1
|
Egeler MD, van Leeuwen M, Lai-Kwon J, Eriksson H, Bartula I, Elashwah S, Fox L, Van Hemelrijck M, Jefford M, Lijnsvelt J, Bagge ASL, Morag O, Ny L, Bagge RO, Rogiers A, Saw RPM, Serpentini S, Iannopollo L, Thompson J, Stiller HT, Vanlaer N, van Akkooi ACJ, van de Poll-Franse LV. Understanding quality of life issues in patients with advanced melanoma: Phase 1 and 2 in the development of the EORTC advanced melanoma module. Eur J Cancer 2024; 207:114176. [PMID: 38875843 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2024.114176] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2024] [Accepted: 06/05/2024] [Indexed: 06/16/2024]
Abstract
AIMS We aimed to develop a European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life (QoL) module tailored for patients with advanced (resectable or unresectable stage III/IV) melanoma receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors or targeted therapy. METHODS Following the EORTC QoL Group module development guidelines, we conducted phases 1 and 2 of the development process. In phase 1, we generated a list of health-related (HR)QoL issues through a systematic literature review and semi-structured interviews with healthcare professionals (HCPs) and patients with advanced melanoma. In phase 2, these issues were converted into questionnaire items to create the preliminary module. RESULTS Phase 1: we retrieved 8006 articles for the literature review, of which 35 were deemed relevant, resulting in 84 HRQoL issues being extracted to create the initial issue list. Semi-structured interviews with 18 HCPs and 28 patients with advanced melanoma resulted in 28 issues being added to the initial issue list. Following EORTC module development criteria, 26 issues were removed, and two issues were added after review by patient advocates. Phase 2: To ensure uniformity and avoid duplication, 16 issues were consolidated into eight items. Additionally, an independent expert contributed one new item, resulting in a preliminary module comprising 80 HRQoL items. CONCLUSION We identified a range of HRQoL issues (dry skin, xerostomia, and arthralgia) relevant to patients with stage III/IV melanoma. Future module development phases will refine the questionnaire. Once completed, this module will enable standardized assessment of HRQoL in patients with (locally) advanced melanoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M D Egeler
- Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - M van Leeuwen
- Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J Lai-Kwon
- Department of Medical Oncology and Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - H Eriksson
- Theme Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Sweden
| | - I Bartula
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - S Elashwah
- Medical Oncology Unit, Oncology Center, Mansoura University (OCMU), Egypt
| | - L Fox
- King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - M Jefford
- Department of Medical Oncology and Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - J Lijnsvelt
- Netherlands Cancer Institute, Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - A-S Lindqvist Bagge
- Sahlgrenska Center for Cancer Research, Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Psychology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - O Morag
- Sheba Medical Center, The Jusjdman Cancer Center, Ramat-gan, Israel
| | - L Ny
- Sahlgrenska Center for Cancer Research, Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - R Olofsson Bagge
- Sahlgrenska Center for Cancer Research, Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - A Rogiers
- Department of Medical Oncology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - R P M Saw
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | | | | - J Thompson
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | | | - N Vanlaer
- Sheba Medical Center, The Jusjdman Cancer Center, Ramat-gan, Israel
| | - A C J van Akkooi
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Luke JJ, Long GV, Robert C, Carlino MS, Choueiri TK, Haas NB, O'Brien M, Paz-Ares L, Peters S, Powles T, Leiby MA, Lin J, Zhao Y, Krepler C, Perini RF, Catherine Pietanza M, Samkari A, Gruber T, Ibrahim N, Eggermont AMM. Safety of pembrolizumab as adjuvant therapy in a pooled analysis of phase 3 clinical trials of melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer, and renal cell carcinoma. Eur J Cancer 2024; 207:114146. [PMID: 38838446 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2024.114146] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2023] [Revised: 05/22/2024] [Accepted: 05/26/2024] [Indexed: 06/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The safety profile of adjuvant pembrolizumab was evaluated in a pooled analysis of 4 phase 3 clinical trials. METHODS Patients had completely resected stage IIIA, IIIB, or IIIC melanoma per American Joint Committee on Cancer, 7th edition, criteria (AJCC-7; KEYNOTE-054); stage IIB or IIC melanoma per AJCC-8 (KEYNOTE-716); stage IB, II, or IIIA non-small cell lung cancer per AJCC-7 (PEARLS/KEYNOTE-091); or postnephrectomy/metastasectomy clear cell renal cell carcinoma at increased risk of recurrence (KEYNOTE-564). Patients received adjuvant pembrolizumab 200 mg (2 mg/kg up to 200 mg for pediatric patients) or placebo every 3 weeks for approximately 1 year. Adverse events (AEs) were summarized for patients who received ≥ 1 dose of treatment. RESULTS Data were pooled from 4125 patients treated with pembrolizumab (n = 2060) or placebo (n = 2065). Median (range) duration of treatment was 11.1 months (0.0-18.9) with pembrolizumab and 11.2 months (0.0-18.1) with placebo. Treatment-related AEs occurred in 78.6 % (1620/2060) of patients in the pembrolizumab group (grade 3-5, 16.3 % [336/2060]) and 58.7 % (1212/2065) in the placebo group (grade 3-5, 3.5 % [72/2065]). Immune-mediated AEs (e.g. adrenal insufficiency, hypophysitis, and thyroiditis) occurred in 36.2 % (746/2060) of patients in the pembrolizumab group (grade 3-5, 8.6 % [177/2060]) and 8.4 % (174/2065) in the placebo group (grade 3-5, 1.1 % [23/2065]). Of patients with ≥ 1 immune-mediated AE or infusion reaction, systemic corticosteroids were required for 35.2 % (268/761) and 20.2 % (39/193) of patients in the pembrolizumab and placebo groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Adjuvant pembrolizumab demonstrated a manageable safety profile that was comparable to prior reports in advanced disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason J Luke
- UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, 5150 Centre Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15232, USA.
| | - Georgina V Long
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Royal North Shore Hospital, and Mater Hospital, 40 Rocklands Road, North Sydney, NSW 2065, Australia
| | - Caroline Robert
- Gustave Roussy and Paris-Saclay University, 114 Rue Edouard Vaillant, Paris, Villejuif, France
| | - Matteo S Carlino
- Westmead and Blacktown Hospitals, Melanoma Institute Australia, and The University of Sydney, 40 Rocklands Road, North Sydney, NSW 2065, Australia
| | - Toni K Choueiri
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, 450 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Naomi B Haas
- Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center Blvd, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Mary O'Brien
- Royal Marsden Hospital and Imperial College, Downs Rd, Sutton, SM2 5PT London, United Kingdom
| | - Luis Paz-Ares
- Complutense University, Cancer Network Biomedical Research Center Consortium (CIBERONC), Spanish National Caner Research Center (CNIO) and Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - Solange Peters
- Lausanne University Hospital Center (CHUV) and University of Lausanne, Quartier Centre, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Thomas Powles
- St Bartholomew's Hospital, West Smithfield, London EC1A 7B, United Kingdom
| | - Melanie A Leiby
- Merck & Co., Inc., 126 E Lincoln Avenue, Rahway, NJ 07065, USA
| | - Jianxin Lin
- Merck & Co., Inc., 126 E Lincoln Avenue, Rahway, NJ 07065, USA
| | - Yujie Zhao
- Merck & Co., Inc., 126 E Lincoln Avenue, Rahway, NJ 07065, USA
| | - Clemens Krepler
- Merck & Co., Inc., 126 E Lincoln Avenue, Rahway, NJ 07065, USA
| | | | | | - Ayman Samkari
- Merck & Co., Inc., 126 E Lincoln Avenue, Rahway, NJ 07065, USA
| | - Todd Gruber
- Merck & Co., Inc., 126 E Lincoln Avenue, Rahway, NJ 07065, USA
| | | | - Alexander M M Eggermont
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Sud, 114 Rue Edouard Vaillant, Villejuif, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kamminga NCW, van der Veldt AAM, Wakkee M, van den Berge FR, van der Beek LAA, Joosen MCW, Joosse A, de Joode K, Nijsten TEC, Lugtenberg M. From decision to reflection: understanding the experiences and unmet care needs of patients treated with immunotherapy for melanoma in the adjuvant or metastatic setting. BMC Cancer 2024; 24:662. [PMID: 38816701 PMCID: PMC11141069 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-12410-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2024] [Accepted: 05/22/2024] [Indexed: 06/01/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite increased use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in patients with advanced melanoma, little is known about patient experiences during this treatment. This study aimed to gain an in-depth understanding of experiences and unmet care needs of patients treated in the adjuvant or metastatic setting for advanced melanoma regarding their ICI treatment trajectory. METHODS Interviews and focus groups were conducted among 35 patients treated with ICIs in the adjuvant setting for completely resected stage III (n = 14), or in the metastatic setting for irresectable stage IV (n = 21) melanoma. A thorough thematic content analysis was conducted. RESULTS Three main themes were identified. When (1) dealing with uncertainty in the decision-making process, adjuvant patients explored the pros and cons, whereas metastatic patients considered immunotherapy their only viable option. Both groups expressed the need for additional guidance. In (2) navigating the immunotherapy course, both perceived the trajectory as intense, experienced a major impact on their and their (close) relatives' lives, and felt the need to (re)gain control. When (3) looking back on the immunotherapy experience, metastatic patients generally felt relieved, while among adjuvant patients, feelings of doubt regarding their choice for ICIs were also reported. CONCLUSIONS ICI treatment is perceived as intensive for both patient groups, facing both comparable and distinct challenges throughout the treatment trajectory, underscoring the need for stage-specific, individualised guidance. Options regarding flexible follow-ups, low-threshold contact and psychosocial support throughout the treatment trajectory should be explored.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadia C W Kamminga
- Department of Dermatology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Astrid A M van der Veldt
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marlies Wakkee
- Department of Dermatology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Fauve R van den Berge
- Department of Dermatology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lianne A A van der Beek
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Margot C W Joosen
- Department Tranzo, Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - Arjen Joosse
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Karlijn de Joode
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Tamar E C Nijsten
- Department of Dermatology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marjolein Lugtenberg
- Department of Dermatology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
- Department Tranzo, Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kähler KC, Gutzmer R, Angela Y, Livingstone E, Lodde G, Meiss F, Rafei-Shamsabadi DA, Weyer-Fahlbusch SS, Nashan D, Loquai C, Hassel JC, Sachse MMM, Maul LV, Heinzerling L, Heppt MV, Colapietro C, Rusch J, Blome C. Preferences of physicians for treatment-related toxicity vs. recurrence in melanoma (GERMELATOX-A): the doctors' perspective. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2024; 150:252. [PMID: 38743104 PMCID: PMC11093864 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-024-05713-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2024] [Accepted: 03/18/2024] [Indexed: 05/16/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Adjuvant treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors, such as PD1-antibodies (ICI) ± CTLA4-antibodies (cICI) or targeted therapy with BRAF/MEK inhibitors (TT), has shown a significant improvement in disease-free survival (DFS) for high-risk melanoma patients. However, due to specific side effects, the choice of treatment is often influenced by the risk of toxicity. Therefore, the role of physicians in treatment decisions of patients is crucial. This study investigated for the first time in a multicenter setting the attitudes and preferences of dermatooncologists in Germany and Switzerland regarding adjuvant treatment with (c)ICI and TT. METHODS In the GERMELATOX-A study, 108 physicians (median age: 32 yrs, 67.6% female) from 11 skin cancer centers were surveyed to rate typical side effect scenarios of (c)ICI and TT treatments and then compared to patients' ratings evaluated in a previous analysis from the same centers. The scenarios described mild-to-moderate or severe toxicity and included melanoma relapse leading to death. The physicians were asked about the level of side effects they would tolerate in exchange for a reduction in melanoma relapse and an increase in survival at 5 years. RESULTS The preferences of physicians and patients revealed significant differences regarding adjuvant melanoma treatment with (c)ICI and TT (p < 0.05). Compared to patients, physicians tend to value a melanoma relapse less severe, according to a visual analog scale. They were also less threatened by all scenarios of side effects during adjuvant treatment with (c)ICI or TT, compared to patients. Physicians required lower risk reductions for disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) for both ICI and TT and their drug-related side effects to accept these treatments. In case of severe side effects, physicians required similar 5-year DFS rates for ICI and TT (60-65%), while patients needed a 15% improvement of 5-year DFS for ICI compared to TT (80%/65%). For survival, physicians expected an OS improvement of + 10% for all three treatment modalities, whereas patients required a higher increase: + 18-22% for ICI and + 15% for TT. CONCLUSION Our study highlights the importance of understanding the patient's perspective and a potential difference to the doctor's view when making decisions about adjuvant melanoma treatment with (c)ICI and TT, especially as these treatments are increasingly being implemented in earlier stages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katharina C Kähler
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH), Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
| | - Ralf Gutzmer
- Department of Dermatology, Johannes Wesling Medical Center Minden, Ruhr University Bochum Medical School, Bochum, Germany
| | - Yenny Angela
- Department of Dermatology, Johannes Wesling Medical Center Minden, Ruhr University Bochum Medical School, Bochum, Germany
| | | | - Georg Lodde
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Frank Meiss
- Department of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - David A Rafei-Shamsabadi
- Department of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | | | | | - Carmen Loquai
- Department of Dermatology, Klinikum Bremen-Ost, Gesundheitnord gGmbH, Bremen, Germany
| | - Jessica C Hassel
- Medical Faculty Heidelberg, Department of Dermatology and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University, NCT Heidelberg, a partnership between DKFZ and University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Lara V Maul
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Lucie Heinzerling
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Markus V Heppt
- Department of Dermatology, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University (FAU) Erlangen-Nürnberg, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Area of Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Chiara Colapietro
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH), Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Judith Rusch
- Institute for Health Services Research in Dermatology and Nursing (IVDP), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Christine Blome
- Institute for Health Services Research in Dermatology and Nursing (IVDP), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Pilz MJ, Loth FLC, Nolte S, Thurner AMM, Gamper EM, Anota A, Liegl G, Giesinger JM. General population normative values for the EORTC QLQ-C30 by age, sex, and health condition for the French general population. J Patient Rep Outcomes 2024; 8:48. [PMID: 38695992 PMCID: PMC11065800 DOI: 10.1186/s41687-024-00719-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2023] [Accepted: 03/07/2024] [Indexed: 05/05/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND General population normative values for the widely used health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measure EORTC QLQ-C30 support the interpretation of trial results and HRQoL of patients in clinical practice. Here, we provide sex-, age- and health condition-specific normative values for the EORTC QLQ-C30 in the French general population. METHODS French general population data was collected in an international EORTC project. Online panels with quota samples were used to recruit sex and age groups. Number and type of comorbidities were assessed. Descriptive statistics were used to calculate general population values for each QLQ-C30 scale, separately for sex, age, and presence of one- and more chronic health conditions. A multivariate linear regression model has been developed to allow estimating the effect of sex, age, and the presence for one- and more chronic health conditions on EORTC QLQ-C30 scores. Data was weighted according to United Nation statistics adjusting for the proportion of sex and age groups. RESULTS In total, 1001 French respondents were included in our analyses. The weighted mean age was 47.9 years, 514 (51.3%) participants were women, and 497 (52.2%) participants reported at least one health condition. Men reported statistically significant better scores for Emotional Functioning (+9.6 points, p = 0.006) and Fatigue (-7.8 point; p = 0.04); women reported better profiles for Role Functioning (+8.7 points; p = 0.008) and Financial Difficulty (-7.8 points, p = 0.011). According to the regression model, the sex effect was statistically significant in eight scales; the effect of increasing age had a statistically significant effect on seven of the 15 EORTC QLQ-C30 scales. The sex- and age effect varied in its direction across the various scales. The presence of health conditions showed a strong negative effect on all scales. CONCLUSION This is the first publication of detailed French normative values for the EORTC QLQ-C30. It aims to support the interpretation of HRQoL profiles in French cancer populations. The strong impact of health conditions on QLQ-C30 scores highlights the importance of considering the impact of comorbidities in cancer patients when interpreting HRQoL data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Micha J Pilz
- Health Outcomes Research Unit, University Hospital of Psychiatry II, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innrain 43, Innsbruck, 6020, Austria
| | - Fanny L C Loth
- Psychological Diagnostics and Intervention, Catholic University of Eichstätt-Ingolstadt, Eichstätt, Germany
| | - Sandra Nolte
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Melbourne Health Economics, Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Anna M M Thurner
- Health Outcomes Research Unit, University Hospital of Psychiatry II, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innrain 43, Innsbruck, 6020, Austria
| | - Eva-Maria Gamper
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Amélie Anota
- Department of Clinical Research and Innovation and Human and Social Sciences Department, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - Gregor Liegl
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Johannes M Giesinger
- Health Outcomes Research Unit, University Hospital of Psychiatry II, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innrain 43, Innsbruck, 6020, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Braud A, Auloge P, Meyer N, Bouvrais C, Gharbi M, Lang H, Gangi A, Lipsker D. Neoadjuvant in Situ and Systemic Immunotherapy with Lymph Node Cryoablation in Resectable Stage III Melanoma Metastasis: a Proof-of-Concept Study. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2024; 47:567-572. [PMID: 38570342 DOI: 10.1007/s00270-024-03699-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2023] [Accepted: 02/27/2024] [Indexed: 04/05/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Complete lymph node dissection is the recommended treatment for clinically detectable lymph nodes in stage III melanoma. This surgery is associated with substantial morbidity. We hypothesize that combining percutaneous imaging-guided cryoablation of locoregional lymph nodes metastases with neoadjuvant in situ and systemic immunotherapy could allow disease control and evaluate the feasibility of this combination in this proof-of-concept study. METHODS We enrolled 15 patients with stage IIIB/IIIC melanoma. Patients were treated as follows: a single 240 mg flat dose infusion of nivolumab on day 1, cryoablation under local anesthesia using CT on day 2, and a single intralesional injection of 10-20 mg of ipilimumab into the lymphadenopathy treated by cryotherapy on day 3. Five-eight weeks after this procedure, complete lymph node dissection was performed according to routine care. The primary outcome measure of this study was feasibility, measured as the number of failures (i.e., inability to complete the entire procedure). RESULTS The procedure was carried out successfully in 15 out of 15 patients with an observed number of failures of 0. The Bayesian analysis showed an estimated failure rate of 4.2% [0.2-20.6]. Eight patients (53%) had adverse events secondary to either immunotherapy or cryotherapy. Grade 3/4 events occurred in three patients, but all resolved quickly and patients could proceed to surgery as scheduled. Eight patients (53%) had a pathological complete or near complete response. CONCLUSION Combining percutaneous cryotherapy with in situ ipilimumab and systemic nivolumab for stage III resectable melanoma is feasible with tolerable toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antoine Braud
- Dermatologic Clinic, University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
| | - Pierre Auloge
- Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Nicolas Meyer
- Public Health Department, University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Caroline Bouvrais
- Direction de la Recherche Clinique et de l'innovation (DRCI), University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Mousselim Gharbi
- Department of Gynecology, University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Hervé Lang
- Departments of Urology, University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Afshin Gangi
- Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Dan Lipsker
- Dermatologic Clinic, University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Vikström S, Syriopoulou E, Andersson TML, Eriksson H. Loss in life expectancy in patients with stage II-III cutaneous melanoma in Sweden: A population-based cohort study. J Am Acad Dermatol 2024; 90:963-969. [PMID: 38218560 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2023.12.053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2023] [Revised: 11/12/2023] [Accepted: 12/10/2023] [Indexed: 01/15/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Survival in cutaneous melanoma (CM) is heterogeneous. Loss in life expectancy (LLE) measures impact of CM on remaining lifespan compared to general population. OBJECTIVES Investigating LLE in operated stage II-III CM patients. METHODS Data from 8061 patients (aged 40-80 years) with stage II-III CM in Sweden, diagnosed between 2005 and 2018, were analyzed (Swedish Melanoma Registry). A flexible parametric survival model estimated life expectancy and LLE. RESULTS Based on 2018 diagnoses, stage II and III CM patients lost 2209 and 1902 life years, respectively. LLE was higher in stage III: 5.2 versus 10.9 years (stage II vs III 60-year-old females). Younger patients had higher LLE: 10.7 versus 3.9 years (stage II CM in 40 vs 70-year-old males). In stage II, females had lower LLE than males; 50-year-old females and males stage II CM had LLE equal to 7.3 and 8.3 years, respectively. LLE increased with higher substages, stage IIB resembling IIIB and IIC resembling IIIC-D. LIMITATIONS Extrapolation was used to estimate LLE. Varying stage group sizes require caution. CONCLUSIONS Our results are both clinically relevant and easy-to-interpret measures of the impact of CM on survival, but the results also summarize the prognosis over the lifetime of a CM patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sofi Vikström
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Pathology and Cancer Diagnostics, Radiumhemmet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Elisavet Syriopoulou
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Therese M-L Andersson
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Hanna Eriksson
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Cancer Theme, Medical Unit Head-Neck, Lung- and Skin Cancer, Skin Cancer Center, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Egeler M, Lai-Kwon J, Tissier R, Fraterman I, Kuijpers A, Van Houdt W, Wilgenhof S, Rao A, Sandhu S, Lee R, Eriksson H, van Leeuwen M, de Ligt K, van Akkooi A, van de Poll-Franse L. Real-world health-related quality of life outcomes for patients with resected stage III/IV melanoma treated with adjuvant anti-PD1 therapy. Eur J Cancer 2024; 200:113601. [PMID: 38340383 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2024.113601] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2023] [Revised: 01/29/2024] [Accepted: 01/30/2024] [Indexed: 02/12/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND While adjuvant therapy with anti-programmed cell death protein-1 (anti-PD1) for patients with resected stage III/IV melanoma has been shown to improve recurrence-free survival, the overall survival benefit remains uncertain. This study aims to evaluate the impact of adjuvant anti-PD1 therapy on the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of patients with resected stage III/IV melanoma METHODS: Data was used from two melanoma registries in Australia and the Netherlands. Patients with resected stage III/IV melanoma treated with adjuvant anti-PD1 who completed a baseline and at least one post-baseline HRQOL assessment were included. HRQOL was assessed using the EORTC QLQ-C30 at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months. Established thresholds were used for interpreting changes in QLQ-C30 scores. RESULTS 92 patients were included. Mean symptom and functioning scores improved or remained stable at 12 months compared to baseline. However, a substantial proportion of patients experienced a clinically significant decline in role (39%, μ = -50.8), social (41%, μ = -32.7), or emotional (50%, μ = -25.1) functioning at 12 months compared to baseline. Younger patients were more likely to experience clinically significant deteriorations in role (OR=1.07, 95% CI: 1.02-1.13, p < 0.01) and social (OR=1.06, 95% CI: 1.01-1.11, p = 0.013) functioning. CONCLUSION A significant proportion of patients with resected stage III/IV melanoma who received adjuvant anti-PD1 experienced clinically significant declines in role, social and emotional functioning at 12 months compared to baseline. This highlights the HRQOL issues that may arise during adjuvant anti-PD1 therapy which may require supportive care intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mees Egeler
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Julia Lai-Kwon
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Renaud Tissier
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Itske Fraterman
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Anke Kuijpers
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Winan Van Houdt
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Sofie Wilgenhof
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Aparna Rao
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Shahneen Sandhu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Rebecca Lee
- Department of Medical Oncology, Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Hanna Eriksson
- Theme Cancer, Unit of Head-Neck-, Lung-, and Skin Cancer, Skin Cancer Center, Karolinska University Hospital, SE-17176 Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Marieke van Leeuwen
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Kelly de Ligt
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Lonneke van de Poll-Franse
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Rutkowski P, Mandala M. Perioperative therapy of melanoma: Adjuvant or neoadjuvant treatment. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2024; 50:107969. [PMID: 38342039 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2024.107969] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/01/2024] [Accepted: 01/14/2024] [Indexed: 02/13/2024]
Abstract
Surgery is the mainstay treatment of melanoma. However, even after radical resection the risk of relapses in majority of stage IIB-IV disease remains high. Currently, the standard treatment after surgery in high risk patients is systemic adjuvant therapy administered up to one year based on the results of clinical trials indicating significant reduction of risk of relapses. All clinical trials in adjuvant setting were based as primary end-point on relapse-free survival, not overall survival, and they did not incorporate and validate biomarkers prospectively. A new therapeutic strategy in locoregional advanced melanomas becomes a preoperative treatment to further increase of the cure rates and decrease the duration of systemic therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Piotr Rutkowski
- Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland.
| | - Mario Mandala
- University of Perugia, Santa Maria Misericordia Hospital, Piazza Menghini 1, 06132, Perugia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Tarhini AA, Castellano E, Eljilany I. Treatment of Stage III Resectable Melanoma-Adjuvant and Neoadjuvant Approaches. Cancer J 2024; 30:54-70. [PMID: 38527258 DOI: 10.1097/ppo.0000000000000706] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/27/2024]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Patients with stage III resectable melanoma carry a high risk of melanoma recurrence that ranges from approximately 40% to 90% at 5 years following surgical management alone. Postoperative systemic adjuvant therapy targets residual micrometastatic disease that could be the source of future recurrence and death from melanoma. Randomized phase III adjuvant trials reported significant improvements in overall survival with high-dose interferon α in 2 of 3 studies (compared with observation and GMK ganglioside vaccine) and with anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 ipilimumab at 10 mg/kg compared with placebo and ipilimumab 3 mg/kg compared with high-dose interferon α. In the modern era, more recent phase III trials demonstrated significant recurrence-free survival improvements with anti-programmed cell death protein 1, pembrolizumab, and BRAF-MEK inhibitor combination dabrafenib-trametinib (for BRAF mutant melanoma) versus placebo. Furthermore, anti-programmed cell death protein 1, nivolumab and pembrolizumab have both been shown to significantly improve recurrence-free survival as compared with ipilimumab 10 mg/kg. For melanoma patients with clinically or radiologically detectable locoregionally advanced disease, emerging data support an important role for preoperative systemic neoadjuvant therapy. Importantly, a recent cooperative group trial (S1801) reported superior event-free survival rates with neoadjuvant versus adjuvant therapy. Collectively, current data from neoadjuvant immunotherapy and targeted therapy trials support a future change in clinical practice in favor of neoadjuvant therapy for eligible melanoma patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmad A Tarhini
- From the H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL
| | | | - Islam Eljilany
- From the H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Su D, Kluger H, Olino K. Educational Review: Clinical Application of Immune Checkpoint Blockade for the Treatment of Melanoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:1865-1879. [PMID: 37989956 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-14587-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2023] [Accepted: 10/25/2023] [Indexed: 11/23/2023]
Abstract
In the last decade, immunotherapy has become the cornerstone in the management of patients with melanoma, the foremost cause of skin-cancer-related death in the USA. The emergence of immune checkpoint blockade as a crucial element in current immunotherapy and combination strategies has significantly transformed the treatments of resectable and advanced (unresectable or metastatic) melanoma. This paper reviews the landmark clinical trials that formed the basis of management of melanoma in the perioperative and metastatic setting. Furthermore, we discuss the rationale for the applications of PD-1 blockade and its combination with anti-CTLA-4 and anti-LAG-3. The review also explores new experimental combinations of PD-1 blockade with other immunomodulatory agents, including targeted therapies, anti-TIGIT antibodies, TLR-9 agonists, antiangiogenic agents, and mRNA vaccines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Su
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Yale Cancer Center, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Harriet Kluger
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Kelly Olino
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Yale Cancer Center, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Su J, Fu Y, Cui Z, Abidin Z, Yuan J, Zhang X, Li R, Zhao C. Relatlimab: a novel drug targeting immune checkpoint LAG-3 in melanoma therapy. Front Pharmacol 2024; 14:1349081. [PMID: 38269271 PMCID: PMC10806167 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1349081] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2023] [Accepted: 12/27/2023] [Indexed: 01/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Relatlimab is a type of human immunoglobulin G4 monoclonal blocking antibody. It is the world's first Lymphocyte-Activation Gene-3 (LAG-3) inhibitor and the third immune checkpoint inhibitor with clinical application, following PD-1 and CTLA-4. Relatlimab can bind to the LAG-3 receptor which blocks the interaction between LAG-3 and its ligand to reduce LAG-3 pathway-mediated immunosuppression and promote T-cell proliferation, inducing tumor cell death. On 18 March 2022, the U.S. FDA approved the fixed-dose combination of relatlimab developed by Bristol Myers Squibb with nivolumab, under the brand name Opdualag for the treatment of unresectable or metastatic melanoma in adult and pediatric patients aged 12 and older. This study comprehensively describes the mechanism of action and clinical trials of relatlimab and a brief overview of immune checkpoint drugs currently used for the treatment of melanoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jingjing Su
- Key Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology and Translational Medicine and Department of Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, Weifang Medical University, Weifang, China
| | - Yiting Fu
- Key Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology and Translational Medicine and Department of Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, Weifang Medical University, Weifang, China
| | - Zitong Cui
- Key Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology and Translational Medicine and Department of Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, Weifang Medical University, Weifang, China
| | - Zain Abidin
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, St. John’s University, Queens, NY, United States
| | - Jingsong Yuan
- Key Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology and Translational Medicine and Department of Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, Weifang Medical University, Weifang, China
| | - Xinmiao Zhang
- Key Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology and Translational Medicine and Department of Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, Weifang Medical University, Weifang, China
| | - Runmin Li
- Key Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology and Translational Medicine and Department of Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, Weifang Medical University, Weifang, China
| | - Chunzhen Zhao
- Key Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology and Translational Medicine and Department of Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, Weifang Medical University, Weifang, China
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Jackson-Carroll N, Whisenant M, Crane S, Johnson C. Impact of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy on Quality of Life in Patients With Advanced Melanoma: A Systematic Review. Cancer Nurs 2023:00002820-990000000-00189. [PMID: 37976054 DOI: 10.1097/ncc.0000000000001299] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) were approved to treat advanced melanoma (AM) because of meaningful clinical benefit. These early data reported that ICI therapy is generally well tolerated, and despite symptoms, patients reported a high global health-related quality of life (HRQOL). OBJECTIVE Immune checkpoint inhibitors are widely used in the oncology community; the aim of this systematic review was to evaluate current data on ICI therapy and its impact on HRQOL of patients with AM. METHODS The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed during this systematic review to identify and select studies from the PubMed, OVID, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases. Selected studies were downloaded into Covidence and analyzed for trends in how ICI therapy impacts HRQOL in patients with AM. Multiple tools were used to assess the quality of the studies. RESULTS The 16 studies included 12 quantitative, 2 qualitative, and 2 mixed-methods studies. The quality of the studies was moderate (n = 7) or strong (n = 9). Symptoms that impacted HRQOL were fatigue, endocrine dysfunction, rash, diarrhea, cognitive impairment, emotional impact (anxiety and depression), and financial toxicity. Suicidal ideation and 1 attempt were reported in 2 studies, which had not been previously published. CONCLUSION Patient-reported symptoms due to ICI negatively impacted HRQOL. Anxiety and depression are prevalent. Current QOL instruments do not capture the entire patient experience. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Patients need to be asked if their symptoms are impacting their HRQOL. Further prospective research is needed to develop or adjust current patient-reported outcome instruments to adequately capture the impact of ICIs on HRQOL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalie Jackson-Carroll
- Author Affiliations: Cizik School of Nursing, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (Drs Jackson-Carroll, Whisenant, Crane, and Johnson); and Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (Dr Jackson-Carroll)
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Xia L, Feng M, Ren Y, Hao X, Jiao Q, Xu Q, Wang Y, Wang Q, Gong N. DSE inhibits melanoma progression by regulating tumor immune cell infiltration and VCAN. Cell Death Discov 2023; 9:373. [PMID: 37833287 PMCID: PMC10576081 DOI: 10.1038/s41420-023-01676-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2023] [Revised: 09/23/2023] [Accepted: 10/03/2023] [Indexed: 10/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Dermatan sulfate epimerase (DSE) is a C5 epiminase that plays a key role in converting chondroitin sulfate into dermal sulfate. DSE is often upregulated during carcinogenesis of some types of cancer and can regulate growth factor signaling in cancer cells. However, the expression and function of DSE in human melanoma have not been reported. In this study, we investigated the influence of tumor-derived DSE in melanoma progression and the potential mechanism of their action. First, proteomic analysis of collected melanoma tissues revealed that DSE was significantly down-regulated in melanoma tissues. DSE silenced or overexpressed melanoma cells were constructed to detect the effect of DSE on melanoma cells, and it was found that the up-regulation of DSE significantly inhibited the proliferation, migration and invasion of melanoma cells. Data analysis and flow cytometry were used to evaluate the immune subpopulations in tumors, and it was found that the high expression of DSE was closely related to the invasion of killer immune cells. Mechanistically, DSE promoted the expression of VCAN, which inhibited the biological activity of melanoma cells. Together, these results suggest that DSE is downregulated in melanoma tissues, and that high expression of DSE can promote melanoma progression by inducing immune cell infiltration and VCAN expression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lin Xia
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Qilu Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, 250012, China
| | - Maoxiao Feng
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, 250021, Shandong, China
| | - Yidan Ren
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, The Second Hospital of Shandong University, 247 Beiyuan Street, Jinan, 250033, Shandong, China
| | - Xiaodong Hao
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, 250021, Shandong, China
| | - Qinlian Jiao
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, 250021, Shandong, China
| | - QinChen Xu
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, The Second Hospital of Shandong University, 247 Beiyuan Street, Jinan, 250033, Shandong, China
| | - Yunshan Wang
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, 250021, Shandong, China
| | - Qin Wang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Qilu Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, 107 Wenhua Xi Road, Jinan, 250012, Shandong, China.
| | - Ningji Gong
- Department of Emergency, The Second Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, 250012, China.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Gershenwald JE. Top Melanoma Articles from 2021 to Inform Your Cancer Practice. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:6325-6331. [PMID: 37493893 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-13853-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2023] [Accepted: 06/24/2023] [Indexed: 07/27/2023]
Abstract
Advances in our understanding of melanoma biology and the role of immune checkpoint blockade and targeted therapy have ushered in a new and rapidly evolving era of multidisciplinary care for patients with melanoma. Based on efficacy for patients with metastatic melanoma, these systemic treatment approaches have been introduced into the adjuvant and, more recently, the neoadjuvant landscape. This report highlights the results of key clinical studies published or initially presented in 2021 that have informed our evidence-based approach to melanoma multidisciplinary care, primarily related to adjuvant and neoadjuvant approaches for patients with resectable or resected stage III or high-risk stage II melanoma and their impact on clinical care. Knowledge concerning these areas of active clinical investigation is critical for surgical oncologists who care for melanoma patients as the treatment landscape continues to evolve.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey E Gershenwald
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Unit 1484, P.O. Box 301402, Houston, TX, 77230-1402, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Kähler KC, Hüning S, Nashan D, Meiss F, Rafei-Shamsabadi DA, Rissmann H, Colapietro C, Livingstone E, Maul LV, Heppt M, Hassel JC, Gutzmer R, Loquai C, Heinzerling L, Sachse MM, Bohne AS, Moysig L, Peters W, Rusch J, Blome C. Preferences of German and Swiss melanoma patients for toxicities versus melanoma recurrence during adjuvant treatment (GERMELATOX-A-trial). J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2023; 149:11705-11718. [PMID: 37405475 PMCID: PMC10465664 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-023-05027-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2023] [Accepted: 06/26/2023] [Indexed: 07/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Adjuvant treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors like PD1-antibodies (ICI) ± CTLA4-antibodies (cICI) or targeted therapy with BRAF/MEK inhibitors (TT) in high-risk melanoma patients demonstrate a significant improvement in disease-free survival (DFS). Due to specific side effects, the choice of treatment is very often driven by the risk for toxicity. This study addressed for the first time in a multicenter setting the attitudes and preferences of melanoma patients for adjuvant treatment with (c)ICI and TT. METHODS In this study ("GERMELATOX-A"), 136 low-risk melanoma patients from 11 skin cancer centers were asked to rate side effect scenarios typical for each (c)ICI and TT with mild-to-moderate or severe toxicity and melanoma recurrence leading to cancer death. We asked patients about the reduction in melanoma relapse and the survival increase at 5 years they would require to tolerate defined side-effects. RESULTS By VAS, patients on average valued melanoma relapse worse than all scenarios of side-effects during treatment with (c)ICI or TT. In case of severe side effects, patients required a 15% higher rate of DFS at 5 years for (c)ICI (80%) compared to TT (65%). For survival, patients required an increase of 5-10% for melanoma survival during (c)ICI (85%/80%) compared to TT (75%). CONCLUSION Our study demonstrated a pronounced variation of patient preferences for toxicity and outcomes and a clear preference for TT. As adjuvant melanoma treatment with (c)ICI and TT will be increasingly implemented in earlier stages, precise knowledge of the patient perspective can be helpful for decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katharina C Kähler
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH), Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
| | - S Hüning
- Department of Dermatology, Dortmund, Germany
| | - D Nashan
- Department of Dermatology, Dortmund, Germany
| | - F Meiss
- Department of Dermatology, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - D A Rafei-Shamsabadi
- Department of Dermatology, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - H Rissmann
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH), Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - C Colapietro
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH), Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - E Livingstone
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - L V Maul
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - M Heppt
- Department of Dermatology, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University (FAU) Erlangen-Nürnberg, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Area of Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
| | - J C Hassel
- Department of Dermatology and National Center for Tumor Therapy (NCT), University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - R Gutzmer
- Department of Dermatology, Johannes Wesling Medical Center Minden, Ruhr University Bochum Medical School, Bochum, Germany
| | - C Loquai
- Department of Dermatology, Klinikum Bremen-Ost, Gesundheitnord gGmbH, Bremen, Germany
| | - L Heinzerling
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - M M Sachse
- Department of Dermatology, Bremerhaven, Germany
| | - A S Bohne
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH), Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - L Moysig
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH), Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - W Peters
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH), Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - J Rusch
- Institute for Health Services Research in Dermatology and Nursing (IVDP), University Medical Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - C Blome
- Institute for Health Services Research in Dermatology and Nursing (IVDP), University Medical Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Olivier T, Smith CEP, Haslam A, Addeo A, Prasad V. Quality of life in the adjuvant setting: A meta-analysis of US Food and Drug Administration approved anti-cancer drugs from 2018 to 2022. J Cancer Policy 2023; 37:100426. [PMID: 37270063 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcpo.2023.100426] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2023] [Revised: 05/21/2023] [Accepted: 05/31/2023] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In oncology, quality of life (QoL) questionnaires were historically designed to be used in the advanced or metastatic setting. We sought to determine the effects of contemporary treatments on QoL in the adjuvant setting and to determine if the QoL instruments used in these studies provide a relevant assessment. METHODS We conducted a systematic identification of all anti-cancer drugs used in the adjuvant setting and approved by the US Food and Drug Administration from January 2018 to March 2022. We conducted a quality evaluation and a meta-analysis of reported QoL results. We used the global QoL results when multiple QoL outcomes were reported. RESULTS There were 224 FDA approvals reviewed, of which 12 met the inclusion criteria. The placebo was the control arm in 10 out of 12 trials. Of those, 11 trials (92 %) assessed QoL, and ten (83 %) reported results. In reports with QoL results, a moderate-risk of bias was found in 3 out of 10 (30 %) and a high-risk of bias in 6 out of 10 (60 %) of reports, respectively. No trial reported a meaningful difference between arms. The meta-analysis found an overall detrimental effect on QoL in the experimental arm, though it was not statistically different. CONCLUSION This study identified 12 FDA registration trials in the adjuvant setting between 2018 and 2022. We found a moderate- to high-risk of bias in 90 % of the ten trials reporting QoL data. Our meta-analysis suggested a detrimental effect on QoL in the experimental arm, questioning the relevancy, in the adjuvant setting, of thresholds that were mostly developed in the advanced or metastatic setting. POLICY SUMMARY Future works should focus on specificities of the adjuvant setting when considering QoL evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothée Olivier
- Department of Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, 4 Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil Street, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, 550 16th St, 2nd Fl, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA.
| | - Claire E P Smith
- Hematology and Medical Oncology, Boston University School of Medicine, 830 Harrison Ave, 3rd Fl, Boston, MA 02118, USA
| | - Alyson Haslam
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, 550 16th St, 2nd Fl, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA
| | - Alfredo Addeo
- Department of Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, 4 Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil Street, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Vinay Prasad
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, 550 16th St, 2nd Fl, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Eljilany I, Castellano E, Tarhini AA. Adjuvant Therapy for High-Risk Melanoma: An In-Depth Examination of the State of the Field. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4125. [PMID: 37627153 PMCID: PMC10453009 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15164125] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2023] [Revised: 08/10/2023] [Accepted: 08/15/2023] [Indexed: 08/27/2023] Open
Abstract
The consideration of systemic adjuvant therapy is recommended for patients with stage IIB-IV melanoma who have undergone surgical resection due to a heightened risk of experiencing melanoma relapse and mortality from melanoma. Adjuvant therapy options tested over the past three decades include high-dose interferon-α, immune checkpoint inhibitors (pembrolizumab, nivolumab), targeted therapy (dabrafenib-trametinib for BRAF mutant melanoma), radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Most of these therapies have been demonstrated to enhance relapse-free survival (RFS) but with limited to no impact on overall survival (OS), as reported in randomized trials. In contemporary clinical practice, the adjuvant treatment approach for surgically resected stage III-IV melanoma has undergone a notable shift towards the utilization of nivolumab, pembrolizumab, and BRAF-MEK inhibitors, such as dabrafenib plus trametinib (specifically for BRAF mutant melanoma) due to the significant enhancements in RFS observed with these treatments. Pembrolizumab has obtained regulatory approval in the United States to treat resected stage IIB-IIC melanoma, while nivolumab is currently under review for the same indication. This review comprehensively analyzes completed phase III adjuvant therapy trials in adjuvant therapy. Additionally, it provides a summary of ongoing trials and an overview of the main challenges and future directions with adjuvant therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Islam Eljilany
- H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
| | - Ella Castellano
- H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
- Emory College of Arts and Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
| | - Ahmad A. Tarhini
- H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Lee R, Mandala M, Long GV, Eggermont AMM, van Akkooi ACJ, Sandhu S, Garbe C, Lorigan P. Adjuvant therapy for stage II melanoma: the need for further studies. Eur J Cancer 2023; 189:112914. [PMID: 37301717 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.05.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2023] [Accepted: 05/03/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors has revolutionised the outcomes for melanoma patients. In the metastatic setting, patients treated with nivolumab and ipilimumab have an expected 5-year survival of> 50%. For patients with resected high-risk stage III disease, adjuvant pembrolizumab, nivolumab or dabrafenib and trametinib are associated with a significant improvement in both relapse-free survival (RFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS). More recently neoadjuvant immunotherapy has shown very promising outcomes in patients with clinically detectable nodal disease and is likely to become a new standard of care. For stage IIB/C disease, two pivotal adjuvant trials of pembrolizumab and nivolumab have also reported a significant improvement in both RFS and DMFS. However, the absolute benefit is low and there are concerns about the risk of severe toxicities as well as long-term morbidity from endocrine toxicity. Ongoing registration phase III trials are currently evaluating newer immunotherapy combinations and the role of BRAF/MEK-directed targeted therapy for stage II melanoma. However, our ability to personalise therapy based on molecular risk stratification has lagged behind the development of novel immune therapies. There is a critical need to evaluate the use of tissue and blood-based biomarkers, to better select patients that will recur and avoid unnecessary treatment for the majority of patients cured by surgery alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca Lee
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Department of Medical Oncology, Manchester, UK; The University of Manchester, Division of Cancer Sciences, Manchester, UK
| | - Mario Mandala
- University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy; Ospedale Papa Givoanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Georgina V Long
- Melanoma Institute Australia, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Royal North Shore and Mater Hospitals, Sydney, Australia
| | - Alexander M M Eggermont
- University Medical Center Utrecht & Princess Maxima Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Comprehensive Cancer Center München, Technical University München & Ludwig Maximiliaan University, München, Germany
| | - Alexander C J van Akkooi
- Comprehensive Cancer Center München, Technical University München & Ludwig Maximiliaan University, München, Germany; Melanoma Institute Australia, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Shahneen Sandhu
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Claus Garbe
- Centre for Dermatooncology, Department of Dermatology, Eberhard Karls University, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Paul Lorigan
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Department of Medical Oncology, Manchester, UK; The University of Manchester, Division of Cancer Sciences, Manchester, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Lucas MW, Versluis JM, Rozeman EA, Blank CU. Personalizing neoadjuvant immune-checkpoint inhibition in patients with melanoma. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2023; 20:408-422. [PMID: 37147419 DOI: 10.1038/s41571-023-00760-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/28/2023] [Indexed: 05/07/2023]
Abstract
Neoadjuvant immune-checkpoint inhibition is a promising emerging treatment approach for patients with surgically resectable macroscopic stage III melanoma. The neoadjuvant setting provides an ideal platform for personalized therapy owing to the very homogeneous nature of the patient population and the opportunity for pathological response assessments within several weeks of starting treatment, thereby facilitating the efficient identification of novel biomarkers. A pathological response to immune-checkpoint inhibitors has been shown to be a strong surrogate marker of both recurrence-free survival and overall survival, enabling timely analyses of the efficacy of novel therapies in patients with early stage disease. Patients with a major pathological response (defined as the presence of ≤10% viable tumour cells) have a very low risk of recurrence, which offers an opportunity to adjust the extent of surgery and any subsequent adjuvant therapy and follow-up monitoring. Conversely, patients who have only a partial pathological response or who do not respond to neoadjuvant therapy still might benefit from therapy escalation and/or class switch during adjuvant therapy. In this Review, we outline the concept of a fully personalized neoadjuvant treatment approach exemplified by the current developments in neoadjuvant therapy for patients with resectable melanoma, which could provide a template for the development of similar approaches for patients with other immune-responsive cancers in the near future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Minke W Lucas
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Judith M Versluis
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Elisa A Rozeman
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Christian U Blank
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
- Department of Molecular Oncology and Immunology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
- Department of Internal Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Jęśkowiak-Kossakowska I, Jawień P, Krzyżak E, Mączyński M, Szafran R, Szeląg A, Janeczek M, Wiatrak B. Search for immunomodulatory compounds with antiproliferative activity against melanoma. Biomed Pharmacother 2023; 160:114374. [PMID: 36774726 DOI: 10.1016/j.biopha.2023.114374] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2022] [Revised: 02/01/2023] [Accepted: 02/03/2023] [Indexed: 02/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Melanoma is a highly aggressive neoplasm with a high degree of malignancy and rapid acquisition of resistance by cancer cells. METHODS Biological studies of a series of isoxazole compounds with immunomodulatory properties were preceded by in silico analysis. The assay evaluated the viability of NHDF and A375 cell cultures after the administration of isoxazole compounds after a 24-hour incubation period in the MTT test. Analyzes of ROS and NO scavenging, P-glycoprotein activity, and properties were performed. The levels of Caspase 3 and Caspase 9 were measured using ELISA to assess which pathways induced apoptosis by the tested compounds. On the chip, the synergistic effect of doxorubicin and the most active compound from the MM9 series on cells of the A375 melanoma line was determined. RESULTS All tested N'-substituted derivatives of 5-amino-N,3-dimethyl-1,2-oxazole-4-carbohydrazide with immunomodulatory activity show multidirectional antitumor activity on A375 melanoma lines with an affinity for P-glycoprotein, induction of free radical formation and generation of DNA damage leading to the death of cancer cells, as well as formation of complexes with DNA Topoisomerase II. Most of the tested compounds show pro-apoptotic activity. The most active compound in the series induces apoptosis in three distinct pathways and acts synergistically with doxorubicin. CONCLUSIONS The most active compound with immunomodulatory properties showed multidirectional antitumor activity against cells of the A375 melanoma line and also had a synergistic pro-apoptotic effect with doxorubicin, which may result in a reduction of this cytostatic dose with increased effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Izabela Jęśkowiak-Kossakowska
- Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Wroclaw Medical University, Mikulicza-Radeckiego 2, 50-345 Wroclaw, Poland.
| | - Paulina Jawień
- Department of Biostructure and Animal Physiology, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Norwida 25/27, 50-375 Wroclaw, Poland.
| | - Edward Krzyżak
- Department of Basic Chemical Sciences, Faculty of Pharmacy, Wroclaw Medical University, ul. Borowska 211a, 50-556 Wrocław, Poland.
| | - Marcin Mączyński
- Department of Organic Chemistry and Drug Technology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Wroclaw Medical University, 211A Borowska Street, 50-556 Wroclaw, Poland.
| | - Roman Szafran
- Department of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Faculty of Chemistry, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, ul. Norwida 4/6, 50-373 Wroclaw, Poland.
| | - Adam Szeląg
- Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Wroclaw Medical University, Mikulicza-Radeckiego 2, 50-345 Wroclaw, Poland.
| | - Maciej Janeczek
- Department of Biostructure and Animal Physiology, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Norwida 25/27, 50-375 Wroclaw, Poland.
| | - Benita Wiatrak
- Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Wroclaw Medical University, Mikulicza-Radeckiego 2, 50-345 Wroclaw, Poland.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Lai-Kwon J, Inderjeeth AJ, Lisy K, Sandhu S, Rutherford C, Jefford M. Impact of immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapy on health-related quality of life of people with stage III and IV melanoma: a mixed-methods systematic review. Eur J Cancer 2023; 184:83-105. [PMID: 36907021 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.02.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2022] [Revised: 02/01/2023] [Accepted: 02/02/2023] [Indexed: 02/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and targeted therapies (TT) have significantly improved disease control and survival in people with stage III and IV cutaneous melanoma. Understanding the impact of therapy on health-related quality of life (HRQL) is vital for treatment decision-making and determining targets for supportive care intervention. We conducted a mixed-methods systematic review to synthesise the impact of ICIs and TT on all domains of HRQL in these populations. METHODS A systematic literature search was conducted in April 2022 on MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Embase and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Quantitative and qualitative data relevant to the review question were extracted and synthesised in tables according to setting (adjuvant versus metastatic), treatment type (ICI versus TT) and HRQL issue. RESULTS Twenty-eight papers describing 27 studies were included: 15 randomised controlled trials (RCTs), four cohort studies, four single arm cross-sectional studies, two qualitative studies, one case control study and one mixed-methods study. In four studies of people with resected stage III melanoma, adjuvant pembrolizumab and dabrafenib-trametinib did not clinically or statistically change HRQL compared to baseline. In 17 studies of people with unresectable stage III/IV melanoma, inconsistencies in the impact of ICI on symptoms, functioning and overall HRQL were noted across different study designs. TT was associated with improvements in symptoms, functioning and HRQL across six studies. CONCLUSION This review highlights the key physical, psychological and social issues experienced by people with stage III and IV melanoma treated with ICI and TT. Inconsistencies in the impact of ICI on HRQL were observed in different study designs. This highlights the need for treatment-specific patient-reported outcome measures for determining the impact of these therapies on HRQL and real-world data to inform treatment decision-making and appropriate supportive care interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Lai-Kwon
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
| | | | - Karolina Lisy
- Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Australian Cancer Survivorship Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Shahneen Sandhu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Claudia Rutherford
- Cancer Nursing Research Unit (CNRU), Susan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Sydney Quality of Life Office, School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Michael Jefford
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Australian Cancer Survivorship Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Zwergel C, Fioravanti R, Mai A. PD-L1 small-molecule modulators: A new hope in epigenetic-based multidrug cancer therapy? Drug Discov Today 2023; 28:103435. [PMID: 36370994 DOI: 10.1016/j.drudis.2022.103435] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2022] [Revised: 10/31/2022] [Accepted: 11/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) is an immune checkpoint protein the overexpression of which results in an inhibitory signal that induces T cell exhaustion responsible for immune escape in tumors. Immunotherapy strategies targeting the PD-L1 pathway have achieved remarkable success in treating various types of cancer. More recently, numerous advances in understanding the complex PD-L1 biology have been made, and the first small-molecule inhibitors have been described in the literature. In this review, we highlight the most promising recent advances in understanding the complex regulation mechanisms focusing on small-molecule modulators, which could be used in rational therapy combinations with other epigenetic chemotherapeutic agents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clemens Zwergel
- Department of Drug Chemistry and Technologies, Department of Excellence 2018-2022, Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy.
| | - Rossella Fioravanti
- Department of Drug Chemistry and Technologies, Department of Excellence 2018-2022, Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy
| | - Antonello Mai
- Department of Drug Chemistry and Technologies, Department of Excellence 2018-2022, Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy; Pasteur Institute, Cenci-Bolognetti Foundation, Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Unger JM, Darke A, Othus M, Truong TG, Khushalani N, Kendra K, Lewis KD, Faller B, Funchain P, Buchbinder EI, Tarhini AA, Kirkwood JM, Sharon E, Sondak V, Guild SR, Grossmann K, Ribas A, Patel SP. Effectiveness of Adjuvant Pembrolizumab vs High-Dose Interferon or Ipilimumab for Quality-of-Life Outcomes in Patients With Resected Melanoma: A Secondary Analysis of the SWOG S1404 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol 2023; 9:251-260. [PMID: 36416836 PMCID: PMC9685550 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.5486] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2022] [Accepted: 08/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Importance A key issue for the adjuvant treatment of patients with melanoma is the assessment of the effect of treatment on relapse, survival, and quality of life (QOL). Objective To compare QOL in patients with resected melanoma at high risk for relapse who were treated with adjuvant pembrolizumab vs standard of care with either ipilimumab or high-dose interferon α 2b (HDI). Design, Setting, and Participants The S1404 phase 3 randomized clinical trial was conducted by the SWOG Cancer Research Network at 211 community/academic sites in the US, Canada, and Ireland. Patients were enrolled from December 2015 to October 2017. Data analysis for this QOL substudy was completed in March 2022. Overall, 832 patients were evaluable for the primary QOL end point. Interventions Patients were randomized (1:1) to treatment with adjuvant pembrolizumab vs standard of care with ipilimumab/HDI. Main Outcomes and Measures Quality of life was assessed for patients at baseline and cycles 1, 3, 5, 7, and 9 after randomization using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) Biological Response Modifiers (FACT-BRM), FACT-General, Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Diarrhea, and European QOL 5-Dimension 3-Level scales. The primary end point was the comparison by arm of cycle 3 FACT-BRM trial outcome index (TOI) scores using linear regression. Linear-mixed models were used to evaluate QOL scores over time. Regression analyses included adjustments for the baseline score, disease stage, and programmed cell death ligand 1 status. A clinically meaningful difference of 5 points was targeted. Results Among 1303 eligible patients (median [range] age, 56.7 [18.3-86.0] years; 524 women [40.2%]; 779 men [59.8%]; 10 Asian [0.8%], 7 Black [0.5%], 44 Hispanic [3.4%], and 1243 White [95.4%] individuals), 1188 (91.1%) had baseline FACT-BRM TOI scores, and 832 were evaluable at cycle 3 (ipilimumab/HDI = 267 [32.1%]; pembrolizumab = 565 [67.9%]). Evaluable patients were predominantly younger than 65 years (623 [74.9%]) and male (779 [58.9%]). Estimates of FACT-BRM TOI cycle 3 compliance did not differ by arm (ipilimumab/HDI, 96.0% vs pembrolizumab, 98.3%; P = .25). The adjusted cycle 3 FACT-BRM TOI score was 9.6 points (95% CI, 7.9-11.3; P < .001) higher (better QOL) for pembrolizumab compared with ipilimumab/HDI, exceeding the prespecified clinically meaningful difference. In linear-mixed models, differences by arm exceeded 5 points in favor of pembrolizumab through cycle 7. In post hoc analyses, FACT-BRM TOI scores favored the pembrolizumab arm compared with the subset of patients receiving ipilimumab (difference, 6.0 points; 95% CI, 4.1-7.8; P < .001) or HDI (difference, 17.0 points; 95% CI, 14.6-19.4; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance This secondary analysis of a phase 3 randomized clinical trial found that adjuvant pembrolizumab improved QOL vs treatment with adjuvant ipilimumab or HDI in patients with high-risk resected melanoma. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02506153.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph M. Unger
- SWOG Statistics and Data Management Center, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Amy Darke
- SWOG Statistics and Data Management Center, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Megan Othus
- SWOG Statistics and Data Management Center, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington
| | | | | | | | | | - Bryan Faller
- Heartland NCORP/Missouri Baptist Medical Center, St Louis
| | | | | | | | - John M. Kirkwood
- The University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Elad Sharon
- National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Vernon Sondak
- H. Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | | | | | - Antoni Ribas
- UCLA Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Sapna P. Patel
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Pedersen S, Holmstroem RB, von Heymann A, Tolstrup LK, Madsen K, Petersen MA, Haslund CA, Ruhlmann CH, Schmidt H, Johansen C, Svane IM, Ellebaek E. Quality of life and mental health in real-world patients with resected stage III/IV melanoma receiving adjuvant immunotherapy. Acta Oncol 2023; 62:62-69. [PMID: 36645166 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2023.2165449] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) has expanded into the adjuvant setting enhancing the importance of knowledge on the immune-related toxicities and their impact on health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Large phase 3 trials of patients with resected Stage III/IV melanoma found no effect on HRQoL during adjuvant immunotherapy. This study investigates how HRQoL was affected during and after adjuvant immunotherapy in a real-world setting. METHODS Patients with resected melanoma treated with adjuvant nivolumab from 2018 to 2021 in Denmark were identified using the Danish Metastatic Melanoma Database (DAMMED). The study was performed as a nationwide cross-sectional analysis as a questionnaire consisting of six different validated questionnaires on HRQoL, cognitive function, fatigue, depression, fear of recurrence, and decision regret was sent to all patients in March 2021. To evaluate HRQoL during and after adjuvant treatment, patients were divided into groups depending on their treatment status when answering the questionnaire; patients in active treatment for 0-6 months, patients in active treatment for >6 months, patients who ended treatment 0-6 months ago, and patients who ended treatment >6 months ago. RESULTS A total of 271/412 (66%) patients completed the questionnaire. Patients who ended therapy 0-6 months ago had the lowest HRQoL and had more fatigue. Patients in active treatment for >6 months had lower HRQoL and more fatigue than patients who started treatment 0-6 months ago. Patients ending therapy >6 months ago had higher HRQoL and less fatigue compared to patients who ended therapy 0-6 months ago. Multivariable analysis showed an association between HRQoL and treatment status, comorbidity, civil status, and employment status. CONCLUSIONS Adjuvant nivolumab may affect some aspects of QoL, but the influence seems temporary. Patient characteristics, such as civil status, employment status, and comorbidity were associated with HRQoL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sidsel Pedersen
- Department of Oncology, National Center for Cancer Immune Therapy (CCIT-DK), Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev and Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Rikke B Holmstroem
- Department of Oncology, National Center for Cancer Immune Therapy (CCIT-DK), Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev and Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Annika von Heymann
- Department of Oncology, Cancer Survivorship and Late Effects Research Center (CASTLE), Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Kasper Madsen
- Department of Oncology, National Center for Cancer Immune Therapy (CCIT-DK), Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev and Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Morten Aagaard Petersen
- Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine GP, Palliative Care Research Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Christina H Ruhlmann
- Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Henrik Schmidt
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Christoffer Johansen
- Department of Oncology, Cancer Survivorship and Late Effects Research Center (CASTLE), Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Inge Marie Svane
- Department of Oncology, National Center for Cancer Immune Therapy (CCIT-DK), Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev and Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Eva Ellebaek
- Department of Oncology, National Center for Cancer Immune Therapy (CCIT-DK), Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev and Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Anestopoulos I, Kyriakou S, Tragkola V, Paraskevaidis I, Tzika E, Mitsiogianni M, Deligiorgi MV, Petrakis G, Trafalis DT, Botaitis S, Giatromanolaki A, Koukourakis MI, Franco R, Pappa A, Panayiotidis MI. Targeting the epigenome in malignant melanoma: Facts, challenges and therapeutic promises. Pharmacol Ther 2022; 240:108301. [PMID: 36283453 DOI: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2022.108301] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2022] [Revised: 10/03/2022] [Accepted: 10/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Malignant melanoma is the most lethal type of skin cancer with high rates of mortality. Although current treatment options provide a short-clinical benefit, acquired-drug resistance highlights the low 5-year survival rate among patients with advanced stage of the disease. In parallel, the involvement of an aberrant epigenetic landscape, (e.g., alterations in DNA methylation patterns, histone modifications marks and expression of non-coding RNAs), in addition to the genetic background, has been also associated with the onset and progression of melanoma. In this review article, we report on current therapeutic options in melanoma treatment with a focus on distinct epigenetic alterations and how their reversal, by specific drug compounds, can restore a normal phenotype. In particular, we concentrate on how single and/or combinatorial therapeutic approaches have utilized epigenetic drug compounds in being effective against malignant melanoma. Finally, the role of deregulated epigenetic mechanisms in promoting drug resistance to targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors is presented leading to the development of newly synthesized and/or improved drug compounds capable of targeting the epigenome of malignant melanoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I Anestopoulos
- Department of Cancer Genetics, Therapeutics & Ultrastructural Pathology, The Cyprus Institute of Neurology & Genetics, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - S Kyriakou
- Department of Cancer Genetics, Therapeutics & Ultrastructural Pathology, The Cyprus Institute of Neurology & Genetics, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - V Tragkola
- Department of Cancer Genetics, Therapeutics & Ultrastructural Pathology, The Cyprus Institute of Neurology & Genetics, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - I Paraskevaidis
- Department of Cancer Genetics, Therapeutics & Ultrastructural Pathology, The Cyprus Institute of Neurology & Genetics, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - E Tzika
- Department of Cancer Genetics, Therapeutics & Ultrastructural Pathology, The Cyprus Institute of Neurology & Genetics, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | | | - M V Deligiorgi
- Laboratory of Pharmacology, Medical School, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - G Petrakis
- Saint George Hospital, Chania, Crete, Greece
| | - D T Trafalis
- Laboratory of Pharmacology, Medical School, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - S Botaitis
- Department of Surgery, Alexandroupolis University Hospital, Democritus University of Thrace School of Medicine, Alexandroupolis, Greece
| | - A Giatromanolaki
- Department of Pathology, Democritus University of Thrace, University General Hospital of Alexandroupolis, Alexandroupolis, Greece
| | - M I Koukourakis
- Radiotherapy / Oncology, Radiobiology & Radiopathology Unit, Department of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, Democritus University of Thrace, Alexandroupolis, Greece
| | - R Franco
- Redox Biology Centre, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA; School of Veterinary Medicine & Biomedical Sciences, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA
| | - A Pappa
- Department of Molecular Biology & Genetics, Democritus University of Thrace, Alexandroupolis, Greece
| | - M I Panayiotidis
- Department of Cancer Genetics, Therapeutics & Ultrastructural Pathology, The Cyprus Institute of Neurology & Genetics, Nicosia, Cyprus.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Eggermont AMM, Kicinski M, Blank CU, Mandala M, Long GV, Atkinson V, Dalle S, Haydon A, Meshcheryakov A, Khattak A, Carlino MS, Sandhu S, Larkin J, Puig S, Ascierto PA, Rutkowski P, Schadendorf D, Boers-Sonderen M, Di Giacomo AM, van den Eertwegh AJM, Grob JJ, Gutzmer R, Jamal R, van Akkooi ACJ, Lorigan P, Grebennik D, Krepler C, Marreaud S, Suciu S, Robert C. Five-Year Analysis of Adjuvant Pembrolizumab or Placebo in Stage III Melanoma. NEJM EVIDENCE 2022; 1:EVIDoa2200214. [PMID: 38319852 DOI: 10.1056/evidoa2200214] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In the previously reported primary analyses of this phase 3 trial, 12 months of adjuvant pembrolizumab resulted in significantly longer recurrence- and distant metastasis-free survival than placebo in patients with resected high-risk stage III melanoma. To confirm the stability of these benefits, longer-term data were needed. METHODS: We randomly assigned 1019 patients to receive 200 mg of pembrolizumab or placebo intravenously every 3 weeks for a total of 18 doses (approximately 1 year) and had previously reported data with a 15-, 36-, and 42-month median follow-up. We now report data at a median follow-up of 4.9 years. We report a number of outcomes, including recurrence-free survival in the overall population and in the subgroup of patients with cancer who were positive for the programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1). Distant metastasis-free survival was a secondary end point. RESULTS: In the overall intention-to-treat population, pembrolizumab was still associated with longer recurrence-free survival than placebo (5-year rate of recurrence-free survival, 55.4% [95% confidence interval (CI), 50.8 to 59.8] vs. 38.3% [95% CI, 33.9 to 42.7]; hazard ratio for recurrence or death, 0.61 [95% CI, 0.51 to 0.72]) and a longer distant metastasis-free survival (5-year rate of distant metastasis-free survival, 60.6% [95% CI, 56.0 to 64.9] vs. 44.5% [95% CI, 39.9 to 48.9]; hazard ratio for distant metastasis or death, 0.62 [95% CI, 0.52 to 0.75]). Similar findings were obtained in the subgroup of 853 patients with PD-L1–positive tumors. CONCLUSIONS: The 5-year analysis of adjuvant therapy with pembrolizumab resulted in a sustained improvement in the long-term recurrence- and distant metastasis-free survival compared with placebo in patients with resected stage III melanoma. (Funded by Merck & Co., Inc.; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02362594, and EudraCT number, 2014-004944-37.)
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander M M Eggermont
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, München, Germany
- Princess Máxima Center and University Medical Center Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Michal Kicinski
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Christian U Blank
- Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Mario Mandala
- University of Perugia, Santa Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Italy
| | - Georgina V Long
- Melanoma Institute Australia, University of Sydney, Mater and Royal North Shore Hospitals, Sydney, VIC, Australia
| | - Victoria Atkinson
- Princess Alexandra Hospital, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Stéphane Dalle
- Lyon Civic Hospital Cancer Institute, Cancer Research Centre of Lyon, Lyon University, France
| | | | - Andrey Meshcheryakov
- Federal State Budgetary Institution "Russian Oncology Scientific Centre named after N.N. Blokhin RAMS," Moscow, Russian Federation
| | - Adnan Khattak
- Fiona Stanley Hospital/University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Matteo S Carlino
- Westmead and Blacktown Hospitals, Melanoma Institute Australia, and University of Sydney, Sydney, VIC, Australia
| | | | | | - Susana Puig
- Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, University of Barcelona and Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Raras, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Paolo A Ascierto
- Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale," Naples, Italy
| | - Piotr Rutkowski
- Maria Sklodowska-Curie Institute-Oncology Center, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Dirk Schadendorf
- University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Anna Maria Di Giacomo
- Center for Immuno-Oncology and Medical Oncology and Immunotherapy Unit, University Hospital of Siena, Italy
| | | | - Jean-Jacques Grob
- Aix-Marseille University, Hôpital de la Timone, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, France
| | - Ralf Gutzmer
- Johannes Wesling Medical Center, Ruhr University Bochum Campus Minden, Germany
| | - Rahima Jamal
- Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Centre de Recherche du CHUM, Quebec, QC, Canada
| | | | - Paul Lorigan
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester and Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Sandrine Marreaud
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Stefan Suciu
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Caroline Robert
- Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus Grand Paris and University Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Khattak MA, Luke JJ, Long GV, Ascierto PA, Rutkowski P, Schadendorf D, Robert C, Grob JJ, de la Cruz Merino L, Del Vecchio M, Spagnolo F, Mackiewicz J, Chiarion-Sileni V, Carlino MS, Mohr P, De Galitiis F, Ross MI, Eroglu Z, Chen K, Jiang R, Fukunaga-Kalabis M, Krepler C, Eggermont AMM, Kirkwood JM. Adjuvant pembrolizumab versus placebo in resected high-risk stage II melanoma: Health-related quality of life from the randomized phase 3 KEYNOTE-716 study. Eur J Cancer 2022; 176:207-217. [PMID: 36202690 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.08.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2022] [Accepted: 08/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adjuvant pembrolizumab significantly improved recurrence-free survival (RFS) versus placebo in resected stage IIB and IIC melanoma in the phase 3 KEYNOTE-716 study. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) results are reported. METHODS Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to pembrolizumab 200 mg (2 mg/kg, patients ≥12 to <18 years) Q3W or placebo for ≤17 cycles or until disease recurrence, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal. Change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 global health status (GHS)/quality of life (QoL) was a prespecified exploratory end point. Change in EORTC QLQ-C30 functioning, symptom, and single-item scales, and EQ-5D-5L visual analog scale (VAS) were also summarized. Primary analyses were performed at week 48 to ensure adequate completion/compliance. The HRQoL population comprised patients who received ≥1 dose of treatment and completed ≥1 assessment. RESULTS The HRQoL population included 969 patients (pembrolizumab, n = 483; placebo, n = 486). Compliance at week 48 was ≥80% for both instruments. EORTC QLQ-C30 GHS/QoL, physical functioning, role functioning, and EQ-5D-5L VAS scores were stable from baseline to week 48 in both arms, with no clinically meaningful decline observed. Scores did not differ significantly between pembrolizumab and placebo. EORTC QLQ-C30 GHS/QoL, physical functioning, role functioning, and EQ-5D-5L VAS scores remained stable through week 96 in both arms. CONCLUSIONS HRQoL was stable with adjuvant pembrolizumab, with no clinically meaningful decline observed. Change from baseline in HRQoL was similar between arms. These results, in conjunction with the improved RFS and manageable safety previously reported, support the use of adjuvant pembrolizumab for high-risk stage II melanoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muhammad A Khattak
- Fiona Stanley Hospital and Edith Cowan University, Perth, WA, Australia.
| | - Jason J Luke
- Cancer Immunotherapeutics Center, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Georgina V Long
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Royal North Shore and Mater Hospitals, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Paolo A Ascierto
- Melanoma, Cancer Immunotherapy and Development Therapeutics Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale," Naples, Italy
| | - Piotr Rutkowski
- Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Dirk Schadendorf
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, Universitaetsklinikum Essen and German Cancer Consortium, Essen, Germany
| | - Caroline Robert
- Dermatology Committee, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Sud, Villejuif, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Matteo S Carlino
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Westmead and Blacktown Hospitals, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Peter Mohr
- Elbe Kliniken Buxtehude, Buxtehude, Germany
| | | | - Merrick I Ross
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Zeynep Eroglu
- H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Ke Chen
- Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA
| | | | | | | | - Alexander M M Eggermont
- University Medical Center Utrecht and Princess Maxima Center, Utrecht, Netherlands; Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - John M Kirkwood
- UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Kobeissi I, Tarhini AA. Systemic adjuvant therapy for high-risk cutaneous melanoma. Ther Adv Med Oncol 2022; 14:17588359221134087. [PMID: 36324735 PMCID: PMC9619267 DOI: 10.1177/17588359221134087] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2022] [Accepted: 10/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Cutaneous melanoma continues to increase in incidence and poses a significant mortality risk. Surgical excision of melanoma in its early stages is often curative. However, patients with resected stages IIB-IV are considered at high risk for relapse and death from melanoma where systemic adjuvant therapy is indicated. The long-studied high-dose interferon-α was shown to improve relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) but is no longer in use. Adjuvant therapy with ipilimumab at 10 mg/kg (ipi10) demonstrated significant RFS and OS improvements but at a high cost in terms of toxicity, while adjuvant ipilimumab 3 mg/kg was shown to be equally effective and less toxic. More recently, the adjuvant therapy for resected stages III-IV melanoma in clinical practice has changed in favor of nivolumab, pembrolizumab, and BRAF-MEK inhibitors dabrafenib plus trametinib (for BRAF mutant melanoma) based on significant improvements in RFS as compared to ipi10 (nivolumab and pembrolizumab) and placebo (dabrafenib plus trametinib). For resected stages IIB-IIC melanoma, pembrolizumab achieved regulatory approval in the United States based on significant RFS benefits. In this article, we review completed and ongoing phase III adjuvant therapy trials. We also briefly discuss neoadjuvant therapy for locoregionally advanced melanoma. Finally, we explore recent studies on predictive and prognostic melanoma biomarkers in the adjuvant setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iyad Kobeissi
- H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Chen C, Wang Z, Qin Y. Health-related quality of life in stage III-IV melanoma treated with targeted therapy or immunotherapy: A systematic review on the adequacy of reporting and clinical issues in phase III randomized controlled trials. Cancer Med 2022; 12:2262-2280. [PMID: 36030506 PMCID: PMC9939121 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.5183] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2022] [Revised: 07/09/2022] [Accepted: 08/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Cutaneous melanoma represents around over 90% of all melanoma. With more effective treatments able to extend patients' survival, health-related quality of life (HRQOL) is increasingly becoming an important endpoint in cancer clinical trials. They are often secondary outcomes measured in phase III randomized controlled trials and their implementation, collection, analysis, and reporting can be challenging methodologically. For these reasons, an increasing number of international recommendations introduced the standards regarding the conduct of HRQOL. In this systematic review, we appraise the adequacy of HRQOL reporting in phase III randomized controlled trials of stage III-IV cutaneous melanoma and the clinical issues of immunotherapy and small-molecular-targeted therapy on HRQOL. Our search strategy totally got 55 articles, and only 13 studies met all inclusion criteria. Findings suggest that most treatments did not yield significant improvements in HRQOL but kept baseline levels, accompanied by prolonged survival and acceptable toxicity. Except for some existing limitations, reporting of HRQOL has made encouraging progress during the period covered by our search, but some aspects still need further optimization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chen Chen
- Department of OncologyThe First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou UniversityZhengzhouChina,Cancer Institute, University College LondonLondonUK
| | - Zehua Wang
- Department of OncologyThe First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou UniversityZhengzhouChina
| | - Yan‐Ru Qin
- Department of OncologyThe First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou UniversityZhengzhouChina
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Campana LG, Quaglino P, de Terlizzi F, Mascherini M, Brizio M, Spina R, Bertino G, Kunte C, Odili J, Matteucci P, MacKenzie Ross A, Schepler H, Clover JAP, Kis E. Health-related quality of life trajectories in melanoma patients after electrochemotherapy: real-world insights from the InspECT register. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2022; 36:2352-2363. [PMID: 35870122 DOI: 10.1111/jdv.18456] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2022] [Accepted: 06/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Electrochemotherapy (ECT) effectively controls skin metastases from cutaneous melanoma. OBJECTIVES This study aimed to evaluate health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in melanoma patients pre-/post-ECT and its effect on treatment outcome. METHODS The analysis included prospective data from the International Network for Sharing Practices of ECT register. Following the Standard Operating Procedures, patients received intravenous or intratumoural bleomycin (15,000 IU/m2 ; 1000 IU mL/cm3 ) followed by 100-microsecond, 1000-V/cm electric pulses. Endpoints included response (RECIST v3.0), local progression-free survival (LPFS), toxicity (CTCAE v5.0), and patient-reported HRQoL at baseline, one, two, four and ten months (EuroQol [EQ-5D-3L], including 5-item utility score [EQ-5D] and visual analogue scale for self-reported health state [EQ-VAS]). Comparisons within/between subgroups were made for statistical and minimal important differences (MID). HRQoL scores and clinical covariates were analysed to identify predictors of response in multivariate analysis. RESULTS Median tumour size was 2 cm. Complete response rate, G3 toxicity and one-year LPFS in 378 patients (76% of the melanoma cohort) were 47%, 5%, and 78%. At baseline, age-paired HRQoL did not differ from the general European population. Following ECT, both EQ-5D and EQ-VAS scores remained within MID boundaries, particularly among complete responders. A subanalysis of the EQ-5D items revealed a statistically significant deterioration in pain/discomfort and mobility (restored within four months), and self-care and usual activities (throughout the follow-up) domains. Concomitant checkpoint inhibition correlated with better EQ-5D and EQ-VAS trajectories. Baseline EQ-5D was the exclusive independent predictor for complete response (RR 14.76, p=0.001). CONCLUSIONS HRQoL of ECT melanoma patients parallels the general population and is preserved in complete responders. Transient deterioration in pain/discomfort and mobility and persistent decline in self-care and usual activities may warrant targeted support interventions. Combination with checkpoint inhibitors is associated with better QoL outcomes. Baseline HRQoL provides predictive information which can help identify patients most likely to respond.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L G Campana
- Department of Surgery, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Department of Surgery, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - P Quaglino
- Dermatologic Clinic, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Italy
| | - F de Terlizzi
- Biophysics Department, IGEA S.p.A., 41012 Carpi, Modena, Italy
| | - M Mascherini
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Polyclinic Hospital San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - M Brizio
- Dermatologic Clinic, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Italy
| | - R Spina
- Psychology Unit, University Hospital of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - G Bertino
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head Neck Surgery, Policlinico San Matteo Foundation IRCCS, Pavia University, Pavia, Italy
| | - C Kunte
- Department of Dermatosurgery and Dermatology, Artemed Fachklinik, Munich, Germany
| | - J Odili
- Department of Plastic Surgery, St. Georges University Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - P Matteucci
- Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Hull, UK
| | - A MacKenzie Ross
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, St Thomas' Hospital, UK
| | - H Schepler
- Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg University KöR, Mainz, Germany
| | - J A P Clover
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Cork University Hospital, Cork, Ireland
- Cancer Research, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| | - E Kis
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology, University of Szeged, Hungary
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Villani A, Potestio L, Fabbrocini G, Troncone G, Malapelle U, Scalvenzi M. The Treatment of Advanced Melanoma: Therapeutic Update. Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23:ijms23126388. [PMID: 35742834 PMCID: PMC9223461 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23126388] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2022] [Revised: 06/05/2022] [Accepted: 06/06/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Cutaneous melanoma is the main cause of death for skin cancer. The majority of patients with a diagnosis of melanoma have localized disease, which can be successfully treated with surgical treatment. However, the surgical approach is not curative for advanced melanoma (AM). Indeed, the management of AM is still challenging, since melanoma is the solid tumor with the highest number of mutations and cancer cells have the capacity to evade the immune system. In the past, the treatment of AM relied on chemotherapeutic agents, without showing efficacy data. Recent knowledge on melanoma pathogenesis as well as the introduction of immunotherapies, targeted therapies vaccines, small molecules, and combination therapies has revolutionized AM management, showing promising results in terms of effectiveness and safety. The aim of this review is to assess and to discuss the role of emerging therapies for AM management in order to obtain a complete overview of the currently available treatment options and future perspectives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessia Villani
- Section of Dermatology, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Via Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy; (L.P.); (G.F.); (M.S.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-081-7462457; Fax: +39-081-7462442
| | - Luca Potestio
- Section of Dermatology, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Via Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy; (L.P.); (G.F.); (M.S.)
| | - Gabriella Fabbrocini
- Section of Dermatology, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Via Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy; (L.P.); (G.F.); (M.S.)
| | - Giancarlo Troncone
- Department of Public Health, University Federico II of Naples, 80131 Naples, Italy; (G.T.); (U.M.)
| | - Umberto Malapelle
- Department of Public Health, University Federico II of Naples, 80131 Naples, Italy; (G.T.); (U.M.)
| | - Massimiliano Scalvenzi
- Section of Dermatology, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Via Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy; (L.P.); (G.F.); (M.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Luke JJ, Rutkowski P, Queirolo P, Del Vecchio M, Mackiewicz J, Chiarion-Sileni V, de la Cruz Merino L, Khattak MA, Schadendorf D, Long GV, Ascierto PA, Mandala M, De Galitiis F, Haydon A, Dummer R, Grob JJ, Robert C, Carlino MS, Mohr P, Poklepovic A, Sondak VK, Scolyer RA, Kirkwood JM, Chen K, Diede SJ, Ahsan S, Ibrahim N, Eggermont AMM. Pembrolizumab versus placebo as adjuvant therapy in completely resected stage IIB or IIC melanoma (KEYNOTE-716): a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial. Lancet 2022; 399:1718-1729. [PMID: 35367007 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(22)00562-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 230] [Impact Index Per Article: 115.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2022] [Revised: 03/10/2022] [Accepted: 03/11/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pembrolizumab prolongs progression-free and overall survival among patients with advanced melanoma and recurrence-free survival in resected stage III disease. KEYNOTE-716 assessed pembrolizumab as adjuvant therapy in patients with completely resected, high-risk, stage II melanoma. We report results from the planned first and second interim analyses for recurrence-free survival. METHODS In this double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 3 study, involving 160 academic medical centres and hospitals in 16 countries (Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Chile, France, Germany, Israel, Italy, Japan, Poland, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the UK, and the USA), patients aged 12 years or older with newly diagnosed, completely resected stage IIB or IIC melanoma (TNM stage T3b or T4 with a negative sentinel lymph node biopsy) were recruited. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1), in blocks of four and stratified by T-category (3b, 4a, and 4b) and paediatric status (age 12-17 years vs ≥18 years), using an interactive response technology system to intravenous pembrolizumab 200 mg (2 mg/kg in paediatric patients) or placebo every 3 weeks for 17 cycles or until disease recurrence or unacceptable toxicity. All patients, clinical investigators, and analysts were masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed recurrence-free survival (defined as time from randomisation to recurrence or death) in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population (ie, all patients randomly assigned to treatment). The primary endpoint was met if recurrence-free survival was significantly improved for pembrolizumab versus placebo at either the first interim analysis (after approximately 128 patients had events) or second interim analysis (after 179 patients had events) under multiplicity control. Safety was assessed in all patients randomly assigned to treatment who received at least one dose of study treatment. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03553836, and is closed to accrual. FINDINGS Between Sept 23, 2018, and Nov 4, 2020, 1182 patients were screened, of whom 976 were randomly assigned to pembrolizumab (n=487) or placebo (n=489; ITT population). The median age was 61 years (IQR 52-69) and 387 (40%) patients were female and 589 (60%) were male. 874 (90%) of 976 patients were White and 799 (82%) were not Hispanic or Latino. 483 (99%) of 487 patients in the pembrolizumab group and 486 (99%) of 489 in the placebo group received assigned treatment. At the first interim analysis (data cutoff on Dec 4, 2020; median follow-up of 14·4 months [IQR 10·2-18·7] in the pembrolizumab group and 14·3 months [10·1-18·7] in the placebo group), 54 (11%) of 487 patients in the pembrolizumab group and 82 (17%) of 489 in the placebo group had a first recurrence of disease or died (hazard ratio [HR] 0·65 [95% CI 0·46-0·92]; p=0·0066). At the second interim analysis (data cutoff on June 21, 2021; median follow-up of 20·9 months [16·7-25·3] in the pembrolizumab group and 20·9 months [16·6-25·3] in the placebo group), 72 (15%) patients in the pembrolizumab group and 115 (24%) in the placebo group had a first recurrence or died (HR 0·61 [95% CI 0·45-0·82]). Median recurrence-free survival was not reached in either group at either assessment timepoint. At the first interim analysis, grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 78 (16%) of 483 patients in the pembrolizumab groups versus 21 (4%) of 486 in the placebo group. At the first interim analysis, four patients died from an adverse event, all in the placebo group (one each due to pneumonia, COVID-19-related pneumonia, suicide, and recurrent cancer), and at the second interim analysis, one additional patient, who was in the pembrolizumab group, died from an adverse event (COVID-19-related pneumonia). No deaths due to study treatment occurred. INTERPRETATION Pembrolizumab as adjuvant therapy for up to approximately 1 year for stage IIB or IIC melanoma resulted in a significant reduction in the risk of disease recurrence or death versus placebo, with a manageable safety profile. FUNDING Merck Sharp & Dohme, a subsidiary of Merck & Co, Kenilworth, NJ, USA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason J Luke
- UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
| | - Piotr Rutkowski
- Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Paola Queirolo
- Istituto Europeo di Oncologia - IRCCS, Milano; Ospedale San Martino IRCCS, Genova, Italy
| | | | - Jacek Mackiewicz
- Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland; Greater Poland Cancer Center, Poznan, Poland
| | | | - Luis de la Cruz Merino
- Clinical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, Sevilla, Spain; Medicine Department, Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain
| | | | - Dirk Schadendorf
- University Hospital Essen and German Cancer Consortium Partner Site, Essen, Germany
| | - Georgina V Long
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Charles Perkins Center, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Royal North Shore and Mater Hospitals, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Paolo A Ascierto
- Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - Mario Mandala
- University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy; Ospedale Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
| | | | - Andrew Haydon
- Alfred Hospital, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Reinhard Dummer
- University Hospital Zürich, University of Zurich, Skin Cancer Center, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | - Caroline Robert
- Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Paris-Saclay University, Villejuif, France
| | - Matteo S Carlino
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Westmead and Blacktown Hospitals, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Peter Mohr
- Elbe Kliniken Buxtehude, Buxtehude, Germany
| | | | - Vernon K Sondak
- H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Richard A Scolyer
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Charles Perkins Center, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Royal Prince Alfred Hospital Sydney, NSW, Australia; NSW Health Pathology, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | | - Ke Chen
- Merck & Co, Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA
| | | | | | | | - Alexander M M Eggermont
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands; Princess Máxima Center, Utrecht, Netherlands; Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Eggermont AM, Meshcheryakov A, Atkinson V, Blank CU, Mandala M, Long GV, Barrow C, Di Giacomo AM, Fisher R, Sandhu S, Kudchadkar R, Ortiz Romero PL, Svane IM, Larkin J, Puig S, Hersey P, Quaglino P, Queirolo P, Stroyakovskiy D, Bastholt L, Mohr P, Hernberg M, Chiarion-Sileni V, Strother M, Hauschild A, Yamazaki N, van Akkooi AC, Lorigan P, Krepler C, Ibrahim N, Marreaud S, Kicinski M, Suciu S, Robert C. Crossover and rechallenge with pembrolizumab in recurrent patients from the EORTC 1325-MG/Keynote-054 phase III trial, pembrolizumab versus placebo after complete resection of high-risk stage III melanoma. Eur J Cancer 2021; 158:156-168. [PMID: 34678677 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.09.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2021] [Accepted: 09/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the phase III double-blind European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer 1325/KEYNOTE-054 trial, pembrolizumab improved recurrence-free and distant metastasis-free survival in patients with stage III cutaneous melanoma with complete resection of lymph nodes. In the pembrolizumab group, the incidence of grade I-V and of grade III-V immune-related adverse events (irAEs) was 37% and 7%, respectively. METHODS Patients were randomised to receive intravenous (i.v.) pembrolizumab 200 mg (N = 514) or placebo (N = 505) every 3 weeks, up to 1 year. On recurrence, patients could enter part 2 of the study: pembrolizumab 200 mg i.v. every 3 weeks up to 2 years, for crossover (those who received placebo) or rechallenge (those who had recurrence ≥6 months after completing 1-year adjuvant pembrolizumab therapy). For these patients, we present the safety profile and efficacy outcomes. RESULTS At the clinical cut-off (16-Oct-2020), in the placebo group, 298 patients had a disease recurrence, in which 155 (52%) crossed over ('crossover'). In the pembrolizumab group, 297 patients completed the 1-year treatment period; 47 had a recurrence ≥6 months later, in which 20 (43%) entered the rechallenge part 2 ('rechallenge'). In the crossover group, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 8.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.7-15.2) and the 3-year PFS rate was 32% (95% CI 25-40%). Among 80 patients with stage IV evaluable disease, 31 (39%) had an objective response: 14 (18%) patients with complete response (CR) and 17 (21%) patients with partial response. The 2-year PFS rate from response was 69% (95% CI 48-83%). In the rechallenge group, the median PFS was 4.1 months (95% CI 2.6-NE). Among 9 patients with stage IV evaluable disease, 1 had an objective response (CR). Among the 175 patients, 51 (29%) had a grade I-IV irAE and 11 (6%) had a grade III-IV irAE. CONCLUSIONS Pembrolizumab treatment after crossover yielded an overall 3-year PFS rate of 32% and a 39% ORR in evaluable patients, but the efficacy (11% ORR) was lower in those rechallenged.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Mm Eggermont
- Princess Máxima Center and University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, 3584 CS, the Netherlands.
| | - Andrey Meshcheryakov
- Federal State Budgetary Institution "Russian Oncology Scientific Centre named after N.N. Blokhin RAMS", Moscow, Russia
| | - Victoria Atkinson
- Princess Alexandra Hospital, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Christian U Blank
- Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Mario Mandala
- Azienda Ospedaliera Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy; Ospedale Santa Maria Della Misericordia, Perrugia, Italy
| | - Georgina V Long
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Mater and Royal North Shore Hospitals, Sydney, Australia
| | | | - Anna Maria Di Giacomo
- Center for Immuno-Oncology, University Hospital of Siena, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Rosalie Fisher
- North Shore Hospital, Waitemata DHB, Takapuna, Auckland, New Zealand; Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
| | | | | | - Pablo Luis Ortiz Romero
- Hospital 12 de Octubre, Institute i+12, CIBERONC, Medical School, University Complutense, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - James Larkin
- Royal Marsden Hospital - Chelsea, London, United Kingdom
| | - Susana Puig
- Hospital Clinic Universitari de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Peter Hersey
- David Maddison Clinical Sciences, Gateshead, Australia
| | - Pietro Quaglino
- Azienda Ospedaliera Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Ospedale San Lazzaro, Torino, Italy
| | - Paola Queirolo
- Istituto Nazionale Per La Ricerca Sul Cancro, Genova, Italy; European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Axel Hauschild
- Universitaetsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel - Klinik Dermatologie, Venerologie und Allergologie, Kiel, Germany
| | | | | | - Paul Lorigan
- The University of Manchester and Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Caroline Robert
- Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus Grand Paris and University Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Adolescent and Young Adult (AYA) Cancer Survivorship Practices: An Overview. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13194847. [PMID: 34638332 PMCID: PMC8508173 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13194847] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2021] [Revised: 09/25/2021] [Accepted: 09/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Worldwide, more than 1.2 million adolescents and young adults (AYAs; those aged 15-39 years) are diagnosed with cancer each year. Although considerable variability exists according to cancer site and stage of disease, the 5-year relative survival at the time of diagnosis has been estimated at >80% for all AYA patients with cancer combined. Extensive survivorship research in recent decades has focused on patients diagnosed with cancer as children (<15 years) and older adults (>39 years), yet few studies to date have reported outcomes specifically for patients diagnosed as AYAs. With increasing incidence and improving survival for many tumor types, leading to the majority of AYA patients with cancer becoming long-term survivors, there is a critical need for research efforts to inform the survivorship care of this growing population. This article describes the population of AYA cancer survivors according to their epidemiology and late and long-term effects, the challenges and models of AYA survivorship care, as well as future opportunities for research and healthcare.
Collapse
|
36
|
Mulder EEAP, Grünhagen DJ, Sleijfer S, Uyl-de Groot CA, van der Veldt AAM. Adjuvant treatment in patients with melanoma: The planning of scanning. Eur J Cancer 2021; 157:306-307. [PMID: 34555650 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.08.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2021] [Accepted: 08/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Evalyn E A P Mulder
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Dirk J Grünhagen
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Stefan Sleijfer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Carin A Uyl-de Groot
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management and Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Astrid A M van der Veldt
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Indini A, Grossi F. Adjuvant pembrolizumab for melanoma: update from the EORTC 1325-MG/KEYNOTE-054 trial. Lancet Oncol 2021; 22:573-575. [PMID: 33857410 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(21)00125-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2021] [Accepted: 02/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Alice Indini
- Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122, Milano, Italy.
| | - Francesco Grossi
- Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122, Milano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Eggermont AMM, Blank CU, Mandalà M, Long GV, Atkinson VG, Dalle S, Haydon AM, Meshcheryakov A, Khattak A, Carlino MS, Sandhu S, Larkin J, Puig S, Ascierto PA, Rutkowski P, Schadendorf D, Koornstra R, Hernandez-Aya L, Di Giacomo AM, van den Eertwegh AJM, Grob JJ, Gutzmer R, Jamal R, Lorigan PC, van Akkooi ACJ, Krepler C, Ibrahim N, Marreaud S, Kicinski M, Suciu S, Robert C. Adjuvant pembrolizumab versus placebo in resected stage III melanoma (EORTC 1325-MG/KEYNOTE-054): distant metastasis-free survival results from a double-blind, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2021; 22:643-654. [PMID: 33857412 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(21)00065-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 211] [Impact Index Per Article: 70.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2020] [Revised: 01/27/2021] [Accepted: 01/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) 1325/KEYNOTE-054 trial assessed pembrolizumab versus placebo in patients with resected high-risk stage III melanoma. At 15-month median follow-up, pembrolizumab improved recurrence-free survival (hazard ratio [HR] 0·57 [98·4% CI 0·43-0·74], p<0·0001) compared with placebo, leading to its approval in the USA and Europe. This report provides the final results for the secondary efficacy endpoint, distant metastasis-free survival and an update of the recurrence-free survival results. METHODS This double-blind, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial was done at 123 academic centres and community hospitals across 23 countries. Patients aged 18 years or older with complete resection of cutaneous melanoma metastatic to lymph node, classified as American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system, seventh edition (AJCC-7) stage IIIA (at least one lymph node metastasis >1 mm), IIIB, or IIIC (without in-transit metastasis), and with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1 were eligible. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) via a central interactive voice response system to receive intravenous pembrolizumab 200 mg or placebo every 3 weeks for up to 18 doses or until disease recurrence or unacceptable toxicity. Randomisation was stratified according to disease stage and region, using a minimisation technique, and clinical investigators, patients, and those collecting or analysing the data were masked to treatment assignment. The two coprimary endpoints were recurrence-free survival in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population and in patients with PD-L1-positive tumours. The secondary endpoint reported here was distant metastasis-free survival in the ITT and PD-L1-positive populations. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02362594, and EudraCT, 2014-004944-37. FINDINGS Between Aug 26, 2015, and Nov 14, 2016, 1019 patients were assigned to receive either pembrolizumab (n=514) or placebo (n=505). At an overall median follow-up of 42·3 months (IQR 40·5-45·9), 3·5-year distant metastasis-free survival was higher in the pembrolizumab group than in the placebo group in the ITT population (65·3% [95% CI 60·9-69·5] in the pembrolizumab group vs 49·4% [44·8-53·8] in the placebo group; HR 0·60 [95% CI 0·49-0·73]; p<0·0001). In the 853 patients with PD-L1-positive tumours, 3·5-year distant metastasis-free survival was 66·7% (95% CI 61·8-71·2) in the pembrolizumab group and 51·6% (46·6-56·4) in the placebo group (HR 0·61 [95% CI 0·49-0·76]; p<0·0001). Recurrence-free survival remained longer in the pembrolizumab group 59·8% (95% CI 55·3-64·1) than the placebo group 41·4% (37·0-45·8) at this 3·5-year follow-up in the ITT population (HR 0·59 [95% CI 0·49-0·70]) and in those with PD-L1-positive tumours 61·4% (56·3-66·1) in the pembrolizumab group and 44·1% (39·2-48·8) in the placebo group (HR 0·59 [95% CI 0·49-0·73]). INTERPRETATION Pembrolizumab adjuvant therapy provided a significant and clinically meaningful improvement in distant metastasis-free survival at a 3·5-year median follow-up, which was consistent with the improvement in recurrence-free survival. Therefore, the results of this trial support the indication to use adjuvant pembrolizumab therapy in patients with resected high risk stage III cutaneous melanoma. FUNDING Merck Sharp & Dohme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander M M Eggermont
- Princess Máxima Center, Utrecht, Netherlands; University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
| | - Christian U Blank
- Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Mario Mandalà
- Azienda Ospedaliera Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Georgina V Long
- Melanoma Institute Australia, the University of Sydney, and Mater and Royal North Shore Hospitals, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | | | | | | | | - Adnan Khattak
- Fiona Stanley Hospital & Edith Cowan University, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Matteo S Carlino
- Westmead and Blacktown Hospitals, Melanoma Institute Australia and the University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | | | | - Susana Puig
- Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Universitat de Barcelona, Spain & Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Raras, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Paolo A Ascierto
- Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G Pascale", Naples, Italy
| | - Piotr Rutkowski
- Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Dirk Schadendorf
- University Hospital Essen, Essen and German Cancer Consortium, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Rutger Koornstra
- Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | - Ralf Gutzmer
- Skin Cancer Center, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Rahima Jamal
- Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Centre de recherche du CHUM, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Caroline Robert
- Gustave Roussy and Paris-Saclay University, Villejuif, France
| | | |
Collapse
|