1
|
López Muñoz AM, González Flores E, Carral Maseda A, Pimentel Cáceres P, Afonso Gómez R, López López C, Jimeno Maté R, Reina Zoilo JJ, Castañón López C, Salgado Fernández M, Aparicio Urtasun J, Asensio Martínez E, Martín Gómez T. Real-world dosing patterns of regorafenib for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer in Spain: the RE-SEARCH study. Clin Transl Oncol 2024:10.1007/s12094-024-03630-1. [PMID: 39127984 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-024-03630-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2024] [Accepted: 07/19/2024] [Indexed: 08/12/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To describe the dosing patterns of regorafenib in a real-world population of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in a routine clinical practice setting in Spain, focusing on the starting dose of regorafenib. METHODS An observational, retrospective, multicenter study that included patients ≥ 18 years old who had histologically documented mCRC and who had initiated treatment with regorafenib since January 2017. Post hoc categorization of dosing patterns revealed the following: initial dose < 160 mg and dose escalation, initial dose < 160 mg and maintenance, initial dose equal to 160 mg and maintenance, and initial dose equal to 160 mg and dose reduction. RESULTS Most patients (152/241, 63.8%) initiated treatment with regorafenib at doses < 160 mg. There was large variation in the starting dose of regorafenib over time: in 2017, most patients (59%) initiated regorafenib at a dose of 160 mg, this proportion decreased to 6% in 2021. There were no significant differences in the median progression-free survival according to the regorafenib dose patterns during the first two cycles. The proportion of patients who reported at least one adverse event (AE), had a grade 3-4 AE or had an AE leading to dose reduction was greater in the group of patients who received an initial dose equal to 160 and reduction. CONCLUSIONS Our results indicate that physicians in Spain have gradually adopted a dose-escalation approach during cycle 1, which is a common practice for starting treatment with a reduced dose (< 160 mg/day), a strategy that seems to improve tolerability while maintaining efficacy. TRIAL REGISTRATION Not applicable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana María López Muñoz
- Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario de Burgos, Avenida Islas Baleares S/N, 09006, Burgos, Spain.
| | | | | | | | - Ruth Afonso Gómez
- Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Nuestra Señora de Candelaria, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain
| | - Carlos López López
- Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla IDIVAL, UNICAN, Santander, Spain
| | - Raquel Jimeno Maté
- Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bekaii-Saab T, Khan N, Ostojic H, Jiao X, Chen G, Lin W, Bruno A. Real-world dosing of regorafenib and outcomes among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a retrospective analysis using US claims data. BMC Cancer 2024; 24:939. [PMID: 39095766 PMCID: PMC11295488 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-12421-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2023] [Accepted: 05/23/2024] [Indexed: 08/04/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The randomized, dose-optimization, open-label ReDOS study in US patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) showed that, compared with a standard dosing approach, initiating regorafenib at 80 mg/day and escalating to 160 mg/day depending on tolerability increased the proportion of patients reaching their third treatment cycle and reduced the incidence of adverse events without compromising efficacy. Subsequently, the ReDOS dose-escalation strategy was included as an alternative regorafenib dosing option in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Clinical Practice Guidelines. A retrospective analysis was conducted using a US claims database to assess whether inclusion of this dose-escalation strategy in NCCN Guidelines has influenced the use of flexible dosing in routine US clinical practice, and to describe clinical outcomes pre- and post-inclusion in NCCN Guidelines. METHODS Patients with CRC in the Optum's de-identified Clinformatics® Data Mart database initiating regorafenib for the first time between January 2016 and June 2020 were stratified based on whether they initiated regorafenib pre- or post-inclusion of ReDOS in NCCN Guidelines, and in two groups: flexible dosing (< 160 mg/day; < 84 tablets in the first treatment cycle) and standard dosing (160 mg/day; ≥ 84 tablets in the first treatment cycle). The primary endpoints were the proportion of patients who initiated their third treatment cycle and the mean number of treatment cycles per group. RESULTS 703 patients initiated regorafenib during the study period, of whom 310 (44%) initiated before and 393 (56%) initiated after inclusion of ReDOS in NCCN Guidelines. After inclusion in the guidelines, the proportion of patients who received flexible dosing increased from 21% (n = 66/310) to 45% (n = 178/393), the proportion who received standard dosing decreased from 79% (n = 244/310) to 55% (n = 215/393), the proportion who initiated their third treatment cycle increased from 36% (n = 113/310) to 46% (n = 179/393), and the mean (standard deviation) number of treatment cycles increased from 2.6 (2.9) to 3.2 (3.1). CONCLUSIONS Following inclusion of ReDOS in NCCN Guidelines, real-world data suggest that US clinicians have markedly increased use of flexible dosing in clinical practice, potentially maximizing clinical benefits and safety outcomes for patients with metastatic CRC receiving regorafenib.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nasreen Khan
- Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, 100 Bayer Blvd, Whippany, NJ, 07981, USA
| | - Helene Ostojic
- Bayer Consumer Care, Peter Merian-Strasse 84, Basel, 4052, Switzerland
| | - XiaoLong Jiao
- Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, 100 Bayer Blvd, Whippany, NJ, 07981, USA
- Pfizer, 66 Hudson Blvd, New York, NY, USA
| | - Guifang Chen
- Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, 100 Bayer Blvd, Whippany, NJ, 07981, USA
| | - Wenlong Lin
- Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, 100 Bayer Blvd, Whippany, NJ, 07981, USA
| | - Amanda Bruno
- Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, 100 Bayer Blvd, Whippany, NJ, 07981, USA
- Syneos Health, 100 Brandywine Blvd, Newtown, PA, 18940, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ono K, Murase R, Matsumoto N, Kubota Y, Ishida H, Fujita KI. Association of VEGFA and CCL4L2 polymorphisms with hand-foot skin reaction and survival of regorafenib in Japanese patients with colorectal cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2024; 94:57-66. [PMID: 38459188 DOI: 10.1007/s00280-024-04649-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2023] [Accepted: 02/02/2024] [Indexed: 03/10/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Treatment with regorafenib, which inhibits vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptor, frequently results in hand-foot skin reaction (HFSR), requiring treatment discontinuation or dose reduction. In our prospective study of regorafenib on patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, 17% of patients developed grade 3 HFSR. Herein, we retrospectively examined genetic polymorphisms associated with regorafenib-induced severe HFSR. METHODS To identify associated polymorphisms, exploratory whole-exome sequencing focusing on factors related to VEGF-mediated signaling pathways was first performed in seven patients each, with grade 3 HFSR and without HFSR. The identified HFSR-associated polymorphisms were analyzed in all the 40 patients. RESULTS The genotype frequency of rs3025009 G/A or A/A in the gene encoding VEGF-A (VEGFA) in patients with ≥ grade 2 HFSR was significantly higher than in other patients (P = 0.0257, Pc = 0.0771 [Bonferroni correction]). The frequency of C-C motif of chemokine ligand 4-like 2 (CCL4L2) rs3744596 A/T or T/T in patients with grade 3 HFSR was significantly lower than in others (P = 0.00894, Pc = 0.0268). The combination of the risk genotypes VEGFA rs3025009 G/A or A/A and CCL4L2 rs3744596 A/A was significantly associated with a higher incidence of grade 3 (P = 0.000614, Pc = 0.00246) and a longer median progression-free survival (P = 0.0234) than others. CONCLUSIONS These VEGF-related polymorphisms were found to be associated with HFSR and the survival benefits of regorafenib treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER AND DATE UMIN000013939, registered on May 12, 2014, when 6 months after the approval by the Institutional Review Board of Showa University.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Koutaro Ono
- Division of Cancer Genome and Pharmacotherapy, Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Showa University School of Pharmacy, 1-5-8 Hatanodai, Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo, 142-8555, Japan
| | - Remi Murase
- Division of Cancer Genome and Pharmacotherapy, Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Showa University School of Pharmacy, 1-5-8 Hatanodai, Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo, 142-8555, Japan
| | - Natsumi Matsumoto
- Division of Cancer Genome and Pharmacotherapy, Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Showa University School of Pharmacy, 1-5-8 Hatanodai, Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo, 142-8555, Japan
| | - Yutaro Kubota
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Showa University School of Medicine, 1-5-8 Hatanodai, Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo, 142-8555, Japan
| | - Hiroo Ishida
- Division of Medical Oncology, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, 35-1 Chigasakichuo, Tsuzuki-ku, Yokohama, 224-8503, Japan
| | - Ken-Ichi Fujita
- Division of Cancer Genome and Pharmacotherapy, Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Showa University School of Pharmacy, 1-5-8 Hatanodai, Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo, 142-8555, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Martin E, Le Malicot K, Guérin-Charbonnel C, Bocquet F, Bouché O, Turpin A, Aparicio T, Legoux JL, Dahan L, Taieb J, Lepage C, Dourthe LM, Pétorin C, Bourgeois V, Raoul JL, Seegers V. How to Balance Prognostic Factors in Controlled Phase II Trials: Stratified Permuted Block Randomization or Minimization? An Analysis of Clinical Trials in Digestive Oncology. Curr Oncol 2024; 31:3513-3528. [PMID: 38920742 PMCID: PMC11202503 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol31060259] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2024] [Revised: 06/06/2024] [Accepted: 06/13/2024] [Indexed: 06/27/2024] Open
Abstract
In controlled phase II trials, major prognostic factors need to be well balanced between arms. The main procedures used are SPBR (Stratified Permuted Block Randomization) and minimization. First, we provide a systematic review of the treatment allocation procedure used in gastrointestinal oncology controlled phase II trials published in 2019. Second, we performed simulations using data from six phase II studies to measure the impacts of imbalances and bias on the efficacy estimations. From the 40 articles analyzed, all mentioned randomization in both the title and abstract, the median number of patients included was 109, and 77.5% were multicenter. Of the 27 studies that reported at least one stratification variable, 10 included the center as a stratification variable, 10 used minimization, 9 used SBR, and 8 were unspecified. In real data studies, the imbalance increased with the number of centers. The total and marginal imbalances were higher with SBR than with minimization, and the difference increased with the number of centers. The efficiency estimates per arm were close to the original trial estimate in both procedures. Minimization is often used in cases of numerous centers and guarantees better similarity between arms for stratification variables for total and marginal imbalances in phase II trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elodie Martin
- Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest, F 49055 Angers, France
| | - Karine Le Malicot
- Fédération Francophone de Cancérologie Digestive (FFCD), EPICAD INSERM LNC-UMR 1231, University of Burgundy, F 21078 Dijon, France
| | - Catherine Guérin-Charbonnel
- Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest, F 49055 Angers, France
- CRCI2NA, INSERM U1307, CNRS UMR6075, University of Nantes, F 44000 Nantes, France
| | - François Bocquet
- Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest, F 49055 Angers, France
- Law and Social Change Laboratory, Faculty of Law and Political Sciences, CNRS UMR 6297, Nantes University, F 44035 Nantes, France
| | - Olivier Bouché
- Department of Digestive Oncology, CHU Reims, F 51092 Reims, France
| | - Anthony Turpin
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital, F 59000 Lille, France;
| | - Thomas Aparicio
- Department of Gastroenterology, Saint Louis Hospital, APHP, Université Paris Cité, F 75010 Paris, France
| | - Jean-Louis Legoux
- Department of Hepato-Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Régional, F 45100 Orléans, France
| | - Laetitia Dahan
- C.H.U. la Timone and Université de la Méditerranée Marseille, F 13005 Marseille, France
| | - Julien Taieb
- Institut du Cancer Paris CARPEM, Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology Department, APHP Centre–Université Paris Cité, Hôpital Européen G. Pompidou, F 75015 Paris, France
- Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, INSERM, CNRS, Sorbonne Université, USPC, Université de Paris, Université Paris Cité, F 75006 Paris, France
| | - Côme Lepage
- Department of HGE & Digestive Oncology, EPICAD INSERM UMR LNC 1231, University Hospital Dijon, University of Burgundy, F 21078 Dijon, France
| | | | - Caroline Pétorin
- Service d’Oncologie Digestive, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, F 63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Vincent Bourgeois
- Service d’Oncologie Digestive, Centre Hospitalier de Boulogne sur Mer, F 62321 Boulogne-sur-Mer, France
| | - Jean-Luc Raoul
- Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest, F 49055 Angers, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Zheng E, Włodarczyk M, Węgiel A, Osielczak A, Możdżan M, Biskup L, Grochowska A, Wołyniak M, Gajewski D, Porc M, Maryńczak K, Dziki Ł. Navigating through novelties concerning mCRC treatment-the role of immunotherapy, chemotherapy, and targeted therapy in mCRC. Front Surg 2024; 11:1398289. [PMID: 38948479 PMCID: PMC11211389 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1398289] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2024] [Accepted: 05/29/2024] [Indexed: 07/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Over the course of nearly six decades since the inception of initial trials involving 5-FU in the treatment of mCRC (metastatic colorectal cancer), our progressive comprehension of the pathophysiology, genetics, and surgical techniques related to mCRC has paved the way for the introduction of novel therapeutic modalities. These advancements not only have augmented the overall survival but have also positively impacted the quality of life (QoL) for affected individuals. Despite the remarkable progress made in the last two decades in the development of chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and target therapies, mCRC remains an incurable disease, with a 5-year survival rate of 14%. In this comprehensive review, our primary goal is to present an overview of mCRC treatment methods following the latest guidelines provided by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), and the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS). Emphasis has been placed on outlining treatment approaches encompassing chemotherapy, immunotherapy, targeted therapy, and surgery's role in managing mCRC. Furthermore, our review delves into prospective avenues for developing new therapies, offering a glimpse into the future of alternative pathways that hold potential for advancing the field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward Zheng
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
| | - Marcin Włodarczyk
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
| | - Andrzej Węgiel
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
| | - Aleksandra Osielczak
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
| | - Maria Możdżan
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
| | - Laura Biskup
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
| | - Agata Grochowska
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
| | - Maria Wołyniak
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
- Department of Biostatistics and Translational Medicine, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
| | - Dominik Gajewski
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
| | - Mateusz Porc
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
| | - Kasper Maryńczak
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
| | - Łukasz Dziki
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Calegari MA, Zurlo IV, Dell'Aquila E, Basso M, Orlandi A, Bensi M, Camarda F, Anghelone A, Pozzo C, Sperduti I, Salvatore L, Santini D, Corsi DC, Bria E, Tortora G. Chemotherapy Rechallenge or Reintroduction Compared to Regorafenib or Trifluridine/Tipiracil for Pretreated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Propensity Score Analysis of Treatment Beyond Second Line (Proserpyna Study). Clin Colorectal Cancer 2024:S1533-0028(24)00057-4. [PMID: 38969549 DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2024.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2023] [Revised: 06/07/2024] [Accepted: 06/09/2024] [Indexed: 07/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The optimal treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) beyond second line is still questioned. Besides the standard of care agents (regorafenib, REG, or trifluridine/tipiracil, FTD/TPI), chemotherapy rechallenge or reintroduction (CTr/r) are commonly considered in clinical practice, despite weak supporting evidence. The prognostic performance of CTr/r, REG and FTD/TPI in this setting are herein evaluated. PATIENTS AND METHODS PROSERpYNa is a multicenter, observational, retrospective study, in which patients with refractory mCRC, progressing after at least 2 lines of CT, treated with CTr/r, REG or FTD/TPI, are considered eligible and were enrolled in 2 independent data sets (exploratory and validation). Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS); secondary endpoints were investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (RR) and safety. A propensity score adjustment was accomplished for survival analyses. RESULTS Data referring to patients treated between Jan-10 and Jan-19 from 3 Italian institutions were gathered (341 and 181 treatments for exploratory and validation data sets respectively). In the exploratory cohort, median OS (18.5 vs. 6.5 months), PFS (6.1 vs. 3.5 months) and RR (28.6% vs. 1.4%) were significantly longer for CTr/r compared to REG/FTD/TPI. Survival benefits were retained at the propensity score analysis, adjusted for independent prognostic factors identified at multivariate analysis. Moreover, these results were confirmed within the validation cohort analyses. CONCLUSIONS Although the retrospective fashion, CTr/r proved to be a valuable option in this setting in a real-world context, providing superior outcomes compared to standard of care agents at the price of a moderate toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M A Calegari
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, UOC Oncologia Medica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy.
| | - I V Zurlo
- Medical Oncology, Ospedale San Giovanni Calibita Fatebenefratelli, Roma, Italy
| | - E Dell'Aquila
- Department of Medical Oncology, Campus Biomedico University, Rome, Italy; Medical Oncology 1, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - M Basso
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, UOC Oncologia Medica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - A Orlandi
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, UOC Oncologia Medica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - M Bensi
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, UOC Oncologia Medica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy; Medical Oncology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy
| | - F Camarda
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, UOC Oncologia Medica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy; Medical Oncology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy
| | - A Anghelone
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, UOC Oncologia Medica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy; Medical Oncology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy
| | - C Pozzo
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, UOC Oncologia Medica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - I Sperduti
- Biostatistics, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Roma, Italy
| | - L Salvatore
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, UOC Oncologia Medica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy; Medical Oncology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy
| | - D Santini
- Department of Medical Oncology, Campus Biomedico University, Rome, Italy; Department of Radiology, Oncology and Pathology, Policlinico Umberto, I Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - D C Corsi
- Medical Oncology, Ospedale San Giovanni Calibita Fatebenefratelli, Roma, Italy
| | - E Bria
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, UOC Oncologia Medica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy; Medical Oncology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy
| | - G Tortora
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, UOC Oncologia Medica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy; Medical Oncology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Zettler ME. Dose Optimization of Targeted Therapies for Oncologic Indications. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:2180. [PMID: 38927886 PMCID: PMC11202153 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16122180] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2024] [Revised: 05/22/2024] [Accepted: 06/06/2024] [Indexed: 06/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Therapeutic advances in oncology in the 21st century have contributed to significant declines in cancer mortality. Notably, targeted therapies comprised the largest proportion of oncology drugs approved by the United States (US) Food and Drug Administration (FDA) over the past 25 years and have become the standard of care for the treatment of many cancers. However, despite the metamorphosis of the therapeutic landscape, some aspects of cancer drug development have remained essentially unchanged. In particular, the dose-finding methodology originally developed for cytotoxic chemotherapy drugs continues to be implemented, even though this approach no longer represents the most appropriate strategy for modern cancer therapies. In recognition of the need to reconsider assumptions, adapt the dose selection process for newer drugs, and design alternative strategies, the FDA has undertaken several initiatives in recent years to address these concerns. These actions include the launch of Project Optimus in 2021 and the issuance of draft guidance for industry on dose optimization of oncology drugs in 2023. Amid this evolving regulatory environment, the present manuscript reviews case studies for six different targeted cancer therapies, highlighting how dose-finding challenges have been managed to date by oncologists, sponsors, and regulators.
Collapse
|
8
|
Zhong J, Liu Y, Fu Q, Huang D, Gong W, Zou J. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Regorafenib versus Other Third-Line Treatments for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. Cancer Manag Res 2024; 16:593-602. [PMID: 38855331 PMCID: PMC11162617 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s464831] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2024] [Accepted: 05/25/2024] [Indexed: 06/11/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Regorafenib, a novel multikinase inhibitor, has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration as a standard treatment choice for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Nonetheless, its substantial cost places a significant burden on social health resources and patients. However, the cost-effectiveness (CE) of regorafenib compared to other third-line therapies is still undetermined. Objective This study aims to assess the CE of regorafenib compared to other third-line therapies for the treatment of mCRC. Methods We conducted a comprehensive literature search in PubMed, Medline, Scopus, Embase, Cochrane Library, as well as nine other databases to identify relevant studies published up to October 2023, focusing on patients with mCRC and examining the cost-effectiveness of regorafenib. Following the screening and extraction of pertinent data, the study quality was assessed using the Quality of Health Economic Studies (QHES) checklist. Results The literature search yielded 751 records, and after applying the inclusion criteria, 13 studies from 7 different countries were included. Of these, 7 studies evaluated the cost-effectiveness of regorafenib compared to trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102), 3 studies compared regorafenib with best supportive care (BSC), and 3 studies compared regorafenib with fruquintinib, serplulimab, and regorafenib dose optimization (ReDo).The quality of the included studies was high with an average QHES scores of 85.62. Regorafenib standard dose proves to be less cost-effective than alternative third-line therapies. Implementing a dose optimization strategy could potentially rectify this disparity and enhance the cost-effectiveness of regorafenib. Conclusion The use of the standard dose of regorafenib is generally regarded as not cost-effective when compared to other third-line therapies for patients with mCRC. However, implementing a dose-escalation strategy may enhance regorafenib's cost-effectiveness. Consequently, significant price reductions or optimizing the dose of regorafenib are required to achieve cost-effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiayun Zhong
- Department of Pharmaceutical, the People’s Hospital of Pengzhou, Chengdu, Sichuan, 611930, People’s Republic of China
| | - Yu Liu
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, the People’s Hospital of Pengzhou, Chengdu, Sichuan, 611930, People’s Republic of China
| | - Qian Fu
- Department of Pharmaceutical, the People’s Hospital of Pengzhou, Chengdu, Sichuan, 611930, People’s Republic of China
| | - Dan Huang
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, the People’s Hospital of Pengzhou, Chengdu, Sichuan, 611930, People’s Republic of China
| | - Wenjun Gong
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, the People’s Hospital of Pengzhou, Chengdu, Sichuan, 611930, People’s Republic of China
| | - Jian Zou
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, the People’s Hospital of Pengzhou, Chengdu, Sichuan, 611930, People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
O’Donnell CDJ, Hubbard J, Jin Z. Updates on the Management of Colorectal Cancer in Older Adults. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1820. [PMID: 38791899 PMCID: PMC11120096 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16101820] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2024] [Revised: 05/04/2024] [Accepted: 05/08/2024] [Indexed: 05/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) poses a significant global health challenge. Notably, the risk of CRC escalates with age, with the majority of cases occurring in those over the age of 65. Despite recent progress in tailoring treatments for early and advanced CRC, there is a lack of prospective data to guide the management of older patients, who are frequently underrepresented in clinical trials. This article reviews the contemporary landscape of managing older individuals with CRC, highlighting recent advancements and persisting challenges. The role of comprehensive geriatric assessment is explored. Opportunities for treatment escalation/de-escalation, with consideration of the older adult's fitness level. are reviewed in the neoadjuvant, surgical, adjuvant, and metastatic settings of colon and rectal cancers. Immunotherapy is shown to be an effective treatment option in older adults who have CRC with microsatellite instability. Promising new technologies such as circulating tumor DNA and recent phase III trials adding later-line systemic therapy options are discussed. Clinical recommendations based on the data available are summarized. We conclude that deliberate efforts to include older individuals in future colorectal cancer trials are essential to better guide the management of these patients in this rapidly evolving field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Conor D. J. O’Donnell
- Mayo Clinic School of Graduate Education, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Mayo Building, Rochester, MN 55905, USA;
| | - Joleen Hubbard
- Allina Health Cancer Institute, Minneapolis, MN 55407, USA
| | - Zhaohui Jin
- Division of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Basso M, Signorelli C, Calegari MA, Lucchetti J, Zurlo IV, Dell'Aquila E, Arrivi G, Zoratto F, Santamaria F, Saltarelli R, Trovato G, Caira G, Angotti L, Schirripa M, Anghelone A, Schietroma F, Chilelli MG, Salvatore L, Pozzo C, Tortora G. Efficacy of Regorafenib and Trifluridine/Tipiracil According to Extended RAS Evaluation in Advanced Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Multicenter Retrospective Analysis. Target Oncol 2024; 19:371-382. [PMID: 38613732 PMCID: PMC11111497 DOI: 10.1007/s11523-024-01050-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/06/2024] [Indexed: 04/15/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There are few molecular markers driving treatment selection in later lines of treatment for advanced colorectal cancer patients. The vast majority of patients who progress after first- and second-line therapy undergo chemotherapy regardless of molecular data. OBJECTIVE We aimed to assess the prognostic and predictive effects of specific RAS mutations on overall survival of patients receiving regorafenib (rego), trifluridine/tipiracil (TFD/TPI), or both. PATIENTS AND METHODS This was a retrospective observational study based on data from a previous study of our research network, involving nine Italian institutions over a 10-year timeframe (2012-2022). Extended RAS analysis, involving KRAS exon 2-4 and NRAS exon 2-4, and BRAF were the main criteria for inclusion in this retrospective evaluation. Patients with BRAF mutation were excluded. Patients were classified according to treatment (rego- or TFD/TPI-treated) and RAS mutational status (wild-type [WT], KRAS codon 12 mutations, KRAS codon 13 mutations, KRAS rare mutations and NRAS mutations, KRAS G12C mutation and KRAS G12D mutation). RESULTS Overall, 582 patients were included in the present analysis. Overall survival did not significantly differ in rego-treated patients according to RAS extended analysis, although a trend toward a better median survival in patients carrying G12D mutation (12.0 months), Codon 13 mutation (8.0 months), and Codon 12 mutation (7.0 months) has been observed, when compared with WT patients (6.0 months). Overall survival did not significantly differ in TFD/TPI-treated patients according to RAS extended analysis, although a trend toward a better median survival in WT patients had been observed (9.0 months) in comparison with the entire population (7.0 months). Patients receiving both drugs displayed a longer survival when compared with the population of patients receiving rego alone (p = 0.005) as well as the population receiving TFD/TPI alone (p < 0.001), suggesting a group enriched for favorable prognostic factors. However, when each group was analyzed separately, the addition of TFD/TPI therapy to the rego-treated group improved survival only in all-RAS WT patients (p = 0.003). Differently, the addition of rego therapy to TFD/TPI-treated patients significantly improved OS in the Codon 12 group (p = 0.0004), G12D group (p = 0.003), and the rare mutations group (p = 0.02), in addition to all-RAS WT patients (p = 0.002). The rego-TFD/TPI sequence, compared with the reverse sequence, significantly improved OS only in the KRAS codon 12 group (p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS Our data demonstrate that RAS mutations do not affect outcome in rego-treated patients as well as TFD/TPI-treated patients. Nevertheless, a trend toward a higher efficacy of rego in RAS-mutated (in particular codon 12, rare RAS mutations, and G12D) patients has been recorded. The rego-TFD/TPI sequence seems to be superior to the reverse sequence in patients carrying an RAS codon 12 mutation, although the impact of other factors as disease burden or performance status cannot be excluded.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michele Basso
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A Gemelli" - IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli n 8, 00168, Rome, Italy.
| | - Carlo Signorelli
- Medical Oncology Unit, Belcolle Hospital, ASL Viterbo, Viterbo, Italy
| | - Maria Alessandra Calegari
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A Gemelli" - IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli n 8, 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Jessica Lucchetti
- Operative Research Unit of Medical Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | - Giulia Arrivi
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Oncology Unit, Sant' Andrea University Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Fiorenza Santamaria
- Department of Experimental Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
- Medical Oncology A, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Dermatology, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Rosa Saltarelli
- UOC Oncology, San Giovanni Evangelista Hospital, ASL RM5, Tivoli, RM, Italy
| | - Giovanni Trovato
- Medical Oncology, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Giulia Caira
- Medical Oncology, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Angotti
- Operative Research Unit of Medical Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy
| | - Marta Schirripa
- Medical Oncology Unit, Belcolle Hospital, ASL Viterbo, Viterbo, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Lisa Salvatore
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A Gemelli" - IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli n 8, 00168, Rome, Italy
- Medical Oncology, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Carmelo Pozzo
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A Gemelli" - IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli n 8, 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Giampaolo Tortora
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A Gemelli" - IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli n 8, 00168, Rome, Italy
- Medical Oncology, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Saito Y, Takekuma Y, Komatsu Y, Sugawara M. Impact of preexisting proteinuria on the development of regorafenib-induced problematic proteinuria in real-world metastatic colorectal cancer treatment. Sci Rep 2024; 14:5153. [PMID: 38431746 PMCID: PMC10908833 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-55727-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2023] [Accepted: 02/27/2024] [Indexed: 03/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Regorafenib is the first multikinase inhibitor for treating metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Proteinuria is a frequently encountered adverse effect, regardless of prior administration of vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors. Herein, we aimed to assess the impact of baseline preexisting proteinuria on regorafenib-induced problematic proteinuria during real-world mCRC therapy. Patients with mCRC receiving regorafenib (n = 100) were retrospectively assessed and divided into control and preexisting proteinuria (baseline grade of 1-2) groups. The primary endpoint was the development of grade ≥ 2 (grade ≥ 3 in case of baseline grade 2 patients) proteinuria. Propensity score-matching was performed to confirm the robustness of primary analyses. Defined proteinuria occurred in 30.7 and 57.9% of patients in the control and preexisting proteinuria groups, respectively, with significant differences in the all-patient population (P = 0.01). The preexisting proteinuria group exhibited significant defined proteinuria development within 7 days of regorafenib initiation, grade ≥ 3 symptoms, and treatment suspension owing to proteinuria. Similar results were obtained in the propensity score-matched population. According to multivariate logistic regression analysis, baseline proteinuria was a singular risk factor for defined proteinuria development (adjusted odds ratio; 3.76, 95% confidence interval; 1.45-9.75, P = 0.007). Collectively, our study revealed that patients with preexisting proteinuria develop regorafenib-induced proteinuria degradation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoshitaka Saito
- Department of Clinical Pharmaceutics & Therapeutics, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Hokkaido University of Science, 4-1, Maeda 7-Jo 15-Chome, Teine-Ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 006-8585, Japan.
| | - Yoh Takekuma
- Department of Pharmacy, Hokkaido University Hospital, Kita 14-Jo, Nishi 5-Chome, Kita-Ku, Sapporo, 060-8648, Japan
| | - Yoshito Komatsu
- Cancer Center, Hokkaido University Hospital, Kita 14-Jo, Nishi 5-Chome, Kita-Ku, Sapporo, 060-8648, Japan
| | - Mitsuru Sugawara
- Department of Pharmacy, Hokkaido University Hospital, Kita 14-Jo, Nishi 5-Chome, Kita-Ku, Sapporo, 060-8648, Japan
- Laboratory of Pharmacokinetics, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Hokkaido University, Kita 12-Jo, Nishi 6-Chome, Kita-Ku, Sapporo, 060-0812, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Chew V, Chuang CH, Hsu C. Translational research on drug development and biomarker discovery for hepatocellular carcinoma. J Biomed Sci 2024; 31:22. [PMID: 38368324 PMCID: PMC10874078 DOI: 10.1186/s12929-024-01011-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2023] [Accepted: 02/10/2024] [Indexed: 02/19/2024] Open
Abstract
Translational research plays a key role in drug development and biomarker discovery for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, unique challenges exist in this field because of the limited availability of human tumor samples from surgery, the lack of homogenous oncogenic driver mutations, and the paucity of adequate experimental models. In this review, we provide insights into these challenges and review recent advancements, with a particular focus on the two main agents currently used as mainstream therapies for HCC: anti-angiogenic agents and immunotherapy. First, we examine the pre-clinical and clinical studies to highlight the challenges of determining the optimal therapeutic combinations with biologically effective dosage for HCC. Second, we discuss biomarker studies focusing on anti-PD1/anti-PD-L1-based combination therapy. Finally, we discuss the progress made in our collective understanding of tumor immunology and in multi-omics analysis technology, which enhance our understanding of the mechanisms underlying immunotherapy, characterize different patient subgroups, and facilitate the development of novel combination approaches to improve treatment efficacy. In summary, this review provides a comprehensive overview of efforts in translational research aiming at advancing our understanding of and improving the treatment of HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valerie Chew
- Translational Immunology Institute, SingHealth-DukeNUS Academic Medical Centre, Singapore, Singapore
- Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Chien-Huai Chuang
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Taiwan University Cancer Center, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chiun Hsu
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Taiwan University Cancer Center, Taipei, Taiwan.
- Graduate Institute of Oncology, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.
- Department of Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Qu W, Liu Z, Chen X, Liu B, Zhao Y, Yan H, Qu X, Li S, Zang A, Sun Y, Zhu L, Zhou A. Regorafenib monotherapy or combined with an immune-checkpoint inhibitor as later-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: a multicenter, real-world retrospective study in China. BMC Cancer 2024; 24:22. [PMID: 38166647 PMCID: PMC10763390 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-11700-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2023] [Accepted: 11/30/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the efficacy and safety of regorafenib monotherapy or in combination with immune-checkpoint inhibitor while treating Chinese patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): a real-world study. METHODS The data of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who received regorafenib-containing regimen as the third or later line treatment at ten Chinese hospitals from Aug 2017 to Jun 2020 were retrospectively analyzed, including dosing details, survival data as well as adverse events. Survival analysis was further performed for patients administrated with regorafenib monotherapy and combined with an immune-checkpoint inhibitor based on Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression methods. The primary endpoint was overall survival. RESULTS A total of 537 patients were included with a median age of 61, among whom 376 received regorafenib monotherapy and 245 received regorafenib combined with immune-checkpoint inhibitors. The clinicopathological characteristics of the two groups at baseline were mainly balanced. No significant difference in progression-free survival (PFS) was observed in patients receiving regorafenib monotherapy or combination therapy (3.8 vs. 5.5 months, p = 0.170). In contrast, patients receiving combination therapy had a more prolonged overall survival (OS) than those receiving regorafenib monotherapy (13.5 vs. 10.0 months, p = 0.001). The treatment regimen and regorafenib dosage were significant prognostic factors in the multivariate analysis. Significant benefits in PFS and OS were achieved in KRAS mutant and anti-angiogenesis treatment-naïve subgroups receiving combination therapy compared to monotherapy. No apparent increase was recorded in treatment-related adverse events in patients receiving combination therapy. CONCLUSION Regorafenib plus an immune-checkpoint inhibitor has already been a widely adopted strategy in the later-line treatment for mCRC in the real world. The combination therapy yielded a significantly prolonged overall survival than regorafenib alone, with a manageable safety profile in Chinese patients, and warrants further investigation. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04835324. Registered 6th April 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wang Qu
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, National Cancer Center, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Zimin Liu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, 266000, China
| | - Xiaobing Chen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, 450003, China
| | - Bo Liu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital, Jinan, 250117, China
| | - YunBo Zhao
- Department of Oncology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Hao Yan
- Department of Oncology, Tianjin Union Medical Center, Tianjin, 300122, China
| | - Xiujuan Qu
- Department of Oncology, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, 110001, China
| | - Shengmian Li
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, 050011, China
| | - Aimin Zang
- Department of Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University, Baoding, 071000, China
| | - Yongkun Sun
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, National Cancer Center, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Liangjun Zhu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital, NO,42 Bai Zi Ting, Xuanwu District, Nanjing, 210000, China.
| | - Aiping Zhou
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, National Cancer Center, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Yang X, Yin X, Qu X, Guo G, Zeng Y, Liu W, Jagielski M, Liu Z, Zhou H. Efficacy, safety, and predictors of fruquintinib plus anti-programmed death receptor-1 (PD-1) antibody in refractory microsatellite stable metastatic colorectal cancer in a real-world setting: a retrospective cohort study. J Gastrointest Oncol 2023; 14:2425-2435. [PMID: 38196544 PMCID: PMC10772700 DOI: 10.21037/jgo-23-931] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2023] [Accepted: 12/18/2023] [Indexed: 01/11/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Patients with microsatellite stable (MSS) advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) have few alternatives for salvage therapy and a large unmet clinical need. Preclinical studies demonstrate that fruquintinib combined with anti-programmed death protein 1 (PD-1) has a synergistic anti-tumor effect. But a few phase 2 clinical studies show inconsistent efficacy of this combination therapy in CRC. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy, safety, and predictors of fruquintinib plus PD-1 antibodies in refractory MSS metastatic CRC (mCRC) in a real-world setting. Methods We performed a retrospective single-center analysis to assess the outcomes of patients with MSS mCRC who were treated with fruquintinib plus anti-PD-1 antibodies subsequent to the failure of standard therapies at the Hunan Cancer Hospital. The overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and toxicity were reviewed and evaluated. The primary endpoint was OS. The impact on OS and PFS was examined using the Cox regression model. Results Between 1 January 2019 and 30 June 2022, we enrolled 70 eligible patients. The median follow-up was 17.2 months (range, 5.3-32.9 months). The median OS (mOS) and median PFS (mPFS) were 19.48 and 5.5 months respectively. The ORR was 11.43% and the DCR was 84.29%. Multivariate Cox regression analysis reveals liver metastasis (LM) without local treatment was a risk factor for OS [hazard ratio (HR) =5.31, P=0.0184], whereas that with local treatment (HR =2.19, P=0.263) was not. The most common adverse events were hand-foot syndrome (37.14%), hypertension (34.29%), mucositis oral (32.86%). No serious adverse effects or adverse effect-related deaths were reported. There were no instances of severe adverse effects or deaths related to adverse effects reported. Conclusions Our study indicates that the combination of fruquintinib and anti-PD-1 antibodies can improve the OS and PFS with a tolerable toxicity profile for Chinese patients with refractory MSS mCRC. LM without local therapy is a negative prognostic factor for OS, but those with local treatment can significantly prolong survival. We require additional well-structured, prospective, and extensive studies to confirm and validate these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaolin Yang
- Department of Gastroenterology and Urology, Hunan Cancer Hospital and the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Xianli Yin
- Department of Gastroenterology and Urology, Hunan Cancer Hospital and the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Xiaozhou Qu
- Department of Gastroenterology and Urology, Hunan Cancer Hospital and the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Geyang Guo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hunan Cancer Hospital and the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Yidong Zeng
- Department of Gastroenterology and Urology, Hunan Cancer Hospital and the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Wu Liu
- Department of Gastroenterology and Urology, Hunan Cancer Hospital and the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Mateusz Jagielski
- Department of General, Gastroenterological and Oncological Surgery, Collegium Medicum Nicolaus Copernicus University, Toruń, Poland
| | - Zhenyang Liu
- Department of Gastroenterology and Urology, Hunan Cancer Hospital and the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Huijun Zhou
- Department of Gastroenterology and Urology, Hunan Cancer Hospital and the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, China
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
He L, Cheng X, Zhou C, Li Q, Zhang B, Cheng X, Donadon M, Mannavola F, Tu S. Significant response from fruquintinib plus anti-PD-1 immunotherapy for microsatellite stable metastatic colorectal cancer with liver and lung metastasis in the third line: case report. J Gastrointest Oncol 2023; 14:2617-2626. [PMID: 38196522 PMCID: PMC10772678 DOI: 10.21037/jgo-23-862] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2023] [Accepted: 12/14/2023] [Indexed: 01/11/2024] Open
Abstract
Background There are limited treatment options available for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). About 95% of CRC patients have mismatch repair proficient/microsatellite stable (pMMR/MSS) tumors are virtually unresponsive to programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) antibody treatment. This report shows that a patient with pMMR/MSS mCRC achieved significant response and the longest progression-free survival (PFS) of 28 months currently reported from tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) targeting vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) family (VEGFR-1,2,3) (fruquintinib) plus anti-PD-1 immunotherapy in the third line, providing a new and promising treatment option for some MSS mCRC patients. Case Description This case details a 65-year-old male with CRC who was diagnosed with pT4aN2bM0, IIIC, and pMMR/MSS after curative surgery in August 2018. Subsequently, he received adjuvant chemotherapy [FOLFOX (folinic acid, fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin) for 5 cycles], first-line treatment (pelvic radiation plus capecitabine), and second-line treatment [TOMIRI (raltitrexed and irinotecan) plus cetuximab for 2 cycles]. Lung, liver, and pelvic cavity metastases worsened in October 2019. He began receiving the fruquintinib plus PD-1 inhibitor (FP) regimen as third-line treatment and after 3 cycles, the size of the lung lesions was significantly reduced and evaluated as partial response (PR), whereas the liver and pelvic cavity lesions remained stable. As of December 2021, he had received a total of 33 courses of FP regimen. In February 2022, liver metastases progressed. In brief, he achieved a long PFS of 28 months and an overall survival (OS) of 40 months from the third-line treatment. Additionally, the patient only experienced mild proteinuria after the combined treatment and tolerated well. Conclusions Fruquintinib combined with immunotherapy could exert good therapeutic effects with safety in MSS mCRC patients. And patients with lung metastasis may be the principal beneficiaries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lina He
- State Key Laboratory of Oncogenesis and Related Genes, Department of Oncology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiaojiao Cheng
- State Key Laboratory of Oncogenesis and Related Genes, Department of Oncology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Cong Zhou
- State Key Laboratory of Oncogenesis and Related Genes, Department of Oncology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Qingli Li
- State Key Laboratory of Oncogenesis and Related Genes, Department of Oncology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Baiwen Zhang
- State Key Laboratory of Oncogenesis and Related Genes, Department of Oncology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Xin Cheng
- State Key Laboratory of Oncogenesis and Related Genes, Department of Oncology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Matteo Donadon
- Department of Surgery, University Maggiore Hospital della Carità, Novara, Italy
| | - Francesco Mannavola
- Division of Medical Oncology, A.O.U. Consorziale Policlinico di Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Shuiping Tu
- State Key Laboratory of Oncogenesis and Related Genes, Department of Oncology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Tarpgaard LS, Winther SB, Pfeiffer P. Treatment Options in Late-Line Colorectal Cancer: Lessons Learned from Recent Randomized Studies. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 16:126. [PMID: 38201553 PMCID: PMC10777930 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16010126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2023] [Revised: 12/18/2023] [Accepted: 12/23/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Systemic treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has improved considerably over the past 20 years. First- and second-line combinations of 5FU, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan, with or without anti-angiogenic and/or anti-EGFR antibodies, were approved shortly after the turn of the millennium. Further triumphs were not seen for almost 10 years, until the approval of initially regorafenib and shortly after trifluridine/tipiracil. A growing understanding of tumor biology through molecular profiling has led to further treatment options. Here, we review the most recent clinical data for late-line treatment options in mCRC, focusing on randomized trials if available. We include recommendations for options in unselected patients and therapies that should only be offered in patients with distinct tumor profiles (e.g., BRAF mutations, KRAS G12C mutations, HER2 amplification, deficient MMR, or NTRK gene fusions).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Line Schmidt Tarpgaard
- Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, 5000 Odense C, Denmark; (S.B.W.); (P.P.)
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, 5230 Odense M, Denmark
| | | | - Per Pfeiffer
- Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, 5000 Odense C, Denmark; (S.B.W.); (P.P.)
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, 5230 Odense M, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Nakashima M, Li K, Chen Q, de Silva S, Li H, Kawakami K, Wei Q, Luo S, Zhao H. Appropriate dose of regorafenib based on body weight of colorectal cancer patients: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Cancer 2023; 23:1268. [PMID: 38129822 PMCID: PMC10740272 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-11720-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2023] [Accepted: 12/05/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Previous randomized studies have shown a survival benefit of using regorafenib but a high rate of adverse events in unresectable colorectal cancer patients. To reduce these adverse events and improve the tolerability, we examined the appropriate dose of regorafenib based on body weight. METHODS We used a nationwide claims database in Japan and examined the efficacy and safety of regorafenib for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer between groups divided by body weight (60 kg) and median average dose (120 mg) between 2013 and 2018. We also assessed overall survival (OS) and adverse events between these groups. RESULTS We identified 2530 Japanese patients (heavy weight/high dose: 513, light weight/low dose: 921, heavy weight/low dose: 452, and light weight/high dose: 644). There was no significant difference in the adverse events and OS after inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) adjustment between heavy weight/high dose group and light weight/low dose group (hazard ratio, HR=0.97). Among the light-weight patients, higher average dose was associated with shorter OS (IPTW adjusted HR=1.21, 95% CI 1.05 - 1.39, Table 3) while among the heavy-weight patients, there was no significant difference in OS between high and low dose groups (IPTW adjusted HR=1.14, 95% CI 0.95 - 1.37). CONCLUSION The findings suggest that a low dose of regorafenib for light-weight patients may be as safe and effective as high doses for heavy-weight patients. Further studies should be conducted to identify an appropriate dose based on each patient's physique and condition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masayuki Nakashima
- Department of Pharmacoepidemiology, Graduate School of Medicine and Public Health, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Kan Li
- MRL, Merck & Co., Inc, North Wales, PA, USA
| | - Qichen Chen
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | | | - Hal Li
- MRL, Merck & Co., Inc, North Wales, PA, USA
| | - Koji Kawakami
- Department of Pharmacoepidemiology, Graduate School of Medicine and Public Health, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Qingyi Wei
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
- Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Sheng Luo
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
| | - Hong Zhao
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Signorelli C, Chilelli MG, Giannarelli D, Basso M, Calegari MA, Anghelone A, Lucchetti J, Minelli A, Angotti L, Zurlo IV, Schirripa M, Morelli C, Dell’Aquila E, Cosimati A, Gemma D, Ribelli M, Emiliani A, Corsi DC, Arrivi G, Mazzuca F, Zoratto F, Morandi MG, Santamaria F, Saltarelli R, Ruggeri EM. Retrospective Correlation between First Drug Treatment Duration and Survival Outcomes in Sequential Treatment with Regorafenib and Trifluridine/Tipiracil in Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Real-World Subgroup Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:5758. [PMID: 38136304 PMCID: PMC10741389 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15245758] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2023] [Revised: 12/03/2023] [Accepted: 12/06/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) rarely receive third-line or further treatment. In this context, regorafenib (R) and trifluridine/tipiracil (T) are two important novel therapeutic choices with statistically significant increases in overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and disease control, with different toxicity profiles. This study is a subgroup analysis of our larger retrospective study, already published, whose objective was to assess the outcomes of patients when R and T were given sequentially. Patients and Methods: The study involved thirteen Italian cancer centers on a 10-year retrospective observation (2012-2022). In this subgroup analysis, we focused our attention on the correlation between the first drug treatment duration (<3 months, 3 to <6 months and ≥6 months) and survival outcomes in patients who had received the sequence regorafenib-to-trifluridine/tipiracil, or vice versa. Results: The initial study included 866 patients with mCRC who received sequential T/R, or R/T, or T or R alone. This analysis is focused on evaluating the impact of the duration of the first treatment in the sequence on clinical outcomes (OS, PFS) and includes 146 and 116 patients of the T/R and R/T sequences, respectively. Based on the duration of the first drug treatment, subgroups for the T/R sequence included 27 patients (18.4%) who received T for <3 months, 86 (58.9%) treated for 3 to <6 months, and 33 (22.6%) treated for ≥6 months; in the reverse sequence (R as the first drug), subgroups included 18 patients (15.5%) who received their first treatment for <3 months, 62 (53.4%) treated for 3 to <6 months, and 35 (31.0%) treated for ≥6 months. In patients who received their first drug treatment for a period of 3 to <6 months, the R/T sequence had a significantly longer median OS (13.7 vs. 10.8 months, p = 0.0069) and a longer median PFS (10.8 vs. 8.5 months, p = 0.0003) than the T/R group. There were no statistically significant differences between groups with first drug treatment durations of <3 months and ≥6 months. Conclusions: Our analysis seems to suggest that the administration of R for a period of 3 to <6 months before that of T can prolong both OS and PFS, as compared to the opposite sequence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlo Signorelli
- Medical Oncology Unit, Belcolle Hospital, ASL Viterbo, 01100 Viterbo, Italy
| | | | - Diana Giannarelli
- Biostatistics Unit, Scientific Directorate, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Michele Basso
- Unit of Medical Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Maria Alessandra Calegari
- Unit of Medical Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Annunziato Anghelone
- Unit of Medical Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Jessica Lucchetti
- Division of Medical Oncology, Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, 00128 Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandro Minelli
- Division of Medical Oncology, Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, 00128 Rome, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Angotti
- Division of Medical Oncology, Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, 00128 Rome, Italy
| | | | - Marta Schirripa
- Medical Oncology Unit, Belcolle Hospital, ASL Viterbo, 01100 Viterbo, Italy
| | - Cristina Morelli
- Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Systems Medicine, Tor Vergata University Hospital, 00133 Rome, Italy
| | - Emanuela Dell’Aquila
- Medical Oncology 1, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy
| | - Antonella Cosimati
- Medical Oncology 1, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy
| | - Donatello Gemma
- Medical Oncology Unit, ASL Frosinone, 03039 Sora (FR), Italy
| | - Marta Ribelli
- Medical Oncology Unit, Isola Tiberina Hospital-Gemelli Isola, 00186 Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandra Emiliani
- Medical Oncology Unit, Isola Tiberina Hospital-Gemelli Isola, 00186 Rome, Italy
| | | | - Giulia Arrivi
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Oncology Unit, Sant’ Andrea University Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, 00189 Rome, Italy
| | - Federica Mazzuca
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Oncology Unit, Sant’ Andrea University Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, 00189 Rome, Italy
| | | | - Maria Grazia Morandi
- Medical Oncology Unit, San Camillo de Lellis Hospital, ASL Rieti, 02100 Rieti, Italy
| | - Fiorenza Santamaria
- UOC Oncology A, Policlinico Umberto I, 00185 Rome, Italy
- Experimental Medicine, Network Oncology and Precision Medicine, Department of Experimental Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, 00189 Rome, Italy
| | - Rosa Saltarelli
- UOC Oncology, San Giovanni Evangelista Hospital, ASL RM5, 00019 Tivoli (RM), Italy
| | - Enzo Maria Ruggeri
- Medical Oncology Unit, Belcolle Hospital, ASL Viterbo, 01100 Viterbo, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Tan S, Zhang S, Zhou N, Cai X, Yi C, Gou H. Efficacy and safety of fruquintinib dose-escalation strategy for elderly patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer: A single-arm, multicenter, phase II study. Cancer Med 2023; 12:22038-22046. [PMID: 38063405 PMCID: PMC10757135 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.6786] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2023] [Revised: 08/24/2023] [Accepted: 09/30/2023] [Indexed: 12/31/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fruquintinib has demonstrated significant improvement in overall survival (OS) among previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients. However, the utilization of fruquintinib has been constrained by various toxicities, such as hand-foot skin reaction (HFSR) and hypertension, particularly in elderly patients with reduced tolerance to the standard dosage. This study aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of fruquintinib dose-escalation strategy for elderly refractory mCRC patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS This open-label, single-arm, phase II trial included patients aged 65 years or over with mCRC who had progressed after two or more lines of chemotherapy. Fruquintinib was administered for 21 consecutive days of a 28-day treatment cycle. The starting dose of fruquintinib was 3 mg/day and escalated to 4 mg/day in Week 2 and 5 mg/day in Week 3 if no significant drug-related toxicity was observed. The highest tolerated dose from Cycle 1 would be administered in Cycle 2 and all subsequent cycles. Before commencing treatment, all enrolled patients underwent a G8 questionnaire and comprehensive geriatric assessments. The primary endpoint of the study was progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS A total of 29 patients were enrolled and all started fruquintinib at 3 mg/day. Fifteen patients (51.7%) were subsequently escalated to 4 mg/day and 4 (13.8%) to 5 mg/day. Only four (13.8%) patients discontinued treatment due to adverse events (AEs). The median PFS was 3.8 months (95% CI, 2.7-4.9), and the median OS was 7.6 months (95% CI, 6.5-8.7). Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were observed in all 29 patients (100%). The most frequently occurring (>10%) TRAEs greater than Grade 3 were HFSR (20.7%), hypertension (20.7%), and diarrhea (10.3%). CONCLUSION Our study indicated that a dose of 4 mg/day was well tolerated by most elderly patients, suggesting that fruquintinib dose-escalation strategy during the first cycle could serve as a viable alternative to the standard 5 mg/day dosing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sirui Tan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center, West China HospitalSichuan UniversitySichuanChina
| | - Shunyu Zhang
- Gastric Cancer CenterWest China Hospital, Sichuan UniversitySichuanChina
| | - Nan Zhou
- Gastric Cancer CenterWest China Hospital, Sichuan UniversitySichuanChina
| | - Xiaohong Cai
- Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, School of MedicineUniversity of Electronic Science and Technology of ChinaChengduChina
| | - Cheng Yi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center, West China HospitalSichuan UniversitySichuanChina
| | - Hongfeng Gou
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center, West China HospitalSichuan UniversitySichuanChina
- Gastric Cancer CenterWest China Hospital, Sichuan UniversitySichuanChina
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Bitsianis S, Mantzoros I, Anestiadou E, Christidis P, Chatzakis C, Zapsalis K, Symeonidis S, Ntampakis G, Domvri K, Tsakona A, Bekiari C, Ioannidis O, Aggelopoulos S. Effect of Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy with Regorafenib on IL-6 and TNF-α Levels and Peritoneal Cytology: Experimental Study in Rats with Colorectal Peritoneal Carcinomatosis. J Clin Med 2023; 12:7267. [PMID: 38068319 PMCID: PMC10706907 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12237267] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2023] [Revised: 11/16/2023] [Accepted: 11/22/2023] [Indexed: 08/11/2024] Open
Abstract
Cytoreductive surgery (CRS), combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy, has significantly improved survival outcomes in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis from colorectal cancer (CRC). Regorafenib is an oral agent administered in patients with refractory metastatic CRC. Our aim was to investigate the outcomes of intraperitoneal administration of regorafenib for intraperitoneal chemotherapy (IPEC) or/and CRS in a rat model of colorectal peritoneal metastases regarding immunology and peritoneal cytology. A total of 24 rats were included. Twenty-eight days after carcinogenesis induction, rats were randomized into following groups: group A: control group; group B: CRS only; group C: IPEC only; and group D: CRS + IPEC. On day 56 after carcinogenesis, euthanasia and laparotomy were performed. Serum levels of interleukin-6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) as well as peritoneal cytology were investigated. Groups B and D had statistically significant lower mean levels of IL-6 and TNF-α compared to groups A and C, but there was no significant difference between them. Both B and D groups presented a statistically significant difference regarding the rate of negative peritoneal cytology, when compared to the control group, but not to group C. In conclusion, regorafenib-based IPEC, combined with CRS, may constitute a promising tool against peritoneal carcinomatosis by altering the tumor microenvironment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefanos Bitsianis
- 4th Department of General Surgery, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, General Hospital of Thessaloniki “G. Papanikolaou”, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece; (S.B.); (I.M.); (E.A.); (P.C.); (C.C.); (K.Z.); (S.S.); (G.N.); (S.A.)
| | - Ioannis Mantzoros
- 4th Department of General Surgery, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, General Hospital of Thessaloniki “G. Papanikolaou”, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece; (S.B.); (I.M.); (E.A.); (P.C.); (C.C.); (K.Z.); (S.S.); (G.N.); (S.A.)
| | - Elissavet Anestiadou
- 4th Department of General Surgery, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, General Hospital of Thessaloniki “G. Papanikolaou”, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece; (S.B.); (I.M.); (E.A.); (P.C.); (C.C.); (K.Z.); (S.S.); (G.N.); (S.A.)
| | - Panagiotis Christidis
- 4th Department of General Surgery, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, General Hospital of Thessaloniki “G. Papanikolaou”, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece; (S.B.); (I.M.); (E.A.); (P.C.); (C.C.); (K.Z.); (S.S.); (G.N.); (S.A.)
| | - Christos Chatzakis
- 4th Department of General Surgery, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, General Hospital of Thessaloniki “G. Papanikolaou”, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece; (S.B.); (I.M.); (E.A.); (P.C.); (C.C.); (K.Z.); (S.S.); (G.N.); (S.A.)
| | - Konstantinos Zapsalis
- 4th Department of General Surgery, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, General Hospital of Thessaloniki “G. Papanikolaou”, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece; (S.B.); (I.M.); (E.A.); (P.C.); (C.C.); (K.Z.); (S.S.); (G.N.); (S.A.)
| | - Savvas Symeonidis
- 4th Department of General Surgery, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, General Hospital of Thessaloniki “G. Papanikolaou”, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece; (S.B.); (I.M.); (E.A.); (P.C.); (C.C.); (K.Z.); (S.S.); (G.N.); (S.A.)
| | - Georgios Ntampakis
- 4th Department of General Surgery, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, General Hospital of Thessaloniki “G. Papanikolaou”, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece; (S.B.); (I.M.); (E.A.); (P.C.); (C.C.); (K.Z.); (S.S.); (G.N.); (S.A.)
| | - Kalliopi Domvri
- Laboratory of Histology-Embryology, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece;
- Department of Pathology, General Hospital of Thessaloniki “G. Papanikolaou”, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Anastasia Tsakona
- Pathology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece;
| | - Chryssa Bekiari
- Experimental and Research Center, Papageorgiou General Hospital of Thessaloniki, 56403 Thessaloniki, Greece;
- Laboratory of Anatomy and Histology, Veterinary School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Orestis Ioannidis
- 4th Department of General Surgery, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, General Hospital of Thessaloniki “G. Papanikolaou”, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece; (S.B.); (I.M.); (E.A.); (P.C.); (C.C.); (K.Z.); (S.S.); (G.N.); (S.A.)
| | - Stamatios Aggelopoulos
- 4th Department of General Surgery, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, General Hospital of Thessaloniki “G. Papanikolaou”, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece; (S.B.); (I.M.); (E.A.); (P.C.); (C.C.); (K.Z.); (S.S.); (G.N.); (S.A.)
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Aydin SG, Kavak EE, Topcu A, Bayramgil A, Akgul F, Kahraman S, Aykan MB, Altıntas YE, Helvaci K, Urun Y, Bilici A, Seker M, Nahit Sendur MA, Olmez OF, Acikgoz O, Cicin I. Prognostic factors for regorafenib treatment in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer: A real-life retrospective multi-center study. BIOMOLECULES & BIOMEDICINE 2023; 23:1089-1095. [PMID: 37289436 PMCID: PMC10655877 DOI: 10.17305/bb.2023.9253] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2023] [Revised: 06/02/2023] [Accepted: 06/02/2023] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
Regorafenib, an oral multikinase inhibitor, has improved survival in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients who have progressed on standard therapies. Our study aimed to evaluate prognostic factors influencing regorafenib treatment and assess the optimal dosing regimen in a real-life setting. We retrospectively analysed 263 patients with mCRC from multiple medical oncology clinics in Turkey. Treatment responses and prognostic factors for survival were evaluated using univariate and multivariate analysis. Of the patients, 120 were male, and 143 were female; 28.9% of tumors were located in the rectum. RAS mutations were present in 3.0% of tumors, while BRAF, K-RAS, and N-RAS mutations were found in 3.0%, 29.7%, and 25.9% of tumor tissues, respectively. Dose escalation was preferred in 105 (39.9%) patients. The median treatment duration was 3.0 months, with an objective response rate (ORR) of 4.9%. Grade ≥ 3 treatment-related toxicity occurred in 133 patients, leading to discontinuation, interruption, and modification rates of 50.6%, 43.7%, and 79.0%, respectively. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 3.0 and 8.1 months, respectively. RAS/RAF mutation (hazard ratio [HR] 1.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1-2.3; P = 0.01), pretreatment carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels (HR 1.6, 95% CI 1.1-2.3; P = 0.008), and toxicity-related treatment interruption or dose adjustment (HR 1.6, 95% CI 1.1-2.4; P = 0.01) were identified as independent prognostic factors for PFS. Dose escalation had no significant effect on PFS but was associated with improved OS (P < 0.001). Independent prognostic factors for OS were the initial TNM stage (HR 1.3, 95% CI 1.0-1.9; P = 0.04) and dose interruption/adjustment (HR 0.4, 95% CI 0.2-0.9; P = 0.03). Our findings demonstrate the efficacy and safety of regorafenib. Treatment line influences the response, with dose escalation being more favorable than adjustment or interruption, thus impacting survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabin Goktas Aydin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Medical Faculty, Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Engin Eren Kavak
- Department of Medical Oncology, Medical Faculty, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Atakan Topcu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Medical Faculty, Bezmialem Vakif University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Ayberk Bayramgil
- Department of Medical Oncology, Medical Faculty, Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Fahri Akgul
- Department of Medical Oncology, Medical Faculty, Trakya University, Edirne, Turkey
| | - Seda Kahraman
- Department of Medical Oncology, Medical Faculty, Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Musa Baris Aykan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gulhane Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Yunus Emre Altıntas
- Department of Medical Oncology, Medical Faculty, Koc University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Kaan Helvaci
- Department of Medical Oncology, Memorial Ankara Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Yuksel Urun
- Department of Medical Oncology, Medical Faculty, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Ahmet Bilici
- Department of Medical Oncology, Medical Faculty, Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Mesut Seker
- Department of Medical Oncology, Medical Faculty, Bezmialem Vakif University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Mehmet Ali Nahit Sendur
- Department of Medical Oncology, Medical Faculty, Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Omer Fatih Olmez
- Department of Medical Oncology, Medical Faculty, Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Ozgur Acikgoz
- Department of Medical Oncology, Medical Faculty, Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Irfan Cicin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Medical Faculty, Trakya University, Edirne, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Choobin BB, Kubota Y, Han Q, Ardjmand D, Morinaga S, Mizuta K, Bouvet M, Tsunoda T, Hoffman RM. Recombinant Methioninase Lowers the Effective Dose of Regorafenib Against Colon-Cancer Cells: A Strategy for Widespread Clinical Use of a Toxic Drug. CANCER DIAGNOSIS & PROGNOSIS 2023; 3:655-659. [PMID: 37927805 PMCID: PMC10619565 DOI: 10.21873/cdp.10268] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2023] [Accepted: 09/26/2023] [Indexed: 11/07/2023]
Abstract
Background/Aim Regorafenib is a multi-kinase inhibitor, targeting vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2, fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 and other oncogenic kinases. Regorafenib has efficacy in metastatic colon cancer, but has severe dose-limiting toxicities which cause patients to stop taking the drug. The aim of the present study was to determine if recombinant methioninase (rMETase) could lower the effective concentration of regorafenib in vitro against a colorectal-cancer cell line. Materials and Methods Firstly, we examined the half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) of regorafenib alone and rMETase alone for the HCT-116 human colorectal-cancer cell line. After that, using the IC50 concentration of each drug, we investigated the efficacy of the combination of regorafenib and rMETase. Results While both methioninase alone (IC50=0.61 U/ml) and regorafenib alone (IC50=2.26 U/ml) inhibited the viability of HCT-116 cells, the combination of the two agents was more than twice as effective as either alone. Addition of rMETase at 0.61 U/ml lowered the IC50 of regorafenib from 2.26 μM to 1.46 μM. Conclusion rMETase and regorafenib are synergistic, giving rise to the possibility of lowering the effective dose of regorafenib in patients, thereby reducing its severe toxicity, allowing more cancer patients to be treated with regorafenib.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Yutaro Kubota
- AntiCancer Inc., San Diego, CA, U.S.A
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, CA, U.S.A
- Division of Internal Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | | | - Sei Morinaga
- AntiCancer Inc., San Diego, CA, U.S.A
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, CA, U.S.A
| | - Kohei Mizuta
- AntiCancer Inc., San Diego, CA, U.S.A
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, CA, U.S.A
| | - Michael Bouvet
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, CA, U.S.A
| | - Takuya Tsunoda
- Division of Internal Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Robert M Hoffman
- AntiCancer Inc., San Diego, CA, U.S.A
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, CA, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Fujita K, Matsumoto N, Murase R, Takeshima K, Ishida H, Kubota Y. Associations of HLA-C*01:02 and HLA-B*46:01 with regorafenib-induced erythema multiforme in Japanese patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Clin Transl Sci 2023; 16:1741-1747. [PMID: 37424405 PMCID: PMC10582655 DOI: 10.1111/cts.13589] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2023] [Revised: 06/26/2023] [Accepted: 06/28/2023] [Indexed: 07/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Regorafenib improves the survival of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC); however, it is also characterized by detrimental dermal side effects that may require treatment cessation or modified dosing. In our previous prospective pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and pharmacogenetic studies, 17.5% (7/40) of the patients with mCRC had grade 3 erythema multiforme (EM) that caused treatment discontinuation. Haplotypes in genes encoding human leukocyte antigen (HLA) are associated with EM following the administration of drugs, such as allopurinol. This study examined the association between HLA haplotypes and regorafenib-induced EM. Regorafenib was administered orally at 160 mg/body once daily for weeks 1-3 of each 4-week cycle. To determine the HLA haplotypes, we used the WAKFlow HLA Typing Kit HLA-A, -B, or -C. The carrier frequency of HLA-C*01:02 in patients with EM (6/7) was higher than that in tolerant controls (8/33; odds ratio [OR] = 18.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.95-180, p = 0.00437). HLA-B*46:01 was also associated with EM (OR = 11.6, 95% CI = 1.47-92.1, p = 0.0299). These associations were no longer significant after Bonferroni correction for multiple testing. Therefore, regorafenib-induced EM in Japanese patients appears to be associated with specific HLA haplotypes but further validation is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ken‐ichi Fujita
- Division of Cancer Genome and Pharmacotherapy, Department of Clinical PharmacyShowa University School of PharmacyTokyoJapan
| | - Natsumi Matsumoto
- Division of Cancer Genome and Pharmacotherapy, Department of Clinical PharmacyShowa University School of PharmacyTokyoJapan
| | - Remi Murase
- Division of Cancer Genome and Pharmacotherapy, Department of Clinical PharmacyShowa University School of PharmacyTokyoJapan
| | - Kosuke Takeshima
- Division of Cancer Genome and Pharmacotherapy, Department of Clinical PharmacyShowa University School of PharmacyTokyoJapan
- Present address:
Division of Molecular Virology, Department of Microbiology and ImmunologyThe Institute of Medical Science, The University of TokyoTokyoJapan
- Present address:
Department of Infectious Disease Control, International Research Center for Infectious DiseasesThe Institute of Medical Science, The University of TokyoTokyoJapan
| | - Hiroo Ishida
- Division of Medical OncologyShowa University Northern Yokohama HospitalYokohamaJapan
| | - Yutaro Kubota
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of MedicineShowa University School of MedicineTokyoJapan
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Wang H, Liu W, Zhao Y, Hu H, Zhang B, Yang S. Real-world effectiveness of regorafenib in the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: A retrospective, observational study. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol 2023; 19:e291-e299. [PMID: 36572661 DOI: 10.1111/ajco.13909] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2022] [Accepted: 11/19/2022] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
AIM To evaluate the real-world usage pattern and factors associated with the effectiveness of regorafenib in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). METHODS This retrospective study analyzed data for 209 patients with mCRC treated with regorafenib as third or later line of therapy. TheKaplan-Meier method was used to draw the survival curves. Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to analyze the prognostic value for overall survival (OS). RESULTS Of 209 patients, 156 (75%) were treated with regorafenib, and 53 (25%) were given regorafenib combined with programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors. About 182 (87%) patients had a dose record of regorafenib. The initial daily doses of regorafenib were 160, 120, 80, and 40 mg, accounting for 29%, 17%, 48%, and 6% of patients, respectively. The median follow-up time was 11.3 months, and the median OS was 12.0 months (95% CI: 9.7-14.3). Patients treated with PD-1 inhibitors plus regorafenib had a longer OS than the non-PD-1 group (13.5 vs. 10.1 months, hazard ratio [HR] = .534, 95% CI: .325-.879; p = .014). A total of 49 patients with microsatellite stable or mismatch repair-proficient genotype treated with PD-1 inhibitors plus regorafenib had a longer OS than the non-PD-1 group (13.5 vs. 9.7 months; HR = .563, p = .027). The median OS of patients continuing treatment with regorafenib after progression (n = 19, with five patients receiving additional immunotherapy) was marginally longer than patients discontinuing regorafenib after progression (12.7 vs. 11.9 months, p = .425) observed in a smaller cohort. CONCLUSION In real-world practice, patients with mCRC in whom standard regimens had failed have a good survival benefit with regorafenib. Combination with PD-1 inhibitor may further prolong survival of the patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hailing Wang
- Department of Oncology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Weiling Liu
- Department of Oncology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Yan Zhao
- Department of Oncology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Hongtao Hu
- Minimally Invasive and Interventional Department, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Bin Zhang
- General Surgery Department, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Shujun Yang
- Department of Oncology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Gao L, Tang L, Hu Z, Peng J, Li X, Liu B. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of third-line treatments for metastatic colorectal cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1269203. [PMID: 37810981 PMCID: PMC10552753 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1269203] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2023] [Accepted: 08/28/2023] [Indexed: 10/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of different third-line treatment regimens for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) through a comprehensive analysis and network meta-analysis (NMA). Additionally, the study aims to provide guidance on selecting appropriate third-line systemic treatment regimens for patients with mCRC. Methods We conducted a search of the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases from January 1, 2005, to May 20, 2023, to include phase II/III randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of third-line treatments for mCRC. The primary outcome assessed in the NMA was median overall survival (mOS), and other outcomes included median progression-free survival (mPFS), disease control rate (DCR), and grade 3 or higher adverse events (≥3AEs). Results Ultimately, nine phase II/III RCTs involving five treatment regimens were included in this study. Trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) plus bevacizumab (hazard ratio [HR] 0.41, 95% credible interval [CrI] 0.32-0.52) was found to be the most effective treatment for mOS compared to best supportive care (BSC). TAS-102 plus bevacizumab also significantly improved mPFS compared to BSC (HR 0.20, 95% CrI 0.16-0.25). In terms of adverse events (AEs), TAS-102 (RR 0.52, 95% CrI 0.35-0.74) had a lower incidence of ≥3AEs compared to fruquintinib, but fruquintinib (RR 1.79, 95% CrI 1.10-3.11) showed better improvement in DCR than TAS-102. Subgroup analysis using the Bayesian surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) ranked the regimens based on the OS benefit. The results indicated that TAS-102 plus bevacizumab ranked first across age, gender, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS), and time from initial diagnosis of metastatic disease to randomization. Conclusion TAS-102, fruquintinib, TAS-102 plus bevacizumab, the regorafenib standard dose regimen (regorafenib), and the regorafenib dose-escalation regimen (regorafenib 80+) all demonstrated improved OS and PFS compared to BSC in mCRC patients. However, TAS-102 plus bevacizumab may be the optimal choice for third-line treatment in mCRC patients. Systematic review registration https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php, CRD42023434929.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Loulu Gao
- School of Clinical Medicine, Weifang Medical University, Weifang, China
- Department of Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China
| | - Lin Tang
- Department of Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China
- Department of Oncology, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China
| | - Zixuan Hu
- School of Clinical Medicine, Weifang Medical University, Weifang, China
| | - Jieqiong Peng
- Department of Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China
| | - Xiaoqian Li
- Department of Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China
| | - Bo Liu
- Department of Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Saito Y, Takekuma Y, Komatsu Y, Sugawara M. Severe hypertension development significantly improves progression-free survival in regorafenib treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. Int J Clin Oncol 2023; 28:1183-1190. [PMID: 37322220 DOI: 10.1007/s10147-023-02364-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2022] [Accepted: 05/31/2023] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Regorafenib is the first multikinase inhibitor used for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treatment. Reports regarding other multikinase inhibitors have suggested that the development of hypertension is associated with improved clinical benefits. We aimed to reveal the relationship between the development of severe hypertension and regorafenib efficacy in an mCRC real-world setting. METHODS Patients with mCRC (n = 100) who received regorafenib were assessed retrospectively. The primary endpoint was a comparison of progression-free survival (PFS) between patients with and without ≥ grade 3 hypertension. The secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), disease control rate (DCR), and adverse effects. RESULTS Patients developing ≥ grade 3 hypertension accounted for 30%, and obtained significantly longer PFS than control patients (median PFS of 53 and 56 days, 95% confidence interval [CI] of 46-144 and 49-63 days, respectively; P = 0.04). In contrast, OS and DCR were not statistically different between the groups (P = 0.13 and P = 0.46, respectively). The incidence and severity of adverse effects were not significantly different, except for hypertension. Treatment interruption was significantly more frequent in patients with hypertension (P = 0.04). Multivariate Cox hazard analysis suggested that the development of ≥ grade 3 severe hypertension was an independent factor for improved PFS (adjusted hazard ratio 0.57, 95% CI 0.35-0.93; P = 0.02). In contrast, baseline hypoalbuminemia was associated with a worse PFS (1.85, 1.14-3.01; P = 0.01). CONCLUSION We have revealed that patients who develop severe hypertension after regorafenib treatment for mCRC have improved PFS. Management of hypertension is important for effective treatment with less burden; therefore, further evaluation is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoshitaka Saito
- Department of Pharmacy, Hokkaido University Hospital, Kita 14-Jo, Nishi 5-Chome, Kita-Ku, Sapporo, 060-8648, Japan
| | - Yoh Takekuma
- Department of Pharmacy, Hokkaido University Hospital, Kita 14-Jo, Nishi 5-Chome, Kita-Ku, Sapporo, 060-8648, Japan
| | - Yoshito Komatsu
- Cancer Center, Hokkaido University Hospital, Kita 14-Jo, Nishi 5-Chome, Kita-Ku, Sapporo, 060-8648, Japan
| | - Mitsuru Sugawara
- Department of Pharmacy, Hokkaido University Hospital, Kita 14-Jo, Nishi 5-Chome, Kita-Ku, Sapporo, 060-8648, Japan.
- Laboratory of Pharmacokinetics, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Hokkaido University, Kita 12-Jo, Nishi 6-Chome, Kita-Ku, Sapporo, 060-0812, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Fernández Montes A, Alonso V, Aranda E, Élez E, García Alfonso P, Grávalos C, Maurel J, Vera R, Vidal R, Aparicio J. SEOM-GEMCAD-TTD clinical guidelines for the systemic treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (2022). Clin Transl Oncol 2023; 25:2718-2731. [PMID: 37133732 PMCID: PMC10425293 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-023-03199-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2023] [Accepted: 04/10/2023] [Indexed: 05/04/2023]
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer deaths in Spain. Metastatic disease is present in 15-30% of patients at diagnosis and up to 20-50% of those with initially localized disease eventually develop metastases. Recent scientific knowledge acknowledges that this is a clinically and biologically heterogeneous disease. As treatment options increase, prognosis for individuals with metastatic disease has steadily improved over recent decades. Disease management should be discussed among experienced, multidisciplinary teams to select the most appropriate systemic treatment (chemotherapy and targeted agents) and to integrate surgical or ablative procedures, when indicated. Clinical presentation, tumor sidedness, molecular profile, disease extension, comorbidities, and patient preferences are key factors when designing a customized treatment plan. These guidelines seek to provide succinct recommendations for managing metastatic CRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Fernández Montes
- Medical Oncology Department, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario, Ourense (CHUO), C/ Ramón Puga, 56, 32005 Ourense, Spain
| | - Vicente Alonso
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Saragossa, Spain
| | - Enrique Aranda
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía, Córdoba, Spain
| | - Elena Élez
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Vall D’Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Pilar García Alfonso
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Cristina Grávalos
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - Joan Maurel
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ruth Vera
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Rosario Vidal
- Medical Oncology Department, Complejo Asistencial Universitario, Salamanca, Spain
| | - Jorge Aparicio
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitari I Politècnic la Fe, Valencia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Peretz Soroka H, Vora T, Noujaim J, Marcoux N, Cohen‐Gogo S, Alcindor T, Holloway C, Rodrigues C, Karachiwala H, Alvi S, Lee U, Cheng S, Banerji S, Oberoi S, Feng X, Smrke A, Simmons C, Razak AA, Gupta AA. Real-world experience of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in children, adolescents and adults with relapsed or refractory bone tumours: A Canadian Sarcoma Research and Clinical Collaboration (CanSaRCC) study. Cancer Med 2023; 12:18872-18881. [PMID: 37724607 PMCID: PMC10557866 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.6515] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2023] [Revised: 08/26/2023] [Accepted: 08/29/2023] [Indexed: 09/21/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We conducted a retrospective multi-centre study to assess the real-world outcome of regorafenib (REGO) and cabozantinib (CABO) in recurrent/refractory bone tumours (BTs) including osteosarcoma (OST), Ewing sarcoma (EWS) and chondrosarcoma (CS)/extra-skeletal mesenchymal CS (ESMC). METHODS After regulatory approval, data from patients with recurrent BT (11 institutions) were extracted from CanSaRCC (Canadian Sarcoma Research and Clinical Collaboration) database. Patient characteristics, treatment and outcomes were collected. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS From July 2018 to May 2022, 66 patients received REGO or CABO; 39 OST, 18 EWS, 4 CS and 5 ESMC. Median age was 27.8 years (range 12-76); median starting dose was 60 mg for CABO (n = 37, range 40-60) and 120 mg for REGO (n = 29, range 40-160). Twenty-eight (42.4%) patients required dose reduction: hand-foot syndrome 7 (10.6%), nausea/vomiting 1 (1.5%), diarrhoea 1 (1.5%), 2 elevated LFTs (3%), elevated bilirubin 1 (1.5%) and mucositis 1 (1.5%). The median OS for patients with OST, EWS, CS and ESMC was 8.5 months (n = 39, 95% CI 7-13.1); 13.4 months (n = 18, 95% CI 3.4-27.2), 8.1 (n = 4, 95% CI 4.1-9.3) and 18.2 (n = 5, 95% CI (10.4-na), respectively. Median PFS for OST, EWS, CS and ECMS was 3.5 (n = 39, 95% CI 2.8-5), 3.9 (n = 18, 95% CI 2.1-5.9), 5.53 (n = 4. 95% CI 2.13-NA) and 11.4 (n = 5, 95% CI 1.83-14.7), respectively. Age, line of therapy, REGO versus CABO, or time from diagnosis to initiation of TKI were not associated with PFS on univariable analysis. CONCLUSION Our real-world data show that TKIs have meaningful activity in recurrent BT with acceptable toxicities when started at modified dosing. Inclusion of TKIs in earlier lines of treatment and/or maintenance therapy could be questions for future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hagit Peretz Soroka
- Division of Medical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity of TorontoTorontoOntarioCanada
| | - Tushar Vora
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Hospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of TorontoTorontoOntarioCanada
| | - Jonathan Noujaim
- Division of Medical Oncology, Hôpital Maisonneuve RosemontUniversity of MontrealMontrealQuebecCanada
| | - Nicolas Marcoux
- Division of Hematology‐OncologyCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de QuébecQuebecCanada
| | - Sarah Cohen‐Gogo
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Hospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of TorontoTorontoOntarioCanada
| | - Thierry Alcindor
- Division of Medical OncologyMcGill University Health CentreMontrealQuebecCanada
| | - Caroline Holloway
- Division of Radiation Oncology, BC CancerUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverBritish ColumbiaCanada
| | - Caroline Rodrigues
- Division of Medical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity of TorontoTorontoOntarioCanada
| | - Hatim Karachiwala
- Division of Medical Oncology, Cross Cancer InstituteAlberta Health ServicesEdmontonAlbertaCanada
| | - Saima Alvi
- Division of Pediatric Hematology/OncologyJim Pattison Children's Hospital SaskatoonSaskatoonSaskatchewanCanada
| | - Ursula Lee
- Division of Medical Oncology, BC CancerUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverBritish ColumbiaCanada
| | - Sylvia Cheng
- Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology/BMTB.C. Children's Hospital, BC CancerVancouverBritish ColumbiaCanada
| | - Shantanu Banerji
- Department of Pediatric Hematology‐Oncology, CancerCare Manitoba Research Institute, Rady Faculty of Health SciencesUniversity of ManitobaWinnipegManitobaCanada
| | - Sapna Oberoi
- Department of Pediatric Hematology‐Oncology, CancerCare Manitoba Research Institute, Rady Faculty of Health SciencesUniversity of ManitobaWinnipegManitobaCanada
| | - Xiaolan Feng
- Division of Medical Oncology, BC CancerUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverBritish ColumbiaCanada
| | - Alannah Smrke
- Division of Medical Oncology, BC CancerUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverBritish ColumbiaCanada
| | - Christine Simmons
- Division of Medical Oncology, BC CancerUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverBritish ColumbiaCanada
| | - Albiruni Abdul Razak
- Division of Medical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity of TorontoTorontoOntarioCanada
- Division of Medical Oncology, Mount Sinai HospitalUniversity of TorontoTorontoOntarioCanada
| | - Abha A. Gupta
- Division of Medical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity of TorontoTorontoOntarioCanada
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Hospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of TorontoTorontoOntarioCanada
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Zöhrlaut LK, Karthaus M, Vehling-Kaiser U, von Kunhardt L, Stintzing S, Heinemann V, von Einem JC. Key Prognostic Factors Create a Composite Risk Score to Stratify Patients into High- and Low-Treatment Benefit Groups: A Multicenter, Retrospective Data Analysis of 84 Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients Treated with Regorafenib as Part of the CORRECT and CONSIGN Trials. Oncol Res Treat 2023; 46:348-361. [PMID: 37607525 PMCID: PMC10614442 DOI: 10.1159/000531268] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2022] [Accepted: 02/04/2023] [Indexed: 08/24/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In further-line mCRC treatment, median progression-free survival (PFS) is rather short, and many patients do not benefit from any antitumor treatment and should therefore be treated according to best-supportive care. A risk score based on standard laboratory values using markers of tumor inflammation aims to define a patient cohort with high treatment benefit and might offer insights into tumor biology. As regorafenib has been dropped off the German market due to an unfavorable risk-benefit ratio, patient selection is key for any further-line treatment option. METHODS We used Cox regression analysis to determine laboratory markers that are independent prognostic factors of OS and PFS outcome. The influence of these variables was weighted using an estimator, which was calculated using Cox regression analysis. The estimators were implemented as multiplication factors, resulting in a risk score. A cut-off value for the resulting risk values was then determined via Cox regression analysis resulting in a low- and high-risk subgroup. RESULTS Using data of 82 patients, a risk score identifying long-term survival in patients with last-line mCRC treatment could be calculated. The following parameters were associated with significantly longer survival in multivariate analysis: NLR ≤5 (p = <0.001), AP ≤200 U/L (p = 0.001), CRP ≤3.2 mg/dL (p = <0.001). The following estimator values were used to calculate a risk score: NLR: 0.132 (p = 0.046), AP: 0.004 (p = 0.014), and CRP: 0.032 (p = 0.039). Implementing the estimators as multiplication factors yielded the following risk score: 0.132*NLR + 0.004*AP + 0.032*CRP = Risk value. Cox regression resulted in low- and high-risk subgroups with risk values below and above 1.4, respectively. In the group with a low-risk score (<1.4), patients had a median OS of 10.5 months after initiating regorafenib. Patients with a high-risk score (>1.4) survived only 3.3 months after starting therapy with regorafenib (n = 43, p < 0.001, HR = 3.76). CONCLUSIONS The presented composite risk score stratifies patients into two prognostic subgroups characterized by standard laboratory values. Patients with signs of systemic inflammation characterized by elevated NLR, AP, and CRP have a high composite risk score and a significant shorter overall survival. Although this score needs to be prospectively validated in larger cohorts, it may be used to stratify patients suitable for further-line treatment studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Lukas von Kunhardt
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany,
- Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Cancer Immunology (CCM), Charité-Universtiätsmedizin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany,
| | - Sebastian Stintzing
- Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Cancer Immunology (CCM), Charité-Universtiätsmedizin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Volker Heinemann
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), DKFZ, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jobst C von Einem
- Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Cancer Immunology (CCM), Charité-Universtiätsmedizin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- MVZ Onkologie Tiergarten, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Golčić M, Jones RL, Huang P, Napolitano A. Evaluation of Systemic Treatment Options for Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumours. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4081. [PMID: 37627109 PMCID: PMC10452236 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15164081] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2023] [Revised: 07/28/2023] [Accepted: 08/01/2023] [Indexed: 08/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST) are the most common mesenchymal tumours of the gastrointestinal tract. Surgical treatment is recommended for the majority of localised GIST, while systemic treatment is the cornerstone of management for metastatic or unresectable disease. While a three-year regimen of imatinib is the standard of care in the adjuvant setting, there is no precise recommendation for the duration of neoadjuvant treatment, where imatinib is usually given between 4 and 12 months. Continuous treatment with imatinib at a dose of 400 mg once per day is recommended for most patients with unresectable or metastatic GIST in the first line. An exception is represented by patients with tumours harbouring the imatinib-insensitive PDGFRA D842V mutation who would be better treated with avapritinib. Targeted therapies are also recommended in the presence of NTRK rearrangements and BRAF mutations, although limited data are available. While an increase in the dose of imatinib to 800 mg is an option for the second line, sunitinib is usually considered the standard of care. Similar outcomes were reported for ripretinib in patients with tumours harbouring KIT exon 11 mutation, with significantly fewer side effects. Regorafenib and ripretinib are the standards of care in the third and fourth lines, respectively. The recent development of various systemic treatment options allows for a more personalised approach based on the molecular profile of the GIST, patient characteristics, and the profile of medications' adverse events. A multidisciplinary approach is paramount since combining systemic treatment with locoregional treatment options and supportive care is vital for long-term survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marin Golčić
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Clinical Hospital Center Rijeka, Krešimirova 42, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia
| | - Robin L. Jones
- Sarcoma Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Fulham Road, London SW3 6JJ, UK
| | - Paul Huang
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton SM2 5NG, UK;
| | - Andrea Napolitano
- Sarcoma Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Fulham Road, London SW3 6JJ, UK
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Cann CG, LaPelusa MB, Cimino SK, Eng C. Molecular and genetic targets within metastatic colorectal cancer and associated novel treatment advancements. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1176950. [PMID: 37409250 PMCID: PMC10319053 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1176950] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2023] [Accepted: 05/30/2023] [Indexed: 07/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer results in the deaths of hundreds of thousands of patients worldwide each year, with incidence expected to rise over the next two decades. In the metastatic setting, cytotoxic therapy options remain limited, which is reflected in the meager improvement of patient survival rates. Therefore, focus has turned to the identification of the mutational composition inherent to colorectal cancers and development of therapeutic targeted agents. Herein, we review the most up to date systemic treatment strategies for metastatic colorectal cancer based on the actionable molecular alterations and genetic profiles of colorectal malignancies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher G. Cann
- Department of Medicine: Hematology/Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States
| | - Michael B. LaPelusa
- Department of Medicine: Hematology/Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States
| | - Sarah K. Cimino
- Department of Pharmacy, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States
| | - Cathy Eng
- Department of Medicine: Hematology/Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Signorelli C, Calegari MA, Basso M, Anghelone A, Lucchetti J, Minelli A, Angotti L, Zurlo IV, Schirripa M, Chilelli MG, Morelli C, Dell'Aquila E, Cosimati A, Gemma D, Ribelli M, Emiliani A, Corsi DC, Arrivi G, Mazzuca F, Zoratto F, Morandi MG, Santamaria F, Saltarelli R, Ruggeri EM. Treatment Settings and Outcomes with Regorafenib and Trifluridine/Tipiracil at Third-Line Treatment and beyond in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Real-World Multicenter Retrospective Study. Curr Oncol 2023; 30:5456-5469. [PMID: 37366896 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30060413] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2023] [Revised: 06/02/2023] [Accepted: 06/02/2023] [Indexed: 06/28/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with refractory mCRC rarely undergo third-line or subsequent treatment. This strategy could negatively impact their survival. In this setting, regorafenib (R) and trifluridine/tipiracil (T) are two key new treatment options with statistically significant improvements in overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and disease control with different tolerance profiles. This study aimed to retrospectively evaluate the efficacy and safety profiles of these agents in real-world practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS In 2012-2022, 866 patients diagnosed with mCRC who received sequential R and T (T/R, n = 146; R/T, n = 116]) or T (n = 325]) or R (n = 279) only were retrospectively recruited from 13 Italian cancer institutes. RESULTS The median OS is significantly longer in the R/T group (15.9 months) than in the T/R group (13.9 months) (p = 0.0194). The R/T sequence had a statistically significant advantage in the mPFS, which was 8.8 months with T/R vs. 11.2 months with R/T (p = 0.0005). We did not find significant differences in outcomes between groups receiving T or R only. A total of 582 grade 3/4 toxicities were recorded. The frequency of grade 3/4 hand-foot skin reactions was higher in the R/T sequence compared to the reverse sequence (37.3% vs. 7.4%) (p = 0.01), while grade 3/4 neutropenia was slightly lower in the R/T group than in the T/R group (66.2% vs. 78.2%) (p = 0.13). Toxicities in the non-sequential groups were similar and in line with previous studies. CONCLUSIONS The R/T sequence resulted in a significantly longer OS and PFS and improved disease control compared with the reverse sequence. R and T given not sequentially have similar impacts on survival. More data are needed to define the best sequence and to explore the efficacy of sequential (T/R or R/T) treatment combined with molecular-targeted drugs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlo Signorelli
- Medical Oncology Unit, Belcolle Hospital, ASL Viterbo, 01100 Viterbo, Italy
| | - Maria Alessandra Calegari
- Unit of Medical Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Michele Basso
- Unit of Medical Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Annunziato Anghelone
- Unit of Medical Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Jessica Lucchetti
- Division of Medical Oncology, Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, 00128 Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandro Minelli
- Division of Medical Oncology, Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, 00128 Rome, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Angotti
- Division of Medical Oncology, Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, 00128 Rome, Italy
| | | | - Marta Schirripa
- Medical Oncology Unit, Belcolle Hospital, ASL Viterbo, 01100 Viterbo, Italy
| | | | - Cristina Morelli
- Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Systems Medicine, Tor Vergata University Hospital, 00133 Rome, Italy
| | - Emanuela Dell'Aquila
- Medical Oncology 1, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy
| | - Antonella Cosimati
- Medical Oncology 1, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy
| | - Donatello Gemma
- Medical Oncology Unit, ASL Frosinone, 03039 Sora (FR), Italy
| | - Marta Ribelli
- Medical Oncology Unit, Ospedale San Giovanni Calibita Fatebenefratelli, Isola Tiberina, Gemelli Isola, 00186 Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandra Emiliani
- Medical Oncology Unit, Ospedale San Giovanni Calibita Fatebenefratelli, Isola Tiberina, Gemelli Isola, 00186 Rome, Italy
| | - Domenico Cristiano Corsi
- Medical Oncology Unit, Ospedale San Giovanni Calibita Fatebenefratelli, Isola Tiberina, Gemelli Isola, 00186 Rome, Italy
| | - Giulia Arrivi
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Oncology Unit, Sant' Andrea Hospital, 00189 Rome, Italy
| | - Federica Mazzuca
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Oncology Unit, Sant' Andrea Hospital, 00189 Rome, Italy
| | | | - Maria Grazia Morandi
- Medical Oncology Unit, San Camillo de Lellis Hospital, ASL Rieti, 02100 Rieti, Italy
| | - Fiorenza Santamaria
- Department of Experimental Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy
- Medical Oncology A, Department of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy
| | - Rosa Saltarelli
- UOC Oncology, San Giovanni Evangelista Hospital, ASL RM5, 00019 Tivoli (RM), Italy
| | - Enzo Maria Ruggeri
- Medical Oncology Unit, Belcolle Hospital, ASL Viterbo, 01100 Viterbo, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Villacampa G, Patel D, Zheng H, McAleese J, Rekowski J, Solovyeva O, Yin Z, Yap C. Assessing the reporting quality of early phase dose-finding trial protocols: a methodological review. EClinicalMedicine 2023; 60:102020. [PMID: 37261325 PMCID: PMC10227378 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2023] [Revised: 05/09/2023] [Accepted: 05/09/2023] [Indexed: 06/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The paradigm of early phase dose-finding trials has evolved in recent years. Innovative dose-finding designs and protocols which combine phases I and II are becoming more popular in health research. However, the quality of these trial protocols is unknown due to a lack of specific reporting guidelines. Here, we evaluated the reporting quality of dose-finding trial protocols. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional study of oncology and non-oncology early phase dose-finding trial protocols posted on ClinicalTrials.gov in 2017-2023. A checklist of items comprising: 1) the original 33-items from the SPIRIT 2013 Statement and 2) additional items unique to dose-finding trials were used to assess reporting quality. The primary endpoint was the overall proportion of adequately reported items. This study was registered with PROSPERO (no: CRD42022314572). Finding A total of 106 trial protocols were included in the study with the rule-based 3 + 3 being the most used trial design (39.6%). Eleven model-based and model-assisted designs were identified in oncology trials only (11/58, 19.0%). The overall proportion of adequately reported items was 65.1% (95%CI: 63.9-66.3%). However, the reporting quality of each individual item varied substantially (range 9.4%-100%). Oncology study protocols showed lower reporting quality than non-oncology. In the multivariable analysis, trials with larger sample sizes and industry funding were associated with higher proportions of adequately reported items (all p-values <0.05). Interpretation The overall reporting quality of early phase dose-finding trial protocols is suboptimal (65.1%). There is a need for improved completeness and transparency in early phase dose-finding trial protocols to facilitate rigorous trial conduct, reproducibility and external review. Funding None.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guillermo Villacampa
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit at The Institute of Cancer Research (ICR-CTSU), United Kingdom
| | - Dhrusti Patel
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit at The Institute of Cancer Research (ICR-CTSU), United Kingdom
| | - Haiyan Zheng
- MRC Biostatistics Unit, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Jessica McAleese
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit at The Institute of Cancer Research (ICR-CTSU), United Kingdom
| | - Jan Rekowski
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit at The Institute of Cancer Research (ICR-CTSU), United Kingdom
| | - Olga Solovyeva
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit at The Institute of Cancer Research (ICR-CTSU), United Kingdom
| | - Zhulin Yin
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit at The Institute of Cancer Research (ICR-CTSU), United Kingdom
| | - Christina Yap
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit at The Institute of Cancer Research (ICR-CTSU), United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Figueroa-Valverde L, Díaz-Cedillo F, Rosas-Nexticapa M, Alvarez-Ramirez M, Mateu-Armad MV, López-Ramos M, López-Gutierrez T. Interaction of Some Amino-Nitrile Derivatives with Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor 1 (VEGFR1) Using a Theoretical Model. Drug Res (Stuttg) 2023. [PMID: 37172939 DOI: 10.1055/a-2062-3571] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Some studies indicate that the angiogenesis process is related to vascular endothelial growth factor, which can interact with endothelial cell surface receptors (VEGF-R1, VEGF-R2, and VEGF-R3); this biochemical process and other factors result in the promotion and growth of new blood vessels under normal conditions. However, some studies indicate that this phenomenon could also occur in cancer cells. It is important to mention that some amino derivatives have been prepared as VEGF-R1 inhibitors; however, their interaction with VEGF-R1 is not clear, perhaps due to different experimental approaches or differences in their chemical structure. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to evaluate the theoretical interaction of several amino-nitrile derivatives (Compounds 1 to 38) with VEGF-R1. METHODS The theoretical interaction of amino-nitrile derivatives with VEGF-R1 was carried out using the 3hng protein as the theoretical model. In addition, cabozantinib, pazopanib, regorafenib, and sorafenib were used as controls in the DockingServer program. RESULTS The results showed different amino acid residues involved in the interaction of amino-nitrile derivatives with the 3hng protein surface compared with the controls. In addition, the inhibition constant (Ki) was lower for Compounds 10 and 34 than for cabozantinib. Other results show that Ki for Compounds 9, 10, 14, 27-29 and 34-36 was lower in comparison with pazopanib, regorafenib, and sorafenib. CONCLUSIONS All theoretical data suggest that amino-nitrile derivatives could produce changes in the growth of some cancer cell lines through VEGFR-1 inhibition. Therefore, these amino-nitrile derivatives could be a therapeutic alternative to treat some types of cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauro Figueroa-Valverde
- Laboratory of Pharmaco-Chemistry, Faculty of Chemical Biological Sciences, University Autonomous of Campeche, Campeche, Camp., México
| | - Francisco Díaz-Cedillo
- Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Biológicas del Instituto Politécnico Nacional. Santo Tomas, México
| | - Marcela Rosas-Nexticapa
- Facultad de Nutrición, Universidad Veracruzana, Médicos y Odontologos, Unidad del Bosque Xalapa Veracruz, México
| | - Magdalena Alvarez-Ramirez
- Facultad de Nutrición, Universidad Veracruzana, Médicos y Odontologos, Unidad del Bosque Xalapa Veracruz, México
| | - Maria Virginia Mateu-Armad
- Facultad de Nutrición, Universidad Veracruzana, Médicos y Odontologos, Unidad del Bosque Xalapa Veracruz, México
| | - Maria López-Ramos
- Laboratory of Pharmaco-Chemistry, Faculty of Chemical Biological Sciences, University Autonomous of Campeche, Campeche, Camp., México
| | - Tomas López-Gutierrez
- Laboratory of Pharmaco-Chemistry, Faculty of Chemical Biological Sciences, University Autonomous of Campeche, Campeche, Camp., México
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Alese OB, Wu C, Chapin WJ, Ulanja MB, Zheng-Lin B, Amankwah M, Eads J. Update on Emerging Therapies for Advanced Colorectal Cancer. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2023; 43:e389574. [PMID: 37155942 DOI: 10.1200/edbk_389574] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/10/2023]
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common malignancy worldwide. It is projected to increase by 3.2 million new cases and account for 1.6 million deaths by 2040. Mortality is largely due to limited treatment options for patients who present with advanced disease. Thus, the development of effective and tolerable therapies is crucial. Chemotherapy has been the backbone of systemic treatment of advanced CRC, but utility has been limited because of invariable resistance to therapy, narrow mechanisms of action, and unfavorable toxicity profile. Tumors that are mismatch repair-deficient have demonstrated remarkable response to immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. However, most CRC tumors are mismatch repair-proficient and represent an unmet medical need. Although ERBB2 amplification occurs only in a few cases, it is associated with left-sided tumors and a higher incidence of brain metastasis. Numerous combinations of HER2 inhibitors have demonstrated efficacy, and antibody-drug conjugates against HER2 represent innovative strategies in this area. The KRAS protein has been classically considered undruggable. Fortunately, new agents targeting KRAS G12C mutation represent a paradigm shift in the management of affected patients and could lead the advancement in drug development for the more common KRAS mutations. Furthermore, aberrant DNA damage response is present in 15%-20% of CRCs, and emerging innovative combinations with poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors could improve the current therapeutic landscape. Multiple novel biomarker-driven approaches in the management of patients with advanced CRC tumors are reviewed in this article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olatunji B Alese
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | | | - William J Chapin
- Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Mark B Ulanja
- Christus Ochsner St Patrick Hospital, Lake Charles, LA
| | | | | | - Jennifer Eads
- Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Olivier T, Haslam A, Prasad V. Is Financial Toxicity Captured in Assessments of Quality of Life In Oncology Randomized Clinical Trials? J Cancer Policy 2023; 36:100423. [PMID: 37075841 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcpo.2023.100423] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2022] [Revised: 03/24/2023] [Accepted: 04/14/2023] [Indexed: 04/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Financial difficulties in relation with diagnosis and treatment of patients with cancer affects their quality-of-life (QoL). We aim to characterize how financial toxicity was captured in oncology randomized clinical trials (RCTs), and to estimate how often the study-drug or other expenses were covered by sponsors. METHODS This was a cross-sectional analysis of articles published in six high impact journals (The New England Journal of Medicine, The Lancet, JAMA, The Lancet Oncology, Journal of Clinical Oncology, and JAMA Oncology). Selected articles needed to report on a RCT published between January 2018 and December 2019, study an anti-cancer drug, and have reported QoL results. We abstracted the QoL questionnaires used; whether the survey was directly assessing financial difficulties; whether a difference in financial toxicity was reported between arms; and whether the sponsor supplied the study-drug or covered other expenses. RESULTS For all 73 studies that met inclusion criteria, 34 studies (47%) utilized QoL questionnaires without direct assessment of financial difficulties. The study drug was provided by the sponsor in at least 51 trials (70%), provided according to local rules in 3 trials (4%), and undeterminated in the remaining 19 trials (26%). We found 2 trials (3%) with payments or compensation to enrolled patients. CONCLUSION This cross-sectional study found 47% of articles reporting on QoL in oncology RCTs did not use QoL questionnaires directly assessing financial toxicity. Additionnaly, the study drug was supplied by the sponsor in most trials. Financial toxicity occurs in real-life settings when patients have to pay for the drugs and other medical expenses. QoL assessments from oncology RCTs lack generalizability to real-world settings, due to limited querying of financial toxicity. POLICY SUMMARY Real-world evidence could be demanded by regulators as post-requirement studies to ensure QoL results observed in trials will replicate in patients treated outside investigational trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothée Olivier
- Department of Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, 4 Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil Street, 1205, Geneva, Switzerland; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, 550 16th St, 2nd Fl, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA.
| | - Alyson Haslam
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, 550 16th St, 2nd Fl, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA
| | - Vinay Prasad
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, 550 16th St, 2nd Fl, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Ioffe D, Dotan E. Guidance for Treating the Older Adults with Colorectal Cancer. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2023; 24:644-666. [PMID: 37052812 DOI: 10.1007/s11864-023-01071-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/20/2023] [Indexed: 04/14/2023]
Abstract
OPINION STATEMENT The need for evidence-based data in the rapidly growing group of older patients is vast and more elderly-specific studies are desperately needed, for which there is clear demand from both patients and providers. Notably, many of the studies discussed in this review included unplanned subset analyses based on age and/or were not originally stratified by age; therefore, these data, particularly overall survival data, need to be interpreted with some caution as they may not be statistically valid based on the initial trial design and statistical plan. As we await data from ongoing elderly-specific trials, our recommendation for managing older patients with CRC should include geriatric screening tools (e.g., CSGA, VES-13, G8, CARG, CRASH) to help guide treatment adjustments for improved tolerability without sacrificing efficacy. For patients with a positive screen for significant geriatric concerns, a full geriatric assessment is recommended to guide treatment approach and supportive care. Prior data support the use of all approved medications for CRC in older adults who are fit; however, treatment breaks and dose attenuation with potential escalation are reasonable options for these patients. Ultimately, management decisions in the care of older adults with mCRC must be made through shared decision-making with the patient with consideration for the patient's functional status, comorbidities, goals of care, social support, as well as potential toxicities and possible effect on QoL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dina Ioffe
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, 333 Cottman Ave, Philadelphia, PA, 19111, USA
| | - Efrat Dotan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, 333 Cottman Ave, Philadelphia, PA, 19111, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Victorino APOS, Meton F, Mardegan L, Festa J, Piranda DN, Araujo KB. Trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) and regorafenib in older patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. J Geriatr Oncol 2023; 14:101477. [PMID: 36990929 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2023.101477] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2022] [Revised: 02/10/2023] [Accepted: 03/07/2023] [Indexed: 03/29/2023]
Abstract
Colorectal cancer is a disease of older patients, but few guidelines directly address age in their recommendations. Older patients may present comorbidities that affect the choice of chemotherapy, and care must be taken when choosing the best approach. This narrative review aimed to describe the literature regarding approved oral agents for third-line treatment in older patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer, regorafenib, and trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI).
Collapse
|
39
|
Long-term response of more than 9 years to regorafenib in a heavily pretreated patient with metastatic colorectal cancer. Anticancer Drugs 2023; 34:451-454. [PMID: 36730636 DOI: 10.1097/cad.0000000000001410] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer worldwide, with approximately 1.9 million new diagnoses and 935 000 deaths annually. Overall, there is accumulating evidence that receiving all available treatments leads to a survival advantage and, although tailored treatments might be appropriate for selected patients, the one-size-fits-all approach is still widely used in chemo-refractory patients. Currently, different antiangiogenics and multitarget agents are indicated in treatment of metastatic CRC (mCRC) whereas the identification of useful predictive factors for the treatment response is lacking. Analysis of potential predictive biomarkers of efficacy of regorafenib is still ongoing but may prove to be difficult because of its nonspecific activity across a wide range of angiogenic, oncogenic, stromal, and intracellular signaling kinases. We present a case of a 57-year-old Caucasian woman diagnosed with recurrence after curative surgery for rectal adenocarcinoma stage III (ypT3N2). Despite undergoing multiple lines of standard chemotherapy, disease control could not be maintained. Consequently, regorafenib, a multikinase inhibitor with antiangiogenic proprieties, was started as a late-line treatment and a dose reduction strategy allowed a long-term response of more than 9 years with good tolerability.
Collapse
|
40
|
Matsumoto T, Ikoma T, Yamamura S, Miura K, Tsuduki T, Watanabe T, Nagai H, Takatani M, Yasui H. Regorafenib is suitable for advanced colorectal cancer patients who have previously received trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab. Sci Rep 2023; 13:2433. [PMID: 36765099 PMCID: PMC9918455 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-29706-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2022] [Accepted: 02/09/2023] [Indexed: 02/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Regorafenib is a standard salvage line therapy used for advanced colorectal cancer (CRC). Recently, trifluridine/tipiracil (TFTD) plus bevacizumab also showed promising efficacy as a salvage line therapy for advanced CRC. However, the efficacy and safety of regorafenib for patients with advanced CRC who have previously received TFTD plus bevacizumab is unclear. We retrospectively collected clinicopathologic data from patients with advanced CRC who received regorafenib after TFTD plus bevacizumab in multiple institutions between April 2017 and June 2020.Thirty-four advanced CRC patients who received regorafenib were analyzed. The median age was 66.5 (range 43-81 years), 11 patients were male, and all had an ECOG performance status(PS) of 0 or 1. Twenty-two patients had left-sided tumors, 18 patients had RAS mutants, and 1 patient had a BRAF V600E mutation. The response rate was 0%, and the disease control rate was 31%. The median progression-free survival was 70 days (95% CI: 56-91), and the overall survival was 233 days (95% CI: 188-324). Treatment was discontinued in 32 patients, and 28 (82%) discontinued treatment due to progressive disease. The major grade 3 and4 toxicities were proteinurea (29%), hypertension (26%), hand-foot syndrome(15%), and platelet decrease (6%). Regorafenib after TFTD plus bevacizumab showed efficacy similar to that of the previous study, and no new adverse events were observed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Toshihiko Matsumoto
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, 2-1-1, Minatojima Minamimachi, Chuo-Ku, Kobe, Hyogo, 6500047, Japan.
- Cancer Treatment Center, Kansai Medical University, 2-3-1, Hirakatashinmachi, Hirakata, Osaka, 573-1191, Japan.
| | - Tatsuki Ikoma
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, 2-1-1, Minatojima Minamimachi, Chuo-Ku, Kobe, Hyogo, 6500047, Japan
| | - Shogo Yamamura
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, 2-1-1, Minatojima Minamimachi, Chuo-Ku, Kobe, Hyogo, 6500047, Japan
| | - Kou Miura
- Department of Internal Medicine, Himeji Red Cross Hospital, 1-12-1, Shimoteno, Himeji, Hyogo, 6708540, Japan
| | - Takao Tsuduki
- Department of Internal Medicine, Himeji Red Cross Hospital, 1-12-1, Shimoteno, Himeji, Hyogo, 6708540, Japan
| | - Takanori Watanabe
- Department of Surgery, Himeji Red Cross Hospital, 1-12-1, Shimoteno, Himeji, Hyogo, 6708540, Japan
| | - Hiroki Nagai
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, 2-1-1, Minatojima Minamimachi, Chuo-Ku, Kobe, Hyogo, 6500047, Japan
| | - Masahiro Takatani
- Department of Internal Medicine, Himeji Red Cross Hospital, 1-12-1, Shimoteno, Himeji, Hyogo, 6708540, Japan
| | - Hisateru Yasui
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, 2-1-1, Minatojima Minamimachi, Chuo-Ku, Kobe, Hyogo, 6500047, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Phase II dose titration study of regorafenib in progressive unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer. Sci Rep 2023; 13:2331. [PMID: 36759648 PMCID: PMC9911606 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-24057-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2022] [Accepted: 11/09/2022] [Indexed: 02/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Regorafenib has shown significant survival benefit as a salvage therapy for colorectal cancer; however, its starting dose has been controversial in recent studies. Therefore, we conducted a prospective study on the efficacy and safety of the dose reduction of regorafenib to 120 mg. Patients received 120 mg regorafenib once per day for 3 weeks, followed by a 1-week off-treatment period. The primary endpoint was the investigator-assessed disease control rate (DCR). Sixty patients were registered, and the DCR was 38.3% with a median progression-free survival of 2.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.9-3.7) and median overall survival of 10.0 months (95% CI 6.9-15.2). Common grade 3-4 adverse events were hand-foot skin reaction and hypertension (20.0% each). The results of administration of 120 mg regorafenib as the starting dose are consistent with reports from prior phase III trials, which used starting doses of 160 mg. This lower initiating dose of regorafenib may be beneficial to certain patient populations. This clinical trial was registered in the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN-CTR number UMIN000018968, registration date: 10/09/2015).
Collapse
|
42
|
Baseline Cytokine Profile Identifies a Favorable Outcome in a Subgroup of Colorectal Cancer Patients Treated with Regorafenib. Vaccines (Basel) 2023; 11:vaccines11020335. [PMID: 36851213 PMCID: PMC9959285 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11020335] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2022] [Revised: 01/28/2023] [Accepted: 01/31/2023] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Metastatic colorectal cancer is frequently associated with poor clinical conditions that may limit therapeutic options. Regorafenib is a small molecule approved for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer, but it is hampered by significative toxicities. Moreover, only a relatively limited number of patients benefit from the treatment. Therefore, the identification of reliable markers for response is an unmet need. Eighteen cytokines, selected based on their prevalent Th1 or Th2 effects, were collected. Peripheral blood samples were gathered at baseline in 25 metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with regorafenib. Data extracted have been linked to progression-free survival. ROC identified the best cytokines associated with outcome. The relative value of the selected cytokines was determined by PCA. Data analysis identified 8 cytokines (TGF-β, TNF-α, CCL-2, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-13 and IL-21), used to create a signature (TGF-β, TNF-α high; CCL-2, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-13 and IL-21 low) corresponding to patients with a significantly longer progression-free survival. This report suggests that the analysis of multiple cytokines might identify a cytokine signature related to a patient's outcome that is able to recognize patients who will benefit from treatment. If confirmed, future studies, also based on different drugs, using this approach and including larger patient populations, might identify a signature allowing the a priori identification of patients to be treated.
Collapse
|
43
|
Cardone C, De Stefano A, Rosati G, Cassata A, Silvestro L, Borrelli M, Di Gennaro E, Romano C, Nappi A, Zanaletti N, Foschini F, Casaretti R, Tatangelo F, Lastoria S, Raddi M, Bilancia D, Granata V, Setola S, Petrillo A, Vitagliano C, Gargiulo P, Arenare L, Febbraro A, Martinelli E, Ciardiello F, Delrio P, Budillon A, Piccirillo MC, Avallone A. Regorafenib monotherapy as second-line treatment of patients with RAS-mutant advanced colorectal cancer (STREAM): an academic, multicenter, single-arm, two-stage, phase II study. ESMO Open 2023; 8:100748. [PMID: 36603521 PMCID: PMC10024144 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100748] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2022] [Revised: 11/18/2022] [Accepted: 11/23/2022] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Maintaining angiogenesis inhibition and switching the chemotherapy backbone represent the current second-line therapy in patients with RAS-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Regorafenib, an oral multikinase inhibitor, prolonged overall survival (OS) in the chemorefractory setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS STREAM was an academic, multicenter, single-arm phase II trial, evaluating the activity of regorafenib in RAS-mutant mCRC, in terms of the rate of patients who were progression-free after 6 months from study entry (6mo-PF). Patients were pretreated with fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin, and bevacizumab. According to Simon's two-stage design, ≥18 patients 6mo-PF were needed in the overall population (N = 46). Secondary endpoints were safety, objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and OS. Early metabolic response by [18F]2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography ([18F]-FDG PET/CT) scan was an exploratory endpoint. EudraCT Number: 2015-001105-13. RESULTS The number of patients 6mo-PF was 8/22 at the first stage and 14/46 in the overall population. The ORR was 10.9%, disease control rate was 54.6%, median (m)PFS was 3.6 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.9-6.7 months], mOS was 18.9 months (95% CI 10.3-35.3 months), and mPFS2 (from study entry to subsequent-line progression) was 13.3 months (95% CI 8.4-19.7 months). Long benefiter patients (>6mo-PF) significantly more often had a single metastatic site and lung-limited disease. No unexpected toxicity was reported. Grade ≥3 events occurred in 39.1% of patients, with hand-foot syndrome (13%), fatigue, and hyperbilirubinemia (6.5%) occurring mostly. Baseline metabolic assessment was associated with OS in the multivariate analysis, while early metabolic response was not associated with clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS The study did not meet its primary endpoint. However, regorafenib was well tolerated and did not preclude subsequent treatments. Patients with good prognostic features (single metastatic site and lung-limited disease) reported clinical benefit with regorafenib. The exploratory metabolic analysis suggests that baseline [18F]-FDG PET/CT might be useful to select patients with a favorable outcome. A chemotherapy-free interval with regorafenib was associated with durable disease control in a selected group of patients with favorable clinical characteristics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Cardone
- Experimental Clinical Abdominal Oncology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy. https://twitter.com/clacardone
| | - A De Stefano
- Experimental Clinical Abdominal Oncology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy. https://twitter.com/alfdestefano
| | - G Rosati
- Medical Oncology Unit, S. Carlo Hospital, Potenza, Italy
| | - A Cassata
- Experimental Clinical Abdominal Oncology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - L Silvestro
- Experimental Clinical Abdominal Oncology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - M Borrelli
- Experimental Clinical Abdominal Oncology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - E Di Gennaro
- Experimental Pharmacology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - C Romano
- Experimental Clinical Abdominal Oncology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - A Nappi
- Experimental Clinical Abdominal Oncology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - N Zanaletti
- Experimental Clinical Abdominal Oncology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - F Foschini
- Experimental Clinical Abdominal Oncology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - R Casaretti
- Experimental Clinical Abdominal Oncology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - F Tatangelo
- Pathology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - S Lastoria
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - M Raddi
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - D Bilancia
- Medical Oncology Unit, S. Carlo Hospital, Potenza, Italy
| | - V Granata
- Radiology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - S Setola
- Radiology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - A Petrillo
- Radiology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - C Vitagliano
- Experimental Pharmacology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - P Gargiulo
- Clinical Trial Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - L Arenare
- Clinical Trial Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - A Febbraro
- Hospital Sacro Cuore di Gesu, Fatebenefratelli, Benevento, Italy
| | - E Martinelli
- Medical Oncology, Precision Medicine Department, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy. https://twitter.com/grikamartinelli
| | - F Ciardiello
- Medical Oncology, Precision Medicine Department, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy
| | - P Delrio
- Colorectal Oncological Surgery, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - A Budillon
- Experimental Pharmacology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy. https://twitter.com/AlfredoBudillon
| | - M C Piccirillo
- Clinical Trial Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - A Avallone
- Experimental Clinical Abdominal Oncology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Yang Y, Chen Y, Wu JH, Ren Y, Liu B, Zhang Y, Yu H. Targeting regulated cell death with plant natural compounds for cancer therapy: A revisited review of apoptosis, autophagy-dependent cell death, and necroptosis. Phytother Res 2023; 37:1488-1525. [PMID: 36717200 DOI: 10.1002/ptr.7738] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2022] [Revised: 01/05/2023] [Accepted: 01/05/2023] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
Regulated cell death (RCD) refers to programmed cell death regulated by various protein molecules, such as apoptosis, autophagy-dependent cell death, and necroptosis. Accumulating evidence has recently revealed that RCD subroutines have several links to many types of human cancer; therefore, targeting RCD with pharmacological small-molecule compounds would be a promising therapeutic strategy. Moreover, plant natural compounds, small-molecule compounds synthesized from plant sources, and their derivatives have been widely reported to regulate different RCD subroutines to improve potential cancer therapy. Thus, in this review, we focus on updating the intricate mechanisms of apoptosis, autophagy-dependent cell death, and necroptosis in cancer. Moreover, we further discuss several representative plant natural compounds and their derivatives that regulate the above-mentioned three subroutines of RCD, and their potential as candidate small-molecule drugs for the future cancer treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuanyuan Yang
- State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy and Cancer Center, Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery and Lung Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Yanmei Chen
- State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy and Cancer Center, Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery and Lung Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- State Key Laboratory of Component-based Chinese Medicine, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China
| | - Jun Hao Wu
- State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy and Cancer Center, Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery and Lung Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Yueting Ren
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Temerity Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Bo Liu
- State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy and Cancer Center, Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery and Lung Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Yan Zhang
- State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy and Cancer Center, Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery and Lung Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Haiyang Yu
- State Key Laboratory of Component-based Chinese Medicine, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Survival and Toxicities of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients Treated with Regorafenib before TAS-102 or Vice Versa: A Mono-Institutional Real-Practice Study. J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12020596. [PMID: 36675525 PMCID: PMC9863455 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12020596] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2022] [Revised: 01/07/2023] [Accepted: 01/09/2023] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Regorafenib and TAS-102 are two orally-administered drugs used to treat refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). This study was performed to explore any differences between different therapy sequences: TAS-102 first or regorafenib first. Patients and methods: This is a retrospective and real-practice study in mCRC patients treated according to the ESMO guidelines. They received TAS-102 first (regorafenib second, TR) or regorafenib first (TAS-102 second, RT) at standard doses. Responses to therapy and toxicities were evaluated by RECIST and CTCAE v4.0, respectively. Associations between clinical and pathologic variables and different therapy sequences were evaluated by χ2-test. p <0.05 was considered statistically significant. A description of any differences in overall survival (OS) between TR and RT was the primary outcome. OS curves were depicted through the Kaplan−Meier product limit. All statistical analyses were performed by the Excel software and MedCalc® version 20.112. Results: Sixty-five patients were analyzed. Twenty-eight received regorafenib before TAS-102, 37 vice versa. Responsiveness to first-line chemotherapy as well as disease control were not different between RT and TR patients. G4 toxicities were very rare. The three most common G1/G2 toxicities with regorafenib were fatigue, anemia, and cutaneous rash; anemia, fatigue, and neutropenia with TAS-102. Compliance to treatment was lower in TAS-102 patients compared to regorafenib. Interestingly, analysis of OS showed a significant difference at Log Rank test (p = 0.0366) in favor of TR (median OS: 4.5 months) compared to RT (median OS: 3.0 months; HR: 0.55; 95% CI: 0.31−0.96). Conclusions: we found a significant difference in terms of survival in favor of the TR sequence of treatment. Larger studies are needed to confirm these data and explore specific biomarkers predicting the correct sequence of oral drugs in the treatment of refractory mCRC patients.
Collapse
|
46
|
Araujo D, Greystoke A, Bates S, Bayle A, Calvo E, Castelo-Branco L, de Bono J, Drilon A, Garralda E, Ivy P, Kholmanskikh O, Melero I, Pentheroudakis G, Petrie J, Plummer R, Ponce S, Postel-Vinay S, Siu L, Spreafico A, Stathis A, Steeghs N, Yap C, Yap TA, Ratain M, Seymour L. Oncology phase I trial design and conduct: time for a change - MDICT Guidelines 2022. Ann Oncol 2023; 34:48-60. [PMID: 36182023 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.09.158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 29.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2022] [Accepted: 09/18/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
In 2021, the Food and Drug Administration Oncology Center of Excellence announced Project Optimus focusing on dose optimization for oncology drugs. The Methodology for the Development of Innovative Cancer Therapies (MDICT) Taskforce met to review and discuss the optimization of dosage for oncology trials and to develop a practical guide for oncology phase I trials. Defining a single recommended phase II dose based on toxicity may define doses that are neither the most effective nor the best tolerated. MDICT recommendations address the need for robust non-clinical data which are needed to inform trial design, as well as an expert team including statisticians and pharmacologists. The protocol must be flexible and adaptive, with clear definition of all endpoints. Health authorities should be consulted early and regularly. Strategies such as randomization, intrapatient dose escalation, and real-world eligibility criteria are encouraged whereas serial tumor sampling is discouraged in the absence of a strong rationale and appropriately validated assay. Endpoints should include consideration of all longitudinal toxicity. The phase I dose escalation trial should define the recommended dose range for later testing in randomized phase II trials, rather than a single recommended phase II dose, and consider scenarios where different populations may require different dosages. The adoption of these recommendations will improve dosage selection in early clinical trials of new anticancer treatments and ultimately, outcomes for patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Araujo
- Hospital de Base, Sao Jose do Rio Preto, Brazil
| | - A Greystoke
- Northern Centre for Cancer Care, Newcastle, UK
| | - S Bates
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, USA
| | - A Bayle
- Institut Gustave Roussy, Paris, France
| | - E Calvo
- START Madrid-CIOCC, Centro Integral Oncológico Clara Campal, Madrid, Spain
| | - L Castelo-Branco
- European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), Lugano, Switzerland
| | - J de Bono
- Institute of Cancer Research, University of London, London; The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | - A Drilon
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, USA
| | - E Garralda
- Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
| | - P Ivy
- National Cancer Institute, USA Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program Investigational Drug Branch (NCI/CTEP/IDB), Bethesda, USA
| | - O Kholmanskikh
- European Medicines Agency, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Federal Agency for Medicines and Health Products, Brussels, Belgium
| | - I Melero
- CUN and CIMA, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - G Pentheroudakis
- European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), Lugano, Switzerland
| | - J Petrie
- Canadian Cancer Trials Group, Queen's University, Kingston
| | - R Plummer
- Northern Centre for Cancer Care, Newcastle, UK
| | - S Ponce
- Institut Gustave Roussy, Paris, France
| | | | - L Siu
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - A Spreafico
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - A Stathis
- Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, EOC, Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - N Steeghs
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - C Yap
- Institute of Cancer Research, University of London, London
| | - T A Yap
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - M Ratain
- Section of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, USA
| | - L Seymour
- Canadian Cancer Trials Group, Queen's University, Kingston.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Olazagasti C, Lee CS, Liu A, Stefanov D, Cheng K. A deep dive into CDK4/6 inhibitors: Evaluating real world toxicities and treatment paradigms in the elderly population. J Oncol Pharm Pract 2023; 29:14-21. [PMID: 34665067 DOI: 10.1177/10781552211050106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors have become part of the standard of care in the treatment of hormone receptor positive, Her2Neu negative metastatic breast cancer. There is concern regarding the efficacy and potential increased cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors toxicity in the geriatric population in the community compared to the clinical trial population. METHODS We evaluated patients treated with cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors from 2015 to 2019 and stratified according to age ≥70 and <70 years. Complete blood count from the first two cycles was recorded. Rates of hematologic toxicities, dose interruptions and reductions, progression-free survival, and overall survival were compared between both groups. We sought to assess the hematologic toxicities between the age groups and the relationship between previous chemotherapy exposure, bone metastasis and starting cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors dose with progression-free survival and overall survival. RESULTS A total of 202 patients were included, 73 were ≥70 years and 129 were <70 years of age. There was no association between age group and grade of neutropenia or thrombocytopenia. There was a profound association between progression-free survival and overall survival and starting dose, where patients with recommended starting dose had higher progression-free survival and overall survival than those with a reduced dose (p = 0.0003 and p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS Our study showed similar progression-free survival and overall survival between age groups without significant differences in neutropenia or thrombocytopenia toxicity. Nevertheless, we found an association between starting dose and progression-free survival and overall survival that has not been previously reported. Given the good tolerability across age groups and the improvement in progression-free survival and overall survival, patients should be treated at the cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors recommended dose and monitored appropriately.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Coral Olazagasti
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/5799Northwell Health, New Hyde Park, New York, USA
| | - Chung-Shien Lee
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/5799Northwell Health, New Hyde Park, New York, USA.,4131St John's University College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, New York, New York, USA
| | - Angel Liu
- 4131St John's University College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, New York, New York, USA
| | - Dimitre Stefanov
- Biostatistics Unit, Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research Northwell Health, Manhasset, New York, USA
| | - Kit Cheng
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/5799Northwell Health, New Hyde Park, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Haque E, Muhsen IN, Esmail A, Umoru G, Mylavarapu C, Ajewole VB, Abdelrahim M. Case report: Efficacy and safety of regorafenib plus fluorouracil combination therapy in the treatment of refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. Front Oncol 2022; 12:992455. [PMID: 36620581 PMCID: PMC9822717 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.992455] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2022] [Accepted: 11/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background More than half of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) present with metastatic disease or develop recurrent disease on first-line and second-line options. Treatment beyond the second line remains an area of unmet need for patients with progressive or recurrent disease. Methods We retrospectively reviewed data of adult (>18 years old) patients with mCRC who received regorafenib + 5FU combination therapy at Houston Methodist Hospital with outcomes of interest including response rate, discontinuation due to side effects, and overall survival. Results Seven patients received regorafenib + 5FU combination therapy for mCRC after receiving at least two other lines of therapy (including at least one fluorouracil-based therapy). Four patients (57%) achieved disease control in 7-12 weeks after therapy initiation while three patients developed recurrent disease. In patients who achieved disease control, no new adverse events were reported among patients with this combination. Conclusion Regorafenib and Fluorouracil combination could be considered an option beyond the second line for patients with treatment-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. Further studies, including a prospective trial, are needed to investigate the efficacy and safety of regorafenib plus 5FU therapy compared to other limited available therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emaan Haque
- College of Medicine, Alfaisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ibrahim N. Muhsen
- Department of Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Abdullah Esmail
- Section of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Houston Methodist Neal Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States,*Correspondence: Maen Abdelrahim, ; Abdullah Esmail,
| | - Godsfavour Umoru
- Department of Pharmacy, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, United States,College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Texas Southern University, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Charisma Mylavarapu
- Department of Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Veronica B. Ajewole
- Department of Pharmacy, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, United States,College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Texas Southern University, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Maen Abdelrahim
- Section of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Houston Methodist Neal Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States,Cockrell Center for Advanced Therapeutic Phase I program, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX, United States,Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States,*Correspondence: Maen Abdelrahim, ; Abdullah Esmail,
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Argilés G, Mulet N, Valladares-Ayerbes M, Viéitez JM, Grávalos C, García-Alfonso P, Santos C, Tobeña M, García-Paredes B, Benavides M, Cano MT, Loupakis F, Rodríguez-Garrote M, Rivera F, Goldberg RM, Cremolini C, Bennouna J, Ciardiello F, Tabernero JM, Aranda E, Argilés G, Tabernero J. A randomised phase 2 study comparing different dose approaches of induction treatment of regorafenib in previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer patients (REARRANGE trial). Eur J Cancer 2022; 177:154-163. [PMID: 36335783 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.09.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2022] [Revised: 09/28/2022] [Accepted: 09/30/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this article is to evaluate the safety of two regorafenib dose-escalation approaches in refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with mCRC and progression during or within 3 months following their last standard chemotherapy regimen were randomised to receive the approved dose of regorafenib of 160 mg QD (arm A) or 120 mg QD (arm B) administered as 3 weeks of treatment followed by 1 week off, or 160 mg QD 1 week on/1 week off (arm C). The primary end-point was the percentage of patients with G3/G4 treatment-related adverse events (AEs) in each arm. RESULTS There were 299 patients randomly assigned to arm A (n = 101), arm B (n = 99), or arm C (n = 99); 297 initiated treatments (arm A n = 100, arm B n = 98, arm C n = 99: population for safety analyses). G3/4 treatment-related AEs occurred in 60%, 55%, and 54% of patients in arms A, B, and C, respectively. The most common G3/4 AEs were hypertension (19, 12, and 20 patients), fatigue (20, 14, and 15 patients), hypokalemia (11, 7, and 10 patients), and hand-foot skin reaction (8, 7, and 3 patients). Median overall survival was 7.4 (IQR 4.0-13.7) months in arm A, 8.6 (IQR 3.8-13.4) in arm B, and 7.1 (IQR 4.4-12.4) in arm C. CONCLUSIONS The alternative regorafenib dosing schedules were feasible and safe in patients with mCRC who had been previously treated with standard therapy. There was a higher numerical improvement on the most clinically relevant AEs in the intermittent dosing arm, particularly during the relevant first two cycles. GOV IDENTIFIER NCT02835924.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guillem Argilés
- Vall d'Hebron University Hospital and Institute of Oncology (VHIO), CIBERONC, Barcelona, Spain; Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA.
| | - Nuria Mulet
- Vall d'Hebron University Hospital and Institute of Oncology (VHIO), CIBERONC, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - José M Viéitez
- Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain
| | | | | | - Cristina Santos
- Institute Català d'Oncologia (ICO), Duran i Reynals Hospital - ONCOBELL, CIBERONC, Barcelona, Spain
| | - María Tobeña
- Santa Creu i Sant Pau Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Beatriz García-Paredes
- Clínico San Carlos Hospital, Instituto de Investigación Hospital Clinico San Carlos (IdISSC) CIBERONC, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - María T Cano
- IMIBIC, Reina Sofía Hospital, University of Córdoba, CIBERONC, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Spain
| | | | | | - Fernando Rivera
- University Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla (IDIVAL) Santander, Spain
| | | | - Chiara Cremolini
- Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Jaafar Bennouna
- University Hospital of Nantes, Digestive Oncology, Nantes, France
| | | | - Josep M Tabernero
- Vall d'Hebron University Hospital and Institute of Oncology (VHIO), CIBERONC, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Guillem Argilés
- Vall d'Hebron University Hospital and Institute of Oncology (VHIO), CIBERONC, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Josep Tabernero
- Vall d'Hebron University Hospital and Institute of Oncology (VHIO), CIBERONC, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Cho SK, Bekaii-Saab T, Kavati A, Babajanyan S, Hocum B, Barzi A. Value-Based Analysis of Therapies in Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in US. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2022; 21:277-284. [PMID: 36216759 DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2022.09.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2022] [Revised: 08/25/2022] [Accepted: 09/14/2022] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recent phase 2 trials have provided data supporting regorafenib dose optimization (ReDO) and trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) with bevacizumab (TAS-BEV) as treatment options in refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Historically, regorafenib standard dose (RSD) and TAS-102 have been utilized as third-line options in mCRC. Given the incorporation of ReDO and TAS-BEV as treatment options, we sought to evaluate relative cost-effectiveness of ReDO vs. RSD, TAS-102, and TAS-BEV for mCRC from a payer perspective. METHODS A Markov model was constructed to estimate total costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) for ReDO, RSD, TAS-102, and TAS-BEV. Clinical parameters were obtained from phase 2 and 3 trials for comparators. Health state utility values were from the RSD phase 3 clinical trial. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were utilized to compare treatments. Model robustness was checked with one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. RESULTS In the base case, ReDO was dominant over TAS-BEV (ie provided a higher QALY at a lower cost). ReDO produced an ICER of $104,308 per QALY relative to RSD and $37,966 relative to TAS-102. In one-way sensitivity analyses, monthly drug cost of TAS-BEV was the most influential parameter determining relative cost-effectiveness between TAS-BEV and ReDO. When TAS-102 and RSD were independently compared to ReDO, the most influential parameters were related to duration of OS and PFS and costs of managing AEs. CONCLUSIONS The optimum dosing strategy for regorafenib has improved its benefit-to-toxicity ratio and relative cost-effectiveness compared to RSD, TAS-102, and TAS-BEV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sang Kyu Cho
- University of Houston College of Pharmacy, Houston, TX.
| | | | | | | | - Brian Hocum
- Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc., Whippany, NJ
| | | |
Collapse
|