1
|
Tran Minh M, Airaksinen M, Lahti T. Experiences of patient organizations' involvement in medicine appraisal and reimbursement processes in Finland - a qualitative study. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2024; 40:e26. [PMID: 38953740 DOI: 10.1017/s0266462324000229] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/04/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study investigated how patient representatives have experienced their involvement in medicines appraisal and reimbursement processes with the Council for Choices in Health Care in Finland (COHERE) and the Pharmaceuticals Pricing Board (PPB) and how authorities perceive the role of patient organizations' input. METHODS Semi-structured thematic individual and pair interviews were conducted in 2021 with representatives (n = 14) of patient organizations and government officials (n = 7) of the Ministry of Social Affairs and Health. The interview data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis. RESULTS Patient representatives expressed their appreciation for the PPB and the COHERE in creating consultation processes and systematic models that support involvement. However, there were many challenges: patient representatives were uncertain about how their submissions were utilized in official processes and whether their opinions had any significance in decision-making. Patients or patient organizations lack representation in appraisal and decision-making bodies, and patient representatives felt that decision-making lacked transparency. The importance of patient involvement was highlighted by the authorities, but they also emphasized that the patient organizations' contributions were complementary to the other materials. Submissions regarding the medications used to treat rare diseases and those with limited research evidence were considered particularly valuable. However, the submissions may not necessarily have a direct impact on decisions. CONCLUSIONS The interviews provided relevant input for the development of involvement processes at the PPB and COHERE. The interviews confirmed the need for increased transparency in the medicines assessment, appraisal, and decision-making procedures in Finland.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Tuuli Lahti
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
- Health and Well-being, Master School, Turku University of Applied Sciences, Turku, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Slejko JF, Mattingly TJ, Wilson A, Xie R, Chapman RH, Amill-Rosario A, dosReis S. Patient-Informed Value Elements in Cost-Effectiveness Analyses of Major Depressive Disorder Treatment: A Literature Review and Synthesis. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2024:S1098-3015(24)02404-5. [PMID: 38852668 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2024.05.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2023] [Revised: 04/24/2024] [Accepted: 05/20/2024] [Indexed: 06/11/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Prior work identified 6 key value elements (attributes of treatment and desired outcomes) for individuals living with major depressive disorder (MDD) in managing their condition: mode of treatment, time to treatment helpfulness, MDD relief, quality of work, interaction with others, and affordability. The objective of our study was to identify whether previous cost-effectiveness analyses (CEAs) for MDD treatment addressed any of these value elements. A secondary objective was to identify whether any study engaged patients, family members, and caregivers in the model development process. METHODS We conducted a systematic literature review to identify published model-based CEAs. We compared the elements of the published studies with the MDD patient value elements elicited in prior work to identify gaps and areas for future research. RESULTS Of 86 published CEAs, we found that 7 included patient out-of-pocket costs, and 32 included measures of productivity, which were both priorities for individuals with MDD. We found that only 2 studies elicited measures from patients for their model, and 2 studies engaged patients in the modeling process. CONCLUSIONS Published CEA models for MDD treatment do not regularly include value elements that are a priority for this patient population nor do they include patients in their modeling process. Flexible models that can accommodate elements consistent with patient experience are needed, and a multistakeholder engagement approach would help accomplish this.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia F Slejko
- Patient-Driven Values in Healthcare Evaluation (PAVE) Center, Department of Practice, Sciences and Health Outcomes Research, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| | - T Joseph Mattingly
- Department of Pharmacotherapy, University of Utah College of Pharmacy, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Alexandra Wilson
- Patient-Driven Values in Healthcare Evaluation (PAVE) Center, Department of Practice, Sciences and Health Outcomes Research, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Richard Xie
- Innovation and Value Initiative, Alexandria, VA, USA
| | | | - Alejandro Amill-Rosario
- Patient-Driven Values in Healthcare Evaluation (PAVE) Center, Department of Practice, Sciences and Health Outcomes Research, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Susan dosReis
- Patient-Driven Values in Healthcare Evaluation (PAVE) Center, Department of Practice, Sciences and Health Outcomes Research, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Powell PA. Incorporating public and wider stakeholder views in the design of health state valuation studies in adults and young people: an undervalued resource? Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2024; 24:581-584. [PMID: 38517687 DOI: 10.1080/14737167.2024.2334349] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2023] [Accepted: 03/20/2024] [Indexed: 03/24/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Philip A Powell
- Sheffield Centre for Health and Related Research, School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
La Mantia I, Ottaviano G, Ragusa M, Trimarchi M, Foglia E, Schettini F, Bellavia D, Cantone E. Multidimensional Impact of Dupilumab on Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps: A Complete Health Technology Assessment of Clinical, Economic, and Non-Clinical Domains. J Pers Med 2024; 14:347. [PMID: 38672974 PMCID: PMC11051702 DOI: 10.3390/jpm14040347] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2024] [Revised: 03/18/2024] [Accepted: 03/20/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Chronic RhinoSinusitis with Nasal Polyps (CRSwNP) represents a condition mainly caused by the type 2 inflammation presence and marked by the existence of polyps within the nasal and paranasal sinuses. The standard of care includes intranasal steroids, additional burst of systemic steroids, if needed, and surgery. However, recurrence is common, especially among patients with comorbid type 2 inflammatory diseases. Recently, biological drugs, addressing the underlying cause of the disease, have been approved in Italy (dupilumab, omalizumab, and mepolizumab). A Health Technology Assessment was conducted to define multidimensional impact, assuming Italian NHS perspective and a 12-month time horizon. The EUnetHTA Core Model was deployed, using the following methods to analyze the domains: (i) literature evidence; (ii) administration of semi-structured questionnaires to 17 healthcare professionals; (iii) health economics tools to define the economic sustainability for the system. Evidence from NMA and ITC showed a more favorable safety profile and better efficacy for dupilumab compared with alternative biologics. All the analyses, synthesizing cost and efficacy measures, showed that dupilumab is the preferable alternative. Specifically, the cost per responder analysis for dupilumab, exhibiting a 67.0% response rate at Week 52, is notably economical at 14,209EUR per responder. This presents a more economical profile compared with the cost per responder for omalizumab (36.2% response rate) at 24,999EUR and mepolizumab (28.5% response rate) at 31,863EUR. These results underscore dupilumab's potential, not merely in terms of clinical outcomes, but also in terms of economic rationality, thereby solidifying its status as a valid and preferrable alternative in the management of CRSwNP, in the context of the Italian NHS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ignazio La Mantia
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies “GF Ingrassia”, ENT Section, University of Catania, 95100 Catania, Italy
| | - Giancarlo Ottaviano
- Department of Neurosciences, Otolaryngology Section, University of Padova, 35122 Padova, Italy
| | - Martina Ragusa
- Operative Unit of Otolaryngology, ASP Messina, Taormina Hospital (ME), 98039 Taormina, Italy
| | - Matteo Trimarchi
- Faculty of Biomedical Sciences and Lugano Regional Hospital, University of Italian Switzerland, 6900 Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Emanuela Foglia
- Healthcare Datascience LAB, LIUC—Carlo Cattaneo University, 21053 Castellanza, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Schettini
- Healthcare Datascience LAB, LIUC—Carlo Cattaneo University, 21053 Castellanza, Italy
| | - Daniele Bellavia
- Healthcare Datascience LAB, LIUC—Carlo Cattaneo University, 21053 Castellanza, Italy
| | - Elena Cantone
- Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences-ENT Section, University of Naples 29 Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Charlton V, DiStefano MJ. The ethical canary: narrow reflective equilibrium as a source of moral justification in healthcare priority-setting. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS 2024:jme-2023-109467. [PMID: 38373831 DOI: 10.1136/jme-2023-109467] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2023] [Accepted: 02/07/2024] [Indexed: 02/21/2024]
Abstract
Healthcare priority-setting institutions have good reason to want to demonstrate that their decisions are morally justified-and those who contribute to and use the health service have good reason to hope for the same. However, finding a moral basis on which to evaluate healthcare priority-setting is difficult. Substantive approaches are vulnerable to reasonable disagreement about the appropriate grounds for allocating resources, while procedural approaches may be indeterminate and insufficient to ensure a just distribution. In this paper, we set out a complementary, coherence-based approach to the evaluation of healthcare priority-setting. Drawing on Rawls, we argue that an institutional priority-setter's claim to moral justification can be assessed, in part, based on the extent to which its many normative commitments are mutually supportive and free from dissonance; that is, on the ability to establish narrow reflective equilibrium across the normative content of a priority-setter's policy and practice. While we do not suggest that the establishment of such equilibrium is sufficient for moral justification, we argue that failure to do so might-like the proverbial canary in the coalmine-act as a generalised warning that something is awry. We offer a theoretical argument in support of this view and briefly outline a practical method for systematically examining coherence across priority-setting policy and practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victoria Charlton
- Global Health and Social Medicine, King's College London School of Social Science and Public Policy, London, UK
| | - Michael J DiStefano
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Roquette C, Crisóstomo S, Milagre T, Ribeiro RS, Pedro AR, Valente A. Patient organisations' views, motivations and experiences on patient involvement in cancer research: a pilot study in Portugal. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e077444. [PMID: 38267237 PMCID: PMC10824046 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077444] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2023] [Accepted: 12/18/2023] [Indexed: 01/26/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To characterise Portuguese cancer-related patient organisations and analyse their views, motivations and experiences on patient involvement in cancer research. DESIGN A multistakeholder group, comprising patient representatives and researchers, codesigned a questionnaire after a literature review, online sessions and collaborative mind maps. In May 2021, a survey was conducted among representatives of Portuguese cancer-related patient organisations, focusing on four dimensions: experience in cancer research; perception of its outcomes; motivations and expectations on patient involvement in research; and organisation characteristics. PARTICIPANTS Twenty-seven representatives from Portuguese cancer-related patient organisations responded to the questionnaire, corresponding to a 64% response rate. RESULTS Among the surveyed organisations, 26% have participated in clinical studies. Their involvement occurred in few stages of the research process and, mostly, with low levels of engagement. They showed 'great interest' in participating in most research steps, although this is not reflected in a high perception of influence over these same steps. More than half claimed to have contributed to the increase in patient recruitment and to a better understanding of informed consent by patients involved. Ensuring that research results are more aligned with the true needs of patients is the greatest motivation. Also, our results suggest that the organisation's number of employees and its integration into a European/International network play a relevant role in patient involvement in research. CONCLUSIONS This study provides the first in-depth characterisation of Portuguese cancer-related patient organisations and their views, motivations and experiences on patient involvement in cancer research. Most importantly, this study revealed that most of these organisations show great interest in being involved in different R&D stages to ensure that research results are aligned with patients' needs. Their motivation should be turned into greater and more meaningful involvement in practice, so that the cancer community can benefit from the outcomes of truly patient-centred research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Constança Roquette
- Nova School of Business and Economics, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Carcavelos, Portugal
| | - Sofia Crisóstomo
- ISCTE - Instituto Universitário de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal
- GAT - Grupo de Ativistas em Tratamentos, Lisbon, Portugal
| | | | - Rute Simões Ribeiro
- NOVA University Lisbon NOVA National School of Public Health, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Ana Rita Pedro
- Public Health Research Centre, Comprehensive Health Research Center (CHRC), NOVA University Lisbon NOVA National School of Public Health, Lisboa, Portugal
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Mayora C, Kazibwe J, Ssempala R, Nakimuli B, Ssennyonjo A, Ekirapa E, Byakika S, Aliti T, Musila T, Gad M, Vassall A, Ruiz F, Ssengooba F. Health technology assessment (HTA) readiness in Uganda: stakeholder's perceptions on the potential application of HTA to support national universal health coverage efforts. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2023; 39:e65. [PMID: 37905441 DOI: 10.1017/s0266462323002635] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/02/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Health technology assessment (HTA) is an area that remains less implemented in low- and lower middle-income countries. The aim of the study is to understand the perceptions of stakeholders in Uganda toward HTA and its role in decision making, in order to inform its potential implementation in the country. METHODS The study takes a cross-sectional mixed methods approach, utilizing an adapted version of the International Decision Support Initiative questionnaire with both semi-structured and open-ended questions. We interviewed thirty key informants from different stakeholder institutions in Uganda that support policy and decision making in the health sector. RESULTS All participants perceived HTA as an important tool for decision making. Allocative efficiency was regarded as the most important use of HTA receiving the highest average score (8.8 out of 10), followed by quality of healthcare (7.8/10), transparency (7.6/10), budget control (7.5/10), and equity (6.5/10). There was concern that some of the uses of HTA may not be achieved in reality if there was political interference during the HTA process. The study participants identified development partners as the most likely potential users of HTA (66.7 percent of participants), followed by Ministry of Health (43.3 percent). CONCLUSION Interviewed stakeholders in Uganda viewed the role of HTA positively, suggesting that there exists a promising environment for the establishment and operationalization of HTA as a tool for decision making within the health sector. However, sustainable development and application of HTA in Uganda will require adequate capacity both to undertake HTAs and to support their use and uptake.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chrispus Mayora
- Department of Health Policy Planning and Management, Makerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Joseph Kazibwe
- Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Richard Ssempala
- Department of Economic Theory and Analysis, Makerere University School of Economics, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Brenda Nakimuli
- Department of Health Policy Planning and Management, Makerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Aloysius Ssennyonjo
- Department of Health Policy Planning and Management, Makerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Elizabeth Ekirapa
- Department of Health Policy Planning and Management, Makerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Sarah Byakika
- Department of Planning, Financing and Policy, Ministry of Health, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Tom Aliti
- Department of Planning, Financing and Policy, Ministry of Health, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Timothy Musila
- Department of Planning, Financing and Policy, Ministry of Health, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Mohamed Gad
- Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Anna Vassall
- Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Francis Ruiz
- Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Freddie Ssengooba
- Department of Health Policy Planning and Management, Makerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
De Freitas Lopes AC, Novaes HMD, De Soárez PC. Does patient and public involvement impact public health decision-making? A 10 year retrospective analysis of public consultation in Brazil. Health Res Policy Syst 2023; 21:72. [PMID: 37438823 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-023-01018-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2023] [Accepted: 06/14/2023] [Indexed: 07/14/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this work is to characterize the processes associated with patient and public involvement (PPI) in the form of public consultations (PC) during the first 10 years of operation of the National Committee for Health Technology Incorporation in the Unified Health System (Conitec) of Brazil, and to identify factors associated with changes in Conitec's recommendations following these PC. METHODS This cross-sectional study analysed all processes related to the adoption of technologies that took place in Brazil between 2012 and 2021 based on technical reports and self-reported information collected from PC participants. A multiple logistic regression model identified factors associated with changes in Conitec's recommendations following PC. RESULTS A total of 479 technical reports were published, of which 83% (n = 400) were submitted to PC. Demands were made mainly by applicants from the government (n = 262; 55%), regarding the adoption of medicines (n = 366; 76%), in which context neoplasms and infectious diseases were the most frequent indications (n = 66; 14% for each). A total of 264 (55%) processes resulted in a final recommendation in favour of introducing the technology. Over the period of 10 years, 196 483 contributions were received in response to PC. The largest volume of contributions was made by patients and their families or representatives (n = 99 082; 50%), females (122 895; 67%), white individuals (129 165; 71%) and individuals between the ages of 25 and 59 years (145 364; 80%). Alteration of the preliminary recommendation occurred in 13% (n = 53) of the PC, with a higher proportion of recommendations being altered from 2017 onwards. Increased participation by patients had a significant impact on the alteration of the preliminary recommendation (odds ratio 3.87, 95% CI 1.33-13.35, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS Increased engagement of patients and their families and caregivers in PC was associated with changing the preliminary recommendation of Conitec about the adoption of technologies into the public health system in Brazil.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Carolina De Freitas Lopes
- Departamento de Medicina Preventiva, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, Av. Dr. Arnaldo 455, Cerqueira Cesar, São Paulo, SP, 01246903, Brazil.
- Departamento de Gestão e Incorporação de Tecnologias em Saúde, Ministry of Health, Esplanada dos Ministérios, Bloco G, Brasilia, Brazil.
| | - Hillegonda Maria Dutilh Novaes
- Departamento de Medicina Preventiva, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, Av. Dr. Arnaldo 455, Cerqueira Cesar, São Paulo, SP, 01246903, Brazil
| | - Patrícia Coelho De Soárez
- Departamento de Medicina Preventiva, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, Av. Dr. Arnaldo 455, Cerqueira Cesar, São Paulo, SP, 01246903, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kinchin I, Walshe V, Normand C, Coast J, Elliott R, Kroll T, Kinghorn P, Thompson A, Viney R, Currow D, O'Mahony JF. Expanding health technology assessment towards broader value: Ireland as a case study. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2023; 39:e26. [PMID: 37129030 DOI: 10.1017/s0266462323000235] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/03/2023]
Abstract
Healthcare innovations often represent important improvements in population welfare, but at what cost, and to whom? Health technology assessment (HTA) is a multidisciplinary process to inform resource allocation. HTA is conventionally anchored on health maximization as the only relevant output of health services. If we accept the proposition that health technologies can generate value outside the healthcare system, resource allocation decisions could be suboptimal from a societal perspective. Incorporating "broader value" in HTA as derived from social values and patient experience could provide a richer evaluative space for informing resource allocation decisions. This article considers how HTA is practiced and what its current context implies for adopting "broader value" to evaluating health technologies. Methodological challenges are highlighted, as is a future research agenda. Ireland serves as an example of a healthcare system that both has an explicit role for HTA and is evolving under a current program of reform to offer universal, single-tier access to public services. There are various ways in which HTA processes could move beyond health, including considering the processes of care delivery and/or expanding the evaluative space to some broader concept of well-being. Methods to facilitate the latter exist, but their adaptation to HTA is still emerging. We recommend a multi-stakeholder working group to develop and advance an international agenda for HTA that captures welfare/benefit beyond health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irina Kinchin
- Centre for Health Policy and Management, Trinity College Dublin, The University of Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | - Charles Normand
- Centre for Health Policy and Management, Trinity College Dublin, The University of Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Joanna Coast
- Bristol Population Health Science Institute, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Rachel Elliott
- Manchester Centre for Health Economics, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Thilo Kroll
- School of Nursing, Midwifery and Health Systems, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Philip Kinghorn
- Health Economics Unit, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Alexander Thompson
- Manchester Centre for Health Economics, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Rosalie Viney
- Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation (CHERE), University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW, Australia
| | - David Currow
- Faculty of Science, Medicine and Health, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
| | - James F O'Mahony
- Centre for Health Policy and Management, Trinity College Dublin, The University of Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Coulibaly LP, Poder TG, Tousignant M. Attributes Underlying Patient Choice for Telerehabilitation Treatment: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review to Support a Discrete Choice Experiment Study Design. Int J Health Policy Manag 2022; 11:1991-2002. [PMID: 34861762 PMCID: PMC9808290 DOI: 10.34172/ijhpm.2021.150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2021] [Accepted: 11/02/2021] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Across most healthcare systems, patients are the primary focus. Patient involvements enhance their adherence to treatment, which in return, influences their health. The objective of this study was to determine the characteristics (ie, attributes) and associated levels (ie, values of the characteristics) that are the most important for patients regarding telerehabilitation (TR) healthcare to support a future discrete choice experiment (DCE) study design. METHODS A mixed-methods systematic review was conducted from January 2005 to the end of July 2020 and the search strategy was applied to five different databases. The initial selection of articles that met the eligibility criteria was independently made by one researcher, two researchers verified the accuracy of the extracted data, and all researchers discussed about relevant variables to include. Reporting of this systematic review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) was used to assess the quality of the study. A qualitative synthesis was used to summarize findings. RESULTS From a total of 928 articles, 11 (qualitative [n = 5], quantitative [n = 3] and mixed-methods [n = 3] design) were included, and 25 attributes were identified and grouped into 13 categories: Accessibility, Distance, Interaction, Technology experience, Treatment mode, Treatment location, Physician contact mode, Physician contact frequency, Cost, Confidence, Ease of use, Feeling safer, and Training session. The attributes levels varied from two to five. The DCE studies identified showed the main stages to undertake these types of studies. CONCLUSION This study could guide the development of interview grid for individual interviews and focus groups to support a DCE study design in the TR field. By understanding the characteristics that enhance patients' preferences, healthcare providers can create or improve TR programs that provide high-quality and accessible care. Future research via a DCE is needed to determine the relative importance of the attributes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucien P. Coulibaly
- Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
- Centre de Recherche sur le Vieillissement, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
| | - Thomas G. Poder
- Département de Gestion, Évaluation et Politique de Santé, École de santé publique de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
- Centre de recherche de l'Institut universitaire en santé mentale de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Michel Tousignant
- Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
- Centre de Recherche sur le Vieillissement, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Evans BA, Carson‐Stevens A, Cooper A, Davies F, Edwards M, Harrington B, Hepburn J, Hughes T, Price D, Siriwardena NA, Snooks H, Edwards A. Implementing public involvement throughout the research process-Experience and learning from the GPs in EDs study. Health Expect 2022; 25:2471-2484. [PMID: 35894169 PMCID: PMC9615054 DOI: 10.1111/hex.13566] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2022] [Revised: 04/26/2022] [Accepted: 06/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Public involvement in health services research is encouraged. Descriptions of public involvement across the whole research cycle of a major study are uncommon and its effects on research conduct are poorly understood. AIM This study aimed to describe how we implemented public involvement, reflect on process and effects in a large-scale multi-site research study and present learning for future involvement practice. METHOD We recorded public involvement roles and activities throughout the study and compared these to our original public involvement plan included in our project proposal. We held a group interview with study co-applicants to explore their experiences, transcribed the recorded discussion and conducted thematic analysis. We synthesized the findings to develop recommendations for future practice. RESULTS Public contributors' activities went beyond strategic study planning and management to include active involvement in data collection, analysis and dissemination. They attended management, scrutiny, planning and task meetings. They also facilitated public involvement through annual planning and review sessions, conducted a Public Involvement audit and coordinated public and patient input to stakeholder discussions at key study stages. Group interview respondents said that involvement exceeded their expectations. They identified effects such as changes to patient recruitment, terminology clarification and extra dissemination activities. They identified factors enabling effective involvement including team and leader commitment, named support contact, building relationships and demonstrating equality and public contributors being confident to challenge and flexible to meet researchers' timescales and work patterns. There were challenges matching resources to roles and questions about the risk of over-professionalizing public contributors. CONCLUSION We extended our planned approach to public involvement and identified benefits to the research process that were both specific and general. We identified good practice to support effective public involvement in health services research that study teams should consider in planning and undertaking research. PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION This paper was co-conceived, co-planned and co-authored by public contributors to contribute research evidence, based on their experiences of active involvement in the design, implementation and dissemination of a major health services research study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bridie Angela Evans
- Swansea University Medical SchoolSwansea UniversitySwanseaUK
- Swansea University Medical School, PRIME Centre WalesSwansea UniversitySwanseaUK
| | - Andrew Carson‐Stevens
- Swansea University Medical School, PRIME Centre WalesSwansea UniversitySwanseaUK
- Division of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, PRIME Centre WalesCardiff UniversityCardiffUK
| | - Alison Cooper
- Swansea University Medical School, PRIME Centre WalesSwansea UniversitySwanseaUK
- Division of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, PRIME Centre WalesCardiff UniversityCardiffUK
| | - Freya Davies
- Swansea University Medical School, PRIME Centre WalesSwansea UniversitySwanseaUK
- Division of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, PRIME Centre WalesCardiff UniversityCardiffUK
| | - Michelle Edwards
- Swansea University Medical School, PRIME Centre WalesSwansea UniversitySwanseaUK
- Division of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, PRIME Centre WalesCardiff UniversityCardiffUK
| | - Barbara Harrington
- Public Contributor, c/o Swansea University Medical SchoolSwansea UniversitySwanseaUK
| | - Julie Hepburn
- Public Contributor, c/o Swansea University Medical SchoolSwansea UniversitySwanseaUK
| | | | - Delyth Price
- Swansea University Medical School, PRIME Centre WalesSwansea UniversitySwanseaUK
- Division of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, PRIME Centre WalesCardiff UniversityCardiffUK
| | | | - Helen Snooks
- Swansea University Medical SchoolSwansea UniversitySwanseaUK
- Swansea University Medical School, PRIME Centre WalesSwansea UniversitySwanseaUK
| | - Adrian Edwards
- Division of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, PRIME Centre WalesCardiff UniversityCardiffUK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Fedorowicz S, Riley V, Cowap L, Ellis NJ, Chambers R, Grogan S, Crone D, Cottrell E, Clark-Carter D, Roberts L, Gidlow CJ. Using social media for patient and public involvement and engagement in health research: The process and impact of a closed Facebook group. Health Expect 2022; 25:2786-2795. [PMID: 36134468 DOI: 10.1111/hex.13515] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2021] [Revised: 03/10/2022] [Accepted: 04/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND As part of a multifaceted approach to patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE), alongside traditional methods, a closed Facebook group was established to facilitate PPIE feedback on various aspects of a project that used video-recording to examine risk communication in NHS Health Checks between June 2017 and July 2019. OBJECTIVE To explore the process and impact of conducting PPIE through a closed Facebook group and to identify the associated benefits and challenges. METHODS Supported by reflections and information from project meetings used to document how this engagement informed the project, we describe the creation and maintenance of the Facebook Group and how feedback from the group members was obtained. Facebook data were used to investigate levels and types of engagement in the closed Facebook group. We reflect on the challenges of using this method of engaging the public in health research. RESULTS A total of 289 people joined the 'Risk Communication of Cardiovascular disease in NHS Health Checks' PPIE closed Facebook group. They provided feedback, which was used to inform aspects of the study, including participant-facing documents, recruitment, camera position and how the methodology being used (video-recorded Health Checks and follow-up interviews) would be received by the public. DISCUSSION Using a closed Facebook group to facilitate PPIE offered a flexible approach for both researchers and participants, enabled a more inclusive method to PPIE (compared with traditional methods) and allowed rapid feedback. Challenges included maintaining the group, which was more labour intensive than anticipated and managing members' expectations. Suggestions for best practice include clear communication about the purpose of the group, assigning a group co-ordinator to be the main point of contact for the group, and a research team who can dedicate the time necessary to maintain the group. CONCLUSION The use of a closed Facebook group can facilitate effective PPIE. Its flexibility can be beneficial for researchers, patients and public who wish to engage in the research process. Dedicated time for sustained group engagement is important. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION Patient representatives were engaged with the development of the research described in this paper and a patient representative reviewed the manuscript.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophia Fedorowicz
- The Centre for Health and Development, Staffordshire University, Stoke-on-Trent, UK
| | - Victoria Riley
- The Centre for Health and Development, Staffordshire University, Stoke-on-Trent, UK
| | - Lisa Cowap
- The Centre for Health and Development, Staffordshire University, Stoke-on-Trent, UK
| | - Naomi J Ellis
- The Centre for Health and Development, Staffordshire University, Stoke-on-Trent, UK
| | - Ruth Chambers
- Technology Enabled Care Programme, Staffordshire Sustainability and Transformation Partnership's Digital Workstream, Stoke-on-Trent Clinical Commissioning Group, Stoke-on-Trent, UK
| | - Sarah Grogan
- Department of Psychology, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK
| | - Diane Crone
- School of Sport and Health Sciences, Cardiff Metropolitan University, Cyncoed Campus, Cardiff, UK
| | | | - David Clark-Carter
- The Centre for Health and Development, Staffordshire University, Stoke-on-Trent, UK
| | - Lesley Roberts
- Member Governor of Midlands Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Patient Representative, Stoke-on-Trent, UK
| | - Christopher J Gidlow
- The Centre for Health and Development, Staffordshire University, Stoke-on-Trent, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Jacob C, Bourke S, Heuss S. From testers to co-creators: the value and approaches to successful patient engagement in the development of eHealth solutions - Qualitative Expert Interviews Study. JMIR Hum Factors 2022; 9:e41481. [PMID: 36102548 PMCID: PMC9585443 DOI: 10.2196/41481] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2022] [Revised: 08/30/2022] [Accepted: 09/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Research has shown that patient engagement is most commonly done at the beginning of research or to test readily available prototypes and less commonly done in other phases such as the execution phases. Previous studies have reported that patients are usually assigned a consultative rather than a decision-making role in health service planning and evaluation. Objective This study had 2 objectives: to better understand the challenges and opportunities in the inclusion of patients in the development of eHealth technologies and ideas on how to overcome the identified gaps and to create a research-based end-to-end practical blueprint that can guide the relevant stakeholders to successfully engage patients as cocreators in all human-centered design phases rather than mere testers of preplanned prototypes. Methods Key informant interviews were conducted using in-depth semistructured interviews with 20 participants from 6 countries across Europe. This was followed by a focus group to validate the initial findings. Participants encompassed all the relevant stakeholder groups including patient experts, eHealth experts, health technology providers, clinicians, pharma executives, and health insurance experts. Results This study shows that engaging patients in eHealth development can help provide different types of value; namely, identifying unmet needs, better usability and desirability, better fit into the patient journey, better adoption and stickiness, better health outcomes, advocacy and trust, a sense of purpose, and better health equity and access. However, the participants agreed that patients are usually engaged too late in the development process, mostly assuming a sounding role in testing a ready-made prototype. The justification for these gaps in engagement is driven by some prominent barriers, notably compliance risks, patient-related factors, power dynamics, patient engagement as lip service, poor value perception, lack of resources, mistrust, and inflexibility. On the positive side, the participants also reflected on facilitators for better patient engagement; for instance, engaging through engagement partners, novel approaches such as the rise of professional patient experts, embedding patients in development teams, expectation management, and professional moderation services. Conclusions Overcoming the current gaps in patient engagement in eHealth development requires consolidated efforts from all stakeholders in a complex health care ecosystem. The shift toward more patient-driven eHealth development requires education and awareness; frameworks to monitor and evaluate the value of patient engagement; regulatory clarity and simplification; platforms to facilitate patient access and identification; patient incentivization, transparency, and trust; and a mindset shift toward value-based health care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine Jacob
- FHNW - University of Applied Sciences Northwestern Switzerland, Bahnhofstrasse 6, Windisch, CH
| | | | - Sabina Heuss
- FHNW - University of Applied Sciences Northwestern Switzerland, Olten, CH
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Dimitrova M, Jakab I, Mitkova Z, Kamusheva M, Tachkov K, Nemeth B, Zemplenyi A, Dawoud D, Delnoij DMJ, Houýez F, Kalo Z. Potential Barriers of Patient Involvement in Health Technology Assessment in Central and Eastern European Countries. Front Public Health 2022; 10:922708. [PMID: 35968493 PMCID: PMC9371596 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.922708] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2022] [Accepted: 06/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Patients' perspectives are important to identify preferences, estimate values and appreciate unmet medical needs in the process of research and development and subsequent assessment of new health technologies. Patient and public involvement in health technology assessment (HTA) is essential in understanding and assessing wider implications of coverage and reimbursement decisions for patients, their relatives, caregivers, and the general population. There are two approaches to incorporating the patients' voice in HTA, preferably used in a mix. In the first one, patients, caregivers and/or their representatives directly participate at discussions in different stages of the HTA process, often at the same table with other stakeholders. Secondly, patient involvement activities can be supported by evidence on patient value and experience collected directly from patients, caregivers and/or their representatives often by patient groups Patient involvement practices, however, are limited in Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries without clear methodology or regulatory mechanisms to guide patient involvement in the HTA process. This poses the question of transferability of practices used in other countries, and might call for the development of new CEE-specific guidelines and methods. In this study we aim to map potential barriers of patient involvement in HTA in countries of the CEE region.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Dimitrova
- Faculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Sofia, Sofia, Bulgaria
- *Correspondence: Maria Dimitrova
| | - Ivett Jakab
- Syreon Research Institute, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Zornitsa Mitkova
- Faculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Sofia, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Maria Kamusheva
- Faculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Sofia, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | | | | | - Antal Zemplenyi
- Syreon Research Institute, Budapest, Hungary
- Center for Health Technology Assessment and Pharmacoeconomics Research, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary
| | - Dalia Dawoud
- National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, London, United Kingdom
- Faculty of Pharmacy, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Diana M. J. Delnoij
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, Netherlands
- National Health Care Institute (Zorginstituut Nederland), Diemen, Netherlands
| | - François Houýez
- EURORDIS: Eurordis, European Organization for Rare Diseases, Paris, France
| | - Zoltan Kalo
- Syreon Research Institute, Budapest, Hungary
- Center for Health Technology Assessment, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Cluley V, Ziemann A, Feeley C, Olander EK, Shamah S, Stavropoulou C. Mapping the role of patient and public involvement during the different stages of healthcare innovation: A scoping review. Health Expect 2022; 25:840-855. [PMID: 35174585 DOI: 10.1111/hex.13437] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2021] [Revised: 01/05/2022] [Accepted: 01/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient and public involvement (PPI) has become increasingly important in the development, delivery and improvement of healthcare. PPI is used in healthcare innovation; yet, how it is used has been under-reported. The aim of this scoping review is to identify and map the current available empirical evidence on the role of PPI during different stages of healthcare innovation. METHODS The scoping review was conducted in accordance with PRISMAScR and included any study published in a peer-reviewed journal between 2004 and 2021 that reported on PPI in healthcare innovation within any healthcare setting or context in any country. The following databases were searched: Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycInfo, HMIC and Google Scholar. We included any study type, including quantitative, qualitative and mixed-method studies. We excluded theoretical frameworks, conceptual, scientific or grey literature as well as discussion and opinion papers. RESULTS Of the 87 included studies, 81 (93%) focused on or were conducted by authors in developed countries. A wide range of conditions were considered, with more studies focusing on mental health (n = 18, 21%) and cancer care (n = 8, 9%). The vast majority of the studies focused on process and service innovations (n = 62, 71%). Seven studies focused on technological and clinical innovations (8%), while 12 looked at both technological and service innovations (14%). Only five studies examined systems innovation (5%) and one study looked across all types of innovations (1%). PPI is more common in the earlier stages of innovation, particularly problem identification and invention, in comparison to adoption and diffusion. CONCLUSION Healthcare innovation tends to be a lengthy process. Yet, our study highlights that PPI is more common across earlier stages of innovation and focuses mostly on service innovation. Stronger PPI in later stages could support the adoption and diffusion of innovation. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION One of the coauthors of the paper (S. S.) is a service user with extensive experience in PPI research. S. S. supported the analysis and writing up of the paper.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victoria Cluley
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Alexandra Ziemann
- Centre for Healthcare Innovation Research, City, University of London, London, UK
| | - Claire Feeley
- School of Community Health and Midwifery, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK
| | - Ellinor K Olander
- Centre for Maternal and Child Health Research, School of Health Sciences, City, University of London, London, UK
| | - Shani Shamah
- Service-User, Research (Public Patient Involvement) Consultant, Independent, London, UK
| | - Charitini Stavropoulou
- Centre for Healthcare Innovation Research, City, University of London, London, UK.,School of Health Sciences, City, University of London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Wale JL, Chandler D, Collyar D, Hamerlijnck D, Saldana R, Pemberton-Whitely Z. Can We Afford to Exclude Patients Throughout Health Technology Assessment? FRONTIERS IN MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY 2022; 3:796344. [PMID: 35146487 PMCID: PMC8821945 DOI: 10.3389/fmedt.2021.796344] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2021] [Accepted: 11/08/2021] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Health technology assessment (HTA) is intended to determine the value of health technologies and, once a technology is recommended for funding, bridge clinical research and practice. Understanding the values and beliefs expressed by patients and health professionals can help guide this knowledge transfer and work toward managing the expectations of end users. We gathered patient and patient group leader experiences to gain insights into the roles that patients and patient advocacy groups are playing. We argue that through partnerships and co-creation between HTA professionals, researchers and patient advocates we can strengthen the HTA process and better align with service delivery where person-centered care and shared decision making are key elements. Patient experiences and knowledge are important to the democratization of evidence and the legitimacy of HTAs. Patient preference studies are used to balance benefits with potential harms of technologies, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) can measure what matters to patients over time. A change in culture in HTA bodies is occurring and with further transformative thinking patients can be involved in every step of the HTA process. Patients have a right to be involved in HTAs, with patients' values central to HTA deliberations on a technology and where patients can provide valuable insights to inform HTA decision-making; and in ensuring that HTA methodologies evolve. By evaluating the implementation of HTA recommendations we can determine how HTA benefits patients and their communities. Our shared commitment can positively effect the common good and provide benefits to individual patients and their communities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janet L. Wale
- HTAi Patient and Citizen Involvement Interest Group (PCIG) Chair, Brunswick, VIC, Australia
- *Correspondence: Janet L. Wale
| | - David Chandler
- Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis Alliance (PAPAA), St Albans, United Kingdom
| | - Deborah Collyar
- Patient Advocates in Research (PAIR), Danville, CA, United States
| | | | - Roberto Saldana
- Spanish Platform European Patients' Academy on Therapeutic Innovation (EUPATI), Madrid, Spain
| | - Zack Pemberton-Whitely
- Acute Leukemia Advocates Network and Leukaemia Patient Advocates Foundation, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Steffensen MB, Matzen CL, Wadmann S. Patient participation in priority setting: Co-existing participant roles. Soc Sci Med 2022; 294:114713. [PMID: 35032747 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114713] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2021] [Revised: 12/22/2021] [Accepted: 01/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
Reflecting a 'participatory turn' in healthcare, a variety of activities have been adopted in many countries to harness the views of patients, relatives and service users. While celebrated as a way of empowering patients and increasing the legitimacy of decisions that impact on patient care, critics contend that practices of patient participation often fall short of the ideals they purport to implement. In this article, we investigate how patients' participation in medical priority setting corresponds with the regulative ideals of deliberation and how the practices of participation influence the ability of patients to make their voices heard. Building on document analysis and semi-structured interviews with 12 patient representatives and four scientific officers in the Danish Medicines Council, the analysis demonstrates that conflicting notions of valid knowledge constituted a main challenge for patient participation. The study contributes to the literature on patient participation through a conceptualization of four co-existing participant roles: 1) compliant keepers of experiential knowledge, 2) lay experts investing in evidence production, 3) knowledge translators engaged in alliance building, and 4) demonstrators promoting public contestation. We suggest that a main challenge for PP initiatives is to take into account this variation in patients' engagement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mette B Steffensen
- Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 5, 1014, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Christina L Matzen
- Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 5, 1014, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Sarah Wadmann
- The Danish Center for Social Science Research - VIVE, Herluf Trolles Gade 11, 1052, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Patient-centered health technology assessment: a perspective on engagement in health technology assessment by three patient organizations and a health technology assessment body. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2022; 38:e76. [DOI: 10.1017/s0266462322000587] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Patient engagement in health technology assessment (HTA) has become increasingly important over the past 20 years. Academic and practitioner literature has produced numerous case studies and best practice accounts of patient involvement practices around the world. This text analyzes the experience of being involved in an Institute for Clinical and Economic Review (ICER) HTA review in the United States. The analysis comes from the joint perspective of three patient organizations: Lupus and Allied Diseases Association, Inc.; Lupus Foundation of America; and Black Women’s Health Imperative, as well as ICER. We suggest that meaningful, patient-centered engagement, where patient communities are systematically integrated throughout the review, can be a way of returning to the discipline’s roots focusing on technologies’ societal and ethical impact. It is a process that requires robust commitment from all involved but produces assessments relevant to those directly affected by them.
Collapse
|
19
|
A framework for action to improve patient and public involvement in health technology assessment. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2021; 38:e8. [DOI: 10.1017/s0266462321000647] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Patient and public involvement (PPI) in the Brazilian Health Technology Assessment (HTA) process occurs in response to a legislative mandate for “social participation.” This resulted in some limited patient participation activities, and, therefore, a more systematic approach was needed. The study describes the development of a suggested framework for action to improve PPI in HTA.
Methods
This work used formal methodology to develop a PPI framework based on three-phase mixed-methods research with desktop review of Brazilian PPI activities in HTA; workshop, survey, and interviews with Brazilian stakeholders; and a rapid review of international practices to enact effective patient involvement. Patient partners reviewed the draft framework.
Results
According to patient group representatives, their involvement in the Brazilian HTA process is important but could be improved. Different stakeholders perceived barriers, identified values, and made suggestions for improvement, such as expansion of communication, capacity building, and transparency, to support more meaningful patient involvement. The international practices identified opportunities for earlier, more active, and collaborative PPI during all HTA stages, based on values and principles that are relevant for Brazilian patients and the public. These findings were synthesized to design a framework that defines and systematizes actions to support PPI in Brazil, highlighting the importance of evaluating these strategies.
Conclusions
Since the publication of this framework, some of its suggestions are being implemented in the Brazilian HTA process to improve PPI. We encourage other HTA organizations to consider a systematic and planned approach with regular evaluation when pursuing or strengthening involvement practices.
Collapse
|
20
|
Gunn CJ, Bertelsen N, Regeer BJ, Schuitmaker-Warnaar TJ. Valuing patient engagement: Reflexive learning in evidence generation practices for health technology assessment. Soc Sci Med 2021; 280:114048. [PMID: 34052699 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Revised: 05/11/2021] [Accepted: 05/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Much attention in health technology assessment (HTA), a health system governance mechanism used for determining the value of health technologies, is being paid to improving the quality and patient-relevance of the evidence used in assessment pratices. Whilst the direct involvement of patient actors throughout HTA processes has become a more routine element of institutional practice, the 'impacts' of patient engagement (PE) initiatives have proven difficult to determine and enhance. In reflexive governance theories, reflexive learning is a critical mechanism of multi-stakeholder arrangements that better handles the complexities of technologies and how they are understood through governance practices. This paper explores how reflexive learning can be used to build a richer conceptualisation of PE in HTA, in order to generate suggestions for enhancing PE practices and their impact. We critically apply reflexive learning insights on qualitative data derived from the co-creation process of a PE evaluation framework, organised through an EU project focused on strengthening PE practices across medicines development (2018-2020), including 24 interactive case studies, 3 multi-stakeholder workshops, and our observations throughout the project. The findings characterise two dimensions of reflexive learning in PE: First, reflexive learning refers to the adaptive reorganisation of evidence generating practices, including the revision of medicines' evaluation criteria and the conditions under which evidence 'relevant' to HTA is constructed. Second, reflexive learning spotlights the sociopolitics which shape technology evaluation. Four themes affecting meaningful and sustained PE in medicines development were analysed: institutional boundaries due to established evaluation criteria; timing of engagements; network relations between institutional actors; and the politics of patient representation. Extending beyond discrete PE activities and their reported impacts, reflexive forms of learning are crucial to yielding more 'meaningful' PE for HTA and medicines development, facilitating a HTA practice that more meaningfully deals with the complexities of medicines evidence generation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Callum J Gunn
- Athena Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1085, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Neil Bertelsen
- Patient & Citizen Involvement in HTA Group, HTAi, Germany
| | - Barbara J Regeer
- Athena Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1085, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|