1
|
Weiss F, Schwarz K, Endrass T. Exploring the relationship between context and obsessions in individuals with obsessive-compulsive disorder symptoms: a narrative review. Front Psychiatry 2024; 15:1353962. [PMID: 38419899 PMCID: PMC10899460 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1353962] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2023] [Accepted: 01/31/2024] [Indexed: 03/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Obsessions in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) have long been proposed to differ from intrusive thoughts in unaffected individuals based on appraisal of the thoughts. However, more recent research indicates that cognitive processes behind obsessions may differ significantly from those in healthy individuals concerning their contextual relationship. This narrative literature review summarizes current evidence for the role of context-relatedness for obsessions in OCD and intrusive thoughts in affected and unaffected individuals. The review encompasses a total of five studies, two of which include individuals diagnosed with OCD (one study also includes a group of unaffected control individuals), while the other three studies investigate the relationship between OCD symptoms and context in unaffected individuals. As assessed by mainly self-reports, the review examines the connection between thoughts and their context, shedding light on how the repetition and automaticity of thoughts, as well as their detachment from context over time contribute to defining obsessions in contrast to intrusive thoughts. However, the link with context depends on the content of the obsessions. We propose the term "decontextualization of thoughts" to describe the phenomenon that obsessions gradually lose their connection with external context during the development of OCD. Future research should investigate whether this hypothesis can be supported by experimental evidence and identify whether this shift might be more likely a cause or a consequence of the disorder.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Franziska Weiss
- Chair of Addiction Research, Institute of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hawes DJ, Gardner F, Dadds MR, Frick PJ, Kimonis ER, Burke JD, Fairchild G. Oppositional defiant disorder. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2023; 9:31. [PMID: 37349322 DOI: 10.1038/s41572-023-00441-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/11/2023] [Indexed: 06/24/2023]
Abstract
Oppositional defiant disorder (ODD) is a disruptive behaviour disorder involving an ongoing pattern of angry/irritable mood, argumentative/defiant behaviour and vindictiveness. Onset is typically before 8 years of age, although ODD can be diagnosed in both children and adults. This disorder is associated with substantial social and economic burden, and childhood ODD is one of the most common precursors of other mental health problems that can arise across the lifespan. The population prevalence of ODD is ~3 to 5%. A higher prevalence in males than females has been reported, particularly before adolescence. No single risk factor accounts for ODD. The development of this disorder seems to arise from the interaction of genetic and environmental factors, and mechanisms embedded in social relationships are understood to contribute to its maintenance. The treatment of ODD is often successful, and relatively brief parenting interventions produce large sized treatment effects in early childhood. Accordingly, ODD represents an important focus for research, practice and policy concerning early intervention and prevention in mental health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David J Hawes
- School of Psychology, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
| | - Frances Gardner
- Centre for Evidence-Based Intervention, Department of Social Policy and Intervention, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Mark R Dadds
- School of Psychology, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Paul J Frick
- Department of Psychology, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, USA
| | - Eva R Kimonis
- Parent-Child Research Clinic, School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jeffrey D Burke
- Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Chapman N, Browning M, Baghurst D, Hotopf M, Willis D, Haylock S, Zakaria S, Speechley J, Withey J, Brooks E, Chan F, Pappa S, Geddes J, Insole L, Mohammed Z, Kessler D, Jones PB, Mansoori P. Setting national research priorities for difficult-to-treat depression in the UK between 2021-2026. J Glob Health 2022; 12:09004. [PMID: 36472926 PMCID: PMC9727823 DOI: 10.7189/jogh.12.09004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Difficult-to-treat depression (DTD) presents a substantial health care challenge, with around one-third of people diagnosed with a depressive episode in the UK finding that their symptoms persist following treatment. This study aimed to identify priority research questions (RQs) that could inform the development of new and improved treatments, interventions, and support for people with DTD. Methods Using an adapted Child Health and Nutrition Research Initiative (CHNRI) method, this national prioritisation exercise engaged 60 leading researchers and health care professionals in the UK, as well as 25 wider stakeholders with relevant lived experience to produce a ranked list of priority RQs in DTD. The final list of 99 distinct RQs was independently scored by 42 individuals against a list of five criteria: answerability, effectiveness, impact on health, deliverability, and equity. Results Highly ranked RQs covered a range of novel and existing treatments. The three highest scoring RQs included evaluation of psychological and pharmacological therapies (eg, behavioural activation, and augmentation therapies), as well as social interventions to reduce loneliness or increase support for people with DTD. Conclusions This exercise identified and prioritised 99 RQs that could inform future research and funding decisions over the next five years. The results of this research could improve treatment and support for people affected by DTD. It also serves as an example of ways in which the CHNRI method can be adapted in a collaborative manner to provide a more active role for patients, carers, and health care professionals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalya Chapman
- National Institute for Health and Care Research Central Commissioning Facility, Twickenham, UK
| | - Michael Browning
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK,Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - David Baghurst
- National Institute for Health and Care Research Central Commissioning Facility, Twickenham, UK,National Institute for Health and Care Research Office for Clinical Research Infrastructure, Twickenham, UK
| | - Matthew Hotopf
- Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, Kings College London, London, UK,South London and the Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Debbie Willis
- National Institute for Health and Care Research Evaluation, Trials and Studies Coordinating Centre, Southampton, UK
| | - Stuart Haylock
- National Institute for Health and Care Research Central Commissioning Facility, Twickenham, UK
| | - Sana Zakaria
- National Institute for Health and Care Research Central Commissioning Facility, Twickenham, UK
| | - Jan Speechley
- National Institute for Health and Care Research Central Commissioning Facility, Twickenham, UK
| | - James Withey
- National Institute for Health and Care Research Central Commissioning Facility, Twickenham, UK
| | - Edmund Brooks
- National Institute for Health and Care Research Central Commissioning Facility, Twickenham, UK
| | - Fiona Chan
- National Institute for Health and Care Research Central Commissioning Facility, Twickenham, UK
| | - Sofia Pappa
- West London NHS Trust, London, UK,Department of Psychiatry, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - John Geddes
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Lisa Insole
- Cumbria, Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle, UK
| | - Zeid Mohammed
- Cumbria, Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle, UK
| | - David Kessler
- Centre for Academic Mental Health, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Peter B Jones
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge and NIHR ARC East of England, Cambridgeshire & Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - Parisa Mansoori
- National Institute for Health and Care Research Office for Clinical Research Infrastructure, Twickenham, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wu J, Chen L, Li X, Yue S, Huang X, Liu J, Hou X, Lai T. Trends in the prevalence of conduct disorder from 1990 to 2019: Findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Psychiatry Res 2022; 317:114907. [PMID: 36265191 DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2022.114907] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2021] [Revised: 10/11/2022] [Accepted: 10/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
Conduct disorder is one of the least widely recognized and studied psychiatric disorders. This study aimed to comprehensively analyze the burden of conduct disorder at the global, regional, and national levels based on the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) 2019 estimates. Globally, the age-standardized prevalence rates (ASPRs) of conduct disorder slightly increased from 1990 to 2019 with an estimated annual percentage change (EAPC) at 0.147. Males had a higher burden than females, but females had a greater increment in ASPRs than males over time. In 2019, the highest ASPR of conduct disorder was observed in Western Europe, followed by Eastern Europe, with the lowest one found in East Asia, then South Asia. However, the most significant increment in ASPRs was observed in high-income North America, followed by East Asia, and South Asia. The EAPCs at the national level were negatively associated with the ASPRs in 1990. The burden of conduct disorder continues to increase globally, especially in high-income North America, East Asia, and South Asia, and should have more attention focused on it.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiayuan Wu
- Clinical Research Service Center, the Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang 524001, Guangdong, China; Guangdong Engineering Research Center of Collaborative Innovation Technology of Clinical Medical Big Data Cloud Service in Medical Consortium of West Guangdong Province, Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang 524001, Guangdong, China.
| | - Lin Chen
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, the Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang 524001, Guangdong, China
| | - Xiaolin Li
- Clinical Research Service Center, the Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang 524001, Guangdong, China; Guangdong Engineering Research Center of Collaborative Innovation Technology of Clinical Medical Big Data Cloud Service in Medical Consortium of West Guangdong Province, Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang 524001, Guangdong, China
| | - Suru Yue
- Clinical Research Service Center, the Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang 524001, Guangdong, China
| | - Xueying Huang
- Clinical Research Service Center, the Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang 524001, Guangdong, China
| | - Jie Liu
- Clinical Research Service Center, the Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang 524001, Guangdong, China
| | - Xuefei Hou
- Clinical Research Service Center, the Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang 524001, Guangdong, China; Guangdong Engineering Research Center of Collaborative Innovation Technology of Clinical Medical Big Data Cloud Service in Medical Consortium of West Guangdong Province, Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang 524001, Guangdong, China
| | - Tianwen Lai
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, the Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang 524001, Guangdong, China.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ledden S, Rains LS, Schlief M, Barnett P, Ching BCF, Hallam B, Günak MM, Steare T, Parker J, Labovitch S, Oram S, Pilling S, Johnson S. Current state of the evidence on community treatments for people with complex emotional needs: a scoping review. BMC Psychiatry 2022; 22:589. [PMID: 36064337 PMCID: PMC9442944 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-022-04171-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2021] [Accepted: 07/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Improving the quality of care in community settings for people with 'Complex Emotional Needs' (CEN-our preferred working term for services for people with a "personality disorder" diagnosis or comparable needs) is recognised internationally as a priority. Plans to improve care should be rooted as far as possible in evidence. We aimed to take stock of the current state of such evidence, and identify significant gaps through a scoping review of published investigations of outcomes of community-based psychosocial interventions designed for CEN. METHODS We conducted a scoping review with systematic searches. We searched six bibliographic databases, including forward and backward citation searching, and reference searching of relevant systematic reviews. We included studies using quantitative methods to test for effects on any clinical, social, and functioning outcomes from community-based interventions for people with CEN. The final search was conducted in November 2020. RESULTS We included 226 papers in all (210 studies). Little relevant literature was published before 2000. Since then, publications per year and sample sizes have gradually increased, but most studies are relatively small, including many pilot or uncontrolled studies. Most studies focus on symptom and self-harm outcomes of various forms of specialist psychotherapy: most result in outcomes better than from inactive controls and similar to other specialist psychotherapies. We found large evidence gaps. Adaptation and testing of therapies for significant groups (e.g. people with comorbid psychosis, bipolar disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, or substance misuse; older and younger groups; parents) have for the most part only reached a feasibility testing stage. We found little evidence regarding interventions to improve social aspects of people's lives, peer support, or ways of designing effective services. CONCLUSIONS Compared with other longer term mental health problems that significantly impair functioning, the evidence base on how to provide high quality care for people with CEN is very limited. There is good evidence that people with CEN can be helped when specialist therapies are available and when they are able to engage with them. However, a much more methodologically robust and substantial literature addressing a much wider range of research questions is urgently needed to optimise treatment and support across this group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Ledden
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Luke Sheridan Rains
- NIHR Mental Health Policy Research Unit, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Merle Schlief
- NIHR Mental Health Policy Research Unit, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.
| | - Phoebe Barnett
- NIHR Mental Health Policy Research Unit, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
- Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness, Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Brian Chi Fung Ching
- NIHR Mental Health Policy Research Unit, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Brendan Hallam
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
- Research Department of Primary Care & Population Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Mia Maria Günak
- NIHR Mental Health Policy Research Unit, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
- Department of Psychology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Thomas Steare
- NIHR Mental Health Policy Research Unit, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Jennie Parker
- NIHR Mental Health Policy Research Unit Co-Production Group, University College London, London, UK
| | - Sarah Labovitch
- NIHR Mental Health Policy Research Unit Co-Production Group, University College London, London, UK
- West London NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Sian Oram
- NIHR Mental Health Policy Research Unit, Department of Health Service and Population Research, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Steve Pilling
- Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness, Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK
- National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health, Royal College of Psychiatrists, London, UK
- Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Sonia Johnson
- NIHR Mental Health Policy Research Unit, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
- Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Spriggs MJ, Douglass HM, Park RJ, Read T, Danby JL, de Magalhães FJC, Alderton KL, Williams TM, Blemings A, Lafrance A, Nicholls DE, Erritzoe D, Nutt DJ, Carhart-Harris RL. Study Protocol for "Psilocybin as a Treatment for Anorexia Nervosa: A Pilot Study". Front Psychiatry 2021; 12:735523. [PMID: 34744825 PMCID: PMC8563607 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.735523] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2021] [Accepted: 09/15/2021] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Anorexia nervosa (AN) is a serious and life-threatening psychiatric condition. With a paucity of approved treatments, there is a desperate need for novel treatment avenues to be explored. Here, we present (1) an overview of the ways through which Public Patient Involvement (PPI) has informed a trial of psilocybin-assisted therapy for AN and (2) a protocol for a pilot study of psilocybin-assisted therapy in AN currently underway at Imperial College London. The study aims to assess the feasibility, brain mechanisms and preliminary outcomes of treating anorexia nervosa with psilocybin. Methods: (1) PPI: Across two online focus groups, eleven individuals with lived experience of AN were presented with an overview of the protocol. Their feedback not only identified solutions to possible barriers for future participants, but also helped the research team to better understand the concept of "recovery" from the perspective of those with lived experience. (2) Protocol: Twenty female participants [21-65 years old, body mass index (BMI) 15 kg/m2 or above] will receive three oral doses of psilocybin (up to 25 mg) over a 6-week period delivered in a therapeutic environment and enveloped by psychological preparation and integration. We will work with participant support networks (care teams and an identified support person) throughout and there will be an extended remote follow-up period of 12 months. Our two-fold primary outcomes are (1) psychopathology (Eating Disorder Examination) across the 6-month follow-up and (2) readiness and motivation to engage in recovery (Readiness and Motivation Questionnaire) across the 6-week trial period. Neurophysiological outcome measures will be: (1) functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) brain changes from baseline to 6-week endpoint and (2) post-acute changes in electroencephalography (EEG) activity, including an electrophysiological marker of neuronal plasticity. Discussion: The results of this pilot study will not only shed light on the acceptability, brain mechanisms, and impression of the potential efficacy of psilocybin as an adjunct treatment for AN but will be essential in shaping a subsequent Randomised Control Trial (RCT) that would test this treatment against a suitable control condition. Clinical Trial Registration: identifier: NCT04505189.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meg J. Spriggs
- Centre for Psychedelic Research, Department of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Hannah M. Douglass
- Centre for Psychedelic Research, Department of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Rebecca J. Park
- OxBREaD Research Group, Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Tim Read
- Centre for Psychedelic Research, Department of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jennifer L. Danby
- Centre for Psychedelic Research, Department of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Kirsty L. Alderton
- Centre for Psychedelic Research, Department of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Tim M. Williams
- Centre for Psychedelic Research, Department of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Allan Blemings
- Centre for Psychedelic Research, Department of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Adele Lafrance
- School of Rural and Northern Health, Laurentian University, Sudbury, ON, Canada
| | - Dasha E. Nicholls
- Division of Psychiatry, Department of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - David Erritzoe
- Centre for Psychedelic Research, Department of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - David J. Nutt
- Centre for Psychedelic Research, Department of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Robin L. Carhart-Harris
- Centre for Psychedelic Research, Department of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Woelbert E, Lundell-Smith K, White R, Kemmer D. Accounting for mental health research funding: developing a quantitative baseline of global investments. Lancet Psychiatry 2021; 8:250-258. [PMID: 33242400 DOI: 10.1016/s2215-0366(20)30469-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2020] [Revised: 10/02/2020] [Accepted: 10/16/2020] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
High-quality data on funding for mental health research are essential to mapping funding levels, identifying gaps in the funding landscape, and tracking the impact of research funding. To date, quantitative analyses of research funding in mental health have been restricted in scope. In this Health Policy paper, we present a comprehensive analysis of grant funding for mental health research as a starting point for discussion among stakeholders globally. We drew on a major international research database and used existing definitions and automated classification tools for mental health research. Our analysis shows a flat and stable trend over the years 2015-19 and highly unequal geographical distribution of funding, and reveals patterns of funding across different conditions and across the research spectrum. Improvements in data availability and quality, in the definitions delineating mental health research from other areas, and in automated classification tools are needed to ensure funders and policy makers can fully rely on the data and generate bespoke analyses as needed. We argue that collaborative reporting of funding for mental health research globally could help to inform and evaluate efforts to increase investments, to improve strategic dialogue, and to achieve the best possible allocation of finite resources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kierstin Lundell-Smith
- Graham Boeckh Foundation, Montreal, Canada; International Alliance of Mental Health Research Funders, Montreal, Canada
| | - Rory White
- International Alliance of Mental Health Research Funders, Montreal, Canada
| | - Danielle Kemmer
- Graham Boeckh Foundation, Montreal, Canada; International Alliance of Mental Health Research Funders, Montreal, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Abstract
OCD most often arises before adulthood with adolescence being a particularly vulnerable period. This is also a time when both brain and cognition undergo fundamental developmental change and reorganisation. However, the neurocognitive mechanisms that drive the emergence of OCD during development are still largely unknown. In this chapter, I review the relatively sparse literature on the developmental aspects of OCD and I discuss the symptomatic, cognitive and neural patterns in OCD and the developing mind. I highlight how we need to understand the emergence of cognitive impairments and neural alteration in a developmental context if we want to understand more about the mechanisms that give rise to OCD. Moreover, I outline how we best approach this challenge to overcome the current limitations in research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T U Hauser
- Max Planck UCL Centre for Computational Psychiatry and Ageing Research, London, UK. .,Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, University College London, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Wade TD, Hart LM, Mitchison D, Hay P. Driving better intervention outcomes in eating disorders: A systematic synthesis of research priority setting and the involvement of consumer input. EUROPEAN EATING DISORDERS REVIEW 2020; 29:346-354. [PMID: 32706169 DOI: 10.1002/erv.2759] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2020] [Revised: 06/17/2020] [Accepted: 06/22/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Setting specific research priorities and involving consumers in this process is one pathway to driving better intervention outcomes in eating disorders (EDs). We reviewed research priority setting in the field and the involvement of consumers in this priority setting. METHOD A systematic review following the PRSIMA statement was conducted and eight studies were identified for inclusion; four included substantial input from consumers, and four were researcher led. Similarities and differences across the types of studies were examined. RESULTS Research priorities informed by consumers were primarily concerned with producing better interventions and outcomes. A large degree of overlap with researcher-led priorities was present. The former studies had a greater focus on early intervention, bridging the research-practice gap, and recovery, while the latter were more likely to address diagnosis, genetic factors, brain circuitry, and pharmacotherapy. Priorities endorsed across more than one consumer-informed study included: the role of self-harm, working with health care professionals to increase early detection, supporting transition between services, and six issues about improved treatments. CONCLUSIONS The ED field needs to engage in more meaningful involvement of co-design across consumers, clinicians and researchers along the entire research journey, not just research priority setting. An integrated research strategy incorporating a co-design perspective has the potential to drive better outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tracey D Wade
- Blackbird Initiative, Órama Institute, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Laura M Hart
- School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.,Centre for Mental Health, Melbourne School of Population Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Deborah Mitchison
- School of Medicine and Translational Health Research Institute, Western Sydney University, Sydney, Australia.,Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| | - Phillipa Hay
- School of Medicine and Translational Health Research Institute, Western Sydney University, Sydney, Australia.,Camden and Campbelltown Hospitals, SWSLHD, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Hauser TU. Bringing Development Into the Equation. BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY: COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE AND NEUROIMAGING 2020; 5:935-936. [PMID: 32532688 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2020.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2020] [Accepted: 05/04/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Tobias U Hauser
- Max Planck University College London Centre for Computational Psychiatry and Ageing Research and the Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Bower P, Grigoroglou C, Anselmi L, Kontopantelis E, Sutton M, Ashworth M, Evans P, Lock S, Smye S, Abel K. Is health research undertaken where the burden of disease is greatest? Observational study of geographical inequalities in recruitment to research in England 2013-2018. BMC Med 2020; 18:133. [PMID: 32418543 PMCID: PMC7232839 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-020-01555-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2019] [Accepted: 03/10/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Research is fundamental to high-quality care, but concerns have been raised about whether health research is conducted in the populations most affected by high disease prevalence. Geographical distribution of research activity is important for many reasons. Recruitment is a major barrier to research delivery, and undertaking recruitment in areas of high prevalence could be more efficient. Regional variability exists in risk factors and outcomes, so research done in healthier populations may not generalise. Much applied health research evaluates interventions, and their impact may vary by context (including geography). Finally, fairness dictates that publically funded research should be accessible to all, so that benefits of participating can be fairly distributed. We explored whether recruitment of patients to health research is aligned with disease prevalence in England. METHODS We measured disease prevalence using the Quality and Outcomes Framework in England (total long-term conditions, mental health and diabetes). We measured research activity using data from the NIHR Clinical Research Network. We presented descriptive data on geographical variation in recruitment rates. We explored associations between the recruitment rate and disease prevalence rate. We calculated the share of patient recruitment that would need to be redistributed to align recruitment with prevalence. We assessed whether associations between recruitment rate and disease prevalence varied between conditions, and over time. RESULTS There was significant geographical variation in recruitment rates. When areas were ranked by disease prevalence, recruitment was not aligned with prevalence, with disproportionately low recruitment in areas with higher prevalence of total long-term and mental health conditions. At the level of 15 local networks, analyses suggested that around 12% of current recruitment activity would need to be redistributed to align with disease prevalence. Overall, alignment showed little change over time, but there was variation in the trends over time in individual conditions. CONCLUSIONS Geographical variations in recruitment do not reflect the suitability of the population for research. Indicators should be developed to assess the fit between research and need, and to allow assessment of interventions among funders, researchers and patients to encourage closer alignment between research activity and burden.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Bower
- NIHR Clinical Research Network, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
| | | | - Laura Anselmi
- NIHR School for Primary Care Research, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | | | - Matthew Sutton
- NIHR School for Primary Care Research, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Mark Ashworth
- School of Population Health and Environmental Sciences, King's College London, Manchester, UK
| | - Philip Evans
- General Practice and Primary Care, College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Manchester, UK.,NIHR CRN National Specialty Lead for Primary Care and Cluster C Lead, Kings College, London, UK
| | - Stephen Lock
- NIHR Clinical Research Network Business Intelligence, Manchester, UK
| | - Stephen Smye
- NIHR CRN Specialty Cluster Lead, CRN National Coordinating Centre (CRNCC), NIHR Clinical Research Network (CRN), Kings College London, London, UK
| | - Kathryn Abel
- NIHR Clinical Research Network, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Bolhuis K. Editorial: Conduct Disorder as a Neurodevelopmental Condition: White Matter Brain Microstructure and the Importance of Gender, Callous Traits, and Development. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2019; 58:1154-1156. [PMID: 31063812 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaac.2019.04.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2019] [Accepted: 04/24/2019] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Although conduct disorder (CD) is a prevalent mental disorder in young people, relatively little research funding is allocated to investigating its etiology.1 More funding for investigation is needed, as the presence of CD can greatly affect a young person's life across various domains, but can also impact their family, peers, and society at large. A better understanding of the neurodevelopment of CD can help tailoring treatment and prevention strategies. Furthermore, as we know that CD symptoms vary across affected individuals, the corresponding neural correlates might also be different for people with different symptom levels. Important factors to take into consideration here include gender; comorbidity, and distinct symptom patterns, such as the presence of callous-unemotional traits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Koen Bolhuis
- Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Fairchild G, Hawes DJ, Frick PJ, Copeland WE, Odgers CL, Franke B, Freitag CM, De Brito SA. Conduct disorder. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2019; 5:43. [PMID: 31249310 DOI: 10.1038/s41572-019-0095-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 173] [Impact Index Per Article: 34.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/17/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Conduct disorder (CD) is a common and highly impairing psychiatric disorder that usually emerges in childhood or adolescence and is characterized by severe antisocial and aggressive behaviour. It frequently co-occurs with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and often leads to antisocial personality disorder in adulthood. CD affects ~3% of school-aged children and is twice as prevalent in males than in females. This disorder can be subtyped according to age at onset (childhood-onset versus adolescent-onset) and the presence or absence of callous-unemotional traits (deficits in empathy and guilt). The aetiology of CD is complex, with contributions of both genetic and environmental risk factors and different forms of interplay among the two (gene-environment interaction and correlation). In addition, CD is associated with neurocognitive impairments; smaller grey matter volume in limbic regions such as the amygdala, insula and orbitofrontal cortex, and functional abnormalities in overlapping brain circuits responsible for emotion processing, emotion regulation and reinforcement-based decision-making have been reported. Lower hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis and autonomic reactivity to stress has also been reported. Management of CD primarily involves parent-based or family-based psychosocial interventions, although stimulants and atypical antipsychotics are sometimes used, especially in individuals with comorbid ADHD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - David J Hawes
- School of Psychology, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Paul J Frick
- Department of Psychology, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, USA and Institute for Learning Science and Teacher Education, Australian Catholic University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | | | - Candice L Odgers
- Department of Psychological Science, School of Social Ecology, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA
| | - Barbara Franke
- Departments of Human Genetics and Psychiatry, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Christine M Freitag
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Stephane A De Brito
- School of Psychology and Centre for Human Brain Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
McIntosh AM, Sullivan PF, Lewis CM. Uncovering the Genetic Architecture of Major Depression. Neuron 2019; 102:91-103. [PMID: 30946830 PMCID: PMC6482287 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2019.03.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 95] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2019] [Revised: 03/05/2019] [Accepted: 03/14/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
There have been several recent studies addressing the genetic architecture of depression. This review serves to take stock of what is known now about the genetics of depression, how it has increased our knowledge and understanding of its mechanisms, and how the information and knowledge can be leveraged to improve the care of people affected. We identify four priorities for how the field of MD genetics research may move forward in future years, namely by increasing the sample sizes available for genome-wide association studies (GWASs), greater inclusion of diverse ancestries and low-income countries, the closer integration of psychiatric genetics with electronic medical records, and the development of the neuroscience toolkit for polygenic disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew M McIntosh
- Division of Psychiatry, Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK; Centre for Cognitive Ageing and Cognitive Epidemiology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
| | - Patrick F Sullivan
- Departments of Genetics and Psychiatry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Cathryn M Lewis
- Social, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Centre, King's College London, London, UK; Department of Medical and Molecular Genetics, King's College London, London UK
| |
Collapse
|