1
|
Yang Z, Khazaieli M, Vaios E, Zhang R, Zhao J, Mullikin T, Yang A, Yin FF, Wang C. Total brain dose estimation in single-isocenter-multiple-targets (SIMT) radiosurgery via a novel deep neural network with spherical convolutions. Med Phys 2025; 52:4266-4277. [PMID: 40100547 DOI: 10.1002/mp.17748] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2024] [Revised: 02/21/2025] [Accepted: 02/25/2025] [Indexed: 03/20/2025] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Accurate prediction of normal brain dosimetric parameters is crucial for the quality control of single-isocenter multi-target (SIMT) stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) treatment planning. Reliable dose estimation of normal brain tissue is one of the great indicators to evaluate plan quality and is used as a reference in clinics to improve potentially SIMT SRS treatment planning quality consistency. This study aimed to develop a spherical coordinate-defined deep learning model to predict the dose to a normal brain for SIMT SRS treatment planning. METHODS By encapsulating the human brain within a sphere, 3D volumetric data of planning target volume (PTVs) can be projected onto this geometry as a 2D spherical representation (in azimuthal and polar angles). A novel deep learning model spherical convolutional neural network (SCNN) was developed based on spherical convolution to predict brain dosimetric evaluators from spherical representation. Utilizing 106 SIMT cases, the model was trained to predict brain V50%, V60%, and V66.7%, corresponding to V10Gy and V12Gy, as key dosimetric indicators. The model prediction performance was evaluated using the coefficient of determination (R2), mean absolute error (MAE), and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE). RESULTS The SCNN accurately predicted normal brain dosimetric values from the modeled spherical PTV representation, with R2 scores of 0.92 ± 0.05/0.94 ± 0.10/0.93 ± 0.09 for V50%/V60%/V66.7%, respectively. MAEs values were 1.94 ± 1.61 cc/1.23 ± 0.98 cc/1.13 ± 0.99 cc, and MAPEs were 19.79 ± 20.36%/20.79 ± 21.07%/21.15 ± 22.24%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The deep learning model provides treatment planners with accurate prediction of dose to normal brain, enabling improved consistency in treatment planning quality. This method can be extended to other brain-related analyses as an efficient data dimension reduction method.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhenyu Yang
- Medical Physics Graduate Program, Duke Kunshan University, Kunshan, Jiangsu, China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Jiangsu Provincial University Key (Construction) Laboratory for Smart Diagnosis and Treatment of Lung Cancer, Duke Kunshan University, Kunshan, Jiangsu, China
| | - Mercedeh Khazaieli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Eugene Vaios
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Rihui Zhang
- Medical Physics Graduate Program, Duke Kunshan University, Kunshan, Jiangsu, China
- Jiangsu Provincial University Key (Construction) Laboratory for Smart Diagnosis and Treatment of Lung Cancer, Duke Kunshan University, Kunshan, Jiangsu, China
| | - Jingtong Zhao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Trey Mullikin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Albert Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Fang-Fang Yin
- Medical Physics Graduate Program, Duke Kunshan University, Kunshan, Jiangsu, China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Jiangsu Provincial University Key (Construction) Laboratory for Smart Diagnosis and Treatment of Lung Cancer, Duke Kunshan University, Kunshan, Jiangsu, China
| | - Chunhao Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Islam S, Inglese M, Aravind P, Barwick TD, Mauri F, McLeavy L, Årstad E, Wang J, Puccio I, Hung L, Lu H, O'Neill K, Waldman AD, Williams M, Aboagye EO. A hybrid [ 18F]fluoropivalate PET-multiparametric MRI to detect and characterise brain tumour metastases based on a permissive environment for monocarboxylate transport. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2025; 52:2290-2306. [PMID: 39915301 PMCID: PMC12119728 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-025-07118-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2024] [Accepted: 01/27/2025] [Indexed: 05/29/2025]
Abstract
The incidence of Intracranial Metastatic Disease (IMD) continues to increase in part due to improvements in systemic therapy resulting in durable control of extra-cranial disease (ECD). Contrast-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging (CE-MRI) is the preferred method for imaging IMD, but has limitations particularly in follow-up surveillance scans to optimise patient care. We investigate a new diagnostic approach of hybrid ([18]F]fluoropivalate (FPIA) Positron Emission Tomography-multiparametric MRI (PET-mpMRI), in 12 treatment-naïve and 10 stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS)-treated patients (± combination therapy within 4-8 weeks). High FPIA uptake was seen in all IMD compared to contralateral white matter, regardless of ECD tumour-of-origin (p = 0.0001) and FPIA-PET volumes extended beyond CE-MRI volumes in treatment-naïve but not SRS-treated tumours. Patients with maximum PET Standardised Uptake Value, (SUVmax) ≥ 2.0 showed particularly short overall-survival (median 4 v 15 months, p = 0.0136), while CE-MRI was uninformative regarding outcome; a PET-mpMRI grade-measure also provided non-invasive prediction of overall-survival, warranting larger studies of PET-mpMRI. Independent metabolomics analyses were consistent with shared adaptation of IMD to utilise or accumulate monocarboxylates and acylcarnitines, respectively, providing a common phenotypic basis to FPIA-PET. Reprogrammed monocarboxylate metabolism-related FPIA-PET provides new insights into annotating IMD, to be expounded in future opportunities for therapy decisions for the growing number of cancer patients with IMD [Trial registration reference: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT04807582; 3rd November 2021, retrospectively registered].
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Islam
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0NN, UK
| | - M Inglese
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0NN, UK
- Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - P Aravind
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0NN, UK
| | - T D Barwick
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0NN, UK
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0HS, UK
| | - F Mauri
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0NN, UK
| | - L McLeavy
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0NN, UK
| | - E Årstad
- Centre for Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry, University College London, 5 Gower Place, London, WC1E 6BS, UK
| | - J Wang
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0NN, UK
| | - I Puccio
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0NN, UK
| | - L Hung
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0NN, UK
| | - H Lu
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0NN, UK
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong
| | - K O'Neill
- Department of Brain Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0NN, UK
| | - A D Waldman
- Department of Brain Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0NN, UK
- Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, 49 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh, EH16 4SB, UK
| | - M Williams
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0NN, UK
| | - E O Aboagye
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0NN, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tos SM, Mantziaris G, Shaaban A, Pikis S, Dumot C, Sheehan JP. Stereotactic Radiosurgery Dose Reduction for Melanoma Brain Metastases Patients on Immunotherapy or Target Therapy: A Single-Center Experience. Neurosurgery 2025; 96:1307-1320. [PMID: 39465916 DOI: 10.1227/neu.0000000000003239] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2024] [Accepted: 09/06/2024] [Indexed: 10/29/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Better local control but higher rates of adverse radiation events (ARE) have been reported when combining American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO)-guideline-suggested dose (SD) stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) with immunotherapy or targeted therapy for melanoma brain metastases. The objective of this study is to explore the efficacy and safety of lower prescription doses compared with ASTRO guidelines for single-fraction SRS for patients with melanoma metastases who are concurrently receiving immunotherapy or targeted therapy. METHODS We conducted a retrospective, single-center study on 194 patients who underwent SRS between 2009 and 2022. After propensity score matching, 71 patients with 292 metastases were included in the ASTRO-SD (20-24 Gy for <2 cm, 18 Gy for ≥2 to <3 cm) group and 33 patients with 292 metastases in the reduced dose (RD, <20 Gy for <2 cm, <18 Gy for ≥2 to <3 cm) group. RESULTS The median diameter (5.4 vs 5.2 mm, P = .6), prescription volume (0.2 vs 0.2 cm 3 , P = .2), and radiographic follow-up (11 vs 12 months, P = .2) were similar in the 2 groups. The cumulative incidence of progressing metastases was significantly higher in the SD compared with the RD group ( P = .018). Higher prescription volumes and ASTRO-suggested radiation doses were associated with local progression in multivariable analysis. Radiographic AREs were significantly more common in the SD compared with the RD group (8.6% vs 3.1%, P = .005). BRAF and other tyrosine kinase inhibitors' concurrent use, higher prescription volumes, and ASTRO-suggested radiation doses were associated with an increased risk of radiographic ARE. CONCLUSION This study provides evidence that RD SRS could offer reduced toxicity rates, while maintaining high local control as compared with the current guideline-SDs for the treatment of melanoma brain metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Salem M Tos
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville , Virginia , USA
| | - Georgios Mantziaris
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville , Virginia , USA
| | - Ahmed Shaaban
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville , Virginia , USA
| | - Stylianos Pikis
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville , Virginia , USA
| | - Chloe Dumot
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville , Virginia , USA
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon , France
| | - Jason P Sheehan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville , Virginia , USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wan G, Yang L, Wang Q, Xu G. T-DM1 with concurrent radiotherapy in HER2-positive breast cancer: preclinical evaluation and mechanisms, prediction, and exploration of adverse effects. Discov Oncol 2025; 16:857. [PMID: 40402389 PMCID: PMC12098256 DOI: 10.1007/s12672-025-02239-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2025] [Accepted: 03/25/2025] [Indexed: 05/23/2025] Open
Abstract
Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2) serves as a pivotal target for breast cancer treatment and a vital prognostic marker. Anti-HER-2 therapies, which are integral to the management of HER-2-positive breast cancer, including monoclonal antibodies (e.g., trastuzumab and pertuzumab), tyrosine kinase inhibitors (e.g., lapatinib and pyrotinib), and antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) such as trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1). ADCs consist of a monoclonal antibody, a linker, and a cytotoxic payload, engineered to deliver chemotherapy selectively to tumor cells, thereby reducing the systemic toxicity associated with traditional chemotherapy. T-DM1, a HER-2-targeting ADC, combines the humanized anti-HER-2 IgG1 trastuzumab with DM1, a cytotoxic agent that inhibits microtubule formation. T-DM1 has significantly enhanced the prognosis of HER-2-positive breast cancer patients who fail to achieve a pathological complete response or develop distant metastases after neoadjuvant trastuzumab and pertuzumab therapy. While the combination therapy of T-DM1 with radiotherapy demonstrates an acceptable safety profile overall, clinicians should remain vigilant regarding potential severe treatment-related toxicities that have been observed in specific clinical scenarios. Nevertheless, limited research exists regarding the adverse effects and mechanisms of T-DM1 in combination with radiotherapy. This review investigates preclinical studies on the interactions between T-DM1 and radiotherapy, investigates associated adverse effects and their underlying mechanisms, identifies predictive factors and prognostic implications, and explores potential therapeutic strategies involving the concurrent T-DM1 with radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guangmin Wan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, 450008, China
| | - Lu Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, 450008, China
| | - Quan Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, 450008, China
| | - Gang Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, 450008, China.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Volovăț CC, Buzea CG, Boboc DI, Ostafe MR, Agop M, Ochiuz L, Burlea ȘL, Rusu DI, Bujor L, Iancu DT, Volovăț SR. Hybrid Deep Learning for Survival Prediction in Brain Metastases Using Multimodal MRI and Clinical Data. Diagnostics (Basel) 2025; 15:1242. [PMID: 40428235 PMCID: PMC12109748 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics15101242] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2025] [Accepted: 05/12/2025] [Indexed: 05/29/2025] Open
Abstract
Background: Survival prediction in patients with brain metastases remains a major clinical challenge, where timely and individualized prognostic estimates are critical for guiding treatment strategies and patient counseling. Methods: We propose a novel hybrid deep learning framework that integrates volumetric MRI-derived imaging biomarkers with structured clinical and demographic data to predict overall survival time. Our dataset includes 148 patients from three institutions, featuring expert-annotated segmentations of enhancing tumors, necrosis, and peritumoral edema. Two convolutional neural network backbones-ResNet-50 and EfficientNet-B0-were fused with fully connected layers processing tabular data. Models were trained using mean squared error loss and evaluated through stratified cross-validation and an independent held-out test set. Results: The hybrid model based on EfficientNet-B0 achieved state-of-the-art performance, attaining an R2 score of 0.970 and a mean absolute error of 3.05 days on the test set. Permutation feature importance highlighted edema-to-tumor ratio and enhancing tumor volume as the most informative predictors. Grad-CAM visualizations confirmed the model's attention to anatomically and clinically relevant regions. Performance consistency across validation folds confirmed the framework's robustness and generalizability. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that multimodal deep learning can deliver accurate, explainable, and clinically actionable survival predictions in brain metastases. The proposed framework offers a promising foundation for integration into real-world oncology workflows to support personalized prognosis and informed therapeutic decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Călin Gheorghe Buzea
- “Prof. Dr. Nicolae Oblu” Clinical Emergency Hospital Iași, 700309 Iași, Romania;
- National Institute of Research and Development for Technical Physics, IFT Iași, 700050 Iași, Romania
| | - Diana-Ioana Boboc
- Medical Oncology-Radiotherapy Department, “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iași, 700115 Iași, Romania; (D.-I.B.); (M.-R.O.); (S.R.V.)
| | - Mădălina-Raluca Ostafe
- Medical Oncology-Radiotherapy Department, “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iași, 700115 Iași, Romania; (D.-I.B.); (M.-R.O.); (S.R.V.)
| | - Maricel Agop
- Physics Department, “Gheorghe Asachi” Technical University Iași, 700050 Iași, Romania;
| | - Lăcrămioara Ochiuz
- Faculty of Pharmacy, “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iași, 700115 Iași, Romania; (L.O.); (Ș.L.B.)
| | - Ștefan Lucian Burlea
- Faculty of Pharmacy, “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iași, 700115 Iași, Romania; (L.O.); (Ș.L.B.)
| | - Dragoș Ioan Rusu
- Department of Environmental Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, “V. Alecsandri” University of Bacău, 600115 Bacău, Romania;
| | - Laurențiu Bujor
- Amethyst Radiotherapy, Drumul Odăii nr. 42, 719241 Otopeni, Romania;
| | - Dragoș Teodor Iancu
- Medical Oncology-Radiotherapy Department, “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iași, 700115 Iași, Romania; (D.-I.B.); (M.-R.O.); (S.R.V.)
| | - Simona Ruxandra Volovăț
- Medical Oncology-Radiotherapy Department, “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iași, 700115 Iași, Romania; (D.-I.B.); (M.-R.O.); (S.R.V.)
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Jannin A, Escande A, Hartl D, Louvel G, Breuskin I, Borson-Chazot F, Hadoux J, Lamartina L, Do Cao C, Deschamps F. ENDOCAN-TUTHYREF guidelines. Locoregional therapies for locally advanced and/or metastatic thyroid cancer. ANNALES D'ENDOCRINOLOGIE 2025; 86:101790. [PMID: 40379205 DOI: 10.1016/j.ando.2025.101790] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2025] [Accepted: 05/01/2025] [Indexed: 05/19/2025]
Abstract
This article presents consensus recommendations by a multidisciplinary panel of endocrinologists, medical oncologists, pathologists, radiation oncologists, surgeons and nuclear medicine physicians. The recommendations specifically address iodine-refractory well-differentiated thyroid carcinoma and locally advanced and/or metastatic medullary thyroid carcinoma. Treatment algorithms based on risk-benefit assessments of various multimodal therapeutic approaches are proposed for each clinical scenario. Given the limited data available on the management of these rare but aggressive forms of thyroid cancer, these consensus recommendations provide essential guidance for multidisciplinary teams to ensure optimal care for patients with these complex thyroid carcinomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arnaud Jannin
- Department of Endocrinology, CHRU de Lille, Hôpital Claude-Huriez, Lille, France.
| | | | - Dana Hartl
- Thyroid Surgery Unit, Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Institute Gustave-Roussy, Paris, France
| | - Guillaume Louvel
- Department of Radiotherapy, Gustave-Roussy Cancer Campus, Paris-Saclay University, Villejuif, France
| | - Ingrid Breuskin
- Thyroid Surgery Unit, Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Institute Gustave-Roussy, Paris, France
| | | | - Julien Hadoux
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Endocrine Oncology, Gustave-Roussy, Paris, France
| | - Livia Lamartina
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Endocrine Oncology, Gustave-Roussy, Paris, France
| | - Christine Do Cao
- Department of Endocrinology, CHRU de Lille, Hôpital Claude-Huriez, Lille, France
| | - Frédéric Deschamps
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Gustave-Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, 114, rue Édouard-Vaillant, 94805 Villejuif, France; Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS, Gustave-Roussy, Aspects Métaboliques et Systémiques de l'Oncogenèse pour de Nouvelles Approches Thérapeutiques, 94805 Villejuif, France
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Sugitani I, Kiyota N, Ito Y, Onoda N, Hiromasa T, Horiuchi K, Kinuya S, Kondo T, Moritani S, Sugino K, Hara H. The 2024 revised clinical guidelines on the management of thyroid tumors by the Japan Association of Endocrine Surgery. Endocr J 2025; 72:545-635. [PMID: 40058844 PMCID: PMC12086281 DOI: 10.1507/endocrj.ej24-0644] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2024] [Accepted: 12/31/2024] [Indexed: 05/09/2025] Open
Abstract
The Japan Association of Endocrine Surgery published the first edition of the "Clinical guidelines on the management of thyroid tumors" in 2010 and the revised edition in 2018. The guideline presented herein is the English translation of the revised third edition, issued in 2024. The aim is to enhance health outcomes for patients suffering from thyroid tumors by facilitating evidence-based shared decision-making between healthcare providers and patients, as well as standardizing the management of thyroid tumors. The focus is on adult patients with thyroid tumors, addressing clinically significant issues categorized into areas such as an overview of the diagnosis and treatment of thyroid nodules, treatment strategies by histological type, radioactive iodine therapy, treatment of advanced differentiated carcinoma, pharmacotherapy, and complications and safety management associated with thyroid surgery. Thirty-two clinical questions were established in these areas. Following a comprehensive search of the literature and systematic review to evaluate the overall evidence, we aimed to present optimal recommendations by considering the balance of benefits and harms from the patient's perspective. We integrated evidence and clinical experience to determine the "Certainty of evidence" and "Strength of recommendations". Based on these, we illustrated overall flows of care as "Clinical algorithms". Necessary background knowledge of diseases and established clinical procedures for understanding the recommendations are presented in "Notes", while information that may be clinically useful but for which evidence remains insufficient is included in "Columns", based on the current state of evidence. Finally, future challenges for the next revision are presented as "Future research questions".
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iwao Sugitani
- Department of Endocrine Surgery, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo 113-8603, Japan
- the Task Force of the Japan Association of Endocrine Surgery on the Guidelines for Thyroid Tumors
| | - Naomi Kiyota
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Cancer Center, Kobe University Hospital, Kobe 650-0017, Japan
- the Task Force of the Japan Association of Endocrine Surgery on the Guidelines for Thyroid Tumors
| | - Yasuhiro Ito
- Department of Surgery, Kuma Hospital, Kobe 650-0011, Japan
- the Task Force of the Japan Association of Endocrine Surgery on the Guidelines for Thyroid Tumors
| | - Naoyoshi Onoda
- Department of Surgery, Kuma Hospital, Kobe 650-0011, Japan
- the Task Force of the Japan Association of Endocrine Surgery on the Guidelines for Thyroid Tumors
| | - Tomo Hiromasa
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Kanazawa University Hospital, Kanazawa 920-8641, Japan
- the Task Force of the Japan Association of Endocrine Surgery on the Guidelines for Thyroid Tumors
| | - Kiyomi Horiuchi
- Department of Endocrine Surgery, Tokyo Women’s Medical University, Tokyo 162-8666, Japan
- the Task Force of the Japan Association of Endocrine Surgery on the Guidelines for Thyroid Tumors
| | - Seigo Kinuya
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa 920-8641, Japan
- the Task Force of the Japan Association of Endocrine Surgery on the Guidelines for Thyroid Tumors
| | - Tetsuo Kondo
- Department of Pathology, University of Yamanashi, Yamanashi 409-3898, Japan
- the Task Force of the Japan Association of Endocrine Surgery on the Guidelines for Thyroid Tumors
| | - Sueyoshi Moritani
- Center for Head and Neck Thyroid Surgery, Oumi Medical Center, Shiga 525-8585, Japan
- the Task Force of the Japan Association of Endocrine Surgery on the Guidelines for Thyroid Tumors
| | - Kiminori Sugino
- Surgical Branch, Ito Hospital, Tokyo 150-8308, Japan
- the Task Force of the Japan Association of Endocrine Surgery on the Guidelines for Thyroid Tumors
| | - Hisato Hara
- Department of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba 305-8576, Japan
- the Task Force of the Japan Association of Endocrine Surgery on the Guidelines for Thyroid Tumors
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Crouzen JA, Zindler JD, Mast ME, Kleijnen JJE, Versluis MC, Hashimzadah M, Kiderlen M, van der Voort van Zyp NCMG, Broekman MLD, Petoukhova AL. Local recurrence and radionecrosis after single-isocenter multiple targets stereotactic radiotherapy for brain metastases. Sci Rep 2025; 15:15722. [PMID: 40325083 PMCID: PMC12053608 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-01034-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2025] [Accepted: 05/02/2025] [Indexed: 05/07/2025] Open
Abstract
Stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) is frequently used to treat brain metastases (BMs). The single-isocenter for multiple targets (SIMT) technique allows for faster treatment of large numbers of BMs, but may adversely affect planning target volume (PTV) coverage due to possible increased positioning uncertainties with an increased isocenter to tumor distance (ITD). This study aims to investigate the association of ITD with local recurrence (LR) and radionecrosis (RN). Patients treated with SRT using a single isocenter for multiple BMs were retrospectively analyzed. Previous cranial radiotherapy and inability to undergo MR imaging were exclusion criteria. Patients were irradiated using a Versa HD LINAC with 6 MV flattening filter-free (FFF) energy and a 6D robotic couch. A non-coplanar volumetric modulated arc technique was used and plans were delivered using 6MV FFF energy. Associations between potential risk factors and LR/RN were investigated with Cox regression analyses. Seventy-five patients with a total of 357 BMs were included. Median survival after SRT was nine months. LR occurred in 7 (9%) patients and 10 (13%) had RN. After 18 months, LR-free survival was 89% and RN-free survival was 85%, respectively. ITD was not significantly associated with LR and RN. GTV was significantly associated with both LR (HR 1.10, 95% CI 1.02-1.17, P 0.0079) and RN (HR 1.09, 95% CI 1.01-1.17, P 0.020). LINAC-based SIMT SRT is a safe and effective treatment modality for patients with multiple BMs. We found no increased risk of LR or RN for BMs located further away from the isocenter.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J A Crouzen
- Department of Radiotherapy, Haaglanden Medical Center, Lijnbaan 32, 2512 VA, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - J D Zindler
- Department of Radiotherapy, Haaglanden Medical Center, Lijnbaan 32, 2512 VA, The Hague, The Netherlands.
- Department of Radiotherapy, HollandPTC, Huismansingel 4, 2629 JH, Delft, The Netherlands.
| | - M E Mast
- Department of Radiotherapy, Haaglanden Medical Center, Lijnbaan 32, 2512 VA, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - J J E Kleijnen
- Department of Medical Physics, Haaglanden Medical Center, Lijnbaan 32, 2512 VA, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - M C Versluis
- Department of Radiotherapy, Haaglanden Medical Center, Lijnbaan 32, 2512 VA, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - M Hashimzadah
- Department of Radiotherapy, Haaglanden Medical Center, Lijnbaan 32, 2512 VA, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - M Kiderlen
- Department of Radiotherapy, Haaglanden Medical Center, Lijnbaan 32, 2512 VA, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | | | - M L D Broekman
- Department of Neurosurgery, Haaglanden Medical Center, Lijnbaan 32, 2512 VA, The Hague, The Netherlands
- Department of Neurosurgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Cell and Chemical Biology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - A L Petoukhova
- Department of Medical Physics, Haaglanden Medical Center, Lijnbaan 32, 2512 VA, The Hague, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Mansouri A, Ozair A, Bhanja D, Wilding H, Mashiach E, Haque W, Mikolajewicz N, de Macedo Filho L, Mahase SS, Machtay M, Metellus P, Dhermain F, Sheehan J, Kondziolka D, Lunsford LD, Niranjan A, Minniti G, Li J, Kalkanis SN, Wen PY, Kotecha R, McDermott MW, Bettegowda C, Woodworth GF, Brown PD, Sahgal A, Ahluwalia MS. Stereotactic radiosurgery for patients with brain metastases: current principles, expanding indications and opportunities for multidisciplinary care. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2025; 22:327-347. [PMID: 40108412 DOI: 10.1038/s41571-025-01013-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/28/2025] [Indexed: 03/22/2025]
Abstract
The management of brain metastases is challenging and should ideally be coordinated through a multidisciplinary approach. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has been the cornerstone of management for most patients with oligometastatic central nervous system involvement (one to four brain metastases), and several technological and therapeutic advances over the past decade have broadened the indications for SRS to include polymetastatic central nervous system involvement (>4 brain metastases), preoperative application and fractionated SRS, as well as combinatorial approaches with targeted therapy and immune-checkpoint inhibitors. For example, improved imaging and frameless head-immobilization technologies have facilitated fractionated SRS for large brain metastases or postsurgical cavities, or lesions in proximity to organs at risk. However, these opportunities come with new challenges and questions, including the implications of tumour histology as well as the role and sequencing of concurrent systemic treatments. In this Review, we discuss these advances and associated challenges in the context of ongoing clinical trials, with insights from a global group of experts, including recommendations for current clinical practice and future investigations. The updates provided herein are meaningful for all practitioners in clinical oncology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alireza Mansouri
- Department of Neurosurgery, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, USA.
- Penn State Cancer Institute, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, USA.
- Department of Neurosurgery, Penn State College of Medicine, Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, PA, USA.
| | - Ahmad Ozair
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Debarati Bhanja
- Department of Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Hannah Wilding
- Department of Neurosurgery, Penn State College of Medicine, Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - Elad Mashiach
- Department of Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Waqas Haque
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Nicholas Mikolajewicz
- Peter Gilgan Centre for Research and Learning, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Leonardo de Macedo Filho
- Penn State Cancer Institute, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Penn State College of Medicine, Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - Sean S Mahase
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Penn State Cancer Institute, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - Mitchell Machtay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Penn State Cancer Institute, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - Philippe Metellus
- Department of Neurosurgery, Ramsay Santé, Hôpital Privé Clairval, Marseille, France
| | - Frédéric Dhermain
- Radiation Therapy Department, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Jason Sheehan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Douglas Kondziolka
- Department of Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York University, New York, NY, USA
| | - L Dade Lunsford
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Ajay Niranjan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Giuseppe Minniti
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Anatomical Pathology, Sapienza IRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli, Italy
| | - Jing Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Steven N Kalkanis
- Department of Neurosurgery, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Patrick Y Wen
- Center For Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Rupesh Kotecha
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, USA
- Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Michael W McDermott
- Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Miami Neuroscience Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Chetan Bettegowda
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Graeme F Woodworth
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Brain Tumour Program, University of Maryland Marlene and Stewart Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
- University of Maryland-Medicine Institute for Neuroscience Discovery, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Paul D Brown
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Arjun Sahgal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Manmeet S Ahluwalia
- Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA.
- Department of Medical Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Bonzano E, Barruscotti S, Chiellino S, Montagna B, Bonzano C, Imarisio I, Colombo S, Guerrini F, Saddi J, La Mattina S, Tomasini CF, Spena G, Pedrazzoli P, Lancia A. Current Treatment Paradigms for Advanced Melanoma with Brain Metastases. Int J Mol Sci 2025; 26:3828. [PMID: 40332507 PMCID: PMC12027546 DOI: 10.3390/ijms26083828] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2025] [Revised: 04/12/2025] [Accepted: 04/17/2025] [Indexed: 05/08/2025] Open
Abstract
The therapeutic management of melanoma brain metastases has undergone a profound revolution during recent decades. Optimal integration of systemic therapies with local treatments seems to represent the strategy to pursue in order to maximize clinical outcomes, stressing the need for real multidisciplinary care in this setting of patients. However, the current approach in the clinics does not necessarily reflect what the current guidelines state, and several pending issues are present, from the ideal therapeutic sequence between stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and drug administration to the current role of surgery and whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT), all of which need to be addressed. This narrative review aims to provide practical help for navigating the current controversies, with an eye towards possible future advancements in the field, which could help to obtain a comprehensive molecular characterization of the tumor and a more personalized patient-centered therapeutic approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisabetta Bonzano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, 27100 Pavia, Italy (S.L.M.)
| | | | - Silvia Chiellino
- Unit of Oncology, Department of Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, 27100 Pavia, Italy (B.M.)
| | - Benedetta Montagna
- Unit of Oncology, Department of Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, 27100 Pavia, Italy (B.M.)
| | - Chiara Bonzano
- Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, University Eye Clinic, 16132 Genoa, Italy
| | - Ilaria Imarisio
- Unit of Oncology, Department of Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, 27100 Pavia, Italy (B.M.)
| | - Sara Colombo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, 27100 Pavia, Italy (S.L.M.)
| | - Francesco Guerrini
- Unit of Neurosurgery, Department of Head & Neck Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, 27100 Pavia, Italy; (F.G.)
| | - Jessica Saddi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, 27100 Pavia, Italy (S.L.M.)
| | - Salvatore La Mattina
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, 27100 Pavia, Italy (S.L.M.)
| | | | - Giannantonio Spena
- Unit of Neurosurgery, Department of Head & Neck Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, 27100 Pavia, Italy; (F.G.)
| | - Paolo Pedrazzoli
- Unit of Oncology, Department of Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, 27100 Pavia, Italy (B.M.)
| | - Andrea Lancia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, 27100 Pavia, Italy (S.L.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Pan K, Wang B, Xu X, Tang Y, Liang J, Ma S, Xia B, Zhu L. Efficacy analysis of brain radiotherapy in EGFR mutation non-small cell lung cancer with brain metastasis: a retrospective study. Discov Oncol 2025; 16:488. [PMID: 40198467 PMCID: PMC11979049 DOI: 10.1007/s12672-025-02230-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2024] [Accepted: 03/25/2025] [Indexed: 04/10/2025] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are at a heightened risk of developing brain metastases (BM). EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) are standard treatment for EGFR-mutated NSCLC. However, the necessity and optimal approach of brain radiotherapy for NSCLC patients with EGFR mutation remain inconclusive. We aimed to answer these questions by retrospectively analyzing the efficacy of radiotherapy in patients with BM from NSCLC with EGFR mutations. METHODS Patients with EGFR- mutant NSCLC and BMs who were diagnosed between January 1, 2018 and December 31, 2022 were included. According to treatment methods those patients were divided into whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) plus EGFR-TKI (WBRT group), stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) plus EGFR-TKI (SRT group) and EGFR-TKI alone (TKI-only group). Propensity-score-matching (PSM) was performed to minimize the effect of possible confounding factors and to balance treatment groups. RESULTS A total of 142 patients were included in this study. The median follow-up time was 22 months (range, 3.0-43.0 months). In the PSM cohort, the median intracranial progression free survival (iPFS) was 14, 30, 12 months and the median overall survival (OS) was 27 months, not reach and 33 months in WBRT group, SRT group and TKI-only group, respectively. Compared with the other two groups, SRT group significantly improved iPFS and OS (p < 0.05). And the local progression rate of intracranial lesions in SRT group was significantly reduced (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION This study showed that SRT combined with TKI may improve iPFS and prolong survival in patients with EGFR mutations in BMs from NSCLC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaicheng Pan
- Department of Radiotherapy, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, Westlake University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Bing Wang
- Department of Radiotherapy, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, Westlake University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Xiao Xu
- Department of Radiotherapy, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, Westlake University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Yi Tang
- Department of Radiotherapy, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, Westlake University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Jiafeng Liang
- Department of Radiotherapy, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, Westlake University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Shenglin Ma
- Department of Radiotherapy, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, Westlake University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Bing Xia
- Department of Radiotherapy, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, Westlake University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
| | - Lucheng Zhu
- Department of Radiotherapy, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, Westlake University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
- Department of Oncology, Affiliated Hangzhou Cancer Hospital, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Zheng S, Ding S, Liu B, Xiong Y, Zhou R, Zhang P, Liu F, Liu Y, Chen M, Situ Y, Wang M, Huang X, Yin S, Fang W, Mou Y, Qiu B, Wang D, Liu H. Efficacy and safety of online adaptive magnetic resonance-guided fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for brain metastases in non-small cell lung cancer (GASTO-1075): a single-arm, phase 2 trial. EClinicalMedicine 2025; 82:103189. [PMID: 40247887 PMCID: PMC12005306 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103189] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2025] [Revised: 03/19/2025] [Accepted: 03/20/2025] [Indexed: 04/19/2025] Open
Abstract
Background Brain metastases (BMs) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are associated with poor prognosis and quality of life (QoL). This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of online adaptive MR-guided fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) using a 1.5 T MR-Linac in this subgroup of patients. Methods This single-arm phase 2 trial was conducted at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre. Patients aged 18-75 years with NSCLC, 1-10 BMs, and an ECOG status of 0-1 were included. Key exclusion criteria included inability to undergo contrast-enhanced MRI and contraindications to bevacizumab. Patients received 30 Gy adaptive FSRT in 5 daily fractions under real-time MR guidance, with bevacizumab before (day 1) and after (day 21) FSRT. The primary endpoint was 1-year intracranial progression-free survival (IPFS); secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), 1-year progression-free survival (PFS), 1-year overall survival (OS), treatment-related toxicities, and QoL. All enrolled patients were included in primary and safety analyses. This trial is registered with Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04946019. Findings Between June 10th, 2021 and June 29th, 2023, 70 patients were assessed for eligibility and 55 patients were enrolled (median follow-up: 22.3 months). The median age was 58 years (IQR: 51-65), with 33% (18/55) female patients, and 82% (45/55) presenting with adenocarcinoma. The 1-year IPFS rate was 78.7% (95% CI, 68.2%-90.7%), with a median IPFS of 21.9 months (95% CI, 13.8-30.1 months). The 1-year PFS rate was 63.5% (95% CI: 51.8%-78.2%), and OS was 82.4% (95% CI: 72.6%-93.6%). The ORR reached 78% (95% CI: 65.0%-88.2%). Treatment-related toxicity was minimal, with only one case (2%) of grade 1 radiation necrosis. QoL improved steadily, with the Global Health Status score increasing from 65.67 ± 16.97 to 79.33 ± 8.79 at 6 months post FSRT (p < 0.0001). Interpretation Online adaptive FSRT using a 1.5 T MR-Linac has demonstrated effectiveness and good tolerability for BMs in patients with NSCLC. However, the relatively small sample size and short follow-up may affect result generalizability. Further randomised studies are warranted to confirm these findings and establish optimal treatment protocols. Funding The National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Number 82073328).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shiyang Zheng
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Lung Cancer Institute of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Guangdong Association Study of Thoracic Oncology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Shouliang Ding
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Biaoshui Liu
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Yixin Xiong
- Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, School of Economics and Trade, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Rui Zhou
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Lung Cancer Institute of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Guangdong Association Study of Thoracic Oncology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Pengxin Zhang
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Lung Cancer Institute of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Guangdong Association Study of Thoracic Oncology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Fangjie Liu
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Lung Cancer Institute of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Guangdong Association Study of Thoracic Oncology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Yimei Liu
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Meining Chen
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Yu Situ
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Lung Cancer Institute of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Guangdong Association Study of Thoracic Oncology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Mengru Wang
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Lung Cancer Institute of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Guangdong Association Study of Thoracic Oncology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Xiaoyan Huang
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Shaohan Yin
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Department of Radiology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Wenfeng Fang
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Yonggao Mou
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Department of Neurosurgery, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Bo Qiu
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Lung Cancer Institute of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Guangdong Association Study of Thoracic Oncology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Daquan Wang
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Lung Cancer Institute of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Guangdong Association Study of Thoracic Oncology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Hui Liu
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Lung Cancer Institute of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Guangdong Association Study of Thoracic Oncology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Warnke PJ, Kersting K, Knop J, Blach R. [Association between age-typical structural brain changes and whole brain irradiation]. Strahlenther Onkol 2025; 201:472-474. [PMID: 39971769 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-024-02337-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/12/2024] [Indexed: 02/21/2025]
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Jan Warnke
- Institut für Anatomie, Medizinische Fakultät Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Deutschland.
- Connectome - Studentische Vereinigung für Neurochirurgie, Neurologie und Neurowissenschaften e. V., Berlin, Deutschland.
| | - Katharina Kersting
- Connectome - Studentische Vereinigung für Neurochirurgie, Neurologie und Neurowissenschaften e. V., Berlin, Deutschland
- Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, korporatives Mitglied der Freien Universität Berlin und der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Julia Knop
- Connectome - Studentische Vereinigung für Neurochirurgie, Neurologie und Neurowissenschaften e. V., Berlin, Deutschland
- Institut für Zell- und Neurobiologie, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, korporatives Mitglied der Freien Universität Berlin und der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Robert Blach
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Spezielle Onkologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Deutschland
- Junge Deutsche Gesellschaft für Radioonkologie (jDEGRO), Berlin, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Wei Z, Jose S, Abou-Al-Shaar H, Deng H, Luy D, Kondziolka D, Niranjan A, Lunsford LD. Intracerebral and pituitary metastatic eccrine carcinoma: prolonged survival using stereotactic radiosurgery. Br J Neurosurg 2025; 39:240-245. [PMID: 36705060 DOI: 10.1080/02688697.2023.2170327] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2022] [Revised: 09/26/2022] [Accepted: 01/15/2023] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Eccrine gland carcinoma (EC) is a rare skin neoplasm that uncommonly spreads to the brain or pituitary gland. We describe the role of multiple stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) procedures to manage recurrent brain metastases of this rare disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS Retrospective chart review was completed to obtain details for this report. The study was performed under IRB study on medical record only and was exempt from patient's consent. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS A 59-year-old female underwent surgical excision of a right parietal scalp EC. Over the next 13 years, the patient underwent initial fractionated whole brain radiation therapy after she developed multiple brain metastases followed by systemic chemotherapy for extracranial disease. Because of repeated development of new brain disease, three SRS procedures were performed to treat a total of 50 brain metastases and a pituitary metastasis (PM). The patient expired from progressive systemic cancer spread 13 years after her initial surgical excision. Due to the rarity of metastatic EC to the brain, no standard treatment paradigm has emerged. Using multimodality options that included local excision of the original skin tumor, followed by radiation, systemic chemotherapy, and three SRS procedures, long-term survival was possible in this unusual case.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhishuo Wei
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Shalini Jose
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Hussam Abou-Al-Shaar
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Hansen Deng
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Diego Luy
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Douglas Kondziolka
- Department of Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ajay Niranjan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - L Dade Lunsford
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Patwe PT, Deshpande SS, Mahajan GR. Stereotactic and fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery for single and multiple brain metastases: Results of multicenter planning studies. Phys Med 2025; 132:104950. [PMID: 40056703 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2025.104950] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2024] [Revised: 01/10/2025] [Accepted: 02/26/2025] [Indexed: 03/10/2025] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Stereotactic and fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS/fSRS) utilization is growing in India, although planning studies are scarce. This study assessed clinical practices for SRS/fSRS treatment planning for brain metastases (BM) using ICRU-91 and explored the impact of planning tools. METHODS & MATERIALS Participants from 23 centers received two anonymized CT datasets with predrawn structures for single met (SM) and four BMs (MM) cases via email. Centers used local protocol to create plans. The plans were evaluated for target coverage, normal brain doses, and ICRU-91 dosimetric indices. RESULTS Monaco TPS overestimated mean GTV (PTV) by 3.7 (4.2)% and 2.1 (2.0)% for SM and MM respectively. Some institutions had good conformity and target coverage, whereas others had high OAR doses despite inadequate PTV dose coverage. Conformity index (CI) ranged from 1.07 to 1.45 (SM) and 1.06 to 1.25 (MM), and homogeneity index (HI) ranged from 0.07 to 0.28 (SM) and 0.13 to 0.32 (MM). Significant variation in GI and dose prescription isodose line selection was observed among centers. CONCLUSIONS There was a significant heterogeneity in the planning parameters noted among different centers. The study emphasized the importance of established planning protocols and comprehensive training for staff involved in SRS/fSRS. Notably, plans with finer MLC width outperformed, yet wider MLC plans achieved ICRU-91 indices comparable to published literature. The importance of our study is underscored by the absence of a national framework for SRS planning in India.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Parimal T Patwe
- School of Physical Sciences, Swami Ramanand Tirth Marathwada University, Nanded, Maharashtra, India 431 606
| | - Sudesh S Deshpande
- Department of Radiation Oncology, P.D. Hinduja National Hospital & Medical Research Centre, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India 400 016
| | - Gajanan R Mahajan
- Department of Physics, Shri Datta Arts, Commerce and Science College, Hadgaon, Nanded, Maharashtra 431 712, India.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Zhang H, Xu L, Xu J, Li M, Wang W, Zhang M, Zhang H, Hong T, Xiang S, Jiaxing, Yu. Immunotherapy promoting spontaneous regression of non-irradiated brain Metastases following gamma knife treatment: an intracranial abscopal effect? Neurosurg Rev 2025; 48:330. [PMID: 40146418 DOI: 10.1007/s10143-025-03505-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2024] [Revised: 03/05/2025] [Accepted: 03/23/2025] [Indexed: 03/28/2025]
Abstract
Radiotherapy has been shown to potentially induce systemic anti-tumor immunity, a phenomenon that may be further enhanced by immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy. However, whether this phenomenon occurs following Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) for brain metastases (BMs) and its potential clinical implications remain poorly understood. We retrospectively analyzed 36 non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with multiple BMs treated with multi-session GKRS. Spontaneous tumor regression (STR) was defined as ≥ 30% volume reduction in non-irradiated tumors. Competing risks analysis and Cox regression were used to evaluate local progression, distant brain failure (DBF), and survival outcomes. In this study, 44% (16/36) of patients received ICI therapy. STR was observed in 38.9% (14/36) of the cohort. Comparative analysis revealed that patients received ICI therapy did not exhibited an improved overall survival (OS) (p = 0.46), but demonstrated a trend toward a higher incidence of STR compared to those without ICI therapy (56.3% vs. 25.0%, p = 0.056). Multivariable regression analysis identified the absence of STR as an independent risk factor for mortality (Hazard Ratio [HR], 7.69; 95% CI: 1.61-33.33; p = 0.009) and local tumor progression (HR, 5.05; 95% CI: 1.71-14.93; p = 0.003). A systemic anti-tumor immunity could be induced by GKRS and cause STR of non-irradiated tumors. Patients exhibiting this phenomenon demonstrate significantly improved survival rates and local tumor control compared to those without this response. These findings underscore the potential immunomodulatory role of GKRS and its clinical implications in the management of BMs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hongyun Zhang
- Department of Neurosurgery, China International Neuroscience Institute, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, 45 Changchun St, Beijing, 100053, China
| | - Lixin Xu
- Department of Neurosurgery, China International Neuroscience Institute, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, 45 Changchun St, Beijing, 100053, China
| | - Jiankun Xu
- Department of Radiology Oncology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100053, China
| | - Mengzhao Li
- Department of Neurosurgery, China International Neuroscience Institute, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, 45 Changchun St, Beijing, 100053, China
| | - Wei Wang
- Department of Neurosurgery, China International Neuroscience Institute, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, 45 Changchun St, Beijing, 100053, China
| | - Mo Zhang
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100053, China
| | - Hongqi Zhang
- Department of Neurosurgery, China International Neuroscience Institute, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, 45 Changchun St, Beijing, 100053, China
| | - Tao Hong
- Department of Neurosurgery, China International Neuroscience Institute, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, 45 Changchun St, Beijing, 100053, China
| | - Sishi Xiang
- Department of Neurosurgery, China International Neuroscience Institute, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, 45 Changchun St, Beijing, 100053, China.
| | | | - Yu
- Department of Neurosurgery, China International Neuroscience Institute, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, 45 Changchun St, Beijing, 100053, China.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Kotecha R, La Rosa A, Brown PD, Vogelbaum MA, Navarria P, Bodensohn R, Niyazi M, Karschnia P, Minniti G. Multidisciplinary management strategies for recurrent brain metastasis after prior radiotherapy: An overview. Neuro Oncol 2025; 27:597-615. [PMID: 39495010 PMCID: PMC11889725 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noae220] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2024] Open
Abstract
As cancer patients with intracranial metastatic disease experience increasingly prolonged survival, the diagnosis and management of recurrent brain metastasis pose significant challenges in clinical practice. Prior to deciding upon a management strategy, it is necessary to ascertain whether patients have recurrent/progressive disease vs adverse radiation effect, classify the recurrence as local or distant in the brain, evaluate the extent of intracranial disease (size, number and location of lesions, and brain metastasis velocity), the status of extracranial disease, and enumerate the interval from the last intracranially directed intervention to disease recurrence. A spectrum of salvage local treatment options includes surgery (resection and laser interstitial thermal therapy [LITT]) with or without adjuvant radiotherapy in the forms of external beam radiotherapy, intraoperative radiotherapy, or brachytherapy. Nonoperative salvage local treatments also range from single fraction and fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS/FSRS) to whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT). Optimal integration of systemic therapies, preferably with central nervous system (CNS) activity, may also require reinterrogation of brain metastasis tissue to identify actionable molecular alterations specific to intracranial progressive disease. Ultimately, the selection of the appropriate management approach necessitates a sophisticated understanding of patient, tumor, and prior treatment-related factors and is often multimodal; hence, interdisciplinary evaluation for such patients is indispensable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rupesh Kotecha
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, Florida, USA
- Department of Translational Medicine, Hebert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Alonso La Rosa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain
| | - Paul D Brown
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | | | - Pierina Navarria
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital-IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Raphael Bodensohn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Tübingen-Stuttgart, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Maximilian Niyazi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Tübingen-Stuttgart, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Philipp Karschnia
- Department of Neurosurgery, Friedrich-Alexander-University, Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany
- Department of Neurosurgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany
| | - Giuseppe Minniti
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology, and Anatomical Pathology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
- IRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli (IS), Italy
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Akdemir EY, Gurdikyan S, Rubens M, Abrams KJ, Sidani C, Chaneles MC, Hall MD, Press RH, Wieczorek DJ, Tolakanahalli R, Gutierrez AN, Gal O, La Rosa A, Kutuk T, McDermott MW, Odia Y, Mehta MP, Kotecha R. Efficacy of 3D-TSE sequence-based radiosurgery in prolonging time to distant intracranial failure: A session-wise analysis in a histology-diverse patient cohort. Neuro Oncol 2025; 27:854-864. [PMID: 39492654 PMCID: PMC11889710 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noae232] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2024] [Indexed: 11/05/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for patients with brain metastases (BM) is associated with a risk of distant intracranial failure (DIF). This study evaluates the impact of integrating dedicated 3D fast/turbo spin echo (3D-TSE) sequences to MPRAGE in BM detection and DIF prolongation in a histology-agnostic patient cohort. METHODS The study population included adults treated with SRS from February 2019 to January 2024 who underwent MPRAGE alone or dual sequence with the addition of 3D-TSE starting from February 2020. Median times to DIF were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS The 216 study patients who underwent 332 SRS courses for 1456 BM imaged with MPRAGE and 3D-TSE (primary cohort) were compared to a control cohort (92 patients, 135 SRS courses, 462 BM). In the session-wise analysis, the median time to DIF between the cohorts was significantly prolonged in the primary vs. control cohorts (11.4 vs. 6.8 months, P = .029), more pronounced in the subgroups with 1-4 metastases (14.7 vs. 8.1 months, P = .008) and with solitary BM (36.4 vs. 10.9 months, P = .001). While patients relapsing on immunotherapy or targeted therapy did not significantly benefit from 3D-TSE (7.2 vs. 5.7 months, P = .280), those who relapsed on chemotherapy or who were off systemic therapy (including synchronous metastases) exhibited a trend toward longer time to DIF with 3D-TSE integration (14.7 vs. 7.9 months, P = .057). CONCLUSIONS Implementing 3D-TSE sequences into SRS practice increases BM detection across all patients and translates into clinical relevance by prolonging time to DIF, particularly in those with limited intracranial disease and those not receiving central nervous system-active agents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eyub Y Akdemir
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Selin Gurdikyan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Muni Rubens
- Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, Florida, USA
- Department of Clinical Informatics, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Kevin J Abrams
- Department of Radiology, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Charif Sidani
- Department of Radiology, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida, USA
| | | | - Matthew D Hall
- Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, Florida, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Robert H Press
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - D Jay Wieczorek
- Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, Florida, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Ranjini Tolakanahalli
- Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, Florida, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Alonso N Gutierrez
- Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, Florida, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Omer Gal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Alonso La Rosa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Tugce Kutuk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Michael W McDermott
- Department of Neurosurgery, Miami Neuroscience Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida, USA
- Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Yazmin Odia
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida, USA
- Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Minesh P Mehta
- Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, Florida, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Rupesh Kotecha
- Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, Florida, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Muthu S, Mudhana G. Optimizing normal tissue objectives (NTO) in eclipse treatment planning system (TPS) for stereotactic treatment of multiple brain metastases using non-coplanar RapidArc and comparison with HyperArc techniques. Jpn J Radiol 2025; 43:520-529. [PMID: 39503823 DOI: 10.1007/s11604-024-01686-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2024] [Accepted: 10/15/2024] [Indexed: 02/28/2025]
Abstract
PURPOSE To optimize NTO parameters in non-coplanar RapidArc (RA) stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for multiple brain metastases and compare them with HyperArc (HA) plans. MATERIALS AND METHODS Thirty patients with multiple brain metastases, receiving 21 Gy prescriptions, were retrospectively enrolled, with lesions ranging from two to eight and volumes between 0.27 and 10.56 cm3. Non-coplanar RapidArc plans utilized manual NTO (RA-mNTO) with varying dose fall-off values (0.1 mm-1, 0.5 mm-1, 1.0 mm-1, 2.0 mm-1, 3.0 mm-1) and end doses (50%, 25% & 10%). Additionally, two HyperArc plans were generated: HA-ALDO used Automatic Lower Dose Objectives with SRS NTO, while HA-mNTO used the same beam geometry with manual NTO parameters optimized from RA-mNTO plans. TrueBeam with High-Definition Multi-leaf Collimators (HDMLC), 6 MV Flattening Filter Free (FFF) Beam at a maximum dose rate of 1400 MU/min, and Eclipse version 16.1 TPS were used. Plans were assessed for Paddick Conformity Index (CI), Gradient Index (GI), Homogeneity Index (HI), normal brain doses (V18Gy, V15Gy, and V12Gy), Monitor Units (MUs), and delivery accuracy using aS1200 Digital Megavolt Imager (DMI) with 2%/2 mm gamma criteria. Statistical analysis utilized integrated scoring and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. RESULTS RA-mNTO plans with 0.5 mm⁻1 dose fall-off and 10% end-dose showed superior dosimetric outcomes: CI (0.85 ± 0.08), GI (3.63 ± 0.87), and HI (0.36 ± 0.06) compared to HA-ALDO (CI 0.84 ± 0.09, GI: 3.97 ± 0.85, HI: 0.39 ± 0.07) and HA-mNTO (CI 0.83 ± 0.08, GI: 3.60 ± 0.93, HI: 0.40 ± 0.06). MUs were comparable: RA-mNTO (9679 ± 1882), HA-ALDO (9509 ± 1315), and higher for HA-mNTO (10,457 ± 1980). RA-mNTO plans exhibited significantly lower normal brain doses (V18Gy: 1.78 ± 1.23, V15Gy: 3.54 ± 2.37, V12Gy: 6.21 ± 4.09) compared to HA-ALDO (V18Gy: 2.02 ± 1.34, V15Gy: 4.09 ± 2.66, V12Gy: 7.15 ± 4.56) and HA-mNTO (V18Gy: 1.85 ± 1.20, V15Gy: 3.68 ± 2.33, V12Gy: 6.36 ± 3.97). All techniques achieved > 98% gamma pass rate. CONCLUSION Non-coplanar RA plans with optimized mNTO settings outperformed HyperArc plans in all studied dosimetric parameters for SRS treatment of multiple brain metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sivakumar Muthu
- Department of Physics, School of Advanced Sciences, Vellore Institute of Technology (VIT), Chennai Campus, Vandalur - Kelambakkam Road, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, 600 127, India
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sri Shankara Cancer Hospital & Research Centre, Bangalore, 560 004, India
| | - Gopinath Mudhana
- Department of Physics, School of Advanced Sciences, Vellore Institute of Technology (VIT), Chennai Campus, Vandalur - Kelambakkam Road, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, 600 127, India.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Randrian V, Portales F, Bouché O, Thezenas S, Chibaudel B, Mabro M, Terrebonne E, Garnier-Tixidre C, Louvet C, André T, Aparicio T, Dubreuil O, Bouché G, Ychou M, Tougeron D. The METACER national cohort study of brain metastases in gastrointestinal cancers prospectively establishes prognostic factors. J Neurooncol 2025; 172:229-238. [PMID: 39747714 PMCID: PMC11832552 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-024-04905-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2024] [Accepted: 12/03/2024] [Indexed: 01/04/2025]
Abstract
PURPOSE Availability data are scarce and primarily retrospective in patients with brain metastasis (BM) from gastrointestinal (GI) cancers. The objective of this cohort was to determine prognostic factors for survival outcomes in patients with BM from GI cancers. METHODS METACER is a national multicentric prospective cohort study which included patients with BM diagnosis during a histologically proven digestive cancer follow-up between 2010 and 2014. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). The secondary endpoints were Progression-Free survival (PFS), prognostic factors, and BM-free survival as time from disease diagnosis to BM diagnosis. RESULTS METACER included 130 patients, with colorectal cancer (CRC) (N = 105) and eso-gastric (N = 25) cancer (EGC). The median OS was 6.6 months: 7.1 months (95%CI: 4.7-9.7) in CRC patients and 5.2 months, (95%CI: 1.9-7.6) in EG patients (p = 0.827). In multivariate analysis, cerebral BM location (versus cerebellar), BM surgery, performance status (0-1 versus 2), and a unique BM were significantly associated with prolonged OS. BM-free survival were 30.8 months (95%CI:25.2-36.9) in CRC patients and 7.8 months (95%CI:3.8-13.6) in EGC patients (p < 0.001). In synchronous metastatic disease, BM-free survival were 18.6 months (95%CI:13.1-25.2) in CRC patients and 3.7 months (95%CI:0.03-7.8) in EGC patients (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION BM in GI cancers are of poor prognosis. BM surgery should be considered in case of unique brain lesion. In metastatic settings, EGC patients have shorter BM-free survival than CRC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Violaine Randrian
- Department of Hepatology and Gastro-enterology, CHU de Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
- PRODICET, UR24144, Université de Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
| | - Fabienne Portales
- Department of Medical Oncology Department, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM), Montpellier, France
| | - Olivier Bouché
- Department of Digestive Oncology, CHU Reims, Reims, France
| | - Simon Thezenas
- Department of Medical Oncology Department, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM), Montpellier, France
| | - Benoist Chibaudel
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hôpital Franco-Britannique - Fondation Cognacq-Jay, Cancérologie Paris Ouest, Levallois-Perret, France
| | - May Mabro
- Department of Oncology, Foch Hospital, GERCOR, Suresnes, France
| | - Eric Terrebonne
- Department of Gastroenterology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Haut Lévèque, CIC 1401, Pessac, France
| | | | - Christophe Louvet
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France
| | - Thierry André
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sorbonne University, Saint-Antoine Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Thomas Aparicio
- Department of Gastroenterology, APHP, Saint Louis Hospital, Université de Paris, Paris, FFCD, France
| | - Olivier Dubreuil
- Department of Digestive Oncology, Groupe Hospitalier Diaconesses Croix Saint Simon, Paris, France
| | - Gregoire Bouché
- Department of Radiotherapy, Institut du Cancer Godinot, Reims, France
| | - Marc Ychou
- Department of Medical Oncology Department, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM), Montpellier, France
| | - David Tougeron
- Department of Hepatology and Gastro-enterology, CHU de Poitiers, Poitiers, France
- PRODICET, UR24144, Université de Poitiers, Poitiers, France
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Murugan P, Manickam R, Rajamanickam T, Muthu S, Dinesan C, Appunu K, Murali A. Dosimetric impact of arc simulation angular resolution in single-isocentre multi-target stereotactic radiosurgery. Radiol Phys Technol 2025; 18:227-237. [PMID: 39812945 DOI: 10.1007/s12194-024-00876-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2024] [Revised: 12/06/2024] [Accepted: 12/27/2024] [Indexed: 01/16/2025]
Abstract
This study evaluates the dosimetric impact of arc simulation angular resolution in VMAT-based Single Isocentre Multiple Target (SIMT) SRS, focusing on their dependence on target size, isocentre distance, number of arcs, and arc type. A phantom study analysed angular resolution (0.5°, 1°, 2°) effects on dosimetric accuracy for PTVs of 0.5 cm, 1 cm, and 2 cm at distances of 2.5 cm, 5 cm, and 7.5 cm from the isocentre using conformal arc and VMAT plans. Clinical validation involved 32 patients with 2-8 brain metastases, comparing plans recalculated at 1° and 2° resolutions. Dosimetric parameters included: Dnear-Min, Dnear-Max, Dmean, Dmedian, TVPIV, CIPaddick, GI, and Brain-GTV 12 Gy. For the 0.5 cm diameter target located at 7.5 cm distance from isocentre, phantom results showed TVPIV, Dmean, and GI deviations of 7.91%, 1.8%, and 0.85 for single-conformal arcs, which decreased to 4.84%, 1.3%, and 0.77 with 4-conformal arcs, and 3.4%, 0.96%, and 0.5 for 4-arc VMAT. Deviations varied based on target size, isocentre distance, number of arcs, and arc type. Clinical results mirrored the phantom study, with maximum TVPIV and GI deviations of 2.76% and 0.65 for the smallest target (0.6 cm) located at 7.5 cm distance for four-arc VMAT. Other dosimetric parameters showed minimal variations (< 1%). Correlation analysis revealed strong associations between dosimetric differences, target size, and distance (r = 0.6-0.78 for small targets). MANOVA identified TVPIV as the only significant parameter (p = 0.01). A 1° angular resolution significantly improves dosimetric accuracy for small, distally located targets in SIMT SRS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Perumal Murugan
- Department of Radiotherapy, Sri Shankara Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, 1st Cross, Shankarapuram, Basavanagui, Bengaluru, 560004, Karnataka, India
| | - Ravikumar Manickam
- Department of Radiotherapy, Sri Shankara Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, 1st Cross, Shankarapuram, Basavanagui, Bengaluru, 560004, Karnataka, India.
| | - Tamilarasan Rajamanickam
- Department of Radiotherapy, Sri Shankara Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, 1st Cross, Shankarapuram, Basavanagui, Bengaluru, 560004, Karnataka, India
| | - Sivakumar Muthu
- Department of Radiotherapy, Sri Shankara Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, 1st Cross, Shankarapuram, Basavanagui, Bengaluru, 560004, Karnataka, India
| | - C Dinesan
- Department of Radiotherapy, Sri Shankara Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, 1st Cross, Shankarapuram, Basavanagui, Bengaluru, 560004, Karnataka, India
| | - Karthik Appunu
- Department of Radiotherapy, Sri Shankara Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, 1st Cross, Shankarapuram, Basavanagui, Bengaluru, 560004, Karnataka, India
| | - Abishake Murali
- Department of Radiotherapy, Sri Shankara Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, 1st Cross, Shankarapuram, Basavanagui, Bengaluru, 560004, Karnataka, India
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Mogenet A, Greillier L, Tomasini P. [Recommendations for the management of oligometatic NSCLC]. Bull Cancer 2025; 112:3S95-3S99. [PMID: 40155082 DOI: 10.1016/s0007-4551(25)00162-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/01/2025]
Abstract
The concept of oligometastatic disease in lung cancer has been the subject of much publication and speculation. Indeed, beyond its definition, which is still a matter of debate, it is a rather broad concept considering synchronous oligometastatic disease but also oligoprogression and oligopersistence concepts. These questions are increasingly common considering the improvement of systemic treatments in recent years. Although no prospective randomized trial has been conducted to date, it would seem appropriate to offer patients local ablative treatment of oligoprogression, especially if symptomatic or in cases of oncogenic addiction. On the other hand, the most recent data do not defend the closure treatment approach for patients who benefit from immunotherapy. All in all, it is important to remember that systemic therapy remains the cornerstone of treatment for metastatic lung cancer, and that further robust randomized studies will be needed to determine the place of local therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alice Mogenet
- Multidisciplinary Oncology and Therapeutic Innovations Department, Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Marseille, Aix Marseille University, Marseille, France; Aix Marseille University, CNRS, Inserm, CRCM, Marseille, France
| | - Laurent Greillier
- Multidisciplinary Oncology and Therapeutic Innovations Department, Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Marseille, Aix Marseille University, Marseille, France; Aix Marseille University, CNRS, Inserm, CRCM, Marseille, France
| | - Pascale Tomasini
- Multidisciplinary Oncology and Therapeutic Innovations Department, Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Marseille, Aix Marseille University, Marseille, France; Aix Marseille University, CNRS, Inserm, CRCM, Marseille, France.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Rusthoven CG, Miao E, Boe LA, Pike LRG. Reply to: Significance of Up-Front Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients With Brain Metastases in the Era of New Generation Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors. J Clin Oncol 2025; 43:762-763. [PMID: 39546734 PMCID: PMC11829825 DOI: 10.1200/jco-24-02129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2024] [Accepted: 09/27/2024] [Indexed: 11/17/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Chad G Rusthoven
- Chad G. Rusthoven, MD, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO; Emily Miao, MD, PharmD, Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Lillian A. Boe, PhD, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; and Luke R.G. Pike, MD, DPhil, Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Emily Miao
- Chad G. Rusthoven, MD, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO; Emily Miao, MD, PharmD, Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Lillian A. Boe, PhD, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; and Luke R.G. Pike, MD, DPhil, Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Lillian A Boe
- Chad G. Rusthoven, MD, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO; Emily Miao, MD, PharmD, Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Lillian A. Boe, PhD, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; and Luke R.G. Pike, MD, DPhil, Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Luke R G Pike
- Chad G. Rusthoven, MD, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO; Emily Miao, MD, PharmD, Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Lillian A. Boe, PhD, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; and Luke R.G. Pike, MD, DPhil, Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Layng SC, Betsock A, Mansouri A, Komiya T, Miccio JA, Mahase SS, Knisely JPS. Brain metastases from lung cancer: recent advances and novel therapeutic opportunities. Discov Oncol 2025; 16:157. [PMID: 39934444 DOI: 10.1007/s12672-025-01873-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2024] [Accepted: 02/03/2025] [Indexed: 02/13/2025] Open
Abstract
Metastatic intracranial progression drastically impacts prognosis, therapeutic considerations and quality of life. The increasing incidence of lung cancer patients developing brain metastases (BM) parallels the incorporation of more effective systemic agents and improved surveillance. Our evolving knowledge of BM pathophysiology, along with advancements in surgical, radiotherapy and systemic therapy options, is rapidly changing prognostication and treatment paradigms. Optimal management of BM in the modern era is patient-specific, dependent on performance status, comorbidities, intracranial and extracranial disease burden, leptomeningeal disease, and the presence of targetable mutations. The purpose of this review is to provide a detailed overview of the detection, prognostication, and multidisciplinary, management of BM arising from non-small cell lung cancer and small cell lung cancer. We discuss contemporary evidence and active clinical trials supporting a wide array of treatment options, including surgery, radiosurgery, memory-avoidance whole brain radiation, craniospinal irradiation, chemotherapy, targeted agents and immunotherapy. Multidisciplinary paradigms will continue to evolve as currently accruing randomized trials evaluating these promising treatments options mature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen C Layng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Penn State Cancer Institute, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - Alexis Betsock
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Penn State Cancer Institute, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - Alireza Mansouri
- Department of Neurosurgery, Penn State Cancer Institute, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - Takefumi Komiya
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, Penn State Cancer Institute, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - Joseph A Miccio
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Penn State Cancer Institute, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - Sean S Mahase
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Penn State Cancer Institute, Hershey, PA, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
El Shafie RA, Bernhardt D, Welzel T, Schiele A, Schmitt D, Thalmann P, Erdem S, Paul A, Höne S, Lang K, König L, Weykamp F, Adeberg S, Lentz-Hommertgen A, Jäkel C, Bozorgmehr F, Nestle U, Thomas M, Sander A, Kieser M, Debus J, Rieken S. Stereotactic radiosurgery for 1-10 brain metastases to avoid whole-brain radiotherapy: Results of the CYBER-SPACE randomized phase 2 trial. Neuro Oncol 2025; 27:479-491. [PMID: 39340439 PMCID: PMC11812257 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noae201] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2024] [Indexed: 09/30/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is an emerging alternative to whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) for treating multiple brain metastases (BM), reducing toxicity, and improving tumor control. The CYBER-SPACE trial compared SRS based on either SPACE or MPRAGE MRI sequence for avoiding or delaying WBRT in patients with 1-10 BM. METHODS Patients with 1-10 untreated BM were randomized 1:1 to receive SRS of all lesions based on either SPACE or MPRAGE MRI sequences. If subsequently new BM occurred, SRS was repeated. WBRT was indicated upon occurrence of >10 new BM, leptomeningeal disease, or exhausted SRS-radiotolerance. The primary outcome was freedom from WBRT indication (WBRTi). Secondary outcomes included overall survival (OS), safety, and quality of life. RESULTS A total of 202 patients were randomized; SPACE n = 99, MPRAGE n = 103. Twelve-month WBRTi-free survival was 77.1% (95% CI: 69.5%-83.1%) overall, 78.5% (95% CI: 66.7%-86.5%) for SPACE, and 76.0% (95% CI: 65.2%-83.9%) for MPRAGE (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.43-1.63, P = .590). Patients with 5-10 BM had shorter WBRTi-free survival (HR = 3.13, 95% CI: 1.53-6.40, P = .002). Median OS was 13.1 months overall, 10.5 months for SPACE, and 15.2 months for MPRAGE (HR = 1.10, 95% CI: 0.78-1.56, P = .585). Neurologic death rate was 10.1%. Predictors for longer OS included Karnofsky Performance Status >80% (HR = 0.51, 95% CI: 0.33-0.77, P = .002) and concurrent immunotherapy (HR = 0.34, 95% CI: 0.23-0.52, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS The more sensitive SPACE sequence did not improve outcomes over MPRAGE. SRS with thorough monitoring and immediate re-treatment for new lesions decreases the need for WBRT and achieves low neurologic death rates. SRS should be considered a favorable alternative to WBRT for patients with 1-10 BM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rami A El Shafie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Denise Bernhardt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine and Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
| | - Thomas Welzel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Annabella Schiele
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Daniela Schmitt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Paul Thalmann
- Institute of Medical Biometry, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sinem Erdem
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Angela Paul
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Simon Höne
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Kristin Lang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Laila König
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Fabian Weykamp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sebastian Adeberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Adriane Lentz-Hommertgen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Cornelia Jäkel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Farastuk Bozorgmehr
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Thoraxklinik, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
- Translational Lung Research Centre Heidelberg (TLRC-H), German Centre for Lung Research (DZL), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ursula Nestle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Freiburg University Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kliniken Maria Hilf, Moenchengladbach, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Michael Thomas
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Thoraxklinik, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
- Translational Lung Research Centre Heidelberg (TLRC-H), German Centre for Lung Research (DZL), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Anja Sander
- Institute of Medical Biometry, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Meinhard Kieser
- Institute of Medical Biometry, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany (J.D.)
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stefan Rieken
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Benghiat H, Hodson J, Hickman M, Meade S, Hussein S, Stange R, Heyes G, Jackson T, Augustus H, Chavda S, Sawlani V, Ramalingham S, Bowen M, Hartley AG, Sanghera P. Outcomes of Patients With Five or More Brain Metastases Treated With Stereotactic Radiosurgery From 2014 to 2019: A UK Series. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2025; 38:103697. [PMID: 39638716 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2024.103697] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2024] [Revised: 11/11/2024] [Accepted: 11/18/2024] [Indexed: 12/07/2024]
Abstract
AIMS Treatment with stereotactic radiosurgery/radiotherapy (SRS/SRT) is standard practice in selected patients with small numbers of brain metastases (BMs). It is less accepted in those with ≥5 BMs, due to the lack of a prospective evidence base. While randomised trials are ongoing, we present the experience of a single UK cancer centre in using SRS/SRT for patients with 5 or more BMs without whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT). MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients undergoing treatment at a single centre between 2014 and 2019 were prospectively identified. All follow-up imaging was reviewed to identify any evidence of local failure or distant brain progression, which was analysed using a death-censored approach. RESULTS A total of N = 88 patients were included, with a median of seven BMs (range: 5-37). Post-SRS/SRT toxicity events occurred in 42%, most commonly reliance on steroids for ≥4 weeks (36% of the cohort). Median survival was 10 months, with median freedom from local failure and distant brain progression of 12 and 8 months, respectively; none of these outcomes differed significantly by the number of BMs. Brain-directed salvage treatment was required after a median of 21 months, and was not significantly associated with the number of BMs. CONCLUSION SRS/SRT alone may have a role in the management of selected patients with multiple BMs. Since the number of BMs were not significantly associated with overall survival or disease control, the National Health Service (NHS) commissioning criteria should continue to be based on tumour volume.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Benghiat
- Hall-Edwards Radiotherapy Research Group, Cancer Centre, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK.
| | - J Hodson
- Research Development and Innovation, Institute of Translational Medicine, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - M Hickman
- Hall-Edwards Radiotherapy Research Group, Cancer Centre, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - S Meade
- Hall-Edwards Radiotherapy Research Group, Cancer Centre, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - S Hussein
- Hall-Edwards Radiotherapy Research Group, Cancer Centre, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - R Stange
- Hall-Edwards Radiotherapy Research Group, Cancer Centre, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - G Heyes
- Hall-Edwards Radiotherapy Research Group, Cancer Centre, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - T Jackson
- Hall-Edwards Radiotherapy Research Group, Cancer Centre, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - H Augustus
- Hall-Edwards Radiotherapy Research Group, Cancer Centre, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - S Chavda
- Department of Radiology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - V Sawlani
- Department of Radiology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - S Ramalingham
- Department of Radiology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - M Bowen
- Department of Radiology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - A G Hartley
- Hall-Edwards Radiotherapy Research Group, Cancer Centre, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - P Sanghera
- Hall-Edwards Radiotherapy Research Group, Cancer Centre, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Sarria GR, Fleckenstein J, Eckl M, Stieler F, Ruder A, Bendszus M, Schmeel LC, Koch D, Feisst A, Essig M, Wenz F, Giordano FA. Impact of the Novel MRI Contrast Agent Gadopiclenol on Radiotherapy Decision Making in Patients With Brain Metastases. Invest Radiol 2025; 60:138-144. [PMID: 39159365 DOI: 10.1097/rli.0000000000001115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/21/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this study was to assess the effect of gadopiclenol versus gadobenate dimeglumine contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on decision-making between whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for treatment of brain metastases (BMs). METHODS Patients with BMs underwent 2 separate MRI examinations in a double-blind crossover phase IIb comparative study between the MRI contrast agents gadopiclenol and gadobenate dimeglumine, both administered at 0.1 mmol/kg. The imaging data of a single site using identical MRI scanners and protocols were included in this post hoc analysis. Patients with 1 or more BMs in any of both MRIs were subjected to target volume delineation for treatment planning. Two radiation oncologists contoured all visible lesions and decided upon SRS or WBRT, according to the number of metastases. For each patient, SRS or WBRT treatment plans were calculated for both MRIs, considering the gross target volume (GTV) as the contrast-enhancing aspects of the tumor. Mean GTVs and volume of healthy brain exposed to 12 Gy (V 12 ), as well as Dice similarity coefficient scores, were obtained. The Spearman rank (ρ) correlation was additionally calculated for assessing linear differences. Three different expert radiation oncologists blindly rated the contrast enhancement for contouring purposes. RESULTS Thirteen adult patients were included. Gadopiclenol depicted additional BM as compared with gadobenate dimeglumine in 7 patients (54%). Of a total of 63 identified metastatic lesions in both MRI sets, 3 subgroups could be defined: A, 48 (24 pairs) detected equal GTVs visible in both modalities; B, 13 GTVs only visible in the gadopiclenol set (mean ± SD, 0.16 ± 0.37 cm 3 ); and C, 2 GTVs only visible in the gadobenate dimeglumine set (mean ± SD, 0.01 ± 0.01). Treatment indication was changed for 2 (15%) patients, 1 from no treatment to SRS and for 1 from SRS to WBRT. The mean GTVs and brain V 12 were comparable between both agents ( P = 0.694, P = 0.974). The mean Dice similarity coefficient was 0.70 ± 0.14 (ρ = 0.82). According to the readers, target volume definition was improved in 63.9% of cases (23 of 36 evaluations) with gadopiclenol and 22.2% with gadobenate dimeglumine (8 of 36), whereas equivalence was obtained in 13.9% (5 of 36). CONCLUSIONS Gadopiclenol-enhanced MRI improved BM detection and characterization, with a direct impact on radiotherapy treatment decision between WBRT and SRS. Additionally, a more exact target delineation and planning could be performed with gadopiclenol. A prospective evaluation in a larger cohort of patients is required to confirm these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gustavo R Sarria
- From the Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany (G.R.S., L.C.S., D.K., A.F.); Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany (J.F., M. Eckl, F.S., A.R., F.A.G.); Department of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany (M.B.); Department of Radiology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada (M. Essig); and University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg University, Freiburg, Germany (F.W.)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Akhavan-Sigari A, Hori YS, Harary PM, Persad AR, Kassu R, Tayag A, Ustrzynski L, Emrich SC, Park DJ, Chang SD. Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Choriocarcinoma Brain Metastases: Illustrative Case Presentation and Systematic Review. World Neurosurg 2025; 194:123387. [PMID: 39491621 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.10.116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2024] [Revised: 10/27/2024] [Accepted: 10/28/2024] [Indexed: 11/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Choriocarcinoma (CC) is a rare and aggressive form of germ cell tumor. There is limited evidence describing clinical outcomes in patients with primary CC and brain metastases (BM). Only a few single case reports have documented the use of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for CC BM. METHODS We retrospectively assessed patients who were treated with SRS for pure CC BM from 1998 to 2024. Lesion follow-up sizes and local tumor control status were evaluated after SRS treatment using response evaluation criteria in solid tumors criteria. A comprehensive literature search was performed for CC BM in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. RESULTS In our series, 3 patients with 7 CC BM underwent SRS. Two were male with testicular CC and one was female with gestational CC. The median diameter of the lesions was 8 mm, with a median volume of 0.14 cm3 at treatment. Magnetic resonance imaging at 3 and 6 months showed reductions in median diameters to 6 mm and 4 mm, respectively. At the last follow-up visits, one lesion had local progression at 15 months after SRS and 1 lesion had sustained complete response. The systematic review yielded 249 articles. After screening, 18 reports were identified for CC BM. Among these reports, only 3 single case reports document outcomes of SRS for CC BM. CONCLUSIONS SRS is a feasible and viable approach for CC BM, particularly in cases where immediate surgical management is not necessary. This is the largest report to date evaluating the outcome of CC BM treated with SRS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Yusuke S Hori
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Paul M Harary
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Amit Rl Persad
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Rodas Kassu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Armine Tayag
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Louisa Ustrzynski
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Sara C Emrich
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - David J Park
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Steven D Chang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Fares J, Petrosyan E, Dmello C, Lukas RV, Stupp R, Lesniak MS. Rethinking metastatic brain cancer as a CNS disease. Lancet Oncol 2025; 26:e111-e121. [PMID: 39914421 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(24)00430-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2023] [Revised: 07/21/2024] [Accepted: 07/23/2024] [Indexed: 05/07/2025]
Abstract
Advances in molecular biology, genetics, and epigenetics have refined our understanding of metastatic brain cancer and underscored the need for better classification and targeted approaches. The heterogeneity of brain metastases highlights the differences from their primary source of origin and contributes to therapeutic resistance. Before colonising the brain, tumour cells acquire specialised proficiencies that enable them to capitalise on the unique microenvironment of the brain. The tumour cells further orchestrate key adaptations to adjust to the brain microenvironment by manipulating the blood-brain barrier, evading immune surveillance, rewiring metabolic profiles, and reprogramming astrocytes. These adaptations facilitate tumour survival, growth, and treatment resistance. Recognising metastatic brain cancer as a distinctive CNS disease, rather than an extension of the primary cancer, would support the development of rational approaches that target its molecular and genetic features and improve research funding in this area. Here, we delve into the distinct genetic and phenotypic characteristics of metastatic brain cancer, and reflect on how a change in the perception of this disease could accelerate the development of more effective therapies and drive continued progress in the field of neuro-oncology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jawad Fares
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA; Northwestern Medicine Malnati Brain Tumor Institute, Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Edgar Petrosyan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA; Northwestern Medicine Malnati Brain Tumor Institute, Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Crismita Dmello
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA; Northwestern Medicine Malnati Brain Tumor Institute, Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Rimas V Lukas
- Department of Neurology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA; Northwestern Medicine Malnati Brain Tumor Institute, Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Roger Stupp
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA; Department of Neurology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA; Northwestern Medicine Malnati Brain Tumor Institute, Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Maciej S Lesniak
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA; Northwestern Medicine Malnati Brain Tumor Institute, Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Yri OE, Astrup GL, Karlsson AT, van Helvoirt R, Hjermstad MJ, Husby KM, Loge JH, Lund JÅ, Lundeby T, Paulsen Ø, Skovlund E, Taran MI, Winther RR, Aass N, Kaasa S. Survival and quality of life after first-time diagnosis of brain metastases: a multicenter, prospective, observational study. THE LANCET REGIONAL HEALTH. EUROPE 2025; 49:101181. [PMID: 39807153 PMCID: PMC11728971 DOI: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.101181] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2024] [Revised: 11/28/2024] [Accepted: 12/02/2024] [Indexed: 01/16/2025]
Abstract
Background A major concern in anticancer treatment (ACT) of brain metastases (BM) is exposing patients with short expected survival to treatments that negatively impact on quality of life (QoL). Such futile ACT at the end of life is time-consuming and burdensome for patients and their families and entails unnecessary healthcare costs. Refraining from ACT is challenging for both physicians and patients. This study aimed to provide real-life data on survival after BM diagnosis and patient reported outcomes (PROs) after ACT to identify risk factors for futile treatment and to support BM treatment decisions. Methods This multi-center, prospective, observational study recruited consecutive patients with first-time BM from November 2017 to March 2021. Patients were followed until death or study end (October 1st, 2023). Clinical factors associated with survival were analyzed by the Cox' proportional hazards model. Changes in PROs after BM treatment were described according to Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, survival, and treatment groups. Findings For the total cohort (N = 912), median overall survival (mOS) after BM diagnosis was 5.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.2-6.7). ECOG 2-4, uncontrolled extracranial metastases, and ≥5 BM were associated with short survival. In patients treated with radiotherapy, survival for patients with ECOG 2 and those with ECOG 3-4 was similar and particularly short for the whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) group (ECOG 2: 2.9 months [95% CI 2.3-3.5]; ECOG 3-4: 2.1 [1.5-2.7]). Patients surviving <6 months after BM diagnosis reported worse QoL scores two months after ACT; patients surviving >6 months reported stable scores over time. Interpretation Patients with ECOG 2-4, especially those with uncontrolled extracranial metastases and ≥5 BM, are at risk for futile ACT. BM treatment guidelines should strongly caution against ACT to patients with expected survival <6 months and specifically advise against WBRT. Funding The South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority; The Norwegian Cancer Society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olav Erich Yri
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, PO Box 4950 Nydalen, Oslo, 0424, Norway
- European Palliative Care Research Centre (PRC), Institute for Clinical Medicine, PO Box 1171, Blindern, Oslo, 0318, Norway
| | - Guro Lindviksmoen Astrup
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, PO Box 4950 Nydalen, Oslo, 0424, Norway
- European Palliative Care Research Centre (PRC), Institute for Clinical Medicine, PO Box 1171, Blindern, Oslo, 0318, Norway
| | - Astrid Telhaug Karlsson
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, PO Box 4950 Nydalen, Oslo, 0424, Norway
- European Palliative Care Research Centre (PRC), Institute for Clinical Medicine, PO Box 1171, Blindern, Oslo, 0318, Norway
| | - Rene van Helvoirt
- Department of Oncology, Sorlandet Hospital Trust, PO Box 416 Lundsiden, Kristiansand, 4604, Norway
| | - Marianne Jensen Hjermstad
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, PO Box 4950 Nydalen, Oslo, 0424, Norway
- European Palliative Care Research Centre (PRC), Institute for Clinical Medicine, PO Box 1171, Blindern, Oslo, 0318, Norway
| | - Kristin Moksnes Husby
- Department of Surgery, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust, PO Box 800, Drammen, 3004, Norway
| | - Jon Håvard Loge
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, PO Box 4950 Nydalen, Oslo, 0424, Norway
- European Palliative Care Research Centre (PRC), Institute for Clinical Medicine, PO Box 1171, Blindern, Oslo, 0318, Norway
| | - Jo-Åsmund Lund
- Clinic for Cancer Treatment and Rehabilitation, Møre and Romsdal Hospital Trust, PO Box 1600, Ålesund, 6026, Norway
- Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Services, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, PO Box 1517, Ålesund, 6025, Norway
| | - Tonje Lundeby
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, PO Box 4950 Nydalen, Oslo, 0424, Norway
- European Palliative Care Research Centre (PRC), Institute for Clinical Medicine, PO Box 1171, Blindern, Oslo, 0318, Norway
| | - Ørnulf Paulsen
- European Palliative Care Research Centre (PRC), Institute for Clinical Medicine, PO Box 1171, Blindern, Oslo, 0318, Norway
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Telemark Hospital Trust, PO Box 2900 Kjørbekk, Skien, 3710, Norway
| | - Eva Skovlund
- Department of Public Health and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), PO Box 8905, Trondheim, 7491, Norway
| | - Marius-Ioan Taran
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Vestfold Hospital Trust, PO Box 2168, Tønsberg, 3103, Norway
| | - Rebecca Rootwelt Winther
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, PO Box 4950 Nydalen, Oslo, 0424, Norway
- European Palliative Care Research Centre (PRC), Institute for Clinical Medicine, PO Box 1171, Blindern, Oslo, 0318, Norway
| | - Nina Aass
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, PO Box 4950 Nydalen, Oslo, 0424, Norway
- European Palliative Care Research Centre (PRC), Institute for Clinical Medicine, PO Box 1171, Blindern, Oslo, 0318, Norway
| | - Stein Kaasa
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, PO Box 4950 Nydalen, Oslo, 0424, Norway
- European Palliative Care Research Centre (PRC), Institute for Clinical Medicine, PO Box 1171, Blindern, Oslo, 0318, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Takahashi Y, Oshika R, Tachibana R, Shirai K, Asakura H, Miyazaki M, Sagawa T, Takahashi S, Kuwae T, Kojima H, Nishiyama S, Nemoto H, Ishihara Y, Umeda M, Kijima K, Kobayashi D, Suzuki K, Nozawa Y, Hoshida K, Kitagawa T, Endo H, Matsunaga Y, Itagaki H, Ishida M, Kanahara S, Horita R, Hori D, Tachibana H. Spatial accuracy of dose delivery significantly impacts the planning target volume margin in linear accelerator-based intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery. Sci Rep 2025; 15:3608. [PMID: 39875508 PMCID: PMC11775166 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-87769-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2024] [Accepted: 01/21/2025] [Indexed: 01/30/2025] Open
Abstract
The impact of three-dimensional (3D) dose delivery accuracy of C-arm linacs on the planning target volume (PTV) margin was evaluated for non-coplanar intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). A multi-institutional 3D starshot test using beams from seven directions was conducted at 22 clinics using Varian and Elekta linacs with X-ray CT-based polymer gel dosimeters. Variability in dose delivery accuracy was observed, with the distance between the imaging isocenter and each beam exceeding 1 mm at one institution for Varian and nine institutions for Elekta. The calculated PTV margins for Varian and Elekta linacs that could cover the gross tumor volume with 95% probability at 95% of the institutions were 2.3 and 3.5 mm, respectively, in the superior-inferior direction. However, with multifactorial system management (i.e., high-accuracy 3D dose delivery with rigorous linac quality assurance, strict patient immobilization, and high intra-fractional positioning accuracy), these margins could be reduced to 1.0 mm and 1.5 mm, respectively. The findings indicate significant millimeter-level variability in 3D dose delivery accuracy among linacs installed in clinical settings. Thus, maximizing a linac's 3D dose delivery accuracy is essential to achieve the required PTV margin in intracranial SRS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuta Takahashi
- Division of Radiation Medical Physics, Jichi Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Riki Oshika
- Radiation Safety and Quality Assurance division, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, 277-8577, Japan
| | | | - Katsuyuki Shirai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Jichi Medical University Hospital, Tochigi, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Asakura
- Radiation Oncology Center, Dokkyo Medical University Hospital, Tochigi, Japan
| | - Masayoshi Miyazaki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Tomohiro Sagawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Shinichi Takahashi
- Division of Radiation Technology, Hospital East, National Cancer Center, Chiba, Japan
| | | | - Hironori Kojima
- Department of Radiology, Kanazawa University Hospital, Kanazawa, Ishikawa, Japan
| | - Shiro Nishiyama
- Department of Radiotechnology, Saiseikai Kawaguchi General Hospital, Saitama, Japan
| | - Hikaru Nemoto
- Department of Radiology, University of Yamanashi, Yamanashi, Japan
| | - Yoshitomo Ishihara
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Medical Physics, Japanese Red Cross Wakayama Medical Center, Wakayama, Japan
| | - Mariko Umeda
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan
| | - Kotaro Kijima
- Department of Radiology, NHO Saitama Hospital, Saitama, Japan
| | - Daisuke Kobayashi
- Department of Radiology, University of Tsukuba Hospital, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Keiji Suzuki
- Department of Radiology, University of Tsukuba Hospital, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Yuki Nozawa
- Department of Radiology, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kento Hoshida
- Department of Radiology, Kurume University Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Tomoki Kitagawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| | - Hiromitsu Endo
- Department of Radiation Physics and Technology, Southern TOHOKU General Hospital, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Yuki Matsunaga
- Department of Radiology, Fukuoka Tokushukai Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Hiroya Itagaki
- Department of Radiology, Niigata City General Hospital, Niigata, Japan
| | - Mayumi Ishida
- Division of Radiology, JCHO Osaka Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Shigeru Kanahara
- Central Radiology Division, Kawasaki Medical School General Medical Center, Okayama, Japan
| | - Ryo Horita
- Central Radiology Division, Nagoya City University East Medical Center, Aichi, Japan
| | - Daisuke Hori
- Department of Radiology, Japanese Red Cross Nagasaki Genbaku Hospital, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Hidenobu Tachibana
- Radiation Safety and Quality Assurance division, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, 277-8577, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Alrasheed AS, Aleid AM, Alharbi RA, Alamer MA, Alomran KA, Bin Maan SA, Almalki SF. Stereotactic radiosurgery versus whole-brain radiotherapy for intracranial metastases: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Neurol Int 2025; 16:18. [PMID: 39926465 PMCID: PMC11799717 DOI: 10.25259/sni_913_2024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2024] [Accepted: 01/04/2025] [Indexed: 02/11/2025] Open
Abstract
Background Brain metastasis has a negative influence on the morbidity and mortality of cancer patients. Conventionally, whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) was favored as the standard treatment for brain metastases. However, it has been linked to a significant decline in neuro-cognitive function and poor quality of life. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has recently gained prominence as an alternative modality, considering that it provides targeted high-dose radiation while minimizing adverse effects. This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of SRS versus WBRT in patients with intracranial metastases. Methods According to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement, through July 2024, we searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science for articles comparing WBRT and SRS in patients with intracranial metastases. Outcomes included local and distant recurrence, leptomeningeal disease (LMD), and survival. We also used a random-effect model to perform a meta-analysis. Results The findings revealed no significant differences in local (risk ratio [RR] = 0.70, 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.46, 1.06]) or distant recurrence rates (RR = 0.83, 95% CI [0.54, 1.28], P = 0.41) between WBRT and SRS. However, SRS was associated with a greater risk of post-radiation LMD (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.09, 95% CI [1.47, 6.49], P = 0.003). Survival rates at 1 year (RR = 1.03, 95% CI [0.83, 1.29], P = 0.76) and 5 years (RR = 0.89, 95% CI [0.39, 2.04], P = 0.78) demonstrated no significant differences. Conclusion SRS and WBRT exhibited similar recurrence rates and overall survival (OS) at 1 and 5 years, with WBRT being more effective in managing post-radiation LMD. SRS patients, on the other hand, had longer OS when measured in months.
Collapse
|
33
|
Terabe M, Kamomae T, Taniguchi Y, Ichikawa H, Yamada T, Miyachi T, Miyauchi R, Ito J, Ishihara S. Comparison of single- and multi-isocenter planning with Dynamic WaveArc for multiple brain metastases. JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH 2025; 66:74-81. [PMID: 39724931 PMCID: PMC11753834 DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rrae098] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2024] [Revised: 10/15/2024] [Indexed: 12/28/2024]
Abstract
Dynamic WaveArc (DWA) is a technique used for continuous, non-coplanar volumetric-modulated arc therapy on the Vero4DRT platform. This study aimed to evaluate the application of single-isocenter DWA (SI-DWA) for treating multiple brain metastases by comparing dose distribution and irradiation time with multi-isocenter DWA (MI-DWA) through retrospective treatment planning. Treatment plans were developed for SI-DWA and MI-DWA in 14 cases with 3-5 brain metastases. Parameters assessed included target dose indices, such as conformity index (CI) of the planning target volume (PTV), volumes of normal brain excluding gross tumor volumes (GTVs) receiving a single dose equivalent of 14 Gy (V14), V30%, V20%, V10%, volumes of normal brain, including GTVs receiving a single dose equivalent of 12 Gy (V12), D2% for other organs at risk, and beam-on time. SI-DWA showed inferior CI, V14, and V12 values for lesions with PTV volumes <1 cc, whereas it performed equivalently to MI-DWA for lesions with PTV volumes ≥1 cc. SI-DWA resulted in higher volumes of normal brain receiving low doses compared to MI-DWA. SI-DWA exhibited significantly shorter beam-on times than MI-DWA. In conclusion, SI-DWA is an effective method for treating multiple brain metastases with PTV volumes ≥1 cc, offering an index of radiation-induced brain necrosis comparable with MI-DWA while allowing for shorter irradiation times.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mitsuaki Terabe
- Department of Radiological Technology, Toyohashi Municipal Hospital, 50 Hakken-nishi, Aotake-cho, Toyohashi, Aichi, 441-8570, Japan
| | - Takeshi Kamomae
- Radioisotope Research Center, Nagoya University, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 466-8550, Japan
- Department of Radiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 466-8550, Japan
| | - Yuki Taniguchi
- Department of Radiological Technology, Toyohashi Municipal Hospital, 50 Hakken-nishi, Aotake-cho, Toyohashi, Aichi, 441-8570, Japan
| | - Hajime Ichikawa
- Department of Radiological Technology, Toyohashi Municipal Hospital, 50 Hakken-nishi, Aotake-cho, Toyohashi, Aichi, 441-8570, Japan
- Department of Quantum Medical Technology, Institute of Medical, Pharmaceutical and Health Sciences, Kanazawa University, 5-11-80 Kodatsuno, Kanazawa, Ishikawa, 920-0942, Japan
| | - Takehiro Yamada
- Department of Radiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 466-8550, Japan
| | - Takayuki Miyachi
- Department of Radiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 466-8550, Japan
| | - Risei Miyauchi
- Department of Radiology, Toyohashi Municipal Hospital, 50 Hakken-nishi, Aotake-cho, Toyohashi, Aichi, 441-8570, Japan
| | - Junji Ito
- Department of Radiology, Toyohashi Municipal Hospital, 50 Hakken-nishi, Aotake-cho, Toyohashi, Aichi, 441-8570, Japan
| | - Shunichi Ishihara
- Department of Radiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 466-8550, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Ciérvide R, Martí J, López M, Hernando O, Prado A, Alonso L, Montero Á, Álvarez B, de la Casa MA, Zucca D, Ortiz de Mendivil A, Martín P, Martínez A, García-Aranda M, Sánchez E, Valero J, García J, Chen-Zhao X, Alonso R, Fernandez-Leton P, Rubio C. Single and multitarget stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) with single isocenter in the treatment of multiple brain metastases (BM): institutional experience. Clin Transl Oncol 2025:10.1007/s12094-024-03844-3. [PMID: 39814975 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-024-03844-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2024] [Accepted: 12/28/2024] [Indexed: 01/18/2025]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION SRS for the treatment of limited brain metastases (BM) is widely accepted, but there are still limitations in the management of numerous BM. Frameless single-isocenter multitarget SRS is a novel technique that allows for rapid treatment delivery to multiple BM. We report our preliminary clinical, dosimetric, and patient´s shifts outcomes with this technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS We have reviewed clinical and dosimetric outcomes of patients with intact BM treated with SRS using one isocenter either for single (1BM) or multiple (≥ 2BM) targets). Immobilization was based on an SRS stereotactic mask. Elements Multiple Brain Mets SRS (Brainlab AG, Munich, Germany) software was used for registration, image fusion, target contouring, and treatment planning. Exactrac Dynamic (Brainlab AG, Munich, Germany) and a 6 degree of freedom couch were used for monitoring, correcting the position and assessing and applying residual errors also when couch rotations. During dose delivery, the patient position was monitored and registered using surface tracking and stereoscopic X-rays. RESULTS From May 2022 to December 2023, we treated 60 patients with a total of 255 BM. The 67% of patients had at least 2 BM treated and the average of treated BM per patient per course was 3.6 (range 1-13). The average total treated BM per patient (sum of all courses) was 4.4. Lung cancer was the most frequent (63%) primary tumor. 77% of cases were patients with a brain relapse and the remaining 23% had BM at diagnosis. Ninety-two percent of BM were treated with single fraction. The most used fractionations were 20 Gy (27.8%) and 21 Gy (43.5%), respectively, and the median PTV target volume (if single fraction) was 0,2 cc (range 0.016-4.32 cc). The median cumulative target volume per isocenter and the sum of all SRS courses were 1.37 and 1.46 cc, respectively. The 100% of patients completed the SRS treatment with no incidences. With an average follow-up of 8.3 months (0.1-19 months), we have not identified any local relapse, although 27% developed an intracranial relapse that was again treated with SRS in the 44% of cases. We did not find any relation between overall survival and the presence of any driver mutation (p = 0.97), presence of BM at diagnosis vs. recurrences (p = 0.113), number of courses of SRS (p = 0.688), number of isocenters (p = 0.679), or number of treated BM (1 vs. 2-3 vs. ≥ 4; p = 0.7). Healthy normal tissue constraints were adequately accomplished with a median V12 (if single dose) and V20 (if 5 fractions) of 0.2 and 5 cc, respectively. No acute toxicity > G2 was reported. Regarding patient positioning, monitoring, and registration based on X-ray imaging and surface guidance, patient shifts distributions were centered at 0.0 mm with standard deviations below 0.25 mm, except for the longitudinal shift based on X-rays, which was 0.35 mm. This implies an adequate fixation system, patient setup, and image guidance protocols. The mean total delivery time per fraction, from the first beam-on to the last beam-off, was 9.6 ± 4.8 min, with a range of 4.6-30.9 min. On average, repositioning occurred 1.2 times per fraction based on X-ray guidance and 0.6 times per fraction based on surface guidance. CONCLUSION Based on our preliminary experience, we find single isocenter for single and multitarget SRS technique is feasible, well tolerated and allows excellent local control. Regarding patient positioning, monitoring, and registration based on X-ray imaging and surface guidance, patients' shifts and repositioning rate are low enough to show an adequate fixation system, patient setup, and image guidance policies at our institution. Patient shifts during treatment are effectively managed by X-ray and SGRT verification. Low shift tolerances ensure patient stability, resulting in acceptable treatment times and patient repositioning rates. This dedicated workflow for SRS at our institution demonstrates excellent clinical outcomes. A longer follow-up period is necessary to evaluate the impact on long-term clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raquel Ciérvide
- Department of Radiation Oncology, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain.
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, HM Hospitales, C/Oña 10, 28050, Madrid, Spain.
| | - Jaime Martí
- Department of Medical Physics, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| | - Mercedes López
- Department of Radiation Oncology, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ovidio Hernando
- Department of Radiation Oncology, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Leyre Alonso
- Department of Medical Physics, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ángel Montero
- Department of Radiation Oncology, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| | - Beatriz Álvarez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Daniel Zucca
- Department of Medical Physics, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | - Ana Martínez
- Department of Medical Physics, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Emilio Sánchez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Juan García
- Department of Medical Physics, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| | - Xin Chen-Zhao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| | - Rosa Alonso
- Department of Radiation Oncology, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Carmen Rubio
- Department of Radiation Oncology, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Phung HT, Le YT, Nguyen TV, Dang GT, Nguyen QH, Phan DT, Nguyen HT, Nguyen LT. Treatment Outcome of Brain Metastases from Breast Cancer Following Gamma Knife Radiosurgery: A Retrospective Study in Vietnam. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2025; 24:15330338251328522. [PMID: 40096166 PMCID: PMC11915535 DOI: 10.1177/15330338251328522] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2024] [Revised: 02/17/2025] [Accepted: 03/04/2025] [Indexed: 03/19/2025] Open
Abstract
BackgroundGamma Knife radiosurgery has proven to be highly effective for small brain lesions and those with a limited number of metastases. This study aimed to evaluate the treatment outcome of Gamma Knife radiosurgery in Vietnamese breast cancer patients with brain metastasis.MethodsThis retrospective descriptive study included 75 patients treated between January 2019 and December 2023. Eligible patients had 1 to 5 brain lesions ≤ 3 cm, a Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) score of ≥ 60, and no prior whole-brain radiotherapy or brain tumor resection. Clinical characteristics were documented, and imaging responses were evaluated using RECIST criteria. Overall survival (OS), brain-specific progression-free survival (BSPFS), and overall response rates were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox regression.ResultsSeventy-five patients were included in the study, with a median follow-up time of 15.9 months. The median age was 53.0 years (range: 29-73 years), and 39 patients (52%) were HER2-positive. The median total tumor volume per patient was 3.78 cm3. A total of 152 brain tumors were identified, of which 131 (86.2%) were <2 cm in diameter, 36 patients (48.0%) had a single lesion. The intracranial tumor control rates were 96% at 3 months and 92.5% at 6 months. The median overall survival (OS) was 17.2 months (range: 13.7-20.7 months). Multivariate analysis revealed that the total volume of metastatic lesions ≤7.0 cm3, hormone receptor negativity, ≤ 3 lines of systemic treatment before brain metastasis and controlled extracranial metastases were correlated with both BSPFS and OS.ConclusionGamma Knife radiosurgery is an effective treatment for limited brain metastases, demonstrating a high rate of local control over brain lesions, which contributed to the promising survival outcome in Vietnamese breast cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huyen Thi Phung
- Department of Medical Oncology No. 6, Vietnam National Cancer Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam
- Department of Oncology, Hanoi Medical University, Hanoi, Vietnam
- Department of Oncology, Vietnam University of Traditional Medicine, Hanoi, Vietnam
| | - Yen Thi Le
- Department of Quan Su Medical Oncology, Vietnam National Cancer Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam
| | - Tung Van Nguyen
- Department of Medical Oncology No. 6, Vietnam National Cancer Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam
| | - Giang Tien Dang
- Department of Medical Oncology No. 6, Vietnam National Cancer Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam
| | | | - Duong Thanh Phan
- Department of Neurosurgery, Vietnam National Cancer Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam
| | - Hoa Thi Nguyen
- Department of Medical Oncology No. 6, Vietnam National Cancer Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam
| | - Long Thanh Nguyen
- Department of Medical Oncology No. 6, Vietnam National Cancer Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Krämer A, Hahnemann L, Schunn F, Grott CA, Thomas M, Christopoulos P, Lischalk JW, Hörner-Rieber J, Hoegen-Saßmannshausen P, Eichkorn T, Deng MY, Meixner E, Lang K, Paul A, Weykamp F, Debus J, König L. Fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy of brainstem metastases - Clinical outcome and prognostic factors. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2025; 50:100893. [PMID: 39651456 PMCID: PMC11621500 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100893] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2024] [Revised: 11/17/2024] [Accepted: 11/17/2024] [Indexed: 12/11/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Brain metastases (BM) are the most common malignancy in the central nervous system (CNS) and observed in approximately 30% of cancer patients. Brainstem metastases (BSM) are challenging because of their location and the associated neurological risks. There are still no general therapeutic recommendations in this setting. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is one of few possible local therapy options but limited due to the tolerance dose of the brainstem. There is still no standard regarding the optimal dose und fractionation. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 65 patients with fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (fSRT) for 69 BSM. FSRT was delivered at a dose of 30 Gy in six fractions prescribed to the 70 % isodose performed with Cyberknife. Overall survival (OS), local control (LC) and total intracranial brain control (TIBC) were analyzed via Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify prognostic factors. Results Median follow-up was 27.3 months. One-year TIBC was 35.0 % and one-year LC was 84.1 %. Median OS was 8.9 months. In total, local progression occurred in 7.7 % and in 8.2 % symptomatic radiation-induced contrast enhancements (RICE) were diagnosed. In univariate analysis the Karnofsky performance scale index (KPI) (p = 0,001) was an independent prognostic factor for longer OS. Acute CTCAE grade 3 toxicities occurred in 18.4 %. Conclusion FSRT for BSM is as an effective and safe treatment approach with high LC rates and reasonable neurological toxicity despite the poor prognosis in this patient cohort is still very poor. Clinical and imaging follow-up is necessary to identify cerebral progression and adverse toxicity including RICE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Krämer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Laura Hahnemann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Fabian Schunn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christoph A. Grott
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Michael Thomas
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Thoraxklinik and National Center for Tumor Diseases at Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg (TLRC-H), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Germany
| | - Petros Christopoulos
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Thoraxklinik and National Center for Tumor Diseases at Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg (TLRC-H), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Germany
| | - Jonathan W. Lischalk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perlmutter Cancer Center at New York University Langone Health at Long Island, New York, NY, USA
| | - Juliane Hörner-Rieber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Philipp Hoegen-Saßmannshausen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology (E050), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Tanja Eichkorn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Y. Deng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Eva Meixner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Kristin Lang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Angela Paul
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Fabian Weykamp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology (E050), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology (E050), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heavy Ion Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 450, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Laila König
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Katano A. Exploring the Current Challenges and Pioneering Clinical Applications of Stereotactic Radiotherapy in Cancer Treatment. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2025; 24:15330338251333658. [PMID: 40179211 PMCID: PMC11970054 DOI: 10.1177/15330338251333658] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2024] [Revised: 03/18/2025] [Accepted: 03/24/2025] [Indexed: 04/05/2025] Open
Abstract
Stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) has become integral to modern oncology, offering the ability to deliver ablative doses while minimizing damage to surrounding normal tissues. Recent advancements in imaging integration, treatment planning, and dose delivery have expanded their clinical applications across various tumor types. However, challenges such as toxicity in anatomically critical regions, optimal margin determination, and the lack of standardized protocols persist. This review explores key issues in contemporary practice and highlights emerging clinical evidence across lung, liver, prostate, brain, and oligometastatic diseases. Further refinement in patient selection and treatment strategies is essential to maximize therapeutic efficacy and ensure safe implementation in broader clinical settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Atsuto Katano
- Department of Radiology, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Yoo Y, Gibson E, Zhao G, Re TJ, Parmar H, Das J, Wang H, Kim MM, Shen C, Lee Y, Kondziolka D, Ibrahim M, Lian J, Jain R, Zhu T, Comaniciu D, Balter JM, Cao Y. Extended nnU-Net for Brain Metastasis Detection and Segmentation in Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging With a Large Multi-Institutional Data Set. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2025; 121:241-249. [PMID: 39059508 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.07.2318] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2024] [Revised: 05/30/2024] [Accepted: 07/13/2024] [Indexed: 07/28/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to investigate an extended self-adapting nnU-Net framework for detecting and segmenting brain metastases (BM) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS AND MATERIALS Six different nnU-Net systems with adaptive data sampling, adaptive Dice loss, or different patch/batch sizes were trained and tested for detecting and segmenting intraparenchymal BM with a size ≥2 mm on 3 Dimensional (3D) post-Gd T1-weighted MRI volumes using 2092 patients from 7 institutions (1712, 195, and 185 patients for training, validation, and testing, respectively). Gross tumor volumes of BM delineated by physicians for stereotactic radiosurgery were collected retrospectively and curated at each institute. Additional centralized data curation was carried out to create gross tumor volumes of uncontoured BM by 2 radiologists to improve the accuracy of ground truth. The training data set was augmented with synthetic BMs of 1025 MRI volumes using a 3D generative pipeline. BM detection was evaluated by lesion-level sensitivity and false-positive (FP) rate. BM segmentation was assessed by lesion-level Dice similarity coefficient, 95-percentile Hausdorff distance, and average Hausdorff distance (HD). The performances were assessed across different BM sizes. Additional testing was performed using a second data set of 206 patients. RESULTS Of the 6 nnU-Net systems, the nnU-Net with adaptive Dice loss achieved the best detection and segmentation performance on the first testing data set. At an FP rate of 0.65 ± 1.17, overall sensitivity was 0.904 for all sizes of BM, 0.966 for BM ≥0.1 cm3, and 0.824 for BM <0.1 cm3. Mean values of Dice similarity coefficient, 95-percentile Hausdorff distance, and average HD of all detected BMs were 0.758, 1.45, and 0.23 mm, respectively. Performances on the second testing data set achieved a sensitivity of 0.907 at an FP rate of 0.57 ± 0.85 for all BM sizes, and an average HD of 0.33 mm for all detected BM. CONCLUSIONS Our proposed extension of the self-configuring nnU-Net framework substantially improved small BM detection sensitivity while maintaining a controlled FP rate. Clinical utility of the extended nnU-Net model for assisting early BM detection and stereotactic radiosurgery planning will be investigated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Youngjin Yoo
- Siemens Healthineers, Digital Technology and Innovation, Princeton, New Jersey.
| | - Eli Gibson
- Siemens Healthineers, Digital Technology and Innovation, Princeton, New Jersey
| | - Gengyan Zhao
- Siemens Healthineers, Digital Technology and Innovation, Princeton, New Jersey
| | - Thomas J Re
- Siemens Healthineers, Digital Technology and Innovation, Princeton, New Jersey
| | - Hemant Parmar
- Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Jyotipriya Das
- Siemens Healthineers, Digital Technology and Innovation, Princeton, New Jersey
| | - Hesheng Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York University, New York, New York
| | - Michelle M Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Colette Shen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Yueh Lee
- Department of Radiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Douglas Kondziolka
- Center for Advanced Radiosurgery, New York University, New York, New York
| | - Mohannad Ibrahim
- Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Jun Lian
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Rajan Jain
- Department of Radiology, New York University, New York, New York
| | - Tong Zhu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Dorin Comaniciu
- Siemens Healthineers, Digital Technology and Innovation, Princeton, New Jersey
| | - James M Balter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Yue Cao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Malhotra J, Mambetsariev I, Gilmore G, Fricke J, Nam A, Gallego N, Chen BT, Chen M, Amini A, Lukas RV, Salgia R. Targeting CNS Metastases in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer With Evolving Approaches Using Molecular Markers: A Review. JAMA Oncol 2025; 11:60-69. [PMID: 39602134 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.5218] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2024]
Abstract
Importance Central nervous system (CNS) metastases presenting as either brain parenchymal metastases or leptomeningeal metastases are diagnosed in up to 50% of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer during their disease course. While historically associated with a poor prognosis due to limited treatment options, the availability of an increasing number of targeted therapies with good CNS penetration has significantly improved clinical outcomes for these patients. This has occurred in parallel with a more nuanced understanding of prognostic factors. Observations Multiple clinical trials have reported that disease control can be observed with targeted therapies with adequate CNS penetration, particularly for patients with molecular alterations in EGFR, ALK, ROS1, and RET. For these tumors, systemic targeted therapy may be used first for the management of CNS metastases, prior to considering radiation therapy (RT). At the time of isolated progression in the CNS, RT may be considered for the progressing lesions with continuation of the same systemic therapy. For other molecular alterations as well as for patients treated with checkpoint inhibitors, data are not yet clear if systemic therapy is sufficient for untreated CNS metastases, and early RT may need to be integrated into the treatment planning. An increasing number of studies investigate the role that emerging techniques, such as the sequencing of tumor DNA from resected brain metastases tissue or cerebrospinal fluid or radiomics-based analysis of CNS imaging, can play in guiding treatment approaches. Conclusions and Relevance With multiple generations of targeted therapies now available, the treatment for CNS metastases should be tailored to the patients with consideration given to molecular testing results, CNS penetrance of systemic therapy, patient characteristics, and multidisciplinary review. More research is needed in understanding the clonal evolution of CNS metastases, and the development of novel therapeutics with CNS efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jyoti Malhotra
- City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, California
| | | | - Gregory Gilmore
- City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, California
| | - Jeremy Fricke
- City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, California
| | - Arin Nam
- University of California, San Diego
| | | | - Bihong T Chen
- City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, California
| | - Mike Chen
- City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, California
| | - Arya Amini
- City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, California
| | - Rimas V Lukas
- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center at Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Ravi Salgia
- City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, California
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Parikh S, Alluri U, Heyes G, Evison F, Meade S, Benghiat H, Hartley A, Hickman M, Sawlani V, Chavda S, Wykes V, Sanghera P. Clinical Outcomes and Relevance of Composite V12 Gy in Patients With Four or More Brain Metastases Treated With Single Fraction Stereotactic Radiosurgery. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2025; 37:103663. [PMID: 39522323 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2024.10.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2024] [Revised: 10/11/2024] [Accepted: 10/16/2024] [Indexed: 11/16/2024]
Abstract
AIMS Tissue V12Gy (total brain volume receiving 12Gy including target) can predict for late toxicity in single target benign disease treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). The value of this metric remains uncertain for multiple brain metastases. This retrospective cohort study reports the outcomes and evaluates the predictors of toxicity in patients with four or more brain metastases treated with single-fraction SRS. MATERIALS AND METHODS Two hundred twenty-six patients with 2160 metastases treated from 2014-21 were retrospectively studied. Symptomatic late toxicity (new/progressive neurological symptoms ≥3 months post SRS) with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) changes suggestive of treatment effect were analysed. Kaplan-Meier and competing risk analysis was used to assess survival and toxicity respectively. RESULTS median number of metastases/patient was 6 (range: 4-41) and median composite tissue V12Gy (inclusive of planning target volume (PTV)) was 11.3 cc (IQR: 6.1 cc-17.1 cc). Sixteen out of the 226 patients developed symptomatic late radiation adverse event (R-AE), and the cumulative incidence was 4.9% at 1 year and 6.9% at 2 years. The total target volume was significantly predictive of the risk of late R-AE. Volume of the largest lesion, V12Gy and V15Gy did not predict for late R-AE, but plotted graphs showed suggestions of linear relationships between dosimetric parameters and late R-AE. CONCLUSION Within the limitations of this study, the cumulative incidence of symptomatic toxicity remains acceptable despite routinely accepting a composite tissue V12Gy in excess of 10 cc to treat multiple brain metastases. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE V12Gy has limitations as a plan quality metric in multiple brain metastases treated with SRS. There is insufficient evidence to have a defined target limit as <10 cc.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Parikh
- Cancer Centre, Department of Clinical Oncology, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, B15 2GW, United Kingdom.
| | - U Alluri
- Cancer Centre, Department of Clinical Oncology, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, B15 2GW, United Kingdom
| | - G Heyes
- Department of Radiotherapy Physics, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, B15 2GW, United Kingdom
| | - F Evison
- Data Science Team, Research, Development & Innovation, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, B15 2GW, United Kingdom
| | - S Meade
- Cancer Centre, Department of Clinical Oncology, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, B15 2GW, United Kingdom
| | - H Benghiat
- Cancer Centre, Department of Clinical Oncology, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, B15 2GW, United Kingdom
| | - A Hartley
- Cancer Centre, Department of Clinical Oncology, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, B15 2GW, United Kingdom
| | - M Hickman
- Cancer Centre, Department of Clinical Oncology, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, B15 2GW, United Kingdom
| | - V Sawlani
- Department of Radiology, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, B12 2GW, United Kingdom
| | - S Chavda
- Department of Radiology, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, B12 2GW, United Kingdom
| | - V Wykes
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, United Kingdom; Department of Neurosurgery, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - P Sanghera
- Cancer Centre, Department of Clinical Oncology, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, B15 2GW, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
von Arx C, Calderaio C, Calabrese A, Marciano B, Martinelli C, Di Lauro V, Cerillo I, Cianniello D, De Laurentiis M. The multidisciplinary management of HER2-positive breast cancer brain metastases: from new biological insights to future therapeutic options. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1447508. [PMID: 39749036 PMCID: PMC11693720 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1447508] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2024] [Accepted: 12/02/2024] [Indexed: 01/04/2025] Open
Abstract
The advent and success of new drugs for treating HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer has led to a constant improvement in disease and progression-free survival as well as overall survival. Despite these advantages, the overall survival and quality of life of patients with HER2-positive breast cancer brain metastases are significantly worse than the ones of patients with HER2-positive breast cancer metastases outside the brain. For this reason, prevention and treatment of brain metastasis remain a major clinical challenge and the keys to further improving the clinical and survival outcomes of HER2-positive breast cancer patients. This review discusses the etiopathogenesis of brain metastasis, the currently available treatments, and the future perspective on new treatment strategies and diagnostic tools.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudia von Arx
- Department of Breast and Thoracic Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - Claudia Calderaio
- Clinical and Translational Oncology, Scuola Superiore Meridionale (SSM), Naples, Italy
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Alessandra Calabrese
- Department of Breast and Thoracic Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - Benedetta Marciano
- Department of Breast and Thoracic Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - Claudia Martinelli
- Clinical and Translational Oncology, Scuola Superiore Meridionale (SSM), Naples, Italy
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Di Lauro
- Department of Breast and Thoracic Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - Ivana Cerillo
- Department of Breast and Thoracic Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - Daniela Cianniello
- Department of Breast and Thoracic Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - Michelino De Laurentiis
- Department of Breast and Thoracic Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Naples, Italy
- Clinical and Translational Oncology, Scuola Superiore Meridionale (SSM), Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Sperber J, Yoo S, Owolo E, Dalton T, Zachem TJ, Johnson E, Herndon JE, Nguyen AD, Hockenberry H, Bishop B, Abu-Bonsrah N, Cook SH, Fecci PE, Sperduto PW, Johnson MO, Erickson MM, Goodwin CR. Validation of the graded prognostic assessment and recursive partitioning analysis as prognostic tools using a modern cohort of patients with brain metastases. Neurooncol Pract 2024; 11:763-771. [PMID: 39554788 PMCID: PMC11567744 DOI: 10.1093/nop/npae057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Prognostic indices for patients with brain metastases (BM) are needed to individualize treatment and stratify clinical trials. Two frequently used tools to estimate survival in patients with BM are the recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) and the diagnosis-specific graded prognostic assessment (DS-GPA). Given recent advances in therapies and improved survival for patients with BM, this study aims to validate and analyze these 2 models in a modern cohort. Methods Patients diagnosed with BM were identified via our institution's Tumor Board meetings. Data were retrospectively collected from the date of diagnosis with BM. The concordance of the RPA and GPA was calculated using Harrell's C index. A Cox proportional hazards model with backwards elimination was used to generate a parsimonious model predictive of survival. Results Our study consisted of 206 patients diagnosed with BM between 2010 and 2019. The RPA had a prediction performance characterized by Harrell's C index of 0.588. The DS-GPA demonstrated a Harrell's C index of 0.630. A Cox proportional hazards model assessing the effect of age, presence of lung, or liver metastases, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status score of 3/4 on survival yielded a Harrell's C index of 0.616. Revising the analysis with an uncategorized ECOG demonstrated a C index of 0.648. Conclusions We found that the performance of the RPA remains unchanged from previous validation studies a decade earlier. The DS-GPA outperformed the RPA in predicting overall survival in our modern cohort. Analyzing variables shared by the RPA and DS-GPA produced a model that performed analogously to the DS-GPA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacob Sperber
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Seeley Yoo
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Edwin Owolo
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Tara Dalton
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Tanner J Zachem
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Eli Johnson
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - James E Herndon
- Department of Biostatistics & Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Annee D Nguyen
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Harrison Hockenberry
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Brandon Bishop
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Kansas City University, Kansas City, Missouri, USA
| | - Nancy Abu-Bonsrah
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- Research Department, Association of Future African Neurosurgeons, Yaounde, Cameroon
| | - Steven H Cook
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Peter E Fecci
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Paul W Sperduto
- Duke Radiation Oncology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Margaret O Johnson
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Melissa M Erickson
- Department of Orthopaedics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - C Rory Goodwin
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Harary PM, Hori YS, Annagiri S, Akhavan-Sigari A, Persad ARL, Ustrzynski L, Emrich SC, Tayag A, Park DJ, Chang SD. Stereotactic radiosurgery for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor brain Metastases: Systematic review and Illustrative case presentation. J Clin Neurosci 2024; 130:110927. [PMID: 39571478 DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2024.110927] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2024] [Revised: 10/26/2024] [Accepted: 11/16/2024] [Indexed: 01/23/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neuroendocrine tumor (NET) brain metastases (BM) are rare malignancies which frequently bear a poor prognosis and have the potential to secrete hormones. The optimal treatment approach for these metastases remains unclear, with significant heterogeneity occurring both across and within primary tumor types, and outcome data are limited. Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (pNET) BM may be particularly aggressive. While stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for other NET BM has previously been described, no report has specifically investigated SRS for management of pNET BM. METHODS A comprehensive literature search was performed in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Search terms included ("neuroendocrine tumor" OR "neuroendocrine neoplasm" OR "neuroendocrine carcinoma" OR "NET") AND ("brain metastasis" OR "brain metastases" OR "intracranial metastases") AND ("stereotactic radiosurgery" OR "stereotactic body" OR "CyberKnife" OR "GammaKnife"). RESULTS Our search strategy yielded 230 articles. After screening, a total of 16 articles with 256 patients were identified. Number of patients per study cohort ranged from 1 to 101 (mean = 16). Ten articles were single case reports. The most commonly investigated primary site was lung (5 studies), followed by skin (2 case reports), and uterine cervix (2 case reports). Median survival post-SRS ranged from 5 to 42 months. Median tumor volume ranged from 0.08 cm3 to 33.62 cm3. Local control rate was provided in 3 of 6 of the reviewed retrospective analyses. A pulmonary cohort of 101 patients reported a recurrence rate of 13.8 % at 12 months. A pulmonary case series similarly reported local progression in only 1 of 8 patients. The mixed primary cohort (33 patients) had a long-term local failure rate of 16.7 %. In addition, we describe a first reported individual case of pNET BM treated with SRS. Nearly 6-years after initial pNET diagnosis, multiple intracranial enhancing lesions were found, which were subsequently treated with SRS. Follow-up imaging demonstrated a statistically significant decrease in lesion diameter (p < 0.001), with none of the 18 BM progressing. CONCLUSION Given the recently increase in age-adjusted incidence of NET BM, determining an optimal treatment approach for these malignancies is of growing importance. Prognosis generally remains poor, with BM being a significant predictor of overall survival. Our review indicated large variability in outcomes both between and within primary tumor types, suggesting a need for further investigation of predictive molecular biomarkers. In addition, to the authors' knowledge, this represents the first reported case of pNET BM successfully treated with SRS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul M Harary
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Yusuke S Hori
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Shreyas Annagiri
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | | | - Amit R L Persad
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Louisa Ustrzynski
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Sara C Emrich
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Armine Tayag
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - David J Park
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Steven D Chang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Nguyen TK, Ramadan S, Palma DA, Corkum MT, O' Neil M, Celinski A, Fakir H, Warner A, Hallock A, Correa RJM, Qu XM, Lock M, Lang P, Velker V, Bauman GS. Ablative Radiation Therapy to Restrain Everything Safely Treatable (ARREST): A Phase 1 Study of Stereotactic Ablative Radiation Therapy for Polymetastatic Disease. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 120:1231-1238. [PMID: 38986914 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.06.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2024] [Revised: 06/18/2024] [Accepted: 06/22/2024] [Indexed: 07/12/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE This phase 1 study aimed to assess the safety and feasibility of SABR therapy delivery to all sites of polymetastatic disease (>10 metastases). METHODS AND MATERIALS A 3 + 3 study design was used with 5 dose levels from 6 Gy (6 Gy × 1) to 30 Gy (6 Gy weekly × 5). Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as any grade 4 or 5 toxicity or more than 3 grade 3 toxicities within 6 weeks of treatment. The primary endpoint was the maximal tolerated dose, defined as the dose level where ≥2/6 of patients experienced DLT. Secondary endpoints included quality of life (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General and European Quality of Life 5 Dimension 5 Level) at 6 weeks posttreatment, progression-free survival, and overall survival. RESULTS Thirteen patients were accrued: 12 Gy (n = 3), 18 Gy (n = 3), 24 Gy (n = 4), and 30 Gy (n = 3), and 207 lesions were treated. Nine patients (69%) had acute toxicity: grade 1 (n = 6, 46%), grade 2 (n = 2, 15%; n = 1 pneumonitis and n = 1 fatigue), and grade 3 (n = 1, 7.7% neutropenia). There were no grade 4 or 5 toxicities. Mean ± SD quality of life (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General and European Quality of Life 5 Dimension 5 Level health state) was 80.4 ± 21.9 and 77.4 ± 20.9 at baseline versus 76.4 ± 21.8 and 68.0 ± 24.2 at 6-week follow-up, respectively (p = .009 and p = .055, respectively). With a median follow-up of 8.7 months posttreatment (IQR, 2.4-24 months), 8 of 13 patients had disease progression (62%). The median and 12-month progression-free survival were 3.6 months and 11.3%, respectively. The median and 12-month overall survival were 13.8 months and 62%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS In this phase 1 trial, SABR therapy for polymetastatic disease was technically feasible with acceptable acute toxicity at dose levels up to 30 Gy (6 Gy weekly × 5). DLT was not observed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy K Nguyen
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, Western University and London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sherif Ramadan
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, Western University and London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - David A Palma
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, Western University and London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mark T Corkum
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Melissa O' Neil
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, Western University and London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Anders Celinski
- Department of Medical Biophysics, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Hatim Fakir
- Department of Medical Biophysics, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Andrew Warner
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, Western University and London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Abhirami Hallock
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Niagara Health, St. Catherine's, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rohann J M Correa
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, Western University and London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - X Melody Qu
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, Western University and London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Michael Lock
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, Western University and London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Pencilla Lang
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, Western University and London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Vikram Velker
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, Western University and London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Glenn S Bauman
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, Western University and London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Gu D, Yu H, Ding N, Xu J, Qian P, Zhu J, Jiang M, Tao H, Zhu X. A phase II study of anlotinib plus whole brain radiation therapy for patients with NSCLC with multiple brain metastases. Ann Med 2024; 56:2401618. [PMID: 39445449 PMCID: PMC11616763 DOI: 10.1080/07853890.2024.2401618] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2024] [Revised: 08/12/2024] [Accepted: 08/29/2024] [Indexed: 10/25/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) is the mainstay of treatment for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with multiple brain metastases (BMs); however, the BRAIN study showed that the efficacy of WBRT is unsatisfactory. This prospective phase II study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of WBRT combined with anlotinib, a novel anti-angiogenic multi-target tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), in patients with multiple BMs (>3) from advanced NSCLC. METHODS Patients with advanced NSCLC with multiple BMs who had received two or more lines of treatment were eligible for enrolment into this study. All patients were treated with anlotinib (8-12 mg, QD, on days 1-14 of a 21-day cycle) combined with WBRT (DT 30 Gy/12 F), followed by maintenance therapy with anlotinib until disease progression or treatment intolerance. The primary endpoint of this study was the intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS). The secondary endpoints were intracranial objective response rate (iORR), intracranial disease control rate (iDCR), overall survival (OS) and treatment safety. RESULTS Between May 2019 and January 2021, 28 patients were enrolled, all of whom were evaluable for efficacy and safety. The median age was 57.7 years, and 46.4% were male. Twenty-five patients had adenocarcinoma (89.3%), six had EGFR mutations (21.4%) and two had ALK mutations (7.1%). The median iPFS was 11.1 months (95% confidence interval (CI): 5.4-16.8 months) and the median OS was 13.4 months (95% CI: 5.2-21.6 months). The iORR was 71.4% (six complete responses + 14 partial responses). The most frequently observed adverse events (AEs) were hypertension (71.4%), fatigue (64.3%), anorexia (46.4%), and foot and hand skin reactions (25.0%). No patients developed ≥ grade 4 AEs. No intracranial haemorrhages occurred during treatment. Dose adjustment due to AEs occurred in 17.9% of patients. CONCLUSIONS Anlotinib combined with WBRT is effective and well-tolerated in patients with NSCLC with multiple BMs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dayong Gu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University & Jiangsu Cancer Hospital & Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research, Nanjing, People’s Republic of China
| | - Hongliang Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University & Jiangsu Cancer Hospital & Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research, Nanjing, People’s Republic of China
| | - Naixin Ding
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University & Jiangsu Cancer Hospital & Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research, Nanjing, People’s Republic of China
| | - Jianhua Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University & Jiangsu Cancer Hospital & Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research, Nanjing, People’s Republic of China
| | - Pudong Qian
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University & Jiangsu Cancer Hospital & Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research, Nanjing, People’s Republic of China
| | - Jun Zhu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University & Jiangsu Cancer Hospital & Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research, Nanjing, People’s Republic of China
| | - Ming Jiang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University & Jiangsu Cancer Hospital & Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research, Nanjing, People’s Republic of China
| | - Hua Tao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University & Jiangsu Cancer Hospital & Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research, Nanjing, People’s Republic of China
| | - Xiangzhi Zhu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University & Jiangsu Cancer Hospital & Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research, Nanjing, People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Nakano H, Shiinoki T, Tanabe S, Utsunomiya S, Kaidu M, Nishio T, Ishikawa H. Assessing tumor volumetric reduction with consideration for setup errors based on mathematical tumor model and microdosimetric kinetic model in single-isocenter VMAT for brain metastases. Phys Eng Sci Med 2024; 47:1385-1396. [PMID: 38884671 DOI: 10.1007/s13246-024-01451-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2024] [Accepted: 05/21/2024] [Indexed: 06/18/2024]
Abstract
The volumetric reduction rate (VRR) was evaluated with consideration for six degrees-of-freedom (6DoF) patient setup errors based on a mathematical tumor model in single-isocenter volumetric modulated arc therapy (SI-VMAT) for brain metastases. Simulated gross tumor volumes (GTV) of 1.0 cm and dose distribution were created (27 Gy/3 fractions). The distance between the GTV center and isocenter (d) was set at 0-10 cm. The GTV was translated within 0-1.0 mm (Trans) and rotated within 0-1.0° (Rot) in the three axis directions using affine transformation. The tumor growth volume was calculated using a multicomponent mathematical model (MCTM), and lethal effects of irradiation and repair from damage during irradiation were calculated by a microdosimetric kinetic model (MKM) for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) A549 and NCI-H460 (H460) cells. The VRRs were calculated 5 days after the end of irradiation using the physical dose to the GTV for varying d and 6DoF setup errors. The tolerance value of VRR, the GTV volume reduction rate, was set at 5%, based on the pre-irradiation GTV volume. With the exception of the only one A549 condition where (Trans, Rot) = (1.0 mm, 1.0°) was repeated for 3 fractions, all conditions met all the tolerance VRR values for A549 and H460 cells with varying d from 0 to 10 cm. Evaluation based on the mathematical tumor model suggested that if the 6DoF setup errors at each irradiation could be kept within 1.0 mm and 1.0°, there would be little effect on tumor volume regardless of the distance from the isocenter in SI-VMAT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hisashi Nakano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Niigata University Medical and Dental Hospital, 1-757 Asahimachi-dori, Chuo-ku, Niigata-shi, Niigata, Japan.
- Department of Medical Physics and Engineering, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-7 Yamadaoka, Suita-shi, Osaka, Japan.
| | - Takehiro Shiinoki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yamaguchi University, Minamikogushi 1-1-1 Ube, Yamaguchi, Japan
| | - Satoshi Tanabe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Niigata University Medical and Dental Hospital, 1-757 Asahimachi-dori, Chuo-ku, Niigata-shi, Niigata, Japan
| | - Satoru Utsunomiya
- Department of Radiological Technology, Niigata University Graduate School of Health Sciences, 2-746 Asahimachi-dori, Chuo-ku, Niigata-shi, Niigata, Japan
| | - Motoki Kaidu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Niigata University Medical and Dental Hospital, 1-757 Asahimachi-dori, Chuo-ku, Niigata-shi, Niigata, Japan
| | - Teiji Nishio
- Department of Medical Physics and Engineering, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-7 Yamadaoka, Suita-shi, Osaka, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Ishikawa
- Department of Radiology and Radiation Oncology, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, 1-757 Asahimachi-dori, Chuo-ku, Niigata-shi, Niigata, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Cui F, Jin T, Li M, Zhu L, Di X, Zhu H. Assessment of scintillation and Cherenkov imaging as beam shape verification method in CyberKnife® radiotherapy. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2024; 25:e14508. [PMID: 39243112 PMCID: PMC11633798 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14508] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2024] [Revised: 05/29/2024] [Accepted: 07/26/2024] [Indexed: 09/09/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The goal of this study is to assess the utility of Cherenkov imaging (CI) and scintillation imaging (SI) as high-resolution techniques to measure CyberKnife® beam shape quantitatively at the irradiation surface in quality assurance (QA). METHODS The EMCCD camera captured scintillation and Cherenkov photons arising from 6 MV x-ray dose deposition produced by the CyberKnife® VSI System. Two imaging methods were done at source to surface distance of 800 cm with the same field size, ranging from 10 to 60 mm using fixed cones and iris collimators. The output sensitivity and constancy were measured using the SI and CI, and benchmarked against an ionization chamber. Line profiles of each beam measured by optical imaging were compared with film measurement. Position shifts were introduced to test the sensitivity of SI and CI to small beam position deviations. To assess reproducibility, the beam measurements were tested three times on 5 consecutive days. RESULTS Both systems exhibited comparable sensitivity to the ionization chamber in response to fluctuations in CyberKnife® output. The beam profiles in SI matched well with the measured film image, with accuracy in the range of ± 0.20 and ± 0.26 mm standard deviation for the circle and iris field, respectively. The corresponding accuracy measured by CI is in the range of ± 0.25 and ± 0.33 mm, respectively. These are all within the tolerance recommended by the guidelines of CyberKnife® QA. The accuracy measured by SI and CI for 1 mm beam position shift within 0.21 and 0.45 mm tolerance, respectively. Repeatability measurements of the beam have shown a standard deviation within 0.94 mm. CONCLUSIONS SI and CI techniques are tested to provide a valid way to measure CyberKnife® beam shape in this study. Meanwhile, the systematic comparison of SI and CI also provides evidence for the measurement methods selection appropriately.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fengwei Cui
- CyberKnife CenterDepartment of NeurosurgeryHuashan HospitalFudan UniversityShanghaiChina
- Neurosurgical Institute of Fudan UniversityShanghaiChina
| | - Tao Jin
- CyberKnife CenterDepartment of NeurosurgeryHuashan HospitalFudan UniversityShanghaiChina
- Neurosurgical Institute of Fudan UniversityShanghaiChina
| | - Mingzhu Li
- Department of OncologyThe First Hospital of Hebei Medical UniversityHebei Medical UniversityShijiazhuangChina
| | - Lei Zhu
- Department of Radiation Oncology Physics and TechnologyShandong Cancer Hospital and InstituteShandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical SciencesJinan CityShandong ProvinceChina
| | - Xing Di
- CyberKnife CenterDepartment of NeurosurgeryHuashan HospitalFudan UniversityShanghaiChina
- Neurosurgical Institute of Fudan UniversityShanghaiChina
| | - Huaguang Zhu
- CyberKnife CenterDepartment of NeurosurgeryHuashan HospitalFudan UniversityShanghaiChina
- Neurosurgical Institute of Fudan UniversityShanghaiChina
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Li Y, Ma H, Hua R, Wang T, Ding N, Deng L, Lu X, Chen W. Analysis of linear accelerator-based fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy in brain metastases: efficacy, safety, and dose tolerances. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1471004. [PMID: 39687885 PMCID: PMC11647529 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1471004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2024] [Accepted: 11/04/2024] [Indexed: 12/18/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective To assess the efficacy and safety of linear accelerator-based fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (LINAC-FSRT) in patients with brain metastases (BM). Methods We retrospectively analyzed 214 patients treated with LINAC-FSRT, categorized based on biologically effective dose (BED10, α/β = 10) into two groups (≤55 Gy, >55 Gy). Stratified analyses were conducted based on targeted therapy to compare survival outcomes. To examine brain tissue dose-tolerance volume, patients were divided into two groups: the standard Hypofractionated Treatment Effects in the Clinic (HyTEC) protocol group and an adjusted HyTEC protocol group where dose-volume restrictions exclude the planning target volume (PTV). Results Results as of December 2023 showed median intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS) at 12.4 months, with median overall survival (OS) not reached and a one-year local control (LC) rate of 68.7%. Mild to moderate toxicity affected 17.3% of patients, while severe toxicity occurred in 2.8%. Multivariate Cox analysis indicated that uncontrolled extracranial disease significantly reduced iPFS (HR = 2.692, 95%CI:1.880-3.853, P < 0.001) and OS (HR = 3.063, 95%CI:1.987-4.722, P < 0.001). BED10 >55 Gy (HR = 0.656, 95%CI:0.431-0.998, P = 0.049) improved OS, showing statistical significance (P = 0.037) without affecting iPFS or CNS toxicity (P = 0.127, P = 0.091). Stratified analysis highlighted nearly significant OS improvements with high-dose FSRT and targeted therapy (P = 0.054), while concurrent therapy markedly enhanced iPFS (P = 0.027). No significant differences were observed in intracranial local failure (ILF-which represents progression in previously treated areas during follow-up), one-year LC rates, iPFS, or OS between dose-volume groups. Adjusting HyTEC volume restrictions did not significantly increase CNS adverse reactions (P = 0.889). Conclusions LINAC-FSRT is safe and effective in BM. BED10>55 Gy notably enhances OS post-LINAC-FSRT and may benefit LC. High BED10 FSRT with targeted therapy likely boosts synergy, and concurrent targeted therapy significantly improves iPFS. Diminishing dose volume constraints at different fractions based on the HyTEC guidelines is feasible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuhong Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital, Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research, Nanjing, China
| | - Huiying Ma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First People's Hospital of Jiande, Hangzhou, China
| | - Rui Hua
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital, Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research, Nanjing, China
| | - Tingting Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital, Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research, Nanjing, China
| | - Naixin Ding
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital, Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research, Nanjing, China
| | - Liping Deng
- Department of Oncology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Clinical College of Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Xiaomin Lu
- Department of Oncology, Affiliated Haian Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, China
| | - Wei Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital, Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research, Nanjing, China
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Habibi MA, Babaei H, Tavani SF, Delbari P, Allahdadi A, Rashidi F, Shahir Eftekhar M, Hajikarimloo B, Sheehan JP. The safety and efficacy of stereotactic radiosurgery in patients with gastrointestinal cancer brain metastasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosurg Rev 2024; 47:851. [PMID: 39549142 DOI: 10.1007/s10143-024-03105-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2024] [Revised: 10/14/2024] [Accepted: 11/12/2024] [Indexed: 11/18/2024]
Abstract
Central nervous system Tumors, including metastasis, are a considerable source of morbidity and mortality. Currently, treatment options such as surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy have been introduced to prevent the progression of the disease, but still, these patients do not have a good prognosis. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) reduces the damage to the surroundings by focusing the radiation on the tumor tissue. In this paper, we aim to investigate the outcomes of SRS on patients with gastrointestinal-originated brain metastases. A systematic review and meta-analysis used the PRISMA guideline from inception until 27th March 2024, utilizing the relevant key terms. Records were screened and included based on pre-defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Demanding data was extracted and analyzed using STATA v. 17. This meta-analysis of 29 studies examining SRS for brain metastases from gastrointestinal cancers revealed several significant findings. The pooled distant intracranial disease rate was 33% (95% CI: 0.21-0.45). Local tumor control rates were high, with an overall pooled rate of 88% (95% CI: 0.83-0.92). Survival outcomes showed a 6-month overall survival (OS) rate of 47% (95% CI: 0.42-0.52), decreasing to 32% at one year and 11% at two years. The 5-year OS rate was 2% (95% CI: 0.01-0.03). Subgroup analyses revealed variations in outcomes based on primary tumor site, with gastric cancer patients showing better short-term survival (73% at six months) compared to hepatic primaries (31% at six months). The 6-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate was 67% (95% CI: 0.12-1.22). Tumor control outcomes showed complete regression in 11% of cases, partial regression in 44%, stable disease in 30%, and progression in 20%. The overall mortality rate was 84% (95% CI: 0.75-0.93). This meta-analysis supports the efficacy of SRS in managing brain metastases from gastrointestinal cancers. SRS offers effective local control and may improve quality of life despite poor long-term outcomes. The high rates of distant intracranial progression underscore the need for comprehensive management strategies addressing both local and systemic disease. Future research should optimize patient selection, combine SRS with novel systemic therapies, and identify predictive biomarkers to improve outcomes in this challenging patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammad Amin Habibi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
| | - Hedye Babaei
- Department of Neurosurgery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | | | - Pouria Delbari
- School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Ali Allahdadi
- School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Farhang Rashidi
- School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mohammad Shahir Eftekhar
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti Hospital, Qom University of Medical Sciences, Qom, Iran
| | - Bardia Hajikarimloo
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
| | - Jason P Sheehan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Hockemeyer KG, Rusthoven CG, Pike LRG. Advances in the Management of Lung Cancer Brain Metastases. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:3780. [PMID: 39594735 PMCID: PMC11593022 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16223780] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2024] [Revised: 11/01/2024] [Accepted: 11/04/2024] [Indexed: 11/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Lung cancer, both non-small cell and small cell, harbors a high propensity for spreading to the central nervous system. Radiation therapy remains the backbone of the management of brain metastases. Recent advances in stereotactic radiosurgery have expanded its indications and ongoing studies seek to elucidate optimal fractionation and coordination with systemic therapies, especially targeted inhibitors with intracranial efficacy. Efforts in whole-brain radiotherapy aim to preserve neurocognition and to investigate the need for prophylactic cranial irradiation. As novel combinatorial strategies are tested and prognostic/predictive biomarkers are identified and tested, the management of brain metastases in lung cancer will become increasingly personalized to optimally balance intracranial efficacy with preserving neurocognitive function and patient values.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathryn G. Hockemeyer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Chad G. Rusthoven
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - Luke R. G. Pike
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| |
Collapse
|