Potential use of animal models to examine antipsychotic prophylaxis for schizophrenia

Neuropeptides and oligopeptidases in schizophrenia

Schizophrenia (SCZ) is a complex psychiatric disorder with severe impact on patient's livelihood. In the last years, the importance of neuropeptides in SCZ and other CNS disorders has been recognized, mainly due to their ability to modulate the signaling of classical monoaminergic neurotransmitters as dopamine. In addition, a class of enzymes coined as oligopeptidases are able to cleave several of these neuropeptides, and their potential implication in SCZ was also demonstrated. Interestingly, these enzymes are able to play roles as modulators of neuropeptidergic systems, and they were also implicated in neurogenesis, neurite outgrowth, neuron migration, and therefore, in neurodevelopment and brain formation. Altered activity of oligopeptidases in SCZ was described only more recently, suggesting their possible utility as biomarkers for mental disorders diagnosis or treatment response. We provide here an updated and comprehensive review on neuropeptides and oligopeptidases involved in mental disorders, aiming to attract the attention of physicians to the potential of targeting this system for improving the therapy and for understanding the neurobiology underlying mental disorders as SCZ.

An Overview of Animal Models Related to Schizophrenia

Schizophrenia is a heterogeneous psychiatric disorder that is poorly treated with current therapies. In this brief review, we provide an update regarding the use of animal models to study schizophrenia in an attempt to understand its aetiology and develop novel therapeutic strategies. Tremendous progress has been made developing and validating rodent models that replicate the aetiologies, brain pathologies, and behavioural abnormalities associated with schizophrenia in humans. Here, models are grouped into 3 categories-developmental, drug induced, and genetic-to reflect the heterogeneous risk factors associated with schizophrenia. Each of these models is associated with varied but overlapping pathophysiology, endophenotypes, behavioural abnormalities, and cognitive impairments. Studying schizophrenia using multiple models will permit an understanding of the core features of the disease, thereby facilitating preclinical research aimed at the development and validation of better pharmacotherapies to alter the progression of schizophrenia or alleviate its debilitating symptoms.

Development of disease-modifying treatment of schizophrenia

Development of disease-modifying therapies requires an innovative approach to drug development where novel drugs are designed to target mechanisms of interest rather than to produce preclinical effects similar to those of currently used antipsychotics. Application of such novel strategy will undoubtedly require a very deep understanding of the disease biology that is just starting to emerge. Alternatively, one may let environmental experiences of the diseased individual guide the repair process and use drugs only to facilitate the effects of experience. Such an approach would bring together functional experience that is age-, environment- and disease-dependent with the plasticity resources that may otherwise not be available. There are currently no preclinical drug-environment interaction models that can be claimed to have significant degrees of validity. Therefore, from a drug development perspective, principles that combine acute symptomatic and disease-modifying properties are clearly preferred. The question arises then how such treatments can be differentiated from those that have only symptomatic effects (i.e., most currently used antipsychotic medications). One expectation is that the former will show superior and broader efficacy (especially with longer treatment duration). Another possibility is that disease-modifying drugs will be particularly useful at the very earliest stages of the disease. Society and medical communities may not be ready yet to initiate the treatment as early as during the prodromal phase, but the situation may change by the time the science advances enough to bring a convincing case of a drug with disease-modification potential.

Evaluating early preventive antipsychotic and antidepressant drug treatment in an infection-based neurodevelopmental mouse model of schizophrenia

Current pharmacotherapy of schizophrenia remains unsatisfactory with little hope for complete functional restoration in patients once the disease has developed. A preventive approach based on intervention in the prodromal stage of the disease aiming to preserve functional integrity by halting the progress of the disease is therefore extremely attractive. Here, we investigated the effects of preventive antipsychotic or antidepressant drug treatment in a well-established neurodevelopmental mouse model of multiple schizophrenia-related abnormalities. Pregnant mice on gestation day 9 were exposed to the viral mimic polyriboinosinic-polyribocytidylic acid (2 mg/kg, intravenously) or corresponding vehicle treatment, and the resulting offspring from both prenatal treatment conditions were subjected to chronic antipsychotic (haloperidol or clozapine), antidepressant (fluoxetine), or placebo treatment during the periadolescent stage of development. The effects of the preventive pharmacotherapy on behavioral and pharmacological functions were then investigated in adulthood using paradigms relevant to schizophrenia, namely prepulse inhibition, latent inhibition, and sensitivity to psychostimulant drugs. We show that periadolescent treatment with the reference antipsychotic and antidepressant drugs can successfully block the emergence of multiple psychosis-related behavioral and pharmacological abnormalities in subjects predisposed to adult brain pathology by exposure to prenatal immune challenge. At the same time, however, our study reveals numerous negative influences of the early pharmacological intervention on normal behavioral development in control subjects. Hence, even though preventive pharmacotherapy may be beneficial in individuals with predisposition to psychosis-related brain dysfunctions, chronic antipsychotic or antidepressant drug treatment in false-positive subjects is associated with substantial risk for long-term behavioral disturbances in adulthood.

Models of neurodevelopmental abnormalities in schizophrenia

The neurodevelopmental hypothesis of schizophrenia asserts that the underlying pathology of schizophrenia has its roots in brain development and that these brain abnormalities do not manifest themselves until adolescence or early adulthood. Animal models based on developmental manipulations have provided insight into the vulnerability of the developing fetus and the importance of the early environment for normal maturation. These models have provided a wide range of validated approaches to answer questions regarding environmental influences on both neural and behavioral development. In an effort to better understand the developmental hypothesis of schizophrenia, animal models have been developed, which seek to model the etiology and/or the pathophysiology of schizophrenia or specific behaviors associated with the disease. Developmental models specific to schizophrenia have focused on epidemiological risk factors (e.g., prenatal viral insult, birth complications) or more heuristic models aimed at understanding the developmental neuropathology of the disease (e.g., ventral hippocampal lesions). The combined approach of behavioral and neuroanatomical evaluation of these models strengthens their utility in improving our understanding of the pathophysiology of schizophrenia and developing new treatment strategies.

Pathophysiology and Animal Models of Schizophrenia

Animal models of schizophrenia are important for research aimed at developing improved pharmacotherapies. In particular, the cognitive deficits of schizophrenia remain largely refrac- tory to current medications and there is a need for improved medications. We discuss the pathophysiology of schizophrenia and in particular the possible mechanisms underlying the cognitive deficits. We review the current animal models of schizophrenia and discuss the extent to which they meet the need for models reflecting the various domains of the symptomatology of schizophrenia, including positive symptoms, negative symptoms and cognitive symptoms. Key words: Animal models, Pharmacotherapy, Schizophrenia

Chronic administration of clozapine alleviates reversal-learning impairment in isolation-reared rats

Isolation rearing has been used for inducing schizophrenia-like symptoms in rats. Human schizophrenics have deficits in prefrontal-dysfunction-related cognitive/behavioral flexibility. Rats with lesions of the medial prefrontal cortex perform poorly in reversal learning. It is uncertain whether isolation rearing, however, causes reversal-learning impairment in adult rats. Using the rotating T maze, this study examined the effect of chronic administration of clozapine on visual discrimination learning and reversal learning in isolation-reared and socially reared adult rats. The results show that isolation-reared rats without clozapine injection performed significantly worse than socially reared rats in reversal learning but not in acquisition learning. Chronic injection of clozapine (5 or 10 mg/kg) in isolation-reared rats significantly improved reversal learning but had no effects on acquisition learning. Further data analyses show that in both the inhibition phase and the new-strategy-acquisition phase of reversal learning, isolation-reared rats needed significantly more correct-response trials to reach the criterion than socially reared rats, and clozapine significantly reduced the isolation-induced impairment of reversal learning only in the new-strategy-acquisition phase. In socially reared rats, clozapine had a dose-related interfering effect on reversal learning but not acquisition learning. This study supports the use of isolation rearing as a model for investigating the neurodevelopmental hypothesis of schizophrenia.

Systems and integrative biology as alternative guises for pharmacology: prime time for an iPharm concept?

Understanding the molecular basis of human disease pathophysiology is critical to accurate disease diagnosis, defining disease progression and to identifying new drugs that more specifically address target diseases. Advances in the understanding of tissue function (including draft maps of the human genome) coupled with industrial-scale, 'enabling' technologies like high throughput screening, combinatorial chemistry, proteomics, etc., have generated data on a scale never before possible. Despite this, there continues to be a dearth of new drug approvals ascribed to: (i) the challenges of working with novel, often non-validated disease targets; (ii) targeting diseases (stroke, Alzheimer's) with limited (if any) treatment and ill-defined clinical trial endpoints; (iii) enhanced regulatory hurdles for drug approval; (iv) insufficient time for the new knowledge and enabling technologies to have reached a productive level. An alternate viewpoint is that unfettered access to such technologies, where exclusion rather than integration has been the hallmark, has markedly reduced the intellectual competent of the biomedical research endeavor, with perceived technological 'quick fixes' displacing the integrative, hierarchical approach of pharmacology, that with medicinal chemistry, represents the core of the drug discovery process. After two decades of profound neglect, pharmacology has re-emerged as the key discipline in providing context to the drug discovery process, facilitating more timely, context-relevant and data-driven outcomes in the search for new drugs. Rather than viewing the future of drug discovery in terms of the 'new' biologies, systems and integrative, a rubric along the lines of iPharm, integrating both established and new technologies, is required.

P50 suppression in individuals at risk for schizophrenia: the convergence of clinical, familial, and vulnerability marker risk assessment

BACKGROUND

Identification of individuals at risk for the development of schizophrenia is important because it can lead to a greater understanding of the early stages of the illness. The aim of the present study was to determine whether individuals "at risk" for schizophrenia have deficits in P50 suppression, a preattentive measure of sensory gating.

METHODS

Thirty-one at-risk and 21 normal comparison subjects were referred to the CARE (Cognitive Assessment and Risk Evaluation) Program at University of California San Diego. The primary aim of the CARE Program is to identify individuals who are at the greatest risk for conversion to psychosis, with a combination of clinical, familial, and vulnerability markers, including P50 suppression.

RESULTS

As a group, the at-risk subjects had modestly lower levels (effect size=.43) of P50 suppression (55.1%, SD=39.8) relative to comparison subjects (71.5%, SD=34.7). At-risk subjects with a first-degree relative with schizophrenia had profoundly deficient P50 suppression (16.4%, SD=33.8) compared with other at-risk (p<.05) and comparison subjects (p<.005).

CONCLUSIONS

Ongoing longitudinal follow-up studies will determine whether it is possible to improve the predictive validity of the clinical and familial variables by using P50 suppression alone or in combination with other measures in determining which individuals are at greatest risk for schizophrenia.