1
|
Kim J, Bang H, Seong C, Kim ES, Kim SY. Transcription factors and hormone receptors: Sex‑specific targets for cancer therapy (Review). Oncol Lett 2025; 29:93. [PMID: 39691589 PMCID: PMC11650965 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2024.14839] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2024] [Accepted: 11/15/2024] [Indexed: 12/19/2024] Open
Abstract
Despite advancements in diagnostic and therapeutic technologies, cancer continues to pose a challenge to disease-free longevity in humans. Numerous factors contribute to the onset and progression of cancer, among which sex differences, as an intrinsic biological condition, warrant further attention. The present review summarizes the roles of hormone receptors estrogen receptor α (ERα), estrogen receptor β (ERβ) and androgen receptor (AR) in seven types of cancer: Breast, prostate, ovarian, lung, gastric, colon and liver cancer. Key cancer-related transcription factors known to be activated through interactions with these hormone receptors have also been discussed. To assess the impact of sex hormone receptors on different cancer types, hormone-related transcription factors were analyzed using the SignaLink 3.0 database. Further analysis focused on six key transcription factors: CCCTC-binding factor, forkhead box A1, retinoic acid receptor α, PBX homeobox 1, GATA binding protein 2 and CDK inhibitor 1A. The present review demonstrates that these transcription factors significantly influence hormone receptor activity across various types of cancer, and elucidates the complex interactions between these transcription factors and hormone receptors, offering new insights into their roles in cancer progression. The findings suggest that targeting these common transcription factors could improve the efficacy of hormone therapy and provide a unified approach to treating various types of cancer. Understanding the dual and context-dependent roles of these transcription factors deepens the current understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying hormone-driven tumor progression and could lead to more effective targeted therapeutic strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juyeon Kim
- Department of Chemistry, College of Science and Technology, Duksung Women's University, Seoul 01369, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyobin Bang
- Department of Chemistry, College of Science and Technology, Duksung Women's University, Seoul 01369, Republic of Korea
| | - Cheyun Seong
- Department of Chemistry, College of Science and Technology, Duksung Women's University, Seoul 01369, Republic of Korea
| | - Eun-Sook Kim
- College of Pharmacy, Duksung Women's University, Seoul 01369, Republic of Korea
| | - Sun Young Kim
- Department of Chemistry, College of Science and Technology, Duksung Women's University, Seoul 01369, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cagnacci A, Villa P, Grassi GP, Biglia N, Gambacciani M, Di Carlo C, Nocera F, Caruso S, Becorpi A, Lello S, Paoletti AM. Systemic hormone therapy after breast and gynecological cancers: an Italian expert group consensus opinion. Climacteric 2025; 28:4-14. [PMID: 39503540 DOI: 10.1080/13697137.2024.2418503] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2024] [Revised: 09/10/2024] [Accepted: 10/09/2024] [Indexed: 11/08/2024]
Abstract
The specific Italian Group of Study of the Menopause formulated a consensus opinion on the use of estrogen therapy (ET) or combined estro-progestin hormone therapy (HT) after breast and gynecological cancers. This consensus is based on the risk of recurrence of the specific cancer during ET/HT, the presence of steroid receptors in cancer cells, the use of adjuvant hormone therapies and data on the use of ET/HT after cancer. The following positions were reached. ET/HT can be used after vulvar cancers and melanoma, but with great caution after the rare adenocarcinomas. ET/HT can be used after cervical cancer, but ET should be used with caution after adenocarcinomas. ET/HT can be used after International Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology (FIGO) stage I-II estrogen-dependent endometrial cancers, except in Black women, and can probably be used after estrogen-independent endometrial cancers. ET/HT cannot be administered or should be used with great caution after most uterine sarcomas. ET/HT can probably be used after ovarian neoplasms except for granulosa cell tumors, and with great caution after low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma and serous borderline ovarian tumors. ET/HT can be used with great caution in women after estrogen receptor (ER)/progesterone receptor (PR)-positive breast cancer and is probably allowed after ER/PR-negative breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angelo Cagnacci
- Teaching Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, DINOGMI San Martino Hospital of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Paola Villa
- Department of Women's and Child Health and Public Health Science, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Giuseppina Paola Grassi
- University Division '1U' of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Sant'Anna Hospital of Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Nicoletta Biglia
- Academic Division of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Mauriziano Hospital, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Marco Gambacciani
- Menopause and Osteoporosis Unit, San Rossore Clinical Center, Pisa, Italy
| | - Costantino Di Carlo
- Department of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | | | - Salvatore Caruso
- Research Center for Study of Prevention, Diagnosis and Treatment of Neoplasms (CRS-PreDiCT), University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Angelamaria Becorpi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Stefano Lello
- Department of Women's and Child Health and Public Health Science, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Anna Maria Paoletti
- Coordinator of the Italian Group of Special Interest on Menopause of the Italian Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Women's Wellness Foundation, Cagliari, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Shalaby A, Shalaby O, Abdullah H, Boulassel MR, Arafa M. Correlation of PD-L1 expression with different clinico-pathological and immunohistochemical features of ovarian surface epithelial tumors. Clin Transl Oncol 2025; 27:699-705. [PMID: 39090421 PMCID: PMC11782382 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-024-03613-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2024] [Accepted: 07/09/2024] [Indexed: 08/04/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Primary carcinoma of the ovary (OCs) are responsible for a significant number of deaths related to cancer, and have the highest rate of death related to cancers of the female reproductive organs. Programmed cell death 1 (PD1) protein, acts as an immune checkpoint, and has an important role in the down-regulation of the immune system by preventing the activation of T-cells, which will weaken the autoimmunity and increases self-tolerance. This study aimed at the evaluation of the immunohistochemical (IHC) expression of PD-L1 in various primary surface ovarian epithelial tumours and to test its correlation with different clinicopathological parameters together with the expression of a panel of P53, ER and PR. METHODS A set of 102 cases of primary ovarian surface epithelial neoplasms (benign, borderline and malignant) were collected to construct Tissue Microarray (TMA) using 3 tissue cores from each case. IHC for PD-L1, p53, PR and ER was performed. The expression of PD-L1 was evaluated in relation to some clinicopathological parameters and to the expression patterns of other markers. RESULTS Expression of PD-L1 was detected in about 51% (n = 36) of malignant tumours. The malignant group significantly showed PD-L1 positivity compared to borderline and benign groups. The malignant tumours significantly showed PD-L1 and total p53 positivity in comparison to borderline group. Also, malignant tumours significantly showed higher combined positivity of PD-L1 and either PR or ER compared to borderline and benign lesions. No significant correlation was appreciated between PD-L1 expression and with any of the studied clinicopathological parameters. CONCLUSIONS This study showed a significant PD-L1 expression in malignant primary surface epithelial tumours. Construction of a panel of IHC markers, including PD-L1, could have a potential value to define patients those would benefit from the addition of immunotherapy to the treatment plan.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Asem Shalaby
- Pathology Department, Faculty of Medicine,, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
- Pathology Department, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat, Oman.
| | - Ola Shalaby
- Pathology Department, Faculty of Medicine,, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
| | - Hazem Abdullah
- Pathology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Damietta University, Damietta, Egypt
| | - Mohamed Rachid Boulassel
- Department of Hematology, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat, Oman
- Department of Biomedical Science, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat, Oman
| | - Mohammad Arafa
- Pathology Department, Faculty of Medicine,, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
- Pathology Department, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat, Oman
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Barbier de Reulle C, Rebotier M, Chopin N, Rossi L, Treilleux I, Meeus P, Ferraioli D, Heineman M, Toussaint P, le Saux O, Ray-Coquard I, Rousset-Jablonski C. Mucinous ovarian carcinoma: Impact of ovarian stimulation, hormonal contraception, and hormone replacement therapy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2025; 307:13-20. [PMID: 39879740 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2025.01.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2024] [Revised: 01/19/2025] [Accepted: 01/21/2025] [Indexed: 01/31/2025]
Abstract
Unlike high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC), which mainly affects postmenopausal women, mucinous ovarian carcinoma (MOC) affects younger patients, with a median age at diagnosis of 53 years, and is rare among premenopausal women. After they receive anticancer treatment, these women encounter specific issues involving fertility preservation (FP) and/or pregnancy, which potentially require assisted reproductive technology (ART) as well as the prescription of hormonal contraception (HC) or hormone replacement therapy (HRT). We reviewed the available literature in PubMed/Medline concerning the risks of the development of ovarian cancer (OC), including MOC, associated with ART, HC and HRT, and literature on the impact of ovarian stimulation in the context of FP and/or ART, HC and HRT in women previously treated for OC, including MOC. MOC is usually a nonhormone-sensitive tumour. In the context of ART, ovarian stimulation is not associated with an increased OC risk. However, data that evaluate the impact of ovarian stimulation in the context of FP or ART after OC, including after MOC, are still scarce. Oral contraception, contraceptive implant or levonorgestrel intrauterine device use are associated with decreased OC risk. This protective effect does not seem to occur in MOC, and no data have been published concerning contraceptive use after OC. HRT is associated with an increased risk of OC, but the risk of MOC is not modified in HRT users when considering histological subtypes. HRT after OC is associated with better overall survival but does not seem to affect disease-free survival. However, since the data are insufficient, it is not feasible to draw robust conclusions in the specific context of MOC. Overall, data on the impact of oral contraceptive and HRT use on the risk of MOC are reassuring. Despite little specific data on the impact of HRT after MOC, data on OC (all histological types) survivors are encouraging. Data concerning the effects of contraceptive use and ovarian stimulation in the context of FP or ART in OC survivors are still lacking. Therefore, the findings from prospective or larger studies in these two groups would help to counsel MOC survivors on contraceptive and fertility options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Nicolas Chopin
- Département de chirurgie, centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - Léa Rossi
- Département de chirurgie, centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | | | - Pierre Meeus
- Département de chirurgie, centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | | | | | | | - Olivia le Saux
- Département de cancérologie médicale, centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - Isabelle Ray-Coquard
- Département de cancérologie médicale, centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; INSERM U1290 RESHAPE, France
| | - Christine Rousset-Jablonski
- Département de chirurgie, centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; INSERM U1290 RESHAPE, France; Hôpital Femme Mère Enfant, Bron, France.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Talhouk A, Chiu DS, Meunier L, Rahimi K, Le Page C, Bernard M, Provencher D, Huntsman DG, Masson AMM, Köbel M. Quantifying intratumoral biomarker heterogeneity in tubo-ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma to optimize clinical translation. Sci Rep 2025; 15:2459. [PMID: 39828752 PMCID: PMC11743601 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-82206-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2024] [Accepted: 12/03/2024] [Indexed: 01/22/2025] Open
Abstract
Intratumoral heterogeneity (ITH) is spatial, phenotypic, or molecular differences within the same tumor that have important implications for accurate tumor classification and assessment of predictive biomarkers. The Canadian Ovarian Experimental Unified Resource (COEUR) has created a cohort of 437 FFPE tissue specimens from 108 tubo-ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) patients to quantify ITH across the anatomical sites and between primary and recurrence. We quantified the ITH of six clinically used immunohistochemical diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers (WT1, p53, p16, PR, CD8, and Ki67). Markers were stained on tissue microarrays and scored using a continuous or categorical interpretation of staining patterns. Two-way random effect and nested intraclass correlation were used to assess continuous markers, and Gwet's AC1 was used for categorical markers. All biomarkers showed at least substantial agreement over several spatial comparisons, with WT1, p53 and p16 showing almost perfect agreement for most spatial comparisons. Similarly, categorical WT1, p53 and p16 showed almost perfect agreement for temporal comparisons, while the agreement for primary versus recurrence for PR, CD8 and Ki67 was only fair. We provide power calculations to achieve reliability of > 0.60 and recommend testing emerging protein biomarkers to see whether they reach a clinically acceptable benchmark level of ITH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aline Talhouk
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1M9, Canada.
| | - Derek S Chiu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1M9, Canada
| | - Liliane Meunier
- Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Universite de Montreal (CRCHUM), Institut du cancer de Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Kurosh Rahimi
- Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Universite de Montreal (CRCHUM), Institut du cancer de Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Department of Pathology du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Department of Pathology, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | | | - Monique Bernard
- Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Universite de Montreal (CRCHUM), Institut du cancer de Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Diane Provencher
- Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Universite de Montreal (CRCHUM), Institut du cancer de Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
| | - David G Huntsman
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Department of Medicine, Universite de Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Anne Marie Mes Masson
- Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Universite de Montreal (CRCHUM), Institut du cancer de Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Department of Medicine, Universite de Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Martin Köbel
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, T2N 2T9, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Na R, Jordan SJ, DeFazio A, Williams M, Livingstone K, Obermair A, Friedlander M, Grant P, Webb PM. Use of menopausal hormone therapy before and after diagnosis and ovarian cancer survival-A prospective cohort study in Australia. Int J Cancer 2025; 156:280-292. [PMID: 39222307 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.35154] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2024] [Revised: 07/07/2024] [Accepted: 07/30/2024] [Indexed: 09/04/2024]
Abstract
Menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) use before ovarian cancer diagnosis has been associated with improved survival but whether the association varies by type and duration of use is inconclusive; data on MHT use after treatment, particularly the effect on health-related quality of life (HRQOL), are scarce. We investigated survival in women with ovarian cancer according to MHT use before and after diagnosis, and post-treatment MHT use and its association with HRQOL in a prospective nationwide cohort in Australia. We used Cox proportional hazards regression to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) and propensity scores to reduce confounding by indication. Among 690 women who were peri-/postmenopausal at diagnosis, pre-diagnosis MHT use was associated with a significant 26% improvement in ovarian cancer-specific survival; with a slightly stronger association for high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC, HR = 0.69, 95%CI 0.54-0.87). The associations did not differ by recency or duration of use. Among women with HGSC who were pre-/perimenopausal or aged ≤55 years at diagnosis (n = 259), MHT use after treatment was not associated with a difference in survival (HR = 1.04, 95%CI 0.48-2.22). Compared to non-users, women who started MHT after treatment reported poorer overall HRQOL before starting MHT and this difference was still seen 1-3 months after starting MHT. In conclusion, pre-diagnosis MHT use was associated with improved survival, particularly in HGSC. Among women ≤55 years, use of MHT following treatment was not associated with poorer survival for HGSC. Further large-scale studies are needed to understand menopause-specific HRQOL issues in ovarian cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renhua Na
- Population Health Program, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia
- School of Public Health, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Susan J Jordan
- Population Health Program, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia
- School of Public Health, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Anna DeFazio
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, Australia
- Centre for Cancer Research, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Westmead, Australia
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, A Joint Venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, Australia
| | | | | | - Andreas Obermair
- Queensland Centre for Gynaecological Cancers, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Michael Friedlander
- Department of Medical Oncology, Prince of Wales Hospital and Prince of Wales Clinical School UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Peter Grant
- Gynaecological Oncology Unit, Mercy Hospital for Women, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Penelope M Webb
- Population Health Program, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia
- School of Public Health, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hillmann J, Maass N, Bauerschlag DO, Flörkemeier I. Promising new drugs and therapeutic approaches for treatment of ovarian cancer-targeting the hallmarks of cancer. BMC Med 2025; 23:10. [PMID: 39762846 PMCID: PMC11706140 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-024-03826-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2024] [Accepted: 12/16/2024] [Indexed: 01/11/2025] Open
Abstract
Ovarian cancer remains the most lethal gynecological malignancy. Despite the approval of promising targeted therapy such as bevacizumab and PARP inhibitors, 5-year survival has not improved significantly. Thus, there is an urgent need for new therapeutics. New advancements in therapeutic strategies target the pivotal hallmarks of cancer. This review is giving an updated overview of innovative and upcoming therapies for the treatment of ovarian cancer that focuses specific on the hallmarks of cancer. The hallmarks of cancer constitute a broad concept to reenact complexity of malignancies and furthermore identify possible targets for new treatment strategies. For this purpose, we analyzed approvals and current clinical phase III studies (registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health; U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2024)) for new drugs on the basis of their mechanisms of action and identified new target approaches. A broad spectrum of new promising drugs is currently under investigation in clinical phase III studies targeting mainly the hallmarks "self-sufficiency in growth signals," "genomic instability," and "angiogenesis." The benefit of immune checkpoint inhibitors in ovarian cancer has been demonstrated for the first time. Besides, targeting the tumor microenvironment is of growing interest. Replicative immortality, energy metabolism, tumor promoting inflammation, and the microbiome of ovarian cancer are still barely targeted by drugs. Nevertheless, precision medicine, which focuses on specific disease characteristics, is becoming increasingly important in cancer treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Hillmann
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University and University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Nicolai Maass
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University and University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Dirk O Bauerschlag
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University and University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
- Department of Gynaecology, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
| | - Inken Flörkemeier
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University and University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Jaiswal SK, Fedkenheuer K, Khamar R, Tan H, Gotea V, Raj S, Fedkenheuer M, Elkahloun A, Zhao M, Jenkins LM, Annunziata CM, Elnitski L. The Megacomplex protects ER-alpha from degradation by Fulvestrant in epithelial ovarian cancer. Cancer Lett 2025; 608:217129. [PMID: 39048045 DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2024.217129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2024] [Revised: 07/03/2024] [Accepted: 07/19/2024] [Indexed: 07/27/2024]
Abstract
Ovarian cancer, a significant contributor to cancer-related mortality, exhibits limited responsiveness to hormonal therapies targeting the estrogen receptor (ERα). This study aimed to elucidate the mechanisms behind ERα resistance to the therapeutic drug Fulvestrant (ICI182780 or ICI). Notably, compared to the cytoplasmic version, nuclear ERα was minimally degraded by ICI, suggesting a mechanism for drug resistance via the protective confines of the nuclear substructures. Of these substructures, we identified a 1.3 MDa Megacomplex comprising transcription factors ERα, FOXA1, and PITX1 using size exclusion chromatography (SEC) in the ovarian cancer cell line, PEO4. ChIP-seq revealed these factors colocalized at 6775 genomic positions representing sites of Megacomplex formation. Megacomplex ERα exhibited increased resistance to degradation by ICI compared to cytoplasmic and nuclear ERα. A small molecule inhibitor of active chromatin and super-enhancers, JQ1, in combination with ICI significantly enhanced ERα degradation from Megacomplex as revealed by SEC and ChIP-seq. Interestingly, this combination degraded both the cytoplasmic as well as nuclear ERα. Pathway enrichment analysis showed parallel results for RNA-seq gene sets following Estradiol, ICI, or ICI plus JQ1 treatments as those defined by Megacomplex binding identified through ChIP-seq. Furthermore, similar pathway enrichments were confirmed in mass-spec analysis of the Megacomplex macromolecule fractions after modulation by Estradiol or ICI. These findings implicate Megacomplex in ERα-driven ovarian cancer chromatin regulation. This combined treatment strategy exhibited superior inhibition of cell proliferation and viability. Therefore, by uncovering ERα's resistance within the Megacomplex, the combined ICI plus JQ1 treatment elucidates a novel drug treatment vulnerability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sushil Kumar Jaiswal
- Translational and Functional Genomics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA
| | - Kevin Fedkenheuer
- Translational and Functional Genomics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA
| | - Ronak Khamar
- Translational and Functional Genomics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA
| | - Hua Tan
- Translational and Functional Genomics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA
| | - Valer Gotea
- Translational and Functional Genomics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA
| | - Sonam Raj
- Genitourinary Malignancies Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA
| | - Michael Fedkenheuer
- Molecular Immunology and Inflammation Branch, National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Abdel Elkahloun
- Microarrays and Single-Cell Genomics Core, National Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA
| | - Ming Zhao
- Proteins and Chemistry Core, Research Technologies Branch, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Rockville, MD, 20852, USA
| | - Lisa M Jenkins
- Mass Spectrometry Resource, Laboratory of Cell Biology, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | | | - Laura Elnitski
- Translational and Functional Genomics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Skrzypczak M, Wolinska E, Adaszek Ł, Ortmann O, Treeck O. Epigenetic Modulation of Estrogen Receptor Signaling in Ovarian Cancer. Int J Mol Sci 2024; 26:166. [PMID: 39796024 PMCID: PMC11720219 DOI: 10.3390/ijms26010166] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2024] [Revised: 12/21/2024] [Accepted: 12/25/2024] [Indexed: 01/13/2025] Open
Abstract
Ovarian cancer remains one of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths in women. There are several processes that are described to have a causal relationship in ovarian cancer development, progression, and metastasis formation, that occur both at the genetic and epigenetic level. One of the mechanisms involved in its pathogenesis and progression is estrogen signaling. Estrogen receptors (ER) α, ERβ, and G-protein coupled estrogen receptor 1 (GPER1), in concert with various coregulators and pioneer transcription factors, mediate the effects of estrogens primarily by the transcriptional regulation of estrogen responsive genes, thereby exerting pleiotropic effects including the regulation of cellular proliferation and apoptosis. The expression and activity of estrogen receptors and their coregulators have been demonstrated to be regulated by epigenetic mechanisms like histone modifications and DNA methylation. Here, we intend to summarize and to provide an update on the current understanding of epigenetic mechanisms regulating estrogen signaling and their role in ovarian cancer. For this purpose, we reviewed publications on this topic listed in the PubMed database. Finally, we assess to which extent drugs acting on the epigenetic level might be suitable for the treatment of ovarian cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maciej Skrzypczak
- Chair and Department of Gynecology, Medical University of Lublin, 20-954 Lublin, Poland;
| | - Ewa Wolinska
- Department of Pathology, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-091 Warsaw, Poland;
| | - Łukasz Adaszek
- Clinic of Infectious Diseases, University of Life Sciences Lublin, 20-950 Lublin, Poland;
| | - Olaf Ortmann
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Center Regensburg, 93935 Regensburg, Germany;
| | - Oliver Treeck
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Center Regensburg, 93935 Regensburg, Germany;
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Beevors LI, Sundar S, Foster PA. Steroid metabolism and hormonal dynamics in normal and malignant ovaries. Essays Biochem 2024; 68:491-507. [PMID: 38994724 PMCID: PMC11625866 DOI: 10.1042/ebc20240028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2024] [Revised: 06/18/2024] [Accepted: 06/24/2024] [Indexed: 07/13/2024]
Abstract
The ovaries are key steroid hormone production sites in post-pubertal females. However, current research on steroidogenic enzymes, endogenous hormone concentrations and their effects on healthy ovarian function and malignant development is limited. Here, we discuss the importance of steroid enzymes in normal and malignant ovaries, alongside hormone concentrations, receptor expression and action. Key enzymes include STS, 3β-HSD2, HSD17B1, ARK1C3, and aromatase, which influence ovarian steroidal action. Both androgen and oestrogen action, via their facilitating enzyme, drives ovarian follicle activation, development and maturation in healthy ovarian tissue. In ovarian cancer, some data suggest STS and oestrogen receptor α may be linked to aggressive forms, while various oestrogen-responsive factors may be involved in ovarian cancer metastasis. In contrast, androgen receptor expression and action vary across ovarian cancer subtypes. For future studies investigating steroidogenesis and steroidal activity in ovarian cancer, it is necessary to differentiate between disease subtypes for a comprehensive understanding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucy I Beevors
- Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, U.K
| | - Sudha Sundar
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, U.K
| | - Paul A Foster
- Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, U.K
- Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology, and Metabolism, Birmingham Health Partners, Birmingham, U.K
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Katcher AH, Greenman MP, Roychoudhury S, Goldberg GL. Utilization of immunohistochemistry in gynecologic tumors: An expert review. Gynecol Oncol Rep 2024; 56:101550. [PMID: 39717157 PMCID: PMC11664289 DOI: 10.1016/j.gore.2024.101550] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2024] [Revised: 11/17/2024] [Accepted: 11/20/2024] [Indexed: 12/25/2024] Open
Abstract
The use of immunohistochemistry (IHC) and molecular pathology has been widely adopted over the past 3 decades and has aided in the precision of diagnosing gynecologic tumors. While many tumors can be diagnosed by histologic appearance on routine hematoxylin and eosin stained slides, the use of IHC has dramatically changed practice, leading to a better understanding and subtyping of gynecologic tumors. This detailed classification of tumors has aided in the implementation and development of targeted therapies. Available IHC stains and their applications continue to rapidly evolve. Our review aims to provide updated information on the use of IHC in gynecologic tumors. We will also address the rationale for preferred therapeutic regimens that are personalized based on IHC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arielle H. Katcher
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Long Island Jewish Medical Center, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Northwell Health, New Hyde Park, NY, United States
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Christiana Care Health System, Newark, DE, United States
| | - Michelle P. Greenman
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Long Island Jewish Medical Center, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Northwell Health, New Hyde Park, NY, United States
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Sudarshana Roychoudhury
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Long Island Jewish Medical Center, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Northwell Health, New Hyde Park, NY, United States
| | - Gary L. Goldberg
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Long Island Jewish Medical Center, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Northwell Health, New Hyde Park, NY, United States
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Gjorgoska M, Rižner TL. From fallopian tube epithelium to high-grade serous ovarian cancer: A single-cell resolution review of sex steroid hormone signaling. Prog Lipid Res 2024; 96:101302. [PMID: 39396711 DOI: 10.1016/j.plipres.2024.101302] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2024] [Revised: 10/03/2024] [Accepted: 10/10/2024] [Indexed: 10/15/2024]
Abstract
High-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) represents the most lethal subtype of ovarian cancer, largely due to being commonly diagnosed at advanced stages. The early molecular mechanisms underlying ovarian carcinogenesis remain poorly defined, posing challenges to the development of prevention and early detection strategies. Here we dissect the molecular mechanisms of sex steroid hormone signaling throughout the decades-long evolution of HGSOC precursor lesions, which predominantly originate from secretory epithelial cells of fallopian tubes (FT). We also discuss the prognostic significance of sex steroid receptor isoforms and steroid metabolizing enzymes in HGSOCs. Finally, we provide a comprehensive gene expression atlases of sex steroid receptors, steroidogenic, and steroid-metabolizing enzymes across different cell populations in pre- and postmenopausal FTs, and HGSOCs, using published single-cell RNA sequencing datasets. These atlases reveal that secretory epithelial cells and stromal populations in FTs express sex steroid receptors and enzymes responsible for the formation and inactivation of genotoxic estrogen metabolites. In HGSOC, epithelial cells express various HSD17B isoforms and steroid conjugating enzymes, suggesting an enhanced ability to finely regulate the levels of bioactive sex steroids.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marija Gjorgoska
- Institute of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Tea Lanišnik Rižner
- Institute of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Bates M, Mohamed BM, Lewis F, O'Toole S, O'Leary JJ. Biomarkers in high grade serous ovarian cancer. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer 2024; 1879:189224. [PMID: 39581234 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2024.189224] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2024] [Revised: 11/15/2024] [Accepted: 11/15/2024] [Indexed: 11/26/2024]
Abstract
High-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSC) is the most common subtype of ovarian cancer. HGSC patients typically present with advanced disease, which is often resistant to chemotherapy and recurs despite initial responses to therapy, resulting in the poor prognosis associated with this disease. There is a need to utilise biomarkers to manage the various aspects of HGSC patient care. In this review we discuss the current state of biomarkers in HGSC, focusing on the various available immunohistochemical (IHC) and blood-based biomarkers, which have been examined for their diagnostic, prognostic and theranostic potential in HGSC. These include various routine clinical IHC biomarkers such as p53, WT1, keratins, PAX8, Ki67 and p16 and clinical blood-borne markers and algorithms such as CA125, HE4, ROMA, RMI, ROCA, and others. We also discuss various components of the liquid biopsy as well as a number of novel IHC biomarkers and non-routine blood-borne biomarkers, which have been examined in various ovarian cancer studies. We also discuss the future of ovarian cancer biomarker research and highlight some of the challenges currently facing the field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Bates
- Department of Histopathology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland; Emer Casey Molecular Pathology Research Laboratory, Coombe Women & Infants University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; Trinity St James's Cancer Institute, Dublin, Ireland.
| | - Bashir M Mohamed
- Department of Histopathology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland; Emer Casey Molecular Pathology Research Laboratory, Coombe Women & Infants University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; Trinity St James's Cancer Institute, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Faye Lewis
- Department of Histopathology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland; Emer Casey Molecular Pathology Research Laboratory, Coombe Women & Infants University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; Trinity St James's Cancer Institute, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Sharon O'Toole
- Department of Histopathology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland; Emer Casey Molecular Pathology Research Laboratory, Coombe Women & Infants University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; Trinity St James's Cancer Institute, Dublin, Ireland; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - John J O'Leary
- Department of Histopathology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland; Emer Casey Molecular Pathology Research Laboratory, Coombe Women & Infants University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; Trinity St James's Cancer Institute, Dublin, Ireland; Department of Pathology, Coombe Women & Infants University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Da-Anoy A, Kang EY, Lee CH, Cheasley D, Llaurado Fernandez M, Carey MS, Cameron A, Köbel M. Molecular Surrogate Subtypes of Ovarian and Peritoneal Low-grade Serous Carcinoma. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2024; 43:617-625. [PMID: 38914014 DOI: 10.1097/pgp.0000000000001043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/26/2024]
Abstract
Low-grade serous carcinoma (LGSC) is an uncommon histotype of ovarian carcinoma, accounting for ~3% of cases. There is evidence that survival of peritoneal LGSC (pLGSC) is longer than that of ovarian LGSC (oLGSC). Key molecular alterations of LGSC have been established, including loss of CDKN2A and PR expression, MAPK pathway alterations, and loss of USP9X expression. We hypothesized that LGSC could be subclassified into clinically applicable molecular subtypes by a few surrogate tests similar to endometrioid carcinomas using a hierarchical decision tree based on the strength of the prognostic associations of the individual alterations. Our study included 71 LGSCs. Immunohistochemistry for CDKN2A, ER, PR, NF1, and USP9X and sequencing for KRAS , NRAS , and BRAF were performed. Our data showed the co-occurrence of key molecular alterations, and despite suggestive trends, hierarchical molecular subtyping did not provide significantly different stratification of patients according to survival in this cohort. We confirmed that patients diagnosed with pLGSC have a longer survival than high-stage oLGSC, with the intriguing observation that normal CDKN2A and PR status were associated with excellent survival in pLGSC. Therefore, CDKN2A and PR status might aid in the classification of indeterminate implants, where abnormal findings favor pLGSC over noninvasive implants. Molecular subtypes should be further evaluated in larger cohorts for their prognostic and potentially predictive value.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annalyn Da-Anoy
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary
| | - Eun Young Kang
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary
| | - Cheng Han Lee
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta
| | - Dane Cheasley
- Cancer Genetics Laboratory, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Marta Llaurado Fernandez
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, and the Department of Clinical Research, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC
| | - Mark S Carey
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, and the Department of Clinical Research, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC
| | - Anna Cameron
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Martin Köbel
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Andres S, Finch L, Iasonos A, Zhou Q, Girshman J, Chhetri-Long R, Green H, Jang D, O'Cearbhaill R, Kyi C, Cohen S, Friedman C, Makker V, Chi DS, Sonoda Y, Chiang S, Aghajanian C, Weigelt B, Grisham RN. Basket study of oral progesterone antagonist onapristone extended release in progesterone receptor-positive recurrent granulosa cell, low-grade serous ovarian cancer, or endometrioid endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2024; 189:30-36. [PMID: 38991472 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2024.06.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2024] [Revised: 06/24/2024] [Accepted: 06/27/2024] [Indexed: 07/13/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the safety and efficacy of the oral progesterone antagonist onapristone extended release (onapristone-XR) in patients with recurrent progesterone receptor (PR)-positive adult-type granulosa cell tumor (aGCT), low-grade serous ovarian cancer (LGSOC), or endometrioid endometrial cancer (EEC). METHODS This single-institution phase II study included patients with PR-positive aGCT, LGSOC, or EEC who received ≥1 prior line of chemotherapy. Patients were enrolled from 5/2019-5/2020. PR status was evaluated via immunohistochemistry. Eligible patients had PR expression ≥1% on tissue collected within 3 years of enrollment. Patients received 50 mg of onapristone-XR twice daily until disease progression or treatment discontinuation. Adverse events were graded by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1. Secondary endpoints were response duration, clinical benefit rate (CBR), and safety. RESULTS Five patients with LGSOC and 1 with EEC enrolled, but both cohorts closed early due to slow accrual. Fourteen patients with aGCT enrolled and completed stage 1 accrual. No responses were observed. Four patients with LGSOC were evaluable, with median PFS of 4.4 months (range, 1.8-NE) and CBR of 50% (range, 6.8%-93.2%). All 14 patients with aGCT were evaluable, with median PFS of 2.8 months (range, 1.6-4.9), 6-month PFS rate of 21.4% (range, 5.2%-44.8%), 12-month PFS rate of 14.3% (range, 2.3%-36.6%), and a CBR of 35.7% (range, 12.8%-64.9%). CONCLUSIONS The study did not meet its primary endpoint. While onapristone-XR was well tolerated in all 3 arms, no objective responses were observed.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Humans
- Female
- Middle Aged
- Aged
- Receptors, Progesterone/metabolism
- Endometrial Neoplasms/drug therapy
- Endometrial Neoplasms/pathology
- Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/drug therapy
- Carcinoma, Endometrioid/drug therapy
- Carcinoma, Endometrioid/pathology
- Carcinoma, Endometrioid/metabolism
- Ovarian Neoplasms/drug therapy
- Ovarian Neoplasms/pathology
- Ovarian Neoplasms/metabolism
- Granulosa Cell Tumor/drug therapy
- Granulosa Cell Tumor/metabolism
- Granulosa Cell Tumor/pathology
- Adult
- Gonanes/administration & dosage
- Gonanes/adverse effects
- Delayed-Action Preparations/administration & dosage
- Aged, 80 and over
- Administration, Oral
- Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous/drug therapy
- Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous/pathology
- Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous/metabolism
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Andres
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Lindsey Finch
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Alexia Iasonos
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Qin Zhou
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jeffrey Girshman
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Rashmi Chhetri-Long
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Hunter Green
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Dasom Jang
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Roisin O'Cearbhaill
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Chrisann Kyi
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Seth Cohen
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Claire Friedman
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Vicky Makker
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Dennis S Chi
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Yukio Sonoda
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sarah Chiang
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Carol Aghajanian
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Britta Weigelt
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Rachel N Grisham
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Onoprienko A, Bartl T, Grimm C, Concin N, Polterauer S. Novel Targeted Agents in Advanced and Recurrent Low-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer: A Silver Lining in the Therapy of a Chemoresistant Disease? Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:3268. [PMID: 39409889 PMCID: PMC11476324 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16193268] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2024] [Revised: 09/21/2024] [Accepted: 09/22/2024] [Indexed: 10/20/2024] Open
Abstract
Low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (LGSOC) is a rare subtype of epithelial ovarian cancer, characterized by a unique molecular background and specific clinical behavior. A growing body of molecular data underscores LGSOC as a distinct disease entity; however, clinical evidence on the optimal treatment regimens for LGSOC remains limited due to the low incidence of the disease. Consequently, treatment recommendations for LGSOC are still often derived from findings on the more common high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC) and typically focus on radical cytoreductive surgery and platinum-based chemotherapy. Since LGSOCs typically exhibit only limited responsiveness to platinum-based chemotherapy, the clinical management of advanced and recurrent LGSOCs remains a significant therapeutic challenge and often results in limited treatment options and suboptimal outcomes. Recent advances in molecular profiling and the identification of new, promising targets, such as the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway, offer hope for improving both the prognosis and health-related quality of life in affected patients. Given the high unmet clinical need to establish new therapeutic standards beyond cytotoxic chemotherapy, this review aims to summarize the most promising molecular targets and emerging targeted agents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Thomas Bartl
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of General Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (A.O.); (C.G.); (N.C.); (S.P.)
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Gupta S, Ahuja S, Kalwaniya DS. Immunohistochemistry Markers in Ovarian and Fallopian Tube Neoplasms: a Comprehensive Review. Indian J Surg Oncol 2024; 15:465-480. [PMID: 39328739 PMCID: PMC11422544 DOI: 10.1007/s13193-024-02049-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2024] [Accepted: 07/22/2024] [Indexed: 09/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Immunohistochemistry (IHC) has emerged as a crucial tool in diagnosing and managing ovarian cancer, offering invaluable insights into tumor biology and guiding therapeutic decisions. The intricate histopathological landscape of ovarian cancer presents challenges in accurate diagnosis and classification. IHC offers a complementary approach, aiding in the characterization of tumor subtypes, prognostication, and prediction of treatment response. By targeting specific biomarkers, IHC enables the identification of diverse histological features and molecular alterations associated with ovarian malignancies. The integration of IHC into routine diagnostic workflows enhances diagnostic accuracy, aids in the subclassification of ovarian tumors, and facilitates personalized treatment strategies. Emphasis is placed on the judicious selection of antibody panels tailored to specific clinical scenarios, ensuring optimal utilization of resources and minimizing diagnostic pitfalls. Overall, this review underscores the pivotal role of IHC in refining the diagnosis, prognostication, and management of ovarian cancer, highlighting its significance in the era of precision medicine. By leveraging the molecular insights provided by IHC, clinicians and pathologists can optimize patient care and improve outcomes in ovarian cancer management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sumedha Gupta
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Sana Ahuja
- Department of Pathology, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Dheer Singh Kalwaniya
- Department of Surgery, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Saner FA, Takahashi K, Budden T, Pandey A, Ariyaratne D, Zwimpfer TA, Meagher NS, Fereday S, Twomey L, Pishas KI, Hoang T, Bolithon A, Traficante N, Alsop K, Christie EL, Kang EY, Nelson GS, Ghatage P, Lee CH, Riggan MJ, Alsop J, Beckmann MW, Boros J, Brand AH, Brooks-Wilson A, Carney ME, Coulson P, Courtney-Brooks M, Cushing-Haugen KL, Cybulski C, El-Bahrawy MA, Elishaev E, Erber R, Gayther SA, Gentry-Maharaj A, Gilks CB, Harnett PR, Harris HR, Hartmann A, Hein A, Hendley J, Hernandez BY, Jakubowska A, Jimenez-Linan M, Jones ME, Kaufmann SH, Kennedy CJ, Kluz T, Koziak JM, Kristjansdottir B, Le ND, Lener M, Lester J, Lubiński J, Mateoiu C, Orsulic S, Ruebner M, Schoemaker MJ, Shah M, Sharma R, Sherman ME, Shvetsov YB, Soong TR, Steed H, Sukumvanich P, Talhouk A, Taylor SE, Vierkant RA, Wang C, Widschwendter M, Wilkens LR, Winham SJ, Anglesio MS, Berchuck A, Brenton JD, Campbell I, Cook LS, Doherty JA, Fasching PA, Fortner RT, Goodman MT, Gronwald J, Huntsman DG, Karlan BY, Kelemen LE, Menon U, Modugno F, Pharoah PD, Schildkraut JM, Sundfeldt K, Swerdlow AJ, Goode EL, DeFazio A, Köbel M, Ramus SJ, Bowtell DD, Garsed DW. Concurrent RB1 Loss and BRCA Deficiency Predicts Enhanced Immunologic Response and Long-term Survival in Tubo-ovarian High-grade Serous Carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 2024; 30:3481-3498. [PMID: 38837893 PMCID: PMC11325151 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-23-3552] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2023] [Revised: 02/08/2024] [Accepted: 05/31/2024] [Indexed: 06/07/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to evaluate RB1 expression and survival across ovarian carcinoma histotypes and how co-occurrence of BRCA1 or BRCA2 (BRCA) alterations and RB1 loss influences survival in tubo-ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN RB1 protein expression was classified by immunohistochemistry in ovarian carcinomas of 7,436 patients from the Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis consortium. We examined RB1 expression and germline BRCA status in a subset of 1,134 HGSC, and related genotype to overall survival (OS), tumor-infiltrating CD8+ lymphocytes, and transcriptomic subtypes. Using CRISPR-Cas9, we deleted RB1 in HGSC cells with and without BRCA1 alterations to model co-loss with treatment response. We performed whole-genome and transcriptome data analyses on 126 patients with primary HGSC to characterize tumors with concurrent BRCA deficiency and RB1 loss. RESULTS RB1 loss was associated with longer OS in HGSC but with poorer prognosis in endometrioid ovarian carcinoma. Patients with HGSC harboring both RB1 loss and pathogenic germline BRCA variants had superior OS compared with patients with either alteration alone, and their median OS was three times longer than those without pathogenic BRCA variants and retained RB1 expression (9.3 vs. 3.1 years). Enhanced sensitivity to cisplatin and paclitaxel was seen in BRCA1-altered cells with RB1 knockout. Combined RB1 loss and BRCA deficiency correlated with transcriptional markers of enhanced IFN response, cell-cycle deregulation, and reduced epithelial-mesenchymal transition. CD8+ lymphocytes were most prevalent in BRCA-deficient HGSC with co-loss of RB1. CONCLUSIONS Co-occurrence of RB1 loss and BRCA deficiency was associated with exceptionally long survival in patients with HGSC, potentially due to better treatment response and immune stimulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Flurina A.M. Saner
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
| | - Kazuaki Takahashi
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Timothy Budden
- School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine and Health, University of NSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
- Skin Cancer and Ageing Lab, Cancer Research United Kingdom Manchester Institute, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
| | - Ahwan Pandey
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
| | | | | | - Nicola S. Meagher
- School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine and Health, University of NSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, A Joint Venture with Cancer Council New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
| | - Sian Fereday
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.
| | - Laura Twomey
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
| | - Kathleen I. Pishas
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.
| | - Therese Hoang
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
| | - Adelyn Bolithon
- School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine and Health, University of NSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
- Adult Cancer Program, Lowy Cancer Research Centre, University of NSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
| | - Nadia Traficante
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.
| | | | - Kathryn Alsop
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.
| | - Elizabeth L. Christie
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.
| | - Eun-Young Kang
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Foothills Medical Center, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
| | - Gregg S. Nelson
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
| | - Prafull Ghatage
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
| | - Cheng-Han Lee
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
| | - Marjorie J. Riggan
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
| | - Jennifer Alsop
- Department of Oncology, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
| | - Matthias W. Beckmann
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
| | - Jessica Boros
- Centre for Cancer Research, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Sydney, Australia.
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
- The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
| | - Alison H. Brand
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
- The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
| | | | - Michael E. Carney
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii.
| | - Penny Coulson
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.
| | - Madeleine Courtney-Brooks
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
| | - Kara L. Cushing-Haugen
- Program in Epidemiology, Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington.
| | - Cezary Cybulski
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland.
| | - Mona A. El-Bahrawy
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
| | - Esther Elishaev
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
| | - Ramona Erber
- Institute of Pathology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
| | - Simon A. Gayther
- Center for Bioinformatics and Functional Genomics and the Cedars Sinai Genomics Core, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.
| | - Aleksandra Gentry-Maharaj
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
- Department of Women’s Cancer, Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women’s Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
| | - C. Blake Gilks
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
| | - Paul R. Harnett
- The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
- Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
| | - Holly R. Harris
- Program in Epidemiology, Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington.
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
| | - Arndt Hartmann
- Institute of Pathology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
| | - Alexander Hein
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
| | - Joy Hendley
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
| | | | - Anna Jakubowska
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland.
- Independent Laboratory of Molecular Biology and Genetic Diagnostics, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland.
| | | | - Michael E. Jones
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.
| | - Scott H. Kaufmann
- Division of Oncology Research, Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
| | - Catherine J. Kennedy
- Centre for Cancer Research, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Sydney, Australia.
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
- The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
| | - Tomasz Kluz
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Gynecology Oncology and Obstetrics, Institute of Medical Sciences, Medical College of Rzeszow University, Rzeszów, Poland.
| | | | - Björg Kristjansdottir
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Center for Cancer Research, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
| | - Nhu D. Le
- Cancer Control Research, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, Canada.
| | - Marcin Lener
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Szczecin, Poland.
| | - Jenny Lester
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
| | - Jan Lubiński
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland.
| | | | - Sandra Orsulic
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
| | - Matthias Ruebner
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
| | - Minouk J. Schoemaker
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.
| | - Mitul Shah
- Department of Oncology, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
| | - Raghwa Sharma
- Tissue Pathology and Diagnostic Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
| | - Mark E. Sherman
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida.
| | - Yurii B. Shvetsov
- Independent Laboratory of Molecular Biology and Genetic Diagnostics, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland.
| | - T. Rinda Soong
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
| | - Helen Steed
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
- Section of Gynecologic Oncology Surgery, North Zone, Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, Canada.
| | - Paniti Sukumvanich
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
| | - Aline Talhouk
- British Columbia’s Gynecological Cancer Research Team (OVCARE), BC Cancer, and Vancouver General Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
| | - Sarah E. Taylor
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
| | - Robert A. Vierkant
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Division of Clinical Trials and Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
| | - Chen Wang
- Division of Computational Biology, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
| | | | - Lynne R. Wilkens
- Independent Laboratory of Molecular Biology and Genetic Diagnostics, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland.
| | - Stacey J. Winham
- Division of Computational Biology, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
| | - Michael S. Anglesio
- British Columbia’s Gynecological Cancer Research Team (OVCARE), BC Cancer, and Vancouver General Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
| | - Andrew Berchuck
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
| | - James D. Brenton
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
| | - Ian Campbell
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.
| | - Linda S. Cook
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado.
- Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
| | - Jennifer A. Doherty
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
| | - Peter A. Fasching
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
| | - Renée T. Fortner
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
- Department of Research, Cancer Registry of Norway, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
| | - Marc T. Goodman
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Cedars-Sinai Cancer, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.
| | - Jacek Gronwald
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland.
| | - David G. Huntsman
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
- British Columbia’s Gynecological Cancer Research Team (OVCARE), BC Cancer, and Vancouver General Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
- Department of Molecular Oncology, BC Cancer Research Centre, Vancouver, Canada.
| | - Beth Y. Karlan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
| | - Linda E. Kelemen
- Division of Acute Disease Epidemiology, South Carolina Department of Health & Environmental Control, Columbia, South Carolina.
| | - Usha Menon
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
| | - Francesmary Modugno
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
- Women’s Cancer Research Center, Magee-Womens Research Institute and Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
| | - Paul D.P. Pharoah
- Department of Oncology, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
- Department of Computational Biomedicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, West Hollywood, California.
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
| | - Joellen M. Schildkraut
- Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
| | - Karin Sundfeldt
- Cancer Control Research, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, Canada.
| | - Anthony J. Swerdlow
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.
- Division of Breast Cancer Research, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.
| | - Ellen L. Goode
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
| | - Anna DeFazio
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, A Joint Venture with Cancer Council New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
- Centre for Cancer Research, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Sydney, Australia.
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
- The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
| | - Martin Köbel
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Foothills Medical Center, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
| | - Susan J. Ramus
- School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine and Health, University of NSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
- Adult Cancer Program, Lowy Cancer Research Centre, University of NSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
| | - David D.L. Bowtell
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.
| | - Dale W. Garsed
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Margoni A, Gargalionis AN, Papavassiliou AG. CA-125:CA72-4 ratio - towards a promising cost-effective tool in ovarian cancer diagnosis and monitoring of post-menopausal women under hormone treatment. J Ovarian Res 2024; 17:164. [PMID: 39127704 PMCID: PMC11316994 DOI: 10.1186/s13048-024-01487-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2024] [Accepted: 08/05/2024] [Indexed: 08/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Ovarian cancer (OC) is the most lethal gynecological cancer in the developed world. Most cases are diagnosed at late stage III-IV with a very low 5-year overall survival rate. Several studies revealed an elevated risk of OC in users of hormone treatment (HT) compared with non-users. The extended duration of HT is a statistically significant risk factor. Carbohydrate antigen or cancer antigen 125 (CA-125) remains the best screening tool for OC; however, its value is limited due to low specificity, leading to unnecessary interventions, surgeries, and psychological harm. Additionally, the variability of ultrasound interpretation highlights the urgent need to develop a univariate index with higher sensitivity and specificity for early diagnosis of OC in women under HT. Herein we critically review the limitations of biomarkers for the detection of OC aiming to suggest an accurate and cost-effective diagnostic ratio that eliminates the impact of body mass index, age, HT, smoking, and benign ovarian diseases on measurements. Numerous studies combine biomarkers such as CA-125, human epididymis protein 4, and thymidine kinase 1 into diagnostic algorithms. Data suggest that the expression of estrogen receptors may have diagnostic and prognostic value, as the estrogen receptor α (ERα):estrogen receptor β (ERβ) ratio is significantly higher in OC than in normal tissue due to ERβ downregulation. A high positive correlation between expression of CA-125 and carbohydrate antigen or cancer antigen 72 - 4 (CA72-4) with ERα and ERβ, respectively, poses that a novel ratio CA-125:CA72-4 could be nodal for monitoring post-menopausal women under HT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angeliki Margoni
- Department of Biological Chemistry, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, 11527, Greece
| | - Antonios N Gargalionis
- Laboratory of Clinical Biochemistry, Medical School, 'Attikon' University General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, 12462, Greece
| | - Athanasios G Papavassiliou
- Department of Biological Chemistry, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, 11527, Greece.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Trozzi R, Tuyaerts S, Annibali D, Herreros Pomares A, Boog L, Van Dam P, Leunen K, Deroose C, Trum H, Amant F. An open-label, single-arm, prospective, multi-center, tandem two-stage designed phase II study to evaluate the efficacy of fulvestrant in women with recurrent/metastatic estrogen receptor-positive gynecological malignancies (FUCHSia study). Int J Gynecol Cancer 2024; 34:1217-1224. [PMID: 38724237 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2023-005229] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/07/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to evaluate fulvestrant efficacy in women with estrogen receptor-positive low-grade gynecological cancers. The primary objective was to determine the response rate. Secondary objectives were progression-free survival, clinical benefit, duration of response, safety, tolerability, and quality of life. METHODS FUCHSia is an open-label, single-arm, prospective, multi-center phase II study. The study population included patients with recurrent/metastatic low-grade gynecological malignancies with estrogen receptor positivity who received a maximum of two lines of previous hormonal therapy. Patients received fulvestrant (FASLODEX, AstraZeneca) via two intramuscular injections (250 mg/5 mL each) in the gluteal muscle on day 1, day 15, day 29, and then every 28 days thereafter until disease progression, withdrawal from the trial due to any unacceptable adverse event, or withdrawal of patient consent. RESULTS A total of 15 patients (uterine sarcoma n=4; sex cord-stromal ovarian tumors n=3; endometrial carcinoma n=4; serous ovarian cancer n=4) were enrolled. Median follow-up was 48 weeks (interquartile range (IQR) 26-122) in the uterine sarcoma cohort, 63 weeks (IQR 28-77) for sex cord-stromal tumors, 19 weeks (IQR 17-21) for endometrial carcinoma, and 60 weeks (IQR 40-119) for serous ovarian cancer. One partial response according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v1.1 was observed in one uterine sarcoma patient. No responses were observed in the other cohorts. However, stable disease was observed in three uterine sarcomas (median duration 12 weeks), three sex cord-stromal tumors (median duration 32 weeks), and four low-grade serous ovarian cancer patients (median duration 20 weeks), leading to a disease control rate of 100% for these tumor types. All patients with endometrial carcinoma showed progressive disease. CONCLUSION Fulvestrant may control tumor growth in recurrent/metastatic estrogen receptor-positive low-grade gynecological malignancies of specific histology. Further studies are needed to confirm these results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rita Trozzi
- Department of Women, children and Public health sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Sandra Tuyaerts
- Laboratory of Medical and Molecular Oncology (LMMO), Department of Medical Oncology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, UZ Brussel, Brussel, Belgium
| | - Daniela Annibali
- Laboratory of Gynecological Oncology, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Netherlands Cancer Institute Department of Gynecology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Lotte Boog
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Netherlands Cancer Institute Department of Gynecology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Peter Van Dam
- Division Gynaecological Oncology, Multidisciplinary oncologic Centre, CORE Antwerp University, Edegem, Belgium
| | - Karin Leunen
- Gynecology and Obstetrics, AZ Sint-Maarten, Mechelen, Antwerpen, Belgium
| | - Christophe Deroose
- Nuclear Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Vlaams-Brabant, Belgium
- Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Flanders, Belgium
| | - Hans Trum
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Netherlands Cancer Institute Department of Gynecology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Frédéric Amant
- Laboratory of Gynecological Oncology, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Netherlands Cancer Institute Department of Gynecology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Xu R, Yang X, Tang B, Mao Y, Jiang F. Combined treatment of All-trans retinoic acid with Tamoxifen suppresses ovarian cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2024; 94:259-270. [PMID: 38714534 PMCID: PMC11390921 DOI: 10.1007/s00280-024-04671-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2023] [Accepted: 04/20/2024] [Indexed: 05/10/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ovarian cancer is a malignant tumor of the female reproductive system, and its mortality rate is as high as 70%. Estrogen receptor α (ERα)-positive ovarian cancer accounted for most of all ovarian cancer patients. ERα can promote the growth and proliferation of tumors. METHODS The combined effect of All-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) and tamoxifen was obtained by the combination screening of tamoxifen and compound library by MTS. In addition, colony formation assay, flow cytometry analysis, immunofluorescence staining, quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR), western blot, and tumor xenotransplantation models were used to further evaluate the efficacy of tamoxifen and ATRA in vitro and in vivo for ER-α-positive ovarian cancer. RESULTS In our study, we found that All-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) can cooperate with tamoxifen to cause cell cycle arrest and apoptosis and inhibit ERα-positive ovarian cancer in vivo and in vitro. Further exploration of the mechanism found that ATRA can Inhibit genes related to the ERα signaling pathway, enhance the sensitivity of ERα-positive ovarian cancer cells to tamoxifen, and ascertain the effectiveness of tamoxifen and ATRA as treatments for ovarian cancer with an ERα-positive status. CONCLUSION Combination of ATRA and tamoxifen is a new way for the treatment of ERα-positive ovarian cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rui Xu
- Department of Gynecology, East China Normal University Wuhu Affiliated Hospital, The Second People's Hospital of Wuhu City, No.259, Middle Jiuhua Road, Jinghu District, Wuhu, 241000, China
| | - Xiaowen Yang
- Department of Electrocardiogram, East China Normal University Wuhu Affiliated Hospital, The Second People's Hospital of Wuhu City, No.259, Middle Jiuhua Road, Jinghu District, Wuhu, 241000, China
| | - Bin Tang
- Department of Gynecology, East China Normal University Wuhu Affiliated Hospital, The Second People's Hospital of Wuhu City, No.259, Middle Jiuhua Road, Jinghu District, Wuhu, 241000, China
| | - Yifan Mao
- Department of Gynecology, East China Normal University Wuhu Affiliated Hospital, The Second People's Hospital of Wuhu City, No.259, Middle Jiuhua Road, Jinghu District, Wuhu, 241000, China
| | - Feiyun Jiang
- Department of Gynecology, East China Normal University Wuhu Affiliated Hospital, The Second People's Hospital of Wuhu City, No.259, Middle Jiuhua Road, Jinghu District, Wuhu, 241000, China.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Sköld C, Corvigno S, Dahlstrand H, Enblad G, Mezheyeuski A, Sundström-Poromaa I, Stålberg K, Tolf A, Glimelius I, Koliadi A. Association between parity and pregnancy-associated tumor features in high-grade serous ovarian cancer. Cancer Causes Control 2024; 35:1101-1109. [PMID: 38578428 PMCID: PMC11266373 DOI: 10.1007/s10552-024-01876-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2023] [Accepted: 03/24/2024] [Indexed: 04/06/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE High-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSC) is the most common ovarian cancer subtype. Parity is an important risk-reducing factor, but the underlying mechanism behind the protective effect is unclear. Our aim was to study if the expression of hormones and proteins involved in pregnancy were affected by the woman's parity status, and if they may be associated with tumor stage and survival. METHODS We evaluated expression of progesterone receptor (PR), progesterone receptor membrane component 1 (PGRMC1), relaxin-2, and transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGFβ1) in tumor tissue from 92 women with HGSC parous (n = 73) and nulliparous (n = 19). Key findings were then evaluated in an independent expansion cohort of 49 patients. Survival rates by hormone/protein expression were illustrated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The independent prognostic value was tested by Cox regression, using models adjusted for established poor-prognostic factors (age at diagnosis, FIGO stage, type of surgery, and macroscopic residual tumor after surgery). RESULTS HGSC tumors from parous women were PR positive (≥ 1% PR expression in tumor cells) more often than tumors from nulliparous women (42% vs. 16%; p-value 0.04), and having more children was associated with developing PR positive tumors [i.e., ≥ 3 children versus nulliparity, adjusted for age at diagnosis and stage: OR 4.31 (95% CI 1.12-19.69)]. A similar result was seen in the expansion cohort. Parity status had no impact on expression of PGRMC1, relaxin-2 and TGFβ1. No associations were seen with tumor stage or survival. CONCLUSION Tumors from parous women with HGSC expressed PR more often than tumors from nulliparous women, indicating that pregnancies might possibly have a long-lasting impact on ovarian cancer development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Camilla Sköld
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
| | - Sara Corvigno
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Hanna Dahlstrand
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Gunilla Enblad
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | | | | | - Karin Stålberg
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Anna Tolf
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Ingrid Glimelius
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Anthoula Koliadi
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Wu CH, Fu HC, Ou YC, Chuang IC, Lan J, Yang MY, Lin H. How Progesterone Receptor Expression Impacts Platinum Sensitivity in Ovarian Clear Cell Carcinoma: Insights from Clinical and Experimental Perspectives. Int J Mol Sci 2024; 25:7942. [PMID: 39063185 PMCID: PMC11276830 DOI: 10.3390/ijms25147942] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2024] [Revised: 07/14/2024] [Accepted: 07/16/2024] [Indexed: 07/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC) is often considered a relatively platinum-resistant malignancy. The aim of this study was to explore the influence of progesterone receptor (PR) expression levels on platinum sensitivity and survival outcomes in people with OCCC. A retrospective analysis was conducted with 80 people with OCCC who underwent surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. PR expression was assessed via immunohistochemical (IHC) staining and quantified using the H score. The platinum sensitivity and survival outcomes of patients with weak and strong PR expression were compared. Additionally, cisplatin viability and migration experiments were conducted with OCCC cell lines (ES-2 and TOV-21G) with varying PR isoform expressions. Among the 80 patients, 62 were classified as having platinum-sensitive disease, while 18 had platinum-resistant disease. The mean total PR H- score of platinum-sensitive tumors was significantly higher than that of platinum-resistant tumors (p = 0.002). Although no significant differences in progression-free and overall survival were observed between patients with high and low PR expression, those with high PR expression tended to have longer survival. While PR protein was only weakly detectable in ES-2 and TOV-21G cells, a transfection of the PR-A or PR-B gene resulted in a strong expression of PR-A or PR-B, which led to significantly reduced proliferation and migration in ES-2 and TOV-21G cells. Furthermore, overexpression of PR-A or PR-B enhanced cisplatin cytotoxicity in these cell lines. In conclusion, strong PR expression was associated with improved platinum sensitivity and survival outcomes, consistent with our experimental findings. The potential of PR as a tumor sensitizer to cisplatin in OCCC warrants further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chen-Hsuan Wu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung 833, Taiwan; (C.-H.W.); (H.-C.F.); (Y.-C.O.)
- Graduate Institute of Clinical Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan;
| | - Hung-Chun Fu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung 833, Taiwan; (C.-H.W.); (H.-C.F.); (Y.-C.O.)
- Graduate Institute of Clinical Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan;
| | - Yu-Che Ou
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung 833, Taiwan; (C.-H.W.); (H.-C.F.); (Y.-C.O.)
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chia-Yi Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi 613, Taiwan
| | - I-Chieh Chuang
- Department of Anatomic Pathology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung 883, Taiwan; (I.-C.C.); (J.L.)
| | - Jui Lan
- Department of Anatomic Pathology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung 883, Taiwan; (I.-C.C.); (J.L.)
| | - Ming-Yu Yang
- Graduate Institute of Clinical Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan;
- Department of Otolaryngology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung 883, Taiwan
| | - Hao Lin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung 833, Taiwan; (C.-H.W.); (H.-C.F.); (Y.-C.O.)
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Aubert M, Mathiot L, Vegas H, Ouldamer L, Linassier C, Augereau P, Bocquet F, Frenel JS, Cancel M. Endocrine therapy in advanced high-grade ovarian cancer: real-life data from a multicenter study and a review of the literature. Oncologist 2024; 29:e910-e917. [PMID: 38768082 PMCID: PMC11224998 DOI: 10.1093/oncolo/oyae093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2023] [Accepted: 04/08/2024] [Indexed: 05/22/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In women, ovarian cancer is the eighth most frequent cancer in incidence and mortality. It is often diagnosed at advanced stages; relapses are frequent, with a poor prognosis. When platinum resistant, subsequent lines of chemotherapy are of limited effect and often poorly tolerated, leading to quality of life deterioration. Various studies suggest a hormonal role in ovarian carcinogenesis, with a rationale for endocrine therapy in these cancers. PATIENTS AND METHODS This multicenter, retrospective study assessed the use of endocrine treatment for high-grade ovarian epithelial carcinomas treated between 2010 and 2020. RESULTS Eighty-one patients with ovarian cancers were included. The median duration of platinum sensitivity was 29 months. We observed a 35% disease control rate with endocrine therapy, and 10% reported symptom improvement. For 19 patients (23.5%), the disease was stabilized for more than 6 months. Median overall survival from diagnosis was 62.6 months. Regarding endocrine therapy predictive factors of response, in a multivariate analysis, 3 factors were statistically significant in favoring progression-free survival: platinum sensitivity (P = .021), an R0 surgical resection (P = .020), and the indication for hormone therapy being maintenance therapy (P = .002). CONCLUSION This study shows real-life data on endocrine therapy in ovarian cancer. As it is a low-cost treatment with many advantages such as its oral administration and its safety, it may be an option to consider. A perspective lies in the search for cofactors to aim as future therapeutic targets to improve the effectiveness of hormone treatment by means of combination therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marine Aubert
- Department of Medical Oncology, CHU Bretonneau Tours, Tours, France
| | - Laurent Mathiot
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest, Site René Gauducheau, Saint Herblain, France
| | - Hélène Vegas
- Department of Medical Oncology, CHU Bretonneau Tours, Tours, France
| | - Lobna Ouldamer
- Department of Gynecology, CHU Bretonneau Tours, Tours, France
| | - Claude Linassier
- Department of Medical Oncology, CHU Bretonneau Tours, Tours, France
| | - Paule Augereau
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest, Site Paul Papin, Angers, France
| | - François Bocquet
- Data Factory and Analytics, Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest, Site René Gauducheau, Saint Herblain, France
| | - Jean-Sébastien Frenel
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest, Site René Gauducheau, Saint Herblain, France
| | - Mathilde Cancel
- Department of Medical Oncology, CHU Bretonneau Tours, Tours, France
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Li Y, Zhong X, Yang F. Silencing HE4 alleviates the renal fibrosis in lupus nephritis mice by regulating the C3/MMPs/prss axis. NAUNYN-SCHMIEDEBERG'S ARCHIVES OF PHARMACOLOGY 2024; 397:4823-4831. [PMID: 38157023 PMCID: PMC11166803 DOI: 10.1007/s00210-023-02883-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2023] [Accepted: 11/30/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024]
Abstract
To explore the regulatory effect of human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) on renal fibrosis in mice with lupus nephritis (LN) and the underlying mechanism. Ten-week old MRL/LPR mice were injected with HE4 shRNA adenovirus vector through the renal pelvis for 5 days. Renal tissues were extracted for HE and Masson staining to evaluate pathological changes and fibrosis in lupus nephritis mice. The level of urine protein was measured using a biochemical analyzer, while the expression level of HE4 and p-NF-κB p65 in renal tissues was visualized using an immunofluorescence assay. The level of β2-microglobulin (β2-MG), neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), and kidney injury molecule 1 (Kim-1) was determined by the immunohistochemical assay. Western blotting was used to determine the levels of C3, HE4, matrix metalloproteinase-2 (MMP2), MMP9, p-p65, prss23, and prss35 in renal tissues. Compared to wild-type C57BL/6 mice, MRL/LPR mice showed a marked increase in the number of glomeruli, hyperplasic basement membrane, severe infiltration of inflammatory cells in renal tubules and glomeruli, obvious necrosis in glomeruli, elevated fibrosis levels, and increased levels of urine protein, β2-MG, NGAL, Kim-1, C3, HE4, MMP2, MMP9, and p-p65; and decreased levels of prss23 and prss35 were observed in MRL/LPR mice. After the administration of the HE4 shRNA adenovirus vector, the repaired structure of renal tubules and glomeruli improved infiltration of inflammatory cells, reduced collagen fiber and urine protein, suppressed levels of C3, HE4, MMP2, MMP9, and p-P65, and facilitated the expression of prss23 and prss35 which were observed. Silencing HE4 improved renal fibrosis and inhibited inflammation in mice with lupus nephritis, which may play a role in inhibiting C3/MMPs and promoting prss-related protein expression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yixia Li
- Department of Nephrology, Affiliated Fuzhou First Hospital of Fujian Medical University, No.190, Dadao Road, Taijiang District, Fuzhou City, Fujian, 350004, China
| | - Xiaorong Zhong
- Department of Nephrology, Affiliated Fuzhou First Hospital of Fujian Medical University, No.190, Dadao Road, Taijiang District, Fuzhou City, Fujian, 350004, China
| | - Feng Yang
- Department of Nephrology, Affiliated Fuzhou First Hospital of Fujian Medical University, No.190, Dadao Road, Taijiang District, Fuzhou City, Fujian, 350004, China.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Steinbuch SC, Lüß AM, Eltrop S, Götte M, Kiesel L. Endometriosis-Associated Ovarian Cancer: From Molecular Pathologies to Clinical Relevance. Int J Mol Sci 2024; 25:4306. [PMID: 38673891 PMCID: PMC11050613 DOI: 10.3390/ijms25084306] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2024] [Revised: 04/08/2024] [Accepted: 04/11/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Endometriosis is a chronic condition affecting reproductive-aged women, characterized by the growth of ectopic endometrial tissue. Despite being benign, endometriosis is associated with an increased risk of certain cancers, including endometriosis-associated ovarian cancer (EAOC). Ovarian cancer is rare, but more common in women with endometriosis, particularly endometrioid and clear-cell carcinomas. Factors such as hormonal imbalance, reproductive history, environmental exposures, and genetic predisposition contribute to the malignant transformation of endometriosis. Thus, understanding potential risk factors causing malignancy is crucial. Over the past few decades, various genetic mutations, microRNAs, as well as tumor microenvironmental factors have been identified, impacting pathways like PI3K/AKT/mTOR, DNA repair mechanisms, oxidative stress, and inflammation. Thus, this review aims to summarize molecular studies involved in EAOC pathogenesis as potential therapeutic targets. However, further research is needed to better understand the molecular and environmental factors driving EAOC development, to target the susceptibility of endometriotic lesions to malignant progression, and to identify effective therapeutic strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie Charlotte Steinbuch
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149 Münster, Germany
| | - Anne-Marie Lüß
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149 Münster, Germany
| | - Stephanie Eltrop
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149 Münster, Germany
| | - Martin Götte
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149 Münster, Germany
- Cells-in-Motion Interfaculty Centre (CiMIC), University of Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany
| | - Ludwig Kiesel
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149 Münster, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Peterson M, Kolin DL, Konstantinopoulos PA. Case report: Response to everolimus in a patient with platinum resistant, high grade serous ovarian carcinoma with biallelic TSC2 inactivation. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1357980. [PMID: 38601768 PMCID: PMC11004469 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1357980] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2023] [Accepted: 03/15/2024] [Indexed: 04/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Patients with platinum-resistant recurrent high grade serous ovarian carcinoma have poor outcomes and limited treatment options. Case presentation We present a case of a 48-year-old woman with platinum-resistant high grade serous ovarian carcinoma harboring the pathogenic TSC2 R611Q variant with concomitant single copy loss of TSC2 (suggesting biallelic TSC2 inactivation) identified in targeted tumor sequencing. The patient was treated with the mTOR inhibitor everolimus, with an excellent response by imaging and a marked decrease in CA125; she remained on everolimus for 19 months until she developed progressive disease. Conclusions While mTOR inhibition is frequently used in tumors associated with tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC), such as lymphangioleiomyomatosis and malignant perivascular epithelioid cell tumors, this is the first case of a patient with ovarian cancer harboring TSC1/2 mutations who responded to mTOR inhibition. This case highlights the utility of targeted DNA sequencing in the management of ovarian carcinoma and demonstrates the value of tumor-agnostic targeted therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariko Peterson
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - David L. Kolin
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Petiot F, Descargues P, Devouassoux-Shisheboran M, You B, Rousset-Jablonski C, Raffin D, Hajri T, Gertych W, Glehen O, Philip CA, Lamblin G, Golfier F, Bolze PA. Retrospective analysis of uterine involvement in low grade serous ovarian carcinoma. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2024; 294:191-197. [PMID: 38295707 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.01.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2023] [Revised: 12/20/2023] [Accepted: 01/03/2024] [Indexed: 02/21/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Low grade serous ovarian carcinoma (LGSOC) accounts for 2.5% of all ovarian carcinoma more affects younger women than high grade serous ovarian carcinoma. Hysterectomy is performed routinely for LGSOC treatment, but fertility sparring surgery (FSS) is feasible for some early stages. Currently, there is no study about uterine involvement in LGSOC. We evaluate uterine involvement in LGSOC patients and aim to identify pre-operative predictive factors. METHODS Retrospective observational study of LGSOC patients treated between January 2000 and May 2022 in the Hospices Civils de Lyon. All cases were viewed, reviewed or approved by an expert pathologist. RESULTS Among 535 serous ovarian carcinomas, 26 were included. Most patients (73 %) had FIGO III disease. Median OS was 115 months and median PFS was 42 months. Uterine involvement was found in 58 % patients who underwent hysterectomy (14/24), serosal involvement was the most frequent type of involvement (n = 13, 54 %). Myometrial involvement was found in 8 patients (33 %) and was associated with serosal involvement (7/8). Among patients with a macroscopic disease-free uterus during exploratory laparoscopy, 31 % had a microscopic serosal involvement. None patient with presumed early stage (FIGO I) were upstaged due to uterine involvement (serosal or myometrial). In patients with stage FIGO IIII, 72 % of uterine involvement were found. Univariate analysis did not show any predictive factor of myometrial involvement. There was no difference on OS nor PFS between patients with or without myometrial involvement. CONCLUSIONS In early stages LGSOC, FSS may be considered for selected patients. In advanced stages, hysterectomy should be performed routinely, since no predictive factor for uterine involvement were identified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florian Petiot
- Université Lyon 1, CHU Lyon Sud, Department of Gynaecological Surgery and Oncology, Obstetrics, Pierre Bénite, France.
| | - Pierre Descargues
- Université Lyon 1, CHU Lyon Sud, Department of Gynaecological Surgery and Oncology, Obstetrics, Pierre Bénite, France
| | | | - Benoit You
- Université Lyon 1, CHU Lyon Sud, Department of Medical Oncology, Pierre Bénite, France
| | - Christine Rousset-Jablonski
- INSERM U1290 RESearch on HealthcAre PErformance (RESHAPE), Université Lyon 1, CHU Lyon Sud, Department of Gynaecological Surgery and Oncology, Obstetrics, Pierre Bénite, France; Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - Delphine Raffin
- Université Lyon 1, CHU Lyon Sud, Department of Gynaecological Surgery and Oncology, Obstetrics, Pierre Bénite, France
| | - Touria Hajri
- French Trophoblastic Disease Reference Center, CHU Lyon Sud, Pierre Bénite, France
| | - Witold Gertych
- Université Lyon 1, CHU Lyon Sud, Department of Gynaecological Surgery and Oncology, Obstetrics, Pierre Bénite, France
| | - Olivier Glehen
- Université Lyon 1, CHU Lyon Sud, Department of Digestive Surgery, Pierre Bénite, France
| | - Charles-André Philip
- Université Lyon 1, CHU Croix-Rousse, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lyon, France
| | - Géry Lamblin
- Université Lyon 1, Hôpital Femme Mère Enfant, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Bron, France
| | - François Golfier
- Université Lyon 1, CHU Lyon Sud, Department of Gynaecological Surgery and Oncology, Obstetrics, Pierre Bénite, France
| | - Pierre-Adrien Bolze
- Université Lyon 1, CHU Lyon Sud, Department of Gynaecological Surgery and Oncology, Obstetrics, Pierre Bénite, France
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Tavares V, Marques IS, Melo IGD, Assis J, Pereira D, Medeiros R. Paradigm Shift: A Comprehensive Review of Ovarian Cancer Management in an Era of Advancements. Int J Mol Sci 2024; 25:1845. [PMID: 38339123 PMCID: PMC10856127 DOI: 10.3390/ijms25031845] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2023] [Revised: 01/30/2024] [Accepted: 02/02/2024] [Indexed: 02/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Ovarian cancer (OC) is the female genital malignancy with the highest lethality. Patients present a poor prognosis mainly due to the late clinical presentation allied with the common acquisition of chemoresistance and a high rate of tumour recurrence. Effective screening, accurate diagnosis, and personalised multidisciplinary treatments are crucial for improving patients' survival and quality of life. This comprehensive narrative review aims to describe the current knowledge on the aetiology, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of OC, highlighting the latest significant advancements and future directions. Traditionally, OC treatment involves the combination of cytoreductive surgery and platinum-based chemotherapy. Although more therapeutical approaches have been developed, the lack of established predictive biomarkers to guide disease management has led to only marginal improvements in progression-free survival (PFS) while patients face an increasing level of toxicity. Fortunately, because of a better overall understanding of ovarian tumourigenesis and advancements in the disease's (epi)genetic and molecular profiling, a paradigm shift has emerged with the identification of new disease biomarkers and the proposal of targeted therapeutic approaches to postpone disease recurrence and decrease side effects, while increasing patients' survival. Despite this progress, several challenges in disease management, including disease heterogeneity and drug resistance, still need to be overcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valéria Tavares
- Molecular Oncology and Viral Pathology Group, Research Center of IPO Porto (CI-IPOP), Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Department, Clinical Pathology SV/RISE@CI-IPOP (Health Research Network), Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto), Porto Comprehensive Cancer Centre (Porto.CCC), 4200-072 Porto, Portugal
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, 4200-072 Porto, Portugal
- ICBAS-Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas Abel Salazar, University of Porto, 4050-313 Porto, Portugal
| | - Inês Soares Marques
- Molecular Oncology and Viral Pathology Group, Research Center of IPO Porto (CI-IPOP), Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Department, Clinical Pathology SV/RISE@CI-IPOP (Health Research Network), Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto), Porto Comprehensive Cancer Centre (Porto.CCC), 4200-072 Porto, Portugal
- Faculty of Sciences, University of Porto, 4169-007 Porto, Portugal
| | - Inês Guerra de Melo
- Molecular Oncology and Viral Pathology Group, Research Center of IPO Porto (CI-IPOP), Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Department, Clinical Pathology SV/RISE@CI-IPOP (Health Research Network), Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto), Porto Comprehensive Cancer Centre (Porto.CCC), 4200-072 Porto, Portugal
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, 4200-072 Porto, Portugal
| | - Joana Assis
- Clinical Research Unit, Research Center of IPO Porto (CI-IPOP), RISE@CI-IPOP (Health Research Network), Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto), Porto Comprehensive Cancer Center (Porto.CCC), 4200-072 Porto, Portugal
| | - Deolinda Pereira
- Oncology Department, Portuguese Institute of Oncology of Porto (IPOP), 4200-072 Porto, Portugal
| | - Rui Medeiros
- Molecular Oncology and Viral Pathology Group, Research Center of IPO Porto (CI-IPOP), Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Department, Clinical Pathology SV/RISE@CI-IPOP (Health Research Network), Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto), Porto Comprehensive Cancer Centre (Porto.CCC), 4200-072 Porto, Portugal
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, 4200-072 Porto, Portugal
- ICBAS-Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas Abel Salazar, University of Porto, 4050-313 Porto, Portugal
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Fernando Pessoa University, 4200-150 Porto, Portugal
- Research Department, Portuguese League Against Cancer (NRNorte), 4200-172 Porto, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Al-Aloosi M, Prechtl AM, Chatterjee P, Bernard B, Kemp CJ, Rosati R, Diaz RL, Appleyard LR, Pereira S, Rajewski A, McDonald A, Gordon EJ, Grandori C. Case report: ex vivo tumor organoid drug testing identifies therapeutic options for stage IV ovarian carcinoma. Front Oncol 2024; 13:1267650. [PMID: 38239650 PMCID: PMC10794297 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1267650] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2023] [Accepted: 11/30/2023] [Indexed: 01/22/2024] Open
Abstract
Patients presenting with stage 4 ovarian carcinoma, including low-grade serous disease, have a poor prognosis. Although platinum-based therapies can offer some response, these therapies are associated with many side effects, and treatment resistance often develops. Toxic side effects along with disease progression render patients unable to receive additional lines of treatment and limit their options to hospice or palliative care. In this case report, we describe a patient with an unusual case of metastatic low-grade serous ovarian cancer with some features of high-grade disease who had received four previous lines of treatment and was suffering from atelectasis, pulmonary embolism, and hydronephrosis. A CLIA-certified drug sensitivity assay of an organoid culture derived from the patient's tumor (PARIS® test) identified several therapeutic options, including the combination of fulvestrant with everolimus. On this treatment regimen, the patient experienced 7 months of stable disease and survived nearly 11 months before succumbing to her disease. This case emphasizes the clinical utility of ex vivo drug testing as a new functional precision medicine approach to identify, in real-time, personalized treatment options for patients, especially those who are not benefiting from standard of care treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Brady Bernard
- SEngine Precision Medicine, Seattle, WA, United States
- Earle A. Chiles Research Institute, Providence Cancer Institute, Portland, OR, United States
| | - Christopher J. Kemp
- Division of Human Biology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, United States
| | | | | | | | | | - Alex Rajewski
- SEngine Precision Medicine, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Amber McDonald
- Private Health Management, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Eva J. Gordon
- Private Health Management, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Beddows I, Fan H, Heinze K, Johnson BK, Leonova A, Senz J, Djirackor S, Cho KR, Pearce CL, Huntsman DG, Anglesio MS, Shen H. Cell State of Origin Impacts Development of Distinct Endometriosis-Related Ovarian Carcinoma Histotypes. Cancer Res 2024; 84:26-38. [PMID: 37874327 PMCID: PMC10758692 DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-23-1362] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2023] [Revised: 09/01/2023] [Accepted: 10/20/2023] [Indexed: 10/25/2023]
Abstract
Clear cell ovarian carcinoma (CCOC) and endometrioid ovarian carcinoma (ENOC) are ovarian carcinoma histotypes, which are both thought to arise from ectopic endometrial (or endometrial-like) cells through an endometriosis intermediate. How the same cell type of origin gives rise to two morphologically and biologically different histotypes has been perplexing, particularly given that recurrent genetic mutations are common to both and present in nonmalignant precursors. We used RNA transcription analysis to show that the expression profiles of CCOC and ENOC resemble those of normal endometrium at secretory and proliferative phases of the menstrual cycle, respectively. DNA methylation at the promoter of the estrogen receptor (ER) gene (ESR1) was enriched in CCOC, which could potentially lock the cells in the secretory state. Compared with normal secretory-type endometrium, CCOC was further defined by increased expression of cysteine and glutathione synthesis pathway genes and downregulation of the iron antiporter, suggesting iron addiction and highlighting ferroptosis as a potential therapeutic target. Overall, these findings suggest that while CCOC and ENOC arise from the same cell type, these histotypes likely originate from different cell states. This "cell state of origin" model may help to explain the presence of histologic and molecular cancer subtypes arising in other organs. SIGNIFICANCE Two cancer histotypes diverge from a common cell of origin epigenetically locked in different cell states, highlighting the importance of considering cell state to better understand the cell of origin of cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ian Beddows
- Department of Epigenetics, Van Andel Institute, Grand Rapids, Michigan
| | - Huihui Fan
- Department of Epigenetics, Van Andel Institute, Grand Rapids, Michigan
| | - Karolin Heinze
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | - Anna Leonova
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Janine Senz
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | - Kathleen R. Cho
- Department of Pathology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Celeste Leigh Pearce
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - David G. Huntsman
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Michael S. Anglesio
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Hui Shen
- Department of Epigenetics, Van Andel Institute, Grand Rapids, Michigan
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Pedernera E, Morales-Vásquez F, Gómora MJ, Almaraz MA, Mena E, Pérez-Montiel D, Rendon E, López-Basave H, Maldonado-Cubas J, Méndez C. 17β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 improves survival in serous epithelial ovarian tumors. Endocr Connect 2023; 12:e230315. [PMID: 37924640 PMCID: PMC10762561 DOI: 10.1530/ec-23-0315] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2023] [Accepted: 10/26/2023] [Indexed: 11/06/2023]
Abstract
The incidence of ovarian cancer has been epidemiologically related to female reproductive events and hormone replacement therapy after menopause. This highlights the importance of evaluating the role of sexual steroid hormones in ovarian cancer by the expression of enzymes related to steroid hormone biosynthesis in the tumor cells. This study was aimed to evaluate the presence of 17β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 (17β-HSD1), aromatase and estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) in the tumor cells and their association with the overall survival in 111 patients diagnosed with primary ovarian tumors. Positive immunoreactivity for 17β-HSD1 was observed in 74% of the tumors. In the same samples, aromatase and ERα revealed 66% and 47% positivity, respectively. No association was observed of 17β-HSD1 expression with the histological subtypes and clinical stages of the tumor. The overall survival of patients was improved in 17β-HSD1-positive group in Kaplan-Meier analysis (P = 0.028), and 17β-HSD1 expression had a protective effect from multivariate proportional regression evaluation (HR = 0.44; 95% CI 0.24-0.9; P = 0.040). The improved survival was observed in serous epithelial tumors but not in nonserous ovarian tumors. The expression of 17β-HSD1 in the cells of the serous epithelial ovarian tumors was associated with an improved overall survival, whereas aromatase and ERα were not related to a better survival. The evaluation of hazard risk factors demonstrated that age and clinical stage showed worse prognosis, and 17β-HSD1 expression displayed a protective effect with a better survival outcome in patients of epithelial ovarian tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Enrique Pedernera
- Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Facultad de Medicina, Departamento de Embriología y Genética, Ciudad de México, México
| | | | - María J Gómora
- Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Facultad de Medicina, Departamento de Embriología y Genética, Ciudad de México, México
| | - Miguel A Almaraz
- Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Facultad de Medicina, Departamento de Embriología y Genética, Ciudad de México, México
| | - Esteban Mena
- Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Facultad de Medicina, Secretaría General, Ciudad de México, México
- Universidad La Salle, Posgrado de la Facultad de Ciencias Químicas, Ciudad de México, México
| | | | - Elizabeth Rendon
- Hospital Militar de Especialidades de la Mujer y Neonatología. Ciudad de México, México
| | | | - Juan Maldonado-Cubas
- Universidad La Salle, Posgrado de la Facultad de Ciencias Químicas, Ciudad de México, México
| | - Carmen Méndez
- Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Facultad de Medicina, Departamento de Embriología y Genética, Ciudad de México, México
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Boscaro C, Ramaschi GE, Trevisi L, Cignarella A, Bolego C. MiR-206 inhibits estrogen signaling and ovarian cancer cell migration without affecting GPER. Life Sci 2023; 333:122135. [PMID: 37778413 DOI: 10.1016/j.lfs.2023.122135] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2023] [Revised: 09/27/2023] [Accepted: 09/28/2023] [Indexed: 10/03/2023]
Abstract
AIMS Estrogen-regulated pathways are involved in the etiology and progression of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), but the relative contribution of estrogen receptor isoforms is unclear. Only a subset of patients responds to antiestrogens including tamoxifen. Based on our previous evidence that miR-206 behaves as an oncosuppressor in EOC, we hypothesized that miR-206 would interfere with G protein-coupled estrogen receptor (GPER)-mediated signaling and cell motility. MAIN METHODS PFKFB3 and FAK proteins from OC cells challenged with selective estrogen receptor agonist and antagonist were measured by Western blotting. Cell proliferation and motility were analyzed by MTT and Boyden chamber, respectively. Estrogen-dependent cells were transfected with miR-206 mimic or control using Lipofectamine. KEY FINDINGS The migration of SKOV3 and OVCAR5 cells significantly increased following treatment with 17β-estradiol (E2) and the selective GPER agonist G1. However, tamoxifen failed to inhibit E2 effect and even promoted SKOV3 cell migration. Estrogen receptor ligands did not affect SKOV3 proliferation. The GPER antagonist G15 significantly prevented E2-mediated upregulation of PFKFB3 expression, while G1 concentration-dependently upregulated PFKFB3 levels. Consistent with the functional link between PFKFB3 and FAK activation, E2 and G1 increased FAK phosphorylation at Tyr397. Transfection with miR-206 abolished estrogen-induced EOC migration and down-regulated PFKFB3 protein levels. Notably, miR-206 transfection reduced ERα protein abundance, whereas GPER amount was unchanged. SIGNIFICANCE By blocking estrogen signaling and G1-induced EOC cell invasiveness with no direct interference with GPER levels, miR-206 mimics have the potential to act as pathway-selective antagonists and deserve further testing as RNA therapeutics in estrogen-dependent EOC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Lucia Trevisi
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, University of Padova, Italy
| | | | - Chiara Bolego
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, University of Padova, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Saner FAM, Takahashi K, Budden T, Pandey A, Ariyaratne D, Zwimpfer TA, Meagher NS, Fereday S, Twomey L, Pishas KI, Hoang T, Bolithon A, Traficante N, Alsop K, Christie EL, Kang EY, Nelson GS, Ghatage P, Lee CH, Riggan MJ, Alsop J, Beckmann MW, Boros J, Brand AH, Brooks-Wilson A, Carney ME, Coulson P, Courtney-Brooks M, Cushing-Haugen KL, Cybulski C, El-Bahrawy MA, Elishaev E, Erber R, Gayther SA, Gentry-Maharaj A, Blake Gilks C, Harnett PR, Harris HR, Hartmann A, Hein A, Hendley J, Hernandez BY, Jakubowska A, Jimenez-Linan M, Jones ME, Kaufmann SH, Kennedy CJ, Kluz T, Koziak JM, Kristjansdottir B, Le ND, Lener M, Lester J, Lubiński J, Mateoiu C, Orsulic S, Ruebner M, Schoemaker MJ, Shah M, Sharma R, Sherman ME, Shvetsov YB, Singh N, Rinda Soong T, Steed H, Sukumvanich P, Talhouk A, Taylor SE, Vierkant RA, Wang C, Widschwendter M, Wilkens LR, Winham SJ, Anglesio MS, Berchuck A, Brenton JD, Campbell I, Cook LS, Doherty JA, Fasching PA, Fortner RT, Goodman MT, Gronwald J, Huntsman DG, Karlan BY, Kelemen LE, Menon U, Modugno F, Pharoah PD, Schildkraut JM, Sundfeldt K, Swerdlow AJ, Goode EL, DeFazio A, Köbel M, Ramus SJ, Bowtell DDL, Garsed DW. Concurrent RB1 loss and BRCA-deficiency predicts enhanced immunological response and long-term survival in tubo-ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma. MEDRXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES 2023:2023.11.09.23298321. [PMID: 37986741 PMCID: PMC10659507 DOI: 10.1101/2023.11.09.23298321] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2023]
Abstract
Background Somatic loss of the tumour suppressor RB1 is a common event in tubo-ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC), which frequently co-occurs with alterations in homologous recombination DNA repair genes including BRCA1 and BRCA2 (BRCA). We examined whether tumour expression of RB1 was associated with survival across ovarian cancer histotypes (HGSC, endometrioid (ENOC), clear cell (CCOC), mucinous (MOC), low-grade serous carcinoma (LGSC)), and how co-occurrence of germline BRCA pathogenic variants and RB1 loss influences long-term survival in a large series of HGSC. Patients and methods RB1 protein expression patterns were classified by immunohistochemistry in epithelial ovarian carcinomas of 7436 patients from 20 studies participating in the Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis consortium and assessed for associations with overall survival (OS), accounting for patient age at diagnosis and FIGO stage. We examined RB1 expression and germline BRCA status in a subset of 1134 HGSC, and related genotype to survival, tumour infiltrating CD8+ lymphocyte counts and transcriptomic subtypes. Using CRISPR-Cas9, we deleted RB1 in HGSC cell lines with and without BRCA1 mutations to model co-loss with treatment response. We also performed genomic analyses on 126 primary HGSC to explore the molecular characteristics of concurrent homologous recombination deficiency and RB1 loss. Results RB1 protein loss was most frequent in HGSC (16.4%) and was highly correlated with RB1 mRNA expression. RB1 loss was associated with longer OS in HGSC (hazard ratio [HR] 0.74, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.66-0.83, P = 6.8 ×10-7), but with poorer prognosis in ENOC (HR 2.17, 95% CI 1.17-4.03, P = 0.0140). Germline BRCA mutations and RB1 loss co-occurred in HGSC (P < 0.0001). Patients with both RB1 loss and germline BRCA mutations had a superior OS (HR 0.38, 95% CI 0.25-0.58, P = 5.2 ×10-6) compared to patients with either alteration alone, and their median OS was three times longer than non-carriers whose tumours retained RB1 expression (9.3 years vs. 3.1 years). Enhanced sensitivity to cisplatin (P < 0.01) and paclitaxel (P < 0.05) was seen in BRCA1 mutated cell lines with RB1 knockout. Among 126 patients with whole-genome and transcriptome sequence data, combined RB1 loss and genomic evidence of homologous recombination deficiency was correlated with transcriptional markers of enhanced interferon response, cell cycle deregulation, and reduced epithelial-mesenchymal transition in primary HGSC. CD8+ lymphocytes were most prevalent in BRCA-deficient HGSC with co-loss of RB1. Conclusions Co-occurrence of RB1 loss and BRCA mutation was associated with exceptionally long survival in patients with HGSC, potentially due to better treatment response and immune stimulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Flurina A. M. Saner
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Kazuaki Takahashi
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Timothy Budden
- School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine and Health, University of NSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Skin Cancer and Ageing Lab, Cancer Research United Kingdom Manchester Institute, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Ahwan Pandey
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | | | - Nicola S. Meagher
- School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine and Health, University of NSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Sian Fereday
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Laura Twomey
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Kathleen I. Pishas
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Therese Hoang
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Adelyn Bolithon
- School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine and Health, University of NSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Adult Cancer Program, Lowy Cancer Research Centre, University of NSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Nadia Traficante
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Kathryn Alsop
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Elizabeth L. Christie
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Eun-Young Kang
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Foothills Medical Center, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Gregg S. Nelson
- Department of Oncology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Prafull Ghatage
- Department of Oncology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Cheng-Han Lee
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Marjorie J. Riggan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Jennifer Alsop
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Matthias W. Beckmann
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Jessica Boros
- Centre for Cancer Research, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Alison H. Brand
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | - Michael E. Carney
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI, USA
| | - Penny Coulson
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Madeleine Courtney-Brooks
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Kara L. Cushing-Haugen
- Program in Epidemiology, Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Cezary Cybulski
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Mona A. El-Bahrawy
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK
| | - Esther Elishaev
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Ramona Erber
- Institute of Pathology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Simon A. Gayther
- Center for Bioinformatics and Functional Genomics and the Cedars Sinai Genomics Core, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Aleksandra Gentry-Maharaj
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College London, London, UK
- Department of Women’s Cancer, Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women’s Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - C. Blake Gilks
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Paul R. Harnett
- The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Holly R. Harris
- Program in Epidemiology, Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Arndt Hartmann
- Institute of Pathology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Alexander Hein
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Joy Hendley
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - AOCS Group
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | | | - Anna Jakubowska
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
- Independent Laboratory of Molecular Biology and Genetic Diagnostics, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | | | - Michael E. Jones
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Scott H. Kaufmann
- Division of Oncology Research, Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Catherine J. Kennedy
- Centre for Cancer Research, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Tomasz Kluz
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Gynecology Oncology and Obstetrics, Institute of Medical Sciences, Medical College of Rzeszow University, Rzeszów, Poland
| | | | - Björg Kristjansdottir
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Center for Cancer Research, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Nhu D. Le
- Cancer Control Research, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Marcin Lener
- International Hereditary Cancer Center, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Jenny Lester
- David Geffen School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Jan Lubiński
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | | | - Sandra Orsulic
- David Geffen School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Matthias Ruebner
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Minouk J. Schoemaker
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Mitul Shah
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Raghwa Sharma
- Tissue Pathology and Diagnostic Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Mark E. Sherman
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | | | - Naveena Singh
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - T. Rinda Soong
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Helen Steed
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
- Section of Gynecologic Oncology Surgery, North Zone, Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Paniti Sukumvanich
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Aline Talhouk
- British Columbia’s Gynecological Cancer Research Team (OVCARE), University of British Columbia, BC Cancer, and Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Sarah E. Taylor
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Robert A. Vierkant
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Division of Clinical Trials and Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Chen Wang
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Division of Computational Biology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | | | - Stacey J. Winham
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Division of Computational Biology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Michael S. Anglesio
- British Columbia’s Gynecological Cancer Research Team (OVCARE), University of British Columbia, BC Cancer, and Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Andrew Berchuck
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - James D. Brenton
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Ian Campbell
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Linda S. Cook
- Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
- Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Jennifer A. Doherty
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Peter A. Fasching
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Renée T. Fortner
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Research, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
| | - Marc T. Goodman
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Cedars-Sinai Cancer, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Jacek Gronwald
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - David G. Huntsman
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- British Columbia’s Gynecological Cancer Research Team (OVCARE), University of British Columbia, BC Cancer, and Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Department of Molecular Oncology, BC Cancer Research Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Beth Y. Karlan
- David Geffen School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Linda E. Kelemen
- Division of Acute Disease Epidemiology, South Carolina Department of Health & Environmental Control, Columbia, SC, USA
| | - Usha Menon
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Francesmary Modugno
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Women’s Cancer Research Center, Magee-Womens Research Institute and Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Paul D.P. Pharoah
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Computational Biomedicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, West Hollywood, CA, USA
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Joellen M. Schildkraut
- Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Karin Sundfeldt
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Center for Cancer Research, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Anthony J. Swerdlow
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
- Division of Breast Cancer Research, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Ellen L. Goode
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Division of Epidemiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Anna DeFazio
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Centre for Cancer Research, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Martin Köbel
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Foothills Medical Center, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Susan J. Ramus
- School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine and Health, University of NSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Adult Cancer Program, Lowy Cancer Research Centre, University of NSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - David D. L. Bowtell
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Dale W. Garsed
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Mauro LJ, Spartz A, Austin JR, Lange CA. Reevaluating the Role of Progesterone in Ovarian Cancer: Is Progesterone Always Protective? Endocr Rev 2023; 44:1029-1046. [PMID: 37261958 PMCID: PMC11048595 DOI: 10.1210/endrev/bnad018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2022] [Revised: 05/04/2023] [Accepted: 05/31/2023] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Abstract
Ovarian cancer (OC) represents a collection of rare but lethal gynecologic cancers where the difficulty of early detection due to an often-subtle range of abdominal symptoms contributes to high fatality rates. With the exception of BRCA1/2 mutation carriers, OC most often manifests as a post-menopausal disease, a time in which the ovaries regress and circulating reproductive hormones diminish. Progesterone is thought to be a "protective" hormone that counters the proliferative actions of estrogen, as can be observed in the uterus or breast. Like other steroid hormone receptor family members, the transcriptional activity of the nuclear progesterone receptor (nPR) may be ligand dependent or independent and is fully integrated with other ubiquitous cell signaling pathways often altered in cancers. Emerging evidence in OC models challenges the singular protective role of progesterone/nPR. Herein, we integrate the historical perspective of progesterone on OC development and progression with exciting new research findings and critical interpretations to help paint a broader picture of the role of progesterone and nPR signaling in OC. We hope to alleviate some of the controversy around the role of progesterone and give insight into the importance of nPR actions in disease progression. A new perspective on the role of progesterone and nPR signaling integration will raise awareness to the complexity of nPRs and nPR-driven gene regulation in OC, help to reveal novel biomarkers, and lend critical knowledge for the development of better therapeutic strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura J Mauro
- Department of Animal Science-Physiology, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN 55108, USA
- Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
| | - Angela Spartz
- Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
| | - Julia R Austin
- Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
| | - Carol A Lange
- Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
- Departments of Medicine (Division of Hematology, Oncology & Transplantation) and Pharmacology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Köbel M, Yang RZ, Kang EY, Al-Shamma Z, Cook LS, Kinloch M, Carey MS, Hopkins L, Nelson GS, McManus KJ, Vizeacoumar FS, Vizeacoumar FJ, Freywald A, Fu Y, Reuss DE, Lee CH. Survey of NF1 inactivation by surrogate immunohistochemistry in ovarian carcinomas. Gynecol Oncol 2023; 178:80-88. [PMID: 37820398 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.09.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2023] [Revised: 09/26/2023] [Accepted: 09/29/2023] [Indexed: 10/13/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Inhibition of the MAPK pathway by MEK inhibitors (MEKi) is currently a therapeutic standard in several cancer types, including ovarian low-grade serous carcinoma (LGSC). A common MAPK pathway alteration in tubo-ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) is the genomic inactivation of neurofibromin 1 (NF1). The primary objectives of our study were to survey the prevalence of NF1 inactivation in the principal ovarian carcinoma histotype as well as to evaluate its associations with clinico-pathological parameters and key biomarkers including BRCA1/2 status in HGSC. METHODS A recently commercialized NF1 antibody (clone NFC) was orthogonally validated on an automated immunohistochemistry (IHC) platform and IHC was performed on tissue microarrays containing 2140 ovarian carcinoma cases. Expression was interpreted as loss/inactivated (complete or subclonal) versus normal/retained. RESULTS Loss of NF1 expression was detected in 250/1429 (17.4%) HGSC including 11% with subclonal loss. Survival of NF1-inactivated HGSC patients was intermediate between favorable BRCA1/2 mutated HGSC and unfavorable CCNE1 high-level amplified HGSC. NF1 inactivation was mutually exclusive with CCNE1 high-level amplifications, co-occurred with RB1 loss and occurred at similar frequencies in BRCA1/2 mutated versus wild-type HGSC. NF1 loss was found in 21/286 (7.3%) endometrioid carcinomas with a favorable prognostic association (p = 0.048), and in 4/64 (5.9%) LGSC, mutually exclusive with other driver events. CONCLUSIONS NF1 inactivation occurs in a significant subset of BRCA1/2 wild-type HGSC and a subset of LGSC. While the functional effects of NF1 inactivation need to be further characterized, this signifies a potential therapeutic opportunity to explore targeting NF1 inactivation in these tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Köbel
- Department of Pathology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
| | - Rui Zhe Yang
- Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Eun Young Kang
- Department of Pathology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Zainab Al-Shamma
- Department of Pathology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Linda S Cook
- Department of CSPH-Epidemiology, University of Colorado-Anschutz, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Mary Kinloch
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
| | - Mark S Carey
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Laura Hopkins
- Division of Oncology, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatchewan, Canada; Saskatchewan Cancer Agency, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
| | - Gregg S Nelson
- Department of Oncology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Kirk J McManus
- Department of Biochemistry & Medical Genetics, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada; Paul Albrechtsen Research Institute CancerCare, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Frederick S Vizeacoumar
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
| | - Franco J Vizeacoumar
- Division of Oncology, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatchewan, Canada; Saskatchewan Cancer Agency, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
| | - Andrew Freywald
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
| | - YangXin Fu
- Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - David E Reuss
- Department of Neuropathology, Institute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Clinical Cooperation Unit Neuropathology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), German Consortium for Translational Cancer Research (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Cheng-Han Lee
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Sun L, Ji WX, Li Y, Li ZL, Duan CC, Xia BR, Xiao L. The PAPSS1 gene is a modulator of response to cisplatin by regulating estrogen receptor alpha signaling activity in ovarian cancer cells. J Ovarian Res 2023; 16:187. [PMID: 37684671 PMCID: PMC10486135 DOI: 10.1186/s13048-023-01262-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2023] [Accepted: 08/16/2023] [Indexed: 09/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cancer cells may develop resistance to cisplatin by various mechanisms. Yet, the exact mechanism of cisplatin in ovarian cancer remains unclear. Recent studies have shown that 3'-phospoadenosine 5'-phosphosulfate synthase 1 (PAPSS1) inhibition combined with low-dose cisplatin increases DNA damage. The aim of this study was to determine the value of targeting PAPSS1 as a cisplatin modulator in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). RESULTS Increased expression of PAPSS1 was observed in both EOC cells and tissues. Also, its higher nuclear expression was distinctly associated with FIGO (The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics) stage, histological subtype, metastasis, and recurrence. Down-regulation of the PAPSS1 gene increased the cisplatin sensitivity of EOC in vitro and in vivo. Expression of PAPSS1 was negatively correlated with estrogen receptor α (ERα) in EOC. Also, low nuclear PAPSS1 and high nuclear ERα expression in EOC were associated with longer overall survival and progression-free survival in all ovarian cancer and ovarian cancer patients who received platinum-based chemotherapy. PAPSS1 silencing increased the activity of ERα-signaling in EOC cells, thus sensitizing tumors to cisplatin. CONCLUSIONS These findings characterize a novel interplay between PAPSS1-mediated sulfation and ERα-signaling in EOC cisplatin resistance. PAPSS1 may be exploited as a cisplatin-sensitizing therapeutic target.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lei Sun
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230020, Anhui, P. R. China
| | - Wei-Xue Ji
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230020, Anhui, P. R. China
| | - Yan Li
- Department of Pathology and Pathophysiology, School of Medicine, Jianghan University, Wuhan, 430056, Hubei, P. R. China
| | - Ze-Lian Li
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230020, Anhui, P. R. China
| | - Can-Can Duan
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230020, Anhui, P. R. China
| | - Bai-Rong Xia
- Department of Gynecology Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, 230031, Anhui, P. R. China.
| | - Lan Xiao
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230020, Anhui, P. R. China.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Craig O, Nigam A, Dall GV, Gorringe K. Rare Epithelial Ovarian Cancers: Low Grade Serous and Mucinous Carcinomas. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 2023; 13:a038190. [PMID: 37277207 PMCID: PMC10513165 DOI: 10.1101/cshperspect.a038190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
The ovarian epithelial cancer histotypes can be divided into common and rare types. Common types include high-grade serous ovarian carcinomas and the endometriosis-associated cancers, endometrioid and clear-cell carcinomas. The less common histotypes are mucinous and low-grade serous, each comprising less than 10% of all epithelial carcinomas. Although histologically and epidemiologically distinct from each other, these histotypes share some genetic and natural history features that distinguish them from the more common types. In this review, we will consider the similarities and differences of these rare histological types, and the clinical challenges they pose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olivia Craig
- Department of Laboratory Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia
- The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
| | - Abhimanyu Nigam
- Department of Laboratory Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia
- The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
| | | | - Kylie Gorringe
- Department of Laboratory Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia
- The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Grisham RN, Manning-Geist BL, Chui MH. The highs and lows of serous ovarian cancer. Cancer 2023; 129:2613-2620. [PMID: 37366225 PMCID: PMC10572736 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34903] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2023] [Revised: 05/16/2023] [Accepted: 05/18/2023] [Indexed: 06/28/2023]
Abstract
Low-grade serous ovarian cancer was initially described as a distinct type of rare epithelial ovarian cancer 20 years ago; however, only recently have physicians begun to leverage the understanding of the clinical behavior and molecular profile of this disease for treatment. The use of routine next-generation sequencing has allowed a deeper understanding of the molecular drivers of this disease and shown how molecular alterations in mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway genes such as KRAS and BRAF can affect overall prognosis and disease behavior. The use of targeted therapies, including MEK inhibitors, BRAF kinase inhibitors, and other investigational targeted therapies are changing the way this disease is viewed and treated. In addition, endocrine therapy can provide prolonged disease stability with generally mild toxicity, as well as promising response rates in recent studies examining combination therapy with CDK 4/6 inhibitors in the upfront and recurrent setting. Once seen merely as a chemo-resistant form of ovarian cancer, recent studies have worked to harness the unique features of low-grade serous ovarian cancer to provide individualized treatment options for patients with this disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel N Grisham
- Department of Medicine, Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Beryl L Manning-Geist
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - M Herman Chui
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Konstantinopoulos PA, Matulonis UA. Clinical and translational advances in ovarian cancer therapy. NATURE CANCER 2023; 4:1239-1257. [PMID: 37653142 DOI: 10.1038/s43018-023-00617-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 30.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2023] [Accepted: 07/17/2023] [Indexed: 09/02/2023]
Abstract
Ovarian cancer is an aggressive disease that is frequently detected at advanced stages and is initially very responsive to platinum-based chemotherapy. However, the majority of patients relapse following initial surgery and chemotherapy, highlighting the urgent need to develop new therapeutic strategies. In this Review, we outline the main therapeutic principles behind the management of newly diagnosed and recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer and discuss the current landscape of targeted and immune-based approaches.
Collapse
|
41
|
Heinze K, Cairns ES, Thornton S, Harris B, Milne K, Grube M, Meyer C, Karnezis AN, Fereday S, Garsed DW, Leung SC, Chiu DS, Moubarak M, Harter P, Heitz F, McAlpine JN, DeFazio A, Bowtell DD, Goode EL, Pike M, Ramus SJ, Pearce CL, Staebler A, Köbel M, Kommoss S, Talhouk A, Nelson BH, Anglesio MS. The Prognostic Effect of Immune Cell Infiltration Depends on Molecular Subtype in Endometrioid Ovarian Carcinomas. Clin Cancer Res 2023; 29:3471-3483. [PMID: 37339172 PMCID: PMC10472107 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-22-3815] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2023] [Revised: 04/14/2023] [Accepted: 06/14/2023] [Indexed: 06/22/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Endometrioid ovarian carcinoma (ENOC) is the second most-common type of ovarian carcinoma, comprising 10%-20% of cases. Recently, the study of ENOC has benefitted from comparisons to endometrial carcinomas including defining ENOC with four prognostic molecular subtypes. Each subtype suggests differential mechanisms of progression, although tumor-initiating events remain elusive. There is evidence that the ovarian microenvironment may be critical to early lesion establishment and progression. However, while immune infiltrates have been well studied in high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma, studies in ENOC are limited. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN We report on 210 ENOC, with clinical follow-up and molecular subtype annotation. Using multiplex IHC and immunofluorescence, we examine the prevalence of T-cell lineage, B-cell lineage, macrophages, and populations with programmed cell death protein 1 or programmed death-ligand 1 across subtypes of ENOC. RESULTS Immune cell infiltrates in tumor epithelium and stroma showed higher densities in ENOC subtypes with known high mutation burden (POLEmut and MMRd). While molecular subtypes were prognostically significant, immune infiltrates were not (overall survival P > 0.2). Analysis by molecular subtype revealed that immune cell density was prognostically significant in only the no specific molecular profile (NSMP) subtype, where immune infiltrates lacking B cells (TILB minus) had inferior outcome (disease-specific survival: HR, 4.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-14.7; P < 0.05). Similar to endometrial carcinomas, molecular subtype stratification was generally superior to immune response in predicting outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Subtype stratification is critical for better understanding of ENOC, in particular the distribution and prognostic significance of immune cell infiltrates. The role of B cells in the immune response within NSMP tumors warrants further study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karolin Heinze
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
- OVCARE - British Columbia's Gynecological Cancer Research Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver General Hospital, and the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Evan S. Cairns
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Shelby Thornton
- OVCARE - British Columbia's Gynecological Cancer Research Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver General Hospital, and the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Molecular and Cellular Immunology Core (MCIC), Deeley Research Centre, BC Cancer, Victoria, Canada
| | - Bronwyn Harris
- Molecular and Cellular Immunology Core (MCIC), Deeley Research Centre, BC Cancer, Victoria, Canada
| | - Katy Milne
- Molecular and Cellular Immunology Core (MCIC), Deeley Research Centre, BC Cancer, Victoria, Canada
| | - Marcel Grube
- Department of Women's Health, Tübingen University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Charlotte Meyer
- OVCARE - British Columbia's Gynecological Cancer Research Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver General Hospital, and the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Department of Women's Health, Tübingen University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Anthony N. Karnezis
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory, UC Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, California
| | - Sian Fereday
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Dale W. Garsed
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Samuel C.Y. Leung
- OVCARE - British Columbia's Gynecological Cancer Research Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver General Hospital, and the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Derek S. Chiu
- OVCARE - British Columbia's Gynecological Cancer Research Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver General Hospital, and the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Malak Moubarak
- Kliniken Essen Mitte, Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Essen, Germany
| | - Philipp Harter
- Kliniken Essen Mitte, Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Essen, Germany
| | - Florian Heitz
- Kliniken Essen Mitte, Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Essen, Germany
- Department for Gynecology with the Center for Oncologic Surgery Charité Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Jessica N. McAlpine
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
- OVCARE - British Columbia's Gynecological Cancer Research Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver General Hospital, and the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Anna DeFazio
- Centre for Cancer Research, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - David D.L. Bowtell
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ellen L. Goode
- Mayo Clinic, Department of Health Science Research, Division of Epidemiology, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Malcolm Pike
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Susan J. Ramus
- School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Multidisciplinary Ovarian Cancer Outcomes Group (Consortium)
| | - C. Leigh Pearce
- Multidisciplinary Ovarian Cancer Outcomes Group (Consortium)
- School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Annette Staebler
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Martin Köbel
- Department of Pathology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Stefan Kommoss
- Department of Women's Health, Tübingen University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Aline Talhouk
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
- OVCARE - British Columbia's Gynecological Cancer Research Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver General Hospital, and the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Brad H. Nelson
- OVCARE - British Columbia's Gynecological Cancer Research Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver General Hospital, and the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Molecular and Cellular Immunology Core (MCIC), Deeley Research Centre, BC Cancer, Victoria, Canada
- Multidisciplinary Ovarian Cancer Outcomes Group (Consortium)
| | - Michael S. Anglesio
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
- OVCARE - British Columbia's Gynecological Cancer Research Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver General Hospital, and the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Ajani MA, Lawan A, Oke T, Khramtsova G, Nwanji I, Salami A, Awolude O, Ebili H, Onwukamuche ME, Sveen E, Yoshimatsu T, Olopade OI. Clinicopathological pattern of oestrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 over-expression of epithelial ovarian carcinomas in Nigeria. Afr Health Sci 2023; 23:236-244. [PMID: 38357171 PMCID: PMC10862617 DOI: 10.4314/ahs.v23i3.29] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/16/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Ovarian cancer is the leading cause of death from all gynaecological malignancies. Only few biomarkers of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) prognosis have been studied so far among Nigerian patients. Objective To determine the pattern of oestrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2) expression in patients with EOC seen in Nigeria. Materials and Methods This was a retrospective multicentre study of 102 cases of epithelial ovarian cancers. Relevant clinical information was obtained from hospital-based records in the 3 participating centres. Tissue microarrays were constructed using representative tumour tissue and the ER, PR and HER2 immunohistochemical staining was carried out at the University of Chicago, United States of America. Results Serous carcinomas predominated (71% of cases). ER positivity was observed in 31.4%, PR positivity in 21.5% and HER2/neu in 16.7% of tumours. Fifty-two percent of tumours were triple negative. Serous tumours were significantly associated with ER positivity (p=0.001). Mean patient age for EOC was 52.6 ± 13.1 years. There were no statistically significant associations between hormone receptor status and histological grade, FIGO staging or survival. Conclusion Serous tumours were significantly associated with ER expression while non-serous tumours tended to be triple negative.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Aliyu Lawan
- Department of Pathology, University College Hospital, Ibadan. Nigeria
| | - Temitope Oke
- Department of Medicine, University College Hospital, Ibadan. Nigeria
| | - Galina Khramtsova
- Department of Medicine, Section of Haematology/Oncology, University of Chicago, Illinois. United States of America
| | | | - Ayodeji Salami
- Department of Pathology, University College Hospital, Ibadan. Nigeria
| | - Olutosin Awolude
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University College Hospital, Ibadan. Nigeria
| | - Henry Ebili
- Department of Morbid Anatomy and Histopathology, Olabisi Onabanjo University Teaching, Hospital, Sagamu, Nigeria
| | - Michael E Onwukamuche
- Department of Histopathology, Nnamdi Azikiwe University Teaching Hospital, Nnewi. Nigeria
| | - Elisabeth Sveen
- Department of Medicine, Section of Haematology/Oncology, University of Chicago, Illinois. United States of America
| | - Toshio Yoshimatsu
- Department of Medicine, Section of Haematology/Oncology, University of Chicago, Illinois. United States of America
| | - Olufunmilayo I Olopade
- Department of Medicine, Section of Haematology/Oncology, University of Chicago, Illinois. United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Chung C, Yeung VTY, Wong KCW. Prognostic and predictive biomarkers with therapeutic targets in breast cancer: A 2022 update on current developments, evidence, and recommendations. J Oncol Pharm Pract 2023; 29:1343-1360. [PMID: 35971313 DOI: 10.1177/10781552221119797] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate and validate the recent and emerging data for prognostic and predictive biomarkers with therapeutic targets in breast cancer. DATA SOURCES A literature search from January 2015 to March 2022 was performed using the key terms breast cancer, clinical practice guidelines, gene mutations, genomic assay, immune cancer therapy, predictive and/or prognostic biomarkers, and targeted therapies. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION Relevant clinical trials, meta-analyses, seminal articles, and published evidence- and consensus-based clinical practice guidelines in the English language were identified, reviewed and evaluated. DATA SYNTHESIS Breast cancer is a biologically heterogeneous disease, leading to wide variability in treatment responses and survival outcomes. Biomarkers for breast cancer are evolving from traditional biomarkers in immunohistochemistry (IHC) such as estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 (HER2) to genetic biomarkers with therapeutic implications (e.g. breast cancer susceptibility gene 1/2 [BRCA1/2], estrogen receptor α [ESR1] gene mutation, HER2 gene mutation, microsatellite instability [MSI], phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase catalytic subunit 3Cα [PIK3CA] gene mutation, neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase [NTRK] gene mutation). In addition, current data are most robust for biomarkers in immunotherapy (e.g. programmed cell death receptor ligand-1 [PD-L1], microsatellite instability-high [MSI-H] or deficient mismatch repair [dMMR]). Oncotype DX assay remains the best validated gene expression assay that is both predictive and prognostic whereas MammaPrint is prognostic for genomic risk. CONCLUSIONS Biomarker-driven therapies have the potential to confer greater therapeutic advantages than standard-of-care therapies. The purported survival benefits associated with biomarker-driven therapies should be weighed against their potential harms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clement Chung
- Department of Pharmacy, Houston Methodist West Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Vanessa T Y Yeung
- State Key Laboratory of Translational Oncology, Sir YK Pao Centre for Cancer, Department of Clinical Oncology, Hong Kong Cancer Institute, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR
| | - Kenneth C W Wong
- State Key Laboratory of Translational Oncology, Sir YK Pao Centre for Cancer, Department of Clinical Oncology, Hong Kong Cancer Institute, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Borella F, Fucina S, Mangherini L, Cosma S, Carosso AR, Cusato J, Cassoni P, Bertero L, Katsaros D, Benedetto C. Hormone Receptors and Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: Recent Advances in Biology and Treatment Options. Biomedicines 2023; 11:2157. [PMID: 37626654 PMCID: PMC10452581 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines11082157] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2023] [Revised: 06/03/2023] [Accepted: 07/22/2023] [Indexed: 08/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is a significant cause of cancer-related mortality in women. Despite advances in diagnosis and treatment, EOC remains a challenging disease to manage, and the 5-year survival rate is still poor. The role of hormone receptors (HRs) in EOC carcinogenesis and prognosis has been actively explored; however, the role of hormone therapy (HT) in the treatment of these tumors is not well established. Most available data on HT mainly come from retrospective series and small early clinical trials. Several of these studies suggest that HT may have a role in adjuvant, maintenance therapy, or in the case of recurrent disease, especially for some subtypes of EOC (e.g., low-grade serous EOC). Furthermore, HT has recently been combined with targeted therapies, but most studies evaluating these combinations are still ongoing. The main aim of this review is to provide an overview of the progress made in the last decade to characterize the biological and prognostic role of HRs for EOC and the developments in their therapeutic targeting through HT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fulvio Borella
- Gynecology and Obstetrics 1U, Departments of Surgical Sciences, City of Health and Science, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy; (S.F.); (S.C.); (A.R.C.); (D.K.); (C.B.)
| | - Stefano Fucina
- Gynecology and Obstetrics 1U, Departments of Surgical Sciences, City of Health and Science, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy; (S.F.); (S.C.); (A.R.C.); (D.K.); (C.B.)
| | - Luca Mangherini
- Pathology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy; (L.M.); (P.C.); (L.B.)
| | - Stefano Cosma
- Gynecology and Obstetrics 1U, Departments of Surgical Sciences, City of Health and Science, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy; (S.F.); (S.C.); (A.R.C.); (D.K.); (C.B.)
| | - Andrea Roberto Carosso
- Gynecology and Obstetrics 1U, Departments of Surgical Sciences, City of Health and Science, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy; (S.F.); (S.C.); (A.R.C.); (D.K.); (C.B.)
| | - Jessica Cusato
- Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenetics, Department of Medical Sciences, Amedeo di Savoia Hospital, University of Turin, 10149 Turin, Italy;
| | - Paola Cassoni
- Pathology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy; (L.M.); (P.C.); (L.B.)
| | - Luca Bertero
- Pathology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy; (L.M.); (P.C.); (L.B.)
| | - Dionyssios Katsaros
- Gynecology and Obstetrics 1U, Departments of Surgical Sciences, City of Health and Science, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy; (S.F.); (S.C.); (A.R.C.); (D.K.); (C.B.)
| | - Chiara Benedetto
- Gynecology and Obstetrics 1U, Departments of Surgical Sciences, City of Health and Science, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy; (S.F.); (S.C.); (A.R.C.); (D.K.); (C.B.)
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Chang YH, Wu KC, Wang KH, Ding DC. Effects of the Overexpression of Progesterone Receptors on a Precancer p53 and Rb-Defective Human Fallopian Tube Epithelial Cell Line. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:11823. [PMID: 37511582 PMCID: PMC10380282 DOI: 10.3390/ijms241411823] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2023] [Revised: 07/20/2023] [Accepted: 07/20/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023] Open
Abstract
This study investigated the effects of progesterone receptors A (PRA) and B (PRB) on proliferation, migration, invasion, anchorage-independent growth (AIG), and apoptosis of FE25 cells, a precancer p53- and retinoblastoma-defective human fallopian tube epithelial cell line. We observed that the transfection of PRA (FE25-PRA) or PRB (FE25-PRB) into FE25 cells significantly increased the expression of PRA or PRB at both RNA and protein levels without affecting cell morphology. The FE25-PRA cells exhibited slower proliferation, whereas FE25-PRB showed faster cell proliferation than the control cells. In contrast, the FE25-PRA cells showed the highest migration and invasion abilities, whereas the FE25-PRB cells showed the lowest migration and invasion abilities. After treatment with progesterone, all cell types showed decreased AIG levels, increased apoptotic rates in Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (TdT) dUTP nick end labeling assay (TUNEL) staining, and increased levels of apoptotic proteins ascertained based on cleaved caspase-3 levels. The half-maximal inhibitory concentration of carboplatin increased in FE25-PRB cells, but that of paclitaxel remained unchanged. Overall, this study suggests that PRA and PRB have distinct roles in regulating the behavior of FE25 cells, and targeting these receptors could be a potential therapeutic strategy for ovarian cancer treatment. If PRA or PRB overexpression is observed in high-grade serous carcinoma, progesterone could be considered as an adjuvant therapy for these specific cancer patients. However, further research is needed to confirm these findings and investigate the mechanisms underlying these effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu-Hsun Chang
- Department of Pediatrics, Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Tzu Chi University, Hualien 97004, Taiwan
| | - Kun-Chi Wu
- Department of Orthopedics, Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Tzu Chi University, Hualien 97004, Taiwan
| | - Kai-Hung Wang
- Department of Medical Research, Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Tzu Chi University, Hualien 97004, Taiwan
| | - Dah-Ching Ding
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Tzu Chi University, Hualien 97004, Taiwan
- Institute of Medical Sciences, Tzu Chi University, Hualien 97004, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Schüler-Toprak S, Skrzypczak M, Gründker C, Ortmann O, Treeck O. Role of Estrogen Receptor β, G-Protein Coupled Estrogen Receptor and Estrogen-Related Receptors in Endometrial and Ovarian Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:2845. [PMID: 37345182 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15102845] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2023] [Revised: 05/08/2023] [Accepted: 05/16/2023] [Indexed: 06/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Ovarian and endometrial cancers are affected by estrogens and their receptors. It has been long known that in different types of cancers, estrogens activate tumor cell proliferation via estrogen receptor α (ERα). In contrast, the role of ERs discovered later, including ERβ and G-protein-coupled ER (GPER1), in cancer is less well understood, but the current state of knowledge indicates them to have a considerable impact on both cancer development and progression. Moreover, estrogen related receptors (ERRs) have been reported to affect pathobiology of many tumor types. This article provides a summary and update of the current findings on the role of ERβ, GPER1, and ERRs in ovarian and endometrial cancer. For this purpose, original research articles on the role of ERβ, GPER1, and ERRs in ovarian and endometrial cancers listed in the PubMed database have been reviewed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susanne Schüler-Toprak
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center Regensburg, Caritas-Hospital St. Josef, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
| | - Maciej Skrzypczak
- Second Department of Gynecology, Medical University of Lublin, 20-954 Lublin, Poland
| | - Carsten Gründker
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Center Göttingen, 37075 Göttingen, Germany
| | - Olaf Ortmann
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center Regensburg, Caritas-Hospital St. Josef, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
| | - Oliver Treeck
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center Regensburg, Caritas-Hospital St. Josef, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Thomson JP, Hollis RL, van Baal J, Ilenkovan N, Churchman M, van de Vijver K, Dijk F, Meynert AM, Bartos C, Rye T, Croy I, Diana P, van Gent M, Creedon H, Nirsimloo R, Nussey F, Lok C, Herrington CS, Gourley C. Whole exome sequencing of low grade serous ovarian carcinoma identifies genomic events associated with clinical outcome. Gynecol Oncol 2023; 174:157-166. [PMID: 37207500 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.04.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2022] [Revised: 04/12/2023] [Accepted: 04/14/2023] [Indexed: 05/21/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (LGSOC) is a distinct, rare, ovarian cancer type characterised by younger patient age and intrinsic chemoresistance. Understanding the molecular landscape is crucial for optimising targeted therapy. METHODS Genomic data from whole exome sequencing of tumour tissue was analysed in a LGSOC cohort with detailed clinical annotation. RESULTS 63 cases were analysed and three subgroups identified based on single nucleotide variants: canonical MAPK mutant (cMAPKm: 52%, KRAS/BRAF/NRAS), MAPK-associated gene mutation (MAPK-assoc: 27%) and MAPK wild-type (MAPKwt: 21%). NOTCH pathway disruption occurred across all subgroups. Tumour mutational burden (TMB), mutational signatures and recurrent copy number (CN) changes varied across the cohort with co-occurrence of chromosome 1p loss and 1q gain (CN Chr1pq) a recurrent feature. Low TMB and CN Chr1pq were associated with inferior disease-specific survival (HR 6.43; p < 0.001 and HR 3.29, p = 0.011 respectively). Stepwise genomic classification in relation to outcome resulted in four groups (TMB low; CN Chr1pq; MAPKwt/MAPKassoc; cMAPKm). 5 year disease-specific survival was 46%, 55%, 79% and 100% respectively for these groups. The two most favourable genomic subgroups were enriched for the SBS10b mutational signature, particularly the cMAPKm subgroup. CONCLUSIONS LGSOC comprises multiple genomic subgroups with distinct clinical and molecular features. Chr1pq CN arm disruption and TMB represent promising methods to identify individuals with poorer prognosis. Further investigation of the molecular basis for these observations is required. MAPKwt cases represent around a fifth of patients. NOTCH inhibitors represent a candidate therapeutic strategy worthy of exploration across these cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John P Thomson
- Nicola Murray Centre for Ovarian Cancer Research, Cancer Research UK Scotland Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Robert L Hollis
- Nicola Murray Centre for Ovarian Cancer Research, Cancer Research UK Scotland Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Juliette van Baal
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology and Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Narthana Ilenkovan
- Nicola Murray Centre for Ovarian Cancer Research, Cancer Research UK Scotland Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK; Cancer Research UK Beatson Institute, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Michael Churchman
- Nicola Murray Centre for Ovarian Cancer Research, Cancer Research UK Scotland Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Koen van de Vijver
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology and Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Frederike Dijk
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology and Department of Pathology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Alison M Meynert
- MRC Human Genetics Unit, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Clare Bartos
- Nicola Murray Centre for Ovarian Cancer Research, Cancer Research UK Scotland Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Tzyvia Rye
- Nicola Murray Centre for Ovarian Cancer Research, Cancer Research UK Scotland Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Ian Croy
- Nicola Murray Centre for Ovarian Cancer Research, Cancer Research UK Scotland Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Patricia Diana
- Nicola Murray Centre for Ovarian Cancer Research, Cancer Research UK Scotland Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Mignon van Gent
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology and Department of Pathology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Helen Creedon
- Edinburgh Cancer Centre, Western General Hospital, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Rachel Nirsimloo
- Edinburgh Cancer Centre, Western General Hospital, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Fiona Nussey
- Edinburgh Cancer Centre, Western General Hospital, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Christianne Lok
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology and Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - C Simon Herrington
- Nicola Murray Centre for Ovarian Cancer Research, Cancer Research UK Scotland Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Charlie Gourley
- Nicola Murray Centre for Ovarian Cancer Research, Cancer Research UK Scotland Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Amin SA, Collin LJ, Kavecansky J, Setoguchi S, Satagopan JM, Bandera EV. Sociodemographic disparities in targeted therapy in ovarian cancer in a national sample. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1104630. [PMID: 37251932 PMCID: PMC10213306 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1104630] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2022] [Accepted: 04/24/2023] [Indexed: 05/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The treatment landscape for ovarian cancer has changed in recent years with the introduction of targeted therapies to treat patients with advanced disease. We investigated patient demographic and clinical factors associated with use of targeted therapies as a part of the first-line treatment for ovarian cancer. Methods This study included patients diagnosed with stage I-IV ovarian cancer between 2012 and 2019 from the National Cancer Database. Information on demographic and clinical characteristics were collected and described using frequency and percent across receipt of targeted therapy. Logistic regression was used to compute the odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) associating patient demographic and clinical factors with receipt of targeted therapy. Results Among 99,286 ovarian cancer patients (mean age 62 years), 4.1% received targeted therapy. The rate of targeted therapy receipt across racial and ethnic groups over the study period was fairly similar; however, non-Hispanic Black women were less likely to receive targeted therapy than their non-Hispanic White counterparts (OR=0.87, 95% CI: 0.76-1.00). Patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy were more likely to receive targeted therapy than those who received adjuvant chemotherapy (OR=1.26; 95% CI: 1.15-1.38). Moreover, among patients who received targeted therapy, 28% received neoadjuvant targeted therapy, with non-Hispanic Black women being most likely to receive neoadjuvant targeted therapy (34%) compared with other racial and ethnic groups. Conclusions We observed differences in receipt of targeted therapy by factors such as age at diagnosis, stage, and comorbidities present at diagnosis, as well as factors related to healthcare access-including neighborhood education level and health insurance status. Approximately 28% of patients received targeted therapy in the neoadjuvant setting, which could negatively impact treatment outcomes and survival due to the increased risk of complications associated with targeted therapies that may delay or prevent surgery. These results warrant further evaluation in a cohort of patients with more comprehensive treatment information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saber A. Amin
- Cancer Epidemiology and Health Outcomes, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, United States
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, United States
| | - Lindsay J. Collin
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
| | - Juraj Kavecansky
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Walnut Creek, CA, United States
| | - Soko Setoguchi
- Department of Medicine, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, United States
- Center for Pharmacoepidemiology and Treatment Science, Institute for Health, Aging and Health Policy Research, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, United States
| | - Jaya M. Satagopan
- Cancer Epidemiology and Health Outcomes, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, United States
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Rutgers School of Public Health, Piscataway, NJ, United States
| | - Elisa V. Bandera
- Cancer Epidemiology and Health Outcomes, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, United States
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Hollis RL, Thomson JP, van Baal J, Ilenkovan N, Churchman M, van de Vijver K, Dijk F, Meynert AM, Bartos C, Rye T, Croy I, Diana P, van Gent M, Creedon H, Nirsimloo R, Lok C, Gourley C, Herrington CS. Distinct histopathological features are associated with molecular subtypes and outcome in low grade serous ovarian carcinoma. Sci Rep 2023; 13:7681. [PMID: 37169775 PMCID: PMC10175560 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-34627-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2022] [Accepted: 05/04/2023] [Indexed: 05/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Low grade serous ovarian carcinoma (LGSOC) demonstrates unique clinical and molecular features compared to other ovarian cancer types. The relationship between common histological features of LGSOC and molecular events, such as hormone receptor expression patterns and MAPK gene mutation status, remains poorly understood. Recent data suggest some of these molecular features may be biomarkers of response to recently introduced biologically-targeted therapies, namely endocrine therapy and MEK inhibitors. We utilize a cohort of 63 pathologically-confirmed LGSOC cases with whole exome sequencing and hormone receptor expression data to investigate these relationships. LGSOC cases demonstrated uniformly high oestrogen receptor (ER) expression, but variable progesterone receptor (PR) expression intensity. 60% and 37% of cases demonstrated micropapillary and macropapillary patterns of stromal invasion, respectively. 63% of cases demonstrated desmoplasia, which was significantly associated with advanced disease stage and visible residual disease after cytoreductive surgery. MAPK-mutant cases (KRAS, BRAF, NRAS) more frequently demonstrated macropapillary stromal invasion, while Chr1p loss was associated with desmoplasia and low PR expression. Presence of micropapillary stromal invasion and low PR expression were associated with significantly poorer survival after accounting for stage and residual disease status. Together, these data identify novel relationships between histopathological features and molecularly-defined subgroups in LGSOC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert L Hollis
- Nicola Murray Centre for Ovarian Cancer Research, Cancer Research UK Scotland Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh, EH4 2XU, UK.
| | - John P Thomson
- Nicola Murray Centre for Ovarian Cancer Research, Cancer Research UK Scotland Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh, EH4 2XU, UK
| | - Juliette van Baal
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Narthana Ilenkovan
- Nicola Murray Centre for Ovarian Cancer Research, Cancer Research UK Scotland Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh, EH4 2XU, UK
- Cancer Research UK Scotland Centre, Beatson Institute for Cancer Research, Glasgow, UK
| | - Michael Churchman
- Nicola Murray Centre for Ovarian Cancer Research, Cancer Research UK Scotland Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh, EH4 2XU, UK
| | - Koen van de Vijver
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Frederike Dijk
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Alison M Meynert
- MRC Human Genetics Unit, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Clare Bartos
- Nicola Murray Centre for Ovarian Cancer Research, Cancer Research UK Scotland Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh, EH4 2XU, UK
| | - Tzyvia Rye
- Nicola Murray Centre for Ovarian Cancer Research, Cancer Research UK Scotland Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh, EH4 2XU, UK
| | - Ian Croy
- Nicola Murray Centre for Ovarian Cancer Research, Cancer Research UK Scotland Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh, EH4 2XU, UK
| | - Patricia Diana
- Nicola Murray Centre for Ovarian Cancer Research, Cancer Research UK Scotland Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh, EH4 2XU, UK
| | - Mignon van Gent
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Helen Creedon
- Edinburgh Cancer Centre, Western General Hospital, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Rachel Nirsimloo
- Edinburgh Cancer Centre, Western General Hospital, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Christianne Lok
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Charlie Gourley
- Nicola Murray Centre for Ovarian Cancer Research, Cancer Research UK Scotland Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh, EH4 2XU, UK
| | - C Simon Herrington
- Nicola Murray Centre for Ovarian Cancer Research, Cancer Research UK Scotland Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh, EH4 2XU, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Köbel M, Kang E, Weir A, Rambau PF, Lee C, Nelson GS, Ghatage P, Meagher NS, Riggan MJ, Alsop J, Anglesio MS, Beckmann MW, Bisinotto C, Boisen M, Boros J, Brand AH, Brooks‐Wilson A, Carney ME, Coulson P, Courtney‐Brooks M, Cushing‐Haugen KL, Cybulski C, Deen S, El‐Bahrawy MA, Elishaev E, Erber R, Fereday S, Fischer A, Gayther SA, Barquin‐Garcia A, Gentry‐Maharaj A, Gilks CB, Gronwald H, Grube M, Harnett PR, Harris HR, Hartkopf AD, Hartmann A, Hein A, Hendley J, Hernandez BY, Huang Y, Jakubowska A, Jimenez‐Linan M, Jones ME, Kennedy CJ, Kluz T, Koziak JM, Lesnock J, Lester J, Lubiński J, Longacre TA, Lycke M, Mateoiu C, McCauley BM, McGuire V, Ney B, Olawaiye A, Orsulic S, Osorio A, Paz‐Ares L, Ramón y Cajal T, Rothstein JH, Ruebner M, Schoemaker MJ, Shah M, Sharma R, Sherman ME, Shvetsov YB, Singh N, Steed H, Storr SJ, Talhouk A, Traficante N, Wang C, Whittemore AS, Widschwendter M, Wilkens LR, Winham SJ, Benitez J, Berchuck A, Bowtell DD, Candido dos Reis FJ, Campbell I, Cook LS, DeFazio A, Doherty JA, Fasching PA, Fortner RT, García MJ, Goodman MT, Goode EL, Gronwald J, Huntsman DG, Karlan BY, Kelemen LE, Kommoss S, Le ND, Martin SG, Menon U, Modugno F, Pharoah PDP, Schildkraut JM, Sieh W, Staebler A, Sundfeldt K, Swerdlow AJ, Ramus SJ, Brenton JD. p53 and ovarian carcinoma survival: an Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis consortium study. J Pathol Clin Res 2023; 9:208-222. [PMID: 36948887 PMCID: PMC10073933 DOI: 10.1002/cjp2.311] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2022] [Revised: 01/06/2023] [Accepted: 01/11/2023] [Indexed: 03/24/2023]
Abstract
Our objective was to test whether p53 expression status is associated with survival for women diagnosed with the most common ovarian carcinoma histotypes (high-grade serous carcinoma [HGSC], endometrioid carcinoma [EC], and clear cell carcinoma [CCC]) using a large multi-institutional cohort from the Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis (OTTA) consortium. p53 expression was assessed on 6,678 cases represented on tissue microarrays from 25 participating OTTA study sites using a previously validated immunohistochemical (IHC) assay as a surrogate for the presence and functional effect of TP53 mutations. Three abnormal expression patterns (overexpression, complete absence, and cytoplasmic) and the normal (wild type) pattern were recorded. Survival analyses were performed by histotype. The frequency of abnormal p53 expression was 93.4% (4,630/4,957) in HGSC compared to 11.9% (116/973) in EC and 11.5% (86/748) in CCC. In HGSC, there were no differences in overall survival across the abnormal p53 expression patterns. However, in EC and CCC, abnormal p53 expression was associated with an increased risk of death for women diagnosed with EC in multivariate analysis compared to normal p53 as the reference (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.18, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.36-3.47, p = 0.0011) and with CCC (HR = 1.57, 95% CI 1.11-2.22, p = 0.012). Abnormal p53 was also associated with shorter overall survival in The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage I/II EC and CCC. Our study provides further evidence that functional groups of TP53 mutations assessed by abnormal surrogate p53 IHC patterns are not associated with survival in HGSC. In contrast, we validate that abnormal p53 IHC is a strong independent prognostic marker for EC and demonstrate for the first time an independent prognostic association of abnormal p53 IHC with overall survival in patients with CCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Köbel
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory MedicineUniversity of Calgary, Foothills Medical CenterCalgaryABCanada
| | - Eun‐Young Kang
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory MedicineUniversity of Calgary, Foothills Medical CenterCalgaryABCanada
| | - Ashley Weir
- School of Clinical MedicineUNSW Medicine and Health, University of NSW SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Adult Cancer Program, Lowy Cancer Research CentreUniversity of NSW SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical ResearchParkvilleVictoriaAustralia
| | - Peter F Rambau
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory MedicineUniversity of Calgary, Foothills Medical CenterCalgaryABCanada
- Pathology DepartmentCatholic University of Health and Allied Sciences‐BugandoMwanzaTanzania
| | - Cheng‐Han Lee
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory MedicineUniversity of AlbertaEdmontonABCanada
| | - Gregg S Nelson
- Department of Oncology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Cumming School of MedicineUniversity of CalgaryCalgaryABCanada
| | - Prafull Ghatage
- Department of Oncology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Cumming School of MedicineUniversity of CalgaryCalgaryABCanada
| | - Nicola S Meagher
- School of Clinical MedicineUNSW Medicine and Health, University of NSW SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- The Daffodil CentreThe University of Sydney, a Joint Venture with Cancer Council NSWSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Marjorie J Riggan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic OncologyDuke University Medical CenterDurhamNCUSA
| | - Jennifer Alsop
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of OncologyUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
| | - Michael S Anglesio
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverBCCanada
- British Columbia's Gynecological Cancer Research Team (OVCARE)University of British Columbia, BC Cancer, and Vancouver General HospitalVancouverBCCanada
| | - Matthias W Beckmann
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen‐EMNFriedrich‐Alexander University Erlangen‐Nuremberg, University Hospital ErlangenErlangenGermany
| | - Christiani Bisinotto
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ribeirão Preto Medical SchoolUniversity of São PauloRibeirão PretoBrazil
| | - Michelle Boisen
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive SciencesUniversity of Pittsburgh School of MedicinePittsburghPAUSA
| | - Jessica Boros
- Centre for Cancer ResearchThe Westmead Institute for Medical Research, University of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Department of Gynaecological OncologyWestmead HospitalSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Discipline of Obstetrics and GynaecologyThe University of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Alison H Brand
- Department of Gynaecological OncologyWestmead HospitalSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Discipline of Obstetrics and GynaecologyThe University of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | | | - Michael E Carney
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, John A. Burns School of MedicineUniversity of HawaiiHonoluluHIUSA
| | - Penny Coulson
- Division of Genetics and EpidemiologyThe Institute of Cancer ResearchLondonUK
| | - Madeleine Courtney‐Brooks
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive SciencesUniversity of Pittsburgh School of MedicinePittsburghPAUSA
| | - Kara L Cushing‐Haugen
- Program in Epidemiology, Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research CenterSeattleWAUSA
| | - Cezary Cybulski
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer CenterPomeranian Medical UniversitySzczecinPoland
| | - Suha Deen
- Department of HistopathologyNottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Queen's Medical CentreNottinghamUK
| | - Mona A El‐Bahrawy
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and ReproductionImperial College London, Hammersmith HospitalLondonUK
| | - Esther Elishaev
- Department of PathologyUniversity of Pittsburgh School of MedicinePittsburghPAUSA
| | - Ramona Erber
- Institute of Pathology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen‐EMN, Friedrich‐Alexander University Erlangen‐Nuremberg, University Hospital ErlangenErlangenGermany
| | - Sian Fereday
- Peter MacCallum Cancer CentreMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of OncologyThe University of MelbourneParkvilleVictoriaAustralia
| | - AOCS Group
- Centre for Cancer ResearchThe Westmead Institute for Medical Research, University of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Peter MacCallum Cancer CentreMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research InstituteBrisbaneQueenslandAustralia
| | - Anna Fischer
- Institute of Pathology and Neuropathology, Tuebingen University HospitalTuebingenGermany
| | - Simon A Gayther
- Center for Bioinformatics and Functional Genomics and the Cedars Sinai Genomics Core, Cedars‐Sinai Medical CenterLos AngelesCAUSA
| | | | - Aleksandra Gentry‐Maharaj
- MRC Clinical Trials UnitInstitute of Clinical Trials & Methodology, University College LondonLondonUK
| | - C Blake Gilks
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory MedicineUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverBCCanada
| | - Helena Gronwald
- Department of Propaedeutics, Physical Diagnostics and Dental PhysiotherapyPomeranian Medical UniversitySzczecinPoland
| | - Marcel Grube
- Department of Women's HealthTuebingen University HospitalTuebingenGermany
| | - Paul R Harnett
- Discipline of Obstetrics and GynaecologyThe University of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Crown Princess Mary Cancer CentreWestmead HospitalSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Holly R Harris
- Program in Epidemiology, Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research CenterSeattleWAUSA
- Department of EpidemiologyUniversity of WashingtonSeattleWAUSA
| | - Andreas D Hartkopf
- Department of Women's HealthTuebingen University HospitalTuebingenGermany
- Department of Gynecology and ObstetricsUniversity Hospital of UlmUlmGermany
| | - Arndt Hartmann
- Institute of Pathology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen‐EMN, Friedrich‐Alexander University Erlangen‐Nuremberg, University Hospital ErlangenErlangenGermany
| | - Alexander Hein
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen‐EMNFriedrich‐Alexander University Erlangen‐Nuremberg, University Hospital ErlangenErlangenGermany
| | - Joy Hendley
- Peter MacCallum Cancer CentreMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | - Brenda Y Hernandez
- Cancer Epidemiology ProgramUniversity of Hawaii Cancer CenterHonoluluHIUSA
| | - Yajue Huang
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo ClinicRochesterMNUSA
| | - Anna Jakubowska
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer CenterPomeranian Medical UniversitySzczecinPoland
- Independent Laboratory of Molecular Biology and Genetic DiagnosticsPomeranian Medical UniversitySzczecinPoland
| | | | - Michael E Jones
- Division of Genetics and EpidemiologyThe Institute of Cancer ResearchLondonUK
| | - Catherine J Kennedy
- Centre for Cancer ResearchThe Westmead Institute for Medical Research, University of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Department of Gynaecological OncologyWestmead HospitalSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Discipline of Obstetrics and GynaecologyThe University of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Tomasz Kluz
- Department of Gynecology and ObstetricsInstitute of Medical Sciences, Medical College of Rzeszow UniversityRzeszówPoland
| | | | - Jaime Lesnock
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive SciencesUniversity of Pittsburgh School of MedicinePittsburghPAUSA
| | - Jenny Lester
- David Geffen School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity of California at Los AngelesLos AngelesCAUSA
| | - Jan Lubiński
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer CenterPomeranian Medical UniversitySzczecinPoland
| | - Teri A Longacre
- Department of PathologyStanford University School of MedicineStanfordCAUSA
| | - Maria Lycke
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyInstitute of Clinical Science, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, University of GothenburgGothenburgSweden
| | | | - Bryan M McCauley
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Division of Epidemiology, Mayo ClinicRochesterMNUSA
| | - Valerie McGuire
- Department of Epidemiology and Population HealthStanford University School of MedicineStanfordCAUSA
| | - Britta Ney
- Institute of Pathology and Neuropathology, Tuebingen University HospitalTuebingenGermany
| | - Alexander Olawaiye
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive SciencesUniversity of Pittsburgh School of MedicinePittsburghPAUSA
| | - Sandra Orsulic
- David Geffen School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity of California at Los AngelesLos AngelesCAUSA
| | - Ana Osorio
- Genetics Service, Fundación Jiménez DíazMadridSpain
- Centre for Biomedical Network Research on Rare Diseases (CIBERER)Instituto de Salud Carlos IIIMadridSpain
| | - Luis Paz‐Ares
- H12O‐CNIO Lung Cancer Clinical Research Unit, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO)MadridSpain
- Oncology DepartmentHospital Universitario 12 de OctubreMadridSpain
| | | | - Joseph H Rothstein
- Department of Genetics and Genomic SciencesIcahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiNew YorkNYUSA
- Department of Population Health Science and PolicyIcahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiNew YorkNYUSA
| | - Matthias Ruebner
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen‐EMNFriedrich‐Alexander University Erlangen‐Nuremberg, University Hospital ErlangenErlangenGermany
| | - Minouk J Schoemaker
- Division of Genetics and EpidemiologyThe Institute of Cancer ResearchLondonUK
| | - Mitul Shah
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of OncologyUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
| | - Raghwa Sharma
- Tissue Pathology and Diagnostic OncologyWestmead HospitalSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Mark E Sherman
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo ClinicJacksonvilleFLUSA
| | - Yurii B Shvetsov
- Cancer Epidemiology ProgramUniversity of Hawaii Cancer CenterHonoluluHIUSA
| | - Naveena Singh
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory MedicineUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverBCCanada
| | - Helen Steed
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity of AlbertaEdmontonABCanada
- Section of Gynecologic Oncology Surgery, North Zone, Alberta Health ServicesEdmontonABCanada
| | - Sarah J Storr
- Nottingham Breast Cancer Research CentreBiodiscovery Institute, University of NottinghamNottinghamUK
| | - Aline Talhouk
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverBCCanada
- British Columbia's Gynecological Cancer Research Team (OVCARE)University of British Columbia, BC Cancer, and Vancouver General HospitalVancouverBCCanada
| | - Nadia Traficante
- Peter MacCallum Cancer CentreMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of OncologyThe University of MelbourneParkvilleVictoriaAustralia
| | - Chen Wang
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Division of Computational Biology, Mayo ClinicRochesterMNUSA
| | - Alice S Whittemore
- Department of Epidemiology and Population HealthStanford University School of MedicineStanfordCAUSA
- Department of Biomedical Data ScienceStanford University School of MedicineStanfordCAUSA
| | | | - Lynne R Wilkens
- Cancer Epidemiology ProgramUniversity of Hawaii Cancer CenterHonoluluHIUSA
| | - Stacey J Winham
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Division of Computational Biology, Mayo ClinicRochesterMNUSA
| | - Javier Benitez
- Centre for Biomedical Network Research on Rare Diseases (CIBERER)Instituto de Salud Carlos IIIMadridSpain
- Human Genetics Group, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO)MadridSpain
| | - Andrew Berchuck
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic OncologyDuke University Medical CenterDurhamNCUSA
| | - David D Bowtell
- Peter MacCallum Cancer CentreMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of OncologyThe University of MelbourneParkvilleVictoriaAustralia
| | - Francisco J Candido dos Reis
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ribeirão Preto Medical SchoolUniversity of São PauloRibeirão PretoBrazil
| | - Ian Campbell
- Peter MacCallum Cancer CentreMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of OncologyThe University of MelbourneParkvilleVictoriaAustralia
| | - Linda S Cook
- Epidemiology, School of Public HealthUniversity of ColoradoAuroraCOUSA
- Community Health Sciences, University of CalgaryCalgaryABCanada
| | - Anna DeFazio
- The Daffodil CentreThe University of Sydney, a Joint Venture with Cancer Council NSWSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Centre for Cancer ResearchThe Westmead Institute for Medical Research, University of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Department of Gynaecological OncologyWestmead HospitalSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Discipline of Obstetrics and GynaecologyThe University of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Jennifer A Doherty
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, Department of Population Health SciencesUniversity of UtahSalt Lake CityUTUSA
| | - Peter A Fasching
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen‐EMNFriedrich‐Alexander University Erlangen‐Nuremberg, University Hospital ErlangenErlangenGermany
| | - Renée T Fortner
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ)HeidelbergGermany
- Department of Research, Cancer Registry of NorwayOsloNorway
| | - María J García
- Computational Oncology Group, Structural Biology Programme, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO)MadridSpain
| | - Marc T Goodman
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Cedars‐Sinai Cancer, Cedars‐Sinai Medical CenterLos AngelesCAUSA
| | - Ellen L Goode
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Division of Epidemiology, Mayo ClinicRochesterMNUSA
| | - Jacek Gronwald
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer CenterPomeranian Medical UniversitySzczecinPoland
| | - David G Huntsman
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverBCCanada
- Department of Molecular Oncology, BC Cancer Research CentreVancouverBCCanada
| | - Beth Y Karlan
- David Geffen School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity of California at Los AngelesLos AngelesCAUSA
| | - Linda E Kelemen
- Division of Acute Disease Epidemiology, South Carolina Department of Health & Environmental ControlColumbiaSCUSA
| | - Stefan Kommoss
- Department of Women's HealthTuebingen University HospitalTuebingenGermany
| | - Nhu D Le
- Cancer Control Research, BC Cancer AgencyVancouverBCCanada
| | - Stewart G Martin
- Nottingham Breast Cancer Research CentreBiodiscovery Institute, University of NottinghamNottinghamUK
| | - Usha Menon
- MRC Clinical Trials UnitInstitute of Clinical Trials & Methodology, University College LondonLondonUK
| | - Francesmary Modugno
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive SciencesUniversity of Pittsburgh School of MedicinePittsburghPAUSA
- Department of EpidemiologyUniversity of Pittsburgh School of Public HealthPittsburghPAUSA
- Women's Cancer Research CenterMagee‐Womens Research Institute and Hillman Cancer CenterPittsburghPAUSA
| | - Paul DP Pharoah
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of OncologyUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
- Department of Computational Biomedicine, Cedars‐Sinai Medical CenterWest HollywoodCAUSA
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary CareUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
| | - Joellen M Schildkraut
- Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public HealthEmory UniversityAtlantaGAUSA
| | - Weiva Sieh
- Department of Genetics and Genomic SciencesIcahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiNew YorkNYUSA
- Department of Population Health Science and PolicyIcahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiNew YorkNYUSA
| | - Annette Staebler
- Institute of Pathology and Neuropathology, Tuebingen University HospitalTuebingenGermany
| | - Karin Sundfeldt
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Clinical ScienceSahlgrenska Center for Cancer Research, University of GothenburgGothenburgSweden
| | - Anthony J Swerdlow
- Division of Genetics and EpidemiologyThe Institute of Cancer ResearchLondonUK
- Division of Breast Cancer ResearchThe Institute of Cancer ResearchLondonUK
| | - Susan J Ramus
- School of Clinical MedicineUNSW Medicine and Health, University of NSW SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Adult Cancer Program, Lowy Cancer Research CentreUniversity of NSW SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - James D Brenton
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of CambridgeCambridgeUK
| |
Collapse
|