1
|
Staccione A, Brown C, Arneth A, Rounsevell M, Hrast Essenfelder A, Seo B, Mysiak J. Exploring the effects of protected area networks on the European land system. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 2023; 337:117741. [PMID: 36966632 DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117741] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2022] [Revised: 02/21/2023] [Accepted: 03/12/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
The European Union's Biodiversity Strategy for 2030 seeks to protect 30% of land, with 10% under strict protection, while building a transnational nature network. We explore the effects of the Biodiversity Strategy targets for land use and ecosystem services across the European land system. To do so, we propose a novel approach, combining a methodological framework for improving green network connectivity with an EU-wide land system model. We identify an improved network of EU protected areas consistent with the 2030 targets, and explore its effects under different levels of protection and in a range of paired climatic and socio-economic scenarios. The existing network of protected areas is highly fragmented, with more than one third of its nodes being isolated. We find that prioritizing connectivity when implementing new protected areas could achieve the strategy's targets without compromising the future provision of ecosystem services, including food production, in Europe. However, we also find that EU-wide distributions of land uses and ecosystem services are influenced by the protected area network, and that this influence manifests differently in different climatic and socio-economic scenarios. Varying the strength of protection of the network had limited effects. Extractive services (food and timber production) decreased in protected areas, but non-extractive services increased, with compensatory changes occurring outside the network. Changes were small where competition for land was low and scenario conditions were benign, but became far larger and more extensive where competition was high and scenario conditions were challenging. Our findings highlight the apparent achievability of the EU's protected area targets, but also the need to account for adaptation in the wider land system and its consequences for spatial and temporal patterns of ecosystem services provision now and in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Staccione
- Euro-Mediterranean Center on Climate Change and Ca' Foscari University of Venice, Edificio Porta dell'Innovazione - Piano 2, Via della Libertà, 12, 30175, Marghera-Venice, VE, Italy; Institute of Meteorology and Climate Research, Atmospheric Environmental Research (IMK-IFU), Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Kreuzeckbahnstraße 19, 82467, Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany.
| | - Calum Brown
- Institute of Meteorology and Climate Research, Atmospheric Environmental Research (IMK-IFU), Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Kreuzeckbahnstraße 19, 82467, Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany
| | - Almut Arneth
- Institute of Meteorology and Climate Research, Atmospheric Environmental Research (IMK-IFU), Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Kreuzeckbahnstraße 19, 82467, Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany; Institute of Geography and Geo-ecology, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Kaiserstraße 12, Building 10.50, 76131, Karlsruhe, Germany
| | - Mark Rounsevell
- Institute of Meteorology and Climate Research, Atmospheric Environmental Research (IMK-IFU), Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Kreuzeckbahnstraße 19, 82467, Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany; Institute of Geography and Geo-ecology, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Kaiserstraße 12, Building 10.50, 76131, Karlsruhe, Germany; School of Geosciences, University of Edinburgh, Drummond Street, Edinburgh, EH8 9XP, UK
| | | | - Bumsuk Seo
- Institute of Meteorology and Climate Research, Atmospheric Environmental Research (IMK-IFU), Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Kreuzeckbahnstraße 19, 82467, Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany
| | - Jaroslav Mysiak
- Euro-Mediterranean Center on Climate Change and Ca' Foscari University of Venice, Edificio Porta dell'Innovazione - Piano 2, Via della Libertà, 12, 30175, Marghera-Venice, VE, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zhao J, Xiao Y, Zhang Y, Shao Y, Ma T, Kou X, Zhang Y, Sang W, Axmacher JC. Socioeconomic development shows positive links to the conservation efficiency of China's protected area network. GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY 2023; 29:3433-3448. [PMID: 36946769 DOI: 10.1111/gcb.16691] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2022] [Accepted: 03/13/2023] [Indexed: 05/16/2023]
Abstract
While the protected area (PA) covers >15% of the planet's terrestrial land area and continues to expand, factors determining its effectiveness in conserving endangered species are being debated. We investigated the links between direct anthropogenic pressures, socioeconomic settings, and the coverage of vertebrate taxa by China's PA network, and indicated that high socioeconomic status and low levels of human pressure correlate with high species coverage, with threatened mammals more effectively conserved than reptiles or amphibians. Positive links between conservation outcomes and socioeconomic progress appear linked to local livelihood improvements triggering positive perceptions of local PAs-aided further by ecological compensation and tourism schemes introduced in wealthy areas and reinforced by continued positive conservation outcomes. Socioeconomic development of China's less developed regions might assist regional PA efficiency and achievement of the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework, while also addressing potential shortcomings from an insufficient past focus on socioeconomic impacts for biodiversity conservation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jinqi Zhao
- Minzu University of China, 27 Zhongguancun South Avenue, Beijing, 100081, China
| | - Yi Xiao
- Minzu University of China, 27 Zhongguancun South Avenue, Beijing, 100081, China
| | - Yanliang Zhang
- Minzu University of China, 27 Zhongguancun South Avenue, Beijing, 100081, China
| | - Yuting Shao
- Minzu University of China, 27 Zhongguancun South Avenue, Beijing, 100081, China
| | - Tianxiao Ma
- Minzu University of China, 27 Zhongguancun South Avenue, Beijing, 100081, China
| | - Xiaojun Kou
- Beijing Normal University, No. 19, Xinjiekouwai St, Haidian District, Beijing, 100875, China
| | - Yuanyuan Zhang
- Beijing Milu Ecological Research Center, Beijing, 100076, China
| | - Weiguo Sang
- Minzu University of China, 27 Zhongguancun South Avenue, Beijing, 100081, China
| | - Jan Christoph Axmacher
- UCL Department of Geography, University College London, London, WC1E 6BT, UK
- Agricultural University of Iceland, Keldnaholt, Reykjavik, Iceland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Li D, Bai Y, Lei W, Que P, Liu Y, Pagani‐Núñez E, Lloyd H, Zhang Z. Mammalian predators and vegetated nesting habitat drive reduced protected area nesting success of Kentish plovers, Yellow Sea region, China. Ecol Evol 2023; 13:e9884. [PMID: 36919018 PMCID: PMC10008299 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.9884] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2022] [Revised: 02/14/2023] [Accepted: 02/17/2023] [Indexed: 03/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Protected areas provide essential habitats for wildlife by conserving natural and semi-natural habitats and reducing human disturbance. However, whether breeding birds vulnerable to nest predation can benefit from strict land management in the protected area is unclear. Here, we compare the nesting performance of two groups of a ground-nesting shorebird, the Kentish plover (Charadrius alexandrinus), in the protected area (Liaohekou Natural Reserve, hereinafter PA), and the control non-protected area (non-PA) around the Liaohekou Natural Reserve, in the north of the Yellow Sea, China, and identify which environmental factors, such as nesting habitat and nest materials, influence the daily nest survival rate (DSR). We found similar nesting habitats in both study areas, dominated by bare land or Suaeda salsa grassland. However, DSR was lower in PA (0.91 ± 0.01) than in non-PA (0.97 ± 0.01). Kentish plovers nesting in areas with vegetation cover experienced lower DSR than in bare lands in both areas, and nests built with materials of S. salsa sticks had the lowest DSR in the bare land. Data from infrared cameras confirmed relatively higher predator abundances and nest predation rates by nocturnal mammals, such as Eurasian badgers (Meles meles), in PA than in non-PA, and this pattern was especially evident for plover nests located in S. salsa grassland. Our results suggest that Liaohekou Natural Reserve protected area may not necessarily provide safe nesting sites for Kentish plovers due to the abundance of generalist mammal nest predators. However, the PA includes about 80% of the nests from both locations. This means the contribution of the total number of successful nests continues to be much higher within PA, with the benefit for the species that this brings in terms of conservation. The variation and mechanisms underlying differences in the nest predator communities of PA and non-PA deserve further study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Donglai Li
- Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Resource and Epidemic Disease Prevention, College of Life SciencesLiaoning UniversityShenyangChina
| | - Yu Bai
- Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Resource and Epidemic Disease Prevention, College of Life SciencesLiaoning UniversityShenyangChina
| | - Weipan Lei
- Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Biodiversity Science and Ecological Engineering, College of Life SciencesBeijing Normal UniversityBeijingChina
| | - Pinjia Que
- Chengdu Research Base of Giant Panda BreedingChengduChina
- Sichuan Key Laboratory of Conservation Biology for Endangered WildlifeChengduChina
- Sichuan Academy of Giant PandaChengduChina
| | - Yang Liu
- State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, School of EcologySun Yat‐sen UniversityGuangzhouChina
| | - Emilio Pagani‐Núñez
- Department of Health and Environmental SciencesXi'an Jiaotong‐Liverpool UniversitySuzhouChina
- School of Applied SciencesEdinburgh Napier UniversityEdinburghUK
- Centre for Conservation and Restoration ScienceEdinburgh Napier UniversityEdinburghUK
| | - Huw Lloyd
- Department of Natural Sciences, Ecology and Environment Research CentreManchester Metropolitan UniversityManchesterUK
| | - Zhengwang Zhang
- Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Biodiversity Science and Ecological Engineering, College of Life SciencesBeijing Normal UniversityBeijingChina
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Diversity and Endemism of Southern African Gekkonids Linked with the Escarpment Has Implications for Conservation Priorities. DIVERSITY 2023. [DOI: 10.3390/d15020306] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/22/2023]
Abstract
South Africa is recognised for its high reptile diversity and endemism, specifically among lizards. Phylogenetic diversity, endemism, and richness can have clear implications or raise important questions in a range of fields, and most urgently in conservation. Among squamate reptiles, these indices are very commonly associated with high temperatures and topographic heterogeneity. Indeed, mountainous biogeography has been a critical driver in the radiation of the family Gekkonidae within the subregion. Here, we assess the species richness, diversity, and endemism of Gekkonidae species inhabiting South Africa, Lesotho, and Eswatini, accounting for phylogenetic relationships. We also employ the CANAPE method to identify regions that have neo- and/or paleoendemics. Southern African gekkonids appear to be most diverse and show high levels of endemism in three regions of Southern Africa: the northwestern Richtersveld, the escarpment running west to southeast, and the northeastern escarpment in the Limpopo province. Implications for conservation priorities are discussed.
Collapse
|
5
|
Chowdhury S, Jennions MD, Zalucki MP, Maron M, Watson JEM, Fuller RA. Protected areas and the future of insect conservation. Trends Ecol Evol 2023; 38:85-95. [PMID: 36208964 DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2022.09.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2021] [Revised: 08/23/2022] [Accepted: 09/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Anthropogenic pressures are driving insect declines across the world. Although protected areas (PAs) play a prominent role in safeguarding many vertebrate species from human-induced threats, insects are not widely considered when designing PA systems or building strategies for PA management. We review the effectiveness of PAs for insect conservation and find substantial taxonomic and geographic gaps in knowledge. Most research focuses on the representation of species, and few studies assess threats to insects or the role that effective PA management can play in insect conservation. We propose a four-step research agenda to help ensure that insects are central in efforts to expand the global PA network under the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shawan Chowdhury
- School of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia; Institute of Biodiversity, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Dornburger Straße 159, 07743 Jena, Germany; Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), Department of Ecosystem Services, Permoserstraße 15, 04318 Leipzig, Germany; German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Puschstraße 4, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.
| | - Michael D Jennions
- Division of Ecology and Evolution, Research School of Biology, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2600, Australia
| | - Myron P Zalucki
- School of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia
| | - Martine Maron
- School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia
| | - James E M Watson
- School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia
| | - Richard A Fuller
- School of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Chaudhary S, Uddin K, Chettri N, Thapa R, Sharma E. Protected areas in the Hindu Kush Himalaya: A regional assessment of the status, distribution, and gaps. CONSERVATION SCIENCE AND PRACTICE 2022. [DOI: 10.1111/csp2.12793] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Sunita Chaudhary
- International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development Kathmandu Nepal
- Macquarie University Sydney New South Wales Australia
| | - Kabir Uddin
- International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development Kathmandu Nepal
| | - Nakul Chettri
- International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development Kathmandu Nepal
| | - Rajesh Thapa
- University of New England Armidale New South Wales Australia
| | - Eklabya Sharma
- International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development Kathmandu Nepal
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Stachowiak C, Crain BJ, Kroetz K, Sanchirico JN, Armsworth PR. The Impact Of Recreational Use And Access On Biotic And Abiotic Disturbances On Areas Protected By Local Communities And A State Conservation Agency. J Nat Conserv 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jnc.2022.126216] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
8
|
Landscape Changes in Protected Areas in Poland. SUSTAINABILITY 2022. [DOI: 10.3390/su14020753] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Land-Use Cover Changes (LUCCs) are one of the main problems for the preservation of landscapes and natural biodiversity. Protected Areas (PAs) do not escape this threat. Poland is among the European leaders in terms of the variety of landscapes and the share of an area designated as a protected area. However, as many as 78% of the habitats have poor or bad conservation status based on EEA reports. This article analyzes the LUCCs between 2000 and 2018 in various types of the Polish legal forms of nature protection areas and the European Natura 2000 network within the country. The research material was: the data of Corine Land Cover (CLC), the Central Register of Nature Protection Forms, and high-resolution layers, such as HRL and orthophotos. The results were compiled according to the CLC class and forms of protection. The matrix of transformations showed that the most frequently transformed CLC class was 312 (coniferous forest). It was transformed into class 324 (transitional woodland shrubs). The changes in PAs were usually smaller than in the surrounding buffer zones, which may indicate their effectiveness. The exception was the areas of the European Natura 2000 network. The scale of land-cover flows (LCFs) changed within particular forms of protected areas, though afforestation and deforestation predominating in all area types. National reserves and parks were the most stable in terms of land cover structures. However, human settlements increased around the protected areas, potentially increasing threats to their ecological integrity.
Collapse
|
9
|
Augusteyn J, McCarthy MA, Robley A, Pople A, Nolan B, Hemson G, Melzer R, Richards S, Dinwoodie A. Bringing back the endangered bridled nail-tailed wallaby at Taunton National Park (Scientific) through effective predator control. WILDLIFE RESEARCH 2022. [DOI: 10.1071/wr21067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
|
10
|
Hernandez S, Benham C, Miller RL, Sheaves M, Duce S. What drives modern protected area establishment in Australia? CONSERVATION SCIENCE AND PRACTICE 2021. [DOI: 10.1111/csp2.501] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie Hernandez
- College of Science and Engineering, James Cook University Townsville Queensland Australia
| | - Claudia Benham
- College of Science and Engineering, James Cook University Townsville Queensland Australia
- School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, The University of Queensland St Lucia Queensland Australia
| | - Rachel L. Miller
- College of Science and Engineering, James Cook University Townsville Queensland Australia
| | - Marcus Sheaves
- Marine Data Technology Hub, College of Science and Engineering, James Cook University Douglas Queensland Australia
- Centre for Tropical Water and Aquatic Ecosystem Research (TropWATER), College of Science and Engineering, James Cook University Douglas Queensland Australia
| | - Stephanie Duce
- College of Science and Engineering, James Cook University Townsville Queensland Australia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Hernandez S, Barnes MD, Duce S, Adams VM. The impact of strictly protected areas in a deforestation hotspot. CONSERVATION SCIENCE AND PRACTICE 2021. [DOI: 10.1111/csp2.479] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie Hernandez
- College of Science and Engineering James Cook University Townsville Queensland Australia
| | - Megan D. Barnes
- Centre for Environmental Economics and Policy The University of Western Australia Crawley Western Australia Australia
| | - Stephanie Duce
- College of Science and Engineering James Cook University Townsville Queensland Australia
| | - Vanessa M. Adams
- School of Technology, Environments and Design University of Tasmania Hobart TAS Australia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Katuwal HB, Zhang M, Baral HS, Sharma HP, Quan RC. Assessment of farmers' knowledge and perceptions towards farmland birds show the need of conservation interventions. Glob Ecol Conserv 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.gecco.2021.e01563] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
|
13
|
Ortega-Andrade HM, Rodes Blanco M, Cisneros-Heredia DF, Guerra Arévalo N, López de Vargas-Machuca KG, Sánchez-Nivicela JC, Armijos-Ojeda D, Cáceres Andrade JF, Reyes-Puig C, Quezada Riera AB, Székely P, Rojas Soto OR, Székely D, Guayasamin JM, Siavichay Pesántez FR, Amador L, Betancourt R, Ramírez-Jaramillo SM, Timbe-Borja B, Gómez Laporta M, Webster Bernal JF, Oyagata Cachimuel LA, Chávez Jácome D, Posse V, Valle-Piñuela C, Padilla Jiménez D, Reyes-Puig JP, Terán-Valdez A, Coloma LA, Pérez Lara MB, Carvajal-Endara S, Urgilés M, Yánez Muñoz MH. Red List assessment of amphibian species of Ecuador: A multidimensional approach for their conservation. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0251027. [PMID: 33956885 PMCID: PMC8101765 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2020] [Accepted: 04/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Ecuador is one of the most biodiverse countries in the world, but faces severe pressures and threats to its natural ecosystems. Numerous species have declined and require to be objectively evaluated and quantified, as a step towards the development of conservation strategies. Herein, we present an updated National Red List Assessment for amphibian species of Ecuador, with one of the most detailed and complete coverages for any Ecuadorian taxonomic group to date. Based on standardized methodologies that integrate taxonomic work, spatial analyses, and ecological niche modeling, we assessed the extinction risk and identified the main threats for all Ecuadorian native amphibians (635 species), using the IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria. Our evaluation reveals that 57% (363 species) are categorized as Threatened, 12% (78 species) as Near Threatened, 4% (26 species) as Data Deficient, and 27% (168 species) as Least Concern. Our assessment almost doubles the number of threatened species in comparison with previous evaluations. In addition to habitat loss, the expansion of the agricultural/cattle raising frontier and other anthropogenic threats (roads, human settlements, and mining/oil activities) amplify the incidence of other pressures as relevant predictors of ecological integrity. Potential synergic effects with climate change and emergent diseases (apparently responsible for the sudden declines), had particular importance amongst the threats sustained by Ecuadorian amphibians. Most threatened species are distributed in montane forests and paramo habitats of the Andes, with nearly 10% of them occurring outside the National System of Protected Areas of the Ecuadorian government. Based on our results, we recommend the following actions: (i) An increase of the National System of Protected Areas to include threatened species. (ii) Supporting the ex/in-situ conservation programs to protect species considered like Critically Endangered and Endangered. (iii) Focalizing research efforts towards the description of new species, as well as species currently categorized as Data Deficient (DD) that may turn out to be threatened. The implementation of the described actions is challenging, but urgent, given the current conservation crisis faced by amphibians.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H. Mauricio Ortega-Andrade
- Grupo de Biogeografía y Ecología Espacial, Universidad Regional Amazónica Ikiam, Tena, Ecuador
- Instituto Nacional de Biodiversidad, Casilla, Quito, Ecuador
- * E-mail:
| | - Marina Rodes Blanco
- Grupo de Biogeografía y Ecología Espacial, Universidad Regional Amazónica Ikiam, Tena, Ecuador
| | - Diego F. Cisneros-Heredia
- Instituto Nacional de Biodiversidad, Casilla, Quito, Ecuador
- Instituto de Diversidad Biológica Tropical iBIOTROP, Museo de Zoología & Laboratorio de Zoología Terrestre, Universidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ, Quito, Ecuador
| | - Nereida Guerra Arévalo
- Grupo de Biogeografía y Ecología Espacial, Universidad Regional Amazónica Ikiam, Tena, Ecuador
| | | | - Juan C. Sánchez-Nivicela
- Instituto Nacional de Biodiversidad, Casilla, Quito, Ecuador
- Instituto de Diversidad Biológica Tropical iBIOTROP, Museo de Zoología & Laboratorio de Zoología Terrestre, Universidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ, Quito, Ecuador
- Grupo de Investigación Evolución y Ecología de Fauna Neotropical, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá D.C., Colombia
| | - Diego Armijos-Ojeda
- Laboratorio de Ecología Tropical y Servicios Ecosistémicos (EcoSs-Lab), Departamento de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Técnica Particular de Loja, Loja, Ecuador
| | | | - Carolina Reyes-Puig
- Instituto Nacional de Biodiversidad, Casilla, Quito, Ecuador
- Instituto de Diversidad Biológica Tropical iBIOTROP, Museo de Zoología & Laboratorio de Zoología Terrestre, Universidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ, Quito, Ecuador
| | | | - Paul Székely
- Laboratorio de Ecología Tropical y Servicios Ecosistémicos (EcoSs-Lab), Departamento de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Técnica Particular de Loja, Loja, Ecuador
| | | | - Diana Székely
- Laboratorio de Ecología Tropical y Servicios Ecosistémicos (EcoSs-Lab), Departamento de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Técnica Particular de Loja, Loja, Ecuador
| | - Juan M. Guayasamin
- Laboratorio de Biología Evolutiva, Colegio de Ciencias Biológicas y Ambientales COCIBA, Instituto Biósfera USFQ, Universidad San Francisco de Quito, Quito, Ecuador
| | | | - Luis Amador
- Instituto de Ciencias Ambientales y Evolutivas, Doctorado en Ciencias m. Ecología y Evolución, Universidad Austral de Chile, Valdivia, Chile
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Daniel Chávez Jácome
- Instituto de Ciencias Ambientales y Evolutivas, Doctorado en Ciencias m. Ecología y Evolución, Universidad Austral de Chile, Valdivia, Chile
| | - Valentina Posse
- Laboratorio de Ecología Tropical y Servicios Ecosistémicos (EcoSs-Lab), Departamento de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Técnica Particular de Loja, Loja, Ecuador
| | | | | | - Juan Pablo Reyes-Puig
- Instituto Nacional de Biodiversidad, Casilla, Quito, Ecuador
- Fundación Ecominga/Fundación Oscar Efrén Reyes, Baños, Ecuador
| | - Andrea Terán-Valdez
- Centro Jambatu de Investigación y Conservación de Anfibios, Fundación Jambatu, Quito, Ecuador
| | - Luis A. Coloma
- Centro Jambatu de Investigación y Conservación de Anfibios, Fundación Jambatu, Quito, Ecuador
| | | | - Sofía Carvajal-Endara
- Centro Jambatu de Investigación y Conservación de Anfibios, Fundación Jambatu, Quito, Ecuador
| | - Miguel Urgilés
- Instituto Nacional de Biodiversidad, Casilla, Quito, Ecuador
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Seidl A, Mulungu K, Arlaud M, van den Heuvel O, Riva M. The effectiveness of national biodiversity investments to protect the wealth of nature. Nat Ecol Evol 2021; 5:530-539. [PMID: 33462490 DOI: 10.1038/s41559-020-01372-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2019] [Accepted: 11/26/2020] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Finance will be among the priority concerns when the United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity launches the post-2020 framework for global biodiversity conservation (Global Biodiversity Framework) in 2021. The Biodiversity Finance Initiative provides a means for countries to account systematically for their biodiversity expenditures. A sample of 30 countries facilitated the construction of a panel to better understand the effectiveness of public biodiversity investments. Overall, the results show a positive trend in national public biodiversity investments and that larger economies invest more in biodiversity in gross magnitude and as a percentage of gross domestic product (GDP) (0.30% of GDP among wealthy countries versus 0.29%) and of national budgets (1.78% versus 1.14%). Controlling for GDP, wealthier countries invest proportionately less than less wealthy countries. The relationship between GDP and public biodiversity expenditure is an inverted-U curve. All biodiversity-related variables (threatened species, protected area and the presence of a hotspot) were positively correlated with public biodiversity investments. Funds allocated to biodiversity are associated with a reduction in the number of threatened species and the rate of biodiversity loss of about 1% per year. Each US$1 billion investment in biodiversity is associated with an annual reduction in the proportion of threatened to total species of about 0.57%. Population growth is associated with lower financial support for biodiversity and an increase in the proportion of threatened to total species in a country.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Seidl
- Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA. .,Biodiversity Finance Initiative (BIOFIN), United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), New York, NY, USA.
| | - Kelvin Mulungu
- Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA
| | | | - Onno van den Heuvel
- Biodiversity Finance Initiative (BIOFIN), United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), New York, NY, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Kraus D, Murphy S, Armitage D. Ten bridges on the road to recovering Canada’s endangered species. Facets (Ott) 2021. [DOI: 10.1139/facets-2020-0084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Wildlife is declining around the world. Many developed nations have enacted legislation on endangered species protection and provide funding for wildlife recovery. Protecting endangered species is also supported by the public and judiciary. Yet, despite what appear as enabling conditions, wild species continue to decline. Our paper explores pathways to endangered species recovery by analyzing the barriers that have been identified in Canada, the United States, and Australia. We summarize these findings based on Canada’s Species at Risk Conservation Cycle (assessment, protection, recovery planning, implementation, and monitoring and evaluation) and then identify 10 “bridges” that could help overcome these barriers and bend our current trajectory of wildlife loss to recovery. These bridges include ecosystem approaches to recovery, building capacity for community co-governance, linking wildlife recovery to ecosystem services, and improving our storytelling about the loss and recovery of wildlife. The focus of our conclusions is the Canadian setting, but our findings can be applied in other national and subnational settings to reverse the decline of wildlife and halt extinction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Kraus
- Faculty of Environment, School of Environment, Resources and Sustainability, University of Waterloo, Environment 2, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
- Nature Conservancy of Canada, 245 Eglinton Avenue East, Suite 410, Toronto, ON M4P 3J1, Canada
| | - Stephen Murphy
- Faculty of Environment, School of Environment, Resources and Sustainability, University of Waterloo, Environment 2, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
| | - Derek Armitage
- Faculty of Environment, School of Environment, Resources and Sustainability, University of Waterloo, Environment 2, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Jones AR, Jessop TS, Ariefiandy A, Brook BW, Brown SC, Ciofi C, Benu YJ, Purwandana D, Sitorus T, Wigley TML, Fordham DA. Identifying island safe havens to prevent the extinction of the World's largest lizard from global warming. Ecol Evol 2020; 10:10492-10507. [PMID: 33072275 PMCID: PMC7548163 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.6705] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2020] [Accepted: 07/30/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
The Komodo dragon (Varanus komodoensis) is an endangered, island‐endemic species with a naturally restricted distribution. Despite this, no previous studies have attempted to predict the effects of climate change on this iconic species. We used extensive Komodo dragon monitoring data, climate, and sea‐level change projections to build spatially explicit demographic models for the Komodo dragon. These models project the species’ future range and abundance under multiple climate change scenarios. We ran over one million model simulations with varying model parameters, enabling us to incorporate uncertainty introduced from three main sources: (a) structure of global climate models, (b) choice of greenhouse gas emission trajectories, and (c) estimates of Komodo dragon demographic parameters. Our models predict a reduction in range‐wide Komodo dragon habitat of 8%–87% by 2050, leading to a decrease in habitat patch occupancy of 25%–97% and declines of 27%–99% in abundance across the species' range. We show that the risk of extirpation on the two largest protected islands in Komodo National Park (Rinca and Komodo) was lower than other island populations, providing important safe havens for Komodo dragons under global warming. Given the severity and rate of the predicted changes to Komodo dragon habitat patch occupancy (a proxy for area of occupancy) and abundance, urgent conservation actions are required to avoid risk of extinction. These should, as a priority, be focused on managing habitat on the islands of Komodo and Rinca, reflecting these islands’ status as important refuges for the species in a warming world. Variability in our model projections highlights the importance of accounting for uncertainties in demographic and environmental parameters, structural assumptions of global climate models, and greenhouse gas emission scenarios when simulating species metapopulation dynamics under climate change.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alice R Jones
- The Environment Institute and School of Biological Sciences The University of Adelaide Adelaide SA Australia.,Department for Environment and Water Adelaide SA Australia
| | - Tim S Jessop
- Centre for Integrative Ecology School of Life and Environmental Sciences Deakin University Waurn Ponds Vic. Australia.,Komodo Survival Program Bali Indonesia
| | | | - Barry W Brook
- School of Natural Sciences University of Tasmania Hobart Tas Australia
| | - Stuart C Brown
- The Environment Institute and School of Biological Sciences The University of Adelaide Adelaide SA Australia
| | - Claudio Ciofi
- Komodo Survival Program Bali Indonesia.,Department of Biology University of Florence Sesto Fiorentino Italy
| | | | | | - Tamen Sitorus
- Balai Besar Konservasi Sumber Daya Alam Kupang Indonesia
| | - Tom M L Wigley
- The Environment Institute and School of Biological Sciences The University of Adelaide Adelaide SA Australia.,Climate and Global Dynamics Laboratory National Center for Atmospheric Research Boulder CO USA
| | - Damien A Fordham
- The Environment Institute and School of Biological Sciences The University of Adelaide Adelaide SA Australia
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Prowse TA, O'Connor PJ, Collard SJ, Rogers DJ. Eating away at protected areas: Total grazing pressure is undermining public land conservation. Glob Ecol Conserv 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.gecco.2019.e00754] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
|
18
|
Adams VM, O'Donnell J, Burley A, Lawson J, Auld TD, Brazill‐Boast J, Laws CA, Gallagher RV. Planning for success: Why conservation programs need a strategic program for recovering species. CONSERVATION SCIENCE AND PRACTICE 2019. [DOI: 10.1111/csp2.95] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Vanessa M. Adams
- Discipline of Geography and Spatial SciencesUniversity of Tasmania Hobart Tasmania
- Department of Biological SciencesMacquarie University North Ryde New South Wales
| | - Jessica O'Donnell
- Department of Biological SciencesMacquarie University North Ryde New South Wales
| | - Alana Burley
- Conservation and Regional Delivery DivisionNew South Wales Office of Environment and Heritage Sydney New South Wales
| | - James Lawson
- Department of Biological SciencesMacquarie University North Ryde New South Wales
| | - Tony D. Auld
- Science DivisionNew South Wales Office of Environment and Heritage Hurstville New South Wales
- School of Biological SciencesUniversity of Wollongong Wollongong New South Wales
- Centre for Ecosystem ScienceUniversity of New South Wales Sydney New South Wales
| | - James Brazill‐Boast
- Conservation and Regional Delivery DivisionNew South Wales Office of Environment and Heritage Sydney New South Wales
| | - Claire A. Laws
- Department of Biological SciencesMacquarie University North Ryde New South Wales
| | - Rachael V. Gallagher
- Department of Biological SciencesMacquarie University North Ryde New South Wales
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Steven R, Barnes M, Garnett ST, Garrard G, O'Connor J, Oliver JL, Robinson C, Tulloch A, Fuller RA. Aligning citizen science with best practice: Threatened species conservation in Australia. CONSERVATION SCIENCE AND PRACTICE 2019. [DOI: 10.1111/csp2.100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Rochelle Steven
- School of Biological SciencesThe University of Queensland St Lucia Queensland Australia
| | - Megan Barnes
- School of Biological SciencesThe University of Queensland St Lucia Queensland Australia
- Department of Natural Resources and Environmental ManagementUniversity of Hawai‘i at Mānoa Honolulu Hawai'i
| | - Stephen T. Garnett
- Research Institute for the Environment and LivelihoodsCharles Darwin University Casuarina Northwest Territories Australia
| | - Georgia Garrard
- ICON Science, School of Global, Urban and Social StudiesRMIT University Melbourne Victoria Australia
| | | | - Jessica L. Oliver
- School of Electrical Engineering and Computer ScienceQueensland University of Technology Brisbane Queensland Australia
| | - Cathy Robinson
- Land and Water, CSIRO Brisbane Queensland Australia
- Northern InstituteCharles Darwin University Casuarina Northwest Territories Australia
| | - Ayesha Tulloch
- Desert Ecology Research Group, School of Life and Environmental SciencesUniversity of Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia
- School of Earth and Environmental SciencesThe University of Queensland St. Lucia Queensland Australia
- Wildlife Conservation SocietyGlobal Conservation Program Bronx New York
| | - Richard A. Fuller
- School of Biological SciencesThe University of Queensland St Lucia Queensland Australia
| |
Collapse
|