 and December 2020. Positron emission tomography (PET) scans after chemotherapy cycle 2 (PET2) were independently reviewed by a nuclear radiologist (Deauville score ≥4, positive; ≤3, negative). Patient outcomes were compared by using an intention-to-treat analysis. Among 125 patients (CMT, n = 63; chemotherapy-alone, n = 62) with a median follow-up of 59.8 months (95% CI, 48.6-71.0), no differences in overall survival were observed (5-year overall survival, CMT 98.0% vs chemotherapy-alone 95.1%; log-rank test, P = .38). However, there was reduced progression-free survival (PFS) with chemotherapy-alone among all patients (2-year PFS, CMT 95.1% vs chemotherapy-alone 75.3%; log-rank test, P = .005) and in those with bulky (n = 43; log-rank test, P < .001), unfavorable (n = 81; log-rank test, P = .002), or PET2-positive (n = 15; log-rank test, P = .02) disease. No significant differences in PFS were seen for patients with non-bulky (log-rank test, P = .35), favorable (log-rank test, P = .62), or PET2-negative (log-rank test, P = .19) disease. Based on our real-world experience, CMT seems beneficial for patients with early-stage cHL, especially those with PET2-positive and unfavorable disease. Chemotherapy-alone regimens can lead to comparable outcomes for patients with favorable, non-bulky, or PET2-negative disease. We conclude that although results seen in clinical trials are replicated in certain patient subgroups, other subgroups not fitting trial criteria do poorly when radiotherapy is excluded.

Subsequent primary cancer risk among five-year survivors of adolescent and young adult cancers

BACKGROUND

A comprehensive examination of the incidence and mortality of subsequent primary cancers (SPCs) among adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer survivors in the US is lacking.

METHODS

Cancer incidence and mortality among 170,404 ≥ 5-year cancer survivors aged 15-39 years at first primary cancer diagnosis during 1975-2013 in 9 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registries were compared to those in the general population using standardized incidence ratio (SIR), absolute excess incidence (AEI), standardized mortality ratio (SMR), and absolute excess mortality (AEM).

RESULTS

During a mean follow-up of 14.6 years, 13,420 SPC cases and 5,008 SPC deaths occurred among survivors (excluding the same-site as index cancer), corresponding to 25% higher incidence (95%CI = 1.23-1.27; AEI = 10.8 per 10,000) and 84% higher mortality (95%CI = 1.79-1.89; AEM = 9.2 per 10,000) than that in the general population. Overall SPC risk was statistically significantly higher for 20 of 29 index cancers for incidence and 26 for mortality, with the highest SIR among female Hodgkin lymphoma survivors (SIR = 3.05, 95%CI = 2.88-3.24; AEI = 73.0 per 10,000) and the highest SMR among small intestine cancer survivors (SMR = 6.97, 95%CI = 4.80-9.79; AEM = 64.1 per 10,000). Type-specific SPC risks varied substantially by index cancers; however, SPCs of the female breast, lung, and colorectum combined constituted 36% of all SPC cases and 39% of all SPC deaths, with lung cancer alone representing 11% and 24% of all cases and deaths, respectively.

CONCLUSION

AYA cancer survivors are almost twice as likely to die from a new primary cancer as the general population, highlighting the need for primary care clinicians to prioritize cancer prevention and targeted surveillance strategies in these individuals.

Primary Lung Cancer After Treatment for Breast Cancer

Breast cancer is the most common malignancy in women and the second most common cause of cancer-related death. Due to advances in the diagnosis and treatment technologies for breast cancer, patients with breast cancer are living longer than before, resulting in an increased risk of developing subsequent malignancies, among which lung cancer is the most common. This review presents the current evidence about the risk, influencing factors and prognostic factors of developing primary lung cancer after treatment for breast cancer. The aim is to help clinicians improve their understanding, diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer after breast cancer.

Serial Cancer Development Three Times in a Patient with Fanconi Anemia

Fanconi anemia (FA) is characterized clinically by bone marrow failure, congenital malformations, sensitivity to DNA cross-linking agents, and increased risk of malignancy. Hematological cancer is the best-described malignancy in patients with FA, but the susceptibility to the development of solid tumors is also well documented, especially after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). With regard to the development of solid tumors in patients with FA, head and neck, esophageal, and anal squamous cell carcinoma are well known, but reports of lung cancer are extremely rare. Here, we describe an FA patient with a history of HSCT that developed 3 serial cancers − oral, esophageal, and nonsmall cell lung cancer − over a period of 6 years. The third lesion was nonsmall cell lung cancer and its location corresponded closely to the field of irradiation treatment for prior esophageal cancer. The occurrence of lung cancer in patients with FA is uncommon, but FA patients should be screened regularly and serially. Our case also indicated the importance of the irradiated field as a location for subsequent cancer development.

Adverse health behaviours in long-term testicular cancer survivors: a Danish nationwide study

BACKGROUND

Treatment for disseminated testicular cancer increases the risk of secondary malignancy and cardiovascular disease. The risk of developing these serious adverse effects may be positively affected by healthy living. The purpose of this study was to identify health behaviours with possible influence on late effects that could be targets for intervention.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, testicular cancer survivors diagnosed in the period 1984-2007 from the Danish Testicular Cancer database completed a questionnaire on health behaviours (2014-2016). We estimated prevalence of smoking, alcohol consumption, sedentary lifestyle and overweight. Prevalence ratios described with 95% confidence intervals of adverse health behaviours were stratified by treatment modalities and compared to a reference population by means of logistic regression with adjustment for sociodemographic confounders.

RESULTS

In total, 2395 testicular cancer survivors (surveillance, 1175; chemotherapy, 897; radiotherapy, 323), median time since diagnosis 19 years, and 65,289 noncancer males were included, questionnaire response rates were 60% and 54%, respectively. There were more current smokers (prevalence ratio; 1.14, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.03-1.26) and patients with body mass index above 25 kg/m² (prevalence ratio; 1.10, 95% CI: 1.01-1.20) among testicular cancer survivors than in the reference population. Testicular cancer survivors reported less sedentary lifestyle (prevalence ratio; 95% CI: 0.74, 0.64-0.85) and everyday drinkers were fewer (prevalence ratio; 0.79, 95% CI: 0.68-0.92) than in the reference population.

CONCLUSION

We identified smoking cessation as primary target for intervention studies in testicular cancer survivors. The effect of smoking cessation interventions as part of treatment should be investigated. Whether drug-based intervention is effective in minimising the risk of exposure to conventional risk factors for cardiovascular disease is also of interest.

Primary mediastinal germ cell tumors - A retrospective analysis of >30 years of experience in a single institution

Background

This study was performed to clarify the treatment outcome of patients with primary mediastinal germ cell tumors (PMGCTs), focusing on the clinical manifestations and management during definitive therapy and long‐term follow‐up.

Methods

In this study, we retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with PMGCTs treated at Shinshu University School of Medicine, and examined the clinical profiles and treatment outcomes of 22 patients (mean age of 29 years) with primary mediastinal GCTs treated at our hospital between 1983 and 2019.

Results

Five patients were diagnosed with pure seminoma and 17 had nonseminomatous GCT. A total of 21 patients were treated with cisplatin‐based chemotherapy and 15 patients (68.2%) underwent thoracic surgery after chemotherapy. Although all cases of nonseminomatous GCT were negative for tumor markers after cisplatin‐based chemotherapy, two cases showed variable GCT cells and two had somatic components (angiosarcoma and rhabdomyosarcoma) in resected specimens. Three relapsed soon after surgery. Growing teratoma syndrome developed during chemotherapy in four cases. Urgent thoracic surgery was performed in three patients, but one case was inoperable. The calculated 10‐year overall survival rates were 100% in mediastinal seminoma and 64.7% in NSGCT. During follow‐up, second non‐GCT malignancies developed in three patients (colon cancer, 190 months; thyroid cancer, 260 months; non‐small cell lung cancer, 250 months after the initial chemotherapy) and one patient with primary mediastinal seminoma was associated with multiple type I endocrine tumors.

Conclusions

Our experiences demonstrated that long‐term survival and/or cure can be achieved with adequate chemotherapy followed by local surgical treatment even in patients with mediastinal GCTs. However, the clinical manifestations and biological behaviors during and/or after chemotherapy were complex and varied. In addition, the development of secondary malignancies should be taken into consideration for long‐term follow‐up. Clinicians should be aware of the various clinical features and secondary malignancies in primary mediastinal GCTs.

Subsequent Primary Neoplasms: Risks, Risk Factors, Surveillance, and Future Research

The authors' objective is to provide a brief update on recent advances in knowledge relating to subsequent primary neoplasms developing in survivors of childhood cancer. This includes a summary of established large-scale cohorts, risks reported, and contrasts with results from recently established large-scale cohorts of survivors of adolescent and young adult cancer. Recent evidence is summarized concerning the role of radiotherapy and chemotherapy for childhood cancer and survivor genomics in determining the risk of subsequent primary neoplasms. Progress with surveillance, screening, and clinical follow-up guidelines is addressed. Finally, priorities for future research are outlined.

The impact of prior malignancies on the development of second malignancies and survival in follicular lymphoma: A population-based study

We assessed the impact of a prior malignancy diagnosis (PMD) - as a potential proxy for genetic cancer susceptibility - on the development of a second primary malignancy (SPM) and mortality in follicular lymphoma (FL) patients. From the nationwide Netherlands Cancer Registry, we selected all adult FL patients diagnosed in 1994-2012 (n = 8028) and PMDs and SPMs relative to FL, with follow-up until 2017. We constructed two Fine and Gray models - with death as a competing risk - to assess the association between a PMD and SPM incidence. A PMD was associated with an increased incidence of SPMs (subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR], 1.30; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03-1.64) - especially carcinomas of the respiratory tract (SHR, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.10-3.05) and cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas (SHR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.01-2.45) - and a higher risk of mortality in a multivariable model (HR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.19-1.71). However, when additionally adjusted for the receipt of systemic therapy and/or radiotherapy before FL diagnosis, only patients who received such therapies had an increased incidence of SPMs (SHR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.02-1.93). In conclusion, patients with a PMD had a higher rate of SPMs and mortality than those without a PMD, which might have resulted from therapy-related carcinogenesis.

Clinical and radiological features of immune checkpoint inhibitor-related pneumonitis in lung cancer and non-lung cancers

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the clinical and radiological features of immune checkpoint inhibitor-related pneumonitis (ICI-P), a rare but serious pulmonary complication of cancer immunotherapy and to evaluate key differences between lung cancer (LC) and non-LC patients.

METHODS

247 patients (LC, n = 151) treated with ICI for malignancies were retrospectively screened in a single institute. The number of patients, history of other immune-related adverse events (irAE), the onset, serum KL-6 levels, and chest CT features (types of pneumonitis, symmetry, laterality, location) were recorded for the ICI-P population and compared for LC and non-LC groups.

RESULTS

ICI-P was identified in 26 patients in total (LC, n = 19; non-LC, n = 7). The incidence of other irAE was significantly higher in ICI-P group (63%) compared with patients without ICI-P (34%) (p = 0.0056). An earlier onset of ICI-P was recorded in LC (78 days) compared to non-LC patients (186 days) (p = 0.0034). Serum KL-6 was significantly elevated only in the non-LC group when ICI-P was noticed (p = 0.029). Major CT findings of ICI-P, irrespective of primary disease, were organizing pneumonia pattern and ground glass opacities. LC patients commonly exhibited consolidation and traction bronchiectasis and were prone to asymmetrical shadows (p < 0.001). Non-LC patients were more likely to exhibit symmetrical infiltrations. A small fraction of both groups experienced relapse or moving patterns of ICI-P.

CONCLUSION

ICI-P patients more often experienced other irAE prior to the development of ICI-P. The characteristics of ICI-P can differ in terms of the onset, KL-6 reliability, and chest CT findings between LC and non-LC patients.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

In ICI-P patients, a history of other irAE can be more frequently observed. Differences in disease onset and radiological patterns between LC and non-LC patients might be helpful to make a diagnosis of ICI-P; however, longitudinal observation of chest CT scans is advised to observe the pneumonitis activity irrespective of cancer types.

Low-Dose CT Screening for Lung Cancer: Evidence from 2 Decades of Study

Lung cancer remains the overwhelmingly greatest cause of cancer death in the United States, accounting for more annual deaths than breast, prostate, and colon cancer combined. Accumulated evidence since the mid to late 1990s, however, indicates that low-dose CT screening of high-risk patients enables detection of lung cancer at an early stage and can reduce the risk of dying from lung cancer. CT screening is now a recommended clinical service in the United States, subject to guidelines and reimbursement requirements intended to standardize practice and optimize the balance of benefits and risks. In this review, the evidence on the effectiveness of CT screening will be summarized and the current guidelines and standards will be described in the context of knowledge gained from lung cancer screening studies. In addition, an overview of the potential advances that may improve CT screening will be presented, and the need to better understand the performance in clinical practice outside of the research trial setting will be discussed. © RSNA, 2020.

Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Epidemiology, Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment

Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer deaths in the United States. In the past decade, significant advances have been made in the science of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Screening has been introduced with the goal of early detection. The National Lung Screening Trial found a lung cancer mortality benefit of 20% and a 6.7% decrease in all-cause mortality with the use of low-dose chest computed tomography in high-risk individuals. The treatment of lung cancer has also evolved with the introduction of several lines of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in patients with EGFR, ALK, ROS1, and NTRK mutations. Similarly, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have dramatically changed the landscape of NSCLC treatment. Furthermore, the results of new trials continue to help us understand the role of these novel agents and which patients are more likely to benefit; ICIs are now part of the first-line NSCLC treatment armamentarium as monotherapy, combined with chemotherapy, or after definite chemoradiotherapy in patients with stage III unresectable NSCLC. Expression of programmed cell death protein-ligand 1 in malignant cells has been studied as a potential biomarker for response to ICIs. However, important drawbacks exist that limit its discriminatory potential. Identification of accurate predictive biomarkers beyond programmed cell death protein-ligand 1 expression remains essential to select the most appropriate candidates for ICI therapy. Many questions remain unanswered regarding the proper sequence and combinations of these new agents; however, the field is moving rapidly, and the overall direction is optimistic.

Response-Adapted Treatment Strategies in Hodgkin Lymphoma Using PET Imaging

Hodgkin lymphoma, a B-cell malignancy, is most common in patients younger than 55 years. Between 70% and 90% are cured with standard approaches. The high cure rate and long-term survival resulted in a need to minimize therapy toxicity. Response-adapted approaches have been developed to de-escalate therapy in those likely to be cured and intensifying therapy in those not responding to initial treatment. FDG-PET after chemotherapy is highly predictive of outcome. Thus, FDG-PET has been incorporated into response-adapted treatments. Use of FDG-PET to guide treatment in Hodgkin lymphoma has been recommended. We summarize literature and discuss challenges and future directions.

Lung nodules: A comprehensive review on current approach and management

In daily clinical practice, radiologists and pulmonologists are faced with incidental radiographic findings of pulmonary nodules. Deciding how to manage these findings is very important as many of them may be benign and require no further action, but others may represent early disease and importantly early-stage lung cancer and require prompt diagnosis and definitive treatment. As the diagnosis of pulmonary nodules includes invasive procedures which can be relatively minimal, such as bronchoscopy or transthoracic aspiration or biopsy, but also more invasive procedures such as thoracic surgical biopsies, and as these procedures are linked to anxiety and to cost, it is important to have clearly defined algorithms for the description, management, and follow-up of these nodules. Clear algorithms for the imaging protocols and the management of positive findings should also exist in lung cancer screening programs, which are already established in the USA and which will hopefully be established worldwide. This article reviews current knowledge on nodule definition, diagnostic evaluation, and management based on literature data and mainly recent guidelines.

Prognosis associated with synchronous or metachronous multiple primary malignancies in patients with completely resected non-small cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

To investigate the influence of multiple primary malignancies (MPMs) on the prognosis of patients with completely resected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

The subjects of this retrospective study were 521 patients who underwent complete curative pulmonary resection for NSCLC. Patients were divided into two groups: those with and those without MPMs.

RESULTS

The 521 NSCLC patients included 184 patients (35.3%) with MPMs and 337 patients without MPMs. The overall 5-year survival rates for patients with vs those without MPMs were 66.1 and 75.6%, respectively (p = 0.0061). According to multivariate analysis, MPMs, age, gender, pathological stage, and interstitial pneumonia were independent predictors of prognosis. The 47 patients with synchronous MPMs and the 82 patients with metachronous MPMs found within the last 5 years had significantly poorer prognoses than patients without MPMs (p = 0.0048 and p = 0.0051, respectively). However, the prognoses of the 55 patients with metachronous MPMs that had been present for over 5 years did not differ from those of the patients without MPMs.

CONCLUSIONS

NSCLC patients with synchronous MPMs or metachronous MPMs diagnosed within the last 5 years had poor prognoses. Decisions about the best therapeutic strategies require comprehensive consideration of the organ location, malignant potential, recurrence, and prognosis of the MPMs. In contrast, decisions about the best therapeutic strategies for NSCLC patients with metachronous MPMs present for over 5 years should be based solely on the NSCLC.

Estimating the risk of lung cancer and cardiac mortality from doses to the lung and heart from modern tangent-only breast radiotherapy

Purpose

The Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group (EBCTCG) reported that the risks of breast cancer treatment in woman smokers may outweigh the benefits. The data used doses from published reports using a variety of treatment techniques. In our study, the risks of lung cancer and heart disease were determined from a modern era tangential-only technique.

Methods and materials

Doses to the lung and heart were obtained for tangential radiotherapy to the breast or chest wall. The risk of lung cancer incidence and cardiac mortality were calculated by taking the ratio of our doses to those published by the EBCTG.

Results

A total of 77 women were identified meeting our inclusion criteria. The mean combined whole lung dose was 2·0 Gy. The mean whole heart dose was 0·9 Gy. The estimated risk of lung cancer and cardiac mortality in a 50-year-old life-long smoker was estimated to be 1·5 and <1%, respectively.

Conclusions

Tangential only radiotherapy delivered substantially lower doses to the combined whole lung and whole heart than those reported by the EBCTCG. In this cohort, the risks of radiation induced lung cancer and heart disease are outweighed by the benefits of radiotherapy even in those that are smokers.

Risk of Second Primary Malignancies in Patients With Follicular Lymphoma: A United States Population-based Study

BACKGROUND

With the improving outcomes of patients with follicular lymphoma (FL), it is imperative to focus on survivorship issues, including the development of second primary malignancies (SPMs). We used a large US database to measure the risk of SPMs among FL survivors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-13 registry to identify FL patients from 1992 to 2011. We calculated the risk of SPMs, developing ≥ 6 months after diagnosis, using the standardized incidence ratio (SIR) and absolute excess risk. We calculated the cumulative incidence of SPMs using the competing risk method and risk factors for SPMs using univariate and multivariate methods.

RESULTS

Of a total of 15,517 patients with FL followed up for a median of 71 months, 1540 (9.9%) developed SPMs, with a SIR of 1.08 and absolute excess risk of 11.3 per 10,000 person-years. A significantly increased risk was noted for Hodgkin lymphoma (SIR, 5.85), acute myeloid leukemia (SIR, 4.88), and the following sites: oral cavity and pharynx (SIR, 1.43), stomach (SIR, 1.43), lung and bronchus (SIR, 1.35), melanoma of skin (SIR, 1.38), other nonepithelial cancers of the skin (SIR, 2.88), urinary bladder (SIR, 1.24), and kidney/renal pelvis (SIR, 1.43). The cumulative incidence of SPMs was 11.06% at 10 years. Multivariate regression showed that age > 65 years (SIR, 1.57; P < .001), male gender (SIR, 1.43; P < .001), and receipt of radiation (SIR, 1.24; P = .001) predicted a higher rate of SPMs.

CONCLUSION

Patients with FL have increased risk of both hematologic and solid malignancies. Risk factors for SPMs include advanced age, male gender, and receipt of radiation therapy.

Effects of Radiotherapy on the Risk of Developing Secondary Malignant Neoplasms in Hodgkin's Lymphoma Survivors

Extended follow-up of Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) survivors indicates that these patients are at high risk of secondary malignant neoplasms (SMNs) contributing to increased morbidity and mortality. This study examined the characteristics of HL survivors who developed SMNs with the aim to report any correlation with radiotherapy (RT) dose. In this retrospective multi-center cohort study of HL patients treated between 1990 and 2011 at three major teaching hospitals in Lebanon, classification was into two groups including those treated with combined modality (RT and chemotherapy-CHT) and those treated with CHT alone. Approval from the University Institutional Review Board (IRB) was obtained. Of the 112 patients evaluated, 52.7% (59) received the combined modality while 47.3% (53) received CHT alone. There were 6 cases of SMNs in the combined modality cohort and 5 cases in the CHT cohort. The mean RT dose in the combined modality cohort was 34.5 Gray (Gy) (SD ± 5.3). A statistically significant increase (1.5 fold) in the risk of developing SMNs was observed among patients who received a dose higher than 41 Gy compared to a dose between 20 to 30 Gy (OR= 1.5; 95% confidence interval= 0.674 to 3.339, p=0.012). The risk of SMNs was not significantly higher among patients who received extended field compared to involved field RT (p=0.964). This study showed that the risk of developing SMNs is higher among patients treated with RT dose greater than 31 Gy, independent of the RT type used.

Risk of second cancers in the era of modern radiation therapy: does the risk/benefit analysis overcome theoretical models?

In the era of modern radiation therapy, the compromise between the reductions in deterministic radiation-induced toxicities through highly conformal devices may be impacting the stochastic risk of second malignancies. We reviewed the clinical literature and evolving theoretical models evaluating the impact of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) on the risk of second cancers, as a consequence of the increase in volumes of normal tissues receiving low doses. The risk increase (if any) is not as high as theoretical models have predicted in adults. Moreover, the increase in out-of-field radiation doses with IMRT could be counterbalanced by the decrease in volumes receiving high doses. Clinical studies with short follow-up have not corroborated the hypothesis that IMRT would drastically increase the incidence of second cancers. In children, the risk of radiation-induced carcinogenesis increases from low doses and consequently the relative risk of second cancers after IMRT could be higher than in adults, justifying current developments of proton therapy with priority given to this population. Although only longer follow-up will allow a true assessment of the real impact of these modern techniques on radiation-induced carcinogenesis, a comprehensive risk-adapted strategy will help minimize the probability of second cancers.

Temporal trends in the risk of developing multiple primary cancers: a systematic review

Background

Cancer survivors are at risk of developing second and subsequent primary cancers, referred to as multiple primary cancers (MPCs). It is not clear whether the risk of MPCs has increased over recent decades, but increasing use of radiological imaging and potentially harmful effects of certain cancer treatments raise this possibility. A systematic review was undertaken to assess whether there has been a temporal change in the risk of developing MPCs.

Methods

A systematic search to identify population-based studies of MPCs was performed in Medline/PubMed and Embase databases from inception to August 2016. Included studies were those reporting risk of MPCs for all sites combined following a first cancer at any site or a specific site, using standard incidence ratios (SIRs) or equivalent, and with analysis stratified by calendar years.

Results

We identified 28 articles eligible for inclusion, comprising 26 population-based studies and two monographs. MPC incidence was reported in nearly 6.5 million cancer survivors. For all first cancer sites combined, a higher rate of MPCs was reported in more recent than earlier calendar periods in four of the six relevant studies. The SIRs ranged from 1.14 for a first cancer diagnosis in the early 1980s to 1.21–1.46 in the late 1990s in the USA and Australia. Two studies from Italy and France showed no significant difference in SIRs across time periods 1978–2010 and 1989–2004. The remaining 22 studies reported various temporal trends in the risk of developing MPCs after a first cancer at a specific site, but most showed little change.

Conclusion

Overall, the risk of developing MPCs appears to have increased since the 1980s when considering studies of all primary cancer sites combined from the USA and Australia but not from Europe. With the introduction of more routine nuclear medical imaging over the last 15 years, more studies are needed to confirm recent trends of MPC risk in adult cancer survivors.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12885-016-2876-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Limited-stage Hodgkin lymphoma: optimal chemotherapy and the role of radiotherapy

Approximately 90% of patients with early-stage Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) will be cured with first-line therapy. Chemotherapy alone or combined-modality therapy are both acceptable standard treatment options for nonbulky early-stage HL. Combined-modality therapy is associated with more serious late effects and, in at least one study, showed inferior survival rates compared with chemotherapy alone. Modern radiotherapy fields and doses are likely to result in fewer complications, but given the common involvement of the mediastinum in HL, complete avoidance of the heart, lungs, and breasts in the radiotherapy field is unlikely. In patients receiving chemotherapy alone, four to six cycles of doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, dacarbazine (ABVD), with fewer cycles being given to those with an early complete remission, is recommended. Three cycles of ABVD may be adequate in those with an early negative PET, but these results have been published only in abstract form. Current standards for combined-modality therapy include two cycles of ABVD and 20 Gy of involved field radiotherapy in those with a favorable risk profile and four cycles of ABVD plus 30 Gy for unfavorable HL in early-stage patients. Standard of care for bulky early-stage HL remains combined-modality therapy. Whether an interim PET will allow selection of patients with nonbulky HL who will benefit most from consolidative radiotherapy is still under investigation.

Clinicopathological Features and Outcome of Lung Cancer Patients with Hematological Malignancy

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to report the incidence of lung cancer in patients with hematological malignancy (HM), as well as patient characteristics and outcome.

METHODS

We investigated 1503 consecutive patients treated for HM and 1208 patients who underwent surgical resection for lung cancer.

RESULTS

Lung cancer with HM was observed in 12 patients (0.8 % of HM cases and 1.0 % of lung cancer cases), including eight men who were smokers and four women who had never smoked. The average Brinkman index was 1010, which suggested heavy smokers. In synchronous cases, all four patients preceded to HM treatment; however, three patients died from HM. In metachronous cases, during a mean 52.7 months after treatment of lung cancer, three patients had HM. At a mean 41.4 months after HM treatment, five patients had lung cancer and underwent surgery without serious postoperative events.

CONCLUSIONS

A second cancer tended to be detected within 5 years after treatment of the first cancer. Men with a history of heavy smoking might be at risk for combined lung cancer and HM. Careful follow-up is recommended within 5 years after treatment of the first cancer. Most lung cancer detected synchronously with HM had poor prognosis. In metachronous cases, surgical resection of lung cancer after treatment of HM was feasible and safe.

Minimizing second cancer risk following radiotherapy: current perspectives

Secondary cancer risk following radiotherapy is an increasingly important topic in clinical oncology with impact on treatment decision making and on patient management. Much of the evidence that underlies our understanding of secondary cancer risks and our risk estimates are derived from large epidemiologic studies and predictive models of earlier decades with large uncertainties. The modern era is characterized by more conformal radiotherapy technologies, molecular and genetic marker approaches, genome-wide studies and risk stratifications, and sophisticated biologically based predictive models of the carcinogenesis process. Four key areas that have strong evidence toward affecting secondary cancer risks are 1) the patient age at time of radiation treatment, 2) genetic risk factors, 3) the organ and tissue site receiving radiation, and 4) the dose and volume of tissue being irradiated by a particular radiation technology. This review attempts to summarize our current understanding on the impact on secondary cancer risks for each of these known risk factors. We review the recent advances in genetic studies and carcinogenesis models that are providing insight into the biologic processes that occur from tissue irradiation to the development of a secondary malignancy. Finally, we discuss current approaches toward minimizing the risk of radiation-associated secondary malignancies, an important goal of clinical radiation oncology.

Low-dose chest computed tomography for lung cancer screening among Hodgkin lymphoma survivors: a cost-effectiveness analysis

PURPOSE

Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) survivors face an increased risk of treatment-related lung cancer. Screening with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) may allow detection of early stage, resectable cancers. We developed a Markov decision-analytic and cost-effectiveness model to estimate the merits of annual LDCT screening among HL survivors.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Population databases and HL-specific literature informed key model parameters, including lung cancer rates and stage distribution, cause-specific survival estimates, and utilities. Relative risks accounted for radiation therapy (RT) technique, smoking status (>10 pack-years or current smokers vs not), age at HL diagnosis, time from HL treatment, and excess radiation from LDCTs. LDCT assumptions, including expected stage-shift, false-positive rates, and likely additional workup were derived from the National Lung Screening Trial and preliminary results from an internal phase 2 protocol that performed annual LDCTs in 53 HL survivors. We assumed a 3% discount rate and a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $50,000 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY).

RESULTS

Annual LDCT screening was cost effective for all smokers. A male smoker treated with mantle RT at age 25 achieved maximum QALYs by initiating screening 12 years post-HL, with a life expectancy benefit of 2.1 months and an incremental cost of $34,841/QALY. Among nonsmokers, annual screening produced a QALY benefit in some cases, but the incremental cost was not below the WTP threshold for any patient subsets. As age at HL diagnosis increased, earlier initiation of screening improved outcomes. Sensitivity analyses revealed that the model was most sensitive to the lung cancer incidence and mortality rates and expected stage-shift from screening.

CONCLUSIONS

HL survivors are an important high-risk population that may benefit from screening, especially those treated in the past with large radiation fields including mantle or involved-field RT. Screening may be cost effective for all smokers but possibly not for nonsmokers despite a small life expectancy benefit.

[The issue of low doses in radiation therapy and impact on radiation-induced secondary malignancies]

Several studies have well documented that the risk of secondary neoplasms is increasing among patients having received radiation therapy as part of their primary anticancer treatment. Most frequently, radiation-induced neoplasms occur in volume exposed to high doses. However, the impact of "low" doses (<5 Gy) in radiation-induced carcinogenesis should be clinically considered because modern techniques of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) or stereotactic irradiation significantly increase tissue volumes receiving low doses. The risk inherent to these technologies remains uncertain and estimates closely depend on the chosen risk model. According to the (debated) linear no-threshold model, the risk of secondary neoplasms could be twice higher with IMRT, as compared to conformal radiation therapy. It seems that only proton therapy could decrease both high and low doses delivered to non-target volumes. Except for pediatric tumors, for which the unequivocal risk of second malignancies (much higher than in adults) should be taken into account, epidemiological data suggest that the risk of secondary cancer related to low doses could be very low, even negligible in some cases. However, clinical follow-up remains insufficient and a marginal increase in secondary tumors could counterbalance the benefit of a highly sophisticated irradiation technique. It therefore remains necessary to integrate the potential risk of new irradiation modalities in a risk-adapted strategy taking into account therapeutic objectives but also associated risk factors, such as age (essentially), chemotherapy, or life style.

Second cancer risk in adults receiving autologous haematopoietic SCT for cancer: a population-based cohort study

Population-based evidence on second cancer risk following autologous haematopoietic SCT (HCT) is lacking. We quantified second cancer risk for a national, population-based cohort of adult Australians receiving autologous HCT for cancer and notified to the Australasian Bone Marrow Transplant Recipient Registry 1992-2007 (n=7765). Cancer diagnoses and deaths were ascertained by linkage with the Australian Cancer Database and National Death Index. Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) were calculated and Cox regression models were used to estimate within-cohort risk factors treating death as a competing risk. During a median 2.5 years follow-up, second cancer risk was modestly increased compared with the general population (SIR 1.4, 95% confidence interval 1.2-1.6); significantly elevated risk was also observed for AML/myelodysplastic syndrome (SIR=20.6), melanoma (SIR=2.6) and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (SIR=3.3). Recipients at elevated risk of any second cancer included males, and those transplanted at a younger age, in an earlier HCT era, or for lymphoma or testicular cancer. Male sex, older age (>45 years) and history of relapse after HCT predicted melanoma risk. Transplantation for Hodgkin lymphoma and older age were associated with lung cancer risk. Second malignancies are an important late effect and these results inform and emphasize the need for cancer surveillance in autologous HCT survivors.

Lung adenocarcinoma in a patient with plasmacytoma

An increased risk of second malignancy is well recognized in patients treated for plasma cell neoplasms. However, second solid tumor is very rare in such patients. We report a case of a 68-year-old woman with plasmacytoma who developed lung adenocarcinoma.

Tobacco smoking and the risk of subsequent primary cancer among cancer survivors: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Smoking is a well-known risk factor for cancer; however, there is little evidence as to whether the smoking status of cancer survivors has any risk for subsequent primary cancer (SPC) incidence, regardless of the first cancer sites.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In total, 29,795 eligible patients with a first cancer between 1985 and 2004 were examined for SPC until the end of 2006, using a record linkage between hospital-based and population-based cancer registries. The association between smoking at the time of the first cancer diagnosis and three SPC groups (i.e. specific SPC, smoking-related SPCs, and all SPCs) was calculated by Poisson regression.

RESULTS

Ever smokers had 59% and 102% higher risk for all SPCs and smoking-related SPCs, respectively, than never smokers. Cancer survivors who had recently stopped smoking had 18% and 26% less risk, respectively, for these SPCs than those who smoked at the diagnosis. We also found that, compared with those who had never smoked, cancer survivors who had ever smoked had a significantly elevated risk of oral/pharyngeal, esophageal, stomach, lung, and hematological SPCs, regardless of the first cancer sites.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings indicate that smoking increases not only the first cancer but also a second or SPC. Moreover, the results from recent quitters versus current smokers suggest that smoking cessation may decrease the risk for SPC, especially for smoking-related SPCs in cancer survivors. Preventive measures are necessary to reduce not only SPC incidence but also tobacco use.

The risk of a second primary lung cancer after a first invasive breast cancer according to estrogen receptor status

PURPOSE

Lung cancers account for 5 % of second primary cancers after breast cancer. The low overall 5-year relative survival rate of lung cancer makes it a particularly concerning new malignancy for breast cancer survivors. It is unknown whether second lung cancer risk varies by estrogen receptor (ER) expression of the first breast cancer.

METHODS

We evaluated second primary lung cancer risks using standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) (95 % confidence intervals (CIs)) among 222,148 one-year breast cancer survivors in the NCI-SEER Program registry database (1992-2008). Relative risks (RRs) and 95 % CIs for lung cancer following ER(-) compared with ER(+) breast cancer were estimated using Poisson regression, adjusted for age, year, and stage of breast cancer diagnosis, attained age, latency, and radiotherapy. We also examined the reciprocal association of second ER(-) and ER(+) breast cancers among 28,107 1-year lung cancer survivors.

RESULTS

There were 418 and 1,444 second lung cancers diagnosed following 50,781 ER(-) and 171,367 ER(+) breast cancers. Second lung cancer rates were significantly elevated after ER(-) (SIR = 1.20 (1.09-1.33)), but not ER(+) (SIR = 0.96 (0.91-1.01)) breast cancer. The adjusted RR for a second lung cancer following ER(-) compared with ER(+) breast cancer was 1.22 (1.10-1.37). The reciprocal adjusted RR for a second ER(-) compared with ER(+) breast cancer following lung cancer was 1.29 (0.98-1.70).

CONCLUSION

The parallel increase for a second lung cancer following an ER(-) first breast cancer and for a second ER(-) breast cancer after a first lung cancer suggests that there may be shared etiologic factors for these cancers. Further evaluation of lung cancer risk after ER(-) breast cancer may identify women at high risk for this fatal malignancy.

Trends in lung cancer incidence and mortality in Croatia, 1988-2008

Aim

To describe and interpret lung cancer incidence and mortality trends in Croatia between 1988 and 2008.

Methods

Incidence data on lung cancer for the period 1988-2008 were obtained from the Croatian National Cancer Registry, while mortality data were obtained from the World Health Organization mortality database. Population estimates for Croatia were obtained from the Population Division of the Department of Economic and Social Affairs of the United Nations. We also calculated and analyzed age-standardized incidence and mortality rates. To describe time incidence and mortality trends, we used joinpoint regression analysis.

Results

Lung cancer incidence and mortality rates in men decreased significantly in all age groups younger than 70 years. Age-standardized incidence rates in men decreased significantly by -1.3% annually. Joinpoint analysis of mortality in men identified three trends, and average annual percent change (AAPC) decreased significantly by -1.1%. Lung cancer incidence and mortality rates in women increased significantly in all age groups older than 40 years and decreased in younger women (30-39- years). Age-standardized incidence rates increased significantly by 1.7% annually. Joinpoint analysis of age-standardized mortality rates in women identified two trends, and AAPC increased significantly by 1.9%.

Conclusion

Despite the overall decreasing trend, Croatia is still among the European countries with the highest male lung cancer incidence and mortality. Although the incidence trend in women is increasing, their age standardized incidence rates are still 5-fold lower than in men. These trends follow the observed decrease and increase in the prevalence of male and female smokers, respectively. These findings indicate the need for further introduction of smoking prevention and cessation policies targeting younger population, particularly women.

Variables affecting survival after second primary lung cancer: A population-based study of 187 Hodgkin's lymphoma patients

BACKGROUND

Patients successfully treated for Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) are at known risk for subsequent malignancies, the most common of which is lung cancer. To date, no population-based study has analyzed prognostic variables for overall survival (OS) among HL survivors who developed non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

For 187 HL patients who developed NSCLC (among 22,648 HL survivors), we examined the impact of the following variables on OS after NSCLC diagnosis: gender, race, sociodemographic status (based upon county of residence), calendar year and age at NSCLC diagnosis, NSCLC histology and grade, HL stage and subtype, radiation for HL and latency between HL and NSCLC. Patients were grouped by NSCLC stage as follows: localized, regional or distant. All patients were reported to the population-based Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program. For those variables significant on univariate analyses, hazard ratios (HR) were derived from Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

Sociodemogaphic status, gender and latency between NSCLC and HL did not significantly affect OS of any NSCLC stage group. For patients with localized NSCLC, a history of mixed celluarlity HL was associated with a 3-fold improved OS (P=0.006). For patients with regional NSCLC, prior radiotherapy for HL was associated with a 2-fold worse OS (P=0.025).

CONCLUSIONS

A history of mixed cellularity HL subtype and a history of no radiotherapy for HL are favorable prognostic factors among patients who develop NSCLC. Further research into clinicopathologic and treatment-associated variables potentially affecting OS after second primary NSCLC among HL survivors is warranted.

Predicting the risk of secondary lung malignancies associated with whole-breast radiation therapy

PURPOSE

The risk of secondary lung malignancy (SLM) is a significant concern for women treated with whole-breast radiation therapy after breast-conserving surgery for early-stage breast cancer. In this study, a biologically based secondary malignancy model was used to quantify the risk of secondary lung malignancies (SLMs) associated with several common methods of delivering whole-breast radiation therapy (RT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Both supine and prone computed tomography simulations of 15 women with early breast cancer were used to generate standard fractionated and hypofractionated whole-breast RT treatment plans for each patient. Dose-volume histograms (DVHs) of the ipsilateral breast and lung were calculated for each patient on each plan. A model of spontaneous and radiation-induced carcinogenesis was used to determine the relative risks of SLMs for the different treatment techniques.

RESULTS

A higher risk of SLMs was predicted for supine breast irradiation when compared with prone breast irradiation for both the standard fractionation and hypofractionation schedules (relative risk [RR] = 2.59, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 2.30-2.88, and RR = 2.68, 95% CI = 2.39-2.98, respectively). No difference in risk of SLMs was noted between standard fractionation and hypofractionation schedules in either the supine position (RR = 1.05, 95% CI = 0.97-1.14) or the prone position (RR = 1.01, 95% CI = 0.88-1.15).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with supine whole-breast irradiation, prone breast irradiation is associated with a significantly lower predicted risk of secondary lung malignancy. In this modeling study, fractionation schedule did not have an impact on the risk of SLMs in women treated with whole-breast RT for early breast cancer.

Primary lung cancer complicated by malignant lymphoma in two cases of epstein-barr virus infection

Background

Double cancer is defined as the co-existence of two pathologically distinct cancers. Double cancer consisting of a lung adenocarcinoma and a malignant lymphoma has seldom been reported in time synchronous cases or prior to cases of primary lung cancer, except in those after treatment for malignant lymphoma.

Case Presentation

Case 1 was a 71-year-old woman who was treated at our hospital for chronic hepatitis C, nontuberculous mycobacteria infection, and bronchiectasis. She was diagnosed with a stage IV lung adenocarcinoma (cT1bN2M1b) with a synchronous complicating diffuse large B-cell-type lymphoma. Case 2 was a 62-year-old man who had undergone resection of a stage IB lung adenocarcinoma (pT2aN0M0). Thirty months after the surgery, a diffuse large B-cell-type lymphoma was discovered. In both cases, high antiviral capsid antigen IgG antibody titers were observed.

Conclusion

Epstein-Barr virus may be associated with the incidence of multiple cancers given the pathological evidence from our two double cancer cases.

The surgical treatment of lung cancer in patients with previous lymphoproliferative disorders: a historical cohort study

OBJECTIVES

We undertook a historical cohort study to compare, in terms of morbidity, mortality and long-term survival associated with lung cancer resection, a group of patients with previous lymphoproliferative disorders and a group without a hematological history.

METHODS

We identified 29 patients with a previous lymphoproliferative disorder who underwent lung cancer resection. These subjects (Group-A) were matched with 87 patients without a hematological history who underwent pulmonary resection during the same period (Group-B).

RESULTS

We found no significant difference between the two groups in length of hospitalization, comorbidities, spirometric parameters, type of surgery, histology, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, morbidity, mortality, median survival (Group-A = 37 months; Group-B = 52 months) and 5-year survival (Group-A = 37%; Group-B = 42%). The mean age of Group-A patients was significantly lower than that of Group-B patients (62 vs 66 years; p = 0.024). Group-A patients had a well differentiated lung cancer more frequently than Group-B patients (p = 0.001). Group-A patients had transitory bacteraemies more frequently than Group-B patients (p = 0.005). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that age (p = 0.01) and lung cancer stage (p = 0.04) were significantly associated with survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with lymphoproliferative disorders had a lower age and more differentiated lung cancers than those without lymphoproliferative disorders. Patients with lymphoproliferative disorders and those without a hematological history had similar morbidity, mortality and long-term survival after pulmonary resection. Distinguishing patients with and without a lymphoproliferative disorder seems to be of limited value in the decision-making process of evaluating the indications for surgical treatment of lung cancer.

In vivo interactions between ionizing radiation, inflammation and chemical carcinogens identified by increased DNA damage responses

Exposure to ionizing radiation or a variety of chemical agents is known to increase the risk of developing malignancy and many tumors have been linked to inflammatory processes. In most studies, the potentially harmful effects of ionizing radiation or other agents are considered in isolation, mainly due to the large number of experiments required to assess the effects of mixed exposures with different doses and different schedules, and the length of time and expense of studies using disease as the measure of outcome. Here, we have used short-term DNA damage responses to identify interactive effects of mixed exposures. The data demonstrate that exposure to ionizing radiation on two separate occasions ten days apart leads to an increase in the percentage of cells with a sub-G(0) DNA content compared to cells exposed only once, and this is a greater than additive effect. Short-term measurements of p53 stabilization, induction of p21/Cdkn1a and of apoptosis also identify these interactive effects. We also demonstrate similar interactive effects of radiation with the mutagenic chemical methyl-nitrosourea and with a nonspecific pro-inflammatory agent, lipopolysaccharide. The magnitude of the interactive effects is greater in cells taken from mice first exposed as juveniles compared to adults. These data indicate that short-term measurements of DNA damage and response to damage are useful for the identification of interactions between ionizing radiation and other agents.

Taking care of second cancer risk

BACKGROUND

Cancer survivors are living longer and are at greater risk of developing cancer than the general population. Promotion of healthy lifestyle behaviors and provision of regular follow-up care may modify the evolution of a second cancer diagnosis. Little is known, however, about cancer survivors' decision making and actions related to modifying second cancer risk.

OBJECTIVE

Part of a larger mixed-method study of second cancer risk, qualitative interview data were collected to arrive at an interpretive description of how cancer survivors modify their second cancer risk, and how nurses and other healthcare professionals can best support survivors throughout the cancer survival trajectory.

INTERVENTIONS/METHODS

Semistructured interviews were conducted with 22 cancer survivors (16 women and 6 men) drawn from a provincial cancer registry. The cancer survivors ranged in age from 19 to 87 years. The cancer history of the participants varied. Data were analyzed using the constant comparative method.

RESULTS

Two themes that emerged from the interviews that speak to how cancer survivors modified their second cancer risk were (1) how I take care of my second cancer risk and (2) support I need to take care of my second cancer risk.

CONCLUSIONS

For many cancer survivors, awareness of the benefits of taking care of second cancer risk does not translate into action.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Study findings reinforce that more needs to be done in supporting cancer survivors in taking care of second cancer risk.

Survival after second primary lung cancer: a population-based study of 187 Hodgkin lymphoma patients

BACKGROUND

Lung cancer accounts for the largest absolute risk of second malignancies among Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) survivors. However, no population-based studies have compared overall survival (OS) between HL survivors who developed nonsmall cell lung cancer (HL-NSCLC) versus patients with first primary NSCLC (NSCLC-1).

METHODS

The authors compared the OS of 178,431 patients who had NSCLC-1 and 187 patients who had HL-NSCLC (among 22,648 HL survivors), accounting for sex, race, sociodemographic status, calendar year, and age at NSCLC diagnosis, and NSCLC histology and stage. All patients were reported to the population-based Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program. Hazard ratios (HRs) were derived from a Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

Although the NSCLC stage distribution was similar in both groups (20% localized, 30% regional, and 50% distant), HL survivors experienced significantly inferior stage-specific OS. For patients with localized, regional, and distant stage NSCLC, the HRs (95% confidence interval [CI]) for death among HL survivors were 1.60 (95% CI, 1.08-2.37; P < .0001), 1.67 (95% CI, 1.26-2.22; P = .0004), and 1.31 (95% CI, 1.06-1.61; P = .013), respectively. Among HL-NSCLC patients, significant associations were observed between more advanced NSCLC stage and the following variables: younger age at HL diagnosis (P = .003), younger age at NSCLC diagnosis (P = .048), and longer latency between HL and NSCLC diagnoses (P = .015).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with patients who had de novo NSCLC, HL survivors experienced a significant 30% to 60% decrease in OS after an NSCLC diagnosis. Further research is needed to not only elucidate the clinical-biologic underpinnings of NSCLC after HL, including the influence of previous HL treatment, but also to define the role of lung cancer screening in selected patients.