Ipilimumab, nivolumab, and brentuximab vedotin combination therapies in patients with relapsed or refractory Hodgkin lymphoma: phase 1 results of an open-label, multicentre, phase 1/2 trial

Optimizing salvage therapy for Hodgkin lymphoma: progress and future challenges

INTRODUCTION

Despite clear advancements in the management of classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) over the past decade including better risk stratification, the usage of 18F-flurodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET)-guided approaches and incorporation of novel agents, approximately one-third of the patients will relapse. Important themes have been recently explored in the first salvage setting including the recognition of the positive prognostic value of a negative pre-autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) FDG-PET response and the incorporation of novel agents such as brentuximab vedotin (BV) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) as salvage regimens to improve patient outcomes.

AREAS COVERED

The evolving treatment paradigm in optimizing salvage therapy in relapsed refractory cHL (RR-cHL) is discussed, including a vision to the future. The methodology included a literature search on PubMed using keywords. Selected articles were screened and evaluated by the authors of this review.

EXPERT OPINION

Achieving a complete remission by FDG-PET pre-ASCT is the most important prognostic factor in obtaining disease control and subsequent cure, and therefore should be a key goal of any salvage regimen. Although data from randomized controlled trials are currently lacking, retrospective evidence demonstrate superior event free survival with CPI-based regimens compared to conventional chemotherapy or BV-based therapy.

Immune-related adverse events of antibody-based biological medicines in cancer therapy

Recombinant antibodies (Abs) are an integral modality for the treatment of multiple tumour malignancies. Since the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of rituximab as the first monoclonal antibody (mAb) for cancer treatment, several mAbs and antibody (Ab)-based therapies have been approved for the treatment of solid tumour malignancies and other cancers. These Abs function by either blocking oncogenic pathways or angiogenesis, modulating immune response, or by delivering a conjugated drug. The use of Ab-based therapy in cancer patients who could benefit from the treatment, however, is still limited by associated toxicity profiles which may stem from biological features and processes related to target binding, alongside biochemical and/or biophysical characteristics of the therapeutic Ab. A significant immune-related adverse event (irAE) associated with Ab-based therapies is cytokine release syndrome (CRS), characterized by the development of fever, rash and even marked, life-threatening hypotension, and acute inflammation with secondary to systemic uncontrolled increase in a range of pro-inflammatory cytokines. Here, we review irAEs associated with specific classes of approved, Ab-based novel cancer immunotherapeutics, namely immune checkpoint (IC)-targeting Abs, bispecific Abs (BsAbs) and Ab-drug-conjugates (ADCs), highlighting the significance of harmonization in preclinical assay development for safety assessment of Ab-based biotherapeutics as an approach to support and refine clinical translation.

Tumor-Immune Signatures of Treatment Resistance to Brentuximab Vedotin with Ipilimumab and/or Nivolumab in Hodgkin Lymphoma

To investigate the cellular and molecular mechanisms associated with targeting CD30-expressing Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) and immune checkpoint modulation induced by combination therapies of CTLA4 and PD1, we leveraged Phase 1/2 multicenter open-label trial NCT01896999 that enrolled patients with refractory or relapsed HL (R/R HL). Using peripheral blood, we assessed soluble proteins, cell composition, T-cell clonality, and tumor antigen-specific antibodies in 54 patients enrolled in the phase 1 component of the trial. NCT01896999 reported high (>75%) overall objective response rates with brentuximab vedotin (BV) in combination with ipilimumab (I) and/or nivolumab (N) in patients with R/R HL. We observed a durable increase in soluble PD1 and plasmacytoid dendritic cells as well as decreases in plasma CCL17, ANGPT2, MMP12, IL13, and CXCL13 in N-containing regimens (BV + N and BV + I + N) compared with BV + I (P < 0.05). Nonresponders and patients with short progression-free survival showed elevated CXCL9, CXCL13, CD5, CCL17, adenosine-deaminase, and MUC16 at baseline or after one treatment cycle and a higher prevalence of NY-ESO-1-specific autoantibodies (P < 0.05). The results suggest a circulating tumor-immune-derived signature of BV ± I ± N treatment resistance that may be useful for patient stratification in combination checkpoint therapy.

SIGNIFICANCE

Identification of multi-omic immune markers from peripheral blood may help elucidate resistance mechanisms to checkpoint inhibitor and antibody-drug conjugate combinations with potential implications for treatment decisions in relapsed HL.

The role of autologous stem-cell transplantation in classical Hodgkin lymphoma in the modern era

Despite excellent cure rates with modern front-line regimens, up to 20% of patients with Hodgkin lymphoma will progress through front-line therapy or experience disease relapse. Worldwide, salvage chemotherapy followed by high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplantation (HDT/ASCT) is considered the standard of care for these patients and can cure approximately 50% of relapsed or refractory (R/R) patients in the second line. Brentuximab vedotin (BV), an anti-CD30 antibody drug conjugate, and PD1 inhibitors like nivolumab and pembrolizumab, have high response rates in patients who recur after HDT/ASCT. When used prior to HDT/ASCT, BV and PD1 inhibitors appear to dramatically increase the effectiveness of salvage therapies with complete response rates often double those seen with historic chemotherapy-based regimens and durable progression free survival (PFS) post-HDT/ASCT. Emerging data in adults and from pediatric trials showing a durable PFS in a subset of relapsed patients raises the question of whether HDT/ASCT is essential for cure in R/R patients after PD1 based salvage. Future studies will help clarify if ASCT can omitted PD1 based salvage to avoid the potential toxicity of HDT/ASCT without compromising cure.

Antibody-drug conjugates combinations in cancer treatment

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) have emerged as a promising class of anticancer agents. Currently, the Food and Drug Administration has granted approval to 12 compounds, with 2 later undergoing withdrawal. Moreover, several other compounds are currently under clinical development at different stages. Despite substantial antitumoral activity observed among different tumor types, adverse events and the development of resistance represent significant challenges in their use. Over the last years, an increasing number of clinical trials have been testing these drugs in different combinations with other anticancer agents, such as traditional chemotherapy, immune checkpoint inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies, and small targeted agents, reporting promising results based on possible synergistic effects and a potential for improved treatment outcomes among different tumor types. Here we will review combinations of ADCs with other antitumor agents aiming at describing the current state of the art and future directions.

Immune Microenvironment in Childhood Cancers: Characteristics and Therapeutic Challenges

The tumor immune microenvironment is pivotal in cancer initiation, advancement, and regulation. Its molecular and cellular composition is critical throughout the disease, as it can influence the balance between suppressive and cytotoxic immune responses within the tumor's vicinity. Studies on the tumor immune microenvironment have enriched our understanding of the intricate interplay between tumors and their immunological surroundings in various human cancers. These studies illuminate the role of significant components of the immune microenvironment, which have not been extensively explored in pediatric tumors before and may influence the responsiveness or resistance to therapeutic agents. Our deepening understanding of the pediatric tumor immune microenvironment is helping to overcome challenges related to the effectiveness of existing therapeutic strategies, including immunotherapies. Although in the early stages, targeted therapies that modulate the tumor immune microenvironment of pediatric solid tumors hold promise for improved outcomes. Focusing on various aspects of tumor immune biology in pediatric patients presents a therapeutic opportunity that could improve treatment outcomes. This review offers a comprehensive examination of recent literature concerning profiling the immune microenvironment in various pediatric tumors. It seeks to condense research findings on characterizing the immune microenvironment in pediatric tumors and its impact on tumor development, metastasis, and response to therapeutic modalities. It covers the immune microenvironment's role in tumor development, interactions with tumor cells, and its impact on the tumor's response to immunotherapy. The review also discusses challenges targeting the immune microenvironment for pediatric cancer therapies.

Paradigm Shifts in Hodgkin Lymphoma Treatment: From Frontline Therapies to Relapsed Disease

Combination chemotherapy with or without radiation has served as the primary therapeutic option for classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL), leading to durable remission in a majority of patients with early- and advanced-stage cHL. Patients with relapsed/refractory (RR) cHL could still be cured with salvage chemotherapy and autologous stem-cell transplantation. Brentuximab vedotin (BV) and the anti-PD-1-blocking antibodies, nivolumab and pembrolizumab, are highly effective treatments for cHL and have revolutionized the management of the disease. Recent studies incorporating BV and PD-1 blockade into salvage therapy for RR cHL and into frontline treatment regimens have changed the cHL treatment paradigm. The novel agents are also useful in the treatment of older patients who have poor outcomes with traditional therapy. This manuscript will review current strategies for approaching the management of previously untreated, RR, and challenging populations with cHL, including how to incorporate the novel agents.

Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class I expression on Hodgkin-Reed-Sternberg cells is an EBV-independent major determinant of microenvironment composition in classic Hodgkin lymphoma

Hodgkin-Reed-Sternberg cells (HRSCs) in classic Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL) frequently lack expression of human leukocyte antigen class I (HLA-I), considered to hamper activation of cytotoxic T cells in the tumor microenvironment (TME). Here, we demonstrate HLA-I expression on HRSCs to be a strong determinant of TME composition whereas expression of HLA-II was associated with only minor differential gene expression in the TME. In HLA-I-positive HL the HRSC content and expression of CCL17/TARC in HRSCs are low, independent of the presence of Epstein-Barr virus in HRSCs. Additionally, HLA-I-positive HL shows a high content of CD8+ cytotoxic T cells. However, an increased expression of the inhibitory immune checkpoint LAG3 on CD8+ T cells in close proximity to HRSCs is observed. Suggesting interference with cytotoxic activity, we observed an absence of clonally expanded T cells in the TME. While HLA-I-positive HL is not associated with an unfavorable clinical course in our cohorts, they share features with the recently described H2 subtype of HL. Given the major differences in TME composition, immune checkpoint inhibitors may differ in their mechanism of action in HLA-I-positive compared to HLA-I-negative HL.

Molecular biomarkers in classic Hodgkin lymphoma

Classic Hodgkin lymphoma is a unique B-cell derived malignancy featuring rare malignant Hodgkin and Reed Sternberg (HRS) cells that are embedded in a quantitively dominant tumor microenvironment (TME). Treatment of classic Hodgkin lymphoma has significantly evolved in the past decade with improving treatment outcomes for newly diagnosed patients and the minority of patients suffering from disease progression. However, the burden of toxicity and treatment-related long-term sequelae remains high in a typically young patient population. This highlights the need for better molecular biomarkers aiding in risk-adapted treatment strategies and predicting response to an increasing number of available treatments that now prominently involve multiple immunotherapy options. Here, we review modern molecular biomarker approaches that reflect both the biology of the malignant HRS cells and cellular components in the TME, while holding the promise to improve diagnostic frameworks for clinical decision-making and be feasible in clinical trials and routine practice. In particular, technical advances in sequencing and analytic pipelines using liquid biopsies, as well as deep phenotypic characterization of tissue architecture at single-cell resolution, have emerged as the new frontier of biomarker development awaiting further validation and implementation in routine diagnostic procedures.

Nivolumab and Ipilimumab Acting as Tormentors of Advanced Tumors by Unleashing Immune Cells and Associated Collateral Damage

Combining immune checkpoint inhibitors, specifically nivolumab (anti-PD-1) and ipilimumab (anti-CTLA-4), holds substantial promise in revolutionizing cancer treatment. This review explores the transformative impact of these combinations, emphasizing their potential for enhancing therapeutic outcomes across various cancers. Immune checkpoint proteins, such as PD1 and CTLA4, play a pivotal role in modulating immune responses. Blocking these checkpoints unleashes anticancer activity, and the synergy observed when combining multiple checkpoint inhibitors underscores their potential for enhanced efficacy. Nivolumab and ipilimumab harness the host's immune system to target cancer cells, presenting a powerful approach to prevent tumor development. Despite their efficacy, immune checkpoint inhibitors are accompanied by a distinct set of adverse effects, particularly immune-related adverse effects affecting various organs. Understanding these challenges is crucial for optimizing treatment strategies and ensuring patient well-being. Ongoing clinical trials are actively exploring the combination of checkpoint inhibitory therapies, aiming to decipher their synergistic effects and efficacy against diverse cancer types. This review discusses the mechanisms, adverse effects, and various clinical trials involving nivolumab and ipilimumab across different cancers, emphasizing their transformative impact on cancer treatment.

Distinct autoantibody profiles across checkpoint inhibitor types and toxicities

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are increasingly used in combination. To understand the effects of different ICI categories, we characterized changes in circulating autoantibodies in patients enrolled in the E4412 trial (NCT01896999) of brentuximab vedotin (BV) plus ipilimumab, BV plus nivolumab, or BV plus ipilimumab-nivolumab for Hodgkin Lymphoma. Cycle 2 Day 1 (C2D1) autoantibody levels were compared to pre-treatment baseline. Across 112 autoantibodies tested, we generally observed increases in ipilimumab-containing regimens, with decreases noted in the nivolumab arm. Among 15 autoantibodies with significant changes at C2D1, all nivolumab cases exhibited decreases, with more than 90% of ipilimumab-exposed cases showing increases. Autoantibody profiles also showed differences according to immune-related adverse event (irAE) type, with rash generally featuring increases and liver toxicity demonstrating decreases. We conclude that dynamic autoantibody profiles may differ according to ICI category and irAE type. These findings may have relevance to clinical monitoring and irAE treatment.

Emerging immunotherapies in the Hodgkin lymphoma armamentarium

INTRODUCTION

Brentuximab vedotin and PD-1 inhibitors have improved outcomes for classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL), but better therapies are needed for patients who relapse after these agents. Based on an improved understanding of cHL biology, there is a robust pipeline of novel therapies in development. In this review, we highlight emerging immunotherapeutic agents and combinations for cHL.

AREAS COVERED

We review clinical trials of novel PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors beyond FDA-approved agents, checkpoint inhibitors targeting CTLA-4, LAG-3, TIM-3, TIGIT, and CD47/SIRPα, PD-1 inhibitor combinations with immunomodulatory agents and epigenetic modifying therapies, antibody-drug conjugates, bispecific antibodies, and cellular therapies including anti-CD30 CAR-T and allogeneic NK cell therapy. We review the key safety and efficacy data from published phase 1-2 studies and highlight trials in progress, including the first phase 3 trial for PD-1 inhibitor-refractory cHL.

EXPERT OPINION

Many novel immunotherapies hold great promise in cHL. Rational combinations with existing agents and next-generation antibody and CAR-T constructs may improve response rates and durability. Identifying biomarkers of response to these immunotherapies and using more sensitive tools to assess response, such as circulating tumor DNA, may further inform treatment decisions and enable a precision medicine approach in the future.

Beyond Chemotherapy: Present and Future Perspectives in the Treatment of Lymphoproliferative Disorders

Over the past three decades, the treatment of lymphoproliferative disorders has undergone profound changes, notably due to the increasing availability of innovative therapies with the potential to redefine clinical management paradigms. A major impact is related to the development of monoclonal antibodies, checkpoint inhibitors, bispecific antibodies, and chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapies. This review discusses the current landscape of clinical trials targeting various hematological malignancies, highlighting promising early-phase results and strategies to overcome resistance. Lymphoproliferative disorders encompass a range of conditions: while in Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) the goal is to reduce chemotherapy-related toxicity by integrating immunotherapy into the frontline setting, peripheral T cell lymphoma (PTCL) lacks effective targeted therapies. The review emphasizes a shifting therapeutic landscape towards precision medicine and treatment modalities that are less toxic yet more effective.

Efficacy and safety of bispecific antibodies vs. immune checkpoint blockade combination therapy in cancer: a real-world comparison

Emerging tumor immunotherapy methods encompass bispecific antibodies (BSABs), immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), and adoptive cell immunotherapy. BSABs belong to the antibody family that can specifically recognize two different antigens or epitopes on the same antigen. These antibodies demonstrate superior clinical efficacy than monoclonal antibodies, indicating their role as a promising tumor immunotherapy option. Immune checkpoints are also important in tumor immunotherapy. Programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) is a widely acknowledged immune checkpoint target with effective anti-tumor activity. PD-1 inhibitors have demonstrated notable therapeutic efficacy in treating hematological and solid tumors; however, more than 50% of patients undergoing this treatment exhibit a poor response. However, ICI-based combination therapies (ICI combination therapies) have been demonstrated to synergistically increase anti-tumor effects and immune response rates. In this review, we compare the clinical efficacy and side effects of BSABs and ICI combination therapies in real-world tumor immunotherapy, aiming to provide evidence-based approaches for clinical research and personalized tumor diagnosis and treatment.

Severe insulin resistance in a patient with diabetes after treatment with brentuximab vedotin

A man in his late 60s with a history of well-controlled type 2 diabetes and hepatic cirrhosis presented to the emergency department due to uncontrollable hyperglycaemia following the initial brentuximab vedotin (BV) infusion. BV was initiated as a treatment for mycosis fungoides, a form of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. The patient was diagnosed with severe hyperglycaemia with ketosis. Empiric treatment with amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, hydration and intravenous insulin infusion was initiated. Hyperglycaemia persisted despite receiving massive amounts of insulin and was corrected only after treatment with high-dose methylprednisolone for suspected type B insulin resistance. Extremely high and difficult-to-treat hyperglycaemia is a rare side effect of BV. Unfortunately, the patient died of upper gastrointestinal bleeding 22 days after discharge. In patients with obesity and/or diabetes mellitus, the blood glucose levels should be carefully monitored when treated with BV.

The role of radiotherapy in patients with refractory Hodgkin's lymphoma after treatment with brentuximab vedotin and/or immune checkpoint inhibitors

Background

Approximately 10%-30% of patients with Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) experience relapse or refractory (R/R) disease after first-line standard therapy. Brentuximab vedotin (BV) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have important roles in the salvage treatment of R/R HL. However, subsequent treatment for HL refractory to BV and/or ICI treatment is challenging.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed patients in two institutions who had R/R HL, experienced BV or ICI treatment failure, and received radiotherapy (RT) thereafter. The overall response rate (ORR), duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were analyzed.

Results

Overall, 19 patients were enrolled. First-line systemic therapy comprised doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD, 84.2%); AVD plus ICIs (10.5%); and bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone (BEACOPP, 5.3%). After first-line therapy, 15 (78.9%) and four patients (21.1%) had refractory disease and relapsed, respectively. After R/R HL diagnosis, six (31.6%), two (10.5%), and 11 (57.9%) patients received BV and ICIs concurrently, BV monotherapy, and ICI monotherapy, respectively. All patients received intensity-modulated RT (n = 12, 63.2%) or volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT; n = 7, 36.8%). The ORR as well as the complete response (CR) rate was 100%; the median DOR to RT was 17.2 months (range, 7.9-46.7 months). Two patients showed progression outside the radiation field; one patient had extensive in-field, out-of-field, nodal, and extranodal relapse. With a median follow-up time of 16.2 months (range, 9.2-23.2 months), the 1-year PFS and OS were 84.4% and 100%, respectively. PFS was associated with extranodal involvement (P = 0.019) and gross tumor volume (P = 0.044). All patients tolerated RT well without adverse events of grade ≥ 3.

Conclusion

RT is effective and safe for treating HL refractory to BV or ICIs and has the potential to be part of a comprehensive strategy for HL.

Brentuximab vedotin with dacarbazine or nivolumab as frontline cHL therapy for older patients ineligible for chemotherapy

ABSTRACT

Older patients with advanced-stage classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) have inferior outcomes compared with younger patients, potentially due to comorbidities and frailty. This noncomparative phase 2 study enrolled patients aged ≥60 years with cHL unfit for conventional chemotherapy to receive frontline brentuximab vedotin (BV; 1.8 mg/kg) with dacarbazine (DTIC; 375 mg/m2) (part B) or nivolumab (part D; 3 mg/kg). In parts B and D, 50% and 38% of patients, respectively, had ≥3 general comorbidities or ≥1 significant comorbidity. Of the 22 patients treated with BV-DTIC, 95% achieved objective response, and 64% achieved complete response (CR). With a median follow-up of 63.6 months, median duration of response (mDOR) was 46.0 months. Median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 47.2 months; median overall survival (mOS) was not reached. Of 21 patients treated with BV-nivolumab, 86% achieved objective response, and 67% achieved CR. With 51.6 months of median follow-up, mDOR, mPFS, and mOS were not reached. Ten patients (45%) with BV-DTIC and 16 patients (76%) with BV-nivolumab experienced grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events; sensory peripheral neuropathy (PN; 27%) and neutropenia (9%) were most common with BV-DTIC, and increased lipase (24%), motor PN (19%), and sensory PN (19%) were most common with BV-nivolumab. Despite high median age, inclusion of patients aged ≤88 years, and frailty, these results demonstrate safety and promising durable efficacy of BV-DTIC and BV-nivolumab combinations as frontline treatment, suggesting potential alternatives for older patients with cHL unfit for initial conventional chemotherapy. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01716806.

Immune checkpoint blockade in hematological malignancies: current state and future potential

Malignant cells are known to evade immune surveillance by engaging immune checkpoints which are negative regulators of the immune system. By restoring the T-lymphocyte mediated anti-tumor effect, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have revolutionized the treatment of solid tumors but have met rather modest success in hematological malignancies. Currently, the only FDA approved indications for ICI therapy are in classic hodgkin lymphoma and primary mediastinal B cell lymphoma. Multiple clinical trials have assessed ICI therapy alone and in combination with standard of care treatments in other lymphomas, plasma cell neoplasms and myeloid neoplasms but were noted to have limited efficacy. These trials mostly focused on PD-1/PDL-1 and CTLA-4 inhibitors. Recently, there has been an effort to target other T-lymphocyte checkpoints like LAG-3, TIM-3, TIGIT along with improving strategies of PD-1/PDL-1 and CTLA-4 inhibition. Drugs targeting the macrophage checkpoint, CD47, are also being tested. Long term safety and efficacy data from these ongoing studies are eagerly awaited. In this comprehensive review, we discuss the mechanism of immune checkpoint inhibitors, the key takeaways from the reported results of completed and ongoing studies of these therapies in the context of hematological malignancies.

Adrenal crisis mainly manifested as recurrent syncope secondary to tislelizumab: a case report and literature review

As an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI), tislelizumab is an anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) drug. With the extensive application of ICIs, there is an ever-increasing proportion of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in clinical settings, some of which may even be life-threatening. Herein, we present a patient with tislelizumab-induced adrenal crisis. The main clinical manifestation was recurrent syncope accompanied by high-grade fever. Timely identification and hormone replacement therapy helped the patient overcome the crisis well. Finally, the patient discontinued tislelizumab and switched to antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) therapy. We report this case to improve our understanding of this situation, identify this kind of disease, and prevent adrenal crisis in time. Eventually, limiting toxicities reduces the interruption of immunotherapy. Since irAEs are multisystem damage with more non-specific symptoms, except for oncologists, general practitioners who endorse the need for taking a holistic approach to the patient should play a vital role in the management of cancer treatment.

Antibody based therapies in Hodgkin lymphoma

Multimodality treatment approaches, with systemic therapies at their core, have made Hodgkin Lymphoma a highly curable cancer. Unmet needs remain. Resistance to therapy manifested by refractory and relapsed disease, and treatment related short- and long-term morbidity are the key challenges. Patient outcomes have improved in the recent past with the advent of novel therapies and are borne out of a better understanding of the disease biology and translational medicine. Antibody based therapies, more broadly immunotherapies, are leading the change in the way we treat this disease. This review looks at the tumor antigen-directed immunotherapies, and immune checkpoint inhibitors that are attempting to overcome the unmet challenges.

The optimal management of relapsed and refractory Hodgkin lymphoma: post-brentuximab and checkpoint inhibitor failure

The treatment landscape of classical Hodgkin lymphoma has changed dramatically over the past decade. Relapsed and refractory mainstay therapeutics such as brentuximab vedotin (BV) and checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) are being moved to earlier lines of therapy. However, the treatment of patients who progress after BV and CPI remains a challenge. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation still plays an important role in this patient population as the only current treatment approach with curative potential. Unfortunately, not all patients are transplant candidates, and many will still relapse afterward. Cytotoxic chemotherapy and radiation may be used for symptom palliation or as a bridge to transplant. Targeted therapies, including the antibody drug conjugate, camidanlumab tesirine, and transcriptional agents such mammalian target of rapamycin and histone deacetylase inhibitors have shown some potential in patients with refractory disease. In addition, combination therapies with CPIs and novel agents may help overcome resistance to therapy. Clinical trials with cellular therapies, including chimeric antigen receptor T cells targeting CD30 and allogeneic natural killer cells combined with AFM13, a CD30/CD16a-bispecific antibody, have shown promising results. The availability of more therapeutic options for this patient population is eagerly awaited.

Safety and efficacy of PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors in relapsed and refractory Hodgkin's lymphoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 20 prospective studies

BACKGROUND

Inhibitors of programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) have been used in the treatment of relapsed and refractory Hodgkin's lymphoma (R/R HL) recently. To further understand the safety and efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in R/R HL, we conducted this meta-analysis.

METHODS

Databases and the Clinical Registration Platforms have been systematically searched for related studies by March 2022. For safety analysis, the incidence and exhibition of any grade and grade 3 or higher adverse effects (AEs) were evaluated. Besides, severe AEs (SAEs), treatment-related deaths, and AEs leading to treatment discontinuation were summarized. The overall response rate (ORR), complete response (CR) rate, partial response (PR) rate, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and duration of response (DOR) were calculated for efficacy analysis. All processes were implemented mainly through the package Meta and MetaSurv of software R 4.1.2.

RESULTS

Overall 20 studies and 1440 patients were enrolled. The pooled incidence of any grade and grade 3 or higher AEs were 92% and 26%, respectively. The pooled ORR, CR rate and PR rate were 79%, 44% and 34%, respectively. The most common AEs were neuropathy (29%), nausea (27%), pyrexia (26%), and leukopenia (25%), and the most common grade 3 or higher AEs included leukopenia (10%), infusion reaction (8%), weight gain (3%), and neutropenia (2.7%). In survival analysis, pembrolizumab monotherapy appeared to perform better compared to nivolumab monotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors show promising efficacy and tolerable AEs in the treatment of R/R HL.

SOHO State of the Art Updates and Next Questions | From Biology to Therapy: Progress in Hodgkin Lymphoma

Classic Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) is a unique lymphoid malignancy where the malignant cells comprise only 1% to 2% of the total tumor cellularity. Over the past 2 decades, the treatment of HL has evolved drastically based on the advent of novel targeted therapies. Novel agents including programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors, antibody-drug conjugates such as brentuximab vedotin, bispecific antibodies, and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapies have served to shape the management of HL in the frontline as well as the relapsed and refractory (R/R) setting. Some of these agents have been incorporated into treatment algorithms, while others are currently under investigation demonstrating promising results. This review focuses on highlighting the underlying tumor biology forming the basis of therapeutics in HL, and reviews some of the emerging and established novel therapies.

Nivolumab combined with brentuximab vedotin for R/R primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma: a 3-year follow-up

Patients with relapsed/refractory primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma (R/R PMBL) have poor responses to salvage therapy. Nivolumab and brentuximab vedotin (BV) showed promising early efficacy in patients with R/R PMBL in the phase 1/2 open-label, multicenter CheckMate 436 study; we report safety and efficacy findings from the 3-year follow-up. Patients who were eligible were aged ≥15 years with R/R PMBL previously treated with either high-dose chemotherapy plus autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) or ≥2 prior multiagent chemotherapies, and had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status scores of 0 to 1 and CD30 expression of ≥1%. Patients were treated with nivolumab 240 mg and BV 1.8 mg/kg once every 3 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary end point was objective response rate (ORR); secondary end points included complete response rate, duration of response, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Safety was monitored throughout. At final database lock (30 March 2022), 29 patients had received nivolumab plus BV; median follow-up was 39.6 months. Investigator-assessed ORR was 73.3%; median time to response was 1.3 months (range, 1.1-4.8). Median PFS was 26.0 months; median OS was not reached. PFS and OS rates at 24 months were 55.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 32.0-73.8) and 75.5% (95% CI, 55.4-87.5), respectively. The most frequently occurring grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse event was neutropenia. Consolidative HCT was received by 12 patients, with a 100-day complete response rate of 100.0%. This 3-year follow-up showed long-term efficacy for nivolumab plus BV in R/R PMBL, with no new safety signals. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02581631.

Optimizing Treatment for Relapsed/Refractory Classic Hodgkin Lymphoma in the Era of Immunotherapy

Most patients with classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) are cured with combination chemotherapy, but approximately 10-20% will relapse, and another 5-10% will have primary refractory disease. The treatment landscape of relapsed/refractory (R/R) cHL has evolved significantly over the past decade following the approval of brentuximab vedotin (BV), an anti-CD30 antibody-drug conjugate, and the PD-1 inhibitors nivolumab and pembrolizumab. These agents have significantly expanded options for salvage therapy prior to autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (AHCT), post-transplant maintenance, and treatment of relapse after AHCT, which have led to improved survival in the modern era. In this review, we highlight our approach to the management of R/R cHL in 2023 with a focus on choosing first salvage therapy, post-transplant maintenance, and treatment of relapse after AHCT. We also discuss the management of older adults and transplant-ineligible patients, who require a separate approach. Finally, we review novel immunotherapy approaches in clinical trials, including combinations of PD-1 inhibitors with other immune-activating agents as well as novel antibody-drug conjugates, bispecific antibodies, and cellular immunotherapies. Ongoing studies assessing biomarkers of response to immunotherapy and dynamic biomarkers such as circulating tumor DNA may further inform treatment decisions and enable a more personalized approach in the future.

Immunotherapy in hematologic malignancies: achievements, challenges and future prospects

The immune-cell origin of hematologic malignancies provides a unique avenue for the understanding of both the mechanisms of immune responsiveness and immune escape, which has accelerated the progress of immunotherapy. Several categories of immunotherapies have been developed and are being further evaluated in clinical trials for the treatment of blood cancers, including stem cell transplantation, immune checkpoint inhibitors, antigen-targeted antibodies, antibody-drug conjugates, tumor vaccines, and adoptive cell therapies. These immunotherapies have shown the potential to induce long-term remission in refractory or relapsed patients and have led to a paradigm shift in cancer treatment with great clinical success. Different immunotherapeutic approaches have their advantages but also shortcomings that need to be addressed. To provide clinicians with timely information on these revolutionary therapeutic approaches, the comprehensive review provides historical perspectives on the applications and clinical considerations of the immunotherapy. Here, we first outline the recent advances that have been made in the understanding of the various categories of immunotherapies in the treatment of hematologic malignancies. We further discuss the specific mechanisms of action, summarize the clinical trials and outcomes of immunotherapies in hematologic malignancies, as well as the adverse effects and toxicity management and then provide novel insights into challenges and future directions.

Antibody-drug conjugates come of age in oncology

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) combine the specificity of monoclonal antibodies with the potency of highly cytotoxic agents, potentially reducing the severity of side effects by preferentially targeting their payload to the tumour site. ADCs are being increasingly used in combination with other agents, including as first-line cancer therapies. As the technology to produce these complex therapeutics has matured, many more ADCs have been approved or are in late-phase clinical trials. The diversification of antigenic targets as well as bioactive payloads is rapidly broadening the scope of tumour indications for ADCs. Moreover, novel vector protein formats as well as warheads targeting the tumour microenvironment are expected to improve the intratumour distribution or activation of ADCs, and consequently their anticancer activity for difficult-to-treat tumour types. However, toxicity remains a key issue in the development of these agents, and better understanding and management of ADC-related toxicities will be essential for further optimization. This Review provides a broad overview of the recent advances and challenges in ADC development for cancer treatment.

Sequencing novel agents in the treatment of classical Hodgkin lymphoma

INTRODUCTION

Classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) is a curable disease, with durable remission achieved in about 80% of patients following first-line treatment. Three new drugs were introduced to the daily use in cHL: brentuximab vedotin (BV), nivolumab, and pembrolizumab. All three drugs were initially approved for the treatment of relapsed/refractory cHL (RRHL) and with their promising outcomes, they are now incorporated in different stages of the treatment.

AREAS COVERED

We performed a literature search using PubMed on all cHL studies investigating BV and CPIs within the past 10 years. We analyzed literature to presume the sequencing of these novel agents.

EXPERT OPINION

Addition of BV or nivolumab to AVD backbone in the frontline setting showed promising activity in advanced stage cHL. BV and CPIs combined with chemotherapy in the second-line treatment of cHL are evaluated in phase 2 studies and comparable results are reported. The results of BrECADD, with good efficacy and toxicity profile, should be followed. Pembrolizumab was shown to be more effective in RRHL compared to BV in patients who have relapsed post-ASCT or ineligible for ASCT. BV is used in post-ASCT maintenance in high-risk cases, although its role will be questioned as it is increasingly used in the frontline treatment.

Efficacy of Immune Checkpoint Blockade and Biomarkers of Response in Lymphoma: A Narrative Review

Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) has revolutionized the prognosis of several advanced-stage solid tumors. However, its success has been far more limited in hematological malignancies and is mostly restricted to classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) and primary mediastinal B cell lymphoma (PMBCL). In patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), response to PD-1/PD-L1 ICB monotherapy has been relatively limited, although some subtypes are more sensitive than others. Numerous predictive biomarkers have been investigated in solid malignancies, such as PD-L1 expression, tumor mutational burden (TMB) and microsatellite instability (MSI), among others. This review aims to appraise the current knowledge on PD-1/PD-L1 ICB efficacy in lymphoma when used either as monotherapy or combined with other agents, and describes potential biomarkers of response in this specific setting.

The Tumor Microenvironment in Classic Hodgkin's Lymphoma in Responder and No-Responder Patients to First Line ABVD Therapy

Although classical Hodgkin lymphoma (CHL) is typically curable, 15-25% of individuals eventually experience a relapse and pass away from their disease. In CHL, the cellular microenvironment is constituted by few percent of H/RS (Hodgkin/Reed-Sternberg) tumor cells surrounded from a heterogeneous infiltration of inflammatory cells. The interplay of H/RS cells with other immune cells in the microenvironment may provide novel strategies for targeted immunotherapies. In this paper we analyzed the microenvironment content in CHL patients with responsive disease (RESP) and patients with relapsed/refractory disease to treatment (REL). Our results indicate the increase of CD68⁺ and CD163⁺ macrophages, the increase of PDL-1⁺ cells and of CD34⁺ microvessels in REL patients respective to RESP patients. In contrast we also found the decrease of CD3⁺ and of CD8⁺ lymphocytes in REL patients respective to RESP patients. Finally, in REL patients our results show the positive correlation between CD68⁺ macrophages and PDL-1⁺ cells as well as a negative correlation between CD163⁺ and CD3⁺.

Education and Empowering Special Forces to Eradicate Secret Defectors: Immune System-Based Treatment Approaches for Mature T- and NK-Cell Malignancies

Mature T- and NK-cell leukemia/lymphoma (MTCL/L) constitute a heterogeneous group of, currently, 30 distinct neoplastic entities that are overall rare, and all present with a challenging molecular markup. Thus, so far, the use of first-line cancer treatment modalities, including chemotherapies, achieve only limited clinical responses associated with discouraging prognoses. Recently, cancer immunotherapy has evolved rapidly, allowing us to help patients with, e.g., solid tumors and also relapsed/refractory B-cell malignancies to achieve durable clinical responses. In this review, we systematically unveiled the distinct immunotherapeutic approaches available, emphasizing the special impediments faced when trying to employ immune system defense mechanisms to target 'one of their own-gone mad'. We summarized the preclinical and clinical efforts made to employ the various platforms of cancer immunotherapies including antibody-drug conjugates, monoclonal as well as bispecific antibodies, immune-checkpoint blockades, and CAR T cell therapies. We emphasized the challenges to, but also the goals of, what needs to be done to achieve similar successes as seen for B-cell entities.

Single or tandem autologous stem cell transplantation for treating Chinese patients with refractory/relapsed classical Hodgkin lymphoma

BACKGROUND

Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is the standard treatment strategy for refractory or relapsed classical Hodgkin lymphoma (R/R cHL). However, a single transplantation is insufficient to cure the disease because of unfavorable risk factors. Herein, we evaluated the outcomes of single or tandem ASCT in patients with R/R cHL, especially in high-risk patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed R/R cHL patients who underwent single or tandem ASCT between April 2000 and June 2021 at the Beijing Cancer Hospital and Peking University International Hospital.

RESULTS

A total of 134 patients were enrolled. Patients were allocated to a favorable-risk group (group A, n = 33), an unfavorable-risk group (group B, n = 81) that underwent single ASCT, and an unfavorable-risk group that underwent tandem ASCT (group C, n = 20). The median follow-up time was 99 months (range, 91-107 months), and no treatment-related deaths occurred after single or tandem ASCT. However, 27 patients (2 in group C) died during the follow-up period. The groups A, B, and C had 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates of 77.05%, 45%, and 74.67%, respectively (p = 0.0014), and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates of 89.85%, 76.06%, and 95%, respectively (p = 0.18). Neither the median PFS rates of groups A and C nor the OS rates of all groups were reached.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study discusses the advantages of tandem transplantation for high-risk patients with R/R cHL.

Novel insights into Hodgkin lymphoma biology by single-cell analysis

The emergence and rapid development of single-cell technologies mark a paradigm shift in cancer research. Various technology implementations represent powerful tools to understand cellular heterogeneity, identify minor cell populations that were previously hard to detect and define, and make inferences about cell-to-cell interactions at single-cell resolution. Applied to lymphoma, recent advances in single-cell RNA sequencing have broadened opportunities to delineate previously underappreciated heterogeneity of malignant cell differentiation states and presumed cell of origin, and to describe the composition and cellular subsets in the ecosystem of the tumor microenvironment (TME). Clinical deployment of an expanding armamentarium of immunotherapy options that rely on targets and immune cell interactions in the TME emphasizes the requirement for a deeper understanding of immune biology in lymphoma. In particular, classic Hodgkin lymphoma (CHL) can serve as a study paradigm because of its unique TME, featuring infrequent tumor cells among numerous nonmalignant immune cells with significant interpatient and intrapatient variability. Synergistic to advances in single-cell sequencing, multiplexed imaging techniques have added a new dimension to describing cellular cross talk in various lymphoma entities. Here, we comprehensively review recent progress using novel single-cell technologies with an emphasis on the TME biology of CHL as an application field. The described technologies, which are applicable to peripheral blood, fresh tissues, and formalin-fixed samples, hold the promise to accelerate biomarker discovery for novel immunotherapeutic approaches and to serve as future assay platforms for biomarker-informed treatment selection, including immunotherapies.

Treatment options in primary mediastinal B cell lymphoma patients, retrospective multicentric analysis; a Turkısh oncology group study

Introduction and Aim

Primary mediastinal B-cell lymphomas (PMBL) are aggressive B- cell lymphomas. Although the initial treatment models vary in PMBL, appropriate treatment methods are not known. We aim to show real-life data on health outcomes in adult patients with PMBL who received various type of chemoimmunotherapies in Turkey.

Method

We analyzed the data of 61 patients who received treatments for PMBL from 2010 to 2020. The overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of the patients were evaluated.

Results

61 patients were observed in this study. The mean age of the study group was 38.4 ± 13.5 years. From among them, 49.2% of the patients were female (n = 30). For first-line therapy, 33 of them had received rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) regimen (54%). Twenty-five patients had received rituximab, etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin (DA-EPOCH-R) regimen. The ORR was 77%. The median OS and PFS were as follows: 25 months (95% CI: 20.4-29.4) and 13 months (95% CI: 8.6-17.3), respectively. The OS and PFS at 12 months were 91.3% and 50%, respectively. The OS and PFS at five years were 64.9% and 36.7%, respectively. Median follow-up time period was 20 months (IQR 8.5-38.5).

Conclusion

R-CHOP and DA-EPOCH-R showed good results in PMBL. These remain one of the best determined systemic treatment options for first-line therapy. Also, the treatment was associated with good efficacy and tolerability.

Immune-related adverse events induced by programmed death protein-1 inhibitors from the perspective of lymphoma immunotherapy

Lymphoma, which is highly malignant, stems from lymph nodes and lymphoid tissue. Lymphoma cells express programmed death-ligand 1/2 (PD-L1/PD-L2), which binds with programmed cell death 1 protein (PD-1) to establish inhibitory signaling that impedes the normal function of T cells and allows tumor cells to escape immune system surveillance. Recently, immune checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapies such as PD-1 inhibitors (nivolumab and pembrolizumab) have been introduced into the lymphoma treatment algorithm and have shown remarkable clinical efficacy and greatly improve prognosis in lymphoma patients. Accordingly, the number of lymphoma patients who are seeking treatment with PD-1 inhibitors is growing annually, which results in an increasing number of patients developing immune-related adverse events (irAEs). The occurrence of irAEs inevitably affects the benefits provided by immunotherapy, particularly when PD-1 inhibitors are applied. However, the mechanisms and characteristics of irAEs induced by PD-1 inhibitors in lymphoma need further investigation. This review article summarizes the latest research advances in irAEs during treatment of lymphoma with PD-1 inhibitors. A comprehensive understanding of irAEs incurred in immunotherapy can help to achieve better efficacy with PD-1 inhibitors in lymphoma.

A Phase 2 Trial of Ibrutinib and Nivolumab in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Classical Hodgkin's Lymphoma

BACKGROUND

Relapsed or refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) remains a difficult treatment challenge. Although checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) have provided clinical benefit for these patients, responses are generally not durable, and progression eventually occurs. Discovering combination therapies which maximize the immune response of CPI therapy may overcome this limitation. We hypothesized that adding ibrutinib to nivolumab will lead to deeper and more durable responses in cHL by promoting a more favorable immune microenvironment leading to enhanced T-cell-mediated anti-lymphoma responses.

METHODS

We conducted a single arm, phase II clinical trial testing the efficacy of nivolumab in combination with ibrutinib in patients ≥18 years of age with histologically confirmed cHL who had received at least one prior line of therapy. Prior treatment with CPIs was allowed. Ibrutinib was administered at 560 mg daily until progression in combination with nivolumab 3 mg/kg IV every 3 weeks for up to 16 cycles. The primary objective was complete response rate (CRR) assessed per Lugano criteria. Secondary objectives included overall response rate (ORR), safety, progression free survival (PFS), and duration of response (DoR).

RESULTS

A total of 17 patients from two academic centers were enrolled. The median age of all patients was 40 (range 20-84). The median number of prior lines of treatment was five (range 1-8), including 10 patients (58.8%) who had progressed on prior nivolumab therapy. Most treatment related events were mild (

CONCLUSIONS

Combined nivolumab and ibrutinib led to a CRR of 29.4% in R/R cHL. Although this study did not meet its primary efficacy endpoint of a CRR of 50%, likely due to enrollment of heavily pretreated patients including over half of who had progressed on prior nivolumab treatment, responses that were achieved with combination ibrutinib and nivolumab therapy tended to be durable even in the case of prior progression on nivolumab therapy. Larger studies investigating the efficacy of dual BTK inhibitor/immune checkpoint blockade, particularly in patients who had previously progressed on checkpoint blockade therapy, are warranted.

Collapse

Key Words

• Hodgkin’s lymphoma
• ibrutinib
• nivolumab

Collapse

MESH Headings Collapse

Grants

• P30 CA016058 NCI NIH HHS

Collapse

Affiliation(s)

Walter Hanel Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, The Ohio State University, 460 W 10th Ave., Columbus, OH 43210, USA
Polina Shindiapina Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, The Ohio State University, 460 W 10th Ave., Columbus, OH 43210, USA
David A. Bond Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, The Ohio State University, 460 W 10th Ave., Columbus, OH 43210, USA
Yazeed Sawalha Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, The Ohio State University, 460 W 10th Ave., Columbus, OH 43210, USA
Narendranath Epperla Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, The Ohio State University, 460 W 10th Ave., Columbus, OH 43210, USA
Timothy Voorhees Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, The Ohio State University, 460 W 10th Ave., Columbus, OH 43210, USA
Rina Li Welkie Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, The Ohio State University, 460 W 10th Ave., Columbus, OH 43210, USA
Ying Huang Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, The Ohio State University, 460 W 10th Ave., Columbus, OH 43210, USA
Gregory K. Behbehani Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, The Ohio State University, 460 W 10th Ave., Columbus, OH 43210, USA
Xiaoli Zhang Center for Biostatistics, Department of Biomedical Informatics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
Eric McLaughlin Center for Biostatistics, Department of Biomedical Informatics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
Wing K. Chan Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, The Ohio State University, 460 W 10th Ave., Columbus, OH 43210, USA
Jonathan E. Brammer Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, The Ohio State University, 460 W 10th Ave., Columbus, OH 43210, USA
Samantha Jaglowski Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, The Ohio State University, 460 W 10th Ave., Columbus, OH 43210, USA
John C. Reneau Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, The Ohio State University, 460 W 10th Ave., Columbus, OH 43210, USA
Beth A. Christian Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, The Ohio State University, 460 W 10th Ave., Columbus, OH 43210, USA
Basem M. William Blood and Marrow Transplant and Cell Therapy Program, OhioHealth, 500 Thomas Ln #A3, Columbus, OH 43214, USA
Jonathon B. Cohen Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, 1365 Clifton Road NE, B4013, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
Robert A. Baiocchi Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, The Ohio State University, 460 W 10th Ave., Columbus, OH 43210, USA
Kami Maddocks Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, The Ohio State University, 460 W 10th Ave., Columbus, OH 43210, USA
Kristie A. Blum Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, 1365 Clifton Road NE, B4013, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
Lapo Alinari Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, The Ohio State University, 460 W 10th Ave., Columbus, OH 43210, USA

Collapse

Immunotherapy for Hodgkin lymphoma: From monoclonal antibodies to chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy

Although up to 80 % of Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) patients are cured with first-line therapy, relapsed/refractory HL remains a major clinical obstacle and is fatal for patients who are not candidates for autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) or relapse after treatment. Several immune-based approaches have been investigated in recent years with the aim of exerting a possible antitumor effect through the immune system response to cancer cells. Clinical studies on novel agents, including brentuximab vedotin (BV) and PD-1 inhibitors, have successfully demonstrated their effectiveness in relapsed disease after ASCT. Additionally, studies examining combination strategies with the goal of reducing the risk of relapse and chemotherapy-related toxicity have showed encouraging results, mainly in untreated early unfavorable or advanced stage classical HL (cHL). Other non-approved immunotherapies such as camidanlumab tesirine, bispecific CD30/CD16A antibody, and CD30 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy are promising approaches that may reinforce the therapeutic arsenal available to patients.

Immune checkpoints in T cells during oncogenic γ-herpesvirus infections

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) and Kaposi sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV) are two persistent oncogenic γ-herpesviruses with an exclusive tropism for humans. They cause cancers of lymphocyte, epithelial and endothelial cell origin, such as Burkitt's and Hodgkin's lymphoma, primary effusion lymphoma, nasopharyngeal carcinoma, and Kaposi sarcoma. Mutations in immune-related genes but also adverse events during immune checkpoint inhibition in cancer patients have revealed molecular requirements for immune control of EBV and KSHV. These include costimulatory and coinhibitory receptors on T cells that are currently explored or already therapeutically targeted in tumor patients. This review discusses these co-receptors and their influence on EBV- and KSHV-associated diseases. The respective studies reveal surprising specificities of some of these receptors for immunity to these tumor viruses, benefits of their blockade for some but not other virus-associated diseases, and that EBV- and KSHV-specific immune control should be monitored during immune checkpoint inhibition to prevent adverse events that might be associated with their reactivation during treatment.

Anti-CD30 antibody-drug conjugate therapy in lymphoma: current knowledge, remaining controversies, and future perspectives

CD30 is overexpressed in several lymphoma types, including classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL), some peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCL), and some cutaneous T-cell lymphomas. The antibody-drug conjugate brentuximab vedotin targets CD30-positive cells and has been evaluated for the treatment of various lymphoma entities. This narrative review summarizes 10 years of experience with brentuximab vedotin for the treatment of CD30-positive lymphomas, discusses novel therapies targeting CD30 in development, and highlights remaining controversies relating to CD30-targeted therapy across lymphoma types. The collective body of evidence for brentuximab vedotin demonstrates that exploitation of CD30 can provide sustained benefits across a range of different CD30-positive lymphomas, in both clinical trials and real-world settings. Preliminary experience with brentuximab vedotin in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors for relapsed/refractory cHL is encouraging, but further exploration is required. The optimal use of brentuximab vedotin for first-line therapy of PTCL remains to be determined. Further research is required on brentuximab vedotin treatment in high-risk patient populations, and in rare lymphoma subtypes, for which no standard of care exists. Novel therapies targeting CD30 include chimeric antigen receptor therapies and bispecific antibody T-cell engagers, which may be expected to further improve outcomes for patients with CD30-positive lymphomas in the coming years.

Advances in the treatment of Hodgkin lymphoma: Current and future approaches

Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) is a rare type of lymphoma with unique histologic, immunophenotypic, and clinical features. It represents approximately one-tenth of lymphomas diagnosed in the United States and consists of two subtypes: classical Hodgkin's lymphoma (cHL), which accounts for majority of HL cases, and nodular lymphocyte predominant Hodgkin lymphoma represent approximately 5% of Hodgkin lymphoma cases. From this point, we will be focusing on cHL in this review. In general, it is considered a highly curable disease with first-line chemotherapy with or without the addition of radiotherapy. However, there are patients with disease that relapses or fails to respond to frontline regimens and the standard treatment modality for chemo sensitive cHL is high dose chemotherapy followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (AHSCT). In recent years, targeted immunotherapy has revolutionized the treatment of cHL while many novel agents are being explored in addition to chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy which is also being investigated in clinical trials as a potential treatment option.

Management of classical Hodgkin lymphoma: a look at up to date evidence and current treatment approaches

The treatment landscape of classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) has undergone significant changes over the past 20 years. Gradual improvements have been made in the management of cHL patients, particularly in prolonging the survival rate for those in the relapsed setting. Most of these improvements came with the addition of brentuximab vedotin and PD1 blockade (nivolumab and pembrolizumab) into the current cHL treatment algorithms. On the other hand, the treatment approach to cHL has become more complex than ever before, with multiple ways to add and sequence therapies to achieve long-term remission. In this review, we will discuss the most up-to-date evidence on the management of cHL patients with the inclusion of ongoing clinical trials in cHL. We will provide a general overview of the current therapeutic landscape of cHL in light of these most recent data. We conclude with our perspective on how the approach to cHL treatment may evolve in the future.

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in Hodgkin lymphoma in Switzerland, 20 years of experience: 2001-2020

Despite the high cure rate with initial therapy, approximately 10% of Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) patients are refractory to initial treatment, and up to 30% of patients will relapse after achieving initial complete remission. Despite promising initial results of treatment by immune checkpoint inhibitors, most patients will eventually progress. We analyzed 62 adult patients with relapsed or refractory HL (rrHL) treated by allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) in one of three University Hospitals of Switzerland (Zurich, Basel, and Geneva) between May 2001 and January 2020. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints were relapse-free survival (RFS), non-relapse mortality (NRM), and relapse incidence, which were assessed in univariate analysis. The median follow-up was 61 months (interquartile range 59-139). The 2- and 5-year OS was 54% (standard error (SE) ±12) and 50.2% (SE ±13.3), respectively, and the 2- and 5-year RFS was 40.7% (SE ±16.3) and 34.4% (SE ±19.0), respectively. NRM was 23.1% (SE ±2.2) and 27.4% (SE ±2.5) at 2 and 5 years, respectively. The cumulative incidence of relapse was 36.1% (SE ±5.6) at 2 years and 38.2% (SE ±6.6) at 5 years. Our analysis of allo-HSCT outcomes in the context of rrHL shows encouraging OS and RFS rates, with the mortality rate reaching plateau at 50% at 2 years after allo-HSCT. This confirms that allo-HSCT still remains as a potentially curative option for half of patients with rrHL.

Promising drugs and treatment options for pediatric and adolescent patients with Hodgkin lymphoma

Currently-available therapies for newly-diagnosed pediatric and adolescent patients with Hodgkin lymphoma result in >95% survival at 5 years. Long-term survivors may suffer from long-term treatment-related side effects, however, so the past 20 years have seen clinical trials for children and adolescents with HL gradually abandon the regimens used in adults in an effort to improve this situation. Narrower-field radiotherapy can reduce long-term toxicity while maintaining good tumor control. Various risk-adapted chemo-radiotherapy strategies have been used. Early assessment of tumor response with interim positron emission tomography and/or measuring metabolic tumor volume has been used both to limit RT in patients with favorable characteristics and to adopt more aggressive therapies in patients with a poor response. Most classical Hodgkin's lymphoma relapses occur within 3 years of initial treatment, while relapses occurring 5 years or more after diagnosis are rare. As the outcome for patients with relapsed/refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma remains unsatisfactory, new drugs have been proposed for its prevention or treatment. This review summarizes the important advances made in recent years in the management of pediatric and adolescent with classical Hodgkin lymphoma, and the novel targeted treatments for relapsed and refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma.

Filling the Gap: The Immune Therapeutic Armamentarium for Relapsed/Refractory Hodgkin Lymphoma

Despite years of clinical progress which made Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) one of the most curable malignancies with conventional chemotherapy, refractoriness and recurrence may still affect up to 20–30% of patients. The revolution brought by the advent of immunotherapy in all kinds of neoplastic disorders is more than evident in this disease because anti-CD30 antibodies and checkpoint inhibitors have been able to rescue patients previously remaining without therapeutic options. Autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation still represents a significant step in the treatment algorithm for chemosensitive HL; however, the possibility to induce complete responses after allogeneic transplant procedures in patients receiving reduced-intensity conditioning regimens informs on its sensitivity to immunological control. Furthermore, the investigational application of adoptive T cell transfer therapies paves the way for future indications in this setting. Here, we seek to provide a fresh and up-to-date overview of the new immunotherapeutic agents dominating the scene of relapsed/refractory HL. In this optic, we will also review all the potential molecular mechanisms of tumor resistance, theoretically responsible for treatment failures, and we will discuss the place of allogeneic stem cell transplantation in the era of novel therapies.

Hodgkin lymphoma: 2023 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification, and management

DISEASE OVERVIEW

Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) is an uncommon B-cell lymphoid malignancy affecting 8540 new patients annually and representing approximately 10% of all lymphomas in the United States.

DIAGNOSIS

HL is composed of two distinct disease entities: classical HL and nodular lymphocyte-predominant HL. Nodular sclerosis, mixed cellularity, lymphocyte depletion, and lymphocyte-rich HL are subgroups of classical HL.

RISK STRATIFICATION

An accurate assessment of the stage of disease in patients with HL is critical for the selection of the appropriate therapy. Prognostic models that identify patients at low or high risk for recurrence, as well as the response to therapy as determined by positron emission tomography scan, are used to optimize therapy.

RISK-ADAPTED THERAPY

Initial therapy for HL patients is based on the histology of the disease, the anatomical stage, and the presence of poor prognostic features. Patients with early-stage disease are typically treated with combined modality strategies utilizing abbreviated courses of combination chemotherapy followed by involved-field radiation therapy, while those with advanced-stage disease receive a longer course of chemotherapy, often without radiation therapy. However, newer agents, including brentuximab vedotin and anti-programmed death-1 (PD-1) antibodies, are now being incorporated into frontline therapy.

MANAGEMENT OF RELAPSED/REFRACTORY DISEASE

High-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) followed by an autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) is the standard of care for most patients who relapse following initial therapy. For patients who fail HDCT with ASCT, brentuximab vedotin, PD-1 blockade, non-myeloablative allogeneic transplant, or participation in a clinical trial should be considered.

Combining BeEAM with Brentuximab Vedotin for High-Dose Therapy in CD30 Positive Lymphomas before Autologous Transplantation—A Phase I Study

The prognosis for patients with CD30+ lymphomas (Hodgkin lymphoma and various T-cell lymphomas) relapsing after autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is critical. Brentuximab vedotin (BV), an ADC targeting CD30, is an obvious candidate for inclusion into high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) regimens to improve outcomes. This single center phase I trial investigated 12 patients with CD30+ lymphoma (AITL: n = 5; relapsed HL: n = 7; median of two previous treatment lines) undergoing ASCT. In a 3 + 3 dose escalation design, 12 patients received a single BV dose at three dose levels (DL) (0.9/1.2/1.8 mg/kg b.w.) prior to standard BeEAM. All patients were treated as planned; no dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) occurred at DL 1 and 2. At DL 3, one DLT (paralytic ileus, fully recovering) occurred. Grade III febrile neutropenia occurred in one patient, and two others had septic complications, all fully recovering. Median hospitalization was 23 days. Hematologic recovery was normal. Six of twelve (50%) patients achieved CR. PFS and OS at 1 year were 67% (n = 8/12) and 83% (n = 10/12), respectively. The addition of brentuximab to standard BeEAM HDCT seems to be safe. We observed a CR rate of 75% post-ASCT in a highly pretreated population. The efficacy of this novel HDCT combination with BV at a 1.8 mg/kg dose level needs to be explored in larger studies.

Advances in immune therapies in hematological malignancies

Immunotherapy in cancer takes advantage of the exquisite specificity, potency, and flexibility of the immune system to eliminate alien tumor cells. It involves strategies to activate the entire immune defense, by unlocking mechanisms developed by tumor cells to escape from surrounding immune cells, as well as engineered antibody and cellular therapies. What is important to note is that these are therapeutics with curative potential. The earliest example of immune therapy is allogeneic stem cell transplantation, introduced in 1957, which is still an important modality in hematology, most notably in myeloid malignancies. In this review, we discuss developmental trends of immunotherapy in hematological malignancies, focusing on some of the strategies that we believe will have the most impact on future clinical practice in this field. In particular, we delineate novel developments for therapies that have already been introduced into the clinic, such as immune checkpoint inhibition and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies. Finally, we discuss the therapeutic potential of emerging strategies based on T-cell receptors and adoptive transfer of allogeneic natural killer cells.

Novel Salvage Therapy Options for Initial Treatment of Relapsed/Refractory Classical Hodgkin's Lymphoma: So Many Options, How to Choose?

The treatment landscape for relapsed/refractory classical Hodgkin's lymphoma (cHL) has evolved with the introduction of several novel agents. Historically, the standard of care for relapsed cHL was salvage chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). However, many patients are ineligible for ASCT or will have poor responses to salvage chemotherapy and ASCT. Brentuximab vedotin (BV) and checkpoint inhibitors (nivolumab/pembrolizumab) were initially approved in the post-ASCT setting. However, as a result of excellent responses and durable outcomes in this setting, they are now being studied and explored in earlier lines of therapy. Additionally, these agents are also being studied for post-transplant consolidation and maintenance with promising results in improving progression-free survival. We will review current salvage therapy options involving these novel agents and provide comparisons between regimens to aid the clinician in selecting the appropriate salvage regimen for patients who progress after first-line therapy.

Novel Agents For Relapsed and Refractory Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma: A Review

Classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) is the most common type of HL that occurs mainly in people aged between 15–30 and over 55 years. Although its general prognosis is favorable, 10%–30% of patients with cHL will ultimately develop relapsed or refractory disease (r/r cHL). Improving the cure rate of r/r cHL has proven to be challenging. Some novel agents, such as brentuximab vedotin and immune checkpoint inhibitors, which have been used in conventional regimens for patients with r/r cHL in the past decade, have been shown to have good curative effects. This paper reviews the conventional regimens for patients with r/r cHL and focuses on the newest clinical trials and treatment measures to prolong prognosis and reduce adverse events. The evaluation of prognosis plays a vital role in analyzing the risk of relapse or disease progression; thus, finding new predictive strategies may help treat patients with r/r cHL more efficaciously.

CD24 is a surrogate for 'immune-cold' phenotype in aggressive large B-cell lymphoma

The tumor microenvironment (TME) is a critical regulator of the development of malignant lymphoma. Therapeutics targeting the TME, especially immune checkpoint molecules, are changing the treatment strategy for lymphoma. However, the overall response to these therapeutics for diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is modest and new targets of immunotherapy are needed. To find critical immune checkpoint molecules for DLBCL, we explored the prognostic impact of immune checkpoint molecules and their ligands using publicly available datasets of gene expression profiles. In silico analysis of three independent datasets (GSE117556, GSE10846, and GSE181063) revealed that DLBCL expressing CD24 had a poor prognosis and had a high frequency of MYC aberrations. Moreover, gene set enrichment analysis showed that the ‘MYC‐targets‐hallmark’ (false discovery rate [FDR] = 0.024) and ‘inflammatory‐response‐hallmark’ (FDR = 0.001) were enriched in CD24‐high and CD24‐low DLBCL, respectively. In addition, the expression of cell‐specific markers of various immune cells was higher in CD24‐low DLBCL than in CD24‐high DLBCL. CIBERSORT analysis of the datasets showed fewer macrophages in CD24‐high DLBCL than in CD24‐low DLBCL. Additionally, immunohistochemical analysis of 335 cases of DLBCL showed that few TME cells were found in CD24‐high DLBCL, although statistical differences were not observed. These data indicate that CD24 expression suppresses immune cell components of the TME in DLBCL, suggesting that CD24 may be a target for cancer immunotherapy in aggressive large B‐cell lymphoma.