1
|
Shimizu M, Maeda I, Kessoku T, Ishiki H, Matsuura T, Hiratsuka Y, Matsuda Y, Hasegawa T, Imai K, Oyamada S, Satomi E. The safety and effectiveness of naldemedine for opioid-induced constipation in patients with advanced cancer in real-world palliative care settings: a multicenter prospective observational study. Support Care Cancer 2024; 32:504. [PMID: 38985364 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-024-08716-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2024] [Accepted: 07/04/2024] [Indexed: 07/11/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE In this study, we aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of naldemedine for treating opioid-induced constipation (OIC) in patients with advanced cancer, who are receiving palliative care, and particularly explored its early effects. METHODS Palliative care teams and inpatient palliative care units across 14 institutions in Japan were included in this multicenter, prospective, observational study. Patients who were newly prescribed a daily oral dose of 0.2 mg naldemedine were enrolled. The spontaneous bowel movement (SBM) within 24 h after the first dose of naldemedine was considered the primary outcome, whereas, the secondary outcomes included weekly changes in SBM frequency and adverse events. RESULTS A total of 204 patients were enrolled and 184 completed the 7-day study. The average age of the participants (103 males, 101 females) was 63 ± 14 years. The primary cancer was detected in the lungs (23.5%), gastrointestinal tract (13.7%), and urological organs (9.3%). A considerable proportion of patients (34.8%) had ECOG performance status of 3-4. Most patients were undergoing active cancer treatment, however, 40.7% of the patients were receiving the best supportive care. Within 24 h of the first naldemedine dose, 146 patients (71.6%, 95% CI: 65.4-77.8%) experienced SBMs. The weekly SBM counts increased in 62.7% of the participants. The major adverse events included diarrhea and abdominal pain, detected in 17.6% and 5.4% of the patients, respectively. However, no serious adverse events were observed. CONCLUSION Conclusively, naldemedine is effective and safe for OIC treatments in real-world palliative care settings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER UMIN000031381, registered 20/02/2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masaki Shimizu
- Department of Palliative Care, Kyoto-Katsura Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Isseki Maeda
- Department of Palliative Care, Senri-Chuo Hospital, Toyonaka, Osaka, Japan.
| | - Takaomi Kessoku
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yokohama City University School of Medicine Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan
- Department of Palliative Medicine, International University Health and Welfare Narita Hospital, Narita, Japan
| | - Hiroto Ishiki
- Department of Palliative Medicine, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tetsuya Matsuura
- Palliative Care Center, Fujisawa Shounandai Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Yusuke Hiratsuka
- Department of Palliative Medicine, Takeda General Hospital, Aizu Wakamatsu, Japan
- Department of Palliative Medicine, Tohoku University School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Yoshinobu Matsuda
- Department of Psychosomatic Internal Medicine, NHO Kinki-Chuo Chest Medical Center, Sakai, Osaka, Japan
| | - Takaaki Hasegawa
- Center for Psycho-Oncology and Palliative Care, Nagoya City University Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Kengo Imai
- Seirei Hospice, Seirei Mikatahara General Hospital, Hamamatsu, Japan
| | | | - Eriko Satomi
- Department of Palliative Medicine, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Squeo F, Celiberto F, Ierardi E, Russo F, Riezzo G, D’Attoma B, Leo AD, Losurdo G. Opioid-induced Constipation: Old and New Concepts in Diagnosis and Treatment. J Neurogastroenterol Motil 2024; 30:131-142. [PMID: 38576366 PMCID: PMC10999847 DOI: 10.5056/jnm23144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2023] [Accepted: 11/06/2023] [Indexed: 04/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Daily use of opioid analgesics has significantly increased in recent years due to an increasing prevalence of conditions associated with chronic pain. Opioid-induced constipation (OIC) is one of the most common, under-recognized, and under-treated side effects of opioid analgesics. OIC significantly reduces the quality of life by causing psychological distress, lowering work productivity, and increasing access to healthcare facilities. The economic and social burden of OIC led to the development of precise strategies for daily clinical practice. Key aspects are the prevention of constipation through adequate water intake and fiber support, avoidance of sedentariness, and early recognition and treatment of cofactors that could worsen constipation. Recommended first-line therapy includes osmotic (preferably polyethylene glycol) and stimulant laxatives. Peripherally acting μ-opioid receptor antagonists, such as methylnaltrexone, naloxegol, or naldemedine, should be used in patients that have not responded to the first-line treatments. The bowel functional index is the main tool for assessing the severity of OIC and for monitoring the response. The paper discusses the recent literature on the pathophysiology, clinical evaluation, and management of OIC and provides a pragmatic approach for its assessment and treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Squeo
- Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, Bari, Italy
| | - Francesca Celiberto
- Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, Bari, Italy
- PhD Course in Organs and Tissues Transplantation and Cellular Therapies, Department of Precision Medicine Jonic Area, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, Bari, Italy
| | - Enzo Ierardi
- Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, Bari, Italy
| | - Francesco Russo
- Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders Research Group, National Institute of Gastroenterology IRCCS “Saverio de Bellis”, Castellana Grotte, Bari, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Riezzo
- Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders Research Group, National Institute of Gastroenterology IRCCS “Saverio de Bellis”, Castellana Grotte, Bari, Italy
| | - Benedetta D’Attoma
- Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders Research Group, National Institute of Gastroenterology IRCCS “Saverio de Bellis”, Castellana Grotte, Bari, Italy
| | - Alfredo Di Leo
- Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, Bari, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Losurdo
- Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, Bari, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Jesuyajolu DA, Abubakar AK, Kowe T, Ogunlade S, Abioye AI, Tangeman J, Latuga N, Omotayo MO. The Management of Opioid-Induced Constipation in Cancer and Advanced Illness: A Meta-Analysis. J Pain Symptom Manage 2024; 67:e285-e297. [PMID: 38092261 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2023.12.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2023] [Revised: 11/29/2023] [Accepted: 12/01/2023] [Indexed: 01/06/2024]
Abstract
CONTEXT Constipation is a common problem among patients with cancer. By some accounts, about 60% of cancer patients experience constipation. There is limited empirical evidence of the clinical effectiveness of pharmacologic agents in opioid-induced constipation in advanced diseases. OBJECTIVES We sought to quantitatively summarize the therapeutic effectiveness of the pharmacologic means of managing opioid-induced constipation. METHODS Randomized control trials (RCTs) identified from medical literature databases that reported quantitative measures of the effect of pharmacotherapeutic agents to treat opioid induced constipation in patients with cancers and other advanced illnesses were included in this study. A conventional random effects meta-analysis was conducted including >3 trials with the same exposure and outcome assessed, and a network-meta-analysis was conducted for all placebo-controlled trials. RESULTS Eighteen studies that examined the effect of various pharmacotherapeutic agents were included. The medications were Methylnatrexone (N = 5), Naldemedine (N = 5), other conventional agents (N = 4) and herbal medicines (N = 4). In conventional meta-analysis, methylnaltrexone increased the proportion achieving rescue-free laxation by 2.68 fold (95% CI: 1.34, 5.37; P = 0.0054) within 4 hours of the administration compared to placebo. In network meta-analysis, the pooled RR of the pharmacotherapeutic agents on rescue-free bowel movements as 2.26 (95% CI: 1.52, 3.36) for methylnaltrexone, 1.58 (95% CI: 0.94, 2.66) for naldemedine, and 0.74 (95% CI: 0.45, 1.23) for polyethylene glycol, compared to placebo. CONCLUSION Methylnatrexone and Naldemedine have currently shown promise in randomized trials concerning opioid-induced constipation in cancer and advanced illness. It is imperative that future research ascertain not just the relative therapeutic efficacy but also the cost-benefit analyses of these newer regimens with more commonly used and accessible laxatives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Aminu Kende Abubakar
- Kebbi Medical Centre (A.K.A.), Kebbi State Ministry of Health, Birnin-Kebbi, Nigeria
| | - Temitope Kowe
- StatsClinic Inc. (T.K., A.I.A.), Barrington, Rhode Island
| | - Samuel Ogunlade
- Faculty of Clinical Sciences (S.O.), Olabisi Onabanjo University, Sagamu, Ogun State, Nigeria
| | - Ajibola Ibraheem Abioye
- StatsClinic Inc. (T.K., A.I.A.), Barrington, Rhode Island; Avicenna Research and Insights Center (A.I.A.), Bariga, Lagos, Nigeria
| | - John Tangeman
- Center for Palliative Health (J.T., N.L., M.O.O.), Buffalo, New York
| | - Natalie Latuga
- Center for Palliative Health (J.T., N.L., M.O.O.), Buffalo, New York
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Tack J, Carbone F, Chang L, Lacy BE. Patient-Reported Outcomes in Disorders of Gut-Brain Interaction. Gastroenterology 2024; 166:572-587.e1. [PMID: 38309628 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2023.11.307] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2022] [Revised: 11/06/2023] [Accepted: 11/11/2023] [Indexed: 02/05/2024]
Abstract
Disorders of gut-brain interaction are characterized by chronic gastrointestinal symptoms in the absence of abnormal endoscopic or radiologic findings or objective biomarkers that can be identified during routine clinical evaluation. The assessment of the symptom pattern and severity, therefore, is the key modality to evaluate the presence, impact, and evolution of these conditions, for both clinical and regulatory purposes. Patient-reported outcomes are structured symptom assessment questionnaires designed to evaluate symptom patterns, quantify severity of symptoms, and evaluate response to treatment at follow-up. This review provides an overview of currently available patient-reported outcomes for evaluating the main disorders of gut-brain interaction, specifically, functional dyspepsia; irritable bowel syndrome; and chronic constipation. It summarizes their content, level of validation for clinical practice and for research, and the regulatory approach to these conditions. Expected future developments and need for further research on patient-reported outcomes for these and other disorders of gut-brain interaction are highlighted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Tack
- Translational Research in Gastrointestinal Disorders, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Gastroenterology, Leuven University Hospitals, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Florencia Carbone
- Department of Gastroenterology, Leuven University Hospitals, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Lin Chang
- G. Oppenheimer Center for Neurobiology of Stress at University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California; Vatche and Tamar Manoukian Division of Digestive Diseases, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Braun UK, Jackson LK, Garcia MA, Imam SN. A Systematic Review of Naldemedine and Naloxegol for the Treatment of Opioid-Induced Constipation in Cancer Patients. PHARMACY 2024; 12:48. [PMID: 38525728 PMCID: PMC10961755 DOI: 10.3390/pharmacy12020048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2024] [Revised: 02/27/2024] [Accepted: 03/01/2024] [Indexed: 03/26/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Opioid-induced constipation (OIC) is a pervasive and distressing side effect of chronic opioid therapy in patients with cancer pain, significantly impacting their quality of life. Peripherally acting μ-opioid receptor antagonists (PAMORAS) were developed for treatment-resistant OIC but most studies were conducted with non-cancer patients. OBJECTIVE to discuss two oral formulations of PAMORAs, naldemedine and naloxegol, and to review available evidence of the effectiveness of these drugs for OIC in cancer patients. METHODS a comprehensive search to identify primary literature for either naldemedine or naloxegol for OIC in cancer patients. RESULTS Only three prospective randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials for naldemedine enrolling cancer patients were identified; the results of a subgroup analysis of two of those studies and two non-interventional post marketing surveillance studies of these trials are also reported here. For naloxegol, only two randomized controlled trials were identified; both were unsuccessful in enrolling sufficient patients. An additional four prospective non-interventional observational studies with naloxegol were found that enrolled cancer patients. There were significantly higher rates of responders in the PAMORA groups than in the placebo groups. The most common side effect for both PAMORAs was diarrhea. LIMITATIONS All studies were industry-funded, and given that only three trials were randomized controlled studies, the overall quality of the studies was lacking. CONCLUSION Naldemedine or naloxegol appeared safe and useful in the treatment of OIC in cancer patients and may improve their quality of life. Larger-scale randomized placebo-controlled studies of PAMORAs in cancer patients would strengthen existing evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ursula K. Braun
- Rehabilitation & Extended Care Line, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (L.K.J.); (M.A.G.)
- Section of Geriatrics & Palliative Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA;
| | - Leanne K. Jackson
- Rehabilitation & Extended Care Line, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (L.K.J.); (M.A.G.)
- Section of Geriatrics & Palliative Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA;
| | - Mary A. Garcia
- Rehabilitation & Extended Care Line, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (L.K.J.); (M.A.G.)
- Section of Geriatrics & Palliative Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA;
| | - Syed N. Imam
- Section of Geriatrics & Palliative Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA;
- Office of Connected Care, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Wobbe B, Gerner M, Köhne CH. Naldemedine versus placebo in opioid-induced constipation: a meta-analysis. BMJ Support Palliat Care 2024; 13:e578-e584. [PMID: 36517204 DOI: 10.1136/spcare-2022-003896] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2022] [Accepted: 11/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Opioid-induced constipation (OIC) is a frequent adverse event among patients receiving chronic pain therapy that is requiring opioids. Naldemedine was approved by the Food and Drug Administration to treat OIC and appears to be more efficient than any other peripherally acting µ-opioid receptor antagonist. This meta-analysis aimed at assessing the available data on naldemedine in terms of efficacy. METHODS We searched the Cochrane Library, PubMed and ClinicalTrials on 24 May 2022 to identify randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing naldemedine to placebo among patients reporting OIC. RESULTS Evaluation of 6 RCTs enrolling 2769 participants showed significantly greater respondence to treatment (OR=2.48; 95% CI: 2.02 to 3.06; p<0.00001), change in weekly spontaneous bowel movements (SBMs) (mean difference=1.45; 95% CI: 1.14 to 1.76; p<0.00001), complete SBMs (mean difference=0.89; 95% CI: 0.62 to 1.17; p<0.00001) and SBMs without straining (mean difference=0.89; 95% CI: 0.61 to 1.17; p<0.00001) for patients treated with naldemedine. We found no difference in numeric pain rating scales after one (mean difference=0.05; 95% CI: -0.22 to 0.31; p=0.73) and two weeks of treatment (mean difference= -0.04; 95% CI: -0.31 to 0.22; p=0.75). Funding and clinical diversity were possible risks of bias. CONCLUSIONS Naldemedine improves a variety of bowel function parameters while preserving analgesia, confirming its efficacy for patients with OIC. However, head-to-head trials are needed to establish naldemedine as treatment of first choice for laxative-refractory OIC. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42022281353.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bastian Wobbe
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Klinikum Oldenburg, Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Gerner
- Department of Medicine 1, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Claus-Henning Köhne
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Klinikum Oldenburg, Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Nishiyama S, Uchino S, Sasabuchi Y, Masuyama T, Lefor AK, Sanui M. Naldemedine is associated with earlier defecation in critically ill patients with opioid-induced constipation: A retrospective, single-center cohort study. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0295952. [PMID: 38170714 PMCID: PMC10763934 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295952] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2023] [Accepted: 11/28/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION There are few reports describing the association of naldemedine with defecation in critically ill patients with opioid-induced constipation. The purpose of this study was to determine whether naldemedine is associated with earlier defecation in critically ill patients with opioid-induced constipation. METHODS In this retrospective cohort study, patients admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) without defecation for 48 hours while receiving opioids were eligible for enrollment. The primary endpoint was the time of the first defecation within 96 hours after inclusion. Secondary endpoints included presence of diarrhea, duration of mechanical ventilation, ICU length of stay, ICU mortality, and in-hospital mortality. The Cox proportional hazard regression analysis with time-dependent covariates was used to evaluate the association naldemedine with earlier defecation. RESULTS A total of 875 patients were enrolled and were divided into 63 patients treated with naldemedine and 812 patients not treated. Defecation was observed in 58.7% of the naldemedine group and 48.8% of the no-naldemedine group during the study (p = 0.150). The naldemedine group had statistically significantly prolonged duration of mechanical ventilation (8.7 days vs 5.5 days, p < 0.001) and ICU length of stay (11.8 days vs 9.2 days, p = 0.001) compared to the no-naldemedine group. However, the administration of naldemedine was significantly associated with earlier defecation [hazard ratio:2.53; 95% confidence interval: 1.71-3.75, p < 0.001]. CONCLUSION The present study shows that naldemedine is associated with earlier defecation in critically ill patients with opioid-induced constipation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seiya Nishiyama
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Jichi Medical University, Saitama Medical Center, Omiya, Saitama, Japan
| | - Shigehiko Uchino
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Jichi Medical University, Saitama Medical Center, Omiya, Saitama, Japan
| | - Yusuke Sasabuchi
- Data Science Center, Jichi Medical University, Shimotsuke, Tochigi, Japan
| | - Tomoyuki Masuyama
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Jichi Medical University, Saitama Medical Center, Omiya, Saitama, Japan
| | - Alan Kawarai Lefor
- Department of Surgery, Jichi Medical University, Shimotsuke, Tochigi, Japan
| | - Masamitsu Sanui
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Jichi Medical University, Saitama Medical Center, Omiya, Saitama, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lyu Z, Tian S, Bao G, Huang R, Gong L, Zhou J, Kong X, Zhang W, Ran R, Nie N, Liu Y, Ji C, Liu S, Shao X, Kai G, Lin X, Fang J, Liang Y. Transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation for cancer-related pain management in patients receiving chronic opioid therapy: a randomized clinical trial. Support Care Cancer 2023; 32:16. [PMID: 38085376 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-023-08240-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2023] [Accepted: 12/04/2023] [Indexed: 12/18/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The opioid crisis resulting from its use disorder and overdose poses additional challenges for cancer pain management. The American Society of Clinical Oncology Practice Guideline recommends acupuncture therapy for the management of adult cancer-related pain (CRP), but the effectiveness of transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation (TEAS) on CRP remains uncertain. METHODS This 5-week prospective randomized clinical trial was conducted at 2 hospitals in China, and participants with CRP receiving chronic opioid therapy were randomized 1:1 into two groups between December 2014 and June 2018. The true TEAS group underwent 15 sessions of TEAS treatments over 3 consecutive weeks, while the control group received sham stimulation. The primary outcome was the numerical rating scale (NRS) score in the past 24h at week 3. The secondary outcomes included morphine equivalent daily dose, quality of life and adverse events. RESULTS A total of 159 participants were included in the modified intention-to-treat population. The baseline characteristics were similar in both groups. The mean NRS scores were 0.98 points at week 3 in the true TEAS group and 1.41 points in the sham group, with the mean difference between groups of -0.43 points (P < 0.001; OR = 0.68, P < 0.05). The proportion of patients with NRS reduction more than thirty percentage at week 3 was 50.00% in the true TEAS group and 35.44% in the sham group (RD = 0.15, P > 0.05; RR = 1.41, P > 0.05). No significant difference in pain intensity between the two groups was observed during the follow-up period without TEAS intervention (week 4, OR = 0.83, P > 0.05; week 5, OR = 0.83, P > 0.05). The Karnofsky Performance Status value suggested that patients in the true TEAS group experienced an improved quality of life (Between-group differences: week 3, 3.5%, P < 0.05; week 4, 4.6%, P < 0.001; week 5, 5.6%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS The 3-week application of TEAS in patients with CRP receiving chronic opioid therapy resulted in a statistically significant reduction in pain scores, but the observed reduction was of uncertain clinical significance. The prolonged analgesic effect of TEAS was not confirmed in this trial. CLINICALTRIAL GOV: ChiCTR-TRC-13003803.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhengyi Lyu
- The Third Clinical Medical College, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, 310005, China
| | - Shuxin Tian
- The Third Clinical Medical College, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, 310005, China
| | - Guanai Bao
- Department of Integrated Chinese Traditional Medicine and Western Medicine, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, 310022, China
| | - Rui Huang
- Department of Acupuncture and Tuina, Wenzhou Central Hospital, Wenzhou, 325000, China
| | - Liyan Gong
- Department of Integrated Chinese Traditional Medicine and Western Medicine, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, 310022, China
| | - Jie Zhou
- Department of Acupuncture, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, 310000, China
| | - Xiangming Kong
- Department of Integrated Chinese Traditional Medicine and Western Medicine, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, 310022, China
| | - Weiping Zhang
- Department of Oncology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, 310000, China
| | - Ran Ran
- Department of Oncology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, 310000, China
| | - Na Nie
- Department of Acupuncture, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, 310000, China
| | - Yang Liu
- The Third Clinical Medical College, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, 310005, China
| | - Conghua Ji
- Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, 310005, China
| | - Shan Liu
- Department of Clinical Evaluation Center, Zhejiang Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Hangzhou, 310000, China
| | - Xiaomei Shao
- Department of Acupuncture, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, 310000, China
| | - Guoyin Kai
- Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, 310005, China
| | - Xianming Lin
- Department of Acupuncture, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, 310000, China
| | - Jianqiao Fang
- Department of Acupuncture, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, 310000, China.
| | - Yi Liang
- Department of Acupuncture, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, 310000, China.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Umbrello M, Venco R, Palandri C, Racagni M, Muttini S. Peripherally-active mu-opioid receptor antagonists for constipation in critically ill patients receiving opioids: A case-series and a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2023; 35:e14694. [PMID: 37869768 DOI: 10.1111/nmo.14694] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2023] [Revised: 09/15/2023] [Accepted: 10/09/2023] [Indexed: 10/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Constipation is frequent in critically ill patients, and potentially related to adverse outcomes. Peripherally-active mu-opioid receptor antagonists (PAMORAs) are approved for opioid-induced constipation, but information on their efficacy and safety in critically ill patients is limited. We present a single-center, retrospective, case-series of the use of naldemedine for opioid-associated constipation, and we systematically reviewed the use of PAMORAs in critically ill patients. METHODS Case-series included consecutive mechanically-ventilated patients; constipation was defined as absence of bowel movements for >3 days. Naldemedine was administered after failure of the local laxation protocol. Systematic review: PubMed was searched for studies of PAMORAs to treat opioid-induced constipation in adult critically ill patients. PRIMARY OUTCOMES time to laxation, and number of patients laxating at the shortest follow-up. SECONDARY OUTCOMES gastric residual volumes and adverse events. KEY RESULTS A total of 13 patients were included in the case-series; the most common diagnosis was COVID-19 ARDS. Patients had their first bowel movement 1 [0;2] day after naldemedine. Daily gastric residual volume was 725 [405;1805] before vs. 250 [45;1090] mL after naldemedine, p = 0.0078. Systematic review identified nine studies (two RCTs, one prospective case-series, three retrospective case-series and three case-reports). Outcomes were similar between groups, with a trend toward a lower gastric residual volume in PAMORAs group. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES In a highly-selected case-series of patients with refractory, opioid-associated constipation, naldemedine was safe and associated to reduced gastric residuals and promoting laxation. In the systematic review and meta-analysis, the use of PAMORAs (mainly methylnaltrexone) was safe and associated with a reduced intolerance to enteral feeding but no difference in the time to laxation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michele Umbrello
- SC Rianimazione e Anestesia, Ospedale Nuovo di Legnano, ASST Ovest Milanese, Legnano, Italy
| | - Roberto Venco
- SC Anestesia e Rianimazione II, Ospedale San Carlo Borromeo, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, Milano, Italy
| | - Chiara Palandri
- SC Anestesia e Rianimazione II, Ospedale San Carlo Borromeo, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, Milano, Italy
| | - Milena Racagni
- SC Anestesia e Rianimazione II, Ospedale San Carlo Borromeo, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, Milano, Italy
| | - Stefano Muttini
- SC Anestesia e Rianimazione II, Ospedale San Carlo Borromeo, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, Milano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Essmat N, Karádi DÁ, Zádor F, Király K, Fürst S, Al-Khrasani M. Insights into the Current and Possible Future Use of Opioid Antagonists in Relation to Opioid-Induced Constipation and Dysbiosis. Molecules 2023; 28:7766. [PMID: 38067494 PMCID: PMC10708112 DOI: 10.3390/molecules28237766] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2023] [Revised: 11/21/2023] [Accepted: 11/22/2023] [Indexed: 12/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Opioid receptor agonists, particularly those that activate µ-opioid receptors (MORs), are essential analgesic agents for acute or chronic mild to severe pain treatment. However, their use has raised concerns including, among others, intestinal dysbiosis. In addition, growing data on constipation-evoked intestinal dysbiosis have been reported. Opioid-induced constipation (OIC) creates an obstacle to continuing treatment with opioid analgesics. When non-opioid therapies fail to overcome the OIC, opioid antagonists with peripheral, fast first-pass metabolism, and gastrointestinal localized effects remain the drug of choice for OIC, which are discussed here. At first glance, their use seems to only be restricted to constipation, however, recent data on OIC-related dysbiosis and its contribution to the appearance of several opioid side effects has garnered a great of attention from researchers. Peripheral MORs have also been considered as a future target for opioid analgesics with limited central side effects. The properties of MOR antagonists counteracting OIC, and with limited influence on central and possibly peripheral MOR-mediated antinociception, will be highlighted. A new concept is also proposed for developing gut-selective MOR antagonists to treat or restore OIC while keeping peripheral antinociception unaffected. The impact of opioid antagonists on OIC in relation to changes in the gut microbiome is included.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nariman Essmat
- Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, Nagyvárad tér 4, H-1445 Budapest, Hungary; (N.E.); (D.Á.K.); (F.Z.); (K.K.); (S.F.)
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Zagazig University, Zagazig 44519, Egypt
| | - Dávid Árpád Karádi
- Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, Nagyvárad tér 4, H-1445 Budapest, Hungary; (N.E.); (D.Á.K.); (F.Z.); (K.K.); (S.F.)
| | - Ferenc Zádor
- Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, Nagyvárad tér 4, H-1445 Budapest, Hungary; (N.E.); (D.Á.K.); (F.Z.); (K.K.); (S.F.)
| | - Kornél Király
- Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, Nagyvárad tér 4, H-1445 Budapest, Hungary; (N.E.); (D.Á.K.); (F.Z.); (K.K.); (S.F.)
| | - Susanna Fürst
- Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, Nagyvárad tér 4, H-1445 Budapest, Hungary; (N.E.); (D.Á.K.); (F.Z.); (K.K.); (S.F.)
| | - Mahmoud Al-Khrasani
- Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, Nagyvárad tér 4, H-1445 Budapest, Hungary; (N.E.); (D.Á.K.); (F.Z.); (K.K.); (S.F.)
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Hanamoto A, Koseki T, Utsunomiya A, Ishihara T, Tobe T, Kondo M, Kijima Y, Matsuoka H, Mizuno T, Hayashi T, Yamada S. Influence of Brain Metastasis on Analgesia-Related Outcomes in Patients with Lung and Breast Cancers Treated with Naldemedine: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis. J Clin Med 2023; 12:6997. [PMID: 38002612 PMCID: PMC10672656 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12226997] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2023] [Revised: 10/24/2023] [Accepted: 11/07/2023] [Indexed: 11/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Naldemedine is structurally designed to prevent passage across the blood-brain barrier (BBB), resulting in the attenuation of opioid-induced constipation without interfering with the analgesic effects of opioids. However, the influence of brain metastasis (BM), as one indicator of BBB disruption, on the analgesic effects of opioids in patients treated with naldemedine remains unclear. To examine whether the analgesic effects of opioids following naldemedine treatment are lower in patients with BM than in those without BM, we surveyed inpatients with lung and breast cancers treated with naldemedine at Fujita Health University Hospital between April 2017 and March 2022. Changes in the numeric rating scale (NRS) scores, morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs), and the number of rescues were assessed as analgesia-related outcomes during the first 7 days of naldemedine treatment in patients with or without BM, matched by the propensity score. In total, 172 patients were enrolled. After propensity-score matching, 30 patients with BM and 60 patients without BM were included in the analysis. Changes in NRS scores, MMEs, and the number of rescues did not differ between patients with and without BM. In the linear mixed-effects model, the coefficient of interaction between patients with or without BM and the days for each outcome was not statistically significant. BM does not influence the analgesic effect of opioids in patients with lung and breast cancers treated with naldemedine. Naldemedine may be useful for treating BM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aya Hanamoto
- College of Pharmacy, Kinjo Gakuin University, Nagoya 463-8521, Japan; (A.H.)
| | - Takenao Koseki
- Department of Pharmacotherapeutics and Informatics, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake 470-1192, Japan (T.T.)
| | - Ayaka Utsunomiya
- Department of Pharmacotherapeutics and Informatics, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake 470-1192, Japan (T.T.)
| | - Takuma Ishihara
- Innovative and Clinical Research Promotion Center, Gifu University Hospital, Gifu 501-1194, Japan
| | - Takao Tobe
- Department of Pharmacotherapeutics and Informatics, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake 470-1192, Japan (T.T.)
| | - Masashi Kondo
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake 470-1192, Japan
| | - Yuko Kijima
- Department of Breast Surgery, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake 470-1192, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Matsuoka
- Department of Surgery, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake 470-1192, Japan
| | - Tomohiro Mizuno
- Department of Pharmacotherapeutics and Informatics, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake 470-1192, Japan (T.T.)
| | - Takahiro Hayashi
- College of Pharmacy, Kinjo Gakuin University, Nagoya 463-8521, Japan; (A.H.)
- Department of Pharmacotherapeutics and Informatics, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake 470-1192, Japan (T.T.)
| | - Shigeki Yamada
- Department of Pharmacotherapeutics and Informatics, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake 470-1192, Japan (T.T.)
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Naya N, Oka H, Hashimoto S, Morioka Y, Kizawa Y. Real-World Evidence for the Safety and Effectiveness of Naldemedine in the Management of Opioid-Induced Constipation in Patients With Cancer Pain: Post-hoc Subgroup Analysis of Post-marketing Surveillance in Japan. Cureus 2023; 15:e46090. [PMID: 37900431 PMCID: PMC10611588 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.46090] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/15/2023] [Indexed: 10/31/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Opioid-induced constipation is common and greatly affects the quality of life but is often under-recognised and undertreated. This study aimed to investigate the safety and effectiveness of naldemedine for opioid-induced constipation with cancer pain according to specific subgroups of clinical interest. METHODS In this exploratory post-hoc subgroup analysis of post-marketing surveillance from Japan (UMIN: 000042851), data were investigated by the subgroups: age (≥75, <75 years), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (PS 0-2, 3-4), constipation severity (mild, moderate, severe), brain metastasis (yes, no), anticancer drug treatment (yes, no), opioid at naldemedine initiation (fentanyl only, only strong opioids other than fentanyl, weak opioids only, other), and prior or concomitant use of laxative (only osmotic/saline laxatives, only stimulant laxatives, other, none). Enrolled patients (n = 1184) received naldemedine (0.2 mg once daily) orally for up to 12 weeks. Regarding safety endpoints, the incidence of adverse drug reactions, including diarrhoea, was determined within each subgroup. Regarding effectiveness endpoints, improvement rates in the frequency and condition of bowel movements were investigated by subgroups. RESULTS The incidence of adverse drug reactions, including diarrhoea, among subgroups ranged from 7.74% to 16.08% (diarrhoea: 5.95% to 13.19%), compared to 11.30% (diarrhoea: 9.09%) in the total population. Through week two to week 12, improvement rates in the frequency and condition of bowel movement among subgroups ranged from 63.6% to 89.7% and 67.6% to 94.9%, compared to 75.0% to 83.2% and 80.0% to 88.0% in the total population, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Naldemedine was well tolerated and effective in patients with opioid-induced constipation and cancer pain regardless of the subgroups investigated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noriyuki Naya
- Medical Affairs Department, Shionogi & Co. Ltd., Osaka, JPN
| | - Hiroaki Oka
- Pharmacovigilance Department, Shionogi & Co. Ltd., Osaka, JPN
| | - Sayo Hashimoto
- Pharmacovigilance Department, Shionogi & Co. Ltd., Osaka, JPN
| | | | - Yoshiyuki Kizawa
- Department of Palliative and Supportive Care, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, JPN
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Chamberlain BH, Rhiner M, Slatkin NE, Stambler N, Israel RJ. Methylnaltrexone Treatment for Opioid-Induced Constipation in Patients with and without Cancer: Effect of Initial Dose. J Pain Res 2023; 16:2595-2607. [PMID: 37533563 PMCID: PMC10391063 DOI: 10.2147/jpr.s405825] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2023] [Accepted: 07/09/2023] [Indexed: 08/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Opioid-induced constipation (OIC) is a common side effect of opioid therapy. Methylnaltrexone (MNTX) is a selective, peripherally acting μ-opioid receptor antagonist, with demonstrated efficacy in treating OIC. We pooled results from MNTX clinical trials to compare responses to an initial dose in patients with chronic cancer and noncancer pain. Patients and Methods This post hoc analysis used pooled data from 3 randomized, placebo-controlled studies of MNTX in patients with advanced illness with OIC. Assessments included the proportions of patients achieving rescue-free laxation (RFL) within 4 and 24 hours of the first study drug dose, time to RFL, current and worst pain intensity, and adverse events, stratified by the presence/absence of cancer. Results A total of 355 patients with cancer (MNTX n = 198, placebo n = 157) and 163 without active cancer (MNTX n = 83; placebo n = 80) were included. More patients treated with MNTX compared with those who received placebo achieved an RFL within 4 (cancer: MNTX, 61.1% vs placebo,15.3%, p<0.0001; noncancer: MNTX, 62.2% vs placebo, 17.5%, p<0.0001) and 24 hours (cancer: MNTX, 71.2% vs placebo, 41.4%, p<0.0001; noncancer: MNTX, 74.4% vs placebo, 37.5%, p<0.0001) of the initial dose. Cumulative RFL response rates within 4 hours of the first, second, or third dose of study drug were also higher in MNTX-treated patients. The estimated time to RFL was shorter among those who received MNTX and similar in cancer and noncancer patients. Mean pain scores declined similarly in all groups. The most common adverse events in both cancer and noncancer patients were abdominal pain, flatulence, and nausea. Conclusion After the first dose, MNTX rapidly induced a laxation response in the majority of both cancer and noncancer patients with advanced illness. Opioid-induced analgesia was not compromised, and adverse events were primarily gastrointestinal in nature. Methylnaltrexone is a well-tolerated and effective treatment for OIC in both cancer and noncancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Michelle Rhiner
- Department of Family Medicine, Loma Linda University Health, Loma Linda, CA, USA
| | - Neal E Slatkin
- University of California Riverside, School of Medicine, Riverside, CA, USA
- Salix Pharmaceuticals, Medical Affairs, Bridgewater, NJ, USA
| | - Nancy Stambler
- Progenics Pharmaceuticals, Inc, a subsidiary of Lantheus Holdings, Inc, Clinical Research, North Billerica, MA, USA
| | - Robert J Israel
- Bausch Health US, LLC, Clinical and Medical Affairs, Bridgewater, NJ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Mousavi T, Nikfar S, Abdollahi M. An update on the use of pharmacotherapy for opioid-induced bowel dysfunction. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2023; 24:359-375. [PMID: 36548911 DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2022.2161883] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION With the growing rate of aging and the incidence of chronic diseases, there has been an upsurge in opioid prescription and abuse worldwide. This has been associated with increased reports of opioid-related adverse events, particularly opioid-induced bowel dysfunction (OIBD), calling for a rational clinical management strategy. AREAS COVERED Through searching PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science, English literature was gathered as of 1 January 2017. Furthermore, the USFDA, EMA, TGA, Clinicaltrials.Gov, WHO-ICTRP databases, and the latest guidelines were reviewed to extract ongoing clinical studies and provide an evidence-based expert opinion with detailed information on efficacy, safety, approval status, and pharmacokinetics of the currently used medications. EXPERT OPINION Despite the significant burden of OIBD, the clinical development of agents lags behind disease progress. Although in most places, management of opioid-induced constipation (OIC) is initiated by lifestyle modifications followed by laxatives, opioid antagonists, and secretagogue agents, there are still major conflicts among global guidelines. The fundamental reason is the lack of head-to-head clinical trials providing inter- and intragroup comparisons between PAMORAs, laxatives, and secretagogue agents. These investigations must be accompanied by further valid biopharmaceutical and economic evaluations, paving the way for rational clinical judgment in each context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taraneh Mousavi
- Department of Toxicology and Pharmacology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran, Iran.,Toxicology and Diseases Group, Pharmaceutical Sciences Research Center (PSRC), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Shekoufeh Nikfar
- Department of Pharmacoeconomics and Pharmaceutical Administration, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran, Iran.,Personalized Medicine Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mohammad Abdollahi
- Department of Toxicology and Pharmacology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran, Iran.,Toxicology and Diseases Group, Pharmaceutical Sciences Research Center (PSRC), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Wang W, Liu Y, Yang X, Sun J, Yue Z, Lu D, Zhou K, Sun Y, Hou A, Zang Z, Jin X, Liu C, Wang Y, Yu J, Zhu L, Liu Z. Effects of Electroacupuncture for Opioid-Induced Constipation in Patients With Cancer in China: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6:e230310. [PMID: 36811861 PMCID: PMC9947731 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.0310] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/24/2023] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Opioid-induced constipation (OIC) is prevalent among patients treated with opioids for cancer pain. Safe and effective therapies for OIC in patients with cancer remain an unmet need. OBJECTIVE To determine the efficacy of electroacupuncture (EA) for OIC in patients with cancer. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This randomized clinical trial was conducted at 6 tertiary hospitals in China among 100 adult patients with cancer who were screened for OIC and enrolled between May 1, 2019, and December 11, 2021. INTERVENTIONS Patients were randomized to receive 24 sessions of EA or sham electroacupuncture (SA) over 8 weeks and then were followed up for 8 weeks after treatment. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was the proportion of overall responders, defined as patients who had at least 3 spontaneous bowel movements (SBMs) per week and an increase of at least 1 SBM from baseline in the same week for at least 6 of the 8 weeks of the treatment period. All statistical analyses were based on the intention-to-treat principle. RESULTS A total of 100 patients (mean [SD] age, 64.4 [10.5] years; 56 men [56.0%]) underwent randomization; 50 were randomly assigned to each group. Among them, 44 of 50 patients (88.0%) in the EA group and 42 of 50 patients (84.0%) in the SA group received at least 20 (≥83.3%) sessions of treatment. The proportion of overall responders at week 8 was 40.1% (95% CI, 26.1%-54.1%) in the EA group and 9.0% (95% CI, 0.5%-17.4%) in the SA group (difference between groups, 31.1 percentage points [95% CI, 14.8-47.6 percentage points]; P < .001). Compared with SA, EA provided greater relief for most OIC symptoms and improved quality of life among patients with OIC. Electroacupuncture had no effects on cancer pain and its opioid treatment dosage. Electroacupuncture-related adverse events were rare, and, if any, all were mild and transient. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE This randomized clinical trial found that 8-week EA treatment could increase weekly SBMs with a good safety profile and improve quality of life for the treatment of OIC. Electroacupuncture thus provided an alternative option for OIC in adult patients with cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03797586.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Weiming Wang
- Department of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, Guang’anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Yan Liu
- Key Laboratory of Chinese Internal Medicine of the Ministry of Education, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaofang Yang
- College of Acumox and Tuina, Guizhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guiyang, China
| | - Jianhua Sun
- Department of Acupuncture Rehabilitation, the Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China
| | - Zenghui Yue
- College of Acupuncture and Tuina, Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Dianrong Lu
- Department of Oncology, Wang Jing Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Kehua Zhou
- Department of Hospital Medicine, ThedaCare Regional Medical Center–Appleton, Appleton, Wisconsin
| | - Yuanjie Sun
- Department of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, Guang’anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Aihua Hou
- Department of Oncology, Yantai Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Yantai, China
| | - Zhiwei Zang
- Department of Acupuncture, Yantai Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Yantai, China
| | - Xiaoqing Jin
- Department of Acupuncture, Zhejiang Hospital, Hangzhou, China
| | - Chao Liu
- College of Acumox and Tuina, Guizhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guiyang, China
| | - Yuhang Wang
- Department of Acupuncture Rehabilitation, the Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China
| | - Jinna Yu
- Department of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, Guang’anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Lili Zhu
- Department of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, Guang’anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Zhishun Liu
- Department of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, Guang’anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Kanbayashi Y, Shimizu M, Ishizuka Y, Sawa S, Yabe K, Uchida M. Factors associated with non-response to naldemedine for opioid-induced constipation in cancer patients: A subgroup analysis. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0278823. [PMID: 36490241 PMCID: PMC9733844 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278823] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2022] [Accepted: 11/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Opioid-induced constipation (OIC) is one of the most common adverse events of opioid therapy and can severely reduce quality of life (QOL). Naldemedine is the orally available peripheral-acting μ-opioid receptor antagonist approved for OIC treatment. However in daily clinical practice, some cancer patients show insufficient control of OIC even while receiving naldemedine. OBJECTIVE To identify factors associated with non-response to naldemedine in cancer patients. METHODS This study retrospectively analyzed 127 cancer patients prescribed naldemedine at Seirei Hamamatsu General Hospital in Japan between November 2016 and June 2021. For the regression analysis of factors associated with OIC, variables were extracted manually from electronic medical records. Naldemedine had been prescribed by the attending physician after the presence of OIC had been defined with reference to Rome IV diagnostic criteria. Naldemedine was evaluated as "effective" in cases where the number of defecations increased at least once in the first 3 days after starting naldemedine. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with non-response to naldemedine. The data used were from the group of patients who received naldemedine in our previous study. RESULTS Factors significantly associated with non-response to naldemedine included chemotherapy with taxanes within 1 month of evaluation of naldemedine effect (odds ratio [OR] = 0.063; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.007-0.568), and addition of or switching to naldemedine due to insufficient efficacy of prior laxatives (OR = 0.352, 95% CI = 0.129-0.966). CONCLUSION The identification of factors associated with non-response to naldemedine prescribed for OIC may help improve QOL among cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuko Kanbayashi
- Faculty of Pharmacy, Department of Education and Research Center for Clinical Pharmacy, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Takatsuki, Japan
- * E-mail:
| | - Mayumi Shimizu
- Department of Pharmacy, Seirei Hamamatsu General Hospital, Hamamatsu, Japan
| | - Yuichi Ishizuka
- Department of Pharmacy, Seirei Hamamatsu General Hospital, Hamamatsu, Japan
| | - Shohei Sawa
- Department of Pharmacy, Seirei Hamamatsu General Hospital, Hamamatsu, Japan
| | - Katsushige Yabe
- Department of Pharmacy, Seirei Hamamatsu General Hospital, Hamamatsu, Japan
| | - Mayako Uchida
- Department of Education and Research Center for Pharmacy Practice, Doshisha Women’s College of Liberal Arts, Kyotanabe, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Andresen V, Becker G, Frieling T, Goebel-Stengel M, Gundling F, Herold A, Karaus M, Keller J, Kim M, Klose P, Krammer H, Kreis ME, Kuhlbusch-Zicklam R, Langhorst J, Layer P, Lenzen-Großimlinghaus R, Madisch A, Mönnikes H, Müller-Lissner S, Rubin D, Schemann M, Schwille-Kiuntke J, Stengel A, Storr M, van der Voort I, Voderholzer W, Wedel T, Wirz S, Witzigmann H, Pehl C. Aktualisierte S2k-Leitlinie chronische Obstipation der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Gastroenterologie, Verdauungs- und Stoffwechselkrankheiten (DGVS) und der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Neurogastroenterologie & Motilität (DGNM) – April 2022 – AWMF-Registriernummer: 021–019. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GASTROENTEROLOGIE 2022; 60:1528-1572. [PMID: 36223785 DOI: 10.1055/a-1880-1928] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- V Andresen
- Medizinische Klinik, Israelitisches Krankenhaus, Hamburg, Deutschland
| | - G Becker
- Klinik für Palliativmedizin, Freiburg, Deutschland
| | - T Frieling
- Medizinische Klinik II, Helios-Klinikum Krefeld, Krefeld, Deutschland
| | | | - F Gundling
- Medizinische Klinik II (Gastroenterologie, Gastroenterologische Onkologie, Hepatologie, Diabetologie, Stoffwechsel, Infektiologie), Klinikum am Bruderwald, Bamberg, Deutschland
| | - A Herold
- Sozialstiftung Bamberg, End- und Dickdarm-Zentrum Mannheim, Mannheim, Deutschland
| | - M Karaus
- Abt. Innere Medizin, Evang. Krankenhaus Göttingen-Weende, Göttingen, Deutschland
| | - J Keller
- Medizinische Klinik, Israelitisches Krankenhaus, Hamburg, Deutschland
| | - M Kim
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral-, Transplantations-, Gefäß- und Kinderchirurgie (Chirurgische Klinik I) des Universitätsklinikums, Zentrum Operative Medizin (ZOM), Würzburg, Deutschland
| | - P Klose
- Universität Duisburg-Essen, Medizinische Fakultät, Essen, Deutschland
| | - H Krammer
- Sozialstiftung Bamberg, End- und Dickdarm-Zentrum Mannheim, Mannheim, Deutschland
| | - M E Kreis
- Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Gefäßchirurgie, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Deutschland
| | | | - J Langhorst
- Knappschafts-Krankenhaus, Essen, Deutschland
| | - P Layer
- Medizinische Klinik, Israelitisches Krankenhaus, Hamburg, Deutschland
| | | | - A Madisch
- Klinik für Gastroenterologie, interventionelle Endoskopie und Diabetologie, Klinikum Siloah-Oststadt-Heidehaus, Hannover, Deutschland
| | - H Mönnikes
- Klinik für Innere Medizin, Martin-Luther-Krankenhaus, Berlin, Deutschland
| | | | - D Rubin
- Klinik für Innere Medizin Schwerpunkt Gastroenterologie, DRK Kliniken Berlin Mitte, Berlin, Deutschland.,Klinik für Innere Medizin mit Schwerpunkt Gastroenterologie, Vivantes Klinikum Spandau, Spandau, Deutschland
| | - M Schemann
- Lehrstuhl für Humanbiologie, TU München, Freising, Deutschland
| | - J Schwille-Kiuntke
- Innere Medizin VI Psychosomat. Medizin u. Psychotherapie, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen, Deutschland.,Institut für Arbeitsmedizin, Sozialmedizin und Versorgungsforschung, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen, Deutschland
| | - A Stengel
- Medizinische Klinik mit Schwerpunkt Psychosomatik, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - M Storr
- Zentrum für Endoskopie, Starnberg, Deutschland
| | - I van der Voort
- Klinik für Innere Medizin Gastroenterologie und Diabetologie, Jüdisches Krankenhaus Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland
| | | | - T Wedel
- Anatomisches Institut, Universität Kiel, Kiel, Deutschland
| | - S Wirz
- Cura Krankenhaus Bad Honnef, Bad Honnef, Deutschland
| | - H Witzigmann
- Klinik für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie, Krankenhaus Dresden-Friedrichstadt, Dresden, Deutschland
| | - C Pehl
- Medizinische Klinik, Krankenhaus Vilsbiburg, Vilsbiburg, Deutschland
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Baykov SV, Tarasenko MV, Semenov AV, Katlenok EA, Shetnev AA, Boyarskiy VP. Dualism of 1,2,4-oxadiazole ring in noncovalent interactions with carboxylic group. J Mol Struct 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.molstruc.2022.132974] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
19
|
Gudin J, Vu L, Ceschim MR, Gude L, Peskin E, Alvarez A, Horn DB. Peripherally acting mu-opioid receptor antagonists for the treatment of opioid-induced constipation. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2022; 55 Suppl 2:S8-S15. [PMID: 35544279 DOI: 10.1111/apt.16864] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2021] [Revised: 02/20/2022] [Accepted: 02/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/09/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey Gudin
- Anesthesiology, Perioperative Medicine and Pain Management, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Ly Vu
- Anesthesiology, Perioperative Medicine and Pain Management, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Mariana Rubini Ceschim
- Anesthesiology, Perioperative Medicine and Pain Management, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Luis Gude
- Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Evan Peskin
- Anesthesiology, Perioperative Medicine and Pain Management, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Armando Alvarez
- Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Danielle Bodzin Horn
- Anesthesiology, Perioperative Medicine and Pain Management, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
BouSaba J, Sannaa W, Camilleri M. Update on the role of naldemedine in opioid-induced constipation in patients with chronic noncancer pain. Therap Adv Gastroenterol 2022; 15:17562848221078638. [PMID: 35509419 PMCID: PMC9058332 DOI: 10.1177/17562848221078638] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2021] [Accepted: 01/17/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Chronic noncancer pain (CNCP) affects up to 20% of adults and can interfere with activities of daily living. Up to 4% of adults in the United States receive chronic opioid therapy and up to 57% of patients on long-term opioids for CNCP report opioid-induced constipation (OIC). OIC is essentially constipation occurring after starting opioid treatment. While laxatives are traditionally the first-line therapy for OIC, 81% of patients taking daily laxatives and opioids still reported OIC and considered that it negatively affected their quality of life. Naldemedine is a peripherally acting µ-opioid receptor antagonists (PAMORA) approved for the treatment of OIC in patients with CNCP. This article reviews the mechanism of action, efficacy, and safety of naldemedine in CNCP patients. Naldemedine improves OIC in patients with CNCP by acting as an opioid receptor antagonist in the gastrointestinal tract. It does not interfere with the analgesic properties of opioids or cause withdrawal symptoms since these effects are centrally mediated, and naldemedine does not cross the blood brain barrier. Naldemedine showed significant and sustained improvement in frequency of bowel movements, quality of life, and constipation-related symptoms. It is generally well tolerated with a higher incidence of gastrointestinal adverse events of mild or moderate severity such as diarrhea, abdominal pain, or vomiting compared to placebo. While there are no randomized, controlled trials that compare head-to-head pharmacological therapies used for treatment of OIC, network meta-analysis shows that naldemedine has an overall good benefit-risk profile compared to the other approved medications.
Collapse
|
21
|
Tang Y, Chen H, Zhou Y, Tan ML, Xiong SL, Li Y, Ji XH, Li YS. Analgesic Effects of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Patients With Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Randomized, Sham-Controlled, Pilot Study. Front Oncol 2022; 12:840855. [PMID: 35372024 PMCID: PMC8969560 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.840855] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2021] [Accepted: 02/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Current pharmacological intervention for the cancer-related pain is still limited. The aim of this study was to explore whether repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) could be an effective adjuvant therapy to reduce pain in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods This was a randomized, sham–controlled study. A total of 41 advanced NSCLC patients with uncontrolled pain (score≥4 on pain intensity assessed with an 11-point numeric rating scale) were randomized to receive active (10 Hz, 2000 stimuli) (n = 20) or sham rTMS (n = 20) for 3 weeks. Pain was the primary outcome and was assessed with the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). Secondary outcomes were oral morphine equivalent (OME) daily dose, quality of life (WHO Quality of Life-BREF), and psychological distress (the Hospital Depression and Anxiety Scale). All outcomes were measured at baseline, 3 days, 1 week, 2 weeks, and 3 weeks. Results The pain intensity in both groups decreased gradually from day 3 and decreased to the lowest at the week 3, with a decrease rate of 41.09% in the rTMS group and 23.23% in the sham group. The NRS score of the rTMS group was significantly lower than that of the sham group on the week 2 (p < 0.001, Cohen’s d =1.135) and week 3 (p=0.017, Cohen’s d = -0.822). The OME daily dose, physiology and psychology domains of WHOQOL-BREF scores, as well as the HAM-A and HAM-D scores all were significantly improved at week 3 in rTMS group. Conclusion Advanced NSCL patients with cancer pain treated with rTMS showed better greater pain relief, lower dosage of opioid, and better mood states and quality of life. rTMS is expected to be a new effective adjuvant therapy for cancer pain in advanced NSCLC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ying Tang
- Chongqing Key Laboratory of Translational Research for Cancer Metastasis and Individualized Treatment, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China
| | - Han Chen
- Department of Rehabilitation, Southwest Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Yi Zhou
- Department of Rehabilitation, Southwest Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Ming-Liang Tan
- Department of Rehabilitation, Southwest Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Shuang-Long Xiong
- Chongqing Key Laboratory of Translational Research for Cancer Metastasis and Individualized Treatment, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China
| | - Yan Li
- Chongqing Key Laboratory of Translational Research for Cancer Metastasis and Individualized Treatment, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China
| | - Xiao-Hui Ji
- Chongqing Key Laboratory of Translational Research for Cancer Metastasis and Individualized Treatment, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China
| | - Yong-Sheng Li
- Chongqing Key Laboratory of Translational Research for Cancer Metastasis and Individualized Treatment, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Tack J, Camilleri M, Hale M, Morlion B, Nalamachu S, Webster L, Wild J. Establishing Minimal Clinically Important Differences in Quality of Life Measures in Opioid-Induced Constipation. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022; 20:855-863. [PMID: 33965574 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2021.05.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2020] [Revised: 04/30/2021] [Accepted: 05/02/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Opioids have a role in chronic pain management. However, opioid-induced constipation may cause patients to skip or reduce opioid doses, leading to inadequate pain relief and negatively impacting quality of life. We sought to establish a minimal clinically important difference to understand whether changes in quality of life scores are of value to patients. METHODS Integrated data from the double-blind, controlled, phase 3 COMPOSE-1 and COMPOSE-2 trials of naldemedine in chronic noncancer pain and opioid-induced constipation were used to determine minimal clinically important differences using Patient Assessment of Constipation Symptoms (PAC-SYM) and Patient Assessment of Constipation Quality of Life (PAC-QOL) questionnaires. Patients completed the questionnaires (5-point Likert scale; predose, Weeks 2, 4, and 12), kept a daily log of Bowel Movement and Constipation Assessment, and rated satisfaction at end of study. Minimal clinically important differences were computed using an anchor-based method with 6 anchors: 5 from the Bowel Movement and Constipation Assessment and 1 from patient satisfaction. Threshold values for each anchor were set to define responders versus nonresponders based on score definitions. Clinically meaningful cutoff values for changes in PAC-SYM and PAC-QOL scores were determined using receiver operating characteristic curves. RESULTS Data from 1095 patients (549, naldemedine; 546, placebo) were analyzed. The area under the curve for the receiver operating characteristic curves (ranges, 0.719 to 0.798 for PAC-SYM and 0.734 to 0.833 for PAC-QOL) indicated that both instruments can discriminate responders and nonresponders for each anchor. PAC-SYM cutoff values ranged from -1.04 to -0.83; PAC-QOL cutoff values ranged from -0.93 to -0.82. CONCLUSIONS Based on data derived from the anchor method, reductions in PAC-SYM and PAC-QOL scores of >1.0 in patients with chronic noncancer pain and opioid-induced constipation are clinically meaningful. CLINICALTRIALS gov Registration: NCT01965158; NCT01993940.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Tack
- Translational Research Center for Gastrointestinal Disorders, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Michael Camilleri
- Clinical Enteric Neuroscience Translational and Epidemiological Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Martin Hale
- Gold Coast Research, LLC, Plantation, Florida
| | - Bart Morlion
- Leuven Center for Algology and Pain Management, University Hospital Leuven, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | | | - James Wild
- Upstate Clinical Research Associates, Williamsville, New York
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Mawatari H, Shinjo T, Morita T, Kohara H, Yomiya K. Revision of Pharmacological Treatment Recommendations for Cancer Pain: Clinical Guidelines from the Japanese Society of Palliative Medicine. J Palliat Med 2022; 25:1095-1114. [PMID: 35363057 DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2021.0438] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Pain is one of the most common symptoms in cancer patients. The Japanese Society for Palliative Medicine (JSPM) first published its clinical guidelines for the management of cancer pain in 2010. Since then, more research on cancer pain management has been reported, and new drugs have become available in Japan. Thus, the JSPM has now revised the clinical guidelines using a validated methodology. Methods: This guideline was developed through a systematic review, discussion, and the Delphi method, following a formal guideline development process. Results: Thirty-five recommendations were created: 19 for the pharmacological management of cancer pain, 6 for the management of opioid-induced adverse effects, and 10 for pharmacological treatment procedures. Due to the lack of evidence that directly addressed our clinical questions, most of the recommendations had to be based on consensus among committee members and other guidelines. Discussion: It is critical to continue to build high-quality evidence in cancer pain management, and revise these guidelines accordingly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hironori Mawatari
- Department of Palliative and Supportive Care, Yokohama Minami Kyosai Hospital, Yokohama City, Japan
| | - Takuya Shinjo
- Department of Palliative Medicine, Shinjo Clinic, Kobe City, Japan
| | - Tatsuya Morita
- Department of Palliative and Supportive Care, Seirei Mikatahara General Hospital, Hamamatsu City, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Kohara
- Department of Palliative Medicine, Hiroshima Prefectural Hospital, Hiroshima City, Japan
| | - Kinomi Yomiya
- Department of Palliative Care, Saitama Cancer Center, Ina-machi, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Abstract
Opioid-related constipation encompasses constipation directly caused by opioid use (opioid-induced constipation [OIC]) as well as pre-existing constipation worsened by opioid use (opioid-exacerbated constipation [OEC]). Over-the-counter laxatives should be used as first-line agents for both OIC and OEC, given their efficacy, low cost, and high safety profiles. Symptoms of OIC and responses to therapy can be assessed with the Bowel Function Index. Individuals with OIC refractory to laxatives may be responsive to peripherally acting μ-opioid receptor antagonists. Although data supporting the superiority of one prescription agent over another is lacking, all have proven effective for the treatment of OIC.
Collapse
|
25
|
Naldemedine for opioid-induced constipation. Drug Ther Bull 2022; 60:39-43. [PMID: 35197302 DOI: 10.1136/dtb.2021.000063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
Generic name: Naldemedine tosylate Brand name: Rizmoic Formulation: 200 mcg film-coated tablets Market Authorisation holder: Shionogi B.V Indication: Treatment of opioid-induced constipation in adult patients who have previously been treated with a laxative Dose: 200 mcg/day, taken at the same time every day. Naldemedine may be used with or without a laxative. It must be discontinued if treatment with the opioid is discontinued. Cost: £41.72 for 28 tablets Classification: Prescription only medicine subject to additional monitoring (▼).
Collapse
|
26
|
Post-marketing surveillance of the safety and effectiveness of naldemedine in the management of opioid-induced constipation in patients with cancer pain in Japan. Support Care Cancer 2022; 30:3943-3954. [PMID: 35044484 PMCID: PMC8942924 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-022-06807-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2021] [Accepted: 12/31/2021] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
Purpose This prospective post-marketing surveillance (PMS) was designed to collect data on the safety and effectiveness of naldemedine in routine clinical practice in patients with opioid-induced constipation (OIC) and cancer pain in Japan and explore the characteristics of patients prone to diarrhea. Methods The enrolled patients received naldemedine (0.2 mg, once a day) orally for up to 12 weeks. In the safety analysis, adverse drug reactions (ADRs), including diarrhea as a special interest, were assessed. Effectiveness was evaluated, especially regarding the frequency and condition of bowel movement. Results In the safety analysis set (n = 1177), 145 ADRs occurred in 133 (11.30%) patients, and diarrhea was the most frequent event (n = 107, 9.09%). Most cases of diarrhea were non-serious (98.1%). Most ADRs were non-serious (93.8%), and they resolved within 2 weeks (75.9%). No patient characteristics influenced the risk of diarrhea development or aggravation. Both the frequency (75.0% and 83.2%) and condition of bowel movement (80.0% and 88.0%) were improved at 2 and 12 weeks, respectively in the effectiveness analysis set (n = 953). Frequency and condition of bowel movement were also improved in patients excluded (e.g., Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status was ≥ 3) or with very small numbers (e.g., received weak opioid) in the clinical trials. Conclusions This PMS indicates that naldemedine is well tolerated and effective in patients of various backgrounds in routine clinical practice who have OIC and cancer pain. Trial registration UMIN000042851. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00520-022-06807-y.
Collapse
|
27
|
Can Naloxegol Therapy Improve Quality of Life in Patients with Advanced Cancer? Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13225736. [PMID: 34830889 PMCID: PMC8616145 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13225736] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2021] [Revised: 11/05/2021] [Accepted: 11/12/2021] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
This observational study aims to evaluate the efficacy of naloxegol therapy in resolving opioid-induced constipation (OIC) and in improving the quality of life in a home palliative care cancer setting. Advanced cancer patients with OIC (Rome IV criteria) not relieved by laxatives started a naloxegol therapy 25 mg/day for 4 weeks. Quality of life was evaluated by Patient Assessment of Constipation Quality-of-Life (PAC-QoL) at day 0 and day 28; background pain by Numerical Rating Scale, number of weekly spontaneous bowel movements and Bowel Function Index (BFI) were evaluated at day 0 and every week. Seventy-eight patients who completed the 4-week study improved all four PAC-QoL dimensions (physical and psychological discomfort, worries/concerns and satisfaction level). Weekly spontaneous bowel movements increased and BFI improved. Background pain reduced after seven days and remained lower during the following weeks. Seventy-two patients dropped out the study before day 28 with a reduced survival compared to patients completing the study. Even in these patients, an improvement of bowel function was observed after two weeks. Naloxegol was effective in improving the quality of life, resolving OIC and reducing overall pain in patients with advanced cancer.
Collapse
|
28
|
Real-World Patient Characteristics and Treatment Patterns of Naldemedine for the Treatment of Opioid-Induced Constipation in Patients with Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Chart Review Study. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2021; 57:medicina57111233. [PMID: 34833451 PMCID: PMC8625056 DOI: 10.3390/medicina57111233] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2021] [Revised: 10/24/2021] [Accepted: 11/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Naldemedine is a peripherally acting μ-opioid receptor antagonist that improves opioid-induced constipation. Although clinical trials have excluded patients with poor performance status (PS) and those started on naldemedine early after opioid initiation, clinical practice has used naldemedine for the same patients. Therefore, we investigated the treatment patterns of naldemedine in a real-world setting. Materials and Methods: This was a multicenter, retrospective chart review study of opioid-treated patients with cancer receiving naldemedine. Adverse events that occurred within 7 days of naldemedine initiation were evaluated in those who received one or more doses of the same. Effectiveness was assessed in patients who used naldemedine for more than 7 days. Results: A total of 296 patients satisfied the eligibility criteria, among whom 129 (43.6%) had a PS of ≥3 and 176 (59.5%) started naldemedine within 2 weeks of opioid initiation. Moreover, 203 (79.6%) patients had ≥3 bowel movements per week. Incidences of all grades of diarrhea and abdominal pain were 87 (29.4%) and 12 (4.1%), respectively. No patient had grade 4 or higher adverse events. Conclusions: Although nearly half of the patients receiving naldemedine in clinical practice belonged to populations that were not included in the clinical trials, our results suggested that naldemedine in clinical practice had the same efficacy and safety as that in clinical trials.
Collapse
|
29
|
Baykov SV, Mikherdov AS, Novikov AS, Geyl KK, Tarasenko MV, Gureev MA, Boyarskiy VP. π-π Noncovalent Interaction Involving 1,2,4- and 1,3,4-Oxadiazole Systems: The Combined Experimental, Theoretical, and Database Study. Molecules 2021; 26:5672. [PMID: 34577142 PMCID: PMC8466036 DOI: 10.3390/molecules26185672] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2021] [Revised: 09/13/2021] [Accepted: 09/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
A series of N-pyridyl ureas bearing 1,2,4- (1a, 2a, and 3a) and 1,3,4-oxadiazole moiety (1b, 2b, 3b) was prepared and characterized by HRMS, 1H and 13C NMR spectroscopy, as well as X-ray diffraction. The inspection of the crystal structures of (1-3)a,b and the Hirshfeld surface analysis made possible the recognition of the (oxadiazole)···(pyridine) and (oxadiazole)···(oxadiazole) interactions. The presence of these interactions was confirmed theoretically by DFT calculations, including NCI analysis for experimentally determined crystal structures as well as QTAIM analysis for optimized equilibrium structures. The preformed database survey allowed the verification of additional examples of relevant (oxadiazole)···π interactions both in Cambridge Structural Database and in Protein Data Bank, including the cocrystal of commercial anti-HIV drug Raltegravir.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sergey V. Baykov
- Institute of Chemistry, Saint Petersburg State University, 7/9 Universitetskaya Nab., 199034 Saint Petersburg, Russia; (S.V.B.); (A.S.M.); (A.S.N.); (K.K.G.)
| | - Alexander S. Mikherdov
- Institute of Chemistry, Saint Petersburg State University, 7/9 Universitetskaya Nab., 199034 Saint Petersburg, Russia; (S.V.B.); (A.S.M.); (A.S.N.); (K.K.G.)
| | - Alexander S. Novikov
- Institute of Chemistry, Saint Petersburg State University, 7/9 Universitetskaya Nab., 199034 Saint Petersburg, Russia; (S.V.B.); (A.S.M.); (A.S.N.); (K.K.G.)
| | - Kirill K. Geyl
- Institute of Chemistry, Saint Petersburg State University, 7/9 Universitetskaya Nab., 199034 Saint Petersburg, Russia; (S.V.B.); (A.S.M.); (A.S.N.); (K.K.G.)
| | - Marina V. Tarasenko
- Pharmaceutical Technology Transfer Centre, Yaroslavl State Pedagogical University Named after K.D. Ushinsky, 108 Respublikanskaya St., 150000 Yaroslavl, Russia;
| | - Maxim A. Gureev
- Research Center “Digital Biodesign and Personalized Healthcare”, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, 119991 Moscow, Russia;
| | - Vadim P. Boyarskiy
- Institute of Chemistry, Saint Petersburg State University, 7/9 Universitetskaya Nab., 199034 Saint Petersburg, Russia; (S.V.B.); (A.S.M.); (A.S.N.); (K.K.G.)
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Hale ME, Wild JE, Yamada T, Yokota T, Tack J, Andresen V, Drewes AM. Naldemedine is effective in the treatment of opioid-induced constipation in patients with chronic non-cancer pain who had a poor response to laxatives. Therap Adv Gastroenterol 2021; 14:17562848211032320. [PMID: 34377150 PMCID: PMC8326612 DOI: 10.1177/17562848211032320] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2020] [Accepted: 05/27/2021] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Two studies demonstrated the efficacy and safety of naldemedine in adult patients with chronic non-cancer pain and opioid-induced constipation (OIC). However, no studies have compared the efficacy of peripherally acting µ-opioid receptor antagonists in patients with adequate and inadequate responses to prior OIC therapy with laxatives. This post hoc analysis of integrated data from the two previous studies compared the efficacy of naldemedine in patients who were unsuccessfully treated with laxatives [poor laxative responders (PLRs)] with those who either did not receive laxatives >30 days prior to screening or those who only received rescue laxative at or after screening (non-PLRs). METHODS Patients with OIC were randomized to once-daily treatment with naldemedine 0.2 mg or placebo. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of responders [⩾3 spontaneous bowel movements (SBMs)/week and an increase from baseline of ⩾1 SBM/week for ⩾9 weeks of the 12-week treatment period and ⩾3 weeks of the final 4 weeks of the 12-week treatment period]. Additional endpoints included change in SBM frequency, change in frequency of SBMs without straining, proportion of complete SBM (CSBM) responders, change in CSBM frequency, and time to first SBM. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were assessed. RESULTS The analysis included 538 (317 PLRs, 221 non-PLRs) and 537 (311 PLRs, 226 non-PLRs) patients in the naldemedine and placebo arms, respectively. There were significantly more responders in the naldemedine PLR (46.4%; p < 0.0001) and non-PLR (54.3%; p = 0.0009) subgroups versus the placebo groups (30.2% and 38.9%, respectively). In both the PLR and non-PLR subgroups, naldemedine treatment was superior to placebo on all additional endpoints. Overall incidence of TEAEs in the PLR subgroups treated with naldemedine or placebo was similar. CONCLUSION This integrated analysis further supports the efficacy and tolerability of naldemedine in the treatment of OIC and demonstrates a consistent effect in both PLR and non-PLR subgroups.[ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01965158 and NCT01993940].
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin E. Hale
- Gold Coast Research LLC, 499 NW 70th Ave Ste 200, Plantation, FL 33317, USA
| | - James E. Wild
- Upstate Clinical Research Associates, Williamsville, NY, USA
| | | | | | - Jan Tack
- Translational Research Center for Gastrointestinal Disorders (TARGID), University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Viola Andresen
- Senior Physician Medical Clinic/Head of Palliative Team/Head of Nutrition Team, Israelitian Hospital Hamburg, Academic Teaching Hospital of University of Hamburg, Germany
| | - Asbjørn Mohr Drewes
- Mech-Sense, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Aalborg University Hospital, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Camilleri M, Hale M, Morlion B, Tack J, Webster L, Wild J. Naldemedine Improves Patient-Reported Outcomes of Opioid-Induced Constipation in Patients with Chronic Non-Cancer Pain in the COMPOSE Phase 3 Studies. J Pain Res 2021; 14:2179-2189. [PMID: 34295186 PMCID: PMC8291809 DOI: 10.2147/jpr.s282738] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2020] [Accepted: 06/16/2021] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective Opioid-induced constipation is among the most common side effects associated with opioid use in patients with chronic non-cancer pain, and it can have a significant negative impact on health-related quality of life (QOL). This analysis evaluated the effect of naldemedine 0.2 mg on patient-reported outcomes in three phase 3 clinical studies. Methods COMPOSE-1 and COMPOSE-2 were identical randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group studies of 12 weeks’ duration, allowing data to be integrated (n=1095). COMPOSE-3 was similar in design, but of 52 weeks’ duration (n=1241). Patients were adults with chronic non-cancer pain who had been treated with opioid analgesics for ≥3 months and experiencing opioid-induced constipation. Patient-reported outcomes included Patient Assessment of Constipation Symptoms (PAC-SYM; 12 questions assessed on a 5-point Likert scale), PAC-QOL (28 questions assessed on a 5-point Likert scale), and Subject Global Satisfaction (measured on a 7-point Likert scale). The proportion of patients achieving a ≥1.5 improvement in PAC-SYM and PAC-QOL was calculated. The correlation between change in PAC-SYM and PAC-QOL scores and frequency of bowel movements was also explored. Results The proportion of PAC-SYM and PAC-QOL responders was significantly higher for naldemedine than for placebo at all assessed time points in COMPOSE-1/COMPOSE-2 (p<0.005 for both) and COMPOSE-3 (p<0.005 and p<0.0001, respectively). There was a statistically significant correlation between improvement in PAC-SYM/PAC-QOL and frequency of bowel movements at all time points (p≤0.0002). The majority of patients treated with naldemedine reported markedly or moderately improved satisfaction with constipation and abdominal symptoms on the Subject Global Satisfaction questionnaire. Discussion Naldemedine treatment was associated with a rapid and sustained clinically relevant improvement in patient-reported outcomes, indicating improvement in opioid-induced constipation-related symptoms and QOL. ClinicalTrials.gov Registration NCT01965158, NCT01993940, NCT01965652.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Camilleri
- Clinical Enteric Neuroscience Translational and Epidemiological Research (CENTER), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Martin Hale
- Gold Coast Research, LLC, Plantation, FL, USA
| | - Bart Morlion
- Leuven Center for Algology and Pain Management, University Hospital Leuven, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jan Tack
- Translational Research Center for Gastrointestinal Disorders (TARGID), University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - James Wild
- Upstate Clinical Research Associates, Williamsville, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
De Giorgio R, Zucco FM, Chiarioni G, Mercadante S, Corazziari ES, Caraceni A, Odetti P, Giusti R, Marinangeli F, Pinto C. Management of Opioid-Induced Constipation and Bowel Dysfunction: Expert Opinion of an Italian Multidisciplinary Panel. Adv Ther 2021; 38:3589-3621. [PMID: 34086265 PMCID: PMC8279968 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-021-01766-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2021] [Accepted: 04/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
The prescribing and use of opioid analgesics is increasing in Italy owing to a profusion in the number and types of opioid analgesic products available, and the increasing prevalence of conditions associated with severe pain, the latter being related to population aging. Herein we provide the expert opinion of an Italian multidisciplinary panel on the management of opioid-induced constipation (OIC) and bowel dysfunction. OIC and opioid-induced bowel dysfunction are well-recognised unwanted effects of treatment with opioid analgesics that can profoundly affect quality of life. OIC can be due to additional factors such as reduced mobility, a low-fibre diet, comorbidities, and concomitant medications. Fixed-dose combinations of opioids with mu (μ) opioid receptor antagonists, such as oxycodone/naloxone, have become available, but have limited utility in clinical practice because the individual components cannot be independently titrated, creating a risk of breakthrough pain as the dose is increased. A comprehensive prevention and management strategy for OIC should include interventions that aim to improve fibre and fluid intake, increase mobility or exercise, and restore bowel function without compromising pain control. Recommended first-line pharmacological treatment of OIC is with an osmotic laxative (preferably polyethylene glycol [macrogol]), or a stimulant laxative such as an anthraquinone. A second laxative with a complementary mechanism of action should be added in the event of an inadequate response. Second-line treatment with a peripherally acting μ opioid receptor antagonist (PAMORA), such as methylnaltrexone, naloxegol or naldemedine, should be considered in patients with OIC that has not responded to combination laxative treatment. Prokinetics or intestinal secretagogues, such as lubiprostone, may be appropriate in the third-line setting, but their use in OIC is off-label in Italy, and should therefore be restricted to settings such as specialist centres and clinical trials.
Collapse
|
33
|
Rekatsina M, Paladini A, Drewes AM, Ayob F, Viswanath O, Urits I, Corli O, Pergolizzi J, Varrassi G. Efficacy and Safety of Peripherally Acting μ-Opioid Receptor Antagonist (PAMORAs) for the Management of Patients With Opioid-Induced Constipation: A Systematic Review. Cureus 2021; 13:e16201. [PMID: 34367804 PMCID: PMC8339109 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.16201] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2021] [Accepted: 07/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
In treating chronic and acute pain, opioids are widely used. Although they do provide analgesia, their usage does come with adverse events (AEs). One of the most burdensome is opioid-induced bowel dysfunction, and more specifically opioid-induced constipation (OIC). The pathogenesis of these AEs is well known as the consequence of the action of opioids on m-receptors in the enteric nervous system. In recent years, medicines counteracting this specific action at the receptors have been registered for clinical use: the peripherally acting μ-opioid receptor antagonists (PAMORAs). The knowledge of their comparative efficacy and tolerability is very important for physicians and patients in opioid therapy. This systematic review of the existing literature on PAMORAs aimed to study the relative clinical advantages and disadvantages. The most important data banks, including "PubMed," "Embase," "CT.gov," "ICTRP" and "CINAHL" were used to find the published material on PAMORAs. The selected publications were examined to systematically analyze the efficacy and safety of the four existing PAMORAs. All of the medications are superior to placebo in reducing OIC. There are few published data on alvimopan used to treat OIC, and it is only indicated for the treatment of post-abdominal surgery ileus. Methylnaltrexone is studied mainly in its subcutaneous (SC) formulation. When used in its oral formulation, it seems more rapid than naloxegol and placebo in the reduction of OIC. Naldemedine is able to produce more spontaneous bowel movements (SBMs) when compared to alvimopan and naloxegol. Tolerability was found to be similar for all of them. In particular, they affect the gastrointestinal tract (GI), with flatulence and diarrhea, especially at high dosages. For some of them, nasopharyngitis and abdominal pain were observed as treatment adverse effects (TEAs). Several cardiovascular TEAs were reported after methylnaltrexone use, but it is not clear whether they were consequences of the drug or related to the general conditions of the patients. Considering the existing data, naloxegol and naldemedine seem to be the best choices, with a higher number of spontaneous bowel movements following naldemedine administration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martina Rekatsina
- Pain Management, Whipps Cross Hospital Barts Health NHS, London, GBR
| | - Antonella Paladini
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Public Health and Life Science (MESVA), University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, ITA
| | - Asbjørn M Drewes
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, DNK
| | | | - Omar Viswanath
- Pain Management, Valley Pain Consultants - Envision Physician Services, Phoenix, USA
| | - Ivan Urits
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - Oscar Corli
- Pain and Palliative Care Research Unit, Mario Negri Institute IRCCS, Milano, ITA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Hikita E, Hashimoto M, Yasu T, Shirota M, Nakamura K. Efficacy of Naldemedine in the Management of Constipation in a Patient with Severe COVID-19 Receiving Mechanical Ventilation. J Palliat Med 2021; 24:651-652. [PMID: 33544649 DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2021.0028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Eri Hikita
- Department of Pharmacy, Tokyo Metropolitan Bokutoh Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mituko Hashimoto
- Department of Pharmacy, Tokyo Metropolitan Bokutoh Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takeo Yasu
- Department of Pharmacy, Tokyo Metropolitan Bokutoh Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Medicinal Therapy Research, Pharmaceutical Education and Research Center, Meiji Pharmaceutical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mikio Shirota
- Department of Pharmacy, Tokyo Metropolitan Bokutoh Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kazuha Nakamura
- Tertiary Emergency Medical Center (Trauma and Critical Care), Tokyo Metropolitan Bokutoh Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Okamoto A, Ikemura K, Mizutani E, Iwamoto T, Okuda M. Opioid therapy duration before naldemedine treatment is a significant independent risk of diarrhea: a retrospective cohort study. J Pharm Health Care Sci 2021; 7:3. [PMID: 33517900 PMCID: PMC7849155 DOI: 10.1186/s40780-020-00187-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2020] [Accepted: 12/21/2020] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The most common adverse event (AE) associated with opioid analgesics is opioid-induced constipation (OIC). Naldemedine (NAL) is widely used for the treatment of OIC. However, diarrhea has been reported as the most common treatment-emergent AE of NAL, and little is known about the risk factors associated with the development of diarrhea during NAL administration. This study examined the risk factors for NAL-induced diarrhea via a retrospective chart review of hospitalized patients. Methods The data of 101 hospitalized adult patients who received NAL for the first time for the treatment of OIC at Mie University Hospital between June 2017 and December 2018 were extracted from electronic medical records. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 70 of the 101 patients were enrolled in this study. Diarrhea was defined as “diarrhea” on the medical record within 2 weeks of NAL administration. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify risk factors for the development of diarrhea in patients receiving NAL. Results Twenty-two of the 70 patients enrolled (31%) developed diarrhea within 2 weeks of NAL administration. The median duration (range) of NAL treatment before diarrhea onset was 3 (1–12) days. Patients with diarrhea had a significantly longer duration of opioid therapy before NAL administration than patients without diarrhea (P=0.002). Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that the independent risk factors for the development of NAL-induced diarrhea were NAL administration after more than 17 days of opioid therapy (odds ratio [OR]=7.539; P=0.016) and pancreatic cancer (OR=6.217; P=0.025). In fact, the incidence of diarrhea in patients who were administered NAL within a day of opioid therapy was significantly lower than that in patients who were administered NAL after more than 17 days of opioid therapy (13% vs. 54%, P=0.030). Conclusions These results suggested that a prolonged duration of opioid therapy prior to NAL initiation is associated with increased incidence of diarrhea. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40780-020-00187-3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akiharu Okamoto
- Department of Pharmacy, Mie University Hospital, 2-174 Edobashi, Tsu, Mie, 514-8507, Japan.,Department of Clinical Pharmaceutics, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-174 Edobashi, Tsu, Mie, 514-8507, Japan
| | - Kenji Ikemura
- Department of Pharmacy, Osaka University Hospital, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan
| | - Eri Mizutani
- Department of Pharmacy, Mie University Hospital, 2-174 Edobashi, Tsu, Mie, 514-8507, Japan
| | - Takuya Iwamoto
- Department of Pharmacy, Mie University Hospital, 2-174 Edobashi, Tsu, Mie, 514-8507, Japan. .,Department of Clinical Pharmaceutics, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-174 Edobashi, Tsu, Mie, 514-8507, Japan.
| | - Masahiro Okuda
- Department of Pharmacy, Osaka University Hospital, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Abstract
Primary care physicians frequently evaluate patients with constipation. The history is crucial in uncovering warning symptoms and signs that warrant colonoscopy. Particular elements in the history and rectal examination also can provide clues regarding the underlying etiology. Regardless of etiology, lifestyle modifications, fiber, and laxatives are first-line therapies. Patients who fail first-line therapies can be offered second-line treatments and/or referred for testing of defecatory function. In those with severely refractory symptoms, referrals to a gastroenterologist and a surgeon should be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David B Snell
- Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Department of Medicine, New York University, 550 First Avenue, New York, NY 10016, USA.
| | - Saamia Faruqui
- Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Department of Medicine, New York University, 550 First Avenue, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Brian P Bosworth
- Department of Medicine, New York University, 550 First Avenue, HCC 3-15, New York, NY 10016, USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Baikov SV, Trukhanova YA, Tarasenko MV, Kinzhalov MA. Synthesis and Study of the Structure of Palladium(II) Acyclic
Diaminocarbene Complexes Containing a 1,2,4-Oxadiazole Moiety. RUSS J GEN CHEM+ 2020. [DOI: 10.1134/s1070363220100126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
|
38
|
Ginex PK, Hanson BJ, LeFebvre KB, Lin Y, Moriarty KA, Maloney C, Vrabel M, Morgan RL. Management of Opioid-Induced and Non-Opioid-Related Constipation in Patients With Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Oncol Nurs Forum 2020; 47:E211-E224. [PMID: 33063777 DOI: 10.1188/20.onf.e211-e224] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to inform the development of national clinical practice guidelines on the management of cancer constipation. LITERATURE SEARCH PubMed®, Wiley Cochrane Library, and CINAHL® were searched for studies published from May 2009 to May 2019. DATA EVALUATION Two investigators independently reviewed and extracted data from eligible studies. The Cochrane Collaboration risk-of-bias tool was used, and the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach was used to assess the certainty of the evidence. SYNTHESIS For patients with cancer and opioid-induced constipation, moderate benefit was found for osmotic or stimulant laxatives; small benefit was found for methylnaltrexone, naldemedine, and electroacupuncture. For patients with cancer and non-opioid-related constipation, moderate benefit was found for naloxegol, prucalopride, lubiprostone, and linaclotide; trivial benefit was found for acupuncture. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Effective strategies for managing opioid-induced and non-opioid-related constipation in patients with cancer include lifestyle, pharmacologic, and complementary approaches. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL CAN BE FOUND AT&NBSP;HTTPS //bit.ly/3c4yewT.
Collapse
|
39
|
Rogers B, Ginex PK, Anbari A, Hanson BJ, LeFebvre KB, Lopez R, Thorpe DM, Wolles B, Moriarty KA, Maloney C, Vrabel M, Morgan RL. ONS Guidelines™ for Opioid-Induced and Non-Opioid-Related Cancer Constipation. Oncol Nurs Forum 2020; 47:671-691. [PMID: 33063786 DOI: 10.1188/20.onf.671-691] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This evidence-based guideline intends to support clinicians, patients, and others in decisions regarding the treatment of constipation in patients with cancer. METHODOLOGIC APPROACH An interprofessional panel of healthcare professionals with patient representation prioritized clinical questions and patient outcomes for the management of cancer-related constipation. Systematic reviews of the literature were conducted. The GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach was used to assess the evidence and make recommendations. FINDINGS The panel agreed on 13 recommendations for the management of opioid-induced and non-opioid-related constipation in patients with cancer. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING The panel conditionally recommended a bowel regimen in addition to lifestyle education as first-line treatment for constipation. For patients starting opioids, the panel suggests a bowel regimen as prophylaxis. Pharmaceutical interventions are available and recommended if a bowel regimen has failed. Acupuncture and electroacupuncture for non-opioid-related constipation are recommended in the context of a clinical trial. SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL CAN BE FOUND AT&NBSP;HTTPS //bit.ly/30y29sI.
Collapse
|
40
|
Ouyang R, Li Z, Huang S, Liu J, Huang J. Efficacy and Safety of Peripherally Acting Mu-Opioid Receptor Antagonists for the Treatment of Opioid-Induced Constipation: A Bayesian Network Meta-analysis. PAIN MEDICINE 2020; 21:3224-3232. [PMID: 32488259 DOI: 10.1093/pm/pnaa152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the efficacy and safety of peripherally acting mu-opioid receptor antagonists (PAMORAs) for the treatment of opioid-induced constipation (OIC). METHODS Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were searched for OIC therapy comparing PAMORAs with placebo. Both a pairwise and network meta-analysis were performed. The surface under the cumulative ranking area (SUCRA) was used to determine the efficacy and safety of OIC treatment using different PAMORAs. RESULTS The primary target outcome was a response that achieves an average of three or more bowel movements (BMs) per week. In the network meta-analysis, four PAMORAs (naldemedine, naloxone, methylnaltrexone, and alvimopan) showed a better BM response than the placebo. Naldemedine was ranked first (odds ratio [OR] = 2.8, 95% credible interval [CrI] = 2-4.5, SUCRA = 89.42%), followed by naloxone (OR = 2.9, 95% CrI = 1.6-5.3, SUCRA = 87.44%), alvimopan (OR = 2.2, 95% CrI = 1.3-3.5, SUCRA = 68.02%), and methylnaltrexone (OR = 1.7, 95% CrI = 1.0-2.8, SUCRA = 46.09%). There were no significant differences in safety found between the PAMORAs and the placebo. CONCLUSIONS We found that PAMORAs are effective and can be safely used for the treatment of OIC. In network meta-analysis, naldemedine and naloxone appear to be the most effective PAMORAs for the treatment of OIC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rong Ouyang
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China.,Department of Gastroenterology, Liuzhou Worker's Hospital, Liuzhou, China
| | - Zhongzhuan Li
- Department of Gastroenterology, Liuzhou Worker's Hospital, Liuzhou, China
| | - Shijiang Huang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Liuzhou Worker's Hospital, Liuzhou, China
| | - Jun Liu
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China
| | - Jiean Huang
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Tarasenko MV, Presnukhina SI, Baikov SV, Shetnev AA. Synthesis and Evaluation of Antibacterial Activity of 1,2,4-Oxadiazole-Containing Biphenylcarboxylic Acids. RUSS J GEN CHEM+ 2020. [DOI: 10.1134/s1070363220090042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
|
42
|
Safety and Efficacy of Naldemedine for the Treatment of Opioid-Induced Constipation in Patients with Chronic Non-Cancer Pain Receiving Opioid Therapy: A Subgroup Analysis of Patients ≥ 65 Years of Age. Drugs Aging 2020; 37:271-279. [PMID: 32086791 PMCID: PMC7096364 DOI: 10.1007/s40266-020-00753-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
Background Opioid-induced constipation (OIC), the most common side effect of opioid treatment, is under-recognized and undertreated in older patients. Naldemedine, an oral, peripherally acting μ-opioid receptor antagonist (PAMORA), is approved in Japan, the United States, and the European Union for treatment of OIC in adult patients. Objective This integrated analysis of three phase 3 trials (COMPOSE-1, COMPOSE-2, and COMPOSE-3) evaluated the safety and efficacy of naldemedine for up to 12 weeks in a subgroup of patients aged ≥ 65 years. Methods Patients aged 18–80 years with chronic non-cancer pain for ≥ 3 months (treated with opioids for ≥ 3 months in COMPOSE-1 and COMPOSE-2) and OIC received oral naldemedine 0.2 mg or placebo once daily. Safety assessments included overall incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), TEAEs in the gastrointestinal disorders System Organ Class, and TEAEs of opioid withdrawal or possible opioid withdrawal. Efficacy was based on the proportion of responders in COMPOSE-1 and COMPOSE-2, defined as having ≥ 3 spontaneous bowel movements/week and a ≥ 1-spontaneous bowel movement/week increase from baseline for ≥ 9 of 12 weeks and ≥ 3 of the last 4 weeks. Results A total of 14.8% (344/2328) of patients were aged ≥ 65 years in all studies. The incidence of TEAEs in naldemedine-treated patients aged ≥ 65 years (45.9%) was comparable to that in patients aged ≥ 65 years receiving placebo (51.6%) and in the overall naldemedine group (47.1%). The incidence of gastrointestinal disorders System Organ Class TEAEs in naldemedine-treated patients aged ≥ 65 years (20.2%) was also comparable to that in patients aged ≥ 65 years receiving placebo (16.1%) and in the overall naldemedine group (21.8%). The incidence of TEAEs of opioid withdrawal with naldemedine was 1.1% in patients aged ≥ 65 years and 1.0% overall, and the incidence of TEAEs of possible opioid withdrawal was 1.1% in patients aged ≥ 65 years and 1.7% overall. The proportion of responders was higher in naldemedine-treated patients versus placebo, both overall (50.1% vs 34.1%; p < 0.0001) and in those aged ≥ 65 years (51.8% vs 37.6%). Conclusions This integrated analysis confirmed that OIC treatment with naldemedine 0.2 mg was generally well tolerated and effective in patients aged ≥ 65 years with chronic non-cancer pain. Safety and efficacy results were consistent with the overall patient population. ClinicalTrials.gov registration NCT01965158, NCT01993940, NCT01965652. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s40266-020-00753-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
|
43
|
Viscusi ER, Viscusi AR. Blood-brain barrier: mechanisms governing permeability and interaction with peripherally acting μ-opioid receptor antagonists. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2020; 45:688-695. [PMID: 32723840 PMCID: PMC7476292 DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2020-101403] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2020] [Revised: 05/18/2020] [Accepted: 05/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
The blood-brain barrier (BBB) describes the unique properties of endothelial cells (ECs) that line the central nervous system (CNS) microvasculature. The BBB supports CNS homeostasis via EC-associated transport of ions, nutrients, proteins and waste products between the brain and blood. These transport mechanisms also serve as physiological barriers to pathogens, toxins and xenobiotics to prevent them from contacting neural tissue. The mechanisms that govern BBB permeability pose a challenge to drug design for CNS disorders, including pain, but can be exploited to limit the effects of a drug to the periphery, as in the design of the peripherally acting μ-opioid receptor antagonists (PAMORAs) used to treat opioid-induced constipation. Here, we describe BBB physiology, drug properties that affect BBB penetrance and how data from randomized clinical trials of PAMORAs improve our understanding of BBB permeability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eugene R Viscusi
- Department of Anesthesiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Andrew R Viscusi
- Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Onset of action of naldemedine in the treatment of opioid-induced constipation in patients with chronic noncancer pain: results from 2 randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trials. Pain 2020; 160:2358-2364. [PMID: 31145214 PMCID: PMC6756260 DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001629] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Naldemedine improves opioid-induced constipation in a timely manner in patients using opioids for noncancer pain; most experienced spontaneous bowel movement within 24 hours of treatment. Opioid-induced constipation (OIC) is a common side effect of chronic opioid therapy. Previously, naldemedine, a peripherally acting μ-opioid receptor antagonist demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of OIC. In this exploratory analysis, the onset of action of naldemedine was evaluated in 2 identically designed phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled trials. Proportion of patients experiencing a spontaneous bowel movement (SBM) within 24 hours of treatment initiation, time from initial dose to first SBM and weekly SBM frequency were assessed. Naldemedine was associated with significant increases in the proportion of patients experiencing an SBM at 4, 8, 12, and 24 hours after the initial dose compared with placebo (all P < 0.0001). Within 24 hours in both studies, statistically significantly (P < 0.0001) more patients treated with naldemedine compared with placebo experienced an SBM (61.2% vs 28.3% and 56.5% vs 33.6%, respectively). Median times to first SBM were significantly shorter in the naldemedine group vs placebo (COMPOSE-1, 16.1 vs 46.7 hours; COMPOSE-2, 18.3 vs 45.9 hours; P < 0.0001). Naldemedine was also associated with significant increases in weekly SBM frequency vs placebo within 1 week (P < 0.001). Most common treatment-emergent adverse events were gastrointestinal-related (abdominal pain, diarrhea, and nausea). Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported most frequently on day 1, followed by a decrease from days 2 to 7. Naldemedine had a timely onset of effect, and gastrointestinal adverse events largely resolved within the first week. These findings should assist clinicians counseling patients with chronic noncancer pain on expectations when initiating naldemedine for OIC.
Collapse
|
45
|
Vijayvargiya P, Camilleri M, Vijayvargiya P, Erwin P, Murad MH. Systematic review with meta-analysis: efficacy and safety of treatments for opioid-induced constipation. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2020; 52:37-53. [PMID: 32462777 DOI: 10.1111/apt.15791] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2019] [Revised: 12/09/2019] [Accepted: 04/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND When opioid-induced constipation is treated with centrally acting opioid antagonists, there may be opioid withdrawal or aggravation of pain due to inhibition of μ-opioid analgesia. This led to the development of peripherally acting μ-opioid receptor antagonists (PAMORAs). AIM To evaluate the efficacy of available PAMORAs and other approved or experimental treatments for relieving constipation in patients with opioid-induced constipation, based on a systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies. METHODS A search of MEDLINE, EMBASE and EBM Reviews Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials was completed in July 2019 for randomised trials compared to placebo. FDA approved doses or highest studied dose was evaluated. Efficacy was based on diverse endpoints, including continuous variables (the bowel function index, number of spontaneous bowel movements and stool consistency based on Bristol Stool Form Scale), or responder analysis (combination of >3 spontaneous bowel movements or complete spontaneous bowel movements plus 1 spontaneous bowel movement or complete spontaneous bowel movements, respectively, over baseline [so-called FDA endpoints]). Adverse effects evaluated included central opioid withdrawal, serious adverse events, abdominal pain and diarrhoea. RESULTS We included 35 trials at low risk of bias enrolling 13 566 patients. All PAMORAs demonstrated efficacy on diverse patient response endpoints. There was greater efficacy with approved doses of the PAMORAs (methylnaltrexone, naloxegol and naldemidine), with lower efficacy or lower efficacy and greater adverse effects with combination oxycodone with naloxone, lubiprostone and linaclotide. CONCLUSIONS Therapeutic response in opioid-induced constipation is best achieved with the PAMORAs, methylnaltrexone, naloxegol and naldemidine, which are associated with low risk of serious adverse events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Priya Vijayvargiya
- Clinical Enteric Neuroscience Translational and Epidemiological Research (CENTER), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Michael Camilleri
- Clinical Enteric Neuroscience Translational and Epidemiological Research (CENTER), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | - Patricia Erwin
- Division of Library Services, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - M Hassan Murad
- Evidence Based Practice Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Liu JJ, Quinton SE, Brenner DM. Naldemedine for the treatment of opioid-induced constipation in adults with chronic noncancer pain. Pain Manag 2020; 10:301-306. [PMID: 32552565 DOI: 10.2217/pmt-2020-0019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
This review aims to summarize the efficacy data for naldemedine, a member of the novel peripherally acting μ-opioid receptor antagonists (PAMORAs), which gained US FDA approval for the treatment of opioid-induced constipation in adults with chronic noncancer pain-related syndromes in 2017. In Phase III trials, patients receiving naldemedine were significantly more likely to meet the primary end point ≥3 spontaneous bowel movements/week and an increase of ≥1 spontaneous bowel movement/week from baseline for at least 9/12 weeks compared to placebo (p < 0.0001). The most frequent adverse events were abdominal pain (8%) and diarrhea (7%). Based on available data, naldemedine appears to be an effective and safe first-line therapy for the treatment of opioid-induced constipation in adults with chronic noncancer pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joy J Liu
- Division of Gastroenterology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
| | - Sarah E Quinton
- Division of Gastroenterology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
| | - Darren M Brenner
- Division of Gastroenterology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Abstract
Opioid-induced bowel dysfunction (OIBD) is a common complication in long-term opioid users and abusers. It is a burdensome condition, which significantly limits quality of life and is associated with increasing health costs. OIBD affects up to 60% of patients with chronic non-cancer pain and over 80% of patients suffering from cancer pain and is one of the conditions of the most common symptoms associated with opioid maintenance. Given the continued use of opioids for chronic pain management in appropriate patients, OIBD is likely to persist in clinical practice in the coming years. We will herein review its underlying pathophysiological mechanisms and the available treatments. In the last years, pharmaceutical research has focused on the opportunity of targeting peripheral mu-opioid receptors without affecting their analgesic activity in the central nervous system, and several peripherally acting mu-opioid receptors antagonists (PAMORAs) drugs have been approved. We will mainly focus on naldemedine, discussing its pharmacological properties, its clinical efficacy and side effects. Head-to-head comparisons between naldemedine and the other PAMORAs are not available yet, but some considerations will be discussed based on the pharmacological and clinical data. As a whole, the available data suggest that naldemedine is a valid treatment option for OIBD, as it is a well-tolerated drug that alleviates constipation without affecting analgesia or causing symptoms of opioid withdrawal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Flaminia Coluzzi
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Sapienza University of Rome, Polo Pontino, Latina, Italy
| | - Maria Sole Scerpa
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Sapienza University of Rome, Polo Pontino, Latina, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Brenner DM, Argoff CE, Fox SM, Bochenek W, D'Astoli P, Blakesley RE, Reasner DS, O'Dea CR, Cash BD. Efficacy and safety of linaclotide for opioid-induced constipation in patients with chronic noncancer pain syndromes from a phase 2 randomized study. Pain 2020; 161:1027-1036. [PMID: 32310620 PMCID: PMC7170446 DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001754] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2019] [Revised: 10/31/2019] [Accepted: 11/12/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Constipation is the most common adverse event (AE) of opioid therapy. This multicenter, phase 2 study evaluated the efficacy and safety of linaclotide in treating opioid-induced constipation (OIC) in patients with chronic noncancer pain syndromes (NCT02270983). Adults with OIC (<3 spontaneous bowel movements [SBMs]/week) related to chronic noncancer pain were randomized 1:1:1 to receive linaclotide 145 µg, linaclotide 290 µg, or placebo once daily for 8 weeks. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in 8-week SBM frequency rate (SBMs/week). Secondary efficacy endpoints included 6/8-week SBM 3 + 1 responders, time to first SBM, and changes from baseline in 8-week stool consistency, abdominal bloating, and straining. Additional endpoints included treatment satisfaction and adequate relief responders. In total, 254 patients were randomized: 87, 88, and 79 received linaclotide 145 µg, linaclotide 290 µg, and placebo, respectively. The mean changes from baseline in SBMs/week during the treatment period were 2.9 and 3.5 in the linaclotide 145 and 290 µg groups (P < 0.01 for both doses), respectively, vs 1.6 in the placebo group. Diarrhea, the most common AE, was generally mild, resulting in 1.1%, 5.7%, and 1.3% of patients discontinuing in the linaclotide 145 μg, linaclotide 290 μg, and placebo groups, respectively. No serious AEs related to diarrhea were reported in any treatment group. Compared with placebo, linaclotide-treated patients had significant improvements in stool consistency, straining, abdominal bloating, and treatment satisfaction scores (P < 0.05). Linaclotide significantly improved OIC symptoms and was well tolerated in patients with chronic noncancer pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Darren M. Brenner
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Charles E. Argoff
- Comprehensive Pain Center, Albany Medical College, Albany, NY, United States
| | - Susan M. Fox
- Clinical Development Department, Allergan plc, Madison, NJ, United States
| | - Wieslaw Bochenek
- Clinical Development Department, Allergan plc, Madison, NJ, United States
| | - Patricia D'Astoli
- Clinical Development Department, Allergan plc, Madison, NJ, United States
| | - Rick E. Blakesley
- Biostatistics Department, Allergan plc, Madison, NJ, United States. Dr. Blakesley is now with Biostatistics, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge, MA, United States
| | - David S. Reasner
- Data Science Department, Ironwood Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Cambridge, MA, United States. Dr. Reasner is now with Data Science and Analytics, Imbria Pharmaceuticals, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Christopher R. O'Dea
- Clinical Development Department, Ironwood Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Cambridge, MA, United States
| | - Brooks D. Cash
- Ertan Digestive Disease Center, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX, United States
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Webster LR, Hale ME, Yamada T, Wild JE. A Renal Impairment Subgroup Analysis of the Safety and Efficacy of Naldemedine for the Treatment of Opioid-Induced Constipation in Patients with Chronic Non-Cancer Pain Receiving Opioid Therapy. J Pain Res 2020; 13:605-612. [PMID: 32280263 PMCID: PMC7125413 DOI: 10.2147/jpr.s237833] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2019] [Accepted: 03/07/2020] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Naldemedine, an oral, peripherally acting μ-opioid receptor antagonist approved for the treatment of opioid-induced constipation (OIC), is renally excreted. This subgroup analysis integrated data from 3 Phase 3 trials (COMPOSE-1, COMPOSE-2, COMPOSE-3) to evaluate the safety and efficacy of naldemedine in patients with renal impairment (RI). Patients and Methods Patients age 18–80 years with chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP) and OIC received oral naldemedine 0.2 mg or placebo once daily. RI subgroups consisted of patients with normal function (baseline glomerular filtration rate ≥90 mL/min/1.73 m2), mild (≥60 to <90 mL/min/1.73 m2), and moderate (≥30 to <60 mL/min/1.73 m2) RI. Safety assessments based on ≤12 weeks of treatment from all 3 studies included incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Efficacy was based on the proportion of responders in COMPOSE-1 and COMPOSE-2 only, defined as ≥3 spontaneous bowel movements (SBMs)/week and a ≥1-SBM/week increase from baseline for ≥9 of 12 weeks and ≥3 of the last 4 weeks. Results In total, 2328 patients were included in this analysis. The incidence of TEAEs was similar in the naldemedine and placebo groups (overall, 47.1% vs 45.6%; normal, 44.6% vs 43.6%; mild RI, 49.0% vs 44.7%; moderate RI, 46.6% vs 55.9%). GI-related TEAEs occurred more frequently in the naldemedine group versus placebo (overall, 21.8% vs 13.8%; normal, 21.6% vs 12.5%; mild RI, 22.6% vs 14.7%; moderate RI, 18.0% vs 14.2%). A significantly greater proportion of patients in the naldemedine 0.2 mg group were responders versus the placebo group (overall, 50.1% vs 34.1%, P<0.0001; normal, 52.0% vs 39.3%; mild RI, 48.3% vs 30.3%; moderate RI, 52.5% vs 31.7%). Conclusion This integrated analysis confirmed that OIC treatment with naldemedine 0.2 mg was generally well tolerated and effective in patients with CNCP and mild or moderate RI. Safety and efficacy results were consistent with the overall population. Clinicaltrials.gov Registration COMPOSE-1: NCT01965158; COMPOSE-2: NCT01993940; COMPOSE-3: NCT01965652.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - James E Wild
- Upstate Clinical Research Associates, Williamsville, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Kanemasa T, Koike K, Takase K, Arai T, Nakamura A, Morioka Y, Hasegawa M. Pharmacological Profile of Naldemedine, a Peripherally Acting μ-Opioid Receptor Antagonist: Comparison with Naloxone and Naloxegol. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2020; 373:438-444. [DOI: 10.1124/jpet.119.264515] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2019] [Accepted: 03/10/2020] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
|