1
|
Danpanichkul P, Auttapracha T, Kongarin S, Ponvilawan B, Simadibrata DM, Duangsonk K, Jaruvattanadilok S, Saowapa S, Suparan K, Lui RN, Liangpunsakul S, Wallace MB, Wijarnpreecha K. Global epidemiology of early-onset upper gastrointestinal cancer: trend from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024. [PMID: 38772743 DOI: 10.1111/jgh.16620] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2024] [Revised: 04/25/2024] [Accepted: 05/03/2024] [Indexed: 05/23/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM In recent years, there has been a growing incidence of gastrointestinal cancer in young individuals. Despite its significant morbidity and mortality, research on upper gastrointestinal (UGI) cancer in young populations has been relatively limited. Therefore, studies on the epidemiological changes of this cancer are needed. METHODS Using data from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019, we examined the incidence, death, and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) from UGI cancers in the young, namely, early-onset esophageal cancer (EOEC) and early-onset gastric cancer (EOGC). These results were stratified by sex, geographical region, country, and sociodemographic index. RESULTS There was a total of 185 140 cases, 120 289 deaths, and 5.70 million DALYs attributable to early-onset UGI cancers globally. From 2010 to 2019, the global incidence, death, and DALYs rates of early-onset UGI cancers decreased. In contrast, the incidence rates increased in both EOEC (+1.15%) and EOGC (+0.21%) in the Eastern Mediterranean region. CONCLUSIONS Over the past decade, the burden of UGI cancer in the young has decreased. However, it has increased in the Eastern Mediterranean region. Further research to elucidate the attributable risk factors in this population is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pojsakorn Danpanichkul
- Immunology Unit, Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
- Department of Internal Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, Texas, USA
| | | | | | - Ben Ponvilawan
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City, Missouri, USA
| | - Daniel M Simadibrata
- Department of Medicine, MetroHealth Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Kwanjit Duangsonk
- Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
| | | | - Sakditad Saowapa
- Department of Internal Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, Texas, USA
| | - Kanokphong Suparan
- Immunology Unit, Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
| | - Rashid N Lui
- Department of Clinical Oncology, and Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Institute of Digestive Diseases, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, SAR, China
| | - Suthat Liangpunsakul
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Michael B Wallace
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sheikh Shakhbout Medical City, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
| | - Karn Wijarnpreecha
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Banner University Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
- BIO5 Institute, University of Arizona College of Medicine-Phoenix, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Siddiqui AK, Belgaumi AF. Paediatric oncology in the Eastern Mediterranean region (EMR): the current state and challenges. Ecancermedicalscience 2024; 18:1677. [PMID: 38439809 PMCID: PMC10911667 DOI: 10.3332/ecancer.2024.1677] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2023] [Indexed: 03/06/2024] Open
Abstract
The WHO Eastern Mediterranean region (EMR) is characterised by highly economically diverse countries, with healthcare systems in various phases of development. Childhood cancer care provision also ranges from that provided in centres able to deliver sophisticated therapy resulting in outcomes comparable to those seen in highly developed nations, to countries with no provision for care of children with cancer. At 10·1 per 100,000 children at risk, the age standardised incidence-rate for cancer in children below 14 years of age is relatively low but may be consequent to poor registration. Shortages in trained care providers were identified in many regional countries, particularly in low and lower-middle income countries, however, implementation of training programs are beginning to counter this deficit. Significant diversity in patient care capacity exists in the region, leading to inequitable access to quality paediatric oncology care. There is strong potential for regional collaboration towards infrastructure and capacity improvement, with facilities available within the EMR for twinning and educational support to those centres and countries that need them. While cancer care coverage is available to citizens of high-income countries, in the lower-income countries out-of-pocket health expenditure can reach 75%. Some relief is achieved through the contribution of multiple charitable foundations working to support childhood cancer care in the region, as well as the provision of care in, often overburdened, public sector hospitals. War and other geo-political turmoil, as well as natural disasters, have negatively impacted healthcare capacity, including childhood cancer care, in several regional countries. Despite all this, the trajectory for change is upward and initiatives such as the WHO Global Initiative for Childhood Cancer are igniting positive change.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arsalan Kabir Siddiqui
- All authors have contributed to this manuscript and take responsibility for its contents
| | - Asim Fakhruddin Belgaumi
- All authors have contributed to this manuscript and take responsibility for its contents
- https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0135-7509
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Alessy SA, Almotlak AA, Alattas M, Alshareef A, Alwosaibai K, Alghamdi MA, Razack HI, Alqahtani SA. Cancer Research Challenges and Potential Solutions in Saudi Arabia: A Qualitative Discussion Group Study. JCO Glob Oncol 2024; 10:e2300189. [PMID: 38166234 PMCID: PMC10803045 DOI: 10.1200/go.23.00189] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2023] [Revised: 10/28/2023] [Accepted: 11/06/2023] [Indexed: 01/04/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Cancer incidence in Saudi Arabia has recently shown an upward trend. Research efforts within the different cancer continuum are pivotal to strengthening control measures. Since cancer research is evolving in the country, it is crucial to understand the current challenges and implement defined interventions to overcome them. The present qualitative study aimed to assess cancer research barriers among researchers and identify potential solutions from their perspectives. METHODS We conducted a focus group discussion among 17 Saudi-based cancer researchers from diverse research backgrounds, provinces, and institutions. We used descriptive-interpretive thematic analysis following an open-ended approach to investigate the challenges in conducting cancer research. We also captured the solutions suggested based on the researchers' experiences. RESULTS Six major themes emerged from the analysis: requirements of the data landscape, organizational support, national research roadmap, sustainable funding, clearer policies and regulations, and capacity building. To address challenges in these areas, researchers stressed the need for improved interinstitutional collaborations, immediate availability of research materials, and unlimited and easy access to research data. CONCLUSION Improving health research is one of the primary goals of Saudi Vision 2030. It is, therefore, essential to overcome the current challenges in cancer research, enabling research findings to inform policies related to cancer control and care provision.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saleh A. Alessy
- Public Health Department, College of Health Sciences, Saudi Electronic University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- Division of Research & Innovation, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- Centre for Cancer, Society & Public Health, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Abdulaziz A. Almotlak
- Department of Pharmacology, College of Clinical Pharmacy, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Maha Alattas
- Department of Community Medicine, King Abdul-Aziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
- Department of Global Health, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA
| | - Abdulraheem Alshareef
- Medical Laboratories Technology Department, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Taibah University, Madinah, Saudi Arabia
| | | | - Majed A. Alghamdi
- College of Medicine, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
- Radiation Oncology, Princess Norah Oncology Center, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | | | - Saleh A. Alqahtani
- Organ Transplant Center of Excellence, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Benitez Fuentes JD, Morgan E, de Luna Aguilar A, Mafra A, Shah R, Giusti F, Vignat J, Znaor A, Musetti C, Yip CH, Van Eycken L, Jedy-Agba E, Piñeros M, Soerjomataram I. Global Stage Distribution of Breast Cancer at Diagnosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. JAMA Oncol 2024; 10:71-78. [PMID: 37943547 PMCID: PMC10636649 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.4837] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2023] [Accepted: 07/25/2023] [Indexed: 11/10/2023]
Abstract
Importance Stage at diagnosis is a key prognostic factor for cancer survival. Objective To assess the global distribution of breast cancer stage by country, age group, calendar period, and socioeconomic status using population-based data. Data Sources A systematic search of MEDLINE and Web of Science databases and registry websites and gray literature was conducted for articles or reports published between January 1, 2000, and June 20, 2022. Study Selection Reports on stage at diagnosis for individuals with primary breast cancer (C50) from a population-based cancer registry were included. Data Extraction and Synthesis Study characteristics and results of eligible studies were independently extracted by 2 pairs of reviewers (J.D.B.F., A.D.A., A.M., R.S., and F.G.). Stage-specific proportions were extracted and cancer registry data quality and risk of bias were assessed. National pooled estimates were calculated for subnational or annual data sets using a hierarchical rule of the most relevant and high-quality data to avoid duplicates. Main Outcomes and Measures The proportion of women with breast cancer by (TNM Classification of Malignant Tumors or the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program [SEER]) stage group. Results Data were available for 2.4 million women with breast cancer from 81 countries. Globally, the proportion of cases with distant metastatic breast cancer at diagnosis was high in sub-Saharan Africa, ranging from 5.6% to 30.6% and low in North America ranging from 0.0% to 6.0%. The proportion of patients diagnosed with distant metastatic disease decreased over the past 2 decades from around 3.8% to 35.8% (early 2000s) to 3.2% to 11.6% (2015 onwards), yet stabilization or slight increases were also observed. Older age and lower socioeconomic status had the largest proportion of cases diagnosed with distant metastatic stage ranging from 2.0% to 15.7% among the younger to 4.1% to 33.9% among the oldest age group, and from 1.7% to 8.3% in the least disadvantaged groups to 2.8% to 11.4% in the most disadvantaged groups. Conclusions and Relevance Effective policy and interventions have resulted in decreased proportions of women diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer at diagnosis in high-income countries, yet inequality persists, which needs to be addressed through increased awareness of breast cancer symptoms and early detection. Improving global coverage and quality of population-based cancer registries, including the collection of standardized stage data, is key to monitoring progress.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Javier David Benitez Fuentes
- Cancer Surveillance Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, IdISSC, Calle Profesor Martín Lagos, Madrid, Spain
- Velindre Cancer Centre, Cardiff, Wales, United Kingdom
| | - Eileen Morgan
- Cancer Surveillance Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon
| | - Alicia de Luna Aguilar
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, IdISSC, Calle Profesor Martín Lagos, Madrid, Spain
- Velindre Cancer Centre, Cardiff, Wales, United Kingdom
| | - Allini Mafra
- Cancer Surveillance Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon
| | - Richa Shah
- Cancer Surveillance Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon
| | - Francesco Giusti
- Cancer Surveillance Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon
- Belgian Cancer Registry, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Jérôme Vignat
- Cancer Surveillance Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon
| | - Ariana Znaor
- Cancer Surveillance Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon
| | | | - Cheng-Har Yip
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
- Ramsay Sime Darby Health Care, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Liesbet Van Eycken
- Cancer Surveillance Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon
- Belgian Cancer Registry, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | - Marion Piñeros
- Cancer Surveillance Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Patel J, Harant A, Fernandes G, Mwamelo AJ, Hein W, Dekker D, Sridhar D. Measuring the global response to antimicrobial resistance, 2020-21: a systematic governance analysis of 114 countries. THE LANCET. INFECTIOUS DISEASES 2023; 23:706-718. [PMID: 36657475 DOI: 10.1016/s1473-3099(22)00796-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2022] [Revised: 11/13/2022] [Accepted: 11/18/2022] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Understanding strategic commitments and policy responses to overcome antimicrobial resistance at the national, regional, and global levels is required to evaluate current progress and direct future planning. National action plans (NAPs) are the primary mechanism for guiding national strategy and action for antimicrobial resistance governance. Although several NAPs have been developed, no comprehensive content analysis of these plans exists. Using a governance framework, we aimed to assess all publicly available NAPs on antimicrobial resistance. METHODS We systematically reviewed the contents of NAPs on antimicrobial resistance from 114 countries, applying a governance framework containing 18 domains and 54 indicators in three integral areas: policy design, implementation tools, and monitoring and evaluation. As well as manually searching NAPs and doing online and literature searches that were relevant to specific indicators from repository inception to June 1, 2022, several data sources were used to generate scores, including the Tripartite Antimicrobial Resistance Country Self-Assessment Survey, the Global Antimicrobial Resistance and Use Surveillance System, the Global Antimicrobial Resistance Research and Development Hub, and various WHO datasets. NAPs were included if the country had also submitted the NAP to the Tripartite Antimicrobial Resistance Country Self-Assessment Survey 2020-21, if the NAP was retrievable through a publicly accessible database or website, and if the NAP was either published in English or eligible for machine translation. Three researchers independently reviewed each NAP and were initially blinded to the evaluations of other researchers. They generated a score using a quantification system for each of 54 indicators. The Cochrane protocol for ensuring reliability was followed. The three researchers were then unblinded and met to resolve any disagreements in scoring to reach a consensus agreement. In each case of discrepancy, consensus was reached between the researchers. We developed criteria to standardise the process of quantifying each indicator. We also weighted and collated relevant national data from various sources to generate composite scores concordant with the key governance areas. We transformed these data to a scale of 0 (worst) to 100 (best), ranked countries on the basis of their mean scores, and used descriptive statistics to analyse global and regional trends. FINDINGS 306 NAPs were identified and 114 were eligible for analysis. Between 2020 and 2021, the mean antimicrobial resistance governance score was 51 (SD 14). Norway had the highest governance score (mean 85 [SD 32]), and the Federated States of Micronesia had the lowest governance score (28 [37]). The highest scoring domain was participation (83 [16]), and the lowest scoring domains were accountability (30 [18]) and feedback mechanism (30 [25]). Domains relating to policy design (55 [13]) and implementation tools (54 [17]) scored similarly, whereas monitoring and evaluation (38 [20]) efforts were lower. INTERPRETATION International efforts to control antimicrobial resistance varied considerably between countries. Monitoring and evaluation efforts need improving for continuous understanding of national and international progress. International response might not be commensurate with the scale and severity of antimicrobial resistance. FUNDING None.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jay Patel
- Global Health Governance Programme, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK; School of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
| | - Anne Harant
- German Institute of Global and Area Studies, Hamburg, Germany; Faculty of Business, Economics and Social Sciences, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Genevie Fernandes
- Global Health Governance Programme, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Ambele Judith Mwamelo
- Global Health Governance Programme, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Wolfgang Hein
- German Institute of Global and Area Studies, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Denise Dekker
- Bernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Devi Sridhar
- Global Health Governance Programme, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Al-Hussaini M, Al-Ani A, Hammouri M, Al-Huneidy L, Mansour A. Investigating the impact of COVID-19 on patients with cancer from areas of conflict within the MENA region treated at King Hussein Cancer Center. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1088000. [PMID: 36910625 PMCID: PMC9995942 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1088000] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2022] [Accepted: 01/30/2023] [Indexed: 02/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Background There is a paucity of evidence regarding the impact of COVID-19 on cancer care among refugees or patients from areas of conflict. Cancer care for these populations remains fragmented due to resource scarcity and limited infrastructure. Aims To explore the effect of COVID-19 on cancer care among patients from areas of conflict treated at King Hussein Cancer Center (KHCC). Methodology We performed a retrospective chart review of all patients from areas of conflict, treated at KHCC from 2018 to 2021. Patients' demographics and clinical characteristics are presented in the form of descriptive statistics. Interrupted Time Series (ITS) analysis was utilized to investigate the impact of COVID-19 on the number of admissions throughout the study's period. Results A total of 3317 patients from areas of conflict were included in the study. Among these, 1546 were males (46.6%) while 1771 (53.4%) were female. Libyans (34.6%), Palestinians (24.8%), Iraqis (24.5%), Syrians (15.3%), and Sudanese patients (0.9%) constituted our study sample. ITS analysis demonstrated that the start of the COVID-19 lockdown significantly decreased admissions by 44.0% (p = 0.020), while the end of the COVID-19 restriction significantly improved admissions by 43.0% (p = 0.023). Among those with available SEER stages, more than a quarter of patients had distant metastasis (n = 935, 28.2%) irrespective of age and biological sex. Advanced presentations during 2020 had approximately a 16% and 6% increase compared to 2018 and 2019, respectively. Breast cancer (21.4%), hematolymphoid cancers (18.1%), and cancers of the digestive system (16.5%) were the most common cancers among our cohort. Conclusion Restrictions associated with COVID-19 had a significant effect on the number of admissions of patients from areas of conflict. In the long term, this effect may impact the survival outcomes of affected patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maysa Al-Hussaini
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, Jordan
| | - Abdallah Al-Ani
- Office of Scientific Affairs and Research, King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, Jordan
| | | | | | - Asem Mansour
- Department of Radiology, King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, Jordan
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Piñeros M, Ginsburg O, Bendahhou K, Eser S, Shelpai WA, Fouad H, Znaor A. Staging practices and breast cancer stage among population-based registries in the MENA region. Cancer Epidemiol 2022; 81:102250. [PMID: 36115143 PMCID: PMC9693698 DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2022.102250] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2022] [Revised: 08/25/2022] [Accepted: 09/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Availability of stage information by population-based cancer registries (PBCR) remains scarce for diverse reasons. Nevertheless, stage is critical cancer control information particularly for cancers amenable to early detection. In the framework of the Global Initiative for Cancer Registry Development (GICR), we present the status of stage data collection and dissemination among registries in the Middle East and Northern Africa (MENA) region as well as the stage distribution of breast cancer patients. METHODS A web-based survey exploring staging practices and breast cancer stage was developed and sent to 30 PBCR in 18 countries of the MENA region. RESULTS Among 23 respondent PBCR, 21 collected stage data, the majority (80%) for all cancers. Fourteen registries used a single classification (9 TNM and 5 SEER), 7 used both staging systems in parallel. Out of 12,888 breast cancer patients (seven registries) 27.7% had unknown TNM stage (11.1% in Oman, 46% in Annaba). When considering only cases with known stage, 65.3% were early cancers (TNM I+II), ranging from 57.9% in Oman to 83.3% in Batna (Algeria), and 9.9% were stage IV cancers. Among the nine registries providing SEER Summary stage for breast cancer cases, stage was unknown in 19% of the cases, (0 in Bahrain, 39% in Kuwait). Stage data were largely absent from the published registry reports. CONCLUSION Despite wide stage data collection by cancer registries, missing information and low dissemination clearly limit informing efforts on early detection. The use of two classification systems in parallel implies additional workload and might undermine completeness. The favourable results of early cancer (TNM I+II) in two thirds of breast cancer patients needs to be interpreted with caution and followed up in time. Although efforts to improve quality of stage data are needed, our findings are particularly relevant to the WHO Global Breast Cancer Initiative.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marion Piñeros
- Cancer Surveillance Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France.
| | - Ophira Ginsburg
- Center for Global Health, US National Cancer Institute, MD, USA
| | | | - Sultan Eser
- Balıkesir University, Faculty of Medicine, Balikesir, Turkey
| | | | - Heba Fouad
- WHO Regional Office for the Eastern Mediterranean, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Ariana Znaor
- Cancer Surveillance Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
A Proposal for a National Cancer Control Plan for the UAE: 2022–2026. Clin Pract 2022; 12:118-132. [PMID: 35200267 PMCID: PMC8870909 DOI: 10.3390/clinpract12010016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2021] [Revised: 02/04/2022] [Accepted: 02/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
The United Arab Emirates (UAE) is one of the fastest growing economies with consequent increase in non-communicable diseases including cancer. The number of reported cases and mortality have been increasing in the UAE over the years, despite screening and early detection efforts which appear to be far from target coverage of the intended population. In this work, we highlight key elements of a proposed national cancer control plan for the UAE. The plan is still a work in progress and has not yet been officially adopted. A comprehensive and effective control plan requires accurate data, a reliable cancer registry, and periodic monitoring and evaluation. The UAE cancer control plan is being prepared in line with the WHO and EMRO framework, with defined objectives and goals. The objectives are to combat cancer, reduce incidence, control mortality, and improve outcomes and quality of life for cancer patients. There is also a focus on improving public health education, prevention, early detection, prompt diagnosis, treatment facilitation, continuity of care, performance evaluation, training of workforce, and research.
Collapse
|