1
|
Seager A, Sharp L, Neilson LJ, Brand A, Hampton JS, Lee TJW, Evans R, Vale L, Whelpton J, Bestwick N, Rees CJ. Polyp detection with colonoscopy assisted by the GI Genius artificial intelligence endoscopy module compared with standard colonoscopy in routine colonoscopy practice (COLO-DETECT): a multicentre, open-label, parallel-arm, pragmatic randomised controlled trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024; 9:911-923. [PMID: 39153491 DOI: 10.1016/s2468-1253(24)00161-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2023] [Revised: 05/15/2024] [Accepted: 05/16/2024] [Indexed: 08/19/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Increased polyp detection during colonoscopy is associated with decreased post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer incidence and mortality. The COLO-DETECT trial aimed to assess the clinical effectiveness of the GI Genius intelligent endoscopy module for polyp detection, comparing colonoscopy assisted by GI Genius (computer-aided detection [CADe]-assisted colonoscopy) with standard colonoscopy in routine practice. METHODS We did a multicentre, open-label, parallel-arm, pragmatic randomised controlled trial in 12 National Health Service (NHS) hospitals (ten NHS Trusts) in England, among adults (aged ≥18 years) undergoing planned colonoscopy for gastrointestinal symptoms or for surveillance due to personal or family history (ie, symptomatic indications), or colorectal cancer screening. Randomisation (1:1) to CADe-assisted colonoscopy or standard colonoscopy was done with a web-based dynamic adaptive algorithm, immediately before colonoscopy, with stratification by age group, sex, colonoscopy indication (screening or symptomatic), and NHS Trust. Recruiting staff, participants, and colonoscopists were unmasked to trial allocation; histopathologists, co-chief investigators, and trial statisticians were masked. CADe-assisted colonoscopy consisted of standard colonoscopy plus the GI Genius module active for at least the entire inspection phase of colonoscope withdrawal. The primary outcome was mean adenomas per procedure (total number of adenomas detected divided by total number of procedures); the key secondary outcome was adenoma detection rate (proportion of colonoscopies with at least one adenoma). Analysis was by intention to treat (ITT), with outcomes compared between groups by mixed-effects regression modelling, in which effect estimates were adjusted for randomisation stratification variables. Data were imputed for outcome measures with more than 5% missing values. All participants who underwent colonoscopy were assessed for safety. The trial is registered on ISRCTN (ISRCTN10451355) and ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04723758), and is complete. FINDINGS Between March 29, 2021, and April 6, 2023, 2032 participants (1132 [55·7%] male, 900 [44·3%] female; mean age 62·4 years [SD 10·8]) were recruited and randomly assigned: 1015 to CADe-assisted colonoscopy and 1017 to standard colonoscopy. 1231 (60·6%) participants were undergoing screening and 801 (39·4%) had symptomatic indications. Mean adenomas per procedure was 1·56 (SD 2·82; n=1001 participants with available data) in the CADe-assisted colonoscopy group versus 1·21 (1·91; n=1009) in the standard colonoscopy group, representing an adjusted mean difference of 0·36 (95% CI 0·14-0·57; adjusted incidence rate ratio 1·30 [95% CI 1·15-1·47], p<0·0001). Adenomas were detected in 555 (56·6%) of 980 participants in the CADe-assisted colonoscopy group versus 477 (48·4%) of 986 in the standard colonoscopy group, representing a proportion difference of 8·3% (95% CI 3·9-12·7; adjusted odds ratio 1·47 [95% CI 1·21-1·78], p<0·0001). Numbers of adverse events were similar between the CADe-assisted colonoscopy and standard colonoscopy groups (adverse events: 25 vs 19; serious adverse events: four vs six), and no adverse events in the CADe-assisted colonoscopy group were deemed to be related to GI Genius use on independent review. INTERPRETATION Results of the COLO-DETECT trial support the use of GI Genius to increase detection of premalignant colorectal polyps in routine colonoscopy practice. FUNDING Medtronic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Seager
- Department of Research and Innovation, South Tyneside and Sunderland NHS Foundation Trust, South Tyneside District Hospital, South Shields, UK; Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University Centre for Cancer, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - Linda Sharp
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University Centre for Cancer, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - Laura J Neilson
- Department of Gastroenterology, South Tyneside and Sunderland NHS Foundation Trust, South Tyneside District Hospital, South Shields, UK; Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University Centre for Cancer, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - Andrew Brand
- North Wales Organisation for Randomised Trials in Health, Clinical Trials Unit, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
| | - James S Hampton
- Department of Research and Innovation, South Tyneside and Sunderland NHS Foundation Trust, South Tyneside District Hospital, South Shields, UK; Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University Centre for Cancer, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - Tom J W Lee
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University Centre for Cancer, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK; Department of Gastroenterology, Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, North Tyneside General Hospital, North Shields, UK
| | - Rachel Evans
- North Wales Organisation for Randomised Trials in Health, Clinical Trials Unit, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
| | - Luke Vale
- Newcastle University-Health Economics Group, Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University Centre for Cancer, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | | | - Nathania Bestwick
- Department of Research and Innovation, South Tyneside and Sunderland NHS Foundation Trust, South Tyneside District Hospital, South Shields, UK; Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University Centre for Cancer, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK; Bowel Cancer UK, London, UK
| | - Colin J Rees
- Department of Gastroenterology, South Tyneside and Sunderland NHS Foundation Trust, South Tyneside District Hospital, South Shields, UK; Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University Centre for Cancer, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rex DK, Anderson JC, Butterly LF, Day LW, Dominitz JA, Kaltenbach T, Ladabaum U, Levin TR, Shaukat A, Achkar JP, Farraye FA, Kane SV, Shaheen NJ. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2024; 100:352-381. [PMID: 39177519 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2024.04.2905] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2024] [Accepted: 04/25/2024] [Indexed: 08/24/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Douglas K Rex
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Joseph C Anderson
- Department of Medicine/Division of Gastroenterology, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA; Department of Medicine/Division of Gastroenterology, White River Junction VAMC, White River Junction, Vermont, USA; University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, Connecticut, USA
| | - Lynn F Butterly
- Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA; Department of Medicine, Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA; New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA
| | - Lukejohn W Day
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco; Chief Medical Officer, University of California San Francisco Health System
| | - Jason A Dominitz
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA; VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Tonya Kaltenbach
- Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA; Division of Gastroenterology, San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Uri Ladabaum
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Theodore R Levin
- Kaiser Permanente Division of Research, Pleasonton, California, USA
| | - Aasma Shaukat
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York Harbor Veterans Affairs Health Care System, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jean-Paul Achkar
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Digestive Diseases Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Francis A Farraye
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Sunanda V Kane
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Nicholas J Shaheen
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Caruso D, Polici M, Bellini D, Laghi A. ESR Essentials: Imaging in colorectal cancer-practice recommendations by ESGAR. Eur Radiol 2024; 34:5903-5910. [PMID: 38418627 PMCID: PMC11364724 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-024-10645-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2023] [Revised: 01/11/2024] [Accepted: 01/16/2024] [Indexed: 03/02/2024]
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a significant global health concern. Diagnostic imaging, using different modalities, has a pivotal role in CRC, from early detection (i.e., screening) to follow-up. The role of imaging in CRC screening depends on each country's approach: if an organized screening program is in place, the role of CT colonography (CTC) is limited to the study of either individuals with a positive stool test unwilling/unable to undergo colonoscopy (CC) or in patients with incomplete CC. Although CC is the most common modality to diagnose CRC, CRC can be also incidentally detected during a routine abdominal imaging examination or at the emergency room in patients presenting with intestinal occlusion/subocclusion or perforation. Staging is a crucial aspect of CRC management, guiding treatment decisions and providing valuable prognostic information. An accurate local staging is mandatory in both rectal and colon cancer to drive the appropriate therapeutic workflow. Important limitations of US, CT, and MR in N-staging can be partially solved by FDG PET/CT. Distant staging is usually managed by CT, with MR and FDG PET/CT which can be used as problem-solving techniques. Follow-up is performed according to the general recommendations of the oncological societies. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: It is essential to summarize each phase of colorectal cancer workup, differentiating the management for colon and rectal cancer supported by the main international guidelines and literature data, with the aim to inform the community on the best practice imaging in colorectal cancer. KEY POINTS: • Colorectal cancer is a prevalent disease that lends itself to imaging at each stage of detection and management. • Various imaging modalities can be used as adjuncts to, or in place of, direct visualization methods of screening and are necessary for evaluating metastatic disease. • Reevaluation of follow-up strategies should be considered depending on patients' individual risk of recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Damiano Caruso
- Radiology Unit, Department of Medical Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Sant'Andrea University Hospital, Via Di Grottarossa, 1035-1039, 00189, Rome, Italy
| | - Michela Polici
- Radiology Unit, Department of Medical Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Sant'Andrea University Hospital, Via Di Grottarossa, 1035-1039, 00189, Rome, Italy
- PhD School in Traslational Medicine and Oncology, Department of Medical Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Davide Bellini
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Pathology, "Sapienza" University of Rome, I.C.O.T. Hospital, Latina, Italy
| | - Andrea Laghi
- Radiology Unit, Department of Medical Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Sant'Andrea University Hospital, Via Di Grottarossa, 1035-1039, 00189, Rome, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Tan CK, Suzuki S, Ang TL, Koh XH, Wang LM, Aniwan S, Chiu HM, Laohavichitra K, Chirapongsathorn S, Yamamura T, Kuo CY, Yoshida N, Takezawa T, Rerknimitr R, Ishikawa H, Gotoda T. Sessile serrated lesion prevalence and factors associated with their detection: a post-hoc analysis of a multinational randomized controlled trial from Asia. Endoscopy 2024; 56:684-693. [PMID: 38857619 DOI: 10.1055/a-2324-6262] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sessile serrated lesions (SSLs) are associated with an increased risk of colorectal cancer. Data on the prevalence of SSLs in Asia are limited. We performed this study to estimate the prevalence of SSLs in Asia and to explore endoscopic factors that are associated with SSL detection. METHODS This is a post-hoc analysis of a multicenter randomized controlled trial from four Asian countries/regions that compared adenoma detection rates using linked-color imaging (LCI) and white-light imaging. Colonoscopies were performed in an average-risk population for screening, diagnostic examination, or polyp surveillance. Patients with SSLs were compared against those without SSLs to evaluate for possible predictors of SSL detection using Firth's logistic regression. RESULTS 2898 participants (mean age 64.5 years) were included in the analysis. The estimated prevalence of SSLs was 4.0% (95%CI 3.4%-4.8%), with no sex or age group differences. On multivariable analysis, use of LCI (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.63, 95%CI 1.10-2.41), experienced endoscopists (aOR 1.94, 95%CI 1.25-3.00), use of transparent cap (aOR 1.75, 95%CI 1.09-2.81), and longer withdrawal time (aOR 1.06, 95%CI 1.03-1.10) were independently associated with SSL detection. Synchronous adenoma detection (aOR 1.89, 95%CI 1.20-2.99) was also predictive of SSL detection. CONCLUSION The prevalence of SSLs in Asia is 4.0%. Use of LCI or a transparent cap, greater endoscopist experience, and longer withdrawal time were all associated with increased SSL detection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chin Kimg Tan
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Changi General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
- Medicine Academic Clinical Programme, SingHealth Duke-NUS Academic Medical Centre, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Sho Suzuki
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, International University of Health and Welfare School of Medicine, Narita, Japan
| | - Tiing Leong Ang
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Changi General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
- Medicine Academic Clinical Programme, SingHealth Duke-NUS Academic Medical Centre, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Xuan Han Koh
- Health Services Research, Changi General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Lai Mun Wang
- Laboratory Medicine, Changi General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
- Pathology Academic Clinical Programme, SingHealth Duke-NUS Academic Medical Centre, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Satimai Aniwan
- Center of Excellence in Endoscopy for Gastrointestinal Oncology, Chulalongkorn University Department of Internal Medicine, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Han-Mo Chiu
- Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | | | - Sakkarin Chirapongsathorn
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Phramongkutklao Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Takeshi Yamamura
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Chen Ya Kuo
- Gastroenterology, Fu Jen Catholic University Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Naohisa Yoshida
- Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Takahito Takezawa
- Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Jichi Medical University, Shimotsuke, Japan
| | - Rungsun Rerknimitr
- Center of Excellence in Endoscopy for Gastrointestinal Oncology, Chulalongkorn University Department of Internal Medicine, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Hideki Ishikawa
- Molecular-Targeting Cancer Prevention, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Takuji Gotoda
- Gastroenterology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Rex DK, Anderson JC, Butterly LF, Day LW, Dominitz JA, Kaltenbach T, Ladabaum U, Levin TR, Shaukat A, Achkar JP, Farraye FA, Kane SV, Shaheen NJ. Quality Indicators for Colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2024:00000434-990000000-01296. [PMID: 39167112 DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002972] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2023] [Accepted: 01/19/2024] [Indexed: 08/23/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Douglas K Rex
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Joseph C Anderson
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, White River Junction VAMC, White River Junction, Vermont, USA
- University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, Connecticut, USA
| | - Lynn F Butterly
- Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA
- Department of Medicine, Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA
- New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA
| | - Lukejohn W Day
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
- Chief Medical Officer, University of California San Francisco Health System, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Jason A Dominitz
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA
- VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Tonya Kaltenbach
- Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
- Division of Gastroenterology, San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Uri Ladabaum
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Theodore R Levin
- Kaiser Permanente Division of Research, Pleasonton, California, USA
| | - Aasma Shaukat
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York Harbor Veterans Affairs Health Care System, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jean-Paul Achkar
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Digestive Diseases Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Francis A Farraye
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Sunanda V Kane
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Nicholas J Shaheen
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Han F, Xu Y, Li X, Song Z, Xie J, Yao J. Clinicopathological features and prognosis analysis of proximal colonic mucinous adenocarcinoma. Sci Rep 2024; 14:18682. [PMID: 39134655 PMCID: PMC11319726 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-69916-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2023] [Accepted: 08/09/2024] [Indexed: 08/15/2024] Open
Abstract
Mucinous adenocarcinoma (MAC) is a distinct subtype of colorectal cancer. Previous studies have confirmed the poor prognosis of rectal or left-sided colon MAC, while the prognosis and response to chemotherapy in proximal colon MAC remains controversial. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinicopathological characteristics, prognosis, response to chemotherapy, and risk prediction factors of proximal colon MAC. Patients with proximal colon MAC and non-mucinous adenocarcinoma (NMAC) were retrospectively analyzed in this study. The analyzed variables included gender, age, smoking, drinking, chemotherapy, metastasis, pathological stage, and tumor size. Overall survival (OS) was the primary outcome. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to assess the impact of mucinous subtype and chemotherapy on OS. We conducted univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses to determine prognosis factors for proximal colon MAC and NMAC. A total of 284 cases of proximal colon MAC and 1384 cases of NMAC were included in the study. Compared to NMAC, proximal colon MAC was diagnosed at a younger age. The proportion of synchronous and metachronous metastasis was also higher, as well as the pathological stage and tumor size. Proximal colon MAC had a worse prognosis than NMAC, especially in stage 3. Moreover, the prognosis of proximal colon NMAC improved after chemotherapy, while MAC showed no improvement in prognosis after chemotherapy. Advanced age, N1 and N2 stage were independent prognostic factors for adverse outcomes in MAC. For proximal colon adenocarcinoma, the independent predictors of adverse outcomes included mucinous subtype, order age, N1 and N2 stages, and pathological stage 4. Proximal colon MAC had a worse prognosis compared to NMAC. Chemotherapy did not improve the prognosis of proximal colon mucinous adenocarcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fei Han
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, No. 1 Jianshe East Road of Erqi District, Zhengzhou, 450052, China
| | - Yue Xu
- Department of Pathology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450052, China
| | - Xiangyu Li
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, No. 1 Jianshe East Road of Erqi District, Zhengzhou, 450052, China
| | - Zhaoxiang Song
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, No. 1 Jianshe East Road of Erqi District, Zhengzhou, 450052, China
| | - Jinlin Xie
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, No. 1 Jianshe East Road of Erqi District, Zhengzhou, 450052, China
| | - Jianning Yao
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, No. 1 Jianshe East Road of Erqi District, Zhengzhou, 450052, China.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Yeh JH, Lin CW, Hsiao PJ, Perng DS, Chen JC, Hung KT, Hsu CC, Chen CC, Liu YP, Lee YC, Wang JY. Prevalence and predictive factors of colorectal sessile serrated lesions in younger individuals. Endoscopy 2024; 56:494-502. [PMID: 38378019 DOI: 10.1055/a-2272-1911] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/22/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sessile serrated lesions (SSLs) are obscured lesions predominantly in the right-sided colon and associated with interval colorectal cancer; however, their prevalence and risk factors among younger individuals remain unclear. METHODS This retrospective study enrolled individuals who underwent index colonoscopy. The primary outcome was the SSL prevalence in the younger (<50 years) and older (≥50 years) age groups, while the secondary outcomes included clinically significant serrated polyps (CSSPs). Multivariable logistic regression was employed to identify predictors. RESULTS Of the 9854 eligible individuals, 4712 (47.8%) were categorized into the younger age group. Individuals in the younger age group exhibited lower prevalences of adenomas (22.6% vs. 46.2%; P<0.001) and right-sided adenomas (11.2% vs. 27.2%; P<0.001) compared with their older counterparts. However, both groups exhibited a similar prevalence of SSLs (7.2% vs. 6.5%; P=0.16) and CSSPs (10.3% vs. 10.3%;P=0.96). Multivariable analysis revealed that age 40-49 years (odds ratio [OR] 1.81, 95%CI 1.01-3.23), longer withdrawal time (OR 1.17, 95%CI 1.14-1.20, per minute increment), and endoscopist performance (OR 3.35, 95%CI 2.44-4.58) were independent predictors of SSL detection in the younger age group. No significant correlation was observed between adenoma and SSL detection rates among endoscopists. CONCLUSION SSLs are not uncommon among younger individuals. Moreover, diligent effort and expertise are of paramount importance in SSL detection. Future studies should explore the clinical significance of SSLs in individuals of younger age.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jen-Hao Yeh
- Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, E-Da DaChang Hospital, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Chih-Wen Lin
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, E-Da Hospital, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Po-Jen Hsiao
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, E-Da DaChang Hospital, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Daw-Shyong Perng
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, E-Da Hospital, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Jen-Chieh Chen
- Department of Health Examination, E-Da Hospital, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Kuo-Tung Hung
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, E-Da DaChang Hospital, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Chia-Chang Hsu
- Department of Health Examination, E-Da Hospital, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Chia-Chi Chen
- Department of Pathology, E-Da Hospital, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Peng Liu
- Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Research Center for Environmental Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Yi-Chia Lee
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Jaw-Yuan Wang
- Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Center for Cancer Research, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Troelsen FS, Sørensen HT, Erichsen R. Risk of a post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer in patients with diverticular disease: a population-based cohort study. Endoscopy 2024; 56:471-481. [PMID: 38331045 DOI: 10.1055/a-2264-8199] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/10/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Post-colonoscopy colorectal cancers (PCCRCs) may account for up to 30% of all colorectal cancers (CRCs) diagnosed in patients with diverticular disease; however, absolute and relative risks of PCCRC among these patients undergoing colonoscopy remain unknown. METHODS We performed a cohort study (1995-2015) including patients with and without diverticular disease who underwent colonoscopy. We calculated 7-36-month cumulative incidence proportions (CIPs) of PCCRC. We used Cox proportional hazards regression models to compute hazard ratios (HRs) of PCCRC, comparing patients with and without diverticular disease, as a measure of relative risk. We calculated 3-year PCCRC rates, as per World Endoscopy Organization recommendations, to estimate the proportion of CRC patients with and without diverticular disease who were considered to have PCCRC. We stratified all analyses by PCCRC location. RESULTS We observed 373 PCCRCs among 56 642 patients with diverticular disease and 1536 PCCRCs among 306 800 patients without diverticular disease. The PCCRC CIP after first-time colonoscopy was 0.45% (95%CI 0.40%-0.51%) for patients with and 0.36% (95%CI 0.34%-0.38%) for patients without diverticular disease. Comparing patients with and without diverticular disease undergoing first-time colonoscopy, the adjusted HR was 0.84 (95%CI 0.73-0.97) for PCCRC and 1.23 (95%CI 1.01-1.50) for proximal PCCRCs. The 3-year PCCRC rate was 19.0% (22.3% for proximal PCCRCs) for patients with and 6.5% for patients without diverticular disease. CONCLUSIONS Although the absolute risk was low, the relative risk of proximal PCCRCs may be elevated in patients with diverticular disease undergoing colonoscopy compared with patients without the disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frederikke S Troelsen
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Surgery, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark
| | - Henrik T Sørensen
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Rune Erichsen
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Surgery, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
IJspeert JEG, van Leerdam ME. Negative screening colonoscopy and long-term colorectal cancer risk-is it time to extend the screening interval? Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024; 9:584-585. [PMID: 38761807 DOI: 10.1016/s2468-1253(24)00115-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2024] [Accepted: 04/04/2024] [Indexed: 05/20/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- J E G IJspeert
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - M E van Leerdam
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ali S, Mowery R, Hoff RT. Regarding "Issues of informed consent for non-specialists conducting colorectal cancer screenings". J Osteopath Med 2024; 0:jom-2024-0026. [PMID: 38855807 DOI: 10.1515/jom-2024-0026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2024] [Accepted: 04/25/2024] [Indexed: 06/11/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Sareena Ali
- Department of Medicine, 21886 Advocate Lutheran General Hospital , Park Ridge, IL, USA
| | - Robert Mowery
- Department of Medicine, 21886 Advocate Lutheran General Hospital , Park Ridge, IL, USA
| | - Ryan T Hoff
- 144559 PeaceHealth Southwest Medical Center , Vancouver, WA, USA
- Elson S. Floyd College of Medicine, Washington State University, Vancouver, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Baile-Maxía S, Mangas-Sanjuán C, Ladabaum U, Sánchez-Ardila C, Sala-Miquel N, Hassan C, Rutter MD, Bretthauer M, Zapater P, Jover R. Risk factors for metachronous colorectal cancer or advanced lesions after endoscopic resection of serrated polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2024:S0016-5107(24)03257-7. [PMID: 38851458 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2024.05.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2024] [Revised: 05/04/2024] [Accepted: 05/26/2024] [Indexed: 06/10/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Serrated polyps (SPs) are precursors to 15% to 20% of colorectal cancers (CRCs). However, there are uncertainties regarding which SPs require surveillance and at what intervals, with recommendations adapted from those for adenomas in the absence of solid evidence. Our aim was to assess which SP risk characteristics relate to a higher risk of metachronous CRC or advanced polyps. METHODS We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane for cohort studies, case-control studies, and clinical trials from inception to December 31, 2023, of CRC or advanced polyps (advanced adenoma [AA] or advanced SP) incidence at surveillance stratified by baseline SP size, dysplasia, location, and multiplicity. We defined advanced SPs as those ≥10 mm or with dysplasia. CRC and advanced polyp incidence per 1000 person-years were estimated. We performed a meta-analysis by calculating pooled relative risks (RRs) using a random-effects model. RESULTS A total of 5903 studies were reviewed, and 14 were included with 493,949 patients (mean age, 59.5 years; 55% men). The mean follow-up was 4.9 years. CRC incidence per 1000 person-years was 2.09 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.29-2.90) for advanced SPs, 1.52 (95% CI, 0.78-2.25) for SPs of ≥10 mm, 5.86 (95% CI, 2.16-9.56) for SPs with dysplasia, 1.18 (95% CI, 0.77-1.60) for proximal SPs, 0.52 (95% CI, 0.08-1.12) for ≥3 SPs, 0.50 (95% CI, 0.35-0.66) for nonadvanced SPs, and 0.44 (95% CI, 0.41-0.46) for normal colonoscopy findings. Metachronous CRC risk was higher in advanced SPs versus nonadvanced SPs (RR, 1.84; 95% CI, 1.11-3.04) and versus normal colonoscopy findings (RR, 2.92; 95% CI, 2.26-3.77), in SPs of ≥10 mm versus <10 mm (RR, 2.61; 95% CI, 1.43-4.77) and versus normal colonoscopy findings (RR: 3.52; 95% CI, 2.17-5.69); and in SPs with dysplasia versus normal colonoscopy findings (RR: 2.71; 95% CI, 2.00-3.67). No increase in CRC or advanced polyp risk was found in patients with proximal versus distal SPs, nor in ≥3 SPs versus 1 or 2 SPs. CONCLUSIONS CRC risk is significantly higher in patients with baseline advanced SPs after 4.9 years of follow-up, with risk magnitudes similar to those described for AA, supporting the current recommendation for 3-year surveillance in patients with advanced SPs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandra Baile-Maxía
- Servicio de Medicina Digestiva, Hospital General Universitario Dr Balmis, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de Alicante (ISABIAL), Universidad Miguel Hernández, Alicante, Spain
| | - Carolina Mangas-Sanjuán
- Servicio de Medicina Digestiva, Hospital General Universitario Dr Balmis, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de Alicante (ISABIAL), Universidad Miguel Hernández, Alicante, Spain
| | - Uri Ladabaum
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | | | - Noelia Sala-Miquel
- Servicio de Medicina Digestiva, Hospital General Universitario Dr Balmis, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de Alicante (ISABIAL), Universidad Miguel Hernández, Alicante, Spain
| | - Cesare Hassan
- Humanitas University, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Pieve Emanuele, Italy; Humanitas Clinical and Research Center-IRCCS, Endoscopy Unit, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Matthew D Rutter
- North Tees and Hartlepool National Health Service Foundation Trust, Stockton-On-Tees, Hardwick Road, Stockton on Tees, Cleveland, Yorkshire, United Kingdom; Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Michael Bretthauer
- Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Pedro Zapater
- Clinical Pharmacology Department, Hospital General Universitario Dr Balmis, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica ISABIAL, Centro de investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas, Alicante, Spain
| | - Rodrigo Jover
- Servicio de Medicina Digestiva, Hospital General Universitario Dr Balmis, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de Alicante (ISABIAL), Universidad Miguel Hernández, Alicante, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Wilson N, Bilal M, Westanmo A, Gravely A, Shaukat A. Prevalence of Sessile Serrated Lesions in Individuals With Positive Fecal Immunochemical Test Undergoing Colonoscopy: Results From a Large Nationwide Veterans Affairs Database. Gastroenterology 2024; 166:1170-1173.e2. [PMID: 38431206 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2024.02.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2023] [Revised: 02/11/2024] [Accepted: 02/25/2024] [Indexed: 03/05/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Natalie Wilson
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Mohammad Bilal
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Minneapolis Veteran Affairs Medical Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Anders Westanmo
- Department of Pharmacy, Minneapolis Veteran Affairs Medical Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Amy Gravely
- Department of Research, Minneapolis Veteran Affairs Medical Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Aasma Shaukat
- Division of Gastroenterology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
van Toledo DEFWM, IJspeert JEG, Bleijenberg AGC, Depla A, Montazeri NSM, Dekker E. Effect of an E-learning resource on endoscopists' proximal serrated polyp detection rate: a randomized controlled trial. Endoscopy 2024; 56:412-420. [PMID: 38191001 DOI: 10.1055/a-2240-7823] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recent studies demonstrated that a higher proximal serrated polyp detection rate (PSPDR) among endoscopists is associated with a lower risk of post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer (PCCRC) incidence and death for their patients. Our objective was to evaluate the effect of an e-learning resource on PSPDR. METHODS We performed a multicenter randomized controlled trial within the Dutch fecal immunochemical test-based colorectal cancer screening program. Endoscopists were randomized using block randomization per center to either receive a 60-minute e-learning resource on serrated polyp detection or not. PSPDR was calculated based on all colonoscopies performed during a 27-month pre-intervention and a 17-month post-intervention period. The primary end point was difference in PSPDR between intervention and control arms (intention to treat) using mixed effect logistic regression modeling, with time (pre-intervention/post-intervention) and interaction between time and arm (intervention/control) as fixed effects, and endoscopists as random effects. RESULTS 116 endoscopists (57 intervention, 59 controls) were included, and performed 27494 and 33888 colonoscopies, respectively. Median PSPDR pre-intervention was 13.6% (95%CI 13.0-14.1) in the intervention arm and 13.8% (95%CI 13.3-14.3) in controls. Post-intervention PSPDR was significantly higher over time in the intervention arm than in controls (17.1% vs. 15.4%, P=0.01). CONCLUSION In an era of increased awareness and increasing PSPDRs, endoscopists who undertook a one-time e-learning course significantly accelerated the increase in PSPDR compared with endoscopists who did not undertake the e-learning. Widespread implementation might reduce PCCRC incidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David E F W M van Toledo
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, location Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Joep E G IJspeert
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, location Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Department of Gastroenterology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Arne G C Bleijenberg
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, location Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Anne Depla
- Department of Gastroenterology, DC Klinieken, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Nahid S M Montazeri
- Biostatistics Unit, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, location Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Evelien Dekker
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, location Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Helderman NC, van Leerdam ME, Kloor M, Ahadova A, Nielsen M. Emerge of colorectal cancer in Lynch syndrome despite colonoscopy surveillance: A challenge of hide and seek. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2024; 197:104331. [PMID: 38521284 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2024.104331] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2024] [Revised: 03/09/2024] [Accepted: 03/20/2024] [Indexed: 03/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Even with colonoscopy surveillance, Lynch syndromes (LS) carriers still develop colorectal cancer (CRC). The cumulative incidence of CRCs under colonoscopy surveillance varies depending on the affected mismatch repair (MMR) gene. However, the precise mechanisms driving these epidemiological patterns remain incompletely understood. In recent years, several potential mechanisms explaining the occurrence of CRCs during colonoscopy surveillance have been proposed in individuals with and without LS. These encompass biological factors like concealed/accelerated carcinogenesis through a bypassed adenoma stage and accelerated progression from adenomas. Alongside these, various colonoscopy-related factors may contribute to formation of CRCs under colonoscopy surveillance, like missed yet detectable (pre)cancerous lesions, detected yet incompletely removed (pre)cancerous lesions, and colonoscopy-induced carcinogenesis due to tumor cell reimplantation. In this comprehensive literature update, we reviewed these potential factors and evaluated their relevance to each MMR group in an attempt to raise further awareness and stimulate research regarding this conflicting phenomenon.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noah C Helderman
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
| | - Monique E van Leerdam
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands; Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Matthias Kloor
- Department of Applied Tumor Biology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Clinical Cooperation Unit Applied Tumor Biology, German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Aysel Ahadova
- Department of Applied Tumor Biology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Clinical Cooperation Unit Applied Tumor Biology, German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Maartje Nielsen
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Savino A, Rondonotti E, Rocchetto S, Piagnani A, Bina N, Di Domenico P, Segatta F, Radaelli F. GI genius endoscopy module: a clinical profile. Expert Rev Med Devices 2024; 21:359-372. [PMID: 38618982 DOI: 10.1080/17434440.2024.2342508] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2023] [Accepted: 04/09/2024] [Indexed: 04/16/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The identification of early-stage colorectal cancers (CRC) and the resection of pre-cancerous neoplastic lesions through colonoscopy allows to decrease both CRC incidence and mortality. However, colonoscopy miss rates up to 26% for adenomas and 9% for advanced adenomas have been reported. In recent years, artificial intelligence (AI) systems have been emerging as easy-to-use tools, potentially lowering the risk of missing lesions. AREAS COVERED This review paper focuses on GI Genius device (Medtronic Co. Minneapolis, MN, U.S.A.) a computer-assisted tool designed to assist endoscopists during standard white-light colonoscopies in detecting mucosal lesions. EXPERT OPINION Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) suggest that GI Genius is a safe and effective tool for improving adenoma detection, especially in CRC screening and surveillance colonoscopies. However, its impact seems to be less significant among experienced endoscopists and in real-world clinical scenarios compared to the controlled conditions of RCTs. Furthermore, it appears that GI Genius mainly enhances the detection of non-advanced, small polyps, but does not significantly impact the identification of advanced and difficult-to-detect adenoma. When using GI Genius, no complications were documented. Only a small number of studies reported an increased in withdrawal time or the removal of non-neoplastic lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Savino
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milano, Italy
| | | | - Simone Rocchetto
- Gastroenterology Unit, Valduce Hospital, Como, Italy
- Foundation IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandra Piagnani
- Gastroenterology Unit, Valduce Hospital, Como, Italy
- Foundation IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Niccolò Bina
- Gastroenterology Unit, Valduce Hospital, Como, Italy
| | - Pasquale Di Domenico
- Gastrointestinal Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery & Dentistry Scuola Medica Salernitana, University of Salerno, Salerno, Italy
| | - Francesco Segatta
- Gastroenterology Unit, Valduce Hospital, Como, Italy
- Foundation IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Anderson JC, Butterly LF. Assessing Risk of Index Serrated Polyps. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024; 22:958-960. [PMID: 37924854 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2023.10.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2023] [Revised: 10/18/2023] [Accepted: 10/19/2023] [Indexed: 11/06/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph C Anderson
- Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, Connecticut; Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, White River Junction VAMC, White River Junction, Vermont; Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire.
| | - Lynn F Butterly
- Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire; Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, NH Colonoscopy Registry, Lebanon, New Hampshire; Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Wisse PHA, de Boer SY, Oudkerk Pool M, Terhaar Sive Droste JS, Verveer C, Meijer GA, Dekker E, Spaander MCW. Post-colonoscopy colorectal cancers in a national fecal immunochemical test-based colorectal cancer screening program. Endoscopy 2024; 56:364-372. [PMID: 38101446 DOI: 10.1055/a-2230-5563] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Post-colonoscopy colorectal cancers (PCCRCs) decrease the effect of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programs. To enable PCCRC incidence reduction in the long-term, we classified PCCRCs diagnosed after colonoscopies performed in a fecal immunochemical test (FIT)-based screening program. METHODS PCCRCs diagnosed after colonoscopies performed between 2014-2016 for a positive FIT in the Dutch CRC screening program were included. PCCRCs were categorized according to the World Endoscopy Organization consensus statement into (a) interval PCCRC (diagnosed before the recommended surveillance); (b) non-interval type A (diagnosed at the recommended surveillance interval); (c) non-interval type B (diagnosed after the recommended surveillance interval); or (d) non-interval type C (diagnosed after the intended recommended surveillance interval, with surveillance not implemented owing to co-morbidity). The most probable etiology was determined by root-cause analysis. Tumor stage distributions were compared between categories. RESULTS 116362 colonoscopies were performed after a positive FIT with 9978 screen-detected CRCs. During follow-up, 432 PCCRCs were diagnosed. The 3-year PCCRC rate was 2.7%. PCCRCs were categorized as interval (53.5%), non-interval type A (14.6%), non-interval type B (30.6%), and non-interval type C (1.4%). The most common etiology for interval PCCRCs was possible missed lesion with adequate examination (73.6%); they were more often diagnosed at an advanced stage (stage III/IV; 53.2%) compared with non-interval type A (15.9%; P<0.001) and non-interval type B (40.9%; P=0.03) PCCRCs. CONCLUSIONS The 3-year PCCRC rate was low in this FIT-based CRC screening program. Approximately half of PCCRCs were interval PCCRCs. These were mostly caused by missed lesions and were diagnosed at a more advanced stage. This emphasizes the importance of high quality colonoscopy with optimal polyp detection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pieter H A Wisse
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Sybrand Y de Boer
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Bevolkingsonderzoek Nederland, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Marco Oudkerk Pool
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Bevolkingsonderzoek Nederland, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Claudia Verveer
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Bevolkingsonderzoek Nederland, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Gerrit A Meijer
- Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Evelien Dekker
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC Location AMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Anderson JC, Rex DK, Mackenzie TA, Hisey W, Robinson CM, Butterly LF. Endoscopist adenomas-per-colonoscopy detection rates and risk for postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer: data from the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry. Gastrointest Endosc 2024; 99:787-795. [PMID: 37993057 PMCID: PMC11039365 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2023.11.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2023] [Revised: 10/13/2023] [Accepted: 11/11/2023] [Indexed: 11/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Adenomas per colonoscopy (APC) may be a better measure of colonoscopy quality than adenoma detection rate (ADR) because it credits endoscopists for each detected adenoma. There are few data examining the association between APC and postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer (PCCRC) incidence. We used data from the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry to examine APC and PCCRC risk. METHODS We included New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry patients with an index examination and at least 1 follow-up event, either a colonoscopy or a colorectal cancer (CRC) diagnosis. Our outcome was PCCRC defined as any CRC diagnosed ≥6 months after an index examination. The exposure variable was endoscopist-specific APC quintiles of .25, .40, .50, and .70. Cox regression was used to model the hazard of PCCRC on APC, controlled for age, sex, year of index examination, index findings, bowel preparation, and having more than 1 surveillance examination. RESULTS In 32,535 patients, a lower hazard for PCCRC (n = 178) was observed for higher APCs as compared to APCs of <.25 (reference): .25 to <.40: hazard ratio (HR), .35; 95% confidence interval (CI), .22-.56; .40 to <.50: HR, .31; 95% CI, .20-.49; .50 to <.70: HR, .20; 95% CI, .11-.36; and ≥.70: HR, .19; 95% CI, .09-.37. When examining endoscopists with an ADR of at least 25%, an APC of <.50 was associated with a significantly higher hazard than an APC of ≥.50 (HR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.06-2.56). A large proportion of endoscopists-one-fifth (32 of 152; 21.1%)-had an ADR of ≥25% but an APC of <.50. CONCLUSIONS Our novel data demonstrating lower PCCRC risk in examinations performed by endoscopists with higher APCs suggest that APC could be a useful quality measure. Quality improvement programs may identify important deficiencies in endoscopist detection performance by measuring APC for endoscopists with an ADR of ≥25%.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph C Anderson
- Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH
- White River Junction VAMC, White River Junction VT
| | - Douglas K Rex
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | | | - William Hisey
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH
- NH Colonoscopy Registry, Lebanon, NH
| | - Christina M Robinson
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH
- NH Colonoscopy Registry, Lebanon, NH
| | - Lynn F Butterly
- Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH
- NH Colonoscopy Registry, Lebanon, NH
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Sullivan BA, Lieberman DA. Colon Polyp Surveillance: Separating the Wheat From the Chaff. Gastroenterology 2024; 166:743-757. [PMID: 38224860 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2023.11.305] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2023] [Revised: 11/20/2023] [Accepted: 11/22/2023] [Indexed: 01/17/2024]
Abstract
One goal of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is to prevent CRC incidence by removing precancerous colonic polyps, which are detected in up to 50% of screening examinations. Yet, the lifetime risk of CRC is 3.9%-4.3%, so it is clear that most of these individuals with polyps would not develop CRC in their lifetime. It is, therefore, a challenge to determine which individuals with polyps will benefit from follow-up, and at what intervals. There is some evidence that individuals with advanced polyps, based on size and histology, benefit from intensive surveillance. However, a large proportion of individuals will have small polyps without advanced histologic features (ie, "nonadvanced"), where the benefits of surveillance are uncertain and controversial. Demand for surveillance will further increase as more polyps are detected due to increased screening uptake, recent United States recommendations to expand screening to younger individuals, and emergence of polyp detection technology. We review the current understanding and clinical implications of the natural history, biology, and outcomes associated with various categories of colon polyps based on size, histology, and number. Our aims are to highlight key knowledge gaps, specifically focusing on certain categories of polyps that may not be associated with future CRC risk, and to provide insights to inform research priorities and potential management strategies. Optimization of CRC prevention programs based on updated knowledge about the future risks associated with various colon polyps is essential to ensure cost-effective screening and surveillance, wise use of resources, and inform efforts to personalize recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian A Sullivan
- Cooperative Studies Program Epidemiology Center-Durham, Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina; Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
| | - David A Lieberman
- Portland Veteran Affairs Medical Center, Portland, Oregon; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, School of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Tan C, Qin G, Wang QQ, Zhou YC, Yao SK. Clinicopathologic and endoscopic features of sessile serrated lesions and conventional adenomas: a large inpatient population-based study in China. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1337035. [PMID: 38638861 PMCID: PMC11024220 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1337035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2023] [Accepted: 03/22/2024] [Indexed: 04/20/2024] Open
Abstract
Objectives Sessile serrated lesions (SSLs) are precursors of sporadic colorectal cancer (CRC) and have distinct characteristics compared with conventional adenomas (CAs). Several lifestyle and environmental factors may play critical roles in the development of advanced lesions. Our aim is to describe the features of SSLs and CAs and further explore risk factors for advanced lesions. Methods This is an observational study that collected demographic, endoscopic, and histological data from the China-Japan Friendship Hospital among the inpatient population with pathologically reported as SSL or CA between 2015 and 2022. We analyzed the clinicopathology and endoscopic differences between SSL alone, CA alone, and synchronous SSL+CA groups, and identified risk factors using multiple regression analysis. Results A total of 9236 polyps from 6598 patients were included in the cohort. Patients with SSL+CA were more likely to be older (p=0.008), while individuals with SSL alone had a higher proportion of early-onset polyps (p<0.001), and SSLs were more common in advanced polyps than CAs (p<0.001). A greater proportion of advanced polyps in the SSL and CA groups were diagnosed as Yamada III, Yamada IV, and laterally spreading tumor (p=0.002, p<0.001, respectively), and multiple SSLs and CAs were more represented in nonadvanced polyps than in advanced polyps. In multiple regression analysis, older patients were more likely to develop advanced SSLs (aOR 1.05, 95% CI 1.02-1.09, p=0.005). Conclusion SSLs and CAs have diverse demographic, endoscopic, and histological characteristics, and their advanced lesions share different risk factors, which advances the understanding of the etiology and progression of SSLs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chang Tan
- Graduate School, Peking University China-Japan Friendship School of Clinical Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Geng Qin
- Department of Gastroenterology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Qian-Qian Wang
- Graduate School, Peking University China-Japan Friendship School of Clinical Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Yuan-Chen Zhou
- Graduate School, Peking University China-Japan Friendship School of Clinical Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Shu-Kun Yao
- Graduate School, Peking University China-Japan Friendship School of Clinical Medicine, Beijing, China
- Department of Gastroenterology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Thiruvengadam NR, Solaimani P, Shrestha M, Buller S, Carson R, Reyes-Garcia B, Gnass RD, Wang B, Albasha N, Leonor P, Saumoy M, Coimbra R, Tabuenca A, Srikureja W, Serrao S. The Efficacy of Real-time Computer-aided Detection of Colonic Neoplasia in Community Practice: A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024:S1542-3565(24)00225-8. [PMID: 38437999 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2024.02.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2023] [Revised: 02/12/2024] [Accepted: 02/13/2024] [Indexed: 03/06/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS The use of computer-aided detection (CADe) has increased the adenoma detection rates (ADRs) during colorectal cancer (CRC) screening/surveillance in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) but has not shown benefit in real-world implementation studies. We performed a single-center pragmatic RCT to evaluate the impact of real-time CADe on ADRs in colonoscopy performed by community gastroenterologists. METHODS We enrolled 1100 patients undergoing colonoscopy for CRC screening, surveillance, positive fecal-immunohistochemical tests, and diagnostic indications at one community-based center from September 2022 to March 2023. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to traditional colonoscopy or real-time CADe. Blinded pathologists analyzed histopathologic findings. The primary outcome was ADR (the percentage of patients with at least 1 histologically proven adenoma or carcinoma). Secondary outcomes were adenomas detected per colonoscopy (APC), sessile-serrated lesion detection rate, and non-neoplastic resection rate. RESULTS The median age was 55.5 years (interquartile range, 50-62 years), 61% were female, 72.7% were of Hispanic ethnicity, and 9.1% had inadequate bowel preparation. The ADR for the CADe group was significantly higher than the traditional colonoscopy group (42.5% vs 34.4%; P = .005). The mean APC was significantly higher in the CADe group compared with the traditional colonoscopy group (0.89 ± 1.46 vs 0.60 ± 1.12; P < .001). The improvement in adenoma detection was driven by increased detection of <5 mm adenomas. CADe had a higher sessile-serrated lesion detection rate than traditional colonoscopy (4.7% vs 2.0%; P = .01). The improvement in ADR with CADe was significantly higher in the first half of the study (47.2% vs 33.7%; P = .002) compared with the second half (38.7% vs 34.9%; P = .33). CONCLUSIONS In a single-center pragmatic RCT, real-time CADe modestly improved ADR and APC in average-detector community endoscopists. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05963724).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikhil R Thiruvengadam
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Riverside University Health System, Moreno Valley, California; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Loma Linda University Health, Loma Linda, California.
| | - Pejman Solaimani
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Riverside University Health System, Moreno Valley, California; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Loma Linda University Health, Loma Linda, California
| | - Manish Shrestha
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Riverside University Health System, Moreno Valley, California; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Loma Linda University Health, Loma Linda, California
| | - Seth Buller
- Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, California
| | - Rachel Carson
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Riverside University Health System, Moreno Valley, California; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Loma Linda University Health, Loma Linda, California
| | - Breanna Reyes-Garcia
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Riverside University Health System, Moreno Valley, California; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Loma Linda University Health, Loma Linda, California
| | - Ronaldo D Gnass
- Department of Pathology, Riverside University Health System, Moreno Valley, California
| | - Bing Wang
- Department of Pathology, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, California
| | - Natalie Albasha
- University of California Riverside School of Medicine, Riverside, California; Department of Medicine, Scripps Green Hospital, La Jolla, California
| | - Paul Leonor
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Riverside University Health System, Moreno Valley, California; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Loma Linda University Health, Loma Linda, California
| | - Monica Saumoy
- Center for Digestive Health, Penn Medicine Princeton Medical Center, Plainsboro, New Jersey
| | - Raul Coimbra
- Comparative Effectiveness and Clinical Outcomes Research Center, Riverside University Health System, Moreno Valley, California; Department of Surgery, Riverside University Health System, Moreno Valley, California
| | - Arnold Tabuenca
- Department of Surgery, Riverside University Health System, Moreno Valley, California; Department of Surgery, University of California Riverside School of Medicine, Riverside, California
| | - Wichit Srikureja
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Riverside University Health System, Moreno Valley, California; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Loma Linda University Health, Loma Linda, California
| | - Steve Serrao
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Riverside University Health System, Moreno Valley, California; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Loma Linda University Health, Loma Linda, California
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Shaukat A, Crockett SD. Colorectal Cancer Screening: Time to Spring Forward. Am J Gastroenterol 2024; 119:395-396. [PMID: 38857481 DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002713] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2024] [Accepted: 02/01/2024] [Indexed: 06/12/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Aasma Shaukat
- Division of Gastroenterology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA; and
| | - Seth D Crockett
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Oregon Health & Science University and Portland VA Medical Center, Portland, Oregon, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Lui TKL, Ko MKL, Liu JJ, Xiao X, Leung WK. Artificial intelligence-assisted real-time monitoring of effective withdrawal time during colonoscopy: a novel quality marker of colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2024; 99:419-427.e6. [PMID: 37858761 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2023.10.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2023] [Revised: 10/06/2023] [Accepted: 10/11/2023] [Indexed: 10/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS The importance of withdrawal time during colonoscopy cannot be overstated in mitigating the risk of missed lesions and postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer. We evaluated a novel colonoscopy quality metric called the effective withdrawal time (EWT), which is an artificial intelligence (AI)-derived quantitative measure of quality withdrawal time, and its association with various colonic lesion detection rates as compared with standard withdrawal time (SWT). METHODS Three hundred fifty video recordings of colonoscopy withdrawal (from the cecum to the anus) were assessed by the new AI model. The primary outcome was adenoma detection rate (ADR) according to different quintiles of EWT. Multivariate logistic regression, adjusting for baseline covariates, was used to determine the adjusted odd ratios (ORs) for EWT on lesion detection rates, with the lowest quintile as reference. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve of EWT was compared with SWT. RESULTS The crude ADR in different quintiles of EWT, from lowest to highest, was 10.0%, 31.4%, 33.3%, 53.5%, and 85.7%. The ORs of detecting adenomas and polyps were significantly higher in all top 4 quintiles when compared with the lowest quintile. Each minute increase in EWT was associated with a 49% increase in ADR (aOR, 1.49; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.36-1.65). The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve of EWT was also significantly higher than SWT on adenoma detection (.80 [95% CI, .75-.84] vs .70 [95% CI, .64-.74], P < .01). CONCLUSIONS AI-derived monitoring of EWT is a promising novel quality indicator for colonoscopy, which is more associated with ADR than SWT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas K L Lui
- Department of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Michael K L Ko
- Department of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | | | | | - Wai K Leung
- Department of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Vu NTH, Le HM, Vo DTN, Vu HA, Le NQ, Ho DDQ, Quach DT. Prevalence, risk factors, and BRAF mutation of colorectal sessile serrated lesions among Vietnamese patients. World J Clin Oncol 2024; 15:290-301. [PMID: 38455129 PMCID: PMC10915949 DOI: 10.5306/wjco.v15.i2.290] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2023] [Revised: 12/25/2023] [Accepted: 01/12/2024] [Indexed: 02/20/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sessile serrated lesions (SSLs) are considered precancerous colorectal lesions that should be detected and removed to prevent colorectal cancer. Previous studies in Vietnam mainly investigated the adenoma pathway, with limited data on the serrated pathway. AIM To evaluate the prevalence, risk factors, and BRAF mutations of SSLs in the Vietnamese population. METHODS This is a cross-sectional study conducted on patients with lower gastrointestinal symptoms who underwent colonoscopy at a tertiary hospital in Vietnam. SSLs were diagnosed on histopathology according to the 2019 World Health Organization classification. BRAF mutation analysis was performed using the Sanger DNA sequencing method. The multivariate logistic regression model was used to determine SSL-associated factors. RESULTS There were 2489 patients, with a mean age of 52.1 ± 13.1 and a female-to-male ratio of 1:1.1. The prevalence of SSLs was 4.2% [95% confidence interval (CI): 3.5-5.1]. In the multivariate analysis, factors significantly associated with SSLs were age ≥ 40 [odds ratio (OR): 3.303; 95%CI: 1.607-6.790], male sex (OR: 2.032; 95%CI: 1.204-3.429), diabetes mellitus (OR: 2.721; 95%CI: 1.551-4.772), and hypertension (OR: 1.650, 95%CI: 1.045-2.605). The rate of BRAF mutations in SSLs was 35.5%. CONCLUSION The prevalence of SSLs was 4.2%. BRAF mutations were present in one-third of SSLs. Significant risk factors for SSLs included age ≥ 40, male sex, diabetes mellitus, and hypertension.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nhu Thi Hanh Vu
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh 700000, Viet Nam
- GI Endoscopy Department, University Medical Center at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh 700000, Viet Nam
| | - Huy Minh Le
- GI Endoscopy Department, University Medical Center at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh 700000, Viet Nam
- Department of Histology-Embryology and Pathology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh 700000, Viet Nam
| | - Diem Thi-Ngoc Vo
- Department of Histology-Embryology and Pathology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh 700000, Viet Nam
| | - Hoang Anh Vu
- Center for Molecular Biomedicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh 700000, Viet Nam
| | - Nhan Quang Le
- GI Endoscopy Department, University Medical Center at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh 700000, Viet Nam
| | - Dung Dang Quy Ho
- Department of Endoscopy, Cho Ray Hospital, Ho Chi Minh 700000, Viet Nam
| | - Duc Trong Quach
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh 700000, Viet Nam
- GI Endoscopy Department, University Medical Center at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh 700000, Viet Nam
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Denis B, Bertolaso A, Gendre I, Perrin P, Hammas K. Post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer: A population-based cohort study of fecal occult blood test-positive colonoscopies. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol 2024; 48:102285. [PMID: 38246488 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinre.2024.102285] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2023] [Revised: 01/09/2024] [Accepted: 01/19/2024] [Indexed: 01/23/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Data on post-colonoscopy colorectal cancers (PCCRCs) after fecal occult blood test (FOBT)-positive colonoscopies is scarce (guaiac-based (gFOBT) or fecal immunochemical test (FIT)). AIMS Evaluate the prevalence and characteristics of PCCRCs in the French gFOBT CRC screening program. METHODS Retrospective population-based cohort study of all gFOBT-positive colonoscopies performed among individuals aged 50-74 between 2003 and 2014 within the CRC screening program organized in the Haut-Rhin (Alsace, France). The main outcome was PCCRC-3y rate. Adenoma detection rates (ADRs) calculated on gFOBT-positive colonoscopies were compared to those calculated on FIT-positive colonoscopies performed by the same gastroenterologists. RESULTS Overall, 9106 gFOBT-positive colonoscopies performed by 36 gastroenterologists were included. Sixteen PCCRC-3y and 31 PCCRC-5y were diagnosed (68.8 % and 58.1 % were true interval PCCRCs respectively). The unadjusted PCCRC-3y rate was 2.4 % [95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.4 %-3.9 %]. The risk for PCCRC-5y was significantly higher when the gastroenterologist's ADR was <35 % compared to ≥35 % (HR 2.17 [95 %CI 1.19-3.93]). The mean absolute difference for ADR between gFOBT- and FIT-positive colonoscopies was 16.3 % in favor of FIT-positive colonoscopies. CONCLUSION PCCRC-3y prevalence was low, estimated at 2.4 %. We suggest that the minimum standard for ADR in gFOBT- and FIT-positive colonoscopies should be set at 35 % and 50 % to 55 % respectively, in the French screening program.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bernard Denis
- Department of Gastroenterology, Pasteur Hospital, 39 avenue de la Liberté, Colmar 68024, France; ADECA Alsace, 122 rue de Logelbach, Colmar, France.
| | - Alice Bertolaso
- Haut-Rhin Cancer Registry, GHRMSA, 87 avenue d'Altkirch, Mulhouse, France
| | - Isabelle Gendre
- ADECA Alsace, 122 rue de Logelbach, Colmar, France; CRCDC Grand Est, Site de Colmar, 122 rue de Logelbach, Colmar, France
| | - Philippe Perrin
- ADECA Alsace, 122 rue de Logelbach, Colmar, France; CRCDC Grand Est, Site de Colmar, 122 rue de Logelbach, Colmar, France
| | - Karima Hammas
- Haut-Rhin Cancer Registry, GHRMSA, 87 avenue d'Altkirch, Mulhouse, France
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Schöler J, Alavanja M, de Lange T, Yamamoto S, Hedenström P, Varkey J. Impact of AI-aided colonoscopy in clinical practice: a prospective randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open Gastroenterol 2024; 11:e001247. [PMID: 38290758 PMCID: PMC10870789 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgast-2023-001247] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2023] [Accepted: 01/11/2024] [Indexed: 02/01/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Colorectal cancer (CRC) has a significant role in cancer-related mortality. Colonoscopy, combined with adenoma removal, has proven effective in reducing CRC incidence. However, suboptimal colonoscopy quality often leads to missed polyps. The impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on adenoma and polyp detection rate (ADR, PDR) is yet to be established. DESIGN We conducted a randomised controlled trial at Sahlgrenska University Hospital in Sweden. Patients underwent colonoscopy with or without the assistance of AI (AI-C or conventional colonoscopy (CC)). Examinations were performed with two different AI systems, that is, Fujifilm CADEye and Medtronic GI Genius. The primary outcome was ADR. RESULTS Among 286 patients, 240 underwent analysis (average age: 66 years). The ADR was 42% for all patients, and no significant difference emerged between AI-C and CC groups (41% vs 43%). The overall PDR was 61%, with a trend towards higher PDR in the AI-C group. Subgroup analysis revealed higher detection rates for sessile serrated lesions (SSL) with AI assistance (AI-C 22%, CC 11%, p=0.004). No difference was noticed in the detection of polyps or adenomas per colonoscopy. Examinations were most often performed by experienced endoscopists, 78% (n=86 AI-C, 100 CC). CONCLUSION Amidst the ongoing AI integration, ADR did not improve with AI. Particularly noteworthy is the enhanced detection rates for SSL by AI assistance, especially since they pose a risk for postcolonoscopy CRC. The integration of AI into standard colonoscopy practice warrants further investigation and the development of improved software might be necessary before enforcing its mandatory implementation. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT05178095.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johanna Schöler
- Medical Department, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Goteborg, Sweden
| | - Marko Alavanja
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Institute of Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Goteborg, Sweden
- Department of Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Goteborg, Sweden
| | - Thomas de Lange
- Medical Department, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Goteborg, Sweden
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Institute of Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Goteborg, Sweden
| | - Shunsuke Yamamoto
- Department of Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Goteborg, Sweden
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, National Hospital Organization Osaka National Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Per Hedenström
- Medical Department, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Goteborg, Sweden
- Department of Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Goteborg, Sweden
| | - Jonas Varkey
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Institute of Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Goteborg, Sweden
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Dornblaser D, Young S, Shaukat A. Colon polyps: updates in classification and management. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 2024; 40:14-20. [PMID: 37909928 DOI: 10.1097/mog.0000000000000988] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Colon polyps are potential precursors to colorectal cancer (CRC), which remains one of the most common causes of cancer-associated death. The proper identification and management of these colorectal polyps is an important quality measure for colonoscopy outcomes. Here, we review colon polyp epidemiology, their natural history, and updates in endoscopic classification and management. RECENT FINDINGS Colon polyps that form from not only the adenoma, but also the serrated polyp pathway have significant risk for future progression to CRC. Therefore, correct identification and management of sessile serrated lesions can improve the quality of screening colonoscopy. Malignant polyp recognition continues to be heavily reliant on well established endoscopic classification systems and plays an important role in intraprocedural management decisions. Hot snare remains the gold standard for pedunculated polyp resection. Nonpedunculated noninvasive lesions can be effectively removed by large forceps if diminutive, but cold snare is preferred for colon polyps 3-20 mm in diameter. Larger lesions at least 20 mm require endoscopic mucosal resection. Polyps with the endoscopic appearance of submucosal invasion require surgical referral or advanced endoscopic resection in select cases. Advances in artificial intelligence may revolutionize endoscopic polyp classification and improve both patient and cost-related outcomes of colonoscopy. SUMMARY Clinicians should be aware of the most recent updates in colon polyp classification and management to provide the best care to their patients initiating screening colonoscopy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Dornblaser
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
van de Schootbrugge-Vandermeer HJ, Kooyker AI, Wisse PHA, Nagtegaal ID, Geuzinge HA, Toes-Zoutendijk E, de Jonge L, Breekveldt ECH, van Vuuren AJ, van Kemenade FJ, Ramakers CRB, Dekker E, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, Spaander MCW, van Leerdam ME. Interval post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer following a negative colonoscopy in a fecal immunochemical test-based screening program. Endoscopy 2023; 55:1061-1069. [PMID: 37793423 PMCID: PMC10684335 DOI: 10.1055/a-2136-6564] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2022] [Accepted: 07/07/2023] [Indexed: 10/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the Dutch colorectal (CRC) screening program, fecal immunochemical test (FIT)-positive individuals are referred for colonoscopy. If no relevant findings are detected at colonoscopy, individuals are reinvited for FIT screening after 10 years. We aimed to assess CRC risk after a negative colonoscopy in FIT-positive individuals. METHODS In this cross-sectional cohort study, data were extracted from the Dutch national screening information system. Participants with a positive FIT followed by a negative colonoscopy between 2014 and 2018 were included. A negative colonoscopy was defined as a colonoscopy during which no more than one nonvillous, nonproximal adenoma < 10 mm or serrated polyp < 10 mm was found. The main outcome was interval post-colonoscopy CRC (iPCCRC) risk. iPCCRC risk was reviewed against the risk of interval CRC after a negative FIT (FIT IC) with a 2-year screening interval. RESULTS 35 052 FIT-positive participants had a negative colonoscopy and 24 iPCCRCs were diagnosed, resulting in an iPCCRC risk of 6.85 (95 %CI 4.60-10.19) per 10 000 individuals after a median follow-up of 1.4 years. After 2.5 years of follow-up, age-adjusted iPCCRC risk was approximately equal to FIT IC risk at 2 years. CONCLUSION Risk of iPCCRC within a FIT-based CRC screening program was low during the first years after colonos-copy but, after 2.5 years, was the same as the risk in FIT-negative individuals at 2 years, when they are reinvited for screening. Colonoscopy quality may therefore require further improvement and FIT screening interval may need to be reduced after negative colonoscopy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Arthur I. Kooyker
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pieter H. A. Wisse
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Iris D. Nagtegaal
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Hiltje A. Geuzinge
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Esther Toes-Zoutendijk
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lucie de Jonge
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Emilie C. H. Breekveldt
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anneke J. van Vuuren
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Christian R. B. Ramakers
- Department of Clinical Chemistry, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Evelien Dekker
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Manon C. W. Spaander
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Monique E. van Leerdam
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Anderson JC, Rex DK, Mackenzie TA, Hisey W, Robinson CM, Butterly LF. Higher Serrated Polyp Detection Rates Are Associated With Lower Risk of Postcolonoscopy Colorectal Cancer: Data From the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry. Am J Gastroenterol 2023; 118:1927-1930. [PMID: 37417792 PMCID: PMC10841069 DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002403] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2023] [Accepted: 06/23/2023] [Indexed: 07/08/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION We used New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry data to examine the association between postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer (PCCRC) and sessile serrated detection rates (SSLDRs). METHODS We included patients with either a colonoscopy or a CRC diagnosis in the NH State Cancer Registry. PCCRC was any CRC diagnosed ≥ 6 months after index examination. RESULTS Of 26,901 patients, 162 were diagnosed with PCCRC. The hazard ratio for PCCRC was lowest for patients whose endoscopists had the highest SSLDR quintile (≥6%) (hazard ratio 0.29; 95% confidence interval 0.16-0.50). DISCUSSION Endoscopists with higher SSLDRs had lower risks of PCCRC. These data validate SSLDR as a clinically relevant quality measure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph C Anderson
- Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH
- White River Junction VAMC, White River Junction VT
| | - Douglas K Rex
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | | | - William Hisey
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH
- NH Colonoscopy Registry, Lebanon, NH
| | - Christina M Robinson
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH
- NH Colonoscopy Registry, Lebanon, NH
| | - Lynn F Butterly
- Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH
- NH Colonoscopy Registry, Lebanon, NH
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Zhang S, Zhao S, Bai Y. New Quality Indicators for Colonoscopy: More Issues Should Be Addressed. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2023; 21:3196. [PMID: 36720298 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2023.01.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2023] [Accepted: 01/09/2023] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Song Zhang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Shengbing Zhao
- Department of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yu Bai
- Department of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Hassan C, Repici A, Mori Y. Cost of artificial intelligence: Elephant in the room and its cage. Dig Endosc 2023; 35:900-901. [PMID: 37160614 DOI: 10.1111/den.14567] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2023] [Accepted: 04/13/2023] [Indexed: 05/11/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Cesare Hassan
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Italy
- Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Alessandro Repici
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Italy
- Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Yuichi Mori
- Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Digestive Disease Center, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Anderson JC, Rex DK. Performing High-Quality, Safe, Cost-Effective, and Efficient Basic Colonoscopy in 2023: Advice From Two Experts. Am J Gastroenterol 2023; 118:1779-1786. [PMID: 37463252 DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002407] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2023] [Accepted: 07/05/2023] [Indexed: 07/20/2023]
Abstract
Based on published evidence and our expert experience, we provide recommendations to maximize the efficacy, safety, efficiency, and cost-effectiveness of routine colonoscopy. High-quality colonoscopy begins with colon preparation using a split or same-day dose and preferably a low-volume regimen for optimal patient tolerance and compliance. Successful cecal intubation can be achieved by choosing the correct colonoscope and using techniques to facilitate navigation through challenges such as severe angulations and redundant colons. Safety is a primary goal, and complications such as perforation and splenic rupture can be prevented by avoiding pushing through fixed resistance and avoiding loops in proximal colon. Furthermore, barotrauma can be avoided by converting to water filling only (no gas insufflation) in every patient with a narrowed, angulated sigmoid. Optimal polyp detection relies primarily on compulsive attention to inspection as manifested by adequate inspection time, vigorous probing of the spaces between haustral folds, washing and removing residual debris, and achieving full distention. Achieving minimum recommended adenoma detection rate thresholds (30% in men and 20% in women) is mandatory, and colonoscopists should aspire to adenoma detection rate approaching 50% in screening patients. Distal attachments can improve mucosal exposure and increase detection while shortening withdrawal times. Complete resection of polyps complements polyp detection in preventing colorectal cancer. Cold resection is the preferred method for all polyps < 10 mm. For effective cold resection, an adequate rim of normal tissue should be captured in the snare. Finally, cost-effective high-quality colonoscopy requires the procedure not be overused, as demonstrated by following updated United States Multi Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer postpolypectomy surveillance recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph C Anderson
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, White River Junction VAMC, White River Junction, Vermont, USA
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, Connecticut, USA
| | - Douglas K Rex
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Mangas-Sanjuan C, de-Castro L, Cubiella J, Díez-Redondo P, Suárez A, Pellisé M, Fernández N, Zarraquiños S, Núñez-Rodríguez H, Álvarez-García V, Ortiz O, Sala-Miquel N, Zapater P, Jover R. Role of Artificial Intelligence in Colonoscopy Detection of Advanced Neoplasias : A Randomized Trial. Ann Intern Med 2023; 176:1145-1152. [PMID: 37639723 DOI: 10.7326/m22-2619] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/31/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The role of computer-aided detection in identifying advanced colorectal neoplasia is unknown. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the contribution of computer-aided detection to colonoscopic detection of advanced colorectal neoplasias as well as adenomas, serrated polyps, and nonpolypoid and right-sided lesions. DESIGN Multicenter, parallel, randomized controlled trial. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04673136). SETTING Spanish colorectal cancer screening program. PARTICIPANTS 3213 persons with a positive fecal immunochemical test. INTERVENTION Enrollees were randomly assigned to colonoscopy with or without computer-aided detection. MEASUREMENTS Advanced colorectal neoplasia was defined as advanced adenoma and/or advanced serrated polyp. RESULTS The 2 comparison groups showed no significant difference in advanced colorectal neoplasia detection rate (34.8% with intervention vs. 34.6% for controls; adjusted risk ratio [aRR], 1.01 [95% CI, 0.92 to 1.10]) or the mean number of advanced colorectal neoplasias detected per colonoscopy (0.54 [SD, 0.95] with intervention vs. 0.52 [SD, 0.95] for controls; adjusted rate ratio, 1.04 [99.9% CI, 0.88 to 1.22]). Adenoma detection rate also did not differ (64.2% with intervention vs. 62.0% for controls; aRR, 1.06 [99.9% CI, 0.91 to 1.23]). Computer-aided detection increased the mean number of nonpolypoid lesions (0.56 [SD, 1.25] vs. 0.47 [SD, 1.18] for controls; adjusted rate ratio, 1.19 [99.9% CI, 1.01 to 1.41]), proximal adenomas (0.94 [SD, 1.62] vs. 0.81 [SD, 1.52] for controls; adjusted rate ratio, 1.17 [99.9% CI, 1.03 to 1.33]), and lesions of 5 mm or smaller (polyps in general and adenomas and serrated lesions in particular) detected per colonoscopy. LIMITATIONS The high adenoma detection rate in the control group may limit the generalizability of the findings to endoscopists with low detection rates. CONCLUSION Computer-aided detection did not improve colonoscopic identification of advanced colorectal neoplasias. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE Medtronic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carolina Mangas-Sanjuan
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital General Universitario Dr. Balmis, Servicio de Medicina Digestiva, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de Alicante (ISABIAL), Spain (C.M., N.S.)
| | - Luisa de-Castro
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Álvaro Cunqueiro, Digestive Pathology Research Group, Galicia Sur Health Research Institute (IIS Galicia Sur), SERGAS-UVIGO, Vigo, Spain (L. de-C., N.F.)
| | - Joaquín Cubiella
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Universitario de Ourense, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Ourense, Spain (J.C., S.Z.)
| | - Pilar Díez-Redondo
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Río-Hortega, Valladolid, Spain (P.D., H.N.)
| | - Adolfo Suárez
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Central de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain (A.S., V.A.)
| | - María Pellisé
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain (M.P., O.O.)
| | - Nereida Fernández
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Álvaro Cunqueiro, Digestive Pathology Research Group, Galicia Sur Health Research Institute (IIS Galicia Sur), SERGAS-UVIGO, Vigo, Spain (L. de-C., N.F.)
| | - Sara Zarraquiños
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Universitario de Ourense, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Ourense, Spain (J.C., S.Z.)
| | - Henar Núñez-Rodríguez
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Río-Hortega, Valladolid, Spain (P.D., H.N.)
| | | | - Oswaldo Ortiz
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain (M.P., O.O.)
| | - Noelia Sala-Miquel
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital General Universitario Dr. Balmis, Servicio de Medicina Digestiva, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de Alicante (ISABIAL), Spain (C.M., N.S.)
| | - Pedro Zapater
- Hospital General Universitario Dr. Balmis, Clinical Pharmacology Department, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de Alicante (ISABIAL), Departamento de Farmacología, Universidad Miguel Hernández, Alicante, CIBERehd, Spain (P.Z.)
| | - Rodrigo Jover
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital General Universitario Dr. Balmis, Servicio de Medicina Digestiva, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de Alicante (ISABIAL), Departamento de Medicina Clínica, Universidad Miguel Hernández, Alicante, Spain (R.J.)
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Sleiman J, Farha N, Beard J, Bena J, Morrison S, Milicia S, Heald B, Kalady MF, Church J, Liska D, Mankaney G, Burke CA. Incidence and prevalence of advanced colorectal neoplasia in Lynch syndrome. Gastrointest Endosc 2023; 98:412-419.e8. [PMID: 37031913 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2023.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2023] [Revised: 02/24/2023] [Accepted: 04/04/2023] [Indexed: 04/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Lynch syndrome (LS) is the most common hereditary cause of colorectal cancer (CRC) and endometrial cancer (EC). Although colonoscopy reduces CRC in LS, the protection is variable. We assessed the prevalence and incidence of neoplasia in LS during surveillance colonoscopy in the United States and factors associated with advanced neoplasia. METHODS Patients with LS undergoing ≥1 surveillance colonoscopy and with no personal history of invasive CRC or colorectal surgery were included. Prevalent and incident neoplasia was defined as occurring <6 months before and ≥6 months after germline diagnosis of LS, respectively. We assessed advanced adenoma (AA), CRC, and the impact of mismatch repair pathogenic variant (PV) and typical LS cancer history (personal history of EC and/or family history of EC/CRC) on outcome. RESULTS A total of 132 patients (inclusive of 112 undergoing prevalent and incident surveillance) were included. The median examination interval and duration of prevalent and incident surveillance was .88 and 1.06 years and 3.1 and 4.6 years, respectively. Prevalent and incident AA were detected in 10.7% and 6.1% and invasive CRC in 0% and 2.3% of patients. All incident CRC occurred in MSH2 and MLH1 PV carriers and only 1 (.7%) while under surveillance in our center. AAs were detected in both LS cancer history cohorts and represented in all PVs. CONCLUSIONS In a U.S. cohort of LS, advanced neoplasia rarely occurred over annual surveillance. CRC was diagnosed only in MSH2/MLH1 PV carriers. AAs occurred regardless of PV or LS cancer history. Prospective studies are warranted to confirm our findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph Sleiman
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition at University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Natalie Farha
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition
| | - Jonathan Beard
- Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA
| | - James Bena
- Department of Quantitative Health Science
| | | | - Susan Milicia
- Department of Colorectal Surgery; Sanford R. Weiss, M.D. Center for Hereditary Colorectal Neoplasia
| | - Brandie Heald
- Sanford R. Weiss, M.D. Center for Hereditary Colorectal Neoplasia; Department of Genomic Medical Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Matthew F Kalady
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - James Church
- Department of Surgery, Division of Colorectal Surgery & Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, Columbia University Medical Center, Herbert Irving Pavilion, New York, New York, USA
| | - David Liska
- Department of Colorectal Surgery; Sanford R. Weiss, M.D. Center for Hereditary Colorectal Neoplasia
| | - Gautam Mankaney
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Virginia Mason Franciscan Health, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Carol A Burke
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition; Department of Colorectal Surgery; Sanford R. Weiss, M.D. Center for Hereditary Colorectal Neoplasia.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Ebner DW, Burger KN, Mahoney DW, Broderick BT, Eckmann JD, Devens ME, Lowrie KL, League JB, Bering J, Kahn A, Rodriguez EA, Prichard DO, Wallace MB, Kane SV, Leighton JA, Buttar NS, Rutten LJF, Gurudu SR, Kisiel JB. Neoplasia Diagnosis After Multi-target Stool DNA Is Enhanced Among Lowest Baseline Detectors. Dig Dis Sci 2023; 68:3721-3731. [PMID: 37486445 PMCID: PMC10882559 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-023-08038-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2023] [Accepted: 07/06/2023] [Indexed: 07/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Variation in colorectal neoplasia detection limits the effectiveness of screening colonoscopy. By evaluating neoplasia detection rates of individual colonoscopists, we aimed to quantify the effects of pre-procedural knowledge of a positive (+) multi-target stool DNA (mt-sDNA) on colonoscopy quality metrics. METHODS We retrospectively identified physicians who performed a high volume of + mt-sDNA colonoscopies; colorectal neoplasia at post-mt-sDNA colonoscopy was recorded. These colonoscopists were stratified into quartiles based on baseline adenoma detection rates. Baseline colonoscopy adenoma detection rates and sessile serrated lesion detection rates were compared to post-mt-sDNA colonoscopy neoplasia diagnosis rates among each quartile. Withdrawal times were measured from negative exams. RESULTS During the study period (2014-17) the highest quartile of physicians by volume of post-mt-sDNA colonoscopies were evaluated. Among thirty-five gastroenterologists, their median screening colonoscopy adenoma detection rate was 32% (IQR, 28-39%) and serrated lesion detection rate was 13% (8-15%). After + mt-sDNA, adenoma diagnosis increased to 47% (36-56%) and serrated lesion diagnosis increased to 31% (17-42%) (both p < 0.0001). Median withdrawal time increased from 10 (7-13) to 12 (10-17) minutes (p < 0.0001) and was proportionate across quartiles. After + mt-sDNA, lower baseline detectors had disproportionately higher rates of adenoma diagnosis in female versus male patients (p = 0.048) and higher serrated neoplasia diagnosis rates among all patients (p = 0.0092). CONCLUSIONS Knowledge of + mt-sDNA enriches neoplasia diagnosis compared to average risk screening exams. Adenomatous and serrated lesion diagnosis was magnified among those with lower adenoma detection rates. Awareness of the mt-sDNA result may increase physician attention during colonoscopy. Pre-procedure knowledge of a positive mt-sDNA test improves neoplasia diagnosis rates among colonoscopists with lower baseline adenoma detection rates, independent of withdrawal time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Derek W Ebner
- Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Kelli N Burger
- Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | | | | | - Jason D Eckmann
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Mary E Devens
- Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Kari L Lowrie
- Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - John B League
- Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | | | | | - Eduardo A Rodriguez
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | | | | | - Sunanda V Kane
- Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - John B Kisiel
- Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Knudsen MD, Wang K, Wang L, Polychronidis G, Berstad P, Wu K, He X, Hang D, Fang Z, Ogino S, Chan AT, Giovannucci E, Wang M, Song M. Development and validation of a risk prediction model for post-polypectomy colorectal cancer in the USA: a prospective cohort study. EClinicalMedicine 2023; 62:102139. [PMID: 37599907 PMCID: PMC10432960 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102139] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2023] [Revised: 07/12/2023] [Accepted: 07/20/2023] [Indexed: 08/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Effective risk stratification tools for post-polypectomy colorectal cancer (PPCRC) are lacking. We aimed to develop an effective risk stratification tool for the prediction of PPCRC in three large population-based cohorts and to validate the tool in a clinical cohort. Methods Leveraging the integrated endoscopic, histopathologic and epidemiologic data in three U.S population-based cohorts of health professional (the Nurses' Health Study (NHS) I, II and Health Professionals Follow-up Study (HPFS)), we developed a risk score to predict incident PPCRC among 26,741 patients with a polypectomy between 1986 and 2017. We validated the PPCRC score in the Mass General Brigham (MGB) Colonoscopy Cohort (Boston, Massachusetts, U.S) of 76,603 patients with a polypectomy between 2007 and 2018. In all four cohorts, we collected detailed data on patients' demographics, endoscopic history, polyp features, and lifestyle factors at polypectomy. The outcome, incidence of PPCRC, was assessed by biennial follow-up questionnaires in the NHS/HPFS cohorts, and through linkage to the Massachusetts Cancer Registry in the MGB cohort. In all four cohorts, individuals who were diagnosed with CRC or died before baseline or within six months after baseline were excluded. We used Cox regression to calculate the hazard ratio (HR), 95% confidence interval (CI) and assessed the discrimination using C-statistics and reclassification using the Net Reclassification Improvement (NRI). Findings During a median follow-up of 12.8 years (interquartile range (IQR): 9.3, 16.7) and 5.1 years (IQR: 2.7, 7.8) in the NHS/HPFS and MGB cohorts, we documented 220 and 241 PPCRC cases, respectively. We identified a PPCRC risk score based on 11 predictors. In the validation cohort, the PPCRC risk score showed a strong association with PPCRC risk (HR for high vs. low, 3.55, 95% CI, 2.59-4.88) and demonstrated a C-statistic (95% CI) of 0.75 (0.70-0.79), and was discriminatory even within the low- and high-risk polyp groups (C-statistic, 0.73 and 0.71, respectively) defined by the current colonoscopy surveillance recommendations, leading to a NRI of 45% (95% CI, 36-54%) for patients with PPCRC. Interpretation We developed and validated a risk stratification model for PPCRC that may be useful to guide tailored colonoscopy surveillance. Further work is needed to determine the optimal surveillance interval and test the added value of other predictors of PPCRC beyond those included in the current study, along with implementation studies. Funding US National Institutes of Health, the American Cancer Society, the South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority, the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Markus Dines Knudsen
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA, USA
- Section of Bowel Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Ullernchausseen 64, Oslo, Norway
- Division of Surgery, Inflammatory Diseases and Transplantation, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Sognsvannsveien 20, Oslo, Norway
| | - Kai Wang
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Liang Wang
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA, USA
- Centre of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, 58 Zhongshaner Rd, Yuexiu District, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Georgios Polychronidis
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of General Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 420, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Paula Berstad
- Section of Bowel Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Ullernchausseen 64, Oslo, Norway
| | - Kana Wu
- Department of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Xiaosheng He
- Division of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA, USA
- Clinical and Translational Epidemiology Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Six Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, 135, Xingang Xi Road, Guangzhou, China
| | - Dong Hang
- Department of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Jiangsu Key Lab of Cancer Biomarkers, Prevention and Treatment, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Personalized Medicine, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, 101 Longmian Avenue, Nanjing, China
| | - Zhe Fang
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Shuji Ogino
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Pathology, Program in Molecular Pathological Epidemiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA, USA
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Merkin Building, 415 Main St, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Andrew T. Chan
- Division of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA, USA
- Clinical and Translational Epidemiology Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA, USA
- Channing Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 181 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Edward Giovannucci
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Molin Wang
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA, USA
- Channing Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 181 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Mingyang Song
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA, USA
- Division of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA, USA
- Clinical and Translational Epidemiology Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Antonelli G. Endoscopic surveillance after resection of sessile serrated lesions: so far, so good? Endoscopy 2023; 55:737-739. [PMID: 37172937 DOI: 10.1055/a-2077-2364] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/15/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Giulio Antonelli
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Ospedale dei Castelli Hospital, Ariccia, Rome, Italy
- Department of Anatomical, Histological, Forensic Medicine and Orthopedic Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
van Toledo D, IJspeert J, Spaander M, Nagtegaal I, van Leerdam M, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, Dekker E. Colorectal cancer risk after removal of polyps in fecal immunochemical test based screening. EClinicalMedicine 2023; 61:102066. [PMID: 37528844 PMCID: PMC10388570 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2023] [Revised: 06/09/2023] [Accepted: 06/12/2023] [Indexed: 08/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Colonoscopy surveillance intervals are based on the predicted risk of metachronous colorectal cancer (CRC) after polyp removal. However, risk estimation per polyp subtype is difficult due to the fact that many patients have multiple polyps. To enable risk estimation per polyp subtypes we examined the metachronous CRC risk of subgroups based on presence or absence of co-occurring findings. Methods Using high-quality screening colonoscopies performed after a positive fecal immunochemical test between 2014 and 2020 within the Dutch CRC screening program, we applied Cox regression analysis to evaluate the association between findings at baseline colonoscopy and metachronous CRCs. For our primary outcome, we appointed each patient to unique subgroups based on removed polyp subtypes that were present or absent at baseline colonoscopy and used the groups without polyps as reference. High-risk subgroups were individuals with high-risk serrated polyps, defined as serrated polyp ≥10 mm, sessile serrated lesions with dysplasia, or traditional serrated adenomas, as well as high-risk adenomas, defined as adenoma ≥10 mm or containing high-grade dysplasia. Findings In total 253,833 colonoscopies were included. Over a median follow-up of 36 months (IQR, 21-57), we identified 504 metachronous CRCs. Hazard ratios for metachronous CRC was 1.70 (95% CI, 1.07-2.69) for individuals with high-risk serrated polyps without high-risk adenomas, 1.22 (0.96-1.55) for individuals with high-risk adenomas without high-risk serrated polyps, and 2.00 (1.19-3.39) for individuals with high-risk serrated polyps and high-risk adenomas, compared to patients without polyps. Interpretation Accounting for co-occurring findings, we observed an increased metachronous CRC risk for individuals that had high-risk serrated polyps with the presence of high-risk adenomas, or individuals with high-risk serrated polyps without high-risk adenomas. These findings could provide more evidence to support post-polypectomy surveillance guidelines. Funding None.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D.E.F.W.M. van Toledo
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Amsterdam Gastroenterology, Endocrinology & Metabolism, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J.E.G. IJspeert
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Amsterdam Gastroenterology, Endocrinology & Metabolism, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M.C.W. Spaander
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - I.D. Nagtegaal
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - M.E. van Leerdam
- Department of Gastroenterology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - I. Lansdorp-Vogelaar
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - E. Dekker
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Amsterdam Gastroenterology, Endocrinology & Metabolism, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Radaelli F. How to optimize the detection of serrated lesions: old tools for a new story? Endoscopy 2023; 55:555-556. [PMID: 37068515 DOI: 10.1055/a-2053-8244] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/19/2023]
|
40
|
Vithayathil M, Smith S, Song M. Epidemiology of overall and early-onset serrated polyps versus conventional adenomas in a colonoscopy screening cohort. Int J Cancer 2023; 152:1085-1094. [PMID: 36178673 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.34306] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2022] [Revised: 09/12/2022] [Accepted: 09/23/2022] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
Serrated polyps (SPs) are precursors to one-third of colorectal cancers (CRCs), with histological subtypes: hyperplastic polyps (HPs), sessile serrated lesions (SSLs) and traditional serrated adenomas (TSAs). The incidence of early-onset CRC before the age of 50 is increasing, with limited understanding of SPs in younger cohorts. Using a large colonoscopy-based cohort, we characterized epidemiologic profiles of SP subtypes, compared to conventional adenomas, with secondary analysis on early-onset polyps. Ninety-four thousand four hundred and twenty-seven patients underwent screening colonoscopies between 2010 and 2018. Demographic, endoscopic and histopathologic characteristics of each polyp subtype were described. High-risk polyps included SSLs ≥10 mm/with dysplasia and conventional adenomas ≥10 mm/with tubulovillous/villous histology/high-grade dysplasia. We examined polyp prevalence with age and compared early- (age < 50) and late-onset polyps (age ≥ 50). Eighteen thousand one hundred and twenty-five patients had SPs (4357 SSLs, 15 415 HPs, 120 TSAs) and 26 699 had conventional adenomas. High-risk SSLs were enriched in the ascending colon (44.1% vs 2.6-35.8% for other locations; P < .003). Early- and late-onset SPs had similar subsite distribution. Early-onset conventional adenomas were more enriched in the distal colon/rectum (51.8% vs 43.4%, P < .001). Multiple conventional adenomas were more represented in late-onset groups (40.8% vs 33.8%, P < .001), with no difference in SSLs. The prevalence of conventional adenomas/high-risk conventional adenomas increased continuously with age, whereas the prevalence of SSLs/high-risk SSLs was stable from age 40 years onwards. A higher proportion of women were diagnosed with early-onset than late-onset SSLs (62.9% vs 57.6%, P = .03). Conventional adenomas, SSLs, early- and late-onset polyps have distinct epidemiology. The findings have implications for improved colonoscopy screening and surveillance and understanding the etiologic heterogeneity of CRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mathew Vithayathil
- Department of Epidemiology and Nutrition, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Scott Smith
- Department of Epidemiology and Nutrition, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Mingyang Song
- Department of Epidemiology and Nutrition, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Clinical and Translational Epidemiology Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Division of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Wang Y, Li L, Niu X, Gao F, Chai N, Linghu E. Melanosis coli: a contrast effect or an oncogenic effect? A large-scale retrospective cohort study. Int J Colorectal Dis 2023; 38:63. [PMID: 36884096 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-023-04357-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/23/2023] [Indexed: 03/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Melanosis coli is characterized by brown mucosa with pigmentation. Studies have showed an increased adenoma detection rate in melanosis patients, whether it is caused by a contrast effect or an oncogenic effect is still controversial. The detection of serrated polys in melanosis patients remains unknown. AIMS The study aimed to clarify the correlation of adenoma detection rate with melanosis coli and discuss outcomes in less-experienced endoscopists. Serrated polyp detection rate was also been investigated. METHODS A total of 2150 patients and 39,630 controls were enrolled. A propensity score matching method was used to balance covariates between the two groups. The detection of polyps, adenomas, serrated polyps, and their features was analyzed. RESULTS The polyp detection rate (44.65% vs 41.01%, P = 0.005) and adenoma detection rate (30.34% vs 23.92%, P < 0.001) were significantly higher, and the serrated polyp detection rate (0.93% vs 1.58%, P = 0.033) was significantly lower in melanosis coli. The percentage of low-risk adenomas (44.60% vs 39.16%, P < 0.001) and polyps with 6 to 10 mm in size (20.16% vs 16.21%, P < 0.001) were higher in melanosis coli. The detection of large serrated polyps was lower (0.11% vs 0.41%, P = 0.026) in melanosis coli. CONCLUSION Melanosis coli correlates with an increased adenoma detection rate. The detection of large serrated polyps was lower in melanosis patients. Melanosis coli may not be considered a precancerous lesion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yan Wang
- Nankai University School of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin, 300071, China
- Department of Gastroenterology, the First Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100853, China
| | - Longsong Li
- Department of Gastroenterology, the First Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100853, China
| | - Xiaotong Niu
- Department of Gastroenterology, the First Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100853, China
- Medical School of Chinese PLA, Beijing, 100853, China
| | - Fei Gao
- Department of Gastroenterology, the First Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100853, China
| | - Ningli Chai
- Department of Gastroenterology, the First Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100853, China.
| | - Enqiang Linghu
- Nankai University School of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin, 300071, China.
- Department of Gastroenterology, the First Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100853, China.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Fuccio L. The detection rate and yield of advanced relevant serrated polyps: one small step for the yield, one giant leap for the quality of colonoscopy. Endoscopy 2023; 55:535-536. [PMID: 36868264 DOI: 10.1055/a-2025-0922] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/05/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Lorenzo Fuccio
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.,IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna Policlinico S.Orsola, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Li J, Chen K, Wei Y, Zhang D, Wang Y, Hou X, Wu R, Peng K, Li L, Huang C, Wang Y, Xun L, Liu F. Colorectal sessile serrated lesion detection using linked-color imaging versus narrow-band imaging: a parallel randomized controlled trial. Endoscopy 2023; 55:546-554. [PMID: 36482165 DOI: 10.1055/a-1995-2685] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Previous studies have reported the effectiveness of narrow-band imaging (NBI) and linked-color imaging (LCI) in improving the detection of colorectal neoplasms. There has however been no direct comparison between LCI and NBI in the detection of colorectal sessile serrated lesions (SSLs). The present study aimed to compare the effectiveness of LCI and NBI in detecting colorectal SSLs. METHODS A prospective, parallel, randomized controlled trial was conducted. The participants were randomly assigned to the LCI or NBI arms. The primary end point was the SSL detection rate (SDR). RESULTS 406 patients were involved; 204 in the LCI arm and 202 in the NBI arm. The total polyp detection rate, adenoma detection rate, and SDR were 54.2 %, 38.7 %, and 10.8%, respectively. The SDR was not significantly different between the LCI and NBI arms (12.3 % vs. 9.4 %; P = 0.36). The differences in the detection rate and the per-patient number of polyps, adenomas, diminutive lesions, and flat lesions between LCI and NBI also were not statistically significant. Multivariate analysis showed that LCI and NBI were not independent factors associated with SDR, whereas Boston Bowel Preparation Scale score (odds ratio [OR] 1.35, 95 %CI 1.03-1.76; P = 0.03), withdrawal time (OR 1.13, 95 %CI 1.00-1.26; P = 0.04), and operator experience (OR 3.73, 95 %CI 1.67-8.32; P = 0.001) were independent factors associated with SDR. CONCLUSIONS LCI and NBI are comparable for SSL detection, as well as for the detection of polyps and adenomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jun Li
- Digestive Endoscopy Center, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.,Department of Gastroenterology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital Chongming Branch, Shanghai, China
| | - Kan Chen
- Digestive Endoscopy Center, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Yunlei Wei
- Digestive Endoscopy Center, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Di Zhang
- Digestive Endoscopy Center, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Yuxin Wang
- Digestive Endoscopy Center, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiaojia Hou
- Digestive Endoscopy Center, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Ruijin Wu
- Digestive Endoscopy Center, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Kangsheng Peng
- Digestive Endoscopy Center, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Lei Li
- Digestive Endoscopy Center, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Chao Huang
- Digestive Endoscopy Center, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Yilong Wang
- Digestive Endoscopy Center, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Linjuan Xun
- Digestive Endoscopy Center, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Feng Liu
- Digestive Endoscopy Center, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.,Department of Gastroenterology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital Chongming Branch, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
IJspeert JEG. Proximal serrated polyp detection rate and post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer: the missing link. Endoscopy 2023; 55:442-443. [PMID: 36702129 DOI: 10.1055/a-2003-1068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Joep E G IJspeert
- Department of Gastroenterology and hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Hassan C, Repici A, Rizkala T, Kaminski MF. Could the sessile serrated lesion detection rate become an ESGE quality parameter? Endosc Int Open 2023; 11:E105-E106. [PMID: 36712909 PMCID: PMC9879631 DOI: 10.1055/a-2007-1644] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Cesare Hassan
- Humanitas University, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Pieve Emanuele, Italy,Humanitas Clinical and Research Center –IRCCS-, Endoscopy Unit, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Alessandro Repici
- Humanitas University, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Pieve Emanuele, Italy,Humanitas Clinical and Research Center –IRCCS-, Endoscopy Unit, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Tommy Rizkala
- Humanitas University, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Pieve Emanuele, Italy
| | - Michal F. Kaminski
- Department of Gastroenterological Oncology, The Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, and Medical Center for Postgraduate Education, Warsaw, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
van Toledo DEFWM, Breekveldt ECH, IJspeert JEG, van Vuuren AJ, van Kemenade FJ, Ramakers C, Nagtegaal ID, van Leerdam ME, Spaander MCW, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, Toes-Zoutendijk E, Dekker E. Advanced serrated polyps as a target of screening: detection rate and positive predictive value within a fecal immunochemical test-based colorectal cancer screening population. Endoscopy 2023; 55:526-534. [PMID: 36323332 DOI: 10.1055/a-1971-3488] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND : Advanced serrated polyps (ASPs) have a comparable risk to advanced adenomas for progression to colorectal cancer (CRC). The yield of most CRC screening programs, however, is based on advanced adenomas and CRC only. We assessed the ASP detection rate, and positive predictive value (PPV) including ASPs in a fecal immunochemical test (FIT)-based screening program. METHODS : We analyzed the findings of follow-up colonoscopies of FIT-positive screenees in the Dutch CRC screening program from 2014 until 2020. Data were retrieved from the national screening and pathology database. An ASP was defined as any serrated polyp of ≥ 10 mm, sessile serrated lesion with dysplasia, or traditional serrated adenoma. The ASP detection rate was defined as the proportion of colonoscopies with ≥ 1 ASP. PPV was originally defined as the proportion of individuals with a CRC or advanced adenoma. The updated PPV definition included CRCs, advanced adenomas, and/or ASPs. RESULTS : 322 882 colonoscopies were included in the analyses. The overall detection rate of ASPs was 5.9 %. ASPs were detected more often in women than men (6.3 % vs. 5.6 %; P < 0.001). ASP detection rates in individuals aged 55-59, 60-64, 65-69, and 70 + were 5.2 %, 6.1 %, 6.1 %, and 5.9 %, respectively (P < 0.001). The PPV for CRCs and advanced adenomas was 41.1 % and increased to 43.8 % when including ASPs. The PPV increase was larger in women than in men (3.2 vs. 2.4 percentage points). CONCLUSIONS : 5.9 % of FIT-positive screenees had ASPs, but half of these were detected in combination with a CRC or advanced adenoma. Therefore, including ASPs results in a small increase in the yield of FIT-based screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David E F W M van Toledo
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Amsterdam Gastroenterology, Endocrinology & Metabolism, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Emilie C H Breekveldt
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Joep E G IJspeert
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Amsterdam Gastroenterology, Endocrinology & Metabolism, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anneke J van Vuuren
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Folkert J van Kemenade
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Christian Ramakers
- Department of Clinical Chemistry, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Iris D Nagtegaal
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Monique E van Leerdam
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.,Department of Gastroenterology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Manon C W Spaander
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Esther Toes-Zoutendijk
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Evelien Dekker
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Amsterdam Gastroenterology, Endocrinology & Metabolism, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Sung JJY, Chiu HM, Lieberman D, Kuipers EJ, Rutter MD, Macrae F, Yeoh KG, Ang TL, Chong VH, John S, Li J, Wu K, Ng SSM, Makharia GK, Abdullah M, Kobayashi N, Sekiguchi M, Byeon JS, Kim HS, Parry S, Cabral-Prodigalidad PAI, Wu DC, Khomvilai S, Lui RN, Wong S, Lin YM, Dekker E. Third Asia-Pacific consensus recommendations on colorectal cancer screening and postpolypectomy surveillance. Gut 2022; 71:2152-2166. [PMID: 36002247 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2022-327377] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2022] [Accepted: 08/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/09/2022]
Abstract
The Asia-Pacific region has the largest number of cases of colorectal cancer (CRC) and one of the highest levels of mortality due to this condition in the world. Since the publishing of two consensus recommendations in 2008 and 2015, significant advancements have been made in our knowledge of epidemiology, pathology and the natural history of the adenoma-carcinoma progression. Based on the most updated epidemiological and clinical studies in this region, considering literature from international studies, and adopting the modified Delphi process, the Asia-Pacific Working Group on Colorectal Cancer Screening has updated and revised their recommendations on (1) screening methods and preferred strategies; (2) age for starting and terminating screening for CRC; (3) screening for individuals with a family history of CRC or advanced adenoma; (4) surveillance for those with adenomas; (5) screening and surveillance for sessile serrated lesions and (6) quality assurance of screening programmes. Thirteen countries/regions in the Asia-Pacific region were represented in this exercise. International advisors from North America and Europe were invited to participate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Han-Mo Chiu
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.,Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | | | | | | | - Finlay Macrae
- The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | | | - Vui Heng Chong
- Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha Hospital, Brunei, Brunei Darussalam
| | - Sneha John
- Digestive Health, Endoscopy, Gold Coast University Hospital, Southport, Queensland, Australia
| | - Jingnan Li
- Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Kaichun Wu
- Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China
| | - Simon S M Ng
- The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | | | - Murdani Abdullah
- Division of Gastroenterology, Pancreatibiliar and Digestive Endoscopy. Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Dr Cipto Mangunkusumo, Jakarta, Indonesia.,Human Cancer Research Center. IMERI. Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia
| | - Nozomu Kobayashi
- Cancer Screening Center/ Endoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.,Division of Screening Technology, National Cancer Center Institute for Cancer Control, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masau Sekiguchi
- Cancer Screening Center/ Endoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.,Division of Screening Technology, National Cancer Center Institute for Cancer Control, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Jeong-Sik Byeon
- University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea (the Republic of)
| | - Hyun-Soo Kim
- Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea (the Republic of)
| | - Susan Parry
- National Bowel Screening Programme, New Zealand Ministry of Health, Auckland, New Zealand.,The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | | | | | | | - Rashid N Lui
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Prince of Wales Hospital, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong.,Institute of Digestive Disease, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Sunny Wong
- Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Singapore
| | - Yu-Min Lin
- Shin Kong Wu Ho Su Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - E Dekker
- Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Cui R, Yang R, Liu F, Cai C. N-Net: Lesion region segmentations using the generalized hybrid dilated convolutions for polyps in colonoscopy images. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2022; 10:963590. [DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.963590] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2022] [Accepted: 08/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer is the cancer with the second highest and the third highest incidence rates for the female and the male, respectively. Colorectal polyps are potential prognostic indicators of colorectal cancer, and colonoscopy is the gold standard for the biopsy and the removal of colorectal polyps. In this scenario, one of the main concerns is to ensure the accuracy of lesion region identifications. However, the missing rate of polyps through manual observations in colonoscopy can reach 14%–30%. In this paper, we focus on the identifications of polyps in clinical colonoscopy images and propose a new N-shaped deep neural network (N-Net) structure to conduct the lesion region segmentations. The encoder-decoder framework is adopted in the N-Net structure and the DenseNet modules are implemented in the encoding path of the network. Moreover, we innovatively propose the strategy to design the generalized hybrid dilated convolution (GHDC), which enables flexible dilated rates and convolutional kernel sizes, to facilitate the transmission of the multi-scale information with the respective fields expanded. Based on the strategy of GHDC designing, we design four GHDC blocks to connect the encoding and the decoding paths. Through the experiments on two publicly available datasets on polyp segmentations of colonoscopy images: the Kvasir-SEG dataset and the CVC-ClinicDB dataset, the rationality and superiority of the proposed GHDC blocks and the proposed N-Net are verified. Through the comparative studies with the state-of-the-art methods, such as TransU-Net, DeepLabV3+ and CA-Net, we show that even with a small amount of network parameters, the N-Net outperforms with the Dice of 94.45%, the average symmetric surface distance (ASSD) of 0.38 pix and the mean intersection-over-union (mIoU) of 89.80% on the Kvasir-SEG dataset, and with the Dice of 97.03%, the ASSD of 0.16 pix and the mIoU of 94.35% on the CVC-ClinicDB dataset.
Collapse
|
49
|
Ijspeert JEG, van Toledo DEFWM, Dekker E. Proximal serrated polyp detection rate and interval post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer risk – Authors' reply. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022; 7:907-908. [DOI: 10.1016/s2468-1253(22)00273-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2022] [Accepted: 08/01/2022] [Indexed: 10/14/2022]
|
50
|
Asokkumar R, Chiu HM, Kaltenbach T, Matsuda T, Soetikno R. Proximal serrated polyp detection rate and interval post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer risk. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022; 7:907. [DOI: 10.1016/s2468-1253(22)00237-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2022] [Accepted: 07/07/2022] [Indexed: 10/14/2022]
|