Contrast coding by cells in the cat's striate cortex: monocular vs. binocular detection

Neural binocular summation and the effect of defocus on the pattern electroretinogram and visual evoked potentials for different pupil sizes

PURPOSE

To evaluate the influence of defocus and pupil size on subjective (visual acuity [VA]) and objective (electrophysiology) descriptors of human vision and their effect on binocular visual performance by means of neural binocular summation (BS).

METHODS

Fifteen healthy young subjects were recruited in this crossover study. Pattern electroretinogram (PERG) and visual evoked potentials (VEP) were measured under two levels of positive (+1.5 and +3.0 D) spherical and astigmatic defocus (axis 90°). Pupil size was controlled to reduce the inter-individual variability factor.

RESULTS

Low- and high-contrast VA showed poorer visual performance in the monocular versus the binocular condition. Positive BS (for VA) was higher with greater pupil size and higher levels of defocus. In the visual electrophysiology tests (i.e., VEP and PERG), peak time and amplitude were affected by pupil size and defocus. The increase in peak time was larger and the reduction in amplitude was more significant with greater levels of defocus and smaller pupil sizes. For the VEP, positive BS was found in all conditions, being stronger with larger amounts of defocus and pupil size (for the P100 amplitude). Significant negative correlations were observed between the P100 amplitude and VA BSs.

CONCLUSION

Smaller pupil size and levels of defocus produced greater changes in cortical activity as evidenced by both the PERG and VEP. Considering these changes and the obtained positive BS, the mechanism could be initiated as early as the retinal processing stage, then being modulated and enhanced along the visual pathway and within the visual cortex.

Interocular Phase Disparity Tuning of Binocular Contrast Summation Depends on Carrier Spatial Frequency and Orientation

SIGNIFICANCE

Binocular summation is a sensitive metric of binocular integration. As such, characterization of the mechanisms underlying binocular summation is a key step in translating and applying this knowledge to abnormal binocular systems afflicted with strabismus and amblyopia.

PURPOSE

Computational models of binocular summation have advocated the operation of mechanisms sensitive to the interocular phase disparity of first order carrier gratings. This study investigated if such generalization depended on carrier spatial frequency and orientation.

METHODS

Monocular and binocular contrast detection thresholds were measured in nine observers with normal binocular vision. Stimuli comprised Gabor targets presented with one of three spatial frequencies (1, 3, and 9 cpd), two orientations (horizontal and vertical) and five interocular phase disparities (0, +/- pi/2, +/- pi radians). Horizontal and vertical fixation disparities were measured for each binocular threshold condition. Binocular summation ratios (BSR) were computed by dividing the mean monocular detection threshold by the respective binocular detection threshold.

RESULTS

BSR varied significantly with interocular phase disparity for the 1 cpd and 3 cpd horizontal and vertical gratings. Phase dependency was reduced with the 9 cpd horizontal grating, and absent for the 9 cpd vertical grating, even though BSR exceeded predictions of probability summation. Computational modelling that incorporated the variability of fixation disparity into a vector summation model, predicted a reduction in peak BSR with increasing carrier spatial frequency, but did not account for the reduction of phase sensitivity noted with the 9 cpd stimulus.

CONCLUSIONS

Binocular summation magnitude is less dependent on interocular phase disparities as carrier spatial frequencies exceed 3 cpd, especially with vertical gratings. While vergence variability due to fixation disparities contribute to the overall reduction in binocular summation magnitude with increasing carrier spatial frequency; however, it does not provide a complete account for the lack of interocular phase disparity tuning noted with high grating spatial frequencies.

Effects of top-down influence suppression on behavioral and V1 neuronal contrast sensitivity functions in cats

To explore the relative contributions of higher-order and primary visual cortex (V1) to visual perception, we compared cats' behavioral and V1 neuronal contrast sensitivity functions (CSF) and threshold versus external noise contrast (TvC) functions before and after top-down influence of area 7 (A7) was modulated with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). We found that suppressing top-down influence of A7 with cathode-tDCS, but not sham-tDCS, reduced behavioral and neuronal contrast sensitivity in the same range of spatial frequencies and increased behavioral and neuronal contrast thresholds in the same range of external noise levels. The neuronal CSF and TvC functions were highly correlated with their behavioral counterparts both before and after the top-down suppression. Analysis of TvC functions using the Perceptual Template Model (PTM) indicated that top-down influence of A7 increased both behavioral and V1 neuronal contrast sensitivity by reducing internal additive noise and the impact of external noise.

•

Top-down suppression lowers both behavioral and V1 neuronal CSF functions

•

Top-down suppression raises both behavioral and V1 neuronal TvC functions

•

The neuronal CSFs and TvCs are highly correlated with their behavioral counterparts

•

Top-down influence lowers internal additive noise and impact of external noise in V1

Hyperactivity of basolateral amygdala mediates behavioral deficits in mice following exposure to bisphenol A and its analogue alternative

Bisphenol A (BPA) is a known endocrine disruptor and has been gradually replaced in industrial applications by other bisphenols, such as bisphenol S (BPS). However, whether these analogues are any safer for the central nervous system remains elusive. Here, we investigated behavioral impairments in mice after BPA and BPS exposure from postnatal days 21-49 (P21~P49). Results showed that BPA (0.1 and 1 mg/kg/d) and BPS (1 mg/kg/d) impaired emotion and social interaction of mice, while low dose exposure (0.1 mg/kg/d) induced no observable changes on emotion in mice. The behavioral deficits were accompanied by hyperactivation of the basolateral amygdala (BLA), i.e., dose-dependent increase in neuronal firing rates and local field potential power. In addition, glutamate receptors were up-regulated in the BLA, showing the same activation trend after exposure to different doses of BPA and BPS. Taken together, these findings imply that BPA and BPS cause behavioral impairments in juvenile mice by disrupting local neuronal activation in the BLA. Although BPS exerted less adverse effects on mice than BPA at the low dose, it does not appear to be a safe alternative to BPA in regard to brain function after prolonged high-volume exposure.

Chronic bisphenol A exposure triggers visual perception dysfunction through impoverished neuronal coding ability in the primary visual cortex

Contrast perception is a fundamental visual ability that allows us to distinguish objects from the background. However, whether it is perturbed by chronic exposure to environmental xenoestrogen, bisphenol A (BPA), is still elusive. Here, we used adult cats to explore BPA-induced changes in contrast sensitivity (CS) and its underlying neuronal coding mechanism. Behavioral results showed that 14 days of BPA exposure (0.4 mg/kg/day) was sufficient to induce CS declines at the tested spatial frequencies (0.05-2 cycles/deg) in all four cats. Furthermore, based on multi-channel electrophysiological recording and interneuronal correlation analysis, we found that the BPA-exposed cats exhibited an obvious up-regulation in noise correlation in the primary visual cortex (area 17, A17), thus providing a population neuronal coding basis for their perceptual dysfunction. Moreover, single neuron responses in A17 of BPA-exposed cats revealed a slight but marked decrease in CS compared to that of control cats. Additionally, these neuronal responses presented an overt decrease in signal-to-noise ratio, accompanied by increased trial-to-trial response variability (i.e., noise). To some extent, these neuron population and unit dysfunctions in A17 of BPA-exposed cats were attributable to decreased response activity of fast-spiking neurons. Together, our findings demonstrate that chronic BPA exposure restricts contrast perception, in response to impoverished neuronal coding ability in A17.

Monocular and binocular thresholds for abruptly and gradually presented illusory contours

BACKGROUND

In this study, monocular thresholds and binocular summation for abrupt onset/offset versus gradually revealed phantom letter E (illusory contours) stimuli are compared to determine the suitability of these stimuli for assessment of the integrity of two of the major retinal streams: the magnocellular and the parvocellular pathways. Such tests are important in progressive retinal disease where disease severity may differ between the classes of retinal ganglion cells and between the two eyes. Abrupt onset phantom contours have long been considered to activate the magnocellular visual pathway and we propose that gradually revealed high contrast ramped onset/offset stimuli are more likely to promote the more sustained processing of the parvocellular stream.

METHODS

Contrast discrimination thresholds for monocular and binocular viewing were compared in a counter-balanced order in 70 young normal subjects, using tests of contrast threshold for a flicker-defined letter E produced by alternation of light and dark dots. Three onset/offset conditions were used - abrupt onset that was maintained for 34 milliseconds (four frames of 8.5 milliseconds) then discontinued, ramped onset over 34 milliseconds (four frames) with offset over 34 milliseconds and ramped onset over 85 milliseconds (10 frames) with offset over 85 milliseconds.

RESULTS

Contrast thresholds for identification of the orientation of the E, when presented with four frames ramped onset and offset when compared to the four frames abrupt onset/offset were three times higher, irrespective of monocular or binocular viewing conditions. Threshold contrasts were seven times higher when the 10 frames ramped onset/offset stimuli were compared to abrupt four frames onset/offset. Binocular contrast thresholds were reduced by approximately 40 per cent compared to monocular thresholds for all conditions. The binocular increase in contrast sensitivity is approximately equal for abrupt transiently presented stimuli and for gradually presented more sustained stimuli.

DISCUSSION

The results indicate that the same mechanisms of monocular processing and binocular summation are used for identification of a flickering contrast-defined phantom contour under presentation conditions, which are characteristic of the temporal and contrast preferences of the primate magnocellular and parvocellular visual pathways. This suggests that the phantom contour E test may be useful for clinical differentiation of the integrity of the M and P retinal ganglion-derived visual pathways, regardless of whether it is applied monocularly or binocularly.

The neural basis of spatial vision losses in the dysfunctional visual system

Human vision relies on correct information processing from the eye to various visual areas. Disturbances in the visual perception of simple features are believed to come from low-level network (e.g., V1) disruptions. In the present study, we modelled monocular losses in spatial vision through plausible multiple network modifications in early visual coding. We investigated perceptual deficits in anisometropic amblyopia and used the monocular tilt illusion as a probe of primary visual cortex orientation coding and inhibitory interactions. The psychophysical results showed that orientation misperception was higher in amblyopic eyes (AE) than in the fellow and neurotypical eyes and was correlated with the subject’s AE peak contrast sensitivity. The model fitted to the experimental results allowed to split these observations between different network characteristics by showing that these observations were explained by broader orientation tuning widths in AEs and stronger lateral inhibition in abnormal amblyopic system that had strong contrast sensitivity losses. Through psychophysics measures and computational modelling of V1, our study links multiple perceptual changes with localized modifications in the primary visual cortex.

Contrast and lustre: A model that accounts for eleven different forms of contrast discrimination in binocular vision

Our goal here is a more complete understanding of how information about luminance contrast is encoded and used by the binocular visual system. In two-interval forced-choice experiments we assessed observers' ability to discriminate changes in contrast that could be an increase or decrease of contrast in one or both eyes, or an increase in one eye coupled with a decrease in the other (termed IncDec). The base or pedestal contrasts were either in-phase or out-of-phase in the two eyes. The opposed changes in the IncDec condition did not cancel each other out, implying that along with binocular summation, information is also available from mechanisms that do not sum the two eyes' inputs. These might be monocular mechanisms. With a binocular pedestal, monocular increments of contrast were much easier to see than monocular decrements. These findings suggest that there are separate binocular (B) and monocular (L,R) channels, but only the largest of the three responses, max(L,B,R), is available to perception and decision. Results from contrast discrimination and contrast matching tasks were described very accurately by this model. Stimuli, data, and model responses can all be visualized in a common binocular contrast space, allowing a more direct comparison between models and data. Some results with out-of-phase pedestals were not accounted for by the max model of contrast coding, but were well explained by an extended model in which gratings of opposite polarity create the sensation of lustre. Observers can discriminate changes in lustre alongside changes in contrast.

Binocular functional architecture for detection of contrast-modulated gratings

Combination of signals from the two eyes is the gateway to stereo vision. To gain insight into binocular signal processing, we studied binocular summation for luminance-modulated gratings (L or LM) and contrast-modulated gratings (CM). We measured 2AFC detection thresholds for a signal grating (0.75c/deg, 216ms) shown to one eye, both eyes, or both eyes out-of-phase. For LM and CM, the carrier noise was in both eyes, even when the signal was monocular. Mean binocular thresholds for luminance gratings (L) were 5.4dB better than monocular thresholds - close to perfect linear summation (6dB). For LM and CM the binocular advantage was again 5-6dB, even when the carrier noise was uncorrelated, anti-correlated, or at orthogonal orientations in the two eyes. Binocular combination for CM probably arises from summation of envelope responses, and not from summation of these conflicting carrier patterns. Antiphase signals produced no binocular advantage, but thresholds were about 1-3dB higher than monocular ones. This is not consistent with simple linear summation, which should give complete cancellation and unmeasurably high thresholds. We propose a three-channel model in which noisy monocular responses to the envelope are binocularly combined in a contrast-weighted sum, but also remain separately available to perception via a max operator. Vision selects the largest of the three responses. With in-phase gratings the binocular channel dominates, but antiphase gratings cancel in the binocular channel and the monocular channels mediate detection. The small antiphase disadvantage might be explained by a subtle influence of background responses on binocular and monocular detection.

The Binocular Combination of Chromatic Contrast

How is chromatic contrast combined binocularly? One index of binocularity is the binocular contrast summation ratio (BCSR), which is the improvement in contrast sensitivity with binocular rather than monocular presentation. Simmons and Kingdom (1998, Vision Research38 1063–1071) noted that BCSRs with some red-green isoluminant stimuli were suggestive of full linear summation. This suggestion was investigated further in four subjects by measuring binocular and monocular contrast thresholds for the detection of 0.5 cycle deg−1 isoluminant (red-green) and isochromatic (yellow-black) Gabor patches. These Gabor patches had either vertically or horizontally oriented carrier gratings and were either dichoptically in phase (same coloured bars in binocular correspondence) or in dichoptic anti-phase (opposite coloured bars in binocular correspondence). Full linear summation would be indicated by BCSRs of 2 for the in-phase and close to 0 for the anti-phase conditions. Mean BCSRs at isoluminance were 1.93 and 0.90, respectively, for the in-phase and anti-phase stimuli with horizontal carriers, the former being consistent with full linear summation, but the latter not. Despite these results, BCSRs obtained with isoluminant and isochromatic stimuli under similar conditions were not statistically distinguishable from each other, although there was a tendency for summation at isoluminance with in-phase stimuli to be higher and anti-phase stimuli to be lower. These data fall short of demonstrating full linear summation of chromatic contrast between the eyes under all presentation conditions, but they do indicate that there are strong binocular interactions at red-green isoluminance, which are similar to, and possibly even stronger than, those obtained with luminance stimuli.

How Does the Cerebral Cortex Work? Development, Learning, Attention, and 3-D Vision by Laminar Circuits of Visual Cortex

A key goal of behavioral and cognitive neuroscience is to link brain mechanisms to behavioral functions. The present article describes recent progress toward explaining how the visual cortex sees. Visual cortex, like many parts of perceptual and cognitive neocortex, is organized into six main layers of cells, as well as characteristic sublamina. Here it is proposed how these layered circuits help to realize processes of development, learning, perceptual grouping, attention, and 3-D vision through a combination of bottom-up, horizontal, and top-down interactions. A main theme is that the mechanisms which enable development and learning to occur in a stable way imply properties of adult behavior. These results thus begin to unify three fields: infant cortical development, adult cortical neurophysiology and anatomy, and adult visual perception. The identified cortical mechanisms promise to generalize to explain how other perceptual and cognitive processes work.

Neuronal basis of perceptual learning in striate cortex

It is well known that, in humans, contrast sensitivity training at high spatial frequency (SF) not only leads to contrast sensitivity improvement, but also results in an improvement in visual acuity as assessed with gratings (direct effect) or letters (transfer effect). However, the underlying neural mechanisms of this high spatial frequency training improvement remain to be elucidated. In the present study, we examined four properties of neurons in primary visual cortex (area 17) of adult cats that exhibited significantly improved acuity after contrast sensitivity training with a high spatial frequency grating and those of untrained control cats. We found no difference in neuronal contrast sensitivity or tuning width (Width) between the trained and untrained cats. However, the trained cats showed a displacement of the cells’ optimal spatial frequency (OSF) to higher spatial frequencies as well as a larger neuronal signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Furthermore, both the neuronal differences in OSF and SNR were significantly correlated with the improvement of acuity measured behaviorally. These results suggest that striate neurons might mediate the perceptual learning-induced improvement for high spatial frequency stimuli by an alteration in their spatial frequency representation and by an increased SNR.

Small-aperture monovision and the Pulfrich experience: absence of neural adaptation effects

PURPOSE

To explore whether adaptation reduces the interocular visual latency differences and the induced Pulfrich effect caused by the anisocoria implicit in small-aperture monovision.

METHODS

Anisocoric vision was simulated in two adults by wearing in the non-dominant eye for 7 successive days, while awake, an opaque soft contact lens (CL) with a small, central, circular aperture. This was repeated with aperture diameters of 1.5 and 2.5 mm. Each day, monocular and binocular pattern-reversal Visual Evoked Potentials (VEP) were recorded. Additionally, the Pulfrich effect was measured: the task of the subject was to state whether a a 2-deg spot appeared in front or behind the plane of a central cross when moved left-to-right or right-to-left on a display screen. The retinal illuminance of the dominant eye was varied using neutral density (ND) filters to establish the ND value which eliminated the Pulfrich effect for each lens. All experiments were performed at luminance levels of 5 and 30 cd/m(2).

RESULTS

Interocular differences in monocular VEP latency (at 30 cd/m(2)) rose to about 12-15 ms and 20-25 ms when the CL aperture was 2.5 and 1.5 mm, respectively. The effect was more pronounced at 5 cd/m(2) (i.e. with larger natural pupils). A strong Pulfrich effect was observed under all conditions, with the effect being less striking for the 2.5 mm aperture. No neural adaptation appeared to occur: neither the interocular differences in VEP latency nor the ND value required to null the Pulfrich effect reduced over each 7-day period of anisocoric vision.

CONCLUSIONS

Small-aperture monovision produced marked interocular differences in visual latency and a Pulfrich experience. These were not reduced by adaptation, perhaps because the natural pupil diameter of the dominant eye was continually changing throughout the day due to varying illumination and other factors, making adaptation difficult.

Effects of multiplicative power law neural noise in visual information processing

The human visual system is intrinsically noisy. The benefits of internal noise as part of visual code are controversial. Here the information-theoretic properties of multiplicative (i.e. signal-dependent) neural noise are investigated. A quasi-linear communication channel model is presented. The model shows that multiplicative power law neural noise promotes the minimum information transfer after efficient coding. It is demonstrated that Weber's law and the human contrast sensitivity function arise on the basis of minimum transfer of information and power law neural noise. The implications of minimum information transfer in self-organized neural networks and weakly coupled neurons are discussed.

How do attention and adaptation affect contrast sensitivity?

Attention and adaptation are both mechanisms that optimize visual performance. Attention optimizes performance by increasing contrast sensitivity for and neural response to attended stimuli while decreasing them for unattended stimuli; adaptation optimizes performance by increasing contrast sensitivity for and neural response to changing stimuli while decreasing them for unchanging stimuli. We investigated whether and how the adaptation state and the attentional effect on contrast sensitivity interact. We measured contrast sensitivity with an orientation-discrimination task, in two adaptation conditions--adapt to 0% or 100% contrast--in focused, distributed, and withdrawn attentional conditions. We used threshold and asymptotic performance to index the magnitude of the attentional effect--enhancement or impairment in contrast sensitivity--before and after adapting to high-contrast stimuli. The results show that attention and adaptation affect the contrast psychometric function in a similar but opposite way: Attention increases stimulus salience, whereas adaptation reduces stimulus salience. An interesting finding is that the adaptation state does not modulate the magnitude of the attentional effect. This suggests that attention affects the normalized signal once the effect of contrast adaptation has taken place and that these two mechanisms act separately to change contrast sensitivity. Attention can overcome adaptation to restore contrast sensitivity.

Binocular interactions in random chromatic changes at isoluminance

To examine the type of chromatic interactions at isoluminance in the phenomenon of binocular vision, I have determined simple visual reaction times (VRT) under three observational conditions (monocular left, monocular right, and binocular) for different chromatic stimuli along random color axes at isoluminance (simultaneous L-, M-, and S-cone variations). Upper and lower boundaries of probability summation as well as the binocular capacity coefficient were estimated with observed distributions of reaction times. The results were not consistent with the notion of independent chromatic channels between eyes, suggesting the existence of excitatory and inhibitory binocular interactions at suprathreshold isoluminance conditions.

Contrast adaptation and representation in human early visual cortex

The human visual system can distinguish variations in image contrast over a much larger range than measurements of the static relationship between contrast and response in visual cortex would suggest. This discrepancy may be explained if adaptation serves to re-center contrast response functions around the ambient contrast, yet experiments on humans have yet to report such an effect. By using event-related fMRI and a data-driven analysis approach, we found that contrast response functions in V1, V2, and V3 shift to approximately center on the adapting contrast. Furthermore, we discovered that, unlike earlier areas, human V4 (hV4) responds positively to contrast changes, whether increments or decrements, suggesting that hV4 does not faithfully represent contrast, but instead responds to salient changes. These findings suggest that the visual system discounts slow uninformative changes in contrast with adaptation, yet remains exquisitely sensitive to changes that may signal important events in the environment.

Coding of the contrasts in natural images by populations of neurons in primary visual cortex (V1)

It is possible to discriminate between grating contrasts over a 300-fold contrast range, whereas V1 neurons have very limited dynamic ranges. Using populations of model neurons with contrast-response parameters taken from electrophysiological studies (cat and macaque), we investigated ways of combining responses to code contrast over the full range. One model implemented a pooling rule that retained information about individual response patterns. The second summed responses indiscriminately. We measured accuracy of contrast identification over a wide range of contrasts and found the first model to be more accurate; the mutual information between actual and estimated contrast was also greatest for this model. The accuracy peak for the population of cat neurons coincided with the peak of the distribution of contrasts in natural images, suggesting an ecological match. Macaque neurons seem better able to code contrasts that are slightly higher on average than those found in the natural environment.

Oblique effect: a neural basis in the visual cortex

The details of oriented visual stimuli are better resolved when they are horizontal or vertical rather than oblique. This "oblique effect" has been confirmed in numerous behavioral studies in humans and to some extent in animals. However, investigations of its neural basis have produced mixed and inconclusive results, presumably due in part to limited sample sizes. We have used a database to analyze a population of 4,418 cells in the cat's striate cortex to determine possible differences as a function of orientation. We find that both the numbers of cells and the widths of orientation tuning vary as a function of preferred orientation. Specifically, more cells prefer horizontal and vertical orientations compared with oblique angles. The largest population of cells is activated by orientations close to horizontal. In addition, orientation tuning widths are most narrow for cells preferring horizontal orientations. These findings are most prominent for simple cells tuned to high spatial frequencies. Complex cells and simple cells tuned to low spatial frequencies do not exhibit these anisotropies. For a subset of simple cells from our population (n = 104), we examined the relative contributions of linear and nonlinear mechanisms in shaping orientation tuning curves. We find that linear contributions alone do not account for the narrower tuning widths at horizontal orientations. By modeling simple cells as linear filters followed by static expansive nonlinearities, our analysis indicates that horizontally tuned cells have a greater nonlinear component than those tuned to other orientations. This suggests that intracortical mechanisms play a major role in shaping the oblique effect.

Coding of the contrasts in natural images by visual cortex (V1) neurons: a Bayesian approach

Individual V1 neurons respond dynamically over only limited ranges of stimulus contrasts, yet we can discriminate contrasts over a wide range. Different V1 neurons cover different parts of the contrast range, and the information they provide must be pooled somehow. We describe a probabilistic pooling model that shows that populations of neurons with contrast responses like those in cat and monkey V1 would most accurately code contrasts in the range actually found in natural scenes. The pooling equation is similar to Bayes's equation; however, explicit inclusion of prior probabilities in the inference increases coding accuracy only slightly.

A laminar cortical model of stereopsis and three-dimensional surface perception

A laminar cortical model of stereopsis and later stages of 3D surface perception is developed and simulated. The model describes how initial stages of monocular and binocular oriented filtering interact with later stages of 3D boundary formation and surface filling-in in the lateral geniculate nucleus and cortical areas V1, V2, and V4. In particular, it details how interactions between layers 4, 3B, and 2/3A in V1 and V2 contribute to stereopsis, and clarifies how binocular and monocular information combine to form 3D boundary and surface representations. Along the way, the model modifies and significantly extends the disparity energy model. Neural explanations are given for psychophysical data concerning: contrast variations of dichoptic masking and the correspondence problem, the effect of interocular contrast differences on stereoacuity, Panum's limiting case, the Venetian blind illusion, stereopsis with polarity-reversed stereograms, da Vinci stereopsis, and various lightness illusions. By relating physiology to psychophysics, the model provides new functional insights and predictions about laminar cortical architecture.

Binocular interaction and sensitivity to horizontal disparity in visual cortex in the awake monkey

We evaluated the binocular interaction and horizontal disparity sensitivity in neurons recorded from macaque visual cortex. Neurons from V1 of three awake Macaca mulatta monkeys were isolated by means of extracellular recording and tested for disparity sensitivity with dynamic random dot stereograms. Neurons sensitive to horizontal disparities were stimulated both monocularly and binocularly with flashing bars and their responses quantified. ANOVA and regression tests were used for data analysis. Sixty-six cells out of 185 (66/185, 36%) showed sensitivity to horizontal disparity. Disparity sensitive cells were grouped into near (25/66, 38%), tuned inhibitory (16/66, 24%), far (13/66, 20%) and tuned excitatory (12/66, 18%). Receptive fields of tuned cells were located more centrally in the visual field than those of near and far cells. The binocular interaction in tuned inhibitory cells increased linearly along with ocular unbalance. Most of tuned excitatory cells (10/12, 83%) showed facilitatory binocular interaction, characterized by a stronger response to binocular stimulation than to the stimulation of the dominant eye. On the contrary, most of tuned inhibitory cells (14/16, 88%) showed suppressory binocular interaction, characterized by a weaker response to binocular stimulation than to the stimulation of the dominant eye. Near and far cells showed both types of interaction in similar percentages. The binocular response showed a linear relationship with the sum of both monocular responses in tuned excitatory, tuned inhibitory and near cells, but not in far cells. Sensitivity to horizontal disparity may be a result of facilitatory and suppressive interactions between left and right inputs.

An oblique effect of chromatic gratings measured by color-mixture thresholds

Contrast sensitivity is lower for obliquely oriented achromatic gratings than for vertical or horizontal gratings at high spatial and low temporal frequencies. Although this response is suggestive of mediation by P-pathway cortical correlates, no clear sensory (i.e. class 1) oblique effect has been demonstrated with isoluminant chromatic stimuli. In the present experiment, a two-alternative forced-choice detection task was used to measure observers' sensitivity to spatiotemporal sinusoids varying in orientation and color contrast. A maximum-likelihood method fit ellipses to the thresholds, with the length of each ellipse taken as a measure of chromatic contrast sensitivity at isoluminance, and the width as luminance contrast threshold. A chromatic oblique effect was observed at about 3 cycles deg-1 suggesting an orientation bias within the cortical stream conveying P-cell activity.

The scintillating grid illusion in stereo-depth

The dark scintillating dots occurring on a gray-on-black, modified Hermann grid [Schrauf, M., Lingelbach, B., & Wist, E. R. (1997). The scintillating grid illusion. Vision Research, 37, 1033-1038] were studied in stereo-depth by assigning various degrees of disparity to the white inducing disks. Dependent on the sign of disparity, the disks and the dark illusory spots within them appeared to lie either in the same plane, in front of, or behind the grid. At zero disparity, illusory strength was maximum and was the same for stereo, binocular and monocular viewing. With increasing disparity, the illusion became progressively weaker; however, the decrease for stereo-patterns was significantly less than for control patterns presented binocularly or monocularly. These results suggest a central contribution to the scintillation effect.

Contrast gain control in the visual cortex: monocular versus binocular mechanisms

In this study, we compare binocular and monocular mechanisms underlying contrast encoding by binocular simple cells in primary visual cortex. At mid to high levels of stimulus contrast, contrast gain of cortical neurons typically decreases as stimulus contrast is increased (). We have devised a technique by which it is possible to determine the relative contributions of monocular and binocular processes to such reductions in contrast gain. First, we model the simple cell as an adjustable linear mechanism with a static output nonlinearity. For binocular cells, the linear mechanism is sensitive to inputs from both eyes. To constrain the parameters of the model, we record from binocular simple cells in striate cortex. To activate each cell, drifting sinusoidal gratings are presented dichoptically at various relative interocular phases. Stimulus contrast for one eye is varied over a large range whereas that for the other eye is fixed. We then determine the best-fitting parameters of the model for each cell for all of the interocular contrast ratios. This allows us to determine the effect of contrast on the contrast gain of the system. Finally, we decompose the contrast gain into monocular and binocular components. Using the data to constrain the model for a fixed contrast in one eye and increased contrasts in the other eye, we find steep reductions in monocular gain, whereas binocular gain exhibits modest and variable changes. These findings demonstrate that contrast gain reductions occur primarily at a monocular site, before convergence of information from the two eyes.

Neural dynamics of binocular brightness perception

How does the visual cortex combine information from both eyes to generate perceptual representations of object surfaces? Important clues about this process may be derived from data about the perceived brightness of surface regions under binocular viewing conditions, including data about binocular brightness summation in response to Ganzfelds, the U-shaped data of Fechner's paradox that violates binocular brightness summation, and the effects of different combinations of monocular and binocular contours and surface luminance differences on threshold sensitivity to monocular flashes of light. How to reconcile these apparently contradictory data properties has been a severe challenge to previous models, and none has explained them all. The present article quantitatively simulates them all by further developing the FACADE vision model. Key model processes discount the illuminant and compute image contrasts in each monocular channel using shunting on-center off-surround networks; binocularly fuse these discounted monocular signals using shunting on-center off-surround networks with nonlinear excitatory and inhibitory signals; and use these binocularly fused activities to trigger filling-in of a binocular surface representation that represents perceived surface brightness. Previous models that have suggested explanations of subsets of these data are discussed.

Neural mechanisms for processing binocular information I. Simple cells

The visual system integrates information from the left and right eyes and constructs a visual world that is perceived as single and three dimensional. To understand neural mechanisms underlying this process, it is important to learn about how signals from the two eyes interact at the level of single neurons. Using a sophisticated receptive field (RF) mapping technique that employs binary m-sequences, we have determined the rules of binocular interactions exhibited by simple cells in the cat's striate cortex in relation to the structure of their monocular RFs. We find that binocular interaction RFs of most simple cells are well described as the product of left and right eye RFs. Therefore the binocular interactions depend not only on binocular disparity but also on monocular stimulus position or phase. The binocular interaction RF is consistent with that predicted by a model of a linear binocular filter followed by a static nonlinearity. The static nonlinearity is shown to have a shape of a half-power function with an average exponent of approximately 2. Although the initial binocular convergence of signals is linear, the static nonlinearity makes binocular interaction multiplicative at the output of simple cells. This multiplicative binocular interaction is a key ingredient for the computation of interocular cross-correlation, an algorithm for solving the stereo correspondence problem. Therefore simple cells may perform initial computations necessary to solve this problem.

On the binocular summation of chromatic contrast

The binocular summation of chromatic contrast was investigated under a variety of stimulus conditions. Binocular and monocular contrast detection thresholds were measured using 0.5 cpd Gabor patches. It was found that, using stimuli which contained combinations of chromatic and luminance contrast, binocular detection could take place independently in luminance-contrast- and chromatic-contrast-sensitive mechanisms. It was also found that, with chromatic stimuli, levels of binocular summation were above those expected from probability summation between the eyes, and thus showed evidence for binocular neural summation within chromatic detection mechanisms. The implications of these results for (a) the binocularity of chromatic detection mechanisms, and (b) the suggested link between stereopsis and binocular neural summation, are discussed.

Binocular cross-orientation suppression in the cat's striate cortex

When a cortical cell is activated by an optimal sinusoidal grating, its response can be attenuated by a superimposed second grating oriented orthogonally to the optimal stimulus. This effect is known as cross-orientation suppression (COS). In previous work, monocular characteristics have been explored and interocular tests have been conducted in an attempt to locate the origin of the suppression. In this study, we have recorded extracellularly from cortical cells to investigate the binocular characteristics of COS. Our hypothesis is that binocular disparity influences the strength of the effect. Our results do not support this supposition. We find that binocular COS is as strong as monocular COS, but disparity changes are of no consequence. We also conducted interocular tests in which the optimal grating and the orthogonal mask were seen by separate eyes. Although most interocular effects were weak, they were present in almost every cell and spanned a wide range of suppression strengths. We also tested the effect of asynchronous presentation of optimal and orthogonal gratings. These temporal offsets did not affect the strength of COS. We conclude that the suppressive mechanism underlying COS is primarily monocular and acts prior to the convergence of the two monocular streams.

Binocular combination of contrast signals by striate cortical neurons in the monkey

With the use of microelectrode recording techniques, we investigated how the contrast signals from the two eyes are combined in individual cortical neurons in the striate cortex of anesthetized and paralyzed macaque monkeys. For a given neuron, the optimal spatial frequency, orientation, and direction of drift for sine wave grating stimuli were determined for each eye. The cell's disparity tuning characteristics were determined by measuring responses as a function of the relative interocular spatial phase of dichoptic stimuli that consisted of the optimal monocular gratings. Binocular contrast summation was then investigated by measuring contrast response functions for optimal dichoptic grating pairs that had left- to right-eye interocular contrast ratios that varied from 0.1 to 10. The goal was to determine the left- and right-eye contrast components required to produce a criterion threshold response. For all functional classes of cortical neurons and for both cooperative and antagonistic binocular interactions, there was a linear relationship between the left- and right-eye contrast components required to produce a threshold response. Thus, for example for cooperative binocular interactions, a reduction in contrast to one eye was counterbalanced by an equivalent increase in contrast to the other eye. These results showed that in simple cells and phase-specific complex cells, the contrast signals from the two eyes were linearly combined at the subunit level before nonlinear rectification. In non-phase-specific complex cells, the linear binocular convergence of contrast signals could have taken place either before or after the rectification process, but before spike generation. In addition, for simple cells, vector analysis of spatial summation showed that the inputs from the two eyes were also combined in a linear manner before nonlinear spike-generating mechanisms. Thus simple cells showed linear spatial summation not only within and between subregions in a given receptive field, but also between the left- and right-eye receptive fields. Overall, the results show that the effectiveness of a stimulus in producing a response reflects interocular differences in the relative balance of inputs to a given cell, however, the eye of origin of a light-evoked signal has no specific consequence.

Binocular spatial phase tuning characteristics of neurons in the macaque striate cortex

We employed microelectrode recording techniques to study the sensitivity of individual neurons in the striate cortex of anesthetized and paralyzed monkeys to relative interocular image disparities and to determine the effects of basic stimulus parameters on these cortical binocular interactions. The visual stimuli were drifting sine wave gratings. After the optimal stimulus orientation, spatial frequency, and direction of stimulus movement were found, the cells' disparity tuning characteristics were determined by measuring responses as a function of the relative interocular spatial phase of dichoptic grating pairs. No attempts were made to assess absolute position disparities or horizontal disparities relative to the horopter. The majority (approximately 70%) of simple cells were highly sensitive to interocular spatial phase disparities, particularly neurons with balanced ocular dominances. Simple cells typically demonstrated binocular facilitation at the optimal phase disparity and binocular suppression for disparities 180 degrees away. Fewer complex cells were phase selective (approximately 40%); however, the range of disparity selectivity in phase-sensitive complex cells was comparable with that for simple cells. Binocular interactions in non-phase-sensitive complex cells were evidenced by binocular response amplitudes that differed from responses to monocular stimulation. The degree of disparity tuning was independent of a cell's optimal orientation or the degree of direction tuning. However, disparity-sensitive cells tended to have narrow orientation tuning functions and the degree of disparity tuning was greatest for the optimal stimulus orientations. Rotating the stimulus for one eye 90 degrees from the optimal orientation usually eliminated binocular interactions. The effects of phase disparities on the binocular response amplitude were also greatest at the optimal spatial frequency. Thus a cell's sensitivity to absolute position disparities reflects its spatial tuning characteristics, with cells sensitive to high spatial frequencies being capable of signaling very small changes in image disparity. On the other hand, stimulus contrast had relatively little effect on a cell's disparity tuning, because response saturation occurred at the same contrast level for all relative interocular phase disparities. Thus, as with orientation tuning, a cell's optimal disparity and the degree of disparity selectivity were invariant with contrast. Overall, the results show that sensitivity to interocular spatial phase disparities is a common property of striate neurons. A cell's disparity tuning characteristics appear to largely reflect its monocular receptive field properties and the interocular balance between excitatory and inhibitory inputs. However, distinct functional classes of cortical neurons could not be discriminated on the basis of disparity sensitivity alone.

A comparison of binocular summation in the peripheral visual field in young and older patients

PURPOSE

To measure binocular and monocular thresholds to a light detection task in order to investigate binocular summation in the central and peripheral visual fields. The study also aims to investigate any differences in the magnitude of binocular summation in young and older subjects with healthy eyes.

METHODS

Binocular and monocular thresholds were measured at eccentricities of 0, 5, 15, 25 and 40 degrees nasally and temporally, using the Humphrey Field Analyser. Binocular summation ratios were computed as the binocular sensitivity divided by the "best" monocular sensitivity.

RESULTS

Binocular and monocular sensitivities declined with increasing eccentricity. Binocular summation ratios were shown to be significantly higher for the younger group compared to the older group at all eccentricities.

CONCLUSIONS

Using this test, the binocular performance is shown to be lower for the older group at all eccentricities. Results are discussed in terms of age-related cortical cell loss and increased monocular sensitivity difference.

A comparison of binocular summation in young and older patients

Binocular and monocular contrast sensitivities were measured at two spatial frequencies of 1 and 6 c/deg in 8 young (mean age 22.6 +/- 3.8 years) and 18 older subjects with normal healthy eyes (mean age 58.4 +/- 7.3 years). Data were analysed as binocular summation ratios defined as binocular CS/"best eye' CS. Binocular summation ratios were higher for the younger group (1.46 and 1.48 for 1 and 6 c/deg respectively) compared to the older group who demonstrated a spatial frequency dependence (1.31 and 1.13 at 1 c/deg and 6 c/deg respectively). The results are discussed in terms of age-related cortical cell loss and increased monocular sensitivity differences between the two eyes.