Apomorphine blocks form-deprivation myopia in chickens by a dopamine D2-receptor mechanism acting in retina or pigmented epithelium

Mechanisms of emmetropization and what might go wrong in myopia

Studies in animal models and humans have shown that refractive state is optimized during postnatal development by a closed-loop negative feedback system that uses retinal image defocus as an error signal, a mechanism called emmetropization. The sensor to detect defocus and its sign resides in the retina itself. The retina and/or the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) presumably releases biochemical messengers to change choroidal thickness and modulate the growth rates of the underlying sclera. A central question arises: if emmetropization operates as a closed-loop system, why does it not stop myopia development? Recent experiments in young human subjects have shown that (1) the emmetropic retina can perfectly distinguish between real positive defocus and simulated defocus, and trigger transient axial eye shortening or elongation, respectively. (2) Strikingly, the myopic retina has reduced ability to inhibit eye growth when positive defocus is imposed. (3) The bi-directional response of the emmetropic retina is elicited with low spatial frequency information below 8 cyc/deg, which makes it unlikely that optical higher-order aberrations play a role. (4) The retinal mechanism for the detection of the sign of defocus involves a comparison of defocus blur in the blue (S-cone) and red end of the spectrum (L + M-cones) but, again, the myopic retina is not responsive, at least not in short-term experiments. This suggests that it cannot fully trigger the inhibitory arm of the emmetropization feedback loop. As a result, with an open feedback loop, myopia development becomes "open-loop".

Contrast Sensitivity of ON and OFF Human Retinal Pathways in Myopia

The human visual cortex processes light and dark stimuli with ON and OFF pathways that are differently modulated by luminance contrast. We have previously demonstrated that ON cortical pathways have higher contrast sensitivity than OFF cortical pathways and the difference increases with luminance range (defined as the maximum minus minimum luminance in the scene). Here, we demonstrate that these ON-OFF cortical differences are already present in the human retina and that retinal responses measured with electroretinography are more affected by reductions in luminance range than cortical responses measured with electroencephalography. Moreover, we show that ON-OFF pathway differences measured with electroretinography become more pronounced in myopia, a visual disorder that elongates the eye and blurs vision at far distance. We find that, as the eye axial length increases across subjects, ON retinal pathways become less responsive, slower in response latency, less sensitive, and less effective and slower at driving pupil constriction. Based on these results, we conclude that myopia is associated with a deficit in ON pathway function that decreases the ability of the retina to process low contrast and regulate retinal illuminance in bright environments.

Acupuncture modulates development of myopia by reducing NLRP3 inflammasome activation via the dopamine-D1R signaling pathway

BACKGROUND

Dopamine has been suggested to be a stop signal for eye growth and affects the development of myopia. Acupuncture is known to increase dopamine secretion and is widely used to treat myopia clinically.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine if acupuncture inhibits myopia progression in form deprived Syrian hamsters by inducing rises in dopamine content that in turn suppress inflammasome activation.

METHODS

Acupuncture was applied at LI4 and Taiyang every other day for 21 days. The levels of molecules associated with the dopamine signaling pathway, inflammatory signaling pathway and inflammasome activation were determined. A dopamine agonist (apomorphine) was used to evaluate if activation of the dopaminergic signaling pathway suppresses myopia progression by inhibiting inflammasome activation in primary retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) cells. A dopamine receptor 1 (D1R) inhibitor (SCH39166) was also administered to the hamsters.

RESULTS

Acupuncture inhibited myopia development by increasing dopamine levels and activating the D1R signaling pathway. Furthermore, we also demonstrated that nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain (NOD)-, leucine-rich repeat (LRR)- and pyrin domain-containing protein 3 (NLR) family pyrin domain-containing 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome activation was inhibited by activation of the D1R signaling pathway.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that acupuncture inhibits myopia development by suppressing inflammation, which is initiated by activation of the dopamine-D1R signaling pathway.

The Role of Retinal Dopamine D1 Receptors in Ocular Growth and Myopia Development in Mice

Dopamine is a key neurotransmitter in the signaling cascade controlling ocular refractive development, but the exact role and site of action of dopamine D1 receptors (D1Rs) involved in myopia remains unclear. Here, we determine whether retinal D1Rs exclusively mediate the effects of endogenous dopamine and systemically delivered D1R agonist or antagonist in the mouse form deprivation myopia (FDM) model. Male C57BL/6 mice subjected to unilateral FDM or unobstructed vision were divided into the following four groups: one noninjected and three groups that received intraperitoneal injections of a vehicle, D1R agonist SKF38393 (18 and 59 nmol/g), or D1R antagonist SCH39166 (0.1 and 1 nmol/g). The effects of these drugs on FDM were further assessed in Drd1-knock-out (Drd1-KO), retina-specific conditional Drd1-KO (Drd1-CKO) mice, and corresponding wild-type littermates. In the visually unobstructed group, neither SKF38393 nor SCH39166 affected normal refractive development, whereas myopia development was attenuated by SKF38393 and enhanced by SCH39166 injections. In Drd1-KO or Drd1-CKO mice, however, these drugs had no effect on FDM development, suggesting that activation of retinal D1Rs is pertinent to myopia suppression by the D1R agonist. Interestingly, the development of myopia was unchanged by either Drd1-KO or Drd1-CKO, and neither SKF38393 nor SCH39166 injections, nor Drd1-KO, affected the retinal or vitreal dopamine and the dopamine metabolite DOPAC levels. Effects on axial length were less marked than effects on refraction. Therefore, activation of D1Rs, specifically retinal D1Rs, inhibits myopia development in mice. These results also suggest that multiple dopamine D1R mechanisms play roles in emmetropization and myopia development.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT While dopamine is recognized as a "stop" signal that inhibits myopia development (myopization), the location of the dopamine D1 receptors (D1Rs) that mediate this action remains to be addressed. Answers to this key question are critical for understanding how dopaminergic systems regulate ocular growth and refraction. We report here the results of our study showing that D1Rs are essential for controlling ocular growth and myopia development in mice, and for identifying the retina as the site of action for dopaminergic control via D1Rs. These findings highlight the importance of intrinsic retinal dopaminergic mechanisms for the regulation of ocular growth and suggest specific avenues for exploring the retinal mechanisms involved in the dopaminergic control of emmetropization and myopization.

Candidate pathways for retina to scleral signaling in refractive eye growth

The global prevalence of myopia, or nearsightedness, has increased at an alarming rate over the last few decades. An eye is myopic if incoming light focuses prior to reaching the retinal photoreceptors, which indicates a mismatch in its shape and optical power. This mismatch commonly results from excessive axial elongation. Important drivers of the myopia epidemic include environmental factors, genetic factors, and their interactions, e.g., genetic factors influencing the effects of environmental factors. One factor often hypothesized to be a driver of the myopia epidemic is environmental light, which has changed drastically and rapidly on a global scale. In support of this, it is well established that eye size is regulated by a homeostatic process that incorporates visual cues (emmetropization). This process allows the eye to detect and minimize refractive errors quite accurately and locally over time by modulating the rate of elongation of the eye via remodeling its outermost coat, the sclera. Critically, emmetropization is not dependent on post-retinal processing. Thus, visual cues appear to influence axial elongation through a retina-to-sclera, or retinoscleral, signaling cascade, capable of transmitting information from the innermost layer of the eye to the outermost layer. Despite significant global research interest, the specifics of retinoscleral signaling pathways remain elusive. While a few pharmacological treatments have proven to be effective in slowing axial elongation (most notably topical atropine), the mechanisms behind these treatments are still not fully understood. Additionally, several retinal neuromodulators, neurotransmitters, and other small molecules have been found to influence axial length and/or refractive error or be influenced by myopigenic cues, yet little progress has been made explaining how the signal that originates in the retina crosses the highly vascular choroid to affect the sclera. Here, we compile and synthesize the evidence surrounding three of the major candidate pathways receiving significant research attention - dopamine, retinoic acid, and adenosine. All three candidates have both correlational and causal evidence backing their involvement in axial elongation and have been implicated by multiple independent research groups across diverse species. Two hypothesized mechanisms are presented for how a retina-originating signal crosses the choroid - via 1) all-trans retinoic acid or 2) choroidal blood flow influencing scleral oxygenation. Evidence of crosstalk between the pathways is discussed in the context of these two mechanisms.

The Role of GJD2(Cx36) in Refractive Error Development

Refractive errors are common eye disorders characterized by a mismatch between the focal power of the eye and its axial length. An increased axial length is a common cause of the refractive error myopia (nearsightedness). The substantial increase in myopia prevalence over the last decades has raised public health concerns because myopia can lead to severe ocular complications later in life. Genomewide association studies (GWAS) have made considerable contributions to the understanding of the genetic architecture of refractive errors. Among the hundreds of genetic variants identified, common variants near the gap junction delta-2 (GJD2) gene have consistently been reported as one of the top hits. GJD2 encodes the connexin 36 (Cx36) protein, which forms gap junction channels and is highly expressed in the neural retina. In this review, we provide current evidence that links GJD2(Cx36) to the development of myopia. We summarize the gap junctional communication in the eye and the specific role of GJD2(Cx36) in retinal processing of visual signals. Finally, we discuss the pathways involving dopamine and gap junction phosphorylation and coupling as potential mechanisms that may explain the role of GJD2(Cx36) in refractive error development.

Retinal Dopamine D2 Receptors Participate in the Development of Myopia in Mice

Purpose

To learn more about the locations of dopamine D2 receptors (D2Rs) that regulate form-deprivation myopia (FDM), using different transgenic mouse models.

Methods

One eye of D2R-knockout (KO) mice and wild-type littermates was subjected to four weeks of monocular FDM, whereas the fellow eye served as control. Mice in both groups received daily intraperitoneal injections of either the D2R antagonist sulpiride (8 µg/g) or vehicle alone. FDM was also induced in retina- (Six3^creD2R^fl/fl) or fibroblast-specific (S100a4^creD2R^fl/fl) D2R-KO mice. A subset of retina-specific D2R-KO mice and D2R^fl/fl littermates were also given sulpiride or vehicle injections. Refraction was measured with an eccentric infrared photorefractor, and other biometric parameters were measured by optical coherence tomography (n ≈ 20 for each group).

Results

FDM development was attenuated in wild-type littermates treated with sulpiride. However, this inhibitory effect disappeared in the D2R-KO mice, suggesting that antagonizing D2Rs suppressed myopia development. Similarly, the development of myopia was partially inhibited by retina-specific (deletion efficiency: 94.7%) but not fibroblast-specific (66.9%) D2R-KO. The sulpiride-mediated inhibitory effects on FDM also disappeared with retinal D2R-KO, suggesting that antagonizing D2Rs outside the retina may not attenuate myopia. Changes in axial length were less marked than changes in refraction, but in general the two were correlated.

Conclusions

This study demonstrates that D2Rs located in the retina participate in dopaminergic regulation of FDM in mice. These findings provide an important and fundamental basis for further exploring the retinal mechanism(s) involved in dopamine signaling and myopia development.

Melanopsin modulates refractive development and myopia

Myopia, or nearsightedness, is the most common form of refractive abnormality and is characterized by excessive ocular elongation in relation to ocular power. Retinal neurotransmitter signaling, including dopamine, is implicated in myopic ocular growth, but the visual pathways that initiate and sustain myopia remain unclear. Melanopsin-expressing retinal ganglion cells (mRGCs), which detect light, are important for visual function, and have connections with retinal dopamine cells. Here, we investigated how mRGCs influence normal and myopic refractive development using two mutant mouse models: Opn4-/- mice that lack functional melanopsin photopigments and intrinsic mRGC responses but still receive other photoreceptor-mediated input to these cells; and Opn4DTA/DTA mice that lack intrinsic and photoreceptor-mediated mRGC responses due to mRGC cell death. In mice with intact vision or form-deprivation, we measured refractive error, ocular properties including axial length and corneal curvature, and the levels of retinal dopamine and its primary metabolite, L-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (DOPAC). Myopia was measured as a myopic shift, or the difference in refractive error between the form-deprived and contralateral eyes. We found that Opn4-/- mice had altered normal refractive development compared to Opn4+/+ wildtype mice, starting ∼4D more myopic but developing ∼2D greater hyperopia by 16 weeks of age. Consistent with hyperopia at older ages, 16 week-old Opn4-/- mice also had shorter eyes compared to Opn4+/+ mice (3.34 vs 3.42 mm). Opn4DTA/DTA mice, however, were more hyperopic than both Opn4+/+ and Opn4-/- mice across development ending with even shorter axial lengths. Despite these differences, both Opn4-/- and Opn4DTA/DTA mice had ∼2D greater myopic shifts in response to form-deprivation compared to Opn4+/+ mice. Furthermore, when vision was intact, dopamine and DOPAC levels were similar between Opn4-/- and Opn4+/+ mice, but higher in Opn4DTA/DTA mice, which differed with age. However, form-deprivation reduced retinal dopamine and DOAPC by ∼20% in Opn4-/- compared to Opn4+/+ mice but did not affect retinal dopamine and DOPAC in Opn4DTA/DTA mice. Lastly, systemically treating Opn4-/- mice with the dopamine precursor L-DOPA reduced their form-deprivation myopia by half compared to non-treated mice. Collectively our findings show that disruption of retinal melanopsin signaling alters the rate and magnitude of normal refractive development, yields greater susceptibility to form-deprivation myopia, and changes dopamine signaling. Our results suggest that mRGCs participate in the eye's response to myopigenic stimuli, acting partly through dopaminergic mechanisms, and provide a potential therapeutic target underling myopia progression. We conclude that proper mRGC function is necessary for correct refractive development and protection from myopia progression.

Advances in biomedical study of the myopia-related signaling pathways and mechanisms

Myopia has become one of the most critical health problems in the world with the increasing time spent indoors and increasing close work. Pathological myopia may have multiple complications, such as myopic macular degeneration, retinal detachment, cataracts, open-angle glaucoma, and severe cases that can cause blindness. Mounting evidence suggests that the cause of myopia can be attributed to the complex interaction of environmental exposure and genetic susceptibility. An increasing number of researchers have focused on the genetic pathogenesis of myopia in recent years. Scleral remodeling and excessive axial elongating induced retina thinning and even retinal detachment are myopia's most important pathological manifestations. The related signaling pathways are indispensable in myopia occurrence and development, such as dopamine, nitric oxide, TGF-β, HIF-1α, etc. We review the current major and recent progress of biomedicine on myopia-related signaling pathways and mechanisms.

Ocular Penetrance and Safety of the Dopaminergic Prodrug Etilevodopa

Purpose

Animal models have demonstrated the role of dopamine in regulating axial elongation, the critical feature of myopia. Because frequent delivery of dopaminergic agents via peribulbar, intravitreal, or intraperitoneal injections is not clinically viable, we sought to evaluate ocular penetration and safety of the topically applied dopaminergic prodrug etilevodopa.

Methods

The ocular penetration of dopamine and dopaminergic prodrugs (levodopa and etilevodopa) were quantified using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in enucleated porcine eyes after a single topical administration. The pharmacokinetic profile of the etilevodopa was then assessed in rats. A four-week once-daily application of etilevodopa as a topical eye drop was conducted to establish its safety profile.

Results

At 24 hours, the studied prodrugs showed increased dopaminergic derivatives in the vitreous of porcine eyes. Dopamine 0.5% (P = 0.0123) and etilevodopa 10% (p = 0.370) achieved significant vitreous concentrations. Etilevodopa 10% was able to enter the posterior segment of the eye after topical administration in rats with an intravitreal half-life of eight hours after single topical administration. Monthly application of topical etilevodopa showed no alterations in retinal ocular coherence tomography, electroretinography, caspase staining, or TUNEL staining.

Conclusions

At similar concentrations, no difference in ocular penetration of levodopa and etilevodopa was observed. However, etilevodopa was highly soluble and able to be applied at higher topical concentrations. Dopamine exhibited both high solubility and enhanced penetration into the vitreous as compared to other dopaminergic prodrugs.

Translational Relevance

These findings indicate the potential of topical etilevodopa and dopamine for further study as a therapeutic treatment for myopia.

Effect of methylphenidate as a dopaminergic agent on myopia: Pilot study

Background Methylphenidate (MPH) hydrochloride is used as a first-line treatment for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). However, there is concern that this treatment may be associated with increased risk of refractive disorder. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of MPH therapy on myopic shifts in refraction in children diagnosed with ADHD. Methods This study, children with ADHD and meeting inclusion criteria were examined before the initiation of MPH treatment and 3, 6 and 12 months after the initiation of treatment. Twenty age-gender-matched participants who applied to the outpatient ophthalmology clinic with various complaints were included in the study as a control group. Cycloplegic refraction examination and detailed eye measurements were performed at each visit. Results Nineteen patients were included in this study and the group consisted of 11 (57.9%) females and 8 (42.1%) males. The mean age of patients was 11.3 ± 2. (range: 8-18) years. During 12 months of use of MPH, the spherical equivalent changed from -0.36 ± 1.08 to -0.39 ± 1.05, and this difference was not statistically significant (P = .187). Axial length ranged from 22.92 ± 0.66. There was a change to 22.93 ± 0.62, and this difference was not statistically significant (P = .076). In the control group, the spherical equivalent changed from -0.43 ± 0.62 to -0.56 ± 0.84, and this difference was statistically significant. (P = .012) There was a change in the axial length from 22.97 ± 0.78 to 22.99 ± 0.62, and this difference was statistically significant (P = .015). Conclusions No significant changes spherical equivalent and axial length were detected during 12-month MPH use, but the increased spherical equivalent and axial length in the control group in the similar age group may indicate that MPH may reduce myopic shifts in refraction progression through dopamine, similar to in vivo studies. What's known Myopia is spreading rapidly in technologically advanced societies. There is strong evidence that myopia develops as the axial length of the eye increases as a result of spending more time indoors and working in close distances in parallel with the increase in education level. Animal studies have shown that decreased dopamine release plays an important role in the development of myopia. What's new The effect of dopamine in slowing or stopping myopia in experimental studies has also been demonstrated in human studies. No significant change in spherical equivalent and axial length was observed in methylphenidate users compared with control patients of similar age group. A significant increase in spherical equivalent and axial length was detected in the control group. This pilot study will shed light on future studies on the safe use of dopamine in the treatment of myopic shifts.

The Role of Dopamine in Emmetropization Modulated by Wavelength and Temporal Frequency in Guinea Pigs

Purpose

Wavelength and temporal frequency have been found to influence refractive development. This study investigated whether retinal dopamine (DA) plays a role in these processes.

Methods

Guinea pigs were randomly divided into nine groups that received different lighting conditions for 4 weeks, as follows: white, green, or blue light at 0, 0.5, or 20.0 Hz. Refractions and axial lengths were measured using streak retinoscopy and A-scan ultrasound imaging. DA and its metabolites were measured by high-pressure liquid chromatography-electrochemical detection.

Results

At 0 Hz, green and blue light produced myopic and hyperopic shifts compared with that of white light. At 0.5 Hz, no significant changes were observed compared with those of green or blue light at 0 Hz, whereas white light at 0.5 Hz induced a myopic shift compared with white light at 0 or 20 Hz. At 20 Hz, green and blue light acted like white light. Among all levels of DA and its metabolites, only vitreous 3, 4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid (DOPAC) levels and retinal DOPAC/DA ratios were dependent on wavelength, frequency, and their interaction. Specifically, retinal DOPAC/DA ratios were positively correlated with refractions in white and green light conditions. However, blue light (0, 0.5, and 20.0 Hz) produced hyperopic shifts but decreased vitreous DOPAC levels and retinal DOPAC/DA ratios.

Conclusions

The retinal DOPAC/DA ratio, indicating the metabolic efficiency of DA, is correlated with ocular growth. It may underlie myopic shifts from light exposure with a long wavelength and low temporal frequency. However, different biochemical pathways may contribute to the hyperopic shifts from short wavelength light.

Insights into the mechanism of atropine's anti-myopia effects: evidence against cholinergic hyperactivity and modulation of dopamine release

Background and Purpose

The ability of the muscarinic cholinergic antagonist atropine to inhibit myopia development in humans and animal models would suggest that cholinergic hyperactivity may underlie myopic growth. To test this, we investigated whether cholinergic agonists accelerate ocular growth rates in chickens. Furthermore, we investigated whether atropine alters ocular growth by downstream modulation of dopamine levels, a mechanism postulated to underlie its antimyopic effects.

Experimental Approach

Muscarinic (muscarine and pilocarpine), nicotinic (nicotine) and non‐specific (oxotremorine and carbachol) cholinergic agonists were administered to chicks developing form‐deprivation myopia (FDM) or chicks that were otherwise untreated. Vitreal levels of dopamine and its primary metabolite 3,4‐dihydroxyphenylacetic acid (DOPAC) were examined using mass spectrometry MS in form‐deprived chicks treated with atropine (360, 15 or 0.15 nmol). Further, we investigated whether dopamine antagonists block atropine's antimyopic effects.

Key Results

Unexpectedly, administration of each cholinergic agonist inhibited FDM but did not affect normal ocular development. Atropine only affected dopamine and DOPAC levels at its highest dose. Dopamine antagonists did not alter the antimyopia effects of atropine.

Conclusion and Implications

Muscarinic, nicotinic and non‐specific cholinergic agonists inhibited FDM development. This indicates that cholinergic hyperactivity does not underlie myopic growth and questions whether atropine inhibits myopia via cholinergic antagonism. This study also demonstrates that changes in retinal dopamine release are not required for atropine's antimyopic effects. Finally, nicotinic agonists may represent a novel and more targeted approach for the cholinergic control of myopia as they are unlikely to cause the anterior segment side effects associated with muscarinic treatment.

Functional integration of eye tissues and refractive eye development: Mechanisms and pathways

Refractive eye development is a tightly coordinated developmental process. The general layout of the eye and its various components are established during embryonic development, which involves a complex cross-tissue signaling. The eye then undergoes a refinement process during the postnatal emmetropization process, which relies heavily on the integration of environmental and genetic factors and is controlled by an elaborate genetic network. This genetic network encodes a multilayered signaling cascade, which converts visual stimuli into molecular signals that guide the postnatal growth of the eye. The signaling cascade underlying refractive eye development spans across all ocular tissues and comprises multiple signaling pathways. Notably, tissue-tissue interaction plays a key role in both embryonic eye development and postnatal eye emmetropization. Recent advances in eye biometry, physiological optics and systems genetics of refractive error have significantly advanced our understanding of the biological processes involved in refractive eye development and provided a framework for the development of new treatment options for myopia. In this review, we summarize the recent data on the mechanisms and signaling pathways underlying refractive eye development and discuss new evidence suggesting a wide-spread signal integration across different tissues and ocular components involved in visually guided eye growth.

Genetic network regulating visual acuity makes limited contribution to visually guided eye emmetropization

During postnatal development, the eye undergoes a refinement process whereby optical defocus guides eye growth towards sharp vision in a process of emmetropization. Optical defocus activates a signaling cascade originating in the retina and propagating across the back of the eye to the sclera. Several observations suggest that visual acuity might be important for optical defocus detection and processing in the retina; however, direct experimental evidence supporting or refuting the role of visual acuity in refractive eye development is lacking. Here, we used genome-wide transcriptomics to determine the relative contribution of the retinal genetic network regulating visual acuity to the signaling cascade underlying visually guided eye emmetropization. Our results provide evidence that visual acuity is regulated at the level of molecular signaling in the retina by an extensive genetic network. The genetic network regulating visual acuity makes relatively small contribution to the signaling cascade underlying refractive eye development. This genetic network primarily affects baseline refractive eye development and this influence is primarily facilitated by the biological processes related to melatonin signaling, nitric oxide signaling, phototransduction, synaptic transmission, and dopamine signaling. We also observed that the visual-acuity-related genes associated with the development of human myopia are chiefly involved in light perception and phototransduction. Our results suggest that the visual-acuity-related genetic network primarily contributes to the signaling underlying baseline refractive eye development, whereas its impact on visually guided eye emmetropization is modest.

Loss of Gap Junction Delta-2 (GJD2) gene orthologs leads to refractive error in zebrafish

Myopia is the most common developmental disorder of juvenile eyes, and it has become an increasing cause of severe visual impairment. The GJD2 locus has been consistently associated with myopia in multiple independent genome-wide association studies. However, despite the strong genetic evidence, little is known about the functional role of GJD2 in refractive error development. Here, we find that depletion of gjd2a (Cx35.5) or gjd2b (Cx35.1) orthologs in zebrafish, cause changes in the biometry and refractive status of the eye. Our immunohistological and scRNA sequencing studies show that Cx35.5 (gjd2a) is a retinal connexin and its depletion leads to hyperopia and electrophysiological changes in the retina. These findings support a role for Cx35.5 (gjd2a) in the regulation of ocular biometry. Cx35.1 (gjd2b) has previously been identified in the retina, however, we found an additional lenticular role. Lack of Cx35.1 (gjd2b) led to a nuclear cataract that triggered axial elongation. Our results provide functional evidence of a link between gjd2 and refractive error.

Quint et al. use zebrafish lines deficient in one of two orthologs of the Gap Junction Delta-2 (GJD2) gene, which is associated with myopia by genome-wide association studies. They link gjd2 with refractive error and report evidence to suggest that gjd2a plays a role in ocular biometry whilst gjd2b, previously found in the retina, possesses an additional lenticular role.

Form-Deprivation and Lens-Induced Myopia Are Similarly Affected by Pharmacological Manipulation of the Dopaminergic System in Chicks

Purpose

Animal models have demonstrated a link between decreases in retinal dopamine levels and the development of form-deprivation myopia (FDM). However, the consistency of dopamine's role in the other major form of experimental myopia, that of lens-induced myopia (LIM), is less clear, raising the question as to what extent dopamine plays a role in human myopia. Therefore, to better define the role of dopamine in both forms of experimental myopia, we examined how consistent the protection afforded by dopamine and the dopamine agonist 6-amino-5,6,7,8-tetrahydronaphthalene-2,3-diol hydrobromide (ADTN) is between FDM and LIM.

Methods

Intravitreal injections of dopamine (0.002, 0.015, 0.150, 1.500 µmol) or ADTN (0.001, 0.010, 0.100, 1.000 µmol) were administered daily to chicks developing FDM or LIM. Axial length and refraction were measured following 4 days of treatment. To determine the receptor subtype by which dopamine and ADTN inhibit FDM and LIM, both compounds were coadministered with either the dopamine D2-like antagonist spiperone (0.005 µmol) or the D1-like antagonist SCH-23390 (0.005 µmol).

Results

Intravitreal administration of dopamine or ADTN inhibited the development of FDM (ED₅₀ = 0.003 µmol and ED₅₀ = 0.011 µmol, respectively) and LIM (ED₅₀ = 0.002 µmol and ED₅₀ = 0.010 µmol, respectively) in a dose-dependent manner, with a similar degree of protection observed in both paradigms (P = 0.471 and P = 0.969, respectively). Coadministration with spiperone, but not SCH-23390, inhibited the protective effects of dopamine and ADTN against the development of both FDM (P = 0.214 and P = 0.138, respectively) and LIM (P = 0.116 and P = 0.100, respectively).

Conclusions

pharmacological targeting of the retinal dopamine system inhibits FDM and LIM in a similar dose-dependent manner through a D2-like mechanism.

The biological basis of myopic refractive error

Myopia is among the most common refractive errors and is associated with the greatest risk of pathological outcomes. Most animals, including humans, are born with hyperopic errors. During development, axial elongation of the eye occurs and is regulated through a vision-dependent process, known as emmetropisation The extremely rapid changes in the prevalence of myopia and the dependence of myopia on the level of education indicate that there are very strong environmental impacts on the development of myopia. This conflicts with the common occurrence of familial patterns of inheritance of myopia, which suggests a role for genetic determination. There are more than 150 defined genetic syndromes in which familial high myopia is one of the features, including some that are not associated with other syndromes. The evidence for the roles of both nature and nurture in the aetiology of myopia is discussed. This review also examines the experimentally induced refractive errors associated with form-deprivation, recovery from form deprivation and the effects of both negative and positive lenses. In addition, it looks at the local and optical control of eye growth. Finally, the various control pathways for growth are considered. These include dopamine, ZENK-glucagon, retinoic acid and retinoic acid receptors, crystallin, seratonin and melatonin, vasoactive intestinal peptide and enkephalins, nitric oxide and various growth factors.

Coadministration With Carbidopa Enhances the Antimyopic Effects of Levodopa in Chickens

Purpose

Topical application of levodopa inhibits the development of form-deprivation myopia (FDM) and lens-induced myopia (LIM) in chicks. Here we examine whether coadministration with carbidopa enhances this protection and compare the effectiveness of topical versus systemic administration. We also investigate the degree to which topical and systemic administration of these compounds alters retinal dopamine release and examine whether this is the mechanism by which they inhibit experimental myopia.

Methods

Levodopa and levodopa:carbidopa (at a 4:1 ratio) were administered as twice-daily eye drops or once-daily intraperitoneal injections to chicks developing FDM or LIM over an ascending dose range. Axial length and refraction were measured following 4 days of treatment. Dopamine levels in the vitreous and blood were analyzed using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry following topical or systemic administration of levodopa or levodopa:carbidopa. Finally, chicks receiving topical or systemic levodopa or levodopa:carbidopa were cotreated with the dopamine antagonist spiperone.

Results

Levodopa:carbidopa inhibited the development of FDM and LIM to a greater extent than levodopa alone (P < 0.05). Topical application was more effective than systemic administration (P < 0.001). Vitreal dopamine levels were increased to the greatest extent by topical application of levodopa:carbidopa (P < 0.001). Systemic but not topical administration significantly increased dopamine levels within the blood (P < 0.01). Cotreatment with spiperone inhibited the antimyopic effects (P < 0.05) of levodopa and levodopa:carbidopa.

Conclusions

The presence of carbidopa increases the bioavailability of levodopa within the eye, enhancing its antimyopic effects, with topical application showing the greatest efficacy. Thus levodopa:carbidopa may be a promising treatment for controlling the progression of human myopia.

The Role of the Dopamine D2 Receptor in Form-Deprivation Myopia in Mice: Studies With Full and Partial D2 Receptor Agonists and Knockouts

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to explore the role and mechanism of D2 receptor (D2R) involvement in myopia development and the effects of the full D2R agonist quinpirole and partial D2R agonist aripiprazole on postnatal refractive development and form-deprivation myopia (FDM).

Methods

C57BL/6 (“B6”) mice, raised either in a visually normal or unilateral form-deprivation environment, were divided into three subgroups, including an intraperitoneally injected (IP) vehicle group and two quinpirole (1 and 10 µg/g body weight) treatment groups. The effects of quinpirole on FDM were further verified in D2R-knockout (KO) mice and corresponding wild-type littermates. Then, the modulation of normal vision development and FDM by aripiprazole (1 and 10 µg/g body weight, IP) was assessed in C57BL/6 mice. All biometric parameters were measured before and after treatments, and retinal cyclic adenosine phosphate (cAMP) and phosphorylated ERK (pERK) levels were analyzed to assess D2R-mediated signal transduction.

Results

Neither quinpirole nor aripiprazole affected normal refractive development. FDM development was inhibited by quinpirole at low dose but enhanced at high dose, and these bidirectional effects were validated by D2R-specificity. FDM development was attenuated by the partial D2R agonist aripiprazole, at high dose but not at low dose. Quinpirole caused a dose-dependent reduction in cAMP levels, but had no effect on pERK. Aripiprazole reduced cAMP levels at both doses, but caused a dose-dependent increase of pERK in the form-deprived eyes.

Conclusions

Reduction of D2R-mediated signaling contributes to myopia development, which can be selectively attenuated by partial D2R agonists that activate D2Rs under the low dopamine levels that occur with FDM.

Topical application of dopaminergic compounds can inhibit deprivation myopia in chicks

PURPOSE

Animal models have demonstrated a link between dysregulation of the retinal dopamine system and the development of experimental myopia (short-sightedness). However, pharmacological investigations of dopamine in animal models rely heavily on intravitreal or systemic administration, which have several limitations for longer-term experiments. We therefore investigated whether administration of dopamine as a topical eye drop can inhibit the development of form-deprivation myopia (FDM) in chicks. We also examined whether chemical modification of dopamine through deuterium substitution, which might enhance stability and bioavailability, can increase dopamine's effectiveness against FDM when given topically.

METHODS

Dopamine or deuterated dopamine (Dopamine-1,1,2,2-d₄ hydrochloride) was administered as a daily intravitreal injection or as daily topical eye drops to chicks developing FDM over an ascending dose range (min. n = 6 per group). Axial length and refraction were measured following 4 days of treatment.

RESULTS

Both intravitreal (ED₅₀ = 0.002μmoles) and topical application (ED₅₀ = 6.10μmoles) of dopamine inhibited the development of FDM in a dose-dependent manner. Intravitreal injections, however, elicited a significantly higher level of protection relative to topical eye drops (p < 0.01). Deuterated dopamine inhibited FDM to a similar extent as unmodified dopamine when administered as intravitreal injections (p = 0.897) or topical eye drops (p = 0.921).

CONCLUSIONS

Both intravitreal and topical application of dopamine inhibit the development of FDM in a dose-dependent manner, indicating that topical administration may be an effective avenue for longer-term dopamine experiments. Deuterium substitution does not alter the protection afforded by dopamine against FDM when given as either an intravitreal injection or topical eye drop.

A prospective study of serum metabolomic and lipidomic changes in myopic children and adolescents

BACKGROUND

Myopia is a prevalent eye disorder, especially among children and adolescents in eastern Asian countries. Multiple measures have already been taken to prevent and treat myopia, including atropine and dopamine. However, the serum metabolic picture of myopia has not yet been studied as a whole and remains largely unclear. In this paper, a prospective and panoramic study was carried out to find out the whole serum metabolomic and lipidomic picture of myopia.

METHODS

With untargeted mass spectrometry (MS), myopia among 211 children and adolescents was studied. The MS features were first grouped across the samples. Then, compound annotation was carried out based on these features. Finally, the metabolite features were mapped to pathways, whose biological functions in myopia were studied and discussed.

RESULTS

A total of 275 metabolite features were derived from 92 aligned MS peak groups with significant fold changes, and then mapped to 33 pathways. By a comprehensive consideration of significance, fold change, importance score and appearance in different omics, 9 pathways were selected, and their biological functions were further analyzed. Among these selected pathways, 5 pathways were related with oxidative stress, a validated phenomenon during myopia development, while 5 pathways were related with dopamine receptor D2, whose molecular function in myopia treatment is not fully understood. A total of 177 metabolite features from 45 peak groups were related with the studied pathways.

CONCLUSION

This prospective study shed light on the whole picture of metabolomic mechanism underlying myopia and provided guidance to further elucidation of compounds and pathways in this whole picture.

Levodopa inhibits the development of lens-induced myopia in chicks

Animal models have demonstrated a link between dysregulation of the retinal dopamine system and the development of myopia (short-sightedness). We have previously demonstrated that topical application of levodopa in chicks can inhibit the development of form-deprivation myopia (FDM) in a dose-dependent manner. Here, we examine whether this same protection is observed in lens-induced myopia (LIM), and whether levodopa’s protection against FDM and LIM occurs through a dopamine D1- or D2-like receptor mechanism. To do this, levodopa was first administered daily as an intravitreal injection or topical eye drop, at one of four ascending doses, to chicks developing LIM. Levodopa’s mechanism of action was then examined by co-administration of levodopa injections with D1-like (SCH-23390) or D2-like (spiperone) dopamine antagonists in chicks developing FDM or LIM. For both experiments, levodopa’s effectiveness was examined by measuring axial length and refraction after 4 days of treatment. Levodopa inhibited the development of LIM in a dose-dependent manner similar to its inhibition of FDM when administered via intravitreal injections or topical eye drops. In both FDM and LIM, levodopa injections remained protective against myopia when co-administered with SCH-23390, but not spiperone, indicating that levodopa elicits its protection through a dopamine D2-like receptor mechanism in both paradigms.

Light adaptation in the chick retina: Dopamine, nitric oxide, and gap-junction coupling modulate spatiotemporal contrast sensitivity

Adaptation to changes in ambient light intensity, in retinal cells and circuits, optimizes visual functions. In the retina, light-adaptation results in changes in light-sensitivity and spatiotemporal tuning of ganglion cells. Under light-adapted conditions, contrast sensitivity (CS) of ganglion cells is a bandpass function of spatial frequency; in contrast, dark-adaptation reduces CS, especially at higher spatial frequencies. In this work, we aimed to understand intrinsic neuromodulatory mechanisms that underlie retinal adaptation to changes in ambient light level. Specifically, we investigated how CS is affected by dopamine (DA), nitric oxide (NO), and modifiers of electrical coupling through gap junctions, under different conditions of adapting illumination. Using the optokinetic response as a behavioral readout of direction-selective ganglion cell activity, we characterized the spatial CS of chicks under high- and low-photopic conditions and how it was regulated by DA, NO, and gap-junction uncouplers. We observed that: (1) DA D2R-family agonists and a donor of NO increased CS tested in low-photopic illumination, as if observed in the high-photopic light; whereas (2) removing their effects using either DA antagonists or NO- synthase inhibitors mimicked low-photopic CS; (3) simulation of high-photopic CS by DA agonists was abolished by NO-synthase inhibitors; and (4) selectively blocking coupling via connexin 35/36-containing gap junctions, using a "designer" mimetic peptide, increased CS, as does strong illumination. We conclude that, in the chicken retina: (1) DA and NO induce changes in spatiotemporal processing, similar to those driven by increasing illumination, (2) DA possibly acts through stimulating NO synthesis, and (3) blockade of coupling via gap junctions containing connexin 35/36 also drives a change in retinal CS functions. As a noninvasive method, the optokinetic response can provide rapid, conditional, and reversible assessment of retinal functions when pharmacological reagents are injected into the vitreous humor. Finally, the chick's large eyes, and the many similarities between their adaptational circuit functions and those in mammals such as the mouse, make them a promising model for future retinal research.

Increased endogenous dopamine prevents myopia in mice

Experimental evidence suggests that dopamine (DA) modulates refractive eye growth. We evaluated whether increasing endogenous DA activity using pharmacological or genetic approaches decreased myopia susceptibility in mice. First, we assessed the effects of systemic L-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (L-DOPA) injections on form deprivation myopia (FDM) in C57BL/6 J (WT^C57) mice. WT^C57 mice received daily systemic injections of L-DOPA (n = 11), L-DOPA + ascorbic acid (AA, n = 22), AA (n = 20), or Saline (n = 16). Second, we tested transgenic mice with increased or decreased expression of vesicular monoamine transporter 2 (VMAT2^HI, n = 22; WT^HI, n = 18; VMAT2^LO, n = 18; or WT^LO, n = 9) under normal and form deprivation conditions. VMAT2 packages DA into vesicles, affecting DA release. At post-natal day 28 (P28), monocular FD was induced in each genotype. Weekly measurements of refractive error, corneal curvature, and ocular biometry were performed until P42 or P49. WT^C57 mice exposed to FD developed a significant myopic shift (treated-contralateral eye) in AA (-3.27 ± 0.73D) or saline (-3.71 ± 0.80D) treated groups that was significantly attenuated by L-DOPA (-0.73 ± 0.90D, p = 0.0002) or L-DOPA + AA (-0.11 ± 0.46D, p = 0.0103). The VMAT2^LO mice, with under-expression of VMAT2, were most susceptible to FDM. VMAT2^LO mice developed significant myopic shifts to FD after one week compared to VMAT2^HI and WT mice (VMAT2^LO: -5.48 ± 0.54D; VMAT2^HI: -0.52 ± 0.92D, p < 0.05; WT: -2.13 ± 0.78D, p < 0.05; ungoggled control: -0.22 ± 0.24D, p < 0.001). These results indicate that endogenously increasing DA synthesis and release by genetic and pharmacological methods prevents FDM in mice.

The role of dopamine in eye growth responses to color and luminance flicker in chicks

Stroboscopic luminance flicker has been found to prevent the increase in eye growth normally associated with form deprivation through the release of retinal dopamine. In this study, we sought to investigate whether dopamine plays a role in the decreased growth observed with 2 Hz sine-wave luminance flicker and increased growth with color flicker. Starting 5-7 days after hatching, chicks were exposed to 2 Hz sinusoidally modulated illumination (Mean: 680 lux) for 4 days and were otherwise in the dark. Chicks were exposed to color-modulated red and green (RG) light, to luminance modulated RGB components (LUM), or to a no-flicker (NF) control. Chicks received daily 10 μL intravitreal injections of apomorphine, spiperone, or saline. Fellow eyes received no injection. Spiperone injections prevented the decrease in eye growth typically seen with LUM flicker, with a relative increase in eye length, but no other significant effects compared with saline controls. Apomorphine injections prevented the increase in eye growth typically seen with RG flicker, with a relative decrease in eye length compared to saline controls. These results indicate a role for the activation of D2-receptor types in the inhibition of eye growth in response to luminance flicker, and a lack of dopamine receptor activation associated with the increase in eye growth with color flicker.

Pharmacogenomic Approach to Antimyopia Drug Development: Pathways Lead the Way

Myopia is the most common eye disorder in the world which is caused by a mismatch between the optical power of the eye and its excessively long axial length. Recent studies revealed that the regulation of the axial length of the eye occurs via a complex signaling cascade, which originates in the retina and propagates across all ocular tissues to the sclera. The complexity of this regulatory cascade has made it particularly difficult to develop effective antimyopia drugs. The current pharmacological treatment options for myopia are limited to atropine and 7-methylxanthine, which have either significant adverse effects or low efficacy. In this review, we focus on the recent advances in genome-wide studies of the signaling pathways underlying myopia development and discuss the potential of systems genetics and pharmacogenomic approaches for the development of antimyopia drugs.

Therapeutic Effects of Anthocyanins for Vision and Eye Health

Anthocyanin (AC) is widely used as supplement of eye health in Europe and in East Asia. In this review, I describe AC effects to clarify the mechanism is important in order to understand the effects of AC on vision health. The bioavailability of AC is quite low but, reported as intact form and many kinds of metabolite. And AC passes through the blood-aqueous fluid barrier and blood-retinal barrier. In vitro study, AC had a relaxing effect on ciliary muscle which is important to treat both myopia and glaucoma. And AC stimulate the regeneration of rhodopsin in frog rod outer segment. Furthermore, AC could inhibit the axial length and ocular length elongation in a negative lens-induced chick myopia model. In addition, we summarized clinical studies of AC intake improved dark adaptation and transient myopic shift and the improvement on retinal blood circulation in normal tension glaucoma patients.

Myopia-Inhibiting Concentrations of Muscarinic Receptor Antagonists Block Activation of Alpha2A-Adrenoceptors In Vitro

Purpose

Myopia is a refractive disorder that degrades vision. It can be treated with atropine, a muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (mAChR) antagonist, but the mechanism is unknown. Atropine may block α-adrenoceptors at concentrations ≥0.1 mM, and another potent myopia-inhibiting ligand, mamba toxin-3 (MT3), binds equally well to human mAChR M4 and α1A- and α2A-adrenoceptors. We hypothesized that mAChR antagonists could inhibit myopia via α2A-adrenoceptors, rather than mAChR M4.

Methods

Human mAChR M4 (M4), chicken mAChR M4 (cM4), or human α2A-adrenergic receptor (hADRA2A) clones were cotransfected with CRE/promoter-luciferase (CRE-Luc; agonist-induced luminescence) and Renilla luciferase (RLuc; normalizing control) into human cells. Inhibition of normalized agonist-induced luminescence by antagonists (ATR: atropine; MT3; HIM: himbacine; PRZ: pirenzepine; TRP: tropicamide; OXY: oxyphenonium; QNB: 3-quinuclidinyl benzilate; DIC: dicyclomine; MEP: mepenzolate) was measured using the Dual-Glo Luciferase Assay System.

Results

Relative inhibitory potencies of mAChR antagonists at mAChR M4/cM4, from most to least potent, were QNB > OXY ≥ ATR > MEP > HIM > DIC > PRZ > TRP. MT3 was 56× less potent at cM4 than at M4. Relative potencies of mAChR antagonists at hADRA2A, from most to least potent, were MT3 > HIM > ATR > OXY > PRZ > TRP > QNB > MEP; DIC did not antagonize.

Conclusions

Muscarinic antagonists block hADRA2A signaling at concentrations comparable to those used to inhibit chick myopia (≥0.1 mM) in vivo. Relative potencies at hADRA2A, but not M4/cM4, correlate with reported abilities to inhibit chick form-deprivation myopia. mAChR antagonists might inhibit myopia via α2-adrenoceptors, instead of through the mAChR M4/cM4 receptor subtype.

IMI - Report on Experimental Models of Emmetropization and Myopia

The results of many studies in a variety of species have significantly advanced our understanding of the role of visual experience and the mechanisms of postnatal eye growth, and the development of myopia. This paper surveys and reviews the major contributions that experimental studies using animal models have made to our thinking about emmetropization and development of myopia. These studies established important concepts informing our knowledge of the visual regulation of eye growth and refractive development and have transformed treatment strategies for myopia. Several major findings have come from studies of experimental animal models. These include the eye's ability to detect the sign of retinal defocus and undergo compensatory growth, the local retinal control of eye growth, regulatory changes in choroidal thickness, and the identification of components in the biochemistry of eye growth leading to the characterization of signal cascades regulating eye growth and refractive state. Several of these findings provided the proofs of concepts that form the scientific basis of new and effective clinical treatments for controlling myopia progression in humans. Experimental animal models continue to provide new insights into the cellular and molecular mechanisms of eye growth control, including the identification of potential new targets for drug development and future treatments needed to stem the increasing prevalence of myopia and the vision-threatening conditions associated with this disease.

Alpha2 -adrenoceptor agonists inhibit form-deprivation myopia in the chick

BACKGROUND

The putative myopia-controlling receptor is thought to be muscarinic acetylcholine receptor subtype M₄ , because mamba toxin-3 can inhibit form-deprivation myopia in chicks at a far lower concentration than atropine. However, mamba toxin-3 is equally potent at the human α_1A -, α_1D -, and α_2A -adrenoceptors. To test the hypothesis that α-adrenoceptors might be involved in regulation of eye growth, the treatment effects of α₂ -adrenoceptor agonists brimonidine, clonidine, and guanfacine, and antagonist yohimbine, on form-deprivation myopia in the chick were measured.

METHODS

Right eyes of White Leghorn chicks were goggled with diffusers to induce form-deprivation myopia; left eyes were left open as controls. Goggled eyes were injected intravitreally with 20 μL of vehicle, or 2, 20, or 200 nmol of brimonidine, clonidine, guanfacine, or yohimbine, 24, 72, and 120 hours after goggle application. Alternatively, myopia was inhibited physiologically by goggle removal for two hours, and the α₂ -adrenoceptor antagonist, yohimbine, was injected to test whether it could block this type of myopia inhibition. One day after the last injection, refractive error and axial length were measured.

RESULTS

Brimonidine (20 and 200 nmol) and clonidine (200 nmol) effectively inhibited experimentally induced increases in negative refractive error and axial elongation. All doses of guanfacine significantly inhibited induced negative refractive error, but only 20 and 200 nmol significantly inhibited axial elongation. Yohimbine had no effect on form-deprivation myopia, but 200 nmol reduced the myopia-inhibiting effect of goggle removal.

CONCLUSION

High concentrations of α₂ -adrenoceptor agonists, similar to those required by atropine, inhibited chick form-deprivation myopia; antagonism by yohimbine had no effect. High-concentration yohimbine partially interfered with emmetropisation in form-deprived chicks experiencing normal vision for two hours per day. These data support the hypothesis that treatment with high concentrations of adrenergic drugs can affect experimentally induced myopia and normal visual processes.

Little effect of 0.01% atropine eye drops as used in myopia prevention on the pattern electroretinogram

PURPOSE

Daily administration of 0.01% atropine eye drops is a promising approach for myopia control. The mechanism of action is believed to involve the dopaminergic system of the retina, triggering an increased release of dopamine. Previous studies in psychiatric condition such as major depression suggest that pattern electroretinogram (PERG) amplitudes are modulated by changes in retinal dopamine. It is thus plausible that atropine eye drops could have an effect on PERG amplitudes. The present study was designed to test this, assessing the difference in amplitude between contrast levels and the ratio of amplitudes between check sizes as primary endpoints.

METHODS

We included 14 participants with no more than ± 2 diopters of ametropia and visual acuity of at least 1.0. One eye was chosen randomly in each participant for atropine application (14 days, one drop of 0.01% atropine solution once daily before bedtime). We recorded two sets of steady-state PERG recordings: one with different contrasts (25% and 98%) and one with different check sizes (0.8° and 17°). Near-point distance, near visual acuity, and pupil diameter were measured additionally.

RESULTS

The recordings to different contrasts did not show atropine-related changes of PERG amplitude. A small increase by 6% of the amplitude difference between contrast levels with atropine application was not significant (p = 0.08). Raw amplitudes in the check size condition increased with atropine by 17% (p < 0.01) and 10% (p < 0.03) for small and large checks, respectively, without a significant concomitant effect on the amplitude ratio. Pupil size was significantly affected (median increase 0.5 mm, p < 0.002). However, neither of the experimental conditions was associated with a significant correlation between pupil size and PERG effects.

CONCLUSION

The effects on PERG primary endpoints after the 14-day period of atropine administration were small, especially compared to effect sizes in major depression, and statistically insignificant. Effects on raw amplitude were inconsistent. The present results suggest that retinal processing as reflected by PERG does not sizably change following a treatment regimen with atropine that is typical for myopia control.

Circadian rhythms, refractive development, and myopia

PURPOSE

Despite extensive research, mechanisms regulating postnatal eye growth and those responsible for ametropias are poorly understood. With the marked recent increases in myopia prevalence, robust and biologically-based clinical therapies to normalize refractive development in childhood are needed. Here, we review classic and contemporary literature about how circadian biology might provide clues to develop a framework to improve the understanding of myopia etiology, and possibly lead to rational approaches to ameliorate refractive errors developing in children.

RECENT FINDINGS

Increasing evidence implicates diurnal and circadian rhythms in eye growth and refractive error development. In both humans and animals, ocular length and other anatomical and physiological features of the eye undergo diurnal oscillations. Systemically, such rhythms are primarily generated by the 'master clock' in the surpachiasmatic nucleus, which receives input from the intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (ipRGCs) through the activation of the photopigment melanopsin. The retina also has an endogenous circadian clock. In laboratory animals developing experimental myopia, oscillations of ocular parameters are perturbed. Retinal signaling is now believed to influence refractive development; dopamine, an important neurotransmitter found in the retina, not only entrains intrinsic retinal rhythms to the light:dark cycle, but it also modulates refractive development. Circadian clocks comprise a transcription/translation feedback control mechanism utilizing so-called clock genes that have now been associated with experimental ametropias. Contemporary clinical research is also reviving ideas first proposed in the nineteenth century that light exposures might impact refraction in children. As a result, properties of ambient lighting are being investigated in refractive development. In other areas of medical science, circadian dysregulation is now thought to impact many non-ocular disorders, likely because the patterns of modern artificial lighting exert adverse physiological effects on circadian pacemakers. How, or if, such modern light exposures and circadian dysregulation contribute to refractive development is not known.

SUMMARY

The premise of this review is that circadian biology could be a productive area worthy of increased investigation, which might lead to the improved understanding of refractive development and improved therapeutic interventions.

Dopamine signaling and myopia development: What are the key challenges

In the face of an "epidemic" increase in myopia over the last decades and myopia prevalence predicted to reach 2.5 billion people by the end of this decade, there is an urgent need to develop effective and safe therapeutic interventions to slow down this "myopia booming" and prevent myopia-related complications and vision loss. Dopamine (DA) is an important neurotransmitter in the retina and mediates diverse functions including retina development, visual signaling, and refractive development. Inspired by the convergence of epidemiological and animal studies in support of the inverse relationship between outdoor activity and risk of developing myopia and by the close biological relationship between light exposure and dopamine release/signaling, we felt it is timely and important to critically review the role of DA in myopia development. This review will revisit several key points of evidence for and against DA mediating light control of myopia: 1) the causal role of extracellular retinal DA levels, 2) the mechanism and action of dopamine D1 and D2 receptors and 3) the roles of cellular/circuit retinal pathways. We examine the experiments that show causation by altering DA, DA receptors and visual pathways using pharmacological, transgenic, or visual environment approaches. Furthermore, we critically evaluate the safety issues of a DA-based treatment strategy and some approaches to address these issues. The review identifies the key questions and challenges in translating basic knowledge on DA signaling and myopia from animal studies into effective pharmacological treatments for myopia in children.

Intravitreally-administered dopamine D2-like (and D4), but not D1-like, receptor agonists reduce form-deprivation myopia in tree shrews

We examined the effect of intravitreal injections of D1-like and D2-like dopamine receptor agonists and antagonists and D4 receptor drugs on form-deprivation myopia (FDM) in tree shrews, mammals closely related to primates. In eleven groups (n = 7 per group), we measured the amount of FDM produced by monocular form deprivation (FD) over an 11-day treatment period. The untreated fellow eye served as a control. Animals also received daily 5 µL intravitreal injections in the FD eye. The reference group received 0.85% NaCl vehicle. Four groups received a higher, or lower, dose of a D1-like receptor agonist (SKF38393) or antagonist (SCH23390). Four groups received a higher, or lower, dose of a D2-like receptor agonist (quinpirole) or antagonist (spiperone). Two groups received the D4 receptor agonist (PD168077) or antagonist (PD168568). Refractions were measured daily; axial component dimensions were measured on day 1 (before treatment) and day 12. We found that in groups receiving the D1-like receptor agonist or antagonist, the development of FDM and altered ocular component dimensions did not differ from the NaCl group. Groups receiving the D2-like receptor agonist or antagonist at the higher dose developed significantly less FDM and had shorter vitreous chambers than the NaCl group. The D4 receptor agonist, but not the antagonist, was nearly as effective as the D2-like agonist in reducing FDM. Thus, using intravitreally-administered agents, we did not find evidence supporting a role for the D1-like receptor pathway in reducing FDM in tree shrews. The reduction of FDM by the dopamine D2-like agonist supported a role for the D2-like receptor pathway in the control of FDM. The reduction of FDM by the D4 receptor agonist, but not the D4 antagonist, suggests an important role for activation of the dopamine D4 receptor in the control of axial elongation and refractive development.

Nitric Oxide (NO) Mediates the Inhibition of Form-Deprivation Myopia by Atropine in Chicks

Myopia is the most common childhood refractive disorder. Atropine inhibits myopia progression, but its mechanism is unknown. Here, we show that myopia-prevention by atropine requires production of nitric oxide (NO). Form-deprivation myopia (FDM) was induced in week-old chicks by diffusers over the right eye (OD); the left eye (OS) remained ungoggled. On post-goggling days 1, 3, and 5, OD received intravitreally 20 µL of phosphate-buffered saline (vehicle), or vehicle plus: NO source: L-arginine (L-Arg, 60–6,000 nmol) or sodium nitroprusside (SNP, 10–1,000 nmol); atropine (240 nmol); NO inhibitors: L-NIO or L-NMMA (6 nmol); negative controls: D-Arg (10 µmol) or D-NMMA (6 nmol); or atropine plus L-NIO, L-NMMA, or D-NMMA; OS received vehicle. On day 6 post-goggling, refractive error, axial length, equatorial diameter, and wet weight were measured. Vehicle-injected goggled eyes developed significant FDM. This was inhibited by L-Arg (ED50 = 400 nmol) or SNP (ED50 = 20 nmol), but not D-Arg. Higher-dose SNP, but not L-Arg, was toxic to retina/RPE. Atropine inhibited FDM as expected; adding NOS-inhibitors (L-NIO, L-NMMA) to atropine inhibited this effect dose-dependently, but adding D-NMMA did not. Equatorial diameter, wet weight, and metrics of control eyes were not affected by any treatment. In summary, intraocular NO inhibits myopia dose-dependently and is obligatory for inhibition of myopia by atropine.

Opposing effects of atropine and timolol on the color and luminance emmetropization mechanisms in chicks

This study analyzed the luminance and color emmetropization response in chicks treated with the nonselective parasympathetic antagonist atropine and the sympathetic β-receptor blocker timolol. Chicks were binocularly exposed (8h/day) for 4days to one of three illumination conditions: 2Hz sinusoidal luminance flicker, 2Hz sinusoidal blue/yellow color flicker, or steady light (mean 680lux). Atropine experiments involved monocular daily injections of either 20μl of atropine (18nmol) or 20μl of phosphate-buffered saline. Timolol experiments involved monocular daily applications of 2 drops of 0.5% timolol or 2 drops of distilled H2O. Changes in the experimental eye were compared with those in the fellow eye after correction for the effects of saline/water treatments. Atropine caused a reduction in axial length with both luminance flicker (-0.078±0.021mm) and color flicker (-0.054±0.017mm), and a reduction in vitreous chamber depth with luminance flicker (-0.095±0.023mm), evoking a hyperopic shift in refraction (3.40±1.77D). Timolol produced an increase in axial length with luminance flicker (0.045±0.030mm) and a myopic shift in refraction (-4.07±0.92D), while color flicker caused a significant decrease in axial length (-0.046±0.017mm) that was associated with choroidal thinning (-0.046±0.015mm). The opposing effects on growth and refraction seen with atropine and timolol suggest a balancing mechanism between the parasympathetic and β-receptor mediated sympathetic system through stimulation of the retina with luminance and color contrast.

The Retina and Other Light-sensitive Ocular Clocks

Ocular clocks, first identified in the retina, are also found in the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE), cornea, and ciliary body. The retina is a complex tissue of many cell types and considerable effort has gone into determining which cell types exhibit clock properties. Current data suggest that photoreceptors as well as inner retinal neurons exhibit clock properties with photoreceptors dominating in nonmammalian vertebrates and inner retinal neurons dominating in mice. However, these differences may in part reflect the choice of circadian output, and it is likely that clock properties are widely dispersed among many retinal cell types. The phase of the retinal clock can be set directly by light. In nonmammalian vertebrates, direct light sensitivity is commonplace among body clocks, but in mice only the retina and cornea retain direct light-dependent phase regulation. This distinguishes the retina and possibly other ocular clocks from peripheral oscillators whose phase depends on the pace-making properties of the hypothalamic central brain clock, the suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN). However, in mice, retinal circadian oscillations dampen quickly in isolation due to weak coupling of its individual cell-autonomous oscillators, and there is no evidence that retinal clocks are directly controlled through input from other oscillators. Retinal circadian regulation in both mammals and nonmammalian vertebrates uses melatonin and dopamine as dark- and light-adaptive neuromodulators, respectively, and light can regulate circadian phase indirectly through dopamine signaling. The melatonin/dopamine system appears to have evolved among nonmammalian vertebrates and retained with modification in mammals. Circadian clocks in the eye are critical for optimum visual function where they play a role fine tuning visual sensitivity, and their disruption can affect diseases such as glaucoma or retinal degeneration syndromes.

Multifocal electroretinogram in non-pathological myopic subjects: correlation with optical coherence tomography

AIM

To investigate the changes of retinal function in non-pathological myopic subjects using multifocal electroretinography (mfERG) and to correlate the data with the central macular thickness obtained using optical coherence tomography (OCT).

METHODS

One hundred and thirteen subjects (113 eyes) with age range from 18 to 35y were enrolled in the study. The subjects were divided into four groups according to spherical equivalent (SE) and axial length (AL): emmetropia group (EG, n=31; SE: +0.75 to -0.50 D; AL: 22 to 24 mm), low and medium myopia group (LMMG, n=26; SE: >-0.50 to -6.00 D; AL: >24 to 26 mm), high myopia group (HMG, n=34; SE: >-6.00 to -10.00 D; AL: >26 to 28 mm) and super high myopia group (SHMG, n=22; SE: >-10.00 D; AL:>28 mm). The P1 amplitude density, P1 amplitude, and P1 implicit time of the first-order kernel mfERG responses were obtained and grouped into five rings. The central subfield macular thickness (CST) was obtained using macular cube 512×218 scan of Cirrus HD-OCT.

RESULTS

With the increasing of eccentricity, the first positive peak (P1) amplitude density (P=0.0000, 0.0001, 0.0021 in ring 1-3 respectively) and P1 amplitude (all P=0.0000 in ring 1-5) of each group decreased. With the increasing of myopia, P1 implicit time gradually extended (all P=0.0000 in ring 1-3). The average CST in four diagnostic groups was 241.56±12.72 µm, 244.56±12.19 µm, 254.33±11.61 µm, 261.75±11.83 µm respectively. With the increasing of myopia, CST increased (P<0.001). There was negative relationship between CST and P1 amplitude, P1 amplitude density (r=-0.402, P<0.001; r=-0.261, P=0.003). There was positive relationship between CST and P1 implicit time (r=0.34, P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

With the increasing of myopia, P1 amplitude density and P1 amplitude of the first-order reaction gradually reduced. This showed potential decline in retinal function in myopia. To some extent it may reflect the functional disorder or depression of the visual cells. The exact mechanism needs further study.

The effect of intravitreal injection of vehicle solutions on form deprivation myopia in tree shrews

lntravitreal injection of substances dissolved in a vehicle solution is a common tool used to assess retinal function. We examined the effect of injection procedures (three groups) and vehicle solutions (four groups) on the development of form deprivation myopia (FDM) in juvenile tree shrews, mammals closely related to primates, starting at 24 days of visual experience (about 45 days of age). In seven groups (n = 7 per group), the myopia produced by monocular form deprivation (FD) was measured daily for 12 days during an 11-day treatment period. The FD eye was randomly selected; the contralateral eye served as an untreated control. The refractive state of both eyes was measured daily, starting just before FD began (day 1); axial component dimensions were measured on day 1 and after eleven days of treatment (day 12). Procedure groups: the myopia (treated eye - control eye refraction) in the FD group was the reference. The sham group only underwent brief daily anesthesia and opening of the conjunctiva to expose the sclera. The puncture group, in addition, had a pipette inserted daily into the vitreous. In four vehicle groups, 5 μL of vehicle was injected daily. The NaCl group received 0.85% NaCl. In the NaCl + ascorbic acid group, 1 mg/mL of ascorbic acid was added. The water group received sterile water. The water + ascorbic acid group received water with ascorbic acid (1 mg/mL). We found that the procedures associated with intravitreal injections (anesthesia, opening of the conjunctiva, and puncture of the sclera) did not significantly affect the development of FDM. However, injecting 5 μL of any of the four vehicle solutions slowed the development of FDM. NaCl had a small effect; myopia development in the last 6 days (-0.15 ± 0.08 D/day) was significantly less than in the FD group (-0.55 ± 0.06 D/day). NaCl + Ascorbic acid further slowed the development of FDM on several treatment days. H2O (-0.09 ± 0.05 D/day) and H2O + ascorbic acid (-0.08 ± 0.05 D/day) both almost completely blocked myopia development. The treated eye vitreous chamber elongation, compared with the control eye, in all groups was consistent with the amount of myopia. When FD continued (days 12-16) without injections in the water and water + ascorbic acid groups, the rate of myopia development quickly increased. Thus, it appears the vehicles affected retinal signaling rather than causing damage. The effect of water and water + ascorbic acid may be due to reduced osmolality or ionic concentration near the tip of the injection pipette. The effect of ascorbic acid, compared to NaCl alone, may be due to its reported dopaminergic activity.

Blue Light Protects Against Temporal Frequency Sensitive Refractive Changes

PURPOSE

Time spent outdoors is protective against myopia. The outdoors allows exposure to short-wavelength (blue light) rich sunlight, while indoor illuminants can be deficient at short-wavelengths. In the current experiment, we investigate the role of blue light, and temporal sensitivity, in the emmetropization response.

METHODS

Five-day-old chicks were exposed to sinusoidal luminance modulation of white light (with blue; N = 82) or yellow light (without blue; N = 83) at 80% contrast, at one of six temporal frequencies: 0, 0.2, 1, 2, 5, 10 Hz daily for 3 days. Mean illumination was 680 lux. Changes in ocular components and corneal curvature were measured.

RESULTS

Refraction, eye length, and choroidal changes were dependent on the presence of blue light (P < 0.03, all) and on temporal frequency (P < 0.03, all). In the presence of blue light, refraction did not change across frequencies (mean change -0.24 [diopters] D), while in the absence of blue light, we observed a hyperopic shift (>1 D) at high frequencies, and a myopic shift (>-0.6 D) at low frequencies. With blue light there was little difference in eye growth across frequencies (77 μm), while in the absence of blue light, eyes grew more at low temporal frequencies and less at high temporal frequencies (10 vs. 0.2 Hz: 145 μm; P < 0.003). Overall, neonatal astigmatism was reduced with blue light.

CONCLUSIONS

Illuminants rich in blue light can protect against myopic eye growth when the eye is exposed to slow changes in luminance contrast as might occur with near work.

Effect of Age and Refractive Error on the Melanopsin Mediated Post-Illumination Pupil Response (PIPR)

Melanopsin containing intrinsically photosensitive Retinal Ganglion cells (ipRGCs) mediate the pupil light reflex (PLR) during light onset and at light offset (the post-illumination pupil response, PIPR). Recent evidence shows that the PLR and PIPR can provide non-invasive, objective markers of age-related retinal and optic nerve disease; however there is no consensus on the effects of healthy ageing or refractive error on the ipRGC mediated pupil function. Here we isolated melanopsin contributions to the pupil control pathway in 59 human participants with no ocular pathology across a range of ages and refractive errors. We show that there is no effect of age or refractive error on ipRGC inputs to the human pupil control pathway. The stability of the ipRGC mediated pupil response across the human lifespan provides a functional correlate of their robustness observed during ageing in rodent models.

Neonatal aphakia is associated with altered levels of dopamine metabolites in the non-human primate retina

Neonatal aphakia is associated with retardation of the axial elongation of the neonatal eye. In contrast, form deprivation increases axial elongation, an effect that has been associated with decreased retinal dopamine metabolism. The present investigation was conducted to test the hypothesis that neonatal aphakia induces an effect on the levels of retinal dopamine opposite to form deprivation. Lensectomy and vitrectomy were performed on the right eyes of rhesus monkeys at approximately 1 week of age; their left eyes were unmanipulated. Axial length was measured by A-scan ultrasonography. Prior to surgery, mean axial length of the right and left eyes was identical. Following lens removal, both eyes continued to elongate, however the aphakic eyes elongated at a slower rate resulting in a significant shorter axial length compared to that of the unmanipulated eye. Removal of the crystalline lens had no effect on steady-state dopamine levels in either central or peripheral retina. However, levels of the dopamine metabolites, 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid and homovanillic acid were significantly elevated in central retina, but not in the peripheral retina of aphakic eyes. Our results support the hypothesis that dopamine is a component of the retinal signaling pathways that are involved in the regulation of eye growth and emmetropization.