Efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of emicizumab prophylaxis given every 4 weeks in people with haemophilia A (HAVEN 4): a multicentre, open-label, non-randomised phase 3 study

Joint health and pain in the changing hemophilia treatment landscape

INTRODUCTION

Hemophilia is an inherited bleeding disorder. Bleeding, and in particular joint hemorrhage results in chronic arthropathy and disability. Acute and chronic pain are frequent and limit activity and participation and result in decreased health-related quality of life. Remarkable progress has been made in the diagnosis and treatment of hemophilia but bleeding continues to prove recalcitrant to currently available treatments and joint disease remains problematic. Physiotherapy and pain management are mainstays of current multidisciplinary integrated care of people with hemophilia (PWH). The focus of this review is on preservation of joint health in the era of new and innovative therapies.

AREAS COVERED

A search of the PubMed Central was conducted on 1 February 2024 using the MeSH Major Topic terms identified as keywords for the manuscript. This review will highlight what is known and unknown about joint bleeding and arthropathy, including insights on pain as a related complication.

EXPERT OPINION

Recent advances in therapeutic interventions aimed at promoting healthy joints in PWH will be discussed, including both the pharmacological treatment landscape and related strategies to promote joint health.

Multicenter evaluation of the hemostatic activity of emicizumab in patients with severe hemophilia A

BACKGROUND

Emicizumab has been approved for the prophylaxis of patients with hemophilia A with or without inhibitors. However, spontaneous and trauma-induced breakthrough bleeds have been reported in patients on emicizumab prophylaxis, and no laboratory assay has been validated to evaluate the hemostatic activity of emicizumab.

OBJECTIVES

The thrombin generation assay (TGA) could be a surrogate marker of the hemostatic efficacy of emicizumab. The correlation between TGA and the methods used to measure emicizumab blood concentration was evaluated in this study.

METHODS

TGA was modified by the use of a trigger reagent combining a very low concentration of tissue factor and activated factor (F)XI. Emicizumab quantification was performed by 3 methods: the modified 1-step FVIII assay and 2 methods based on liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry (LC-MS).

RESULTS

Using tissue factor/activated FXI-triggered TGA and platelet-poor plasma, a relationship was observed between the area under the thrombin generation curve (endogenous thrombin potential [ETP]) and the clinical response of patients to emicizumab. The ultrastructure of fibrin clots was consistent with ETP results and showed that emicizumab had a hemostatic activity equivalent to 20 to 30 IU/dL of FVIII. Finally, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analyses showed no correlation between ETP and LC-MS nor with modified 1-stage FVIII assay, but a statistically significant correlation between the LC-MS methods and the time-to-peak results of the TGA.

CONCLUSION

Using a modified TGA, this study showed that patients who experienced breakthrough bleeds while on emicizumab had a lower thrombin-generating capacity compared with others with good clinical response to emicizumab.

Reduced doses of emicizumab achieve good efficacy: Results from a national-wide multicentre real-world study in China

INTRODUCTION

Reduced doses of emicizumab improve the affordability among patients in developing countries. However, the relationship between variant dose selection and efficacy in the real world of China is still unclear.

AIM

This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of emicizumab especially in those on reduced dose regimens in a real-world setting.

METHODS

We carried out a multicentre study from 28 hospitals between June 2019 and June 2023 in China and retrospectively analysed the characteristics including demographics, diagnosis, treatment, bleeding episodes, and surgical procedures.

RESULTS

In total, 127 patients with haemophilia A, including 42 with inhibitors, were followed for a median duration of 16.0 (IQR: 9.0-30.0) months. Median age at emicizumab initiation was 2.0 (IQR: 1.0-4.0) years. Median (IQR) consumption for loading and maintenance was 12.0 (8.0-12.0) and 4.2 (3.0-6.0) mg/kg/4 weeks, respectively. While on emicizumab, 67 (52.8%) patients had no bleeds, whereas 60 (47.2%) patients had any bleeds, including 26 with treated bleeds. Compared to previous treatments, patients on emicizumab had significantly decreased annualized bleeding rate, annualized joint bleeding rate, target joints and intracerebral haemorrhage. Different dosages had similar efficacy except the proportion of patients with treated spontaneous bleeds and target joints. Adverse events were reported in 12 (9.4%) patients. Postoperative excessive bleeding occurred following two of nine procedures.

CONCLUSION

This is the largest study describing patients with HA receiving emicizumab prophylaxis on variant dose regimens in China. We confirmed that nonstandard dose is efficacious and can be considered where full-dose emicizumab is ill affordable.

Transitioning from emicizumab prophylaxis to valoctocogene roxaparvovec gene therapy: A simulation study for individuals with severe haemophilia A

INTRODUCTION

Valoctocogene roxaparvovec, a gene therapy evaluated in the phase 3 GENEr8-1 trial, supports endogenous factor VIII (FVIII) production to prevent bleeding in people with severe haemophilia A. Individuals receiving emicizumab, an antibody mimicking the function of activated FVIII, were excluded from GENEr8-1 enrolment since emicizumab was an investigational therapy at the time of trial initiation.

AIM

Utilize pharmacokinetic simulations to provide guidance on best practices for maintaining haemostatic control while transitioning from emicizumab prophylaxis to valoctocogene roxaparvovec.

METHODS

To estimate bleeding risk at weekly intervals following valoctocogene roxaparvovec infusion, a published emicizumab pharmacokinetic model was used to simulate emicizumab concentrations and merged with FVIII activity time-course data for participants in GENEr8-1. The analysis investigated three approved emicizumab dosing regimens for two transition scenarios that varied whether the last dose of emicizumab was administered on the same day or 4 weeks after valoctocogene roxaparvovec infusion.

RESULTS

Simulations demonstrated administering the last emicizumab dose the day of valoctocogene roxaparvovec infusion and 4 weeks after offered similar levels of haemostatic control, and bleeding risk was similar for all emicizumab dosing regimens. An algorithm was developed to provide guidance for discontinuation of emicizumab. Theoretical cases based on GENEr8-1 participants are presented to illustrate how decisions may vary among individuals.

CONCLUSION

Pharmacokinetic simulations demonstrated no clinically meaningful difference in bleeding risk caused by decaying emicizumab levels and rising gene therapy-derived endogenous FVIII for all examined emicizumab doses and dosing regimens. Therefore, multiple approaches can safely transition individuals from emicizumab prophylaxis to valoctocogene roxaparvovec.

Predictive parameters for spontaneous joint bleeding during emicizumab prophylaxis

ABSTRACT

Emicizumab is approved for prophylaxis of patients with hemophilia A (HA). Despite its efficacy in reducing bleeding, some patients on emicizumab still experience hemarthrosis, but no tool is yet available to identify those at a higher risk of spontaneous joint bleeding. This study aimed to evaluate whether laboratory measurements (global coagulation assays and emicizumab concentration) and/or arthropathy scores can distinguish patients at higher risk of spontaneous joint bleeding while on emicizumab prophylaxis. A thrombin generation assay was performed upon the addition of tissue factor and synthetic phospholipids. Nonactivated thromboelastography was performed on citrated whole blood. Emicizumab concentrations were measured using a modified 1-stage factor VIII assay. The degree of hemophilic arthropathy was assessed using the Hemophilia Joint Health Score and Hemophilia Early Arthropathy Detection with Ultrasound (HEAD-US) score. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate the association between variables and bleeding. The predictive power of these variables was investigated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Forty patients with severe HA, with or without inhibitors, on emicizumab prophylaxis were enrolled in an observational cohort study. Ten of 40 developed spontaneous joint bleeding. None of the laboratory parameters were able to distinguish patients with a higher risk of spontaneous joint bleeding. ROC analysis showed that during emicizumab prophylaxis, only the presence of synovitis and a higher HEAD-US score were associated with spontaneous joint bleeding (area under the curve, 0.84). A greater degree of arthropathy and the presence of synovitis could help predict the risk of spontaneous joint bleeding in patients with HA on emicizumab prophylaxis.

Emicizumab promotes factor Xa generation on endothelial cells

BACKGROUND

Until recently, the treatment of hemophilia A relied on factor (F)VIII replacement. However, up to one-third of patients with severe hemophilia A develop neutralizing alloantibodies that render replacement therapies ineffective. The development of emicizumab, a bispecific antibody that partially mimics FVIIIa, has revolutionized the treatment of these patients. However, the use of an activated prothrombin complex concentrate [FEIBA (Takeda)] to treat breakthrough bleeding in patients on emicizumab has been associated with thrombotic complications including a unique microangiopathy.

OBJECTIVES

We hypothesized that the thrombotic complications observed with the combination of emicizumab and FEIBA might be due to excessive expression of procoagulant activity on the surface of endothelial cells.

METHODS

We examined the ability of emicizumab to promote FX activation on endothelial cells using 2 cell culture models.

RESULTS

We found that endothelial cells readily support emicizumab-mediated activation of FX by FIXa. The level of FXa generation depends on the concentration of available FIXa. The addition of FEIBA to emicizumab increased FXa generation in a dose-dependent manner on endothelial cells in both models. The rate of FXa generation was further enhanced by endothelial cell activation. However, unlike emicizumab, we found limited FXa generation in the presence of FVIII(a), which followed a significant lag time and was not dependent on FIXa concentration under these conditions.

CONCLUSION

Emicizumab promotes FXa generation on the surface of endothelial cells, which is markedly enhanced in the presence of FEIBA. These findings demonstrate a potential mechanism for the thrombotic complications seen with the combined use of emicizumab and FEIBA.

Emicizumab prophylaxis in people with hemophilia A and inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Until recently, the treatment of people with hemophilia A and inhibitors (PwHAi) was based on the use of bypassing agents (BPA). However, the advent of emicizumab as prophylaxis has demonstrated promising results.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to compare the bleeding endpoints between PwHAi on BPA and those on emicizumab prophylaxis.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Systematic review of interventions and meta-analysis conducted at the Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil.

METHODS

The CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Scopus, and LILACS databases were searched on February 21, 2023. Two authors conducted the literature search, publication selection, and data extraction. The selected publications evaluated the bleeding endpoints between PwHAi on emicizumab prophylaxis and those on BPA prophylaxis. The risk of bias was evaluated according to the Joanna Briggs Institute criteria. A meta-analysis was performed to determine the annualized bleeding rate (ABR) for treated bleeds.

RESULTS

Five publications (56 PwHAi) were selected from the 543 retrieved records. Overall, bleeding endpoints were lower during emicizumab prophylaxis than during BPA prophylaxis. All the publications had at least one risk of bias. The only common parameter for the meta-analysis was the ABR for treated bleeds. During emicizumab prophylaxis, the ABR for treated bleeds was lower than during BPA prophylaxis (standard mean difference: -1.58; 95% confidence interval -2.50, -0.66, P = 0.0008; I2 = 68.4%, P = 0.0031).

CONCLUSION

Emicizumab was superior to BPA in bleeding prophylaxis in PwHAi. However, both the small population size and potential risk of bias should be considered when evaluating these results.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

CRD42021278726, https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=278726.

The effects of emicizumab on in vitro coagulation and fibrinolysis parameters in patients with disseminated intravascular coagulation with and without addition of anti-FVIII antibody

BACKGROUND

Emicizumab (Emi) is used as haemostatic prophylaxis for patients with haemophilia A (PwHA). Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) is a condition characterized by persistent systemic activation of coagulation, but there is yet no information on coagulation and fibrinolysis potentials in Emi-treated PwHA with DIC.

AIM

To examine the effect of Emi on coagulation and fibrinolysis potentials in HA-model DIC plasmas.

METHODS

Plasma from a patient with sepsis-DIC (seven patients) was treated with anti-factor (F)VIII monoclonal antibody (HA-model DIC plasma) and incubated with Emi (50 µg/mL). The plasma was then assessed using clot-fibrinolysis waveform analysis (CFWA). Coagulation and fibrinolysis parameters were expressed as ratios relative to normal plasma (|min1|-ratio and |FL-min1|-ratio, respectively).

PATIENTS AND RESULTS

In case 1, coagulant potential was slightly high and fibrinolytic potential was extremely low, presenting a coagulant-dominant state (|min1|-ratio/|FL-min1|-ratio: 1.1/.38). In cases 2-5, fibrinolytic potential was not suppressed, but there were marked hypercoagulant potentials, indicating relative coagulant-dominant states. In case 6, coagulant and fibrinolytic potentials were increased but well balanced (|min1|-ratio/|FL-min1|-ratio: 1.38/1.28). In case 7, both potentials were severely deteriorated in not only CFWA but also the thrombin/plasmin generation assay. The addition of Emi into the HA-model DIC plasmas increased |min1|-ratio values in all cases, but the coagulant potentials did not exceed the initial ones (DIC plasma before treatment with anti-FVIII antibody).

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of Emi in the HA-model DIC plasma improved coagulation potentials, but did not increase coagulation potentials beyond those of DIC plasma in non-HA states.

Emicizumab as first-line therapy in acquired hemophilia A

Acquired hemophilia A (AHA) is a rare autoimmune disease resulting from the development of autoantibodies directed against endogenous factor (F)VIII, leading to bleeding manifestations that can be life-threatening. The current standard hemostatic treatment involves the use of bypassing agents that circumvent FVIII (recombinant activated FVII, activated prothrombin complex concentrate, and recombinant porcine FVIII) that must be administered intravenously and possess a short half-life. These limitations and the risk of potentially fatal bleeding complications justify the early initiation of immunosuppressive treatment (IST) aimed at promptly eradicating the autoantibodies. IST is not without side effects, sometimes severe and possibly fatal, especially in persons with AHA who are generally older and have multiple comorbidities. Emicizumab, a bispecific antibody that mimics the action of FVIII, has emerged as an effective hemostatic therapy among persons with congenital hemophilia, whether complicated by the presence of anti-FVIII antibodies or not. Numerous arguments from recent clinical experiences suggest positioning emicizumab as a first-line treatment for AHA. This strategy has the potential to reduce bleeding complications and, importantly, the side effects associated with IST, which can be delayed and tailored to each patient.

Mutational landscape, inhibitor development, and health-care burden in non-severe haemophilia A: A single-centre Australian experience

AIM

To characterise non-severe haemophilia A (HA) patients enrolled on the Australian Bleeding Disorders Registry (ABDR) treated through a state-wide Haemophilia Treatment Centre (HTC) with respect to their mutational profile, inhibitor risk and health-care burden.

METHOD

We conducted a single-centre observational study of all non-severe HA patients treated at the Alfred Health HTC registered on the ABDR as of the 26th July 2023. Data were extracted from the ABDR and electronic medical record (EMR) regarding demographics, severity, genetic testing, treatment, inhibitors, bleeding events and procedures. Inhibitor risk was calculated as a function of exposure days (EDs) of FVIII replacement.

RESULTS

There were 289 non-severe HA patients treated at the Alfred HTC registered on the ABDR as of July 2023, all of whom were adult patients aged > 18 years old. Genotyping had been performed in 228/289 (78.9%). Of the inhibitor analysis population, 14/193 (7.3%) had an inhibitor. The cumulative incidence of inhibitor development at 75 EDs was 31% (95% CI 13%-46%). The median cost of bypassing agents per inhibitor patient was $57,087.50/year.

CONCLUSION

These results demonstrate a relatively high inhibitor prevalence and incidence risk in non-severe HA compared to previously published work, although this may partly reflect a smaller population size. High rates of genotyping have allowed representative mutational characterisation. The burden of care imposed by non-severe HA in terms of bleeding events, procedures and bypassing agent cost is larger than expected, particularly within the inhibitor population.

Emicizumab prophylaxis in infants with hemophilia A (HAVEN 7): primary analysis of a phase 3b open-label trial

ABSTRACT

Subcutaneous emicizumab enables prophylaxis for people with hemophilia A (HA) from birth, potentially reducing risk of bleeding and intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). HAVEN 7 (NCT04431726) is the first clinical trial of emicizumab dedicated to infants, designed to investigate the efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of emicizumab in those aged ≤12 months with severe HA without factor VIII (FVIII) inhibitors. Participants in this phase 3b trial received emicizumab 3 mg/kg maintenance dose every 2 weeks for 52 weeks and are continuing emicizumab during the 7-year long-term follow-up. Efficacy end points included annualized bleed rate (ABR): treated, all, treated spontaneous, and treated joint bleeds. Safety end points included adverse events (AEs), thromboembolic events (TEs), thrombotic microangiopathies (TMAs), and immunogenicity (anti-emicizumab antibodies [ADAs] and FVIII inhibitors). At primary analysis, 55 male participants had received emicizumab (median treatment duration: 100.3; range, 52-118 weeks). Median age at informed consent was 4.0 months (range, 9 days to 11 months 30 days). Model-based ABR for treated bleeds was 0.4 (95% confidence interval, 0.30-0.63), with 54.5% of participants (n = 30) having zero treated bleeds. No ICH occurred. All 42 treated bleeds in 25 participants (45.5%) were traumatic. Nine participants (16.4%) had ≥1 emicizumab-related AE (all grade 1 injection-site reactions). No AE led to treatment changes. No deaths, TEs, or TMAs occurred. No participant tested positive for ADAs. Two participants were confirmed positive for FVIII inhibitors. This primary analysis of HAVEN 7 indicates that emicizumab is efficacious and well tolerated in infants with severe HA without FVIII inhibitors.

The importance and evolution of bleeding disorder registries

Registries are excellent sources of data to address questions that are typically not evaluated in randomized clinical trials, including natural history, disease prevalence, treatment approaches and adverse events, and models of care. Global and regional registries can provide data to identify differences in outcomes and in haemophilia care between countries, economic settings, and regions, while facilitating research and data sharing. In this manuscript, we highlight five bleeding disorder registries: Country registries from Australia and China, Paediatric Network on Haemophilia Management (PedNet) data on children who have received emicizumab, data from the European Haemophilia Safety Surveillance (EUHASS) system, and data on women and girls with haemophilia from the World Federation of Haemophilia (WFH) registries. Data from these and other bleeding disorder registries have been and will continue to be used to advance patient care, understand treatment patterns and adverse reactions, and identify areas of increased need and focus.

Management of Urgent Bleeding in Patients with Hemophilia A: Focus on the Use of Emicizumab

Management of patients with hemophilia A (HA) requires the knowledge and experience of specialized health care professionals. However, these patients may need to be attended in emergencies, outside the referral hospital, where health care professionals do not know about hemophilia and/or new innovative treatments. This study aimed to develop a simple and practical algorithm that could be used in emergency situations by nonspecialized treaters in HA and bleeding with or without factor VIII (FVIII) inhibitors under emicizumab prophylaxis. A group of experts agreed on a simple algorithm, easy to operate, adapted from previous international guidelines, and based on their clinical experience. The proposed algorithm starts with identifying the patient, confirming the diagnosis of HA, prophylaxis with emicizumab, and/or use of other treatments. After stabilizing the patient and stratifying the bleeding risk, the patient is managed according to the presence/absence of FVIII inhibitors. Patients without FVIII inhibitors should receive FVIII concentrate. Dose and follow-up depend on bleeding localization and severity. Patients with FVIII inhibitors should preferably receive recombinant activated factor VII as bypass agent. A basic coagulation assay, FVIII assessment, and FVIII inhibitors detection assays are necessary in an emergency. However, these tests should be interpreted with caution and appropriately chosen, as emicizumab may alter the results. The management of patients with HA is challenging in emergency situations, especially if they are treated with new agents. Nonspecialized in coagulopathies health care professionals have limited understanding of the disease, highlighting the need for an algorithm to assist them in making informed decisions.

Expert Opinions on the Management of Hemophilia A in India: The Role of Emicizumab

Hemophilia A (HA) is a genetic disorder of hemostasis associated with a deficiency or reduced activity of clotting factor VIII (FVIII). This disorder remains unacceptably underdiagnosed in India. Early diagnosis and appropriate management of HA can substantially prevent morbidity and mortality. Currently, HA is managed with regular replacement therapy using standard or extended half-life FVIII concentrates or non-factor drug products. The challenges associated with FVIII concentrates include plateauing of drug effect, issues with its administration and adherence to treatment, breakthrough bleeds, and the development of inhibiting antibodies against administered clotting factors. Emicizumab is a bispecific antibody, launched in India in April 2019, for managing patients with HA. To investigate the role of emicizumab in Indian patients with HA, opinions were sought from 13 eminent hematologists and experts from India on the effectiveness of emicizumab in preventing all bleeds, spontaneous bleeds, perioperative bleeds, and intracranial hemorrhage; resolving target joints; and reducing the rate of hospitalizations and fatality associated with HA in children and adults, with or without inhibitors. The benefits of emicizumab over traditional FVIII concentrates include the subcutaneous route of delivery, less frequent dosing, and a lack of inhibitor development, in addition to providing sustained hemostasis without in-depth monitoring. It is a safe and effective management option for all HA patients, especially for patients with certain archetypes, such as those with inhibitors, those with high annualized bleed rates, those living far away from hemophilia care centers, pediatric patients and infants with intravenous access challenges, and those with a history of life-threatening bleeding events.

Haemophilia in the era of novel therapies: Where do inhibitors feature in the new landscape?

INTRODUCTION

The advent of therapeutic recombinant factor VIII (FVIII) and factor IX (FIX) protein infusions revolutionized the care of persons with haemophilia in the 1990s. It kicked off an era with the increasing use of prophylactic factor infusions for patients and transformed conversations around the ideal trough activity levels as well as the ultimate goals in tailored, individualized care. Our knowledge surrounding the immunologic basis of inhibitor development and treatment derives from a time when patients were receiving frequent factor infusions and focused on immune tolerance induction following inhibitor development.

DISCUSSION

More recently, care was revolutionized again in haemophilia A with the approval of emicizumab, a bispecific antibody mimicking activated FVIII function, to prevent bleeding. The use of emicizumab prophylaxis has resulted in a significantly slower accumulation of factor exposure days and continued effective prophylaxis in the case of inhibitor development. While emicizumab is effective at reducing the frequency of bleeding events in patients with haemophilia A, management of breakthrough bleeds, trauma, and surgeries still requires additional treatment. Ensuring that FVIII is a therapeutic option, particularly for life-threatening bleeding events and major surgeries is critical to optimizing the care of persons with haemophilia A. Other novel non-factor concentrate therapies, including rebalancing agents, will dramatically change the landscape for persons with haemophilia B with inhibitors.

CONCLUSION

This review discusses the changing landscape regarding the timing of inhibitor development and management strategies after inhibitor development, stressing the importance of education across the community to continue to vigilantly monitor for inhibitors and be prepared to treat persons with inhibitors.

Budget impact and cost-utility analysis of prophylactic emicizumab versus on-demand bypassing agents for adolescent severe haemophilia A patients with inhibitors in India

Introduction

Severe Haemophilia A patients with inhibitors are currently being treated with bypassing agents like activated prothrombin complex concentrates (aPCC) and recombinant factor VIIa. Emicizumab is a recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody, introduced to reduce the bleeding events, improve treatment adherence, and quality of life. However, cost-effectiveness and long-term sustainability of the intervention is not studied in a low middle income setting like India.

Aim

The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the cost-utility of Emicizumab compared to traditional bypassing agents in the treatment of severe haemophilia A patients with inhibitors in India. Secondary objective was to analyze the budgetary impact of introducing Emicizumab for this patient population from the perspective of public health system in India.

Methods

Markov model was created to compare the prophylactic emicizumab therapy against bypassing agents for a hypothetical cohort of 10-year-old adolescents in India. The time horizon was 10 years and model built based on health system perspective. Cost utility was expressed as costs per quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained. All costs were expressed as 2021 US dollars. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis was performed to check the robustness of the estimates.

Results

Prophylactic emicizumab was a cost saving intervention with negative Incremental Cost Utility Ratio (ICUR) against recombinant factor VIIa of -853,573 USD (INR -63,109,773), and negative ICUR of -211,675 USD (INR -15,650,403) against APCC. The estimated total budget for treating all the severe Haemophilia A patients with inhibitors in India was USD 59,042,000 (INR 4,365,329,312) for 10 years' time horizon (per patient cost of USD 295,210 [INR 21,826,646.56]).

Conclusion

Prophylactic emicizumab therapy is a cost saving intervention when compared to both the bypassing agents as it is less costly and more effective for severe Haemophilia A patients with inhibitors in India.

Emicizumab is efficacious in people with hemophilia A with comorbidities aged ≥50 years: analysis of 4 phase III trials

Background

The treatment of older people with hemophilia A (HA) can be complicated by comorbidities.

Objectives

This post hoc analysis evaluates the efficacy and safety of emicizumab in people with HA aged ≥50 years with cardiovascular (CV) risk factors or HIV and/or hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection.

Methods

The HAVEN 1 (NCT02622321), HAVEN 3 (NCT02847637), HAVEN 4 (NCT03020160), and STASEY (NCT03191799) studies enrolled adults/adolescents with severe HA. Participants were categorized as having a comorbidity if they had any CV risk factors (including history of CV disease, hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, prior stroke, or obesity), HIV, and/or HCV infection. Efficacy and safety outcomes were compared by age (<50 vs ≥50 years).

Results

Of 504 participants at data cutoff, 408 were aged <50 years and 96 were aged ≥50 years. In people with HA aged <50 years, 26.7% had ≥1 CV risk factor and 29.4% had HIV and/or HCV infection. In people with HA aged ≥50 years, 72.9% had ≥1 CV risk factor and 74.0% had HIV and/or HCV infection. The mean (95% CI) annualized bleed rate for treated bleeds was 1.29 (0.07-6.06) for people with HA aged <50 years and 1.82 (0.19-6.93) for people with HA aged ≥50 years. No significant differences in annualized bleed rates were observed for those with comorbidities compared with those without. Safety outcomes were similar regardless of age.

Conclusion

This pooled analysis suggests that emicizumab efficacy and safety in people with HA aged ≥50 years with CV and HIV/HCV comorbidities were consistent with those in people with HA aged <50 years enrolled in the HAVEN 1, 3, and 4 and STASEY studies.

Nothing short of a revolution: Novel extended half-life factor VIII replacement products and non-replacement agents reshape the treatment landscape in hemophilia A

Hemophilia A, an X-linked genetic disorder, is characterized by a deficiency or dysfunction of clotting Factor VIII. The treatment landscape has substantially changed by introducing novel extended half-life factor VIII (EHL-FVIII) replacement therapies such as efanesoctocog Alfa and non-factor replacement therapy such as emicizumab. These agents signal a shift from treatments requiring multiple weekly infusions to advanced therapies with long half-lives, offering superior protection against bleeding and improving patient adherence and quality of life. While EHL-FVIII treatment might lead to inhibitor development in some patients, non-factor replacement therapy carries thrombotic risks. Therefore, ongoing research and the generation of robust clinical evidence remain vital to guide the selection of optimal and cost-effective first-line therapies for hemophilia A patients.

Non-clotting factor therapies for preventing bleeds in people with congenital hemophilia A or B

BACKGROUND

Management of congenital hemophilia A and B is by prophylactic or on-demand replacement therapy with clotting factor concentrates. The effects of newer non-clotting factor therapies such as emicizumab, concizumab, marstacimab, and fitusiran compared with existing standards of care are yet to be systematically reviewed.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects (clinical, economic, patient-reported, and adverse outcomes) of non-clotting factor therapies for preventing bleeding and bleeding-related complications in people with congenital hemophilia A or B compared with prophylaxis with clotting factor therapies, bypassing agents, placebo, or no prophylaxis.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group's Coagulopathies Trials Register, electronic databases, conference proceedings, and reference lists of relevant articles and reviews. The date of the last search was 16 August 2023.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating people with congenital hemophilia A or B with and without inhibitors, who were treated with non-clotting factor therapies to prevent bleeds.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently reviewed studies for eligibility, assessed risk of bias, and extracted data for the primary outcomes (bleeding rates, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), adverse events) and secondary outcomes (joint health, pain scores, and economic outcomes). We assessed the mean difference (MD), risk ratio (RR), 95% confidence interval (CI) of effect estimates, and evaluated the certainty of the evidence using GRADE.

MAIN RESULTS

Six RCTs (including 397 males aged 12 to 75 years) were eligible for inclusion. Prophylaxis versus on-demand therapy in people with inhibitors Four trials (189 participants) compared emicizumab, fitusiran, and concizumab with on-demand therapy in people with inhibitors. Prophylaxis using emicizumab likely reduced annualized bleeding rates (ABR) for all bleeds (MD -22.80, 95% CI -37.39 to -8.21), treated bleeds (MD -20.40, 95% CI -35.19 to -5.61), and annualized spontaneous bleeds (MD -15.50, 95% CI -24.06 to -6.94), but did not significantly reduce annualized joint and target joint bleeding rates (AjBR and AtjBR) (1 trial; 53 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Fitusiran also likely reduced ABR for all bleeds (MD -28.80, 95% CI -40.07 to -17.53), treated bleeds (MD -16.80, 95% CI -25.80 to -7.80), joint bleeds (MD -12.50, 95% CI -19.91 to -5.09), and spontaneous bleeds (MD -14.80, 95% CI -24.90 to -4.71; 1 trial; 57 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). No evidence was available on the effect of bleed prophylaxis using fitusiran versus on-demand therapy on AtjBR. Concizumab may reduce ABR for all bleeds (MD -12.31, 95% CI -19.17 to -5.45), treated bleeds (MD -10.10, 95% CI -17.74 to -2.46), joint bleeds (MD -9.55, 95% CI -13.55 to -5.55), and spontaneous bleeds (MD -11.96, 95% CI -19.89 to -4.03; 2 trials; 78 participants; very low-certainty evidence), but not target joint bleeds (MD -1.00, 95% CI -3.26 to 1.26). Emicizumab prophylaxis resulted in an 11.31-fold increase, fitusiran in a 12.5-fold increase, and concizumab in a 1.59-fold increase in the proportion of participants with no bleeds. HRQoL measured using the Haemophilia Quality of Life Questionnaire for Adults (Haem-A-QoL) physical and total health scores was improved with emicizumab, fitusiran, and concizumab prophylaxis (low-certainty evidence). Non-serious adverse events were higher with non-clotting factor therapies versus on-demand therapy, with injection site reactions being the most frequently reported adverse events. Transient antidrug antibodies were reported for fitusiran and concizumab. Prophylaxis versus on-demand therapy in people without inhibitors Two trials (208 participants) compared emicizumab and fitusiran with on-demand therapy in people without inhibitors. One trial assessed two doses of emicizumab (1.5 mg/kg weekly and 3.0 mg/kg bi-weekly). Fitusiran 80 mg monthly, emicizumab 1.5 mg/kg/week, and emicizumab 3.0 mg/kg bi-weekly all likely resulted in a large reduction in ABR for all bleeds, all treated bleeds, and joint bleeds. AtjBR was not reduced with either of the emicizumab dosing regimens. The effect of fitusiran prophylaxis on target joint bleeds was not assessed. Spontaneous bleeds were likely reduced with fitusiran (MD -20.21, 95% CI -32.12 to -8.30) and emicizumab 3.0 mg/kg bi-weekly (MD -15.30, 95% CI -30.46 to -0.14), but not with emicizumab 1.5 mg/kg/week (MD -14.60, 95% CI -29.78 to 0.58). The percentage of participants with zero bleeds was higher following emicizumab 1.5 mg/kg/week (50% versus 0%), emicizumab 3.0 mg/kg bi-weekly (40% versus 0%), and fitusiran prophylaxis (40% versus 5%) compared with on-demand therapy. Emicizumab 1.5 mg/kg/week did not improve Haem-A-QoL physical and total health scores, EQ-5D-5L VAS, or utility index scores (low-certainty evidence) when compared with on-demand therapy at 25 weeks. Emicizumab 3.0 mg/kg bi-weekly may improve HRQoL measured by the Haem-A-QoL physical health score (MD -15.97, 95% CI -29.14 to -2.80) and EQ-5D-5L VAS (MD 9.15, 95% CI 2.05 to 16.25; 1 trial; 43 participants; low-certainty evidence). Fitusiran may result in improved HRQoL shown as a reduction in Haem-A-QoL total score (MD -7.06, 95% CI -11.50 to -2.62) and physical health score (MD -19.75, 95% CI -25.76 to -11.94; 1 trial; 103 participants; low-certainty evidence). The risk of serious adverse events in participants without inhibitors also likely did not differ following prophylaxis with either emicizumab or fitusiran versus on-demand therapy (moderate-certainty evidence). Transient antidrug antibodies were reported in 4% (3/80) participants to fitusiran, with no observed effect on antithrombin lowering. A comparison of the different dosing regimens of emicizumab identified no differences in bleeding, safety, or patient-reported outcomes. No case of treatment-related cancer or mortality was reported in any study group. None of the included studies assessed our secondary outcomes of joint health, clinical joint function, and economic outcomes. None of the included studies evaluated marstacimab.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Evidence from RCTs shows that prophylaxis using non-clotting factor therapies compared with on-demand treatment may reduce bleeding events, increase the percentage of individuals with zero bleeds, increase the incidence of non-serious adverse events, and improve HRQoL. Comparative assessments with other prophylaxis regimens, assessment of long-term joint outcomes, and assessment of economic outcomes will improve evidence-based decision-making for the use of these therapies in bleed prevention.

[Efficacy and safety of prophylaxis with emicizumab in hemophilia A: A study of 13 patients]

INTRODUCTION

Emicizumab is the first non-replacement therapy for prophylaxis in severe hemophilia A.

AIMS

The principal aim of this study is to describe the results of our patients in prophylaxis with emicizumab, according to the usual clinical practice.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Follow-up of 13 patients from the start of prophylaxis, recording of bleeding, surgeries, adverse reactions and the need or not for factor therapy. Plasma levels were measured at follow-up visits, the technique was coagulative in one stage, modified by 1:20 dilution.

RESULTS

Median plasma levels were 52.2mg [30.7-71.9]. Prophylaxis was safe and effective; only one spontaneous haemorrhage was recorded over time and no treatment was required. There were no thromboembolic events or serious hypersensitivity, anaphylaxis or anaphylactoid reactions. The incidence of injection site reactions was 8%. Perioperative management in minor interventions was carried out without adjuvant factorial therapy, in 2 major surgeries a dose of plasmatic FVIII concentrate was required in the patient with hemophilia A without inhibitor and FVII in the patient with inhibitor, and it was sufficient to stop the bleeding.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated emicizumab pharmacokinetics and its half life ensure optimal levels with prophylaxis treatment at doses established in the technical data sheet.

Emicizumab-mediated hemostatic function assessed by thrombin generation assay in an in vitro model of factor VIII-depleted thrombophilia plasma

Patients with hemophilia A (PwHA) may have concurrent deficiency of representative anticoagulant proteins, protein (P)C, PS, and antithrombin (AT), which reduces bleeding frequency. However, emicizumab-driven hemostasis in PwHA with such thrombophilic potential remains unclarified. This study investigated the influence of natural anticoagulants on emicizumab-driven coagulation in HA model plasma. Various concentrations of PS and AT were added to PS-deficient plasma and AT-deficient plasma in the presence of anti-FVIII antibody (FVIIIAb; 10BU/mL). PC-deficient plasma was mixed with normal plasma at various concentrations in the presence of FVIIIAb. Emicizumab (50 µg/mL) was added to these thrombophilic HA model plasmas, prior to tissue factor/ellagic acid-triggered thrombin generation assays. Co-presence of emicizumab increased peak thrombin values (PeakTh) dependent on PS, AT, and PC concentrations. Maximum coagulation potentials in the PS-reduced HA model plasmas remained normal in the presence of emicizumab. PeakTh were close to normal in the presence of 50%AT irrespective of emicizumab, but were higher than normal in the presence of 25%AT. Addition of recombinant FVIIa (corresponding to an administered dose of 90 μg/kg) enhanced coagulation potential to normal levels. Our findings provide novel information on hemostatic regulation in emicizumab-treated PwHA with a possible thrombophilic disposition.

Effectiveness of emicizumab in preventing bleeding events in severe and moderate hemophilia A: A single-center experience in Bangladesh

Emicizumab is a monoclonal antibody that bridges activated factor IX (FIX) and factor X (FX) to replace the function of missing activated factor VIII (FVIII) in hemophilia A patients irrespective of FVIII inhibitor status. This study assessed the effectiveness of emicizumab in preventing bleeding episodes in patients with hemophilia A. This observational study included patients with moderate to severe hemophilia A who were undergoing episodic FVIII replacement therapy. The primary endpoint was the difference in annualized bleeding rates (ABR) and the secondary endpoint was the difference in Hemophilia Joint Health Score (HJHS) before and after emicizumab prophylaxis. A total of 30 male hemophilia patients were included, the mean age was 16.7 (SD: ±8.1) years, and most of them had moderate hemophilia A [63.3%]. Before prophylaxis, the median ABR was 48 (interquartile range [IQR]: 35-60), and 93.3% of patients had ABR greater than eight, whereas after prophylaxis the median ABR decreased significantly (median [IQR]: 0 [0.0-0.4], p < 0.001), and 56.7% had zero bleeds. ABR was not significantly different in patient with and without FVIII inhibitors. The HJHS scores significantly improved after prophylaxis (10 vs. 2.5, p < 0.001). The bleeding events were reduced significantly (23 vs. 0.0, p < 0.001), and zero new target joints were reported after prophylaxis. Most of the patients [93.3%] did not face any serious adverse events after prophylaxis. Emicizumab prophylaxis was associated with a significantly lower rate of bleeding events among participants with hemophilia A, regardless of inhibitor status.

Long-term outcomes with emicizumab in hemophilia A without inhibitors: results from the HAVEN 3 and 4 studies

Background

Emicizumab, a bispecific monoclonal antibody, bridges activated factor (F) IX and FX, mimicking the function of missing or deficient activated FVIII in people with hemophilia A (HA).

Objectives

To evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of emicizumab prophylaxis in people with HA without FVIII inhibitors in the HAVEN 3 and 4 studies.

Methods

HAVEN 3 and 4 were phase 3 open-label studies. Participants received emicizumab maintenance doses of 1.5 mg/kg every week or 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks (HAVEN 3), or 6 mg/kg every 4 weeks (HAVEN 4). Long-term efficacy and safety were assessed.

Results

A total of 151 and 40 individuals without FVIII inhibitors received emicizumab in HAVEN 3 and 4, respectively. At the last patient, last visit dates (May 12, 2022 [HAVEN 3] and June 29, 2022 [HAVEN 4]), the median (range) duration of emicizumab exposure across the 2 studies was 248.1 (6.1-287.1) weeks. The mean (95% CI) annualized bleed rate for treated bleeds was 2.0 (0.23-7.15) for weeks 1 to 24, decreasing to 0.9 (0.01-5.28) by weeks 217 to 240. Overall, 188 (98.4%) participants experienced ≥1 adverse event (AE), with 185 treatment-related AEs in 71 (37.2%) participants. Forty-four (23.0%) participants reported a serious AE. Two thromboembolic events were reported, which were deemed unrelated to emicizumab by the investigator. No thrombotic microangiopathies were reported.

Conclusion

With nearly 5 years of emicizumab exposure across the HAVEN 3 and 4 studies in people with HA without inhibitors, these data indicate continued bleed control with no new safety signals observed during long-term follow-up.

Pharmacokinetics and coagulation biomarkers in children and adults with hemophilia A receiving emicizumab prophylaxis every 1, 2, or 4 weeks

Background

Emicizumab is a bispecific antibody that bridges activated factor (F)IX and FX, mimicking the function of missing activated FVIII and thus improving hemostasis in people with hemophilia A. The efficacy and safety of emicizumab were demonstrated in 4 phase III clinical trials (HAVEN 1-4).

Objectives

Here, we describe pharmacokinetics (PKs), pharmacodynamics (PDs), and exploratory safety biomarkers in HAVEN 1 to 4.

Methods

Participants received emicizumab at a loading dose of 3 mg/kg weekly for 4 weeks, followed by maintenance doses of 1.5 mg/kg weekly, 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks, or 6 mg/kg every 4 weeks. PKs, PDs, and safety biomarkers were assessed in samples collected at regular intervals during the trials.

Results

Emicizumab plasma trough concentrations increased during the loading dose period, reaching a mean of 52.9 μg/mL (SD, 13.6 μg/mL) at week 5, and were sustained at 42.1 to 52.3 μg/mL thereafter with maintenance dosing. Activated partial thromboplastin time shortened following the first emicizumab dose. Mean FVIII-like activity and thrombin generation peak height increased to 25.2 IU/dL (SD, 6.9 IU/dL) and 115.2 nM (SD, 42.5 nM) at week 5, with levels sustained at 17 to 23 IU/dL and >116 nM thereafter, respectively. Emicizumab did not notably affect FIX or FX plasma antigen levels, prothrombin time, or concentrations of exploratory safety markers of coagulation activation (D-dimer, prothrombin fragment 1 + 2, and fibrinogen).

Conclusion

In HAVEN 1 to 4, emicizumab demonstrated sustained PKs and PDs and improved coagulation parameters without affecting safety biomarkers.

Thrombin generation on vascular cells in the presence of factor VIII and/or emicizumab

BACKGROUND

The effect of factor VIII (FVIII) or emicizumab on thrombin generation is usually assessed in assays using synthetic phospholipids. Here, we assessed thrombin generation at the surface of human arterial cells (aortic endothelial cells [hAECs] and aortic vascular smooth muscle cells [hVSMCs]).

OBJECTIVES

To explore the capacity of hAECs (resting or stimulated) and hVSMCs to support thrombin generation by FVIII or emicizumab.

METHODS

Primary hVSMCs and hAECs were analyzed for tissue factor (TF)-activity and antigen, phosphatidylserine (PS)-exposure, tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI)-content and thrombomodulin expression. Cells were incubated with FVIII-deficient plasma spiked with FVIII, emicizumab, activated prothrombin complex concentrate (APCC) or combinations thereof.

RESULTS

TF activity and PS-exposure were present on both hVSMCs and hAECs. In contrast, thrombomodulin and TFPI were expressed on hAECs, while virtually lacking on hVSMCs, confirming the procoagulant nature of hVSMCs. Tumor necrosis factor α-mediated stimulation of hAECs increased not only TF antigen, TF activity, and PS-exposure but also TFPI and thrombomodulin expression. As expected, FVIII and emicizumab promoted thrombin generation on nonstimulated hAECs and hVSMCs, with more thrombin being generated on hVSMCs. Unexpectedly, FVIII and emicizumab increased thrombin generation to a lesser extent on stimulated hAECs compared with nonstimulated hAECs. Finally, adding emicizumab to FVIII did not further increase thrombin generation, whereas the addition of emicizumab to APCC resulted in exaggerated thrombin generation.

CONCLUSION

Tumor necrosis factor stimulation of hAECs increases both pro- and anticoagulant activity. Unexpectedly, the increased anticoagulant activity is sufficient to limit both FVIII- and emicizumab-induced thrombin generation. This protective effect disappears when emicizumab is combined with APCC.

Association of physical activity with bleeding events and safety in patients with haemophilia A starting emicizumab prophylaxis: an interim analysis of the TSUBASA study

INTRODUCTION

Little information exists on the relationship between bleeding outcomes and physical activity in patients with haemophilia A (PwHA).

AIM

This interim analysis of the TSUBASA study (UMIN-CTR ID: UMIN000037448) evaluated the association of physical activity with bleeding and safety in PwHA starting emicizumab.

METHODS

PwHA without factor VIII inhibitors were recruited. Physical activity and bleed data were obtained using an electronic patient-reported outcome application and wearable activity tracker. Adverse events (AEs) were documented.

RESULTS

At data cut-off (31-May-2021), 107 PwHA were enrolled, with a median (range) age of 35 (0-73) years. Physical activity data were obtained for 74 participants. Of these, 47 (63.5%) recorded a total of 396 exercise events. The most common exercise events were walking (32.4%), cycling (14.9%), and football (5.4%). Two (0.5%) exercise events in the same individual were associated with bleeding (running, weight training). The safety analysis population consisted of 106 participants treated with emicizumab (median observation period: 241.5 days). Twenty-one (19.8%) participants experienced a total of 39 AEs. Five (4.7%) experienced a serious AE, none of which was emicizumab-related, and three (2.8%) experienced an adverse drug reaction.

CONCLUSIONS

PwHA receiving emicizumab in the TSUBASA study experienced minimal bleeding associated with physical activity.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Trial registration: UMIN-CTR ID: UMIN000037448.

NXT007-mediated hemostatic potential is suppressed by activated protein C-catalyzed inactivation of activated factor V

Background

Activated protein C (APC) inactivates activated factor (F) V (FVa) and FVIIIa. NXT007, an emicizumab-based engineered therapeutic bispecific antibody, enhances the coagulation potential of FVIII-deficient plasma (FVIIIdef-plasma) to near normal levels. However, little is known about the effect of APC-induced inactivation in NXT007-mediated hemostatic function.

Objectives

To investigate the contribution of APC-mediated reactions to NXT007-driven hemostasis.

Methods

In pooled normal plasma (PNP) or FVIIIdef-plasma spiked with NXT007 (10 μg/mL), effects of APC (0-16 nM) were measured using a thrombin generation assay (TGA). The direct effects of APC on cofactor activity of NXT007 or FVIIIa in a FXa generation assay were also measured. The FVdef-plasma and FV Leiden plasma (FVLeiden plasma) were preincubated with 2 anti-FVIII monoclonal antibodies (termed FVIII-depleted), and the APC effect in the presence of NXT007 in FVIII-depleted FVdef-plasma with the addition of exogenous FV (7.5-30 nM) or FVIII-depleted FVLeiden plasma was investigated.

Results

The APC dose-dependent suppression effect in TGA of FVIIIdef-plasma spiked with NXT007 was similar to that of PNP. FXa generation with NXT007 was not impaired by the addition of APC, suggesting that the APC-induced reaction in TGA with NXT007 was attributed to the direct inactivation of FVa. The addition of APC to FVIII-depleted FVdef-plasma, along with NXT007 and various FV concentrations, showed a similar attenuation to PNP. The NXT007-driven thrombin generation in FVIII-depleted FVLeiden plasma was suppressed by APC, similar to the reaction in native FVLeiden plasma.

Conclusion

NXT007 did not impair APC-mediated downregulation of FVa in FVIIIdef-plasmas, regardless of the presence of FV mutation with APC resistance.

The role of emicizumab in acquired hemophilia A

Acquired hemophilia is a rare bleeding disorder that predominantly affects older people with potential underlying comorbidities, including cardiovascular and thrombotic risk factors. The current standard therapies with hemostatic agents for acute bleeding and immunosuppression often require inpatient management, are not approved for routine bleeding prophylaxis, and contribute to the high mortality in this population. Emicizumab is a factor VIII (FVIII) mimetic approved for bleeding prophylaxis in congenital hemophilia A with and without FVIII inhibitors. Given subcutaneously, it may allow easier outpatient bleeding prophylaxis and reduce intensity of immunosuppression. This article summarizes the currently available data on the efficacy and safety of emicizumab in acquired hemophilia A.

Expert opinion paper on the treatment of hemophilia a with emicizumab

INTRODUCTION

Prophylaxis with emicizumab, a bispecific monoclonal antibody that mimics FVIII function, has shown encouraging results in clinical trials in terms of efficacy and safety. However, current experience is limited, and many areas of concern to clinicians have yet to be reviewed.

AREAS COVERED

This paper reviews the experience of hemophilia A patients treated with emicizumab based on the results of clinical trials and real-life studies. The authors place special emphasis on issues such as the management of these patients in situations of hemorrhage and/or surgical interventions, joint health or laboratory monitoring.

EXPERT OPINION

Treatment with emicizumab has been shown to improve joint health and reduce bleeding, of particular interest to patients with inhibitors and high bleeding rates. However, there are still concerns about its administration in neonates and previously untreated patients due to limited reported experience. Laboratory monitoring is not strictly necessary due to the stable pharmacokinetics emicizumab has been shown to exhibit, however, tests that globally assess hemostasis may be useful especially in cases of bleeding or surgery. The authors are also of the opinion that prophylaxis before minor surgery is not necessary and that major surgeries can be safely performed with additional prophylactic coagulation factor.Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04431726..

Longitudinal dynamic changes in factor VIII inhibitor titers in patients with hemophilia A and inhibitors receiving emicizumab prophylaxis

Emicizumab prophylaxis dramatically reduces bleeding events in patients with hemophilia A (PwHA) with or without factor VIII (FVIII) inhibitors. However, long-term dynamic changes in FVIII inhibitor titers during emicizumab prophylaxis remain to be investigated. We conducted a retrospective follow-up study of FVIII inhibitor titers after initiation of emicizumab prophylaxis in 25 PwHA carrying current or historical FVIII inhibitors. Nineteen PwHA had FVIII inhibitors at initiation of emicizumab prophylaxis (age: median 22 [range 4-60] years and inhibitor titer: 30 [1.0-1450] BU/mL). In 17 of the 19 patients, the inhibitor titers markedly decreased to a median of 1.2 (< 0.6-58) BU/mL at a median follow-up of 71 (38-111) months. In two patients, titers were slightly elevated after initiation of emicizumab but decreased in the long term. The remaining six patients had negative inhibitor status (< 0.6 BU/mL) when switched to emicizumab from FVIII prophylaxis. Five patients maintained negative titers. One patient had inhibitor recurrence, with a peak titer of 1.6 BU/mL that decreased to 0.9 BU/mL. In most cases, FVIII inhibitor titers can be expected to decrease spontaneously during emicizumab prophylaxis, but regular follow-up is necessary to manage breakthrough bleeds.

Emicizumab prophylaxis for people with hemophilia A: Waste estimation and the Brazilian perspective

Costs of hemophilia A treatment are increasing. Waste of clotting products should be avoided. To estimate the first-year waste of emicizumab prophylaxis for people with hemophilia A and inhibitors (PwHAi) who failed immune tolerance induction (ITI), in Brazil. We evaluated the manufacturer and the Brazilian Ministry of Health (MoH) protocol-recommended regimens in a budget impact model. The loading dose consisted of 3.0 mg/kg/Q1W for 4 weeks, for both recommendations. The manufacturer maintenance regimens comprised 1.5 mg/kg/Q1W, 3.0 mg/kg/Q2W, and 6.0 mg/kg/Q4W. The MoH protocol maintenance regimen encompassed a hybrid Q1W/Q2W administration, depending on the body weight. The Q4W regimen was not recommended by the MoH protocol. Analyses were performed to estimate waste given its expense based on the World Health Organization body weight range (percentiles [P] 15, 50, and 85). The first-year emicizumab waste was estimated individually and for the disclosed PwHAi who failed ITI (n = 114). The highest emicizumab waste was estimated for the lowest body weights and the Q1W regimen. The Q4W regimen resulted in the lowest emicizumab waste, followed by the MoH protocol regimen. The total reconstituted costs estimated for the PwHAi who failed ITI according to the hybrid MoH protocol ranged from US$32,858,777 (P15) to US$47,186,858 (P85), with emicizumab waste ranging from 7.9 % (US$2,594,515) to 3.7 % (US$1,738,750), respectively. Lost resources due to current protocols for emicizumab prophylaxis for PwHAi who failed ITI in Brazil are considerable. Waste was more pronounced due to lower body weight and shorter administration intervals.

Real-world data on the use of emicizumab in patients with haemophilia A with and without inhibitors in Singapore

Introduction

Emicizumab is a bispecific monoclonal antibody that mimics the function of factor VIII by binding to factor IXa and factor X to achieve haemostasis in haemophilia A. The long half-life and subcutaneous mode of administration makes emicizumab a compelling treatment option for bleeding prophylaxis. There is still limited real-world data on its use and management considerations, especially during surgical procedures. The objective of the study is to describe the real-world experience of emicizumab in a cohort of adult and paediatric haemophilia A patients in Singapore, including its use in the periprocedural setting.

Method

This was an observational study conducted at the 2 main haemophilia treatment centres in Singapore. All haemophilia A patients who commenced treatment with emicizumab before 1 July 2022 were recruited.

Results

A total of 18 patients with haemophilia A were included in this study. Ten (55.6%) patients had active inhibitors. The median annual bleeding rate for all patients before emicizumab use was 4.5 events (interquartile range [IQR] 2.8-8.3) compared with 0 events (IQR 0-0) after emicizumab was commenced (P=0). There were no adverse events of venous or arterial thrombosis, thrombotic microangiopathy, or death. A total of 6 procedures in 5 patients were performed during the study period with no major bleeding complications.

Conclusion

Emicizumab effectively protects against bleeding in haemophilia A patients with and without inhibitors, including in children less than 12 years old. More studies are required to address clinical nuances, such as periprocedural management and the role of immune tolerance in patients with inhibitors on emicizumab.

Serious bleeds in pediatric persons with hemophilia A on emicizumab prophylaxis

Background

Clinical trials have shown success in bleed prevention with emicizumab, but real-world data on the effectiveness of emicizumab in preventing serious bleeds in the pediatric population are lacking.

Objectives

To report real-world data on the effectiveness of Emicizumab in pediatric persons with hemophilia A.

Methods

We completed a retrospective chart review of 37 pediatric male patients aged ≤18 years on emicizumab prophylaxis for a median duration of 30.5 months at Children's Medical Center in Dallas, Texas.

Results

We identified 4 pediatric persons with severe hemophilia A with and without inhibitors who experienced a provoked or unprovoked serious bleed requiring hospitalization.

Conclusion

This study highlights that serious bleeds, both provoked and unprovoked, can occur in pediatric persons with severe hemophilia A. These findings are important for clinicians to provide appropriate counseling/education and recommendation of treatment for pediatric persons with severe hemophilia A through shared decision making. Up-titration of emicizumab or factor VIII replacement needs consideration in persons with hemophilia with suboptimal bleeding control or who participate in activities categorized as moderate- to high-risk activities.

Treatment-related outcome from patient report outcome (PRO) of children with severe and moderate hemophilia A in China: An analysis report of registration data from patient organization "hemophilia home care center"

OBJECTIVES

To assess current treatment-related outcomes for children with severe and moderate haemophilia A (cHA) in China.

METHODS

This cross-section Patient Report Outcome (PRO) report collected PRO data of severe and moderate cHAs registered in the 'Hemophilia Home Care Center' database (http://web.bjxueyou.cn) between January 2021 and November 2022. Data included records of bleeding, activities, and concentrates consumption. All patients had a confirmed diagnosis of moderate or severe haemophilia A (FVIII: C ≤ 5%) and were < 18 years old.

RESULTS

Among 1038 analysable cases, 9.6% of children with inhibitors had a higher rate of intracranial haemorrhage, dropout school rate, and higher FVIII consumption than children without inhibitors. Among 100 children with inhibitors, 36 patients were treated without immune tolerance induction (ITI), 14 patients with irregular treatment and 50 patients received ITI. Children with ITI had a lower ABR (2.4 (0,6.6) vs. 13.4 (9.5, 26.6), p<.001) and AJBR (0 (0, 3.1) vs. 8.9 (1.6, 19.3), p < .001) compared to those without ITI. Among 938 children without inhibitors, 28.5% received on-demand treatment and 71.5% received prophylaxis. Of 528 children with 1343.8 (1050.4, 2922.9)IU/kg/year median FVIII consumption, 43.0% received low-dose, 43.2% received intermediate-dose, and 13.8% received high-dose regimen; these children with prophylaxis had a lower ABR (3.1 (0, 10.7) vs. 12.8 (2.4, 45.5), p < .001), AJBR (0.5 (0, 3.9) vs. 3.0 (0, 12.0), p < .001) and disability rate (9.0% vs.18.5%, p = .032) compared to children who received on-demand treatment.

CONCLUSION

The high rate of drop-out of school and disability still present a huge gap to meet the needs in China. It is necessary to improve the level of medical accessibility and medicine affordability and strengthen the patient/parent's education in China.

Emicizumab use in females with moderate or mild hemophilia A without factor VIII inhibitors who warrant prophylaxis

Background

Hemophilia A (HA) is predominantly associated with males due to X-linked inheritance. Males and females with HA have shared unmet medical needs, highlighting the necessity for comprehensive care irrespective of sex.

Objectives

This analysis investigated the efficacy and safety of emicizumab prophylaxis in 3 females with HA.

Methods

HAVEN 6 (NCT04158648) is a phase III study of emicizumab in people with non-severe HA without factor (F)VIII inhibitors warranting prophylaxis per investigator assessment, and the study methodology has been reported previously. Female-specific endpoints included menstruation-related quality of life and menstruation heaviness.

Results

HAVEN 6 enrolled 3 females aged ≥18 years and within reproductive age (n = 2 mild HA; n = 1 moderate HA; n = 2 receiving prior FVIII prophylaxis; n = 1 receiving prior episodic FVIII). Participants presented with diverse bleeding phenotypes at baseline: 2 had no bleeds in the 24 weeks prior to enrollment, while 1 had an annualized bleed rate for all bleeds of 208.6. On-study annualized bleed rates for all bleeds were 0, 2.8, and 11.6, respectively. The 2 evaluable participants indicated improved menstruation-related quality of life vs baseline. Two participants experienced 3 grade 1/2 treatment-related adverse events; no new safety signals were identified. All 3 participants preferred emicizumab over their previous treatment and reported a better score for treatment burden and preoccupation domains of the Comprehensive Assessment Tool of Challenges in Hemophilia questionnaire.

Conclusion

Overall, results were consistent with those reported in the male population enrolled in the HAVEN 6 study, suggesting efficacy and a favorable safety profile for emicizumab in females with non-severe HA warranting prophylaxis.

The in vitro effect of anticoagulant agents on coagulation and fibrinolysis in the presence of emicizumab in the plasmas from patients with haemophilia A

INTRODUCTION

Emicizumab is used as hemostatic prophylaxis for patients with hemophilia A (PwHA), irrespective of the presence of inhibitors. Although bacterial infection can lead to a procoagulant state, there is limited information on coagulation and fibrinolysis potentials in emicizumab-treated PwHA and on the use of anticoagulants in such cases.

AIM

We examined whether anticoagulants affect the coagulation and fibrinolysis potentials in plasma from PwHA spiked with emicizumab.

METHODS

Plasma from PwHA was in vitro supplemented with emicizumab (50 μg/mL; emi-plasma) and anticoagulants (recombinant thrombomodulin (rTM), nafamostat mesylate (NM), unfractionated heparin (UFH), or low-molecular-weight heparin (LMH)). PwHA plasma spiked with rFVIII (1 IU/mL) was used as a reference (ref-plasma). The coagulation and fibrinolysis potentials in plasma was measured by thrombin and plasmin generation assay (T/P-GA) and clot-fibrinolysis waveform analysis (CFWA).

RESULTS

In T/P-GA and CFWA, coagulation potentials (maximum coagulation velocity; |min1|, and peak thrombin; Th-Peak) in plasma rose with increasing concentrations of emicizumab and rFVIII, but fibrinolytic potentials (peak plasmin; Plm-Peak, and maximum fibrinolytic velocity; |FL-min1|) remained unchanged. Adding rTM, NM, and UFH to emi-plasma suppressed coagulation and fibrinolysis potentials, similar to ref-plasma. Regarding the heparin, UFH and LMH inhibited the improved coagulation in emi-plasma. UFH inhibited fibrinolysis as well, but LMH did not.

CONCLUSIONS

Anticoagulants could exhibit the inhibitory effects on the coagulation and fibrinolysis potentials in plasma from PwHA spiked with emicizumab, similar to those in normal plasma.

Efficacy, safety and cost of emicizumab prophylaxis in haemophilia A patients with inhibitors: A nationwide observational study in Taiwan

INTRODUCTION

Emicizumab mimicking the cofactor function of activated factor VIII (FVIII) restores haemostasis.

METHODS

This nationwide observational study aimed to retrospectively investigate efficacy, safety, and cost in 1 year before and up to 3 years after emicizumab prophylaxis for haemophilia A (HA) patients with FVIII inhibitors.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

A total of 39 severe HA patients with a median age of 23.0 years were enrolled. The median historical peak FVIII inhibitor titre was 174.2 BU/mL with an interquartile range of 56.5-578.8 BU/mL. The median annualized bleeding rate reduced from 24 to 0 events in the first year after emicizumab prophylaxis (p < .01) and sustained in the second and third years. The median annualized joint bleeding rate reduced to 0 and maintained up to 3 years (p < .01). Twenty-seven patients (69.2%) had target joints before emicizumab prophylaxis and only seven patients (17.9%) of them had target joints after prophylaxis. Medical costs, including cost of haemostatic therapy, frequency of outpatient department visits, emergency room visits and hospital admission, were significantly reduced after emicizumab prophylaxis (p < .01). FVIII inhibitor titre decreased after emicizumab prophylaxis. Overall, three (7.7%) patients experienced 202 grade 1 drug-related adverse events after emicizumab prophylaxis. No serious adverse events were reported during emicizumab prophylaxis period. The adherence to emicizumab prophylaxis was 100% up to 3 years.

CONCLUSIONS

HA patients with FVIII inhibitors treated with emicizumab prophylaxis resulted in a significant reduction in treated bleeds and associated costs. No new safety events were observed.

Effect of emicizumab-neutralizing antibodies on activated partial thromboplastin time-based clotting time test results in patients treated with emicizumab

Background

Emicizumab is a bispecific humanized monoclonal antibody that shortens the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), making aPTT-based tests unreliable.

Objectives

To evaluate the efficacy of a mixture of 2 anti-idiotype monoclonal antibodies (anti-emi) in neutralizing emicizumab in samples from persons with hemophilia A treated with emicizumab.

Methods

Fifty samples from persons with hemophilia A treated with emicizumab were analyzed for aPTT and factor VIII procoagulant activity; FVIII inhibitor titer was measured using Nijmegen-Bethesda assay in 50 plasma samples of additional patients (positive for FVIII inhibitor) treated with emicizumab. FVIII procoagulant activity and inhibitor titer were measured using 1-stage (Actin FS, Siemens) and chromogenic assays with bovine regents (Factor VIII Chromogenic Assay, Siemens). Emicizumab concentration was measured by modified a 1-stage assay calibrated with a drug-specific calibrator (r2 Diagnostics Inc). All the tests were performed on Sysmex CS-2400 (Sysmex) before and after the addition of anti-emi (Chugai Pharmaceutical).

Results

Emicizumab concentrations measured after neutralization were <1.6 μg/mL in all samples. FVIII levels were >480 IU/dL with an aPTT of <30.8 seconds in all samples before neutralization and were <1 IU/dL with an aPTT of >70 seconds after adding anti-emi. FVIII inhibitor resulted in a false negative result in 44 of 50 samples measured with the 1-stage assay before neutralization. A good correlation (r = 0.98) was found between inhibitor titer measured using the chromogenic (insensitive to emicizumab) and 1-stage assays after neutralization.

Conclusion

The anti-emi antibodies were shown to completely neutralize emicizumab, making samples pretreated with anti-emi analyzable with the 1-stage assay.

Pharmacodynamics Monitoring of Emicizumab in Patients with Hemophilia A

BACKGROUND

 Emicizumab is a bispecific antibody mimicking coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) employed to treat patients with hemophilia A (PwHA) regardless of FVIII inhibitor status. The identification of biological markers reflecting the hemostatic competence of patients under emicizumab therapy would have a great clinical value. Unfortunately, emicizumab over-corrects standard coagulation assays, precluding their use for evaluating the hemostatic correction achieved in vivo. Here, we investigated whether global coagulation assays (GCA) would allow monitoring the biological response to non-factor replacement therapy with emicizumab.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

 Six adults PwHA received a weekly dose of emicizumab of 3 mg/kg during weeks (W) 1 4 and 1.5 mg/kg from W5 onwards. Response to treatment was monitored weekly by emicizumab plasma concentration, thrombin generation (TG), and fibrin clot formation (FCF) and structure. TG and FCF results were compared to patient baseline, FVIII replacement, and healthy donors.

RESULTS

 TG and FCF significantly increased in PwHA after the loading period, reaching a plateau that lasted until the end of monitoring. Similarly, fibrin clot network became denser with thinner fibrin fibers. However, TG contrary to FCF remained at the lower limits of reference values. Remarkably, despite having similar plateau concentrations of emicizumab some patients showed markedly different degrees of TG and FCF improvement.

CONCLUSION

 Our study enriches the knowledge on the use of GCA to monitor non-factor replacement therapy, indicating that TG and FCF could act as direct markers of emicizumab biological activity. GCA allow to capture and visualize the individually variable response to emicizumab, leading a step forward to the personalization of patient treatment.

Coagulant potentials of emicizumab in the plasmas from infant and toddler patients with hemophilia A

BACKGROUND

Emicizumab significantly reduces bleedings in patients with hemophilia A (PwHA). A clinical study (HAVEN 7; NCT04431726) for PwHA aged less than or equal to 12 months is ongoing, but emicizumab-driven coagulation potential in PwHA in early childhood remains to be clarified.

AIM

To investigate the in vitro or in vivo coagulation potential of emicizumab in plasmas obtained from infant and toddler PwHA.

METHODS

Twenty-seven plasma samples from 14 infant/toddler PwHA (aged 0-42 months, median 19 months) who received emicizumab (n = 9), factor (F)VIII products (n = 8), or no treatment (n = 10) were obtained. FVIII activity in FVIII-treated plasmas was cancelled by the addition of anti-FVIII monoclonal antibody (mAb). Emicizumab-treated plasmas (in vivo) and emicizumab-spiked plasmas (in vitro) were analyzed. Emicizumab-untreated plasma or emicizumab-treated plasma supplemented with two anti-emicizumab mAbs were used as references. Adjusted maximum coagulation velocity (Ad|min1|) by clot waveform analysis and peak thrombin (Peak-Th) by thrombin generation assay was assessed.

RESULTS

Ad|min1| values in 24 samples were improved by the presence of emicizumab. Values did not improve in the three remaining samples (aged 1, 23, and 31 months). Although the presence of emicizumab showed an age-dependent increase in Peak-Th in 20 samples, this increase was not observed in seven samples (aged 0, 1, 1, 2, 8, 19, and 36 months). Emicizumab-dependent increases in both Ad|min1| and Peak-Th were shown in 18 samples, and increases in either parameter were shown in eight samples. One sample (from patient aged 1 month) showed no increase in both, however.

CONCLUSION

Emicizumab could improve coagulant potential in plasmas from infant/toddler patients with hemophilia A.

Management of surgery in persons with hemophilia A receiving emicizumab prophylaxis: data from a national hemophilia treatment center

Background

Persons with hemophilia A may require surgical procedures. Real-world data on invasive procedures in persons with hemophilia A receiving emicizumab prophylaxis are limited.

Objectives

To evaluate the safety of invasive procedures in persons with hemophilia A receiving emicizumab prophylaxis and their outcomes in a longitudinally followed cohort.

Methods

Data from medical records of persons with hemophilia A with and without factor VIII (FVIII) inhibitors longitudinally followed at our tertiary center, who received emicizumab prophylaxis and underwent all types of invasive procedures, were retrieved. Outcomes of interest were bleeding and thrombotic complications.

Results

Overall, 35 patients underwent 56 invasive procedures, 18 (32.1%) were major. The median age was 36.3 years (IQR, 8.8-55.9 years); 12 patients (34.3%) were younger than 18 years at the time of procedure; 17 (48.6%) were patients with FVIII inhibitors. Among major procedures, orthopedic surgeries prevailed. All patients who underwent major procedures received factor replacement with either recombinant activated factor VII (patients with inhibitors) or FVIII (patients without inhibitors). Factor concentrates were administered prior to 32 (84.2%) of the minor procedures. Repeated doses were given according to international expert opinion recommendations and patients' condition.There were 7 bleeding events in 6 patients, 5 were major bleeds, including 1 patient who underwent a minor procedure without factor replacement. None of the patients experienced a thrombotic complication.

Conclusion

Invasive procedures can be performed safely in patients receiving emicizumab prophylaxis with close surveillance after surgery. Factor concentrates may be advised in selected patients undergoing minor procedures.

Neutralizing antidrug antibody to emicizumab in patients with severe hemophilia A: Case report of a first noninhibitor patient and review of the literature

Background

Hemophilia A (HA) is a genetic bleeding disorder characterized by the deficiency of the coagulation protein factor (F) VIII (FVIII). The development of neutralizing antidrug antibodies (ADAs) to factor concentrates (inhibitors) created an unmet need for novel therapies. The first agent to address this need is emicizumab.

Key Clinical Question

Can emicizumab ADA occur in patients with HA without FVIII inhibitors?

Clinical Approach

A new case (the first in a noninhibitor patient) presented with unexpected and excessive bleeding and a prolonged activated partial thromboplastin time. The patient was evaluated by assessing FVIII levels, and the previously published modified version of the Bethesda assay was used to determine the level of ADA to emicizumab.

Conclusion

Although emicizumab is very effective and has minimal immunogenicity, ADAs, albeit rare, can still occur. There have been 4 previously published anti-emicizumab ADA cases with severe HA with inhibitors, and herein, we describe 1 new case with severe HA without inhibitors.

Etranacogene dezaparvovec for the treatment of adult patients with severe and moderately severe hemophilia B

INTRODUCTION

Etranacogene dezaparvovec is the first gene therapy approved for treatment of adults with severe and moderately severe hemophilia B.

AREAS COVERED

This review describes the results of the clinical trial program of AMT-060 and etranacogene dezaparvovec, outlining the pharmacokinetic, clinical efficacy and safety data. With the entry of etranacogene dezaparvovec into the market, this review summarizes the treatment landscape in hemophilia B and discusses the current unknowns in the field.

EXPERT OPINION

Gene therapy appears to be a feasible option for adults with severe and moderately severe hemophilia B. Etranacogene dezaparvovec enables most patients to reach stable factor IX (FIX) levels after a single intravenous infusion, eliminating the need for regular prophylaxis; thus, drastically reducing treatment burden and avoiding variable bleeding risk owing to fluctuating FIX activity levels. Efficacy of etranacogene dezaparvovec has been demonstrated even in the presence of preexisting neutralizing antibodies (up to a titer of 1:678), with a relative low risk of transaminitis and its associated potential loss of transgene expression. However, long-term data are required to ascertain the durability of FIX levels achieved and safety. The cost-effectiveness and adoption of innovative payment models for reimbursement are key in choosing gene therapy over existing treatments.

Efficacy/effectiveness and safety of emicizumab prophylaxis of people with hemophilia A: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Emicizumab is a monoclonal antibody approved for prophylaxis against bleeds for people with hemophilia A (PwHA). A systematic review was conducted evaluating the efficacy/effectiveness and the safety of emicizumab as prophylaxis for PwHA compared to prophylaxis with factor VIII (FVIII) or bypassing agents (BPA), respectively in patients without and with inhibitors.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Database-directed search strategies were performed in Aug/26/2022 and updated in Mar/16/2023. Studies evaluating the prophylaxis with emicizumab versus prophylaxis with FVIII or BPA in PwHA without or with inhibitors, respectively, were selected by two independent reviewers. Data were extracted by two independent reviewers. Annualized bleeding rates for total treated bleeding events (ABR-all) were evaluated by meta-analysis. The quality of studies and certainty of evidence were assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 11 studies were included. The standard mean differences for ABR-all were -0.6 (95%CI -1.0 to -0.2, p-value = 0.0002), among PwHA without inhibitors, and -1.7 (95%CI -2.4 to -0.9, p-value <0.00001), among PwHA with inhibitors. However, there was moderate heterogeneity in both meta-analyses. The most frequent adverse event was injection site reaction.

CONCLUSIONS

Emicizumab prophylaxis was superior in reducing the ABR-all when compared with prophylaxis with FVIII or BPA.

Clinical pharmacology of emicizumab for the treatment of hemophilia A

INTRODUCTION

Emicizumab is a humanized bispecific antibody approved for the routine prophylaxis of bleeding episodes in patients with hemophilia A (PwHA) regardless of the presence of factor VIII (FVIII) inhibitors. It mimics the cofactor function of missing activated FVIII by bridging activated factor IX and factor X, thereby restoring hemostasis.

AREAS COVERED

This review covers the clinical pharmacology of emicizumab and the translation of its pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) to clinical efficacy and safety. The PK of emicizumab is linear, with an approximately 1-month half-life. Once-weekly to every-4-week subcutaneous (SC) administrations maintain effective trough concentrations throughout the dosing intervals, associated with a coagulation potential analogous to that in patients with mild hemophilia A. In combination with activated prothrombin complex concentrate, and to a lesser extent with recombinant activated factor VII, emicizumab exerts a synergistic effect, whereas combination with FVIII may result in a non-additive coagulation potential at normal FVIII activity.

EXPERT OPINION

The translation of emicizumab PK/PD into clinical effects was demonstrated in several phase III studies, which showed remarkable bleed control and a favorable safety profile in PwHA. These emicizumab attributes, together with the convenience of use (infrequent SC injections), offer a novel paradigm for the management of PwHA.