Comparative effectiveness of combination therapy with nirmatrelvir-ritonavir and remdesivir versus monotherapy with remdesivir or nirmatrelvir-ritonavir in patients hospitalised with COVID-19: a target trial emulation study

Seeking innovative concepts in development of antiviral drug combinations

Antiviral drugs are crucial for managing viral infections, but current treatment options remain limited, particularly for emerging viruses. These drugs can be classified based on their chemical composition, including neutralizing antibodies (nAbs), recombinant human receptors (rhRs), antiviral CRISPR/Cas systems, interferons, antiviral peptides (APs), antiviral nucleic acid polymers, and small molecules. Some of these agents target viral factors, host factors, or both. A major challenge for virus-targeted treatments is their narrow-spectrum effectiveness and the potential for drug resistance, while host-directed and virus/host-targeted therapies often suffer from significant side effects. The synergistic combination of multiple antiviral drugs holds promise for improving treatment outcomes by targeting different stages of the viral life cycle, reducing resistance, and minimizing side effects. However, developing such drug combinations presents its own set of challenges. Several drug combinations could be optimized, and new combinations developed by using AI, to more effectively treat both emerging and re-emerging viral infections.

The evolving landscape of COVID-19: factors associated with in-hospital COVID-19 related mortality during the 2023-2024 phase of JN.1 subvariant dominance

BACKGROUND

COVID-19 remains a complex health challenge. We analysed the characteristics and outcomes of COVID-19-related hospitalisations during JN.1 variant dominance.

METHODS

Conducted in a hospital serving a socioeconomically deprived population, this study included all adults hospitalised with COVID-19 from 1st November 2023 to 31st August 2024. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality, analysed in relation to demographic, clinical, and laboratory parameters.

RESULTS

Among 122 individuals (median age 76 years, 58.2% males, median comorbidity index 5), 114/122 (93.4%) had received ≥ 1 SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, with a median of 23 months elapsed since the last dose. Fever (67/122, 54.9%) and dyspnoea (49/122, 40.2%) were common presenting symptoms, with 78/122 (64%) showing CT evidence of SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia; 25/122 (20%) had purely neurological presentations. Treatment included remdesivir (115/122, 94.3%) and/or nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (9/122, 7.4%), sotrovimab (15/122, 12.3%), corticosteroids (61/122, 50.0%), and oxygen supplementation (76/122, 62.3%). Whereas 107/122 (87.7%) were discharged after a median of seven days, in-hospital mortality was 15/122 (12.3%) after a median of 16 days. Baseline factors associated with mortality were neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio > 8, D-dimer ≥ 1800 ng/mL, procalcitonin ≥ 1.0 ng/mL, and albumin < 3.2 g/dL; during admission, nasopharyngeal SARS-CoV-2 antigen positivity persisting for > 12 days, hospitalisation for ≥ 10 days, higher oxygen requirements with the resulting corticosteroid use, and healthcare-associated bacteraemia were associated with increased odds of mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Baseline laboratory parameters and persistent SARS-CoV-2 antigen positivity despite antiviral therapy offer readily available prognostic insights for patients hospitalised with COVID-19. It is imperative to advocate for up-to-date COVID-19 vaccination among older people and other vulnerable groups.

Antiviral combination treatment strategies for SARS-CoV-2 infection in immunocompromised patients

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review is to report the available evidence regarding the use of combination regimens of antivirals and/or antibody-based therapy in the treatment of SARS-CoV-2 in immunocompromised patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

Literature search identified 24 articles, excluding single case reports, which included mainly patients with hematological malignancies and/or B-cell depletion. Data were divided based on the timing and reason for administration of combination treatment, that is, early treatment to prevent progression to severe COVID-19 and treatment of prolonged or relapsed infection. We described the treated populations, treatment duration and composition of combination treatment. We briefly addressed new treatment options and we proposed an algorithm for the management of COVID-19 infection in patients affected by hematological malignancies.

SUMMARY

Combination treatment seems an effective (73-100%) and well tolerated (<5% reported bradycardia, hepatotoxicity, neutropenia) strategy for treating prolonged/relapsed SARS-CoV-2 infections in the immunocompromised host, although its optimal composition and duration cannot be defined based on the currently available evidence. The role of combination treatment as an early treatment strategy for immunocompromised patients at a high risk of progression to severe disease/persistent shedding requires further evidence from comparison with monotherapy, even though high efficacy was reported for combinations of antivirals plus mAbs in case of previous viral variants.

Antiviral combination treatment of SARS-CoV-2 after repeated treatment failures of remdesivir monotherapy: A case report

Immunocompromised patients infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) can have a longer duration of viral shedding and persistence of symptoms. The optimal treatment strategy for these patients remains to be established. This case describes a male in his late sixties with follicular lymphoma and persistent symptoms of infection with SARS-CoV-2 variant BA.2 who was treated with remdesivir five times over a period of six months. The clinical effect of remdesivir treatment decreased over time, and further viral sequencing revealed the emergence of mutations across the SARS-CoV-2 genome. Due to the lack of other treatment options, the patient was treated with a combination of remdesivir and molnupiravir for 10 days, and epcoritamab was discontinued, which led to the cessation of symptoms. This case illustrates the risk of a diminished effect of remdesivir with prolonged use and the need for treatment guidelines for immunocompromised patients with persistent COVID-19.

Integrated Analysis of Remdesivir and Paxlovid in COVID-19 Patients: A Personalized Approach to High-Risk Individuals for Severe Evolution

Background/Objectives: COVID-19 led to a pandemic that has brought misery to millions of people but more so to those with pre-existing conditions. For this infection, several antiviral drugs were employed, including remdesivir (R) and Paxlovid (nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (NR)). Methods: The current study compared the effectiveness of remdesivir and Paxlovid treatment for COVID-19 patients with comorbid conditions. Data from a cohort of 151 adult patients with COVID-19 who also had associated comorbidities were used in this study. These patients were treated with antivirals according to local guidelines. The subjects included 78 case-patients assigned to group R and 73 to group NR. Results: In group NR, a considerable improvement in oxygen saturation was seen in the first 24 h of treatment (p = 0.010), but the levels were significantly higher from the second day of treatment (p < 0.001) in group R of patients. At the end of the 5 days of treatment, the oxygen saturation improved statistically significantly compared to the admission day, but only in the R group (95.11 ± 1.80; 91.76 ± 1.80; p < 0.001). Conclusions: Both drugs can be considered a breakthrough in the current treatment approach to the COVID-19 disease since they provide readily available options that can alleviate the severity of the disease and, hence, the prognosis of patients. That is why their effectiveness relies on the correct administration time and choosing the patient with suitable characteristics regarding the presence of comorbidities and the likelihood of the critical further development of the process.