MECHANICAL HEART VALVES AND PREGNANCY

High-Versus Low-Dose Warfarin-Related Teratogenicity: A Case Report and Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

The optimal anticoagulant therapy during pregnancy in women with mechanical heart valves remains controversial. This study highlights a case of high-dose warfarin ingestion throughout pregnancy and performed a systematic review to assess rates of teratogenicity with high versus low warfarin dosing (≤5 mg daily).

METHODS

A literature search for all case reports and available literature was conducted in PubMed, Medline, and EMBASE up to December 2016 using medical subject heading terms "mechanical prosthetic valves," "pregnancy," "oral anticoagulants," "warfarin," "coumarins," "heparin, low-molecular-weight," and "thromboembolism." To be included, warfarin had to be administered anytime between 6 and 12 weeks of gestation with the dose being specified. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess quality of the cohort data.

RESULTS

The woman in the studied case received the highest reported warfarin doses throughout pregnancy (14.5-16.5 mg daily) and delivered a baby with no evidence of teratogenicity to the current age of 5 years. The study identified 23 case reports, with all demonstrating warfarin teratogenicity regardless of high-dose (n = 12) or low-dose (n = 11) warfarin. Twelve cohort studies identified a warfarin teratogenicity rate of 5.0%, with rates of 2.4% and 10.5% with low- and high-dose warfarin, respectively. Risk of bias was moderate (median Newcastle-Ottawa Scale score of 6) for all of the cohort studies.

CONCLUSION

Although a lower prevalence of warfarin-induced teratogenicity is reported with low-dose warfarin, a safe "cut-off" dose is misleading. Teratogenic risk with warfarin is unpredictable, mandating individual decisions regardless of the dose.

Impact of prosthetic heart valves on pregnancy in Bangladeshi women

Background:

This study evaluated pregnancy outcome in women with a prosthetic heart valve, especially with the oral anticoagulation therapy that must be weighed against the risk of intracardiac thrombosis.

Methods:

This multicenter, retrospective, cohort study was undertaken between January 2012 and June 2017. The principal maternal outcome variables included bleeding and thromboembolic complications, infective endocarditis, prosthetic valve thrombosis and heart failure. However, the main foetal outcome variables included miscarriage, mortality, preterm baby, warfarin embryopathy, low birthweight and the mode of delivery.

Results:

A total of 265 pregnancies in women with prosthetic heart valves were evaluated in two groups: Group I (n = 182) covers a mechanical valve, while Group II (n = 82) covers a bioprosthetic valve. The mean age of the patients was 25.2 ± 2.5 years and 24.5 ± 5.2 years in Group I and Group II, respectively. Approximately 80% of the patients had normal echocardiography findings. However, Group I (mechanical prostheses) has a higher incidence (11.54%) of thrombus formation in comparison with the bioprostheses. Hemorrhagic complications and spontaneous miscarriage were statistically significant (p⩽0.05) between the study groups. However, normal pregnancy outcome (91.57%) was significantly higher (p⩽0.05) in Group II compared to Group I (61.54%). Mean birthweight and mean APGAR score were found normal in both study groups. Only 2.75% of patients have warfarin embryopathy in Group I. Furthermore, comparison of SF-36 scores for HRQOL (Health-Related Quality of Life) before and after pregnancy were statistically insignificant among the study population.

Conclusion:

Proper antenatal care and early risk stratification are the fundamental measures to improve the maternal and foetal outcomes in a patient with a prosthetic heart valve.

Impact of prosthetic heart valves on pregnancy in Bangladeshi women

Background:

This study evaluated pregnancy outcome in women with a prosthetic heart valve, especially with the oral anticoagulation therapy that must be weighed against the risk of intracardiac thrombosis.

Methods:

This multicenter, retrospective, cohort study was undertaken between January 2012 and June 2017. The principal maternal outcome variables included bleeding and thromboembolic complications, infective endocarditis, prosthetic valve thrombosis and heart failure. However, the main foetal outcome variables included miscarriage, mortality, preterm baby, warfarin embryopathy, low birthweight and the mode of delivery.

Results:

A total of 265 pregnancies in women with prosthetic heart valves were evaluated in two groups: Group I (n = 182) covers a mechanical valve, while Group II (n = 82) covers a bioprosthetic valve. The mean age of the patients was 25.2 ± 2.5 years and 24.5 ± 5.2 years in Group I and Group II, respectively. Approximately 80% of the patients had normal echocardiography findings. However, Group I (mechanical prostheses) has a higher incidence (11.54%) of thrombus formation in comparison with the bioprostheses. Hemorrhagic complications and spontaneous miscarriage were statistically significant (p⩽0.05) between the study groups. However, normal pregnancy outcome (91.57%) was significantly higher (p⩽0.05) in Group II compared to Group I (61.54%). Mean birthweight and mean APGAR score were found normal in both study groups. Only 2.75% of patients have warfarin embryopathy in Group I. Furthermore, comparison of SF-36 scores for HRQOL (Health-Related Quality of Life) before and after pregnancy were statistically insignificant among the study population.

Conclusion:

Proper antenatal care and early risk stratification are the fundamental measures to improve the maternal and foetal outcomes in a patient with a prosthetic heart valve.

Use of low molecular weight heparin in pregnant women with mechanical heart valves

There are a number of different anticoagulation options for pregnant women with mechanical heart valves. The purpose of this study was to examine maternal thromboembolic complications in women with mechanical valves treated with low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH) throughout pregnancy. This was a substudy of a larger prospective cohort study of pregnant women with heart disease followed from 1998 to 2008. All pregnant women with mechanical left-sided valves who were treated with LMWH throughout pregnancy were included. Maternal thromboembolic events were defined as valve thrombosis, need for valve replacement, or stroke during pregnancy or postpartum (up to 6 months). Twenty-three pregnancies (17 women) occurred in women treated with LMWH and low-dose aspirin: 15 in women with mechanical mitral valves, 9 in women with mechanical aortic valves, and 1 in a woman with both. There was 1 maternal thromboembolic event (4%), which resulted in maternal and fetal death. Five women (22%) developed other adverse cardiac events during pregnancy. Nine pregnancies (43%) had fetal or neonatal adverse events, 5 of which had favorable outcomes. Three pregnancies were complicated by postpartum hemorrhage. In conclusion, carefully monitored LMWH may be a suitable anticoagulation strategy in pregnant women with mechanical heart valves who are unwilling to use warfarin. However, this group of women remains at risk for maternal cardiac and fetal complications. The occurrence of valve thrombosis resulting in maternal death despite therapeutic anti-Xa levels highlights current limitations with anticoagulation in this population.

Prosthetic heart valves and management during pregnancy

QUESTION

What are the major concerns during pregnancy for women with prosthetic heart valves?

ANSWER

There are 2 types of prosthetic heart valves, bioprosthetic and mechanical. Although successful pregnancies are possible for women with prosthetic heart valves, there are potential complications-some of which can be fatal-for both types of valves. Therefore, preconception counseling and assessment are recommended, and care for these patients should be delivered throughout pregnancy in a specialized program for high-risk patients by a multidisciplinary team.