1
|
Born KB, Levinson W, Pramesh CS, Kerr EA. Choosing Wisely in a time of resource constraints. BMJ 2024; 385:q166. [PMID: 38609103 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.q166] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/14/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Karen B Born
- Institute of Health Policy, Management & Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Wendy Levinson
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - C S Pramesh
- Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Eve A Kerr
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbour, Michigan, United States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ismael J, Esandi E, Arroyo G, Becerra S, Bejarano S, Castro C, Enrique C, Gauna C, Gutiérrez-Delgado F, Deza EG, Kopitowsky K, Lewi D, Muller B, Murillo R, Pomata A, Puyol J, Quintanilla G, Rompato S, Santini L, Vidaurre T, Solano A, Campos D, Cazap E. Choosing Wisely in oncology in Latin America: what SLACOM does not recommend in the care of cancer patients in Latin America: Ten essential recommendations to avoid harmful onclogy procedures in Latin America. Ecancermedicalscience 2024; 18:1691. [PMID: 38774563 PMCID: PMC11108044 DOI: 10.3332/ecancer.2024.1691] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2023] [Indexed: 05/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Choosing Wisely is an initiative by the American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM) and ABIM Foundation to deter unnecessary medical treatments and procedures. Faced with the burden of modern technologies and treatments, it is crucial to identify practices lacking value in daily care. The Latin American and Caribbean Society (SLACOM), comprising cancer control experts, deems it vital to tailor this initiative for enhancing cancer care in the region. Through a modified DELPHI methodology involving two rounds of electronic questionnaires and a hybrid meeting to discuss key points of contention, ten essential recommendations were identified and prioritised to avoid harmful oncology procedures in our region. These consensus-based recommendations, contextualised for Latin America, have been compiled and shared to benefit patients. The Scientific Committee, consisting of prominent oncologists and health experts, collaborates remotely to drive this project forward.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Ismael
- GEDYT S.A., Juncal 2345, C1125ABE, Buenos Aires, Argentina
- https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9513-0681
| | - Eugenia Esandi
- Academia Nacional de Medicina J.A. Pacheco de Melo 3081, C1425AUM, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | - Sergio Becerra
- Fundación CARE, Bucarest 17, Of.81, ZC7510031, Providencia, Santiago de Chile, Chile
| | - Suyapa Bejarano
- Liga Contra el Cáncer, 8 calle 11 avenida SO No. 51, ZC21101, San Pedro Sula, Honduras
| | - Carlos Castro
- Liga Colombiana Contra el Cancer, Carrera 12A No. 77 – 34 ZC110911, Bogotá, D.C., Colombia
| | - Claudia Enrique
- Provincial Cancer Institute, Entre Ríos Montiel 1274, E3104BIO, Paraná, Entre Ríos, Argentina
| | - Cinthia Gauna
- Sociedad Paraguaya de Oncologia Medica, Las Residentas 744, Fdo de la Mora, ZC110306, Asunción, Paraguay
| | | | - Ernesto Gil Deza
- Henry Moore Institute, Gral Las Heras 1917, CP 1602, Florida, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Karin Kopitowsky
- Argentine Society of Family Medicine, Fragata Sarmiento 885, C1405API, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Daniel Lewi
- Hospital Fernadez- Medicus, Av. Cerviño 3356, C1425AGP, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Bettina Muller
- Grupo Oncológico Cooperativo Chileno de Investigación, José Manuel Infante 125, Providencia, Santiago, Chile
- https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8589-5725
| | - Raul Murillo
- Centro Javeriano de Oncología, Tv. 5 #412, ZC110911, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Alicia Pomata
- Programa Nacional de Control del Cancer, Rogelio Benitez 912 v1 casi Antolin Irala, ZC060404, Asunción, Paraguay
| | - Jorge Puyol
- Argentine Society of Cancerology, Tinogasta 2863 4 A, C1417EHI, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Gabriela Quintanilla
- National University of Rosario, Maipú 1065, S2000CGK Rosario, Santa Fe, Argentina
| | - Silvana Rompato
- Asoc. Argentina de Oncología Clinica, Moreno 150, P3600KAD, Formosa, Argentina
| | - Luiz Santini
- Former director, INCA, Rua André Cavalcanti, 37 - 2º andar, Rio de Janeiro, RJ 20.231-050, Brazil
| | - Tatiana Vidaurre
- Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas, Av. Angamos Este 2520, ZC15038, Surquillo, Peru
| | - Angela Solano
- Centro de Educacion Médica e Investigaciones Clínicas - HUSS, Avda. Galván 4102, C1431FWO, CABA, Argentina
- https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6342-3663
| | - Daniel Campos
- Sociedad Latinoamericana y del Caribe de Oncología Medica (SLACOM) Av. Córdoba 2415, 5º Piso, C1120AAG, Buenos Aires, Argentina, and ecancer
| | - Eduardo Cazap
- Sociedad Latinoamericana y del Caribe de Oncología Medica (SLACOM) Av. Córdoba 2415, 5º Piso, C1120AAG, Buenos Aires, Argentina, and ecancer
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ellen M, Correia L, Levinson W. Choosing wisely 10 years later: reflection and looking ahead. BMJ Evid Based Med 2024; 29:10-13. [PMID: 37479242 DOI: 10.1136/bmjebm-2023-112266] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/24/2023] [Indexed: 07/23/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Moriah Ellen
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Guilford Glazer Faculty of Business and Management and Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel
| | - Luis Correia
- Department of Internal Medicine, Center for Evidence-Based Medicine, Escola Bahiana de Medicina e Saúde Pública, Salvador, Brazil
| | - Wendy Levinson
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ranganathan P, Dare A, Harrison EM, Kingham TP, Mutebi M, Parham G, Sullivan R, Pramesh CS. Inequities in global cancer surgery: Challenges and solutions. J Surg Oncol 2024; 129:150-158. [PMID: 38073139 PMCID: PMC11186466 DOI: 10.1002/jso.27551] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2023] [Accepted: 11/15/2023] [Indexed: 12/17/2023]
Abstract
The disparity in access to and quality of surgical cancer care between high and low resource settings impacts immediate and long-term oncological outcomes. With cancer incidence and mortality set to increase rapidly in the next few decades, we examine the factors leading to inequities in global cancer surgery, and look at potential solutions to overcome these challenges.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Priya Ranganathan
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Anna Dare
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ewen M Harrison
- Centre for Medical Informatics, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - T Peter Kingham
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Miriam Mutebi
- Department of Surgery, Aga Khan University, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Groesbeck Parham
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Charles Drew University of Science and Medicine, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Richard Sullivan
- School of Cancer Sciences, Centre for Cancer Society and Public Health, Institute of Cancer Policy, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - C. S. Pramesh
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Murthy SS, Are C. Cancer surgery on the global stage: Updates and progress. J Surg Oncol 2024; 129:145-149. [PMID: 38059658 DOI: 10.1002/jso.27548] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2023] [Accepted: 11/02/2023] [Indexed: 12/08/2023]
Abstract
Over 5 billion people lack access to basic surgical procedures, and it is estimated, the number of surgical procedures needed for cancer care will increase by 5 million from 2018 to 2040. The greatest increase in demand will occur in low- and middle-income countries. In this article, we highlight progress made in surgical cancer care globally and gaps that still needs to be addressed. We highlight political support, workforce progress and shortages, impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, and the importance of high value cancer care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shilpa S Murthy
- Department of Surgery, Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Chandrakanth Are
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Albarqouni L, Abukmail E, MohammedAli M, Elejla S, Abuelazm M, Shaikhkhalil H, Pathirana T, Palagama S, Effa E, Ochodo E, Rugengamanzi E, AlSabaa Y, Ingabire A, Riwa F, Goraya B, Bakhit M, Clark J, Arab-Zozani M, Alves da Silva S, Pramesh CS, Vanderpuye V, Lang E, Korenstein D, Born K, Tabiri S, Ademuyiwa A, Nabhan A, Moynihan R. Low-Value Surgical Procedures in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Scoping Review. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6:e2342215. [PMID: 37934494 PMCID: PMC10630901 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.42215] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2023] [Accepted: 09/22/2023] [Indexed: 11/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Importance Overuse of surgical procedures is increasing around the world and harms both individuals and health care systems by using resources that could otherwise be allocated to addressing the underuse of effective health care interventions. In low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), there is some limited country-specific evidence showing that overuse of surgical procedures is increasing, at least for certain procedures. Objectives To assess factors associated with, extent and consequences of, and potential solutions for low-value surgical procedures in LMICs. Evidence Review We searched 4 electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, and Global Index Medicus) for studies published from database inception until April 27, 2022, with no restrictions on date or language. A combination of MeSH terms and free-text words about the overuse of surgical procedures was used. Studies examining the problem of overuse of surgical procedures in LMICs were included and categorized by major focus: the extent of overuse, associated factors, consequences, and solutions. Findings Of 4276 unique records identified, 133 studies across 63 countries were included, reporting on more than 9.1 million surgical procedures (median per study, 894 [IQR, 97-4259]) and with more than 11.4 million participants (median per study, 989 [IQR, 257-6857]). Fourteen studies (10.5%) were multinational. Of the 119 studies (89.5%) originating from single countries, 69 (58.0%) were from upper-middle-income countries and 30 (25.2%) were from East Asia and the Pacific. Of the 42 studies (31.6%) reporting extent of overuse of surgical procedures, most (36 [85.7%]) reported on unnecessary cesarean delivery, with estimated rates in LMICs ranging from 12% to 81%. Evidence on other surgical procedures was limited and included abdominal and percutaneous cardiovascular surgical procedures. Consequences of low-value surgical procedures included harms and costs, such as an estimated US $3.29 billion annual cost of unnecessary cesarean deliveries in China. Associated factors included private financing, and solutions included social media campaigns and multifaceted interventions such as audits, feedback, and reminders. Conclusions and Relevance This systematic review found growing evidence of overuse of surgical procedures in LMICs, which may generate significant harm and waste of limited resources; the majority of studies reporting overuse were about unnecessary cesarean delivery. Therefore, a better understanding of the problems in other surgical procedures and a robust evaluation of solutions are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Loai Albarqouni
- Institute for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond University, Gold Coast, Australia
| | - Eman Abukmail
- Institute for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond University, Gold Coast, Australia
| | - Majdeddin MohammedAli
- Medicine & Health Sciences Faculty, Department of Medicine, An-Najah National University, Nablus, Palestine
| | - Sewar Elejla
- Faculty of Medicine, Islamic University of Gaza, Gaza Strip, Palestine
| | | | | | - Thanya Pathirana
- School of Medicine and Dentistry, Griffith University, Sunshine Coast, Australia
| | - Sujeewa Palagama
- School of Medicine and Dentistry, Griffith University, Sunshine Coast, Australia
| | - Emmanuel Effa
- Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Clinical Sciences, College of Medical Sciences, University of Calabar, Calabar, Nigeria
| | - Eleanor Ochodo
- Centre for Global Health Research, Kenya Medical Research Institute, Kismu City, Kenya
- Centre for Evidence-Based Health Care, Department of Global Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa
| | - Eulade Rugengamanzi
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
| | - Yousef AlSabaa
- Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University of Gaza, Gaza Strip, Palestine
| | - Ale Ingabire
- Institute for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond University, Gold Coast, Australia
| | - Francis Riwa
- Institute for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond University, Gold Coast, Australia
| | - Burhan Goraya
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mina Bakhit
- Institute for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond University, Gold Coast, Australia
| | - Justin Clark
- Institute for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond University, Gold Coast, Australia
| | - Morteza Arab-Zozani
- Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, Iran
| | | | - C. S. Pramesh
- Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Verna Vanderpuye
- National Centre for Radiotherapy, Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Korle Bu Teaching Hospital, Accra, Ghana
| | - Eddy Lang
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Deborah Korenstein
- Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Karen Born
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Stephen Tabiri
- Department of Surgery, University for Development Studies–School of Medicine and Tamale Teaching Hospital, Tamale, Ghana
| | - Adesoji Ademuyiwa
- Paediatric Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Clinical Sciences, College of Medicine of the University of Lagos and Lagos University Teaching Hospital, Idi Araba, Lagos
| | - Ashraf Nabhan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Ray Moynihan
- Institute for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond University, Gold Coast, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Balakrishna K, Ramasamy T, Venketeswaran MV. Initiation of Palliative Care Referral from the Intensive Care Unit for Advanced Stage Metastatic Cancer Patients: A Quality Improvement Process from a Tertiary Referral Cancer Institute from South India. Indian J Palliat Care 2023; 29:412-417. [PMID: 38058480 PMCID: PMC10696335 DOI: 10.25259/ijpc_267_2022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2022] [Accepted: 10/04/2023] [Indexed: 12/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives Critically ill cancer patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) did not have any palliative care (PC) intervention as there was no PC referral from the ICU. The project aimed to initiate PC referral for at least 50% of progressive palliative intent cancer patients in intensive care to enhance communication with patients and caregivers. We included PC physicians, oncologists, and psychologists in the team for this project. Material and Methods We used the A3 problem-solving method of quality improvement (QI) and also used the Plan Do Check Act process. The first baseline assessment over 6 months of ICU deaths of patients who could have benefited from PC referral was collected; this made us realise that PC could have been initiated for some patients. Process maps of patient admission into the ICU and the process of their discharge were constructed. Analysis of root causes that were barriers to referral was examined. We made a PC trigger tool after team consultations and consensus and started using it to initiate PC referrals. PC discharge protocol was also initiated. Educational discussions were held with residents and nurses to ensure the continued use of the trigger tool. Results PC referral from intensive care slowly went up from 0% to beyond 50% by November 2019 and reached over 70% by March 2020; patients getting discharged had details of PC centres near their homes. Conclusion Structured QI process and introducing the PC trigger tool led to the outcome of 50% PC referral for critically ill patients in ICU.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Thendral Ramasamy
- Department of Anaesthesia and Pain and Palliative Care, Cancer Institute Women’s Indian Association, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Meenakshi V. Venketeswaran
- Department of Anaesthesia and Pain and Palliative Care, Cancer Institute Women’s Indian Association, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Wilson BE, Booth CM, Sullivan R, Aggarwal A, Sengar M, Jacob S, Bray F, Barton MB, Pearson SA. Global application of National Comprehensive Cancer Network resource-stratified guidelines for systemic treatment of colon cancer: a population-based, customisable model for cost, demand, and procurement. Lancet Oncol 2023; 24:682-690. [PMID: 37269845 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(23)00183-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2022] [Revised: 04/06/2023] [Accepted: 04/19/2023] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Resource-stratified guidelines (RSGs) can inform systemic treatment decisions in the face of limited resources. The objective of this study was to develop a customisable modelling tool to predict the demand, cost, and drug procurement needs of delivering National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) RSG-based systemic treatment for colon cancer. METHODS We developed decision trees for first-course systemic therapy for colon cancer based on the NCCN RSGs. Decision trees were merged with data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results programme, the International Agency for Research on Cancer's GLOBOCAN 2020 national estimates for colon cancer incidence, country-level income data, and data on drug costs from Redbook (USA), the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (Australia), and the Management Sciences for Health 2015 International Medical Products price guide to estimate global treatment needs and costs, and forecast drug procurement. Simulations and sensitivity analyses were used to explore the effect of scaling up services globally and the effect of alternative stage distributions on treatment demand and cost. We generated a customisable model, in which estimates can be tailored to local incidence, epidemiological, and costing data. FINDINGS First-course systemic therapy is indicated in 608 314 (53·6%) of 1 135 864 colon cancer diagnoses in 2020. Indications for first-course systemic therapy are projected to rise to 926 653 in 2040; the indications in 2020 might be as high as 826 123 (72·7%), depending on stage distribution assumptions. Adhering to NCCN RSGs, patients with colon cancer in low-income and middle income countries (LMICs) would constitute 329 098 (54·1%) of 608 314 global systemic therapy demands, but only 10% of global expenditure on systemic therapies. The total cost of NCCN RSG-based first-course systemic therapy for colon cancer in 2020 would be between about US$4·2 and about $4·6 billion, depending on stage distribution. If all patients with colon cancer in 2020 were treated according to maximal resources, global expenditure on systemic therapy for colon cancer would rise to around $8·3 billion. INTERPRETATION We have developed a customisable model that can be applied at global, national, and subnational levels to estimate systemic treatment needs, forecast drug procurement, and calculate expected drug costs on the basis of local data. This tool can be used to plan resource allocation for colon cancer globally. FUNDING None.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brooke E Wilson
- Division of Cancer Care and Epidemiology, Queen's Cancer Research Institute and Department of Oncology, Queens University, Kingston, ON, Canada; Collaboration for Cancer Outcomes, Research and Evaluation, South-West Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Liverpool, NSW, Australia; School of Population Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | - Christopher M Booth
- Division of Cancer Care and Epidemiology, Queen's Cancer Research Institute and Department of Oncology, Queens University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Richard Sullivan
- Institute of Cancer Policy, King's College London, London, UK; Department of Oncology, Guy's & St Thomas' National Health Service Trust, London, UK
| | - Ajay Aggarwal
- Department of Oncology, Guy's & St Thomas' National Health Service Trust, London, UK; Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Manju Sengar
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Susannah Jacob
- Collaboration for Cancer Outcomes, Research and Evaluation, South-West Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Liverpool, NSW, Australia
| | - Freddie Bray
- Cancer Surveillance Branch, International Agency for Cancer Research, Lyon, France
| | - Michael B Barton
- Collaboration for Cancer Outcomes, Research and Evaluation, South-West Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Liverpool, NSW, Australia
| | - Sallie-Anne Pearson
- School of Population Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia; NHMRC Medicines Intelligence Centre of Research Excellence, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Pathirana T, Wang Y, Martiny F, Copp T, Kumar R, Mendis K, Tang J. Perspectives from China, India and Sri Lanka on the drivers and potential solutions to overuse and overdiagnosis. BMJ Evid Based Med 2023; 28:85-88. [PMID: 35961768 DOI: 10.1136/bmjebm-2021-111869] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Thanya Pathirana
- Institute for Evidence Based Healthcare, Bond University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
- School of Medicine and Dentistry, Griffith University, Sunshine Coast, Queensland, Australia
| | - Yu Wang
- Department of Global Health, School of Public Health, Peking University, China
| | - Frederik Martiny
- The Research Unit and Section of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Center for Social Medicine in the Capital Region, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Frederiksberg, Denmark
| | - Tessa Copp
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Raman Kumar
- Academy of Family Physicians of India, New Delhi, Delhi, India
| | - Kumara Mendis
- Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Kelaniya, Ragama, Sri Lanka
| | - Jinling Tang
- School of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Sharma D, Agarwal P, Agrawal V, Bajaj J, Yadav SK. Low Value Surgical Care: Are We Choosing Wisely? Indian J Surg 2023. [DOI: 10.1007/s12262-023-03739-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/29/2023] Open
|
11
|
Mohanty SK, Wadasadawala T, Sen S, Khan PK. Socio-economic variations of breast cancer treatment and discontinuation: a study from a public tertiary cancer hospital in Mumbai, India. BMC Womens Health 2023; 23:113. [PMID: 36935486 PMCID: PMC10025058 DOI: 10.1186/s12905-023-02275-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2022] [Accepted: 03/14/2023] [Indexed: 03/21/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The study examined the socio-economic variation of breast cancer treatment and treatment discontinuation due to deaths and financial crisis. METHODS We used primary data of 500 patients with breast cancer sought treatment at India's one of the largest cancer hospital in Mumbai, between June 2019 and March 2022. This study is registered on the Clinical Trial Registry of India (CTRI/2019/07/020142). Kaplan-Meier method and Cox-hazard regression model were used to calculate the probability of treatment discontinuation. RESULTS Of the 500 patients, three-fifths were under 50 years, with the median age being 46 years. More than half of the patients were from outside of the state and had travelled an average distance of 1,044 kms to get treatment. The majority of the patients were poor with an average household income of INR15,551. A total of 71 (14%) patients out of 500 had discontinued their treatment. About 5.2% of the patients died and 4.8% of them discontinued treatment due to financial crisis. Over one-fourth of all deaths were reported among stage IV patients (25%). Patients who did not have any health insurance, never attended school, cancer stage IV had a higher percentage of treatment discontinuation due to financial crisis. Hazard of discontinuation was lower for patients with secondary (HR:0.48; 95% CI: 0.27-0.84) and higher secondary education (HR: 0.42; 95% CI: 0.19-0.92), patients from rural area (HR: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.42-1.50), treated under general or non-chargeable category (HR: 0.60; 95% CI:0.22-1.60) while it was higher for the stage IV patients (HR: 3.61; 95% CI: 1.58-8.29). CONCLUSION Integrating breast cancer screening in maternal and child health programme can reduce delay in diagnosis and premature mortality. Provisioning of free treatment for poor patients may reduce discontinuation of treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sanjay K Mohanty
- Department of Population & Development, International Institute for Population Sciences, Mumbai, India
| | - Tabassum Wadasadawala
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer (ACTREC), Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
| | - Soumendu Sen
- International Institute for Population Sciences, Govandi Station Road, Mumbai, India.
| | - Pijush Kanti Khan
- International Institute of Health Management Research, New Delhi, India
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Mushonga M, Abdihamid O, Ntizimira C, Murenzi G, Ka S, Hammad N, Rubagumya F. The first Choosing Wisely Africa conference: a roadmap to value-based cancer care in Africa (16th December 2022, Senegal). Ecancermedicalscience 2023; 17:1517. [PMID: 37113728 PMCID: PMC10129401 DOI: 10.3332/ecancer.2022.1517] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2023] [Indexed: 04/29/2023] Open
Abstract
The Choosing Wisely campaign was formally launched in 2012 and a decade later, the inaugural Choosing Wisely Africa conference was held in Dakar, Senegal on 16 December 2022 supported by ecancer. Academic partners included Ministere de la Sante et de I'Action Sociale, Senegalese Association of Palliative Care, Federation Internationale des Soins Palliatifs, Universite Cheikh Anta diop de Dakar, Societe Senegalaise de Cancerologie and King's College London. There were around 70 delegates attending in person mostly from Senegal and a further 30 joining virtually. Ten speakers gave insight into Choosing Wisely from an African perspective and Dr's Fabio Moraes and Frederic Ivan Ting shared the Choosing Wisely experience from Brazil and the Philippines, respectively. This report therefore shares the highlights of the first Choosing Wisely Africa conference guided by topics discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melinda Mushonga
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences, Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
- Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe
| | - Omar Abdihamid
- The Garissa Cancer Center, Garissa County Referral Hospital, Garissa, Kenya
| | | | - Gad Murenzi
- Einstein-Rwanda Research and Capacity Building Program, Research for Development (RD Rwanda) and Rwanda Military Hospital, Kigali, Rwanda
| | - Sidy Ka
- Cheikh Anta Diop University, Dakar 10700, Senegal
| | - Nazik Hammad
- Departments of Oncology, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada
| | - Fidel Rubagumya
- Einstein-Rwanda Research and Capacity Building Program, Research for Development (RD Rwanda) and Rwanda Military Hospital, Kigali, Rwanda
- Department of Oncology and Department of Research, Rwanda Military Hospital, Kigali, Rwanda
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Mushonga M, Weiss J, Liu ZA, Nyakabau AM, Mohamad O, Tawk B, Moraes FY, Grover S, Yap ML, Zubizarreta E, Lievens Y, Rodin D. Hypofractionation in Breast Cancer Radiotherapy Across World Bank Income Groups: Results of an International Survey. JCO Glob Oncol 2023; 9:e2200127. [PMID: 36706350 PMCID: PMC10166450 DOI: 10.1200/go.22.00127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Hypofractionated breast radiotherapy has been found to be equivalent to conventional fractionation in many clinical trials. Using data from the European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology Global Impact of Radiotherapy in Oncology survey, we identified preferences for hypofractionation in breast cancer across World Bank income groups and the perceived facilitators and barriers to its use. MATERIALS AND METHODS An international, electronic survey was administered to radiation oncologists from 2018 to 2019. Demographics, practice characteristics, preferred hypofractionation regimen for specific breast cancer scenarios, and facilitators and barriers to hypofractionation were reported and stratified by World Bank income groups. Variables associated with hypofractionation were assessed using multivariate logistic regression models. RESULTS One thousand four hundred thirty-four physicians responded: 890 (62%) from high-income countries (HICs), 361 (25%) from upper-middle-income countries (UMICs), 183 (13%) from low- and lower-middle-income countries (LLMICs). Hypofractionation was preferred most frequently in node-negative disease after breast-conserving surgery, with the strongest preference reported in HICs (78% from HICs, 54% from UMICs, and 51% from LLMICs, P < .001). Hypofractionation for node-positive disease postmastectomy was more frequently preferred in LLMICs (28% from HICs, 15% from UMICs, and 35% from LLMICs, P < .001). Curative doses of 2.1 to < 2.5 Gy in 15-16 fractions were most frequently reported, with limited preference for ultra-hypofractionation, but significant variability in palliative dosing. In adjusted analyses, UMICs were significantly less likely than LLMICs to prefer hypofractionation across all curative clinical scenarios, whereas respondents with > 1 million population catchments and with intensity-modulated radiotherapy were more likely to prefer hypofractionation. The most frequently cited facilitators and barriers were published evidence and fear of late toxicity, respectively. CONCLUSION Preference for hypofractionation varied for curative indications, with greater acceptance in earlier-stage disease in HICs and in later-stage disease in LLMICs. Targeted educational interventions and greater inclusivity in radiation oncology clinical trials may support greater uptake.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melinda Mushonga
- Sally Mugabe Central Hospital, Harare, Zimbabwe.,Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jessica Weiss
- Department of Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Zhihui Amy Liu
- Department of Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Anna-Mary Nyakabau
- Department of Oncology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe
| | - Osama Mohamad
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Bouchra Tawk
- German Cancer Research Consortium, Core Site Heidelberg, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.,Division of Molecular and Translational Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Faculty of Medicine and Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Fabio Y Moraes
- Department of Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Surbhi Grover
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States; Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Mei Ling Yap
- Collaboration for Cancer Outcomes, Research and Evaluation (CCORE), Ingham Institute, UNSW Sydney, Liverpool, Australia.,Liverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centres, Western Sydney University, Campbelltown, Australia.,School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Campbelltown, Australia
| | | | - Yolande Lievens
- Ghent University Hospital and Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Danielle Rodin
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Albarqouni L, Arab-Zozani M, Abukmail E, Greenwood H, Pathirana T, Clark J, Kopitowski K, Johansson M, Born K, Lang E, Moynihan R. Overdiagnosis and overuse of diagnostic and screening tests in low-income and middle-income countries: a scoping review. BMJ Glob Health 2022; 7:bmjgh-2022-008696. [PMID: 36316027 PMCID: PMC9442491 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-008696] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2022] [Accepted: 07/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Overdiagnosis and overuse of healthcare services harm individuals, take resources that could be used to address underuse, and threaten the sustainability of health systems. These problems are attracting increasing attention in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). Unaware of any review of relevant evidence, we conducted a scoping review of the evidence around overdiagnosis and overuse of diagnostic and screening tests in LMICs. Design Scoping review. Methods We searched PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, Global Index Medicus for relevant studies published until 24 May 2021, with no restrictions on date or language. We categorised included studies by major focus (overdiagnosis, overuse of tests, or both) and main themes (presence or estimates of extent; drivers; consequences and solutions). Results We identified 2763 unique records and included 162 articles reporting on 154 studies across 55 countries, involving over 2.8 million participants and/or requests for tests. Almost half the studies focused on overdiagnosis (70; 45.5%), one-third on overuse of tests (61; 39.6%) and one-fifth on both (23; 14.9%). Common overdiagnosed conditions included malaria (61; 39.6%) and thyroid cancer (25; 16.2%), estimated to be >70% in China. Overused tests included imaging (n=25 studies) such as CT and MRI; laboratory investigations (n=18) such as serological tests and tumour markers; and procedures (n=14) such as colonoscopy. Drivers included fear of conflict with patients and expanding disease definitions. Common consequences included unnecessary treatments such as antimalarials, and wasted resources, with costs of malaria overdiagnosis estimated at US$86 million in Sudan in 1 year alone. Only 9% of studies discussed solutions, which included addressing inappropriately lowered diagnostic thresholds and reforming test-ordering processes. Conclusions Overdiagnosis and overuse of tests are widespread in LMICs and generate significant harm and waste. Better understanding of the problems and robust evaluation of solutions is needed, informed by a new global alliance of researchers and policy-makers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Loai Albarqouni
- Institute for Evidence-Based Healthcare (IEBH), Bond University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| | - Morteza Arab-Zozani
- Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, Iran
| | - Eman Abukmail
- Institute for Evidence-Based Healthcare (IEBH), Bond University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| | - Hannah Greenwood
- Institute for Evidence-Based Healthcare (IEBH), Bond University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| | - Thanya Pathirana
- Institute for Evidence-Based Healthcare (IEBH), Bond University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia,School of Medicine and Dentistry, Griffith University, Sunshine Coast, QLD, Australia
| | - Justin Clark
- Institute for Evidence-Based Healthcare (IEBH), Bond University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| | - Karin Kopitowski
- Directora Departamento de Investigación, Instituto Universitario Hospital Italiano, Argentina, Argentina
| | - Minna Johansson
- Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, Institute of Medicine, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden,Cochrane Sustainable Healthcare, Uddevalla, Sweden
| | - Karen Born
- Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, Institute of Medicine, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Eddy Lang
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Ray Moynihan
- Institute for Evidence-Based Healthcare (IEBH), Bond University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Implications of Oncology Trial Design and Uncertainties in Efficacy-Safety Data on Health Technology Assessments. Curr Oncol 2022; 29:5774-5791. [PMID: 36005193 PMCID: PMC9406873 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol29080455] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2022] [Revised: 08/10/2022] [Accepted: 08/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Advances in cancer medicines have resulted in tangible health impacts, but the magnitude of benefits of approved cancer medicines could vary greatly. Health Technology Assessment (HTA) is a multidisciplinary process used to inform resource allocation through a systematic value assessment of health technology. This paper reviews the challenges in conducting HTA for cancer medicines arising from oncology trial designs and uncertainties of safety-efficacy data. Methods: Multiple databases (PubMed, Scopus and Google Scholar) and grey literature (public health agencies and governmental reports) were searched to inform this policy narrative review. Results: A lack of robust efficacy-safety data from clinical trials and other relevant sources of evidence has made HTA for cancer medicines challenging. The approval of cancer medicines through expedited pathways has increased in recent years, in which surrogate endpoints or biomarkers for patient selection have been widely used. Using these surrogate endpoints has created uncertainties in translating surrogate measures into patient-centric clinically (survival and quality of life) and economically (cost-effectiveness and budget impact) meaningful outcomes, with potential effects on diverting scarce health resources to low-value or detrimental interventions. Potential solutions include policy harmonization between regulatory and HTA authorities, commitment to generating robust post-marketing efficacy-safety data, managing uncertainties through risk-sharing agreements, and using value frameworks. Conclusion: A lack of robust efficacy-safety data is a central problem for conducting HTA of cancer medicines, potentially resulting in misinformed resource allocation.
Collapse
|
16
|
de Moraes FY, Marta GN, Mitera G, Forte DN, Pinheiro RN, Vieira NF, Gadia R, Caleffi M, Kauer PC, de Camargo Barros LH, Mathias C, da Conceicao Vasconcelos KGM, Booth C, Dos Santos Fernandes G. Choosing Wisely for oncology in Brazil: 10 recommendations to deliver evidence-based cancer care. Nat Med 2022; 28:1738-1739. [PMID: 35941378 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-022-01924-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Fabio Ynoe de Moraes
- Department of Oncology, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada. .,Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group (LACOG), Porto Alegre, Brazil.
| | - Gustavo Nader Marta
- Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group (LACOG), Porto Alegre, Brazil.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo/Brasília, Brazil
| | | | - Daniel Neves Forte
- Palliative Care Program, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, Sao Paulo, Brazil.,Medical Emergencies ICU, Hospital das Clínicas, Sao Paulo University, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Rodrigo Nascimento Pinheiro
- Vice President (2021-2023), Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.,Surgical Oncology Residency at Hospital de Base, Distrito Federal, Brazil
| | | | - Rafael Gadia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo/Brasília, Brazil
| | - Maira Caleffi
- Hospital Moinhos de Vento Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | | | | | | | | | - Christopher Booth
- Department of Oncology, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.,Division of Cancer Care and Epidemiology, Cancer Research Institute at Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Jiwnani S, Penumadu P, Ashok A, Pramesh CS. Lung Cancer Management in Low and Middle-Income Countries. Thorac Surg Clin 2022; 32:383-395. [PMID: 35961746 DOI: 10.1016/j.thorsurg.2022.04.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/15/2022]
Abstract
Lung cancer is an increasing problem in the developing world due to rising trends in smoking, high incidence of air pollution, lack of awareness and screening, delayed presentation, and diagnosis at the advanced stage. Even after diagnosis, there are disparities in access to health care facilities and inequitable distribution of resources and treatment options. In addition, the shortage of trained personnel and infrastructure adds to the challenges faced by patients with lung cancer in these regions. A multi-pronged effort targeting tobacco cessation, health promotion and awareness, capacity building, and value-based care are the need of the hour.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabita Jiwnani
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, India.
| | - Prasanth Penumadu
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Jawaharlal Institute of Medical Education and Research, JIPMER, 5343, 3rd Floor, SSB, Gorimedu, Pondicherry 605006, India
| | - Apurva Ashok
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Tata Memorial Hospital, 3rd Floor, Dr. E. Borges Road, Parel, Mumbai 400012, India
| | - C S Pramesh
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Tata Memorial Hospital, Main Building, Ground Floor, Dr. E. Borges Road, Parel, Mumbai 400012, India
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Sengar M, Pramesh CS, Mehndiratta A, Shah S, Munshi A, Vijaykumar DK, Puri A, Mathew B, Arora RS, Kumari T P, Deodhar K, Menon S, Epari S, Shetty O, Cluzeau F. Ensuring quality in contextualised cancer management guidelines for resource-constraint settings: using a systematic approach. BMJ Glob Health 2022; 7:bmjgh-2022-009584. [PMID: 35985695 PMCID: PMC9396157 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-009584] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2022] [Accepted: 07/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
To address the wide variation in access to cancer care in India requires strengthening of infrastructure, trained oncology workforce, and minimisation of out-of-pocket expenditures. However, even with major investments, it is unlikely to achieve the same level of infrastructure and expertise across the country. Therefore, a resource stratified approach driven by evidence-based and contextualised clinical guidelines is the need of the hour. The National Cancer Grid has been at the forefront of delivery of standardised cancer care through several of its initiatives, including the resource-stratified guidelines. Development of new guidelines is resource and time intensive, which may not be feasible and can delay the implementation. Adaptation of the existing standard guidelines using the transparent and well-documented methodology with involvement of all stakeholders can be one of the most reasonable pathways. However, the adaptation should be done keeping in mind the context, resource availability, budget impact, investment needed for implementation and acceptability by clinicians, patients, policymakers, and other stakeholders. The present paper provides the framework for systematically developing guidelines through adaptation and contextualisation. The process can be used for other health conditions in resource-constraint settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manju Sengar
- Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India.,Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - C S Pramesh
- Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India .,Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | | | - Sudeep Shah
- P.D. Hinduja Hospital and Medical Research Centre, Mumbai, India
| | | | - D K Vijaykumar
- Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Cochin, Kerala, India
| | - Ajay Puri
- Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India.,Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Beela Mathew
- Regional Cancer Centre, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India
| | - Ramandeep Singh Arora
- Max Institute of Cancer Care, Max Super Speciality Hospital, New Delhi, New Delhi, India
| | - Priya Kumari T
- Regional Cancer Centre, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India
| | - Kedar Deodhar
- Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India.,Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Santosh Menon
- Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India.,Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Sridhar Epari
- Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India.,Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Omshree Shetty
- Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India.,Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Rubagumya F, Makori K, Borges H, Mwanzi S, Karim S, Msadabwe C, Dharsee N, Mutebi M, Hopman WM, Vanderpuye V, Ka S, Ndlovu N, Hammad N, Booth CM. Choosing Wisely Africa: Insights from the front lines of clinical care. J Cancer Policy 2022; 33:100348. [PMID: 35872184 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcpo.2022.100348] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2022] [Revised: 07/18/2022] [Accepted: 07/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A multidisciplinary Task Force of African oncologists and patient representatives published the Choosing Wisely Africa (CWA) recommendations in 2020. These top 10 recommendations identify low-value, unnecessary, or harmful practices that are frequently used in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). In this study, we describe agreement and concordance with the recommendations from front-line oncologists across SSA. METHODS An electronic survey was distributed to members of the African Organization for Research & Training in Cancer (AORTIC) and oncology groups within SSA using a hierarchical snowball method; each primary contact distributed the survey through their personal networks. The survey captured information about awareness of the CWA list, agreement with recommendations, and concordance with clinical practice. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize study results. RESULTS 52 individuals responded to the survey; 64% (33/52) were female and 58% (30/52) were clinical oncologists. Respondents represented 15 countries in SSA; 69% (36/52) practiced exclusively in the public system. Only 46% (24/52) were aware of the CWA list and 89% (46/52) agreed it would be helpful if the list was displayed in their clinic. There was generally a high agreement with the recommendations (range 84-98%); the highest agreement was related to staging/defining treatment intent (98%). The proportion of oncologists who implemented these recommendations in routine practice was somewhat lower (range 68-100%). Lowest rates of concordance related to: the use of shorter schedules of radiotherapy (67%); discussion of active surveillance forlow-risk prostate cancer (67%); only performing breast surgery for a mass that was proven to be malignant (70%); and seeking multidisciplinary input for curative intent treatment plans (73%). CONCLUSION While most frontline SSA oncologists agree with CWA recommendations, efforts are needed to disseminate the list. Agreement with the recommendations is high but there are gaps in implementation in routine practice. Further work is needed to understand the barriers and enablers of implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fidel Rubagumya
- Rwanda Military Hospital, Kigali, Rwanda; Division of Cancer Care and Epidemiology, Queen's University Cancer Research Institute, Kingston, Canada; Department of Oncology, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada; Department of Public Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada; Cancer Diseases Hospital, Ministry of Health, Lusaka, Zambia.
| | - Kevin Makori
- International Cancer Institute, Kenya; Cancer Diseases Hospital, Ministry of Health, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Hirondina Borges
- Hospital Agostinho Neto, Praia, Cabo Verde; Cancer Diseases Hospital, Ministry of Health, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Sitna Mwanzi
- Aga Khan University Hospital, Nairobi, Kenya; Cancer Diseases Hospital, Ministry of Health, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Safiya Karim
- Tom Baker Cancer Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada; Cancer Diseases Hospital, Ministry of Health, Lusaka, Zambia
| | | | - Nazima Dharsee
- Cancer Diseases Hospital, Ministry of Health, Lusaka, Zambia; Ocean Road Cancer Institute, Tanzania; Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Tanzania
| | - Miriam Mutebi
- Aga Khan University Hospital, Nairobi, Kenya; Cancer Diseases Hospital, Ministry of Health, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Wilma M Hopman
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada; Cancer Diseases Hospital, Ministry of Health, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Verna Vanderpuye
- Cancer Diseases Hospital, Ministry of Health, Lusaka, Zambia; Korle Bu Teaching Hospital, Accra, Ghana
| | - Sidy Ka
- Cancer Diseases Hospital, Ministry of Health, Lusaka, Zambia; Joliot Curie Cancer Institute, Dakar, Senegal
| | - Ntokozo Ndlovu
- Cancer Diseases Hospital, Ministry of Health, Lusaka, Zambia; University of Zimbabwe Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Harare, Zimbabwe; Parirenyatwa Hospital Radiotherapy Centre, Harare, Zimbabwe
| | - Nazik Hammad
- Department of Oncology, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada; Cancer Diseases Hospital, Ministry of Health, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Christopher M Booth
- Division of Cancer Care and Epidemiology, Queen's University Cancer Research Institute, Kingston, Canada; Department of Oncology, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada; Department of Public Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada; Cancer Diseases Hospital, Ministry of Health, Lusaka, Zambia
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Choosing Wisely—Barriers and Solutions to Implementation in Low and Middle-Income Countries. Curr Oncol 2022; 29:5091-5096. [PMID: 35877263 PMCID: PMC9320636 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol29070403] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2022] [Revised: 07/11/2022] [Accepted: 07/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Globally, there is increasing emphasis on value-based cancer care. Rising healthcare costs and reduced health care spending and budgets, especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), call for patients, providers, and healthcare systems to apply the Choose Wisely (CW) approach. This approach seeks to advance a dialogue on avoiding unnecessary medical tests, treatments, and procedures. Several factors have been described as barriers and facilitators to the implementation of the Choosing Wisely recommendations in high-income countries but none for LMICs. In this review, we attempt to classify potential barriers to the Choose Wisely implementation relative to the sources of behavior and potential intervention functions that can be implemented in order to reduce these barriers.
Collapse
|
21
|
Pramesh CS, Badwe RA, Bhoo-Pathy N, Booth CM, Chinnaswamy G, Dare AJ, de Andrade VP, Hunter DJ, Gopal S, Gospodarowicz M, Gunasekera S, Ilbawi A, Kapambwe S, Kingham P, Kutluk T, Lamichhane N, Mutebi M, Orem J, Parham G, Ranganathan P, Sengar M, Sullivan R, Swaminathan S, Tannock IF, Tomar V, Vanderpuye V, Varghese C, Weiderpass E. Priorities for cancer research in low- and middle-income countries: a global perspective. Nat Med 2022; 28:649-657. [PMID: 35440716 PMCID: PMC9108683 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-022-01738-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 95] [Impact Index Per Article: 47.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2021] [Accepted: 02/09/2022] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
Cancer research currently is heavily skewed toward high-income countries (HICs), with little research conducted in, and relevant to, the problems of low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This regional discordance in cancer knowledge generation and application needs to be rebalanced. Several gaps in the research enterprise of LMICs need to be addressed to promote regionally relevant research, and radical rethinking is needed to address the burning issues in cancer care in these regions. We identified five top priorities in cancer research in LMICs based on current and projected needs: reducing the burden of patients with advanced disease; improving access and affordability, and outcomes of cancer treatment; value-based care and health economics; quality improvement and implementation research; and leveraging technology to improve cancer control. LMICs have an excellent opportunity to address important questions in cancer research that could impact cancer control globally. Success will require collaboration and commitment from governments, policy makers, funding agencies, health care organizations and leaders, researchers and the public.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C S Pramesh
- Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
| | - Rajendra A Badwe
- Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Nirmala Bhoo-Pathy
- Centre for Epidemiology and Evidence-Based Practice, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Christopher M Booth
- Departments of Oncology and Public Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Anna J Dare
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - David J Hunter
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Satish Gopal
- Centre for Global Health, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Mary Gospodarowicz
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | | | - Peter Kingham
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Tezer Kutluk
- Faculty of Medicine and Cancer Institute, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Manju Sengar
- Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | | | | | - Ian F Tannock
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Verna Vanderpuye
- National Center for Radiotherapy Oncology and Nuclear Medicine and Korle Bu Teaching Hospital, Accra, Ghana
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Aggarwal A, Lievens Y, Sullivan R, Nolte E. What Really Matters for Cancer Care – Health Systems Strengthening or Technological Innovation? Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2022; 34:430-435. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2022.02.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2021] [Revised: 01/29/2022] [Accepted: 02/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
|
23
|
Sanders JJ, Manson L, Constien D, Downar J. Discussing prognosis and what matters most for people with serious illness. BMJ 2022; 376:e067572. [PMID: 35228302 DOI: 10.1136/bmj-2021-067572] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Justin J Sanders
- Palliative Care McGill, Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
- Ariadne Labs, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Leigh Manson
- Health Quality and Safety Commission, New Zealand
| | | | - James Downar
- Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
- Bruyere Continuing Care, Ottawa, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Dharmshaktu GS. Choosing Wisely matters in reducing radiation footprints. J Family Med Prim Care 2021; 10:3524-3525. [PMID: 34760787 PMCID: PMC8565164 DOI: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_854_21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2021] [Accepted: 06/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Ganesh S Dharmshaktu
- Department of Orthopaedics, Government Medical College, Haldwani, Uttarakhand, India
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Rodin D, Dare AJ, Booker R, Booth C, Bryant H, Ginsburg O, Giuliani M, Gospodarowicz M, Gupta S, Hammad N, Rosberger Z, Sutcliffe S, Earle CC. Transforming Canada's role in global cancer control. Lancet Oncol 2021; 22:e400-e409. [PMID: 34478676 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(21)00374-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2021] [Revised: 06/11/2021] [Accepted: 06/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Cancer has not been an explicit priority of Canada's international health and development agenda, but it is key to realising the country's Sustainable Development Goal commitments. Multiple converging political, health, and social forces could now drive support for a more integrated Canadian approach to global cancer control. Success will depend on the extent to which Canadian leaders and institutions can build consensus as a community and agree to work together. Collaboration should include agreement on the framing and prioritisation of the core issues, building a broad coalition base, aligning with priorities of international partners, and on a governance structure that reflects the principles of equity, diversity, and inclusion. This Series paper will discuss global cancer control within Canada's global health agenda, how Canada can address its history of colonisation and present-day disparities in its global work, and the challenges and opportunities of creating a Canadian global cancer control network.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danielle Rodin
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| | - Anna J Dare
- Centre for Global Health Research, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Reanne Booker
- Palliative and End-of-Life Care Services-Calgary Zone, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | | | - Heather Bryant
- Canadian Partnership Against Cancer, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Ophira Ginsburg
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Population Health and Perlmutter Cancer Centre, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Meredith Giuliani
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Mary Gospodarowicz
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Sumit Gupta
- Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Division of Haematology/Oncology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Nazik Hammad
- Department of Oncology, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Zeev Rosberger
- Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | | | - Craig C Earle
- Canadian Partnership Against Cancer, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Rubagumya F, Mitera G, Ka S, Manirakiza A, Decuir P, Msadabwe SC, Adani Ifè S, Nwachukwu E, Ohene Oti N, Borges H, Mutebi M, Abuidris D, Vanderpuye V, Booth CM, Hammad N. Choosing Wisely Africa: Ten Low-Value or Harmful Practices That Should Be Avoided in Cancer Care. JCO Glob Oncol 2021; 6:1192-1199. [PMID: 32735489 PMCID: PMC7392774 DOI: 10.1200/go.20.00255] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Choosing Wisely Africa (CWA) builds on Choosing Wisely (CW) in the United States, Canada, and India and aims to identify low-value, unnecessary, or harmful cancer practices that are frequently used on the African continent. The aim of this work was to use physicians and patient advocates to identify a short list of low-value practices that are frequently used in African low- and middle-income countries. METHODS The CWA Task Force was convened by the African Organization for Research and Training in Cancer and included representatives from surgical, medical, and radiation oncology, the private and public sectors, and patient advocacy groups. Consensus was built through a modified Delphi process, shortening a long list of practices to a short list, and then to a final list. A voting threshold of ≥ 60% was used to include an individual practice on the short list. A consensus was reached after a series of teleconferences and voting processes. RESULTS Of the 10 practices on the final list, one is a new suggestion and 9 are revisions or adaptations of practices from previous CW campaign lists. One item relates to palliative care, 8 concern treatment, and one relates to surveillance. CONCLUSION The CWA initiative has identified 10 low-value, common interventions in Africa’s cancer practice. The success of this campaign will be measured by how the recommendations are implemented across sub-Saharan Africa and whether this improves the delivery of high-quality cancer care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fidel Rubagumya
- Rwanda Military Hospital, Kigali, Rwanda.,University of Global Health Equity, Burera, Rwanda
| | | | - Sidy Ka
- Joliot Curie Cancer Institute, Dakar, Senegal
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Dafalla Abuidris
- National Cancer Institute, University of Geriza, Wad Madani, Sudan
| | | | - Christopher M Booth
- Kingston Health Science Center, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Nazik Hammad
- Kingston Health Science Center, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Choosing Wisely for COVID-19: ten evidence-based recommendations for patients and physicians. Nat Med 2021; 27:1324-1327. [PMID: 34226738 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-021-01439-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
|
28
|
Leighl NB, Nirmalakumar S, Ezeife DA, Gyawali B. An Arm and a Leg: The Rising Cost of Cancer Drugs and Impact on Access. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2021; 41:1-12. [PMID: 33956494 DOI: 10.1200/edbk_100028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Increasing cancer drug prices present global challenges to treatment access and cancer outcomes. Substantial variability exists in drug pricing across countries. In countries without universal health care, patients are responsible for treatment costs. Low- or middle-income countries are heavily impacted, with limited patient access to novel cancer treatments. Financial toxicity is seen across cancer types, countries, and health care systems. Those at highest risk include younger patients, new immigrants, visible minority groups, and those without private health coverage. Currently, cancer drug pricing does not correlate with value or clinical benefit. Value-based pricing of oncology drugs may incentivize development of higher-value medicines and eliminate excess spending on drugs that yield little benefit. Generics and biosimilars in oncology can also improve affordability and patient access, offering dramatic reductions in drug spending while maintaining patient benefit. Oncologists can promote value-based care by following evidence-based clinical guidelines that avoid low-value treatments. Researchers can also engage in value-based research that critically explores optimal cancer drug dosing, schedules, and treatment duration and defines patient populations most likely to benefit (e.g., through biomarker selection). Cancer Groundshot proposes that we improve outcomes for today's patients with cancer, including broader global access for high-value treatments, promotion of affordable cancer control strategies, and reduction of cancer morbidity and mortality through low-cost prevention and screening initiatives. Moving forward, major oncology societies recommend promoting uniform global access to essential cancer medicines and avoiding financial harm for patients as key principles in addressing the affordability of cancer drugs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natasha B Leighl
- Department of Medical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sharon Nirmalakumar
- Department of Medical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Doreen A Ezeife
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Bishal Gyawali
- Department of Oncology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Impact of COVID-19 on cancer care in India: a cohort study. Lancet Oncol 2021; 22:970-976. [PMID: 34051879 PMCID: PMC8159191 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(21)00240-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 83] [Impact Index Per Article: 27.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2021] [Revised: 04/05/2021] [Accepted: 04/12/2021] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
Background The COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted health-care systems, leading to concerns about its subsequent impact on non-COVID disease conditions. The diagnosis and management of cancer is time sensitive and is likely to be substantially affected by these disruptions. We aimed to assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cancer care in India. Methods We did an ambidirectional cohort study at 41 cancer centres across India that were members of the National Cancer Grid of India to compare provision of oncology services between March 1 and May 31, 2020, with the same time period in 2019. We collected data on new patient registrations, number of patients visiting outpatient clinics, hospital admissions, day care admissions for chemotherapy, minor and major surgeries, patients accessing radiotherapy, diagnostic tests done (pathology reports, CT scans, MRI scans), and palliative care referrals. We also obtained estimates from participating centres on cancer screening, research, and educational activities (teaching of postgraduate students and trainees). We calculated proportional reductions in the provision of oncology services in 2020, compared with 2019. Findings Between March 1 and May 31, 2020, the number of new patients registered decreased from 112 270 to 51 760 (54% reduction), patients who had follow-up visits decreased from 634 745 to 340 984 (46% reduction), hospital admissions decreased from 88 801 to 56 885 (36% reduction), outpatient chemotherapy decreased from 173634 to 109 107 (37% reduction), the number of major surgeries decreased from 17 120 to 8677 (49% reduction), minor surgeries from 18 004 to 8630 (52% reduction), patients accessing radiotherapy from 51 142 to 39 365 (23% reduction), pathological diagnostic tests from 398 373 to 246 616 (38% reduction), number of radiological diagnostic tests from 93 449 to 53 560 (43% reduction), and palliative care referrals from 19 474 to 13 890 (29% reduction). These reductions were even more marked between April and May, 2020. Cancer screening was stopped completely or was functioning at less than 25% of usual capacity at more than 70% of centres during these months. Reductions in the provision of oncology services were higher for centres in tier 1 cities (larger cities) than tier 2 and 3 cities (smaller cities). Interpretation The COVID-19 pandemic has had considerable impact on the delivery of oncology services in India. The long-term impact of cessation of cancer screening and delayed hospital visits on cancer stage migration and outcomes are likely to be substantial. Funding None. Translation For the Hindi translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.
Collapse
|
30
|
Value-based radiotherapy: A new chapter of the ESTRO-HERO project. Radiother Oncol 2021; 160:236-239. [PMID: 33992629 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.05.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2021] [Accepted: 05/09/2021] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
Radiotherapy interventions are rapidly evolving and improving, holding promise for better patient outcomes, yet at the possible detriment of higher societal costs. The ESTRO-HERO value-based radiotherapy project aims to develop a framework defining and assessing the value of radiotherapy innovations, to support clinical implementation and equitable access, within a sustainable healthcare system.
Collapse
|
31
|
Lombe D, Sullivan R, Caduff C, Ali Z, Bhoo-Pathy N, Cleary J, Jalink M, Matsuda T, Mukherji D, Sarfati D, Vanderpuye V, Yusuf A, Booth C. Silver linings: a qualitative study of desirable changes to cancer care during the COVID-19 pandemic. Ecancermedicalscience 2021; 15:1202. [PMID: 33889211 PMCID: PMC8043681 DOI: 10.3332/ecancer.2021.1202] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2021] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Public health emergencies and crises such as the current COVID-19 pandemic can accelerate innovation and place renewed focus on the value of health interventions. Capturing important lessons learnt, both positive and negative, is vital. We aimed to document the perceived positive changes (silver linings) in cancer care that emerged during the COVID-19 pandemic and identify challenges that may limit their long-term adoption. Methods This study employed a qualitative design. Semi-structured interviews (n = 20) were conducted with key opinion leaders from 14 countries. The participants were predominantly members of the International COVID-19 and Cancer Taskforce, who convened in March 2020 to address delivery of cancer care in the context of the pandemic. The Framework Method was employed to analyse the positive changes of the pandemic with corresponding challenges to their maintenance post-pandemic. Results Ten themes of positive changes were identified which included: value in cancer care, digital communication, convenience, inclusivity and cooperation, decentralisation of cancer care, acceleration of policy change, human interactions, hygiene practices, health awareness and promotion and systems improvement. Impediments to the scale-up of these positive changes included resource disparities and variation in legal frameworks across regions. Barriers were largely attributed to behaviours and attitudes of stakeholders. Conclusion The COVID-19 pandemic has led to important value-based innovations and changes for better cancer care across different health systems. The challenges to maintaining/implementing these changes vary by setting. Efforts are needed to implement improved elements of care that evolved during the pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dorothy Lombe
- Cancer Diseases Hospital, Lusaka, 10101, Zambia.,https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5083-1801
| | - Richard Sullivan
- Institute of Cancer Policy, King's College London, London, WC2R 2LS, United Kingdom
| | - Carlo Caduff
- King's College London, London, WC2R 2LS, United Kingdom
| | - Zipporah Ali
- Kenya Hospices and Palliative Care Association, Nairobi, 00202, Kenya
| | - Nirmala Bhoo-Pathy
- Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, 50603, Malaysia
| | - Jim Cleary
- Department of Medicine and IU Simon Cancer Center, IU School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
| | - Matt Jalink
- Division of Cancer Care and Epidemiology, Cancer Research Institute, Queen's University, Kingston, K7L 3N6, Canada
| | - Tomohiro Matsuda
- Population-based Cancer Registry Section, Division of Surveillance, Center for Cancer Control and Information Services, National Cancer Center, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan
| | - Deborah Mukherji
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology, American University of Beirut Medical Center (AUBMC), Beirut, 1107 2020, Lebanon
| | - Diana Sarfati
- Te Aho o Te Kahu, Cancer Control Agency, Wellington, 6011, New Zealand
| | - Verna Vanderpuye
- National Center for Oncology, Radiotherapy, and Nuclear Medicine, Accra, 00233, Ghana
| | - Aasim Yusuf
- Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centres, Lahore and Peshawar, 25100, Pakistan
| | - Christopher Booth
- Division of Cancer Care and Epidemiology, Cancer Research Institute, Queen's University, Kingston, K7L 3N6, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Gago J, Pendharkar D, Tripathi C, Ginsburg O. Making the Best Use of Resources in Global Cancer Care. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2021; 40:e361-e366. [PMID: 32614655 DOI: 10.1200/edbk_290311] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Inequitable access to high-quality cancer control and care remains one of the greatest public health challenges in countries at all resource levels. Core issues include the limited oncology health care workforce and equitable access to affordable (essential) cancer diagnostics, medicines, surgery, systemic therapies, and radiotherapy, compounded by existing social inequalities. To reduce cancer health disparities globally and subnationally, countries can enhance their capabilities to deliver high-quality, affordable care closer to where most people live. Decentralization and integration of health services can be part of the solution, offloading the strained capacity of tertiary facilities where possible and expanding cadres of trained providers to support some aspects of cancer prevention and control that require a lesser degree of specialization. The strategy to eliminate cervical cancer provides a salient example of a data-driven effort that optimizes resources to dramatically reduce one of the greatest cancer health disparities globally. Here, we highlight two responses to meet the challenge through greater engagement of the primary care workforce and by adoption of universal health care coverage to ensure access to cancer prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan Gago
- NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY
| | | | | | - Ophira Ginsburg
- Perlmutter Cancer Center at NYU Langone Health, New York, NY.,Section for Global Health, Department of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Rodin D, Tawk B, Mohamad O, Grover S, Moraes FY, Yap ML, Zubizarreta E, Lievens Y. Hypofractionated radiotherapy in the real-world setting: An international ESTRO-GIRO survey. Radiother Oncol 2021; 157:32-39. [PMID: 33453312 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.01.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2020] [Revised: 12/21/2020] [Accepted: 01/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Multiple large trials have established the non-inferiority of hypofractionated radiotherapy compared to conventional fractionation. This study will determine real-world hypofractionation adoption across different geographic regions for breast, prostate, cervical cancer, and bone metastases, and identify barriers and facilitators to its use. MATERIALS AND METHODS An anonymous, electronic survey was distributed from January 2018 through January 2019 to radiation oncologists through the ESTRO-GIRO initiative. Predictors of hypofractionation were identified in univariable and multivariable regression analyses. RESULTS 2316 radiation oncologists responded. Hypofractionation was preferred in node-negative breast cancer following lumpectomy (82·2% vs. 46·7% for node-positive; p < 0.001), and in low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer (57·5% and 54·5%, respectively, versus 41·2% for high-risk (p < 0.001)). Hypofractionation was used in 32·3% of cervix cases in Africa, but <10% in other regions (p < 0.001). For palliative indications, hypofractionation was preferred by the majority of respondents. Lack of long-term data and concerns about local control and toxicity were the most commonly cited barriers. In adjusted analyses, hypofractionation was least common for curative indications amongst low- and lower-middle-income countries, Asia-Pacific, female respondents, small catchment areas, and in centres without access to intensity modulated radiotherapy. CONCLUSION Significant variation was observed in hypofractionation across curative indications and between regions, with greater concordance in palliation. Using inadequate fractionation schedules may impede the delivery of affordable and accessible radiotherapy. Greater regionally-targeted and disease-specific education on evidence-based fractionation schedules is needed to improve utilization, along with best-case examples addressing practice barriers and supporting policy reform.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danielle Rodin
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada.
| | - Bouchra Tawk
- German Cancer Research Consortium, Core Site Heidelberg, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany; Division of Molecular and Translational Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Faculty of Medicine and Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Osama Mohamad
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, United States
| | - Surbhi Grover
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States; Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
| | - Fabio Y Moraes
- Department of Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada
| | - Mei Ling Yap
- Collaboration for Cancer Outcomes, Research and Evaluation (CCORE), Ingham Institute, UNSW Sydney, Liverpool, Australia; Liverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centres, Western Sydney University, Campbelltown, Australia
| | | | - Yolande Lievens
- Ghent University Hospital and Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Shah H, Surujballi J, Awan AA, Hutton B, Arnaout A, Shorr R, Vandermeer L, Alzahrani MJ, Clemons M. A scoping review characterizing "Choosing Wisely®" recommendations for breast cancer management. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2020; 185:533-547. [PMID: 33156490 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-020-06009-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2020] [Accepted: 10/29/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Choosing Wisely (CW)® was created by the American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM) to promote patient-physician conversations about unnecessary medical interventions. Similarly, other countries created their own panels of experts called "CW® campaigns" which review recommendations submitted by that country's oncology societies. We performed a scoping review to consolidate CW® recommendations from different groups with respect to breast cancer care. METHODS A systematic search of Medline and Embase was designed by an information specialist for publications presenting CW® recommendations for breast cancer care practices from 2011-2020. We also reviewed the websites of all CW® campaigns and reference sections of each CW® recommendation. Two reviewers independently screened studies for inclusion and performed data extraction. Findings were summarized narratively. RESULTS Review of ABIM CW® recommendations showed 19 breast cancer-related recommendations pertaining to; screening (n = 4), radiological staging (n = 2), treatment (n = 10), surveillance (n = 2), and miscellaneous (genetic testing; n = 1). Of 22 countries with CW® campaigns, 10 published recommendations for breast cancer. Over half (57%) of recommendations were supported by more than one country. No recommendations were refuted between campaigns. Two campaigns developed 3 novel recommendations on new topics, including chemotherapy in ductal carcinoma in situ (Italy) and comparison of screening imaging modalities (Portugal). CONCLUSIONS CW® recommendations focus on reducing overutilization of investigations and treatments. There was a high rate of consensus between different CW® campaigns. As health care systems globally move attention to reduce low-value care, further studies are required to address adherence to these current recommendations and develop new recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hely Shah
- Department of Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Julian Surujballi
- Division of Medical Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Arif Ali Awan
- Division of Medical Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Brian Hutton
- The University of Ottawa, School of Epidemiology and Public Health, and Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Angel Arnaout
- Department of Surgery, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | | | | | - Mashari Jemaan Alzahrani
- Division of Medical Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Mark Clemons
- Department of Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada. .,Division of Medical Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, ON, Canada. .,The University of Ottawa, School of Epidemiology and Public Health, and Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Pramesh CS, Chaturvedi H, Reddy VA, Saikia T, Ghoshal S, Pandit M, Babu KG, Ganpathy KV, Savant D, Mitera G, Sullivan R, Booth CM. “Choosing Wisely” for Cancer Care in India. Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.4103/ijmpo.ijmpo_304_20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- C S Pramesh
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | | | - Vijay Anand Reddy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Apollo Hospitals, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
| | - Tapan Saikia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Prince Aly Khan Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Sushmita Ghoshal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | | | - K Govind Babu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
| | - K V Ganpathy
- Jeet Association for Support to Cancer Patients, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Dhairyasheel Savant
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Asian Institute of Oncology, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Gunita Mitera
- Department of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Richard Sullivan
- Institute of Cancer Policy, King's College London, UK
- King's Health Partners Comprehensive Cancer Centre, London, UK
| | - Christopher M Booth
- Division of Cancer Care and Epidemiology, Queen's University Cancer Research Institute, Kingston, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Caduff C, Booth CM, Pramesh CS, Sullivan R. India's new health scheme: what does it mean for cancer care? Lancet Oncol 2020; 20:757-758. [PMID: 31162087 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(19)30322-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2019] [Revised: 04/28/2019] [Accepted: 05/03/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Carlo Caduff
- Department of Global Health & Social Medicine, King's College London, London WC2B 4BG, UK.
| | - Christopher M Booth
- Canada Research Chair in Population Cancer Care, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | | | - Richard Sullivan
- Institute of Cancer Policy, Conflict & Health Research Group, King's College London, King's Health Partners Comprehensive Cancer Centre, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Munshi A. Do not use robotic surgery in oncology patients when conventional surgical approaches are equally effective. Lancet Oncol 2020; 20:e240. [PMID: 31044715 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(19)30147-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2019] [Accepted: 03/18/2019] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Anusheel Munshi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Manipal Hospital, Dwarka, New Delhi 110075, India.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Trapani D, Curigliano G. How can biosimilars change the trajectory of breast cancer therapy? Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2020; 20:325-328. [DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2020.1757438] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Dario Trapani
- Division of Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Curigliano
- Division of Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Booth CM, Hammad N. Childhood cancer care: closing equity gaps on the ground. Lancet Oncol 2020; 21:485-487. [PMID: 32240605 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(20)30094-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2020] [Accepted: 02/07/2020] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher M Booth
- Division of Cancer Care and Epidemiology, Queen's University Cancer Research Institute, Kingston, ON, K7L 3N6, Canada; Department of Oncology, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
| | - Nazik Hammad
- Department of Oncology, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Pramesh CS, Chaturvedi H, Reddy VA, Saikia T, Ghoshal S, Pandit M, Govind Babu K, Ganpathy KV, Savant D, Mitera G, Sullivan R, Booth CM. "Choosing Wisely" for Cancer Care in India. Indian J Surg Oncol 2020; 11:4-6. [PMID: 32205959 DOI: 10.1007/s13193-020-01051-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- C S Pramesh
- 1Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Dr Ernest Borges Road, Parel, Mumbai, 400012 India
| | - Harit Chaturvedi
- 2Department of Surgical Oncology, Max Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Vijay Anand Reddy
- 3Department of Radiation Oncology, Apollo Hospitals, Hyderabad, India
| | - Tapan Saikia
- 4Department of Medical Oncology, Prince Aly Khan Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | - Sushmita Ghoshal
- 5Department of Radiation Oncology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | | | - K Govind Babu
- 7Department of Medical Oncology, Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Bengaluru, India
| | - K V Ganpathy
- Jeet Association for Support to Cancer Patients, Mumbai, India
| | | | - Gunita Mitera
- 10Department of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Richard Sullivan
- 11Institute of Cancer Policy, King's College London, & King's Health Partners Comprehensive Cancer Centre, London, UK
| | - Christopher M Booth
- 12Division of Cancer Care and Epidemiology, Queen's University Cancer Research Institute, Kingston, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Pramesh CS, Chaturvedi H, Reddy VA, Saikia T, Ghoshal S, Pandit M, Babu KG, Ganpathy KV, Savant D, Mitera G, Sullivan R, Booth CM. Choosing Wisely for Cancer Care in India. Indian J Surg 2020. [DOI: 10.1007/s12262-020-02086-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022] Open
|
42
|
Chopra S, Mittal P, Viswanathan A, Tharavichitkul E, Zubizarreta E, Nout RA, Yap ML, Grover S, Rodin D, Rai B, Gondhowiardjo S, Shrivastava SK. Global Collaborations for Cervical Cancer: Can the East-West Alliance Facilitate Treatment for all? Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2019; 31:529-538. [PMID: 31229379 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2019.05.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2019] [Revised: 05/11/2019] [Accepted: 05/28/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Despite the advances in the primary prevention of cervical cancer, there is an absolute increase in the incidence of cervical cancer as a result of an increase in world population. A vast majority of patients in low and low-middle income countries continue to present at a locally advanced stage, necessitating treatment with chemoradiation and brachytherapy. There is a dearth of equipment and trained professionals for the treatment of cervical cancer, especially in low and low-middle income countries. There is an urgent need to improve treatment availability and develop better treatments. Worldwide trends, however, reveal a low number of therapeutic and innovative research trials in cervical cancer. The present article elucidates the existing challenges and provides solutions to improve outcomes. The proposed strategies hinge on strengthening collaborations for global advocacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Chopra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer (ACTREC), Tata Memorial Centre, Navi Mumbai, India; Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
| | - P Mittal
- Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India; Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India
| | - A Viswanathan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Johns Hopkins University Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - E Tharavichitkul
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
| | - E Zubizarreta
- Division of Human Health, International Atomic of Energy Agency - Vienna International Centre, Vienna, Austria
| | - R A Nout
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center LUM, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - M L Yap
- Collaboration for Cancer Outcomes, Research and Evaluation (CCORE), Ingham Institute, UNSW Sydney, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia; Liverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centres, Western Sydney University, Campbelltown, New South Wales, Australia; School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia
| | - S Grover
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA; Botswana-UPENN Partnership, University of Botswana, Gaborone, Botswana
| | - D Rodin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - B Rai
- Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - S Gondhowiardjo
- Department of Radiotherapy, Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo National General Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia
| | - S K Shrivastava
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Apollo Hospital, Belapur, Navi Mumbai, India
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Gupta T, Achari R, Chatterjee A, Chen ZP, Mehta M, Bouffet E, Jalali R. Comparison of Epidemiology and Outcomes in Neuro-Oncology Between the East and the West: Challenges and Opportunities. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2019; 31:539-548. [PMID: 31182288 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2019.05.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2019] [Revised: 05/10/2019] [Accepted: 05/15/2019] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Although neoplasms of the brain and central nervous system (CNS) are relatively uncommon, comprising only 1-2% of the overall cancer burden, they represent a substantial source of morbidity and mortality worldwide. The age-adjusted annual incidence of CNS tumours is reportedly low; however, there is substantial global variability in its incidence, with nearly a five-fold difference between regions with the highest rates in developed countries in the West and those with the lowest rates in developing countries in South-East Asia, including India, possibly attributable to key differences in environmental factors, genetic susceptibilities and cultural practices, as well as resource constraints in low-middle income countries precluding precise ascertainment and accurate diagnosis. The burden of CNS tumours is further compounded by the fact that they require highly specialised and skilled multidisciplinary care, including access to modern neuroimaging, neurosurgery, neuropathology and molecular biology, radiotherapy, chemotherapy and rehabilitation services, which may not be widely available in an integrated manner in large parts of the world with a large variation in clinical pathways, non-uniformity of care and resultant heterogeneity in clinical outcomes. CNS tumours encompass a heterogeneous spectrum of histopathological entities with differences in presentation, distinct molecular/genetic alterations, diverse biological behaviour and varying clinical outcomes. Survival is highly dependent on histology, grade and molecular biology, but varies widely across continents, even for the same tumour type and grade. In general, survival is higher in children with primary brain tumours than in adults, largely due to the differences in histological distribution across age groups. However, there is widespread variability, with 5-year survival for paediatric brain tumours being <40% in some low-middle income countries compared with 70-80% in the developed world. This review compares the descriptive epidemiology and clinical outcomes of primary brain tumours between the East and the West that pose unique challenges but also provide new opportunities in contemporary neuro-oncological practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Gupta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India.
| | - R Achari
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Medical Centre, Kolkata, India
| | - A Chatterjee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India
| | - Z-P Chen
- Department of Neurosurgery, SunYat-sen University Cancer Centre, Guangzhou, China
| | - M Mehta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - E Bouffet
- Neuro-Oncology Section, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - R Jalali
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Apollo Proton Cancer Centre, Chennai, India
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Pramesh CS, Sullivan R, Booth CM. Do not use robotic surgery in oncology patients when conventional surgical approaches are equally effective - Authors' reply. Lancet Oncol 2019; 20:e241. [PMID: 31044716 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(19)30247-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2019] [Accepted: 04/11/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- C S Pramesh
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai 400012, India.
| | - Richard Sullivan
- Institute of Cancer Policy, King's College London, London, UK; King's Health Partners Comprehensive Cancer Centre, London, UK
| | - Christopher M Booth
- Department of Cancer Care and Epidemiology, Queen's University Cancer Research Institute, Kingston, Canada
| |
Collapse
|