Characterisation and classification of oligometastatic disease: a European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology and European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer consensus recommendation

1-year efficacy results after MR-guided risk-adapted stereotactic radiotherapy of infra-diaphragmatic oligometastases in a multicenter phase II trial

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The SOFT (Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy of infra-diaphragmatic sOFT tissue metastases) trial assesses the safety and efficacy of risk-adapted MR-guided stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) of infra-diaphragmatic soft tissue metastasis in patients with oligometastatic disease (OMD) (clinicaltrials.gov ID NCT04407897). This paper reports the one-year efficacy analysis and evaluates associations between local control (LC) and clinical and dosimetric parameters.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This investigator-initiated, multicenter, single-arm, phase 2 study recruited patients from four MR-linac centers in Denmark and the US. Patients with De novo or recurrent OMD with ≤5 metastases in ≤3 organs and patients with induced OMD or oligoprogressive disease (OPD) with ≤3 metastases were eligible. Fractionation schemes were 45-75 Gy in 3-8 fractions.

RESULTS

The trial included 121 patients with 147 oligometastatic lesions, primarily in the liver (41 %), lymph nodes (35 %), or adrenal glands (14 %). The median follow-up time was 13.0 months, interquartile range (IQR) (11.7,13.7) months. The 1-year LC rate was 89 %, 95 % confidence interval (CI) (83,94 %). We did not observe any statistically significant associations between LC and clinical and dosimetric parameters. The median progression-free survival was 7.1 months, 95 % CI (6.0,9.4). One- and two-year overall survival was 82.6 %, 95 % CI (76.2 %,89.7 %), and 65.1 %, 95 % CI (56.4 %,75.3 %). Sixty-one patients (50 %) were kept off systemic therapy throughout the one-year follow-up.

CONCLUSION

In our study, treatment with risk-adapted, MR-guided SABR resulted in a high one-year local control and survival rate and could keep half of the patients off systemic therapy within the first year of follow-up.

A Randomized, Multicenter, Phase 2 Trial of Camrelizumab With or Without Metastasis-directed Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in Recurrent or Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

PURPOSE

To investigate the efficacy of metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) when added to camrelizumab (Cam) in patients with recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (R/M-NPC).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We conducted a randomized, controlled, multicenter, phase 2 trial in 3 centers from China (NCT04830267). Patients with R/M-NPC, without prior exposure to immunotherapy, who presented with ≥2 lesions, and at least 1 measurable lesion were randomized 1:1 to either Cam alone or Cam plus MDT (Cam+MDT). Patients randomized to the MDT group must have 1 lesion that is amendable to stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) prescribed to 27 Gy in 3 fractions every other day. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) of unirradiated lesions using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v1.1.

RESULTS

Between April 2021 and August 2023, 39 patients were randomly assigned to receive either Cam (n = 20) or Cam+MDT (n = 19). In total, 17 out of 39 (43.6%) patients had oligometastatic disease (≤3 lesions), 18 out of 39 (46.2%) had liver involvement, and 3 out of 39 (7.7%) had locoregional recurrent disease. ORR of unirradiated lesions did not differ between the treatment groups (26.3% [Cam+MDT] vs 30.0% [Cam], P = 1.0). The disease control rate of unirradiated lesions was 73.7% in the Cam+MDT group compared with 60.0% in the Cam group (P = .571). After a median follow-up of 25.8 months, median progression-free survival was 9.3 (95% CI, 6.2-not reached [NR]) months in the Cam+MDT group and 8.8 (95% CI, 3.3-NR) months in the Cam group (P = .750). Exploratory analyses suggested a longer overall survival (OS) with Cam+MDT for patients with >3 lesions (HR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.07-0.77; P = .009). G3 and above adverse events were comparable between the treatment groups (15.8% [Cam+MDT] vs 20.0% [Cam]). The overall rate of capillary proliferation was 17.9% (7/39) for the trial.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study did not meet its primary endpoint of superior ORR of unirradiated lesions with the addition of MDT to Cam in patients with R/M-NPC.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy for lung-only oligometastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: Long-term clinical outcome and favorable predictive factors

BACKGROUND

Oligometastatic disease in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is a rare setting. Local ablative therapies are the most adopted strategies although no evidence-based recommendations are currently published. We report on long-term clinical outcomes of a cohort of HNSCC patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for lung-only oligometastatic disease.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Eligible patients had 1-5 lung metastases. The oligometastatic pattern was classified as "de novo" or "induced oligoprogressive". We evaluated time to progression (TTP) as the time from the last day of SBRT to disease progression or death from any cause. Predictive factors of better clinical outcome and survival analysis were performed.

RESULTS

A cohort of 50 patients (52 metastases) was retrospectively evaluated. The median age was 68 years and 45 patients had an ECOG PS 0-1. Oropharynx cancer was the primary tumor subsite in 20 patients and HPV positive status was reported in 13 patients. "De novo" oligometastatic pattern was observed for the majority of patients. After a median follow up of 24,5 months, median TTP and overall survival (OS) from the end of SBRT were 17 months and 46 months, respectively. The 2-years LC rates was 86 %. At univariate analysis, patients aged > 70 years reported a better TTP (0.03).

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggested that SBRT may improve clinical outcome prolonging time to progression in a properly selected cohort of HNSCC patients with lung-only oligometastatic disease. Distant metastases from HPV-related primary HNSCC should be tested for p16/HPV status.

Stereotactic Ablative Radiation Therapy for Oligometastatic Ovarian Cancer Lymph Node Disease: The MITO-RT3/RAD Phase II Trial

PURPOSE

MITO-RT3/RAD (NCT04593381) is a prospective multicenter phase 2 trial designed to assess the effectiveness and safety of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in patients who received diagnoses of oligometastatic ovarian cancer. In this report, we provide the results of the trial in the setting of lymph node disease.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The primary endpoint was the complete response (CR) rate, secondary endpoints included local control (LC), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, treatment-free interval, and toxicity rates. The sample size was based on a previous study reporting an average 70.0% CR with SBRT. The study was powered to detect an improvement in the CR rate from 70.0% to 85.0%, with an α error of 0.05 (one-side) and a β error of 0.1.

RESULTS

The study met its primary endpoint of a statistically significant improvement in CR. One hundred thirty-five patients with 249 lesions were enrolled across 15 institutions from May 2019 to November 2023. CRs were observed in 194 lesions (77.9%), partial responses in 40 (16.1%), stable disease in 14 (5.6%), and progressive disease in 1 lesion (0.4%). The objective response rate was 94%, with an overall clinical benefit rate of 99.6%. CR lesions exhibited a significantly higher LC rate than partial or not responding lesions (12-month LC: 92.7% vs 63.1%, P < .001). The 12-month actuarial rates for PFS and for overall survival were 36.6% (CR, 38.3% vs not-CR, 18.8%; P, .022) and 97.2% (CR, 97.8% vs not-CR, 93.8%; P, .067), respectively. The 12-month actuarial rate for treatment-free interval was 52.7% (CR, 58.4% vs not-CR, 24.4%; P, .004). CR was substantially associated with higher PFS (P, .036) and treatment-free interval (P, .006) rates in the univariate analysis. Twenty-three patients (17.0%) experienced mild acute toxicity. Late toxicity was reported in 9 patients (6.7%), mostly grade 1.

CONCLUSIONS

This trial confirms the efficacy of ablative SBRT, with minimal toxicity observed. SBRT offered a high CR rate, promising long-term outcomes, and a significant systemic therapy-free survival period for complete responders.

Patterns of failure after stereotactic body radiotherapy to non-spine bone metastases

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has proven useful for non-spine bone metastases (NSBM). We analyzed local relapse rates and patterns of failure after NSBM-SBRT, contrasting our results with existing contouring guidelines.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of NSBM-SBRT treatments performed between 2013 and 2024 in a single institution. Clinical, pathologic, and treatment-related data were collected. Failure patterns were assessed based on imaging tests and categorized as in-field, marginal/out-of-field.

RESULTS

Among 119 NSBM-SBRT treatments in 85 patients, the most common primary tumors were prostate (36.1%) and breast cancer (24.4%). The coxal bone was the predominant metastatic site (52.9%). The median follow-up was 32.8 months. OS rates at 1, 2, and 3 years were 90.1%, 83.5%, and 75.8%, respectively. Twenty seven relapses were observed in the treated bone with a median recurrent tumor volume of 9.9 cm3 and a median time to recurrence of 15.1 months. Relapse-free survival in the treated bone was 89.4%, 78.5%, and 74.2% at 1, 2, and 3 years, respectively. Median recurrent tumor volume within the CTV was 50.6% and the median distance from the relapse center to the initial tumor was 11.4 mm.

CONCLUSION

NSBM-SBRT provides effective local control with relapses often occurring near the initial tumor lesion. While adherence to existing contouring guidelines captures most scenarios, consideration of larger CTV expansions may be warranted in cases with poorer prognosis. Further studies are needed to identify risk factors for relapses outside the margins and optimize volume delineation in these scenarios.

Impact of HER2-targeting antibody drug conjugates in treatment strategies for patients with breast cancer

Antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel drugs that exert specific cytotoxicity against breast cancer. Although ADCs such as trastuzumab emtansine and trastuzumab deruxtecan have significantly improved survival for patients with breast cancer expressing HER2, there is still controversy over options after ADCs. The radiotherapy and ablation should also be used as an effective strategy for oligoprogressions. Herein, we conducted a review of ADCs, and then discussed several strategies to maximize the potential benefit to patients with HER2 expression breast cancer.

Oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer: Impact of local and contemporary systemic treatment approaches on clinical outcome

Oligometastatic (OMD) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a distinct but heterogeneous entity. Current guidelines recommend systemic therapy and consolidation with local ablative therapy (LAT). However, evidence regarding the optimal choice of multimodal treatment approaches is lacking, in particular with respect to the integration of immunotherapy. This real-world study identified 218 patients with OMD NSCLC (2004-2023, prespecified criteria: ≤5 metastases in ≤2 organ systems) from three major German comprehensive cancer centers. Most patients had one (72.5%) or two (17.4%) metastatic lesions in a single (89.9%) organ system. Overall survival (OS) was significantly longer with a single metastatic lesion (HR 0.54, p = .003), and female gender (HR 0.4, p < .001). Median OS of the full cohort was 27.8 months, with 29% survival at 5 years. Patients who had completed LAT to all NSCLC sites, typically excluding patients with early progression, had a median OS of 34.4 months (37.7% 5-year OS rate) with a median recurrence-free survival (RFS) of 10.9 months (13.3% at 5 years). In those patients, systemic treatment as part of first-line therapy was associated with doubling of RFS (12.3 vs. 6.4 months, p < .001). Despite limited follow-up of patients receiving chemo-immunotherapy (EU approval 2018/2019), RFS was greatly improved by adding checkpoint inhibitors to chemotherapy (HR 0.44, p = .008, 2-year RFS 51.4% vs. 15.1%). In conclusion, patients with OMD NSCLC benefitted from multimodality approaches integrating systemic therapy and local ablation of all cancer sites. A substantial proportion of patients achieved extended OS, suggesting a potential for cure that can be further augmented with the addition of immunotherapy.

Treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma after immunotherapy

Immunotherapy has revolutionized the treatment landscape for advanced HCC, resulting in prolonged response and improved survival. With these results, a pressing question arises: what is the optimal treatment following first-line immunotherapy? Despite the benefits of immunotherapy, most patients will experience disease progression within six months and will require subsequent therapies. International guidelines recommend second-line multi-kinase inhibitors following progression on immunotherapy; however, this recommendation is primarily based on expert consensus rather than high-quality evidence. Nevertheless, real-world data indicate that these agents demonstrate similar efficacy and safety when used as first-line treatments. Conversely, it remains unclear whether continuing immunotherapy after progression is beneficial. In some cases, adding anti-CTLA-4 as salvage therapy has shown effectiveness. Molecular-directed therapies have also been tested, showing some initial promise, but further data is needed to confirm the benefits of this approach. Emerging evidence suggests that patients experiencing oligoprogression may benefit from local or locoregional therapies while continuing immunotherapy. In this review, we will discuss treatment strategies following progression after first-line immunotherapy.

The Impact of Ultracentral Tumor Location on Outcomes in Patients with Pulmonary Oligometastases: A Secondary Analysis of the Single-Arm Phase 2 SABR-5 Trial

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES

There are limited data on outcomes in patients with ultracentral pulmonary oligometastases treated with SABR. The purpose of this study was to determine whether ultracentral location was prognostic for toxicity and survival.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Oligometastatic lung lesions treated on the single-arm phase 2 SABR-5 trial were retrospectively stratified into 2 cohorts: ultracentral tumors (UC), defined as planning target volume overlap or direct tumor abutment to the proximal bronchial tree, esophagus, great vessels, or heart, and nonultracentral tumors. Cohorts were compared with respect to grade ≥ 2 toxicity, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

In total, 41 patients with 45 ultracentral metastases and 93 patients with 172 nonultracentral metastases underwent SABR. The most common primary histologies were colorectal (30%), lung (13%), and renal (13%), and these did not differ between groups. Patients with UC had a lower median PFS of 5.8 months compared with 15.8 months in patients with non ultracentral tumors (P < .001). OS was also worse in the UC cohort: median 29.0 months versus not yet reached (P < .001). On multivariable regression, UC remained prognostic for worse PFS (hazard ratio 2.18, P = .004) and OS (hazard ratio 3.45, P < .001). Groups had similar rates of local tumor control. Patients with UC had higher 2-year cumulative incidence of polymetastatic progression: 69.2% versus 31.4% (P < .001). The 2-year cumulative incidence of grade ≥ 2 toxicity was 14.6% for patients with UC and 9.8% for patients with nonultracentral tumors (P = .74). There were no grade 4 or 5 toxicities.

CONCLUSIONS

In this prospective patient cohort, SABR for ultracentral tumor had low toxicity rates and good local control. However, ultracentral location was an adverse prognostic feature for survival. This finding should be validated with larger studies and may be a factor when weighing the benefit versus risk of SABR in patients with pulmonary oligometastases.

Recent developments in the field of radiotherapy for the management of lung cancer

Lung cancer has a poor prognosis, and further improvements in outcomes are needed. Radiotherapy plays an important role in the treatment of unresectable lung cancer, and there have been recent developments in the field of radiotherapy for the management of lung cancer. However, to date, there have been few reviews on the improvement in treatment outcomes associated with high precision radiotherapy for lung cancer. Thus, this review aimed to summarize the recent developments in radiotherapy techniques and indicate the future directions in the use of radiotherapy for lung cancer. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for unresectable stage I lung cancer has been reported to improve local control rates without severe adverse events, such as radiation pneumonitis. For locally advanced lung cancer, a combination of chemoradiotherapy and adjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors dramatically improves treatment outcomes, and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) enables safer radiation therapy with less frequent pneumonitis. Particle beam therapy, such as carbon-ion radiotherapy and proton beam therapy, has been administered as advanced medical care for patients with lung cancer. Since 2024, it has been covered under insurance for early stage lung cancer with tumors ≤ 5 cm in size in Japan. In addition to chemotherapy, local ablative radiotherapy improves treatment outcomes in patients with oligometastatic stage IV lung cancer. A particular problem with radiotherapy for lung cancer is that the target location changes with respiratory motion, and various physical methods have been used to control respiratory motion. Recently, coronavirus disease has had a major impact on lung cancer treatment, and cancer treatment during situations, such as the coronavirus pandemic, must be performed carefully. To improve treatment outcomes for lung cancer, it is necessary to fully utilize evolving radiotherapy modalities, and the role of radiotherapy in lung cancer treatment is expected to increase.

Real-world outcomes of PARP inhibitor maintenance in advanced ovarian cancer: a focus on disease patterns and treatment modalities at recurrence

BACKGROUND

The utilization of poly-ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (PARPi) as a first-line maintenance therapy for advanced ovarian cancer has increased significantly, with ∼80% of patients potentially eligible. This expansion has led to a rise in the population experiencing platinum-sensitive recurrence, yet data on first recurrence during PARPi are limited. This real-world study from a high-volume referral center aims to elucidate recurrence rates, disease distribution, and treatment modalities at the time of progression in PARPi-treated patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We analyzed our prospectively maintained database to identify patients receiving first-line PARPi maintenance from January 2019 to December 2022 at our institution.

RESULTS

A total of 373 cases were identified, 51.5% of which had a BRCA mutation. With a median follow-up of 38 months, 44.8% of patients experienced recurrence, with 90.3% having a platinum-free interval exceeding 6 months. Recurrences were oligometastatic in 44.9% of cases, with BRCA mutations strongly predicting this pattern (hazard ratio 3.014, confidence interval 1.486-6.113, P = 0.002). The median progression-free survival was 39 months, significantly longer for BRCA-mutated and homologous recombination deficiency-positive patients. Over one-third of platinum-sensitive recurrent patients were candidates for local treatments, and PARPi administration was prolonged in 53.7%.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the notable survival improvement, a significant proportion of the population will experience a platinum-sensitive recurrence on PARPi, for which local treatments are often a viable option. Our study highlights the need for further research to determine whether the ablation of oligometastatic sites has a significant impact on post-recurrence survival and to identify if there are patient categories that would benefit from personalized follow-up due to their susceptibility to oligometastatic recurrences and local treatments.

Thoracic Radiotherapy Improves the Survival in Patients With EGFR-Mutated Oligo-Organ Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated With Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors: A Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled, Phase III Trial

PURPOSE

This multicenter, randomized, phase III clinical trial (Northern Radiation Oncology Group of China-002) focused on patients with oligo-organ metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations. We aimed to investigate whether first-line concurrent thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) and EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), compared with TKIs alone, could achieve better survival.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The patients in the TKI plus TRT group received 60 Gy to primary lung tumor and positive regional lymph nodes. Radiotherapy for metastases to other sites was determined by clinicians. The primary end point was the progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points included overall survival (OS) and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). The first and second interim analyses were performed in March 2021 and March 2022.

RESULTS

Between April 14, 2016, and February 25, 2022, a total of 118 patients were enrolled. Compared with the TKI alone group, the TKI plus TRT group achieved significantly better PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.57; P = .004) and OS (HR, 0.62; P = .029). The median PFS was 10.6 months in the TKI alone group and 17.1 months in the TKI plus TRT group. The median OS was 26.2 months and 34.4 months in the TKI alone group and TKI plus TRT group, respectively. The TKI plus TRT group showed better local control but was associated with a higher incidence of severe TRAEs (11.9% v 5.1%).

CONCLUSION

For patients with EGFR-mutated oligo-organ metastatic NSCLC treated with first-line EGFR-TKIs, concurrent TRT improves the PFS and OS, and TRAEs are acceptable and tolerable.

Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Oligoprogressive Ovarian Cancer Patients Treated During Poly(ADP-Ribose)-Polymerase Inhibitor Maintenance: Efficacy and Adverse Events From the Epimetheo Retrospective Study

PURPOSE

The aim of this observational, retrospective, multicenter study (Epimetheo) was to analyze the activity and the safety of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) during poly(ADP-ribose)-polymerase inhibitor (PARPi) maintenance in a series of oligometastatic ovarian cancer (OC) patients.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients treated with PARPi in maintenance setting received SBRT if oligometastatic progression occurred. Maintenance treatment was continued until the extensive progression of the disease. The primary endpoints of the study were as follows: next systemic treatment change-free survival (NEST-FS) and acute and late toxicity; the secondary endpoints were as follows: the rate of clinical complete response (CR), the 2-year actuarial local control (LC, progression of disease inside SBRT field) rate on "per lesion" basis, the 2-year actuarial progression-free survival, and 2-year overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

From April 2018 to September 2023, SBRT was used to treat 74 OC patients with a total of 158 lesions (98 lymph nodes and 60 parenchymal lesions) under PARPi maintenance. Olaparib, niraparib, and rucaparib were administered to 41.9%, 48.6%, and 9.5% of patients, respectively. CR, partial response, stable disease, and progressive disease were observed in 115 (72.8%), 32 (20.3%), 9 (5.7%), and 2 lesions (1.3%), respectively. Severe toxicities were reported in less than 3% of patients. The actuarial median NEST-FS was 10 months, with a range of 6.7-13.3 months. The 12- and 24-month actuarial NEST-FS rates were 44.9% and 31.4%, respectively. The 2-year actuarial LC, progression-free survival, and OS were 68.1%, 22.5%, and 77%, respectively with differences in figures between complete and incomplete responders. The achievement of CR was found to be correlated with an improvement in LC and OS.

CONCLUSIONS

This study reports the activity and the low toxicity profile of SBRT in association with PARPi in oligometastatic OC patients. A rapid, minimally invasive, and cost-effective treatment such as SBRT may be proposed as a means of prolonging NEST-FS and maintaining an effective treatment regimen involving PARPi.

The Role of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Oligoprogressive Malignant Disease (RADIANT): Oncologic Outcomes From a Phase 2 Nonrandomized Controlled Trial

PURPOSE

In oligoprogressive (OP) cancer, there are a limited number of metastatic areas progressing on a background of stable or responding to widespread cancer. Although the standard of care for OP is changing systemic therapy (ST), stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is being explored as an alternative local therapy targeting the sites of progression.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

RADIANT (NCT04122469) was a single-center phase 2 study of patients with metastatic genitourinary (GU), breast, and gastrointestinal (GI) cancers, receiving ST for ≥3 months, with radiographic OP disease in ≤5 sites. Patients received SBRT for all OP disease in 1 to 5 fractions and were maintained on ST. The primary endpoint was the cumulative incidence of change in ST, which was estimated using the Aalen-Johansen method. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, as well as toxicity and health-related quality of life. Comparisons between diagnosis groups were done using the log-rank test. A 2-sided p value <.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Seventy patients were analyzed, with a median age of 69 years; 32 patients (46%) were women; the median number of lines of prior ST was 3. Primary sites were GU (n = 32; 46%), breast (n = 23; 33%), and GI (n = 15; 21%). The median follow-up was 12.3 months (IQR, 8.2-21.6 months). At 1 year, change in ST occurred in 47% (95% CI, 36%-61%) (GU 45%, breast 41%, and GI 60%; p = .23). PFS at 1 year was 32% (95% CI, 23%-45%), and median PFS was 4.7 months (95% CI, 3.8-8.1) (GU 4.8, breast 6.5, and GI 3.2), which significantly differed by disease type (p = .006). Overall survival was 75% at 1 year (95% CI, 65%-87%), which significantly differed between cancer types (GU 86%, breast 96%, and GI 22%; p < .001). The cumulative incidence of late grade ≥2 toxicity was 1.2%, with 1 patient experiencing late grade 3 toxicity and no grade 4 to 5 acute or late toxicities. Health-related quality of life declined from the mean (SD) of 66.9 (20.2) at baseline to 60.5 (22.2) at 6 months, which did not meet the threshold for a minimal clinically important difference.

CONCLUSIONS

SBRT for OP metastases delayed change in ST in approximately half of patients, warranting investigation in randomized trials.

Future directions in the evaluation and management of newly diagnosed metastatic cancer

There is a much debate regarding optimal selection in patients with metastatic cancer who should undergo local treatment (surgery or radiation treatment) to the primary tumor and/or metastases. Additionally, the optimal treatment of newly diagnosed metastatic cancer is largely unclear. Current prognostication systems to best inform these clinical scenarios are limited, as all metastatic patients are grouped together as having Stage IV disease without further incorporation of patient and disease-specific covariates that significantly impact patient outcomes. Therefore, improving current prognostic scoring systems and incorporation of these covariates is essential to best individualize treatment for patients with metastatic cancer. In this narrative review article, we provide a detailed review of prognostication systems that can be used for both the site of metastasis and primary site to best tailor treatment in these patients. Additionally, we discuss the incorporation and ongoing developments in radiographic, genomic, and biostatistical techniques that can be used as prognostication tools.

Evolving Paradigms in the Treatment of Oligometastatic Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

Multiple randomized trials have suggested that the addition of comprehensive metastasis-directed therapy to best systemic therapy improves disease control and survival among patients with oligometastatic disease, even for histologies with a high propensity for rapid spread. Here, we review the growing literature supporting the oligometastatic paradigm in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. We summarize key details from nascent institutional series and reflect on the recently reported phase II randomized EXTEND trial. We discuss various strategies for enhancing the clinical and technical implementation of metastasis-directed therapy in this patient population. Lastly, we highlight multiple ongoing landmark trials seeking to optimize and validate the role of metastasis-directed therapy in oligometastatic pancreatic cancer. Ultimately, these and other continued clinical and translational research efforts will be critical to improve care and outcomes for patients with oligometastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Metastasis-directed stereotactic radiotherapy and systemic treatment continuation for patients with oligoprogressive metastatic breast cancer

BACKGROUND

About 15-20 % of patients with metastatic breast cancer (mBC) can experience oligoprogressive disease (OPD) in ≤ 5 sites of disease. Patients with OPD may benefit from metastasis-directed stereotactic radiotherapy (SBRT) to all sites of cancer progression while maintaining the same systemic treatment, aiming to prolong the time to next systemic treatment (NEST). This study aims to assess the outcomes provided by this multimodal strategy.

METHODS

Prospective-retrospective, single-center, cohort study including consecutive patients who received SBRT to all extracranial OPD sites (≤ 5), from January 2011 to June 2023, without changing systemic therapy, according to the multidisciplinary tumor board's indication. The primary endpoint was post-radiotherapy progression-free survival (pRT-PFS). A sample size of 130 patients was needed to estimate a median pRT-PFS of 8 months with a 95 % confidence interval (95 %CI) ranging from 5.4 (considered clinically significant) to 10.6 months.

RESULTS

129 patients were included: 99 (77 %) had hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative (HR+/HER2-) disease, 116 (90 %) had ≤ 2 oligoprogressive lesions, 118 (91 %) presented with non-visceral OPD involving bones or lymph nodes. Patients experienced OPD after a median PFS on systemic therapy (pre-OPD PFS) of 11.3 months (95 % CI, 8.7-13.0). Median pRT-PFS was 11.3 months (95 % CI, 9.1-13.5) and median NEST was 13.6 months (95 % CI, 11.5-15.2). Only 19 (15 %) patients experienced a subsequent PD in the OPD sites treated with SBRT.

CONCLUSION

Patients with oligoprogressive mBC, especially with HR+/HER2- disease and non-visceral OPD after a durable pre-OPD PFS, benefit from OPD-directed SBRT while maintaining the same systemic treatment, suggesting its broader implementation in clinical practice.

Maintaining First-Line Therapy Plus Radiation Therapy May Prolong Progression-Free Survival and Delay Second-Line Therapy for Oligoprogressive Hepatocellular Carcinoma

PURPOSE

Optimal treatment strategies for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma with oligoprogression after first-line systemic therapy (FLST) remain undefined. We aimed to determine whether maintaining (ie, continuing) FLST plus radiation therapy (RT) for oligoprogressive lesions (m-FLST + RT) would result in progression-free survival (PFS) equal to or greater than that of second-line systemic therapy (s-SLST), either alone or with RT (s-SLST + RT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From October 2018 to February 2024, 154 patients from 7 medical centers who developed oligoprogression after FLST were enrolled and assigned to 1 of 3 groups based on post-oligoprogression treatment strategy: m-FLST + RT, s-SLST + RT, or s-SLST-only. The primary outcome was PFS, and early patterns of recurrence were noted.

RESULTS

At a median follow-up time of 8.4 months, the median PFS time was longer in the m-FLST + RT group (8.6 months) compared with the s-SLS-only group (3.1 months) (hazard ratio, 3.163; 95% CI, 2.133-4.690; P < .001) and the s-SLST + RT group (5.8 months) (hazard ratio, 2.183; 95% CI, 1.110-4.293; P = .006). Multivariate Cox analysis demonstrated that albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) grade and postoligoprogression treatment strategy were independent prognostic factors for PFS. Stratified analysis by ALBI grade showed that m-FLST + RT resulted in significantly longer median PFS in patients with both ALBI-1 and ALBI-2 compared with s-SLST-only (P < .001). Regarding subsequent patterns of relapse, the m-FLST + RT group had a lower rate of re-enlargement of recently oligoprogressive lesions (27.6%) than the s-SLST + RT (31.8%) and s-SLST-only (50.0%) groups. It also had the lowest rate of re-enlargement of previously identified metastases that did not progress during FLST (13.8%) compared with s-SLRT + RT (27.3%) and s-SLST-only (24.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests a potential clinical benefit of m-FLST + RT without the need for s-SLST and provides insights to optimize treatment strategies for oligoprogressive hepatocellular carcinoma.

Prostate Cancer: A Journey Through Its History and Recent Developments

Prostate cancer is one of the most common diseases among men worldwide and continues to pose a serious threat to health. This review shows the history and the new developments in the management of prostate cancer, with an emphasis on a range of therapeutic approaches, such as hormone therapy, radiation therapy, surgery, and innovative targeted therapeutics. The evolution of these treatments is examined in light of clinical outcomes, patient quality of life, and emerging resistance mechanisms, such as the recently shown vitamin D-based strategies. New developments that have the potential to increase survival rates and reduce side effects are also discussed, including PARP inhibitors (PARPis), immunotherapy, and tailored medication. Additionally, the use of biomarkers and sophisticated imaging methods in therapeutic decision-making is explored, with a focus on how these tools might improve patient care. The absolute necessity for a multidisciplinary approach for improving treatment strategies is becoming more and more apparent as our understanding of the biology of prostate cancer deepens. This approach ensures that patients receive customized medicines that fit their unique profiles. Future avenues of investigation will focus on resolving issues dealing with treatment efficacy and resistance to improve treatment results, ultimately leading to disease cure for prostate cancer patients.

Single-arm multicenter phase II study on aggressive local consolidative therapy in combination with systemic chemotherapy for stage IV non-small cell lung carcinoma with oligometastases: CURE-OLIGO (TORG1529)

INTRODUCTION

Stage IV non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) with oligometastases is potentially curable by radical treatment. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for thoracic disease, including the primary lesion and lymph node metastases, combined with local consolidative therapy (LCT) for oligometastases.

METHODS

This was a multicenter Phase II trial for patients with Stage IV NSCLC with oligometastases for whom CRT for thoracic disease was feasible. The treatment procedures included CRT containing platinum-doublet for thoracic disease and LCT for oligometastases within 8 weeks of starting or completing CRT. The primary endpoint was the 2-year survival rate.

RESULTS

We enrolled 19 patients between June 2016 and May 2020. The median age was 68 (range: 51-74) years. Twelve patients had adenocarcinoma, and 6 had squamous cell carcinoma. The metastasis sites included the brain, bone, adrenal gland, lung, and cervical lymph node (n = 9, 7, 2, 1, and 1, respectively). All patients completed CRT concurrently with LCT for all oligometastases. There were 11 partial responses, resulting in a response rate of 58% (95% confidence interval [CI] 33.5-79.7%). Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 8.6 (95% CI 7.0-10.2) and 42.1 (80% CI 13.6-not reached) months, respectively. The 2-year survival rate was 68.4% (80% CI 52.6%-79.9%). Fourteen patients (74%) showed progression with newly observed lesions. There were no severe adverse events, and toxicities were tolerable.

CONCLUSION

Chemotherapy in combination with aggressive LCT for NSCLC with oligometastases might extend survival and achieve local control.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

University Hospital Medical Information Network, Japan (protocol identification number: UMIN000022431, first registration date: 01/JUN/2016).

Pulmonary Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy of Oligometastatic Head-and-Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Multicenter Retrospective Study

PURPOSE

The value of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in patients with oligometastatic head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) remains unclear, as existing evidence is primarily derived from retrospective single-center analyses with small patient cohorts. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of pulmonary SBRT in patients with oligometastatic HNSCC and to identify factors associated with survival.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

This trinational multicenter cohort study, including 16 centers from Germany, Austria, and Switzerland, retrospectively analyzed patients with oligometastatic HNSCC undergoing SBRT for pulmonary metastases between 2010 and 2023. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes included progression-free survival and incidence of local failures.

RESULTS

A total of 178 patients with 284 irradiated lung metastases were analyzed. The most common primary HNSCC subsites were oropharyngeal (n = 71), laryngeal (n = 37), and hypopharyngeal (n = 31). Lung metastases were treated with a median biologically effective dose (BEDα/β=10 Gy) of 105 Gy (IQR, 84-113) at the planning target volume periphery. After a median follow-up of 40 months (95% CI, 34-46), the median OS and progression-free survival were 33 months (95% CI, 26-40) and 9 months (95% CI, 7-11), respectively. The 1-year cumulative incidence of local failures was 5.5% (95% CI, 3.2-8.8). One patient (0.6%) developed acute grade 3 dysphagia, and among 146 patients assessed for chronic toxicities, 2 (1.4%) experienced grade 3 events, with no grade 4-5 toxicities. On multivariable analysis, older (>65 years) patients (hazard ratio [HR], 1.59; 95% CI, 1.02-2.49; P = .040) and females (HR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.04-2.99; P = .035) exhibited worse OS, whereas longer time between HNSCC diagnosis and first SBRT was associated with longer OS (HR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.99-1.00; P = .045).

CONCLUSION

SBRT for pulmonary metastases achieves excellent local control with minimal toxicity in patients with oligometastatic HNSCC. Prospective trials are needed to determine the optimal timing for integrating SBRT with systemic treatment.

Oligometastatic Esophagogastric Cancer: Does It Exist and How Do We Treat It?

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW

This narrative review aims to provide an overview of recently completed randomized trials and expert consensus recommendations, and their implications for clinical practice and future trial design in patients with de-novo esophagogastric oligometastatic disease (OMD).

RECENT FINDINGS

The IKF-575/RENAISSANCE phase III trial showed no significant overall survival difference between systemic therapy alone and systemic therapy combined with local therapy for patients with gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer and de-novo OMD, except for patients with retroperitoneal lymph node metastases only. The ESO-Shanghai 13 phase II trial demonstrated superiority of adding local therapy to systemic therapy for progression-free and overall survival in oligometastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. The OMEC project developed a multidisciplinary European consensus for OMD, proposing a restrictive definition of OMD. Clinical trial assessing the optimal treatment of care are urgently needed. The findings highlight the importance of strict patient selection for local metastasis-directed treatment and the need for stratifying patients based on histology and location of metastases. Future research should focus on identifying biomarkers and clinical features to guide multidisciplinary treatment approaches for OMD.

The efficacy of screening with FDG-PET/CT for distant metastases in breast cancer patients scheduled for neoadjuvant systemic therapy

PURPOSE

This study aims to identify which breast cancer patients benefit from the routine use of FDG-PET/CT in a large cohort of patients scheduled for neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST).

METHODS

A total of 1337 breast cancer patients eligible for NST were identified from a retrospective database between 2011 and 2020 at a single tertiary care hospital. All patients underwent staging with FDG-PET/CT prior to NST. The incidence and extent of asymptomatic distant metastases in different patient subgroups were determined, as well as the impact on treatment. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify prognostic patient and tumor characteristics.

RESULTS

FDG-PET/CT detected distant metastases in 109 patients (8%). Initial clinical stage was a prognostic factor for the presence of distant metastases, with a significantly higher risk for stage 2b and 3 as opposed to lower stages (p < 0.001). The incidence of distant metastases was 3% (4/125) for stage 1, 2% (8/534) for stage 2a, 7% (24/354) for stage 2b and 23% (73/324) for stage 3. Other characteristics such as age, tumor subtype, histological type and grade were not correlated with the risk of distant metastases. Among the subset of patients with distant metastases, 46% received palliative treatment, while the remaining 54% were diagnosed with oligometastatic breast cancer and were treated with curative intent.

CONCLUSION

The results of the current study support the routine use of FDG-PET/CT for the detection of distant metastases in breast cancer patients with initial clinical stage 2b and 3, regardless of tumor subtype.

Multimodal Imaging Approach for Tumor Treatment Response Evaluation in the Era of Immunotherapy

ABSTRACT

Immunotherapy is likely the most remarkable advancement in lung cancer treatment during the past decade. Although immunotherapy provides substantial benefits, their therapeutic responses differ from those of conventional chemotherapy and targeted therapy, and some patients present unique immunotherapy response patterns that cannot be judged under the current measurement standards. Therefore, the response monitoring of immunotherapy can be challenging, such as the differentiation between real response and pseudo-response. This review outlines the various tumor response patterns to immunotherapy and discusses methods for quantifying computed tomography (CT) and 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET) in the field of lung cancer. Emerging technologies in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and non-FDG PET tracers are also explored. With immunotherapy responses, the role for imaging is essential in both anatomical radiological responses (CT/MRI) and molecular changes (PET imaging). Multiple aspects must be considered when assessing treatment responses using CT and PET. Finally, we introduce multimodal approaches that integrate imaging and nonimaging data, and we discuss future directions for the assessment and prediction of lung cancer responses to immunotherapy.

Predictors of brain metastases in patients with oligometastatic solid tumours treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy

PURPOSE

In patients with oligometastatic disease (OMD) treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), those who develop brain metastases (BrM) may have poor outcomes. We aimed to investigate variables associated with BrM development in this population.

METHODS

Patients with ≤ 5 extracranial metastases from solid tumors treated with SBRT from 2008 to 2016 at Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre were included. We investigated the association between covariates and CIBrM (cumulative incidence of BrM) using Fine-Gray analysis, and progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) using Cox regression. We investigated the association between extracranial progression and CIBrM using time-based conditional analysis.

RESULTS

Among 404 patients, the most common primary sites were lung, colorectal, prostate, breast and kidney. Median follow-up was 49 months. Median PFS was 25 months. Median OS was 70 months. 58 patients developed BrM, and 5-year CIBrM was 16%. On multivariable analysis, number of extracranial metastases, location of metastases, total planning target volume (PTV), and time from primary diagnosis to OMD were not associated with CIBrM, although several of these variables were associated with extracranial PFS and OS. Primary site was associated with CIBrM, with colorectal and prostate cancer associated with lower CIBrM compared to lung cancer. Widespread extracranial progression (≥ 5 sites) within 24, 36, 48 and 60 months of OMD diagnosis was independently associated with higher CIBrM.

CONCLUSION

In patients with OMD treated with SBRT, baseline variables related to extracranial disease burden and distribution were not associated with BrM development, while primary site and widespread extracranial progression were associated with BrM development.

Radiosurgery Society Case-Based Guide to Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Challenging Cases of Spinal Metastases

PURPOSE

Spinal stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has become the standard of care in management of patients with limited sites of metastatic disease, radioresistant histologies, painful vertebral metastases with long life expectancy and cases of reirradiation. Our case-based guidelines aim to assist radiation oncologists in the appropriate utilization of SBRT for common, yet challenging, cases of spinal metastases.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Cases were selected to include scenarios of large volume sacral disease with nerve entrapment, medically inoperable disease abutting the thecal sac, and local failure after prior SBRT. Relevant literature was reviewed, and areas requiring further investigation were discussed to offer a framework for evidence-based clinical practice.

RESULTS

Spinal SBRT can be effectively delivered in challenging cases following multidisciplinary discussion by using a methodical approach to patient selection, appropriate dose selection, and adherence to evidence-based dose constraints.

CONCLUSIONS

The Radiosurgery Society's case-based practice review offers guidance to practicing physicians treating technically challenging SBRT candidate patients with spinal metastases.

Comparison of the Long-term Survival Outcome of Surgery versus Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy as Initial Local Treatment for Pulmonary Oligometastases from Colorectal Cancer: A Propensity Score Analysis

PURPOSE

Optimal local treatment for pulmonary oligometastases from colorectal cancer (CRC) remains unclear. We aimed to compare the long-term survival outcomes between surgery and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) as the initial local treatment for CRC pulmonary oligometastases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 335 consecutive patients who initially underwent surgery or SBRT for CRC pulmonary metastases from 2011 to 2022, and 251 patients (173 surgery and 78 SBRT) were ultimately included. Freedom from intrathoracic progression (FFIP), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared using stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting (sIPTW) analysis. In addition, patterns of intrathoracic progression and subsequent treatment were analyzed.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 61.6 months for surgery and 54.4 months for SBRT. After sIPTW adjustment, significant differences emerged in both FFIP and PFS between surgery and SBRT (FFIP: hazard ratio [HR] = 0.50, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.31-0.79; PFS: HR = 0.56, 95% CI, 0.36-0.87). The 3- and 5-year FFIP rates were 58.6% and 54.8%, respectively, after surgery, and 34.6% and 31.3%, respectively, after SBRT (P = .006). The 3- and 5-year PFS rates were 49.4% and 45.2%, respectively, after surgery, and 28.8% and 26.1%, respectively, after SBRT (P = .010). However, OS was not significantly affected by treatment approach (HR = 0.93, 95% CI, 0.49-1.76). The 3- and 5-year OS rates were 85.9% and 73.1%, respectively, after surgery, and 78.9% and 68.7%, respectively, after SBRT (P = .849). Recurrence at the treated site was more prevalent after SBRT than after surgery (33.3% vs 16.9%), whereas new intrathoracic tumors occurred more frequently after surgery than after SBRT (71.8% vs 43.1%). Both groups chose radiation therapy as the primary local salvage treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Notwithstanding the significant differences in FFIP and PFS between surgery and SBRT, the long-term survival of patients with CRC pulmonary oligometastases did not depend on the initial choice of the local treatment approach.

Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy for Bone-Only Oligometastatic Breast Cancer: On a Quest to Find the Optimum Cohort

AIMS

We aimed to evaluate the treatment outcomes and associated prognostic factors in breast cancer (BC) patients who had bone-only oligometastatic disease (OMD) and we tried to determine the subgroup that would benefit most from stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We enrolled 47 patients with a total of 63 lesions with bone-only oligometastatic BC who underwent SABR for all bone lesions between July 2013 and March 2022. Cases with bone-only metastatic disease with up to 5 metastatic lesions that can be safely treated with SABR were included in this study. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 23.0 software (SPSS, Chicago, IL).

RESULTS

The median follow-up time was 34 months. The 2- and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 90% and 66%, and the progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 49% and 29%, respectively. The local control rate in the SABR-treated foci was 85%. In multivariate analysis, OMD state (genuine vs. induced), de-novo OMD state (synchronous vs. metachronous), and histology (luminal vs. HER-2 enriched) were prognostic for OS. Molecular subtype switch was observed in 21 (42%) patients, and 0% PFS was observed in 5 years in patients with phenotypic discordance. SABR was well tolerated and there were no ≥grade 4 acute or late toxicities.

CONCLUSION

Our study showed that in patients with bone-only OMD, in HER2-enriched subtypes with genuine & de-novo & synchronous OMD, SABR should be strongly considered for all metastatic foci, especially if there is phenotypic discordance in the primary tumor and metastasis.

Efficacy of radiotherapy for bone metastasis in breast cancer patients treated with cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors

BACKGROUND

In patients diagnosed withestrogen receptor (ER)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative advanced breast cancer, bone metastasesemerge as theprimary siteofsignificant tumor burden. Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6i) inhibitorsare thegold standard in this clinical scenario, while radiotherapy (RT) represents a valuable addition. However, data on the efficacy of this combination remain scarce. We aimed to evaluate efficacy of RT in bone metastatic breast cancer patients treated with CDK4/6 inhibitors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

398 patients (pts) with ER-positive HER2-negative breast cancer with bone metastases treated with CDK4/6i between 2018-2024 were analyzed. A total of 114 pts received 177 bone RT concurrently with CDK4/6i or within 6 months before CDK4/6i initiation, including 34 courses of stereotactic-body RT and 143 courses of conventional RT.

RESULTS

The median progression-free survival (PFS) in pts who received bone RT was 31.0 months, compared to 26.3 months in pts without bone RT. The 2-y PFS for pts with bone RT was 57.1 % [95 % CI: 46.3-66.6 %] vs. 53.2 % [95 % CI: 46.3-59.6 %] for patients without bone RT (p = 0.51). The median overall survival (OS) for pts who received bone RT was 49.1 months, compared to 40.5 months for pts without bone RT. The 3-y OS for pts with bone RT was 63.7 % [95 % CI: 51.5-73.5 %] vs. 55.0 % [95 % CI 46.6-62.6 %] for pts without bone RT (p = 0.50). The 3-y local control for irradiated patients was 86.9 % [95 % CI 72.2-94.1 %].

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, we present the largest cohort published to date of breast cancer patients who received CDK4/6i alongside bone-directed RT. Although the observed differences in survival were not statistically significant, RT remains a viable treatment modality in metastatic breast cancer in some patients.

Immunochemotherapy plus radiotherapy versus immunochemotherapy alone as first-line treatment for treatment-naïve, advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (AEC-ICR-1st): A multi-center cohort study

Immunochemotherapy is Currently the standard first-line treatment for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, its prognosis remains unsatisfactory. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of immunochemotherapy plus radiotherapy (ICR) compared with immunochemotherapy (IC) alone as a first-line treatment for advanced ESCC. This multicenter cohort study was conducted across five cancer centers (NCT06190652). We evaluated the outcomes in patients with advanced ESCC who received first-line therapy of IC, with or without radiotherapy (RT), between 2018 and 2023. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to control for potential confounders. Sensitivity analysis was conducted to evaluate the robustness of the results. Overall, 23,641 patients were screened, and 702 patients were finally eligible. 270 patients included in ICR cohort, and 432 patients in IC alone cohort. Both before and after PSM, the ICR cohort had a longer median OS compared to IC alone cohort (20.4 versus 16.8 months, P = 0.001; 21.3 versus 17.5 months, P = 0.008; respectively); multivariate analysis further supported that RT was associated with a better OS (HR: 0.695, 95%CI: 0.558-0.867, P = 0.001; HR: 0.729, 95%CI: 0.561-0.947, P = 0.018; respectively). Exploratory analysis revealed that the survival benefits were most pronounced in the subgroup that received IC concurrently combined with definitive dose RT to the primary tumor, with a median OS of 23.6 months (HR: 0.515, 95%CI: 0.308-0.862, P = 0.011) and PFS of 14.4 months (HR: 0.567, 95%CI: 0.370-0.870, P = 0.009). The grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were esophagitis (4.10 % versus 0.41 %; P = 0.006), anemia (6.97 % versus 1.64 %; P = 0.004), leukopenia (12.70 % versus 6.56 %; P = 0.021) and lymphopenia (38.52 % versus 4.92 %, P < 0.001) in the ICR and IC cohorts. The addition of RT to IC as a first-line treatment for advanced ESCC could bring benefits, and was well-tolerated.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy as metastasis-directed therapy in oligometastatic prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

The use of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) to definitively treat oligometastases in prostate cancer has drawn large clinical and research interests within radiation oncology. However, the evidence is considered in its early stages and there is currently no systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in this field. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SBRT as metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) in oligometastatic prostate cancer (OMPC) compared to no MDT reported in RCTs.

METHODS

MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL Complete, and Cochrane Library were searched on October 28, 2023. Eligible studies were RCTs comparing SBRT as MDT with no MDT in extracranial OMPC, without restrictions on follow-up time, publication status, language, or year. Participant subsets fulfilling the eligibility criteria were included. Critical outcomes were overall survival and grade ≥ 3 toxicity, and additional important outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS), local control, grade 5 toxicity, health-related quality of life, and systemic therapy-free survival. Meta-analyses were planned. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool version 2, and the quality of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation.

RESULTS

In total, 1825 unique study reports were identified and seven phase II RCTs with 559 eligible participants were included. Four trials included multiple types of primary cancer. Outcome definitions were heterogeneous except for overall survival and toxicity. For overall survival, only one study reported events in both arms. Meta-analysis of the grade ≥ 3 toxicity results from two trials showed no difference (pooled risk ratio 0.78, 95% confidence interval 0.37-1.65, p = 0.52). Four trials reported significantly longer PFS, with a pooled hazard ratio of 0.31 (95% confidence interval 0.21-0.45, p < 0.00001). Risk of bias was of some concerns or high. Quality of evidence was low or moderate.

CONCLUSIONS

Phase II trials have shown promising improvements in PFS for several OMPC states without excess toxicity. Overall survival comparisons are immature. In future confirmatory phase III trials, adequately large sample sizes, blinding of outcome assessors, and/or increased adherence to assigned intervention could improve the quality of evidence. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42021230131.

Oligo-Recurrence in Lung Cancer; The Most Curable State Among Advanced Disease?

Despite the introduction of effective systemic therapies and advancements in precision medicine, recurrence or progression remains common in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). For a subset of patients with more localized metastatic disease-referred to as oligometastases and oligo-recurrence-emerging evidence suggests that a multimodal approach combining systemic therapy with local ablative therapies (LATs) may offer curative potential. Oligo-recurrence is defined by the presence of a limited number of metastases and recurrences in patients with controlled primary lesions. In this review, we focus on providing a comprehensive overview of the evidence supporting the concepts of oligo-recurrence in lung cancer, which is considered one of the most curable states among advanced diseases. Although the definition remains variable and is still under discussion, retrospective studies have reported that it is not a rare condition (occurring in 18-53% of cases) and shows relatively better survival outcomes regardless of whether a local ablative therapy (LAT) is performed. However, this classification remains a topic of ongoing debate and warrants further exploration. In addition to an ongoing randomized clinical trial on oligo-recurrent NSCLC, further rigorous studies specifically addressing oligo-recurrence are needed to refine treatment strategies for this advanced yet potentially curable state. These investigations are essential for developing effective, tailored approaches to optimize outcomes for patients within this prognostically favorable subgroup.

Novel Methods to Assess Tumor Burden and Minimal Residual Disease in Genitourinary Cancers

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Advances in molecular diagnostics have ushered in a new era for patients with prostate, renal, and urothelial cancers, with novel radiographic and molecular modalities for the assessment of disease burden and minimal residual disease (MRD). Conventional imaging has a limited threshold for disease detection and is often unable to discern clinically occult disease with varying risks of false-negative or false-positive findings depending on the disease state and type of imaging.

METHODS

We provide an overview of emerging radiographic and molecular tools in development within the genitourinary (GU) disease space. A literature review of contemporary basic, translational, and clinical research studies was performed, covering the timeframe of 1980-2024 through the MEDLINE (via PubMed) and Scopus databases. We highlight select examples of emerging technologies and biomarker-informed clinical trials, which aim to quantify disease at lower thresholds and have the potential for integrating MRD in clinical practice for GU patients.

KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS

The development of novel radiotracers, such as prostate-specific membrane antigen or carbonic anhydrase IX, is being evaluated in both clinical practice and trial setting, aiming to change the management of these tumors. Molecular tools including circulating tumor cells and byproducts such as plasma and urine cell-free circulating tumor DNA provide the opportunity for MRD detection. MRD capture on single-cell or cellular byproducts can serve as a conduit for genomic and transcriptomic analyses, providing insight into the molecular underpinnings and clonal evolution of disease.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

While the full potential for MRD applications has yet to be realized, we are witnessing the emergence of novel techniques aimed at MRD detection and the rapid development of elegantly designed studies implementing iterative detection of MRD as means to provide biological rationale and tailor therapeutic options in GU tumors.

Prognostic value of circulating tumor cells in oligorecurrent hormone-sensitive prostate cancer patients undergoing stereotactic body radiation therapy

BACKGROUND

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is an effective metastasis-directed therapy for managing oligometastatic prostate cancer patients. However, it lacks reliable biomarkers for risk stratification. Circulating Tumor Cells (CTC) show promise as minimally invasive prognostic indicators. This study evaluates the prognostic value of CTC in oligorecurrent hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (orHSPC).

METHODS

orHSPC patients with 1-3 nodal and/or bone metastases undergoing SBRT were enrolled (N = 35), with a median follow-up time of 42.1 months. CTC levels were measured at baseline (T0), 1 month (T1), and 3 months (T2) post-SBRT using a novel metabolism-based assay. These levels were correlated with clinical outcomes through Cox-regression and Kaplan-Meier analyses.

RESULTS

Median CTC counts were 5 at T0, 8 at T1, and 5 at T2 with no significant variation over time. Multivariate analysis identified high (≥5/7.5 mL) T0 CTC counts (HR 2.9, 95% CI 1.3-6.5, p = 0.01, median DPFS 29.7 vs. 14.0 months) and having more than one metastasis (HR 3.9, 95% CI 1.8-8.6, p < 0.005, median DPFS 34.1 vs. 10.7 months) as independent predictors of distant progression-free survival (DPFS). CTC assessment successfully stratified patients with a single metastasis (HR 3.4, 95% CI 1.1-10.2, p = 0.03, median DPFS 42.1 vs. 16.7 months), but not those with more than one metastasis. Additionally, a combined score based on CTC levels and the number of metastases effectively stratified patients.

CONCLUSION

The study demonstrates that hypermetabolic CTC could enhance risk stratification in orHSPC patients undergoing SBRT, particularly in patients with limited metastatic burden, potentially identifying patients with indolent disease who are suitable for tailored SBRT interventions.

Local treatment for oligoprogressive metastatic sites of breast cancer: efficacy, toxicities and future perspectives

Metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is still an incurable disease, which eventually develops resistance mechanisms against systemic therapies. While most patients experience widespread disease progression during systemic treatment (ST), in some cases, progression may occur at a limited number of metastatic sites. Evidence from other malignancies suggests that local treatment with stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) of oligoprogressive disease (OPD) may allow effective disease control without the need to modify ST. Available evidence regarding local treatment of oligoprogressive breast cancer is limited, mostly consisting of retrospective studies. The only randomized data come from the randomized CURB trial, which enrolled patients with oligoprogressive disease, including both small cell lung cancer and breast cancer patients, and did not show a survival benefit from local treatment in the latter group. However, local treatment of oligoprogressive MBC is still considered in clinical practice, especially to delay the switch to more toxic STs. This review aims to identify patients who may benefit from this approach based on the current available knowledge, focusing also on the potential risks associated with the combination of radiotherapy (RT) and ST, as well as on possible future scenarios.

Unraveling the role of local ablative therapies for patients with metastatic soft tissue sarcoma - A retrospective multicenter study of the Bavarian university hospitals

BACKGROUND

Local ablative therapies (LAT) are increasingly used in patients with metastatic soft tissue sarcoma (STS), yet evidence-based standards are lacking. This study aimed to assess the impact of LAT on survival of metastatic STS patients and to identify prognostic factors.

METHODS

In this retrospective multicenter study, 246 STS patients with metastatic disease who underwent LAT on tumor board recommendation between 2017 and 2021 were analyzed. A mixed effects model was applied to evaluate multiple survival events per patient.

RESULTS

Median overall survival (OS) after first metastasis was 5.4 years with 1-, 2- and 5-year survival rates of 93.7, 81.7, and 53.1 %, respectively. A treatment-free interval ≥12 months and treatment of liver metastases were positively correlated with progression-free survival (PFS) after LAT (HR = 0.61, p = 0.00032 and HR = 0.52, p = 0.0081, respectively). A treatment-free interval ≥12 months and treatment of metastatic lesions in a single organ site other than lung and liver were positive prognostic factors for OS after first LAT (HR = 0.50, p = 0.028 and HR = 0.40, p = 0.026, respectively) while rare histotypes and LAT other than surgery and radiotherapy were negatively associated with OS after first LAT (HR = 2.56, p = 0.020 and HR = 3.87, p = 0.025). Additional systemic therapy was independently associated with a PFS benefit in patients ≤60 years with ≥4 metastatic lesions (for max. diameter of treated lesions ≤2 cm: HR = 0.32, p = 0.02 and >2 cm: HR = 0.20, p = 0.0011, respectively).

CONCLUSION

This multicenter study conducted at six German university hospitals underlines the value of LAT in metastatic STS. The exceptionally high survival rates are likely to be associated with patient selection and treatment in specialized sarcoma centers.

Prognostic and Predictive Biomarkers of Oligometastatic NSCLC: New Insights and Clinical Applications

This review discusses the current data on predictive and prognostic biomarkers in oligometastatic NSCLC and discusses whether biomarkers identified in other stages and widespread metastatic disease can be extrapolated to the oligometastatic disease (OMD) setting. Research is underway to explore the prognostic and predictive value of biological attributes of tumor tissue, circulating cells, the tumor microenvironment, and imaging findings as biomarkers of oligometastatic NSCLC. Biomarkers that help define true OMD and predict outcomes are needed for patient selection for oligometastatic treatment, and to avoid futile treatments in patients that will not benefit from locoregional treatment. Nevertheless, these biomarkers are still in the early stages of development and lack prospective validation in clinical trials. Furthermore, the absence of a clear definition of OMD contributes to a heterogeneous study population in which different types of OMD are mixed and treatment strategies are different. Multiple tissue-based, circulating, and imaging features are promising regarding their prognostic and predictive role in NSCLC, but data is still limited and might be biased owing to the inclusion of heterogeneous patient populations. Larger homogeneous and prospective series are needed to assess the prognostic and predictive role of these biomarkers. As obtaining tissue can be difficult and is invasive, the most promising tools for further evaluation are liquid biopsies and imaging-based biomarkers as these can also be used for longitudinal follow-up.

Is Local Ablative Stereotactic Radiation Therapy a Valuable Rescue Strategy for Time on Drug in Patients Enrolled in Phase I Trials?

PURPOSE

Patients with advanced tumors enrolled in phase I trials display strong treatment expectations and few therapeutic alternatives. When oligoacquired resistance (OAR; ≤3 lesions of disease progression) occurs, local ablative stereotactic radiation therapy (SRT) could allow disease control and continuing the experimental systemic treatment.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Data from patients enrolled in phase I trials evaluating systemic treatments, who experienced OAR while on the phase I systemic therapy and subsequently received SRT between January 2014 and April 2023, were retrospectively analyzed. Progression-free survival (PFS)1 (trial entry to OAR), PFS2 (SRT to first subsequent relapse), time to next systemic treatment (TTNT), and overall survival (OS) were assessed. First subsequent patterns of relapse after SRT were distinguished as OAR2, which could be locally rechallenged, or systemic acquired resistance (SAR; >3 lesions of disease progression). When available, correlations between molecular profile and pathway enrichments of OAR and SAR were explored.

RESULTS

Forty-two patients with 52 oligoprogressive lesions were analyzed. The median follow-up was 24 months. SRT allowed a median PFS2 of 7.1 months and a median TTNT of 12.8 months. PFS2 included 49% OAR2 and 51% SAR. Median time to first subsequent relapse (9.6 vs 3.5 months; P = .014) and TTNT (22.4 vs 7.6 months; P < .001) were longer for OAR2 compared with that for SAR. No severe toxicities were reported. A PFS1 of <6 months and de novo oligoprogressive lesions were associated with the presence of SAR. More diverse enriched gene pathways were observed for SAR compared with that for OAR2.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients enrolled in phase I trials, OAR managed with SRT may increase time on investigational systemic treatments. Predictive factors reflecting tumor aggressiveness and clonal heterogeneity could help deciphering OAR2 from SAR and maximize SRT output in the oligoprogressive setting.

OligoM-Cancer: A multidimensional information platform for deep phenotyping of heterogenous oligometastatic cancer

Patients with oligometastatic cancer (OMC) exhibit better response to local therapeutic interventions and a more treatable tendency than those with polymetastatic cancers. However, studies on OMC are limited and lack effective integration for systematic comparison and personalized application, and the diagnosis and precise treatment of OMC remain controversial. The application of large language models in medicine remains challenging because of the requirement of high-quality medical data. Moreover, these models must be enhanced using precise domain-specific knowledge. Therefore, we developed the OligoM-Cancer platform (http://oligo.sysbio.org.cn), pioneering knowledge curation that depicts various aspects of oligometastases spectrum, including markers, diagnosis, prognosis, and therapy choices. A user-friendly website was developed using HTML, FLASK, MySQL, Bootstrap, Echarts, and JavaScript. This platform encompasses comprehensive knowledge and evidence of phenotypes and their associated factors. With 4059 items of literature retrieved, OligoM-Cancer includes 1345 valid publications and 393 OMC-associated factors. Additionally, the included clinical assistance tools enhance the interpretability and credibility of clinical translational practice. OligoM-Cancer facilitates knowledge-guided modeling for deep phenotyping of OMC and potentially assists large language models in supporting specialised oligometastasis applications, thereby enhancing their generalization and reliability.

Outcomes Analysis of Patients Receiving Local Ablative Therapy for Oligoprogressive Metastatic NSCLC Under First-Line Immunotherapy

CONTEXT

Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) treatment relies on first-line immunotherapy as single agent or combined with chemotherapy. Oligoprogression may be observed in this setting.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

We performed a European multicentric retrospective study on patients treated with first-line immunotherapy, who presented with oligoprogressive disease, treated with a local ablative treatment.

RESULTS

A total of 61 patients were retrospectively included between 2018 and 2022. Twenty-four patients (39%) received immunotherapy as single agent, and 37 (61%) chemo-immunotherapy. First oligoprogression occurred more frequently in pre-existing metastatic sites (47% of patients). Median PFS1 (defined as time to first oligoprogression) was 11.5 months [IC95%: 10.0-12.3]. We observed that 37 patients (61%) progressed after first oligoprogression, and 20 (54%) from them presented second oligoprogression. Median OS for the whole cohort was 72.0 months [IC95%: 19.3-124.8], with positive correlation between OS and PFS1 (R=0.65, P < .0001). After loco-ablative treatment with radiotherapy, disease control rate was 89% with ablative radiotherapy: 88% with conventional radiotherapy, and 89% with stereotactic radiotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Patients with oligoprogression under/after immunotherapy have better prognosis with a high risk of subsequent oligoprogression.

Survival Without Quality of Life Deterioration in the GORTEC 2014-04 "OMET" Randomized Phase 2 Trial in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer with Oligometastases using Stereotactic Ablative Radiation Therapy (SABR) alone or Chemotherapy and SABR

PURPOSE

Patients with oligometastasis may have prolonged survival with multisite stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR). Evidence to support this paradigm is scarce in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (HNSCC). The multicenter open-label randomized GORTEC 2014-04 (NCT03070366) phase 2 study assesses survival without definitive quality of life (QoL) deterioration of omitting upfront chemotherapy in oligometastatic patients with HNSCC using SABR alone, in the French Head and Neck Intergroup.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Eligible participants (≥18 years old with 1-3 oligometastases, the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score 0-2) were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive chemo-SABR or SABR alone. Salvage treatments were left to the physician's appreciation. The standard therapy was considered to be systemic therapy and SABR (chemo-SABR; EXTREME regimen [5 fluorouracil/platinum/cetuximab]). The primary endpoint was 1-year (±3 months) overall survival rate without definitive deterioration (ie, without subsequent better QoL score) of the global European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QoL Questionnaire-Core30 score.

RESULTS

Between September 2015 and October 2022, 69 participants were assigned to receive chemo-SABR (N = 35) or SABR alone (N = 34); 57 had lung-only metastases (82.6%), and 40 had isolated metastasis (58.0%). The median baseline QoL score was 66.7 (IQR, [50.0-83.3]). The median follow-up was 55.3 months (95% CI, 45.0-69.7). Of participants (N = 59) evaluable for the primary endpoint, 16 of 29 (55.2%, 90% CI, 0.38-0.71) and 16 of 30 (53.3%, 90% CI, 0.37-0.69) were alive and free of QoL deterioration at 1 year in the SABR-alone and chemo-SABR arms. However, QoL deterioration was deeper with chemo-SABR (50.0; IQR, [41.7-66.7]) than with SABR alone (16.7; IQR, [16.7-41.7]). In intent-to-treat analysis (N = 69), median survival was 42.3 months (95% CI, 26.5-not reached) with chemo-SABR and 41.1 months (95% CI, 32.1-66.9) with SABR alone; median progression-free survival was 12.9 (95% CI, 7.5-17.3) and 7.4 months (95% CI, 4.2-15.6) in the chemo-SABR and SABR alone arms, respectively. Rates of severe treatment-related toxicities were 21 of 35 (60.0%) with chemo-SABR and 3 of 34 (8.8%, no grade 5) with SABR alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Using SABR alone, the omission of upfront EXTREME-based chemotherapy and maintenance cetuximab in oligometastatic patients with HNSCC resulted in similar survival but much less severe QoL deterioration and fewer toxicity rates. SABR alone could be a reasonable alternative in oligometastatic patients with HNSCC.

Esophagectomy may have a role in stage IV esophageal adenocarcinoma

OBJECTIVE

We sought to determine whether aggressive local treatment provides a benefit in patients with stage IV esophageal adenocarcinoma and to determine factors associated with survival.

METHODS

Patients with clinical stage IV esophageal adenocarcinoma at diagnosis who underwent esophagectomy from 2010 to 2023 were identified from our prospectively maintained database. Clinicopathologic and demographic characteristics were compared among patients by stage. Overall survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier approach.

RESULTS

In total, 66 patients met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 30 (45%) had stage IVA disease, and 36 (55%) had stage IVB disease. Of the 36 patients with stage IVB disease, 26 had oligometastatic disease, and 10 had disseminated disease. All patients with stage IVA disease received standard neoadjuvant therapy followed by curative-intent surgery; 26 of these patients (87%) received chemoradiation. Patients with oligometastatic stage IVB disease underwent systemic therapy with the goal of surgical resection. Patients with disseminated stage IVB disease underwent palliative chemotherapy, which led to improvement in disease burden and performance of esophagectomy. Median time from the start of therapy to surgery was shorter for patients with stage IVA disease than patients with stage IVB disease (P < .001). Three-year progression-free survival was lower for patients with stage IVA disease (40% vs 56%), as was 3-year overall survival (57% vs 85%). Adjusted overall survival, from the start of therapy to most recent follow-up, was higher for patients with stage IVB disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Aggressive local treatment may provide a benefit for highly selected patients with advanced or metastatic esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Intratumoral Treatment in Lung Cancer: Is It Time to Move Towards Clinical Practice?

According to a modern view, cancer no longer follows a purely mechanistic model. Rather, a tumor is conceived as a more complex structure, composed of cancer cells, the activities of which may interact and reshape the so-called tumor microenvironment (TME), leading to preservation of specific tumoral niches and promoting the survival of tumoral stem cells. Background/Objective: Therapeutic strategies must deal with this unique cancer architecture in the near future by widening their range of activities outside the cancer cells and rewiring a TME to ensure it is hostile to cancer growth. Therefore, an intratumoral therapeutic strategy may open the door to a new type of anticancer activity, one that directly injures the tumoral structure while also eliciting an influence on the TME through local and systemic immunomodulation. This review would like to assess the current situation of intratumoral strategies and their clinical implications. Methods We analyzed data from phase I, II, and III trials, comprehensive reviews and relevant clinical and preclinical research, from robust databases, like PUBMED, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and clinicaltrials.gov. Results: Intratumoral strategies can be quite variable. It is possible the injection and inhalation of traditional antiblastic agents or immunomodulant agents, or intrapleural administration. Ablation strategy is available, both thermal and photodynamic method. Moreover, TTfields and NPs are analyzed and also brachytherapy is mentioned. Intratumoral therapy can find space in "adjuvant"/perioperative or metastatic settings. Finally, intratumoral strategies allow to synergize their activities with systemic therapies, guaranteeing better local and systemic disease control. Conclusions: Intratumoral strategies are overall promising. Antiblastic/immunomodulant injection and NPs use are especially interesting and intriguing. But, there is generally a lack of phase II and III trials, in particular NPs use need additional experimentation and clinical studies.

Complete response of a metastatic microsatellite-stable gastric cancer after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy: should we still operate? A case report and review of the literature

Gastric cancer often presents at an advanced stage in Western populations due to a lack of screening programs, leading to poor prognoses. Historically, palliative chemotherapy resulted in a median survival of 9.9 months. However, the introduction of the FLOT regimen and immunotherapy has significantly altered treatment outcomes. Oligometastatic gastric cancer, defined as metastasis limited to a single organ or a few sites, has emerged as a distinct subgroup with improved survival when treated with a combination of systemic and local therapies. We present the case of a 54-year-old male patient diagnosed with microsatellite-stable (MSS) oligometastatic gastric adenocarcinoma, including liver and peritoneal metastases, who achieved a complete pathological response following neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy with FOLFOX and nivolumab. Despite unfavorable prognostic factors, such as liver involvement and positive peritoneal cytology, the patient responded well to the treatment, allowing curative surgery. Postoperative histology confirmed complete regression of both the primary tumor and metastases, with no recurrence observed at the 1-year follow-up. This case shows the potential of combined chemoimmunotherapy to convert previously inoperable MSS gastric cancer to surgical candidates. Further research is needed to better define patient selection criteria and assess long-term outcomes for these patients.

Effectiveness and safety of first-line pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in patients with advanced/recurrent or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in China: a real-world multicenter study

Background

There are currently limited real-world data on the effectiveness and safety of first-line pembrolizumab combined with chemotherapy in patients with advanced/recurrent or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) in China. This study was conducted to address this knowledge gap.

Methods

This multicenter retrospective cohort study was conducted at 17 hospitals in China and included adults (⩾18 years) with stage IV primary ESCC, or recurring 6 months after radical radiotherapy/surgery-based combination therapy, who had received first-line pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy. Data were collected from electronic medical records. Endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Subgroup analyses were conducted to identify patient characteristics and treatment patterns associated with treatment response.

Results

In total, 202 patients who had received treatment from 2018 to 2023 were included: 125 (61.9%) newly diagnosed and 77 (38.1%) with recurrence, 181 (89.1%) were male. Pembrolizumab was most commonly combined with paclitaxel + platinum (69.8%) or fluorouracil + platinum (19.3%). After a median follow-up of 22.6 months (95% confidence interval (CI) 20.1-25.4), the ORR and DCR were 60.9% and 87.6% and the median PFS and OS were 10.8 months (95% CI 9.1-13.5) and 17.3 months (95% CI 14.9-19.9), respectively. OS was similar in patients with treatment-naïve and recurrent disease. Among the combination chemotherapy regimens, paclitaxel + platinum was associated with the longest median OS (18.2 months, 95% CI 16.1-22.5). Favorable survival outcomes were observed in patients with oligometastases. No new safety signals were observed.

Conclusion

These real-world data indicate that the first-line treatment with pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy is effective and safe in Chinese patients with advanced ESCC and show that paclitaxel + platinum is the most commonly used and most effective partner chemotherapy in China.

Treatment of oligometastatic breast cancer: The role of patient selection

Up to 90 % of death from solid tumors are caused by metastases. By 2040, breast cancer (BC) is predicted to increase to over 3 million new cases. Additionally, with the personalization and intensification of BC follow-up, many patients will relapse with oligometastatic disease (OMD). Over the past decades, advances in treatment planning, image guidance, target position reproducibility, and online tracking, along with a compelling radiobiological rationale, have led to the implementation of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT). This has become a valid ablative treatment option for OMD patients. However, there are still concerns about which patients benefit the most from ablative treatment. In this review, we will analyze the literature regarding SBRT for OMD in BC patients. We aim to present the current data on its effectiveness and define the optimal tailored scenarios for SBRT outcomes.

Addition of Metastasis-Directed Therapy to Systemic Therapy for Oligometastatic Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (EXTEND): A Multicenter, Randomized Phase II Trial

PURPOSE

The EXTEND trial tested the hypothesis that adding comprehensive metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) to chemotherapy would improve progression-free survival (PFS) over chemotherapy alone among patients with oligometastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

METHODS

EXTEND (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03599765) is a multicenter, phase II basket trial randomly assigning patients with ≤five metastases 1:1 to MDT plus systemic therapy versus systemic therapy. Disease progression was defined by radiologic criteria (RECIST v1.1), clinical progression, or death. The primary end point was PFS in the per-protocol population, evaluated after all patients achieved at least 6 months of follow-up. Exploratory end points included systemic immune response measures.

RESULTS

Between March 19, 2019, and February 13, 2023, 41 patients were randomly assigned and 40 were eligible for the primary analysis of PFS (19 patients in the MDT arm; 21 patients in the control arm). At a median follow-up time of 17 months, the median PFS time was 10.3 months (95% CI, 4.6 to 14.0) in the MDT arm versus 2.5 months (95% CI, 1.7 to 5.1) in the control arm. PFS was significantly improved by the addition of MDT to systemic therapy (P = .030 for stratified log-rank test) with a hazard ratio of 0.43 (95% CI, 0.20 to 0.94). No grade ≥3 or greater adverse events related to MDT were observed. Systemic immune activation events were associated with MDT and correlated with improved PFS.

CONCLUSION

This study supports the addition of MDT to systemic therapy for patients with oligometastatic PDAC. Induction of systemic immunity is a possible mechanism of benefit. These results warrant confirmatory trials to refine treatment strategy and provide external validation.

Different approach to M descriptor for future staging of oligometastatic disease in SCLC: A cross-sectional survival analysis

PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate the impact of oligometastasis and the M descriptor on survival in small cell lung cancer (SCLC).

METHODS

This multicenter, retrospective study included patients with newly diagnosed extensive-stage SCLC(ES-SCLC) from 2010 to 2020. Subgroups: Group 1: single metastasis in a single organ, Group 2: 2-5 metastases in a single organ, Group 3: 6 or more metastases in a single organ, and Group 4: metastases in two or more organs. This classification was based on the 9th Staging-M descriptor. Three-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) analyses were conducted.

RESULTS

The mean age of the 439 patients was 62 ± 10 years, and 89.5% of them were male. The mean PFS for Groups 1, 2, 3, 4 was 10.7 months (95% CI 8.9-12.5), 7.5 months (95% CI 5.6-9.4), 4.3 months (95% CI 2.9-5.7), and 5.4 months (95% CI 4.7-6.1), respectively. PFS in Group 2 was significantly higher. The mean OS for Groups 1, 2, 3, 4 was 13.3 months (95% CI 11.2-15.3), 9.5 months (95% CI 7.1-11.9), 7.1 months (95% CI 4.5-9.7), and 6.9 months (95% CI 6.0-7.9), respectively. OS in Group 1 was significantly higher. OS and PFS in the M1b group were significantly higher than in the M1c1 and M1c2 groups (p < 0.05) with no statistical difference between the M1c1 and M1c2 groups.

CONCLUSION

There is no significant difference in survival between the M1c1 and M1c2 groups. In ES-SCLC, the number of metastases may be a more predictive factor for prognosis than the number of metastatic organs.