1
|
Verhofstadt M, Moureau L, Pardon K, Liégeois A. Ethical perspectives regarding Euthanasia, including in the context of adult psychiatry: a qualitative interview study among healthcare workers in Belgium. BMC Med Ethics 2024; 25:60. [PMID: 38773465 PMCID: PMC11107029 DOI: 10.1186/s12910-024-01063-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2023] [Accepted: 05/15/2024] [Indexed: 05/23/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Previous research has explored euthanasia's ethical dimensions, primarily focusing on general practice and, to a lesser extent, psychiatry, mainly from the viewpoints of physicians and nurses. However, a gap exists in understanding the comprehensive value-based perspectives of other professionals involved in both somatic and psychiatric euthanasia. This paper aims to analyze the interplay among legal, medical, and ethical factors to clarify how foundational values shape the ethical discourse surrounding euthanasia in both somatic and psychiatric contexts. It seeks to explore these dynamics among all healthcare professionals and volunteers in Belgium. METHODS Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 30 Dutch-speaking healthcare workers who had encountered patients requesting euthanasia for psychiatric conditions, in Belgium, from August 2019 to August 2020. Qualitative thematic analysis was applied to the interview transcripts. FINDINGS Participants identified three pivotal values and virtues: religious values, professional values, and fundamental medical values encompassing autonomy, beneficence, and non-maleficence, linked to compassion, quality care, and justice. These values interwove across four tiers: the patient, the patient's inner circle, the medical realm, and society at large. Irrespective of their euthanasia stance, participants generally displayed a blend of ethical values across these tiers. Their euthanasia perspective was primarily shaped by value interpretation, significance allocation to key components, and tier weighting. Explicit mention of varying ethical values, potentially indicating distinct stances in favor of or against euthanasia, was infrequent. CONCLUSION The study underscores ethical discourse's central role in navigating euthanasia's intricate landscape. Fostering inclusive dialogue, bridging diverse values, supports informed decision-making, nurturing justice, and empathy. Tailored end-of-life healthcare in psychiatry is essential, acknowledging all involved actors' needs. The study calls for interdisciplinary research to comprehensively grasp euthanasia's multifaceted dimensions, and guiding policy evolution. While contextualized in Belgium, the implications extend to the broader euthanasia discourse, suggesting avenues for further inquiry and cross-cultural exploration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monica Verhofstadt
- End-of-life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) & Ghent University, Laarbeeklaan 103, Brussels, 1090, Belgium.
| | - Loïc Moureau
- Faculty of Theology and Religious Studies, KU Leuven, Louvain, Belgium
| | - Koen Pardon
- End-of-life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) & Ghent University, Laarbeeklaan 103, Brussels, 1090, Belgium
| | - Axel Liégeois
- Faculty of Theology and Religious Studies, KU Leuven, Louvain, Belgium
- Organisation Brothers of Charity, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Piili RP, Hökkä M, Vänskä J, Tolvanen E, Louhiala P, Lehto JT. Facing a request for assisted death - views of Finnish physicians, a mixed method study. BMC Med Ethics 2024; 25:50. [PMID: 38702731 PMCID: PMC11067268 DOI: 10.1186/s12910-024-01051-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2023] [Accepted: 04/28/2024] [Indexed: 05/06/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Assisted death, including euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide (PAS), is under debate worldwide, and these practices are adopted in many Western countries. Physicians' attitudes toward assisted death vary across the globe, but little is known about physicians' actual reactions when facing a request for assisted death. There is a clear gap in evidence on how physicians act and respond to patients' requests for assisted death in countries where these actions are not legal. METHODS A survey including statements concerning euthanasia and PAS and an open question about their actions when facing a request for assisted death was sent to all Finnish physicians. Quantitative data are presented as numbers and percentages. Statistical significance was tested by using the Pearson chi-square test, when appropriate. The qualitative analysis was performed by using an inductive content analysis approach, where categories emerge from the data. RESULTS Altogether, 6889 physicians or medical students answered the survey, yielding a response rate of 26%. One-third of participants agreed or partly agreed that they could assist a patient in a suicide. The majority (69%) of the participants fully or partly agreed that euthanasia should only be accepted due to difficult physical symptoms, while 12% fully or partly agreed that life turning into a burden should be an acceptable reason for euthanasia. Of the participants, 16% had faced a request for euthanasia or PAS, and 3033 answers from 2565 respondents were achieved to the open questions concerning their actions regarding the request and ethical aspects of assisted death. In the qualitative analysis, six main categories, including 22 subcategories, were formed regarding the phenomenon of how physicians act when facing this request. The six main categories were as follows: providing an alternative to the request, enabling care and support, ignoring the request, giving a reasoned refusal, complying with the request, and seeing the request as a possibility. CONCLUSIONS Finnish physicians' actions regarding the requests for assisted death, and attitudes toward euthanasia and PAS vary substantially. Open discussion, education, and recommendations concerning a request for assisted death and ethics around it are also highly needed in countries where euthanasia and PAS are not legal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reetta P Piili
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
- Palliative Care Centre, Tampere University Hospital, Palliative Care Unit, Sädetie 6, R-building, Tampere, 33520, Finland.
| | - Minna Hökkä
- Diaconia University of Applied Sciences, Helsinki, Finland
- Research Unit of Health Sciences and Technology, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
| | | | - Elina Tolvanen
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- Palliative Care Centre, Tampere University Hospital, Palliative Care Unit, Sädetie 6, R-building, Tampere, 33520, Finland
| | - Pekka Louhiala
- Faculty of Social Sciences, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
| | - Juho T Lehto
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- Palliative Care Centre, Tampere University Hospital, Palliative Care Unit, Sädetie 6, R-building, Tampere, 33520, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Verhofstadt M, Van Assche K, Pardon K, Gleydura M, Titeca K, Chambaere K. Perspectives on the eligibility criteria for euthanasia for mental suffering caused by psychiatric disorder under the Belgian Euthanasia Law: A qualitative interview study among mental healthcare workers. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LAW AND PSYCHIATRY 2024; 93:101961. [PMID: 38330512 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2024.101961] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2023] [Revised: 12/22/2023] [Accepted: 02/01/2024] [Indexed: 02/10/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Euthanasia in adults with psychiatric conditions (APC) is allowed in Belgium and impacts a variety of workers in this field, including psychiatrists, psychiatric nurses, psychologists, and support "buddies". This study examines their perspectives on the appropriateness of the current legal criteria for, and practice of, euthanasia in the context of psychiatry, and their suggestions to properly implement or amend these criteria. METHODS Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 30 Dutch-speaking mental healthcare workers who had at least one experience with an APC requesting euthanasia, in Flanders and Brussels (Belgium), between August 2019 and August 2020. Interview transcripts were analyzed through qualitative content analysis. FINDINGS Our study shows that, for these mental healthcare workers, only one of the legal eligibility criteria to assess euthanasia requests by APC (i.e., unbearable suffering) is rather straightforward to interpret. In addition, there was a lack of consensus on what aspects of the Euthanasia Law should be modified and in what way. CONCLUSIONS Many mental healthcare workers do not well understand or misinterpret the legal criteria for euthanasia involving APC. Criteria are sometimes defined so narrowly that euthanasia requests by APC are generally deemed ineligible or, alternatively, are stretched to allow for inclusion of cases that go beyond what the Law intended. Our study indicates the need for an authoritative professional code of conduct offering clear advice for Belgian euthanasia practice in the context of psychiatry. It is also recommended that future trainings are standardized, supported by the most important professional associations in the field, and freely available to all who are confronted with euthanasia requests from APC or who offer support to APC who consider euthanasia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Verhofstadt
- End-of-Life Care Research Group, Ghent University & Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Ghent, Brussels, Belgium.
| | - K Van Assche
- Research Group Personal Rights and Property Rights, Antwerp University, Antwerp, Belgium; Antwerp Health Law and Ethics Chair, Antwerp University, Antwerp, Belgium.
| | - K Pardon
- End-of-Life Care Research Group, Ghent University & Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Ghent, Brussels, Belgium.
| | - M Gleydura
- Thomas J. Watson Fellow, Watson Foundation, USA.
| | - K Titeca
- Department of Psychiatry, General Hospital Groeninge, Courtrai, Belgium.
| | - K Chambaere
- End-of-Life Care Research Group, Ghent University & Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Ghent, Brussels, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Schomerus G, Schindler S, Baumann E, Angermeyer MC. Stigma and public attitudes toward euthanasia or assisted suicide for psychiatric conditions: results from a general population survey in Germany. BJPsych Open 2024; 10:e44. [PMID: 38327181 PMCID: PMC10897688 DOI: 10.1192/bjo.2024.4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2023] [Revised: 12/23/2023] [Accepted: 01/03/2024] [Indexed: 02/09/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND With growing numbers of countries legalizing euthanasia or assisted suicide (EAS), there is a debate as to whether EAS should also be available to people with severe, treatment-resistant mental illness. Excluding mental illness as a legitimate reason to receive EAS has been framed as discriminating against people with mental illness. AIMS We examine whether approval or opposition to psychiatric EAS are related to stigma toward people with mental illness. METHOD We asked a representative sample of the general population in Germany (N = 1515) whether they would approve of EAS for someone with severe, treatment-resistant mental illness. Stigma was assessed with the Value-Based Stigma Inventory (VASI), addressing rejection of people with mental illness in relation to different personal values. RESULTS A total of 19% of the German population approved of psychiatric EAS. Higher stigma scores were associated with greater approval of EAS (Spearman rank correlation coefficient, 0.28; P < 0.001). This association held true when controlling for sociodemographic variables. It was strongest for stigma related to perceived threats to one's security, reputation and meritocratic values. CONCLUSIONS Our results highlight that, although opposing psychiatric EAS is sometimes framed as discriminatory, approval of psychiatric EAS might also carry hidden, stigmatising motives. To avoid any unintended negative consequences for people with severe, treatment-resistant mental illness, any legislation on psychiatric EAS needs to be crafted with particular caution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georg Schomerus
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Germany
| | | | - Eva Baumann
- Department of Journalism and Communication Research, Hannover University of Music, Drama, and Media, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Appelbaum PS. Physician-assisted death for psychiatric disorders: ongoing reasons for concern. World Psychiatry 2024; 23:56-57. [PMID: 38214640 PMCID: PMC10785964 DOI: 10.1002/wps.21153] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Paul S Appelbaum
- Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, and New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hudson H. Dying in a terminal society: a response to Maung. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS 2023:jme-2022-108777. [PMID: 38135471 DOI: 10.1136/jme-2022-108777] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2023] [Accepted: 12/02/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023]
Abstract
Maung argues that an externalist understanding of mental disorder exposes how, if society was more just for the most deprived, patterns of access to assisted dying might be different. I counter that reducing inequality lacks relevance to the immediate permissibility of assisted dying for mental disorder, owing to the need for solutions for those in distress. I suggest that the question of assistance in death for mental disorders is one of pragmatic politics, not for obfuscatory philosophy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harry Hudson
- Princess Alexandra Hospital NHS Trust, Harlow, Essex, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kim SYH. Canadian Medical Assistance in Dying and the Hegemony of Privilege. THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS : AJOB 2023; 23:1-6. [PMID: 37930942 PMCID: PMC11146200 DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2023.2264096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2023]
|
8
|
Favron-Godbout C, Racine E. Medical assistance in dying for people living with mental disorders: a qualitative thematic review. BMC Med Ethics 2023; 24:86. [PMID: 37875867 PMCID: PMC10594804 DOI: 10.1186/s12910-023-00971-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2023] [Accepted: 10/15/2023] [Indexed: 10/26/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Medical assistance in dying (MAiD) sparks debate in several countries, some of which allow or plan to allow MAiD where a mental disorder is the sole underlying medical condition (MAiD-MD). Since MAiD-MD is becoming permissible in a growing number of jurisdictions, there is a need to better understand the moral concerns related to this option. Gaining a better understanding of the moral concerns at stake is a first step towards identifying ways of addressing them so that MAiD-MD can be successfully introduced and implemented, where legislations allow it. METHODS Thus, this article aims (1) to better understand the moral concerns regarding MAiD-MD, and (2) to identify potential solutions to promote stakeholders' well-being. A qualitative thematic review was undertaken, which used systematic keyword-driven search and thematic analysis of content. Seventy-four publications met the inclusion criteria. RESULTS Various moral concerns and proposed solutions were identified and are related to how MAiD-MD is introduced in 5 contexts: (1) Societal context, (2) Healthcare system, (3) Continuum of care, (4) Discussions on the option of MAiD-MD, (5) MAiD-MD practices. We propose this classification of the identified moral concerns because it helps to better understand the various facets of discomfort experienced with MAiD-MD. In so doing, it also directs the various actions to be taken to alleviate these discomforts and promote the well-being of stakeholders. CONCLUSION The assessment of MAiD-MD applications, which is part of the context of MAiD-MD practices, emerges as the most widespread source of concern. Addressing the moral concerns arising in the five contexts identified could help ease concerns regarding the assessment of MAiD-MD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline Favron-Godbout
- Pragmatic Health Ethics Research Unit, Montreal Clinical Research Institute, 110 av. des Pins O, Montreal, QC, H2W 1R7, Canada
| | - Eric Racine
- Pragmatic Health Ethics Research Unit, Montreal Clinical Research Institute, 110 av. des Pins O, Montreal, QC, H2W 1R7, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Nicolini ME, Jardas EJ, Zarate CA, Gastmans C, Kim SYH. Irremediability in psychiatric euthanasia: examining the objective standard. Psychol Med 2023; 53:5729-5747. [PMID: 36305567 PMCID: PMC10482705 DOI: 10.1017/s0033291722002951] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2022] [Revised: 08/22/2022] [Accepted: 08/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Irremediability is a key requirement for euthanasia and assisted suicide for psychiatric disorders (psychiatric EAS). Countries like the Netherlands and Belgium ask clinicians to assess irremediability in light of the patient's diagnosis and prognosis and 'according to current medical understanding'. Clarifying the relevance of a default objective standard for irremediability when applied to psychiatric EAS is crucial for solid policymaking. Yet so far, a thorough examination of this standard is lacking. METHODS Using treatment-resistant depression (TRD) as a test case, through a scoping review in PubMed, we analyzed the state-of-the-art evidence for whether clinicians can accurately predict individual long-term outcome and single out irremediable cases, by examining the following questions: (1) What is the definition of TRD; (2) What are group-level long-term outcomes of TRD; and (3) Can clinicians make accurate individual outcome predictions in TRD? RESULTS A uniform definition of TRD is lacking, with over 150 existing definitions, mostly focused on psychopharmacological research. Available yet limited studies about long-term outcomes indicate that a majority of patients with long-term TRD show significant improvement over time. Finally, evidence about individual predictions in TRD using precision medicine is growing, but methodological shortcomings and varying predictive accuracies pose important challenges for its implementation in clinical practice. CONCLUSION Our findings support the claim that, as per available evidence, clinicians cannot accurately predict long-term chances of recovery in a particular patient with TRD. This means that the objective standard for irremediability cannot be met, with implications for policy and practice of psychiatric EAS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie E Nicolini
- Department of Bioethics, National Institutes of Health, 10 Center Drive, Room 1C118, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA
- Center for Biomedical Ethics and Law, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 35 - Box 7001, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - E J Jardas
- Department of Bioethics, National Institutes of Health, 10 Center Drive, Room 1C118, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA
| | - Carlos A Zarate
- Section on the Neurobiology and Treatment of Mood Disorders, Experimental Therapeutics and Pathophysiology Branch, National Institutes of Mental Health, 6001 Executive Boulevard, Room 6200, MSC 9663, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Chris Gastmans
- Center for Biomedical Ethics and Law, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 35 - Box 7001, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Scott Y H Kim
- Department of Bioethics, National Institutes of Health, 10 Center Drive, Room 1C118, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kious BM, Pabst Peggy Battin M. A Focus Group Study of the Views of Persons with a History of Psychiatric Illness about Psychiatric Medical Aid in Dying. AJOB Empir Bioeth 2023; 15:1-10. [PMID: 37339278 DOI: 10.1080/23294515.2023.2224591] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Medical aid in dying (MAID) is legal in a number of countries, including some states in the U.S. While MAID is only permitted for terminal illnesses in the U.S., some other countries allow it for persons with psychiatric illness. Psychiatric MAID, however, raises unique ethical concerns, especially related to its effects on mental illness stigma and on how persons with psychiatric illnesses would come to feel about treatment and suicide. To explore those concerns, we conducted several focus groups with persons with lived experience of mental illness. METHODS We conducted three video-conference-based focus groups involving adults residing in the U.S. who reported a prior diagnosis of any psychiatric illness. Only participants who reported thinking that MAID for terminal illness was morally acceptable were included. Focus group participants were asked to respond to a series of four questions. Groups were facilitated by a coordinator who was independent of the research team. RESULTS A total of 22 persons participated in the focus groups. The majority of participants had depression and anxiety disorders; no participants had psychotic disorders such as schizophrenia. Many participants strongly favored permitting psychiatric MAID, generally on the basis of respect for autonomy, its effects on stigma, and the severe suffering caused by mental illness. Others expressed concerns, typically related to difficulties in ensuring decision-making capacity and to the risk that MAID would be used in lieu of suicide. CONCLUSIONS Persons with a history of psychiatric illness, as a group, have a diverse array of views about the permissibility of psychiatric MAID, reflecting nuanced consideration of how it relates to the public perception of mental illness, stigma, autonomy, and suicide risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brent M Kious
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
- Department of Philosophy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
- Center for Health Ethics, Arts, and Humanities, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Margaret Pabst Peggy Battin
- Department of Philosophy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
- Center for Health Ethics, Arts, and Humanities, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Moureau L, Verhofstadt M, Liégeois A. Mapping the ethical aspects in end-of-life care for persons with a severe and persistent mental illness: A scoping review of the literature. Front Psychiatry 2023; 14:1094038. [PMID: 37009126 PMCID: PMC10062453 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1094038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2022] [Accepted: 02/20/2023] [Indexed: 03/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Persons with severe and persistent mental illness (SPMI) make up a vulnerable group within mental healthcare and society. Not only do they suffer from long-term, serious psychiatric disorders; they often also experience considerable problems in their psychosocial functioning. Research has disclosed that the care needs of this target group are complex, and that the life expectancy of these persons is significantly lower than in the general population. Given (1) the lower life expectancy of persons with SPMI, (2) the higher suicide risk related to mental disorders, and (3) the legalization and practice of medical assistance in dying in an increasing number of countries, it is of utmost importance to map the ethical aspects and challenges of end-of-life care needs in persons with SPMI. Therefore, we charted the way end-of-life care is provided for them by means of a scoping review of the scientific literature, with an emphasis on the ethical aspects surrounding it. We explore existing ethical dilemmas; the underlying ethical values, principles and attitudes; and the locus and stakeholders of ethical dialog regarding end-of-life care in persons with SPMI. The results indicate that the four guiding principles of biomedical ethics can well be identified in the literature, and are each addressed in their own specific way: Autonomy in relation to questions regarding the decision-making capacity of persons with SPMI; Justice in relation to access to quality care and the presence of stigma; and Non-maleficence and Beneficence in relation to the ongoing debate regarding the benefits and obstacles in applying palliative care approaches in the context of psychiatry, and the status of the futility-concept therein. Personal virtues and attitudes in care professionals, like compassion, non-abandonment and upholding dignity are key, as care professionals are the main advocates of persons with SPMI, which often lack an extensive social network. Further, we find that the ethical dialog is mainly focused on care professionals and relatives, rather than the persons with SPMI themselves. This is reflected in the existing research that often had the voices of the latter missing. Future research may benefit from the inclusion of persons with SMPI’s first-hand accounts. End-of-life care for persons with SPMI may benefit from identifying and integrating (locally developed) good practices like cross-sectoral education, specific care models, and ethics support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Loïc Moureau
- Faculty of Theology and Religious Studies, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- *Correspondence: Loïc Moureau,
| | - Monica Verhofstadt
- Medical and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, East Flanders, Belgium
| | - Axel Liégeois
- Faculty of Theology and Religious Studies, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Ramos-Pozón S, Terribas-Sala N, Falcó-Pegueroles A, Román-Maestre B. Persons with mental disorders and assisted dying practices in Spain: An overview. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LAW AND PSYCHIATRY 2023; 87:101871. [PMID: 36871498 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2023.101871] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2022] [Revised: 02/21/2023] [Accepted: 02/21/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
On 25 June 2021, the Law on Euthanasia in Spain came into force, providing for two modes of helping an individual end their life: euthanasia and/or medically assisted suicide. Among the requisites that a request for euthanasia has to fulfil are that the individual must be suffering a severe, chronic and debilitating condition or a severe and incurable disease, at the same time as that person shows the necessary competence to decide. The possibility exists that a patient suffering mental health problems submits such a request; however, the specific characteristics of a mental health disorder make such a request considerably more complex. In this article, based on a narrative review of the law itself and the related literature, the requisites established under the law are analysed from an ethical-legal perspective with the aim of defining when a request for euthanasia from a person with a mental health disorder may be deemed legitimate and in line with legal provisions. This should help clinicians make rational, reasoned decisions when dealing with a request of this type.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sergio Ramos-Pozón
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Peereboom J. Implications of psychiatric diagnosis for Voluntary Assisted Dying in Victoria. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2023; 57:629-635. [PMID: 36752078 DOI: 10.1177/00048674231154200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/09/2023]
Abstract
Voluntary Assisted Dying is a process whereby terminally ill patients are provided a lethal dose of medication for them to voluntarily ingest to end their life. Victoria, Australia, implemented legislation permitting Voluntary Assisted Dying for terminally ill adult patients with a life expectancy less than 6 months. Ethical dilemmas arise when terminally ill patients with a comorbid mental illness attempt to access Voluntary Assisted Dying because of the complex relationship between psychiatric conditions and suicidal ideation. This paper seeks to investigate the most ethical approach for doctors to respond to such a request by discussing objections raised in other literature to patients with a comorbid psychiatric illness aiming to access Voluntary Assisted Dying in Victoria. To answer this question, objections to terminally ill patients with a comorbid psychiatric illness accessing Voluntary Assisted Dying were found through review of literature. Discussion of these objections centred around unpacking the two historical ethical justifications for Voluntary Assisted Dying: respect for autonomy and relief of suffering. Regarding autonomy, contention focused on competency to make autonomous decisions. Not all psychiatric patients lack competency to decide about Voluntary Assisted Dying, and there are comparable competency assessments used in psychiatry today. Considering suffering, objections related to the authenticity of the intolerable nature of a patient's suffering out of concerns that it has been influenced by their condition, and that the psychiatric illness may still be treatable. However, given suffering is subjective, its perception is not lessened if the source is psychological in nature. Furthermore, it is challenging to justify a position where a patient is forced to spend the last months of their life enduring suffering that has been historically refractory to multiple, genuine treatment efforts. Not all terminally ill patients with a comorbid psychiatric disorder will lack competency to choose Voluntary Assisted Dying, and many will have genuine suffering for which they are requesting Voluntary Assisted Dying. Multidisciplinary, holistic assessments for these patients are not mandated, but would be useful to address the issues, overcome barriers to access and determine that applicants are making an authentic request.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jim Peereboom
- The Centre of Health Equity, School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Riley S, Sarbey B. The Unexamined Benefits of the Expansive Legalization of Medical Assistance-in-Dying. JOURNAL OF BIOETHICAL INQUIRY 2022; 19:655-665. [PMID: 36156765 DOI: 10.1007/s11673-022-10211-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2021] [Accepted: 05/17/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
If you slide far enough down the slippery slope envisioned by opponents of medical assistance-in-dying (MAiD), you eventually land in a ghastly society with industrialized euthanasia, rampant suicide, and devalued life. But what if the slippery slope leads us somewhere better? This paper explores the benefits of eliminating nearly all MAiD prohibitions and regulations. We anticipate three positive effects for public health: 1. Expanded access to those currently not qualified from MAiD by removing ineffective access criteria; 2. Harm reduction by making MAiD safer and by rerouting suicidal patients into alternate care; and 3. Improvements to the health system through lowered healthcare costs and increased patient activation in end-of-life care. Safeguards and prohibitions deny those who wish to die the ability to do so to prevent the potential danger of a few being subjected to an undesired early death.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sean Riley
- The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 2050 Kenny Rd, Columbus, OH, 43215, USA.
| | - Ben Sarbey
- Duke University, 1364 Campus Dr., Durham, NC, 27705, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Verhofstadt M, Chambaere K, Pardon K, Mortier F, Liégeois A, Deliens L, Audenaert K. The impact of the euthanasia assessment procedure: a qualitative interview study among adults with psychiatric conditions. BMC Psychiatry 2022; 22:435. [PMID: 35761195 PMCID: PMC9235145 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-022-04039-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2022] [Accepted: 06/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Assisted dying for adults with psychiatric conditions (APC) is highly controversial but legally possible in a few countries, including Belgium. Previous research has suggested that the complex euthanasia assessment procedure may cause additional suffering in APC but may also induce positive experiences. This study reports on the impact of the euthanasia assessment procedure as experienced by APC on three counts: 1) their mental state, including death ideation; 2) their treatment trajectory; 3) their social relationships. METHODS We performed an in-depth qualitative interview study with 16 APC in Flanders, Belgium, who had voiced a euthanasia request between 2016-2020. Thematic coding was used. FINDINGS We interviewed 16 APC. Euthanasia assessment procedures brought out a plethora of experiences in APC, both favourable and unfavourable. Whereas thoughts of suicide remain present to a certain extent, being in the assessment procedure allows some APC to reconsider alternatives towards life, and also to attempt new treatment options. However, many APC experience ambivalence about the supposedly inherent desirability and dignity in euthanasia. Worries also surfaced about the rationale behind and effects of involvement of APCs' social circle, and about the impact it could have on them. CONCLUSION Further research, including other stakeholder perspectives, is recommended with a view to maximising favourable and minimising unfavourable impacts for all involved. In clinical practice attention to these impacts is paramount, and clear communication and management of expectations between physician and patient, seems appropriate to address the many ambivalent experiences that accompany APC during the euthanasia assessment procedure. Policy attention could in this regard go to clarifying certain sources of ambivalence and issues that are insufficiently addressed, such as modalities of relatives' involvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monica Verhofstadt
- End-of-Life Care Research Group, Department Public Health and Primary Care, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) & Ghent University, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 6K3, Ghent, Brussels, Belgium.
| | - Kenneth Chambaere
- grid.8767.e0000 0001 2290 8069End-of-Life Care Research Group, Department Public Health and Primary Care, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) & Ghent University, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 6K3 Ghent, Brussels Belgium
| | - Koen Pardon
- grid.8767.e0000 0001 2290 8069End-of-Life Care Research Group, Department Public Health and Primary Care, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) & Ghent University, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 6K3 Ghent, Brussels Belgium
| | - Freddy Mortier
- grid.8767.e0000 0001 2290 8069End-of-Life Care Research Group, Department Public Health and Primary Care, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) & Ghent University, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 6K3 Ghent, Brussels Belgium ,grid.5342.00000 0001 2069 7798Bioethics Institute Ghent, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Axel Liégeois
- grid.5596.f0000 0001 0668 7884Faculty of Theology and Religious Studies, KU Leuven, Louvain, Belgium ,Organisation Brothers of Charity, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Luc Deliens
- grid.8767.e0000 0001 2290 8069End-of-Life Care Research Group, Department Public Health and Primary Care, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) & Ghent University, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 6K3 Ghent, Brussels Belgium
| | - Kurt Audenaert
- grid.410566.00000 0004 0626 3303Department of Psychiatry, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Doherty AM, Axe CJ, Jones DA. Investigating the relationship between euthanasia and/or assisted suicide and rates of non-assisted suicide: systematic review. BJPsych Open 2022; 8:e108. [PMID: 35656575 PMCID: PMC9230443 DOI: 10.1192/bjo.2022.71] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Euthanasia and assisted suicide (EAS) are practices that aim to alleviate the suffering of people with life-limiting illnesses, but are controversial. One area of debate is the relationship between EAS and suicide rates in the population, where there have been claims that availability of EAS will reduce the number of self-initiated deaths (EAS and suicide combined). Others claim that legislation for EAS makes it acceptable to end one's own life, a message at variance with that of suicide prevention campaigns. AIMS To examine the relationship between the introduction of EAS and rates of non-assisted suicide and self-initiated death. METHOD We conducted a systematic review to examine the association between EAS and rates of non-assisted suicide and of self-initiated death. We searched PubMed, Scopus, PsycINFO and Science Direct, until 20 December 2021. Studies that examined EAS and reported data on population-based suicide rates were included. RESULTS Six studies met the inclusion criteria; four reported increases in overall rates of self-initiated death and, in some cases, increased non-assisted suicide. This increase in non-assisted suicide was mostly non-significant when sociodemographic factors were controlled for. Studies from Switzerland and Oregon reported elevated rates of self-initiated death among older women, consistent with higher rates of depressive illnesses in this population. CONCLUSIONS The findings of this review do not support the hypothesis that introducing EAS reduces rates of non-assisted suicide. The disproportionate impact on older women indicates unmet suicide prevention needs in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Caitlyn J Axe
- School of Bioethics, University of Washington, Washington, USA
| | - David A Jones
- Department of Bioethics, St Mary's University Twickenham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Braun E, Gather J, Scholten M, Vollmann J. An Autonomy-Based Approach to Justifying Physician-Assisted Death: A Recent Judgment of the German Federal Constitutional Court. THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS : AJOB 2022; 22:71-73. [PMID: 35089831 DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2021.2013979] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
|
18
|
"Resource Limitation and 'Forced Irremediability' in Physician-Assisted Death for Nonterminal Mental and Physical Conditions: A Survey of the US Public". J Acad Consult Liaison Psychiatry 2022; 63:302-313. [PMID: 35026471 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaclp.2021.12.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2021] [Revised: 11/12/2021] [Accepted: 12/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Physician-assisted death (PAD) for people with nonterminal illnesses (PAD-NT) is a controversial practice legal in some countries and increasingly debated in others, including the US. A major concern about legalization of PAD-NT is that a lack of resources may drive some with mental illnesses or physical disabilities to seek PAD. METHODS The authors surveyed 2139 US adults matched to the US population in sex, age, race/ethnicity, education, political affiliation, and income. After giving their opinions regarding terminal PAD and PAD-NT in response to traditional PAD survey questions, respondents were randomly presented one of four scenarios of persons with nonterminal conditions requesting PAD-NT who lacked adequate resources to maintain their quality of life. The type of resources lacking (social or healthcare) and medical condition (mental or physical disability) were varied. Respondents' views regarding PAD-NT for the scenario specifically and legalization generally were then re-assessed. RESULTS At baseline, 55.4% of respondents supported legalizing terminal PAD and 36.9% supported legalizing PAD-NT. After scenarios, 28.2% (range 18.6% to 39.7%) agreed/strongly agreed with legalizing PAD-NT generally and 23.7% (15.2% to 33.7%) agreed/strongly agreed with PAD-NT for the instance depicted, with mental illness scenarios receiving much lower support; respondents' comments suggest devaluation of life with physical disability versus with mental illness. Being politically liberal, not religious, and assigned physical disability scenarios were associated with greater support for PAD-NT in multivariable analyses. CONCLUSIONS A minority of the US public supports PAD-NT in the context of inadequate resources, with much lower support for PAD-NT for mental illness than for physical disability, suggesting that PAD-NT policy debates and future research should address the issue of whether sufficient resources must be available to potential requestors of PAD-NT.
Collapse
|
19
|
Verhofstadt M, Audenaert K, Mortier F, Deliens L, Liégeois A, Pardon K, Chambaere K. Concrete Experiences and Support Needs Regarding the Euthanasia Practice in Adults With Psychiatric Conditions: A Qualitative Interview Study Among Healthcare Professionals and Volunteers in Belgium. Front Psychiatry 2022; 13:859745. [PMID: 35360142 PMCID: PMC8963330 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.859745] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2022] [Accepted: 02/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Although euthanasia in the context of adult psychiatry is legalized in Belgium, it poses major ethical and clinical challenges for the health care professionals and volunteers involved. This study aimed to address these members' concrete experiences and support needs. METHODS A qualitative semi-structured interview study was conducted with 16 physicians and 14 other health care professionals and volunteers, with at least one concrete experience with euthanasia requests and procedures concerning adults with psychiatric conditions. FINDINGS Concrete experiences concerned the following 8 domains: (1) the impact of euthanasia on the clinical trajectory and (2) on the therapeutic relationship, (3) internal and (4) external collaborative partnerships, (5) patients' social inner circle (non-)involvement, (6) the use of recently published guidelines and, (7) the first criminal trials on this topic, and (8) the act of euthanasia. The following 8 main support needs emerged; (1) protocols addressing specific sub-populations and pathologies, (2) protocols specifically drawn up for non-medics, (3) guidance on how to adequately implement the two-track approach, (4) (after)care for patients, (5) (after)care for the health care team, (6) guidance on the patient's social inner circle involvement, (7) enhanced education measures, and (8) enhanced financial measures, including incentives for holistic, palliative care approaches. CONCLUSION The health care professionals and volunteers reported many positive and negative experiences in dealing with euthanasia requests in adult psychiatry. They reported several support needs across the extensive euthanasia trajectory, pertaining to concrete management of thorny issues that guidelines do not (yet) touch on. Important implications of our study relate to tackling these existing issues, and to paying sufficient attention to the impact of a euthanasia trajectory on all actors, including the patients and their social inner circle, involved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monica Verhofstadt
- End-of-life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) & Ghent University, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Kurt Audenaert
- Department of Psychiatry, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Freddy Mortier
- End-of-life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) & Ghent University, Brussels, Belgium.,Bioethics Institute Ghent, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Luc Deliens
- End-of-life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) & Ghent University, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Axel Liégeois
- Faculty of Theology and Religious Studies, KU Leuven, Louvain, Belgium.,Organisation Brothers of Charity, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Koen Pardon
- End-of-life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) & Ghent University, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Kenneth Chambaere
- End-of-life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) & Ghent University, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
van Veen S, Widdershoven G, Beekman A, Evans N. Physician Assisted Death for Psychiatric Suffering: Experiences in the Netherlands. Front Psychiatry 2022; 13:895387. [PMID: 35795029 PMCID: PMC9251055 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.895387] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2022] [Accepted: 05/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Physician assisted death (PAD) for patients with a psychiatric disorder is a controversial topic of increasing relevance, since a growing number of countries are allowing it. General requirements for PAD include that patients possess decision-making capacity to decide on PAD and that their suffering is unbearable and irremediable. In the Netherlands PAD has been eligible for patients with psychiatric disorders since the 1990s, making it one of the few countries that can offer insights on the practice from real life experience. Much of the literature describing these experiences is only available in Dutch. This article aims to make this knowledge more widely available and provide a comprehensive overview of the experience with PAD for psychiatric suffering in the Netherlands. First, the history of PAD for patients suffering from a psychiatric disorder is described. Second, an overview of relevant rules and regulations governing the practice is given. Third, an overview is provided of the scarce epidemiological data. Finally, we will discuss two major clinical challenges; establishing irremediability and decision-making capacity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Smp van Veen
- Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands.,Department of Ethics, Law and Humanities, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands.,113 Suicide Prevention, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Gam Widdershoven
- Department of Ethics, Law and Humanities, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Atf Beekman
- Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - N Evans
- Department of Ethics, Law and Humanities, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Abstract
The preponderance of women among persons who request and receive euthanasia and assisted suicide based on a psychiatric condition, as shown by data from The Netherlands and Belgium, is virtually unexplored. We provide a critical discussion of this gender gap, and propose that it can inform a key debate point in the controversy over the practice, namely its conflict with suicide prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie E. Nicolini
- Department of Bioethics, National Institutes of Health, 10 Center Drive, Room 1C118, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA,Center for Biomedical Ethics and Law, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 35 - Box 7001, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Chris Gastmans
- Center for Biomedical Ethics and Law, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 35 - Box 7001, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Scott Y.H. Kim
- Department of Bioethics, National Institutes of Health, 10 Center Drive, Room 1C118, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Over the last 30 years, medical assistance in dying (MAiD) including euthanasia (EU) and physician-assisted death (or suicide, PAS) has become the center of a large debate, particularly when these practices have involved people with psychiatric illness, including resistant depression, schizophrenia, personality, or other severe psychiatric disorders. We performed a review utilizing several databases, and by including the most relevant studies in full journal articles investigating the problem of MAiD in patients with psychiatric disorders but not in physical terminal conditions (non-terminal, MAiD-NT). RECENT FINDINGS Literature has shown that a small percentage of people with psychiatric disorders died by MAiD-NT in comparison with patients with somatic diseases in terminal clinical conditions (e.g., cancer, AIDS). However, the problem in the field is complex and not solved yet as confirmed by the fact that only a few countries (e.g., the Netherlands, Belgium, Luxemburg) have legalized MAiD-NT for patients with psychiatric disorders, while most have maintained the practices accessible only to people with somatic disease in a terminal phase. Also, how to make objective the criterion of irremediability of a mental disorder; how to balance suicide prevention with assisted suicide; how to avoid the risk of progressively including in requests for MAiD-NT vulnerable segments of the population, such as minors, elderly, or people with dementia, in a productive-oriented society, are some of the critical points to be discussed. The application of MAiD-NT in people with psychiatric disorders should be further explored to prevent end-of-life rights from contradicting the principles of recovery-oriented care.
Collapse
|
23
|
Rajkumar RP. Physician-Assisted Suicide in Dementia: Paradoxes, Pitfalls and the Need for Prudence. FRONTIERS IN SOCIOLOGY 2021; 6:815233. [PMID: 35004941 PMCID: PMC8727695 DOI: 10.3389/fsoc.2021.815233] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2021] [Accepted: 12/07/2021] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
There has been an increasing drive towards the legalization of physician-assisted suicide (PAS) in patients with dementia, particularly in patients with advanced disease and severe cognitive impairment. Advocacy for this position is often based on utilitarian philosophical principles, on appeals to the quality of life of the patient and their caregiver(s), or on economic constraints faced by caregivers as well as healthcare systems. In this paper, two lines of evidence against this position are presented. First, data on attitudes towards euthanasia for twenty-eight countries, obtained from the World Values Survey, is analyzed. An examination of this data shows that, paradoxically, positive attitudes towards this procedure are found in more economically advanced countries, and are strongly associated with specific cultural factors. Second, the literature on existing attitudes towards PAS in cases of dementia, along with ethical arguments for and against the practice, is reviewed and specific hazards for patients, caregivers and healthcare professionals are identified. On the basis of these findings, the author suggests that the practice of PAS in dementia is not one that can be widely or safely endorsed, on both cultural and ethical grounds. Instead, the medical field should work in collaboration with governmental, social welfare and patient advocacy services to ensure optimal physical, emotional and financial support to this group of patients and their caregivers.
Collapse
|
24
|
Turillazzi E, Maiese A, Frati P, Scopetti M, Di Paolo M. Physician-Patient Relationship, Assisted Suicide and the Italian Constitutional Court. JOURNAL OF BIOETHICAL INQUIRY 2021; 18:671-681. [PMID: 34674155 DOI: 10.1007/s11673-021-10136-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2020] [Accepted: 09/06/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
In 2017, Italy passed a law that provides for a systematic discipline on informed consent, advance directives, and advance care planning. It ranges from decisions contextual to clinical necessity through the tool of consent/refusal to decisions anticipating future events through the tools of shared care planning and advance directives. Nothing is said in the law regarding the issue of physician assisted suicide. Following the DJ Fabo case, the Italian Constitutional Court declared the constitutional illegitimacy of article 580 of the criminal code in the part in which it does not exclude the punishment of those who facilitate the suicide when the decision has been freely and autonomously made by a person kept alive by life-support treatments and suffering from an irreversible pathology, the source of physical or psychological suffering that he/she considers intolerable, but fully capable of making free and conscious decisions. Such conditions and methods of execution must be verified by a public structure of the national health service, after consulting the territorially competent ethics committee. This statement admits, within strict and regulated bounds, physician assisted suicide, so widening the range of end-of-life decisions for Italian patients. Future application and critical topics will be called into question by the Italian legislator.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Turillazzi
- Section of Legal Medicine, Department of Clinical, Medical, Molecular Pathology and Critical Medicine, University of Pisa, Via Paolo Savi 57, 56126, Pisa, Italy.
| | - A Maiese
- Section of Legal Medicine, Department of Clinical, Medical, Molecular Pathology and Critical Medicine, University of Pisa, Via Paolo Savi 57, 56126, Pisa, Italy
| | - P Frati
- Department of Anatomical, Histological, Forensic and Orthopaedic Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - M Scopetti
- Department of Anatomical, Histological, Forensic and Orthopaedic Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - M Di Paolo
- Section of Legal Medicine, Department of Clinical, Medical, Molecular Pathology and Critical Medicine, University of Pisa, Via Paolo Savi 57, 56126, Pisa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Verhofstadt M, Pardon K, Audenaert K, Deliens L, Mortier F, Liégeois A, Chambaere K. Why adults with psychiatric conditions request euthanasia: A qualitative interview study of life experiences, motives and preventive factors. J Psychiatr Res 2021; 144:158-167. [PMID: 34638052 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2021.09.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2021] [Revised: 08/24/2021] [Accepted: 09/08/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE As the empirical picture of adults with psychiatric conditions (further referred to as 'patients') requesting euthanasia is still incomplete, this study aims to deepen our understanding of why these patients request euthanasia, how this relates to the option of suicide, and what could have prevented these patients from considering death and requesting euthanasia. METHODS A qualitative study using in-depth, face-to-face interviews was conducted with 16 patients who had their euthanasia request under assessment in the period 2016-2020. Thematic coding was used. FINDINGS Most patients were in a state of feeling emotionally worn-out as a result of the many accumulated misfortunes and setbacks, leading to the all-pervasive sense that life is no longer worth living. Whereas some patients reported lifelong adversity, others struggled predominantly in later life. Whereas some patients longed for death strongly, others expressed ambivalence towards death ideation, and some even requested euthanasia to hear of their ineligibility for it, to restore hope and to (re)find meaning in life. patients valued euthanasia over suicide as being more dignified and acceptable, both for themselves and for their inner circle. With regard to preventive factors, patients posited the need for improved accessibility and quality of mental healthcare, as well as a profound change in society's perception of, and support for, these patients. CONCLUSIONS This study revealed the many complexities of euthanasia in the context of psychiatry, due to the many differences in patients' background characteristics, in their motives for requesting euthanasia, and the multi-layered aspects of mental suffering that go beyond the field of psychiatry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monica Verhofstadt
- Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) & Ghent University, End-of-life Care Research Group, Brussels, Belgium.
| | - Koen Pardon
- Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) & Ghent University, End-of-life Care Research Group, Brussels, Belgium.
| | - Kurt Audenaert
- Department of Psychiatry, Ghent University Hospital, Belgium.
| | - Luc Deliens
- Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) & Ghent University, End-of-life Care Research Group, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Freddy Mortier
- Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) & Ghent University, End-of-life Care Research Group, Brussels, Belgium; Bioethics Institute Ghent, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
| | - Axel Liégeois
- Faculty of Theology and Religious Studies, KU Leuven, Louvain, Belgium; Organisation Brothers of Charity, Ghent, Belgium.
| | - Kenneth Chambaere
- Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) & Ghent University, End-of-life Care Research Group, Brussels, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Dembo J, van Veen S, Widdershoven G. The influence of cognitive distortions on decision-making capacity for physician aid in dying. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LAW AND PSYCHIATRY 2020; 72:101627. [PMID: 32950802 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2020.101627] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2020] [Revised: 08/18/2020] [Accepted: 08/22/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
As international laws on physician aid in dying (PAD) evolve, the question of permitting PAD in non-terminal illness, and in sole psychiatric illness, is under intense debate. In jurisdictions where PAD is permissible, certain safeguards and eligibility requirements must be met for all patients making a PAD request, and one of these requirements is that the patient have sound decision-making capacity with respect to the request. Legal criteria already exist for the determination of capacity, and they are quite similar between different jurisdictions. In current debates about the question of psychiatric PAD, one concern that has been raised is that cognitive distortions in mental disorders may affect a patient's decision-making capacity. At the same time, it has been established that all persons, with or without a mental disorder, experience cognitive distortions. If cognitive distortions are ubiquitous, it is likely that the severity and frequency of cognitive distortions is dimensional rather than categorical, between samples with and without mental illness. Furthermore, currently, there is no requirement for a formalized evaluation of cognitive distortions as part of capacity assessment for any type of medical decision, including PAD decisions. The current paper examines the literature related to cognitive distortions in mental disorders and in healthy populations. It proposes that the existence of cognitive distortions, alone, cannot be used as an argument for a blanket exclusion of psychiatric PAD. It therefore concludes that further research and ethical analysis should be undertaken to examine the impact of cognitive distortions on decision-making for consequential medical decisions, including PAD, in patients with and without mental disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justine Dembo
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
| | - Sisco van Veen
- GGZinGeest, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Guy Widdershoven
- Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|