Dexamethasone plus oseltamivir versus dexamethasone in treatment-naive primary immune thrombocytopenia: a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial

Treatment of Immune Thrombocytopenia: Contextualization from a Historical Perspective

Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an autoimmune disease characterized by an isolated decrease in platelet count and an increased risk of bleeding. The pathogenesis is complex, affecting multiple components of the immune system and causing both peripheral destruction of platelets and inadequate production in the bone marrow. In this article, we review the treatment of ITP from a historical perspective, discussing first line and second line treatments, and management of refractory disease.

Pretreatment Absolute Immature Platelet Count is a Promising Predictor of Response to Short-Term Dexamethasone Monotherapy or Combination Therapy in Newly Diagnosed Adult Primary Immune Thrombocytopenia

Reliable indicators that can predict drug responsiveness in primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) patients are urgent. We aimed to establish a reference interval of percentage of immature platelet fraction (IPF%) and absolute immature platelet count (A-IPC), and assess their efficacy in discriminating ITP patients from controls, especially their predictive value for responsiveness to drug treatment. We retrospectively studied 72 treatment-naive adult patients with ITP who received Dexamethasone monotherapy or combination therapy. Baseline (pretreatment) information was collected from medical records. Reference intervals for A-IPC and IPF% were established based on controls and their effectiveness in discriminating ITP patients from controls was assessed. Predictive value of pretreatment IPF% and A-IPC at four co-primary endpoints of treatment response in patients were investigated. The 95% reference intervals for A-IPC and IPF% were (2.7-15.6) × 109/L and 1.2%-7.3%, respectively. Both A-IPC and IPF% had excellent discrimination ability for ITP patients from controls. It showed highly statistically significant differences in pretreatment A-IPC for predicting treatment response at day 7 between responders and non-responders, but not at days 14, 21 and 28. Pretreatment A-IPC had the higher area under the ROC curve with a cut-off of 0.86 than that of IPF% with a cut-off of 14.5% in predicting the treatment response in ITP patients at day 7. Pretreatment A-IPC exhibited acceptable predictive power and could be a promising predictor of response to short-term Dexamethasone monotherapy or combination therapy at day 7 in ITP patients.

Can low-dose intravenous immunoglobulin be an alternative to high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin in the treatment of children with newly diagnosed immune thrombocytopenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) is a first-line treatment for children with newly diagnosed immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). Higher doses of IVIg are associated with a more insupportable financial burden to pediatric patients' families and may produce more adverse reactions. Whether low-dose IVIg (LD-IVIg) can replace high-dose IVIg (HD-IVIg) has yet to be established. We conducted a comprehensive literature search from the establishment of the database to May 1, 2023, and eventually included 22 RCTs and 3 cohort studies compared different dosages of IVIg. A total of 1989 patients were included, with 991 patients in the LD-IVIg group and 998 patients in the HD-IVIg group. Our results showed no significant differences between the two groups in the effective rate (LD-IVIg: 91% vs. HD-IVIg: 93%; RR: 0.99; 95%CI: 0.96-1.02) and the durable remission rate (LD-IVIg: 65% vs. HD-IVIg: 67%; RR: 0.97; 95%CI: 0.89-1.07). Similar results were also found in the time of platelet counts (PC) starting to rise (MD: 0.01, 95%CI: -0.06-0.09), rising to normal (MD: 0.16, 95%CI: -0.03-0.35), and achieving hemostasis (MD: 0.11, 95%CI: -0.02-0.23) between the two groups. Subgroup analysis showed the effective rate of 0.6 g/kg was equal to 1 g/kg subgroup (91%) but higher than 0.8 g/kg subgroup (82%), and a combination with glucocorticoid may contribute to effect enhancement (combined with glucocorticoid: 91% vs. IVIg alone: 86%) whether combined with dexamethasone (92%) or methylprednisolone (91%). Besides, the incidence rate of adverse reactions in the LD-IVIg group (3%) was significantly lower than the HD-IVIg group (6%) (RR: 0.61; 95%CI: 0.38-0.98). So low-dose IVIg (≤ 1 g/kg) is effective, safe, and economical, which can replace high-dose IVIg (2 g/kg) as an initial treatment. This systematic review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022384604).

Successful treatment with oseltamivir phosphate in children with ITP who failed first-line therapy: a case series report

Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is a common bleeding disorder in children. First-line medicines (glucocorticoids and immunoglobulin) may not be effective for some children, endangering their lives, posing challenges for healthcare facilities, and leading to an unfavorable prognosis. As a sialidase inhibitor, oseltamivir phosphate can reduce the destruction of platelets in liver macrophages by inhibiting the sialylation of platelets, and finally achieve the purpose of increasing platelet count. In this paper, three cases of children with ITP who failed first-line therapy and were cured by oral administration of oseltamivir phosphate granules were reported. The mechanism of action of oseltamivir phosphate granules was clarified.

New insights into the glycobiology of immune thrombocytopenia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The platelet surface harbors a lush forest of glycans (carbohydrate polymers) attached to membrane proteins and lipids. Accumulating evidence suggests that these glycans may be relevant to the pathophysiology of immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). Here, we critically evaluate data that point to a possible role for loss of sialic acid in driving platelet clearance in ITP, comment on the potential use of neuraminidase inhibitors for treatment of ITP, and highlight open questions in this area.

RECENT FINDINGS

Multiple lines of evidence suggest a role for loss of platelet sialic acid in the pathophysiology of thrombocytopenia. Recent work has tested the hypothesis that neuraminidase-mediated cleavage of platelet sialic acid may trigger clearance of platelets in ITP. Some clinical evidence supports efficacy of the viral neuraminidase inhibitor oseltamivir in ITP, which is surprising given its lack of activity against human neuraminidases.

SUMMARY

Further study of platelet glycobiology in ITP is necessary to fill key knowledge gaps. A deeper understanding of the roles of platelet glycans in ITP pathophysiology will help to guide development of novel therapies.

Rituximab resistance in ITP and beyond

The pathophysiology of immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is complex and encompasses innate and adaptive immune responses, as well as megakaryocyte dysfunction. Rituximab is administered in relapsed cases and has the added benefit of inducing treatment-free remission in over 50% of patients. Nevertheless, the responses to this therapy are not long-lasting, and resistance development is frequent. B cells, T cells, and plasma cells play a role in developing resistance. To overcome this resistance, targeting these pathways through splenectomy and novel therapies that target FcγR pathway, FcRn, complement, B cells, plasma cells, and T cells can be useful. This review will summarize the pathogenetic mechanisms implicated in rituximab resistance and examine the potential therapeutic interventions to overcome it. This review will explore the efficacy of established therapies, as well as novel therapeutic approaches and agents currently in development.

Efficacy and Safety Analysis of Combination Therapy Consisting of Intravenous Immunoglobulin and Corticosteroids versus Respective Monotherapies in the Treatment of Relapsed ITP in Adults

Objective  In this study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combination therapy, consisting of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) and corticosteroids, in comparison to respective monotherapies in the treatment of relapsed immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) in adults. Methods  A retrospective analysis of clinical data was conducted on 205 adult patients with relapsed ITP who received first-line combination therapy or monotherapy in multiple centers across China from January 2010 to December 2022. The study evaluated the patients' clinical characteristics, efficacy, and safety. Results  We found that the proportion of patients with platelet counts in complete response was significantly higher in the combination group (71.83%) compared with the IVIg group (43.48%) and the corticosteroids group (23.08%). The mean PLT _max in the combination group (178 × 10 ⁹ /L) was significantly higher than that in the IVIg group (109 × 10 ⁹ /L) and the corticosteroids group (76 × 10 ⁹ /L). Additionally, the average time for platelet counts to reach 30 × 10 ⁹ /L, 50 × 10 ⁹ /L, and 100 × 10 ⁹ /L in the combination group was significantly shorter than in the monotherapy groups. The proportion curves for reaching these platelet counts during treatment were also significantly different from those in the monotherapy groups. However, there were no significant differences in the effective rate, clinical characteristics, and adverse events among the three groups. Conclusion  We concluded that combining IVIg and corticosteroids was a more effective and faster treatment for relapsed ITP in adults than using either therapy alone. The findings of this study provided clinical evidence and reference for the use of first-line combination therapy in the treatment of relapsed ITP in adults.

Recent progress in ITP treatment

In this review, the recently approved drugs avatrombopag and fostamatinib, which were not extensively covered within 2019 international recommendations for ITP, will be discussed in some detail. Avatrombopag appears more convenient than eltrombopag as it does not require dietary restrictions or subcutaneous administration like romiplostim. However, data on quality of life (QoL) are lacking and the rate of thromboembolic events in exposed patients is not negligible. Efficacy of fostamatinib, an inhibitor of macrophagic activity, is supported by placebo-controlled trials in patients refractory to several therapies, including TPO-RA. While hypertension and diarrhea have been reported, only one minor thrombotic event occurred in 146 exposed patients. In addition, several new treatment combinations and new agents entered clinical investigation in recent years. In a UK trial, combining mycophenolate mofetil with corticosteroids as first line therapy was more effective than corticosteroids alone, but at the cost of worse QoL. No combination, including oseltamivir or all-trans retinoic acid or danazol, resulted in convincing evidence of superior efficacy and safety when used in first or later lines of treatment. Agents targeting specific mechanisms are also discussed: sutimlimab (complement inhibitor); rilzabrutinib (BTK inhibitor) and efgartigimod (modified Fc fragment inhibiting FcRn). Only efgartigimod has completed phase 3 investigation.

Oseltamivir phosphate for suspension is bioequivalent to TAMIFLU in healthy volunteers: a randomized, open-label clinical study

PURPOSE

The study was aimed at evaluating the bioequivalence and safety of oseltamivir phosphate for suspension, provided by Shenzhen Beimei Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. and manufactured by Hetero Labs Limited, and the reference product TAMIFLU® in healthy Chinese subjects.

METHODS

A single-dose, randomized, two-phase, self-crossed model was adopted. Among 80 healthy subjects, 40 subjects in the fasting group and 40 subjects in the fed group. Subjects in the fasting group were randomized into two sequences according to the proportion of 1:1, each given 75 mg/12.5 mL of Oseltamivir Phosphate for Suspension or TAMIFLU®, and cross-administered after 7 days. Postprandial group is the same as fasting group.

RESULTS

The T_max of TAMIFLU® and Oseltamivir Phosphate for Suspension in the fasting group were 1.50 h and 1.25 h, which in the fed group were both 1.25 h. Geometrically adjusted mean ratios of the PK parameters of Oseltamivir Phosphate for Suspension along with TAMIFLU® under fasting and postprandial conditions were in the range of 80.00-125.00% at the 90% confidence interval (CI). The 90% CI of C_max, AUC_0-t, AUC_0-∞ for fasting group and postprandial group were (92.39,106.50), (94.26,100.67), (94.32,100.89) and (93.61,105.83),(95.64,100.19),(96.06,102.66). Among the subjects on medication, a total of 18 subjects reported 27 adverse events, all of which were treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), six of these TEAEs were rated as grade 2 in severity and the rest were as grade 1. The number of TEAEs in the test product and the reference product were 14,13 respectively.

CONCLUSION

Two Oseltamivir phosphate for suspensions are safe and bioequivalent.

A bibliometric analysis of primary immune thrombocytopenia from 2011 to 2021

Primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an autoimmune disorder characterized by isolated thrombocytopenia. This bibliometric analysis was applied to identify the characteristics of global scientific output, the hotspots, and frontiers of ITP over the past 10 years. We retrieved publications from 2011 to 2021 from the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC). Bibliometrix package, VOSviewer, and Citespace were used to analyse and visualize the trend, distribution, and hotspots of research on ITP. Altogether, there were 2084 papers, written by 9080 authors from 410 organizations in 70 countries/regions, published in 456 journals with 37 160 co-cited references. In the last decades, the most productive journal was British Journal of Haematology, China was the most productive country. and the most cited journal was Blood. Shandong University was the most productive institution in the field of ITP. NEUNERT C, 2011, BLOOD, CHENG G, 2011, LANCET, and PATEL VL, 2012, BLOOD were the top three most cited documents. "Thrombopoietin receptor agonist", "regulatory T cell" and "sialic acid" were three hotspots of the last decade. And "immature platelet fraction", "Th17", and "fostamatinib" would be research frontiers in the feature. The present study provided a novel insight for future research directions and scientific decision-making.

Efficacy and safety of treatments in newly diagnosed adult primary immune thrombocytopenia: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Immune thrombocytopenia is an autoimmune disease characterised by decreased platelet count. In recent years, novel therapeutic regimens have been investigated in randomised controlled trials (RCTs). We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of different treatments in newly diagnosed adult primary immune thrombocytopenia.

METHODS

We did a systematic review and network meta-analysis of RCTs involving treatments for newly diagnosed primary immune thrombocytopenia. PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched up to April 31, 2022. The primary outcomes were 6-month sustained response and early response. Secondary outcome was grade 3 or higher adverse events. This study is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022296179).

FINDINGS

Eighteen RCTs (n = 1944) were included in this study. Pairwise meta-analysis showed that the percentage of patients achieving early response was higher in the dexamethasone-containing doublet group than in the dexamethasone group (79.7% vs 68.7%, odds ratio [OR] 1.82, 95% CI 1.10-3.02). The difference was more profound for sustained response (60.5% vs 37.4%, OR 2.57, 95% CI 1.95-3.40). Network meta-analysis showed that dexamethasone plus recombinant human thrombopoietin ranked first for early response, followed by dexamethasone plus oseltamivir or tacrolimus. Rituximab plus prednisolone achieved highest sustained response, followed by dexamethasone plus all-trans retinoic acid or rituximab. Rituximab plus dexamethasone showed 15.3% of grade 3 or higher adverse events, followed by prednis(ol)one (4.8%) and all-trans retinoic acid plus dexamethasone (4.7%).

INTERPRETATION

Our findings suggested that compared with monotherapy dexamethasone or prednis(ol)one, the combined regimens had better early and sustained responses. rhTPO plus dexamethasone ranked top in early response, while rituximab plus corticosteroids obtained the best sustained response, but with more adverse events. Adding oseltamivir, all-trans retinoic acid or tacrolimus to dexamethasone reached equally encouraging sustained response, without compromising safety profile. Although this network meta-analysis compared all the therapeutic regimens up to date, more head-to-head RCTs with larger sample size are warranted to make direct comparison among these strategies.

FUNDING

National Natural Science Foundation of China, Major Research Plan of National Natural Science Foundation of China, Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation and Young Taishan Scholar Foundation of Shandong Province.

How we treat primary immune thrombocytopenia in adults

Primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an immune-mediated bleeding disorder characterized by decreased platelet counts and an increased risk of bleeding. Multiple humoral and cellular immune abnormalities result in accelerated platelet destruction and suppressed platelet production in ITP. The diagnosis remains a clinical exclusion of other causes of thrombocytopenia. Treatment is not required except for patients with active bleeding, severe thrombocytopenia, or cases in need of invasive procedures. Corticosteroids, intravenous immunoglobulin, and anti-RhD immunoglobulin are the classical initial treatments for newly diagnosed ITP in adults, but these agents generally cannot induce a long-term response in most patients. Subsequent treatments for patients who fail the initial therapy include thrombopoietic agents, rituximab, fostamatinib, splenectomy, and several older immunosuppressive agents. Other potential therapeutic agents, such as inhibitors of Bruton's tyrosine kinase and neonatal Fc receptor, are currently under clinical evaluation. An optimized treatment strategy should aim at elevating the platelet counts to a safety level with minimal toxicity and improving patient health-related quality of life, and always needs to be tailored to the patients and disease phases. In this review, we address the concepts of adult ITP diagnosis and management and provide a comprehensive overview of current therapeutic strategies under general and specific situations.

Clinical efficacy of recombinant human thrombopoietin combined with glucocorticoids in the treatment of immune thrombocytopenia

OBJECTIVE

Herein, we aimed to determine the clinical efficacy of recombinant human thrombopoietin (rhTPO) combined with glucocorticoids for treating immune thrombocytopenia (ITP).

METHODS

Clinical data of 87 patients with ITP admitted to our hospital were retrospectively analyzed, and patients were divided into two groups according to the treatment employed: 42 patients in the control group (CG) were prescribed glucocorticoids, and 45 patients in the study group (SG) received rhTPO combined with glucocorticoids.

RESULTS

The total effective treatment rate in the SG (95.56%) was higher than that in the CG (76.19%) (P < 0.05). The SG achieved a platelet (PLT) count > 50 × 10⁹/L faster and required fewer PLT transfusions than the CG (P < 0.05). At 1, 7, and 14 days after treatment, the PLT count increased in both groups and was higher in the SG than in the CG (P < 0.05). After treatment, CD3+, CD4+, and CD4+/CD8+ T cells increased, whereas CD8 + decreased in both groups, with the SG exhibiting a superior improvement to the CG (P < 0.05). Considering prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, and fibrinogen, differences between the two groups were not statistically significant, both before and after treatment (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

rhTPO combined with glucocorticoids for treating ITP can effectively enhance the therapeutic effect, regulate the T lymphocyte subpopulation, rapidly increase the PLT level, and induce no significant effect on the coagulation function of patients, with good safety and high clinical promotion value.

Changing Paradigms in ITP Management: Newer Tools for an Old Disease

Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an autoimmune disease characterized by isolated thrombocytopenia that may be accompanied clinically by bleeding and reduced health-related quality of life (HRQoL). While corticosteroids, splenectomy, and various immunosuppressants (used off-label) have served as historical mainstays of ITP treatment, their use is associated with adverse effects and morbidity. Over the last 15 years, the advent of the thrombopoietin receptor agonists has revolutionized the management of chronic ITP with high response rates, durable responses, and minimal adverse effects in most patients. With four agents now FDA-approved to manage chronic ITP, there is a renewed emphasis on improving HRQoL and minimizing the toxicities associated with traditional therapies. Promising agents with diverse mechanisms of action, ranging from those targeting Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase to the neonatal Fc receptor, are currently under investigation. This review highlights recent landmark clinical trials which have made significant impacts on ITP management and ongoing drug development. In critically analyzing studies of relevance, we illustrate the changing paradigms of ITP management and how the field is advancing beyond traditional therapies.

Systemic lupus erythematosus-complicating immune thrombocytopenia: From pathogenesis to treatment

Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is a common hematological manifestation of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The heterogeneity of its clinical characteristics and therapeutic responses reflects a complex pathogenesis. A better understanding of its pathophysiological mechanisms and employing an optimal treatment regimen is therefore important to improve the response rate and prognosis, and avoid unwanted outcomes. Besides glucocorticoids, traditional immunosuppressants (i.e. cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil) and intravenous immunoglobulins, new therapies are emerging and promising for the treatment of intractable SLE-ITP, such as thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs), platelet desialylation inhibitors(i.e. oseltamivir), B-cell targeting therapy(i.e. rituximab, belimumab), neonatal Fc receptor(FcRn) inhibitor, spleen tyrosine kinase(Syk) inhibitor and Bruton tyrosine kinase(BTK) inhibitor et al., although more rigorous randomized controlled trials are needed to substantiate their efficacy. In this review, we update our current knowledge on the pathogenesis and treatment of SLE-ITP.

Diagnostic Value of Peripheral Blood Lymphocytes for Primary Immune Thrombocytopenia

The purpose of this study was to investigate the absolute value of peripheral blood lymphocytes in patients with primary immune thrombocytopenia and the diagnostic effect on patients with primary immune thrombocytopenia. From January 2020 to June 2021, 76 patients with primary immune thrombocytopenia and 80 healthy check-ups admitted to our hospital were selected as study subjects and divided into a control group (80 patients, healthy check-ups) and an observation group (76 patients, primary immune thrombocytopenia), according to the health status of the organism. Early morning fasting venous blood was collected from both groups, and the absolute value of peripheral blood lymphocytes was measured and compared using a fully automated hematology analyzer to investigate the diagnostic value of absolute peripheral blood lymphocytes in primary immune thrombocytopenia. The CD3+, CD3+CD4+, CD4+/CD8+, and CD16+CD56+ assay values in the observation group were lower than those in the control group, and the CD3+CD8+, CD19+, and ALC assay values were higher than those in the control group (P < 0.05). The CD3+CD8+ detection values of newly diagnosed patients were similar to those of relapsed refractory patients (P > 0.05); CD3+, CD3+CD4+, CD4+/CD8+, and CD16+CD56+ detection values of newly diagnosed patients were lower than those of relapsed refractory patients, and CD19+ and ALC detection values were higher than those of relapsed refractory patients; CD3+, CD3+CD4+, CD4+, CD4+/CD8+, and CD16+CD56+ detection values of mild patients were lower than those of relapsed refractory patients; CD3+, CD3+CD4+, CD4+/CD8+, and CD16+CD56+ detection values were higher in mild patients than in severe patients, and CD3+CD8+, CD19+, and ALC detection values were lower than in severe patients (P < 0.05). The absolute lymphocyte values were of high diagnostic value in primary immune thrombocytopenia, with a sensitivity and specificity of 93.42% and 90.00%. The application of absolute peripheral blood lymphocyte value in the clinical diagnosis of primary immune thrombocytopenia can achieve a better detection and diagnosis effect, which has a positive impact on the early diagnosis rate and can help patients to obtain more timely, effective and targeted treatment, and is worthy of promotion.

Current therapeutic strategies and perspectives in refractory ITP: What have we learned recently?

Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an acquired autoimmune bleeding disorder featured by increased platelet destruction and deficient megakaryocyte maturation. First-line treatments include corticosteroids, intravenous immunoglobulin and intravenous anti-D immunoglobulin. Second-line treatments consist of rituximab, thrombopoietin receptor agonists and splenectomy. Although most patients benefit from these treatments, an individualized treatment approach is warranted due to the large heterogeneity among ITP patients. In addition, ITP patients may relapse and there remains a subset of patients who become refractory to treatments. The management of these refractory patients is still a challenge. This review aims to summarize emerging therapeutic approaches for refractory ITP in several categories according to their different targets, including macrophages, platelets/megakaryocytes, T cells, B cells, and endothelial cells. Moreover, current management strategies and combination regimens of refractory ITP are also discussed.

Novel Therapies to Address Unmet Needs in ITP

Primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an autoimmune disorder that causes low platelet counts and subsequent bleeding risk. Although current corticosteroid-based ITP therapies are able to improve platelet counts, up to 70% of subjects with an ITP diagnosis do not achieve a sustained clinical response in the absence of treatment, thus requiring a second-line therapy option as well as additional care to prevent bleeding. Less than 40% of patients treated with thrombopoietin analogs, 60% of those treated with splenectomy, and 20% or fewer of those treated with rituximab or fostamatinib reach sustained remission in the absence of treatment. Therefore, optimizing therapeutic options for ITP management is mandatory. The pathophysiology of ITP is complex and involves several mechanisms that are apparently unrelated. These include the clearance of autoantibody-coated platelets by splenic macrophages or by the complement system, hepatic desialylated platelet destruction, and the inhibition of platelet production from megakaryocytes. The number of pathways involved may challenge treatment, but, at the same time, offer the possibility of unveiling a variety of new targets as the knowledge of the involved mechanisms progresses. The aim of this work, after revising the limitations of the current treatments, is to perform a thorough review of the mechanisms of action, pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics, efficacy, safety, and development stage of the novel ITP therapies under investigation. Hopefully, several of the options included herein may allow us to personalize ITP management according to the needs of each patient in the near future.

Alternatives for managing patients with newly diagnosed immune thrombocytopenia: a narrative review

INTRODUCTION

Primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an acquired bleeding disorder. Conventionally, first-line ITP therapy aims to obtain a rapid response and stop or decrease the risk of bleeding by increasing the platelet count. At this point, the duration of the response, the tolerability, and the long-term safety of pharmacologic interventions are considered less of a priority. Combination treatments that simultaneously address multiple disease mechanisms are an attractive strategy to increase efficacy in acute ITP therapy. In this review, we discuss the treatment of newly diagnosed ITP patients, emphasizing the use of new combinations to benefit from their synergy.

AREAS COVERED

This article summarizes conventional treatment, recent and novel combinations, and COVID-19 management recommendations of newly diagnosed ITP patients.

EXPERT OPINION

The key areas for improvement consider the long-term effects of conventional first-line therapy, reducing relapse rates, and extending responses to achieve long-term remission. Although corticosteroids remain first-line therapy, restricting their use to avoid toxicity and the increasing use of rituximab and TPO-RAs in the first three months after diagnosis open the landscape for future interventions in frontline therapy for ITP. First-line therapy intensification or synergistic drug combination offers a potential and realistic shift in future treatment guidelines.

Recent advances in treatments of adult immune thrombocytopenia

Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is isolated thrombocytopenia characterized by autoimmune-mediated disruption of platelet without other etiologies. Treatments for chronic ITP consist of corticosteroids, intravenous immunoglobulins, anti-D immunoglobulin, rituximab, thrombopoietin receptor agonists, immunosuppressants and splenectomy. Although current therapies are effective in over two-thirds of patients, some patients are refractory to therapies or fail to achieve long-term responses. Recently, great advance has been made in identifying various mechanisms involved in ITP pathogenesis, and new treatments targeting these pathways are being developed. Novel agents such as splenic tyrosine kinase inhibitor, Bruton kinase inhibitor, plasma cell targeting therapies, neonatal Fc receptor inhibitor, platelet desialylation inhibitor, and inhibition of the classical complement pathway are expected to be effective for ITP treatment. This review summarizes current strategies and emerging therapies of ITP.

Oseltamivir as rescue therapy for persistent, chronic, or refractory immune thrombocytopenia: a case series and review of the literature

Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an autoimmune disease that results from antibody-mediated platelet destruction and impaired platelet production. Novel therapies have emerged in the last decade, but 15-20% of patients will relapse or fail and require further therapy. We performed a prospective, single-arm intervention study on seven patients with chronic, persistent, or refractory ITP from the Hospital Universitario "Dr. José E González", in Monterrey, Mexico between 2015 and 2019. Eligible patients received oral oseltamivir 75 mg twice daily for 5 days and were followed up for six months. Most patients received a median of three distinct therapies (range 2-6). Four patients (57.1%) received combined therapy. The median time for any response was 55.5 days (range = 14-150). All patients responded at some point in time (ORR = 100%, six had a proportion of loss of response [PR], and one achieved [CR]). Six months after oseltamivir administration, three patients (42.9%) maintained a response, and one patient had a CR (14.3%). Oseltamivir was well tolerated with a good overall response rate and was useful for treating chronic ITP. We observed an initial increase in the number of platelets; however, this response was not maintained.

Comparative efficacy of 19 drug therapies for patients with idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura: a multiple-treatments network meta-analysis

Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is the most common clinical bleeding disorder with a high mortality rate and poor long-term survival quality in severe patients. There is controversy on how to choose the appropriate treatment. We systematically reviewed 19 randomized controlled trials (including 2615 participants) from January 1, 2015, to April 20, 2021. These investigations compared multiple drugs or their combinations in the therapeutic dose range for the treatment of ITP. The primary endpoint was based on the proportion of patients who responded to these therapies. The efficacy of eltrombopag plus rituximab, avatrombopag, dexamethasone plus anti-HP, and dexamethasone plus rhTPO was significantly higher than placebo (OR: 46.66, 29.44, 2.66, 1.86) or dexamethasone alone (OR: 46.22, 29.01, 2.22, 1.40). Placebo, oral immunosuppressants, and dexamethasone plus oseltamivir were less effective than the other ITP therapies tested. Eltrombopag plus rituximab may be the best choice when starting treatment for ITP.

Effect of oseltamivir phosphate versus placebo on platelet recovery and plasma leakage in adults with dengue and thrombocytopenia; a phase 2, multicenter, double-blind, randomized trial

Background

Thrombocytopenia, bleeding and plasma leakage are major complications of dengue. Activation of endogenous sialidases with desialylation of platelets and endothelial cells may underlie these complications. We aimed to assess the effects of the neuraminidase inhibitor oseltamivir on platelet recovery and plasma leakage in dengue.

Methods

We performed a phase 2, double-blind, multicenter, randomized trial in adult dengue patients with thrombocytopenia (<70,000/μl) and a duration of illness ≤ 6 days. Oseltamivir phosphate 75mg BID or placebo were given for a maximum of five days. Primary outcomes were the time to platelet recovery (≥ 100,000/μl) or discharge from hospital and the course of measures of plasma leakage.

Results

A total of 70 patients were enrolled; the primary outcome could be assessed in 64 patients (31 oseltamivir; 33 placebo). Time to platelet count ≥100,000/μl (n = 55) or discharge (n = 9) were similar in the oseltamivir and placebo group (3.0 days [95% confidence interval, 2.7 to 3.3] vs. 2.9 days [2.5 to 3.3], P = 0.055). The kinetics of platelet count and parameters of plasma leakage (gall bladder thickness, hematocrit, plasma albumin, syndecan-1) were also similar between the groups.

Discussion

In this trial, adjunctive therapy with oseltamivir phosphate had no effect on platelet recovery or plasma leakage parameters.

Trial registration

ISRCTN35227717.

Moderate to severe thrombocytopenia is common in the febrile and/or critical phase of dengue virus infection. Platelets are important for preservation of vascular integrity, especially during inflammation, and low platelet counts may contribute to plasma leakage. Currently, no therapeutic intervention that targets the pathogenic pathway is available for DENV infection, including therapies to prevent or reduce thrombocytopenia or plasma leakage. Oseltamivir phosphate is widely used for prevention and treatment of influenza by inhibiting viral neuraminidase. However, oseltamivir may also inhibit human endogenous neuraminidase involved in sialic acid metabolism, and as such extend the lifespan of platelets. In the phase 2 TOTO trial (Treatment Of Thrombocytopenia with Oseltamivir in acute dengue virus infection: a randomized, placebo controlled, multicenter trial) we investigated the potential of oseltamivir phosphate to shorten the time to platelet recovery and reduce plasma leakage in patients with DENV infection. In this trial involving 70 adult thrombocytopenic patients, hospitalized with acute DENV infection, adjunctive therapy with oseltamivir phosphate did not shorten platelet recovery time compared with placebo. The trial also did not show an effect of adjunctive oseltamivir on plasma leakage parameters. The reasons that oseltamivir had no apparent effect on platelet counts, markers of plasma leakage and glycocalyx distortion in this study remain speculative, but may involve one or more of the following; first, dengue-associated thrombocytopenia and plasma leakage are both multifactorial in origin and targeting neuraminidase alone may be insufficient to impact these processes. Second, oseltamivir phosphate was designed to inhibit viral neuraminidase, and data of its inhibitory actions on human neuraminidases are inconclusive. The finding in this study also suggest that while laboratory works may lead to hypotheses for novel treatment, proof of concept studies are essential to test them in a clinical setting.

Current status of drug repositioning in hematology

INTRODUCTION

Drug repositioning (DR) is defined as determining new therapeutic applications for existing drugs. This approach is advantageous over de novo drug discovery in accelerating clinical development, in terms of lower costs, a shortened development period, a well-known action mechanism, a feasible dosage, and an acceptable safety profile.

AREAS COVERED

This work was aimed at reviewing agents with successful DR in hematology.

EXPERT OPINION

Thalidomide and plerixafor have been successfully repositioned for treating multiple myeloma and harvesting peripheral blood stem cells, respectively. The former was originally developed as a sedative and the latter as an anti-HIV drug. Currently, the feasibility of repositioning various agents is being explored (e.g. an anti-influenza virus drug oseltamivir for primary immune thrombocytopenia, an anti-HIV drug abacavir for adult T-cell leukemia, and a macrolide antibiotic clarithromycin for multiple myeloma). Furthermore, bosutinib for chronic myeloid leukemia or the antiplatelet drug cilostazol have been suggested to have clinical benefits for the management of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and ischemic stroke, respectively. To promote DR, effective application of artificial intelligence or stem cell models, comprehensive database construction shared between academia and pharmaceutical companies, suitable handling of drug patents, and wide cooperation in the area of specialty are warranted.

Novel therapies for immune thrombocytopenia

Current therapies for immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) are successful in providing a haemostatic platelet count in over two-thirds of patients. Still, some patients have an inadequate response and there is a need for other therapies. A number of novel therapies for ITP are currently being developed based upon the current pathophysiology of ITP. Many therapies are targetted at reducing platelet destruction by decreasing anti-platelet antibody production by immunosuppression with monoclonal antibodies targetted against CD40, CD38 and the immunoproteasome or physically reducing the anti-platelet antibody concentration by inhibition of the neonatal Fc receptor. Others target the phagocytic system by inhibiting FcγR function with staphylococcal protein A, hypersialylated IgG, polymeric Fc fragments, or Bruton kinase. With a recognition that platelet destruction is also mediated by complement, inhibitors of C1s are also being tested. Inhibition of platelet desialylation may also play a role. Other novel therapies promote platelet production with new oral thrombopoietin receptor agonists or the use of low-level laser light to improve mitochondrial activity and prevent megakaryocyte apoptosis. This review will focus on these novel mechanisms for treating ITP and assess the status of treatments currently under development. Successful new treatments for ITP might also provide a pathway to treat other autoimmune disorders.