1
|
Keller MS, Chen X, Godwin J, Needleman J, Pourat N. Evaluating inpatient adverse outcomes under California's Delivery System Reform Incentive Payment Program. Health Serv Res 2020; 56:36-48. [PMID: 32844435 DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.13550] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The California Delivery System Reform Incentive Payment Program (DSRIP) provided incentive payments to Designated Public Hospitals (DPHs) to improve quality of care. We assessed the program's impact on reductions in sepsis mortality, central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs), venous thromboembolisms (VTEs), and hospital-acquired pressure ulcers (HAPUs). DATA SOURCES We used 2009-2014 discharge data from California hospitals. STUDY DESIGN We used a pre-post study design with a comparison group. We constructed propensity scores and used them to assign inverse probability weights according to their similarity to DPH discharges. Interaction term coefficients of time trends and treatment group provided significance testing. DATA EXTRACTION We used Patient Safety Indicators for CLABSI, HAPU, and VTE, and constructed a sepsis mortality measure. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS Discharges from DPHs and non-DPHs both saw decreases in the four outcomes over the DSRIP period (2010-2014). The difference-in-difference estimator (DD) for sepsis was only significant during two time periods, comparing 2010 with 2012 (DD: -2.90 percent, 95% CI: -5.08, -0.72 percent) and 2010 with 2014 (DD: -5.74, 95% CI: -8.76 percent, -2.72 percent); the DD estimator was not significant comparing 2010 with 2012 (DD: -1.30, 95% CI: -3.18 percent, 0.58 percent) or comparing 2010 with 2013 (DD: -3.05 percent, 95% CI: -6.50 percent, 0.40 percent). For CLABSI, we did not find any meaningful differences between DPHs and non-DPHs across the four time periods. For HAPU and VTE, the only significant DD estimator compared 2014 with 2010. CONCLUSIONS We did not find that DPHs participating in DSRIP outperformed non-DPHs during the DSRIP program. Our results were robust to multiple sensitivity analyses. Given multiple concurrent inpatient safety initiatives, it was challenging to assign improvements over time periods to DSRIP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle S Keller
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.,Department of Health Policy and Management, UCLA Fielding School of Public Health,, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Xiao Chen
- UCLA Center for Health Policy Research, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Jamie Godwin
- Department of Health Policy and Management, UCLA Fielding School of Public Health,, Los Angeles, California, USA.,UCLA Center for Health Policy Research, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Jack Needleman
- Department of Health Policy and Management, UCLA Fielding School of Public Health,, Los Angeles, California, USA.,UCLA Center for Health Policy Research, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Nadereh Pourat
- Department of Health Policy and Management, UCLA Fielding School of Public Health,, Los Angeles, California, USA.,UCLA Center for Health Policy Research, Los Angeles, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kahn SR, Diendéré G, Morrison DR, Piché A, Filion KB, Klil-Drori AJ, Douketis J, Emed J, Roussin A, Tagalakis V, Morris M, Geerts W. Effectiveness of interventions for the implementation of thromboprophylaxis in hospitalised patients at risk of venous thromboembolism: an updated abridged Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e024444. [PMID: 31129575 PMCID: PMC6537979 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024444] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2018] [Revised: 01/30/2019] [Accepted: 03/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the effectiveness of system-wide interventions designed to increase the implementation of thromboprophylaxis and decrease the incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in hospitalised medical and surgical patients at risk of VTE. DESIGN Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs). DATA SOURCES Medline, PubMed, Embase, BIOSIS, CINAHL, Web of Science, CENTRAL, DARE, EED, LILACS and clinicaltrials.gov without language restrictions from inception to 7 January 2017, as well as the reference lists of relevant review articles. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES RCTs that evaluated the effectiveness of system-wide interventions such as alerts, multifaceted, education, and preprinted orders when compared with no intervention, existing policy or another intervention. RESULTS We included 13 RCTs involving 35 997 participants. Eleven RCTs had data available for meta-analysis. Compared with control, we found absolute increase in the prescription of prophylaxis associated with alerts (21% increase, 95% CI [15% to 275%]) and multifaceted interventions (4% increase, 95% CI [3% to 11%]), absolute increase in the prescription of appropriate prophylaxis associated with alerts (16% increase, 95% CI [12% to 20%]) and relative risk reductions (risk ratio 64%, 95% CI [47% to 86%]) in the incidence of symptomatic VTE associated with alerts. Computer alerts were found to be more effective than human alerts, and multifaceted interventions with an alert component appeared to be more effective than multifaceted interventions without, although comparative pooled analyses were not feasible. The quality of evidence for improvement in outcomes was judged to be low to moderate certainty. CONCLUSIONS Alerts increased the proportion of patients who received prophylaxis and appropriate prophylaxis, and decreased the incidence of symptomatic VTE. Multifaceted interventions increased the proportion of patients who received prophylaxis but were found to be less effective than alerts interventions. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER CD008201.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan R Kahn
- Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Gisele Diendéré
- Centre of Excellence in Thrombosis and Anticoagulation Care (CETAC), Clinical Epidemiology of the Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - David R Morrison
- Centre of Excellence in Thrombosis and Anticoagulation Care (CETAC), Clinical Epidemiology of the Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Alexandre Piché
- Department of Mathematics and Statistics, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | | | - Adi J Klil-Drori
- Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Centre of Excellence in Thrombosis and Anticoagulation Care (CETAC), Clinical Epidemiology of the Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - James Douketis
- Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jessica Emed
- Nursing, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - André Roussin
- Medicine, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Thrombosis Canada, Whitby, Ontario, Canada
| | - Vicky Tagalakis
- Centre of Excellence in Thrombosis and Anticoagulation Care (CETAC), Clinical Epidemiology of the Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Internal Medicine and Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Martin Morris
- Schulich Library of Physical Sciences, Life Sciences and Engineering, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - William Geerts
- Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kahn SR, Morrison DR, Diendéré G, Piché A, Filion KB, Klil‐Drori AJ, Douketis JD, Emed J, Roussin A, Tagalakis V, Morris M, Geerts W. Interventions for implementation of thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized patients at risk for venous thromboembolism. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018; 4:CD008201. [PMID: 29687454 PMCID: PMC6747554 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd008201.pub3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in hospitalized patients. While numerous randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have shown that the appropriate use of thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized patients at risk for VTE is safe, effective, and cost-effective, thromboprophylaxis remains underused or inappropriately used. Our previous review suggested that system-wide interventions, such as education, alerts, and multifaceted interventions were more effective at improving the prescribing of thromboprophylaxis than relying on individual providers' behaviors. However, 47 of the 55 included studies in our previous review were observational in design. Thus, an update to our systematic review, focused on the higher level of evidence of RCTs only, was warranted. OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of system-wide interventions designed to increase the implementation of thromboprophylaxis and decrease the incidence of VTE in hospitalized adult medical and surgical patients at risk for VTE, focusing on RCTs only. SEARCH METHODS Our research librarian conducted a systematic literature search of MEDLINE Ovid, and subsequently translated it to CENTRAL, PubMed, Embase Ovid, BIOSIS Previews Ovid, CINAHL, Web of Science, the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE; in the Cochrane Library), NHS Economic Evaluation Database (EED; in the Cochrane Library), LILACS, and clinicaltrials.gov from inception to 7 January 2017. We also screened reference lists of relevant review articles. We identified 12,920 potentially relevant records. SELECTION CRITERIA We included all types of RCTs, with random or quasi-random methods of allocation of interventions, which either randomized individuals (e.g. parallel group, cross-over, or factorial design RCTs), or groups of individuals (cluster RCTs (CRTs)), which aimed to increase the use of prophylaxis or appropriate prophylaxis, or decrease the occurrence of VTE in hospitalized adult patients. We excluded observational studies, studies in which the intervention was simply distribution of published guidelines, and studies whose interventions were not clearly described. Studies could be in any language. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We collected data on the following outcomes: the number of participants who received prophylaxis or appropriate prophylaxis (as defined by study authors), the occurrence of any VTE (symptomatic or asymptomatic), mortality, and safety outcomes, such as bleeding. We categorized the interventions into alerts (computer or human alerts), multifaceted interventions (combination of interventions that could include an alert component), educational interventions (e.g. grand rounds, courses), and preprinted orders (written predefined orders completed by the physician on paper or electronically). We meta-analyzed data across RCTs using a random-effects model. For CRTs, we pooled effect estimates (risk difference (RD) and risk ratio (RR), with 95% confidence interval (CI), adjusted for clustering, when possible. We pooled results if three or more trials were available for a particular intervention. We assessed the certainty of the evidence according to the GRADE approach. MAIN RESULTS From the 12,920 records identified by our search, we included 13 RCTs (N = 35,997 participants) in our qualitative analysis and 11 RCTs (N = 33,207 participants) in our meta-analyses. PRIMARY OUTCOME Alerts were associated with an increase in the proportion of participants who received prophylaxis (RD 21%, 95% CI 15% to 27%; three studies; 5057 participants; I² = 75%; low-certainty evidence). The substantial statistical heterogeneity may be in part explained by patient types, type of hospital, and type of alert. Subgroup analyses were not feasible due to the small number of studies included in the meta-analysis.Multifaceted interventions were associated with a small increase in the proportion of participants who received prophylaxis (cluster-adjusted RD 4%, 95% CI 2% to 6%; five studies; 9198 participants; I² = 0%; moderate-certainty evidence). Multifaceted interventions with an alert component were found to be more effective than multifaceted interventions that did not include an alert, although there were not enough studies to conduct a pooled analysis. SECONDARY OUTCOMES Alerts were associated with an increase in the proportion of participants who received appropriate prophylaxis (RD 16%, 95% CI 12% to 20%; three studies; 1820 participants; I² = 0; moderate-certainty evidence). Alerts were also associated with a reduction in the rate of symptomatic VTE at three months (RR 64%, 95% CI 47% to 86%; three studies; 5353 participants; I² = 15%; low-certainty evidence). Computer alerts were associated with a reduction in the rate of symptomatic VTE, although there were not enough studies to pool computer alerts and human alerts results separately. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS We reviewed RCTs that implemented a variety of system-wide strategies aimed at improving thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized patients. We found increased prescription of prophylaxis associated with alerts and multifaceted interventions, and increased prescription of appropriate prophylaxis associated with alerts. While multifaceted interventions were found to be less effective than alerts, a multifaceted intervention with an alert was more effective than one without an alert. Alerts, particularly computer alerts, were associated with a reduction in symptomatic VTE at three months, although there were not enough studies to pool computer alerts and human alerts results separately.Our analysis was underpowered to assess the effect on mortality and safety outcomes, such as bleeding.The incomplete reporting of relevant study design features did not allow complete assessment of the certainty of the evidence. However, the certainty of the evidence for improvement in outcomes was judged to be better than for our previous review (low- to moderate-certainty evidence, compared to very low-certainty evidence for most outcomes). The results of our updated review will help physicians, hospital administrators, and policy makers make practical decisions about adopting specific system-wide measures to improve prescription of thromboprophylaxis, and ultimately prevent VTE in hospitalized patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan R Kahn
- McGill UniversityDepartment of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational HealthMontrealCanada
- SMBD‐Jewish General Hospital, McGill UniversityCentre for Clinical Epidemiology and Community Studies3755 Cote Ste CatherineMontrealQCCanadaH3T 1E2
- McGill UniversityDivision of Internal Medicine and Department of MedicineMontrealQCCanadaH3T 1E2
| | - David R Morrison
- SMBD‐Jewish General Hospital, McGill UniversityCentre for Clinical Epidemiology and Community Studies3755 Cote Ste CatherineMontrealQCCanadaH3T 1E2
| | - Gisèle Diendéré
- SMBD‐Jewish General Hospital, McGill UniversityCentre for Clinical Epidemiology and Community Studies3755 Cote Ste CatherineMontrealQCCanadaH3T 1E2
| | - Alexandre Piché
- McGill UniversityDepartment of Mathematics and StatisticsMontrealCanada
| | - Kristian B Filion
- SMBD‐Jewish General Hospital, McGill UniversityCentre for Clinical Epidemiology and Community Studies3755 Cote Ste CatherineMontrealQCCanadaH3T 1E2
- McGill UniversityDepartments of Medicine and of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational HealthMontrealCanada
| | - Adi J Klil‐Drori
- SMBD‐Jewish General Hospital, McGill UniversityCentre for Clinical Epidemiology and Community Studies3755 Cote Ste CatherineMontrealQCCanadaH3T 1E2
| | - James D Douketis
- McMaster University and St. Josephs HospitalDepartment of MedicineRoom F‐53850 Carlton Avenue EastHamiltonONCanadaL8N 4A6
| | - Jessica Emed
- Jewish General HospitalDepartment of Nursing3755 Cote Ste CatherineMontrealQCCanadaH3T 1E2
| | - André Roussin
- University of Montreal and Thrombosis CanadaDepartment of Medicine1851 Sherbrooke St # 601MontrealQCCanadaH2K 4LS
| | - Vicky Tagalakis
- SMBD‐Jewish General Hospital, McGill UniversityCentre for Clinical Epidemiology and Community Studies3755 Cote Ste CatherineMontrealQCCanadaH3T 1E2
- McGill UniversityDivision of Internal Medicine and Department of MedicineMontrealQCCanadaH3T 1E2
| | - Martin Morris
- McGill UniversitySchulich Library of Physical Sciences, Life Sciences and EngineeringMontrealCanada
| | - William Geerts
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of TorontoDepartment of MedicineRoom D674, 2075 Bayview AvenueTorontoONCanadaM4N 3M5
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Marqués M, Panizo E, Alfonso A, García-Mouriz A, Gil-Bazo I, Hermida J, Schulman S, Páramo J, Lecumberri R. High incidence of venous thromboembolism despite electronic alerts for thromboprophylaxis in hospitalised cancer patients. Thromb Haemost 2017; 110:184-90. [DOI: 10.1160/th13-02-0131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2013] [Accepted: 04/04/2013] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
SummaryMany cancer patients are at high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) during hospitalisation; nevertheless, thromboprophylaxis is frequently underused. Electronic alerts (e-alerts) have been associated with improvement in thromboprophylaxis use and a reduction of the incidence of VTE, both during hospitalisation and after discharge, particularly in the medical setting. However, there are no data regarding the benefit of this tool in cancer patients. Our aim was to evaluate the impact of a computer-alert system for VTE prevention in patients with cancer, particularly in those admitted to the Oncology/Haematology ward, comparing the results with the rest of inpatients at a university teaching hospital. The study included 32,167 adult patients hospitalised during the first semesters of years 2006 to 2010, 9,265 (28.8%) with an active malignancy. Appropriate prophylaxis in medical patients, significantly increased over time (from 40% in 2006 to 57% in 2010) and was maintained over 80% in surgical patients. However, while e-alerts were associated with a reduction of the incidence of VTE during hospitalisation in patients without cancer (odds ratio [OR] 0.31; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.15–0.64), the impact was modest in cancer patients (OR 0.89; 95% CI, 0.42–1.86) and no benefit was observed in patients admitted to the Oncology/Haematology Departments (OR 1.11; 95% CI, 0.45–2.73). Interestingly, 60% of VTE episodes in cancer patients during recent years developed despite appropriate prophylaxis. Contrary to the impact on hospitalised patients without cancer, implementation of e-alerts for VTE risk did not prevent VTE effectively among those with malignancies.
Collapse
|
5
|
Northup A, Wilcox S. Thromboprophylaxis Failure in the Adult Medical Inpatient. Am J Med Sci 2017; 354:107-116. [PMID: 28864367 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjms.2017.03.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2016] [Revised: 03/01/2017] [Accepted: 03/03/2017] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
Venous thromboembolism (VTE), a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among hospitalized patients, is often due to prophylaxis failure rather than omission, but few studies have identified the risk factors for failure. Risk factors for thromboprophylaxis failure include personal or family history of VTE, use of vasopressors or inotropes, increased body mass index, cranial surgery, intensive care patient, leukocytosis, indwelling central venous catheter and admission from a long-term care facility. Identifying patients at risk for thromboprophylaxis failure should prompt close observation during hospitalization for signs of VTE, close observation after discharge and potentially more aggressive prophylaxis strategies, although no specific guidelines exist for medical patients at this time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda Northup
- Division of Cardiology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
| | - Susan Wilcox
- Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina; Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, Allergy and Sleep Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina; Division of Emergency Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hussain SA, Arsene C, Hamstra C, Woehrlen TH, Wiese-Rometsch W, White SR. Successful Resident Engagement in Quality Improvement: The Detroit Medical Center Story. J Grad Med Educ 2016; 8:214-8. [PMID: 27168890 PMCID: PMC4857509 DOI: 10.4300/jgme-d-15-00316.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In 2014, the Detroit Medical Center launched a new program to engage residents and fellows in a strategy to deliver optimal care within 1 year, focusing on quality at an earlier stage of their careers and preparing them for working posttraining. Methods Residents from clinically relevant residency and fellowships programs were selected to be Resident Quality Directors. The project involved development of an interactive electronic health record (EHR) checklist to visually depict real time gaps in 40 process measures, while focusing on 14 areas related to stroke and venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis. We also implemented an incentive approach, using a pay-for-performance (P4P) model. Results The project included 800 residents led by 14 resident quality directors. We were able to achieve 100% resident participation. Prior compliance with VTE quality measures 6 months was 88.5%, with performance increasing to 94.2% (P < .006) at 6 months and 100% at 12 months (P < .005) after the intervention. The VTE prophylaxis score improved from the 89.7% to 92.9% range at inception to 100% by 12 months. A similar steady improvement of stroke process measures was observed, with a 100% compliance within 12 months. The institution made 4 incentive payments to trainees (ranging from $300 to $4,000 per year). The remaining 26 process measures remained at goal with above 95% compliance. Conclusions This quality improvement initiative was associated with system-wide quality performance on VTE prevention and stroke care process measures, which was facilitated by a interactive EHR-based checklist and linkage to P4P incentive payments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Syed Ahmed Hussain
- Corresponding author: Syed Ahmed Hussain, MD, Detroit Medical Center Corporate Administrative Offices, 3990 John R Street, Detroit, MI 48201, 313.745.3030, fax 313.966.7589,
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lee JA, Grochow D, Drake D, Johnson L, Reed P, van Servellen G. Evaluation of hospital nurses' perceived knowledge and practices of venous thromboembolism assessment and prevention. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR NURSING 2015; 32:18-24. [PMID: 24534084 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvn.2013.06.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2013] [Revised: 05/30/2013] [Accepted: 06/03/2013] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a preventable cause of hospital death. Bedside registered nurses (RNs) are a key group that can be the first to recognize risks of patients in acute care settings. The purpose of this study was to identify bedside hospital RNs' perceived knowledge of VTE, their assessment practices, their self-efficacy in conducting VTE prevention care, and their perceived barriers to performing VTE risk assessment. An anonymous web-based survey on VTE risk assessment and prevention was conducted with RNs who provided direct patient care at two hospitals. RNs who were not directly involved in bedside patient care such as managers and educators were excluded. A total of 221 RNs completed the survey. Most participants rated their overall knowledge of VTE risk assessment between "good" (44%) and "fair" (28%). VTE assessment frequencies performed by participants varied widely. Participants reported high confidence in their ability to educate patients and families about VTE symptoms, prevention, and treatments. Participants were least confident in their own ability to conduct a thorough VTE risk assessment. Greater self-reported VTE knowledge was associated with greater VTE assessment frequency and self-efficacy for VTE preventive care. The most common perceived barriers in performing VTE risk assessment were lack of knowledge (21%) and lack of time (21%). The findings demonstrate a substantial need for focused education about VTE prevention for hospital nurses and support for hospital systems to monitor VTE care. Despite the Joint Commission emphasis on VTE risk assessment in all hospitalized patients, there remains a gap between current, evidence-based recommendations for VTE prevention and reported nursing practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jung-Ah Lee
- Program in Nursing Science, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California.
| | - Donna Grochow
- Nursing Quality, Research & Education, Magnet Program, University of California, Irvine Medical Center, Orange, California
| | - Diane Drake
- Mission Hospital, St. Joseph Health Systems, Mission Viejo, California
| | - Linda Johnson
- Patient Care of Mission Hospital, St. Joseph Health Systems, Mission Viejo, California
| | - Preston Reed
- Program in Nursing Science, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California
| | - Gwen van Servellen
- School of Nursing, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Association between hospital imaging use and venous thromboembolism events rates based on clinical data. Ann Surg 2015; 260:558-64; discussion 564-6. [PMID: 25115432 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000000897] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective was to assess the presence and extent of venous thromboembolic (VTE) surveillance bias using high-quality clinical data. BACKGROUND Hospital VTE rates are publicly reported and used in pay-for-performance programs. Prior work suggested surveillance bias: hospitals that look more for VTE with imaging studies find more VTE, thereby incorrectly seem to have worse performance. However, these results have been questioned as the risk adjustment and VTE measurement relied on administrative data. METHODS Data (2009-2010) from 208 hospitals were available for analysis. Hospitals were divided into quartiles according to VTE imaging use rates (Medicare claims). Observed and risk-adjusted postoperative VTE event rates (regression models using American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project data) were examined across VTE imaging use rate quartiles. Multivariable linear regression models were developed to assess the impact of hospital characteristics (American Hospital Association) and hospital imaging use rates on VTE event rates. RESULTS The mean risk-adjusted VTE event rates at 30 days after surgery increased across VTE imaging use rate quartiles: 1.13% in the lowest quartile to 1.92% in the highest quartile (P < 0.001). This statistically significant trend remained when examining only the inpatient period. Hospital VTE imaging use rate was the dominant driver of hospital VTE event rates (P < 0.001), as no other hospital characteristics had significant associations. CONCLUSIONS Even when examined with clinically ascertained outcomes and detailed risk adjustment, VTE rates reflect hospital imaging use and perhaps signify vigilant, high-quality care. The VTE outcome measure may not be an accurate quality indicator and should likely not be used in public reporting or pay-for-performance programs.
Collapse
|
9
|
Venous thromboembolism knowledge among older post-hip fracture patients and their caregivers. Geriatr Nurs 2014; 35:374-80. [PMID: 25012989 DOI: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2014.05.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2013] [Revised: 05/14/2014] [Accepted: 05/19/2014] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
Patient education about venous thromboembolism (VTE) prevention is needed to prevent complications and costly re-hospitalization. Nurses are uniquely positioned to provide vital education as patients transition from the inpatient setting to after discharge. Still, little is known about patient knowledge deficits and those of their caregivers. The purpose of this study was to explore VTE prevention knowledge in a sample of older hip fracture patients and family caregivers. At the time of hospital discharge, surveys were completed by hip fracture surgery patients (≥65; n=30) and family caregivers (n=30). Participants reported needs for more prophylactic anticoagulation and side effects education. Mean education satisfaction was 3.49 out of 5 among patients and 3.83 among caregivers. Focused patient education regarding the wisdom of VTE prevention, potential risks involved, and patient and caregiver roles in advocating for better prevention measures is needed for these patients at risk for hospital readmission secondary to VTE.
Collapse
|
10
|
Duff J, Walker K, Omari A, Middleton S, McInnes E. Educational outreach visits to improve nurses’ use of mechanical venous thromboembolism prevention in hospitalized medical patients. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR NURSING 2013; 31:139-49. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jvn.2013.04.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2013] [Revised: 04/02/2013] [Accepted: 04/07/2013] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
11
|
Duff J, Omari A, Middleton S, McInnes E, Walker K. Educational outreach visits to improve venous thromboembolism prevention in hospitalised medical patients: a prospective before-and-after intervention study. BMC Health Serv Res 2013; 13:398. [PMID: 24103108 PMCID: PMC3852069 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-398] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2012] [Accepted: 09/25/2013] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite the availability of evidence-based guidelines on venous thromboembolism (VTE) prevention clinical audit and research reveals that hospitalised medical patients frequently receive suboptimal prophylaxis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the acceptability, utility and clinical impact of an educational outreach visit (EOV) on the provision of VTE prophylaxis to hospitalised medical patients in a 270 bed acute care private hospital in metropolitan Australia. METHODS The study used an uncontrolled before-and-after design with accompanying process evaluation. The acceptability of the intervention to participants was measured with a post intervention survey; descriptive data on resource use was collected as a measure of utility; and clinical impact (prophylaxis rate) was assessed by pre and post intervention clinical audits. Doctors who admit >40 medical patients each year were targeted to receive the intervention which consisted of a one-to-one educational visit on VTE prevention from a trained peer facilitator. The EOV protocol was designed by a multidisciplinary group of healthcare professionals using social marketing theory. RESULTS Nineteen (73%) of 26 eligible participants received an EOV. The majority (n = 16, 85%) felt the EOV was effective or extremely effective at increasing their knowledge about VTE prophylaxis and 15 (78%) gave a verbal commitment to provide evidence-based prophylaxis. The average length of each visit was 15 minutes (IQ range 15 to 20) and the average time spent arranging and conducting each visit was 92 minutes (IQ range 78 to 129). There was a significant improvement in the proportion of medical patients receiving appropriate pharmacological VTE prophylaxis following the intervention (54% to 70%, 16% improvement, 95% CI 5 to 26, p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS EOV is effective at improving doctors' provision of pharmacological VTE prophylaxis to hospitalised medical patients. It was also found to be an acceptable implementation strategy by the majority of participants; however, it was resource intensive requiring on average 92 minutes per visit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jed Duff
- St Vincent’s Private Hospital Sydney, Victoria Street, 2010, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia
- National Centre for Clinical Outcomes Research, Australian Catholic University, Sydney, Australia
- University of Tasmania School of Nursing & Midwifery, Education Centre, 1 Leichhardt St, 2010, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia
| | - Abdullah Omari
- St Vincent’s Private Hospital Sydney, Victoria Street, 2010, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia
| | - Sandy Middleton
- National Centre for Clinical Outcomes Research, Australian Catholic University, Sydney, Australia
- Nursing Research Institute, St Vincent’s & Mater Health Sydney- Australian Catholic University, St Vincent’s Hospital, Victoria Street, 2010, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia
| | - Elizabeth McInnes
- National Centre for Clinical Outcomes Research, Australian Catholic University, Sydney, Australia
- Nursing Research Institute, St Vincent’s & Mater Health Sydney- Australian Catholic University, St Vincent’s Hospital, Victoria Street, 2010, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia
| | - Kim Walker
- St Vincent’s Private Hospital Sydney, Victoria Street, 2010, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia
- University of Tasmania School of Nursing & Midwifery, Education Centre, 1 Leichhardt St, 2010, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Pai M, Lloyd NS, Cheng J, Thabane L, Spencer FA, Cook DJ, Haynes RB, Schünemann HJ, Douketis JD. Strategies to enhance venous thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized medical patients (SENTRY): a pilot cluster randomized trial. Implement Sci 2013; 8:1. [PMID: 23279972 PMCID: PMC3547806 DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 123] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2012] [Accepted: 12/14/2012] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common preventable cause of mortality in hospitalized medical patients. Despite rigorous randomized trials generating strong recommendations for anticoagulant use to prevent VTE, nearly 40% of medical patients receive inappropriate thromboprophylaxis. Knowledge-translation strategies are needed to bridge this gap. METHODS We conducted a 16-week pilot cluster randomized controlled trial (RCT) to determine the proportion of medical patients that were appropriately managed for thromboprophylaxis (according to the American College of Chest Physician guidelines) within 24 hours of admission, through the use of a multicomponent knowledge-translation intervention. Our primary goal was to determine the feasibility of conducting this study on a larger scale. The intervention comprised clinician education, a paper-based VTE risk assessment algorithm, printed physicians' orders, and audit and feedback sessions. Medical wards at six hospitals (representing clusters) in Ontario, Canada were included; three were randomized to the multicomponent intervention and three to usual care (i.e., no active strategies for thromboprophylaxis in place). Blinding was not used. RESULTS A total of 2,611 patients (1,154 in the intervention and 1,457 in the control group) were eligible and included in the analysis. This multicomponent intervention did not lead to a significant difference in appropriate VTE prophylaxis rates between intervention and control hospitals (appropriate management rate odds ratio = 0.80; 95% confidence interval: 0.50, 1.28; p = 0.36; intra-class correlation coefficient: 0.022), and thus was not considered feasible. Major barriers to effective knowledge translation were poor attendance by clinical staff at education and feedback sessions, difficulty locating preprinted orders, and lack of involvement by clinical and administrative leaders. We identified several factors that may increase uptake of a VTE prophylaxis strategy, including local champions, support from clinical and administrative leaders, mandatory use, and a simple, clinically relevant risk assessment tool. CONCLUSIONS Hospitals allocated to our multicomponent intervention did not have a higher rate of medical inpatients appropriately managed for thromboprophylaxis than did hospitals that were not allocated to this strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Menaka Pai
- Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Venous thromboembolism (VTE) incurs considerable socioeconomic costs, partly owing to the fact that the treatment and prevention of VTE via effective thromboprophylaxis remains suboptimal in the inpatient and outpatient settings of many healthcare systems. A number of organizations-including the National Quality Forum, The Joint Commission, and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services-have established measures to assess and reduce the healthcare burden of VTE. These improvement strategies focus on increasing the use of thromboprophylaxis, implementing existing guidelines, and improving awareness. FINDINGS Based on clinical trial results, the oral anti-coagulants rivaroxaban, apixaban, and dabigatran etexilate have been approved in many countries for the prevention of VTE in patients after elective hip or knee replacement surgery. Recently, dabigatran etexilate and rivaroxaban have also been approved in the US for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. In addition, rivaroxaban is currently the only newer anti-coagulant that has been approved in Europe for the treatment of deep vein thrombosis and for the long-term prevention of recurrent VTE. These oral anti-coagulants have several advantages over established anti-coagulants, including no need for routine coagulation monitoring and only minimal food and drug interactions. These characteristics, together with convenient oral administration, may improve adherence and quality of life for patients, which could result in reductions in the rate of VTE. CONCLUSIONS These three oral agents have several advantages over established anti-coagulants and could, therefore, address the unmet needs of patients, physicians, and healthcare systems, with the potential to reduce the burden of anti-coagulant management and the occurrence of VTE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charles Mahan
- Department of Outcomes Research, New Mexico Heart Institute, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87102, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Karcher RB, Sison A, Weber SE, Sheldon P, Kahn KA, Tapson VF. Commentary: Persistent gaps in VTE prophylaxis in orthopedic surgery: will new educational strategies help? Am J Med Qual 2011; 26:502-4. [PMID: 21960646 DOI: 10.1177/1062860611401370] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
|
15
|
|
16
|
Wolpin S, Lee JA, Glenny RW, Wittkowsky AK, Wolf FM, Zierler BK. Evaluation of online training on the prevention of venous thromboembolism. Vasc Endovascular Surg 2010; 45:146-56. [PMID: 21156715 DOI: 10.1177/1538574410391281] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The integration of new evidence into clinical practice can be a prolonged process, with delays of years or even decades. One approach to speed this integration is through the use of online provider education. PROBLEM Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a serious patient safety issue. Prevention requires coordinated care and adherence to evidence-based guidelines, supported by provider education. PURPOSE This study reports how an interdisciplinary team developed and piloted an online provider training program for the prevention of VTE. HYPOTHESIS If providers use the online educational training, they will demonstrate increased mastery of key content areas related to VTE prophylaxis. METHODS We used a prospective test-retest study design in which medical residents and fellows served as their own controls. All participants were given a pretest followed by educational content and then a posttest. We also assessed 2 different types of learning content (ie, with and without case studies/questions) and randomized participants to each type prior to assessment. RESULTS Using the McNemar test we found a trend for knowledge gains related to VTE guidelines on the posttest for clinicians (n = 67) with a 14.5% improvement in content mastery (P = .05, 2-tailed). We did not find any significant differences between training modalities. Clinicians overall reported high levels of satisfaction with the application. CONCLUSION Our online education efforts indicate the potential for increasing mastery of VTE prophylaxis concepts. If resources are limited, we suggest a static approach to content delivery and an exploration of standardized methods for portability of online curriculums across learning management systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seth Wolpin
- Department of Biobehavioral Nursing and Health Systems, School of Nursing, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|