Safety and efficacy of tirzepatide as an add-on to single oral antihyperglycaemic medication in patients with type 2 diabetes in Japan (SURPASS J-combo): a multicentre, randomised, open-label, parallel-group, phase 3 trial

A consensus statement from the Japan Diabetes Society: A proposed algorithm for pharmacotherapy in people with type 2 diabetes - 2nd edition (English version)

This algorithm was issued for the appropriate use of drugs for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus in Japan. The revisions include safety considerations, fatty liver disease as a comorbidity to be taken into account and the position of tirzepatide.

Tirzepatide: unveiling a new dawn in dual-targeted diabetes and obesity management

INTRODUCTION

Incretin-based therapies have emerged as effective treatments for type 2 diabetes (T2D) and obesity. However, not all patients achieve optimal outcomes with existing treatments, highlighting the need for more effective solutions.

AREAS COVERED

We present a comprehensive evaluation of Tirzepatide (TZP), a novel dual glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide/glucagon-like peptide-1 (GIP/GLP-1) receptor agonist, for managing obesity and T2D. We conducted a systematic search of Cochrane, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases from inception to April 2024. The focus of the review is on the development and therapeutic potential of TZP, with detailed exploration on pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy, and safety. Furthermore, it reviews TZP's impacts on glycemic control, weight management, and its potential cardiovascular (CV) benefits.

EXPERT OPINION

TZP represents a significant advancement in the dual-targeted approach to treating T2D and obesity. Its unique mechanism of action offers superior efficacy in reducing glycemic levels and body weight compared to existing therapies. New data suggesting improvements in CV outcomes indicate that TZP could set a new standard in the treatment paradigm. While long-term data on efficacy and safety are still forthcoming, current evidence positions TZP as a promising option for patients who have not reached their therapeutic goals with existing treatments.

Achieving normoglycaemia with tirzepatide: Post hoc exploratory analysis of the SURPASS J-mono and J-combo studies

AIM

Normoglycaemia was achieved in a significant proportion of Japanese participants with type 2 diabetes in two phase 3 studies of tirzepatide. This post hoc exploratory analysis aimed to identify predictive factors associated with normoglycaemia achievement.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

SURPASS J-mono and SURPASS J-combo study data were pooled for this analysis. Characteristics of participants in whom normoglycaemia [glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) <5.7%] was achieved were summarized. Logistic regression analyses were performed with HbA1c <5.7% achievement as the target variable.

RESULTS

Of 912 participants, normoglycaemia was achieved in 553 (60.6%) following 52 weeks of tirzepatide treatment. Overall, the mean (SD) age was 56.7 (10.6) years and mean diabetes duration was 7.7 (6.0) years, and 76% of participants were men. Mean (SD) change from baseline in HbA1c and bodyweight was -2.87% (0.95) versus -2.47% (1.1) and -10.30 (5.8) kg versus -3.75 (4.3) kg for participants in whom normoglycaemia was and was not reached, respectively. Multivariate regression analyses showed that lower baseline body mass index, shorter disease duration and lower baseline HbA1c were significantly associated with higher rates of normoglycaemia achievement (p = 0.009, p = 0.008, p < 0.001, respectively) as was a tirzepatide dose of 10 or 15 mg compared with 5 mg (p < 0.001). The highest percentage of participants in whom normoglycaemia (94%) was achieved were those with lower baseline HbA1c (<8%) and the greatest weight reduction (≥15%).

CONCLUSIONS

Baseline HbA1c and body mass index, disease duration and the tirzepatide treatment group were shown to be predictive factors for achieving normoglycaemia. A lower baseline HbA1c was most strongly associated with normoglycaemia achievement.

The real-world safety profile of tirzepatide: pharmacovigilance analysis of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database

PURPOSE

Randomized controlled trials with tirzepatide (TZP) displayed unprecedented glucose and body weight lowering efficacy in individuals with type 2 diabetes and/or obesity and a safety profile similar to that of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA), mainly characterized by gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events (AE). Concerns on diabetic retinopathy, pancreato-biliary disorders, and medullary thyroid cancer were also addressed. We aimed to investigate whether the same safety issues emerged from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) post-marketing surveillance database.

METHODS

OpenVigil 2.1-MedDRA-v24 and AERSMine (data 2004Q1-2023Q3) were used to query the FAERS database. Reports of GI AE, diabetic retinopathy, pancreato-biliary disorders, and medullary thyroid cancer were investigated. The analysis was then filtered for age, gender, and designation as primary suspect. AE occurrence with TZP was compared to insulin, sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors, metformin, and GLP-1RA.

RESULTS

Disproportionate reporting of GI [i.e., nausea (ROR 4.01, 95% CI 3.85-4.19)] and pancreato-biliary disorders [i.e., pancreatitis (ROR 3.63, 95% CI 3.15-4.19)], diabetic retinopathy (ROR 4.14, 95% CI 2.34-7.30), and medullary thyroid cancer (ROR 13.67, 95% CI 4.35-42.96) was detected. TZP exhibited a similar risk of GI AE and medullary thyroid cancer and a lower risk of most pancreato-biliary AE and diabetic retinopathy vs. GLP-1RA.

CONCLUSIONS

TZP was associated with an increased risk of specific AE. However, its safety profile was similar to that of GLP-1RA, without increased risk of pancreato-biliary AE, diabetic retinopathy, and medullary thyroid cancer.

Targeting the incretin system in obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus

Obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) are widespread, non-communicable diseases that are responsible for considerable levels of morbidity and mortality globally, primarily in the form of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Changes to lifestyle and behaviour have insufficient long-term efficacy in most patients with these diseases; metabolic surgery, although effective, is not practically deliverable on the scale that is required. Over the past two decades, therapies based on incretin hormones, spearheaded by glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP1) receptor agonists (GLP1RAs), have become the treatment of choice for obesity and T2DM, and clinical evidence now suggests that these agents have benefits for CVD. We review the latest advances in incretin-based pharmacotherapy. These include 'GLP1 plus' agents, which combine the known advantages of GLP1RAs with the activity of additional hormones, such as glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide, glucagon and amylin, to achieve desired therapeutic goals. Second-generation non-peptidic oral GLP1RAs promise to extend the benefits of GLP1 therapy to those who do not want, or cannot have, subcutaneous injection therapy. We conclude with a discussion of the knowledge gaps that must be addressed before incretin-based therapies can be properly deployed for maximum benefit in the treatment of obesity and T2DM.

The role of incretin receptor agonists in the treatment of obesity

INTRODRODUCTION

Obesity and its associated metabolic conditions have become a significant global health problem in recent years, with many people living with obesity fulfilling criteria for pharmacological treatment. The development of the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists for chronic weight management has triggered new interest in the incretins and other hormones as targets for obesity, and investigations into dual and triple co-agonists.

METHODS

The objective of this narrative review was to summarize the available data on approved and emerging incretin-based agents for the treatment of obesity.

RESULTS

In clinical trials of currently available agents in people with overweight or obesity, weight loss of between 6% and 21% of baseline body weight has been observed, with between 23% and 94% of participants achieving 10% or higher weight loss, depending on the study and the agent used. Favourable outcomes have also been seen with regard to cardiovascular risk and outcomes, diabetes prevention, metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease/steatohepatitis and prevention of weight regain after metabolic surgery. Limitations associated with these agents include high costs, the potential for weight regain once treatment is stopped, the potential loss of lean body mass and gastrointestinal adverse events; potential issues with respect to gallbladder and biliary diseases require further investigation.

CONCLUSIONS

Many dual and triple co-agonists are still in development, and more data are needed to assess the efficacy, safety and tolerability of these emerging therapies versus the established incretin-based therapies; however, data are promising, and further results are eagerly awaited.

Transforming obesity: The advancement of multi-receptor drugs

For more than a century, physicians have searched for ways to pharmacologically reduce excess body fat. The tide has finally turned with recent advances in biochemically engineered agonists for the receptor of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and their use in GLP-1-based polyagonists. These polyagonists reduce body weight through complementary pharmacology by incorporating the receptors for glucagon and/or the glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP). In their most advanced forms, gut-hormone polyagonists achieve an unprecedented weight reduction of up to ∼20%-30%, offering a pharmacological alternative to bariatric surgery. Along with favorable effects on glycemia, fatty liver, and kidney disease, they also offer beneficial effects on the cardiovascular system and adipose tissue. These new interventions, therefore, hold great promise for the future of anti-obesity medications.

Tirzepatide ameliorates eating behaviors regardless of prior exposure to glucagon-like peptide receptor agonists in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

AIMS

To investigate effects of tirzepatide, a dual receptor agonist for glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), on eating behaviors.

METHODS

Eating behaviors were evaluated by using a validated questionnaire survey in 33 Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) (mean age: 51.8 years) who were treated with tirzepatide (2.5 mg/week for 4 weeks and then 5.0 mg/week) for 6 months (M).

RESULTS

Treatment with tirzepatide significantly decreased median hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) (baseline/3 M/6 M: 7.3 %/6.0 %/5.8 %), mean body weight (BW) (baseline/3 M/6 M: 87.7 kg/82.0 kg/79.6 kg) and mean relative score of eating behaviors (baseline/3 M/6 M: 57.0/50.7/45.9). In the GLP-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) naïve group (n = 20, men/women: 13/7), HbA1c and BW were continuously decreased up to 6 M. Changes in eating behaviors were mainly observed in the first 3 M. In the GLP-1RA non-naïve group (n = 13, men/women: 8/5), reductions in HbA1c and BW were predominant in the first 3 M, and changes in eating behaviors were observed up to 6 M. There were no significant correlations of changes in scores of eating behaviors with changes in glycemic control or those in BW.

CONCLUSIONS

Tirzepatide ameliorates eating behaviors as well as glycemic management and obesity in Japanese patients with T2DM, and the patterns of improvement are partially dependent on prior exposure to GLP-1RAs.

Subcutaneously administered tirzepatide vs semaglutide for adults with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS

We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of s.c. administered tirzepatide vs s.c. administered semaglutide for adults of both sexes with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

METHODS

We searched PubMed and Cochrane up to 11 November 2023 for RCTs with an intervention duration of at least 12 weeks assessing s.c. tirzepatide at maintenance doses of 5 mg, 10 mg or 15 mg once weekly, or s.c. semaglutide at maintenance doses of 0.5 mg, 1.0 mg or 2.0 mg once weekly, in adults with type 2 diabetes, regardless of background glucose-lowering treatment. Eligible trials compared any of the specified doses of tirzepatide and semaglutide against each other, placebo or other glucose-lowering drugs. Primary outcomes were changes in HbA1c and body weight from baseline. Secondary outcomes were achievement of HbA1c target of ≤48 mmol/mol (≤6.5%) or <53 mmol/mol (<7.0%), body weight loss of at least 10%, and safety outcomes including gastrointestinal adverse events and severe hypoglycaemia. We used version 2 of the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool (ROB 2) to assess the risk of bias, conducted frequentist random-effects network meta-analyses and evaluated confidence in effect estimates utilising the Confidence In Network Meta-Analysis (CINeMA) framework.

RESULTS

A total of 28 trials with 23,622 participants (44.2% female) were included. Compared with placebo, tirzepatide 15 mg was the most efficacious treatment in reducing HbA1c (mean difference -21.61 mmol/mol [-1.96%]) followed by tirzepatide 10 mg (-20.19 mmol/mol [-1.84%]), semaglutide 2.0 mg (-17.74 mmol/mol [-1.59%]), tirzepatide 5 mg (-17.60 mmol/mol [-1.60%]), semaglutide 1.0 mg (-15.25 mmol/mol [-1.39%]) and semaglutide 0.5 mg (-12.00 mmol/mol [-1.09%]). In between-drug comparisons, all tirzepatide doses were comparable with semaglutide 2.0 mg and superior to semaglutide 1.0 mg and 0.5 mg. Compared with placebo, tirzepatide was more efficacious than semaglutide for reducing body weight, with reductions ranging from 9.57 kg (tirzepatide 15 mg) to 5.27 kg (tirzepatide 5 mg). Semaglutide had a less pronounced effect, with reductions ranging from 4.97 kg (semaglutide 2.0 mg) to 2.52 kg (semaglutide 0.5 mg). In between-drug comparisons, tirzepatide 15 mg, 10 mg and 5 mg demonstrated greater efficacy than semaglutide 2.0 mg, 1.0 mg and 0.5 mg, respectively. Both drugs increased incidence of gastrointestinal adverse events compared with placebo, while neither tirzepatide nor semaglutide increased the risk of serious adverse events or severe hypoglycaemia.

CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION

Our data show that s.c. tirzepatide had a more pronounced effect on HbA1c and weight reduction compared with s.c. semaglutide in people with type 2 diabetes. Both drugs, particularly higher doses of tirzepatide, increased gastrointestinal adverse events.

REGISTRATION

PROSPERO registration no. CRD42022382594.

A consensus statement from the Japan Diabetes Society (JDS): a proposed algorithm for pharmacotherapy in people with type 2 diabetes-2nd Edition (English version)

The Japan Diabetes Society (JDS) adopted a sweeping decision to release consensus statements on relevant issues in diabetes management that require updating from time to time and launched a "JDS Committee on Consensus Statement Development." In March 2020, the committee's first consensus statement on "Medical Nutrition Therapy and Dietary Counseling for People with Diabetes" was published. In September 2022, a second consensus "algorithm for pharmacotherapy in people with type 2 diabetes" was proposed. In developing an algorithm for diabetes pharmacotherapy in people with type 2 diabetes, the working concept was that priority should be given to selecting such medications as would appropriately address the diabetes pathology in each patient while simultaneously weighing the available evidence for these medications and the prescribing patterns in clinical practice in Japan. These consensus statements are intended to present the committee's take on diabetes management in Japan, based on the evidence currently available for each of the issues addressed. It is thus hoped that practicing diabetologists will not fail to consult these statements to provide the best available practice in their respective clinical settings. Given that the persistent dual GIP/GLP-1 receptor agonist tirzepatide was approved in April 2023, these consensus statements have been revised1). In this revision, specifically, tirzepatide was added to the end of [likely involving insulin resistance] of "Obese patients" in Step 1: "Select medications to address the diabetes pathology involved" in Fig. 2. While the sentence, "Insulin insufficiency and resistance can be assessed by referring to the various indices listed in the JDS 'Guide to Diabetes Management.' was mentioned in the previous edition as well, "While insulin resistance is analogized based on BMI, abdominal obesity, and visceral fat accumulation, an assessment of indicators (e.g., HOMA-IR) is desirable" was added as information in order to more accurately recognize the pathology. Regarding Step 2: "Give due consideration to safety," "For renal excretion" was added to the "Rule of thumb 2: Avoid glinides in patients with renal impairment." The order of the medications in "rule of thumb 3: Avoid thiazolidinediones and biguanides in patients with heart failure (in whom they are contraindicated)." to thiazolidinediones then biguanides. In the description of the lowest part of Fig. 2, for each patient failing to achieve his/her HbA1c control goal, "while reverting to step 1" was changed to "while reverting to the opening" and "including reassessment if the patient is indicated for insulin therapy" was added. In the separate table, the column for tirzepatides was added, while the two items, "Characteristic side effects" and "Persistence of effect" were added to the area of interest. The revision also carried additional descriptions of the figure and table such as tirzepatides and "Characteristic side effects" in the statement, and while not mentioned in the proposed algorithm figure, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is covered from this revision for patients with comorbidities calling for medical attention. Moreover, detailed information was added to the relative/absolute indication for insulin therapy, the Kumamoto Declaration 2013 for glycemic targets, and glycemic targets for older people with diabetes. Again, in this revision, it is hoped that the algorithm presented here will not only contribute to improved diabetes management in Japan, but will continue to evolve into a better algorithm over time, reflecting new evidence as it becomes available.

Evaluating the effectiveness and safety of various Tirzepatide dosages in the management of Type 2 diabetes mellitus: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Purpose

Excess body fat, insulin resistance, and abnormal lipid levels signal type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2). Globally, 536.6 million people suffer from DM2, projected to rise to 783.2 million by 2045. Obesity fuels insulin resistance and DM2 development, with weight loss significantly improving glycemic control. Titrzepatide (TZP), a dual GIP and GLP-1 receptor agonist, proves highly effective in controlling hyperglycemia, stimulating insulin secretion, and promoting weight loss. TZP, holds promise as a treatment for DM2, surpassing insulin and GLP-1. The study aimed to meticulously assess the safety and efficacy of various doses, offering insights into optimal therapeutic strategies for managing DM2.

Methods

This study aimed to comprehensively evaluate the safety and efficacy of TZP in treating DM2. The primary focus of the inclusion criteria was on trials comparing TZP with a placebo until November 23, 2023, excluding patients with certain comorbidities. Data extraction included key parameters, and outcomes were assessed for HbA1c levels, weight changes, fasting serum glucose levels, and various adverse events. Quality assessment utilized the Cochrane Collaboration's risk-of-bias tool, and a network meta-analysis explored outcomes across different TZP dosages.

Results

This meta-analysis systematically reviewed ten studies on TZP for DM2. Results revealed significant reductions in HbA1c with TZP 10 mg (19%) and TZP 15 mg (31%) compared to TZP 5 mg (MD: -0.19 and MD: -0.32, respectively). Additionally, weight reduction was notable for TZP 10 mg (MD: -1.96) and TZP 15 mg (MD: -3.31). Fasting serum glucose showed improvement with TZP 15 mg (MD:-6.71). Gastrointestinal events increased with higher doses, yet without statistical significance. Death, nausea, diarrhea, vomiting, dyspepsia, decreased appetite, injection site reaction, hypoglycemia, treatment discontinuation, and serious adverse events showed no significant differences across doses.

Conclusion

TZP effectively lowers HbA1c and induces weight loss across its three doses for type 2 diabetes management. The higher dose (15 mg) significantly reduces fasting serum glucose, with increased adverse events observed at higher doses. Dose-specific patterns for adverse effects emphasize the need to balance therapeutic benefits and risks. Further research is crucial for refining clinical applications and understanding TZP's role in DM2 management across doses.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40200-024-01412-8.

The preclinical discovery and clinical evaluation of tirzepatide for the treatment of type 2 diabetes

INTRODUCTION

Despite numerous antidiabetic medications available for the treatment of type 2 diabetes, a substantial percentage of patients fail to achieve optimal glycemic control. Furthermore, the escalating obesity pandemic underscores the urgent need for effective relevant pharmacotherapies. Tirzepatide, a novel dual GIP and GLP-1 receptor agonist, offers a promising therapeutic option.

AREAS COVERED

This review describes the discovery and clinical development of tirzepatide. Based on data from pivotal in vivo and in vitro studies, the authors present the pharmacodynamic profile of tirzepatide. Furthermore, they summarize data from the clinical trial programs that assessed the efficacy and safety of tirzepatide for the treatment of type 2 diabetes or obesity in a broad spectrum of patients, and discuss its therapeutic potential.

EXPERT OPINION

Tirzepatide effectively reduces glucose levels and body weight in patients with type 2 diabetes and/or obesity, with a generally safe profile. Based on data from phase 3 clinical trials, several agencies have approved its use for the treatment of type 2 diabetes and obesity. Clinicians should be aware of possible adverse events, mainly mild-to-moderate gastrointestinal side effects. Overall, tirzepatide represents a promising treatment option for the treatment of type 2 diabetes.

Efficacy and Safety of Tirzepatide in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: Analysis of SURPASS-AP-Combo by Different Subgroups

INTRODUCTION

Tirzepatide is a novel glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist. In the SURPASS-AP-Combo trial, once-weekly tirzepatide was associated with improved glycemic control and weight loss versus insulin glargine and was generally well tolerated in an Asia-Pacific, predominately Chinese, population with type 2 diabetes (T2D). This post hoc subgroup analysis of SURPASS-AP-Combo assessed the potential influence of patient baseline characteristics on the efficacy and safety of tirzepatide.

METHODS

Changes from baseline to week 40 in HbA1c, body weight, fasting serum glucose (FSG), and daily glucose average from self-measured blood glucose profiles were analyzed by potential influential factors including age (< 65, ≥ 65 years), sex, baseline HbA1c (≤ 8.5, > 8.5%), body mass index (BMI) (< 25, ≥ 25 kg/m2), body weight (< 75, ≥ 75 kg), duration of diabetes (< 10, ≥ 10 years), and concomitant oral antihyperglycemic medications (metformin, metformin plus sulphonylurea). Gastrointestinal adverse events and hypoglycemia were also evaluated.

RESULTS

At week 40, all tirzepatide doses were associated with reduced HbA1c, body weight, FSG, and daily glucose average from baseline in all subgroups. Greater HbA1c reductions were achieved in patients with higher baseline HbA1c across all tirzepatide doses, higher body weight with 10 mg and younger age with 15 mg tirzepatide. Greater reductions in body weight were observed in patients with higher body weight across all tirzepatide doses, lower baseline HbA1c with 5 mg and higher BMI with 5 mg tirzepatide.

CONCLUSIONS

In this post hoc analysis, tirzepatide was associated with reduced blood glucose and body weight in a predominantly Chinese population with T2D across different subgroups, consistent with previous reports for tirzepatide.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT04093752.

Efficacy and safety of tirzepatide in people with type 2 diabetes by baseline body mass index: An exploratory subgroup analysis of SURPASS-AP-Combo

AIMS

To assess the efficacy and safety of tirzepatide versus insulin glargine in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) by baseline body mass index (BMI).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Participants with T2D from the Phase 3 SURPASS-AP-Combo trial (NCT04093752) were categorized into three BMI subgroups (normal weight [<25 kg/m2 ], overweight [≥25 and <30 kg/m2 ], and obese [≥30 kg/m2 ]) according to World Health Organization criteria. Exploratory outcomes including glycaemic control, body weight, cardiometabolic risk, and safety were compared among three tirzepatide doses (5, 10 or 15 mg) and insulin glargine.

RESULTS

Of 907 participants, 235 (25.9%) had a BMI <25 kg/m2 , 458 (50.5%) a BMI ≥25 to <30 kg/m2 , and 214 (23.6%) a BMI ≥30 kg/m2 at baseline. At Week 40, all tirzepatide doses led to a greater reduction in mean glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c; -2.0% to -2.8% vs. -0.8% to -1.0%, respectively) and percent change in body weight (-5.5% to -10.8% vs. 1.0% to 2.5%, respectively) versus insulin glargine, across the BMI subgroups. Compared with insulin glargine, a higher proportion of tirzepatide-treated participants achieved treatment goals for HbA1c and body weight reduction. Improvements in other cardiometabolic indicators were also observed with tirzepatide across all the BMI subgroups. The safety profile of tirzepatide was similar across all subgroups by BMI. The most frequent adverse events with tirzepatide were gastrointestinal-related events and decreased appetite, with relatively few events leading to treatment discontinuation.

CONCLUSIONS

In participants with T2D, regardless of baseline BMI, treatment with tirzepatide resulted in statistically significant and clinically meaningful glycaemic reductions and body weight reductions compared with insulin glargine, with a safety profile consistent with previous reports.

Revolutionizing diabetes care: unveiling tirzepatide's potential in glycemic control and beyond

INTRODUCTION

Diabetes is a global public health challenge with rising prevalence. This review explores current diabetes understanding, diagnostic and management guidelines, economic impact, and lifestyle modifications as the primary approach.

AREAS COVERED

Focusing on pharmacological interventions, we discuss the roles of GLP-1 agonists and GLP/GIP agonists in diabetes management and cardiovascular risk reduction. Tirzepatide, a novel medication, is highlighted for its unique mechanism of action. Clinical trials demonstrate its effectiveness in glucose control, weight reduction, and its potential impact on diabetes, obesity, NASH, and cardiovascular risks.

EXPERT OPINION

Tirzepatide shows promise in diabetes treatment, offering glucose control and weight loss. It also holds potential for addressing comorbidities. However, cautious use is vital due to potential adverse effects and contraindications, including hypersensitivity reactions, pregnancy, and breastfeeding precautions. This review underscores tirzepatide as a valuable addition to diabetes therapies, with evolving prospects for enhanced patient outcomes as research advances.

Population pharmacokinetics of the GIP/GLP receptor agonist tirzepatide

Tirzepatide is a first-in-class glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist approved as for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. A population-based pharmacokinetic (PK) model was developed from 19 pooled studies. Tirzepatide pharmacokinetics were well-described by a two-compartment model with first order absorption and elimination. The tirzepatide population PK model utilized a semimechanistic allometry model to describe the relationship between body size and tirzepatide PK. The half-life of tirzepatide was ~5 days and enabled sustained exposure with once-weekly subcutaneous dosing. The covariate analysis suggested that adjustment of the dose regimen based on demographics or subpopulations was unnecessary. The tirzepatide PK model can be used to predict tirzepatide exposure for various scenarios or populations.

Metabolic Abnormalities Following Tirzepatide Monotherapy in Japanese Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Phase 3 SURPASS J-mono Post Hoc Analysis

INTRODUCTION

The presence of metabolic abnormalities in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) increases the risk of cardiovascular disease and other comorbidities. This analysis compared the effects of tirzepatide (5, 10, and 15 mg) and dulaglutide 0.75 mg on the prevalence of metabolic abnormalities in Japanese patients with T2D.

METHODS

This was a post hoc analysis of SURPASS J-mono, a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, parallel-group, phase 3 trial that compared the efficacy and safety of tirzepatide monotherapy (5, 10, and 15 mg) to dulaglutide 0.75 mg in Japanese patients with T2D. Thresholds for abnormalities were based on the Japanese criteria for metabolic syndrome. Proportions of participants meeting a composite endpoint (visceral fat accumulation measured by waist circumference plus two or more of dyslipidemia, hypertension, or hyperglycemia) or individual component thresholds were calculated at baseline and week 52 for the overall population and for baseline body mass index (BMI) subgroups (< 25, 25 to < 30, and ≥ 30 kg/m2).

RESULTS

Of 636 randomized participants, 431 (67.8%) met the composite endpoint at baseline, with similar findings observed across treatment arms. At week 52, the proportion of participants on treatment that met the composite endpoint was 31.7%, 23.0%, and 14.2% in the tirzepatide 5-, 10-, and 15-mg arms, respectively, and 56.5% in the dulaglutide arm (p < 0.001). A higher proportion met the composite endpoint at baseline in the BMI 25 to < 30 and ≥ 30 kg/m2 subgroups (73.2-79.3%) compared with the < 25 kg/m2 subgroup (45.3%), with reductions observed across all BMI subgroups treated with tirzepatide. The proportion of participants with individual metabolic abnormalities showed similar trends to those observed for the composite endpoint. Tirzepatide was consistently superior to dulaglutide across all assessments.

CONCLUSIONS

Tirzepatide reduced the prevalence of multiple metabolic abnormalities, indicating tirzepatide may have metabolic benefit in Japanese patients with T2D.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03861052.

New therapies for obesity

Obesity is a chronic disease associated with serious complications and increased mortality. Weight loss (WL) through lifestyle changes results in modest WL long-term possibly due to compensatory biological adaptations (increased appetite and reduced energy expenditure) promoting weight gain. Bariatric surgery was until recently the only intervention that consistently resulted in ≥ 15% WL and maintenance. Our better understanding of the endocrine regulation of appetite has led to the development of new medications over the last decade for the treatment of obesity with main target the reduction of appetite. The efficacy of semaglutide 2.4 mg/week-the latest glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor analogue-on WL for people with obesity suggests that we are entering a new era in obesity pharmacotherapy where ≥15% WL is feasible. Moreover, the WL achieved with the dual agonist tirzepatide (GLP-1/glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide) for people with type 2 diabetes and most recently also obesity, indicate that combining the GLP-1 with other gut hormones may lead to additional WL compared with GLP-1 receptor analogues alone and in the future, multi-agonist molecules may offer the potential to bridge further the efficacy gap between bariatric surgery and the currently available pharmacotherapies.

The Body weight Reducing Effects of Tirzepatide in People with and without Type 2 Diabetes: A Review on Efficacy and Adverse Effects

Obesity is becoming more frequent and has several negative health impacts. Recent advances in weight management strategies have primarily resided in pharmaceutical treatments, and the glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists have shown great potential in terms of body weight reduction in addition to improving glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Recently, the dual GLP-1 and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) receptor agonist tirzepatide has been developed. Tirzepatide has shown strong effects on glycated hemoglobin (HbA1C) levels in several clinical trials including participants with T2D (SURPASS program). In addition to its lowering effect on HbA1C, tirzepatide leads to substantial reductions in body weight, and a series of clinical trials (SURMOUNT program) have investigated the effects on body weight as the primary outcome. In these two trial programs, tirzepatide in doses of 5 mg to 15 mg administered subcutaneously once weekly resulted in body weight reduction of up to 15% in participants with T2D and up to 21% in participants without T2D, despite comparable baseline bodyweight. Across the two trial programs, adverse effects were mainly gastrointestinal (nausea, diarrhea, and vomiting) occurring with similar incidences of vomiting and lower incidences of diarrhea and nausea in trial participants with T2D compared to trials participants without T2D. Overall, discontinuation due to adverse events occurred in 3-7% of participants with no major differences between individuals with and without T2D. The higher weight-reducing efficacy of tirzepatide in trial participants without T2D is currently unexplained and may be partly reflected in dissimilarities in frequencies of gastrointestinal adverse events. The weight reducing effects of tirzepatide hold great promise for weight management in obese patients regardless of the presence of T2D.

Tirzepatide: A Review in Type 2 Diabetes

Tirzepatide (Mounjaro®), a first-in-class dual incretin agonist of the glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptors, is approved for use as an adjunct to diet and exercise to improve glycaemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in the USA, EU, Japan and other countries. It comes as single-dose prefilled pens and single-dose vials. In phase III SURPASS trials, once-weekly subcutaneous tirzepatide, as monotherapy or add-on-therapy to oral glucose-lowering medications and insulin, was superior to the GLP-1 receptor agonists (RAs) dulaglutide 0.75 mg and semaglutide 1 mg as well as basal and prandial insulin for glycaemic control and weight loss in adults with inadequately controlled T2DM. Tirzepatide was generally well tolerated, with a safety profile consistent with that of GLP-1 RAs. Tirzepatide was associated with a low risk of clinically significant or severe hypoglycaemia and no increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events. Adverse events were mostly mild to moderate in severity, with the most common being gastrointestinal events including nausea, diarrhoea, decreased appetite and vomiting. In conclusion, tirzepatide is a valuable addition to the treatment options for T2DM.

Impact of a dual glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide/glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist tirzepatide on heart rate among patients with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and pairwise and network meta-analysis

AIMS

To evaluate the impact of a dual glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide (GIP) and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist tirzepatide (TZP), and its potential dose-response effect, on heart rate.

METHODS

Articles were searched from PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, and clinical trials registries (ClinicalTrials.gov) databases. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing TZP at doses of 5, 10 and 15 mg in adults with type 2 diabetes were included. Six study arms were summarized from original research (TZP 5, 10 and 15 mg, GLP-1 receptor agonists [GLP-1RAs], insulin, placebo). The GLP-1RA and non-GLP-1RA groups were combined to form a control group. Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed the quality of each study. Mean differences (MDs) were calculated as effect estimates for continuous outcomes. Pairwise meta-analyses and network meta-analyses were conducted. The study protocol was prospectively registered (PROSPERO ID: CRD42023418551).

RESULTS

Eight articles were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. The mean baseline heart rate ranged from 65.2 to 75.7 beats per minute. Pairwise meta-analysis showed that, compared with combined the control group, there were significantly greater increases in heart rates in the TZP group (MD 1.82, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.75, 2.89). Similar significant rises were identified when comparing TZP with GLP-1RAs and non-GLP-1RAs (GLP-1 RAs: MD 2.29, 95% CI 1.00, 3.59; non-GLP-1RAs: MD 1.58, 95% CI 0.26, 2.91). TZP 5 mg was associated with smaller increases in heart rates compared to TZP 10 mg and TZP 15 mg (TZP 10 mg: MD -0.97, 95% CI -1.79, -0.14; TZP 15 mg: MD -2.57, 95% CI -3.79, -1.35). TZP 10 mg increased heart rate less than TZP 15 mg (MD -1.5, 95% CI -2.38, -0.82). Network meta-analysis indicated that TZP 15 mg was associated with significant increases in heart rate compared with TZP 5 mg (MD 2.53, 95% CI 1.43, 3.62), TZP 10 mg (MD 1.44, 95% CI 0.35, 2.53), GLP-1RAs (MD 3.46, 95% CI 1.67, 5.25), insulin (MD 2.86, 95% CI 1.32, 4.41) and placebo (MD 2.96, 95% CI 1.36, 4.57).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study showed not only that there was a greater increase in heart rate in the TZP group than in the control, GLP-1RA and non-GLP-1RA groups, but also that the 15-mg dose of TZP had the strongest impact on increasing heart rates compared with the other five inventions, with a TZP dose-response impact on heart rate. Further research on the effects of TZP treatment-related increases in heart rate is required.

The Road towards Triple Agonists: Glucagon-Like Peptide 1, Glucose-Dependent Insulinotropic Polypeptide and Glucagon Receptor - An Update

Obesity is the fifth leading risk factor for global deaths with numbers continuing to increase worldwide. In the last 20 years, the emergence of pharmacological treatments for obesity based on gastrointestinal hormones has transformed the therapeutic landscape. The successful development of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists, followed by the synergistic combined effect of glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP)/GLP-1 receptor agonists achieved remarkable weight loss and glycemic control in those with the diseases of obesity and type 2 diabetes. The multiple cardiometabolic benefits include improving glycemic control, lipid profiles, blood pressure, inflammation, and hepatic steatosis. The 2023 phase 2 double-blind, randomized controlled trial evaluating a GLP-1/GIP/glucagon receptor triagonist (retatrutide) in patients with the disease of obesity reported 24.2% weight loss at 48 weeks with 12 mg retatrutide. This review evaluates the current available evidence for GLP-1 receptor agonists, dual GLP-1/GIP receptor co-agonists with a focus on GLP-1/GIP/glucagon receptor triagonists and discusses the potential future benefits and research directions.

Comparative effectiveness of GLP-1 receptor agonists on glycaemic control, body weight, and lipid profile for type 2 diabetes: systematic review and network meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the comparative efficacy and safety of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) on glycaemic control, body weight, and lipid profile in adults with type 2 diabetes.

DESIGN

Systematic review and network meta-analysis.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Embase from database inception to 19 August 2023.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES

Eligible randomised controlled trials enrolled adults with type 2 diabetes who received GLP-1RA treatments and compared effects with placebo or any GLP-1RA drug, with a follow-up duration of at least 12 weeks. Trials with a crossover design, non-inferiority studies comparing GLP-1RA and other drug classes without a placebo group, using withdrawn drugs, and non-English studies were deemed ineligible.

RESULTS

76 eligible trials involving 15 GLP-1RA drugs and 39 246 participants were included in this network meta-analysis; all subsequent estimates refer to the comparison with placebo. All 15 GLP-1RAs effectively lowered haemoglobin A1c and fasting plasma glucose concentrations. Tirzepatide induced the largest reduction of haemoglobin A1c concentrations (mean difference -2.10% (95% confidence interval -2.47% to -1.74%), surface under the cumulative ranking curve 94.2%; high confidence of evidence), and fasting plasma glucose concentrations (-3.12 mmol/L (-3.59 to -2.66), 97.2%; high confidence), and proved the most effective GLP-1RA drug for glycaemic control. Furthermore, GLP-1RAs were shown to have strong benefits to weight management for patients with type 2 diabetes. CagriSema (semaglutide with cagrilintide) resulted in the highest weight loss (mean difference -14.03 kg (95% confidence interval -17.05 to -11.00); high confidence of evidence), followed by tirzepatide (-8.47 kg (-9.68 to -7.26); high confidence). Semaglutide was effective in lowering the concentration of low density lipoprotein (-0.16 mmol/L (-0.30 to -0.02)) and total cholesterol (-0.48 mmol/L (-0.84 to -0.11)). Moreover, this study also raises awareness of gastrointestinal adverse events induced by GLP-1RAs, and concerns about safety are especially warranted for high dose administration.

CONCLUSIONS

GLP-1RAs are efficacious in treating adults with type 2 diabetes. Compared with the placebo, tirzepatide was the most effective GLP-1RA drug for glycaemic control by reducing haemoglobin A1c and fasting plasma glucose concentrations. GLP-1RAs also significantly improved weight management for type 2 diabetes, with CagriSema performing the best for weight loss. The results prompt safety concerns for GLP-1RAs, especially with high dose administration, regarding gastrointestinal adverse events.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42022342845.

Tirzepatide Immunogenicity on Pharmacokinetics, Efficacy, and Safety: Analysis of Data From Phase 3 Studies

CONTEXT

Antidrug antibodies (ADA) can potentially affect drug pharmacokinetics, safety, and efficacy.

OBJECTIVE

This work aimed to evaluate treatment-emergent (TE) ADA in tirzepatide (TZP)-treated participants across 7 phase 3 trials and their potential effect on pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety.

METHODS

ADA were assessed at baseline and throughout the study until end point, defined as week 40 (SURPASS-1, -2, and -5) or week 52 (SURPASS-3, -4, Japan-Mono, and Japan-Combo). Samples for ADA characterization were collected at SURPASS trial sites. Participants included ADA-evaluable TZP-treated patients with type 2 diabetes (N = 5025). Interventions included TZP 5, 10, or 15 mg. ADA were detected and characterized for their ability to cross-react with native glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (nGIP) and glucagon-like peptide-1 (nGLP-1), neutralize tirzepatide activity on GIP and GLP-1 receptors, and neutralize nGIP and nGLP-1.

RESULTS

TE ADA developed in 51.1% of tirzepatide-treated patients. Proportions were similar across dose groups. Maximum ADA titers ranged from 1:20 to 1: 81 920 among TE ADA+ patients. Neutralizing antibodies (NAb) against TZP activity on GIP and GLP-1 receptors were observed in 1.9% and 2.1% of patients, respectively. Less than 1.0% of patients had cross-reactive NAb against nGIP or nGLP-1. TE ADA status, ADA titer, and NAb status had no effect on the pharmacokinetics or efficacy of TZP. More TE ADA+ patients experienced hypersensitivity reactions or injection site reactions than TE ADA- patients. The majority of hypersensitivity and injection site reactions were nonserious and nonsevere, and most events occurred and/or resolved irrespective of TE ADA status or titer.

CONCLUSION

Immunogenicity did not affect TZP pharmacokinetics or efficacy. The majority of hypersensitivity or injection site reactions experienced by TE ADA+ patients were mild to moderate in severity.

Glycaemic control, body weight, and safety of tirzepatide versus dulaglutide by baseline glycated haemoglobin level in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes: A subgroup analysis of the SURPASS J-mono study

AIM

To evaluate glycaemic control, body weight, and safety outcomes following treatment with tirzepatide or dulaglutide in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) with a baseline haemoglobin (HbA1c) level of ≤8.5% (≤69 mmol/mol) versus >8.5% (>69 mmol/mol).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

SURPASS J-mono was a 52-week, multicentre, randomized, double-blind, parallel, active-controlled, phase 3 study conducted in Japan. In this exploratory subgroup analysis of SURPASS J-mono, we examined mean change in HbA1c and body weight and the incidence of adverse events (AEs) in patients with a baseline HbA1c of ≤8.5% versus >8.5% after treatment with tirzepatide (5, 10 or 15 mg) or dulaglutide 0.75 mg.

RESULTS

Of 636 randomized participants, 203 had a baseline HbA1c of >8.5% and 433 had a baseline HbA1c of ≤8.5% (range ≥7.0% to ≤10.0%). Both subgroups showed significantly greater reductions in HbA1c and body weight with any-dose tirzepatide versus dulaglutide 0.75 mg, with greater HbA1c reductions observed in patients with a baseline HbA1c of >8.5% treated with tirzepatide (least squares mean [LSM] differences of -3.13% to -3.86%) or dulaglutide (LSM -1.81%) compared with patients with a baseline HbA1c of ≤8.5% (LSM -2.00% to -2.32%) or dulaglutide (LSM -1.05%; treatment-by-baseline HbA1c subgroup interaction P ≤ 0.001). For the tirzepatide treatment arms, LSM change from baseline in body weight ranged from -6.7 to -10.7 kg for the baseline HbA1c ≤8.5% subgroup and from -4.0 to -10.6 kg for the baseline HbA1c >8.5% subgroup, compared with -0.6 kg and -0.4 kg, respectively, for the dulaglutide arm. The incidence of hypoglycaemia was low, with no substantial difference in hypoglycaemia or treatment-emergent AEs between subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

Regardless of baseline HbA1c (≤8.5% or >8.5%), tirzepatide at doses of 5, 10 and 15 mg is effective in Japanese patients with T2D compared with dulaglutide 0.75 mg in terms of glycaemic control and body weight reduction, with an adequate safety profile consistent with previous reports.

Health state utilities associated with weight loss: preferences of people with type 2 diabetes and obesity in Japan

AIMS

Health state utilities associated with weight change are needed for cost-utility analyses (CUAs) examining the value of treatments for type 2 diabetes and obesity. Previous studies have estimated the utility benefits associated with various amounts of weight reduction in the US and Europe, but preferences for weight change in Asian cultures may differ from these published values. The purpose of this study was to estimate utilities associated with reductions in body weight based on preferences of individuals with type 2 diabetes and obesity in Japan.

METHODS

Health state vignettes represented type 2 diabetes with respondents' own current weight and weight reductions of 2.5%, 5%, 7.5%, 10%, 12.5%, 15%, and 20%. Utilities were elicited in time trade-off interviews with a sample of respondents in Japan with type 2 diabetes and body mass index (BMI) ≥25 kg/m2 (the cutoff for obesity in Japan).

RESULTS

Analyses were conducted with data from 138 respondents (84.8% male; mean age = 58.0 years; mean BMI = 29.4 kg/m2) from all eight regions of Japan. Utility gains gradually increased with rising percentage of weight reductions ranging from 2.5% to 15%. Weight reductions of 2.5% to 15% resulted in utility increases of 0.013 to 0.048. The health state representing a 20% weight reduction yielded a wide range of preferences (mean utility increase of 0.044). Equations are recommended for estimating utility change based on any percentage of weight reduction (up to 20%) in Japanese people with type 2 diabetes and obesity.

LIMITATIONS

This study was conducted in a sample with limited representation of patients with BMI >35 kg/m2 (n = 13) and relatively few women (n = 21).

CONCLUSION

Results may be used to provide inputs for CUAs examining the value of treatments that are associated with weight loss in patients with type 2 diabetes and obesity in Japan.

Treatment Satisfaction and Quality of Life with Tirzepatide Versus Dulaglutide Among Japanese Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: Exploratory Evaluation of the SURPASS J-mono Trial

INTRODUCTION

Treatment satisfaction in diabetes management is vital to achieving long-term clinical outcomes. This analysis evaluated treatment satisfaction among patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) after 52 weeks of treatment with once-weekly tirzepatide (5, 10, and 15 mg) compared with dulaglutide 0.75 mg.

METHODS

This exploratory analysis of the phase 3 SURPASS J-mono trial assessed treatment satisfaction using the Japanese translation of the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire status (DTSQs) and change versions (DTSQc). Subgroup analyses were post hoc and conducted for the DTSQc overall treatment satisfaction score based on age (< 65 or ≥ 65 years), sex (male or female), baseline body mass index (BMI; < 25 or ≥ 25 kg/m2), and baseline glycated hemoglobin (≤ 8.5% or > 8.5%).

RESULTS

Baseline DTSQs scores were similar among patients across all treatment arms. Overall, trends showed higher satisfaction among patients who received any tirzepatide dose compared with those who received dulaglutide after 52 weeks of treatment. Mean overall DTSQc treatment satisfaction scores at week 52 were significantly higher with tirzepatide 5, 10, and 15 mg versus dulaglutide 0.75 mg (11.5, 12.1, and 12.3, respectively, vs 8.9; P < 0.001). The DTSQc perceived frequency scores for unacceptable hyperglycemia were significantly lower with tirzepatide 5, 10, and 15 mg versus dulaglutide 0.75 mg (- 1.7, - 1.8, and - 2.3, respectively, vs - 0.6; P < 0.001), while scores for unacceptable hypoglycemia were similar across all treatment arms, ranging from - 0.8 to - 1.1. Subgroup analyses showed increased treatment satisfaction with tirzepatide compared with dulaglutide in the < 65 years (P < 0.001) and baseline BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 subgroups (P < 0.01 or < 0.001) and similar treatment satisfaction across treatment arms in the ≥ 65 years and BMI < 25 kg/m2 subgroups.

CONCLUSION

Patients with T2D reported higher treatment satisfaction with once-weekly tirzepatide (5, 10, and 15 mg) compared with dulaglutide 0.75 mg after 52 weeks of treatment.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03861052.

The importance of glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptor activation for the effects of tirzepatide

Tirzepatide is a unimolecular co-agonist of the glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) receptors recently approved for the treatment of type 2 diabetes by the US Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicine Agency. Tirzepatide treatment results in an unprecedented improvement of glycaemic control and lowering of body weight, but the contribution of the GIP receptor-activating component of tirzepatide to these effects is uncertain. In this review, we present the current knowledge about the physiological roles of the incretin hormones GLP-1 and GIP, their receptors, and previous results of co-targeting the two incretin hormone receptors in humans. We also analyse the molecular pharmacological, preclinical and clinical effects of tirzepatide to discuss the role of GIP receptor activation for the clinical effects of tirzepatide. Based on the available literature on the combination of GLP-1 and GIP receptor activation, tirzepatide does not seem to have a classical co-activating mode of action in humans. Rather, in vitro studies of the human GLP-1 and GIP receptors reveal a biased GLP-1 receptor activation profile and GIP receptor downregulation. Therefore, we propose three hypotheses for the mode of action of tirzepatide, which can be addressed in future, elaborate clinical trials.

Effects of Incretin Therapy on Skeletal Health in Type 2 Diabetes-A Systematic Review

Diabetes poses a significant risk to bone health, with Type 1 diabetes (T1D) having a more detrimental impact than Type 2 diabetes (T2D). The group of hormones known as incretins, which includes gastric inhibitory peptide (GIP) and glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1), play a role in regulating bowel function and insulin secretion during feeding. GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) are emerging as the primary treatment choice in T2D, particularly when atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease is present. Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors (DPP-4is), although less potent than GLP-1 RAs, can also be used. Additionally, GLP-1 RAs, either alone or in combination with GIP, may be employed to address overweight and obesity. Since feeding influences bone turnover, a relationship has been established between incretins and bone health. To explore this relationship, we conducted a systematic literature review following the PRISMA guidelines. While some studies on cells and animals have suggested positive effects of incretins on bone cells, turnover, and bone density, human studies have yielded either no or limited and conflicting results regarding their impact on bone mineral density (BMD) and fracture risk. The effect on fracture risk may vary depending on the choice of comparison drug and the duration of follow-up, which was often limited in several studies. Nevertheless, GLP-1 RAs may hold promise for people with T2D who have multiple fracture risk factors and poor metabolic control. Furthermore, a potential new area of interest is the use of GLP-1 RAs in fracture prevention among overweight and obese people. Based on this systematic review, existing evidence remains insufficient to support a positive or a superior effect on bone health to reduce fracture risk in people with T2D. © 2023 The Authors. JBMR Plus published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Effect on Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and Body Weight After Discontinuation of Tirzepatide, a Novel Glucose-Dependent Insulinotropic Peptide (GIP) and Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 (GLP-1) Receptor Agonist: A Single-Center Case Series Study

Introduction The purpose of this study was to examine changes in blood glucose levels and body weight after discontinuation of tirzepatide, a novel long-acting dual glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide (GIP) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA). Methods Nine subjects (five males, four females, age 54.3±5.4 years, body mass index 33.5±3.3 kg/m2) participating with type 2 diabetes in the SURPASS J-mono study were included. Subjects were randomized to tirzepatide 5 mg, 10 mg, 15 mg, or a dulaglutide 0.75 mg group. Fifty-two weeks after randomization, study drug administration was discontinued. To investigate progress after the end of administration, changes in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and body weight were further examined two, four, and six months after discontinuation of the study drug. Results After fifty-two weeks, all tirzepatide groups had improved HbA1c and body weight compared with the dulaglutide group. At two, four, and six months after the end of study drug administration, re-elevation of HbA1c was observed in all groups. Furthermore, in the tirzepatide groups, dose-dependent weight regain was observed from an early stage. Conclusions Compared to dulaglutide, tirzepatide exhibited excellent blood-glucose-improving and weight-reducing effects. However, exacerbation of blood glucose and rebound of weight gain occurred relatively early after administration was ended. For type 2 diabetes patients who need weight loss and are prescribed tirzepatide, these findings suggest a necessity for continuous prescription or careful follow-up when stopping.

The Cardiovascular Effect of Tirzepatide: A Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 and Glucose-Dependent Insulinotropic Polypeptide Dual Agonist

Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists have been used extensively in the clinic and have an established safety profile in cardiovascular disease settings. For the treatment of peptide-secreting enteroendocrine cells, most research has focused on developing peptide multi-agonists as most of these cells are multihormonal. Among the various peptides secreted by enteroendocrine cells, the combination of GLP-1 and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) is an attractive strategy for treating type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) because both of these hormones have glucose-lowering actions. Tirzepatide, a synthetic peptide composed of 39 amino acids, functions as a dual receptor agonist of both the GIP and GLP-1 receptors. This unique mechanism of action has earned tirzepatide the nickname "twincretin." Tirzepatide's dual agonist activity may be the mechanism by which tirzepatide significantly reduces glycated hemoglobin levels and body weight in patients with T2DM as observed in phase 3 clinical trials. Besides its glucose-lowering and anti-obesity effects, tirzepatide has been reported to have potential cardiovascular benefits. In this review, we discuss the cardiovascular effects of tirzepatide based on the available preclinical and clinical data.

Tirzepatide for type 2 diabetes

One in ten adults worldwide is living with diabetes, with 95% having type 2 diabetes (T2D). Sustained glycaemic control in people with T2D is difficult to achieve despite recent advances in T2D management with the advent of glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP1RA) and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i). Tirzepatide represents a first-in-class agent as a dual glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP)/GLP1RA to be approved in the USA and Europe for the treatment of T2D. This narrative review intends to list and discuss the glycaemic efficacy, key safety and weight loss outcomes related to the treatment of T2D with tirzepatide. Tirzepatide has been evaluated in five published clinical trials (n=6278) within the SURPASS clinical trial programme, with a focus on glycaemic control and weight loss. These trials have demonstrated significant improvements in glycosylated haemoglobin (-1.24% to -2.11% versus placebo and -0.6% to -1.14% versus active comparator) and weight (up to 15.5 kg versus placebo or active comparator) in patients with T2D. Notably, tirzepatide exhibited superior glycaemic control and weight loss when compared directly with a GLP1RA. Adverse events with the use of tirzepatide are similar to other approved GLP1RA and are predominantly gastrointestinal (nausea, vomiting). The tirzepatide cardiovascular outcomes trial (SURPASS-CVOT) is in progress and is expected to be completed in the fall of 2024. Tirzepatide represents an attractive new option and first-in-class agent for the treatment of T2D in people unable to achieve their glycaemic or weight management goals.

A Phase 1 Multiple Dose Study of Tirzepatide in Chinese Patients with Type 2 Diabetes

INTRODUCTION

To investigate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD) of tirzepatide in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D).

METHODS

In this phase 1, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multiple dose study, patients were randomized into one of two cohorts to receive once-weekly subcutaneous tirzepatide or placebo. The initial tirzepatide dose in both cohorts was 2.5 mg, which was increased by 2.5 mg every 4 weeks to a maximum final dose of 10.0 mg at week 16 (Cohort 1) or 15.0 mg at week 24 (Cohort 2). The primary outcome was the safety and tolerability of tirzepatide.

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients were randomized (tirzepatide 2.5-10.0 mg: n = 10, tirzepatide 2.5-15.0 mg: n = 10, placebo: n = 4); 22 completed the study. The most frequently reported treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) among patients receiving tirzepatide were diarrhea and decreased appetite; most TEAEs were mild and resolved spontaneously with no serious adverse events reported in the tirzepatide groups and one in the placebo group. The plasma concentration half-life of tirzepatide was approximately 5-6 days. Mean glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) decreased over time from baseline in the 2.5-10.0 mg (- 2.4%) and 2.5-15.0 mg (- 1.6%) tirzepatide groups, at week 16 and week 24, respectively, but remained steady in patients receiving placebo. Body weight decreased from baseline by - 4.2 kg at week 16 in the tirzepatide 2.5-10.0 mg group and by - 6.7 kg at week 24 in the 2.5-15.0 mg group. Mean fasting plasma glucose levels fell from baseline by - 4.6 mmol/L in the tirzepatide 2.5-10.0 mg group at week 16 and by - 3.7 mmol/L at week 24 in the tirzepatide 2.5-15.0 mg group.

CONCLUSIONS

Tirzepatide was well tolerated in this population of Chinese patients with T2D. The safety, tolerability, PK, and PD profile of tirzepatide support once-weekly dosing in this population.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04235959.

Novel Dual Incretin Receptor Agonists in the Spectrum of Metabolic Diseases with a Focus on Tirzepatide: Real Game-Changers or Great Expectations? A Narrative Review

The prevalence of metabolic diseases including type 2 diabetes (T2D), obesity and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) increases globally. This highlights an unmet need for identifying optimal therapies for the management of these conditions. Tirzepatide is a novel dual incretin receptor agonist (twincretin) that activates both glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) receptors. The aim of this narrative review was to examine the impact of novel twincretins, focusing on tirzepatide, on the management of a wide spectrum of metabolic diseases. Data from preclinical and clinical trials have shown that twincretins significantly reduce blood glucose levels in T2D, and tirzepatide is the first agent of this class that has been approved for the management of T2D. Additionally, the beneficial impact of tirzepatide on weight reduction has been corroborated in several studies, showing that this agent can achieve substantial and sustained weight loss in obese patients with or without T2D. Data also suggest that tirzepatide could be a promising drug for hepatic steatosis reduction in individuals with NAFLD. The remarkable effects of tirzepatide on glycaemic control, weight loss and liver-related outcomes have posed new research questions that are likely to lead to further advancements in the treatment of T2D, obesity and related metabolic disorders.

Emerging Role of GLP-1 Agonists in Obesity: A Comprehensive Review of Randomised Controlled Trials

Obesity is a chronic disease with high prevalence and associated comorbidities, making it a growing global concern. These comorbidities include type 2 diabetes, hypertension, ventilatory dysfunction, arthrosis, venous and lymphatic circulation diseases, depression, and others, which have a negative impact on health and increase morbidity and mortality. GLP-1 agonists, used to treat type 2 diabetes, have been shown to be effective in promoting weight loss in preclinical and clinical studies. This review summarizes numerous studies conducted on the main drugs in the GLP-1 agonists class, outlining the maximum achievable weight loss. Our aim is to emphasize the active role and main outcomes of GLP-1 agonists in promoting weight loss, as well as in improving hyperglycemia, insulin sensitivity, blood pressure, cardio-metabolic, and renal protection. We highlight the pleiotropic effects of these medications, along with their indications, contraindications, and precautions for both diabetic and non-diabetic patients, based on long-term follow-up studies.

Gut hormone co-agonists for the treatment of obesity: from bench to bedside

The discovery and development of so-called gut hormone co-agonists as a new class of drugs for the treatment of diabetes and obesity is considered a transformative breakthrough in the field. Combining action profiles of multiple gastrointestinal hormones within a single molecule, these novel therapeutics achieve synergistic metabolic benefits. The first such compound, reported in 2009, was based on balanced co-agonism at glucagon and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptors. Today, several classes of gut hormone co-agonists are in development and advancing through clinical trials, including dual GLP-1-glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) co-agonists (first described in 2013), and triple GIP-GLP-1-glucagon co-agonists (initially designed in 2015). The GLP-1-GIP co-agonist tirzepatide was approved in 2022 by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of type 2 diabetes, providing superior HbA1c reductions compared to basal insulin or selective GLP-1 receptor agonists. Tirzepatide also achieved unprecedented weight loss of up to 22.5%-similar to results achieved with some types of bariatric surgery-in non-diabetic individuals with obesity. In this Perspective, we summarize the discovery, development, mechanisms of action and clinical efficacy of the different types of gut hormone co-agonists, and discuss potential challenges, limitations and future developments.

Pharmacotherapy for chronic obesity management: a look into the future

Substantial leaps have been made in the drug discovery front in tackling the growing pandemic of obesity and its metabolic co-morbidities. Greater mechanistic insight and understanding of the gut-brain molecular pathways at play have enabled the pursuit of novel therapeutic agents that possess increasingly efficacious weight-lowering potential whilst remaining safe and tolerable for clinical use. In the wake of glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) based therapy, we look at recent advances in gut hormone biology that have fermented the development of next generation pharmacotherapy in diabesity that harness synergistic potential. In this paper, we review the latest data from the SURPASS and SURMOUNT clinical trials for the novel 'twincretin', known as Tirzepatide, which has demonstrated sizeable body weight reduction as well as glycaemic efficacy. We also provide an overview of amylin-based combination strategies and other emerging therapies in the pipeline that are similarly providing great promise for the future of chronic management of obesity.

Efficacy and safety of tirzepatide for treatment of overweight or obesity. A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Recent studies suggest that tirzepatide, a dual glucose-dependent insulinotropic-peptide (GIP) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA), has significant weight loss effects. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to assess the efficacy and safety of tirzepatide for weight loss in patients with overweight or obesity.

METHODS

Medline, Embase and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on tirzepatide's weight loss efficacy for these patients. A single arm meta-analysis of proportions estimated primary outcomes, ≥5%, ≥10%, and ≥15% weight loss, and adverse events (AEs); while meta-analysis of means estimated secondary outcomes. Comparative meta-analysis was conducted between tirzepatide and control arms where mean differences and odds ratios were estimated for continuous and dichotomous outcomes respectively.

RESULTS

RCTs included in this study revealed that among 5800 patients, 78.22% (95% CI: 72.15% to 83.73%), 55.60% (95% CI: 46.54% to 64.47%), 32.28% (95% CI: 23.17% to 42.12%) achieved ≥5%, ≥10%, and ≥15% weight loss, respectively. Tirzepatide 5 mg demonstrated weight loss superiority relative to placebo (MD: -12.47 kg, 95% CI: -13.94 kg to -11.00 kg) and semaglutide (n = 1409, MD: -1.90 kg, 95% CI: -2.97 kg to -0.83 kg) with dose-dependent increase for 10 mg and 15 mg doses. The comparison between tirzepatide and semaglutide was examined in the SURPASS-2 trial that was included in this systematic review. For AEs, there was increase odds of experiencing gastrointestinal AEs with tirzepatide compared to placebo, but no significant difference with semaglutide.

CONCLUSION

Tirzepatide has significant potential as a weight loss drug in patients with overweight and obesity, with little increase in AEs compared to other weight loss drugs. With its ability to concurrently target multiple aspects of metabolic syndrome, it should be considered as the next helm of weight loss therapies.

Tirzepatide versus insulin glargine as second-line or third-line therapy in type 2 diabetes in the Asia-Pacific region: the SURPASS-AP-Combo trial

Tirzepatide is a once-weekly GIP/GLP-1 receptor agonist. In this phase 3, randomized, open-label trial, insulin-naive adults (≥18 years of age) with type 2 diabetes (T2D) uncontrolled on metformin (with or without a sulphonylurea) were randomized 1:1:1:1 to weekly tirzepatide 5 mg, 10 mg or 15 mg or daily insulin glargine at 66 hospitals in China, South Korea, Australia and India. The primary endpoint was non-inferiority of mean change in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) from baseline to week 40 after treatment with 10 mg and 15 mg of tirzepatide. Key secondary endpoints included non-inferiority and superiority of all tirzepatide doses in HbA1c reduction, proportions of patients achieving HbA1c < 7.0% and weight loss at week 40. A total of 917 patients (763 (83.2%) in China) were randomized to tirzepatide 5 mg (n = 230), 10 mg (n = 228) or 15 mg (n = 229) or insulin glargine (n = 230). All doses of tirzepatide were non-inferior and superior to insulin glargine for least squares mean (s.e.) reduction in HbA1c from baseline to week 40: tirzepatide 5 mg, 10 mg and 15 mg, -2.24% (0.07), -2.44% (0.07) and -2.49% (0.07), respectively, and insulin glargine, -0.95% (0.07), with a treatment difference ranging from -1.29% to -1.54% (all P < 0.001). Proportions of patients achieving HbA1c < 7.0% at week 40 were greater in tirzepatide 5-mg (75.4%), 10-mg (86.0%) and 15-mg (84.4%) groups compared to insulin glargine (23.7%) (all P < 0.001). All tirzepatide doses led to superior body weight reduction at week 40: tirzepatide 5 mg, 10 mg and 15 mg, -5.0 kg (-6.5%), -7.0 kg (-9.3%) and -7.2 kg (-9.4%), respectively, compared to insulin glargine, 1.5 kg (+2.1%) (all P < 0.001). The most common adverse events with tirzepatide were mild to moderate decreased appetite, diarrhea and nausea. No severe hypoglycemia was reported. Tirzepatide demonstrated superior reductions in HbA1c versus insulin glargine in an Asia-Pacific, predominately Chinese, population with T2D and was generally well tolerated. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT04093752 .

Tirzepatide: A Promising Drug for Type 2 Diabetes and Beyond

Tirzepatide is a promising drug with dual-acting glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor activation that has revolutionized the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) as an adjunct to diet and exercise. In phase 3 clinical trials (SURPASS 1-5), the dose-dependent efficacy and safety of tirzepatide were assessed by once-weekly subcutaneous injection (5 mg, 10 mg, and 15 mg), as monotherapy or combination therapy, in individuals with T2DM. Tirzepatide has been shown to achieve better glycemic control in terms of glycosylated hemoglobin reduction and improved fasting and postprandial glucose levels as compared to other diabetic medications. Moreover, the studies demonstrate a reduction in body weight (-6.2 to -12.9 kg), and other cardiovascular benefits by altering the lipid profile, reducing blood pressure, and visceral adiposity. Tirzepatide has acceptable side effects and is well tolerated, with a low risk of hypoglycemia. The SURPASS 4 clinical trial has shown positive cardiovascular outcomes in people with T2DM and elevated cardiovascular risk. Additionally, encouraging results from SURMOUNT trials and ongoing SURPASS-CVOT studies will shed more light on cardiovascular safety in the future. In this review, we have summarized the clinical trials and their respective outcomes and highlighted the potential future indications for tirzepatide in the management of obesity, heart failure, and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis.

A Comprehensive Review on Weight Loss Associated with Anti-Diabetic Medications

Obesity is a complex metabolic condition that can have a negative impact on one's health and even result in mortality. The management of obesity has been addressed in a number of ways, including lifestyle changes, medication using appetite suppressants and thermogenics, and bariatric surgery for individuals who are severely obese. Liraglutide and semaglutide are two of the five Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved anti-obesity drugs that are FDA-approved agents for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients. In order to highlight the positive effects of these drugs as anti-obesity treatments, we analyzed the weight loss effects of T2DM agents that have demonstrated weight loss effects in this study by evaluating clinical studies that were published for each agent. Many clinical studies have revealed that some antihyperglycemic medications can help people lose weight, while others either cause weight gain or neutral results. Acarbose has mild weight loss effects and metformin and sodium-dependent glucose cotransporter proteins-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors have modest weight loss effects; however, some glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists had the greatest impact on weight loss. Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitors showed a neutral or mild weight loss effect. To sum up, some of the GLP-1 agonist drugs show promise as weight-loss treatments.

An update on tirzepatide for the management of type 2 diabetes: a focus on the phase 3 clinical development program

INTRODUCTION

Tirzepatide, a novel dual glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist (RA), received regulatory approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (13 May 2022) and marketing authorization from the European Commission (25 September 2022) for the improvement of glycemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D). In the phase 3 clinical development program (SURPASS), tirzepatide demonstrated superior glycemic and body weight control compared with placebo and active comparators across a spectrum of patients with T2D.

AREAS COVERED

This review summarizes efficacy and safety results of the tirzepatide T2D phase 3 clinical trials that supported regulatory approvals. Additionally, it discusses a meta-analysis assessing tirzepatide cardiovascular (CV) safety, and provides a brief overview of ongoing late-stage clinical trials in patients with T2D. Information in this review was acquired from peer-reviewed published trials, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the manufacturer's website.

EXPERT OPINION

Based on phase 3 clinical trial data, tirzepatide is the most potent glucose and body weight lowering agent available for the management of T2D. The potential for tirzepatide to improve CV outcomes is currently being assessed in a CV outcomes trial (SURPASS CVOT). Results of this trial are highly anticipated and expected in 2024.

Short-term cost-effectiveness analysis of tirzepatide for the treatment of type 2 diabetes in the United States

BACKGROUND: Tirzepatide is a novel once-a-week dual glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist that is used as an addition to diet and exercise to improve blood glucose in adults with type 2 diabetes. It is the first dual glucagon-like peptide-1 and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptor agonist that has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration. The SURPASS-2 clinical trial demonstrated superiority of tirzepatide 10 mg and 15 mg over semaglutide 1 mg in glycated hemoglobin A1c reduction and weight loss from baseline to week 40. Economic analyses to support coverage and access decision-making for tirzepatide are limited. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of tirzepatide 10 mg vs semaglutide 1 mg injection over 52 weeks of treatment regarding A1c reduction and weight loss from the perspective of the US health care payer. METHODS: A decision tree model over a 52-week time horizon was developed to identify incremental treatment-related costs of once-weekly tirzepatide 10 mg vs semaglutide 1 mg injection. Costs were divided by mean reduction in A1c and change in body weight from baseline to week 52 observed in the SURPASS-2 clinical trial. In addition to efficacy, probabilities of adverse events, discontinuation, and need for rescue therapy were derived from the SURPASS-2 study. Drug costs in 2022 US dollars were based on wholesale acquisition cost. Costs associated with adverse events were sourced from the published literature. One-way sensitivity analyses were conducted. RESULTS: Treatment with once-weekly tirzepatide 10 mg injection was associated with a higher cost and larger reduction in A1c and body weight after 52 weeks, compared with once-weekly semaglutide 1 mg injection. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for tirzepatide vs semaglutide was $2,247 per 1% reduction in A1c and $237 per 1 kg weight loss. One-way sensitivity analysis suggested that incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were most sensitive to the drug costs and treatment effect on A1c and weight. CONCLUSIONS: Once-weekly tirzepatide 10 mg was associated with higher cost and greater reduction in A1c and weight vs semaglutide. Tirzepatide 10 mg is cost-effective compared with semaglutide 1 mg if payers' willingness-to-pay threshold exceeds $2,247 for 1% reduction in A1c level and $237 for 1 kg weight loss.

Profile of tirzepatide in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus: design, development, and place in therapy

INTRODUCTION

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality. Peptide-based multi-targeting agonists represent a new paradigm in metabolic pharmacology as they manifest multiplexed pharmacological actions over mono-agonists. Tirzepatide is a novel dual glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptor (GIPR) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R) agonist that has been recently approved by the FDA. This review aims to summarize the available evidence on the discovery, pharmacology, pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, efficacy, and safety of tirzepatide in the pharmacotherapy of T2DM.

AREAS COVERED

We searched PubMed, Embase, and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts to identify relevant papers on tirzepatide use in T2DM. Clinical trial registries were also searched.

EXPERT OPINION

Tirzepatide improves glycemic control compared to baseline, placebo, and active comparators. It is also associated with weight reduction and an improvement in some, but not all, dyslipidemia, cardiovascular risk, and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) biomarkers. Tirzepatide has a favorable safety profile with a low risk of hypoglycemia; however, adverse events such as gastrointestinal reactions were frequently reported and sometimes even led to therapy discontinuation. Future research should focus on investigating the role of tirzepatide in obesity, NASH, and cardio-renal benefits. Real-world observational studies are also needed to assess rare and long-term adverse events.

[Gastrointestinal hormones: their increasing pharmacotherapeutic relevance in metabolic diseases]

Gastrointestinal hormones play an important role in the endocrine communication between the intestine, the pancreas, the liver and the brain. Glucagon-like peptide‑1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) are established therapeutic agents in the treatment of type‑2 diabetes. Multiple agonists acting as ligands on various gastrointestinal hormone receptors are a novel pharmacological development. In addition to glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1), these multiple agonists also have glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and/or glucagon receptors as target structures for their pharmacological action. The multiple agonist action is designed to increase glycaemic effects as well as the effects on body weight. This article provides an overview of GLP-1RA and the multiple agonists. Among the dual agonists, the GIP/GLP-1-agonist tirzeptide has been approved for the treatment of type‑2 diabetes, and clinical studies with tirzepatide as a treatment for obesity are ongoing. The currently available data on studies with GLP-1/glucagon agonists and triple agonists are also summarized.

Weight loss efficiency and safety of tirzepatide: A Systematic review

OBJECTIVE

Tirzeptide is a novel glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) drug, which shows good efficiency for weight loss. Therefore, we aim to investigate the efficacy and safety of tirzepatide for weight loss in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and obesity patients in this meta-analysis study.

METHODS

Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, Clinical Trials, and Web of Science were searched from inception to October 5, 2022. All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. The odds ratio (OR) was calculated using fixed-effects or random-effects models by Review Manager 5.3 software.

RESULTS

In total, ten studies (12 reports) involving 9,873 patients were identified. A significant loss body weight in the tirzepatide group versus the placebo by -9.81 kg (95% CI (-12.09, -7.52), GLP-1 RAs by -1.05 kg (95% CI (-1.48, -0.63), and insulin by -1.93 kg (95% CI (-2.81, -1.05), respectively. In sub-analysis, the body weight of patients was significantly reduced in three tirzepatide doses (5 mg, 10 mg, and 15 mg) when compared with those of the placebo/GLP-1 RA/insulin. In terms of safety, the incidence of any adverse events and adverse events leading to study drug discontinuation was higher in the tirzepatide group, but the incidence of serious adverse events and hypoglycaemia was lower. Additionally, the gastrointestinal adverse events (including diarrhea, nausea, vomiting and decreased appetite) of tirzepatide were higher than those of placebo/basal insulin, but similar to GLP-1 RAs.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, tirzeptide can significantly reduce the weight of T2DM and patient with obesity, and it is a potential therapeutic regimen for weight-loss, but we need to be vigilant about its gastrointestinal reaction.

Tirzepatide: A Systematic Update

Tirzepatide is a new molecule capable of controlling glucose blood levels by combining the dual agonism of Glucose-Dependent Insulinotropic Polypeptide (GIP) and Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptors. GIP and GLP1 are incretin hormones: they are released in the intestine in response to nutrient intake and stimulate pancreatic beta cell activity secreting insulin. GIP and GLP1 also have other metabolic functions. GLP1, in particular, reduces food intake and delays gastric emptying. Moreover, Tirzepatide has been shown to improve blood pressure and to reduce Low-Density Lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and triglycerides. Tirzepatide efficacy and safety were assessed in a phase III SURPASS 1-5 clinical trial program. Recently, the Food and Drug Administration approved Tirzepatide subcutaneous injections as monotherapy or combination therapy, with diet and physical exercise, to achieve better glycemic blood levels in patients with diabetes. Other clinical trials are currently underway to evaluate its use in other diseases. The scientific interest toward this novel, first-in-class medication is rapidly increasing. In this comprehensive and systematic review, we summarize the main results of the clinical trials investigating Tirzepatide and the currently available meta-analyses, emphasizing novel insights into its adoption in clinical practice for diabetes and its future potential applications in cardiovascular medicine.

Updates of incretin-related drugs for the treatment of type 2 diabetes

Mechanisms of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor/glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptor dual-agonist in glycemic control and/or weight loss.

Tirzepatide, the Newest Medication for Type 2 Diabetes: A Review of the Literature and Implications for Clinical Practice

Objective:

The objective of this article was to review pharmacology, efficacy, safety, and place in therapy of tirzepatide, a dual glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist.

Data Sources:

PubMed/MEDLINE and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched through September 7, 2022, using the keyword “tirzepatide.”

Study Selection and Data Extraction:

Clinical trials with available results were included.

Data Synthesis:

Seven published phase 3, multicenter, randomized, parallel-group trials investigated efficacy and safety of tirzepatide versus placebo, semaglutide, insulin degludec, and insulin glargine for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) treatment. Studies included adults with uncontrolled T2DM and body mass index above 23 or 25 kg/m2. Hemoglobin A1c reduction from baseline was greater with tirzepatide across all studies with absolute reductions up to 3.02% and relative reductions ranging 0.44% (vs semaglutide) to 2.11% (vs placebo). Weight loss was significant. Incidence of gastrointestinal adverse effects (AE) was similar to semaglutide, and major cardiovascular events was similar to insulin glargine.

Relevance to Patient Care and Clinical Practice:

Studies demonstrated greater A1c lowering and weight reduction versus placebo and active comparators with AE similar to semaglutide, suggesting tirzepatide will be a valuable addition to the growing list of antidiabetic medications. Although tirzepatide’s effects on major cardiovascular events was not increased when compared with insulin glargine, further evidence is needed to assess long-term implications on cardiovascular outcomes compared with agents with proven cardiovascular benefits.

Conclusions:

Tirzepatide has the potential to significantly impact the clinical management of T2DM, and results of ongoing clinical trials will help to fully determine its place in therapy.

Efficacy and safety of tirzepatide monotherapy compared with dulaglutide in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes (SURPASS J-mono): a double-blind, multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

As the disease progresses, many patients with type 2 diabetes have difficulty in reaching treatment goals. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of tirzepatide, a novel GIP and GLP-1 receptor agonist, compared with dulaglutide in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

This multicentre, randomised, double-blind, parallel, active-controlled, phase 3 trial was conducted in 46 medical research centres and hospitals in Japan. Adults aged 20 years or older with type 2 diabetes who had discontinued oral antihyperglycaemic monotherapy or were treatment-naïve were included. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1) to receive tirzepatide (5, 10, or 15 mg) or dulaglutide (0·75 mg) once per week using a computer-generated random sequence with an Interactive Web Response System. Participants were stratified based on baseline HbA_1c (≤8·5% or >8·5%), baseline BMI (<25 or ≥25 kg/m²), and washout of antidiabetic medication. Participants, investigators, and the sponsor were masked to treatment assignment. The starting dose of tirzepatide was 2·5 mg once per week for 4 weeks, which was then increased to 5 mg in the tirzepatide 5 mg treatment group. For the tirzepatide 10 and 15 mg treatment groups, increases by 2·5 mg occurred once every 4 weeks until the assigned dose was reached. The primary endpoint was mean change in HbA_1c from baseline at week 52 measured in the modified intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03861052.

FINDINGS

Between May 7, 2019, and March 31, 2021, 821 participants were assessed for study eligibility and 636 were randomly assigned to receive at least one dose of tirzepatide 5 mg (n=159), 10 mg (n=158), or 15 mg (n=160), or dulaglutide 0·75 mg (n=159). 615 (97%) participants completed the study and 21 (3%) discontinued. Participants had a mean age of 56·6 years (SD 10·3) and were mostly male (481 [76%]). At week 52, HbA_1c decreased from baseline by a least squares mean of -2·4 (SE 0·1) for tirzepatide 5 mg, -2·6 (0·1) for tirzepatide 10 mg, -2·8 (0·1) for tirzepatide 15 mg, and -1·3 (0·1) for dulaglutide. Estimated mean treatment differences versus dulaglutide were -1·1 (95% CI -1·3 to -0·9) for tirzepatide 5 mg, -1·3 (-1·5 to -1·1) for tirzepatide 10 mg, and -1·5 (-1·71 to -1·4) for tirzepatide 15 mg (all p<0·0001). Tirzepatide was associated with dose-dependent reductions in bodyweight with a least square mean difference of -5·8 kg (SE 0·4; -7·8% reduction) for 5 mg, -8·5 kg (0·4; -11·0% reduction) for 10 mg, and -10·7 kg (0·4; -13·9% reduction) for 15 mg of tirzepatide compared with -0·5 kg (0·4; -0·7% reduction) for dulaglutide. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were nausea (19 [12%] participants in the 5 mg group vs 31 [20%] in the 10 mg group vs 32 [20%] in the 15 mg group all receiving tirzepatide vs 12 (8%) in the group receiving dulaglutide), constipation (24 [15%] vs 28 [18%] vs 22 [14%] vs 17 [11%]), and nasopharyngitis (29 [18%] vs 25 [16%] vs 22 [14%] vs 26 [16%]). The most frequent adverse events were gastrointestinal (23 [4%] of 636).

INTERPRETATION

Tirzepatide was superior compared with dulaglutide for glycaemic control and reduction in bodyweight. The safety profile of tirzepatide was consistent with that of GLP-1 receptor agonists, indicating a potential therapeutic use in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes.

FUNDING

Eli Lilly and Company.

TRANSLATION

For the Japanese translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.