1
|
Wallace WH, Kelsey TW, Morrison D, Anderson RA. Live birth and maternity outcome in childhood and adolescent cancer survivors under 18 years at diagnosis: a 40-year population-based cohort study. Br J Cancer 2024:10.1038/s41416-024-02818-0. [PMID: 39266623 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-024-02818-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2023] [Revised: 07/23/2024] [Accepted: 08/02/2024] [Indexed: 09/14/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Survival from childhood and adolescent cancer has increased, but the chance of a livebirth in female survivors under 18 years at diagnosis may be reduced. METHODS We performed a national population-based analysis, including all female cancer survivors diagnosed in Scotland before the age of 18 years between 1981 and 2012. Scottish Cancer Registry records were linked to Scottish maternity records. Females from the exposed group with no pregnancies before cancer diagnosis (n = 2118) were compared with three general population controls matched for age and year of diagnosis. FINDINGS The cumulative incidence of a livebirth for all diagnoses was reduced to 37% (95% CI 33-40%) for cancer survivors at 30 years of age vs 58% (57-60%) for controls. The deficit varying by diagnosis: for lymphoid leukaemia, the cumulative incidence at 30 years was 29% (23-36%) vs 57% (52-61%) for controls with similar deficits in CNS tumours and retinoblastoma. There was a steady improvement in the chance of livebirth in those diagnosed more recently. INTERPRETATION We have shown a reduced chance of livebirth in female survivors of cancer diagnosed before age 18. The deficit is present for all diagnoses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W H Wallace
- Department of Paediatric Haematology and Oncology, Royal Hospital for Children and Young People and University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
| | - T W Kelsey
- School of Computer Science, University of St. Andrews, North Haugh, St. Andrews, UK
| | - D Morrison
- Scottish Cancer Registry, Public Health Scotland, 1 South Gyle Crescent, Edinburgh, UK
| | - R A Anderson
- Centre for Reproductive Health, Institute for Regeneration and Repair, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sakashita K, Komori K, Morokawa H, Kurata T. Screening and interventional strategies for the late effects and toxicities of hematological malignancy treatments in pediatric survivors. Expert Rev Hematol 2024; 17:313-327. [PMID: 38899398 DOI: 10.1080/17474086.2024.2370559] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2023] [Accepted: 06/17/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Advancements in pediatric cancer treatment have increased patient survival rates; however, childhood cancer survivors may face long-term health challenges due to treatment-related effects on organs. Regular post-treatment surveillance and early intervention are crucial for improving the survivors' quality of life and long-term health outcomes. The present paper highlights the significance of late effects in childhood cancer survivors, particularly those with hematologic malignancies, stressing the importance of a vigilant follow-up approach to ensure better overall well-being. AREAS COVERED This article provides an overview of the treatment history of childhood leukemia and lymphoma as well as outlines the emerging late effects of treatments. We discuss the various types of these complications and their corresponding risk factors. EXPERT OPINION Standardizing survivorship care in pediatric cancer aims to improve patient well-being by optimizing their health outcomes and quality of life. This involves early identification and intervention of late effects, requiring collaboration among specialists, nurses, and advocates, and emphasizing data sharing and international cooperation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kazuo Sakashita
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Nagano Children's Hospital, Azumino, Japan
| | - Kazutoshi Komori
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Nagano Children's Hospital, Azumino, Japan
| | - Hirokazu Morokawa
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Nagano Children's Hospital, Azumino, Japan
| | - Takashi Kurata
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Nagano Children's Hospital, Azumino, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Asadi-Azarbaijani B, Oskam IC, Jahnukainen K. A 12-year overview of fertility preservation practice in Nordic pediatric oncology centers. J Cancer Surviv 2024:10.1007/s11764-024-01627-x. [PMID: 38871993 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-024-01627-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2024] [Accepted: 06/03/2024] [Indexed: 06/15/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Fertility preservation is the only option to safeguard fertility following gonadotoxic treatments. This study aimed to provide an updated status on fertility preservation for pediatric cancer patients in the Nordic countries. METHODS A questionnaire consisting of 14 questions was sent to directors of 18 main pediatric oncology centers in the Nordic countries in 2010 and 2022. We received information regarding indications, guidelines, counseling, and available fertility preservation options. RESULTS The response rates were 89% in 2010 and 72% in 2022. The results reveal an increase in clinical practice guidelines on fertility preservation for cancer patients, from 25% in 2010 to 70% in 2022. Counseling on fertility preservation options in 2022 was more specific and offered to most patients who fulfilled indications for fertility preservation (from 19 to 77%). Sperm cryopreservation continues to be the predominant fertility preservation method for pubertal boys in the Nordic countries. However, there has been a notable increase in the availability of testicular tissue preservation for prepubertal boys (0 to 62%). A similar increase in the offer of ovarian tissue preservation for prepubertal girls (0 to 92%) was observed among pediatric cancer patients. CONCLUSIONS The past decade has shown commendable advancements in fertility preservation for pediatric cancer patients in the Nordic countries. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS As fertility care evolves globally, continuous assessment of regional practices and challenges is imperative to enhance the quality of care and life for pediatric cancer survivors in the Nordic regions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Irma C Oskam
- The Livestock Production Research Centre, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Aas, Norway
| | - Kirsi Jahnukainen
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
- NORDFERTIL Research Lab Stockholm, Childhood Cancer Research Unit, Karolinska Institute and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Drechsel KCE, IJgosse IM, Slaats S, Raasen L, Stoutjesdijk FS, van Dulmen-den Broeder E, Wallace WH, Beishuizen A, Körholz D, Mauz-Körholz C, Cepelova M, Uyttebroeck A, Ronceray L, Kaspers GJL, Broer SL, Veening MA. Fertility-Preserving Treatments and Patient- and Parental Satisfaction on Fertility Counseling in a Cohort of Newly Diagnosed Boys and Girls with Childhood Hodgkin Lymphoma. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:2109. [PMID: 38893227 PMCID: PMC11171249 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16112109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2024] [Revised: 05/19/2024] [Accepted: 05/28/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study is to evaluate the use of fertility-preserving (FP) treatments and fertility counseling that was offered in a cohort of newly diagnosed children with classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL). METHODS In this observational study, boys and girls with cHL aged ≤ 18 years with scheduled treatment according to the EuroNet-PHL-C2 protocol were recruited from 18 sites (5 countries), between January 2017 and September 2021. In 2023, a subset of Dutch participants (aged ≥ 12 years at time of diagnosis) and parents/guardians were surveyed regarding fertility counseling. RESULTS A total of 101 boys and 104 girls were included. Most post-pubertal boys opted for semen cryopreservation pre-treatment (85% of expected). Invasive FP treatments were occasionally chosen for patients at a relatively low risk of fertility based on scheduled alkylating agent exposure (4/5 testicular biopsy, 4/4 oocyte, and 11/11 ovarian tissue cryopreservation). A total of 17 post-menarchal girls (20%) received GnRH-analogue co-treatment. Furthermore, 33/84 parents and 26/63 patients responded to the questionnaire. Most reported receiving fertility counseling (97%/89%). Statements regarding the timing and content of counseling were generally positive. Parents and patients considered fertility counseling important (94%/87% (strongly agreed) and most expressed concerns about (their child's) fertility (at diagnosis 69%/46%, at present: 59%/42%). CONCLUSION Systematic fertility counseling is crucial for all pediatric cHL patients and their families. FP treatment should be considered depending on the anticipated risk and patient factors. We encourage the development of a decision aid for FP in pediatric oncology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katja C. E. Drechsel
- Emma Children’s Hospital, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Pediatric Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, 1007 MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands (M.A.V.)
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Medical Center, 1007 MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Irene M. IJgosse
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Sofie Slaats
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Lisanne Raasen
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Francis S. Stoutjesdijk
- Emma Children’s Hospital, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Pediatric Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, 1007 MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands (M.A.V.)
| | - Eline van Dulmen-den Broeder
- Emma Children’s Hospital, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Pediatric Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, 1007 MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands (M.A.V.)
| | - W. Hamish Wallace
- Department of Haematology/Oncology, Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Edinburgh EH16 4TJ, UK
| | - Auke Beishuizen
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Haematology/Oncology, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children’s Hospital, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Dieter Körholz
- Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Giessen und Marburg GmbH, Standort Giessen—Zentrum für Kinderheilkunde und Jugendmedizin, Feulgenstr. 12, 35392 Giessen, Germany (C.M.-K.)
| | - Christine Mauz-Körholz
- Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Giessen und Marburg GmbH, Standort Giessen—Zentrum für Kinderheilkunde und Jugendmedizin, Feulgenstr. 12, 35392 Giessen, Germany (C.M.-K.)
- Clinic for Paediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Medical Faculty of the Martin-Luther University of Halle, Ernst-Grube-Str. 40, 06120 Halle, Germany
| | - Michaela Cepelova
- Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Faculty Hospital Motol and 2nd Medical Faculty, Charles University, V Úvalu 84, 150 06 Prague 5, Czech Republic
| | - Anne Uyttebroeck
- Department of Paediatric Haematology and Oncology, KU Leuven, UZ Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Leila Ronceray
- Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, St. Anna Children’s Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Kinderspitalgasse 6, A-1090 Wien, Austria
| | - Gertjan J. L. Kaspers
- Emma Children’s Hospital, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Pediatric Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, 1007 MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands (M.A.V.)
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Simone L. Broer
- Department of Reproductive Medicine & Gynecology, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Margreet A. Veening
- Emma Children’s Hospital, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Pediatric Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, 1007 MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands (M.A.V.)
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Rotz SJ, Hamilton BK, Wei W, Ahmed I, Winston SA, Ballard S, Bernard RJ, Carpenter P, Farhadfar N, Ferraro C, Friend BD, Gloude NJ, Hayashi RJ, Hoyle K, Jenssen K, Koo J, Lee CJ, Mariano L, Nawabit R, Ngwube A, Lalefar N, Phelan R, Perkins L, Rao A, Rayes A, Sandheinrich T, Stafford L, Tomlinson K, Whiteside S, Wiedl C, Myers K. Fertility Potential and Gonadal Function in Survivors of Reduced-Intensity Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation. Transplant Cell Ther 2024; 30:534.e1-534.e13. [PMID: 38342136 PMCID: PMC11056299 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtct.2024.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2023] [Revised: 01/05/2024] [Accepted: 02/04/2024] [Indexed: 02/13/2024]
Abstract
The use of reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens has increased in an effort to minimize hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) end-organ toxicity, including gonadal toxicity. We aimed to describe the incidence of fertility potential and gonadal function impairment in adolescent and young adult survivors of HCT and to identify risk factors (including conditioning intensity) for impairment. We performed a multi-institutional, international retrospective cohort study of patients age 10 to 40 years who underwent first allogeneic HCT before December 1, 2019, and who were alive, in remission, and available for follow-up at 1 to 2 years post-HCT. For females, an AMH level of ≥.5 ng/mL defined preserved fertility potential; an AMH level of ≥.03 ng/mL was considered detectable. Gonadal failure was defined for females as an elevated follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) level >30 mIU/mL with an estradiol (E2) level <17 pg/mL or current use of hormone replacement therapy (regardless of specific indication or intent). For males, gonadal failure was defined as an FSH level >10.4 mIU/mL or current use of hormone replacement therapy. A total of 326 patients (147 females) were available for analysis from 17 programs (13 pediatric, 4 adult). At 1 to 2 years post-HCT, 114 females (77.6%) had available FSH and E2 levels and 71 (48.3%) had available AMH levels. FSH levels were reported for 125 males (69.8%). Nearly all female HCT recipients had very low levels of AMH. One of 45 (2.2%) recipients of myeloablative conditioning (MAC) and four of 26 (15.4%) recipients of reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) (P = .06) had an AMH ≥.5 ng/m, and 8 of 45 MAC recipients (17.8%) and 12 of 26 RIC recipients (46.2%) (P = .015) had a detectable AMH level. Total body irradiation (TBI) dose and cyclophosphamide equivalent dose (CED) were not associated with detectable AMH. The incidence of female gonadal hormone failure was 55.3%. In univariate analysis, older age at HCT was associated with greater likelihood of gonadal failure (median age, 17.6 versus 13.9; P < .0001), whereas conditioning intensity (RIC versus MAC), TBI, chronic graft-versus-host disease requiring systemic therapy, and CED were not significantly associated with gonadal function. In multivariable analysis, age remained statistically significant (odds ratio [OR]. 1.11; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03 to 1.22) for each year increase; P = .012), Forty-four percent of the males had gonadal failure. In univariate analysis, older age (median, 16.2 years versus 14.4 years; P = .0005) and TBI dose (P = .002) were both associated with gonadal failure, whereas conditioning intensity (RIC versus MAC; P = .06) and CED (P = .07) were not statistically significant. In multivariable analysis, age (OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.06-1.27 for each year increase; P = .0016) and TBI ≥600 cGy (OR, 6.23; 95% CI, 2.21 to 19.15; P = .0008) remained significantly associated with gonadal failure. Our data indicate that RIC does not significantly mitigate the risk for gonadal failure in females or males. Age at HCT and (specifically in males) TBI use seem to be independent predictors of post-transplantation gonadal function and fertility status. All patients should receive pre-HCT infertility counseling and be offered appropriate fertility preservation options and be screened post-HCT for gonadal failure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seth J Rotz
- Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio; Blood and Marrow Transplant Program, Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
| | - Betty K Hamilton
- Blood and Marrow Transplant Program, Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Wei Wei
- Quantitate Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Ibrahim Ahmed
- Division of Pediatric Hem/Onc and BMT, Children's Mercy, Kansas City, Missouri
| | - Sameeya Ahmed Winston
- Center for Cancer and Blood Disorders, Children's National Health System, Washington, District of Columbia
| | | | - Robyn J Bernard
- Center for Cancer and Blood Disorders, Children's National Health System, Washington, District of Columbia
| | | | - Nosha Farhadfar
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainsville, Florida
| | - Christina Ferraro
- Blood and Marrow Transplant Program, Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Brian D Friend
- Center for Cell and Gene Therapy, Baylor College of Medicine, Texas Children's Hospital; Houston, Texas
| | - Nicholas J Gloude
- MD Division of Hematology Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, University of California San Diego, Rady Children's Hospital San Diego, California
| | - Robert J Hayashi
- Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Kerry Hoyle
- Pediatric Transplant and Cellular Therapy, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Kari Jenssen
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Jane Koo
- Division of Bone Marrow Transplantation and Immune Deficiency, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Catherine J Lee
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Livia Mariano
- Serviço de Hematologia, Hemoterapia e Terapia Celular, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Rawan Nawabit
- Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | | | - Nahal Lalefar
- Pediatric Hematology/Oncology/BMT, UCSF Benioff Children's Hospital, Oakland, California
| | - Rachel Phelan
- Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology/Blood and Marrow Transplant, Department of Pediatrics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Laynie Perkins
- Pediatric immunology and Hematopoietic stem cell transplant program, University of Utah/Primary Children's Hospital, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | | | - Ahmad Rayes
- Pediatric immunology and Hematopoietic stem cell transplant program, University of Utah/Primary Children's Hospital, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Taryn Sandheinrich
- Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Lauren Stafford
- Pediatric Transplant and Cellular Therapy, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | | | - Stacy Whiteside
- Department of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology, & Bone Marrow Transplantation, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Christina Wiedl
- Center for Cancer and Blood Disorders, Children's National Health System, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Kasiani Myers
- Division of Bone Marrow Transplantation and Immune Deficiency, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Pasten González A, Salvador Alarcón C, Mora J, Martín Gimenez MP, Carrasco Torrents R, Krauel L. Current Status of Fertility Preservation in Pediatric Oncology Patients. CHILDREN (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2024; 11:537. [PMID: 38790532 PMCID: PMC11120648 DOI: 10.3390/children11050537] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2024] [Revised: 04/25/2024] [Accepted: 04/29/2024] [Indexed: 05/26/2024]
Abstract
Cancer poses significant emotional challenges for children and adolescents, despite improvements in survival rates due to new therapies. However, there is growing concern about the long-term effects, including fertility issues. This review examines recent advancements and future directions in fertility preservation within a pediatric population subjected to oncological therapies. Worldwide, there is variability in the availability of fertility preservation methods, influenced by factors like development status and governmental support. The decision to pursue preservation depends on the risk of gonadotoxicity, alongside factors such as diagnosis, treatment, clinical status, and prognosis. Currently, options for preserving fertility in prepubertal boys are limited compared to girls, who increasingly have access to ovarian tissue preservation. Adolescents and adults have more options available, but ethical considerations remain complex and diverse.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Albert Pasten González
- Pediatric Surgical Oncology Unit, Department of Pediatric Surgery, SJD Barcelona Children’s Hospital, Universitat de Barcelona, 08950 Barcelona, Spain; (A.P.G.); (M.P.M.G.); (R.C.T.)
- Pediatric Cancer Center Barcelona, SJD Barcelona Children’s Hospital, Universitat de Barcelona, 08950 Barcelona, Spain;
| | - Cristina Salvador Alarcón
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, SJD Barcelona Children’s Hospital, Universitat de Barcelona, 08950 Barcelona, Spain;
| | - Jaume Mora
- Pediatric Cancer Center Barcelona, SJD Barcelona Children’s Hospital, Universitat de Barcelona, 08950 Barcelona, Spain;
| | - Marta P. Martín Gimenez
- Pediatric Surgical Oncology Unit, Department of Pediatric Surgery, SJD Barcelona Children’s Hospital, Universitat de Barcelona, 08950 Barcelona, Spain; (A.P.G.); (M.P.M.G.); (R.C.T.)
- Pediatric Cancer Center Barcelona, SJD Barcelona Children’s Hospital, Universitat de Barcelona, 08950 Barcelona, Spain;
| | - Rosalia Carrasco Torrents
- Pediatric Surgical Oncology Unit, Department of Pediatric Surgery, SJD Barcelona Children’s Hospital, Universitat de Barcelona, 08950 Barcelona, Spain; (A.P.G.); (M.P.M.G.); (R.C.T.)
- Pediatric Cancer Center Barcelona, SJD Barcelona Children’s Hospital, Universitat de Barcelona, 08950 Barcelona, Spain;
| | - Lucas Krauel
- Pediatric Surgical Oncology Unit, Department of Pediatric Surgery, SJD Barcelona Children’s Hospital, Universitat de Barcelona, 08950 Barcelona, Spain; (A.P.G.); (M.P.M.G.); (R.C.T.)
- Pediatric Cancer Center Barcelona, SJD Barcelona Children’s Hospital, Universitat de Barcelona, 08950 Barcelona, Spain;
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Glackin A, Marino JL, Peate M, McNeil R, Orme LM, McCarthy MC, Sawyer SM. Experiences of Oncofertility Decision-Making and Care in a National Sample of Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer Patients and Parents. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol 2024; 13:170-179. [PMID: 37535814 DOI: 10.1089/jayao.2023.0036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose: Cancer and its treatments are known to compromise fertility in adolescents and young adults (AYAs). The emotional burden of possible infertility is reduced in those who receive supportive oncofertility care. In legal minors, provision of health care must consider the legal context and desire that AYAs have for autonomous decision-making, together with their competence to make health decisions. This has important implications for how oncofertility discussions may, or may not, involve parents. The aim of this study was to explore oncofertility decision-making and care experiences in a national Australian sample of AYA cancer patients and their parents. Methods: AYAs aged 15-25 years and parents were recruited from 17 cancer care sites and CanTeen Australia as part of a national AYA cancer care study. The cross-sectional survey included open-ended questions regarding oncofertility care experiences. We used reflexive thematic analysis to identify themes. Results: Data were available for 99 AYAs and 111 parents. Four themes were identified: emotional care needs; parent-AYA dynamics including AYA autonomy and agency; decision-making considerations including values and practicalities; and reflections on oncofertility care and follow-up. Both AYAs and parents placed importance on AYA autonomy in fertility decision-making, but many AYAs appreciated the role of parents in providing support and guidance throughout the process. Conclusion: Health care professionals are encouraged to autonomously engage AYAs around fertility decision-making, while concurrently offering opportunities that promote parental support. Better psychological support and follow-up oncofertility care are also needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aoife Glackin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Centre for Adolescent Health, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jennifer L Marino
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Centre for Adolescent Health, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Specialty of Child and Adolescent Health, The University of Sydney, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Michelle Peate
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Robyn McNeil
- Centre for Adolescent Health, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Lisa M Orme
- ONTrac at Peter Mac, Victorian Youth Cancer Service, Peter MacCallum Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Children's Cancer Centre, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Maria C McCarthy
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Children's Cancer Centre, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Susan M Sawyer
- Centre for Adolescent Health, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
de Beijer IAE, Skinner R, Haupt R, Grabow D, Bardi E, Beccaria A, Nieto AC, Essiaf S, Filbert AL, Gsell H, Kienesberger A, Langer T, McColgan P, Muraca M, Rascon J, Tallone R, Tomasikova Z, Uyttebroeck A, Kremer LCM, van der Pal HJH, Mulder RL. European recommendations for short-term surveillance of health problems in childhood, adolescent and young adult cancer survivors from the end of treatment to 5 years after diagnosis: a PanCare guideline. J Cancer Surviv 2023:10.1007/s11764-023-01493-z. [PMID: 38048011 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-023-01493-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2023] [Accepted: 10/27/2023] [Indexed: 12/05/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Childhood, adolescent and young adult (CAYA) cancer survivors require ongoing surveillance for health problems from the end of cancer treatment throughout their lives. There is a lack of evidence-based guidelines on optimal surveillance strategies for the period from the end of treatment to 5 years after diagnosis. We aimed to address this gap by developing recommendations for short-term surveillance of health problems based on existing long-term follow-up (LTFU) care guidelines. METHODS The guideline working group, consisting of healthcare professionals, parents and survivor representatives from 10 countries, worked together to identify relevant health problems that may occur in survivors between the end of treatment and 5 years after diagnosis and to develop recommendations for short-term surveillance of health problems. The recommendations were drawn from existing LTFU guidelines and adapted where necessary based on clinical expertise. RESULTS The working group developed 44 recommendations for short-term surveillance of health problems, which were divided into four categories based on the level of surveillance required: awareness only (n = 11), awareness, history and/or physical examination without surveillance test (n = 15), awareness, history and/or physical examination with potential surveillance test (n = 1) and awareness, history and/or physical examination with surveillance test (n = 17). CONCLUSION The development of a guideline for short-term surveillance of health problems fills a critical gap in survivorship care for CAYA cancer survivors, providing much-needed support immediately after treatment up to 5 years after diagnosis. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS This guideline will support healthcare professionals to provide appropriate follow-up care and improve the quality of life of CAYA cancer survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ismay A E de Beijer
- Princess Maxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Heidelberglaan 25, 3584 CS, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Roderick Skinner
- Wolfson Childhood Cancer Research Centre, Newcastle University Centre for Cancer, Herschel Building, Brewery Lane, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, UK
- Great North Children's Hospital, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Queen Victoria Road, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE1 4 LP, UK
- Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Wolfson Childhood Cancer Research Centre, Herschel Building, Brewery Lane, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, UK
| | | | - Desiree Grabow
- Division of Childhood Cancer Epidemiology/German Childhood Cancer Registry, Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics (IMBEI), University Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Edit Bardi
- St. Anna Children's Hospital, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Linz, Austria
| | | | | | - Samira Essiaf
- European Society for Paediatric Oncology, C/O BLSI, Clos Chapelle-Aux-Champs 30, Bte 1.30.30, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Anna-Liesa Filbert
- Division of Childhood Cancer Epidemiology/German Childhood Cancer Registry, Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics (IMBEI), University Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | | | | | - Thorsten Langer
- Universitatsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lubeck, Lubeck, Germany
| | - Patricia McColgan
- Childhood Cancer Ireland, Carmichael House, 4 Brunswick Street North, Dublin, D07 RHA8, Ireland
| | | | - Jelena Rascon
- Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Klinikos, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | | | | | | | - Leontien C M Kremer
- Princess Maxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Heidelberglaan 25, 3584 CS, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Pediatrics, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Helena J H van der Pal
- Princess Maxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Heidelberglaan 25, 3584 CS, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Renée L Mulder
- Princess Maxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Heidelberglaan 25, 3584 CS, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Canavera KE, Bjornard KL, Cost NG, Grady A, Irving H, Kaye EC, Ketterl T, Levine J, Reinecke J, Rios J, Roth M, Sawyer K, Thomas SM, Unguru Y, Johnson LM. Disparate Access to Fertility Preservation in Youth: A Call for Advocacy to Close the Gap. J Pediatr 2023; 261:113496. [PMID: 37211206 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2023.113496] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2022] [Revised: 04/07/2023] [Accepted: 05/14/2023] [Indexed: 05/23/2023]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kari L Bjornard
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Riley Hospital for Children at Indiana University Health, Indianapolis, IN
| | - Nicholas G Cost
- Department of Pediatric Urology and the Surgical Oncology Program, Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO
| | - Allison Grady
- Department of Pediatrics, Oncology Section, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI; University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee College of Nursing, Milwaukee, WI
| | - Helen Irving
- Department of Oncology, Queensland Children's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Erica C Kaye
- Department of Oncology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN
| | - Tyler Ketterl
- Department of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, WA
| | - Jennifer Levine
- Division of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
| | | | - Julie Rios
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Science, The University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Michael Roth
- Division of Pediatrics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Kimberly Sawyer
- Department of Pediatrics, Section of Palliative Care, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | - Stefanie M Thomas
- Department of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology, and Bone Marrow Transplant, Cleveland Clinic Children's, Cleveland, OH
| | - Yoram Unguru
- Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, The Herman and Walter Samuelson Children's Hospital at Sinai, Baltimore, MD; Johns Hopkins Berman Institute of Bioethics, Baltimore, MD
| | - Liza-Marie Johnson
- Department of Oncology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Pawłowski P, Ziętara KJ, Michalczyk J, Fryze M, Buchacz A, Zaucha-Prażmo A, Zawitkowska J, Torres A, Samardakiewicz M. Fertility Preservation in Children and Adolescents during Oncological Treatment-A Review of Healthcare System Factors and Attitudes of Patients and Their Caregivers. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4393. [PMID: 37686669 PMCID: PMC10487203 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15174393] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2023] [Revised: 08/31/2023] [Accepted: 09/01/2023] [Indexed: 09/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Oncofertility is any therapeutic intervention to safeguard the fertility of cancer patients. Anti-cancer therapies (chemotherapy, radiation therapy, etc.) entail the risk of reproductive disorders through cytotoxic effects on gamete-building cells, especially those not yet fully developed. This literature review analyzes the available data on securing fertility in pediatric and adolescent populations to identify the methods used and describe aspects related to financing, ethics, and the perspective of patients and their parents. Topics related to oncofertility in this age group are relatively niche, with few peer-reviewed articles available and published studies mostly on adults. Compared to pubertal individuals, a limited number of fertility preservation methods are used for prepubertal patients. Funding for the procedures described varies from country to country, but only a few governments choose to reimburse them. Oncofertility of pediatric and adolescent patients raises many controversies related to the decision, parents' beliefs, having a partner, ethics, as well as the knowledge and experience of healthcare professionals. As the fertility of young cancer patients is at risk, healthcare professionals should make every effort to provide them with an opportunity to fulfill their future reproductive plans and to have a family and offspring. Systemic solutions should form the basis for the development of oncofertility in pediatric and adolescent populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Piotr Pawłowski
- Student Scientific Association at the Department of Psychology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Lublin, 20-093 Lublin, Poland; (P.P.); (J.M.)
| | - Karolina Joanna Ziętara
- Student Scientific Association at the Department of Psychology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Lublin, 20-093 Lublin, Poland; (P.P.); (J.M.)
| | - Justyna Michalczyk
- Student Scientific Association at the Department of Psychology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Lublin, 20-093 Lublin, Poland; (P.P.); (J.M.)
| | - Magdalena Fryze
- Department of Psychology, Psychosocial Aspects of Medicine, Medical University of Lublin, 20-093 Lublin, Poland; (M.F.); (M.S.)
| | - Anna Buchacz
- Youth Cancer Europe, 400372 Cluj-Napoca, Romania;
| | - Agnieszka Zaucha-Prażmo
- Department of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Transplantology, Medical University of Lublin, 20-093 Lublin, Poland; (A.Z.-P.); (J.Z.)
| | - Joanna Zawitkowska
- Department of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Transplantology, Medical University of Lublin, 20-093 Lublin, Poland; (A.Z.-P.); (J.Z.)
| | - Anna Torres
- Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology, Medical University of Lublin, 20-093 Lublin, Poland;
| | - Marzena Samardakiewicz
- Department of Psychology, Psychosocial Aspects of Medicine, Medical University of Lublin, 20-093 Lublin, Poland; (M.F.); (M.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Stukaite-Ruibiene E, van der Perk MEM, Vaitkeviciene GE, Bos AME, Bumbuliene Z, van den Heuvel-Eibrink MM, Rascon J. Evaluation of oncofertility care in childhood cancer patients: the EU-Horizon 2020 twinning project TREL initiative. Front Pediatr 2023; 11:1212711. [PMID: 37565239 PMCID: PMC10411952 DOI: 10.3389/fped.2023.1212711] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2023] [Accepted: 07/14/2023] [Indexed: 08/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The 5-year survival rate of childhood cancer exceeds 80%, however, many survivors develop late effects including infertility. The aim of this study was to evaluate the current status of oncofertility care at Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Klinikos (VULSK) within the framework of the EU-Horizon 2020 TREL project. Methods All parents or patients aged 12-17.9 years treated from July 1, 2021 until July 1, 2022 were invited to complete an oncofertility-care-evaluation questionnaire. After completing the questionnaire, patients were triaged to low-risk (LR) or high-risk (HR) of gonadal damage using a risk stratification tool (triage). Data was assessed using descriptive statistics. Results Questionnaires were completed by 48 parents and 13 children triaged as 36 (59%) LR and 25 (41%) HR patients. Most HR respondents (21/25, 84%) were not counseled by a fertility specialist. Six boys (4 HR, 2 LR) were counseled, none of the girls was counseled. Three HR boys underwent sperm cryopreservation. Only 17 (27.9%, 9 HR, 8 LR) respondents correctly estimated their risk. All counseled boys (n = 6) agreed the risk for fertility impairment had been mentioned as compared to 49.1% (n = 27) of uncounseled. All counseled respondents agreed they knew enough about fertility (vs. 42%). Conclusions Respondents counseled by a fertility specialist were provided more information on fertility than uncounseled. HR patients were not sufficiently counseled by a fertility specialist. Based on the current experience oncofertility care at VULSK will be improved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Goda Elizabeta Vaitkeviciene
- Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania
- Center for Pediatric Oncology and Hematology, Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Klinikos, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | | | - Zana Bumbuliene
- Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania
- Center of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Klinikos, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | | | - Jelena Rascon
- Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania
- Center for Pediatric Oncology and Hematology, Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Klinikos, Vilnius, Lithuania
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Frederick NN, Klosky JL, Meacham L, Quinn GP, Kelvin JF, Cherven B, Freyer DR, Dvorak CC, Brackett J, Ahmed-Winston S, Bryson E, Su HI, Chow EJ, Levine J. Fertility Preservation Practices at Pediatric Oncology Institutions in the United States: A Report From the Children's Oncology Group. JCO Oncol Pract 2023; 19:e550-e558. [PMID: 36763922 PMCID: PMC10113112 DOI: 10.1200/op.22.00349] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2022] [Revised: 12/16/2022] [Accepted: 01/06/2023] [Indexed: 02/12/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Fertility discussions are an integral part of comprehensive care for pediatric, adolescent, and young adult patients newly diagnosed with cancer and are supported by national guidelines. Current institutional practices are poorly understood. METHODS A cross-sectional survey was distributed to 220 Children's Oncology Group member institutions regarding fertility discussion practices. Descriptive statistics were calculated for all variables. The association between specific practices and selected outcomes on the basis of sex was examined via multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS One hundred forty-four programs (65.5%) returned surveys. Of these, 65 (45.1%) reported routine discussions of fertility with all female patients and 55 (38.5%) all male patients (P = .25). Ninety-two (63.8%) reported no specific criteria for offering females fertility preservation (FP), compared with 40 (27.7%) for males (P < .001). Program characteristics associated with fertility discussions included reproductive endocrinology and infertility on site (females odds ratio [OR], 2.1; 95% CI, 1.0 to 4.3), discussion documentation mandate (females OR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.0 to 5.5; males OR, 3.5; 95% CI, 1.4 to 8.7), and cumulative institution-based FP infrastructure (which included [1] routine practice of documentation, [2] template for documentation, [3] mandate for documentation, and [4] availability of FP navigation; females OR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.1 to 2.3; males OR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.6 to 3.4). Utilization of practices unsupported by guidelines included offering sperm banking after treatment initiation (39/135 programs; 28.9%), gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogs for ovarian suppression/FP (75/144 programs; 52.1%), ovarian tissue cryopreservation at diagnosis for patients with leukemia (19/64 programs; 29.7%), and testicular tissue cryopreservation (23/138 programs; 16.7%) not part of a clinical trial. CONCLUSION Despite recommended guidelines, fertility discussions with patients/families before treatment initiation are not routine at Children's Oncology Group institutions. Standard criteria to determine which options should be offered to patients are more common for males than females.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natasha N. Frederick
- Center for Cancer and Blood Disorders, Connecticut Children's Medical Center, Hartford, CT
- University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, CT
| | - James L. Klosky
- Aflac Cancer and Blood Disorders Center at Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, GA
- Department of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
| | - Lillian Meacham
- Aflac Cancer and Blood Disorders Center at Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, GA
- Department of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
| | - Gwendolyn P. Quinn
- Division of Medical Ethics, Departments of OB-GYN, Population Health, Grossman School of Medicine, New York University, New York, NY
| | | | - Brooke Cherven
- Aflac Cancer and Blood Disorders Center at Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, GA
- Department of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
| | - David R. Freyer
- Cancer and Blood Disease Institute, Children's Hospital, Los Angeles, CA
- USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
- Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Christopher C. Dvorak
- Division of Pediatric Allergy, Immunology and Bone Marrow Transplant, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Julienne Brackett
- Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Texas Children's Cancer and Hematology Centers, Houston, TX
| | | | - Elyse Bryson
- Aflac Cancer and Blood Disorders Center at Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, GA
| | - H. Irene Su
- Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Diego, CA
| | - Eric J. Chow
- Clinical Research and Public Health Sciences Divisions, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Jennifer Levine
- Division of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Ehrhardt MJ, Dixon SB, Belsky J, Hochberg J. Late effects and frontline treatment selection for children with non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Best Pract Res Clin Haematol 2023; 36:101443. [PMID: 36907640 DOI: 10.1016/j.beha.2023.101443] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2023] [Accepted: 01/31/2023] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Approximately 1 in 640 adults between 20 and 40 years of age is a survivor of childhood cancer. However, survival has often come at the expense of increased risk of long-term complications, including chronic health conditions and higher mortality rates. Similarly, long-term survivors of childhood non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) experience significant morbidity and mortality related to prior cancer treatments, highlighting the importance of primary and secondary prevention strategies to mitigate late toxicity. As a result, effective treatment regimens for pediatric NHL have evolved to reduce both short- and long-term toxicity through cumulative dose reductions and elimination of radiation. The establishment of effective regimens facilitates shared decision-making opportunities for frontline treatment selection that considers efficacy, acute toxicity, convenience, and late effects of treatments. The current review seeks to merge current frontline treatment regimens with survivorship guidelines to enhance understanding of potential long-term health risks to facilitate best treatment practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew J Ehrhardt
- Department of Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA; Department of Epidemiology and Cancer Control, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA.
| | - Stephanie B Dixon
- Department of Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA; Department of Epidemiology and Cancer Control, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Jennifer Belsky
- Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Jessica Hochberg
- Department of Pediatrics, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
El Alaoui-Lasmaili K, Nguyen-Thi PL, Demogeot N, Lighezzolo-Alnot J, Gross MJ, Mansuy L, Chastagner P, Koscinski I. Fertility discussions and concerns in childhood cancer survivors, a systematic review for updated practice. Cancer Med 2023; 12:6023-6039. [PMID: 36224740 PMCID: PMC10028046 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.5339] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2022] [Revised: 09/26/2022] [Accepted: 09/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To provide ways to improve the clinical practice of fertility preservation (FP) for children, adolescents, and young adults (AYA) with cancer. DESIGN A systematic research of online databases was undertaken in March 2020 following the PRISMA criteria, including Medline and Web of Science. RESULTS Fifty-nine articles were included. Surveys, interviews, and focus groups were used to collect data from patients, parents, and health care providers (HCPs). Four themes worth exploring emerged: (a) what do patients and professionals think of and know about FP? (b) what makes the fertility discussion happen or not? (c) what, retrospectively, led to FP being pursued or not? and (d) how do patients and HCPs feel about fertility issues? CONCLUSION A minority of AYAs preserve their fertility (banking assay for 45% of boys and 23% of girls). Yet fertility concerns have a significant impact on the quality of life of young cancer survivors. Although recommendations and guidelines regarding FP are available internationally, there are no specific guidelines as to how to conduct fertility counseling for children and adolescents. Some barriers are not removable, such as a poor prognosis of an obvious severe disease, time constraints for starting treatment, and cultural and religious beliefs. In response to aspects hindering patients and families to be receptive to any discussion at the time of diagnosis, psychological support could reduce the level of emotional distress and help restore a degree of open-mindedness to open a window for discussion. Moreover, as the lack of knowledge of professionals about fertility is frequently pointed out as a limiting factor for fertility discussion, reinforcing professional training regarding FP could be proposed to promote fertility discussion and eventually referral for FP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Phi Linh Nguyen-Thi
- Unité d'évaluation médicale, Unité de Méthodologie, Data management et Statistique - UMDS, CHRU de Nancy
| | - Nadine Demogeot
- Interpsy Laboratory (UR4432), University of Lorraine, Nancy, France
| | | | | | - Ludovic Mansuy
- Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital of Nancy, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - Pascal Chastagner
- Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital of Nancy, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - Isabelle Koscinski
- Laboratory of Biology of Reproduction-CECOS Lorraine, University Hospital of Nancy, Nancy, France
- INSERM U1256, NGERE, Université de Lorraine, Nancy, France
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Xu Z, Ibrahim S, Burdett S, Rydzewska L, Al Wattar BH, Davies MC. Long term pregnancy outcomes of women with cancer following fertility preservation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2023; 281:41-48. [PMID: 36535069 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.12.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2022] [Revised: 11/22/2022] [Accepted: 12/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE As cancer survivorship increases, there is higher uptake of fertility preservation treatments among affected women. However, there is limited evidence on the subsequent use of preserved material and pregnancy outcomes in women who underwent fertility preservation (FP) before cancer treatments. We aimed to systematically review the long-term reproductive and pregnancy outcomes in this cohort of women. PATIENTS Women who underwent any type of the following FP treatments: embryo cryopreservation (EC), oocyte cryopreservation (OC) and ovarian tissue cryopreservation (OTC)) before any planned cancer treatment. EVIDENCE REVIEW We searched electronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, and HTA) from inception until May 2021 for all observational studies that met our inclusion criteria. We extracted data on reproductive and pregnancy outcomes in duplicate and assessed the risk of bias in included studies using the ROBINS-I tool. We pooled data using a random-effects model and reported using odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Our primary outcome was live birth rate and other important reproductive and pregnancy outcomes. RESULTS Of 5405 citations, we screened 103 and included 26 observational studies (n = 7061 women). Hematologic malignancy was the commonest cause for seeking FP treatments, followed by breast and gynecology cancers. Twelve studies reported on OTC (12/26, 46 %), eight included EC (8/26, 30 %), and twelve reported on OC (12/26, 46 %). The cumulative live birth rate following any FP treatment was 0.046 (95 %CI 0.029-0.066). Only 8 % of women returned to use their frozen reproductive material (558/7037, 8.0 %), resulting in 210 live births in total, including assisted conceptions following EC/OC/OTC and natural conceptions following OTC. The odds for live birth was OR 0.38 (95 %CI 0.29-0.48 I2 83.7 %). The odds for live birth was the highest among women who had EC (OR 0.45, 95 %CI 0.14-0.76, I2 95.1 %), followed by the OTC group (OR 0.37, 95 %CI 0.22-0.53, I2 88.7 %) and OC group (OR 0.31, 95 %CI 0.15-0.47, I2 78.2 %). CONCLUSIONS Fertility preservation treatments offered good long-term reproductive outcomes for women with cancer with a high chance to achieve a live birth. Further research is needed to evaluate the long-term pregnancy and offspring outcomes in this cohort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zilin Xu
- Reproductive Medicine Unit, University College London Hospitals, London, United Kingdom; UCL Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Sameh Ibrahim
- UCL Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Sarah Burdett
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Larysa Rydzewska
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Bassel H Al Wattar
- Beginings Assisted Conception Unit, Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals, London, United Kingdom.
| | - Melanie C Davies
- Reproductive Medicine Unit, University College London Hospitals, London, United Kingdom; UCL Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Zhang J, Wei L, Deng X, Luo C, Zhu Q, Lu S, Mao C. Current status and reflections on fertility preservation in China. J Assist Reprod Genet 2022; 39:2835-2845. [PMID: 36322229 PMCID: PMC9790826 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-022-02648-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2022] [Accepted: 10/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE With the progress of medical technology and renovated conception of fertility, the prospective studies and practice of fertility preservation are drawing more and more attention from medical workers. With the largest population of over 1.4 billion, China makes the experience accumulated in fertility preservation efforts even more relevant. This article summarizes China's experience and shares it with the world to promote the healthy development of fertility preservation. METHODS This study was based on multiple Chinese expert consensuses on fertility preservation issued in 2021 and the current national regulations and principles, compared with the latest advice and guidelines issued by global reproductive authorities such as the ASRM and ESHRE. Summarize the experience and reflection of Chinese scholars in the process of fertility preservation. RESULTS This study reports on the current situation of fertility preservation in China, sharing the Chinese experience gained in the process of development, and offering Chinese reflections on worrying issues. CONCLUSION Fertility preservation is a medical and social issue of reproductive health security, which is conducive to the sound development of the world population and social production.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiakai Zhang
- Reproductive Medicine Center, First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, 899 Pinghai Rd, Suzhou Suzhou, Jiangsu, 215000 China
- Marxism Research Institute, Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, 215123 China
- Suzhou High School Affiliated to Xi’an Jiaotong University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, 215000 China
| | - Lun Wei
- Reproductive Medicine Center, First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, 899 Pinghai Rd, Suzhou Suzhou, Jiangsu, 215000 China
| | - Xiaoling Deng
- Reproductive Medicine Center, First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, 899 Pinghai Rd, Suzhou Suzhou, Jiangsu, 215000 China
| | - Chao Luo
- Reproductive Medicine Center, First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, 899 Pinghai Rd, Suzhou Suzhou, Jiangsu, 215000 China
| | - Qianmeng Zhu
- Reproductive Medicine Center, First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, 899 Pinghai Rd, Suzhou Suzhou, Jiangsu, 215000 China
| | - Shucheng Lu
- Marxism Research Institute, Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, 215123 China
| | - Caiping Mao
- Reproductive Medicine Center, First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, 899 Pinghai Rd, Suzhou Suzhou, Jiangsu, 215000 China
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Factors influencing perceived communication quality for successful fertility preservation counseling for adolescent and young adult cancer patients and their caregivers in Korea. Support Care Cancer 2022; 30:9751-9762. [DOI: 10.1007/s00520-022-07425-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2021] [Accepted: 10/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
18
|
Micol LA, Adenubi F, Williamson E, Lane S, Mitchell RT, Sangster P. The importance of the urologist in male oncology fertility preservation. BJU Int 2022; 130:637-645. [PMID: 35535513 PMCID: PMC9796952 DOI: 10.1111/bju.15772] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To demonstrate that surgical sperm retrieval (SSR) and spermatogonial stem cell retrieval (SSCR) in an oncological context are safe and successful. PATIENTS AND METHODS This a retrospective study in a tertiary hospital in the UK. Patients requiring fertility preservation from December 2017 to January 2020 were included. Data were analysed with Microsoft Excel 2016 and the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (version 20). RESULTS Among 1264 patients referred to the Reproductive Medical Unit at the University College of London Hospitals for cryopreservation prior to gonadotoxic treatment, 39 chose to go forward with SSR/SSCR because they presented as azoo-/cryptozoospermic or an inability to masturbate/ejaculate. Interventions were testicular sperm extraction (23 patients) or aspiration (one), electroejaculation (one), and testicular wedge biopsy for SSCR (14). The median (range) age was 15.0 (10-65) years and the median testosterone level was 4.4 nmoL/L. Primary diagnoses were sarcoma in 11 patients, leukaemia in nine, lymphoma in eight, testicular tumour in five, other oncological haematological entities in two, other solid cancers in two, while two patients had non-oncological haematological diseases. SSR/SSCR could be offered within 7.5 days on average. Chemotherapy could follow within 2 days from SSR/SSCR, and bone marrow transplant occurred within 19.5 days (all expressed as medians). The success rate for SSR was 68.0% (at least one vial/straw collected). The mean (SD) Johnsen score of testicular biopsies was 5.23 (2.25) with a trend towards positive correlation with SSR success (P = 0.07). However, age, hormonal profile and type of cancer did not predict SSR outcome. CONCLUSION We show that SSR and SSCR in an oncological context are valid treatment options with a high success rate for patients in which sperm cryopreservation from semen is impossible. By providing an effective pathway, fertility preservation is possible with minimal delay to oncological treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lionel A. Micol
- Institute of AndrologyUniversity College London Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK,UrologyCHUVLausanneSwitzerland,CPMALausanneSwitzerland
| | - Funmi Adenubi
- Reproductive Medicine UnitUniversity College London Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
| | - Elizabeth Williamson
- Reproductive Medicine UnitUniversity College London Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
| | - Sheila Lane
- Children's Haematology and OncologyOxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustOxfordUK
| | - Rod T. Mitchell
- Centre for Reproductive HealthEdinburgh Royal Hospital for Sick ChildrenThe University of Edinburgh MRCEdinburghUK
| | - Philippa Sangster
- Institute of AndrologyUniversity College London Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Alshamsan B, Kushnir I, Al‐Saadi S, Srikanthan A. Perceptions and attitudes of medical oncologists regarding fertility preservation and pregnancy in high-risk cancer patients: A survey among Canadian medical oncologists. Cancer Med 2022; 12:1912-1921. [PMID: 35833372 PMCID: PMC9883564 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.5023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2021] [Revised: 05/02/2022] [Accepted: 06/30/2022] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Infertility is a critical late toxicity that impacts adolescent and young adult (AYA, ages 15-39 years) cancer survivors. International oncology societies recommend discussing fertility preservation (FP) for all AYA patients, regardless of stage or prognosis. We aim to understand Canadian medical oncologists' perceptions, attitudes, and knowledge toward FP and pregnancy in patients with cancer, including advanced stages and high risk for recurrence. METHODS An anonymous electronic survey utilizing hypothetical scenarios was sent to medical oncologists in the province of Ontario, Canada. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize all data. Logistic regression models were constructed to identify factors that predicted FP discussions and referrals. RESULTS The survey was received by 91 medical oncologists, and the response rate was 44%. Fifty-eight percent of respondents offer FP for all patients. Physicians are more likely to refer patients for FP before curative intent therapy than before palliative chemotherapy (95% vs. 39.5%, p < 0.001). Most respondents (86%) are comfortable discussing FP; however, only 31% self-reported feeling up-to-date on knowledge of current FP methods. Female physicians were more likely to report up-to-date knowledge and confidence discussing FP with patients. Forty percent of respondents identified that concerns about the welfare of the resulting offspring should not be a cause for denying patients assistance in reproduction. CONCLUSION There is a significant difference in physician attitude toward offering FP based on the cancer stage. Increased awareness of standard of care guidelines and resources for difficult situations may improve the frequency of discussions about FP in motivated cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bader Alshamsan
- Division of Medical OncologyThe Ottawa Hospital Cancer CentreOttawaOntarioCanada
| | - Igal Kushnir
- Division of Medical OncologyThe Ottawa Hospital Cancer CentreOttawaOntarioCanada,Sackler Faculty of MedicineTel Aviv UniversityTel AvivIsrael
| | | | - Amirrtha Srikanthan
- Division of Medical OncologyThe Ottawa Hospital Cancer CentreOttawaOntarioCanada,Department of MedicineThe University of OttawaOttawaOntarioCanada,Ottawa Hospital Research InstituteOttawaOntarioCanada
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
van der Perk MEM, Stukaitė-Ruibienė E, Bumbulienė Ž, Vaitkevičienė GE, Bos AME, van den Heuvel-Eibrink MM, Rascon J. Development of a questionnaire to evaluate female fertility care in pediatric oncology, a TREL initiative. BMC Cancer 2022; 22:450. [PMID: 35468746 PMCID: PMC9036799 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-09450-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2021] [Accepted: 03/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Currently the five-year survival of childhood cancer is up to 80% due to improved treatment modalities. However, the majority of childhood cancer survivors develop late effects including infertility. Survivors describe infertility as an important and life-altering late effect. Fertility preservation options are becoming available to pre- and postpubertal patients diagnosed with childhood cancer and fertility care is now an important aspect in cancer treatment. The use of fertility preservation options depends on the quality of counseling on this important and delicate issue. The aim of this manuscript is to present a questionnaire to determine the impact of fertility counseling in patients suffering from childhood cancer, to improve fertility care and evaluate what patients and their parents or guardians consider good fertility care. Methods Within the framework of the EU-Horizon 2020 TREL project, a fertility care evaluation questionnaire used in the Netherlands was made applicable for international multi-center use. The questionnaire to be used at least also in Lithuania, incorporates patients’ views on fertility care to further improve the quality of fertility care and counseling. Results evaluate fertility care and will be used to improve current fertility care in a national specialized pediatric oncology center in the Netherlands and a pediatric oncology center in Lithuania. Conclusion An oncofertility-care-evaluation questionnaire has been developed for pediatric oncology patients and their families specifically. Results of this questionnaire may contribute to enhancement of fertility care in pediatric oncology in wider settings and thus improve quality of life of childhood cancer patients and survivors. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-022-09450-2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Žana Bumbulienė
- Vilnius University, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius, Lithuania.,Center of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Klinikos, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Goda Elizabeta Vaitkevičienė
- Vilnius University, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius, Lithuania.,Center for Pediatric Oncology and Hematology, Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Klinikos, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Annelies M E Bos
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Reproductive Medicine and Gynaecology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Jelena Rascon
- Vilnius University, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius, Lithuania.,Center for Pediatric Oncology and Hematology, Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Klinikos, Vilnius, Lithuania
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Marchak JG, Christen S, Mulder RL, Baust K, Blom JMC, Brinkman TM, Elens I, Harju E, Kadan-Lottick NS, Khor JWT, Lemiere J, Recklitis CJ, Wakefield CE, Wiener L, Constine LS, Hudson MM, Kremer LCM, Skinner R, Vetsch J, Lee JL, Michel G. Recommendations for the surveillance of mental health problems in childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancer survivors: a report from the International Late Effects of Childhood Cancer Guideline Harmonization Group. Lancet Oncol 2022; 23:e184-e196. [PMID: 35358467 PMCID: PMC9639707 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(21)00750-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2021] [Revised: 12/06/2021] [Accepted: 12/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Survivors of childhood, adolescent, and young adult (diagnosed when <25 years of age) cancer are at risk of mental health problems. The aim of this clinical practice guideline is to harmonise international recommendations for mental health surveillance in survivors of childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancer. This guideline was developed by a multidisciplinary panel of experts under the sponsorship of the International Guideline Harmonization Group. We evaluated concordance among existing survivorship clinical practice guidelines and conducted a systematic review following evidence-based methods. Of 7249 studies identified, 76 articles from 12 countries met the inclusion criteria. Recommendations were formulated on the basis of identified evidence in combination with clinical considerations. This international clinical practice guideline strongly recommends mental health surveillance for all survivors of childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancers at every follow-up visit and prompt referral to mental health specialists when problems are identified. Overall, the recommendations reflect the necessity of mental health surveillance as part of comprehensive survivor-focused health care.
Collapse
|
22
|
Newton HL, Picton HM, Friend AJ, Hayden CM, Brougham M, Cox R, Grandage V, Kwok-Williams M, Lane S, Mitchell RT, Skinner R, Wallace WH, Yeomanson D, Glaser AW. Inconsistencies in fertility preservation for young people with cancer in the UK. Arch Dis Child 2022; 107:265-270. [PMID: 34544694 DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2021-321873] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2021] [Accepted: 06/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the utilisation of and funding structure for fertility preservation for children diagnosed with cancer in the UK. DESIGN Survey of paediatric oncologists/haematologists. Questionnaires were sent electronically with reminder notifications to non-responders. SETTING UK Paediatric Oncology Principal Treatment Centres (PTCs). PARTICIPANTS Paediatric oncologists/haematologists with an interest in the effects of treatment on fertility representing the 20 PTCs across the UK. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Referral practices, sources and length of funding for storage of gametes or gonadal tissue for children diagnosed with cancer in the preceding 12 months. RESULTS Responses were received from 18 PTCs (90%) with responses to 98.3% of questions. All centres had referred patients for fertility preservation: ovarian tissue collection/storage 100% (n=18 centres), sperm banking 100% (n=17; one centre was excluded due to the age range of their patients), testicular tissue storage 83% (n=15), mature oocyte collection 35% (n=6; one centre was excluded due to the age range of their patients). All centres with knowledge of their funding source reported sperm cryopreservation was NHS funded. Only 60% (n=9) centres reported the same for mature oocyte storage. Of the centres aware of their funding source, half reported that ovarian and testicular tissue storage was funded by charitable sources; this increased in England compared with the rest of the UK. CONCLUSIONS Inequality exists in provision of fertility preservation for children with cancer across the UK. There is lack of formalised government funding to support international guidelines, with resultant geographical variation in care. Centralised funding of fertility preservation for children and young adults is needed alongside establishment of a national advisory panel to support all PTCs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah L Newton
- University of Leeds Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, Leeds, UK.,Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Helen M Picton
- University of Leeds Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, Leeds, UK
| | - Amanda Jane Friend
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.,Paediatric and Adolescent Oncology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | | | - Mark Brougham
- Department of Haematology and Oncology, Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Rachel Cox
- Paediatric Oncology, Bristol Royal Hospital for Children, Bristol, UK
| | | | | | - Sheila Lane
- Paediatric Oncology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Rod Thomas Mitchell
- MRC Centrre for Reproductive Health, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.,Department of Diabetes and Endocrinology, Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Roderick Skinner
- Paediatric Haematology, Great North Children's Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.,Translational and Clinical Research Institute, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - W Hamish Wallace
- The University of Edinburgh MRC Centre for Reproductive Health, Edinburgh, UK.,Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Daniel Yeomanson
- Paediatric Oncology, Sheffield Children's Hospital, Sheffield, UK
| | - Adam W Glaser
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK .,Paediatric and Adolescent Oncology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The issue of fertility preservation has become increasingly relevant as survival rates of children with cancer exceeds 80% at 5 years. Fertility preservation options are being utilized alongside less gonadotoxic therapeutic regimens in the treatment of these patients. The purpose of this review is to summarize the recent advances in fertility preservation in the pediatric, adolescent, and young adult population. RECENT FINDINGS Education research involves both patient and provider; to increase understanding on both sides for improved adoption of techniques and higher rates of posttreatment fertility. Basic science research, specific to the pediatric population, has worked to further understanding of protective techniques and cryopreserved tissue transfer. Research on the techniques of preservation confirms the safety of surgical gonadal (ovarian and testicular) tissue retrieval for cryopreservation but a viable pathway for testicular tissue utilization, as it has for ovarian, has yet to be realized. Outcomes may be improving but it is apparent that robust registries are necessary to track patients long-term. Possibly the largest advancement in the recent past are group efforts, such as by PanCareLIFE, to create guidelines for these issues using larger cohorts and registries than were available. SUMMARY Current research implies the need for the development of a national strategy to ensure that pediatric patients undergoing gonadotoxic regimens are educated, alongside their family, about fertility options and outcomes thereafter.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Roshni Dasgupta
- Division of Pediatric General and Thoracic Surgery, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
OUP accepted manuscript. Hum Reprod Update 2022; 28:747-762. [DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmac019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2021] [Revised: 02/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
25
|
Martinez-Ibarra NA, Remolina-Bonilla YA, Buerba-Vieregge HH, Barragan-Carrillo R, Castro-Alonso FJ, Mateos-Corella S, Bourlon MT. Oncofertility and Fertility Preservation in Cancer Patients Across the Twitterverse. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2022; 13:926668. [PMID: 35846298 PMCID: PMC9278620 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2022.926668] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2022] [Accepted: 05/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Infertility is a major problem affecting children, adolescents, and young adults (AYAs) with cancer, either due to the disease itself or because of oncologic treatment. Oncofertility (OF) focuses on counseling cancer patients about fertility risks and preservation options. However, OF and fertility preservation (FP) conversations on Twitter and their impact are unknown. We aim to characterize the users and type of content of these conversations. MATERIALS AND METHODS This observational study analyzed tweets with the hashtags "#Oncofertility" and "#FertilityPreservation" over eight months. We classified Twitter accounts by user type and country. Tweets were categorized by content type, and retweets and likes were quantified. Descriptive statistics were used for analysis. RESULTS A total of 399 tweets from 223 different accounts were evaluated. Twitter accounts comprised 22 countries and stemmed from high, upper-middle, and lower-middle-income countries in 86.5%, 5.4%, and 6.3%, respectively; no accounts from low-income countries were found. Accounts were mostly from physicians (37%) and healthcare centers (20%); we did not find any patient accounts. The most common content category was informative tweets directed to patients (30.8%), followed by discussion/sharing of medical papers (25.6%). Only 14.5% of tweets contained information about children and adolescents. Still, only 4.5% were aimed at children. Retweets were absent in 16.5% of the tweets, and 80.7% did not have comments. CONCLUSION OF and FP discussions on Twitter were limited to interactions among medical professionals. Also, advocacy groups showed limited activity on social media. Even though a significant proportion of tweets directed to patients were found, no active involvement of patients was observed. Finally, limited number of tweets (4.5%) were directed to children and adolescents. There is a need to raise awareness about the effects of cancer on fertility in this group. Currently, Twitter is not a resource of information for children and AYAs with cancer who need OF counseling and fertility preservation. Our results open a debate on how to promote the use of social media in the future to improve the quality of OF information available, awareness, and care since there is an unmet need for fertility preservation access in young cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nayeli A. Martinez-Ibarra
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición “Salvador Zubirán”, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Yuly A. Remolina-Bonilla
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición “Salvador Zubirán”, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Hector H. Buerba-Vieregge
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición “Salvador Zubirán”, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Regina Barragan-Carrillo
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición “Salvador Zubirán”, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Francisco J. Castro-Alonso
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Regional de Alta Especialidad de Oaxaca, San Bartolo Coyotepec, Mexico
| | - Samantha Mateos-Corella
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición “Salvador Zubirán”, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Maria T. Bourlon
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición “Salvador Zubirán”, Mexico City, Mexico
- *Correspondence: Maria T. Bourlon,
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Katano A, Yamashita H. Primary urinary bladder marginal zone B-cell lymphoma of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue. J Cancer Res Ther 2022; 18:1814-1816. [DOI: 10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_238_21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
|
27
|
Meeting Challenges in the Long-Term Care of Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. Curr Hematol Malig Rep 2021; 17:15-24. [PMID: 34735688 DOI: 10.1007/s11899-021-00657-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/07/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To discuss the long-term view of treating and following pediatric, adolescent, and young adult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) - with review of what can be done to prevent, monitor for, and treat complications of therapy. RECENT FINDINGS Pediatric, adolescent, and young adult oncology patients, including those with ALL, are living longer with higher overall survival rates as treatments and supportive care for these patients continue to improve. These patients are burdened by the risk of significant health and quality of life consequences as a result of their treatment.. For these patients, the late effects of treatment can be life-threatening, such as secondary cancers or cardiotoxicity, or life-altering with respect to quality of life. The goal of this paper is to review the current literature, research, and surveillance guidelines regarding the late effects of ALL therapy, to outline what can be done to mitigate the toxic effects of oncology treatment, and to extend life expectancy and improve quality of life for our patients. We review risk factors and interventions available to prevent and treat cardiovascular disease, secondary malignancies, endocrine complications (obesity, osteoporosis, infertility, and premature menopause), cognitive effects, and effects on functioning and mortality.
Collapse
|
28
|
Brookshire-Gay KA, Byrd M. Commentary: The Importance and Complexities of Understanding Parent-Adolescent Concordance Regarding Fertility Perspectives Prior to Cancer Treatment. J Pediatr Psychol 2021; 46:1159-1161. [PMID: 34510206 DOI: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsab097] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2021] [Revised: 08/17/2021] [Accepted: 08/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | - Michelle Byrd
- Department of Psychology, Eastern Michigan University, Ypsilanti, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Cheng HY, Chau HC, Cheung CKC, Yang LS, Lee SLK, Leung AWK, Li CK, Lam TTN, Yeung NCY, Cheung YT. Perceptions of Infertility Risk Among Chinese Parents of Children with Cancer: A Qualitative Study. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol 2021; 11:394-401. [PMID: 34613849 DOI: 10.1089/jayao.2021.0106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: Anticancer treatment may be associated with damage to the reproductive organs and risk of infertility in children with cancer. The collectivist cultural norms of Asian societies may lead Chinese parents to have unique concerns regarding infertility. This qualitative study explored the perceptions of infertility risk and parenthood among parents of childhood cancer survivors in Hong Kong. Methods: Thirteen parents were recruited via a snowball sampling approach from a nongovernmental organization in Hong Kong, representing nine survivors of childhood cancer (leukemia n = 5, solid tumors n = 4). The in-depth semistructured interviews were audiotaped and transcribed verbatim. A thematic analysis was performed using ATLAS.ti 8. Results: Parents mostly perceived their children's fertility status as a distant concern (n = 11, 85%) but emphasized the need for timely information from clinicians when their children reach young adulthood (n = 8, 62%). They reported receiving inconsistent fertility information from different oncology practitioners (n = 9, 69%). A few parents acknowledged that under the influence of the Chinese culture, their children, especially sons, have an important duty to continue the family lineage. However, even if the cancer treatment were associated with infertility risk, almost all parents (n = 12, 92%) stated that it would still not affect their willingness to let their child undergo treatment because survival and cure were still their highest priority. Conclusion: Our findings suggest the need to proactively provide fertility information to parents both during active treatment and when survivors reach reproductive age. Future studies should evaluate the benefits of developing culturally relevant decision-making aids to address parents' informational needs regarding fertility issues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ho Yu Cheng
- The Nethersole School of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, New Territories, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Ho Cheung Chau
- School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, New Territories, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Cedric Ka Chun Cheung
- School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, New Territories, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Lok Sum Yang
- School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, New Territories, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Samantha Lai-Ka Lee
- Department of Paediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, Hong Kong Children's Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Alex Wing Kwan Leung
- Department of Paediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, Hong Kong Children's Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.,Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, New Territories, Hong Kong SAR, China.,Hong Kong Hub of Paediatric Excellence, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, New Territories, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Chi Kong Li
- Department of Paediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, Hong Kong Children's Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.,Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, New Territories, Hong Kong SAR, China.,Hong Kong Hub of Paediatric Excellence, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, New Territories, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Teddy Tai Ning Lam
- School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, New Territories, Hong Kong SAR, China.,Little Life Warriors Society Hong Kong, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Nelson Chun Yiu Yeung
- JC School of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, New Territories, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Yin Ting Cheung
- School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, New Territories, Hong Kong SAR, China
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Garutti M, Lambertini M, Puglisi F. Checkpoint inhibitors, fertility, pregnancy, and sexual life: a systematic review. ESMO Open 2021; 6:100276. [PMID: 34597942 PMCID: PMC8487000 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100276] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2021] [Accepted: 09/09/2021] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (i.e. anti-PD1, anti-PDL1, and anti-CTLA4) have revolutionized the therapeutic approach of several cancer types. In a subset of metastatic patients, the duration of the response is so long that a cure might be hypothesized, and a treatment discontinuation strategy could be proposed. Considering that long-term efficacy, some patients could also plan to have a child. Moreover, immunotherapy is moving to the early setting in several diseases including melanoma and breast cancer that are common cancers in young patients. However, there is a paucity of data about their potential detrimental effect on fertility, pregnancy, or sexuality. Herein, we conducted a systematic review with the aim to comprehensively collect the available evidence about fertility, pregnancy, and sexual adverse effects of checkpoint inhibitors in order to help clinicians in daily practice and trialists to develop future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Garutti
- CRO Aviano National Cancer Institute IRCCS, Aviano, Italy.
| | - M Lambertini
- Department of Medical Oncology, Breast Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy; Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - F Puglisi
- CRO Aviano National Cancer Institute IRCCS, Aviano, Italy; Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy; Department of Medicine (DAME), University of Udine, Udine, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
van der Perk MEM, Broer L, Yasui Y, Robison LL, Hudson MM, Laven JSE, van der Pal HJ, Tissing WJE, Versluys B, Bresters D, Kaspers GJL, de Vries ACH, Lambalk CB, Overbeek A, Loonen JJ, Beerendonk CCM, Byrne J, Berger C, Clemens E, Dirksen U, Falck Winther J, Fosså SD, Grabow D, Muraca M, Kaiser M, Kepák T, Kruseova J, Modan-Moses D, Spix C, Zolk O, Kaatsch P, Krijthe JH, Kremer LCM, Brooke RJ, Baedke JL, van Schaik RHN, van den Anker JN, Uitterlinden AG, Bos AME, van Leeuwen FE, van Dulmen-den Broeder E, van der Kooi ALLF, van den Heuvel-Eibrink MM. Effect of Genetic Variation in CYP450 on Gonadal Impairment in a European Cohort of Female Childhood Cancer Survivors, Based on a Candidate Gene Approach: Results from the PanCareLIFE Study. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:4598. [PMID: 34572825 PMCID: PMC8470074 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13184598] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2021] [Revised: 09/01/2021] [Accepted: 09/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Female childhood cancer survivors (CCSs) carry a risk of therapy-related gonadal dysfunction. Alkylating agents (AA) are well-established risk factors, yet inter-individual variability in ovarian function is observed. Polymorphisms in CYP450 enzymes may explain this variability in AA-induced ovarian damage. We aimed to evaluate associations between previously identified genetic polymorphisms in CYP450 enzymes and AA-related ovarian function among adult CCSs. METHODS Anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels served as a proxy for ovarian function in a discovery cohort of adult female CCSs, from the pan-European PanCareLIFE cohort (n = 743; age (years): median 25.8, interquartile range (IQR) 22.1-30.6). Using two additive genetic models in linear and logistic regression, nine genetic variants in three CYP450 enzymes were analyzed in relation to cyclophosphamide equivalent dose (CED) score and their impact on AMH levels. The main model evaluated the effect of the variant on AMH and the interaction model evaluated the modifying effect of the variant on the impact of CED score on log-transformed AMH levels. Results were validated, and meta-analysis performed, using the USA-based St. Jude Lifetime Cohort (n = 391; age (years): median 31.3, IQR 26.6-37.4). RESULTS CYP3A4*3 was significantly associated with AMH levels in the discovery and replication cohort. Meta-analysis revealed a significant main deleterious effect (Beta (95% CI): -0.706 (-1.11--0.298), p-value = 7 × 10-4) of CYP3A4*3 (rs4986910) on log-transformed AMH levels. CYP2B6*2 (rs8192709) showed a significant protective interaction effect (Beta (95% CI): 0.527 (0.126-0.928), p-value = 0.01) on log-transformed AMH levels in CCSs receiving more than 8000 mg/m2 CED. CONCLUSIONS Female CCSs CYP3A4*3 carriers had significantly lower AMH levels, and CYP2B6*2 may have a protective effect on AMH levels. Identification of risk-contributing variants may improve individualized counselling regarding the treatment-related risk of infertility and fertility preservation options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M. E. Madeleine van der Perk
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands; (H.J.v.d.P.); (W.J.E.T.); (B.V.); (D.B.); (G.J.L.K.); (A.C.H.d.V.); (E.C.); (L.C.M.K.); (E.v.D.-d.B.); (A.-L.L.F.v.d.K.); (M.M.v.d.H.-E.)
| | - Linda Broer
- Department of Internal Medicine, Rotterdam, ErasmusMC University Medical Center Rotterdam, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands; (L.B.); (A.G.U.)
| | - Yutaka Yasui
- Department of Epidemiology and Cancer Control, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN 38105, USA; (Y.Y.); (L.L.R.); (M.M.H.); (R.J.B.); (J.L.B.)
| | - Leslie L. Robison
- Department of Epidemiology and Cancer Control, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN 38105, USA; (Y.Y.); (L.L.R.); (M.M.H.); (R.J.B.); (J.L.B.)
| | - Melissa M. Hudson
- Department of Epidemiology and Cancer Control, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN 38105, USA; (Y.Y.); (L.L.R.); (M.M.H.); (R.J.B.); (J.L.B.)
- Department of Oncology, Division of Survivorship, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN 38105, USA
| | - Joop S. E. Laven
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Erasmus MC–University Medical Center, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands;
| | - Helena J. van der Pal
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands; (H.J.v.d.P.); (W.J.E.T.); (B.V.); (D.B.); (G.J.L.K.); (A.C.H.d.V.); (E.C.); (L.C.M.K.); (E.v.D.-d.B.); (A.-L.L.F.v.d.K.); (M.M.v.d.H.-E.)
| | - Wim J. E. Tissing
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands; (H.J.v.d.P.); (W.J.E.T.); (B.V.); (D.B.); (G.J.L.K.); (A.C.H.d.V.); (E.C.); (L.C.M.K.); (E.v.D.-d.B.); (A.-L.L.F.v.d.K.); (M.M.v.d.H.-E.)
| | - Birgitta Versluys
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands; (H.J.v.d.P.); (W.J.E.T.); (B.V.); (D.B.); (G.J.L.K.); (A.C.H.d.V.); (E.C.); (L.C.M.K.); (E.v.D.-d.B.); (A.-L.L.F.v.d.K.); (M.M.v.d.H.-E.)
| | - Dorine Bresters
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands; (H.J.v.d.P.); (W.J.E.T.); (B.V.); (D.B.); (G.J.L.K.); (A.C.H.d.V.); (E.C.); (L.C.M.K.); (E.v.D.-d.B.); (A.-L.L.F.v.d.K.); (M.M.v.d.H.-E.)
| | - Gertjan J. L. Kaspers
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands; (H.J.v.d.P.); (W.J.E.T.); (B.V.); (D.B.); (G.J.L.K.); (A.C.H.d.V.); (E.C.); (L.C.M.K.); (E.v.D.-d.B.); (A.-L.L.F.v.d.K.); (M.M.v.d.H.-E.)
- Department of Pediatric Oncology-Haematology, Emma Children’s Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Andrica C. H. de Vries
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands; (H.J.v.d.P.); (W.J.E.T.); (B.V.); (D.B.); (G.J.L.K.); (A.C.H.d.V.); (E.C.); (L.C.M.K.); (E.v.D.-d.B.); (A.-L.L.F.v.d.K.); (M.M.v.d.H.-E.)
| | - Cornelis B. Lambalk
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (C.B.L.); (A.O.)
| | - Annelies Overbeek
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (C.B.L.); (A.O.)
| | - Jacqueline J. Loonen
- Department of Haematology, Radboud University Medical Center, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands;
| | - Catharina C. M. Beerendonk
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Center, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands;
| | - Julianne Byrne
- Boyne Research Institute, 5 Bolton Square, East, Drogheda, A92 RY6K Co. Louth, Ireland;
| | - Claire Berger
- Department of Paediatric Oncology, University Hospital, 42 055 Saint-Etienne, France;
- Lyon University, Jean Monnet University, INSERM, U 1059, Sainbiose, 42023 Saint-Etienne, France
| | - Eva Clemens
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands; (H.J.v.d.P.); (W.J.E.T.); (B.V.); (D.B.); (G.J.L.K.); (A.C.H.d.V.); (E.C.); (L.C.M.K.); (E.v.D.-d.B.); (A.-L.L.F.v.d.K.); (M.M.v.d.H.-E.)
| | - Uta Dirksen
- University Hospital Essen, Pediatrics III, West German Cancer Centre, 45147 Essen, Germany;
- German Cancer Research Centre, DKTK, Site Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Jeanette Falck Winther
- Childhood Cancer Research Group, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark;
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health, Aarhus University and University Hospital, 8200 Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Sophie D. Fosså
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, 0372 Oslo, Norway;
| | - Desiree Grabow
- Division of Childhood Cancer Epidemiology, German Childhood Cancer Registry, Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics (IMBEI), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany; (D.G.); (M.K.); (C.S.); (P.K.)
| | - Monica Muraca
- Epidemiology and Biostatistics Unit and DOPO Clinic, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, 16147 Genova, Italy;
| | - Melanie Kaiser
- Division of Childhood Cancer Epidemiology, German Childhood Cancer Registry, Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics (IMBEI), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany; (D.G.); (M.K.); (C.S.); (P.K.)
| | - Tomáš Kepák
- University Hospital Brno, International Clinical Research Center (FNUSA-ICRC), Masaryk University, 656 91 Brno, Czech Republic;
| | | | - Dalit Modan-Moses
- The Edmond and Lily Safra Children’s Hospital, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, and the Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv 6997801, Israel;
| | - Claudia Spix
- Division of Childhood Cancer Epidemiology, German Childhood Cancer Registry, Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics (IMBEI), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany; (D.G.); (M.K.); (C.S.); (P.K.)
| | - Oliver Zolk
- Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Immanuel Klinik Rüdersdorf, 16816 Neuruppin, Germany;
| | - Peter Kaatsch
- Division of Childhood Cancer Epidemiology, German Childhood Cancer Registry, Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics (IMBEI), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany; (D.G.); (M.K.); (C.S.); (P.K.)
| | - Jesse H. Krijthe
- Department of Intelligent Systems, Delft University of Technology, 2628 BL Delft, The Netherlands;
| | - Leontien C. M. Kremer
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands; (H.J.v.d.P.); (W.J.E.T.); (B.V.); (D.B.); (G.J.L.K.); (A.C.H.d.V.); (E.C.); (L.C.M.K.); (E.v.D.-d.B.); (A.-L.L.F.v.d.K.); (M.M.v.d.H.-E.)
| | - Russell J. Brooke
- Department of Epidemiology and Cancer Control, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN 38105, USA; (Y.Y.); (L.L.R.); (M.M.H.); (R.J.B.); (J.L.B.)
| | - Jessica L. Baedke
- Department of Epidemiology and Cancer Control, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN 38105, USA; (Y.Y.); (L.L.R.); (M.M.H.); (R.J.B.); (J.L.B.)
| | - Ron H. N. van Schaik
- Department of clinical chemistry, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands;
| | - John N. van den Anker
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Children’s National Hospital, Washington, DC 20010, USA;
| | - André G. Uitterlinden
- Department of Internal Medicine, Rotterdam, ErasmusMC University Medical Center Rotterdam, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands; (L.B.); (A.G.U.)
| | - Annelies M. E. Bos
- Department of Reproductive Medicine and Gynecology, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands;
| | - Flora E. van Leeuwen
- Department of Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
| | - Eline van Dulmen-den Broeder
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands; (H.J.v.d.P.); (W.J.E.T.); (B.V.); (D.B.); (G.J.L.K.); (A.C.H.d.V.); (E.C.); (L.C.M.K.); (E.v.D.-d.B.); (A.-L.L.F.v.d.K.); (M.M.v.d.H.-E.)
| | - Anne-Lotte L. F. van der Kooi
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands; (H.J.v.d.P.); (W.J.E.T.); (B.V.); (D.B.); (G.J.L.K.); (A.C.H.d.V.); (E.C.); (L.C.M.K.); (E.v.D.-d.B.); (A.-L.L.F.v.d.K.); (M.M.v.d.H.-E.)
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Erasmus MC–University Medical Center, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands;
| | - Marry M. van den Heuvel-Eibrink
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands; (H.J.v.d.P.); (W.J.E.T.); (B.V.); (D.B.); (G.J.L.K.); (A.C.H.d.V.); (E.C.); (L.C.M.K.); (E.v.D.-d.B.); (A.-L.L.F.v.d.K.); (M.M.v.d.H.-E.)
| | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Rodriguez-Wallberg KA, Hao X, Marklund A, Johansen G, Borgström B, Lundberg FE. Hot Topics on Fertility Preservation for Women and Girls-Current Research, Knowledge Gaps, and Future Possibilities. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10081650. [PMID: 33924415 PMCID: PMC8069871 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10081650] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2021] [Revised: 04/06/2021] [Accepted: 04/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Fertility preservation is a novel clinical discipline aiming to protect the fertility potential of young adults and children at risk of infertility. The field is evolving quickly, enriched by advances in assisted reproductive technologies and cryopreservation methods, in addition to surgical developments. The best-characterized target group for fertility preservation is the patient population diagnosed with cancer at a young age since the bulk of the data indicates that the gonadotoxicity inherent to most cancer treatments induces iatrogenic infertility. Since improvements in cancer therapy have resulted in increasing numbers of long-term survivors, survivorship issues and the negative impact of infertility on the quality of life have come to the front line. These facts are reflected in an increasing number of scientific publications referring to clinical medicine and research in the field of fertility preservation. Cryopreservation of gametes, embryos, and gonadal tissue has achieved quality standards for clinical use, with the retrieval of gonadal tissue for cryopreservation being currently the only method feasible in prepubertal children. Additionally, the indications for fertility preservation beyond cancer are also increasing since a number of benign diseases and chronic conditions either require gonadotoxic treatments or are associated with premature follicle depletion. There are many remaining challenges, and current research encompasses clinical health care and caring sciences, ethics, societal, epidemiological, experimental studies, etc.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenny A. Rodriguez-Wallberg
- Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, SE-171 64 Stockholm, Sweden; (X.H.); (A.M.); (G.J.); (B.B.); (F.E.L.)
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, Division of Gynecology and Reproduction, Karolinska University Hospital, SE-141 86 Stockholm, Sweden
- Correspondence:
| | - Xia Hao
- Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, SE-171 64 Stockholm, Sweden; (X.H.); (A.M.); (G.J.); (B.B.); (F.E.L.)
| | - Anna Marklund
- Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, SE-171 64 Stockholm, Sweden; (X.H.); (A.M.); (G.J.); (B.B.); (F.E.L.)
| | - Gry Johansen
- Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, SE-171 64 Stockholm, Sweden; (X.H.); (A.M.); (G.J.); (B.B.); (F.E.L.)
| | - Birgit Borgström
- Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, SE-171 64 Stockholm, Sweden; (X.H.); (A.M.); (G.J.); (B.B.); (F.E.L.)
| | - Frida E. Lundberg
- Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, SE-171 64 Stockholm, Sweden; (X.H.); (A.M.); (G.J.); (B.B.); (F.E.L.)
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Managing a Pan-European Consortium on Late Effects among Long-Term Survivors of Childhood and Adolescent Cancer-The PanCareLIFE Project. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2021; 18:ijerph18083918. [PMID: 33917926 PMCID: PMC8068322 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18083918] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2021] [Revised: 02/18/2021] [Accepted: 04/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
PanCareLIFE brought together European partners and is the largest study to have evaluated the issues of fertility impairment, hearing loss, and health-related quality of life in survivors of childhood and adolescent cancer. Successful delivery of the project aims did not evolve solely from scientific qualities. Organizational structure and careful information management were key components for its successful completion and are retrospectively assessed in this paper. PanCareLIFE used cohort studies, case-control studies, clinical evaluation of hearing, and genetic testing to study 32,000 survivors from 25 data providers. A management team implemented the organizational structures, was the decision making body, developed and maintained a communication plan, and supervised deadlines, and made timely decisions. A biostatistics support group and an ethical advisory board were established. A publication committee ensured quality and accuracy of publications and is jointly responsible for the sustainability of the project. The chosen management structure of PanCareLIFE can serve as a blueprint for the management of complex international projects. Apart from the survivors themselves, various target audiences like oncology researchers, health care providers, and policy makers can derive benefits from the project. The results can also be used in oncological frontline therapy to reduce toxicity.
Collapse
|
34
|
van der Perk MEM, van der Kooi ALLF, van de Wetering MD, IJgosse IM, van Dulmen-den Broeder E, Broer SL, Klijn AJ, Versluys AB, Arends B, Oude Ophuis RJA, van Santen HM, van der Steeg AFW, Veening MA, van den Heuvel-Eibrink MM, Bos AME. Oncofertility care for newly diagnosed girls with cancer in a national pediatric oncology setting, the first full year experience from the Princess Máxima Center, the PEARL study. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0246344. [PMID: 33667234 PMCID: PMC7935241 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246344] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2020] [Accepted: 01/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Childhood cancer patients often remain uninformed regarding their potential risk of gonadal damage. In our hospital we introduced a five step standard oncofertility care plan for all newly diagnosed female patients aiming to identify, inform and triage 100% of patients and counsel 100% of patients at high risk (HR) of gonadal damage. This observational retrospective study (PEARL study) evaluated the use of this standard oncofertility care plan in the first full year in a national cohort. Methods The steps consist of 1)timely (preferably before start of gonadotoxic treatment) identification of all new patients, 2)triage of gonadal damage risk using a standardized gonadal damage risk stratification tool, 3)informing all patients and families, 4)counseling of a selected subset of girls, and 5) fertility preservation including ovarian tissue cryopreservation (OTC) in HR patients using amended Edinburgh criteria. A survey of the medical records of all girls newly diagnosed with cancer the first year (1-1-2019 until 31-12-2019) was conducted. Results Of 261 girls, 228 (87.4%) were timely identified and triaged. Triage resulted in 151 (66%) low(LR), 32 (14%) intermediate(IR) and 45 (20%) high risk(HR) patients. Ninety-nine families were documented to be timely informed regarding gonadal damage risk. In total, 35 girls (5 LR, 5 IR, 25 HR) were counseled by an oncofertility expert. 16/25 HR patients underwent fertility preservation (1 ovariopexy + OTC, oocyte cryopreservation (1 with and 1 without OTC) and 13 OTC). Fertility preservation did not lead to complications or delay of cancer treatment in any patient. Conclusion We timely identified and triaged most girls (88%) with cancer with a high risk of gonadal damage to be counseled for fertility preservation. We aim to optimize the oncofertility care plan and the standardized gonadal damage risk stratification tool based on this experience and these may be of value to other pediatric oncology centers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Irene M. IJgosse
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | | | - Simone L. Broer
- Reproductive Medicine and Gynecology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Aart J. Klijn
- Pediatric Urology, University Medical Center Utrecht—Wilhelmina Children’s Hospital, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | | | - Brigitte Arends
- Reproductive Medicine and Gynecology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Ralph J. A. Oude Ophuis
- Reproductive Medicine and Gynecology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Hanneke M. van Santen
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, Netherlands
- Pediatric Endocrinology, University Medical Center Utrecht—Wilhelmina Children’s Hospital, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - Annelies M. E. Bos
- Reproductive Medicine and Gynecology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Mulder RL, Font-Gonzalez A, Green DM, Loeffen EAH, Hudson MM, Loonen J, Yu R, Ginsberg JP, Mitchell RT, Byrne J, Skinner R, Anazodo A, Constine LS, de Vries A, Jahnukainen K, Lorenzo A, Meissner A, Nahata L, Dinkelman-Smit M, Tournaye H, Haupt R, van den Heuvel-Eibrink MM, van Santen HM, van Pelt AMM, Dirksen U, den Hartogh J, van Dulmen-den Broeder E, Wallace WH, Levine J, Tissing WJE, Kremer LCM, Kenney LB, van de Wetering MD. Fertility preservation for male patients with childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancer: recommendations from the PanCareLIFE Consortium and the International Late Effects of Childhood Cancer Guideline Harmonization Group. Lancet Oncol 2021; 22:e57-e67. [PMID: 33539754 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(20)30582-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 88] [Impact Index Per Article: 29.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2019] [Revised: 09/10/2020] [Accepted: 09/16/2020] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
Male patients with childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancer are at an increased risk for infertility if their treatment adversely affects reproductive organ function. Future fertility is a primary concern of patients and their families. Variations in clinical practice are barriers to the timely implementation of interventions that preserve fertility. As part of the PanCareLIFE Consortium, in collaboration with the International Late Effects of Childhood Cancer Guideline Harmonization Group, we reviewed the current literature and developed a clinical practice guideline for fertility preservation in male patients who are diagnosed with childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancer at age 25 years or younger, including guidance on risk assessment and available methods for fertility preservation. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology was used to grade the available evidence and to form the recommendations. Recognising the need for global consensus, this clinical practice guideline used existing evidence and international expertise to rigorously develop transparent recommendations that are easy to use to facilitate the care of male patients with childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancer who are at high risk of fertility impairment and to enhance their quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renée L Mulder
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, Netherlands.
| | - Anna Font-Gonzalez
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, Netherlands; Pediatric Oncology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam University, Amsterdam UMC, location AMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Daniel M Green
- Department of Epidemiology and Cancer Control and Department of Oncology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Erik A H Loeffen
- Department of Pediatric Oncology/Hematology, Beatrix Children's Hospital, UMC Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Melissa M Hudson
- Department of Epidemiology and Cancer Control and Department of Oncology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | | | - Richard Yu
- Boston Children's Hospital and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Harvard Universty, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jill P Ginsberg
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Rod T Mitchell
- Medical Research Council Centre for Reproductive Health, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | - Roderick Skinner
- Department of Paediatric and Adolescent Haematology/Oncology, Great North Children's Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK; Newcastle University Centre for Cancer, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Antoinette Anazodo
- Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Nelune Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia; School of Women's and Children's Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Louis S Constine
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Department of Pediatrics, University of Rochester Medical Center, University of Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Andrica de Vries
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, Netherlands; Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Sophia Children's Hospital, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Kirsi Jahnukainen
- Children's Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland; Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Armando Lorenzo
- Division of Urology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Andreas Meissner
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, location AMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, location AMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Leena Nahata
- Division of Endocrinology, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA; Department of Pediatrics, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Marij Dinkelman-Smit
- Division of Andrology, Department of Urology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Herman Tournaye
- Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Free University of Brussels, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Riccardo Haupt
- Epidemiology and Biostatistics Unit and Livebirth Clinic, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genova, Italy
| | - Marry M van den Heuvel-Eibrink
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, Netherlands; Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Sophia Children's Hospital, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Hanneke M van Santen
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, Netherlands; Department of Pediatric Endocrinology, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Ans M M van Pelt
- Laboratory for Reproductive Biology, Amsterdam UMC, location AMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Uta Dirksen
- Department of Pediatrics III, West German Cancer Centre, Essen University Hospital, Essen, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site, Essen, Germany
| | - Jaap den Hartogh
- Dutch Childhood Cancer Parent Organization (VOX), Nieuwegein, Netherlands
| | - Eline van Dulmen-den Broeder
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, Netherlands; Pediatric Oncology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - W Hamish Wallace
- Department of Paediatric Haematology and Oncology, Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Jennifer Levine
- Division of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Wim J E Tissing
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, Netherlands; Department of Pediatric Oncology/Hematology, Beatrix Children's Hospital, UMC Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Leontien C M Kremer
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, Netherlands; Pediatric Oncology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam University, Amsterdam UMC, location AMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Lisa B Kenney
- Boston Children's Hospital and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Harvard Universty, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Mulder RL, Font-Gonzalez A, Hudson MM, van Santen HM, Loeffen EAH, Burns KC, Quinn GP, van Dulmen-den Broeder E, Byrne J, Haupt R, Wallace WH, van den Heuvel-Eibrink MM, Anazodo A, Anderson RA, Barnbrock A, Beck JD, Bos AME, Demeestere I, Denzer C, Di Iorgi N, Hoefgen HR, Kebudi R, Lambalk C, Langer T, Meacham LR, Rodriguez-Wallberg K, Stern C, Stutz-Grunder E, van Dorp W, Veening M, Veldkamp S, van der Meulen E, Constine LS, Kenney LB, van de Wetering MD, Kremer LCM, Levine J, Tissing WJE. Fertility preservation for female patients with childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancer: recommendations from the PanCareLIFE Consortium and the International Late Effects of Childhood Cancer Guideline Harmonization Group. Lancet Oncol 2021; 22:e45-e56. [PMID: 33539753 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(20)30594-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 87] [Impact Index Per Article: 29.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2019] [Revised: 09/10/2020] [Accepted: 09/16/2020] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
Female patients with childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancer are at increased risk for fertility impairment when treatment adversely affects the function of reproductive organs. Patients and their families desire biological children but substantial variations in clinical practice guidelines reduce consistent and timely implementation of effective interventions for fertility preservation across institutions. As part of the PanCareLIFE Consortium, and in collaboration with the International Late Effects of Childhood Cancer Guideline Harmonization Group, we reviewed the current literature and developed a clinical practice guideline for fertility preservation in female patients who were diagnosed with childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancer at age 25 years or younger, including guidance on risk assessment and available methods for fertility preservation. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology was used to grade the available evidence and to form the recommendations. This clinical practice guideline leverages existing evidence and international expertise to develop transparent recommendations that are easy to use to facilitate the care of female patients with childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancer who are at high risk for fertility impairment. A complete review of the existing evidence, including a quality assessment, transparent reporting of the guideline panel's decisions, and achievement of global interdisciplinary consensus, is an important result of this intensive collaboration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renée L Mulder
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, Netherlands.
| | - Anna Font-Gonzalez
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, Netherlands; Pediatric Oncology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Melissa M Hudson
- Department of Epidemiology and Cancer Control and Department of Oncology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Hanneke M van Santen
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, Netherlands; Department of Pediatric Endocrinology, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Erik A H Loeffen
- Department of Pediatric Oncology/Hematology, Beatrix Children's Hospital, UMC Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Karen C Burns
- Cancer and Blood Disease Institute, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA; Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Gwendolyn P Quinn
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Population Health, and Division of Medical Ethics, New York University School of Medicine, New York University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Eline van Dulmen-den Broeder
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, Netherlands; Pediatric Oncology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Riccardo Haupt
- Epidemiology and Biostatistics Unit and DOPO Clinic, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genova, Italy
| | - W Hamish Wallace
- Department of Paediatric Haematology and Oncology, Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Marry M van den Heuvel-Eibrink
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, Netherlands; Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Sophia Children's Hospital, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Antoinette Anazodo
- Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Nelune Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia; School of Women's and Children's Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Richard A Anderson
- Medical Research Council Centre for Reproductive Health, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Anke Barnbrock
- Division for Stem Cell Transplantation and Immunology, Department for Children and Adolescents, University Hospital, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Joern D Beck
- Hospital for Children and Adolescents, University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany; LESS Group, Hospital for Children and Adolescents, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Annelies M E Bos
- Department of Reproductive Medicine and Gynaecology, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Isabelle Demeestere
- Research Laboratory on Human Reproduction and Fertility Clinic, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, CUB-Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Christian Denzer
- Division of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Ulm University Medical Center, Ulm, Germany
| | - Natascia Di Iorgi
- Department of Pediatrics, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Holly R Hoefgen
- Division of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, Washington University, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - Rejin Kebudi
- Division of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Istanbul University Cerrahpasa, Istanbul, Turkey; Oncology Institute, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Cornelis Lambalk
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Thorsten Langer
- Division Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Lillian R Meacham
- Aflac Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, GA, USA; Division of Hematology/Oncology and Division of Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Kenny Rodriguez-Wallberg
- Division of Gynecology and Reproduction, Department of Reproductive Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Catharyn Stern
- Melbourne IVF, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Reproductive Services, Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Eveline Stutz-Grunder
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Children's Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Wendy van Dorp
- Division of Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Margreet Veening
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, Netherlands; Pediatric Oncology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Saskia Veldkamp
- Pediatric Oncology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Louis S Constine
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Department of Pediatrics, University of Rochester Medical Center, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Lisa B Kenney
- Boston Children's Hospital and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Leontien C M Kremer
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, Netherlands; Pediatric Oncology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Jennifer Levine
- Division of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Wim J E Tissing
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, Netherlands; Department of Pediatric Oncology/Hematology, Beatrix Children's Hospital, UMC Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Abstract
Puberty, which in humans is considered to include both gonadarche and adrenarche, is the period of becoming capable of reproducing sexually and is recognized by maturation of the gonads and development of secondary sex characteristics. Gonadarche referring to growth and maturation of the gonads is fundamental to puberty since it encompasses increased gonadal steroid secretion and initiation of gametogenesis resulting from enhanced pituitary gonadotropin secretion, triggered in turn by robust pulsatile GnRH release from the hypothalamus. This chapter reviews the development of GnRH pulsatility from before birth until the onset of puberty. In humans, GnRH pulse generation is restrained during childhood and juvenile development. This prepubertal hiatus in hypothalamic activity is considered to result from a neurobiological brake imposed upon the GnRH pulse generator resident in the infundibular nucleus. Reactivation of the GnRH pulse generator initiates pubertal development. Current understanding of the genetics and physiology of the brake will be discussed, as will hypotheses proposed to account for timing the resurgence in pulsatile GnRH and initiation of puberty. The chapter ends with a discussion of disorders associated with precocious or delayed puberty with a focus on those with etiologies attributed to aberrant GnRH neuron anatomy or function. A pediatric approach to patients with pubertal disorders is provided and contemporary treatments for both precocious and delayed puberty outlined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Selma Feldman Witchel
- Pediatric Endocrinology, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
| | - Tony M Plant
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
| |
Collapse
|